- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition
4 n m% i' {& \4 Q- l) j9 ?6 vCategories
8 \7 N+ k' y+ U3 q+ p7 H4 r3 eCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
j0 ? M: }6 H0 g6 b/ Mand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories& U: T' [/ H7 F+ I" g* c
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
: c5 ~; J% r6 Z# A. D% q+ JAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
+ V1 {; N1 }; g( C4 b7 f3 @0 C, qhave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting3 R9 y) }2 o' w0 v) P; b
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under7 e& V! l k& ~; J, K1 }
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;- R) R* ~8 a9 Y$ a8 [, \
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
4 F- g4 k4 ]. \+ Z" a nacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the9 _3 b( P1 b! i3 W2 o/ t3 s6 g
Component Acquisition Executive.
3 Q" A9 K5 m. V; oAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
F' B/ e* o4 M* z& H5 \9 T) n8 hdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
, P3 t+ k `8 C; F( Y7 bunique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area, Q; V- l5 t0 }6 Z
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition, m! h W: i Y* Q" `% m% L
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
$ @8 T4 V$ u- @) |( Edecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
+ ?' H" i# V6 S6 e$ X) ywithin their respective organizations.8 a. {; |3 t) t2 @, F. A- ?; m F
Acquisition
% [5 t6 }' G+ B" [" gDecision; U; s3 w |3 Z" ^/ `! x
Memorandum' |. r) k& K- h A
(ADM)
5 x# b8 v3 d, aA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
& r( f+ _- }$ e9 Tdecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
! v- T; p# p# p! ~4 Vdecision review or in-process review.( `, q. p6 X9 \& e# H
Acquisition) a/ V5 K$ G+ G$ s8 Y$ I
Field of View
$ j8 d% w7 P# @' r V(FOV)
) m [! V l. _The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
" s9 E3 a, v# q$ }; P4 }' fof searching its assigned volume.; }. x G2 D: c% b* X, n2 C# ]# U
Acquisition Life
& r4 ], p: Y* v. d7 vCycle3 |7 H" r# d0 z/ V' G v# S
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which& D% C3 l' g0 S4 Q& r9 u2 P" n
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and- N9 n- k) l. { U
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration! }, }4 [) k1 J, Y' t: V4 R" p
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
5 ]: e9 z1 k1 {Deployment, Operations and Support., k: ^0 N+ n! v2 m3 l7 M
Acquisition
" j, S9 E; ]) u7 o3 CLogistics5 g: W- F; K0 d% f2 e/ D4 p
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,% r- S( a4 n E. ~* o M
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics
! d' `, @3 X x6 j) Q2 ~support throughout the acquisition process.
- j! M, M5 J+ [, Q8 fAcquisition5 A2 @& P$ ]& s+ n9 y& g! j: X
Management' [6 E" X. E' n* e! t
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of6 |0 A7 V: }! i% f
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
4 V3 t' T& I/ J- Racquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense6 a/ L @* _$ J+ F. {9 I, s8 G- e; q
acquisition systems/programs.8 B+ b' H9 { ]1 I5 a% H0 `+ ~
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute) r# P ~. Q" D8 S, J) m% a; b7 S
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
# q7 m& a; Y" }contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
0 A% P1 k5 Q) M- I) SDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)( I* G6 |" F# K4 Q g/ u/ B* [
Acquisition
* m c0 K% V- t' v$ [0 vPlanning! n3 Z8 g- s' ]8 h3 b4 d+ M( d
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition" \, _: p0 e* |! S
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
! h# Z8 m8 L: N1 ^! o% rneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
! V* B- c( z! q4 I+ J) q% wthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
+ U2 Y/ Z4 h! e1 J# c- Tmanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
/ U r; y3 V+ N/ \# c( lMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
! V7 m/ n' c, j+ {! W' p5
0 Z) ]& o5 c8 b/ C6 zAcquisition* W3 z9 X4 o" c2 S& t! G, [4 r6 A
Program
1 N3 N: S! X! q/ s+ y0 h5 O( y! ~ E9 m4 WA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
- ]' E% t. @0 y( \- ^capability in response to a validated need.+ a; j! Q; T0 `- }7 |; B6 m
Acquisition* \8 f8 F. I7 N) f8 G4 D5 v5 n
Program
5 h$ V( }0 f9 ], \4 E( KBaseline (APB)
- }5 k* ^* q2 U. U& PAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
5 T; K7 q0 G* ~6 X) pobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
% [4 y# z3 H* N1 d2 rauthority milestone reviews as follows:
" k. H( D; D3 |7 \; s7 g•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
8 H/ T, U7 P# b: CDemonstration and Validation.# p8 q6 \% w2 h9 c' [/ ?6 H
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in7 z; x s/ m x& q
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
& G6 H7 f6 Z7 ]5 F A9 s$ @• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
! L2 E3 o* F4 X% MPhase III, Production and Deployment.
& r- B' D% w" N. B4 W' OEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
5 M4 H: K8 O% E5 jparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
$ t" b- i1 H5 K( i) I/ z v) ethresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
8 e% {0 O' z! B" N. \changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
/ A* ~! @+ m/ k |; `the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline% E; Y, ]) d& ~$ ^# Z
deviation.
4 X3 m3 g0 |# m: x3 WAcquisition
2 n+ n. D* R5 l. y1 ~Radar' U! r; |" G' _
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
4 @3 M9 O, L$ U2 @- h' u5 ]background and non-hostile objects.
: _' D) t% [- w1 I" [$ p6 sAcquisition
1 D9 J& A0 B! \: D2 S' q& \1 }Risk
5 n' c* A& ? x0 i! ?! y4 ~1 QThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an3 ]: {( R8 ?+ A% x, O8 O5 S
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
) e* x6 J+ z2 t, `) m/ c' x$ Scost, or availability for deployment.
( Q% N9 e1 Z" _Acquisition/1 n! J8 w; r* {, p- r6 d; Z
Reacquisition
+ T: b* j- r LTime2 B4 Y, Y8 F. i; l- s5 g
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This+ i+ j8 g/ t: \; n9 c
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|