标题: Performance Based Navigation: RNAV and RNP FAA Program Update [打印本页] 作者: 航空 时间: 2010-9-7 09:00:11 标题: Performance Based Navigation: RNAV and RNP FAA Program Update
作者: 航空 时间: 2010-9-7 09:00:31
Federal Aviation 0 Administration 0 Performance Based Navigation: RNAV and RNP FAA Program Update Federal Aviation Administration Presentation to: ICNS Conference & Workshop 2006 Baltimore, Maryland Name: Jeff Williams Manager, RNAV/RNP Group, Air Traffic Organization Date: May, 3, 2006 Federal Aviation 1 Administration 1 Overview • Performance-Based Navigation Roadmap • Enabling Criteria and Guidance • Update on RNAV and RNP Implementation • Implementation Challenges • International Federal Aviation 2 Administration 2 FAA’s Roadmap for Performance-Based Navigation • Collaborative effort among aviation industry stakeholders Performance-based Operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC) • Three Planning Horizons (updated version) Near-term 2003 to 2006 (2006 to 2010) Mid-term 2007 to 2012 (2011 to 2015) Far-term 2013 to 2020 (2016 to 2025) • Harmonization considerations • Focuses on operational capabilities in: En route domain RNAV Q-Routes RNAV T-Routes Terminal domain RNAV Standard Terminal Arrivals (STARs) RNAV Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) Approach domain RNP Special Aircrew and Aircraft Authorization Required (SAAAR) RNP Parallel Approach Transition Draft Update available at http://www.faa.gov/ats/atp/rnp/rnav.htm Federal Aviation 3 Administration 3 Highways in the Sky Visit our website for a link to the video - http://www.faa.gov/ats/atp/rnp/rnav.htm Federal Aviation 4 Administration 4 Performance-Based Navigation In All Phases of Flight “Snapshot” of Current U.S. Implementations RNAV SIDs RNAV Q Routes, T Routes RNAV STARs RNP SAAAR approaches RNAV approaches Federal Aviation 5 Administration 5 En Route •RNP-2 Q Routes •RNP-1 in selected areas high altitude •GPS Direct and RNAV T Routes •Lower MEAs on routes based on GPS Near Term (2006-2010) Mid Term (2011-2015) Far Term (2016-2025) Terminal •RNAV SIDs/STARs at OEP Airports •Controller Tools for Merging and Spacing •RNP-2/1 SIDs/STARs in busy terminal areas Approach •Complete Standards for Performance-based Approaches •Initial sites for Basic RNP •25 RNP SAAAR per year •300 LPV per year •Standards for closely spaced parallel and converging approaches (e.g., enhanced surveillance) Mandate RNAV above FL350 En Route •RNP-2/1 Q Routes and Airspace •GPS Direct and RNAV T Routes •Lower MEAs Terminal •RNP 2/1 and RNAV SIDs/STARs •Merging and Spacing with Time of Arrival Control Approach •Hundreds of Basic RNP, RNP SAAAR, and LPV per year •Standards for closely spaced parallel and converging approaches (e.g., improved surveillance) Mandate RNP above FL290 Mandate RNAV above FL180 and for arriving/departing at OEP Airports Mandate RNP in busy en route and terminal airspace Explore need for 4D, data link, and enhanced surveillance capability mandates Performancebased NAS Operations •Optimized Airspace and procedures based on Required System Performance •4D Trajectory Management •Delegation of separation tasks Draft Roadmap Milestones (in Industry Coordination) Federal Aviation 6 Administration 6 Enabling Criteria and Guidance • AC 90-100 U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations Airworthiness, Operational Approval, Operating Procedures, and Training guidance for RNAV Departure Procedures, RNAV Standard Terminal Arrivals, and RNAV routes Currently in revision by FAA and Industry team to incorporate lessons learned and harmonize with international developments • Order 8260.52 United States Standard for Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Approach Procedure with Special Aircraft and Aircrew Authorization Required (SAAAR) Written for approach procedure designers to develop public RNP SAAAR instrument approach procedures • Notice 8000.300 RNP SAAAR This document outlines the operational approval process for special (non-14CFR Part 97) RNP SAAAR operations and addresses the implementation of special aircraft and aircrew authorization requirements similar to current ILS Category II/III approvals • AC 90-101 Approval for RNP procedures with Special Aircraft and Aircrew Authorization Required (SAAAR) Airworthiness, Operational Approval, Operating Procedures, and Training guidance for RNP SAAAR Instrument Approach Procedures • AC 20-153 Acceptance of Data Processes and Associated Navigation Databases How to evaluate whether data processes comply with the requirements