航空缩略语词典

帅哥

MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 7 z( m8 I5 p8 @* o3 y211 ' m, N7 m% T' _; ?5 i; NOperational Assessment 3 |$ d/ v; E! W- e' c' hAn evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an independent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk, " i3 F- F- H7 ~: \7 fadequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate 2 Z: U& u l( E1 k4 |% ?operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using 1 K+ P8 c0 P9 N3 R* D8 I, u2 ltechnology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development : Q7 Y$ M% j5 pmodels, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test and evaluation necessary to support full production decisions. Operational Availability 5 X: |7 ~- J; `! `) `! SThe degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect equipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is uptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link / I7 k# A3 n: M* X' n: Dbetween readiness objectives and supportability. V( N- f+ o3 t& W5 n6 q2 L' xOperational Concept An end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, 1 x7 X% H: R0 [6 A8 w2 [6 {7 e! gorganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task. Operational 9 ~2 I Q3 ~5 U) i- M7 OControl (OPCON) Transferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any 6 t' {% _% k" c$ z& T2 E, h. \8 bechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is inherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to perform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving ; A# F& p% x2 B( a# t6 _" Qorganizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating objectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions : d I0 q! C7 I" e. U( g; [4 C: s: jassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the " P; d" Z6 N4 Q$ `commanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised through the Service component commanders. Operational control normally provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to accomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself, # J/ b; `9 L/ a6 G( E& ^include authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline, 1 l* \( d9 C/ P: `; w" D+ }6 Z8 binternal organization, or unit training. - b. t+ L" q F( zOperational ( W8 k. v! L& L& ~" Z7 OEffectiveness 0 Y, y: w) ]- a' `The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by representative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural, electronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including 6 c8 x) c. h: j( q- X$ Mcountermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and chemical contamination (NBCC) threats). 2 Q6 e" S3 O& J. x/ o2 c* yOperational ' [, j2 M! J6 u3 bEvaluation % m q8 W- g6 Q+ ?* _7 RThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable ( \8 K( b4 E( D, p3 J u% @under Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; 2 ?" ^' h5 c) k5 ^and b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems, consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy 9 {7 y* l+ X: B( c( @capabilities in the field. Operational : A w( U$ Q! ]* [$ c& i% lLevel of War , L1 p5 t2 p5 IThe level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned, 0 M. A9 T/ T9 A# wconducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or % g" ~2 `: j" z+ `' @; Kareas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by & c" r2 c7 n6 \3 d( festablishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic q3 b+ i, ?0 v; s& Nobjectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating ! T' l, e$ s$ ]5 i/ _2 vactions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These 7 V/ M2 @& ~9 E# |9 wactivities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure the logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by 6 s$ H' D4 R3 |3 y' z2 R' \which tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives. ! z! n9 l. t- P2 o" K5 M' PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 3 w1 N. A; L; Z* M3 [' J212 Operational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the 9 D) V0 s0 `4 t8 T+ O) Soperational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training configuration. Operational Readiness The capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform $ E2 E3 o- X1 b4 t% \+ Othe missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in a general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness. Operational 6 p. F" e: m. y2 X. |Reliability The reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment. Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment. ) f4 A4 M! o5 s) Q' v7 ROperational - `% B; F. _* C5 b dRequirement Navy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected , @9 ~0 h! l4 ]4 qby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less 1 o# K6 }' M* z, `+ s. H' K3 Lthan major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

