航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H 8 w2 R Z, ?. c; [' t& U* q130 2 t( F$ j; h0 _8 QHuman-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system% d' X% l+ A5 w$ z. D processes. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential( S' `9 ~2 v1 ?7 Y8 {: i9 Z high-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to 8 P& Q) C L k: ~" e( E8 SBMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal* T: B/ `7 s- [8 S. N3 H# E Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of1 R) r% I1 _. z; R7 s command and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost5 Y1 U& \; s) v2 R7 W8 ? phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses , O( h. x* |! S% B2 rto initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human 1 X- h' C# Z3 l6 y) `9 }2 t+ T# ?# ? ydecision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) ! ~3 W: }$ J4 L1 X. ?- ~Human - m/ H, F, E% t* JIntelligence& c8 c. [7 X& X& s3 \ (HUMINT)% t( Y% Z1 U9 X. L A category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by + t3 x% n5 |8 `human sources. 2 p" G8 q/ Y: Y* E8 C0 {$ pHuman Systems& m* f' Z* S2 i- r+ s9 v Integration ( r% {% X% |. e$ JThe human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, 8 W4 E! F% U* Ftraining, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort3 b. u+ i" q: Z: ^- C- U/ l for the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of7 f+ u( t% s9 z/ f4 B ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier, 0 T' W6 M( x+ Q2 D, a/ \ F& Gsailor, airman, or Marine.2 P: Z7 J5 Q |9 F" f4 P HUMINT Human Intelligence.6 S& k* p9 h [- l HVAA High Value Airborne Assets. ! [8 d; `9 p" g" q; mHVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. " S& @. o* m e. Q( O: GHVG Hypervelocity Gun. % P5 \9 p* L9 w# UHVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). " P: I* y+ M3 }, _4 jHVM Hypervelocity Missile. ]4 u* ^1 z4 x( _: x8 N6 s HVP Hypervelocity Projectile. 9 g1 F5 A! m. Q7 Z2 EHVT Half-Value Thickness. ! t- f0 v" ?$ I+ h3 b! N iHW Hardware. ! _: y& {- c$ U0 uHW/SW Hardware/Software. % p) C7 @1 O5 w% H, f9 qHWCI Hardware Configuration Item. * k% s4 h9 Q) Y' G! BHWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. ( I& e9 n* V% F% G6 m1 FHWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test. 7 h( I8 Z( q7 O. S. UHYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature. + S7 c4 e) w- G+ v' bHypervelocity7 G' t9 m& x4 A) E1 c! f Gun (HVG)$ I% |8 z& Y7 O9 R! f' A( G3 x3 b A gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example,5 W' U& `8 a4 V# M1 z5 {) f( D+ T an electromagnetic or rail gun. . H5 w; T0 c3 G2 xHypervelocity v& }& ^% Z+ e% L% y/ ~# I5 iMissile (HVM)2 f9 S2 f3 g% \: Q% \* `1 L A missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second. ( _! |" Z: d& ?0 R m @HYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance.& }+ i1 I) U) g+ r( X$ A& |5 c Hz Hertz (cycles per second). ! S+ j6 S9 `# J* dMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 0 M& K9 F" i1 ?( p& {1 v131 % C0 l. y5 \/ f8 j+ Y/ HI&CO Installation and Checkout.+ \; u9 Z( J: v d I&I Installation and Integration. & U9 D" y2 t# N; e' `( ]# e6 AI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis. 6 z% n! n: q4 R; d/ V4 _I&T Integration and Test." |- f# j! B$ E5 |& W I&W Indications and Warning. ! E: }) ?' {; g6 T( n5 i) AI-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering. 9 S0 [' b- Y# e- r5 f; J3 c8 e5 _I-HAWK Improved HAWK.) g: X7 {# b2 @5 ~" z' l I-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term). $ W' i8 F/ i. B( M. ^1 V1 @I/F Interface.1 D9 ]3 r$ o4 o9 ]2 L: e I/O Input/Output.) [' D! u& J/ M* T& v4 n$ g I/R Interchangeability/Reparability." h/ X8 b2 U, g7 M4 M2 p4 A/ R: K I4 International Information Integrity Institute. + ^0 ]2 n4 o( R. Z1 r% u2 MIA Information Architecture. ! M- `6 X6 B, Y4 f" _IA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations. t' r8 j8 s6 P8 a3 } IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test. + J5 ~) t% H) JIAD Integrated Air Defense.4 \& ~, T$ A; P8 f( w& N IADS Integrated Air Defense System. 2 [! i% `. ~; r2 OIAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.* E5 h4 P# N# J( ?1 y7 m IAG International Agreement Generator. ! J% p1 p0 s( M, \5 `. N6 N6 \IAI Israel Aircraft Industries. % Q" | k+ b1 E8 n \7 ]IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package.9 w4 I B8 |4 M( s IAS Israeli Architecture Study.* B3 |! p( r& P! m! w5 B IAT Integrated Assembly Test.9 y, R& W- w& O0 @) h2 d1 Y IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. 1 A( `* A" ]( _3 d$ ^" IIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out. , X- k6 C+ C& b" DIAW In Accordance With. 0 D: x( v; H lIBA Industrial Base Assessment. 4 v( N9 A, `6 R% p2 q6 b; `IBC Impurity Band Conduction.( [, l/ X- Q! R1 h IBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.7 J0 C' ?4 ^# W( P; Y9 @ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - ^7 [( ], A; O1323 [3 N0 c6 { V! l, E/ _' f IBDL Intra-Battery Data Link." o/ _! I0 C; u IBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration H4 ?; p9 V |* pIBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System., Y2 e; T( G- Y1 U IBM International Business Machines Corporation.& `: F' b8 e: q7 n6 | IBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis. # ?; x9 U& p- @# I8 J Y- ]5 WIBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term).( I: `. V5 H U& `, T$ ~" K IBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US, H4 D; j- m2 S naval ships.0 r5 T0 M- R- g1 a) G6 \ IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey. * W h' D L |$ M" l; ?$ r3 j! H: [IC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit. 9 t7 Y; R( u( b: g, BICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment. 5 v* ?, H0 u) w* i/ }" k, kICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System.' X/ ] i( _! W& G ICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces.1 c# N2 S; T+ g5 ]4 R6 X ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. 8 j" v- S- s) \- d! |" {0 _0 F) SICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control0 O6 D+ D" S. y; ^, M7 {: y System (ICS) for US naval ships. " v% |; o$ ?0 k& VICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering.% k% b$ u+ N9 M8 ? ICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. 9 \, z# S5 O5 ?8 p8 q; p, `ICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).9 D# S. n4 }2 Z (2) Item Category Code (ILS term). ! K2 I6 O9 I, ]% X- n6 SICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing.* h1 R- K; `. s2 M. Q ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security.$ e, R8 e, s* g% M ICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking.+ _7 F/ Y( l x5 u ICD Interface Control Document/Drawing.( e7 [, k" E7 d! D4 j9 ~7 a ICE Independent Cost Estimate.- T& j- w* M' f4 S ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO). 2 b8 Y1 \ g* g$ F8 k/ X; aICM Improved Conventional Munitions.1 s1 R3 N; |! o }6 H- A8 S ICN Installation Completion Notification. + a k7 s/ q% o% lICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term).' o# ?" J$ I& ]( R) c ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures. : _" z' a3 m e+ e) aMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I R' o8 Z8 O% r( ] 1336 f/ v8 v& {1 }3 I8 u: P0 | ICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term).% z, g5 [* \' `' X3 g (3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process. ; S: V8 \6 [, W# w1 W3 s0 j! fICR Integrated Contracting Report. " v+ W. S5 O2 `9 K/ K; y QICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and! K8 y- C) x- r- A# o9 _0 K control system for US naval ships.) `, K! N' t# H: f# T. Y& ?" E. K (2) Interface Control Specification. # m' |0 s+ j/ R% q3 ~+ w! fICU Interface Control Unit. 6 u, [7 ]: V% U/ h2 F+ l3 U# A8 J. ^ICWG Interface Control Working Group.; k6 Y% p$ Q! t ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification.! y6 I& E# z! s' V7 W v IDA Institute for Defense Analysis.) {/ A! x1 t9 U* X; z5 j l9 O2 W. s. A IDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term). # }4 G$ }1 G. _IDB Integrated Data Base. 2 C1 X$ e( x' s% O" n; sIDD Interface Design Document. 9 K f, u; a( QIDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis." b. g+ y9 m# \+ H- @$ i% b/ M IDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term).4 v# x+ V. D( U* V7 U- {( B Identification 3 o3 l- @ U. d! }Friend or Foe ; m5 |- I( T1 B# \(IFF) u) }+ t. i$ a5 _A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by , }( o; w' i: Lfriendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby + H: M* o8 S# ~9 b |7 l$ O% d5 l+ Hdistinguishing themselves from enemy forces.3 l7 z- C/ n6 J+ V' G: x& M) i IDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. 8 A7 }9 X5 t/ k- u6 fIDHS Intelligence Data Handling System.: K" w& E/ k; t+ z, d8 G8 M4 \ IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.) D/ k$ o- _- W5 t9 H' ] IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System. . s2 y! p8 f/ ]! T: R5 P% W8 JIE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise. . ~6 l5 a, v. yIED Intrinsic Event Discrimination. - L3 N" A0 [' X5 y% |IEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 5 i D% s5 ^6 _' VIEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure. 8 ~ @" Z# @' u" U7 HIEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse.# C, D" u2 `7 _2 u IEP Integrated Evaluation Plan.* X' Z# p8 }) n0 w0 c' ?# S7 p+ h IER Independent Evaluation Report. q& Y) f0 [! Q% i0 ZIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group. d! l" |# Z0 E8 p- l; aMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I$ m X/ }: n' r( t& t) g 134 6 r' x$ [& h9 r8 |* r3 S! LIETF Internet Engineering Task Force. 6 u, i# b, _) i" r- O2 |, yIEV Integrated Experimental Version.. B! |) C' e# J z5 m# v6 z- D IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare. * O. h3 k& } y$ i- TIFA Integrated Financial Analysis. ( \8 k0 d% g+ gIFF Identification, Friend or Foe.+ x- n& k U: Q- W* g* L: V! a IFHV In-Flight Homing View. , g& S3 X9 P N7 o( F7 [IFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the : C2 X t8 {1 O; X5 k0 C) [% i( E1 pcommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets. * C; ]1 p; C! Z* |+ }+ N1 ]( AThe generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications, [7 P7 P3 I6 a0 m system term GEP. 8 {3 P s" v6 _7 {# L5 RIFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope.2 f& Z1 `* l/ @5 v* { IFOV Instantaneous Field of View.+ C# x, N! H- q( s( r5 O: g$ g IFSR In-Flight Status Report% x4 S( Q. v( z g6 | IFT Integrated Flight Test.0 | l' q# R2 E$ e! h; S7 C IFTU In-Flight Target Update. . M' ]; F/ S! |5 {IG Inspector General., g' K: H$ e! ]$ _9 u IGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse. 0 o1 q; ?5 ~7 H) Z9 hIGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard. : U2 C4 \) Q. }$ H- N% dIGS Inertial Guidance System. 