航空 发表于 2010-8-21 23:49:37

Navigation Evolution, & LAAS Certification

**** Hidden Message *****

航空 发表于 2010-8-21 23:49:49

Federal Aviation<BR>Administration U.S. GNSS Update: p<BR>Navigation Evolution,<BR>&amp; LAAS Certification<BR>Moving To a Performance Based NAS<BR>• FAA’s Goal Is To<BR>Design An Integrated,<BR>Performance Based<BR>National Airspace<BR>System That Can Meet<BR>The Needs Of<BR>Tomorrow And Satisfy<BR>ICAO’s Vision Of A<BR>Safe, Secure, And<BR>S l I t ti l<BR>Presentation to: Regional Airline Seamless International<BR>Air Transportation<BR>PresentSatiyons tot:e Rmegional Association<BR>Flight Technology Committee<BR>Name: Phil Leman<BR>Date: June 2, 2005<BR>System<BR>Federal Aviation 2<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Performance-Based Navigation in the<BR>United States<BR>• Complete Transition By 2025<BR>• Consistent With ICAO Global Vision<BR>• Operational Capability Based On GPS And Augmentations<BR>• Enhance Safety, Capacity, Efficiency<BR>• Reduce Cost For Legacy Navigation Systems<BR>Streamlined<BR>Vector -Free<BR>A i l<BR>Efficient, Flexible Routing<BR>Arrivals All-Weather<BR>Approaches<BR>Departures Federal Aviation 3<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Aviation Navigation Evolution<BR>• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)<BR>Structure For Future Air Navigation Is Global<BR>Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Capability<BR>• Components Of GNSS:<BR>– Satellite Position, Velocity, and Time Constellation(s)<BR>• Global Positioning Satellites (GPS), U.S. - Operational<BR>• GLONASS, Russian Federation – Limited Operational<BR>• Galileo, European Union - Not Operational<BR>• Compass – Not Operational<BR>– Augmentation Systems<BR>• Aircraft Based Augmentation Systems (ABAS)<BR>• Satellite Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS)<BR>• Ground Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS)<BR>Federal Aviation 4<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>FAA Satellite Navigation Vision<BR>Federal Aviation 5<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>LAAS and the FAA Next Generation Air<BR>Transportation System (NextGen)<BR>• The Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) represents the U.S.<BR>solution to the international goal of an interoperable GBAS capability<BR>• The FAA has identified GBAS as an “enabler” for the Next<BR>Generation Air Transportation System for the US National Airspace,<BR>as the all-weather landing aid for a satellite based navigation system<BR>for all phases of flight, and as an alternative technology to ILS<BR>• The NextGen Integrated Work Plan (IWP) includes GBAS as part of<BR>the PNT Services enabler roadmap<BR>• GBAS was cited as a promising solution in the New York/ New<BR>Jersey Flight Delay Task Force Report (December 6, 2007). The<BR>report recommends accelerating the development of LAAS<BR>Federal Aviation 6<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>FAA GBAS/LAAS Implementation<BR>• Facility/Service approval for integration into the NAS at Memphis<BR>and Newark early 2010<BR>• Other US airports interested (Minneapolis, Houston, Seattle, Guam,<BR>Philadelphia, John F Kennedy, Atlanta)<BR>•Memphis<BR>•Memphis Shelby County Airport Authority<BR>•Newark<BR>•Port Authority New York New Jersey<BR>11/10/2009<BR>•Federal Express<BR>•Honeywell Corporation<BR>•FAA<BR>•Continental Airlines<BR>•Honeywell Corporation<BR>•FAA<BR>Federal Aviation 7<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>FAA GBAS Activities<BR>• Continue CAT I implementation at Memphis and<BR>Newark<BR>• Drafting required documents according to FAA<BR>Acquisition Management System (AMS) policy for<BR>CAT II/III acquisition decision<BR>• CAT II/III Activities<BR>– Finalize CAT III standards for user equipment and avionics<BR>– Perform Prototyping and Validation<BR>– Develop CAT-III Prototype LGF and User Avionics by<BR>~2010/11<BR>– Validate a Integrity Design and Allocations ~2011<BR>– Develop FAA Ground Equipment Specification<BR>Federal Aviation 8<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS Integrity<BR>• Responsibility for GBAS Integrity resides in the<BR>Ground Facility<BR>– The user (aircraft) receives a set of integrity parameters from<BR>the LGF and applies those in a set of standardized equations<BR>to determine protection levels<BR>– A protection level bound, or Alert Limit, is transmitted from the<BR>LGF with each procedure<BR>– The aircraft must check the calculated result against the<BR>requirement<BR>• The Service Provider is responsible for ensuring<BR>that the uplink integrity parameters are accurate<BR>and that they provide the required function<BR>– Ensuring the uplink integrity will require a review of the<BR>equipment design, siting methods/processes, installation<BR>methods/processes, and the methods/processes used to<BR>characterize the actual/installed system performance<BR>Federal Aviation 9<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS CAT I Approval<BR>• To be approved by FAA, system or equipment must be shown to<BR>meet ICAO, FAA and/or other (e.g. RTCA) recognized standard.