- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition
) w" q: N- G: g3 X N$ zCategories
' F$ j; u! \6 y- V7 P" @, WCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
7 y9 z# k; R3 xand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories" A" G# ]% _2 W
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.$ H. s' F5 G( o& q
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
: h$ U, ~2 G7 @: E5 G. i. I5 x2 Fhave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
( ~5 Y! W: [ erequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
2 U7 i* F6 ~4 v+ S; B+ C! ?; WSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;; R2 f5 V' g9 U
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
; x2 Y% _% l( ]& z; `1 s+ b8 sacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the! Q9 N# E0 B2 Q* a# v3 ?) {
Component Acquisition Executive.( Q$ {+ F# U+ [
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is7 f, a3 A! E2 X4 Q- D# {% L
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have$ h+ G+ s- J% U% u8 S
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
. Z$ m6 g1 M3 Q H0 d; TAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition M; _4 `+ ]2 K6 {$ e
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
( ^9 a! ?% k) [ y0 z! T! g; E9 B4 {decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
! _2 [$ o5 c# W0 S9 twithin their respective organizations.
! _0 I0 k- H0 p* X, Q e, Y( ?Acquisition; ]; U+ ]0 V4 b8 }' }; p( f
Decision
# O' e7 Y( K% C, k2 q9 }, WMemorandum4 A4 I' w6 ^, @8 \& |% |- j! L
(ADM)/ _7 q9 L/ j" o9 u
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
, x' y5 a& B1 R5 X* M# adecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone) o. e5 ]0 W) {& f3 N5 ]
decision review or in-process review.
N9 J6 o+ O: K, \! dAcquisition; M5 Y( ]+ U3 Q, p4 [: X1 H
Field of View
, a# @, k0 V! V) _4 v9 M9 U( J$ {(FOV)
% o) L- n1 i1 d9 m8 `The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
8 i s/ `& W: P% h. X0 R( H6 _) z {of searching its assigned volume.& m& U" Z7 A9 l) P
Acquisition Life
5 R- F, m& o6 Y# `" I6 B4 {; |( b# RCycle: e5 [6 G- }" w# y: ~
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
5 G7 W* X( U* {7 Ra system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
* H7 p* W) B) B1 Yproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
# w( h; b, q6 @ L+ @+ cand Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
5 c/ e8 E, A+ {( vDeployment, Operations and Support.
' Q/ ?# L# W+ [) K: T. |Acquisition; y# p- f- ?( x, a0 W ]# _* M
Logistics3 ~% ]0 l: s& f2 k0 x% O
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,5 I7 Q! q' r; F" \. ^* p" _1 X# d* |
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics7 s9 l# a- x* M! U% n8 S+ D( V
support throughout the acquisition process.
5 o' _; t) {. A" j$ Q j! ?Acquisition
$ \! ]+ m! U& u2 E/ Y4 |Management
: s5 Y' B1 A* V% G& sManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
5 i! M& W2 v5 k' u& e/ x“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense; v* @0 Y [+ @6 d
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense& o( n- U* G1 ~
acquisition systems/programs.9 v& I4 R% s4 T! i6 i, s3 U6 e
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
! s* o- L2 U5 f. k5 N1 v+ \& Y, v8 B; x0 ythe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding/ ]+ P6 R" L7 y+ z# Z
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
* N5 y% D V* z2 @- UDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)$ g0 z- U) X/ I8 {
Acquisition. ~4 m% {) W. Q: s0 ?: x% ]
Planning
# B, K6 u' m1 J+ L0 w7 c) Y: z4 y( pThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
2 r$ A& S4 M& mare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
9 w( e% A8 s0 m/ q vneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout& Z1 I6 V. r- F S) y% ^
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
, {# H) B2 I: s9 ^2 q1 lmanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.0 ]/ d8 C1 T. [* o* s% [
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A2 e5 c7 D/ A& J" N) @9 g# t5 ~ g
5
5 d& `4 m& w/ ` kAcquisition
7 I, u# S* j! O8 K' ]- UProgram3 \/ n2 B0 ]; K0 _/ `
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
& q& f* ^$ ]& T$ T# l* Scapability in response to a validated need., K( R' \4 f$ K/ j, N- ^" I
Acquisition
, K3 u: J9 e4 j6 ?3 b$ k IProgram# u( f/ G, R$ O" |
Baseline (APB)
( m |0 K$ S/ p% C1 S6 xAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance+ r9 a3 F' [5 b2 Q0 E4 V$ s
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision @, A2 q+ }% t" C! D: C- `, ` x+ c
authority milestone reviews as follows:2 c/ I! n9 Z/ p q& z+ h3 {: W
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,7 ?+ l9 [1 a4 t/ \: h/ `6 r4 a
Demonstration and Validation.
' c0 @5 v# W7 m2 q4 O2 c4 K" y& S•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in2 a4 X- Y6 `$ C
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
- z; P( @8 j- j- _2 H% z•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in! i1 H. F, u; m! W
Phase III, Production and Deployment.9 `# [! Q/ O0 {- [& L
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
1 J1 j7 e# H+ `3 E" R5 {parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called" t& {- @. C7 K; z5 h! `( S
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
3 q7 b* T7 L8 g; y8 K* M0 jchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
5 g9 x4 R) N4 o' v0 ]) m9 uthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
8 f4 f1 p9 L, f- W. r9 s- d/ s u& ddeviation.
T- C; C, i; C, {) P rAcquisition
& x, q3 i0 m1 \ v' V& x; @Radar
5 H; o! K! H$ Z: L+ DRadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the* t- C5 \8 P9 G8 ?; t
background and non-hostile objects.
8 a; N0 ?) T! i4 X( T' }Acquisition
L; p" A& k1 P( ^. f0 WRisk5 V9 b) X- `3 C) K
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
1 I: q: O' Z$ c6 @: i0 j6 Zunintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,7 o$ b$ e4 _2 G
cost, or availability for deployment.
0 C T( ?) F) B/ QAcquisition/) r/ {# M. E5 V. h
Reacquisition
9 W& c4 a a7 C- s2 uTime
4 L! x- g" x( s5 ~7 \( k2 YThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
$ {% Z8 c5 p% Q5 M |includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|