6 c% P; ?) G7 \IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS).# x# T X: d5 T5 ^' ?6 q1 U) Y IGT Integrated Ground Test.+ O- ?9 m5 U) c) j IGU Inertial Guidance Unit. ) C6 q! ]+ g! Q Q4 ^$ nII Impulse Intensity. ; M3 A3 N% y' w+ U# |( p) EIIP Interoperability Improvement Program. " ?, E( N f/ _* C& hIIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. ; u% w' A, Z( | X- c! Z6 @+ |IIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.0 z0 s. j1 r. S! U# h I, \. T' j IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).) n/ O a C4 M% v8 Z IIT Interceptor Integration Test. / h# j6 ^$ c f7 f6 c4 RIITF Information Infrastructure Task Force. X1 c6 R9 O( l9 i' a IJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon. 1 s% y$ v9 [$ }: ]9 bMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 N/ F: ^7 W& F }6 x 135 4 b2 I- j: S5 S& W; G' GILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term). - ?: `, u: N8 N* N7 Y8 R+ rILC Initial Launch Capability.( I7 ]) {! e' p" u C/ K( d Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g., 1 M! ~( S- C6 w' `5 E; h3 B. Uavailability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics D/ A2 a5 T) n+ X supportability, etc.).3 B/ a- F5 _" y Illumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray# B: N9 ]9 v$ L, r. L satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. 7 J$ P/ e5 u2 S, H/ H6 g SILS Integrated Logistics Support.0 }6 Z- A: A: q! \4 u1 ~& S ILSM ILS Manager.# @- W' q/ o# B; |9 n" ~* J, a ILSMT ILS Management Team ) u. z/ r- |) p8 j( A( KILSO ILS Office.3 i1 a3 Q9 i6 W. n6 e ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan. : z4 b2 v9 Z1 B" LILSWG ILS Working Group.3 t y. ?5 U( ] IM Information Management. ( F. ?' q: F6 I' QImagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical $ O" K+ H. a- E) j2 ` Y$ wmeans on film, electronic display devices, or other media.; }: v" t" y, u: A- l Imagery & C" Z) z9 D, Y" ~3 Z8 {! l j2 TIntelligence , e0 a- _) V: s1 D, A(IMINT) . u7 u* z% _, K/ q: Y+ iIntelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography,. L. U. x2 v3 D3 K7 m! i# E8 N& t/ p' W infrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic ) q7 d. p' {& J D$ |0 e1 raperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or: O( W9 x, G* A) H electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media.8 g9 h5 P- b$ u5 d! I- w: l; _* P Imagery [4 T( T+ B( V* L2 c1 M |5 D Correlation ) _4 @& e8 I5 G$ @/ K: n+ cThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from! ^& v5 {% b, y7 Q6 ^ different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics 7 _) I0 t! K5 gsignified.: n" {/ |+ `1 L6 k Imaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object.9 V! N& ^6 p' d7 T% U% _ IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term).% Z- f8 t1 a& h/ a, d (2) Internal Management Control. ! U2 c, r4 s Q' o6 D* M4 vIMDB Imagery Management. / Y4 [9 b3 s$ Y2 W7 F- I6 ZIMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of 2 c" K6 O5 U$ A; n- d3 }Defense.; D9 W8 G0 h- \. h( k0 q IMINT Imagery Intelligence. ; ^* J; H+ t, o$ g; H/ AIMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program. . c2 r' S, c) C) b- {4 [Immediate Kill " V$ \- g% h( f' |' |( f" _Mode ' }2 }- Y! m9 |# @# {: e; n2 @A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by / j/ A3 N, H% X1 f) Nimpact with the KV or KED.) x# ~$ \" s9 _! U( W- m Impact Point " S4 \! r5 E6 p# L5 VPrediction (IPP)3 M6 D) h" b6 W! P Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact,, r% L8 F4 z% i* b" C8 d+ T/ _ usually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes # _: i k4 q9 X5 C" x2 |the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties. $ z, B# B: K1 SMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I . O( n$ b5 M5 }1 [6 d. a$ c136 : O; M* g V; r6 L' z; {, M" O4 CImplicit, ?2 d5 T8 v' F9 l4 T. _* L Coordination ) r6 u' T: o k) MMany independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to# r& `- J% M8 n H' T+ E derive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations 0 D. f& c- ?% y" X( I' J! O3 |will be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical.; o0 v) A8 J y2 {, R Decisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers." p5 i! P9 ]- H+ N Impulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for # W8 k, g9 T0 s2 |+ [3 }a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.)5 u7 I& [# Q7 v( B9 b) s! _" ~) M Impulse 2 U. p+ q) t% j$ G RIntensity (II) % w; y; D/ Q6 h- i# qMechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse 8 D/ @! S! N: Z$ M/ l1 l, D4 a- jintensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of 4 c$ X* @( R. N: G( limpulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter;, c& d. a9 Y" h$ ]! k% A! Z hence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s.0 ~* F# T9 \% E+ I Impulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The $ N- F/ [7 K! F" gintensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target4 \( K6 W+ [! D0 k/ m, u" f violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of$ l! k$ I; ~' v5 R' \ the target and causing structural failure.6 N; w" J. `5 G& F$ ~ IMPWG Information Policy Working Group. k3 i3 p) X# e, `, K: Q$ L; x IMS Integrated Master Schedule. . s4 k4 j$ e; p* }% ?+ s% _3 I- yIMU Inertial Measurement Unit.9 B+ L/ I; ^( W/ r. K$ ]- m IN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse, s9 m/ n4 C. u Noise., t6 z4 T* \5 Z In Inch. % d3 L" }" X6 O6 A: \IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator. - T* |7 @! t4 KIn-Flight Target 0 t3 @, C6 W+ x1 q/ }5 u; GUpdate (FTU) . Y- p, W0 x4 m+ SA report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control 5 U3 `0 i, w" }7 Q/ V$ Usuite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target.% c! M5 Q8 Y, n) u Inclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing & V' m r n6 uthe orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has % ~, J( b2 `& ] G* {. l( h; Fan inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite ( e/ Y6 G& l+ e: g$ x x6 ztraveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in e2 K; `7 Y5 A4 A: u which a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An$ |; K- l" h) a4 o- L' L orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is % A) t3 u" L, k6 V4 Lcalled a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a4 @" Z- T/ M2 m! { retrograde orbit. % d9 f* i1 J; {1 {Incremental9 s f# T/ Q. N# N& M. a Funding5 \7 h- N/ \, _! o k The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project9 b& B7 U3 w+ y$ D7 i R based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such! y3 w8 c1 Q2 Y8 w budgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in; L b, C$ [$ K5 n# s: `9 E completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding,3 v. j" e) Q% j3 X where budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated4 M( K2 ^7 q7 A+ G1 a obligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification D% r/ O1 o7 t, @Friend or Foe+ ~1 [. Q' z N7 s9 ~' l) b (IFF) - Y; ?( s7 V# @$ L$ N9 E8 g$ QA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by% I+ m% B; o" H# a( @- Z friendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby2 ^/ c& A5 Z- Q0 D" W distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. * }* t/ @ n8 e! M/ b% P) |MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I; K5 O& e# I: X8 J8 Q 137 - _& S& h8 z$ c0 KImagery1 k( I4 u, Y8 [ Correlation9 d: g' U3 J4 ]+ j The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from! O6 d' E( ^) `( \. V different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics " G6 Z+ ^5 ]5 F1 A3 v# y" s0 Nsignified.- X3 A9 o% F2 ^+ o# N: O Independent , X f0 S7 ]7 u$ @Cost Analysis* \, C8 ?& E5 k1 E s7 J5 Y X An analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body' _) T& V& l9 n3 ^' k disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United # f, b4 ^( I5 z, yStates Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational ! X9 W) k% b4 c! v6 ]Manpower Requirements.”)* f) X3 u. T, [1 y Independent Cost4 V1 m) v. V1 f2 @ Estimate (ICE) 9 V' G2 d- v/ \- J6 X$ ]* D2 ]* [8 e* E" LA cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority4 g* ^+ U* b: M' `; r8 K responsible for acquiring or using the goods or services.2 W5 v; \- ?/ d+ M, t; { Independent; W8 o+ W5 U+ o Evaluation % @7 n N1 z/ @. }: dReport (IER) 3 a# `( a4 B+ a$ h7 @8 Y" f8 o& \) }Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, " ]0 [0 Y8 Q8 E; Z6 preports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s' E. U4 O$ m9 U( d assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on 6 s, U$ B7 x. G) g- T. y5 j( Fthe future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is & W4 C! C6 q9 f( wprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER : c. x. {2 K8 A2 p. Emay also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army) ' ~2 k4 h& w$ }' d7 [" xIndependent$ U5 F# O% ^7 p4 s- h Research and a6 S6 M3 @6 o0 PDevelopment( @6 G( t2 Q" a4 i& a1 M" p. r (IR&D) ! n! T6 T% \, QEffort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a L' b2 Y8 D0 U( S contract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and 3 _* s% O* ?% ?, M! j. ^- s: ?/ R, ~( vapplied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation1 D4 x) F# P6 u8 u studies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See+ r6 H! Q, o" w/ L" F FAR 31.001.)) L5 w3 x: z2 N+ B1 m Independent/ @( v0 |! Q7 t Verification and" Y9 ^( h- @% @$ q8 M; C Validation (IV&V)& X9 H# r @9 P/ `0 x Verification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that) k9 k4 ~4 `- D( K0 b is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being : p. \; e7 i: d! devaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software v1 e( b' ^$ t development activities.! T7 p0 L4 g, L9 {& [. K Indium+ I& a: _0 V& w& u; a: G Antimonide 9 O) F* Z! e! L [, S1 X3 W- Z. | IInfrared sensing material.3 j* g* H9 U) J) M# I$ ^ Individual5 B: m/ I7 t/ @9 u( g Acceptance Test' t9 ~2 z2 O' k A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics % H" w3 e% S1 C5 x. Iprior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using4 T7 k$ f3 c7 U& p ] the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency. , h& Q4 J: j0 H4 I# mInduced' `0 w5 B$ x8 A Environments * o5 T; N: z# D5 _* ~" @Induced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the 5 ] _! Q$ q. O( F; ~6 F- ]$ N6 Lnatural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets * v u2 x- V7 X: K7 m/ P, {8 b(Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or ( |3 I3 M" H/ p: I$ xthe influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally- / P' s4 Y3 X, FInduced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E5 L% r. @& N5 u1 G electronic equipment). " d: i' q' w4 sInduced. y5 m3 n% {& F0 D Radioactivity5 ?