Navigation Evolution Update
**** Hidden Message ***** Federal Aviation<BR>Administration Navigation<BR>Evolution Update<BR>Daniel Salvano<BR>Director, Navigation Services<BR>Briefing to the Regional Airline Association (RAA)<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Federal Aviation 2<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Airport Landing,<BR>Weather, Lighting<BR>Radar<BR>Radar<BR>Air/Ground<BR>Communications<BR>NAVAIDs<BR>Airport<BR>Traffic<BR>Control<BR>Tower<BR>(ATCT)<BR>Systems<BR>Today’s ground based, humancentered<BR>Air Transportation System<BR>has reached its technological and capacity<BR>limits<BR>Federal Aviation 3<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Performance-Based Navigation<BR>• Complete Transition By 2025<BR>• Consistent With ICAO Global Vision<BR>• Operational Capability Based On GPS And Augmentations<BR>• Enhance Safety, Capacity, Efficiency<BR>• Reduce Cost For Legacy Navigation Systems<BR>Streamlined<BR>Departures<BR>Vector-Free<BR>Arrivals All-Weather<BR>Approaches<BR>Efficient, Flexible Routing<BR>Federal Aviation 4<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Operational benefits hierarchy<BR>DME, VOR, ILS, WAAS, GPS, MALSR<BR>Operational<BR>Benefit<BR>Navigation<BR>Services<BR>Navigation<BR>Capability<BR>Navigation<BR>Systems<BR>IMC Operations, Gate Management<BR>Departure, Enroute, Approach, Surface<BR>Category I/II/III, RNAV SIDS, RNAV STARS,<BR>Q Routes<BR>Federal Aviation 5<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>The Why<BR>Acquisition, maintenance and life cycle costs<BR>$0<BR>$500<BR>$1,000<BR>$1,500<BR>$2,000<BR>$2,500<BR>$3,000<BR>VOR<BR>DME<BR>ILS<BR>new ILS<BR>NDB<BR>Approach Lights<BR>Navaid type<BR>Thousand dollars/navaid<BR>acquistion costs<BR>yearly maintenance<BR>costs<BR>20 year life cycle costs<BR>Federal Aviation 6<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>FAA FY05 Acquisition Costs<BR>ILS<BR>WAAS 25.8%<BR>53.0%<BR>Approach<BR>Lighting<BR>19.3%<BR>VORTAC<BR>1.2%<BR>DME<BR>0.6%<BR>Federal Aviation 7<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>FAA FY05 O&M Costs<BR>Does not include land lease nor telecommunications costs<BR>Approach Lighting<BR>16%<BR>ILS<BR>46%<BR>DME<BR>9%<BR>NDB<BR>4%<BR>VOR<BR>16%<BR>WAAS<BR>9%<BR>Federal Aviation 8<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Cat I ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr)<BR>Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include<BR>airport infrastructure costs<BR>Total $ 2,138,803 $ 4,438,840 $ 6,577,643<BR>DME $ 95,042 $ 640,640 $ 735,682<BR>MALSR $ 971,471 $ 724,760 $ 1,696,231<BR>RVR $ 413,374 $ 1,277,520 $ 1,690,894<BR>ILS $ 658,916 $ 1,795,920 $ 2,454,836<BR>F&E Ops Total<BR>F&E Costs<BR>ILS<BR>31%<BR>RVR<BR>19%<BR>MALSR<BR>46%<BR>DME<BR>4%<BR>20 Year Ops Costs<BR>ILS<BR>41%<BR>RVR<BR>29%<BR>MALSR<BR>16%<BR>DME<BR>14%<BR>Federal Aviation 9<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Cat II ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr)<BR>Total $ 4,180,328 $ 5,514,620 $ 9,694,948<BR>DME $ 95,042 $ 640,640 $ 735,682<BR>ALSF-2 $ 2,902,792 $ 2,232,380 $ 5,135,172<BR>RVR $ 466,599 $ 1,087,760 $ 1,554,359<BR>ILS $ 715,895 $ 1,553,840 $ 2,269,735<BR>F&E Ops Total<BR>Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include<BR>airport infrastructure costs<BR>F&E Costs<BR>ILS<BR>17%<BR>RVR<BR>11%<BR>ALSF-2<BR>70%<BR>DME<BR>2%<BR>20 Year Ops Costs<BR>ILS<BR>28%<BR>RVR<BR>20%<BR>ALSF-2<BR>40%<BR>DME<BR>12%<BR>Federal Aviation 10<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Cat III ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr)<BR>Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include<BR>airport infrastructure