航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O y0 A. d) r( U0 C) ?1 ~0 t! A 211 4 I' T3 j2 w+ a& V- g- `2 _Operational % P6 S- X9 Y; d: cAssessment $ W# A) j$ D! G- Q7 J0 Y MAn evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an : i/ H# Y7 v0 O% ^+ m6 lindependent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other. ^8 a& B0 O( }: K- D than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on; h8 h4 {, \; s. f0 Z1 j significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk, ! K4 X7 k- O* y# X1 @% ^adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate 4 P7 B5 n1 d g Toperational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using1 b7 k2 Q; t" R& a9 _ technology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development2 P; p; s0 c; ?4 P3 k/ |0 ` models, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test' {+ C2 ?% b% O, W and evaluation necessary to support full production decisions. ' J+ m" B* D& P6 W& U( p: DOperational1 k8 Q3 @1 O. d, R Availability8 B2 N8 k, D7 B" H) Q$ t0 s7 H The degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect 5 i" H4 {0 V2 kequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is - P6 L* B2 U8 V' {: quptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link( j( o0 n: k) v8 D) W between readiness objectives and supportability.# d( b% C1 c" f: t Operational4 T8 t+ w9 g' A9 G& ]7 j( V; F. K Concept 4 p/ _& N& \- H- D* QAn end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, 8 C( z5 ]) y4 ~/ e! y( rorganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task.2 z- l @' z) Z. _# }, X Operational 3 G9 {! b$ q' k# {9 X1 BControl (OPCON)5 O* p& ?1 P3 @/ l% q5 o: V Transferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any- ^3 q+ a9 \* y5 l3 y: [7 Y echelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is 9 b# n9 E& e9 B) g5 M4 i0 Yinherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to) [8 a* {+ }4 U perform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving 5 `$ ~5 u- |. |8 lorganizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating2 o) D, V0 k$ T/ y: d objectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions " ~/ _/ L! T# J* U! `% w: P) Cassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the2 N/ q4 i5 _. k4 x$ h' T; c+ A commanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised 8 v# @: T6 C; x, B' fthrough the Service component commanders. Operational control normally- a, c' n9 d P# o, M$ V provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those4 k" T+ g4 m1 B! J/ L( K( r* v+ { forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to 9 ^: Y9 ~/ s1 F9 {: K+ ^accomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself,+ o: K% A; T& p" Z' U' x( R include authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline,* ^) v$ `0 L) X" i" O* j internal organization, or unit training. " S" [4 o3 Y/ fOperational" V2 I& s5 |/ B. J Effectiveness 9 i5 F" }9 d6 y6 i: R9 `+ {The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by & s' X/ g/ x, drepresentative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural, & u( Y$ U7 a, Helectronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering : f) A0 b5 K' O. Z. U) r, r' Gorganization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including , Q' k+ l" b6 i% Q! _ M# c- [countermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and 4 I! C4 H" Z! c6 X; S8 Mchemical contamination (NBCC) threats). " G3 ?- M, ?! p5 BOperational 4 x9 @7 J2 V/ a$ sEvaluation ( y) Y. Y! A9 D, h: f A; v( r) fThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable - }, R2 i- H+ I5 K: @under Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is & N; Q2 y4 l8 O% uwarranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; + U' C0 U/ T3 O& Dand b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems,4 V. T+ ~. y7 J; o( m consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate 9 F2 u2 U2 r7 o9 p0 `' \the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy 7 e5 H/ o* t1 H8 s/ P; ?( hcapabilities in the field. ) ^0 K' C" @) G4 G( @1 WOperational ( {+ l6 Q$ i; l5 Z# \- k" D7 HLevel of War% A/ q5 W9 u4 y( \7 m' G The level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned, ; V' B. I" ?' O" bconducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or9 I! @/ f+ ^* C" [ areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by, T" k u. p3 I3 u0 _- C, f2 b% [ establishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic1 h3 w1 W, m! I1 G# m2 c7 y% K' C objectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating 7 ^. {$ @0 \' o. `$ {actions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These / m" x/ l4 u( Y% E; aactivities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure6 z: \: M) P, J( T3 H3 n8 Z the logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by4 P9 i4 K! W x6 T1 v* x which tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives.* v: }& n' s+ n1 w; J0 a9 E! h MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O! e3 ?( h) c! A3 i7 i7 ~% \ 212 ; e" b: f, N' g6 _1 c. ~Operational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the ' |) k8 C, l2 l, b- X* ]operational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training! }% `" D# t i4 d" ` configuration. / T. H" l5 T2 [: l4 NOperational G+ B4 s% ~) @Readiness . _' c7 ~- {* s! g+ ^" o5 I/ ~The capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform8 [$ L% ^7 P- P# Q the missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in 6 d+ e' Q! \% {1 \7 K( v6 ~$ ca general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.: C6 u( S: Z7 ` Operational / u7 O$ n4 R7 r. R7 pReliability+ B( p" E% g) o- A The reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment. \. _% ~5 f" `' j5 t; K+ f. qOperational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment.8 [& @, [2 N2 \: o6 r4 ? Operational) E9 H+ |' I; @ Requirement, ^" d/ j' Y; w3 ]9 l7 B Navy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected 0 p/ [' t& \ l# N: j$ W9 Nby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less4 O) r& j( x2 B8 n; ] than major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |只看该作者
Operational $ T! Q5 s. I* [2 vRequirements/ j! z4 w! d% _! } Document (ORD)3 _' o0 R3 x3 n6 n; o4 A& a; R Documents the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for6 ^3 w R7 S2 H+ S* h% d/ n' p/ K0 i operational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and 1 A6 c/ z% c) I$ I6 J6 {$ ADoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components.7 i5 U1 N3 U( f Operational& P/ q. N4 ^* v9 ~! f6 } Suitability0 c& K& U! ~" ^ The degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with8 w, }" C8 }0 K consideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, # g5 R3 K+ a2 f# f: Creliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower , e2 @ f) X6 J7 N6 B6 v* Csupportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts,8 z7 c$ e" ?6 t% D2 B documentation, and training requirements.+ T1 |8 H- X. w& L4 O( s Operational Test7 r; J: y9 a8 l1 Q and Evaluation A& S7 o! J( p& Z% A1 s1 i (OT&E)/ e/ \0 V& f) N* }" k: u That T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational1 {. ?8 t# X2 B2 \- i# D' r) W ` effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any3 l& X: a. z4 f1 C& v3 S5 \" p modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the $ @# {% g3 R+ X5 }9 E% ctypes and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when " V( Q8 Q4 n0 Sdeployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as & L) A7 h. S3 B3 R7 r* H7 S; tpossible.0 s# R# E4 |' G8 [3 \; ^" P Operationally- b: i/ W# D6 {+ f Ready ! u" F9 \; Q$ j& u9 z4 ^1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or 4 b' f$ u' q0 v0 r9 E+ G" F- Udesigned (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both3 M+ v3 {# B# o: [/ b equipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to # Q- C9 @* |# k; H& {perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel)." _4 _) k9 u7 s% t- V% R Operations and " L: V" P8 d4 v' C; D( }* USupport (O&S) 7 u" w; @8 g$ A; X# T$ B# JCosts 3 h5 k o1 B: p( O, dThose resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a 7 ^/ k$ e7 [+ o' mmajor component during its useful life in the operational inventory.2 I7 ^& m9 q! o9 u/ E Operations& l6 T7 d+ t, }% J Profile , o5 i5 F6 l) |" x8 ^# I) [An identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time ; `0 k$ H: l& |2 M* athose actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational ! G/ h x9 Y. Gprocedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are1 `& |8 ?