- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition- l( Z% b c; Z; m! i
Categories# @1 F) p& E1 j' S" [
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
7 u4 j- @- @4 J$ g9 e. s! f7 {and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories* q0 q2 B k. i! A( G
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.0 G0 A0 g7 E- D+ U+ v& G
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They; G7 J4 {3 g0 G1 V% c/ h$ C
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting0 H2 q% A$ N% o2 N
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under5 x+ S4 |; I: v7 d
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
- z9 \# g/ E6 n$ D0 ](b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
5 l ^$ p$ w8 ~2 K7 Nacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the* q& T7 x5 W: \7 ]! C$ Y
Component Acquisition Executive.7 H" n; O; f7 V& v+ O/ R2 B1 S
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is* d/ P8 v. s7 r C
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have/ ?/ R- O1 i3 t+ S
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area) K/ k) E$ s. U1 k: ]4 d) M
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
6 J( _ N' {% H0 E% n" gcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone# L8 J" j' U* `; U! c! r1 F" _
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate& T" Q) f9 d( z- r
within their respective organizations.) R) d6 n6 J$ Z% ^4 [
Acquisition1 m- C2 h- \) h! b. m
Decision
3 b4 e( U/ V# `Memorandum
8 v5 h3 B) n4 B(ADM)
. z4 C" t* _/ {4 u6 v$ RA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
# x6 R0 s! q; e) \& \; zdecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone- C+ T# x$ H, Q* @% U. S; a$ t
decision review or in-process review., K/ L. t, L8 s" |+ @% Z
Acquisition1 N% x4 X9 y. x" y
Field of View
~& q9 t& {4 D! ^7 j' ]' W! R(FOV)
@7 M; l, [0 Y- C3 o7 ]The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process1 l- G7 G$ O' X( |! c* }8 Q+ q, s2 H
of searching its assigned volume.
) |4 _3 k5 p5 Z7 g, ?5 JAcquisition Life
9 g+ o6 I; J+ Q. E% RCycle
0 C& L' ]2 b. r$ x7 s) Q8 AFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which; w/ A2 g$ A- s# o. Y8 L- ~
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
, k) w! N. w1 y! \" ]& M7 iproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
+ B7 P$ y- E% @6 Q" land Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and* r7 {& a% N- c
Deployment, Operations and Support.' D( y J4 }4 a; i( K
Acquisition
9 s1 Z/ M8 }5 }/ E1 [9 jLogistics
! R; E- `3 K! k7 W6 l( t5 EProcess of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
$ U, a: H7 y0 u: l* \7 A3 Nanalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics; F2 G% Q$ t) s
support throughout the acquisition process.5 W* ^# j- N- _, e% e0 `
Acquisition- V- S P4 B: Y
Management
. ^* |8 f0 j' NManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of- G0 H) c5 j) F9 ~6 O
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense* j# s5 ^" X% c8 e5 _* f
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense$ l3 K! g& U# ?1 U' E
acquisition systems/programs.( V& B: j' o% A/ `* }
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
5 G; m) l- Q+ Z7 r1 [the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
4 k. P' c$ r! m1 ]( wcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and; u' f$ R ~* n* X4 `, c
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)5 z0 Z. l% }) @, I
Acquisition
5 b( B0 W5 L1 b: S; l2 r" ^" kPlanning' l/ r4 \+ d) ?9 M: s. L- H
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
7 G! c0 ^6 Q% M- ?5 Ware coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
6 z3 e* S6 Y: G0 Xneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout! t6 F" ~8 @. C/ \ [8 Y
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for. ^: U( m1 ?) B; E' s2 S0 ?# u
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
* P# {: e1 a6 Q- m1 CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
/ c( l6 F' m, M6 h+ o6 N* b5
7 A1 L: p+ a" t; ]1 b, `Acquisition2 j. o9 f3 P$ o* C+ R3 E* C1 x! V6 ~
Program
# o% s% e& m( X! L( nA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
! _' V- k5 _$ {* \7 N# mcapability in response to a validated need.
( I& [. q/ D1 F1 A8 e: C# tAcquisition7 p V7 @6 u! ^- e |7 m" D
Program+ R5 t+ Y5 I* g" l5 K9 _" I
Baseline (APB)" [1 h. o- U6 n1 o k/ ]4 G- w
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
! H* h. l) M$ }2 h4 S+ wobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
L4 u9 p" o3 ]1 }5 Fauthority milestone reviews as follows:
4 x7 ]5 n# j/ |% `2 O9 C+ [3 C z% h8 K•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,1 k/ l- z$ `0 S4 p
Demonstration and Validation.
0 ]( Z/ ^1 \. D& J8 C# i•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in+ |8 M8 r; `" d& x% S
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.$ `) U0 b0 N: A/ u+ n$ Z3 r' Y
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in0 E5 ~; E6 j: f4 _6 d& Z+ O# v
Phase III, Production and Deployment.
8 B* q4 C) n% G$ T5 D3 TEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance8 z$ J H/ {5 |3 r% _
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called' X1 h' ~4 X4 b
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be# F0 |$ d8 G4 Z6 I
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
/ M9 y- Q; l! G6 [, mthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline9 @, n2 X; y. b9 l- x* s! t6 R
deviation.
% ^' x# \8 T! B5 L% fAcquisition
( C. H% B! L' v" ORadar
7 d @6 Q, n, b3 H9 L. T" ERadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the- W) k p- x- B
background and non-hostile objects., U3 ?3 C5 Q3 d6 X0 u
Acquisition
/ b+ v* h. Q6 h3 {Risk# [; |; Y2 E& o/ O6 J6 I
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an4 Q# U# e4 A( G
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
( a/ `( |7 Y5 y" w- f- I$ ]cost, or availability for deployment.' p* \+ }+ G: z4 R% L( Z1 F3 L
Acquisition/
8 E& Z; B; m% @. a) ~Reacquisition- a2 a$ P# M1 U ^' o
Time
' v) N$ \3 Y8 q" kThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This# p3 K- Z! n5 I5 `- V \
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|