of RTCA/DO-200A, Standards for Processing Aeronautical Data How to obtain a Letter of Acceptance (LOA) from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) How to define the aeronautical data quality requirements when obtaining airworthiness approval of new equipment or installations where the function of the equipment is dependent on an updateable database Federal Aviation 7 Administration 7 RNAV and RNP 2005 Accomplishments and Plans for 2006 2 Revised 22 Revised 158 34 New 63 New 23 14 In Development FY06 Total 89 167 RNP SAAAR 6 25 SIDs/STARs 58 98 RNAV Q-Routes 21 28 RNAV T-Routes 4 16 and GPS MEAs Funding Plan FY07 Completed FY05 Description Federal Aviation 8 Administration 8 Atlanta RNAV Departure Procedures • Approx 90% of 1350 daily IFR departures are RNAV capable • Structured “lanes” to en route airspace • Over 4,000 routine daily pilot/controller voice transmissions eliminated (30% reduction) • Validated model estimates of annualized benefits are ~$39M Realized from delay and capacity benefits Before RNAV After RNAV Federal Aviation Administration 9 Before After RNAV ATL Efficiency Benefits (2) Federal Aviation 10 Administration 10 Dallas Fort Worth RNAV Departure Procedures 2004 Environment (Pre-RNAV) RNAV • Approx 85% of 990 daily IFR departures are RNAV capable • Structured “lanes” to en route airspace • Over 3,700 routine daily pilot/controller voice transmissions eliminated (40% reduction) • Validated estimates ~$8.5M annual benefits Realized from delay and capacity benefits Up to ~$13M with 100% RNAV Fanned departure operations on initially diverging RNAV routes Pre Implementation Post Implementation Conventional Departures RNAV Departures Federal Aviation 11 Administration 11 RNP SAAAR Approach Site Prioritization • Single runway access and risk mitigation • Predominantly future airspace de-confliction Tier 3 • Regional capacity impact • Access and risk mitigation enhancement Tier 2 • Includes converting 2004/2005 specials to public • Urgent capacity needs, with national impact • Risk mitigation cases Tier 1 Airports Characteristics Federal Aviation 12 Administration 12 Applications of RNP SAAAR Criteria Approach minimums lower than existing minima Increased arrival and departure rates for adjacent airports involved Arrival capacity gains up to 50% over single runway operations Arrival capacity gains up to 60% over single runway operations Several hundred runway ends 10 to 15 Top Airports 15 to 20 Top Airports 10 to 15 Top Airports Single Runway Access Adjacent Airport Operations Converging Operations Parallel Operations 750’ - <5000’ 36 31 16 L 16R 9 Airport A Airport B 36L Conventional 36R RNP SAAAR – Special Aircraft and Aircrew Authorization Required Federal Aviation 13 Administration 13 RNP SAAAR: KDCA • First “public” RNP SAAAR, published 1 Sept 05 FAA Order 8260.52 criteria Avoids prohibited airspace Significantly improves RWY 19 availability in low visibility Federal Aviation 14 Administration 14 International Harmonization • ICAO RNP Special Operations Requirements Study Group is primary forum for harmonization Members include Australia, Brazil, Canada, EUROCONTROL, France, Japan, United Kingdom, United States, IATA, ICCAIA, IFALPA Rewriting ICAO Doc 9613, Manual on RNP (to be renamed Performance- Based Navigation Manual) Agreed on globally consistent definitions of RNAV and RNP Agreed on “ICAO RNAV” – harmonized Europe’s P-RNAV and US RNAV Performance-Based Navigation Implementation considerations & guidance Publication planned for Fall 2006 Federal Aviation 15 Administration 15 International Harmonization • U.S. Harmonization activities with regions FAA/EUROCONTROL Joint “Train the Trainers” proposal to ICAO week-long sessions in ICAO Regions beginning in 2007 ICAO Seminar in Beijing 22-24 May (w/FAA, EUROCONTROL, China, Japan, Australia, Boeing, Airbus, IATA) for China & 10 East Asia States North American Aviation Trilateral activities with Canada, Mexico Western Hemisphere coordination via ICAO GREPECAS subgroup (regional planning & implementation) Multiple initiatives with Civil Aviation Administration of China Federal Aviation 16 Administration 16 RNAV and RNP Implementation Challenges • Environmental Sites unavailable due to ongoing environmental issues Costs unpredictable • Standardization of aircraft performance • Flight crew training • Need DME/DME infrastructure changes • Rate of industry aircraft equipage and compliance Federal Aviation 17 Administration 17 Questions?作者: jack_hwu 时间: 2010-10-19 19:57:40 标题: 回复 1# 航空 的帖子