PART II. AVIATION PHYSIOLOGY
<P>PART II. AVIATION PHYSIOLOGY</P><P>**** Hidden Message *****</P> ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008<BR>Doc 8984-AN/895<BR>Part II<BR>MANUAL OF CIVIL AVIATION MEDICINE<BR>PRELIMINARY EDITION — 2008<BR>International Civil Aviation Organization<BR>PART II. AVIATION PHYSIOLOGY<BR>Approved by the Secretary General<BR>and published under his authority<BR>INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008<BR>Part II<BR>Chapter 1. PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF RELEVANCE TO FLIGHT SAFETY<BR>Page<BR>INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. II-1-1<BR>General ..............................................................................................................II-1-1<BR>Human factors specified in Annexes................................................................. II-1-1<BR>Working environment........................................................................................II-1-2<BR>PHYSICS OF THE ATMOSPHERE................................................................... II-1-3<BR>Barometric pressure...........................................................................................II-1-3<BR>Hypoxia .............................................................................................................II-1-7<BR>PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS ................................................................................... II-1-7<BR>Cabin pressurization ..........................................................................................II-1-7<BR>DECOMPRESSION.............................................................................................. II-1-9<BR>COSMIC RADIATION......................................................................................... II-1-11<BR>OZONE................................................................................................................... II-1-15<BR>ACCELERATION EFFECTS.............................................................................. II-1-15<BR>Short-term accelerations....................................................................................II-1-15<BR>SENSORY ILLUSIONS........................................................................................ II-1-16<BR>COMMUNICATIONS .......................................................................................... II-1-16<BR>FLIGHT CREW WORKLOAD AND ITS<BR>EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE..................................................................... II-1-18<BR>Fatigue............................................................................................................... II-1-18<BR>FURTHER READING.......................................................................................... II-1-18<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-1<BR>INTRODUCTION<BR>General<BR>Throughout the ages of evolution most higher mammals, including humans, have become biologically<BR>adjusted to an existence in the earth’s atmosphere at or near sea level. Departure from this natural habitat<BR>by aerial flight can cause serious and possibly fatal disturbances unless either adequate physiological<BR>adjustments have time to take place or artificial means for life support are employed, depending upon the<BR>altitude involved and the duration of exposure.<BR>This chapter is intended to familiarize the designated medical examiner with some of the basic<BR>principles of aviation physiology related to the working and environmental conditions encountered in<BR>civil aviation; a brief description will also be made of the man-machine relationship, the physical and<BR>mental demands imposed on aviation personnel, and the medico-biological aspects conducive to safe civil<BR>aviation operations. However, a single chapter does not do justice to this important topic, and the<BR>interested reader is therefore referred to one of the standard textbooks in aviation medicine for further<BR>information. Two examples of such texts are provided at the end of this chapter.<BR>The human being is the most important element in the aviation system, and a healthy and competent<BR>crew is a prerequisite for safe and efficient flight. The philosophies underlying initial certification and<BR>continuing integrity of both the man and the machine are in fact analogous.<BR>Advances in aviation research, development and improved technology have served to minimize the<BR>probability of human failure of the man-machine system. Being one of the vital elements in this system,<BR>man should be properly assessed from somatic and psychological viewpoints, taking into account the<BR>requirements for the task to be accomplished.<BR>The rapid development of aviation during the past decades and the ever increasing number of<BR>individuals of all ages who avail themselves of air travel, have stimulated extensive research on the<BR>physiological effects of altitude in order to define tolerable and safe limits of exposure and to develop the<BR>most effective protective measures. In this respect, this chapter includes a short description of some<BR>technological necessities, e.g. cabin pressurization and oxygen systems, which permit life in otherwise<BR>hostile environments.<BR>Human factors specified in Annexes<BR>ICAO regulatory documents – Annexes – make many references to human factor aspects of civil aviation<BR>operations. Annex 1, 1.2.4.4.1 specifies that “Medical examiners shall have received training in aviation<BR>medicine and shall receive refresher training at regular intervals. Before designation, medical examiners<BR>shall demonstrate adequate competency in aviation medicine.” In addition, 1.2.4.4.2 requires that<BR>“Medical examiners shall have practical knowledge and experience of the conditions in which the holders<BR>of licences and ratings carry out their duties”, followed by a Note in which it is stated that “Examples of<BR>practical knowledge and experience are flight experience, simulator experience, on-site observation or<BR>any other hands-on experience deemed by the Licensing Authority to meet this requirement.”<BR>Part I, Chapter 1 of this manual also describes the relevant provisions contained in Annex 6<BR>concerning oxygen in flight and fitness of flight crew members, as well as limitations of flight time<BR>intended to ensure that fatigue does not endanger the safety of a flight.<BR>Annex 6, Part I, 6.12 describes the relevant provisions concerning radiation indicators to be carried by<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-2<BR>aeroplanes intended to be operated above 15 000 m (49 000 ft).<BR>Figure 1.