帅哥

Operational 6 {! B3 p. S# l: t5 J7 m/ PRequirements 9 n) w" \9 q! m% ~8 {' {' JDocument (ORD) 0 l/ ^" l u$ e4 }( e; kDocuments the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for ( i' v2 f. G' c* H9 Yoperational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and DoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components. 7 n( P4 e+ _( B5 uOperational Suitability The degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with $ E" h5 j0 k& V4 zconsideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, 2 A( |% j+ ?. Ureliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower 5 `8 W/ ^+ \" K" w- Hsupportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts, ; N8 y) `* F( Y, Gdocumentation, and training requirements. Operational Test 4 C9 k( k3 |* @: w5 `and Evaluation (OT&E) That T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when deployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as possible. $ f$ o" x7 a5 |# [1 d! zOperationally 9 o* Y% |$ T- o& \6 W2 iReady : t' ?9 V" [7 h( A$ H1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or designed (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both equipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel). , v8 P5 f- t& u4 E0 POperations and Support (O&S) " x7 A+ o( w6 K, y* Y6 \# p1 x" }2 ACosts # V7 H. P ]9 X" u2 o5 T* {+ i! ?7 o. dThose resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a 5 A/ v: T" L/ S, m3 U( P- A6 Nmajor component during its useful life in the operational inventory. Operations 7 y+ g- |8 B( M4 @& I5 N( p5 |, m8 KProfile 2 @! p/ q5 J& e) u Z( x. OAn identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time those actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational procedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are 5 Y: \0 _. E P* s; T1 ]0 pdiscernible. ; v& ~2 ~* R: |# {, c; K0 ROperations ) i7 T. L- ], k8 ?& D# }" i: Q$ C- eSecurity (OPSEC) Survey 7 P3 G9 \5 n5 u9 d x) ~% JThe method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or inefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational effectiveness. OPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy). " M4 r' y, N' T( C( ?$ z w# qOPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment. % Y2 k8 c- ~# w& vOPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O # S* p/ h8 f/ w" i" c213 , X/ z" a2 @9 {OPLAN Operation Plan. # Q4 t0 k" ~: n* L( H5 YOPM Office of Personnel Management. & J N2 U0 [9 @5 {1 yOPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. , Y- c+ Z* A7 u* W# n. \" LOPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction. OPNS Operations. OPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. ; a1 C1 q% [9 V/ n$ d2 O0 TOPORD Operation Order. ! @9 T, J3 M6 Q5 VOPP Other Physical Principles. OPR Office of Primary Responsibility. Ops Operations (employment). OPS Operations. , \2 ^) H) f3 X; B3 COPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies. 5 o9 k" R5 M8 J" ]% \OPSEC Operations Security. . W0 p. `: t: Q0 j D( n+ YOPSMOD Operations Module. OPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army) OPTEMPO Operating Tempo. 7 v8 R/ {5 R7 t& S! m$ W$ }OPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy) Optic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. Optical Airborne + w- t- ^' G# X/ W" s: [$ `$ ]Measurement 6 m& U- x# R1 G. X N& b. mProgram (OAMP) 8 P5 h0 b& x% f, Z! m) sA program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct , Q7 D4 J( A6 d+ D R9 Y- l0 i3 {surveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems. (Also known as Cobra Eye.) " X: M4 {8 E* ]# ?9 J+ c* Z; w% TOptical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the . h. x2 H+ d' a2 w0 p% Gmaterial to which they are applied. 2 n9 y5 s7 V$ h3 d' {Optical Processing A type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed through optical systems, is used in problem solving. ) k v# y7 w2 f/ fOR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational Readiness. (4) Operational Reliability. OR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis. 6 _( Z4 i2 G- s& f D% A; X$ EORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser. 8 c6 k# A, x/ _: @/ P3 P9 DORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 214 Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.) used to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital , e" w; ~6 J* C2 l& yelements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a Keplerian orbit at a particular time. 1 p2 I5 T! P) _ i3 f$ iOrbital 1 s% K7 C6 z& iManeuvering 0 c' c6 \6 m' x7 F# M" WVehicle (OMV) 3 _ k' K% n! [ r$ LNASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing. Operates from shuttle and Space Station. Orbital Suborbital $ K/ U, ?4 W& ~. _Program (OSP) A strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the 3 L" V, O' K: e) a( m" X% T8 h6 p$ eMinuteman II booster stack.