( A% ?7 j* Z, s+ ^ Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions, " b6 |0 ?6 p+ s, G, q( j$ |particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of 9 P `) {) O+ U8 E! Aunstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce 1 P" |0 Q- D4 r+ k$ ^/ bradioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by: ^/ e( s" e1 n" B- o interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and " A9 n0 z6 s: h. g2 ?silicon in soil and sea water). H, F# P6 }: ]# E9 f1 @ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I+ p$ H+ j3 E6 D+ C( X5 Z 138 1 O% }# ?0 x3 I& j) ]Industrial: s. Q6 H9 e4 X4 k/ u5 r. s5 g+ B Resource & f0 H' J# W/ x* r$ q3 l o) x' ?3 R& dAnalysis (IRA)! o) K; ], \2 {( `5 U; l A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory, X& X S# g8 `$ D7 l8 [5 x capabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to( y7 B5 y5 L* D9 O support SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and * R+ J1 ?" p, B9 s( t' cspecial tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the 9 ~5 M, f, M0 l' x8 U ?* J0 Drange of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies, % x w9 J' C$ F- u8 A; G( cproducibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in' v- G: A; a8 x" z- @ IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and; s5 l" }7 H7 q0 Y: n* e! y2 P become issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues / Y8 B% h; J$ F; x' O+ w- g( ~2 pResolution Strategies (PPIRS) document.1 }% m( s1 y( X5 f6 ` Inertial 6 }& m M$ K6 iGuidance: p! K0 D6 w" z6 [ A guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,4 G+ M$ S0 l* C3 N/ l, m wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly( z; q# r% g7 a3 G+ q within the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures / s) w# j; _0 R' _9 @& t) x! Tand converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain 6 [8 r% X) N5 V; k$ Bdirection. # s6 B+ q1 Z( D2 }Inertial) D/ t) L& W1 n6 R Measurement l& Y) L. t1 T: Z2 _: Z( Z Unit (IMU)$ K. B9 D- T5 q) s" x A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, # k& \* d5 J7 `( c6 \wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly 8 o' F% ^/ O6 _7 |; [$ N8 xwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures {4 ]( ]3 r+ L3 k8 ?- E and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain & l4 q+ u1 u$ \; w3 |) ?direction. 5 A \' r" E" K$ ?: sINETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability. * m$ G; r! [4 Y2 C( DINEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). % s7 Z y: t: S6 p" UINF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR% r+ x$ `3 L' s8 e: D Treaty.) f% [1 {5 J/ y: i* X In-Flight Target1 U" c5 n7 _; T Q/ F ` Update' U6 v7 x0 ^2 M: J3 I A data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and - w# [' G B8 [+ W4 w2 Wvelocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. & D8 \5 W- s" B(USSPACECOM) 8 W9 {% t/ q3 \3 `8 {# ]3 g+ HInformation, r8 b6 h7 W- j# G5 ^% B/ V$ }7 R- J% ~ Architecture (IA)' L* e7 J0 ?4 Q$ M- d Z% A A description of the information that is needed to support command and control! o! T, e, k$ r8 o: ]( [ decision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing0 x Y$ }' ^! [. A$ e that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description, R" v6 t" i3 B @ J- r, N F! g9 e1 X provides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design * D3 i3 R; M2 g2 ^- t3 R Oflexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability. . B, E% s0 o- j% ^0 v$ @Information& _8 F, }' j, H I) _. M Resources) {- m$ x4 Z5 e) Y1 a4 i Management . J( W# B" Z6 p0 nThe planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling,' D2 W, n0 [0 l" y and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, " M4 e, t0 y% E" p# O9 W: l& fand dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of : E/ N7 e3 J% G+ Q% a# jinformation and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information; o* P, s. y% r+ V D3 A+ a; g' a+ j Security5 [5 G2 w* K" Q" W7 L (INFOSEC) 9 E& u( `9 d7 [( P. \% LThose measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and 2 }/ H- T6 V, \6 j5 M8 uprotecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or . q4 L# V' b6 O5 {0 K4 m' m0 Munclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical2 f* z) C. p' U5 O data and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned 6 {" r/ w1 M+ L3 @3 t1 Gwith security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, y: n l+ F. o( v! ^: Y2 J9 Qdowngrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring. Q( s1 ]$ k' {/ F' L6 E9 EInfrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,0005 f, D3 @! G# c' F: P Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic # ^8 [. o/ Q M5 C7 l& H8 f1 g) ^Radiation.) % e* E9 m9 J+ V/ g9 qInfrared (IR). }( \' W' Q9 Q( s; p1 l1 x Electro-Optics1 F* O J$ S( m& v3 A: ? Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength" ^) o1 p% d9 M% B spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. 8 A: ]- [$ o- N: oMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I$ f2 u/ _5 z ]# g 139 F, a8 d9 X- O9 l+ a f6 LInfrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted8 j) B8 H8 z' |; ~* W3 p C5 q or reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the1 Q/ Q) M! t- d# p electromagnetic spectrum.0 X) x' x1 I$ S2 k, P1 M% o3 r! c Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength 0 u a9 Z8 D( uregion of 1 to 40 microns.# m) j4 ~* U& J% ^ D2 z Initial 7 M B( Q, N: R2 |+ o3 @1 g+ r8 a6 A; XOperational1 U/ z) C; @5 h# M6 m Capability (IOC) + w. y" U* O; aThe first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of 0 c+ L6 U3 H8 @8 h) Yequipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned $ P3 c ?$ C* y- Mor operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force.( t8 H+ _/ f+ K% j7 L2 f Initial & @% O! R6 M- {- O- @- qOperational Test - }, V1 _* t6 E$ Dand Evaluation& L$ u x+ R: t4 n (IOT&E)- D: ` _, R, U6 r7 e& u All operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production 2 A( T7 o; k* x1 Wrepresentative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial8 s8 P1 f' v! C production. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system % _, }$ }& Z" poperational effectiveness and operational suitability. 1 N) h" Z2 G+ z' P4 n% vINMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite). ) r7 f' T( g/ D% Z& hINS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code.. R% r3 ~- ?* u7 u% U8 g* \2 H InSb Indium Antimonide. & F6 |7 o1 N' g! WINSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. 9 k% v; x$ _. m4 T9 U7 v$ VINSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments.+ ?" _* q. J7 r# F4 x& I Integ Integrated. ' H+ _# h, M) zIntegrated 1 R* X, E! P+ s3 T7 i' \8 A! u6 MContracting7 @. c3 R. O, j# ]4 E' ?& i Report (ICR) 5 @" q8 q6 J7 s8 S6 iA quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and 9 z% o/ {; W9 @, Rinterfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a4 y! r8 H1 H& g% i! J! B; k mechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as 7 h+ {1 F; L3 ~$ z9 |Integrated Contracting Plan or ICP)." T" H5 |+ E& d1 x! O0 B Integrated Fire$ j( r4 ]$ g8 z5 ?0 V Control System6 B. d8 {, O4 o0 X, m, K" y" ]) M A system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data & a, W) j0 P) E3 B5 a9 ?6 J0 Ucomputation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted4 V; u8 x5 P6 c+ m by electromechanical devices.! t, ^+ F- R0 A0 x Integrated & X1 M2 n0 n# u" p/ HLogistics Support& P, k* a" X, y& j (ILS)# u0 Q& ]9 Z- G3 i% e+ F: V (1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and# t i) L" A4 t- R0 E4 o6 H technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into ( I" r; |# z G' `9 R+ tsystem and equipment design; develop support requirements that are e w {/ ^4 brelated consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each 8 A+ ~ F4 _9 f. E. ]other; acquire the required support; and provide the required support) _ n. X' U! W- v during the operational phase at minimum cost.2 G. @8 G/ f6 R6 J7 _7 T! ~3 a (2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the6 N" f) Z' j% m effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an 5 e! `/ L: a& A: O* |2 ?3 i) o2 fintegral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation. - k _& D8 A Z; L. F8 F+ CIntegrated! E1 W: g& h& v) c2 }- [ Logistics Support' M- o. l, U d( A r (ILS) Elements/ H/ T3 V M6 K1 o X. ]4 @ Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish + u5 N# V4 |& w/ t! Z1 omaintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system.* e# Q& y8 M3 ?. Q) g3 {+ h* e/ c Manpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and; Z% l0 y0 {# [( |! u7 H$ q8 \ civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a6 L4 l4 F4 I0 n* d materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.9 G5 D% `; i K Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to( F! k3 P- g$ n# h' t# S8 n. w5 D determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and # P, `- m4 V6 ]dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well% C7 `6 b' W, R2 T' d as replenishment supplies support. 2 c/ R1 K& K. m: mMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I9 o9 g3 @. H7 Y$ B' R 140$ M) B u1 [0 w2 r& i Support Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the+ c0 L8 Q; S+ H! f+ T$ {2 h operation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology* ^9 K$ u3 D6 j2 J1 \5 W Y and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It8 X) R0 f, i$ h- ^: F+ i5 `8 |; C includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment; }$ L, y. `) y5 V: ?1 O3 A itself.' A# U$ v+ N9 p" w8 R8 K Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as . G& D# |' E* `1 j0 fmanuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs . _; g; Q$ ^! ^2 C9 y+ Z5 q4 H5 vand related software are not technical data; documentation of computer6 M6 u/ m" [" _ programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other6 f6 E' C+ k% m2 O information related to contract administration.3 K% ]! b# P8 h4 T Training and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training) a3 s: T. `, M devices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military4 K+ k+ f$ E' H1 {' b3 ? personnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual+ W& H# v4 ]1 \, C3 U7 q- E8 \5 ? and crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training;6 G& E. I+ C$ n$ J and logistic support planning for training equipment and training device/ F4 r! {% T5 j; b& D( \ acquisitions and installations. 