— Flight deck of an Airbus 330 (courtesy – Airbus)<BR>Working environment<BR>The designated medical examiner must be familiar with the design and operation of aircraft cockpits and<BR>air traffic control towers, so as to enable an adequate assessment of licence holders. Aircraft cockpits are<BR>designed in such a way that the flight crew member can function optimally not only under normal but also<BR>under critical conditions such as peak workloads. The main factors to consider in this working<BR>environment are graphically depicted in Figure 1. The major portion of information gathering is by vision;<BR>therefore limitations of human vision with respect to both acuity, the size and shape of the peripheral<BR>visual fields, and colour perception must be considered against the problems of access to visual<BR>information presented from both inside and outside the cockpit.<BR>The position and operation of controls and flight instruments are fundamental. All controls should be<BR>within easy reach of the crew and all instruments should be easy to read. This will permit the pilot to<BR>acquire the information without interference (sensory acquisition) and permit him to operate all the<BR>controls efficiently (effector function).<BR>The air traffic controller’s workload is subject to wide variation. It depends on such factors as the<BR>number of aircraft supervised, the complexity of air traffic routes, individual aircraft speed and relative<BR>aircraft movement comprising fast and slow aircraft, arrivals, departures and en-route traffic.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-3<BR>An example of the working environment of air traffic controllers is shown in Figure 2. It should be<BR>noted that good manual dexterity and neuromuscular co-ordination are required of controllers in the<BR>discharge of their duties. Good visual acuity, both at distance and for reading is required, and the amount<BR>of colour coded information makes good colour perception necessary. Furthermore, air traffic controllers<BR>should be capable of spreading their attention over a number of tasks simultaneously.<BR>Figure 2.— Air Traffic Controllers at their work stations<BR>PHYSICS OF THE ATMOSPHERE<BR>Barometric pressure<BR>The earth is surrounded by a thin layer of gases and vapours in which two forces counteract: the kinetic<BR>energy of the gas molecules leading them away from each other, and the gravitational attraction due to the<BR>mass of the earth. This attraction is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. The action of<BR>these two forces results in a decrease, with increasing altitude, in the density of the atmosphere and<BR>therefore a decrease in the resulting barometric pressure which follows an exponential curve with<BR>increasing altitude. Associated with this pressure event are other phenomena such as a temperature drop<BR>and an increase in the intensity of solar radiation. From a biological viewpoint, the barometric pressure<BR>drop is the most specific feature of the altitude climate. The manifestations directly related to reduced<BR>barometric pressure per se are of two types:<BR>a) mechanical (expansion of trapped gases); and<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-4<BR>0.2094 2<BR>= × O B P P<BR>( 47) 0.2094 2<BR>= − × O B P P<BR>b) biological (drop in oxygen partial pressure).<BR>The chemical composition of the atmosphere remains constant up to an altitude of about 25 km<BR>(82 000 ft). The oxygen fraction is about 20.94 per cent and the partial pressure (pO2) changes in direct<BR>proportion to the total barometric pressure (PB) and can be calculated for dry gas as follows:<BR>(1)<BR>On entering the airways, the inspired gas becomes immediately saturated with water vapour at body<BR>temperature. The partial pressure exerted by the water vapour at 37°C (98.6°F) is always 47 mm Hg<BR>regardless of the total barometric pressure. This fact poses a special problem in aviation medicine because<BR>it is obvious that with increasing altitude, the water vapour pressure represents an increasing proportion of<BR>the inhaled gaseous constituents of the atmosphere. When considering the water vapour pressure, formula<BR>(1) has to be modified as follows:<BR>(2)<BR>Since aviation operations are carried out in an environment different from the regular habitat of<BR>humans, the designated medical examiner should be familiar with the physical characteristics of the<BR>environment in which the flight crew operates.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-5<BR>Table 1 shows the relationship between altitude, pressure and temperature as shown in a standard<BR>atmosphere.<BR>ALTITUDE PRESSURE TEMPERATURE<BR>metres feet mm HG psia °C °F<BR>sea level 760 14.7 15.0 59.0<BR>400 1 312 725 14.0 12.4 54.4<BR>600 1 968 707 13.7 11.1 52.0<BR>800 2 625 691 13.4 9.8 49.6<BR>1 000 3 281 674 13.0 8.5 47.3<BR>1 500 4 921 634 12.3 5.3 41.5<BR>2 000 6 562 596 11.5 2.0 35.5<BR>2 500 8 202 560 10.8 −1.2 29.7<BR>3 000 9 842 526 10.2 −4.5 23.9<BR>3 500 11 483 493 9.5 −7.7 18.1<BR>4 000 13 123 462 8.9 −11.0 12.2<BR>4 500 14 764 433 8.4 −14.2 6.4<BR>5 000 16 404 405 7.8 −17.5 0.5<BR>5 500 18 044 379 7.3 −20.7 −5.3<BR>6 000 19 685 354 6.8 −24.0 −11.2<BR>6 500 21 325 331 6.4 −27.2 −16.9<BR>7 000 22 966 308 6.0 −30.5 −22.9<BR>7 500 24 606 287 5.6 −33.7 −28.6<BR>8 000 26 246 267 5.2 −36.9 −34.5<BR>10 000 32 808 199 3.8 −49.9 −57.8<BR>12 000 39 370 146 2.8 −56.5 −69.7<BR>14 000 45 931 106 2.0 −56.5 −69.7<BR>16 000 52 493 78 1.5 −56.5 −69.7<BR>18 000 59 054 57 1.1 −56.5 −69.7<BR>20 000 65 616 41 0.80 −56.5 −69.7<BR>25 000 82 020 19 0.37 −51.6 −60.9<BR>30 000 98 424 9 0.17 −46.6 −51.9<BR>Table 1.— The relationship between altitude (in ft),<BR>pressure (in mm Hg and pounds per square inch (absolute)), and temperature (in °C and °F)<BR>The range of environmental conditions encountered in civil aviation operations varies widely, from<BR>those characteristic of unpressurized small aircraft and gliders, to those of subsonic and supersonic jets.<BR>The relationship between barometric pressure and the operational ceiling of aircraft is shown in<BR>Figure 3, demonstrating the decrease in barometric pressure with increasing altitude.<BR>Physiological effects of hypoxia at different altitudes are given in Table 2.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-6<BR>1) 2 450 m (8 000 ft): The atmosphere provides a blood oxygen saturation of approximately 93 per cent<BR>in the resting individual who does not suffer from cardiovascular or pulmonary disease.<BR>2) 3 050 m (10 000 ft): The atmosphere provides a blood oxygen saturation of approximately<BR>89 per cent. After a period of time at this level, the more complex cerebral functions such as making<BR>mathematical computations begin to suffer. Flight crew members must use oxygen when the cabin<BR>pressure altitudes exceed this level.<BR>3) 3 650 m (12 000 ft): The blood oxygen saturation falls to approximately 87 per cent and in addition to<BR>some arithmetical computation difficulties, short-term memory begins to be impaired and errors of<BR>omission increase with extended exposure.<BR>4) 4 250 m (14 000 ft): The blood oxygen saturation is approximately 83 per cent and all persons are<BR>impaired to a greater or lesser extent with respect to mental function including intellectual and<BR>emotional changes.<BR>5) 4 550 m (15 000 ft): This altitude gives a blood oxygen saturation of approximately 80 per cent and<BR>all persons are impaired, some seriously.