帅哥

Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites. 4 U0 s$ q. O2 V N9 KORC Operational Readiness Condition. ! n) b5 V( `" E9 }0 w2 J- {% aORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment. + }" D8 T" l7 O& NORD See Operational Requirements Document. ORDALT Ordnance Alteration. Order of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the * x5 P' h& {6 o, X8 K" d7 R( H, t0 apersonnel, units, and equipment of any military force. Order Wire Message A communications support function for internal control of communications $ ?1 t% ]2 m' t( D4 e( _elements. % p$ j& t m% K2 m2 E, EOrganic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic parts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the operating forces for the Navy. $ F& O$ M9 Y5 y! SOrnate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. 7 Z: z8 g9 M- d' F9 JORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. ' J3 G7 o. `- ]8 e* h5 k- t+ J; MORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications. ( F: R; Q, s$ N$ f/ AORU Orbital Replacement Unit. ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. : A% j# K' H1 _' y7 nOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System. % A, V5 a8 I: K" M2 UOSA Optical Society of America. OSC Optical Signature Code. OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe. * Q: c. e/ b" ^4 E' LOSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2 W; q/ e& [% v' t) k/ [5 S$ _OSE Operational Support Equipment. OSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool. ) g9 U$ M3 j5 E' M7 n( v2 kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 215 OSF Open Systems Foundation. ; _+ R* ~6 \& x; Y* R" v! bOSH Occupational Safety and Health. OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. OSI Operator System Interface. 8 b. p! T6 h9 u5 o) QOSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC. OSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term). OSIP Operational System Integration Plan. OSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group. : C( a% y$ ~ l6 a. H$ yOSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. 3 g* B4 z) B, G; `, zOSM Object Sighting Message. OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program). # A6 z8 h4 h) z* r& o COSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy. ! A5 _, O7 J# Z% R* LOSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research. * s# @% c1 t8 [4 YOT Operational Test. OTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC. J' O( B( [5 u- f- x0 k5 e' z( v' i(2) Operational Test Agency. (3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA. OTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term). ' W* r+ u: i( O7 I4 V# GOT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation. , {0 j* I3 G8 F# gOTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. $ j' J) a; \* }: I q4 u! bOTF Object Track Profile. OTH Over the Horizon. OTH-B Over-The-Horizon. OTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting. OTO Operational Test Organization. OTP Outline Test Plan. OTS Off-the-Shelf. OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis. OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle. . \" b2 A: d2 H0 YOUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. 5 {; @: l: S3 R5 UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 3 B$ n& K+ y" T5 t ?! S$ F. c216 6 ]6 k: h- S% E9 [# eOUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T). OUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). Outer Space & A* ?0 g- d& b/ T% R7 R" H9 V& rTreaty of 1967 , B5 a6 q; V# Y7 Y l0 g- n$ HA multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the 6 c: H& j3 F1 u3 ~# a. _(former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing * W* Z3 L1 l" h- qnuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space. Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or ) |+ Z. o" l8 y1 i# Iother payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays , v/ v: U" v. @5 zconsist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget, % e: u: p) b0 ~, lminus receipts. / E6 Q$ s+ T- V" F/ _! VOut of Band Laser Flux (Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt 2 g% Z' a$ _2 X% [the sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth. Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget. Overlay BMD System An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of ICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear ! D$ J0 i# A: ]! ~" n( u$ hhoming interceptors. % M4 m! m! H0 `& i6 C5 zOWG Operating Working Group. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P / V# ^* Z1 T+ U, W% _217 P&D Planning and Design (MILCON term). , ]. W$ _9 Q; @6 B! WP&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture. P.B. President’s Budget. ; l; T" h! c1 X. p; u/ LP2 Pollution Prevention. p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. P3 Pollution Prevention Program. 7 Z) q+ c2 a$ o o; n% u. e5 ?P3 I Preplanned Product Improvement. ) ~6 E O/ P4 lPA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs. PA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation. PA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate. PAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA) PAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-2 * x4 w! `3 p( M* O- ~1 LPAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT. * I0 d7 v5 G) X2 GPAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 PAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL. " g" ]: p7 J& I6 n4 \6 [$ \PAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4. ' F0 ~, F$ L2 o2 CPACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. PACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific. ; |' P9 G( C; HPACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier. ( o! |+ ^) G- wPACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