9 d# z2 L- X- J; ?3 JComputer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software, % B7 C3 U: C3 }; Q- N& Rdocumentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support0 q4 V; y% {/ d) _& K( M4 y' |5 w embedded computer systems.3 @9 { u* p9 ~ X4 [* b- m Facilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets L3 k3 `7 O: B6 F- `! z required to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define 0 L7 x& ~( u8 x4 Y; E7 ytypes of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities, . R( g1 a1 B4 H& tenvironmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment.8 P2 m6 d4 r) R. \% r Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes, ) A) m( e1 V* U$ |% k( o& k) Iprocedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,) s: i5 S) X& L5 Q5 T equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and& |8 \; s. e0 t4 I. y* ` transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment : _& O1 M- g! O+ D( Tpreservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability. ' M2 [+ }! H7 _$ XDesign Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as! d2 K4 v5 c: \) @5 K reliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements. * R: R! o' G& l2 o+ d7 J$ lThese logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms/ A: l: n$ m) @' x rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness3 c2 A, ]3 L# m8 Q! ]: F' I) @" ~6 K objectives and support costs of the materiel system.$ d5 _, l) l! \ A Integrated 9 b, Q! j& z' B- VLogistics 1 K6 [5 K9 F" Q" eSupport Plan" l6 y! Y6 @ A5 Z) m& S8 O (ILSP)/ |. B( i+ J/ q, k2 V% C The formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the / k- t9 j# Z& nprogram life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed 0 i" [ q5 R+ a1 e' uILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with # ?/ g! m* V% v& l7 s7 g9 b2 nnecessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and+ U5 e1 h& \% R2 d% ^ production, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications 0 P, F$ f5 `2 Z) \% x' o7 lRFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs.& G& T) {& A" @: D% S$ V3 t Integrated0 [# i- S% c' b Priority List ) y6 }% J9 l/ O2 T5 _A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized1 p5 r+ g. M0 T7 f7 s across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs( f+ e/ x3 n0 \2 z5 j1 o5 r that, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the! B6 F N, m0 D' h/ e capability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated 4 m9 z0 h6 Q$ a- n. vpriority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for8 u9 v0 @" S& z- J0 b programming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System ) h: x! p7 q! D/ w1 c5 C* `# jprocess. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated 1 T- {$ I ?4 q! W8 ` ~Program1 v3 o) r1 [! b) }7 K Assessment( j7 j2 y; [2 _8 \% Q0 s (IPA) 6 ~3 G3 z' u# |A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone 4 d3 _# w" @! g' N- |8 W+ K" Rdecision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an & o# |: d6 J- g! v8 X$ z$ o' w xindependent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into2 W/ i' @: ?5 S7 V% g the next phase of the acquisition cycle. " r8 z/ U' e+ n0 G$ W; ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I' Z: ~" F0 C9 }% K* z% Z+ _ 141 # f& V! b, q" Q' uIntegrated$ f# x, G3 y! u3 t Program1 |7 X# _/ N/ B$ p Summary (IPS)- I, Z9 p( `' w2 x' Z A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision / X' P# w0 w, |authority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights : z! c, j4 P! @( O h1 s0 I2 `the status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the# C4 }. y- P) K/ |7 x* \- O acquisition cycle. 0 c% M$ A1 W/ ]0 @& pIntegrated- q, `; F- {% s8 I f Tactical Warning # a7 I. s* \% Q4 c0 ]- h ^and Attack' y7 S" S" }5 l2 `, R Assessment, g+ P/ J9 ?# H6 q! Y3 O/ ]2 e (ITW/AA)1 |1 e! ~2 m* w$ a ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and $ h+ N) i# k6 \# C; g3 Iatmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack2 j7 v5 W# h4 l4 N4 x3 f5 Q warning information, strategic and tactical. o( A) q% |3 Q& O Integrated 3 b m! F6 O) s' WWarfare 9 }. e9 F* ], G2 cThe conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing , ^/ ^, Q! g8 tforces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional& d* G) y* A# l2 W. ]) l" m weapons. & P& F" Y0 r5 e+ s9 X7 x' qIntegration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such 3 B$ y0 ?. ^, g& Q+ Ya way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without8 L$ O, a, g: [- ^0 O0 C# P adversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) / ]. H- [! B3 g8 J(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a9 a- F8 `8 v' k/ U$ j7 F1 x system.3 S' b9 I: x6 g+ D INTEL Intelligence.5 p5 K+ \+ [" C, n Intelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis, " I1 S4 M* H" U4 m2 `integration and interpretation of all available information concerning0 j1 C& s! h# _ r' ] foreign countries or areas. 1 F* }: d. t k" ](2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through , ~% E' M$ ~/ ~* y( c2 g0 D( [6 N6 ^observation, investigation, analysis, or understanding.2 d# E( |: v7 D$ W* ]: {* D Intelligence1 N k- u6 K& E Indicators " M* |6 v) _/ N0 A: r5 cClassified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that,+ s& k- k6 U$ G0 x; n" I( b0 ^6 d when properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and; k7 F0 x7 P; m' U9 Y intentions.1 l3 @! t3 ~; b. n0 l Intelligence' x$ H/ A x) ? Operations5 q0 l v- C5 F7 @( H0 o: L7 b Center (IOC) ( e2 K4 v) E4 d; GAn organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB.- q# X3 c) g4 j" S, \9 V+ G) O The IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational 9 i9 _# M6 ~: H& h3 v k: l- BIntelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC)6 I' R7 F& e, p$ C) P Cheyenne Mountain Node (JCN).8 r- P! A. U' y# o2 j+ N8 K Intelligence 5 c9 L$ z! X! T+ y; jPreparation of' {5 w) P3 x: l the Battlespace 4 s+ r0 {$ U% Y0 Z( l; PAn analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the/ B* y9 q- u! D, l' o" d enemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence1 o# p1 m$ H d# X T5 b$ Q preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential+ o; Q' E- \: o0 D area in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed 5 d( X4 u* s) l: r3 ]) J# Pin detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on , a7 J5 T( c8 k' U0 L' Boperations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle ( ]1 c8 O8 t! g& x2 uspace is a continuing process. Also called IPB. : V; b- \6 e# o7 l( oIntelligence! A8 d6 [) Q% J8 t Report (INTREP) / T. Z r* ~% z6 w5 ZA specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of) a, E+ s% v' f# r command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in % \/ e6 U& `) hkeeping with the timeliness of the information. 3 g3 G; }7 ?6 m, iIntelligence 4 R7 e0 q7 [- p+ CThreat 7 a6 Z3 Z8 f2 }- CAn identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and + _1 s, C# ~0 @* v& s' F" Y g* V. Kexploit information from a given or similar operation.! L5 a8 P7 X s. r8 r2 C& Z MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I , g# Z+ W3 J( N0 o2 b; t+ t" B% \142 i0 `) e& \0 O) [. Y. _. G1 ]: \0 M+ rIntensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit/ z; }$ ] `% X; D3 } area, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal D8 N; Y1 h) M5 S4 e" I. C( p radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second & r& L; ?1 @8 v4 Z' s- K, Sfalling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation, " F& {# I: P+ \4 Y B* |( |& w1 p% hthe term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or 4 l: R4 b% x6 z+ Ldose) rate at a given location. 3 s. C1 p3 r' QInteractive 2 b( ~0 M. E3 _- ?# M4 X* h( zResponses, @2 z% h$ k" O, \2 | Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification. " C% a5 E: }0 ]. n1 ?+ WInterceptor( Q' o3 a' \/ a Cluster% Z- e2 S" E5 o7 U7 s4 y, r A group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor.* `8 \: Y! N `$ ^, q) K) [5 y5 ~ Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and + Q2 `' Z# _* B5 _ Ivelocity in three dimensions.( L" h( d0 L8 @6 U. T6 V Interceptor Track9 U v+ z. m" Q Range (Max)% k6 F/ q0 s4 d/ o0 \! l, \5 X. k The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function( M8 {, J n6 b4 @( A! `$ W on a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit + g% G6 d! _ @y 0 ~3 d) \# @0 e8 PA condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and! f! ~ {: H* T, [7 X: G4 P physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and ( ~, C1 h T5 g' \2 n! jare capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items8 l0 z. n% @$ B- Q" d themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for ( I1 \# r: C5 d# G ]) I+ h8 {0 Zfit and performance. / W; |% T B/ Y4 N; [- lInterconnection The linking together of interoperable systems." X4 l' I* x8 v9 ]. P. x% }( D/ ] Intercontinental+ Y6 y" O ^' o: i1 [: O+ N Ballistic Missile0 O( d3 Q/ K* W; T' A# T (ICBM): C0 v8 c7 \5 A Q A ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The1 `, y, x. c+ s1 a! A- ^- h term ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from9 Z: Q: I9 `9 E5 |) z8 { submarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.) " K4 V L3 X2 O' H- yInterface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection5 e, x- g1 X4 s% N characteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged / K" q6 d. [4 A1 C! {' u. D* F! o! Zsignals. . @. n0 F: ~2 Q5 e) H/ S4 X(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two 3 Q2 A- |7 S* S7 p$ @) `. asystems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register.$ Z5 q9 ]) J( n (3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. & m: b1 m4 Q! d(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between6 E% `; N1 A0 k h2 ]2 G/ C systems, or between persons and systems.5 C9 [& L+ Y; r( T: l$ I$ o4 G Interface Control * Z% T. F S) A/ z% K4 ~" N" M2 A0 mDocument (ICD) 3 R# x4 P; ] }) t4 B$ [(1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must7 j" P9 o1 u0 \& e8 n$ Q: A6 h exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer 8 p1 x: l h) K X1 r0 `software products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an 0 ?6 |: B( r5 YInterface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD).) i# o$ `) i# o- i4 w+ d! @ (MDA Lexicon) ' n V+ A. i/ F. R9 P(2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control5 G! t# U, q4 x# e$ G2 I% A agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements.$ B1 T; | ^8 F' V8 {5 I; Z The ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification. " E& R) Q: H( K/ |1 d7 q" \5 xInterface4 {/ s0 x! S7 D, O& C Requirements 0 y7 R2 p0 K0 K2 V' C- U w5 ]& tDocument (IRD) . G4 O$ `4 n: c- I; H& t( hA document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system - f: Z1 Q$ s" ]8 tcomponent. M8 x* \, h8 i" t# JMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I! a0 t4 O0 p8 D% a 143 3 W5 t+ z7 [( D% w. \7 a$ w2 H! U$ uInterference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to ) Q: A+ t! x g+ q& Aform a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum 6 j3 n0 O& s2 n, Y ^/ h$ f# _of the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point.