<BR>6) 6 100 m (20 000 ft): The blood oxygen saturation is 65 per cent and all unacclimatized persons lose<BR>useful consciousness within 10 minutes (TUC, the time of useful consciousness, is determined<BR>generally from the time of onset of hypoxia to the time when purposeful activity, such as the ability to<BR>don an oxygen mask, is lost). At 6 100 m (20 000 ft), the TUC is 10 minutes. (It should be mentioned<BR>that a given volume of gas at sea level doubles in volume when the pressure is dropped to that at<BR>approximately 5 500 m (18 000 ft).)<BR>7) 7 600 m (25 000 ft): This altitude, and all those above it, produce a blood oxygen saturation below<BR>60 per cent and a TUC of 2.5 minutes or less. Above this altitude, the occurrence of bends (nitrogen<BR>embolism) begins to be a threat.<BR>8) 9 150 m (30 000 ft): The TUC is approximately 30 seconds.<BR>9) 10 350 m (34 000 ft): The TUC is approximately 22 seconds. Provision of 100 per cent oxygen will<BR>produce a 95 per cent blood oxygen saturation (at 10 050 m (33 000 ft), a given volume of gas at sea<BR>level will have approximately quadrupled).<BR>10) 11 300 m (37 000 ft): The TUC is approximately 18 seconds. Provision of 100 per cent oxygen will<BR>produce an oxygen saturation of approximately 89 per cent. When this altitude is exceeded, oxygen<BR>begins to leave the blood unless positive-pressure oxygen is supplied. (A given volume of gas<BR>approximately quintuples when the altitude changes from sea level to 11 600 m (38 000 ft).)<BR>11) 13 700 m (45 000 ft): The TUC is approximately 15 seconds and positive-pressure oxygen is of<BR>decreasing practicality due to the increasing inability to exhale against the requisite oxygen pressure.<BR>Table 2.— Effects of hypoxia at different altitudes<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-7<BR>Figure 3.— Barometric pressure and altitude<BR>A matter of practical importance is that barotrauma may occur at low altitudes because of the steep slope<BR>of the altitude pressure curve at lower levels. Even normal shifts in pressurized cabins can result in<BR>barotrauma since descent from only 2 000 m (6 500 ft) to sea level entails a pressure differential of<BR>150 mm Hg.<BR>Hypoxia<BR>An important characteristic of biological significance of the flight environment is the decrease in partial<BR>pressure of oxygen with increasing altitude.<BR>Hypoxia can for practical purposes be defined as decreased amounts of oxygen in organs and tissues,<BR>i.e. less than the physiologically “normal” amount.<BR>In aviation medicine it is a subject of particular interest due to the fact that pressurized cabins are not<BR>usually maintained at sea-level values and therefore cabin pressures may add a moderate degree of<BR>hypoxia at altitude. Hypoxia has been the object of many studies, and several attempts have been made to<BR>classify and define its stages and varieties. A classification that has gained wide acceptance defining four<BR>varieties of hypoxia is as follows:<BR>a) Hypoxic hypoxia is the result of a reduction in the oxygen tension in the arterial blood and hence in<BR>the capillary blood. It may be caused by low oxygen tension in the inspired air (hypobaric hypoxia)<BR>and is therefore of special significance when considering flight crew. Other causes are<BR>hypoventilatory states, impairment of gas exchange across the alveolar-capillary membrane, and<BR>ventilation-perfusion mismatches.<BR>b) Anaemic hypoxia is the result of a reduction in the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. Decreased<BR>amount of haemoglobin available to carry oxygen may be caused by reduced erythrocyte count,<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-8<BR>reduced haemoglobin concentration, and synthesis of abnormal haemoglobin (e.g., sickle cell<BR>anaemia). Anaemia is an important consideration when assessing the advisability of air transportation<BR>for passengers with certain clinical entities.<BR>c) Ischaemic hypoxia is the result of a reduction in blood flow through the tissues. It may be caused by<BR>obstruction of arterial supply by disease or trauma, and by general circulatory failure. Coronary artery<BR>disease is of major concern when assessing applicants for licences.<BR>d) Histotoxic hypoxia is the result of an interference with the ability of the tissues to utilize a normal<BR>oxygen supply for oxidative processes. It may be caused by certain biochemical disorders as well as<BR>poisoning and may be of concern in crash survivability.<BR>Subjective symptoms Objective signs<BR>Breathlessness; dyspnoea<BR>Headache<BR>Dizziness (giddiness)<BR>Nausea<BR>Feeling of warmth about face<BR>Dimness of vision<BR>Blurring of vision<BR>Double vision (diplopia)<BR>Confusion; exhilaration<BR>Sleepiness<BR>Faintness<BR>Weakness<BR>Stupor<BR>Hyperpnoea or hyperventilation<BR>Yawning<BR>Tremor<BR>Sweating<BR>Pallor<BR>Cyanosis<BR>Drawn, anxious facies<BR>Tachycardia<BR>Bradycardia (dangerous)<BR>Poor judgement<BR>Slurred speech<BR>Incoordination<BR>Unconsciousness; convulsions<BR>Table 3.— Signs and symptoms of hypoxia<BR>In aviation, hypobaric hypoxia is by far the most common form of hypoxia. The symptoms produced<BR>in the body by hypoxia are both subjective and objective. Rarely are all the signs and symptoms found in<BR>any one person. Table 3 shows common signs and symptoms which might occur. It is difficult to state<BR>precisely at what altitude a given individual will react (i.e., show symptoms). The threshold of hypoxia is<BR>generally considered to be 1 000 m (3 300 ft) since no demonstrable physiological reaction to decreased<BR>atmospheric pressure has been reported below that altitude. In practice, however, a significant decrement<BR>in performance does not occur as low as that, but as altitude increases above that level the first detectable<BR>symptoms of hypoxia begin to appear and a more realistic threshold would be around 1 500 m (5 000 ft).<BR>Symptoms become more pronounced above 3 000 m (10 000 ft) which sets the limit for flight in<BR>unpressurized aircraft unless oxygen is carried on board. Pressurization systems are commonly designed<BR>to provide a physiologically adequate partial pressure of oxygen in the inspired air. In most passenger<BR>aircraft, the cabin pressure at cruising level corresponds to an ambient altitude of 1 500 to 2 450 m (5 000<BR>to 8 000 feet).<BR>PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS<BR>Cabin pressurization<BR>Cabin pressurization is one of the examples of technological solutions to a physiological problem in<BR>relation to aviation. In most modern commercial aircraft the problems of hypoxia and decompression<BR>symptoms are overcome by pressurizing the aircraft cabin to maintain a pressure that is compatible with<BR>I<BR>NCRE<BR>A<BR>S<BR>I<BR>NG<BR>HY<BR>P<BR>OX<BR>I<BR>A<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-9<BR>normal physiological needs.