+ l8 \3 Z" ^( L discernible.0 l% [7 h- e0 Y) ^! k9 u( c Operations0 }* O' ~1 g- o% A5 w9 w' i Security (OPSEC) ! X# q& f! j7 rSurvey : x ]8 G, `; RThe method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is 1 l8 `4 A. Z& W; J7 {composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or 3 y6 X/ j% [) ~8 ^4 c5 Yinefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational ) P' k$ x* E: V4 |' d" eeffectiveness.2 D3 h k' e8 w3 y: u T OPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy). 3 l# x9 c" s- B1 AOPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment. / e" C4 \! b- G& n" N& l5 F+ AOPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor./ f9 Z5 x1 d1 l/ t% G! e: u MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O7 L6 s3 f, m7 L0 O% C" i 213& P4 J7 D+ w9 P! g" m OPLAN Operation Plan.1 w8 q1 q( T# O& C0 M OPM Office of Personnel Management.8 i& W( l4 I1 C! c' U OPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. ; I8 L) S6 ^5 k2 h5 @$ J# |4 k* oOPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction.6 s; \8 R/ z3 p6 S- o OPNS Operations./ d6 d/ g- T3 u, l OPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. / O) r3 a2 m/ f; J1 }2 g/ POPORD Operation Order.& @; Z; y9 E+ G3 x% `* y8 \( b, | OPP Other Physical Principles./ O5 s8 E5 z* `+ @$ o+ F. H OPR Office of Primary Responsibility. 8 w: q2 {2 h U4 z- A% wOps Operations (employment). ) Y5 A/ z0 L& T2 z; a, s! m8 oOPS Operations.. g6 W- P( l) B* U5 a! d OPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies.! ]* S9 t" Z: e7 s1 ?0 P OPSEC Operations Security. { S: C: y" a6 l0 D1 N OPSMOD Operations Module.; r* C' w4 Q' y. C: f# y7 d OPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army): n) i, N- [* a* s OPTEMPO Operating Tempo.1 Y' D- @$ J. l: u5 L1 U6 x OPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy)9 X5 L: h1 z% O3 g% T4 d Optic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise./ I& g+ d- ?: U: Z! \) q Optical Airborne3 K: H# V; n+ o9 Q Measurement & o* F# w9 o! L3 {7 P, C5 _ ^, NProgram (OAMP) & N" q0 W# N9 E' \- [" W2 @A program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct 1 K# ^9 E4 O4 P- \% Nsurveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems.* r: E- d2 I" V5 W5 S- J( W (Also known as Cobra Eye.), L0 \) F& l) X7 X o9 t9 o C Optical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the' {6 `. U. k7 J3 N0 i( m material to which they are applied. + ]: K# n' T4 H9 g1 c( dOptical$ n# U& `/ b- @" _* W Q. g Processing , R2 e- C7 A2 q% y3 f# aA type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed t- L& ^! K( p" Kthrough optical systems, is used in problem solving.' a7 s$ m( p) |" P! @! K5 ]0 x% [% q OR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational 9 q- H# f( o r( E& vReadiness. (4) Operational Reliability. , n; X$ _2 _9 M7 lOR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis. / s! F w. u; ]# xORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser. & v3 i3 A4 |5 r1 d* SORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature.) [6 G2 W- a9 h% Q! \3 ] MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 3 I0 t3 X/ C/ q214: Z: o' \' M* X% b$ Q, I. p- T* u Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.)3 W# W% z, i+ |1 {7 D: r* s) m used to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital, ]% P4 w" v1 k$ w- i elements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a5 ~( D, P% `! {- |' H0 J Keplerian orbit at a particular time. 1 A8 ?$ Y% M( {& kOrbital - E/ ~5 t2 y; @- qManeuvering b: B9 D5 x3 t% T$ Z( O D4 q Vehicle (OMV)4 I; e f! h* x6 w9 U9 e) y1 n NASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing.7 u; u" q: D) v& f, Y( C- e Operates from shuttle and Space Station. . {1 B& W. n8 a+ @: g& B+ FOrbital Suborbital 6 f% C6 {/ L. f* TProgram (OSP) F8 a7 y R$ s2 C6 V( VA strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the 6 x6 _( Z: Q7 S# p" {Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |只看该作者
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites. $ ^8 b; N5 Y+ c/ s2 Q1 GORC Operational Readiness Condition. E9 T% g' _! |1 zORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment. 3 a5 ^6 ]/ n% {3 [2 \1 _ORD See Operational Requirements Document.8 X* K6 p! j0 L( I) H$ |! s+ [" m ORDALT Ordnance Alteration.: J+ l4 L6 s7 W! } Order of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the) G% E2 h, w' C personnel, units, and equipment of any military force.. M( _, O! G% A' z3 Y1 J$ \3 E Order Wire 6 G% [- G2 c) T1 y0 FMessage" g* |! L5 E! _4 z A communications support function for internal control of communications , {6 M1 U3 }) ]1 t4 x: \elements. p" L6 Y9 w$ _& _) P( @- ~Organic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic ( t# m; T6 m& g0 K2 z( E" Nparts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force, 4 Y9 Z; _/ r o6 Nand Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the # p0 F3 ?3 N. i% `& joperating forces for the Navy. 6 f9 F6 E/ _9 a9 ^Ornate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.# W9 O: C* U9 G4 l ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. 8 `! u# h* y. PORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications.1 K/ N. U) n; |" G; S ORU Orbital Replacement Unit.+ x, E2 [" r& |, K ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. ! ?) W& Y# P- Q: b; N4 P7 _OS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System. : s, i- C4 n: o& }. Y& sOSA Optical Society of America.3 j$ N4 ?7 L$ t+ E( y* i5 W" | OSC Optical Signature Code.( U w2 q! D0 P% @ OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe. 1 }# O4 z1 W. F; G6 UOSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. ( J3 n' ~ v6 Y H- L. ~2 JOSE Operational Support Equipment. ( e" _+ A l- E. mOSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool. ! S0 A" r$ p/ m. U+ D3 I- `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O# N t4 z3 @1 @( I8 f9 Z 215 ; I& m4 D M* {/ y- ?( dOSF Open Systems Foundation. ' f; o3 W9 S1 _1 b, qOSH Occupational Safety and Health.3 P3 A: e9 e/ X% G3 B$ X) {( f OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. 0 y' H2 C$ p( }$ r: q! g9 DOSI Operator System Interface. % u( t: Z) L+ ~2 IOSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC. " v. O) `4 c" \ `8 t) VOSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term).( E" A( F( U5 ? OSIP Operational System Integration Plan. 7 @/ u" k! H, }0 l# qOSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group. ; {9 r/ D# J; a. d- sOSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. ( Z( O' k8 ]' j; T! I& rOSM Object Sighting Message. / R$ l* |/ @2 d5 }1 |OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program)." i( K7 i2 M' U" u3 Y OSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy.+ E. k# W. c$ S3 H OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research.( W, b! Q8 n# p5 L OT Operational Test.7 r# c+ l/ A* T OTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.7 y6 Z: ^/ _* {; s2 i. N4 w. | (2) Operational Test Agency. , Z+ o# b* Q. c9 @% W+ y(3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA./ n1 z( G( [/ B0 U OTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term). & C) ~3 Z& Y: m6 H$ F4 p; POT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation. 8 p) p- O! V9 L- X8 L# A4 GOTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. 4 ]; z: c4 M J3 S, w/ h# h8 q+ t: E! eOTF Object Track Profile. T" y$ P% X% d, ZOTH Over the Horizon.. [: E8 O- h5 H" f# [8 Q$ A OTH-B Over-The-Horizon. : c+ U$ P3 I( i* h4 y# u7 y8 pOTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting. $ N6 [& I+ g% {5 F/ Y6 ?. l6 AOTO Operational Test Organization. . Q# m$ A { YOTP Outline Test Plan.! H# o/ p* Z1 i: w OTS Off-the-Shelf." k( f3 B& @) V- t9 p5 a' X OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis.4 d$ D4 I0 g; R% v$ l7 b5 [) G& h OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle. + c- K7 p! s: I8 hOUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. 3 G/ D8 c. k3 E: PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O% ?