Glossary of Human Factors terms
Glossary of Human Factors terms<BR>**** Hidden Message ***** A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 1 Trainee's Booklet<BR>Glossary of Human Factors terms<BR>Main Sources:<BR>• ACRM 2000's Instructor Guide © Dedale 1996-2000.<BR>• Human Factors Training for AI/SE © Dedale 2001.<BR>• Adaptation from ECOTTRIS – European Collaboration On Transition Training Research for Improved Safety – NLR. 1999.<BR>• BRIEFINGS (2000) A Human Factors Course for Pilots. Reference Manual Dedale 1993-2000.<BR>• BRIEFING Notebook © Dedale 1994.<BR>A<BR>Accident ICAO's Definition (Annex 13, chapter 1):<BR>"Event linked to the use of an airplane, that occurs between the moment where one<BR>person goes on board with the intention to make a flight and the moment where all the<BR>persons on board with the same intention are out of the plane, and during which:<BR>one person is fatally or seriously injured and/or there is damage to property or<BR>equipment, and/or the airplane disappeared or is totally out of reach."<BR>Maintenance is not a frequent cause of accidents. It directly contributed (primary cause)<BR>to about 6% of accidents (from 1990 to 1999, source: Boeing) and is ranked number 4<BR>in terms of frequency, just after ‘Flight crew’ (67%), ‘Airplane’(11%) and ‘Weather’<BR>(7%).<BR>Aircraft accidents involve multiple causes and contributing factors. Because only single<BR>cause coding was used, this statistic is a simplification which gives a good idea about<BR>the influence of the categories listed. If we don’t focus only on maintenance as a<BR>primary cause of accident, a 1995 industry study found that maintenance was a<BR>contributing factor in about 15% of the accidents (39 out of 263).<BR>But, on average, maintenance related accidents tend to be very serious. As indicated by<BR>the statistics (source : Boeing), maintenance was the second highest cause of fatalities<BR>related to air accidents, from 1982 to 1991 (1481 fatalities, after CFIT: 2169, and before<BR>Loss of control: 1387). 15 % of accident fatalities have been attributed to maintenance<BR>in the official accident investigation reports.<BR>Note. We have no direct statistics about the number of accidents that have been<BR>prevented thanks to maintenance, and this is rather frustrating!<BR>ACRM Airbus Crew Resource Management.<BR>A stands for Airbus oriented (however relevant for all modern aircraft) and embedded in<BR>Airbus main courses; C stands for Crew: tailored for maintenance crew, cockpit crew<BR>and cabin crew (can be expanded to the whole company); R stands for Resource and M<BR>for Management.<BR>See CRM.<BR>Active failure Active failures are the errors & violations committed at the ‘sharp end’ of the system -<BR>by the front-line operators (for instance maintenance technicians, pilots). Such unsafe<BR>acts are likely to have a direct impact on the safety of the system, and because of the<BR>immediacy of their adverse effects, these acts are termed ‘active’ failures.<BR>ATA 104 ATA 104 is a US regulation concerning maintenance stating that “safety and human<BR>factors related to the subjects should be discussed throughout the course”. At Airbus,<BR>safety and human factors will be addressed in an integrated manner in your technical<BR>training, starting with the MTD 3D briefings of the ATA chapters.<BR>Automatic mode of behavior Opposite of the conscious mode: it is largely unconscious. We may be aware of the<BR>outcome of our action, idea, or perception but not of the process that created it.<BR>Limitless in capacity, it is very fast and operates in parallel (many things at once, rather<BR>than one thing after another). It is effortless and essential for handling the recurrences of<BR>everyday life. Naturally, we prefer to operate in the automatic mode whenever possible.<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 2 Trainee's Booklet<BR>C<BR>Circadian rhythm Many biological processes indeed evolve in a sinusoidal way over a period of about 24<BR>hours. This circadian regulation tends to optimize human functional capabilities during<BR>the day and decrease them during the night (this is the case for the sleep/wake cycle, the<BR>body temperature cycle, the secretion of hormones, blood pressure, etc.). The situation<BR>which results from that combination is thus different in day and night shifts.