<BR>It would seem ideal to maintain sea-level pressure in an aircraft cabin at all times. This solution is<BR>usually impractical due to weight penalties and technical considerations. For these reasons, aircraft cabins<BR>are designed with pressure differentials which represent the compromise between the physiological ideal<BR>and optimal technological design. The pressurization characteristics of different commercial aircraft types<BR>are similar, with minor variations. In general, while the aircraft rate of climb might be in the order of<BR>1000-3 000 ft/min (5-15 m/s) at lower altitudes, cabin altitude increases at a rate of about 500 ft/min (2.5<BR>m/s) which represents an acceptable physiological compromise to equilibrate pressures within the body<BR>and the surrounding environment with a minimum of discomfort. On descent, the usual rate is no more<BR>than 300 ft/min (1.5 m/s).<BR>The normal method of achieving cabin pressurization is by obtaining compressed air from the engine<BR>compressor, cooling it and leading it into the cabin. The pressure level is then set by controlling the rate<BR>of escape of the compressed air from the cabin by means of a barometrically operated relief valve.<BR>Figure 4 indicates a typical pressure differential between the ambient altitude and cabin altitude for a<BR>commercial aircraft.<BR>Figure 4.— Aircraft and cabin altitudes for a commercial aircraft during a typical flight1<BR>DECOMPRESSION<BR>All gases present in the body, either in free form in the cavities of the viscera or in solution in the body<BR>fluids, are in equilibrium with the external environment. Therefore, any changes in barometric pressure<BR>will give rise to transient pressure gradients between gases within the body and the external environment,<BR>and a gradient will persist until a new balance is reached. Depending upon the magnitude of the changing<BR>pressure and the rate at which it takes place, mechanical deformation and structural damage may occur on<BR>1 Adapted from Rainford, D.J., Gradwell, D.P. eds. (2006)<BR>Time of flight (min)<BR>Altitude (thousands of feet)<BR>Cabin altitude<BR>Aircraft<BR>altitude<BR>0 5 10 15 95 100 105 110 115 120<BR>10<BR>20<BR>30<BR>40<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-10<BR>decompression due to the relatively higher pressure of free gases trapped in body cavities.<BR>In spite of all precautions, loss of cabin pressurization, including the remote event of rapid<BR>decompression, remains a potential hazard in the operation of pressurized aircraft at high altitudes.<BR>Rapid decompression is an uncommon event in civil aviation operations. It may be produced as a<BR>result of structural failure or damage to the cabin wall (pressure hull). If it occurs, those on board might<BR>be exposed to the sudden onset of hypoxia for which oxygen equipment will be required. If the rate of<BR>decompression is of severe magnitude, organ and tissue damage may also ensue. Free gases in the body<BR>will expand. Cavities containing such gases are:<BR>a) those with distensible walls;<BR>b) those with free communication with the external environment; and<BR>c) rigid or semi-rigid closed cavities.<BR>The gases present in the distensible cavities, i.e. gastrointestinal tract, will expand under hypobaric<BR>conditions and may cause symptoms of discomfort and pain. Cavities with free communication will not<BR>give rise to complications as long as the size and patency of the communicating orifice and/or anatomical<BR>structure is adequate. Examples of these cavities are paranasal sinuses with open communication. The<BR>third type of cavities are those formed when a blocked paranasal sinus ostia or blocked Eustachian tube<BR>leading to the middle ear is present; they might give origin to pain of magnitude so severe as to be<BR>incapacitating.<BR>Other forms of decompression manifestations are those produced by the evolution of bubbles from<BR>gases dissolved in blood and tissues - decompression sickness. In the context of civil aviation operations,<BR>this might occur when a person has been exposed to a hyperbaric environment, which has<BR>overcompressed inert gases in the body, prior to an ascent to altitude. Based on case studies and<BR>prospective investigations, the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society recommends the following<BR>intervals between diving and flying:<BR>Dive schedule<BR>Minimum interval<BR>1.<BR>Non-decompression dives<BR>a. Less than 2 hours accumulated dive time in the<BR>48 hours preceding surfacing from the last dive<BR>12 hours<BR>b. Multi-day, unlimited diving<BR>24 hours<BR>2.<BR>Dives requiring decompression stops (but not<BR>including saturation dives)<BR>24-48 hours<BR>Table 4.— Recommended intervals between diving and flying<BR>Further information concerning dive times and flying is available from the Professional Association<BR>of Diving Instructors (PADI) and the National Association of Underwater Instructors (NAUI).<BR>Another important consideration in civil aviation operations is the possibility of slow decompression,<BR>including failure to pressurize during climb, which might occur as a result of failures of pressurization<BR>equipment, such as failure of an outflow valve, or incorrect settings of the flight deck pressurization<BR>controls by flight crew. If a slow loss of pressure occurs, the aircraft usually initiates a descent to a safer<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-11<BR>altitude; in some cases, on account of high ground, the aircraft is forced to continue flying at an altitude<BR>requiring oxygen. In such cases, the availability of oxygen systems is mandatory and if the planned route<BR>is over high ground that prevents an immediate descent to 10,000 feet or below, additional oxygen is<BR>required to be carried. When cabin pressure is lost, a barometrically triggered valve opens at a given cabin<BR>altitude - usually 10 000 - 14 000 ft (3 050 - 4 250 m) - and releases the masks for passengers. Passengers<BR>are briefed, prior to the flight, about the procedures to be taken to start breathing oxygen when required.<BR>Other forms of decompression symptoms (dysbarisms) such as barotitis, barosinusitis and barodontalgia<BR>are further described in Part III, Chapter 12 of this manual.<BR>COSMIC RADIATION<BR>Radiation consists of a flow of atomic and subatomic particles and of waves, such as those that<BR>characterize heat rays, light rays, and X-rays. All matter is constantly bombarded with radiation of both<BR>types from cosmic and terrestrial sources.<BR>Radiation can be ionizing (i.e. capable of turning atoms and molecules in matter and tissue penetrated<BR>into ions2 and thus causing an electrical effect) or non-ionizing.<BR>Cosmic radiation is the collective term used for radiation coming from the sun (the solar component)<BR>and from the galaxies of the universe (the galactic component).<BR>Ionizing Radiation<BR>Matter consists of a number of simple substances called elements which, as mixtures and compounds,<BR>form all the materials present on earth and in the universe. The basic unit of any element is the atom, and<BR>it is the characteristics of atoms that determine the properties of the elements.<BR>Some elements are naturally radioactive, i.e. they change into other elements with the emission of<BR>atomic particles: radiation. Radiation may be thought of as energy in motion or as transfer of energy.