+ T- L$ ~% r2 ]. G- H' z 216# [( |: b9 }& p7 |5 b4 Q6 h/ S OUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T). + w7 u1 n& Z0 ]- ]* wOUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). 2 t8 ? B' g8 HOuter Space & z+ V# e" H* @; o- W" s- nTreaty of 1967 , H% ]* ?1 H* K% W) qA multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the" f. C6 a, y5 `1 b K+ {$ X6 P (former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing' h6 S0 h+ f7 \' \3 `' g2 w nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space. & Q6 ^2 g' E% }, t9 `( \Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or" \- L2 X- |3 U1 q; o( c' S other payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays' L" j" t. q( k; t consist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget,( w% w7 e8 }, B, U! L minus receipts. 9 x/ @1 ?( u' A+ |; HOut of Band( K; ?; C0 E2 |+ O4 K Laser Flux 4 b+ I: [% W! s/ t( j(Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt0 y6 w$ O& _0 J/ l# E; i/ o the sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth.& I; k( F; i' B } Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget.2 m/ {, l6 \9 m Overlay BMD . Z. m9 t, J: u; N4 wSystem - Y3 c$ C7 y$ F/ Z: f3 zAn advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of $ w; Q9 o0 M8 s2 i8 w2 j8 aICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear ! n0 p- f; ~6 {: T3 M6 j6 F( Dhoming interceptors.1 a$ q3 h! n4 k9 |/ N' K OWG Operating Working Group. . B/ K1 P$ d) G7 O" e) T0 w# fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 7 U1 K& d5 K* k; N+ z217 2 g/ \1 J! P3 H! uP&D Planning and Design (MILCON term).5 j: @" ]8 L! S, D f8 y/ _/ u P&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture. 5 R3 H0 D* f0 h8 b! J+ \) Q& qP.B. President’s Budget.9 s& E v9 w$ b9 J1 @9 ^/ m% f P2 Pollution Prevention.) Q4 n3 ` {6 N, S* H p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. ' V _7 T" @3 r, X3 EP3 Pollution Prevention Program. ! E1 {2 [" w! {3 o. e; P6 i! dP3 I Preplanned Product Improvement. v3 L, P7 Z/ CPA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs.) u5 f X0 e/ H: i8 c( D" N) B M PA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation.% W6 S7 f- N/ f PA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate.& x9 g. L2 C9 P PAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA), X n, X' I6 } PAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-2 ! H+ y1 ]3 |8 o; zPAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT. 8 L7 ^: S: t/ n7 ?# S1 x( ]8 kPAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 : b5 @+ x/ O* _ JPAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL. ' f+ i4 k6 u/ ePAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4./ | u& v3 F- y& B9 X! _ PACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. , H o8 G) i9 Q u2 b9 e# P9 TPACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific. 0 g# b2 o9 [! o' S# v# N/ t; aPACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier. / E0 w5 v, Q, c- L1 ]PACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |只看该作者
Packaging,9 J8 }/ k" Z( y# w# |3 l! y Handling,+ ]; S: L4 l9 t* s0 t: { Storage, and; s& {% \) H" h9 z5 N" K+ N* `, g Transportation ) X" a- \9 E! ]/ s, u: ]/ F(PHS&T)( b$ z8 E1 U9 |0 R8 m3 ?9 G- I The resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to 2 q/ S1 z3 L/ }" ^! @ensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, 1 z( g9 V3 w0 Q2 b$ F# qhandled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations, / |2 Q- |3 p" Oequipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and 9 X! |4 w5 i% d0 N2 O" A+ Stransportability./ R w; A/ f# O Packet Switching 1 Y; o( Y3 u4 _/ ^(PSW)5 B* l5 T, S* q A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is. ?. Y" F' u3 @* |8 ^) t occupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data) M% W- P* w8 M. g, D" g communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and 2 T0 @9 f- d2 A Rthen formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment - P( {5 ?3 k, H) |' ?or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes.; e$ V7 }9 C1 o$ p: U8 e PACOM U.S. Pacific Command.; E5 }, g+ W6 T/ h5 x PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures. + }, J4 r9 o" U" Y; d' C8 PPADIL Patriot Data & Information Link.: o! S; f5 h! v" S" w; k1 X$ |: T MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P, s5 \. B: x0 G/ c" K, ]" ~ 2185 b6 d, `# m ? PAFB Patterson Air Force Base. c% ]1 B5 C! E d! oPAL Permissive Action Link. " U% C! ], W' ePALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). 4 w$ T1 X* E" D0 ~- T4 gPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation.* f8 B2 m, @- L8 \ PAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber].1 R. _/ J' A1 i; b8 N( b/ E; { Pancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to% f/ D( Q) S3 j# A; Y* \: y+ r the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown. # Y4 ?5 O5 l0 _' k/ [7 @6 \8 DPAP Predicted Aim Point.6 j+ b: P+ i0 F- a5 o PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar. - x. _# \6 {' x# H9 e(2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.)3 h' w( t ^# N, h8 w$ a, z (3) Preprocessing Analysis Report. \) \# ?. X+ l4 n(4) Program Assessment Report. 1 E6 Z3 n. o9 H5 f6 g6 _(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar. , a$ |5 d# l5 I" z! \Parallel - @8 r! V! ?3 D$ S2 a) B% x" sProcessing 1 u3 m; |7 R# u- r6 MIn parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into % t& W: g2 H; u: {, f! W( g8 ksmaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that " j( T8 R2 n F* i* o( G. j$ Omuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained.8 c( \. Y' A+ P3 I Parametric Cost 7 [' h6 B- w6 B# n8 S+ O5 XEstimate $ Q& L6 Y! b8 R0 `" jA cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical 1 J4 Z9 j" o( O: f8 Vcosts and other program variables such as system physical or performance3 O2 @+ B5 G1 |% i0 p characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also 7 Y, J( B$ b1 |# @referred to as a top-down approach.4 j5 P( a. q% S% l I' n* N PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System. . b! j; a. R0 R0 U2 s$ Y+ iPARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs.5 g( k p- m8 d& s7 l Partial Mission & w! a n2 M& E. u4 V( E6 ~Capable ' D" T* X6 t: }7 mMaterial condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at 3 Z+ e) v( O6 ^& y2 ?# Xleast one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission. o. }5 ~6 b( u' T _+ r; i3 R Capable. " }" o6 @/ `2 y4 P4 |! K4 A, ]Participating # d) U$ f$ |2 gService+ N/ ?, B7 R. o; k/ i8 y I A military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint 7 w& [" W" }" n: }acquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds.6 {& ?* W+ q4 z: m Particle Beam 9 ^3 w$ _9 {% i) z0 S: U4 D7 u(PB); Q4 Z) V& }# G* E @ High-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or5 Y4 Y' |% ~6 W+ D1 Y neutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light. 7 _7 A0 v+ Q6 v ~3 L5 t# fParticle Beam + G6 @' v6 |, [! \Weapon (PBW) ( g5 X# o6 n+ E7 F- LA weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers)2 N. A$ i% B- u( W4 B9 K to emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of$ W9 V/ J- \2 I: L+ g8 P, M light. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g.,6 r, ]& Y! T2 l0 K" q electronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor ) R5 r: v3 ]. \# tdamage, and initiation of high explosives." T4 }5 F/ j1 V/ |. m0 ? PASS POET Advanced Submunition Study.5 `4 r; u# c2 N# ? Passive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no' [0 |+ E& {9 Y& K energy capable of being detected.- Q4 D9 N- q" I MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' z( }# N$ \' n219 5 z2 e: k) z9 b9 R2 h& a+ uPassive Air' v7 P7 k9 {7 ~4 z1 r Defense+ c- O) d+ J {4 v$ ^3 H All measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness $ R& V. j6 p/ V: `: K2 h; wof hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use * _" Z; j1 x9 l5 Tof protective construction.# { I* Y/ O/ X+ D6 ~" |: T Passive 5 ^3 y; S8 `' D1 O6 dCommunications 4 _" I; P' _- p% w6 |8 h3 P3 LSecurity Threats 7 U) s T/ p; }$ ~Threats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through2 A) g" H0 B0 \( L intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic & z, d* B$ k! D9 b+ Y1 zemanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications) _& K9 l8 {' o: p. i interception and direction finding.0 m" [% ?0 j# O& u. V# w' I Passive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects, `2 q. s7 z5 t! v+ i of damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the 9 q6 J- G; X: O" Hinitiative.2 N4 O* J3 V5 O; o |2 `, ~ (2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile 3 X. l1 H) t3 l P+ @$ ~; Tattack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing 8 M! M: e1 o5 y3 \( Q9 i1 b+ {the vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the) d* q' _' j* ]" K5 g- o: M potential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive5 q7 }0 |1 H9 l0 e0 \ measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and & g- p' s! m1 D/ _$ Zconcealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and 8 f: P* K* o( u$ g& {1 qredundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of . E1 ]0 B+ w1 _7 M' O5 p! q3 nTMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS) ' f' Q! U7 j# LPassive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking! ~' M; N% s4 c7 l v, R* J+ ] and/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |只看该作者
