Avoiding Hard Landings 避免重着陆 PPT

航空发表于 2011-8-26 20:24:15

**** Hidden Message *****

航空发表于 2011-8-26 20:24:26

Avoiding Hard Landings
文本框: Capt. Marc PARISIS Head of Flight and Cabin Crew Training
Presented by:
 
Content
. Hard Landings definition, detection, classification
. Avoiding Hard Landings
 
 Content
. Hard Landings definition, detection, classification
. Avoiding Hard Landings
 
 Definition of Hard Landing : Pilot’s point of view
. Pilots judge subjectively and comparatively  the landings as being:
 Soft – Normal – Firm – Hard 
. Subjectively =  modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background
. Comparatively = In a relative manner; by comparison to something else
 
“Hard landing suspected”: when the pilot decide that a structural examination is necessary
 
Hard Landing information : Maintenance’s side
. Maintenance uses objective data to classify the landings. Recorded vertical acceleration at aircraft CG
. Recorded vertical speed using Radio Altimeter data
 
 
 . Limit values will depend of:. aircraft types and standards
. Quality of recorded parameters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VERT ACC (g)
VERT Speed
 Normal Landing
 Hard Landing
Severe Hard Landing
 
 
 Load Report
 
 
LOAD REPORT <15>
 
Classification of the landing by maintenance
After a suspected hard landing: . Classification of the landing using the Load Report
 
 
 
Hard Landing confirmed: Maintenance inspection
Inspection is divided in different phases . Phase 1: general inspection for primary damage and indication of remote damage (mainly external) . If damage = perform further inspection (phase 2) and required maintenance actions.
. If no damage = end of inspection
 
 
. No damage = Aircraft can temporarily return to service. Grace period (e.g. 30 days or 100 - 200 cycles)
. Waiting for further elaborated analysis of the event by Airbus
. Required structural strength is maintained
. Risk is only stress corrosion (e.g. gear not achieving full life)
 
 
 
Identification of Hard Landing
. Pilot: Subjective judgment
. Maintenance: Objective but incomplete data
 
 
 
 
 Identification of Hard Landing: New problem 
. The pilots’ perception judgment and reporting has proven to be effective
 . However, the perception of the severity of the landing is not so obvious for: . Long aircraft
 . Flexible aircraft
 . Complex landing gear system
 
 
 
 Future: Hard Landing Detector
. Design of new automatic self-reliant system with specific sensors and adapted high synchronized sampling rate
 . This future system should. Provide a rapid and direct “Go” OR “No Go and inspect” decision for all circumstances 
. Indicate which part of the aircraft has been impacted and to which level
 
 
. Medium term (during development of this self-reliant system). Use selected data from this system to enhance the pilots’ conventional evaluation and reporting of the landings (data should be provided in a suitable way to be used directly by the pilots)
 
 
 
Today situation
 . The primary source of identifying a suspected hard landing is the flight crew
 . It is flight crew’s duty to detect and report a suspected hard landing
 
. Airbus recommends the active use of the Load Report15
 
 Content
. Hard Landings definition, detection, classification
. Avoiding Hard Landings
 
 Main sources of Hard Landings 
. Hard landings usually result directly from:. Non-stabilized approaches
. Inappropriate approach speed
. Destabilization of the approach in the last 100 ft
. Incorrect flare techniques
. Incorrect derotation techniques (nose landing gear)
 
 . And subsequently from:. Reluctance to perform a go-around
. Dual sidestick inputs
. Bounce at landing incorrect recovery techniques
 
 
 
 
 Flying stabilized approaches
Rushed and non-stabilized approaches are one of the main sources of hard landings
. Refer to the Flight Operations Briefing Notes “Flying Stabilized Approaches” “Aircraft Energy Management during Approach”
 . If the aircraft is not stabilized at:. 1000 feet in IMC, or
. 500 feet in VMC, or
. as restricted by Operator policy/regulations,
 
 
a go-around must be initiated.
 Flying stabilized approaches
 
 
 Approach speed
. Determination of approach speed. In most cases, the FMGS provides valuable VAPP on MCDU PERF APPR page once tower wind and landing configuration has been inserted
. The flight crew can insert a higher VAPP in case of strong suspected downburst, or gusty crosswind greater than 20 knots but this increment is limited to 15 kt above VLS
 
 
. Managed speed should be used. Managed speed provides Ground Speed mini (GS mini) guidance, even when the VAPP has been manually inserted
. “Ground Speed mini” function will  keep the aircraft energy level above a minimum value, whatever the wind variations or gusts.
 
