- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition1 F/ A& p) b; a- D" t, A; l
Categories& j8 l8 v; n' ^' G* R M r- j2 v
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
: r6 {8 Z' f9 o1 I2 j" iand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories7 H+ v; a W+ b8 w& E4 [
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.' f! w5 G% H f5 } k
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
9 z+ W# d/ X" }; C* Whave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
$ D; U$ ^- {$ I( xrequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under7 l D9 F/ y+ ]+ a& d: ]
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
1 L( v2 d, S* o7 [/ N! D- O(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
1 a$ J# C' _& I9 eacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the( L3 h9 ^1 Z. i0 u
Component Acquisition Executive.
0 e7 \. m3 u$ y7 @9 {% U+ I) E! r; i* `Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
2 d8 X7 t& N6 S/ {' M0 Wdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have" s3 F2 Y6 D& m9 y" `. H' k5 {: g
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area; `3 O5 O3 o; j8 q2 ~$ \9 s/ E
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
5 _# M( o' Z( F1 V6 \( M, ^categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
" E- `5 @/ s9 a k4 T% s- `decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
8 v5 n7 b9 S. D( U6 C: Xwithin their respective organizations.* R7 s9 m- G C+ ?: v
Acquisition- {- U% R: C, I% m4 a$ W
Decision
1 V: ?5 M, V1 KMemorandum- X8 a$ `) {& O2 P
(ADM)4 S$ ^3 f8 T. H5 B& |7 F: g
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents6 P, q7 a0 [( f
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone- L* n5 N! O- [( x: |
decision review or in-process review.
) I- }# |0 o5 y, x* lAcquisition1 f1 _& l& L% D" w7 p ?+ {) ?% z
Field of View
$ D, U6 d) t( v( o4 K(FOV)1 r. F' b- D! \# t% c
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
) B" V Q! a- r* F% e, Xof searching its assigned volume.
; `9 w9 {% G! JAcquisition Life
; F0 Q% V# M7 ZCycle" Y# k5 z% O& Z; L
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which5 l. C, U6 F. u
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and# ~' S9 \+ E3 M8 c% h
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
& i7 {5 Y4 i$ v- B/ T6 b& |$ pand Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
' G/ ^# b/ _1 k' T ADeployment, Operations and Support.
+ h0 I2 \ m5 ]Acquisition
' z+ ?& p- ~( A% ELogistics+ g8 ?, f+ I6 I2 ^ O
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,+ N7 m+ O* a/ c% |: U
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics; g' _; c4 }8 E* n
support throughout the acquisition process.6 |$ x- P8 o; d
Acquisition
) l! f0 O* U5 D e4 N* ^Management
# g m- m) k. MManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
# t3 q* I9 H: s- n4 {; H3 B+ u“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
$ b! y4 ?, L6 O& M$ D. }- w; C4 u: Gacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense/ \. i% x0 ~. y0 i
acquisition systems/programs.
7 R) W6 O! t% L) q3 K& PAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
) ^6 s; b2 D; {3 q# u6 j$ jthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
! | G0 e' y0 z5 q; Z$ ]% {) O. {. rcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
' G' L) i8 u- a, C% X+ cDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)' g9 y/ E; y4 [* l8 }
Acquisition
- w% h$ p6 d/ X. zPlanning3 q2 W6 x+ M+ p% Z' U
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
0 }3 }' n% I& f9 N* _/ h X$ Eare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the4 k( d6 F# E6 N0 B6 p( A
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
2 k1 ?6 `7 n5 j/ ~# I7 vthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for3 W- W( ^4 U2 g6 {7 r" D
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
9 i) G2 ~1 @- i, |, _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
7 v, f: V* C7 ~$ L. F8 y5
+ B4 B) `4 \$ | u& FAcquisition
8 G5 i6 I: X! A) ?1 tProgram. }0 V* G* @8 k5 M
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel+ b, Q6 J- ~) Z& p
capability in response to a validated need.
; s$ s" j4 f% @Acquisition% x3 i1 p1 Q f# j7 H
Program' j( N0 D4 H4 D( a
Baseline (APB)
; r% y2 h3 I: O8 \Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
+ f* g. n( A$ `) fobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision$ J! h. |$ t/ c' I4 c+ y
authority milestone reviews as follows:" D9 G. l; {* p, l
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
, l+ `1 e/ K% n, g" zDemonstration and Validation.
4 R7 F; S% k' `! l' D•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in- T2 q% f7 Y& S& ]( ^& C+ Y
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.6 C X0 h$ r: C. e* v5 H
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
3 L" ^& Q+ w/ F( z2 D2 q# SPhase III, Production and Deployment.
* t5 V) e* [$ ^3 [+ \Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance1 ~! Y- f& M! q' W* m
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called' D9 V+ U0 H6 f6 l/ L- M
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
2 N8 T% Y& O8 h: `changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
' J0 F/ l1 @+ Qthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
) S1 @8 O/ t8 Q$ Y( A; R8 zdeviation.7 e: Q$ D s p5 O n" M
Acquisition
N5 d% E! }1 z1 `; jRadar& R% `4 U: w' ]* Q8 K
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the* ~4 ]& o1 n) C, Y. x
background and non-hostile objects.
y! {4 X! ?: @8 |, ]9 F+ wAcquisition+ l: x1 S3 X6 ~7 [9 |
Risk' }* c1 p0 `1 i0 c0 A
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an9 F1 h; p- i5 q# _4 k$ ?9 M! E
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
: Y+ \9 b. S+ I- y6 ~) [cost, or availability for deployment.
- w: E, A) D7 `) N3 aAcquisition/
4 n0 `4 V. p1 KReacquisition9 Z& N) Q! ~ w3 R3 o4 {4 _
Time0 [+ g1 ?' q V4 B
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
; g7 D } x. J% Aincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|