帅哥

Packaging, Handling, 4 d C8 c/ {9 I; z3 v; U8 hStorage, and Transportation ; F; o& I- A A2 a5 ?4 ^- K(PHS&T) 6 g7 Z2 b8 @% S4 pThe resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to & ]7 w: K: {. V- iensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations, ; j) X7 _* j$ W+ eequipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and 5 b1 B6 x9 g* Ytransportability. Packet Switching (PSW) A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is : `) h6 S$ K' x/ g: }6 E8 O Q2 {occupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data # h0 }" E2 T* x* I+ bcommunication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and 8 a; c0 X( l# C# ?6 E4 Hthen formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes. + a1 r: v6 J* x f1 N4 e, w0 QPACOM U.S. Pacific Command. PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures. * ^: I7 ]' W e9 m/ K7 VPADIL Patriot Data & Information Link. ) |# v# v4 z7 ^3 {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ( O1 h4 J! z1 u. L, u' @9 i- h; ~; u- N218 & f7 y* ~3 l- W1 T, f* X6 uPAFB Patterson Air Force Base. 4 @# p2 I9 N9 S7 t# u) `3 ^% x z- jPAL Permissive Action Link. PALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). 4 A/ y0 g' J4 NPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation. + v7 k7 x6 \# e0 |2 H+ v% JPAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber]. Pancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown. PAP Predicted Aim Point. 6 j3 n& R& U! s' UPAR (1) Phased-Array Radar. (2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.) " j7 W8 u2 c$ k% j- S5 t6 n1 t3 o(3) Preprocessing Analysis Report. (4) Program Assessment Report. 2 c5 E1 ?4 f& a7 p% ^. e(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar. 7 {( \8 k0 Q2 V; o) S- W/ XParallel Processing . x( g; L, P9 [5 L- ^5 O& F+ y4 J6 dIn parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that much higher effective processing speeds can be attained. ! y( ^4 ]. j4 C% Z9 g( ZParametric Cost $ x- [) r* h% Q+ {% XEstimate A cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical * w) ? z/ i& z7 N' }costs and other program variables such as system physical or performance characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also . n* c' N+ t. G! G( g& @8 r/ greferred to as a top-down approach. / T4 e6 k/ W% bPARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System. PARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs. 6 ~, H! }& h- J5 UPartial Mission ! V- B8 B h( ~6 U. u: H/ t! nCapable Material condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at least one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission Capable. Participating 1 s. n6 }7 ?; |) w7 J) \Service A military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint 7 R4 Q& s3 [8 |2 Y; Lacquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds. Particle Beam ! C) y, a9 d" U$ c' O(PB) High-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or 4 g2 W3 j* }( h1 Q& C8 k: Uneutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light. ( t/ E4 l) z; ?4 l$ MParticle Beam 4 k- n. b. a. N, _* `: k ~Weapon (PBW) A weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers) ! ~" u) C3 E! ato emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of 7 Y2 F& ~, p3 t6 O# Rlight. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g., electronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor ( P; e2 n0 ]7 a4 c! I; Z9 odamage, and initiation of high explosives. & _) Q0 L* T& @! W6 M4 I, APASS POET Advanced Submunition Study. Passive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no , G0 U1 [; Z/ Benergy capable of being detected. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 219 - V: X9 B; X( P4 |( s9 APassive Air Defense 3 R. T6 H8 r* A6 V1 |5 Q: D' x) yAll measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness g% B" f: V6 h. Bof hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use ! I4 A1 M1 L4 ^ d' Zof protective construction. . B. [$ |3 ~0 E; OPassive Communications Security Threats Threats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic emanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications 9 @$ D. @/ Y8 {6 @ ointerception and direction finding. $ n V9 d& N; ?- X' Y% ?Passive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects of damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the initiative. 8 o( |( @- L6 r* ]2 e) T(2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile ! a8 `/ k2 ?8 @$ @attack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing the vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the potential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive " |" @5 c v$ |measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and 7 D& U: _( A8 e1 \concealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and " i% |4 L8 o6 U% D: A5 p( jredundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of ~9 U, x3 H) k6 MTMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS) Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking and/or identification purposes.

帅哥

PAT Process Action Team. PAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation. PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor. ' [3 S$ u6 }' ~' ]* ZPATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile). ! Y8 z; C- S4 S" R8 ^8 h* iPAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System. ( J6 C+ S j, i& |Phased array SLBM warning system. Four sites: a. East Otis ANG Base, MA b. West Beale AFB, CA " [( _7 X% w3 g; Oc. Southeast Robins AFB, GA d. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX - V k/ k& |' M$ n; e7 XPAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term). Payload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile. / s" i3 z7 m9 q3 V8 }9 _(2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile. r0 O( {! m' g# W' M; h# Y% b2 }(3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry ; P, B3 x# Q9 a3 |vehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon) - S3 V; \7 B; X+ A- OPayload Build-up # s- s6 d( G4 z: A0 n(Missile and Space) . ?3 l4 b1 L% S: I8 ]* iThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and % T4 b$ b3 ^0 }- N: lnecessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a complete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of J) ?- s% ?+ G( [the mission. & S" ] @; Q- SPayload Integration (Missile and 7 O$ |( i5 [, z' \9 cSpace) ) |* f* I% p! f; x: V, w4 X- G! gThe compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft / N$ V: d' {! ], P$ S! t+ jand space vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 220 ! I5 q; @( g3 o5 mPB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget. + B$ x( ]4 a- L$ M(4) Program Baseline. , U% ~0 _9 L- f3 L# T/ [+ g1 T6 F' DPB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD. PBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer. / E" o% y+ j2 i; B. [: ~1 v ?PBCS Post-Boost Control System. PBD Program Budget Decision. ! Y1 I( n1 U7 o" w6 u8 RPBI Post-Boost Intercept. 2 l$ C; F/ r1 s0 @. WPBP Post-Boost Phase. PBS President’s Budget Submission. PBV Post-Boost Vehicle. PBW Particle Beam Weapon. PC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee. 8 H. d5 [) F& q; g) R- WPC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term). PCA Physical Configuration Audit. PCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. # n! ]1 @( V7 r' bPCB Printed Circuit Board. PCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term). ) l. x- u. q( APCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term). ! j6 y4 W0 c' _" l, H% F% uPCE PLRS Communications Enhancement. PCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team. ( ?5 c0 r6 |) ]' }) ^( vPCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term). PCI Peripheral Component Interface. i h1 M1 F! ^* ^! x) b+ [PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language. PCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation. 8 e# i/ @* k2 b- fPCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. PCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). * q* t; C, _: m" p: cPCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative. 9 G1 c/ _. n& P0 YPCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System. ( q# t2 ~+ R3 r0 z+ [/ W/ ZPCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure. " a% l% b# l2 p5 IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 5 a7 n/ ` X- E; I/ q221 PD (1) Presidential Directive. ' K; P* Z* C* ~( b3 H" `0 P( E: q( ^(2) Procedures Description. 6 f# o! @$ ]+ N# Q! t, i(3) Probability of Damage. ; d) J5 o4 b! k& e/ H(4) Probability of Detection. (5) Preconditions for Defense. : Y5 Z) f) } j6 K) B: {; H. b2 d(6) Program Director (AF). (7) Production/Deployment. (8) Phenomenology Document. (9) Passive Defense. ) ~. V8 \4 W0 a3 u2 l. l7 K4 xPD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term). PD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term). PD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term). PDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT). PDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN. PDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive. PDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term). / w. `6 ~ D0 e4 q: H+ tPDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). PDP Pulse Doppler Processor. PDR Preliminary Design Review. PDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2). * p9 z3 E. E4 f H; F: q(2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction. PDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. - T) |$ W5 Q- h; N0 Y/ D* z9 I1 aPDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term). PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense. PDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology). 4 H) u9 }2 }3 L' B, \0 Y8 r& j+ gPDV Program Definition and Validation. PE Program Element.

