民航 发表于 2010-4-5 20:39:56

747 CF6-80C2 Icing Events

<P>747 CF6-80C2 Icing Events</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>**** Hidden Message *****</P>

民航 发表于 2010-4-5 20:40:14

747.1<BR>747 CF6-80C2 Icing<BR>Events<BR>Jeanne Mason<BR>Propulsion Operability<BR>Boeing Commercial Airplanes<BR>May 2004<BR>The Boeing Company 747.2<BR>Inclement Weather Event History<BR>• Seventeen CF6-80C2 FADEC engine flameout events have<BR>occurred between 1991 and 2004<BR>• All 17 events occurred during descent in inclement<BR>weather conditions.<BR>• Five dual engine events (three 747-400 and two MD-11)<BR>have been reported.<BR>• All engines were restarted and operated normally for<BR>remainder of flight.<BR>• No PMC engine flameouts have been reported during<BR>descent in inclement weather<BR>• Only one event reported on the 767.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.3<BR>Inclement Weather Event Locations<BR>1<BR>10<BR>9<BR>8<BR>7<BR>6<BR>5<BR>4<BR>3<BR>2<BR>11<BR>12<BR>13<BR>14<BR>15<BR>16<BR>17<BR>Event no. Date A/C Locn Alt<BR>1 4/29/1991 747-400 WASH, DC 19000<BR>2 6/9/1993 747-400 HONG KONG 30000<BR>3 11/26/1993 MD11 INDIA U<BR>4 1/5/1995 MD11 LAX 11500<BR>5 2/17/1995 747-400 BRAZIL 15000<BR>6 5/13/1995 MD11 JAPAN 17500<BR>7 3/21/1996 747-400 MALAYSIA 19000<BR>8 5/29/1996 747-400 HONG KONG 18500<BR>9 4/6/1997 747-400 JAPAN 22100<BR>10 6/3/1998 747-400 HONG KONG 20600<BR>11 9/1/2000 MD11 HONG KONG 28000<BR>12 12/19/2000 747-400 MALAYSIA U<BR>13 5/4/2002 MD11 FLORIDA 23000<BR>14 1/10/2003 747-400 URUGUAY 28000<BR>15 4/3/2003 767-300ER JAPAN 13300<BR>16 12/26/2003 747-400 BRISBANE 32200<BR>17 3/1/2004 MD-11 BANGKOK 33000<BR>The Boeing Company 747.4<BR>Characteristic Event Details<BR>• Engine behavior and climatic conditions were similar in<BR>these events.<BR>– Engine flamed out:<BR>– Descent in icing conditions,<BR>– at or near approach idle.<BR>– At level-off, during throttle-up,<BR>– TAT was typically flat-lined at 0oC shortly before<BR>event.<BR>– The airplanes were near thunderstorms/convective<BR>weather systems.<BR>– The icing conditions appear different from “normal”<BR>icing conditions.<BR>– Engine icing can occur without detectable airframe<BR>icing.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.5<BR>Characteristic Event Details - Relight<BR>– FADEC auto relight typically causes engines to selfrecover<BR>without pilot intervention.<BR>– Time for relight and recovery to commanded power<BR>ranges from 30 sec – 120 sec.<BR>– Auto relight has always relit the engine inside the start<BR>envelope, and sometimes above the envelope.<BR>– In many cases engine anti-ice and ignition were selected<BR>prior to the flameout.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.6<BR>Characteristic Event Details – Ice Shed<BR>• Flameout phenomenon:<BR>– Believed to be caused by ice shed from booster static<BR>structure.<BR>– Believe that temperature rise on descent, and airflow<BR>increase during throttle-up causes ice to shed.<BR>– On acceleration from approach idle VBVs are closing, ice<BR>goes into core.<BR>– Resulting heat absorption from ice/water in the combustor<BR>quenches the flame.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.7<BR>Recent Event Findings<BR>HPC airfoil damage was observed after the last two events.<BR>• Both events occurred during icing conditions at high altitude<BR>• In both events the engines operated normally for the<BR>remainder of the event flight after they were restarted<BR>• Mechanism for damage is not understood.<BR>• Change to AMM/fault isolation manuals/FRM to ensure<BR>HPC borescope inspection occurs after flameout in<BR>suspected inclement weather events is under<BR>consideration.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.8<BR>ECU VBV Logic Revised 1996<BR>• GE Introduced change in ECU VBV control logic to open<BR>VBV schedule in 1996<BR>– Opens VBV’s to increase ice extraction from booster<BR>discharge / core inlet<BR>– Targeted 10K to 20K ft altitude range<BR>– Typical icing envelope<BR>– Phased out completely below 5K and above<BR>25K<BR>• Boeing and GE recommend incorporation of the modified<BR>schedule.<BR>– No events have occurred on airplanes where it is<BR>incorporated inside the altitude envelope where it is<BR>active.<BR>– The software modification does not cover all known<BR>events.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.9<BR>Operational Considerations<BR>• Engine anti ice, which commands approach idle engine<BR>speed has not shown to be effective in preventing<BR>flameouts due to core ice ingestion.<BR>• Continuous ignition selected ON prior to event has not<BR>prevented flameout.<BR>• TAT freezing does not appear to be a reliable indicator of<BR>conditions which can cause flameout.<BR>• Airframe icing is not always evident in these conditions.<BR>The Boeing Company 747.10<BR>Boeing Safety Service Related Problem<BR>(SRP)<BR>This issue is being given the highest priority at Boeing and GE<BR>• Working together to determine root cause of the flameouts.<BR>• Actions include:<BR>– Low altitude capability – ensure capability below 10,000 ft.<BR>is adequate.<BR>– HPC damage – put procedures in place to ensure no<BR>follow-on flight with damage.<BR>– Determine interim operational procedures that can reduce<BR>the likelihood of flameout.<BR>– Insure current operational procedures are adequate in the<BR>event of flameout<BR>– Ensure the operational community is aware of the flameout<BR>phenomenon.

carol08 发表于 2010-5-4 00:52:04

我不想落水的

失速 发表于 2010-6-11 00:23:53

回复 1# 民航 的帖子

先顶后下!!!!!!!!

Virgin 发表于 2010-6-12 07:35:32

看,谢谢楼主

gamit 发表于 2010-7-25 10:42:48

<DIV class=t_msgfont id=postmessage_17840>这么好的资料,谢谢分享</DIV>

忙盲忙 发表于 2010-7-28 09:08:27

楼主辛苦啦~~

楼主辛苦啦~~

f214216709 发表于 2010-7-30 15:03:17

飞行教材?
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 747 CF6-80C2 Icing Events