PAT Process Action Team. 8 P: J" i, W, WPAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation.% b3 Y ?- u2 \ PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor.( a6 j; f( N. V. r PATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile). $ t1 g( R9 a9 u C* O* \PAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System.+ o* f( Q U9 U' p Phased array SLBM warning system. Four sites:% |9 ?# \! t# C5 r# I a. East Otis ANG Base, MA . V, C; c4 Z0 `! T% B' zb. West Beale AFB, CA! X- Y; {$ |% N, g& @ c. Southeast Robins AFB, GA ) I1 Z5 p& G9 y, M1 bd. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX ; t: x8 w) M: b$ dPAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term). ( ~) K! ]/ a! C4 EPayload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile. / j1 h% t4 X- ~ P- O; E(2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile. % q# g% x+ R7 W" o3 d6 V(3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry x/ o9 d( l$ M" H& C5 R7 D vehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon)9 z+ H, C" U# e; ^ Payload Build-up1 T4 [* \9 U Q/ P (Missile and% m x* {$ m$ x- R! c/ D; R Space) ! Y/ M3 b6 q0 z# {8 Q6 VThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and1 N% f2 }* R& K4 B necessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a # R; [5 }4 h. Q/ ]3 ?+ j* I3 m3 Ncomplete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of 9 \* f% V2 O: j" b% d% fthe mission.$ A6 @8 g. F: g Payload $ y p5 h% w& m; |) nIntegration% s! X+ Y. O$ w( [$ d- l (Missile and % @# j! Q5 b G: d/ gSpace); [ w& @3 `5 i' l4 p- g0 L% R The compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft . i) z; ]* [# wand space vehicle. # ^/ E T- O! rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P! z/ ` P/ i' N) W) }* o 220: l/ B- r% g3 R8 _( f; R4 ?, B! V PB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget. 3 T4 y+ d4 r' g4 v4 z1 R# v% R# {(4) Program Baseline.* _3 @8 u: r0 `2 i+ h1 O8 f% `6 Q' ~ PB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD.% ^7 g3 F( ?; D) K- m5 N) e PBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer.; \% w: \" n* y( l, g8 d* s$ S PBCS Post-Boost Control System. O2 N x- B4 T8 Q PBD Program Budget Decision.: ?- {+ U* L& _9 h8 ` PBI Post-Boost Intercept. 3 |5 {- V7 P1 _9 W2 a) F Z" sPBP Post-Boost Phase. 6 T @; k0 G9 ^- S" z7 F4 dPBS President’s Budget Submission.- p# Q% p+ g& p+ c: D PBV Post-Boost Vehicle. , a8 X+ V" N) m$ g: ?4 i0 @: ?PBW Particle Beam Weapon. F9 ~" k( e- q" Q# t1 K8 E* SPC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee.; u& x. O' U. Q! c3 o7 A: Y PC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term). " a5 |6 X7 Z+ z4 cPCA Physical Configuration Audit.. i6 c% f9 U9 V. j3 Y' b) n PCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology.7 U3 b8 }$ g8 l1 A8 f9 B# F. ? PCB Printed Circuit Board.3 N& y+ l2 u# \8 H+ {( `: E; s1 ~ PCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term). 0 P+ T" m) ~8 `& P! H% G: l, a$ APCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term). 6 O% V1 p- f! `+ v( i9 Z9 Y2 _6 DPCE PLRS Communications Enhancement." J5 }% T1 B2 I PCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team.9 ?+ g# o8 a# {6 ~$ `* I PCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term). 3 L" }5 N( c5 {7 P l0 YPCI Peripheral Component Interface. * g7 i4 r, N( F# P/ hPCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language. 9 l3 [4 e3 }5 nPCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation. / f6 Q$ c- Y) p S; J# l# |1 \: }PCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. & x5 y' j) R2 cPCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). ! P$ [% M3 f4 D9 V" U% H n& h r5 jPCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative. - w/ e8 }6 C( x( [( SPCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System.1 W* ~% c, {# H4 B: W PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure. : ^0 r! | c: [2 J p0 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P6 G% z" S( s! _% L5 N" t3 \9 i) r5 Z 221 $ ?! I9 | K; {PD (1) Presidential Directive. " M) J6 m- l6 `$ r. t6 Q4 p3 q(2) Procedures Description.9 y; k2 \/ F7 j' a; p0 e (3) Probability of Damage.4 o$ k G5 c9 G8 P. T' C# V (4) Probability of Detection., Z* D" p& X3 }+ ^, m# s (5) Preconditions for Defense. # o( ]' E3 _3 u$ n: ^(6) Program Director (AF). 0 ]+ @' R( b2 }! I(7) Production/Deployment.7 `( Z6 \& {0 m (8) Phenomenology Document. c: u; p( |; @(9) Passive Defense., S! c l8 ]! y" |4 f PD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term). ( Q* h+ _' V2 K, B; dPD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term). 5 L& }# o. k8 ]) u# Y [0 e, E/ RPD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term). - z& z Z c' ^8 P* ~: OPDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT).$ y A% Z& O* a8 R9 E3 G6 B PDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN.' Q, A2 x/ f1 T. V PDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive.( \# T' ^' `: H PDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term).4 H( t+ y* F. O- y! H. J PDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). ! Q. m% A# R1 uPDP Pulse Doppler Processor./ c, E' S: n0 @0 {$ r PDR Preliminary Design Review.( h/ Q" q6 C, y* K- L1 i PDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2). $ g, ?! U8 l9 Z, B) X: Z \(2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction. 3 O1 c8 N0 F6 C3 `4 T) [PDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. % k% T, @: b: ^7 T( K$ t9 a* T# ]PDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term).( P h' F/ F% d/ w' ` Z3 _$ X PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense.! P) J1 c0 O( v PDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology). 5 T( C4 x! w: `3 X7 S) W) o# lPDV Program Definition and Validation.# j- K, v H' S+ R PE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |只看该作者
Peacekeeper US MX Missile.% b; z% E' R. L) `" ]% A2 K) c Peak Gamma4 H% n7 z6 F" h- {) ` Dose Rate $ e3 {1 I4 N1 p' c0 GThe maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could 1 \9 u. r- B& R# E1 R1 ysurvive and continue functioning.4 T J( |4 q1 ?# q2 {* \( e PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria. 7 u9 ~2 v: c& Y# @" G6 \( XPEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation. 1 ^; b5 G! [' f5 V" nPEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD). Y% q9 b; [# p PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. % w0 h" v$ k% Z- O+ x3 j# xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P6 p* K9 u6 T' @' J7 ^8 _ 2226 Y7 l/ l# m! F7 T( ` PEM Program Element Monitor (AF). 7 e+ p0 B& O* v+ u! b$ a" ePENAID Penetration Aid. 2 W; R- N6 L1 H+ xPenaid 3 a; v, _! ?6 b9 y0 {. U: W# L. I(Penetration Aid)" d9 [8 e ]+ o& g4 q (Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by + A! }4 @1 h/ @: K6 Y2 G- Qoffensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating1 ~5 L- i3 s: ^ K enemy defenses.: x2 L# v* r$ p$ h Penetration. t' J# |9 k" j3 e$ y Testing" @( { p" ~7 G& C) J The portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the. v; \9 S) { q1 G4 A security features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all( \% T7 d; W) L0 f* {- m$ w* J system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of7 z) K0 z/ e4 X6 b8 q2 X system source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under- _) o2 C5 `* f* J no constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. ! F* j3 s& o- G7 O% B7 g; y% c2 lPEO Program Executive Officer. , _% ?7 s2 S0 x* b( B& VPEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army)/ b+ h8 p' z$ s- @ PEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program.