( D, e( L9 y( g$ D5 @0 Y) w Intermediate! X: Z% R/ l" x- x Range Ballistic* w$ }% P5 O: I' j- l4 S% h( n Missile (IRBM)4 P& M: F' W5 K; z9 O9 k A ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles. _: C; k0 u" I$ [& @1 Y" p International 2 P9 N0 h ~) d9 r! y" J$ vAgreement ! t; F/ K C& {Generator (IAG)" N+ Z f. r9 @5 N9 v Software system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD+ _4 i8 H# P8 v$ b international Agreements. $ U3 y8 s% L t& z* QInternational& ~" P- h8 a/ i9 h Cooperative% c7 C' i( M; U0 M" `5 m; X Logistics' H6 ^: ?3 M$ R, { Cooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination2 ^$ F2 A; X! \% _" W# |' { of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply' z, W# ~# C& x1 w) D9 e8 t+ l and exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and; ^& |) w3 m. P' H j5 ? multilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions. ' D8 x5 y7 s) A4 T+ u z* SInternational # B6 H W7 Q& ^* o( ALogistics $ x0 k7 l( \1 J- ^4 k- W) YThe negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics 8 W# g. H+ O5 s i9 E9 [arrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing% v1 ]$ [5 l# m& P# ~- I7 s logistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign / ^6 l6 p6 @) R: E. W$ `governments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without ) r/ n. A9 T$ J( i2 vreimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing ! V$ v8 g* I- l% O8 W- N F |7 ^of a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or( p0 J; t5 V- L6 Z' @ procedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments, " [- m W4 `$ T: o f4 @4 T4 zinternational organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. & j# `2 B+ L0 Z/ l bIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States 8 H2 ?' {. L/ X% c% {1 r5 I2 ?2 Mlogistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or" Q8 [" c' m1 X V, }) y more foreign governments, international organizations, or forces., o8 Z" s7 q/ `# P International 4 i1 u" Z. S0 |3 _Logistic Support2 e$ P" d6 m6 x A9 t! z The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or, j2 L, V6 X, d X: Z more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.9 y D4 e# J( f4 L6 m Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services8 E! x$ _4 l- X7 i- F+ v. W& g from other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to9 @# N1 C6 [' u" e+ D i operate effectively together.* w) A$ K2 P; i/ o0 \ INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization.! t! j- w9 r4 H6 O- h6 [) ? INTLCT Integrated Electronics. 7 F# k2 Y& r A8 z" Z0 F9 t2 QIntruder " h- N j X7 EOperation& z, j6 P$ a: {' d: M5 O# D7 H, p An offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary 0 C% O) o! Q# g$ ]object of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases.) p+ |* h0 q4 `, } INU Inertial Navigation Unit./ ]$ o( `4 b9 w/ C Inventory Control7 V# ]; @% A* { Point 0 v$ c0 X" i7 l w$ }+ K" ^: gAn organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the3 K, ^* \: k, V: ^ primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a / C, M# k6 q6 f1 S8 l9 ?particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management 9 o3 x! ~+ |+ D) ?) J6 y, |0 B) `. W* Cincludes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, % l$ h/ E6 T/ B8 t& J' E$ B4 vdistribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction." l+ ]: w: A% r( ?& ]# W Inverse Square 5 m2 N$ z3 K; S# GLaw j( U# ]3 {: _' y( `% U" H The law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a ) D: a" z ^! W# ]! Y) q n: L; ]point source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the ! C( S: F+ i+ g+ P) Bsource, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that 7 I' p) p% f' d+ \5 S' V9 `distance.$ Y8 V( b4 W# [) V MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I+ G1 d& }- L0 L0 M$ Z 144 & S3 B$ @$ L9 k% a) d1 `* W7 o2 f; KInverse Synthetic - K8 i8 z0 j/ p9 |; l' iAperture Radar% \! \+ J) O, l+ G (ISAR) $ J" I S8 `/ ~$ v- }A type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from4 U. V. u& z0 f' Z- w" W& W( {: \; \4 L the motion of targets to provide high resolution. / x+ x4 B- f. m. X. ?IO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic./ S- w- m \/ O+ `# O8 z. U; ^4 m$ i IOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. ' w. `6 }, B7 D Y7 O: J(2) Intelligence Operations Center. 6 }' ~. h: g( w8 a w: R, n5 F! [(3) Integrated Optics Chip. & m* z8 q" ~: v: c' g2 DIOM Inert Operational Missile.( D- @' K* p& G IONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US). 9 I0 @6 ~( F- g$ R, l4 aIonization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition3 c. U0 Y# ]% k9 ]% E* ^3 S of electrons to atoms or molecules.7 j+ p6 C7 z' s. N9 R' F' k/ c Ionizing 3 _* {* k3 y; l0 a# V7 g1 tRadiation; g9 l0 @+ X% I' P. b9 G" g Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or ; L* C% a2 @2 T$ z& {3 T: {5 Jparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of 8 P9 ^$ ^, b3 n# i+ Vproducing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its 0 G- `+ Y' }& Z4 Rpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.) 4 O: ^3 k2 c h3 K- e2 yIonosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers3 F, p) D) u3 o* P% _" _! Q9 o altitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect' o4 I5 G# ]0 U$ f; ~. Q electromagnetic waves. + ?+ R& N. J ] V. \IOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff.: m" j/ @$ O1 s* @7 } IOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation. ' d; I0 v! s! z! dIOU Input/Output Unit. / q1 x; D( s4 K/ Z5 j6 P: ?# QIP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol. 2 m" ^ C3 X/ `) W: n(5) Interconnect Protocol. 1 n) S" p! S ` Q4 tIPA Integrated Program Assessment.& Y& e5 S1 U! J5 B: m6 O IPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace. 2 N, i; W1 Q8 A" [% D5 G SIPC Information Policy Committee. 6 h- F$ f! H# `2 ]IPD Integrated Product (Process) Development., ~) H- T u/ d) f) |8 R. `: s! ? IPE Industrial Plant Equipment. * G# {9 K+ S$ v7 j5 aIPL Integrated Priority List.3 B& D' _( {5 c' w# h9 u% Z IPM Integration Program Manager. 5 o0 c/ z; m- `' q# K* qIPMI Integration Program Management Initiative.+ u' {! T0 h5 j9 N IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program. & R, r, u0 E$ n$ RIPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.3 `# k$ ~% z, Y4 ~4 p; x- b8 U IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review). 8 i8 Q n! h$ M6 C, cMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I0 y9 [2 F2 l$ ~, V+ b* K4 O2 m 1451 x, o8 F9 S- `# i5 d9 V# u* T* |1 I. ?- x IPRR Initial Production Readiness Review. n/ ~' S9 W4 n5 c& z4 EIPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group.- O1 b% [. c) ?6 f# N$ O2 V IPS Integrated Program Summary.2 d# K: G- A9 d z( g: F' }- Q IPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit. 9 ?& ?7 b; ]; f9 m5 O; ?IPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated8 ^) Y* I% C) g. J( S4 X0 K Planning Team.3 t+ G, f+ y Z. w IQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term).) _4 a+ q, ?8 A: O' `$ S1 A: x* v IR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4) ( G$ s1 ]& ^, e1 @! }* nInformation Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope) i/ @3 t* u2 c Radar.- @1 f A! s s E$ N+ J1 `/ A IR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength( s& ?/ i9 k/ }* w1 F& v8 N( n4 V: e spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. Z6 j& c( b/ S, b! L IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).+ H3 U1 |$ ~& G+ U1 B" C IR/Vies Infrared Visual. : F5 r; s# t0 M* o8 u2 m* o* \" xIRA Industrial Resource Analysis. 9 {3 H8 `) R$ v$ L! VIRAD Independent Research and Development. : i, Y$ T6 s7 v% N9 XIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite. 5 L6 ], G, |# _5 a# F- @% ?IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. ' j7 }: c/ \. ?; y; R& W2 O5 C( k1 xIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System." w. A( r( _! r3 \; p IRCM Infrared Countermeasures. 0 B `# Q& _. {) X. T! BIRD Interface Requirements Document. ; w) u* g5 r; E4 kIRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term). e! R& ]/ t1 r' h7 k6 A+ x8 kIRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array.$ m( V/ C0 |+ H IRG Independent Review Group. 8 j! y: Y6 L, Z6 [: E# pIRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center. # J* U+ {. g- t& ZIRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group., i2 U3 ^# U. i7 I IRINT Infrared Intelligence., }8 N6 `, \' \& [/ B IRIS Infrared Instrumentation System. . r% j; c/ K: ~9 F7 oIRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). K4 @- t) h' w( C* c0 c; v3 y IRM Information Resources Management.4 x' D* P) B' i3 p3 c IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I( }+ H/ V/ [3 ?9 t9 V 146 . v5 B- G; }/ ^1 Q& f( r; VIRMC Information Resource Management College.8 T5 T) J; X, F' ]: C) w. K) ]0 s0 C IRR Internal Requirements Review. 7 k: g% b$ |* ^, y0 m& b* f! AIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System. 6 Q- J4 @. {! j2 NIRRS Information Resources Requirements Study. ( Y, A6 I; I' n2 f7 X. fIRS Interface Requirements Review. # V+ [) }9 k* h2 Z6 ^/ m+ zIRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). ; q0 K( [4 _9 Y) g ZIRST Infrared Search and Track./ R- p1 U5 R( n4 r IRTF Internet Research Task Force.$ L8 j9 l! X \8 `1 q, V8 ^ IS Information System.7 D0 y a4 O; Q8 {5 ]7 u# X. L" \ IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.' F* y0 d6 `( _0 E9 F! c$ s (2) Innovative Science and Technology. * X O) `8 q% s(3) Integrated Science & Technology. 1 s8 @/ E w: L7 q7 o0 g+ }ISA Inter-service Agreement.% ?" F4 t9 M4 [+ p- P | IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. & C( ?+ x* t& ?$ N; _* L& ^(2) Innovative Science and Technology.4 t9 m% \8 g3 l4 [$ a ISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar.7 u* L' e1 X" F7 {. P. F/ x ISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). 0 E4 P& K+ W& |& H4 l7 c% kISC (1) Information Systems Command. X" a9 W+ d0 M+ o* O(2) Irvine Sensors Corporation. ) W: v* H8 }: W7 yISDN Integrated Services Digital Network.& S: f$ l1 h/ E K% u ISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment.7 s0 R Y! Q9 `9 j ISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration., D& i2 f5 \) W1 i ISG Industry Support Group.& a! N& q5 f: _2 C ISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model. , Z9 X# E. r4 P/ AISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group. 9 G( |3 a, F0 h+ mISMO Information Security Management Office. - z9 s l- [7 ~ISO International Standards Organization.0 f7 F5 z* n- U, A7 Q+ c% q7 q ISOO Information Security Oversight Office./ U6 F- k- X. ~+ K1 @2 d Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with ' T/ O8 p! v8 B, requal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional). 