<BR>Maintenance technicians work in shifts, and everyone knows it is harder to work<BR>overnight. The explanation comes from the way fatigue combines to the negative effect<BR>of the circadian rhythm which is decreasing during the night.<BR>See fatigue.<BR>Communication Communication involves the transmission of or interchange of information.<BR>Communication thus consists of an exchange of messages between one or several<BR>transmitters and one or several receivers using one or several modes or ‘channels’,<BR>including speech, writing, gestures, etc.<BR>In a larger perspective, communication can be defined as the motivated establishment<BR>of a relationship aimed at achieving one or several goals.<BR>Communication problems and solutions are reviewed in the course.<BR>Conscious mode of behavior Opposite of the automatic mode. It is restricted in capacity, slow, sequential, laborious,<BR>error-prone but potentially very smart. This is the mode which is used to ‘ pay<BR>attention ’ to something.<BR>Crew Resource Management<BR>CRM<BR>JAR OPS & ICAO definition: Crew Resource Management (CRM) is the effective<BR>utilization of all available resources (e.g. crew members, airplane systems, and<BR>supporting facilities) to achieve safe and efficient operation<BR>MRM stands for Maintenance Resource Management, a terminology often used to<BR>designate a CRM for Maintenance personnel.<BR>See ACRM.<BR>Critical task A task which, if not accomplished in accordance with system requirements, will have<BR>adverse effects on cost, system reliability, efficiency, effectiveness, or safety.<BR>Cross checking Monitoring of other team member activities as a standard practice. Cross checking is a<BR>powerful error detection tool. Its efficiency is due to the fact that errors are usually more<BR>easily detected by others than by those who make them. Cross checking thus makes the<BR>best use of human redundancy.<BR>D<BR>Decision making Ability to evaluate information in order to (timely) choose the optimal course of action,<BR>or to select a solution among different available solutions (does not include the initiation<BR>of standard procedures). Decision making implies making a choice between different<BR>options.<BR>E<BR>Economic issues in maintenance Here are some strong indicators of the role played by maintenance on quality and costrelated matters (flight delays, flight cancellations, IFTB & Diversions, IFSD).<BR>- 1 hour delay: 10,000 to 15,000 $<BR>Maintenance contributed to about 15% of flight delays with respect to Airbus aircraft. It<BR>also contributed to 50% of delays due to engine problems (Source: General Electric).<BR>Besides the financial impact, delays can also impact safety due to the stress they<BR>generate on the crew. Further, delays attributed to maintenance may be partially due to<BR>constraints imposed by the overall system (technical resources and manpower available,<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 3 Trainee's Booklet<BR>planning and scheduling of flights, corporate policy,...). Delays are also very often the<BR>result of maintaining safety.<BR>- Flight Cancellation: 50,000 to 90,000 $<BR>Another A/C is needed for the passengers, that results in more than 1 hour delay.<BR>As shown on the slide, maintenance contributed to 50% of flight cancellations due to<BR>engine problems.<BR>- IFTB (In Flight Turn Back) / Diversion: about 300,000 $<BR>The A/C returns to the main base to be repaired (IFTB). If it is diverted the cost can be<BR>higher if no other A/C is available because food and accommodation need to be<BR>provided to the passengers.<BR>- IFSD (In Flight Shut Down). Maintenance contributed to 20% of IFSD (Source:<BR>Boeing). The cost is not estimated because it can have very different consequences: a<BR>short delay if the problem is easily fixed, or a flight cancellation if the problem persists.<BR>If the cost of the engine repair or change is included it can easily reach 500,000 $ to a<BR>million dollars.<BR>- Another category is often referred to as well: AOG (Aircraft On Ground). It is not<BR>mentioned here because it results in a flight cancellation.<BR>Error (human error) Definition 1 (Psychologists and Human Factors specialists)<BR>Definition by James Reason in Human Error (1990):<BR>Error is intimately bound up with the notion of intention. The term 'error' can only be<BR>meaningfully applied to planned actions that fail to achieve their desired consequences<BR>without the intervention of some chance or unforeseeable agency. Two basic error<BR>types: slips and lapses, where the actions do not go according to plan, and mistakes,<BR>where the plan itself is inadequate to achieve its objectives.