- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition! X# x/ L% U. S3 J4 x7 Z% g
Categories
) U# u% G7 \9 F5 k$ |Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
) ?9 ^9 c/ i3 c# k9 E; D3 Qand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories) @" i& ^) {( ]+ m6 k4 n% L q! k
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.2 T" ? U8 X6 a* Z8 J9 T1 m- [ @8 b
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They* n9 \( O3 T8 J9 p% H7 d9 @- {
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
a* J2 v6 g: e4 ^5 c4 }( N1 [0 b8 xrequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under' P/ b9 a' L, V, @- x" }/ i+ n
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;8 V3 C \+ V! |7 B+ L% {
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --* Z9 v% H6 ?7 H- E. o' Q
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
* V8 u6 ]2 Z2 {8 L# I; F0 T9 vComponent Acquisition Executive.! F" P: q8 }5 b+ O
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: Q, ]6 ~/ |# B0 F
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
2 C* c2 D6 i5 M' ]unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area% X8 `" t# j2 ?0 P* @2 M
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition( m+ [; C0 N% U1 E" z
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
1 O5 b( \9 T+ I( R0 _! ]decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate& k# @" E! }- j& P$ S2 z! B5 a; l
within their respective organizations.
7 M/ h; x* F; v6 X$ d7 i2 cAcquisition
1 w( ]3 |9 L/ L4 W0 vDecision; l7 w* Y( S4 i7 D$ P$ _2 {( Y
Memorandum4 d6 W$ i; W. S; Y7 Y3 T
(ADM)/ V, T9 U8 N ?: e4 y
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents$ F# h F7 {! R, Y$ N/ ]+ s$ O; P
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone+ E* J6 @4 n1 f
decision review or in-process review.
1 b' V# ^5 Y: E& g0 D$ vAcquisition
# R# q' W: L8 ^2 p5 V" iField of View
3 t( Y! f# `5 L(FOV)
9 \. O, W. p2 ^1 F+ D2 LThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process7 k8 O1 U/ W S/ Y" M) D
of searching its assigned volume.. G5 z( O; r1 _& V. [
Acquisition Life
7 a4 Y8 t' E- d Q3 g/ J7 a A! zCycle6 Z! N9 H P3 i3 x/ ^
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which- j) N( | w+ y
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and; D' S* Z. m( S# l) V ^
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
1 H, n$ p$ M m, [, E$ ?- Q" ?and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
% w* x* P8 x3 ]& ?( x! f% S+ wDeployment, Operations and Support.
- L0 x: _$ O+ vAcquisition
6 {3 b$ J9 Y" d- @+ S: a7 XLogistics8 T" b' \1 [3 Y. @9 _& [' H
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,3 o/ ]. k, t/ e- X3 M
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics
$ X0 ]5 p0 W" v( Psupport throughout the acquisition process.
' a- _9 }% a) a) m. \; WAcquisition
% k: K' [# G. J4 K% ` w2 t8 kManagement) [* f+ m9 I) `
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of. c; t6 |2 z+ U1 q$ ~( h
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
, N5 q; Y0 s3 n4 j( Tacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
2 s" }/ G& z, }acquisition systems/programs.; h6 @! R7 p# N8 I
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
, c# Q: ~( f8 B+ u# C0 Fthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
7 u& w2 f5 S" t% r# W5 ycontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
' W9 T/ i' `# U; Z r5 s% [Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
+ q# T$ h* E3 p) b4 mAcquisition; v7 {, A2 y5 W ^/ `
Planning
7 J4 b, y' v7 @! K7 r' G- d+ fThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition4 L/ _; p# h- z; d: f+ P4 j
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
4 O9 u+ t: `! @2 c0 c% I% p% Vneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
' ]+ w" n3 d5 ~! N! E" Dthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for+ f V8 {) `$ I0 w
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
9 A8 L+ q' F7 A, @9 uMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A3 d5 r7 ]! L/ O2 m% s
5
+ x- {$ N2 S& PAcquisition+ H* r* R5 ?! M; i
Program! F. B" e' g8 D4 g( J: M
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
2 s( I: s% e7 M8 D6 @4 F- |capability in response to a validated need.
8 Y, U+ H2 `& \4 }7 rAcquisition q. ^" N- H* K. G) L
Program @: W$ R9 r# X: T* ]8 ?3 U
Baseline (APB)3 ]# S k! D4 V# E+ w
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance- i! N2 \$ G6 a9 v& s+ ?
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision' X3 j$ J5 e( d% e
authority milestone reviews as follows:
% y6 b' r& B2 |) A( ^ W* U ?6 N. P•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
3 W" i/ f& L6 y5 o8 r9 |; P1 |Demonstration and Validation.! m6 B0 U6 F! n9 |
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
# U+ H' u; d% ?- P+ fPhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
; R k. ^) Z; Z5 @: L• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
; j- o2 e& c& z8 H5 dPhase III, Production and Deployment.
8 R9 D2 i) l* o1 j$ pEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
0 ]% o5 e- [% s# s. H5 r, q, R5 xparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called( v0 o/ {) `6 _8 _* i# l2 m
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
' U @3 F& u" Lchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of* j* B; D- i- k& `, d! ]) Y6 j" b
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
7 R, `2 L1 Q; B! }. vdeviation.
2 |, ]% Q# R* v. N2 @6 UAcquisition5 }! ^ k- u+ C) T, g9 `
Radar6 T# p8 N: J& M
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
* n/ V- @, o |5 g7 e; J; F0 n/ cbackground and non-hostile objects.
5 m9 ` T! n4 r$ UAcquisition
+ d- G+ T' N" Z+ F* f! ERisk- Z* ]- L2 s& h2 o, Z, `
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an9 f* z8 n9 l9 v$ A0 D$ U7 _
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,& E+ g2 Y O! d3 i7 Z1 v8 _! P$ v3 u
cost, or availability for deployment.
0 S: W# v5 a, \7 I' NAcquisition/
( i: I* Q, Z: |& F" v! qReacquisition
" H0 Y9 q8 v' C+ Q2 l7 ~Time
5 B# y8 q) {7 NThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
. b8 S' P8 F; g1 w" r1 Dincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|