Airbus Automatic wing box assembly developments
<P>Automatic wing box assembly developments</P><P>**** Hidden Message *****</P> Automatic wing box<BR>assembly<BR>developments<BR>Brian Rooks<BR>The continuing growth in air travel has<BR>spawned major expansions in commercial<BR>airliner manufacture, not least by Airbus, the<BR>European partnership in which BAE Systems<BR>has a 20 percent shareholding and European<BR>Aeronautic Defence and Space Company<BR>(EADS) 80 percent. Airbus UK, which is<BR>responsible for the wings of all Airbus models,<BR>has made major investments to increase<BR>production and satisfy market demand as well<BR>as reduce costs and further improve quality. A<BR>significant proportion of this spend has been<BR>aimed at improving wing assembly by<BR>reducing reliance on manual methods and<BR>dedicated fixturing. Included in this agenda is<BR>research to develop and prove-out methods<BR>for automating wing box assembly, and the<BR>second phase of the Automated Wing Box<BR>Assembly (AWBA) project has recently been<BR>completed at Airbus UK's Broughton plant<BR>with part funding under the UK government's<BR>Civil Aviation Research and Demonstration<BR>(CARAD) programme.<BR>Airbus UK, which employs over 9,500 ±<BR>equally split between Filton in Bristol and<BR>Broughton in North Wales ± is the UK's<BR>national entity of the new Airbus Integrated<BR>Company (AIC), which began operation on 1<BR>January 2001. AIC, which incorporates the<BR>``old'' Airbus Industrie and all the major<BR>Airbus activities of BAE Systems and EADS,<BR>generated a turnover of $17.2 billion in 2000.<BR>Its ``fleet'' of 14 aircraft range in size from the<BR>new, single-aisle, 100-seater A318 to the<BR>recently launched, 550-seater, ``doubledecker''<BR>A380 that now has firm<BR>commitments from six airlines.<BR>The UK headquarters of Airbus UK at<BR>Filton is also home to the main UK design<BR>and engineering facilities, while the principal<BR>manufacturing plant is at Broughton. The<BR>latter was established in 1938 by Armstrong<BR>Whitworth, and has a proud history in British<BR>aircraft manufacture. It built over half the<BR>Lancaster bombers that went into the second<BR>world war service and later the Comet jetliner.<BR>Its association with Airbus began in 1971<BR>(then Hawker Siddeley Aviation), as subcontractor<BR>for the wings of the first Airbus,<BR>the A300. Every wing of the 2544 aircraft so<BR>far delivered by Airbus was built at<BR>Broughton, as will the 1626, on order at the<BR>end of 2000. These are delivered to the final<BR>assembly lines at Airbus Deutschland<BR>(Bremen and Hamburg) and Airbus France<BR>(Toulouse).<BR>The author<BR>Brian Rooks is an Associate Editor of this journal.<BR>Keywords<BR>Robots, Aircraft industry, Assembly<BR>Abstract<BR>A demonstrator cell has been developed at Airbus UK for<BR>building large aircraft wing box assemblies by a<BR>partnership of six companies partly funded under the UK<BR>government's civil aviation research and demonstration<BR>(CARAD) programme. The cell has shown the feasibility of<BR>assembling the three principle components of a wing box<BR>automatically using robotic technology. It includes<BR>handling 6m high ribs and placing them between the<BR>leading and trailing edge spars and skin wrapping and<BR>fastening. Two robot systems were developed for external<BR>and internal work, employing a combination of standard<BR>robot arms and specials fitted with vision sensing and<BR>drilling and fastening tooling. Software tools were used to<BR>plan, simulate and programme the cell and also to<BR>develop a full scaled-up version of the cell for studying<BR>the potential of the systems employed for future<BR>applications in production.<BR>Electronic access<BR>The research register for this journal is available at<BR>http://www.mcbup.com/research_registers<BR>The current issue and full text archive of this journal is<BR>available at<BR>http://www.emerald-library.com/ft<BR>Feature<BR>297<BR>Industrial Robot: An International Journal<BR>Volume 28 . Number 4 . 2001 . pp. 297±301<BR># MCB University Press . ISSN 0143-991X<BR>The wing of a modern aircraft is made up of<BR>the main central wing box plus the leading<BR>and trailing edges (Figure 1). The completed<BR>wing box of an Airbus is a massive structure,<BR>measuring up to 32m long 6 7.5m wide and<BR>1.6m deep for the very long range A340-500/<BR>600 (Plate 1), which is claimed to have the<BR>world's largest aircraft wings ± the wing box of<BR>the A380 with a 36m span will be even larger.