帅哥

Peacekeeper US MX Missile. 3 ~: X- i% ]8 U0 y9 ?! o% M/ EPeak Gamma $ ?5 R3 Q' \# nDose Rate ! q4 E; _* W( {7 f8 \4 EThe maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could survive and continue functioning. PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria. PEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation. PEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD). PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 222 PEM Program Element Monitor (AF). 2 I/ G; |& ~: _PENAID Penetration Aid. 1 [3 {, _# V( Q' Z5 aPenaid ( W$ b4 ]9 s) d(Penetration Aid) (Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by offensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating ' d/ d4 {% w* aenemy defenses. Penetration 2 f6 h" e$ e8 M3 \Testing - ^' G+ k1 a4 S0 H( c$ j/ e. _, OThe portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the security features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of system source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under " t( B; V1 E6 {2 N L. y1 D3 {no constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. PEO Program Executive Officer. PEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army) - y$ _+ y/ z& T. }4 j/ OPEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program. PEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy) u( M0 H. r# {$ y, ]PEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program Office. PEP Producibility Engineering and Planning. PEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning. ) }( ]: }% l4 _8 i! U. o9 X2 MPeregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. Performance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support # z" u) C1 ^0 M/ |2 h( \8 Ucharacteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design ' B& A0 r0 U8 D2 o7 A! tand the support elements necessary for system operation. Performance Requirement ( _' r* S+ @# y4 }' d( ?1 {A requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system or system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency. 6 c* o1 n" m I( z# _) pPerformance Specification R: V2 o0 Q- I. z(1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system or system component. 0 W4 Y: }& t0 U' |5 I(2) Synonymous with requirements specification. Perimeter Acquisition 3 ]! y3 u* W& CRadar and Attack Characterization 5 f0 G# G& `7 }4 ]+ I) {4 p* ]% j2 V5 {System (PARCS) 9 r/ [% U" c. Y% QAN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and : ]8 f) o/ A }5 Hattack assessment. Period (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit. Permeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something. 2 o, v4 n" q6 z+ |- V8 FPershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe. PERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique. 6 N2 X& M$ f* ]7 JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' K3 E5 _4 R- D6 c2 D$ g' z+ o223 & U2 a; |* d# X6 NPERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other activities for completion, and depiction of the critical path. PESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation. PET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test. 8 |( L4 H" g; f P X4 [+ gPFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler. 7 I! L" }# i5 C F+ ?, ]3 dPFD Preconditions for Defense. PFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. 6 o0 A4 I, F) M$ K/ M, hPFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD). r8 n9 j" H6 j6 c. i2 V k- m* j6 cPGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term). * M; ]# R7 V: I, ]; h" ^PGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term). ) y, |( ^; H8 n8 J0 u% YPGM Precision Guided Munition. PGU Power Generation Unit. PH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term). Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically ' T/ R. h0 \6 t" e% Astationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to # `4 P0 o, L: X* Wanother (e.g., phased array radar). Phased Array Tracking Radar " m. F! h6 O( t# k5 A0 J/ m* U' ZIntercept On Target (missile) 9 U& w+ b9 ` c/ x3 U u! i2 j(PATRIOT) ; w- x* N8 B: u. p' mA point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 improvements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles, ( J k1 J$ h9 I, pinclude upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either : l% c: ^; Q( Y" pPATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT. Phased Deployment - D0 e. v, M% uThe sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints. Phase One Engineering Team (POET) * b- `$ Q- b) D zOBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program Office. Now referred to as POET. - I; k" C( }1 l& Y2 w: K$ UPhenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts 2 Q$ w; ^2 X% @1 ~collect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena 6 v; A# U0 e6 _9 }9 srequired by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. PHI Photonic Hit Indicator. # g( R: q" V. @- A5 ^/ ^PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. PHOTINT Photographic Intelligence. 3 X+ h3 c: s$ ^1 ]% ?Photochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 8 N: A/ V6 V& b# A# A5 d9 |224 Photoelectric ( O8 W. C {( D$ ?, QEffect : O& z8 B6 p; Q/ |% D4 GThe process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat greater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its energy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it 9 L* n* I" P1 z7 Uhas lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.) , b- |% v4 H9 b7 }, {9 y( `Photon A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, 9 I" U1 j* v5 t1 twhich is characteristic of the particular radiation. S/ |. ?6 {" ~2 T" oPHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. Physical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic fields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris, 3 `/ C5 x7 k' E5 M! qand extreme cold.