- `6 k7 i" d X! w, P PEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy)& P4 n: \8 W7 ]7 D4 B0 R PEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program1 l3 r2 U' O) P; H0 H9 B Office.9 k% v# F2 ]6 J PEP Producibility Engineering and Planning. ( b8 `1 K4 r# O8 T. a$ SPEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning.0 x: R5 b- R$ W6 o) ^) T6 u Peregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. / O) w3 f5 a0 _- s, m0 vPerformance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to5 q! v+ k+ _# \8 p effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support6 y8 H. E9 ?0 U2 m' Y6 u1 o characteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design% y1 E3 V/ M( t( V- j( m: p and the support elements necessary for system operation.1 S. @2 W, O) ]% ^, A9 o, S Performance8 X! N& Y9 ?( W7 W( _5 A Requirement + k, l& J6 C6 r5 m/ m9 |A requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system ; X% h9 t e- i) Sor system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency.1 s. T9 f6 E; Z8 a Performance4 g. W' s; f+ e; M& V2 g( @ Specification * x+ L) c9 V6 O7 Z# ?(1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system$ y1 x3 E( c/ `9 G8 i or system component. . c D, V) L9 E& S) A(2) Synonymous with requirements specification. J7 [5 |1 ?6 Z) P% w: r2 k$ OPerimeter* l3 D0 x* a8 j* Y7 }% C% } Acquisition% g, b" r' D$ f' F: X- f Radar and Attack * F9 b6 n" K C0 i' a- uCharacterization, b2 r1 U+ L; O+ p3 a System (PARCS)3 ?' F! B0 M# o( d: u2 i# n1 D" Y AN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and 0 V& P# z8 r# }4 F) Uattack assessment.8 S# g: U2 q& [& U @ Period (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit. 4 `, `8 ^: S% p0 KPermeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something.) r2 j, \7 o* Q) C, G8 M# T! } Pershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe.! r5 K/ v }$ G# W5 M9 \ PERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique. / k5 x9 ~( D" Z* X2 y; v9 nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ; v/ b7 b, ]4 _: c: n) c2235 S$ Q4 z% @" T# {& W4 O PERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other6 n1 _0 I/ N/ m) ?( h2 y activities for completion, and depiction of the critical path. 0 J( j$ G4 J0 U7 a* _( gPESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation. & y6 K% _0 F3 R+ v5 Q# JPET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test.8 T7 H2 A0 v, g PFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler.$ J, X% f0 D2 U% | PFD Preconditions for Defense. 4 p* S/ F6 R7 A% E6 x+ p0 EPFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. 9 A0 k; e# X9 q0 g" ^PFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD). - r ]% W8 s- G/ Q# b0 JPGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term). 2 K, y5 n' N# D0 H3 ?PGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term). " Z: l' g* e8 |2 h5 Z* H, yPGM Precision Guided Munition. ) B( [1 W% H, E: IPGU Power Generation Unit. # v6 ?# d! u2 y( @PH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).# @9 _4 K/ G/ K6 F Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically - l9 y5 @3 c2 C. a6 v) H5 U: lstationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to 6 t# e( q/ e' z$ D( _. [another (e.g., phased array radar). & n4 ?3 Q. f. Q/ U9 d) b9 M vPhased Array P7 ^' A" U. a8 I+ D" Y+ H: [* [ Tracking Radar3 y$ Q4 q5 f7 k5 q6 U$ @: v Intercept On / }4 P: e/ a- @7 b2 o" r( dTarget (missile)+ ]0 [9 q- O6 M. y9 D( d0 O% M6 o (PATRIOT)( N$ x; ~9 A& r; l$ _ A point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 ' v) j% k/ X0 z$ S8 U5 W* U: d1 Dimprovements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles, 3 n0 s" P' T' i( A" W1 sinclude upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either 9 _; q1 y2 X/ v' ?" M1 K7 \PATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT./ f5 W" p9 ]+ K# T Phased 0 V* |9 g8 d8 M) u, v/ H/ PDeployment - D8 N' Y6 ]! C& Z" h! lThe sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system ' X+ P4 j- R( C9 I) U+ q- rcapability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints. 3 M) P3 v1 r( N' \Phase One + A: V0 R( _- d9 S+ O+ VEngineering% h; T$ ]) M9 X5 a# Y Team (POET) 6 c0 H5 T* y1 d% W/ E! |) V; z& ~OBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program) K! q( c: D U& ~ Office. Now referred to as POET.! x# A! h0 ]1 T, h- S: e+ X. I Phenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts % i& t- r! ^- |% N0 i- Pcollect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena# Z* e8 F m9 l. ?( ]- u required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. % }% d% X2 F, ?0 l/ i1 K" r' qPHI Photonic Hit Indicator. 8 \. J' u) @* `/ ?" ~PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System.* p/ [8 l8 _5 f* d# S3 }/ U8 D& D PHOTINT Photographic Intelligence. 3 v$ f ?% B. P, T+ L6 K" pPhotochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light., ]* }- h6 `! a, o- q9 C+ Q0 j MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ) d) I6 G: g; L# q/ B- J5 f224/ R D1 ?& @7 D" B Photoelectric, l h% W J+ ^, e4 x6 ]4 B& V Effect - S/ v6 S. J6 n8 g) A4 iThe process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat " J! |9 \* G+ I T3 e& F: Kgreater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its " ^: C) f6 ]$ H* q) S* G+ renergy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it # P6 `4 v" A$ ]3 r, j; Lhas lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.) U! f6 t( G7 u" ]6 T: f! GPhoton A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, : p- h! j* L! ^* j, J; Cwhich is characteristic of the particular radiation.# A; I4 }4 I9 ?: C PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation.; m" o. ]: @) e! q2 I3 Q Physical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic7 E u0 m- k9 X3 d+ M9 S: |& W fields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris, - W6 F& o/ l* z4 k& \8 r8 gand extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |只看该作者
Physical. T3 X) z$ C) M% N9 e' E Configuration % k8 ~& Z4 r p4 g% W: XAudit (PCA) . v2 C! F: x; M- mPhysical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to 4 Q/ ]7 L3 \3 F# j/ c2 {the technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government; ^4 z+ P- M: X5 z* {# m program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this * S# P. I8 w5 N4 C$ D. a& Aaudit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production * i3 }9 ] _2 @9 s+ |2 ?8 oor first LRIP team. ) e; a4 ]' W+ J2 cPI Program Integrator.; K' V2 v! D9 T PIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term).5 J L( O3 i, g PIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term). , e# K, y- T" K" @! U `* b# o(2) Policy Integration Committee. e$ g" ?; g# M/ r* T, l(3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term). / C7 h' C% Y, H* OPicture Element 3 C, A" a% K2 J9 D# Q; k0 h% Y+ c(PIXEL) 8 j4 j g/ B: d, oThe smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned3 A8 _( }; Q$ r3 Z color and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a3 J, ^1 [& v2 { recording medium." L. t- X! R5 i2 G0 T7 I PIDS Prime Item Development Specification.! {* Q3 A& V9 D2 W Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing . a; a6 O# B3 c7 [9 Qmethods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. # S8 m3 K) {1 w& _1 b" u" a" INot the same as long range initial production. 5 N( T$ c5 V# j9 rPIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term). / h) @5 z A+ l+ gPIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System.% `! y, g Q0 W. `6 s8 ~ PIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point.6 ]6 j1 d) a1 A; s (3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program., s' O( c4 g, E% { PIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team., p4 t4 Y \3 g: A PIR Program Information Report.3 ~! c* ]: T3 b5 } PIXEL Picture Element. N! s) q* w1 mPk Probability of Kill. / E% J- t, M S+ k0 i1 wPKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard.7 Q9 |. [' f& C2 d* g+ y PKH Probability of Kill, given a hit.