- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition
. ~9 V9 A8 v3 |6 W' \0 B& ]' n* E& RCategories1 H- H; ]' ?) x! l! ~+ v8 x( X
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution! o. S7 j8 `* z/ v- C5 K" r5 G
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
0 o, e1 y! v* A1 [ Odetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
" I) n, U* _7 l5 a* a$ HAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
' V2 ]# [! o; d9 Ghave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
3 G6 C) l- u! N+ grequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
0 A P0 I- Z( a' A, U8 D( dSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
2 f* p5 p7 c# [, Q( K(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
4 \8 h) [; L: s! j) Iacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the/ L: e- T% e& G
Component Acquisition Executive.4 d* f8 Q+ e7 _+ i0 N5 l
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is7 }( U6 t5 s5 s/ u+ {
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
0 Y9 A$ Y% H( j1 N9 i' bunique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area$ }# @- _+ m, a
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
7 ]# z7 z" \% ~categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
4 H% D; H7 `- l+ }/ q8 \; p8 S; ]decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
4 H# t s4 h& `: j: k; Awithin their respective organizations.% y' c3 S2 F% P4 X. ~" G4 |
Acquisition
1 ]4 {5 k# x3 a0 VDecision1 c- J' d W6 `( ^* z- G
Memorandum
) k3 y& r( n, q(ADM)
1 \: Q: D A- TA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
( q4 m% I% v5 Hdecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
. x' E- }% x7 i% C9 [2 udecision review or in-process review.
4 t3 f! r2 W/ l5 f, ^Acquisition
- k1 X, K' J! n3 S+ a, VField of View& V! v9 u% a$ I0 g5 z% Y: z ^' `
(FOV)
6 U# v: n% e# X3 A0 g6 T; Z2 JThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
7 l; W5 `# x6 C" v' p3 Fof searching its assigned volume.% w- O- a" J5 X0 W4 e7 k, p
Acquisition Life
1 l0 J" a& [# ^+ i) ` e* |/ r4 bCycle4 \$ J& W$ S5 Z
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
: G I1 [8 N" F+ J$ y* ia system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
, R4 p3 R `6 o+ i2 [production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
% i8 Y; Q* F' J2 A4 l e6 pand Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
" ?& a2 @3 S2 b s4 `3 LDeployment, Operations and Support.* h6 Z! R6 f3 L0 K. h8 [
Acquisition: D3 d. o. j" s/ s# D. e" g
Logistics
8 ^& z1 n3 ]6 n: x4 J6 Q. }Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,: o- z h& K" U
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics) o" D% i1 T, _7 i7 B9 ]
support throughout the acquisition process.9 e& u3 D/ [/ s3 T
Acquisition/ S) N0 z' {$ {, s7 l
Management
; ?( }/ ]7 v5 A( T: k$ CManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
# q4 B; `& u; \+ d2 c“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
0 w3 M( w7 C- Q4 z, |, E% Bacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
* |% T8 f% N" ~4 o/ Wacquisition systems/programs.7 X: w C- ]" s
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
3 `* P5 }. Z7 l# _8 h5 Sthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding7 b/ w+ J& g V q) d9 X+ o& k
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
$ i" N9 u5 [: { S9 r, d! w! vDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)' e# m' t! z7 X
Acquisition
: L, h7 o) E5 I9 r* e+ s( yPlanning, k- G8 ^" d( d; ^
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition( J% w3 E( e4 e
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
5 q+ a$ p4 s8 g0 { `1 wneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
6 T$ e7 @, E; t5 K" sthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for3 k; M& _5 o7 L1 `# e
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.! A* i8 R3 m5 D8 B& e
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A( A9 K/ I# t; @
57 A8 w4 W. F; G: |# U, H+ `
Acquisition& [/ Q! Y5 q4 ^" r9 @6 z/ I
Program
+ F$ f. p n2 s3 ]* k! lA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
& {: a* R( I! Q2 f) A" tcapability in response to a validated need.3 D0 Y- Y/ Z2 g' C }2 w0 w/ k
Acquisition1 r6 x& G- G. H$ k0 z3 i3 d/ ?
Program4 P0 `4 \" d" v
Baseline (APB)0 F3 D3 c2 ]: x4 P
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
' _3 V. T8 t4 l7 `objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision1 P% Q+ D( p; a1 ]& G" Y1 @9 ?! C
authority milestone reviews as follows:6 ]2 [, H3 y% n
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
* v k2 R( Z4 j: N0 r) `Demonstration and Validation.
' V3 A# m' w; L8 T1 o9 @" T•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in8 j4 a% L- u. y
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development./ R- N* ]- i' \* ~
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
' H% K0 x m: z6 m0 }Phase III, Production and Deployment.
! M( q0 {# D3 V* B2 ?' \2 Y* MEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance4 Y$ p W1 Q% ?; d2 g* w7 K8 S
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called* Q% S4 i. ]9 O
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
9 D- J% K3 p- O' wchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
8 l; N9 y- ~! }9 L3 f4 b B8 J cthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline5 d0 o4 u% e0 A# u4 n$ z' p' c
deviation.
" f7 Z7 F- Z! `! u, ZAcquisition
$ C! L! ~0 B5 T8 t7 M% t. rRadar
/ `- z8 j( L+ _; d4 v- A! E8 \Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
! k w# L/ X/ v7 Ybackground and non-hostile objects.7 E$ f- U. v C$ H' f& U
Acquisition0 ]6 H) F& T; M8 B4 ?+ x- P& p, \: v
Risk
' g) ^1 ~3 y: m$ Y& fThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an2 v9 Y0 J. G6 Z% @9 g, H3 ~
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,+ g" r5 X }& \8 u. }5 g
cost, or availability for deployment." E. ?3 \! E" J$ N
Acquisition/
2 f) m! c) t& ]/ F, W2 l+ ~7 VReacquisition
, V# Y4 z! E& v6 OTime
& [1 _. l5 V* [) SThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This' `# q7 u$ M+ ]' o' } |
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|