1 r% ?, L; X9 i. U: S! C8 q& UMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 i3 a4 K" k+ h5 _. X$ u& V 1475 b! ?4 x( V( ~6 C' r% m; C Isotropic ) n& z ?5 p8 z4 S( QNuclear Weapon, p0 E6 L6 s6 p4 [# ]4 n A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with % J! k: M/ s! O+ Y/ Y$ eapproximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to0 ?% e" y$ }1 w& F% D9 M distinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons.1 H- p w. \3 ]) K% f" e2 k ISP Integrated Support Plan.( B$ a/ d, k! l/ P: I ISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. 2 K$ l( j/ G' j c% lISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System.. s& Q _, T- i7 B. @ ISSA Information System Security Association. 9 i$ G+ s1 V6 E2 t% n V9 AISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency. ! t6 F: e. t5 D3 K7 S8 PISSC Information Systems Security Committee.# s# v- K2 ^+ m! b8 } ISSM Information System Security Manager. % F: Y6 E. Z' SISSO Information System Security Officer.5 y& a+ X5 c; Q' k+ o: Q ISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications. ' Q7 W9 S/ C6 S) Y9 FIssue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and / J9 e6 O6 K8 {: J$ H" w8 Xextends into July. . k% N% B; z$ u5 P; h9 {* ~4 LIssue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.0 I# h! N. ?" _1 n6 N# R IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test.! m& p* F3 v# ?9 G" k* r6 w" Q ISTC Integrated System Test Capability. + u: O6 M& ~4 s0 f# bISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. ; T, e( X5 M( L1 O% X5 SISTF Installed System Test Facility. 7 G; ^7 h9 t& f( t8 wISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle.+ {! c: {# Z& i4 V! x ISWG Integration Support Working Group. 1 n' C) N3 T: \- e7 I$ j1 A" h4 eIT Information Technology. 0 Z8 z$ e8 ^) r. k, s' Q. oITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center., J( \4 y% y9 _+ P2 W0 V3 V2 x ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations. 2 E$ S1 t4 l% P) zITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed. 0 @% B( z3 [& x8 |3 }. M0 KITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations./ |* Z- r" p0 H. p3 @ ITD Integration Technology Demonstration. : c# F. D" g( S6 t+ I/ NITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan.' |( Y$ J9 M7 L# I) p (2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan. 3 b) J, ?* ?2 N! L% |* z1 L4 r. lItem Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such. p+ T) N& |$ v organization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items ) c+ {$ x' a d7 ]of materiel. : ]6 h! }7 t [5 j" V9 r% @MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I & y3 @- ]' U" R+ z148 - d. l7 C4 ]5 {4 [: d/ {ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. & Z7 b$ \: _7 L$ _* `( P% r9 M* vITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch/ A) N( O3 a3 u. B& b; e ITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council. * d! G; y# ^8 r9 c8 ]/ C+ AITMT Integrated Technical Management Team. 3 q3 J0 U# V+ zITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). 3 m5 r3 N2 c! d3 B ?, \ITP Integrated Test Plan.5 P; q) a0 v( l! \% k4 R ITPB Information Technology Policy Board. # F: W6 p9 F5 j7 qITR Information Technology Resources.5 C5 `& E4 G( L( Y ITS Information Technology Service.: K# s' `0 _3 \, q. F+ ~ ITSD Information Technology Services Directorate. 0 g3 N$ g/ Y9 L- L' sITT ITT Corporation.; I7 O+ ?3 H0 h9 C3 b/ Z, f ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle : o0 K+ V. |& s8 Y q# m7 d( tITW Integrated Tactical Warning.2 I+ v3 P; m7 m" | ITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment.# a, C* i+ I* b! [* y* L IUI Integrated User Interface. 3 O* f- |6 A/ { R8 {IV Interceptor Vehicle. ) y) u, _! M C- _' aIV&V Independent Verification and Validation.% w. l( L. g; Q7 ^& u; R IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System.- t! X( J6 ^! T C' c- s IVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).4 a; n. D7 e" l& R- T3 v5 M- Y IW Information Warfare. 2 ]/ x H% D- l+ U/ M4 ^IWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration.8 E% F3 `/ J, v) o8 L F* v IWEB Information Warfare Executive Board.$ P; C y l& n) s* G% | IWG Interagency Working Group. * p* Q# R9 x+ x/ ]# G# n7 _IWS Indications and Warning System.$ o, }1 U: W* A0 m; p; O4 d IWSM Integrated weapons system management. - c4 ]4 O+ ]! p7 F1 n2 ^, ?IXS Information Exchange System.& t+ {" H1 ]9 F# @% f% M MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J * b( @) U& T0 h1 C5 ^. @" d149 7 w0 X L2 O2 r% d& sJ&A Justification and Approval.* j8 v- s, c( a+ c' ~ J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. M, m6 F# q: c. K* n2 ^ JAAT Joint Air Attack Team.5 y! c* W- W4 N0 Y. R4 d JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. % {1 G0 i8 U9 g0 l* m J5 B! [" I2 QJAE Joint Acquisition Executive.8 g4 k/ R9 p& w4 T: V JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).! F0 H& J, A- o. S JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).& w+ Z$ l$ n- `, a9 _) b2 E4 d Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the6 I5 N! m6 ]" [: X! @5 V4 k same frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals! ?2 ?9 h! o+ y- K1 U reflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming( x* K1 d* O9 \+ N6 ?" ^/ g# g generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, 0 p% R! ]( ?9 [. r7 b6 W; p5 K4 f/ Pand with increasing radar power. - H5 v) r; m7 r) |; zJAO Joint Area of Operations.- L. L+ F7 F8 G8 a2 L- [: \* A# U JAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). {# ]- V" s4 o. P7 a1 W# d JASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term).. p" a& i6 C2 {/ R8 O JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program). ! P4 j+ S2 u7 ~' _7 u4 \9 ]3 RJBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term).$ T# N [/ \* h) D6 b% |' m JCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US). / u% r3 O0 ?0 R7 Y" q; KJCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions.! H$ o' ?6 ~; e1 C JCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US.4 ]. e9 b' E# {9 |% \, {' { JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum.( ?# n; Q* X( a5 t0 R JCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network. ! e8 ^; g6 f8 o- R) C0 |JDA Japan Defense Agency.% b( ~: c& H! u' M% b JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon). 0 j, g; t/ o e& UJDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community.' q8 R. D) @% H JDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System.4 r* \0 @$ E# M' v$ N/ a JDN Joint Data Net. . ^& H0 G7 [ OJEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA). ( R* T2 b" X$ `; g7 \, VJEC Joint Economic Committee (US).0 u) X" T- v9 D; M/ P9 L JEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. ! A2 m& U' {0 k. z% IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 9 J( @# a+ w& K# }' w6 A- i150! A+ k' G8 V l q JEM Joint Exercise Manual.! c2 V/ E4 Q: G' w, Y; A% V* q1 @ JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis.% U/ l1 t) R c9 ~* L& { JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center.9 k( I H- q3 e* S8 l JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. 9 `2 @' R$ ~( [8 h1 `! bJFCC Joint Forces Command Center. 6 |1 G2 i3 o4 K3 mJFET Junction Field Effect Transistor. ; C# n2 h/ O% `# O; @0 T- S7 k7 kJFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).( B I5 d( U4 {6 u* r JFLC Joint Force Land Component.. S1 [; \4 v5 c g2 S* I' J) C JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component.1 p( d9 [2 V+ i2 f1 \& @4 c6 D4 P JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA.9 S8 S) |. m9 Y+ R JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. ) Z. r8 ^# R8 n, j) m$ H! NJG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention. % P! B2 D, n- ~" t3 P% u0 p6 QJHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 5 j5 p7 }9 B' K3 J) g# T. E {JHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. % @" i! l: i3 A6 N$ L% mJIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls. * U$ I! X- M4 E! G4 U6 |- B% M9 sJICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). : A! p R6 H' T8 U, V0 R+ {JIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. ) ?: X1 A; U* XJINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems. & `. ^( j% U( l* v9 m3 Z6 wJIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures. ' l* P0 M; I+ Y4 L* g# k9 wJIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms." V, r; H! p4 b }, { JIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). + e8 B7 l9 d1 G$ QJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center./ c4 x0 K" ^" D3 ` JLC Joint Logistics Commanders. $ f7 e" I5 q4 {( ~% VJLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. 2 F4 Q" z- y+ t' L- LJM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. 7 ]: D- L4 n5 S9 ~+ q- ^JMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. 3 |9 D& ?. M* k3 QJMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. + Q3 H1 h8 }1 ?9 b( yJMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. & ? H2 ] A( G3 f! u& m" JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J ) Q) j7 P& h3 o, H: Q151 0 s! T" p, K" ~4 R8 PJMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information 6 I- P0 Y3 z- ~# PTechnology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded % M1 l: _) O$ ?) |/ _% ]by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major) z6 @- N+ _ Y, J6 ~. j' P/ t( x7 j component of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN), ' F) `8 H4 |0 k+ I4 Q$ p( R' o3 moperated by the JNTF.0 S* O; P/ R: w) [# F0 s+ A JMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual. % @4 \# |5 _/ j) ?) c3 kJMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement. & T% p$ [% J1 @* ~, \* OJMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement. ; }! j0 o6 @; m) @+ u6 nJMO Joint Maritime Operations.& ~1 @& z4 J5 N# H% |# U2 C* K JMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. 5 h3 `' d% g2 Q# W6 jJMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group.8 K; D6 y# `( ]* ^/ w5 X9 N7 g8 y (2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group.3 J' _ |1 Z: c1 I- h JNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service.9 s( \4 r2 f# x! k/ \% B JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System.4 y* t; f: O1 Y8 M" x* L) ^) f JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC.8 a9 _9 X9 U( P& P$ E+ K' [ JNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. - D, W% m6 U6 {' _" NJNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor.( V& ]# ?