% o$ n+ r- `0 e: b- `- T% N+ s MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P+ h. e. ^8 Y8 Q0 b 225/ [4 K. z; N, m' D PKO Peacekeeping Operations. ) A9 A% E+ s8 w- yPkss Probability of kill -- single shot. # d4 _" f( i$ LPL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public 1 e4 M0 V* r5 t! O$ rLaw. ; w( ]& a# P5 |- V* tPLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement.6 }7 A' Q2 Z2 Q/ h9 ?! e9 h( E- ^ PLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military).& ?* x" _0 t5 K( }! ~ Planning,3 X: P- V8 G: f- O% h Programming, 6 m" s+ a- _$ W2 k5 z9 OBudgeting4 U3 Z, ?( d0 N System (PPBS) + A$ i& W. i! I) mThe primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic - u8 M( @+ U2 X/ H! ~structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces8 f5 y ?0 ]6 N) \/ ~ and capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process 6 n/ J5 a4 j2 {3 p- Bcontaining three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the2 X! T# M% k! L! V. m' T8 D! U$ u# j Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and / J/ K' a$ a" h8 m: GDefense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the " Z) }& a5 e0 \3 kPresident’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each + c" S: I# { F: a; D4 Iodd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning8 T3 v! W# Y3 I% C( g% i0 d1 x" D, R phase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the8 c- G6 V" w! W9 C5 m( A President’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management2 z% K4 M" t; @6 r9 g: L College)1 \# j% M9 e% ] q; ^' w$ f2 H PLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate.0 t9 t( u7 A# _( M3 ` PLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term). & `( x/ e3 Q+ t/ i$ WPLRS Position Location Reporting System. 2 p5 `0 D+ G. {9 `Plume Data $ u) }& K( ^, Q! J# WCenter # s# y9 H" r1 H$ i! h" }. c+ h, _AEDC, Arnold AFB, TN.! z3 F' `/ J3 p& I PLV Payload Launch Vehicle.' ?: Z9 Z# \. g7 t PM See Program Manager. - e: ^0 u' w0 b, J+ ^1 E% cPMA (1) See Program Management Agreement. $ v+ F6 r* K3 g4 U* l. ^(2) Post-Mission Analysis.7 R! t O" v5 x C2 D (3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station)./ U- R. T* v" e7 w1 c) a) ~ PMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool).4 D/ z9 P' p0 u; ?. I PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term). 0 r2 G/ N* o5 P) t2 W% Q& W7 TPMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF).. H- A3 l) ^: T' o0 [' m* t PMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory.9 K! H5 T* D; t y+ X! C PMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection.( b9 h. c4 u: w: J: Y: }6 g) M! _+ ` PMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term). 9 D! w' G( l* L9 ~PMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group. . r' h" K, b# M$ CPMO Program Management Office.. B* u1 G% n, s5 [( D* Z; j: {+ z MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P1 [% q& f) S- u A 2264 H1 t# j: ?. y- { PMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP).5 T- `8 X0 O% L% G2 e% B+ S (2) Program Master Plan. ( V0 K: d. W& X- s: d1 e s" `(3) Prime Mission Product. ) t/ E5 v5 k1 Q! t8 L3 X(4) Program Management Plan. & c$ [& B2 z. v6 V7 e" dPMR (1) Program Management Review. 5 b! A( s7 Z- ~$ ]# _(2) Pacific Missile Range. & d- @; P4 o. R% Y, ^+ g(3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term).0 c# b+ ?( \5 F1 E& d* K* O PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI. # m1 m! r% [% H+ EPMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term).' q8 v; F2 b7 [9 f' P1 m- B/ ` (2) Performance Measurement System. % f2 T A8 {$ B: M: jPMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA., _# {, T! i, j. C$ L PMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group. $ B/ ~& s0 E+ T1 e# A8 a4 D9 FPN Probability of Negotiation.8 ^6 A% C4 e) G2 F PNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. * }+ N1 y5 U; U# c& K( r( T: UPNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty. " j) f. d" z1 T' yPO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office.& H5 U% p3 |: i (2) Purchase Order." o5 G& ~- Y0 q POA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones. ' w' N2 K ?! j1 d5 YPOC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept. a4 G6 e4 Q3 Z5 @% m( _3 [4 UPOC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile ]- u7 [: P: J$ ]2 o8 z8 Q command post). # U% h B- S# g f$ M0 X4 JPOCT Passive Optical Component Technology. ) F8 J) v* v! G% X! X9 @POD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation. 8 R) u: _) ~# dPODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance. 0 h# U& ^5 F1 N$ g4 qPOE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment. 8 B3 R9 i& a& P7 v' x( VPOET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support7 p1 N% S7 i) ^$ u to the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.); S' s0 w& I; K7 ]% O9 D7 I. | Point Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g., & G: f6 H( }) e7 |command and control facilities, air bases, etc.7 v& U- {& d( ~3 x& R1 B- S Point Defense8 [9 i/ X0 z/ L' }! U# a& Q System # i# A" R: B( vA terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles2 p, p! w1 G- |7 {0 ` to defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s. , Q E) E! f. X J+ V' _Pointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy' D! u, S$ k2 X4 n% c either to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing+ L% W2 E k) @ and tracking are frequently integrated operations. + m& L2 l+ I5 ^. Y q4 \POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication.3 y/ J3 U3 [+ q9 H3 ] MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P) n* g) [* Z! j4 U. M$ u, N 227 + T+ y" e7 \1 EPOLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |只看该作者
POM Program Objectives Memorandum.8 V8 R0 b1 J$ N) _$ }3 O# _ POMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets. 4 W9 g5 C- [* h! sPOP Proof of Principle., J: c j; W% q. Z0 v Port Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems. ) o' a) Q3 u+ c" ?Portability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on* r1 s0 a% M' _: W4 R% ] one computer or operating system can be used on another computer or4 x- B4 e0 y. U operating system. 9 z' Q" ^4 K; c5 }POS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position. 5 l' ^4 m" j$ v6 [6 C Y) `Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). % G. G$ S" `0 b1 ?( D& l; rPOSIX Portable Operating System Interface.: Y' j O: g& {& S/ w6 { POST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. 0 o0 m3 R5 _9 K+ i3 e. b) ?Post-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. : j0 N# ~! R) j( }9 e( PPost-Attack 0 y. l5 q0 z4 R/ w( o [" S. nPeriod 5 z& ?# E/ a1 _5 H& U+ m# [0 aIn nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final9 S% e$ [8 P" r3 T5 _- W0 H attack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities. : z, y* S+ k& x+ w/ LPost-Boost ) ^' D# B" l8 e) `$ T4 U. RPhase (PBP) 3 E/ L, Y* w- j1 m( ?- z* c9 ~That portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered ( z! A' t! o1 b [& ]7 ]) b. v5 \flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic: l' e% V- d/ T ] missiles. (USSPACECOM)5 v1 ^6 P% Z& ~: ^, o Post-Boost$ Z! v0 Q8 m% `3 M Vehicle (PBV)# U: O A6 U4 a- T The portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the* w: S* A( o6 ?: q7 C h$ K4 d, C( ^ maneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final $ [. k, Y5 S: L$ b0 ntrajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus." 7 Q9 n5 u- \* R0 s, s u" MPOSTPROD Post-Production. $ t. I" G* Y8 B; C$ n$ P$ L2 H+ E3 _POTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification. 2 C: b) x1 j) j" T7 |PP (1) Parallel Processing. ) B$ Y& C: K# Y(2) Principal Polarization. & V7 n3 r1 J/ L; G# x. ^# O(3) Post Processing. % Y6 y+ _3 E/ f. _5 n, I(4) Program Plan. - u9 f) e# d3 S7 k2 [1 dPPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System." G/ l& |- o* m" u$ R& [7 Y (2) Program Planning and Budgeting System. / K1 X9 P: J: p4 ^. gPPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System. : I y6 x; f n$ q+ h p2 L( `PPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance.' P3 {8 Q/ r7 p0 F) f; @4 X PPI POM Preparation Instructions. 