 
 
Destabilization of the approach in the last 100 ft
Common errors . Descending below the final path ("duck under")
. Reducing the drift too early
 . Autopilot disconnection. Pilot should disconnect the AP early enough to resume manual control of the aircraft and to evaluate the drift before flare.
 
 
. High sink rate avoidance. In the very late stages of the approach, priority should be given to attitude and sink rate. If normal touchdown distance is not possible perform a go-around
 
 
 
Flare techniques
. Flare height varies with different parameters such as weight, rate of descent, wind variations, …
 . Avoid under flaring.. The rate of descent must be controlled prior to the initiation of the flare (rate not increasing)
. Start the flare with positive backpressure on the sidestick and holding as necessary
. Avoid forward stick movement once flare initiated (releasing back-pressure is acceptable)
 
 
. Retard thrust levers when best adapted
 
 Derotation techniques – Fly the nose down
 . When the aircraft is on the ground, pitch and roll control operates in Direct Law.. Derotation is conventional
 
 
. Fly the nose down smoothly, but with no delay
 
 Reluctance to perform a go-around
. Go-around is possible at anytime until the selection of the reverse
 . Even if a late go-around will not avoid the contact with the runway it should soften it and could avoid a hard touch
 . Once the go-around has been initiated it must be completed. Reversing a go-around decision is hazardous– e.g. F/o initiating a late go-around; Captain overriding and trying to land the aircraft
 
 
 
 
 Dual sidestick inputs
. The basic task sharing principle for any aircraft operation is that one pilot is PF at a time. If the PNF feels he must intervene, he should press the Priority P/B while calling “I have controls”
 
 
. “Instinctive” Dual Input: instinctive reactions on the sidestick by the PNF surprised by the development of a dynamic situation
. In prolonged “Dual Input” situation : both PF and PNF will be aware of the dual input situation by the light and aural indicators.. it is to the Captain to take over by pressing the Priority P/B while saying “I have controls”
 
 
 
Bounce at landing
 
 Bounce at landing
Flight Operations Briefing Notes “Bounce Recovery - Rejected Landing” Bounce at landing . Maintain pitch attitude (freeze and control the pitch)
. Keep thrust idle
. Do not increase pitch (tail strike)
. Complete the landing
 
Strong bounce →Go Around . Go around maintaining pitch attitude
. Keep flaps ; keep landing gear
. Only when positive climb is properly established– Flaps one step and Landing Gear up
 
 
 
Crosswind landings
 
 Crosswind landings
Flight Operations Briefing Notes “Landing Techniques – Crosswind landings” . Final approach with crosswind drift correction with wings level (crabbed-approach)
 . During the flare, rudder should be applied as required to align the aircraft with the runway. Any tendency to drift downwind should be counteracted by an appropriate roll input on the sidestick
 . In case of very strong crosswind, combination of the partial de-crab and wing down techniques may be required. Aircraft can be landed with a residual drift (max 5°) to prevent an excessive bank (max 5°) 
 
 
 
Windshear – Down burst: Apply FCOM procedures
. Delay landing, or divert to another airport, until conditions are more favorable. Select the most favorable runway, in conjunction with the most appropriate runway approach aid
. Select Flaps 3
. Use managed speed in approach phase
 
 
. Recovery techniques. Set thrust levers to TOGA. 
. If the autopilot is engaged, use it (be aware that automatic disengagement may occur) 
. Follow SRS orders.
. Do not change configuration
. Closely monitor the flight path and speed
 
 
 
Avoiding Hard Landing – Airbus documentation
. Airbus Operational and Training documentation. FCOM – FCTM
. FCOM Bulletin N°819 “Avoiding Hard Landings” for LR
 
