- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition8 s2 b1 s4 p. F9 e" c
Categories, i S! Z! \- D; g& k! b
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
2 O% F2 J4 o) P$ s) Z+ j+ w- Yand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories6 m* l; Q2 G1 F8 C
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.' F. ] o' A1 X9 U# a% n5 A
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
7 J, x# C. Q3 L' F% ahave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
. V% R# P0 g# j) |) ^requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
! v% @6 u* J2 V4 n) K4 J. c5 QSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;9 D* t4 u/ P' U; M% G( i! h8 W% x X
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --' u8 T9 I, a$ m! M- s: U
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the& B) x" o0 R+ i0 \" a3 ?
Component Acquisition Executive.
4 K, y6 I" M, IAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
3 F6 w7 A+ {/ F8 e1 Gdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have; Y+ {) E1 K$ L3 V, ]
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
- x, l% G$ R1 y( V+ ?. PAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
3 j/ W2 I( V6 N( ?% U( Hcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone* }( t$ O4 ~8 k& U$ v4 n5 ?
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
0 j% R6 z2 b: ?& T8 c; ^within their respective organizations.5 G) h/ n% ]8 g
Acquisition
2 \$ M! _3 p5 a" u8 G1 B# }0 ]Decision
/ I$ t6 Z( d4 j4 B t& }6 kMemorandum
0 z8 P o$ P$ T j L(ADM)! ^9 |7 r6 u2 Q* y) m6 J
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents. j) B/ k, J/ r+ J
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
2 d! q7 E0 |0 Z8 X, g2 gdecision review or in-process review.4 s7 ^" d- p! H" \ O' [+ g7 B4 W0 T
Acquisition: T" O0 {$ z' Y2 T9 l
Field of View6 ~9 k! S* g; ~# z, K r: [
(FOV)
; o" T' z. J4 w+ E0 ^The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
: F8 f* H/ T4 o( ~of searching its assigned volume.
) Q+ P) d4 t( [Acquisition Life+ j" k0 i6 ^9 v6 e
Cycle2 y8 S/ L7 j' L) j+ Z' V9 ~+ o
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which$ G$ x4 s/ d0 u; r' a6 q1 v+ C
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
6 F G# w7 \8 [% a( [9 uproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration& z$ }, w8 I: W; W5 Y3 W
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and6 _# r0 _7 j8 e3 z7 n3 G
Deployment, Operations and Support.: y& p- _( ~/ y2 u/ U
Acquisition
# U4 X" l/ o( GLogistics) t, @; ^6 [% i: o
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,# p I2 Z" V0 O4 e3 e2 t
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics9 l7 L7 }4 e8 H" L w
support throughout the acquisition process.5 @, P5 n$ g' w9 n' h3 [7 \7 H' R
Acquisition
/ I" }( \0 y( fManagement
: _; m8 t7 s; b- U- k$ ZManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of& I# I. }2 i# S
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense$ s3 ~$ J( F: T1 E# j- L& E5 {
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
$ t% ?, z, _) N- s* C- O racquisition systems/programs.- z! p' _7 j% s. R
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute8 r. O5 ]. k5 b( I
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
9 [- O2 [ j( i7 @) R! K4 rcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
" ?" {/ ]2 W4 C9 R& mDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
& M! j7 S x4 I$ m# R. ~Acquisition2 T4 Z, F; c2 P1 B1 U, @1 l! u6 ^+ {
Planning& l. p' w! I( V) W) r: I% v9 U9 I( B
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
5 m9 {$ R8 d8 J9 a2 ~are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
& M# j& ?+ ?/ T8 s- z% ]need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout, i( R+ A* ]9 J2 G3 F- ?- |
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
" }. r4 y2 r+ N; Umanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
8 K( a$ ?% r* S* T- X0 TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A( L0 D+ Z+ \) o, g3 i6 X' C; W: M* `; E
59 p! I! w7 I. X) U& F( O; I$ |
Acquisition
: j- }/ ~ w" p8 a) O# rProgram: W/ @6 d# s3 @3 Q E; ~+ ?7 ?
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
o3 n$ e u# L& L+ Bcapability in response to a validated need.
# L% j/ f p8 c) w7 f) A8 k2 EAcquisition
" L& T3 l$ n- @2 Y9 _: PProgram
+ U2 z- L7 I/ e' ?- R# ]Baseline (APB)
3 ~! u* F: D3 j% o/ HAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance' m. c/ b9 B* ~) d
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
3 a2 a. M% N: x g/ f! _authority milestone reviews as follows:3 G3 D* p3 f3 H! o5 O) M9 N% C0 V
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
$ w- l8 f- y5 @! TDemonstration and Validation.
4 |. x" H! F: \9 Y2 f•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in$ |1 A9 L; m$ S0 @/ e- T/ q
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development., M/ @; b' X' q/ M: V; S C
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
: p, K4 T% a: z! O0 ~Phase III, Production and Deployment.; V0 b% r1 i$ h/ G; u2 l7 D
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance% d0 L8 t" Q6 O' P
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
3 ?7 J6 l+ Q( L, r2 s) @2 qthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be, O" u0 Q+ M$ M' K. q
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
8 `- K7 n {! z: L! Q- N3 kthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
" G% f# A/ K9 N9 \1 S; ?) y: [+ Mdeviation.
, @6 h5 z* }; |) v4 f/ yAcquisition
+ I7 Z3 J0 C V4 n" U* Y7 VRadar
: }& S. p; ?* z( ]. ARadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the! R" b- V1 c0 _# P( P% ~5 g
background and non-hostile objects.
' h" V4 r8 ]- U: T/ SAcquisition
! t( A+ ~! w0 \: @3 a% R0 _& n% lRisk/ z8 V9 M3 |7 w% J. p, X3 j ^ H
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an7 R( m% X+ g- D5 m) j
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
3 c8 m, J' K' A t* |0 \cost, or availability for deployment.$ z$ z% f4 k7 I9 ?: C" O
Acquisition/
5 Q! r+ P1 q3 xReacquisition \9 y* {- I- w! v4 F6 A+ d
Time% z, M- D7 z( t) B
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This& I3 ?3 S8 p8 u- r' @
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|