航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 1402|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

747 CF6-80C2 Icing Events [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2010-4-5 20:39:56 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

747 CF6-80C2 Icing Events

 

游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

2#
发表于 2010-4-5 20:40:14 |只看该作者
747.1
747 CF6-80C2 Icing
Events
Jeanne Mason
Propulsion Operability
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
May 2004
The Boeing Company 747.2
Inclement Weather Event History
• Seventeen CF6-80C2 FADEC engine flameout events have
occurred between 1991 and 2004
• All 17 events occurred during descent in inclement
weather conditions.
• Five dual engine events (three 747-400 and two MD-11)
have been reported.
• All engines were restarted and operated normally for
remainder of flight.
• No PMC engine flameouts have been reported during
descent in inclement weather
• Only one event reported on the 767.
The Boeing Company 747.3
Inclement Weather Event Locations
1
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Event no. Date A/C Locn Alt
1 4/29/1991 747-400 WASH, DC 19000
2 6/9/1993 747-400 HONG KONG 30000
3 11/26/1993 MD11 INDIA U
4 1/5/1995 MD11 LAX 11500
5 2/17/1995 747-400 BRAZIL 15000
6 5/13/1995 MD11 JAPAN 17500
7 3/21/1996 747-400 MALAYSIA 19000
8 5/29/1996 747-400 HONG KONG 18500
9 4/6/1997 747-400 JAPAN 22100
10 6/3/1998 747-400 HONG KONG 20600
11 9/1/2000 MD11 HONG KONG 28000
12 12/19/2000 747-400 MALAYSIA U
13 5/4/2002 MD11 FLORIDA 23000
14 1/10/2003 747-400 URUGUAY 28000
15 4/3/2003 767-300ER JAPAN 13300
16 12/26/2003 747-400 BRISBANE 32200
17 3/1/2004 MD-11 BANGKOK 33000
The Boeing Company 747.4
Characteristic Event Details
• Engine behavior and climatic conditions were similar in
these events.
– Engine flamed out:
– Descent in icing conditions,
– at or near approach idle.
– At level-off, during throttle-up,
– TAT was typically flat-lined at 0oC shortly before
event.
– The airplanes were near thunderstorms/convective
weather systems.
– The icing conditions appear different from “normal”
icing conditions.
– Engine icing can occur without detectable airframe
icing.
The Boeing Company 747.5
Characteristic Event Details - Relight
– FADEC auto relight typically causes engines to selfrecover
without pilot intervention.
– Time for relight and recovery to commanded power
ranges from 30 sec – 120 sec.
– Auto relight has always relit the engine inside the start
envelope, and sometimes above the envelope.
– In many cases engine anti-ice and ignition were selected
prior to the flameout.
The Boeing Company 747.6
Characteristic Event Details – Ice Shed
• Flameout phenomenon:
– Believed to be caused by ice shed from booster static
structure.
– Believe that temperature rise on descent, and airflow
increase during throttle-up causes ice to shed.
– On acceleration from approach idle VBVs are closing, ice
goes into core.
– Resulting heat absorption from ice/water in the combustor
quenches the flame.
The Boeing Company 747.7
Recent Event Findings
HPC airfoil damage was observed after the last two events.
• Both events occurred during icing conditions at high altitude
• In both events the engines operated normally for the
remainder of the event flight after they were restarted
• Mechanism for damage is not understood.
• Change to AMM/fault isolation manuals/FRM to ensure
HPC borescope inspection occurs after flameout in
suspected inclement weather events is under
consideration.
The Boeing Company 747.8
ECU VBV Logic Revised 1996
• GE Introduced change in ECU VBV control logic to open
VBV schedule in 1996
– Opens VBV’s to increase ice extraction from booster
discharge / core inlet
– Targeted 10K to 20K ft altitude range
– Typical icing envelope
– Phased out completely below 5K and above
25K
• Boeing and GE recommend incorporation of the modified
schedule.
– No events have occurred on airplanes where it is
incorporated inside the altitude envelope where it is
active.
– The software modification does not cover all known
events.
The Boeing Company 747.9
Operational Considerations
• Engine anti ice, which commands approach idle engine
speed has not shown to be effective in preventing
flameouts due to core ice ingestion.
• Continuous ignition selected ON prior to event has not
prevented flameout.
• TAT freezing does not appear to be a reliable indicator of
conditions which can cause flameout.
• Airframe icing is not always evident in these conditions.
The Boeing Company 747.10
Boeing Safety Service Related Problem
(SRP)
This issue is being given the highest priority at Boeing and GE
• Working together to determine root cause of the flameouts.
• Actions include:
– Low altitude capability – ensure capability below 10,000 ft.
is adequate.
– HPC damage – put procedures in place to ensure no
follow-on flight with damage.
– Determine interim operational procedures that can reduce
the likelihood of flameout.
– Insure current operational procedures are adequate in the
event of flameout
– Ensure the operational community is aware of the flameout
phenomenon.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

3#
发表于 2010-5-4 00:52:04 |只看该作者
我不想落水的

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

4#
发表于 2010-6-11 00:23:53 |只看该作者

回复 1# 民航 的帖子

先顶后下!!!!!!!!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

5#
发表于 2010-6-12 07:35:32 |只看该作者
看,谢谢楼主

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

6#
发表于 2010-7-25 10:42:48 |只看该作者
这么好的资料,谢谢分享

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

7#
发表于 2010-7-28 09:08:27 |只看该作者

楼主辛苦啦~~

楼主辛苦啦~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

8#
发表于 2010-7-30 15:03:17 |只看该作者
飞行教材?

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-24 00:19 , Processed in 0.026002 second(s), 12 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部