<BR>An error is NOT intentional. You make an error when:<BR>• what you do differs from what you intended,<BR>• or your plan was inappropriate.<BR>An error differs from a violation. The difference, simply, is that unlike an error, a<BR>violation is an intentional deviation. It is a deviation from a rule, a regulation, a<BR>procedure.<BR>Definition 2 (Industry)<BR>There is another way to define the term ‘error’ in the maintenance domain, and this is a<BR>source of ambiguity. ICAO for example states in its 1995 Circular that: "Human error<BR>in maintenance usually manifests itself as an unintended aircraft discrepancy (physical<BR>degradation or failure) attributable to the actions or non-actions of the aircraft<BR>maintenance technician”. Notice that these ‘actions’ or ‘non-actions’ can be either<BR>‘errors’ or ‘violations’, referring to definition 1.<BR>Error and learning Short-term: we use our errors to regulate our difficulties and risks perception and then<BR>consequently adapt our performance.<BR>Long-term: we memorize what has happened… and benefit from it!<BR>“Error & intelligence are two faces of the same coin” (J. Reason)<BR>Error is the price to pay for our intelligence: flexibility, creativity, adaptation, learning,<BR>anticipation, economy of resources, etc.<BR>‘To err is human’. Human error is embedded in human performance. Error is like<BR>experimentation; from error we learn new ways of doing things. The same processes<BR>that lead to error also produce creative new ways of approaching and solving problems.<BR>Error management Prevention: even if it is impossible to prevent all errors, it is still important to make an<BR>effort on that side. Reason uses the following metaphor to illustrate this “It is better to<BR>drain the swamp than to try to kill all the mosquitoes”. The design of technical systems<BR>and equipment, regulations, procedures, professional skills, team work, good<BR>communication rules, etc. all contribute to prevent predictable errors.<BR>Detection: when an error is committed, what is important is to catch it before it can<BR>threaten safety. The resources and tools mentioned above are also error-detection tools.<BR>Correction/Recovery/Mitigation : These three terms have close meanings.<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 4 Trainee's Booklet<BR>‘Correction’ embeds a notion of reversibility while ‘recovery’ doesn’t. (For instance,<BR>when driving if we take the wrong road, making a U-turn on a country road is a<BR>correction, whereas taking another road later on – hence changing our initial route – is a<BR>recovery). ‘Mitigation’ means compensating consequences (e.g. extinguishing a fire).<BR>Here again, the tools and resources mentioned as prevention strategies can also serve the<BR>error correction, recovery and mitigation.<BR>The Airbus Global Safety Strategy achieves error management through design of A/C<BR>systems and equipment (design for maintainability), operating procedures and personnel<BR>training.<BR>General remarks:<BR>- Error detection and recovery improve error prevention, since we rarely commit the<BR>same error twice.<BR>- The detection can take place just before the error is committed (in the course of<BR>action), just after or be delayed (several months later), then creating a latent<BR>condition. Because of the nature of its activity, maintenance is likely to produce a<BR>lot of latent conditions that may affect a flight days, months and even years later.<BR>Example In the case of the 1989 Iowa DC10 engine disk failure, the suspected<BR>inspection failure occurred 17 months before the accident!<BR>Error tolerance System design is of primary importance because it greatly undermines error<BR>propagation.<BR>The consequences of the same error drastically vary according to the system in which<BR>the error is made. For example pushing the wrong button on your television doesn’t<BR>have the same impact as it would on the control panel of a nuclear power plant or on the<BR>MCDU of a glass cockpit.<BR>An error that yields serious consequences and that cannot be recovered is called a<BR>critical error, and a system in which errors can develop serious consequences is called<BR>vulnerable or error-intolerant towards this specific erroneous action.<BR>On the contrary, a system is error tolerant if it is designed so as to ensure that no error<BR>can have serious implications for overall safety.