<BR>• The baseline for the FAA GBAS is the FAA GBAS Specification<BR>2937a<BR>SYSTEM DESIGN<BR>APPROVAL<BR>•Safety<BR>FACILITY APPROVAL<BR>• SERVICE APPROVAL<BR>System • Installation<BR>Assessment<BR>•System Engineering<BR>•Software Design<BR>Assurance<BR>C l H d<BR>Installation Requirements<BR>• O&amp;M Manual<BR>• Operator training<BR>• Local SRMD<BR>• Flight Procedures<BR>Aircraft Approval<BR>• ATC Training<BR>• Pilot Training<BR>•Complex Hardware • Instrument Flight Design<BR>•System Level Verification<BR>•Commercial Instruction<BR>Book<BR>• Flight Inspection<BR>Criteria<BR>• Flight Procedures<BR>•Training Material Review<BR>•System SRMD<BR>•Operational Evaluation<BR>Federal Aviation 10<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS System Design Approval (SDA)<BR>Requirements<BR>• System Design Approval activities are based on:<BR>– FAA Order 6700.20A, Non-Federal Navigational Aids and Air<BR>Traffic Control Facilities<BR>– 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 171.75 allows for<BR>FAA approval of new or non-standard systems and equipment.<BR>– Baseline is the FAA Non-Federal LAAS Specification, FAA-EAJW44-<BR>2937A Category I Local Area Augmentation System<BR>Ground Facility<BR>• GBAS Facility Approval and Service Approval<BR>follow SDA<BR>Federal Aviation 11<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Design Approval<BR>System Design<BR>Approval<BR>SW Design Assurance<BR>Training Material Review Reviews<BR>System Safety<BR>Assessment<BR>Complex HW Design<BR>Assurance Reviews<BR>Commercial<BR>Instruction Book<BR>Review<BR>Systems Engineering<BR>Review<BR>System Level<BR>Verification<BR>Functional Hazard<BR>Assessment<BR>HMI Analysis/Report<BR>Preliminary System<BR>Safety FMEA/FMES<BR>Assessment<BR>Algorithm Description<BR>Document<BR>SRMD<BR>(System Design<BR>Aspects)<BR>Federal Aviation 12<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Design Approval Areas<BR>• System Engineering<BR>• System Level Verification<BR>• Software Design Assurance<BR>• Complex Hardware Design<BR>• Commercial Instruction Book<BR>• Training Material (Maintainer Training)<BR>• System Safety Assessment<BR>• Operational Evaluation<BR>Federal Aviation 13<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Engineering Review<BR>• Review of applicant's system engineering<BR>processes and products<BR>– Human Factors<BR>– Personnel Safety<BR>– Security<BR>– Reliability/Availability<BR>– Spectrum<BR>– Requirements Management process<BR>– Configuration Management process<BR>– Quality Assurance process<BR>Federal Aviation 14<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Level Verification Review<BR>• Intent is to find compliance with every<BR>system requirement in the Specification<BR>– Review of applicant's verification processes and<BR>products<BR>– For each requirement in the non-Fed specification:<BR>• Trace Requirement from non-Fed spec through design<BR>– Requirements decomposition, implementation<BR>• Review Test Plan, Procedures and Results<BR>– Hardware/Software integration plans, procedures, and results,<BR>– Inspection procedures and reports,<BR>– Analysis and simulation files and reports<BR>• Ensure test approach is adequate<BR>Federal Aviation 15<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Software Design Assurance Review<BR>• Intent is to find compliance with the<BR>applicable objectives listed in RTCA DO-278<BR>– Review of applicant’s (and sub-contractors’)<BR>software development processes and products<BR>– Perform desk reviews and on-site audits at key<BR>points during the SW development lifecycle<BR>• Review planning documents, standards,<BR>• Review requirements, design, code, &amp; integration artifacts,<BR>• Review verification plans, procedures, &amp; results,<BR>• Review CM &amp; QA records,<BR>Federal Aviation 