 
. Additional documentation. Flight Operations Briefing Notes
 
 
. An e-briefing  for pilots dedicated to hard landing prevention is available:. Specific presentations
. Specific videos
. Operational and Training documentation references
 
 
 
Conclusion
. It is pilot’s duty to detect and report a suspected Hard Landing
 . Hard landings usually result directly from:. Non-stabilized approaches
. Inappropriate approach speed
. Destabilization of the approach in the last 100 ft
. Incorrect flare techniques
. Incorrect derotation techniques (nose landing gear)
 
 . And subsequently from:. Reluctance to perform a go-around
. Dual sidestick inputs
. Bounce at landing incorrect recovery techniques
 
 
 
Proprietary document. By taking delivery of this Presentation (hereafter “Presentation”), you accept on behalf of your company to comply with the following. No other property rights are granted by the delivery of this Presentation than the right to read it, for the sole purpose of information. This Presentation, its content, illustrations and photos shall not be modified nor reproduced without prior written consent of Airbus S.A.S. This Presentation and the materials it contains shall not, in whole or in part, be sold, rented, or licensed to any third party subject to payment or not. This Presentation may contain market-sensitive or other information that is correct at the time of going to press. This information involves a number of factors which could change over time, affecting the true public representation. Airbus assumes no obligation to update any information contained in this document or with respect to the information described herein.     The statements made herein do not constitute an offer or form part of any contract. They are based on Airbus information and are expressed in good faith but no warranty or representation is given as to their accuracy. When additional information is required, Airbus S.A.S can be contacted to provide further details. Airbus S.A.S shall assume no liability for any damage in connection with the use of this Presentation and the materials it contains, even if Airbus S.A.S has been advised of the likelihood of such damages. This licence is governed by French law and exclusive jurisdiction is given to the courts and tribunals of Toulouse (France) without prejudice to the right of Airbus to bring proceedings for infringement of copyright or any other intellectual property right in any other court of competent jurisdiction.

coindong 发表于 2011-10-9 17:10:32

执照持有人申请按本规则颁发驾驶员执照复习思考题： 1、“增加航空器等级”作了哪几点规定？为什么要作这样的规定？ 2、“仪表等级要求”作了哪几点规定？为什么要作这样的规定？ 3、对按照其他规章批准的训练大纲完成训练的人员，其执照的实践考试有哪些规定？ 4、对具有军用航空器驾驶员经历的人员有哪些特殊规定？ 5、“外国驾驶员执照或香港、澳门特别行政区执照持有人申请按本规则颁发驾驶员执照”作了哪几点规定？为什么要作这样的规定？ D章学生驾驶员执照第61.101条适用范围第61.103条资格要求第61.107条一般限制复习思考题： 1、“资格要求”作了哪几点规定？ 2、对学生驾驶员执照持有人有哪些限制？为什么要作这些限制？ E章私用驾驶员执照第61.121条适用范围第61.123条资格要求第61.139条私用驾驶员执照持有人的权利和限制复习思考题： 1、“资格要求”作了哪几点规定？ 2、私用驾驶员执照持有人有哪些权利和限制？ F章商用驾驶员执照第61.151条适用范围第61.153条资格要求第61.155条航空知识要求第61.157条飞行技能要求第61.159条飞机驾驶员的飞行经历要求第61.171条夜间飞行限制第61.

zhishumimi 发表于 2011-10-10 14:22:33

看一看看一看看一看

一氧化硫 发表于 2011-10-11 13:18:29

我想看看看看

songsimple 发表于 2012-2-20 18:51:27

谢谢分享拿走学习谢谢楼主

songsimple 发表于 2012-2-20 18:51:38

谢谢分享拿走学习谢谢楼主

erics8482 发表于 2012-2-22 21:42:54

学习一下，谢谢了！

thunderland 发表于 2013-11-11 23:37:40

Thanks for sharing!

thunderland 发表于 2013-11-11 23:37:54

Thanks for sharing!

页: [1] 2

航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译's Archiver

Avoiding Hard Landings 避免重着陆 PPT