<BR>When radiation energy is absorbed in living tissue, it may have a biological effect which depends not only<BR>on the amount of energy absorbed, but also on the specific effect of the wavelength and on the type of<BR>particles (electrons, neutrons, positrons, etc). If ionization takes place, it frequently results in chemical<BR>changes in matter and in living tissue. These changes may affect the behaviour of living cells and the<BR>organism may suffer obvious injury if enough cells are involved. Unlike light and heat, which are also<BR>forms of radiation, ionizing radiations cannot be directly detected by the body’s senses, except that the<BR>dark-adapted eye, during the 5-6 hours of a transatlantic polar flight, may see a few flashes of light as<BR>cosmic rays directly ionize the retina.<BR>Source and type of radiation<BR>The ionizing radiation to which everyone on earth is exposed comes from the universe, partly from outer<BR>space (galactic radiation of constant intensity) and partly from the sun (solar radiation of increased<BR>intensity during solar flare activity). Furthermore, the earth itself produces ionizing radiation (of intensity<BR>varying with geographical location). Even food and drinking water are sources of ionizing radiation.<BR>In addition to this natural background radiation which has existed for millions of years, there are<BR>2ion: an electrically charged atom or molecule.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-12<BR>modern man-made sources of ionizing radiation: building materials in houses, medical and dental X-ray<BR>examinations, radioactive cargoes, fall-out from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, and possibly<BR>nuclear power plants.<BR>Unit of measurement<BR>The effect of both electrons, α-particles and γ-radiation on living tissue is to cause ionization. The amount<BR>of radiation energy absorbed is measured in gray (Gy)3, but as the biological effect depends not only on<BR>energy but also on the composition of the radiation (different particles etc.), it is necessary to weight the<BR>absorbed dose to obtain a dose equivalent, a unit of “harmful effect”, called sievert (Sv).4<BR>Background Radiation<BR>Everybody on earth is exposed to radiation. The total normal radiation (background radiation) per person<BR>is virtually constant with a yearly dose equivalent estimated to be about 2 mSv in most countries. But due<BR>to natural radioactivity in soil and rocks, in parts of Brazil the yearly average is as high as 5-10 mSv, and<BR>in Kerala (India) a yearly dose of 28 mSv has been measured. In the industrial countries radiation from<BR>other sources, mainly medical X-rays, is estimated to around 1 mSv. On top of this exposure, totalling<BR>3 mSv/year, may be added “occupational exposure”.<BR>Occupational Exposure<BR>In recent years world-wide attention has been given to the problem of air crew being exposed to ionizing<BR>radiation. In the European Union, following the recommendations of the International Commission on<BR>Radiological Protection (ICRP), specific provisions on the health protection of air crew against dangers<BR>arising from exposure to cosmic radiation have been laid down in legislation since May 2000. There is,<BR>however, still some disagreement about the effects and even the amount of radiation to which air crew are<BR>exposed while on duty.<BR>A substantial part of the cosmic radiation is absorbed by the upper part of the atmosphere or deflected<BR>by the earth’s magnetic shield, but some penetrates to ground level and thus forms part of our natural<BR>environment. The intensity of cosmic radiation increases with height above sea level because the<BR>atmosphere becomes thinner and absorbs less of the radiation (e.g. the intensity of cosmic radiation is<BR>doubled by an increase in altitude from sea level to about 5000 feet and this doubling continues up to<BR>about 70 000 feet). High altitude flight therefore increases the degree of exposure to cosmic radiation. The<BR>polar regions have a greater radiation intensity than the equatorial regions, owing to flattening of the<BR>atmosphere over the poles and the shape of the earth’s magnetic field.<BR>Many studies have been conducted aboard airliners, mainly flying on North Atlantic routes, to<BR>establish the amount of radiation to which the air crew are exposed. Based on these studies, it is possible<BR>to calculate a radiation exposure of approximately 5 mSv per year for air crew flying 600 hours per year<BR>north of N50 at altitudes above 39 000’, and approximately 3.3 mSv per year if the flight level is reduced<BR>to altitudes around 33 000’. If the annual flying hours are calculated for cruising only (with deduction for<BR>start, climb, descent, and landing) to 400 hours per year, the radiation exposure will be around 2 mSv.<BR>Flying south of N50 will entail a further reduction in exposure.<BR>31 Gy = 1 joule/kg = 100 rad (absorbed radiation).<BR>41 Sv = 1 joule/kg = 100 rem<BR>(dose equivalent = 1 Gy for β-radiation).<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-13<BR>In a recent study conducted by the national airline in a Contracting State, situated between N60 and<BR>N70, the maximum radiation exposure in full-time air crew measured during ordinary scheduled flying<BR>over one year was 2.8 mSv.<BR>Maximum Exposure<BR>The maximum radiation exposure, recommended by ICRP, for individual members of the public is 1 mSv<BR>per year or, in particular cases, 5 mSv per 5 years. For workers exposed to radiation (and therefore under<BR>special surveillance which may include annual health examinations) the recommended limit is 100 mSv<BR>per five years or an average of 20 mSv per year with a maximum of 50 mSv in any one year. For pregnant<BR>workers the recommended limit is 1 mSv per year or the same for the foetus as for any other individual<BR>member of the general public.<BR>Use of Computer Programmes to Estimate Dose<BR>It is possible to estimate the radiation dose for a certain route by using a computer programme developed<BR>for this purpose. The data to be input are the date and location of departure, the flight profile, detailing the<BR>time in climb, cruise and descent, and the time and location of arrival.<BR>One such programme, which is simple to use and has been validated, is produced by the Civil<BR>Aeromedical Institute (CAMI) in the United States. CAMI was previously known as the Civil<BR>Aeromedical Research Institute (CARI). The latest version of this computer programme is called CARI-6<BR>(dated 7 July 2004). It can be down-loaded from CAMI’s website or accessed on-line at<BR>http://jag.cami.jccbi.gov./cariprofile.asp. A similar European programme, EPCARD (European Program<BR>Package for the Calculation of Aviation Route Doses), has been developed and is available on-line in<BR>English and German at www.gsf.de/epcard2/index.phtml.<BR>Risk Assessment<BR>Ionization can cause chemical changes in living tissue and may thus affect the behaviour of living cells.