costs<BR>Total $ 4,233,554 $ 6,244,200 $ 10,477,754<BR>DME $ 95,042 $ 640,640 $ 735,682<BR>ALSF-2 $ 2,902,792 $ 2,540,920 $ 5,443,712<BR>RVR $ 519,825 $ 1,158,980 $ 1,678,805<BR>ILS $ 715,895 $ 1,903,660 $ 2,619,555<BR>F&E Ops Total<BR>F&E Costs<BR>ILS<BR>17%<BR>RVR<BR>12%<BR>ALSF-2<BR>69%<BR>DME<BR>2%<BR>20 Year Ops Costs<BR>ILS<BR>30%<BR>RVR<BR>19%<BR>ALSF-2<BR>41%<BR>DME<BR>10%<BR>Federal Aviation 11<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Service Affordability<BR>• F&E and operations budget shortfalls<BR>• 15,000 facilities/$389M annual sustainment<BR>cost* -- fluctuates and grows yearly<BR>• Annual earmarks exceed 60% of total GBNA<BR>budget<BR>– Focused on hardware procurement<BR>• No clear service provision relationship in<BR>acquisition<BR>* Source: FY05 Actual Ops<BR>Federal Aviation 12<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>VOR Land Lease Cost<BR>• Average cost = $500/acre<BR>• Costs range from $120K/acre to $0/acre<BR>• FY07 DME Evaluation will investigate<BR>movement of FAA facilities to Government<BR>owned land and existing FAA nonnavigation<BR>sites<BR>Federal Aviation 13<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>This is not a paper study<BR>• 2005 Facilities Divested<BR>– 177 total divested<BR>• ~$2.9M cost avoidance<BR>• 2006 Facilities Divested<BR>– 227 total divested (NDB, VOR, etc)<BR>• ~$1.5M cost avoidance<BR>• 2007<BR>– Goal is to divest a minimum of 100 navaids<BR>Federal Aviation 14<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Instrument Approach Update<BR>• LPV<BR>– Published 351 LPVs in FY06<BR>• Total LPVs to date – 615<BR>– Preliminary plans to publish over 450 LPVs in FY07<BR>• Over 350 of which will be at non-ILS runway ends<BR>• NDB<BR>– Total reduction to date of 401 in FY05<BR>• FY07 …. similar actions<BR>• Source – AVN<BR>Federal Aviation 15<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>The Next Generation Air Transportation System<BR>(NextGen) Plan Defines A System That Can Meet<BR>Demands For The 21st Century<BR>Trajectory-Based Operations<BR>Performance-Based<BR>Operations and Services<BR>Precision Navigation<BR>Weather Integration<BR>Network-Centric<BR>Information Sharing<BR>Surveillance Services<BR>Equivalent Visual Operations<BR>Super Density Operations<BR>Layered, Adaptive Security<BR>Capabilities<BR>Federal Aviation 16<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>RNP/Roadmap<BR>• The RNAV/RNP<BR>roadmap v 2 was<BR>published this year<BR>• We are developing a<BR>navigation roadmap<BR>that enables<BR>implementation of<BR>RNAV, RNP and<BR>NextGen<BR>Federal Aviation 17<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Navigation Evolution Roadmap<BR>• Supports the RNAV/RNP Roadmap<BR>• Informal Outreach since March 2005<BR>– Included RAA, ATA, AOPA, and AVS SME, international …<BR>• Formal Outreach<BR>– PARC<BR>– DOD - PBFA<BR>– AOPA<BR>– ATA<BR>– RTCA<BR>• ATMAC Requirements and Planning Working Group<BR>• Public Outreach Meeting July 25-26, 2006<BR>• Roadmap released to Industry via PARC on Nov. 1st, 2006<BR>• Report target date for signature Dec 2006<BR>Federal Aviation 18<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Financial Plan<BR>2 year window<BR>Business<BR>Plan<BR>3-5 year<BR>window<BR>Navigation<BR>Evolution<BR>Roadmap<BR>Roadmap Layout<BR>2007-2025<BR>Federal Aviation 19<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Navigation Roadmap Assumptions<BR>• The FAA requires an aggressive transition to performance-based service<BR>– Decisions need to be made with the aviation community.