- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition9 u0 J9 x: {8 g4 ]* s& I6 n) {
Categories4 |: b' r/ R1 n9 ~4 \, I6 R j5 `3 l4 r
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution6 Z% X3 j$ M1 \/ i1 P
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories" j4 L0 l% f% f# K1 I1 ^/ V
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.* P; f' @ O8 f5 y% |+ x I. U
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They1 b, @6 a! n/ j, c
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
% E' I) ^- T7 {- h! @! r; crequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under2 S5 p9 }" f D
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
3 T, B+ X) R( g9 p; l/ c/ m) w0 \(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
/ U: ~0 @% R( y. ?" k% {& Bacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
# e8 l# z$ O, C& A# p( B. V3 aComponent Acquisition Executive.2 l* P5 }5 n, s3 X2 r
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
* c9 x0 o2 v# K7 g2 U8 V' `delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have6 L: `! k A s) |0 q& r/ _8 a: ?4 ~
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area; D9 ]. Q0 `, Q# @1 [; {
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition" P! ^2 d+ g- u
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
2 o" v! [ n' Y! H2 B: j( Vdecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate3 X$ N2 j0 ^8 N8 \$ F2 G
within their respective organizations.
Y/ J7 v% x7 v& p6 g) sAcquisition1 B, N4 v& \" s4 ]
Decision
% _! n8 n' ]- {* O4 U0 ]& {3 F+ d. UMemorandum1 b. P! L9 b( R
(ADM)
1 G+ [# t/ H: nA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents5 `4 H( F/ K: ?1 b8 W6 |
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
- G" R1 e* M" n# v- u2 Ydecision review or in-process review.- }! S" G! m1 j$ {3 Z/ @
Acquisition- U8 m# t3 {/ V( M- w i S
Field of View
2 Z O3 N6 E" f( B- B(FOV)2 l7 y, v4 v8 E
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process) C3 u6 f( W' W( B
of searching its assigned volume.2 B4 I2 V1 v& B1 y1 J$ f
Acquisition Life3 N' J) w7 j. S# L! {2 [
Cycle
$ v$ n* W( x, w% I S; \* GFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which( _- M! Y# } l# U6 f( f
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
7 x9 k' e7 V+ i/ f. w1 Qproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration8 A4 n4 ^* }4 F t+ L0 B% M' p
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and3 h2 X3 O, x: }% u. C
Deployment, Operations and Support.4 I: c) {7 n d- b; ]) o( R
Acquisition
* H1 u- }' Z- q, rLogistics0 \4 R/ a+ f3 u7 z# e. G9 _) R
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,( ~! x J4 b- Q
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics5 h8 p( i5 J, J" A1 r
support throughout the acquisition process./ q# v- m" o. `5 k
Acquisition- }# I- N6 q, d% } x
Management9 t5 p. W& | L
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of3 a2 S' U. d) R6 k4 Q! B
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense. O& _7 ]( s- d9 i
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
" w9 P8 G ?9 L' g0 aacquisition systems/programs.! i c8 A; x+ Y6 u
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
8 b; g% P* c* a6 U3 k3 ethe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding% E$ j i; U! ~1 \
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and$ A; a# M. J( ^
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)7 [& ?1 |( B' E8 S# x$ g, W( n
Acquisition2 k6 q: ~- ~6 j& Q
Planning
( L- B* V0 A+ |8 hThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition& j, x6 M# ` e+ ?
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the' g7 m9 y" y" S- [ P. R
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
+ s# e* m6 n- m- D4 |# Y$ vthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for1 a4 {6 i( \/ C+ z- t% B" J
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.4 f3 H9 V5 i9 {% ^* `
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A8 V& `- r/ \8 w) H8 }) g& n
5: W; {$ ^* l( s+ ?- x& ^
Acquisition7 N/ L5 ]" B1 [. c, k4 G5 f7 u/ G
Program
7 o4 g6 }3 s2 [0 b' [A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel4 r# u2 ~% m- R
capability in response to a validated need.( m: H! O; I2 W# j# B
Acquisition# N% m1 P7 J" [- J
Program
7 S) X# |, K+ `: n( yBaseline (APB), T4 }$ K& x. b
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance. P6 L( s: B3 v" e* B$ O
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision2 Q4 d& g( ^" p9 s. p) u
authority milestone reviews as follows:
5 v$ \: \2 ?* ~- T•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
9 I3 g1 n* _1 B% q* C2 T% HDemonstration and Validation.
% p7 O$ \, U+ Q/ ?•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in% r! V6 h* y0 ~2 S
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
% |5 K9 V! U$ M2 d7 b. w•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in4 Z9 B/ K M& S4 b
Phase III, Production and Deployment." z4 _6 h4 E8 b: S$ e
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
9 C! p l: I/ e }5 O$ x; cparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called# c4 s6 C4 Z5 b8 P& k$ u6 ]" N3 }
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
6 l m' O9 d: S4 o+ r- b; n. ~changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of2 |8 H2 ?) q- R- c
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline) j7 X) C1 q Z. @% V
deviation.
6 Z# }+ u9 `* }Acquisition4 w% j1 i( `/ r X
Radar& ^- X& ^2 @4 B2 `/ \7 I
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the; r: q4 |0 Y: {! O( q
background and non-hostile objects.
1 p# ?& J0 P. p% w+ t$ D3 E. uAcquisition3 ^: } \7 M! B/ c% Y# Q
Risk
! H) e: \2 l! h2 W1 `, RThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
/ r' c u6 q- f& x' G" Iunintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,/ e/ m, v1 M% f: p% T' n
cost, or availability for deployment.9 z: @. p: J0 t
Acquisition/
/ m; o, t1 _! O% y! B2 RReacquisition
& D% f5 c1 R, H; H/ \0 YTime ~! K' _; F5 C ?: D1 _! t
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This6 A0 }4 ]5 J8 s0 h
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|