1 y2 P5 ]* Y, C. D. yPPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan.0 E( m9 ?$ ^( J' |! v PPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies.. R. _9 F/ ?2 S5 f6 n9 K MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 8 ?5 V$ m+ X' a, h x# ~( s: O# Y228# V( c% q# _3 I( Q, S PPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term).0 v! A: t( N$ v" Q PPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term).' C9 A' f/ Y% X- I5 S4 ~- z PPP Program Protection Plan.! Z' T2 ]( j' w- s" j! P0 d& L3 N PPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test.6 B+ X1 Q8 X6 r G- b PPS Precision Positioning System. 6 I9 x# h, {# _/ b# ^PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD).8 ^1 z% u) j- e8 J& ?$ C8 l7 a PR Procurement Request.9 P) m+ G/ z; t( O3 b6 o% I8 { PRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board., U$ C: P# ~. N* a9 y+ s/ ` PRC Program Review Committee. # b k% J9 z" ]2 k1 o0 P2 cPRD Presidential Review Decision. 0 f' u' t' u" ~& G4 kPRDA Program Research and Development Announcement. ; b; U. h" [+ l8 _5 S! E: lPRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review.$ J$ ?. t$ U1 u: D2 K: a Pre-Allocated9 d/ j. o# f# ^/ ?1 v; a Defense% k$ U* e5 U( P A preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be$ G, g g0 H6 M0 T, }7 k used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or( \; C1 I3 f. W [4 U% a& T2 k set of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the, Q9 v6 A7 |; \! E1 t number of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets2 g4 J) ]! q2 { under attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack. 2 P+ N$ H- @4 D8 m8 a4 RPre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off.) r( Y1 P: K& o- C6 e Pre-Authorized5 \- n5 ?: `3 ? M! M { Engagement# ]" m6 b) m8 A1 R6 @# K' Y Criteria (PEC)6 Y: }- q5 i& }0 U( ~" ` Pre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when 0 S0 [7 F& F4 ~ |0 Usurpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled.6 `5 P2 i- E4 v3 B q$ [ Pre-Commit : J5 _+ U" z8 z' A5 e( gStrategy / X* g2 Y% j* O* M6 `0 IA tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed # Q1 t6 i6 J8 }9 q) ]to specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the ) O' T( y) n& f* z& \defensive weapon’s trajectory. ; z0 X! x( M0 G4 E0 L7 l& GPre Launch ( `/ w! v: }& x0 zSurvivability+ i# H8 s8 o$ Y. G) n9 o8 I( h* P# a8 ` The probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack % r' q6 O* p0 aunder an established condition of warning. , v# E% y8 x+ H$ \3 Q' i3 hPrecedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall- r- }6 [9 X* o K$ G% a* U+ p be served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the 4 t/ T/ S% ]" j# C- h8 Yhighest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served - S5 M7 K" W" k8 Mfirst and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence : g' M9 \1 |7 L" ~! z& `levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance)- d$ |/ K3 w5 [) U" c% B" R A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance b0 e \6 s A& s; fmissions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established& Z# f& E! t1 O( Q2 z priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |只看该作者
Precision 5 t1 ?# e4 R! R& SDecoys ( G% b+ v* K8 g- JDecoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or) {2 G" s# J2 R I+ Q endoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting" `1 G) G V7 E5 m them. 3 l: Z$ j. v' `* t: Q. eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P: D) {) ^! w- T0 B% P 229% x5 G( e! u3 k5 w6 {: ?" ~2 k% N Preconditions for . R" P7 B- f d' s8 }4 ?Defense (PD) 6 [9 l3 R8 V2 EPDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate9 {; ?: Q; U% Q m circumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue3 Z" k. q. K4 c. l: o1 R combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks; K2 K3 W) ^2 j( T) v6 t+ J3 u directed at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and % V- [) w' I l* v, i: J$ Owar. u; b6 N4 O9 g3 O$ m7 W Predicted + D, o2 |4 d$ m2 u+ F3 _% i9 mIntercept Point# C4 D+ r2 P1 s/ Z; {8 X( y (PIP)" s7 F1 P, G$ n+ ?5 Y The calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide. % P( T- ~# g7 fPreferential . H5 r: J7 i8 _5 r7 x- `$ K5 CDefense3 Z$ M4 O/ d, v* ]7 W& _- F) x5 K Preferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect ! T, o7 f% D- Ugiven facilities or capabilities. , w$ N" g$ _! n5 NPreferential/ Z) |9 a4 l7 m1 p }4 } Defense Strategy' X ~2 c3 h6 U6 T A tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and : C( k5 Z" R$ C7 d+ r; U+ \5 Usensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while ; @9 r3 s& B5 Atemporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the $ w, s G, X+ B8 d' D/ X2 _" Uoffense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has3 W$ N0 D& N" I# q# h interceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction,6 }3 x4 S+ W8 |9 A* A- n the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can5 B8 f7 C0 ~+ B) N' G/ ?* L* g maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase.4 ? u' a: T% f/ h Preferential7 D/ R: E L8 C4 q* ^/ J6 Z- d Offense4 r9 N$ k9 G* ]3 ?8 u1 \2 }! |0 R The concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets., L; v5 C! {; Y# G& [ Preliminary! V" W" ^$ g+ F" f Design Review0 b# N% s. @ I2 c (PDR)& o7 m4 E6 `( g( f$ I A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress, ( G5 [- ~% ^- Ntechnical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to( X7 C9 V/ U" t( d determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the 1 Z' D1 y: i* ~. _, x1 N; t; t6 odevelopment specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of 4 }: `4 g S; dthe physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of - d, S7 s: T: i3 o: |; ?# Cequipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during 8 s4 V9 c0 ~5 X$ [2 j, U- h% V hPhase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II, 5 S; i$ @4 z. D- a2 |Engineering and Manufacturing Development.: K. w8 G; C) n9 U* ^* n. m Preplanned1 T" {+ h2 E# \( N& X Product Y. m3 C4 |% v: k7 y2 D' e4 x7 W Improvement ' A$ w0 ^8 \0 E5 u) y$ x$ J(P3 I), j! C* e \: t/ l* B, m# p* C, g Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which- F9 L- O# t+ D+ \+ E/ V) i& W design considerations are effected during development to enhance future * k* y/ T3 O" ^* M4 c( B, kapplication of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing+ m' P$ P7 B" `) k systems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed 6 N3 k, A- y; j* E# doperational capability. , }' u: t1 @4 k* ~' S, P5 F/ HPreplanned 7 `$ n$ \9 _( h+ b. N. m# h V- R# MResponse D( C" Y0 [! t$ h2 L, M. M$ e6 Y- uOptions (PRO) _5 `; m5 v7 q% Z& @& `" DBallistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned," L! b% `9 d/ z. m% j1 g2 l analyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO, 3 K# @+ \" P: Q! w9 [' [equivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment& z% M9 E- m9 K) T0 V; `; F' h Options (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces % j i+ d' s, Q+ u' w0 Xbased upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status, # h7 D6 U: Z5 p& q2 T2 }. |/ ^! Uand the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time+ F1 L* {5 Z( g+ R% Y7 [& \ human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution.+ t9 x4 s- F% T8 O" ]0 E Preproduction ' t4 }8 X5 E* V! t$ ePrototype" U& K0 o8 w: B9 E An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be. A7 r0 d/ c& c! _: _* i! N produced subsequently in a production line. * q/ p+ A/ B: M) T1 cPreproduction- ]0 I8 N, T9 A" ~! f Test 8 m) {: y7 ? U: {$ h0 DThis is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production7 V* W8 ~8 P( r3 `9 J3 i tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware.9 t6 P3 e3 M" v& T No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of/ W1 T6 U9 M# C( k/ u this test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware 7 h! U( U6 |9 ?: b& L2 xis going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported ) l2 I. A, U9 j3 u1 Gby the user; and that it is not over designed. . S) e9 V$ F- o B8 G, }( h. RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P, K1 j( {' q5 [) V 2303 }% f5 _4 z2 A ` Preset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the + p" H2 G. ?! l+ P: ncontrol mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching. 