<BR>Expert Being an expert involves at least two components.<BR>First, an expert has spent the time necessary to develop the appropriate skills for the job,<BR>and performs those skills accurately and efficiently. The skills can be physical (motor<BR>and manipulation skills) or mental (the ability to do analyze a situation, etc.).<BR>Experts have also developed the ability to quickly isolate relevant information or cues in<BR>their environment and can recognize significant patterns that will direct their actions<BR>more efficiently (e.g. Trouble-Shooting).<BR>Furthermore, experts better know what they know and what they don’t, which allows<BR>them to remain in their domain of competence, avoiding risky attitudes.<BR>F<BR>Family concept Airbus has wanted to facilitate the transition from an Airbus aircraft type to another,<BR>through the concept of Airbus Family. This concept means a commonality of<BR>philosophy and principles. For example, the way documentation is organized as well as<BR>the way to use it are also similar. They are 3 families which also represent subsequent<BR>aircraft generations: the A300-A310 family, the A319-A320-A321 family, and the<BR>A330-A340 family. They are more similarities within families than between families.<BR>For example an A340 is closer to an A330 than to an A320. Beware of the differences in<BR>order to avoid errors!<BR>Fatigue Fatigue comes from consuming our physical or mental resources. Our resources, mental<BR>and physical, are like fuel in a car. During a normal day, we consume our fuel at a<BR>fairly constant level (like being in ‘cruise mode’ on the highway). But if we have to go<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 5 Trainee's Booklet<BR>faster or if we have to work harder, then just like a car, we will consume our fuel more<BR>quickly.<BR>Maintenance technicians work in shifts, and everyone knows it is harder to work<BR>overnight. The explanation comes from the way fatigue combines with circadian<BR>rhythm.<BR>See circadian rhythm.<BR>Followership While leadership is the ability to lead the others, ‘followership’ is the ability to properly<BR>follow the leader. All team members must express their willingness to follow the leader,<BR>but not ‘blindly’. So in case of doubt or if you have any question related to the job or to<BR>safety, you should express your concern (the concepts of ‘assertiveness’ and<BR>‘advocacy’) in the most suitable manner according to your airline culture and policy.<BR>See leadership.<BR>H<BR>Human Factors Originally and generally meaning, “Human Factors” refer to the role of men regarding<BR>safety or quality, in high-risk domains such as aviation, marine, nuclear power plants,<BR>railways, and all intrinsically hazardous processes where human operators interact with<BR>complex technical systems.<BR>“Human Factors” is about people in their living and working environments. It is about<BR>their relationship with machines and equipment, with procedures, and with the<BR>environment about them. It is also about their relationship with other people…<BR>Hence, addressing human factors is dealing with interactions within a large sociotechnical system.<BR>Maintenance Human Factors: today’s reality, taken from the ADAMS report:<BR>“Double standard of task performance:<BR>- quality of task documentation & usability of documentation technology in many<BR>maintenance organizations, quite inadequate from a users point of view<BR>- ‘Black Books’ are universally accepted to exist: illegal, unofficial manuals in which<BR>the technician records useful information for their own reference – making it more<BR>likely for a technician to use information that is not current, up to date and accurate.<BR>- A/C technicians report they do not follow documented procedures as prescribed in 1/3<BR>of the tasks surveyed.<BR>- Technicians & their managers have a contradictory understanding of what the job of<BR>the Maintenance technician involves:<BR>* The technician sees himself as responsible for the A/C safety & of using his<BR>judgement to do what is necessary for that<BR>* The managers see the primary role of the tech to follow procedures as laid down (if<BR>this is done, safety is ensured). But they know that if the procedures were followed<BR>strictly nothing would be done on time”<BR>Human limitations Why do human beings make errors? There is a simple analogy we can use to explain<BR>this. Think first about a machine or a piece of equipment. It was engineered with<BR>specific thresholds in mind - weight tolerance, speed limit, etc. If you take the machine<BR>past its recommended limits, its performance is going to suffer. It may even shut down<BR>altogether.