<BR>A wing box is made up of three major<BR>components; the ribs (up to 41), the<BR>longitudinal spars (between four and seven)<BR>and the skin panels (up to four on the top and<BR>four on the bottom), which are strengthened<BR>with rows of stringers attached by thousands<BR>of rivets and bolts.<BR>Automatic riveting<BR>Over £400 million has been invested in wing<BR>box production at Broughton over the past<BR>four years. This includes £21 million on an<BR>Ingersoll spar milling machine, the only one<BR>of its type in the world, £6.6 million on a<BR>41m long 6 3.2m wide skin mill for<BR>machining A340-500/600 panels, and £21<BR>million on two low voltage electromagnetic<BR>riveting machines (LVER), also for the A340<BR>range. The latter automatically drills the holes<BR>and inserts the fasteners to attach stringers to<BR>the skin panels in a continuous operation ±<BR>approximately 65,500 rivets and 32,000 bolts<BR>are used in assembling one A340-500/600<BR>wing skin.<BR>The wing box is built up in the assembly jigs<BR>(Plate 2) where the ribs and spars are loaded<BR>in a set sequence. The skin assemblies are<BR>then progressively located and drilled before<BR>being bolted to the supporting ribs and spars.<BR>Currently, this is a labour-intensive process<BR>using manual drilling and fastening methods<BR>with dedicated jigs and fixtures. Ideally, much<BR>of this process should be carried out<BR>automatically, but presents many difficulties,<BR>not least the sheer physical size of the<BR>components involved and the accuracies of<BR>alignment needed. It was to study potential<BR>solutions to these and other problems that<BR>Airbus UK initiated the AWBA research<BR>project.<BR>AWBA has been carried out in two phases,<BR>each of two years' duration: the £2 million<BR>AWBA 1 completed in 1997; and the recently<BR>concluded AWBA 11, which had a £5 million<BR>Figure 1 Construction of a typical wing build<BR>Plate 1 The very long range Airbus A340/600 that has the world's largest<BR>wings, which are built at Airbus UK's Broughton plant<BR>Plate 2 Current method of building a wing box of an A340/600 in an<BR>assembly jig<BR>298<BR>Automatic wing box assembly developments<BR>Brian Rooks<BR>Industrial Robot: An International Journal<BR>Volume 28 . Number 4 . 2001 . 297±301<BR>budget. Both phases were 50 percent funded<BR>by the DTI under the CARAD programme.<BR>The first phase was to identify and acquire<BR>specific technologies for automated assembly<BR>of large wings while the prime objective of<BR>AWBA 11 was to demonstrate flexible<BR>manufacture within a single automated<BR>assembly cell at the same time as securing<BR>further enabling technologies and identifying<BR>technology gaps.<BR>Both phases involved several partners. In<BR>phase two, these were AEA Technology<BR>(robotic fastening process control),<BR>automated handling and positioning systems<BR>(AMTRI), BAE Systems Advanced<BR>Technology Centre (ATC) ± Sowerby (vision<BR>and sensor automated positioning systems),<BR>Leica (measuring systems), RTS Advanced<BR>Robotics (robotic technologies) and<BR>Tecnomatix (software and simulation) as well<BR>Airbus UK who project managed the<BR>programme and provided the facilities and<BR>materials.<BR>AWBA demonstrator<BR>Set up in a converted hangar alongside the<BR>main Broughton wing production facility, the<BR>8.5m high AWBA 11 cell demonstrator (Plate<BR>3) is able to build a four-rib wing box section<BR>for Airbus' largest aircraft, the A380, with the<BR>minimum of manual intervention. It<BR>undertakes all the elements needed in the<BR>assembly from the precise handling and<BR>positioning of the 6m high ribs to drilling and<BR>fastening the skins to the ribs. However, it is<BR>not a production cell and cannot build a<BR>complete full-length wing box.<BR>The cell is of a gantry construction that<BR>allows the wing box to be assembled with the<BR>rib vertical, the concept for which was<BR>developed by AMTRI. The upper raft fixed<BR>below the gantry cross member holds the<BR>tooling for the leading edge spar, while tooling<BR>to locate the trailing edge spar is mounted on<BR>the lower raft close to floor level. With the two<BR>spars in position, the first operation is to place<BR>the ribs between the two spars, for which<BR>AMTRI developed the rib carrier robot.