0 y; J, l8 p1 y' j/ DPresident's$ s" ]5 h9 ?+ ^- Q, u! E2 r Budget (PB); M9 y r" g8 W Q c, P5 u( M The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in 6 E! a; R3 S% H% _# Q+ i1 p0 @6 |5 dJanuary (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in9 a/ ^9 d; U8 P/ c6 F2 J* h accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended. ; g7 P- N \0 T8 G' \" ]5 hIncludes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial: e5 R* {' L7 Y: ^( \ branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.) - w' w$ M* b) _4 E9 p8 s3 w0 }0 |PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency.3 |6 S4 g: b7 B4 S. V+ D PRG Program Review Group. 7 g6 y0 q: l9 T# F8 o0 [4 aPrime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or 8 }3 S7 h5 t7 n5 i0 @) Vequipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles,6 }( D* ^2 w3 }; \! y. } ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and6 \! o5 b* |" f+ G6 Q3 F! ]; K3 m test equipment. ( q5 ~/ B7 s2 NPrioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type, 6 s2 q8 S' U# s n+ K6 _- @. Lpredicted impact point, and predicted time of impact. 2 R- ~7 M1 d0 ~: M* r; bPRN Pseudo Random Noise. % e* i1 p+ j/ m2 LPRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office.% O4 r2 A; o# c" t6 |. j' ? Probability of / J: _/ u2 Z0 |( O' ]! |Damage 2 h7 @7 |+ X+ x+ m: UThe probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or: y0 t+ k, c* L: m* X# `# e% M as a decimal.; m& p. ?% P/ K0 r( ~3 P Probability of! C/ |* D2 r, q5 q" y Detection * H0 O! q! m' L+ C, e& k7 b(1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given& @6 C: [. M3 A2 Z& ~0 T conditions if it is in the area searched. : f$ h6 {4 N0 v(2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise ; g2 T$ N, V; g% x2 [' A/ F7 Gsources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |只看该作者
Probability of ' o! b# G9 Q z$ x8 u2 aDiscrimination 1 v$ n- Q0 L9 A" \, H) c! kThis is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly 8 _* Q: d, G' gidentified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is % A2 J) O. j" n! ]quantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the # B- y5 y( X# {' f3 n9 fprobability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is, c! J% H6 X& S$ f2 t( y% p indistinguishable from the decoy). 6 L) x, j- v# l' p4 d& vProbability of% U" k l$ l/ p- ^3 E' I- {: Z" F False Alarm2 d" o5 e) p* e' f (1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected& N! @5 w6 } y1 Y ` when no object is present. - s4 q& ?/ Y9 ?0 }4 Z( o% M/ |- m2 k(2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a r- y* V. P% q2 a, P+ Tthreatening object will be identified as one. 3 E9 L Q' ~- {6 G9 [4 M! HProbability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles,1 I4 K. Z; _+ j& c ordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate ; l: v4 Z! _) B' `close enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense$ U$ c* @: f0 r" I1 z; @ Systems Management College)+ n r. {- Y: c% u, X0 x4 |' {: ` Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS. ( w0 a* L/ N: a! a9 O2 NPROC Procurement.6 Y5 U& W( I5 ~3 B9 d+ E1 J0 v Process Data ' m9 G4 K1 v% Q2 Q `Sensitivity Label- d: }( Z6 @0 E2 U( M P (PDSL) % t t& d, Y/ f# U$ e$ Y0 u: iThe sensitivity label for data contained in a process.7 k4 T3 J2 i2 \; h( _, X4 v( l MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P " R* ]7 |. ^" t/ s231 % O2 W& |1 w S( G: ?PROCMT Procurement.: N# ]5 d2 T0 b& l" ~ Procuring6 e: N" M/ V: A C Contracting7 r0 J& f } @0 C Officer (PCO)& c2 H' s- J' C7 {. N The individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on; w: ], \, G- |+ I behalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for$ B- `' P/ i5 t) R overall procurement of the contract.* m; g& [) Q% V Prod Production.+ `) S8 w3 q" I: S# M3 z5 O+ W Producibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is; y- o$ l1 @( V. C% J governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical/ b/ r- i! Z; Y- Z6 C fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing) }+ W4 ~& Q: j" K techniques. K# a3 _* d% E# G( | Producibility,6 N- H; V/ q. x5 r2 y) k) b* t: v Engineering, and( _5 M6 t* q6 [ u0 w# N8 C8 y, H4 G Planning (PEP)2 M, E6 z% M6 y) m Applies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering % l r- ~7 O! ?0 ?- n! Jtransition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning 3 }, @2 a, o( P2 y7 Zengineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required 3 d- a" }% J$ ?% mquantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will 2 L$ B# @( a9 mmeet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification 9 h: H( W7 X1 G) \! O/ M& X9 dconstraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to 5 s8 R; |, w" Q5 C* B, Y- nidentify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production$ z1 c# K, C) ~0 w7 a1 ?- X+ V changes or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process.3 t: @/ W* z" | Producibility,, A# f/ n5 H. @: ]. l" a; o) _ Programming,+ q& |, e+ Q. ~ and Issues' ~1 l" {! O8 d9 P Resolution : N: j* B6 @' Q- ?Strategies X% m5 k+ J' R1 i, ]9 W- W (PPIRS) 5 a: p+ _4 d, s% s6 @2 ]& O% nA semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium7 G3 q* U) F6 F$ S and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M. B$ s1 [0 |: {# z8 w M Working Group. ) S6 U) U; a$ ~Producibility & _8 `" t5 @2 e* A# _; R2 {Review$ Y2 h0 L' T& Z' P3 I A feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to 1 S" q7 o$ E3 h8 q6 }3 p7 S' v6 `5 Cdetermine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology0 N! H! D1 {$ Y" k* @ considering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a+ W5 E% h7 z/ s* p generic term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system% ?# p% H7 f) k) v0 h3 p' ] design reviews. , d6 t/ ?" Q6 L4 ^Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration i- s, N/ c5 F3 M& L/ Z, X item. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline# P. H I1 |0 A) ? (type E spec), type C spec, and drawings. ! \$ Z7 h* l( w3 k2 A9 J y(2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical * q/ K; O6 V, N' _5 N+ xdocumentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a - g! o* Q6 B4 i' N9 |configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and! i1 `0 [6 w& b/ ]6 E logistic support of its life cycle.; t: e8 c% I9 k0 ^. l$ k' _' ? Product1 G a7 L$ z: _1 Q% ?$ ^+ z Configuration 9 E$ h. C4 L) Y3 RIdentification 6 q1 m* H; d5 A8 Z$ gThe current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration 1 e) M4 V8 {: v; O W: tof a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and * \& b4 @) p* a& z' Zlogistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for:: h6 y9 I* I' m1 S, `/ ` fit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected " h( j3 |2 D; B5 cfunctional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production ' U5 q `6 F8 U; M7 h0 pacceptance test.- o( A/ K/ M- b. F8 h, l# I9 _ Product. y* r/ n4 }: b* Q7 S# c7 _ Improvement 0 V2 Z2 j! ]1 v/ z; ]* QEffort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on' j' u1 [: E' F! b" b3 Q end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than ' R: S, W$ z9 X" A" \0 n$ [developmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend " a* a4 y- a, h% Ouseful military life. Usually results from user feedback.6 v7 k, |+ B+ g u MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P # d7 \& B" {- n9 h232 ! A4 u* ~; l0 e( xProduct Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority- W& l' y8 z* v and assigned responsibility for centralized management of a8 j% S N/ @8 @+ M2 e development/acquisition program that does not qualify for ( v+ r* Q4 l" s9 j$ w* ^* K, Bsystem/program/project management.* B3 [. ?; n3 p2 |; G1 q+ S9 v$ i Product Security4 t& [% n7 `, j! n2 |9 x (PRODSEC) / c- p, r7 h9 @: }5 y4 I) k: UThat physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost, * C2 y( k5 ?, y$ K3 c5 \; T% ]$ o! {politically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of * t+ i! J. g4 J$ @" aDefense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential* A0 D8 l% Z$ {% N3 k6 v to the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2026-2-11 23:07 , Processed in 0.042002 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部