<BR>This can lead to cell death (as in acute radiation sickness) or to alteration of genetic material within the<BR>cell (so-called mutation as seen in late sequels). The latter can induce cancer or lead to anatomical defects<BR>in a foetus. These effects, however, are dose related: low doses of radiation carry a low risk, and the lower<BR>the radiation dose is, the longer is the interval from exposure to development of disease, often many<BR>years.<BR>We have no exact knowledge about the risk of low dose radiation, but studies of the survivors from<BR>the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings in 1945 indicate that a radiation dose of 500 mSv leads to<BR>development of cancer in about 1% of those exposed. Consequently, according to the theory of linearity, a<BR>radiation dose of 1 mSv entails a cancer risk of 0.002% (1 mSv is about 1/3 of the natural background<BR>radiation, vide supra). With few exceptions the incidence of cancer has not been increased detectably by<BR>doses of less than 100 mSv.<BR>It is generally estimated that 1.5% of all fatal cancers in the general population result from natural<BR>background ionizing radiation. A man, living on Earth for 70 years, will receive a total dose of ionizing<BR>radiation of about 210 mSv. His risk of developing a cancer due to radiation is about 0.42% or one in 238.<BR>If he flies as an airline pilot for 40 years he may receive an additional dose of some 112 mSv which<BR>entails an additional cancer risk of about 0.22%. The over-all risk of acquiring a fatal cancer disease (all<BR>types, all causes) during a lifetime is about 22% (including 0.42% caused by radiation). The airman’s<BR>total risk will thus rise from about 22% to about 22.2%. In other words: if one thousand airmen have a<BR>normal flying career, the expectation is that two of them would eventually die of cancer as a result of<BR>occupational exposure to radiation. Based on normal expectation for the adult population, about an<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-14<BR>additional 220 of the 1000 airmen would die of cancer from causes unrelated to occupational radiation<BR>exposure. There is, of course, no way of telling whether a specific cancer is caused by background<BR>radiation, occupational radiation or other factors.<BR>A liveborn child conceived after radiation exposure of its parents is at risk of inheriting a genetic<BR>defect that may lead to a serious health impairment. From each parent’s exposure, the risk coefficient is<BR>1.5 in 1 000 000 per mSv. If a female crewmember works for ten years and thus is exposed to an<BR>additional 28 mSv, the risk to the child as a result of work related exposure to radiation would be<BR>approximately 28 x 1.5 = 42 in 1 000 000. In the general population about 6% (or 60 000 in 1 000 000) of<BR>the children are born with anomalies that have serious health consequences. In other words: if 23 800<BR>children were born after occupational radiation exposure of their mothers, one of them would have a<BR>congenital genetic defect or eventually develop a genetic disease as a result of his mother’s occupational<BR>exposure to radiation. Based on the normal expectation for newborn children, an additional 1428 children<BR>of the 23 800 would have genetic defects from other causes.<BR>Recommendations<BR>In view of the fact that ionizing radiation is now assumed to play a role in mutagenic or carcinogenic<BR>activity, any procedure involving radiation exposure is considered to entail some degree of risk. At the<BR>same time, however, the radiation-induced risks associated with flying are very small in comparison with<BR>other risks encountered in daily life. Nevertheless such risks are not necessarily acceptable if they can be<BR>easily avoided.<BR>Theoretically, the radiation exposure in air crew can be reduced by optimizing flight routes and crew<BR>scheduling, and by installation of radiation warning devices5. Such devices are particularly effective in<BR>detecting high momentary radiation during solar flares and can thus be used in determining a need for a<BR>lower cruising level. Female crew members should be aware of the possible risk to the foetus and should<BR>be scheduled in such a way as to minimize the exposure during pregnancy.<BR>Much study has been directed to the potential hazards of cosmic radiation (CR) to flight crews and<BR>passengers of supersonic transport (SST) aircraft. Measurements show that in the high latitudes above<BR>50N the maximum total body dosage at 65 000 ft (~20 000 m) – an altitude approximating the cruise<BR>altitude of SST aircraft - is about 0.013 mSv/hour. Because of the reduced journey time the dosage per<BR>unit of distance traveled is about the same as in current subsonic jets where 0.005 mSv/hour is recorded<BR>during flights at about 37 000 ft (11 000 m) and at latitudes around 45ΕN. CR is not therefore expected to<BR>be significantly more hazardous to the flight crews and passengers of SST aircraft, as even if the mileage<BR>flown by crews were to be doubled, the effects of CR would not be regarded as harmful. As previously<BR>stated, Annex 6, Part I, (paragraphs 6.12 and 11.1.17) contains provisions concerning radiation<BR>monitoring in aeroplanes operated above 49 000 ft (15 000 m).<BR>5A radiation warning device (an in-flight radiation dosimeter) was used in the Anglo-French supersonic transport<BR>(SST) aircraft Concorde. This device provided a continuous display of the radiation dose rate.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-15<BR>OZONE<BR>Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3. Stratospheric ozone is formed by the action of ultraviolet light on oxygen<BR>(3 O2 > 2 O3). It is found in varying quantities, the peak values being recorded at about 35 000 m<BR>(115 000 ft) with negligible values at or below 12 200 m (40 000 ft) and much reduced levels above<BR>42 700 m (140 000 ft). The cruise altitude of commercial SST aircraft in northern latitudes, about 18 450<BR>m (60 000 ft), could produce levels of ozone of 2 000-4 000 μg/m3 (1-2 parts per million (ppm)). Ozone is<BR>destroyed by heat, by the catalytic action of some materials including nickel and by organic compounds.<BR>Total destruction occurs at 400°C (750°F). Air in the cabin pressurization system of one type of SST<BR>(when SST public transport operations were undertaken) is heated to 600°C (1 120°F) and this heat is<BR>utilized to destroy ozone. However, it has been reported that when engine power is reduced to initiate<BR>descent, this manoeuvre is accompanied by a fall in the temperature of the cabin pressurization system<BR>which could permit a potential buildup of ozone. During descent, levels of 400-1 000 μg/m3 (0.2-0.5 ppm)<BR>may be experienced for about ten minutes within the pressurized section of the aircraft. The existing data<BR>on the health effects of ozone, considered in conjunction with its high natural background level, lead to<BR>the recommendation of a 1-hour guideline in the range of 150-200 μg/m3 (0.076-0.1 ppm). To lessen the<BR>potential for adverse acute and chronic effects and to provide an additional margin of protection, an 8-<BR>hour guideline for exposure to ozone of 100-120 μg/m3 (0.05-0.06 ppm) is recommended by the World<BR>Health Organization (WHO). Tests, based on the exposure concentrations and time intervals calculated<BR>for SST aircraft, have been conducted by the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and<BR>showed no significant functional impairment. Although the original research concerning ozone and<BR>aviation was undertaken for SST operations, catalytic converters were recommended by the UK House of<BR>Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology to be fitted to subsonic aircraft when they could be<BR>expected to fly through higher concentrations of ozone. Such equipment is now standard on many modern<BR>aircraft.