<BR>The two spars have a series of pockets to<BR>accept the ribs and the robot has to<BR>manipulate a rib into these two sets of<BR>pockets. To accomplish this, the rail mounted<BR>rib carrier robot has a pivoting axis in addition<BR>to three linear XYZ axes. The sequence is to<BR>take a rib from the store, tilt it at<BR>approximately 458 to the vertical using the<BR>pivot axis, move it into position so that the<BR>bottom edge of the rib locates into the lower<BR>(trailing edge) spar and then bring the rib to<BR>the vertical so that the upper edge locates into<BR>the upper (leading edge) spar. The rib is then<BR>clamped hydraulically.<BR>Locating the rib into the spars requires the<BR>robot to position to an accuracy of 0.5mm,<BR>which for such a large structure is precise.<BR>This is accomplished with the aid of the Leica<BR>laser tracker system, which measures the<BR>position, in this case, of the upper and lower<BR>spar tooling and communicates any off-sets to<BR>the robot. The Leica system is used in<BR>industry, particularly in aerospace and<BR>automotive industries, for large-scale, 3D<BR>metrology, and is capable of measuring to<BR>accuracies of 0.05mm over distances of up<BR>to 35m. The unit's motorised head directs the<BR>laser beam over a 3D volume up to 70m<BR>diameter to locate and measure the 3D coordinates<BR>of target reflectors placed at the<BR>measurement positions. In the case of the<BR>AWBA demonstrator, the transmitting unit is<BR>located on one of the gantry legs but it is also<BR>portable.<BR>Skin wrapping<BR>After fixing a set of ribs in position, the next<BR>operation is skin wrapping, which was also the<BR>responsibility of AMTRI. Skins are taken<BR>from the store and simultaneously placed<BR>against pads on both sides of the ribs either<BR>Plate 3 The gantry-style AWBA 11 demonstrator set up in a hangar<BR>alongside Airbus UK's wing manufacturing facility at Broughton<BR>299<BR>Automatic wing box assembly developments<BR>Brian Rooks<BR>Industrial Robot: An International Journal<BR>Volume 28 . Number 4 . 2001 . 297±301<BR>two or four at a time and then clamped by a<BR>series of programmable pneumatic clamps.<BR>Working from both sides balances the load<BR>when the clamps are applied and avoids<BR>having to construct a highly stiff supporting<BR>structure. The skin sets cover the trailing<BR>(lower) and leading (upper) part of the wing<BR>box, leaving the centre section open to allow<BR>access for internal fastening, and in<BR>production for manual assembly and<BR>inspection.<BR>Fastening of the skins to the ribs in the<BR>demonstrator involves both external (to the<BR>wing box) and internal operations, for which<BR>two separate robot systems were developed.<BR>The external work of drilling the hole and<BR>inserting the fastener is done with a standard<BR>Kuka K350 six-axis robot rail mounted<BR>(seventh axis) and equipped with a<BR>sophisticated end-effector developed by BAE<BR>Systems ATC. The end-effector incorporates<BR>a vision sensor, high-speed spindle drilling<BR>head and stud inserter (Plate 4).<BR>Before skin wrapping takes place, the robot<BR>uses the vision sensor, which consists of two<BR>cameras and four laser ranger finders, to<BR>locate the 3D position of each pad on the rib.<BR>This is memorised so that after the skin has<BR>been placed the Kuka robot knows exactly<BR>where to drill through the skin and the pad in<BR>one operation. Each hole four per pad is<BR>drilled and deburred and then a stud inserted<BR>in a cycle time of 15 seconds per hole. During<BR>these operations the robot's six axes are<BR>locked in position; in effect the robot is merely<BR>an ``end-effector positioner''. Responsibility<BR>for the drilling technology for these operations<BR>rested with AEA technology. It undertook<BR>tests to establish the optimum drilling<BR>parameters and cutting conditions to ensure<BR>maximum hole quality and minimum burr<BR>size. It also carried out modal analysis and<BR>vibration trials on the robot to study the effect<BR>of these factors on hole accuracy when drilling<BR>automatically.