- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition0 y! e$ c% _# s# z# v, i, F
Categories2 w& s& Y7 n; @( Q! M* D7 W6 Z
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
) T/ |( J; U. i+ ^and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
" c8 F# O/ G; j3 X! wdetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures. ]# R( @, u$ }! B. T) p$ d
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They) n# n: g# j1 H* q! G2 f5 _
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting4 V2 O3 I6 [8 I+ X( ?
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under( U7 }: B' U5 o2 N$ n
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
, \( k. U5 V. E8 o) h(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --& P8 u1 Z( r6 Y3 E, X# s; w
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
5 X, _- O+ @/ W" s4 q8 s/ s. ]Component Acquisition Executive.
( J% a9 t m9 T& Z5 M5 tAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
h0 }/ P) a( J( o* ^delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have; R" d- q+ {1 D# S8 t% E
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area8 J, j- b6 N) c( V! q
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
1 s! z% m. Z5 V5 M7 i5 l4 v5 K4 Icategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone) N# Q1 A# h( ]% t3 S- h \
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate$ y6 F/ }* L0 h( ~% b+ ~# B0 n' K- N
within their respective organizations.& b' b& T% A2 ~$ s
Acquisition# D8 e" m- P9 D, O" E
Decision- z9 Z" j7 \' |' V; _' B
Memorandum
1 } m$ n9 y- u( r9 d, ^(ADM)
% v# T' X& ]& B& d8 v9 |2 t; [A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents4 n& y# [: d @, v/ Y8 S( g
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
1 |6 y; ~6 j! `' z: g5 i* X( I/ idecision review or in-process review.- Z, \; ^2 U3 p* J/ x9 g
Acquisition/ S% X) g: ?! N/ b" E
Field of View
9 H$ I n- U" X& L: [' e(FOV)0 s u# z7 b! D$ B- H- s; a$ h$ c
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process% v4 w# K" I* i4 y. E/ h" E" f/ \/ A
of searching its assigned volume.
# F; m- Z/ p' ?Acquisition Life
+ u2 S2 p) } ]/ H; \9 iCycle
+ T2 ?, w4 \) t. u& W( EFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which% W X# U6 s j. e% ~6 O, A
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and1 ` h" [0 I# f( _5 j9 b/ M" M
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
: [$ R/ f, V1 Land Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and2 ]4 D% x, l- s% q0 _1 F- K1 |4 c7 u
Deployment, Operations and Support.% o9 c; ^2 A0 g% L# o# e
Acquisition# l% k! f0 m6 i% x( `4 P
Logistics- H) w- F8 b8 ?% N4 p$ {
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,+ G$ `" v# l. q& p: v* U6 ~, V
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics' }4 R9 m o, \. C1 ^4 M
support throughout the acquisition process. \0 j' T2 E* h; V5 x
Acquisition
1 b# X( q5 Y0 s! w6 h$ JManagement
9 u# l) l9 m% X8 _& Q, m* QManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
3 H, s% A4 G5 D2 X2 k$ X7 H1 K& |“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense) ?1 [( v, C8 L& G
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense5 e8 I# f- m1 f& J( V0 f3 w
acquisition systems/programs.' \% N2 l t# ^" {
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
: G7 R* A1 g* c9 }' ~5 l t& [the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
, x- Q8 @+ v% o0 v% H: ]' fcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and3 ]2 |. D( U8 P8 W0 X6 x
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)# `+ u" n% i1 x6 {: n0 S6 v
Acquisition$ w& U1 T1 C; P4 c" D
Planning
% V% ^+ k( u7 c+ `4 dThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
6 G y/ Y* \3 U- o- H4 }+ D3 ^are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the! }! w; l, r: a% B, d1 `% U
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout8 D8 D/ f! M# ?$ s( h
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
; K8 X- l5 |, T7 \managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan., C+ C: `& |4 R( `# \2 k
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
4 V/ D T2 \+ i1 c53 G: C: ]( N7 \: r9 N% @7 C* O
Acquisition
/ f- W6 N, R8 R2 H5 d6 K2 [5 E, }Program
9 i1 x& K9 l; F* q8 UA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel1 s$ s5 |9 n9 u1 D0 M
capability in response to a validated need.. M @ `) i; ~1 j, `
Acquisition
! @# K# p8 Q" {/ S9 [. i. f8 _Program1 R2 A) \" u5 X
Baseline (APB)! v/ x/ m; l, y$ M
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
3 S# a6 r$ U' f! M( ~objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision/ r8 a% B' `& t
authority milestone reviews as follows:
! R2 h3 s- U/ ?, u( n- p+ S* }•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
! f2 w0 T& C2 {( u' H K; pDemonstration and Validation.; h+ y9 Z' B4 R; a$ e
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in# s2 R) ~4 k: M- O
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development." b8 A( o; v. m$ z( X9 V
•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in' ~. q/ O& l" M" S1 ?( y
Phase III, Production and Deployment.: C) e7 W, U3 x
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
9 s8 x: S. Z9 I/ ]! b+ gparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called# ?* O# Z) ]( D' }
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
" R3 u) y0 _. h$ S7 Jchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of6 f& b4 M8 s9 Z* M1 s9 s2 m: @, v
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
8 N% p1 N$ B4 @deviation.3 ?2 V3 Y# m Z, G% A+ }9 s& s
Acquisition' ^1 f% ^( g5 R- `. m T7 B3 l7 K
Radar, b% f! E o. L% U( D
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
0 T' X8 L& n* o+ q8 A6 Ebackground and non-hostile objects.% i5 @+ v- i/ ~( ]& `
Acquisition+ ~6 c3 f2 W5 r; U
Risk
- e& Q6 P5 W7 U% lThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
, G# {% c/ R, W1 y3 |unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
8 j9 Q% p6 v4 O0 S0 j) x" Bcost, or availability for deployment.
& Q6 F* F' [* g! w# _Acquisition/
/ ^4 ?' [. X$ ]4 J- W3 }Reacquisition+ X1 y' j; [; P: r
Time
0 f& K7 s" {+ s2 vThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
" X" V+ Y! |8 |# c r$ ~includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|