帅哥

Physical 3 {* M! |% h uConfiguration Audit (PCA) n- d6 ~4 _; s: p- x5 A( wPhysical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to 6 a$ I- m* _% O @$ T9 ythe technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this ( i/ O- m0 D! I- i0 j9 [audit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production ! z( U5 G- \ d1 p R" vor first LRIP team. PI Program Integrator. PIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term). $ o' z* Y+ A7 n) C$ JPIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term). 7 A5 Q, S2 p1 `9 B+ n% B* C(2) Policy Integration Committee. & ?+ O, d0 Y5 k# N$ p: {(3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term). Picture Element # B" Q. h5 T: |/ O; l2 N(PIXEL) The smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned color and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a 5 v8 F& \; ?4 E' _) ]# K9 K) Orecording medium. 0 t. n$ `3 s- G0 UPIDS Prime Item Development Specification. $ `1 X5 W H* _5 ?# }" r4 @Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing 6 ^7 o; l$ U- `5 t/ Omethods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. 3 N8 P; j% Y6 [4 mNot the same as long range initial production. PIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term). PIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System. ( ]' w1 f. b3 O2 D7 Z( B3 WPIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point. (3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program. : Q: R0 n: G# ^3 Q! B* b. I2 }PIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team. ; U7 o$ _6 J! ]# `PIR Program Information Report. PIXEL Picture Element. M+ ]( v1 h0 D8 O0 x( hPk Probability of Kill. 4 E& z8 M1 s+ z/ VPKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard. 7 f( D6 u3 J. M8 m6 @4 EPKH Probability of Kill, given a hit. - D! j! w( {: D- c1 l5 NMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 225 PKO Peacekeeping Operations. & d0 Q* M& S: P i4 |Pkss Probability of kill -- single shot. $ o6 [* F( ?+ B/ dPL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public Law. PLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement. / r i1 O0 u+ R/ J% f' O5 TPLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military). ( f9 l& _( c* H3 C P) |* zPlanning, Programming, / N9 S! \# H. Y* }- c: s: sBudgeting 3 W- q9 _+ {2 K5 ?8 ^3 P) @. fSystem (PPBS) 5 `( f: v, ], P0 y1 E5 wThe primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces 8 F; N9 k! I) J+ I( Eand capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process containing three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the 1 q6 Y, w, j+ v ~4 \) FProgram Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and Defense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the President’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each odd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning phase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the 4 y F: R, a" }# h5 q0 TPresident’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management 9 H9 U9 _" d6 T' r9 ECollege) / g8 `- W" Y( r5 |' P B* lPLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate. PLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term). ) h5 P k$ J; S; W; ?. TPLRS Position Location Reporting System. 1 \3 J. ~' q- I0 K3 D! B$ cPlume Data ( D$ E( U; a$ z3 g5 ]3 lCenter - {) o8 d* }8 f( e4 n: R* v5 gAEDC, Arnold AFB, TN. ' U7 Z& K0 m1 cPLV Payload Launch Vehicle. PM See Program Manager. ' E& k5 {' U- v6 `PMA (1) See Program Management Agreement. (2) Post-Mission Analysis. (3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station). PMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool). PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term). ) L# v+ w6 b* F/ M, ^( x+ K$ JPMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF). PMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory. PMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection. PMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term). PMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group. & I" V& v7 K7 [3 gPMO Program Management Office. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 226 1 y; I! N) Z2 [% ?PMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP). (2) Program Master Plan. , D: c( d4 }$ |' O- q: @( `* |/ z(3) Prime Mission Product. (4) Program Management Plan. & M$ `0 W/ T) t+ q& d6 VPMR (1) Program Management Review. (2) Pacific Missile Range. (3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term). PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI. PMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term). (2) Performance Measurement System. PMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA. PMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group. PN Probability of Negotiation. PNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. 0 ~) _7 C5 O8 M$ bPNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty. PO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office. (2) Purchase Order. POA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones. ) ?" _1 Y$ w" ^) ^3 lPOC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept. ( p5 Y7 S4 Z8 J2 UPOC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile " p I) N5 E3 ~+ L6 fcommand post). POCT Passive Optical Component Technology. / d. d* i; t# e W+ `* x' P; F6 [POD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation. ! }* V" Y3 M. W o$ ], ~( |PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance. POE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment. , F1 i9 u, N/ j( Q) l5 I) \POET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support 4 }: A/ X( N/ [" |0 b r- r2 jto the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.) " n% @1 O$ ^$ k* r, MPoint Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g., ! }4 [8 X- I% b ]' U' pcommand and control facilities, air bases, etc. Point Defense System 2 ]: @3 s: y' N/ E; F2 `A terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles % q R; y y7 xto defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s. # V+ M- v0 `+ K, l/ ^- M: P" i: \Pointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy either to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing and tracking are frequently integrated operations. 7 _- u* T2 @. A# B# I: }& `POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication. % k B2 G- n& _7 E: K( B: WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' D: k0 o6 c) j4 h6 L227 % J# b" _" h" |4 X" q0 |; ^POLAD Political Advisor.