<BR>Swaging of the fastening collar to the stud<BR>inserted during the latter operation is done by<BR>the internal robot, which was developed by<BR>RTS Advanced Robotics (formerly UK<BR>Robotics). Because of the restricted opening<BR>into the wing box ± approximately 1 6 1.5m<BR>± and the 5.5m reach to access the back of the<BR>fastener through the far side skin, RTS could<BR>not apply a standard, off-the-shelf robot and<BR>had to develop a ``special''.<BR>Deployment robot<BR>The finished device is a 10 degrees-of-freedom<BR>robot with a reach of 6.5m. It is made up of the<BR>deployment robot, a telescopic boom that<BR>swivels about a horizontal axis and is mounted<BR>on a linear track to allow access to the full<BR>length of the wing box, and a standard Fanuc<BR>six-axis parallel leg robot. The latter is fitted to<BR>the end of the boom arm and basically acts as<BR>its end effector. The ultimate tooling<BR>consisting of the swaging unit with collar feed<BR>and stereoscopic vision sensor (developed by<BR>BAE Systems ATC) is mounted on the end of<BR>the legged robot. The sensor guides the robot<BR>to find the stud end so that the tooling may<BR>dock with the stud. The collar then slides over<BR>the stud and is pulled tight before it is swaged<BR>onto the stud.<BR>The internal robot is designed to behave<BR>like any other industrial robot, with the<BR>exception that positioning for set-up and<BR>programming is done by a teleoperator-type<BR>strategy. This is to avoid placing an operator<BR>or programmer in a potentially unsafe<BR>position within the confines of a wing box and<BR>also to overcome the problem of a large and<BR>heavy robot arm in a remote position. Using<BR>the teleoperator system, the end effector is<BR>positioned remotely using television cameras<BR>that form part of the tooling, to observe<BR>movement. As a further safety measure, the<BR>Plate 4 External robot consisting of Kuka industrial robot equipped with<BR>special tooling for locating rib pads, drilling and stud insertion<BR>300<BR>Automatic wing box assembly developments<BR>Brian Rooks<BR>Industrial Robot: An International Journal<BR>Volume 28 . Number 4 . 2001 . 297±301<BR>robot arm is fitted with capacitance sensors<BR>to detect the onset of a collision, whether<BR>during teleoperational set-up or automatic<BR>operation.<BR>Throughout the second phase of the AWBA<BR>project, extensive use has been made of<BR>software planning and simulation tools, for<BR>which Tecnomatix provided the solutions<BR>with its eMPower software products. RTS<BR>Advanced Robotics used these robotic<BR>simulation and off-line programming tools<BR>routinely for design of the internal robot, and<BR>BAE Systems ATC used them in the design of<BR>the external drilling and fastening robot. The<BR>whole cell was simulated in 3D to help the<BR>partners understand the interactions of the<BR>various sub-systems and to provide a visual<BR>tool for developing the optimum sequence of<BR>operations. It was also useful in supporting<BR>line-of-light studies during development of<BR>the laser tracking measurement system.<BR>At the later stages of the project a final<BR>model of the whole cell was produced that<BR>enabled the cell's entire build process to be<BR>viewed in 15 minutes, which in ``real life''<BR>would have taken one-and-a-half days.<BR>Subsequently, the simulation model was<BR>scaled-up to the assembly of a full production<BR>wing box, allowing its physical feasibility to be<BR>assessed, the operational sequences and cycle<BR>times to be established and the likely cost of a<BR>full-scale production facility to be estimated.<BR>Airbus UK states that the test work carried<BR>out in the cell has met all expectations and has<BR>already proved the concept of automatic wing<BR>skin panel wrapping. It is capable of handling<BR>and positioning a 6m high wing rib quickly<BR>and safely. It will continue to use the cell to<BR>assess the ``scale-up'' implications as well as<BR>the impact of the automatic methods on<BR>aerodynamics and systems and on health and<BR>safety. However, no decision has been made<BR>on which technologies used in the<BR>demonstrator will be implemented into fullscale<BR>production, nor have any time scales<BR>been laid down.<BR>301<BR>Automatic wing box assembly developments<BR>Brian Rooks<BR>Industrial Robot: An International Journal<BR>Volume 28 . Number 4 . 2001 . 297±301 看看的 谢谢 let me c c 好资料,学习学习。 看看好用不。。。
回复 1# 航空 的帖子
/ A321。。。。。。。。。。 好好学习天天上上回复 1# 航空 的帖子
LGR起落架部件项目培训大纲 :victory: :victory:
页:
[1]