Airbus A380 数据
**** Hidden Message ***** 1Airbus A380
Karen Berger
Eric Harris
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4183707.stm
March 2, 2006
References:
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=29
http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/a380/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380
Jane's All the worlds Aircraft
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/a380/index.shtml
http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Collins.pdf
http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Weisman.pdf
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=27
2
Geometry
261’ 10”
239’ 6”
79’ 1”
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=29
Full Weight 1,234,600 lb
Wetted Area 45460 ft2
Empty Weight 610,700 lb
sweep 33 deg 30'
AR 7.5
Wing Area 9100 ft2
Geometry and basic information was from
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=29 as well as from Jane’s All the
World’s Aircraft. The wetted area calculation was made using estimates from
aircraft diagrams in Jane’s.
Component Title Swet (Ft2) Refl(ft) Tc Icode Frm Fctr Ftrans
Fuselage 14640.0000 253.100 0.104 1 1.0580 0.0000
Wing 20896.8008 65.500 0.122 0 1.2307 0.0000
Vertical Tail 3192.2000 43.600 0.083 0 1.1510 0.0000
Engine 2955.0000 19.400 0.625 1 3.4501 0.0000
Horizontal Tail 3776.0000 29.100 0.124 0 1.2344 0.0000
3
Other Information
Static Margin 14.15 ft = 5.9% chord
Estimated cg 101.05 ft = 42.2% chord
Cruise CL 0.901
Minimum CD 0.0358
Neutral Point 115.2 ft = 48.1% chord
L/Dmax 20.6
CDo 0.0121
Span “e” 0.8689
Penalties for scaled down span:
•scaled off the wing area and wing span, the A380 should have a span of
almost 460 ft
•Actual wing span is almost 262 ft, meaning a loss of 197 ft
•Actual wing is only 57% of the span of the desired wing
Data was calculated from:
LAMDES – span “e,” minimum CD, cruise CL
VLMpc – neutral point
FRICTION – CDo
Hand calculated – L/Dmax, estimated cg, estimated static margin
Penalties – calculations were based on a wing area of 9095 ft^2 for the A380,
and of 3908.4 ft^2 for the A340-200. The span of the A340-200 was listed as
197.0 ft
4
Twist Distribution
Airfoil Section Twists
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
y/(b/2)
twist (deg)
Wing
Tail
Airfoil Twist Distribution was obtained using LAMDES. Only wings and
horizontal tails were modeled (fuselage was excluded). The center of gravity
was assumed to be the estimated cg of 101.05 ft, or roughly 42% chord length
for the output.
5
Root/Tip Changes
Mean Camber Line of Airfoil
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x/c
z/c
Tip
Root
Information was calculated using LAMDES, and data was taken for the span
wise stations closest to the tip and the root (actual stations are roughly 3.5% of
the half span distance from the targeted location, relating to about 3.5 feet
away)
6
Center of Gravity
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.035 0.036 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.04 0.041 0.042
CD
cg shift (static margin)
This shows that there is very little change in the
center of gravity as a function of the change in
drag coefficient
A change of 62 drag counts is needed to change the static margin 20 ft = 8.35% chord
1 drag count = 0.135% change in static margin
Data was calculated by changing the location of the center of gravity and
looking at the changes in the drag output. Because the neutral point is
assumed to remain constant, the change in the cg is also the change in the
static margin. The data was then plotted as a function of the change in the
drag, and it is shown that 62 counts of drag are necessary to move the static
margin 8.35%.
Each drag count can be attributed to a 0.135% change in the static margin
7
Transonic Airfoil
Used a modified Whitcomb SC airfoil
Closely matched Megaliner design
CLCrtiical =0.58
At Mach 0.6
Above this Mach Number TSfoil exploded 学习ing…… hdfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfg 谢谢楼主！ （A I S） 十分强大~~~感谢斑竹1 :lol :lol :lol 这个还需要回复才能看啊 好资料！科学性