- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition
$ [. e7 z6 ]! m8 GCategories" B9 } O7 G# J" V o
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
. w, S3 X: W* T6 d5 Jand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories4 B* z& Q `5 H3 L& x3 n+ E8 N
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.4 c. H9 G! }& t7 \ W
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
) B5 d2 Y; ]3 Z# t* n# w- Fhave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting: s( h5 E0 r( A! z! ^/ T1 W
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under9 s/ I8 r& _: {: a: }7 x- t
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
9 ~8 b/ T; ?$ T- G' W4 ^, m0 b(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --; M/ y0 z0 q+ @5 ]. C/ x
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
7 z$ _3 P+ x" o1 n' f# h" hComponent Acquisition Executive.
* c4 D0 l' u) }* w g5 @' wAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is+ n5 H7 T x6 W1 P# v8 ?$ ?
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
' q/ I! G# n: {7 g/ }& E; Runique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
6 H6 t" N; h" E V. @8 S/ ~Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
( C$ W' ^; ]( Y" }categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
& t; }' _; m( o+ q; ldecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate% ]7 U/ c% }4 Q0 b" f9 r7 L1 H
within their respective organizations." `* G2 Q; ~+ ~# b: I
Acquisition. K% S$ f: T, d3 [* w: z
Decision0 c: @; e$ l; `& Q/ \. l1 R
Memorandum
1 S0 Y y% v0 o# d(ADM)
/ ~4 u" I3 ^5 V4 }2 q( _A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents$ u t' x. V/ ^- @
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone4 w& x8 ^$ D: \& e
decision review or in-process review.
1 ~9 Q& Y# G$ B7 [; [Acquisition/ K; g. n V, i, n0 l% z, c
Field of View& v8 _# A( ^" f) i4 g8 I
(FOV)
- ~! R( l9 U8 i* t' j7 m0 v" f0 T8 fThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
4 J3 {/ i- @, T# pof searching its assigned volume.) d9 T7 r' K8 S. m2 X
Acquisition Life9 y3 {) p8 s+ D8 s( A0 u8 T7 [
Cycle6 |: ^% X! |; Z$ U
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
4 q( t1 G$ D; q5 |+ J& I. ^a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
4 K/ i' a5 n1 g o' Zproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
7 g; J$ I: o2 _1 S# y# b( T3 Jand Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
3 P9 `5 |; [! e" g8 F! k- f1 w/ tDeployment, Operations and Support.5 r% i: _9 J, G! V& K$ ~
Acquisition
0 O3 S. H8 ?# @% L) @/ P, A2 `+ L3 nLogistics
/ c! D- E+ P, i# g! M0 WProcess of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
6 c/ k% k/ B9 C+ q4 \6 ranalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics
& M& I5 l, \$ _. i/ usupport throughout the acquisition process.
! n: v: n, ]' G. x: y1 n) {Acquisition
/ ^4 M; Z4 z4 @Management
( s" {7 i, w3 \1 x+ y% D0 U: XManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
' h! e ]+ q/ X" b/ G0 F, V: O- [“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
9 L( n0 B) I ^# Tacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
6 l; Y$ M1 U" k! b4 ^5 Sacquisition systems/programs.
. N3 a- F/ X: @3 C& c- C) uAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute5 t4 N y2 o/ \; l' [
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding$ L& E2 ~! ~$ M; D; Y2 l4 M
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and5 ~" I0 s; b* x1 Y- x! @
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.), I. b8 H; a Y- |; }
Acquisition/ _! j* {. N7 h6 ]# U5 U
Planning. a6 F! t" Y- ^! E
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition: W6 b6 H; ~* t" a o
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
7 D3 E3 V3 ]! i6 A, B4 ~need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
9 u3 e2 J* W- q: j. V7 \9 T+ hthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
3 s2 r* K: a, O! u omanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
. }/ w+ M9 \1 EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
6 X' W' g5 a0 `# ^+ z" w5
' U! `9 |( q: g$ K4 xAcquisition4 ~: z+ g3 m. X8 k8 H% i
Program
% c, N H" _* a3 i" rA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
* ?7 H2 S) L. C( n; T! V+ n. lcapability in response to a validated need.1 \% O; T3 `( n g H7 z
Acquisition# G* ^0 q3 f# C& Z1 I
Program7 ` A* e0 l2 ~% c- b
Baseline (APB)' }0 r- F$ K5 W0 O# X
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance+ E' c' d3 t6 g) [3 _" m+ y
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision1 @# x: Y1 w5 c/ d
authority milestone reviews as follows:' p2 Z% R! m; u1 _% @6 u2 d% R1 b0 V
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,0 I+ a7 v/ H) E: z: @; `2 G
Demonstration and Validation.5 F) O( q- j; [6 `. `
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in0 ?# g7 }& ~" z! x: J4 e
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
4 Z, z% e M! Y•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in6 {- ]& W* o# l/ t5 {
Phase III, Production and Deployment.4 r$ ^5 G2 S+ ~( R1 z R+ F
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
T* W! x3 H: _% ]2 R- f7 Iparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
4 w9 _: Z) j( Z' X; Bthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
& s4 h2 E' |& I* N" o# k4 u! \changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
, Z E8 d2 I9 d# F% c$ N4 d2 zthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
: ?& d% `" J5 T( }. S$ Ddeviation.
, y, T/ h; D$ s! a! UAcquisition
0 G: u# M8 o+ B% D) }: g* W2 s- {Radar) e; }' y4 _! A! k. W
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
5 I4 Z9 m- x) [ ?. Pbackground and non-hostile objects.
5 z: M8 M8 M4 R- d6 v1 ~) PAcquisition
' o* H* z, l: v# P! i- h: A+ KRisk w% D0 t2 W" C7 d6 K; g! b5 Y
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an" g I; z6 i3 d5 ^* b2 |
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
0 s1 W+ K7 ~0 z8 w" A5 ?cost, or availability for deployment.7 y+ g( h) z6 _9 T$ k& b
Acquisition/! L6 ^% J% R; d
Reacquisition W H( V2 Q1 }4 y
Time
. x. A0 ^, O4 _6 w6 }9 b8 ?! r0 aThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
& a8 m* V# k# ~; [8 vincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|