<BR>Humans are very similar. We have mental, physical and psychological limits to our<BR>performance. When we push ourselves past those optimums, the likelihood of error is<BR>going to increase. We make more errors when we are tired or when our mental<BR>resources are consumed with details of a novel and demanding situation.<BR>The biggest difference between humans and machines in this analogy is that humans<BR>can learn and adapt their performance. They can actually change their thresholds. How<BR>do we do this? One way that we learn is from the errors that we make. Have you heard<BR>anyone say «I know I’ll never do that again!» - that is learning from error.<BR>Humans also differ to machines by the fact that they know they are limited and protect<BR>themselves about that. Our knowledge of both our weaknesses and forces explains why<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 6 Trainee's Booklet<BR>we are, in spite of our limitations, capable of outstanding performance.<BR>I<BR>Incident ICAO's Definition (Annex 13, chapter 1):<BR>"Any non-accident event, linked to the use of an airplane, that compromises or could<BR>compromise operating safety". "A serious incident is an incident whose circumstances<BR>could have lead to an accident (an accident was about to happen)."<BR>Note that the only difference between an accident and a serious incident lies in the<BR>outcome.<BR>L<BR>Latent condition Latent conditions are to technological organizations what resident pathogens are to the<BR>human body. Like pathogens, latent conditions - such as poor design, gaps in<BR>supervision, undetected manufacturing defects or maintenance failures, unworkable<BR>procedures, clumsy automation, shortfalls in training, less than adequate tools and<BR>equipment - may be present for many years before they combine with local<BR>circumstances and active failures to penetrate the system’s many layers of defenses.<BR>They arise from strategic & other top-level decisions made by governments, regulators,<BR>manufacturers, designers, and organizational managers. The impact of those decisions<BR>spread throughout the organizations, shaping a distinctive corporate culture, and<BR>creating error-producing factors within the individual workplaces. Latent conditions can<BR>increase the likelihood of active failures through the creation of local factors promoting<BR>errors & violations, and can also aggravate the consequences of unsafe acts, by their<BR>effects upon the system’s defences.<BR>Leadership By giving status - e.g. Foreman - the company assigns official authority.<BR>But it's also a matter of personal qualities: attitudes, motivation, experience,<BR>communication, social and human intelligence that confer on someone the capacity to<BR>influence and lead other persons.<BR>A good leader doesn’t need to resort to authority to lead the others: he ‘naturally’ gets<BR>from the team members what he wants because he is trusted and respected.<BR>Learning Learning is the modification of the capacity of an individual to perform a task through<BR>interactions with the environment. Learning can refer either to the process or to its<BR>result. For education sciences, learning defines more precisely the modality of<BR>acquisition of knowledge, skills or aptitudes.<BR>Learning is greatly facilitated when you are motivated to learn. See motivation.<BR>Long lasting team Maintenance personnel often work in long lasting teams, i.e. in teams with low<BR>personnel turnover. Because they work and live together over a long period of time,<BR>team members get used to each other and know each other quite well.<BR>This work organization presents both advantages and drawbacks for safety. They are<BR>reviewed in the course.<BR>People working in the same long lasting team tend to form a ‘clan’. A clan is a social<BR>structure based on relations of proximity and closed to the outside world in which<BR>everyone's roles are defined mainly through tacit rules, enforced through 'peer pressure'<BR>(group conformity). Clan members have the tendency to reject newcomers until they are<BR>considered to be worthy of becoming members of the clan.