- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition
( {, Z j9 x7 KCategories
G7 G" v D SCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
, Q3 D: G2 G# Tand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
$ I0 F, [7 a+ L1 i2 f) ~& d) S5 c2 hdetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.8 K' X q0 I8 j# E4 S4 q
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They \8 n! L5 c/ f
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting7 r3 I( b- V/ y6 X9 o8 s
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
0 a$ i+ S% k. I7 _$ E9 JSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
. ]) e: q# ?, D: z& K7 k! t(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --/ k# w; x& m c- W+ _- k! S
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
9 ~3 [% I7 b3 |: }, r. z% t. iComponent Acquisition Executive.# D- S3 I- k+ a6 W) Q
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
7 u( N5 g, N/ w6 tdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have: N. s: a. X1 K- ?# b. z! H7 z* G
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
7 a5 p9 @8 z0 L8 B3 ^" F9 J" p) w$ sAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition& c {# J* Y) j7 @$ l
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone9 F$ k* F/ `* g/ V z8 z: e
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate C6 m" Y0 w. ?. n
within their respective organizations.
% d' N0 M& x* L- f; }, Z! PAcquisition
- q2 h8 ]. E5 x6 Z' x2 L% W0 gDecision
: L+ q( w3 n4 jMemorandum
2 _4 _6 `: ~4 W(ADM)
- C7 m1 s( v: TA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents, E; C( I k7 F
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone; t, H0 [# P1 K |1 y2 K
decision review or in-process review.9 |, x: `% C V
Acquisition
! Q% V; H5 Z0 j T5 M5 T5 \. B2 H TField of View0 a1 W' U# ? T6 u9 a
(FOV)
0 i& i2 z) \- ~# N1 D7 ?, \The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process) D8 s4 r4 C- `; m
of searching its assigned volume.
1 `; ^ n- p7 W Q, GAcquisition Life
3 g6 o4 _* r0 J! t1 [) O0 {Cycle7 }4 Z, h/ r U+ F9 _3 b
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
! H' t3 R9 b, ~1 w. `a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and+ w+ P: p9 O" c, x+ I: k
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration2 `! y3 q( h# j: g0 I; f! N
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and; ^' U3 L7 Z. {( ?: z
Deployment, Operations and Support./ S) `8 ^" u: J
Acquisition
7 V) C! ~- L5 \8 [Logistics
O9 g0 t2 A% x7 ?8 O/ k( BProcess of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,* b6 U' w5 y) d( e5 c6 L
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics- E6 V* U. p$ g# o2 |: |) P
support throughout the acquisition process.2 f; z, h$ x( G* E7 _: s+ {
Acquisition
' U% [$ d1 \5 c9 FManagement
/ l0 V. j/ c6 }. L2 X; t$ V9 bManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
5 E. O+ {' e, T, M) v9 ` p/ Y# F1 x“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
5 t, I8 K2 P; {; H$ W$ ?9 tacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
9 x/ n: M+ v2 ]7 S) C2 t% Cacquisition systems/programs.8 Q3 I& h, l$ N5 I8 ~( e
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
; h% r% J. [; ]; Uthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding8 b; {; v! R% {% x0 n- K
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and j- _, m- Z* j5 A6 Z4 G
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
% t0 B; F+ I, j" B7 ] J0 F& R# iAcquisition
- ]1 M1 L' |( d8 Z9 m. [8 K& ?Planning
% T* q5 s- z9 AThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
8 F+ x4 q2 |0 w0 _3 l' D+ Eare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the' d0 ~$ K& s( M4 S# j
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
* V1 _; r* h' H8 }- Uthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
' Z8 V# e$ y1 F* S g, B; S# ~3 qmanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
+ R ` i7 h/ x ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
3 Z9 i" h3 `# I; B& r9 h9 ?5
* R3 _% ^& O4 l# r LAcquisition2 B3 W" r+ g3 H5 r1 T. i, T
Program7 q7 a: t6 ]4 q5 h. p* K
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
$ L1 U h! o" d3 c9 s4 v4 Wcapability in response to a validated need.0 ]2 W! \" |3 M8 g1 S7 w
Acquisition
. V/ G' n! a& |1 b( SProgram( A: s+ y9 f, c; A3 [& i- Q8 p( ^
Baseline (APB)
- N2 K4 `) u: @* N5 T' }- h w/ JAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance5 w+ t& L4 G7 t7 K+ y
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
) K" m4 @* n% uauthority milestone reviews as follows:% x9 l; F d! ~% f
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,' s9 p3 k3 y I+ H, F! ~5 P
Demonstration and Validation.
) `2 h- f9 {* p•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in& n( N- @) ^: v( M# L
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.0 v8 O; _( l' [2 U6 h% i! \
•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in/ N) J7 k4 w2 \% u* z8 u* f
Phase III, Production and Deployment./ _+ U% a/ a8 c
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance, M& p. u6 S3 x1 P, d% G* I; x! y$ W
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called0 R0 l. J# b2 ]* m* @3 m
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be7 I( `: b! ^8 w2 |* H; A, ^) i3 [# Z
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
! T+ I% z3 h- ? W7 j* A; ithe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline) a8 _9 P& ]1 `6 s0 }* B0 u" r
deviation.) K6 ?4 U0 c7 ~" ?8 ?6 [- J( @
Acquisition
0 F: g% G9 ]. X% kRadar
+ X% g/ @: O+ n( t1 q9 [8 v1 o2 uRadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
" j7 r( K7 B+ z3 J# \" v" Q( Jbackground and non-hostile objects.& X4 n9 Z+ D) i- Y7 }
Acquisition
- q. ~/ T3 D8 Z- z7 F4 xRisk' e( w7 v% O7 Q
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
$ H( B3 Q$ ]. L$ }/ S# Runintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
% h' l4 f. M' |" N4 [: Q: ~2 Hcost, or availability for deployment.9 i$ A' G9 c/ \, X0 @* F/ }
Acquisition/8 B& M( p# J) h5 ^1 H
Reacquisition$ |; ~" z. C! k! ?7 j* P2 n2 x
Time
$ J! `4 N) ]5 ~8 T9 [5 _The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This) L( i$ @1 d# f* G
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|