16<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Complex Electronic Hardware Review<BR>• Intent is to find compliance with the<BR>appropriate objectives listed in RTCA DO-<BR>254<BR>– Review of applicant’s (and sub-contractors’)<BR>complex electronic hardware (CEH) development<BR>processes and products<BR>– Perform desk reviews and on-site audits at key<BR>points during the CEH development lifecycle<BR>• Review planning documents and standards,<BR>• Review requirements, design, simulation, &amp; integration artifacts,<BR>• Review validation and verification processes, procedures, &amp;<BR>results,<BR>• Review CM &amp; process assurance records,<BR>Federal Aviation 17<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Commercial Instruction Book Review<BR>• Intent is to find compliance with FAA-D-<BR>2494/b<BR>– Contains all necessary information, is up to date with<BR>the as-built equipment and has been validated by<BR>the applicant<BR>– In-Process Reviews of the applicant’s Commercial Instruction<BR>Book (CIB) development activities<BR>• Technical descriptions, standards &amp; tolerances, maintenance schedules &amp;<BR>procedures, parts lists, installation procedures, etc<BR>– Review of applicant’s CIB Validation<BR>• FAA review and hands-on verification of maintenance procedures (periodic<BR>and corrective), operations, troubleshooting, installation procedures<BR>Federal Aviation 18<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Training Material Review<BR>• Review of the training development process<BR>and training materials<BR>– Intent is to ensure that training materials:<BR>• Are consistent with the equipment design,<BR>• Appropriately cover periodic and corrective<BR>maintenance, and<BR>• Appropriately cover operations activities<BR>(installation, calibration, normal operation, etc.)<BR>Federal Aviation 19<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Safety Assessment Review<BR>• Review of applicant's system safety<BR>processes and products using:<BR>– ARP 4754, Certification Considerations for Highly-Integrated or<BR>Complex Aircraft Systems<BR>– ARP 4761, Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety<BR>Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment<BR>– FAA-prepared Operational Hazard Assessment (OHA)<BR>• The FAA’s Safety Management System (SMS) must<BR>be employed IAW FAA Policy<BR>– FAA-developed Safety Risk Management Document (SRMD) must be<BR>coordinated and approved<BR>• Residual risks are acceptable<BR>– Disposition of system risks required prior to System Design Approval<BR>Federal Aviation 20<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>System Safety Assessment<BR>• Standard Documentation<BR>– Applicant System Safety Assurance Plan<BR>– Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA)<BR>– Preliminary System Safety Assessment (PSSA)<BR>– System Safety Assessment (SSA)<BR>• Additional Safety Related Documentation<BR>– Algorithm Design Document<BR>– HMI Analysis/Report<BR>Federal Aviation 21<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Operational Evaluation<BR>• The purpose of this activity is to review the operation of the system<BR>in the installed configuration.<BR>– Evaluation Criteria<BR>• The system is operated in accordance with the operating instruction provided in the<BR>Commercial Instruction Book to ensure that the system operates as intended.<BR>• System Stability Test<BR>– Operate the system over continuously over an extended period of to evaluate the basic<BR>stability of the system.<BR>• System Log Event Recording<BR>– Review of system event / fault logs for false alarms, false exclusions, missed detections, etc.)<BR>– Evaluation of System Operation<BR>• Review independent user performance data to verify that the information reported in<BR>the event log is correct. This is done by comparing the system data to data recorded<BR>by an independent system such as the FAATC’s GAEM<BR>• Evaluate the system behavior when confronted with obstructions and reflectors (this<BR>is done to verify that the system responds appropriately with an excluded RR, an<BR>event log entry, etc)<BR>Federal Aviation 22<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS CAT I Approval<BR>• To be approved by FAA, system or equipment must be shown to<BR>meet ICAO, FAA and/or other (e.g. RTCA) recognized standard.