<BR>M<BR>Motivation Motivation plays an important role in learning. In other words, how you approach your<BR>transition experience can greatly affect the efficiency of the learning.<BR>You can be negative and resistant, and you will find the work that much harder to<BR>master. A closed mind is a slow mind to learn. If you are reluctant to make errors (too<BR>fearful or too proud), you will be too cautious, and you will lose valuable opportunities<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 7 Trainee's Booklet<BR>to learn.<BR>Or you can be positive and enthusiastic. The more open you are to the new material, the<BR>faster you will become an expert on the new plane.<BR>Any problem or difficulty? Remember your AI instructors are here to help!<BR>N<BR>Negative transfer (in learning) A condition in which previous experience negatively interferes with the learning of a<BR>new task, usually due to conflicting stimuli or response requirements.<BR>The opposite is called positive transfer.<BR>No Fault Found policy Maintenance personnel sometimes have difficulties in locating a fault. This often results<BR>in undue removals of properly working components, which represents costs for the<BR>airline. The 'No Fault Found' policy has been developed by Airbus Industrie in close<BR>collaboration with the major avionics manufacturers for coping with that problem. This<BR>policy remains the only NFF reduction procedure in use in the aerospace industry today.<BR>It states that the tests performed by Airbus or authorized repair stations are normally<BR>free of charge, unless:<BR>- The airline doesn’t supply supporting data (or chooses not to provide the<BR>substantiating data after the request of the Supplier’s repair station);<BR>- Supporting data doesn’t substantiate the removal;<BR>- The relevant TSM procedures, in relation to a PFR warning message, provide the<BR>correct system trouble shooting.<BR>So if you encounter difficulties in locating a fault, don’t remove a Unit only to prove<BR>that you have done something! By the way, it is very likely that applying the<BR>corresponding TS procedure will solve the problem.<BR>Furthermore, keep all historical data. It helps to put the TS cases in perspective. In case<BR>you sent the Unit to Airbus Industrie or the authorized repair station for testing.<BR>Remember that historical data will be required not to charge the test to your airline.<BR>Note: Details can be found in the Airbus Industrie NFF Policy document, ref.AI/SG-<BR>ES/921.0320/99 – May 1999.<BR>O<BR>Organizational learning Individual behaviors are bounded by the fact that they work within an organization,<BR>which does not imply they have no degree of freedom…<BR>The safety of an organization partly depends on its capacity to learn from experience:<BR>organizational safety. This is based on systems of operational feedback, for example<BR>incident reporting systems.<BR>P<BR>Procedure A procedure defines what the task is, when the task is conducted, by whom it is<BR>conducted, how the task is done, what the sequence of actions is and what type of<BR>feedback is required. A procedure also often includes warnings and cautions, that must<BR>be complied with for its safe application.<BR>Role and features of procedures:<BR>- Predetermined framework for joint action<BR>- Common language which facilitates communication and make it more reliable<BR>- Error detection tool: a common reference makes it easier to detect deviations<BR>- Because A/C systems are complex, opaque and interconnected, procedures are the<BR>only way to interact safely with modern technology aircraft.<BR>Adhering to procedures is absolutely needed with modern technology aircraft!<BR>Practice A procedure is like a music score, it is ‘interpreted’ during the course of action and<BR>transformed into practice. In other words, instructions cannot tell you everything. You<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 8 Trainee's Booklet<BR>need to be knowledgeable and properly trained to follow instructions the way they were<BR>intended to be followed. Safe procedure application requires that maintenance staff<BR>understand the main reasons behind the procedures (i.e. that modern technology is too<BR>complex to be operated without proper guidelines) and the consequences of their<BR>actions.<BR>In real operational life, procedures are not always adhered to! Factors affecting<BR>compliance with procedures are reviewed in the course.