帅哥

POM Program Objectives Memorandum. & N+ R; ~( ^$ K$ E3 RPOMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets. " z' x4 C$ N& h0 ?; ^POP Proof of Principle. Port Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems. Portability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on one computer or operating system can be used on another computer or 5 _5 l: t! p# B. K0 Aoperating system. ) H9 j/ _0 ^% H/ o6 C. bPOS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position. Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). POSIX Portable Operating System Interface. 4 H9 Y6 F0 A" jPOST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. * J7 {) D a( B+ S1 iPost-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. 7 X4 G1 q3 R. J% [) i+ uPost-Attack 3 D' |+ J+ |) I% LPeriod # d9 K4 s! F# U9 C7 ^: hIn nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final attack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities. Post-Boost ! t$ w( r% `# T& S5 h/ W; SPhase (PBP) ) H! w7 _$ j) t2 E: h& O, WThat portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic missiles. (USSPACECOM) Post-Boost Vehicle (PBV) ' n+ E2 X! C" K; i( ~- G7 ~0 hThe portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the 5 ~" f1 ~7 d6 U2 r# M& k0 zmaneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final # b/ V! g; Y( `* ~, G8 }! G0 ~trajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus." 6 g# b% ^! g/ d) @, N! _POSTPROD Post-Production. 1 z- `- [- y# } X2 W! a4 P8 _5 mPOTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification. 2 Z- g; a8 Q6 q. z5 C. QPP (1) Parallel Processing. (2) Principal Polarization. (3) Post Processing. # v0 [4 {& a! e8 E(4) Program Plan. PPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System. " k7 S+ l( {0 _3 A. W9 c(2) Program Planning and Budgeting System. ! O1 v0 K/ K! {2 V: Y& R8 pPPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System. # v$ R- `8 r0 f7 D: FPPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance. PPI POM Preparation Instructions. $ }% _! x$ ~1 k* {3 h, J& ~0 T! H$ BPPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan. q7 t3 P$ H6 j, ^. a6 {PPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies. 5 s% f3 E2 W/ dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 228 PPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term). $ U! ]0 J0 k5 {5 f" oPPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term). ! Y: n0 t- J, t( l$ v4 _3 gPPP Program Protection Plan. - Q* I) K: ^1 HPPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test. y" B$ A; M3 b; jPPS Precision Positioning System. * a5 M0 d9 F5 D# K% z7 _! b7 pPPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD). PR Procurement Request. PRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board. , n, z1 `1 B) I& d; p; v% E4 BPRC Program Review Committee. PRD Presidential Review Decision. W3 T6 t5 H& d7 G. o5 z0 rPRDA Program Research and Development Announcement. PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review. Pre-Allocated , A1 O9 y# o( [) jDefense A preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be & N. J/ U1 e& K- }, p- }used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or 2 E( s. |( [( J' n6 Kset of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the 2 z4 l$ P. L7 A, Q; snumber of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets under attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack. Pre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off. Pre-Authorized ) b7 Y& Q$ \; @ J( LEngagement Criteria (PEC) Pre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when x" c9 e0 u, E2 ~% v0 G4 V6 W/ |surpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled. Pre-Commit * l; I, N, L: c% m* G! A& [2 GStrategy A tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed ' @4 N# }- z- s! ?9 Oto specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the 5 b5 y# o6 ~& L2 T, bdefensive weapon’s trajectory. Pre Launch ( n) C- H# P& TSurvivability 4 _3 T( w' J! P6 f0 X4 o- UThe probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack ! v% P4 a! e8 C; t6 Zunder an established condition of warning. ' Z! L$ k0 G: G3 SPrecedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall be served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the highest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served & o$ w* H8 U% cfirst and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance) A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance missions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established priority, of the mission requested.