<BR>ACCELERATION EFFECTS<BR>Short-term accelerations<BR>Speed itself in straight and level flight has no effect on the human body; accelerations due to changing<BR>speed and/or direction of flight may, on the other hand, produce very considerable physiological effects<BR>upon the occupants of an aircraft depending on the following factors:<BR>a) magnitude, rate and direction of acceleration;<BR>b) duration;<BR>c) area of application; and<BR>d) protection.<BR>Accelerations of relatively short duration, usually less than a second, are associated with situations<BR>such as flying in turbulence or emergencies such as crash landings. The critical protective factor for<BR>short-term accelerations and rapid decelerations is the availability of restraint systems. The desirability of<BR>shoulder harnesses for flight crew has been documented, taking into account not only crash protection but<BR>also the possibility of on-duty incapacitation of a kind that might interfere with the operation of flight<BR>controls.<BR>The reader is referred to other texts for information relating to long-duration accelerations and other<BR>aspects relevant to in-flight acceleration. Acceleration effects may result in sensory illusions (see below).<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-16<BR>SENSORY ILLUSIONS<BR>The sensory perceptors of the human body associated primarily with maintaining equilibrium and<BR>orientation are the eyes, the inner ears and proprioceptors in muscles, tendons and joint capsules. Their<BR>coordinated action plus the mental integration of all their messages establish a reference which keeps<BR>human beings upright and oriented in relation to the direction of the gravitational force.<BR>The eye is a very reliable orientation mechanism provided adequate reference points are available.<BR>When flying, however, there are disadvantages in trying to interpret visual clues. Objects seen from the<BR>air often look quite different from objects seen from the ground. In the air, there is also a lack of visual<BR>clues that a continuous background provides for recognition of objects and assessment of their size and<BR>distance.<BR>Visual illusions in flight may be caused by any of the following factors:<BR>a) Optical characteristics of windshields<BR>b) Rain on windshields<BR>c) Fog, haze, dust and their effects on depth perception<BR>d) Glide slope<BR>e) Width and length of runway<BR>f) Runway lighting systems<BR>g) Runway slope<BR>h) Terrain slope<BR>i) Landing at night over water or other unlit terrain<BR>j) Auto-kinetic illusion<BR>k) White-out, specifically in high-latitude areas.<BR>The semicircular canals are associated with equilibrium. Angular movement or rotation of the body<BR>moves the fluid of the semicircular canal, thereby causing displacement of the cupulae covering the hair<BR>cells in the ampullae. Impulses are transmitted to the brain and interpreted as motion. Since each one of<BR>the three semicircular canals lies in a different plane, they can report rotation in three planes. The normal<BR>mode of stimulation for these organs is an abrupt, short-duration acceleration followed immediately by a<BR>short deceleration.<BR>It must be remembered that the semicircular canals provide information only about angular<BR>movements of the head. Sensations of relative motion and relative position of body parts are supplied by<BR>perceptors in the skin, joints and muscles. Otoliths provide information about position.<BR>Humans normally depend on the complex integration of the three above-mentioned sensory inputs,<BR>i.e. eyes, inner ear and proprioceptors, for the perception of the body’s relationships to terrestrial<BR>references.<BR>The following are common examples of disorientation in flight:<BR>a) In a horizontal turn, the illusion of continued straight flight may be experienced if the rate of turn<BR>is too low to stimulate the semicircular canals.<BR>b) The subjective impression of angle of bank during instrument flying is false when the angular<BR>change is introduced gradually and below the thresholds of stimulation of the semicircular canals<BR>and proprioceptors.<BR>c) The “graveyard spiral” results when, in a prolonged (> 20 seconds), coordinated banked turn the<BR>cupulae come to rest and the sensation of turning is lost. When leveling the wings, the pilot may<BR>experience a sensation of now turning to the opposite side. To counter-act this sensation of<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-17<BR>turning, the pilot may re-enter the original turn. Because the instruments indicate loss of altitude,<BR>the pilot may pull back on the stick and add power, thus making the turn tighter (increasing the<BR>bank) and inducing the spiral.<BR>d) The somatogravic illusion is caused by the effect of acceleration on the otolith organ. When<BR>deprived of visual input from the surrounding world (for example taking-off in IMC6), a pilot<BR>may interpret accelerative forces (+GX<BR>7) as a nose high attitude of his aircraft, correct this false<BR>sensation by pushing the stick forward and may thus fly his aircraft into the ground.<BR>A further elaboration on disorientation in flight, as well as vertigo, is contained in Part III,<BR>Chapters 10 and 12.<BR>COMMUNICATIONS<BR>The importance of the communication system in present-day civil aviation operations cannot be<BR>overemphasized. Speech intelligibility and communication are vital elements in the safety of civil<BR>aviation. In order to start the engine, taxi the aircraft, line up for take-off, get clearance for take- off, start<BR>climbing procedures, reach cruising level, or to initiate the sequence of events that will lead to the safe<BR>approach and landing of the aircraft at the destination, a licence holder must be able to transmit and<BR>receive verbal instructions to and from the air traffic control system as well as from the crew complement.<BR>In this particular respect, account should be taken not only of the physiological speech intelligibility in<BR>noisy surroundings, but also of the aspect of hearing under operational conditions, when the attention is<BR>required to encompass a multiplicity of stimuli which are of paramount importance.