<BR>Adhering to procedures is absolutely needed with modern technology aircraft!<BR>R<BR>Role The set of tasks performed by a human operator which constitute his/her<BR>purpose in the system. For example, releasing the aircraft to service is one of the<BR>maintenance roles.<BR>S<BR>Skill (1) A goal-directed, well-organized behavior that is acquired through practice and<BR>performed with economy of effort.<BR>(2) An organized and co-ordinated pattern of mental and/or physical activity. It is built<BR>up gradually in the course of repeated training or other experience. Skills can be<BR>described as motor, manual, intellectual etc. according to the context or the most<BR>important aspect of the skill pattern.<BR>Status A status is a recognized social position within an organization. For example, the status<BR>of Team Supervisor / Chief technician / Technician is always attributed by the airline.<BR>Status provides authority, and authority is a source of leadership.<BR>See leadership.<BR>Stress Stress is an automatic response to a disturbing situation. Such a situation can be either<BR>unexpected (an emergency) or anticipated (ex. when you know in advance that you will<BR>work under time pressure, of when you know you will be overloaded - a lot of work to<BR>do). Stress is a vital adaptation mechanism, as it mobilizes resources against any kind of<BR>aggression agent also called a ‘stressor’.<BR>Stress is not only a physical reaction but also an emotional one.<BR>Stress can either be good or bad, it is a matter of intensity: it is good when moderate,<BR>enabling us to adapt to the situation, but bad when in excess, resulting in drastic<BR>performance impairment.<BR>Main sources of stress in maintenance are physical working conditions (light, noise,<BR>temperature and weather conditions, etc.), production pressure (e.g. delivering the A/C<BR>on time) and conflicts (with maintenance, cockpit crew, cabin crew and other<BR>personnel).<BR>Stress can be managed, both at the individual and at the team level. Furthermore, the<BR>organization should prevent conditions favoring excessive stress.<BR>Synergy Synergy is synonymous with proper or efficient teamwork. Synergy exists when the<BR>crew’s performance exceeds the sum of individual performances (the 1+1>2 or 11x1>11<BR>metaphor). Synergy needs some primary conditions to be built: a common goal, a leader<BR>recognized by team members (good leadership and followership), clear roles, tasks<BR>sharing, and communication. See leadership and followership.<BR>T<BR>Transfer The change in performance of a task as a result of previous learning. Transfer can be<BR>positive (former learning helps), negative (former learning negatively interferes) or<BR>absent (former learning plays no role).<BR>A.C.R.M.<BR>MAINTENANCE CREW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<BR>© Dedale 1996-2001<BR>DATE: APRIL 2001 Page 9 Trainee's Booklet<BR>V<BR>Violation The main difference between an error and a violation is that the violation is intentional –<BR>e.g. you intend to deliberately deviate from the procedure. Let us take car driving as an<BR>example. You know it is a red light, and you still go through it. You are aware of what<BR>you are doing when you do it.<BR>Sometimes, a violation can become routine. You have deviated in the past, with no<BR>apparent negative consequences, and probably some short-term advantages (e.g., like<BR>saving time by speeding or running a red light). So the behaviour is repeated, and starts<BR>to become automatic, a habit, albeit a bad habit. Or perhaps the violation has evolved<BR>throughout the fleet such that it becomes the norm, standard practice, «everyone does<BR>it». Here are some reasons why procedures are not followed:<BR>- Team values: The good mechanic is the one who can work without procedures!<BR>- Routine, Habit: I am used to doing it like this, and it works ...<BR>- Group Norms: That’s the way we do it here... in the airline, the team<BR>- Time pressure: I don’t need the procedure anymore, and it’s urgent!<BR>- Economy of resources / Workload management: It's easier to do it this way and it<BR>saves time ...<BR>- Lack of knowledge / Lack of training …Understanding the why’s behind the<BR>procedure<BR>- To be of help or to do someone a favour, to save time and let others save time<BR>e.g. Refuelling above the High level (2%) to please the pilots<BR> hoallaakalala THANKS A LOT FOR SHARING. 看看,谢谢楼主谢谢 ,楼主辛苦了~~
谢谢 ,楼主辛苦了~~ 好。。。。。。。。 :) :) 恩恩 HM,学习呀, 谢谢 ,楼主辛苦了~~
页:
[1]
2