<BR>• define standard services provided by FAA<BR>• define public use special services<BR>• define non-public services provided by the airport operator/user<BR>• FAA will provide NAS-wide performance-based service<BR>– RNAV/RNP (primarily GNSS)<BR>– LPV at all runway ends<BR>– LPV-200 where needed<BR>– Determination if CAT II minima is the appropriate requirement at specific airports<BR>– CAT III service requirements become responsibility of the airport operator/user<BR>• A Policy will exist for mitigating a loss of GNSS<BR>– Mitigation strategy supports RNAV/RNP<BR>– FAA will provide Cat I ILS as backup at OEP airports (~55 airports)<BR>• Fleet Equipage<BR>– Today = Mixed Fleet – GNSS, D/D and D/D/I<BR>– Future = Fleet equipped with GNSS<BR>• Decision/specification of “operational” mitigation<BR>• GPS modernization and sustainment is crucial<BR>CAT II/III CAT I or Equivalent<BR>NPA En Route &<BR>Terminal<BR>GNSS<BR>WAAS<BR>ABAS<BR>Galileo GPS (L5)<BR>Galileo GPS (L5) GPS III<BR>GPS III<BR>VOR<BR>GNSS<BR>1a<BR>1 1a<BR>4a<BR>4a<BR>4a<BR>GBAS/GLS<BR>SBAS/LPV<BR>2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025<BR>VOR 1<BR>DME 2<BR>GBAS/GLS<BR>ILS 4<BR>ILS 3a<BR>3a<BR>PRECISION APPROACH (PA)<BR>3<BR>4<BR>4<BR>3<BR>3 3b<BR>Navigation Roadmap<BR>Federal Aviation 21<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Navigation Roadmap Decisions<BR>• 2007 - VOR decision for drawdown based on GNSS<BR>– 2015 - VOR decision on remaining drawdown<BR>• 2007 - Develop rightsizing DME Requirements, e.g., service volume,<BR>architecture, pathway<BR>• 2008 - Decision on next generation Cat I landing system<BR>– 2012 - Begin ILS Cat I drawdown - limited backup at OEP<BR>airports<BR>– 202X - Decision on CAT I ILS drawdown<BR>• 2008 - Decision on next generation Cat II/III service mandate, pending<BR>feasibility & schedule of potential ABAS/GBAS solutions and risk<BR>mitigation strategies<BR>– 2012 Determination if CAT II minima is the appropriate requirement at specific<BR>airports<BR>1<BR>1a<BR>2<BR>3<BR>4<BR>3a<BR>4a<BR>3b<BR>Federal Aviation 22<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Collaboration is Key<BR>• Direct Interface with Users<BR>– Why? - Consensus Building, Collaboration, Restoring Trust<BR>• Direct Interface with JPDO, NSSO, PBFA, …<BR>– Steering toward the NGATS Vision together<BR>• Direct Input to Enterprise Architecture<BR>– Through Nav Chief, Systems Engineer<BR>– Ensure one FAA message conveyed to industry – building trust<BR>• Direct Interaction across FAA lines of business<BR>– It’s more than ATO<BR>– AVS owns the rules and regulations<BR>• It’s about communication - leading the collaborative evolution<BR>to a global, performance based system<BR>Federal Aviation 23<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Navigation Evolution Customer<BR>Council (NECC)<BR>• Council made up of Government and Industry<BR>members<BR>• Created by Director of Navigation Services to:<BR>– Implement the Nav Evolution Roadmap<BR>– Adjudication Navigation Evolution Roadmap Comments<BR>– Develop updates for future versions of the Roadmap<BR>• Assure viability of the implementation process<BR>– Liaison between policy-makers and the aviation community<BR>• Guarantee concerns are heard and addressed<BR>Federal Aviation 24<BR>Administration<BR>RAA<BR>November 15, 2006<BR>Conclusion<BR>• Importance of Navigation Services role in setting<BR>the stage for performance-based system<BR>– NAV is setting the stage for communications and surveillance<BR>– Work collaboratively to define and achieve NextGen<BR>• Navigation Services is changing<BR>• Collaboration with user community paramount to a<BR>successful transition<BR>• Maximize service delivery, reduce costs and<BR>improve or maintain safety<BR>• Collaboration is paramount很好!正对此感兴趣 !
很好!正对此感兴趣 ! bhfgdfgdffdgsdgdfgdf Good!Thanks!
页:
[1]