<BR>Interference with intelligibility and speech communication is a potentially serious problem which can<BR>be brought about by higher levels of noise at certain frequencies. This problem can prevent crew members<BR>from communicating with each other, whether directly or by means of an intercommunication system<BR>(“intercom”), and can also interfere with voice communication between ground and aircraft. When sound<BR>pressure levels within cockpits and communication systems rise, the voice must be raised in order to<BR>communicate against the noisy background, and if the interference becomes excessive, speech<BR>intelligibility becomes adversely affected or lost altogether. This is auditory masking or “drowning out”<BR>by noise; it lasts only whilst the noise is present. It represents the inability of the auditory system to<BR>separate the different tonal components, and tends to be worse when the conflicting frequencies are<BR>similar.<BR>Apart from controlling noise sources, efforts must also be made to limit the entry of noise into the<BR>communication system. The position can be further improved by selecting the best possible characteristics<BR>for a communication system and by the use of special vocabularies (as standard ICAO phraseology for<BR>Aeronautical Telecommunications, described in detail in Annex 10, Volume 2, Chapter 5). Apart from<BR>engine and aerodynamic sources, noise can be generated by the cabin air conditioning system, by<BR>electronic equipment within the cockpit, by certain types of oxygen regulators, and by the individual’s<BR>breathing into a “live” microphone. The degree of interference will depend upon the relative frequencies<BR>and strengths of the voice or tone signal and the ambient noise level.<BR>6 IMC: Instrument Meteorological Conditions, i.e. weather with reduced visibility where only flying in accordance<BR>with the Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) is allowed.<BR>7 +Gx: Acceleration (G) is a change in velocity either in direction or in magnitude. It is described in three axes in<BR>relation to the human body, x, y and z. Each axis is described as positive (+) or negative (–). +Gx is a forward<BR>acceleration with a transverse anterior-posterior (chest to back) resultant force.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-18<BR>To guide the medical examiner in the proper assessment of applicants for medical certification,<BR>speech tests in neutral noise as well as aviation noise have been described elsewhere in this manual (see<BR>Part III, Chapter 11).<BR>FLIGHT CREW WORKLOAD AND<BR>ITS EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE<BR>Fatigue<BR>Many working and environmental conditions lead to fatigue, affecting people in a multiplicity of ways.<BR>Individual responses to fatigue are significantly different.<BR>Fatigue may be transient and/or cumulative. Transient fatigue is normally experienced by a healthy<BR>individual following a period of work, exertion or excitement, and it is normally alleviated by a single<BR>period of sleep. Cumulative fatigue may occur after delayed or incomplete recovery or as the after-effect<BR>of more than normal amounts of work, exertion or excitement without sufficient recuperation.<BR>Workload fatigue, as it affects flight crews, may have a significant effect in reducing performance.<BR>Some of the causes contributing to workload fatigue are the cockpit layout, the hours of work and other<BR>specific factors as follows: beginning and end of last flight, duration of rest time between present and last<BR>flight, duration of sleep during this rest period, the time of commencement of pre-flight briefing,<BR>problems arising during briefing, delays preceding departure, timing of flights, meteorological conditions,<BR>quality and quantity of radio communication, visibility during descent, glare and protection from sun,<BR>turbulence, and technical and personal problems. One Contracting State found that what flight crew<BR>described as “hassle”, meaning anything that caused a non-routine situation, was fatiguing.<BR>Continuous technological developments are being pursued; seating, instrumentation, lighting, cockpit<BR>design, climatic conditions in the cabin and radio communications equipment are being further improved.<BR>An important contributing factor to fatigue in aviation operations is the disruption of circadian<BR>rhythms. Time zone displacements without sufficient adjustment time might seriously impair the<BR>performance of personnel engaged in aviation duties. Many organic functions are periodic - their rhythm<BR>determined by both internal and external phenomena - for instance sleep-wake cycles, respiration, body<BR>temperature, endocrine functions and physical and psychological performance. All these functions show a<BR>24-hour cyclic pattern. Transmeridian flights crossing time zones affect the specific patterns and<BR>periodicity for travellers.<BR>One of the most common causes of fatigue in aviation has to do with the scheduling of flight crews.<BR>Mental and physical conditions might influence the appearance and severity of fatigue, the end result<BR>being a lowered efficiency and impaired performance.<BR>In this particular connection, care should be taken by appropriate authorities to ensure that good<BR>quality rest facilities are provided for air crew at stations away from their bases. This is an important<BR>measure to diminish the effects of fatigue.<BR>Several self-imposed stresses can be mentioned as contributory causes leading to fatigue: of<BR>paramount importance in this respect are drugs, alcohol, tobacco, poor sleep hygiene, inadequate diet, and<BR>the general state of health of the licence holder.<BR>ICAO Preliminary Unedited Version — October 2008 II-1-19<BR>Consideration should be given not only to the routine operational conditions, but also to those<BR>situations when there is an increased demand for mental and physical ability to cope with emergency<BR>situations and periods of peak workloads (e.g. missed approach, aborted take-off and, for ATC officers,<BR>high density towers, heavy traffic).<BR>Particular reference is made in the above considerations to results of studies showing that a fatigued<BR>pilot can concentrate effectively enough on a principal task but has reduced ability to cope with extra<BR>stimuli or secondary tasks which may arise.<BR>To ensure that fatigue of licence holders does not endanger the safety of a flight, regulatory<BR>documents specify limitations of flight time and flight duty periods (see further Part I, Chapter 1).<BR>However, it is true to say that prevention of fatigue is an issue that requires further work by many<BR>regulatory authorities.<BR>FURTHER READING<BR>DeHart, R.L., Davis, J.R. Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine, 3rd edition. Lippencott, Williams and<BR>Wilkins,Philadelphia, 2002<BR>Rainford, D.J., Gradwell, D.P. eds. Ernsting’s Aviation Medicine. Hodder Arnold, London, 2006.<BR>Roesler S et al. Calculation of radiation fields in the atmosphere and comparison to experimental data.<BR>Radiat Res; 149: 87-97. 1998.<BR>Schraube H et al. Experimental verification and calculation of route doses. Radiat Prot Dosim; 86: 309-<BR>15. 1999.<BR>UK House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Air Travel and Health:<BR>http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/121/12101.htm<BR>November 2000<BR>————————
页:
[1]