% c0 @6 j3 n9 I) _/ w5 Q JNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access.3 T e& y/ F( d+ X& b9 v( X JOB Joint Operations Board.8 W2 T6 d4 f# m" b6 E' f+ K JOC Joint Oversight Council.) {0 ~- @% w, {* n9 K JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. ! n. s% K3 I; [* G( [# zJoint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one" B, U9 O+ Z0 X& j Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the + @% i0 u! X! H/ i% w" x+ _participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy).9 B' a, `, K/ h1 J5 d9 G Joint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more 7 d8 {" k; O% J4 F' aServices in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be ; T: q) j8 D: a! {/ }7 x5 Ipromulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the 0 @5 k9 P- P4 }* b* j, { lcombatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint5 I1 s" Y, k' s8 r1 s$ q6 F Chiefs of Staff.3 f; ]! ?" c, @9 O! X( B3 D3 e1 U Joint Doctrine$ d" O' N T* D. q+ j0 n$ u Working Party, y7 B- Z3 n+ \7 E3 X A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands6 s: A6 c/ d ~- }6 o! o* M+ L with the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, # g8 J1 B0 T/ V7 C, d8 Ztechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ) R% a3 V+ w# m# v' m1 v# y- n- mproject scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation. + A& f! Y/ O# L FThe Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, / c2 b$ f' g( A9 s# r) T) _) I, GOperations Plans and Interoperability. . B% B+ I+ ^! d* I. @% VJoint Electronic% a0 F- j* G. Y4 w5 J Warfare Center 3 F1 K8 s! N4 T6 x+ P0 I# Y(JEWC)0 w: T7 T" ?: ?1 f Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for ) A, L$ D$ S9 S2 Z( |) d8 m! ninvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground 1 b5 I$ t8 T r$ X/ }) m% s2 Xsystems.8 @1 `; w3 R9 |/ ~2 h" }0 y7 @ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J , Z* f* e# v' I& x- Z3 O# ^8 W152 0 s3 A! B$ {) Q6 bJoint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or : \- ?8 M8 Q5 V: c, kattached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or1 y: Q: p# a' g5 F/ g2 n7 a, v more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to 5 X3 L3 d6 S: }3 p. c2 ? _ ^2 ?exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander. ' p. }! D9 [1 X1 F( k0 KJoint Force Air, `8 r% O1 E; P6 s, Y Component. g! I8 K8 U" [ Commander : b, I7 p( d3 E* u. A G9 V7 B3 u/ o(JFACC)1 Z+ S! R- x) T- L: E! u The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or" d1 ?) i2 v" r. c& H9 O' f joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making ! m; `( f& {/ X' R& trecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and 2 \, Q" @" C0 jcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may, j6 p! V! }" Y6 I c. ^ be assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority/ v3 f9 U9 |2 ^; w necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing3 q4 b2 i# G6 S8 _ commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the9 Z+ G! r. V! F- o; \1 I preponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. 4 O3 K: h4 l' p- h8 zJoint Force) v+ V f L9 w; m# a- B Commander : u; N5 a2 h* j7 A(JFC) 6 Y) T; Z; b9 u; A' y# n% {A general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant 2 l7 t$ I( v' m8 |7 ^command (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also 1 w5 q3 l9 T! w* T( Pcalled JFC. 2 c% j5 r( w9 @4 \8 AJoint Force Land / Z2 M! f7 H4 t+ k& f- ^( gComponent + l$ z& V* @! X- p* L$ v' c. ZCommander4 [' N" N, \- m( a: ~6 ^: S (JFLCC) ( H% v4 `! y4 ?4 L3 k2 aThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or1 n5 F9 ^$ r7 [" N joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making ; o" n0 T+ ? t; precommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and ) x. n. ^3 ~% f: ^coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may - w5 u" k+ W2 N+ dbe assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority6 I3 ~2 g4 k. u* f- O6 r: B B necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing 8 Z: o" w. y0 _commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the7 B3 ]& z* F0 \4 q% d; E& T: q preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control- e# L- Y1 R3 s/ J' w capabilities. / r+ a2 B! z6 m2 k3 @5 t) f, d0 rJoint Force 3 G1 f* ]; e% ~3 A4 rSpecial 6 e, U6 G* ^4 ]6 wOperations & H0 a; K6 v& pComponent5 y1 O3 p* B/ x Commander# z8 q8 S. d" I (JFSOCC)( c! G4 a( t8 N/ m The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or . c: ~, ~$ v7 f2 l' s% Djoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making: f2 }. D% r5 B* D! i recommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and" H8 L; u3 p, \$ P4 B" a# T! O assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such2 i, p( h; Y" u. S. s operational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority" H, m: a+ G6 V; W necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing 3 d2 n n- t, P- [commander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the 5 T+ E- L0 T$ D" G/ Y% |preponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and + d& a3 d0 ^7 R5 G. Gcontrol capabilities. # z: W2 ^0 R" g' G) Y% {' O; FJoint National, z; V5 `$ P- z Test Facility) W; e+ P1 }' @ E' f (JNTF)! h4 ^0 f8 c, _3 F4 i, a# k. O A large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado 0 p9 y `0 M/ s- j# f" O6 O" Bwhich serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the' ~) w- \) U9 S) G) d$ W NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF)' Z( r, B+ A( C Joint Operational 0 O0 ?# J V+ X3 s' h g9 sPlanning and 3 c0 P+ R5 j6 h, O0 R- VExecution [% b7 A* l/ V' S& `6 b System (JOPES)5 z C- u- Y* Z$ D+ y A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration & e7 ^0 d" k. a; H r4 c% ]4 Dand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation7 h/ {+ q9 g: A; _ g2 ] Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for . @6 I2 ]; C1 J/ r5 zconventional command and control by national and theater level commanders / i2 J, j; U9 A& l7 P7 `9 Xand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct- `5 @; ^% M2 l5 j$ E, A6 P of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning* |0 f2 J! P* B7 f" ?9 B# a8 P2 T policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and 8 j; q. c, S* A0 wautomated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and5 g! [: L! n+ W; _! s+ U execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities $ u+ v% G3 E1 n3 W) {( c$ }* Nassociated with joint operations. 8 [% K7 g: u! F) x. {" N8 A5 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J # L5 D+ c% N J) _' }1534 t; [' ?% [# W Joint Operating 6 {/ ^2 l% l+ Z- wProcedures, n. Y0 g, K* O: g0 A9 m) B (JOPs) " }: H$ Q6 @% tThese documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions7 K; [% ]4 [; X& A. { necessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs $ h1 o4 k( D1 d- bmay include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, & ]4 u7 ?2 f1 G8 ]' xVulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting,3 s/ N- d8 s- h Financial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement% _$ e7 Z3 O+ W, \ and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program 7 [' I( u: H. v1 ]Manger and the participating Services. 5 |# J) o w7 DJoint Operations : g* @8 b! i5 DArea, H# q+ s0 [5 S" N W Z That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military& ^7 [; }6 ~; _" @7 C5 c+ Q9 k operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to : Z% q% B. ^, c' Q. ~ r( @2 i; ksuch military operations. Also called JOA.4 h8 Z, u* Z! ~$ c4 G7 q Joint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program " g! F; m. _& fthat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component - s+ C( y5 J4 t- Q. Q* c9 }0 `7 \during any phase of a system’s life-cycle. # @- ^( }; y5 A( i3 `( CJoint( Y' @4 P' Q9 D8 A' k) q Requirements9 x/ D ?3 G$ `5 i. W Oversight$ U) c6 D- i, P7 U% M. U Council (JROC) ( J# S% ]/ O s; K5 oA council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts6 t0 z, i" a) R. A requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops( n- \, J0 ^0 C6 p6 g) {# e recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates' d4 t9 f! m. ]+ e; ]2 A performance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition5 ]% Q1 a; j1 `8 F# }6 d Board. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air , S9 L4 f3 P+ i* f0 LForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps.* y" }1 J% L! g' x9 Z, x Joint SPACECOM * {1 Y. ~7 q. y, R* }Intelligence ) J9 d4 B2 {* \- w0 Z' A" KCenter (JSIC)0 ?5 a1 M6 O7 ~8 r* ^+ y A USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational + Q( |, E9 y6 V8 B0 Rintelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for+ ]8 S$ L$ B. S' R4 \, z$ z the DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production6 c! V$ @, a r* `: M4 j+ a includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and/ O! g* [# Y# y) _3 D Satellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB." f9 O* J' {4 r- X% X. Q Joint Strategic 0 p, g4 C# m0 EDefense Planning' a0 }- Z: [! u! O! Z' H0 z1 l8 ] Staff (JOSDEPS)2 N" o' f4 D$ E3 [( t9 w& u A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for" N: ^4 j6 a6 o+ }$ d3 H7 |. D integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive % u4 d J, v; `and strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint 7 |6 ]. _% f3 w% iStrategic Defense Planning Staff.* J7 N) V% \) x! @ Joint Strategic 5 L5 y1 M/ ^/ I0 T" a0 c, kTarget Planning ) ~/ R7 Q; f% }/ v, P. |Staff (JSTPS) 7 \* e# R7 k+ ], O8 W, fA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing, 9 _! R- a. Y2 D- g Lcoordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP).0 Q! ?5 K7 w l Also responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The. E3 w4 \- v; x$ {1 a Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target w$ D- }: o' b; g Planning Staff. ( u% A$ p5 Z6 VJoint e5 y; I0 }$ w Suppression of + {1 s2 i5 ?% t# H e: gEnemy Air: H+ Y2 X# E1 |7 e. i" Z" _2 @ Defense 4 C& ?) l% M( h8 bA broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities* |3 t+ B; F- f1 l: X provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called" I9 {8 F/ ^4 c% ]8 C) X6 F3 z J-SNEAD.! o; r+ p5 L8 f# ] Joint Tactical 6 V/ ]! n0 H" E" y! t! U7 TInformation 5 ^, r" i& Y" c& ~Distribution. W3 T! x7 @! Q5 b; r3 i System (JTIDS)4 H/ [6 _' n+ q/ ]2 C* s A joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the 7 |' [: A( N: \ [/ d! L5 Z7 ?interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels,. `7 K3 a, W0 L! ~1 w2 v3 H: v and mobile or fixed-base land stations./ t5 m1 Z0 u6 S) V6 Q Joint Tactics, 3 j! L# J) P; n/ v: j' ~5 [3 z) zTechniques, and! A6 B+ P2 y) A1 H/ u# ?% ? Procedures8 b2 j0 X) b. ]* k! } (JTTP) , ^; z9 E& j$ YThe actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how ( p' L s; l0 {+ uforces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,; p1 |/ b; Y3 L# e, C& S promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and, x; w3 Q$ R+ a' H Joint Staff. Also called JTTP.- k4 Q; g2 C. A: @% t/ v( V. ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 2 f# F' Y: f9 `1547 Y! n- W7 z5 B! a# q, x5 S Joint Test and' h c" u# ^5 O Evaluation* t' L/ \" m( } T&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be @3 _% f0 }, h. O: Tacquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have# Q: o/ r w' O7 p1 ] interfaces with equipment of another component.% l) \! V8 V: I2 s! l+ y. A2 r Joint Test and : P5 R3 K% X" {% A9 s. D* _/ zEvaluation + m$ |/ Y! N# o( f3 MProgram5 q# @) F8 z! ] {) f# K An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on# A. v8 d* G2 F- w1 R system performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements, 6 n: n) @" F+ J# ^5 Wsystems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for& t! W4 f! a: v W9 D! k force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. 3 H6 ~2 A S" M3 ZJON Job Order Number. # h- q2 K! A3 rJOP Joint Operating Procedures. " x0 Z5 F( K0 Y# o! o" D! {. _) vJOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System. / s- G9 _9 E" q$ _JOPS Joint Operations Planning System.9 x" k! M' E: x# t" s9 C5 }' a. e7 n JOR Joint Operational Requirements. * h" U) U a$ L* \" ^$ T+ B! kJORD Joint Operational Requirements Document. 0 F7 E3 ?, W4 dJOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. 8 u, s7 _3 G; K, T" m& CJOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). 3 V9 Z' F9 M6 U( l: H: ]8 mJOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).. A) `" z6 E, E2 X JP Joint Publication. : a% e- q& Q7 h9 m/ VJPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.4 F4 |" t! u3 K: Q( B5 N0 w JPM Joint Program Manager. # f, v9 S) {. X. mJPN Joint Planning Net. J9 h8 u+ v+ A: ~9 G9 y5 e+ u+ YJPO Joint Program Office." G' u; {0 @# _% ?* I Z' l* ~ JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. E @ i* M' |, w- l JPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact9 N* \1 E$ M2 y& d! a5 h$ J; K/ B1 } JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle. 0 B% H1 |9 e2 ]JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net.' f( K2 _2 F6 m0 c JPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration.$ T$ |* V/ u% U' r; {( a( l JPT Joint Planning Tool.! G6 ]" X, x% @5 ?. x. O JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). i2 G# ]" e2 u' S4 _7 AJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term). 2 P# p: L X @+ {JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).6 O$ s2 ~9 q- O* [3 i( T JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J# w5 p( V9 g' o" b- L3 g 155$ p; |5 R0 r$ `% h$ m: r* y JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council.& e c: @1 B/ z$ W JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group. ! S& R3 I9 g% O8 z! E t+ O, DJRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications.6 U* G7 N" t; X, {& _3 T. K JRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. " A0 k" Z; W/ kJS Joint Staff. 7 m8 w5 ^, l& I* C8 E9 ~JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. : @' O! q& m7 h1 Y' \- }JSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term). 8 Z0 S I: |1 ?9 ]' @JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. 0 d+ p% }; T8 w0 l1 KJSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term).( _, `- |, t t$ x0 }8 s JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). 3 Q$ p q3 R8 I6 z(2) Joint Service Evaluation Team. % Y, x+ U& s( `, _JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). : C' O% C$ L; X. UJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center.- ]7 M: c6 g5 \: _8 Q' f7 \ JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term). 0 f. A: T! ^; M2 { P1 |, O c) oJSMB Joint Space Management Board.& V {$ e1 f% D6 \3 d$ h; B7 b JSOC Joint Special Operations Command. 6 d. W, c: Q& ]: Q. Y: jJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. 3 H* `& ^5 @( z% Y: f5 oJSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document. ! n$ K' }6 W# V7 @/ V! ^JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System. / D, Q3 E( R# f! V& \1 OJSS Joint Surveillance System. & @3 B. k3 G( wJSST Joint Space Support Team.- ?; b! v, c7 O% b2 r6 V2 o JSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System.: V( {+ x m3 R JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff.' F5 `/ v @$ S. ?, _ JT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting . D; m0 l( Y6 M: j9 R2 M2 tJT&E Joint Test and Evaluation. ! B4 V# d0 a, n) G5 j/ ^/ p- nJTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term).8 h! i0 ~3 b5 n" ]" l$ p3 _) l4 o JTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station. 1 ~7 p: w L- j. ]JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. _2 ~8 `3 A C. j6 h JTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. + p+ h4 _ ~5 D; M( R4 l. h3 q, FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J5 S" @0 {7 v' ^/ f6 |" ^ 156 q: r- C& L! E JTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). . D5 }# S* m" j, V* F7 Y1 J/ c! S( lJTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture.# S$ c7 X# `1 Y3 z JTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). 4 ]0 C5 w0 W6 F7 k1 xJTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term). $ {! x: t" v/ KJTF Joint Task Force. , M0 `7 s# o$ V3 O$ t+ e5 NJTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise. ) E8 R) ]# O# D, p; s' UJTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System. ; @1 `: E3 V+ W% j4 k& Z9 j/ gJTL Joint Target List.1 @+ [3 E( n( M/ { JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense. ; e8 ?3 C, M. s# o* }' iJTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan./ y" M3 a- t" A# D" f JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]. ( Q' B* }/ }+ E0 r2 W3 M; mJTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. 6 m" d. q- q5 }8 tJTR Joint Travel Regulations.0 S1 I8 X/ D. J JTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board.( n# h4 `# H$ j! v JTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). 6 N1 t- Q( z. m: v3 eJTT Joint Tactical Terminal.$ [8 ~5 i/ d3 M7 {( b/ {# j- d JTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. , U: D8 F c/ j6 y, l' S% J0 {JVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft. 5 H0 k; r9 w) @( jJWAN Joint Wide Area Net.. ]& f6 j3 g6 w5 u- y, t5 M* L JWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). 5 |) C/ C5 _$ KJWC Joint Warfare Center. ' C. X3 L" F0 `# i9 a! xJWG Joint Working Group. 8 v# S- i) G M, z! T0 M# nJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network.' b2 q* d4 v# B4 m! \" J JWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration + }4 l: }0 ~1 N2 L* |JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.! L" `7 f; H/ J' t5 n2 M' q! r5 l& M MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K8 T( c2 e' m0 Y v6 C1 n 157/ n8 j7 `/ r o4 t4 k2 P' r# ^ K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo.( M l1 [9 W3 g5 S4 } K Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another. + ~( H5 s! x: u! _Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of 7 |1 G) `8 ]: `* Ftwo observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both! L* q; [% I% [9 n7 q; | objects. & @* K8 ], u2 ^/ kKA Kill Assessment." I4 z1 y$ r P# C KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. - V) F! l. X9 _1 \KB Kilobyte./ \# }; ?0 _9 f3 I- i Kbps Kilobyte per second.7 o6 _0 h) S# ?( F; H+ y2 r KBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). 9 ~- ], |( G( q/ PKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion. : J" a$ s" @# E/ `KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL.* \1 |& ^3 u" Q9 [( e" R2 {0 {2 e1 I KDS Kwajalein Discrimination System.# X1 @1 y# A& @" o KE See Kinetic Energy.1 o# s" b7 B% U) i KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon.* G, N5 b2 c3 A9 H+ L |9 Z+ Z+ D KED Kill Enhancement Device. + N4 d' t( Q$ a* b# t" E+ m$ uKeep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the * d1 W& d- ~- H$ n; @: {( d: Qasset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to % Q( o* g, |# @defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones . @1 _3 C- B3 v- l/ P/ Gunder the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined. % ]& _, z* x9 ~! uKEI Kinetic Energy Intercept., i6 K R4 l% c: P KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool. * k/ {3 g0 D( E3 w1 vKEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. 2 ] b7 {8 T, r! B1 @7 I) {KEW Kinetic Energy Weapon.# N+ V* a$ Q9 T6 R KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion). ( Q8 M v) @) P+ u. NKEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). $ k, @; q9 I4 e/ X6 f0 eKEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. 0 G s* p/ D# aKEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. ( n. v; e ~4 K- c3 Q+ A: m3 uKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a + R- B8 n1 Y ~2 D2 m$ m2 G* ssequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption.: G5 G/ j+ N6 l5 j Kg Kilogram.9 ^/ R5 z% p; [7 G KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL. $ k# A' Q7 W% J. t# @, gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K 2 v1 h/ R; P7 F6 r4 _# |9 c158 . t8 ?3 ~/ K6 c; `" |KHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. / i( N" c7 ~2 G9 BKIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution. 4 d% q0 `, C r4 K0 DKill Assessment 8 h7 X2 R0 w7 G! H4 W# W" r h(KA)0 m1 }' c5 Y8 a8 w6 b An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV2 \( f6 S& f6 q+ u4 G- y( g. ^$ X intercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and 8 L: w: Z# a8 j. F' pre-engagements. (USSPACECOM)- B, Q+ o( w" U# }- ]. G3 M Kill Enhancement- f& A/ E" }5 J Device 0 s" w$ g' Y/ l) }A device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. . D: N. p, j! d. }Kinematic! W% j/ Y+ X& q Battlespace 4 A1 c, c$ W# T8 ^6 W* b v/ mThe planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor , {. C6 e1 k4 v6 T( I5 Qtimeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and2 \3 C: N, {8 S8 v8 z1 W3 ^& x0 q operational constraints. 9 U8 i! Z8 P3 s# uKinetic Energy , V# i( m6 s7 h: }(KE) . c+ U4 \' z. |/ A' q3 F" TThe energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion. $ v& {: l0 X) t1 a2 @; H H0 yKinetic Energy ! r* Q: P/ _% Y; X3 uWeapon (KEW) ; @5 n- I. y* A" eA weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object. $ s1 H7 W1 y0 T7 X2 RExamples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun.* U9 ]" E) J% d Kinetic Kill; P* t" H! m! S4 m- i1 y7 \) H Vehicle (KKV) / r8 }2 ]6 Y: _A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy3 m6 p/ u, [" o" w/ l a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board " U8 z$ L& n, d# ?1 m, j( {( Y& krockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell ( l0 _9 a, v; U8 `( rlaunched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-16 08:09 , Processed in 0.046800 second(s), 10 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部