<BR>• The baseline for the FAA GBAS is the FAA GBAS Specification<BR>2937a<BR>SYSTEM DESIGN<BR>APPROVAL<BR>•System Safety Assessment<BR>FACILITY APPROVAL<BR>•SERVICE APPROVAL<BR>•Installation<BR>•System Engineering<BR>•Software Design<BR>Assurance<BR>•Complex Hardware Design<BR>S t L l V ifi ti<BR>Installation Requirements<BR>• O&amp;M Manual<BR>• Operator training<BR>•Local SRMD<BR>•Procedures<BR>Aircraft Approval<BR>•ATC Training<BR>• Pilot Training<BR>•System Level Verification • Instrument Flight •Commercial Instruction<BR>Book<BR>•Training Material Review<BR>•Flight •Flight Inspection<BR>Criteria<BR>• Flight Procedures<BR>System SRMD<BR>•Operational Evaluation<BR>Federal Aviation 23<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Key Components/Considerations of the<BR>Facility Approval Plan<BR>• The Facility Approval Plan describes the activities, objectives,<BR>and documentation necessary to address:<BR>– Installation<BR>– System Operations<BR>– Security<BR>– Spectrum<BR>– Personnel<BR>– Test and Evaluation<BR>– Maintenance<BR>• Local SRMD<BR>• Flight Procedures<BR>• Flight Inspection<BR>Federal Aviation 24<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS CAT I Approval<BR>• To be approved by FAA, system or equipment must be shown to<BR>meet ICAO, FAA and/or other (e.g. RTCA) recognized standard.<BR>• The baseline for the FAA GBAS is the FAA GBAS Specification<BR>2937a<BR>SYSTEM DESIGN<BR>APPROVAL<BR>• System Safety Assessment<BR>FACILITY APPROVAL<BR>•SERVICE APPROVAL<BR>• Installation<BR>• System Engineering<BR>• Software Design<BR>Assurance<BR>• Complex Hardware Design<BR>S t L l V ifi ti<BR>Installation Requirements<BR>• O&amp;M Manual<BR>• Operator training<BR>• Local SRMD<BR>• Flight Procedures<BR>Aircraft Approval<BR>• ATC Training<BR>• Pilot Training<BR>• System Level Verification • Instrument Flight • Commercial Instruction<BR>Book<BR>• Training Material Review<BR>• • Flight Inspection<BR>Criteria<BR>System SRMD<BR>•Operational Evaluation<BR>Federal Aviation 25<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Service Approval – User Requirements<BR>• Aircraft Equipment<BR>– Aircraft equipment designs approved via FAA Technical Standard Orders<BR>(TSOs)<BR>• TSO-C161 (GBAS equipment)<BR>• TSO-C162 (GBAS VHF Receiver)<BR>• TSO-C190 (Active Antenna)<BR>– Aircraft installations approved via existing FAA processes (e.g., TC, STC, etc)<BR>• User/Airlines<BR>– Coordinating Approval with FAA Flight Standards POI (Principle Operations<BR>Inspector) assigned to an air carrier certificate holder and responsible for the<BR>approval of this training<BR>– Continental and Qantas use Aircrew Bulletins<BR>• ATC Training<BR>– Computer based training<BR>• GBAS technology, procedures, phraseology, etc.<BR>Federal Aviation 26<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>GBAS Avionics Integration<BR>• GBAS/LAAS CAT I avionics documents<BR>completed<BR>– (MASPS / MOPS / TSO / SARPS)<BR>• LAAS Integration into Multi Mode Receiver<BR>(MMR) completed<BR>– Rockwell Collins MMR<BR>• Boeing<BR>– 737- 800 series GBAS capable,<BR>– B787 and B 747-800 GBAS as standard<BR>capability<BR>• Airbus<BR>– A320/A380 certification completed<BR>– Planning for GBAS option in all new generation<BR>aircraft<BR>Federal Aviation 27<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009<BR>Summary<BR>• The U.S. is transitioning to a performance based CNS/ATM system<BR>• GNSS is one of the cornerstones of NextGen<BR>• RNAV/RNP is being implemented throughout the U.S. National<BR>Airspace<BR>• SBAS (WAAS) development continuing with LP and LPV-200<BR>certifications<BR>• GBAS System Design Approval completed in Sept 2009 for<BR>Honeywell SLS 4000 “SmartPath”<BR>– LAAS implementation efforts ongoing for Memphis and Newark with<BR>operational approval expected early 2010<BR>– LAAS avionics available today, multiple aircraft and air carriers already<BR>equipped<BR>– Continuing to investigate technical approach to achieve Cat III GBAS<BR>• GPS III Plan will incorporate greater civil capabilities while<BR>increasing multinational signal compatibility<BR>• The United States will continue its multilateral and bilateral efforts<BR>Federal Aviation 28<BR>Administration<BR>FAA GBAS Certification<BR>China 2009

drjones 发表于 2010-9-1 09:37:29

很好!正对此感兴趣 !

很好!正对此感兴趣 !

icekylinwin 发表于 2011-1-20 19:48:34

gfgggdfgdfgdfsgfdgsdfg

brightjm 发表于 2011-1-23 20:53:35

<P>非常感谢。</P>

skycloud1011 发表于 2011-2-14 09:43:14

Good!Thanks!

gcjcdn-007 发表于 2012-2-9 10:13:31

正是我所求的,多谢多谢

liu5031 发表于 2012-3-10 09:35:31

看看这个资料
页: [1]
查看完整版本: Navigation Evolution, & LAAS Certification