帅哥

Precision Decoys Decoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or - d" |+ v& ^/ oendoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting them. / P0 [$ ]) e4 s$ y3 W' YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 2 Q; V# N8 x0 L K1 M+ L5 I229 8 n; V5 {! w( e+ x+ |: XPreconditions for Defense (PD) PDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate circumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks - `! P; e! V1 R" ndirected at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and war. & Y2 o& E# Q3 Z% m3 vPredicted ! C0 l9 w9 O1 x2 [5 e9 VIntercept Point (PIP) 5 G+ G# k/ H' G% w9 d& C6 NThe calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide. Preferential Defense p6 t3 Y c K) I& F* e: p9 PPreferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect " ]# _6 A& A3 Q" }given facilities or capabilities. $ n) V) v9 T% z# U' mPreferential - D- _; O, \3 Y* F" a5 r ~Defense Strategy & @& G; t1 b, K) z( M9 I6 M# e" |A tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and , q$ x3 W1 P* T Isensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while 8 _ v n! c3 | Ptemporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the offense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has : y C0 J6 f( P+ ~8 m5 u6 G5 Xinterceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction, the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can 0 X4 J8 j% p' T, imaneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. Preferential Offense The concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets. Preliminary Design Review (PDR) A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress, technical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of the physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of , ?7 Y, l" ]3 |/ g" p/ n) O6 q0 requipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during Phase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II, / Z. T% A* ?3 P* s+ N& CEngineering and Manufacturing Development. 3 n, R! ~# l1 \9 _$ I5 ?Preplanned Product Improvement (P3 I) # C% n4 T4 ` ~Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which ; i5 q7 f! T. H- `9 [7 Cdesign considerations are effected during development to enhance future 8 Y" s& c T0 a& Dapplication of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing - a; d$ }9 H: m8 V5 \3 Hsystems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed ! e- J/ R7 F, E5 }* F# n( h$ _operational capability. Preplanned / Y0 g" \5 {7 v* l6 A iResponse $ p6 d8 ?3 }5 {2 i& G' wOptions (PRO) / b3 x9 s( C5 RBallistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned, analyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO, ! u, q) K# M- n7 c, @equivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment - `7 v( g$ ]: E' N, G6 D' A8 d& uOptions (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces 4 A4 v, K$ g, E H, \0 jbased upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status, and the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution. 2 u2 D1 t7 Z0 t5 jPreproduction Prototype ) j: x$ h* P, u/ _6 _An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be - b9 j" d. A7 t. i+ T9 M9 }- l- oproduced subsequently in a production line. 5 m- i X* d& Y4 n' IPreproduction Test This is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware. No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of this test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware is going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported * Z4 `+ l& l; [5 p& ^% b$ Cby the user; and that it is not over designed. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 8 G; N) g- V T, Z& O3 P230 Preset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the / h1 G% S) z3 acontrol mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching. / V$ k' v0 H. i2 Y |President's Budget (PB) 6 J1 [7 F9 m+ j8 j/ `) a' {The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in January (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended. Includes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.) PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency. PRG Program Review Group. . C4 x+ g7 a& p/ N8 dPrime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or 2 e, t- m/ S3 T3 lequipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles, ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and 3 {' ^' ^2 k9 T" v+ u, V0 Qtest equipment. Prioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type, predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact. 0 F9 V2 X( G" y K- [+ _7 e3 sPRN Pseudo Random Noise. & `7 O+ n; {' pPRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office. Probability of 6 o$ ]8 O2 H8 ]; G1 _& dDamage The probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or 8 s* i4 S) o/ s+ V4 G K; _* eas a decimal. Probability of 9 }) g1 v( r% f# V: \" z3 _0 {Detection (1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given conditions if it is in the area searched. (2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise ' [4 V( g2 J5 \+ Z( Ksources.

帅哥

Probability of Discrimination This is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly 2 X1 [5 |% g: L5 \identified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is quantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the probability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is 1 l! j+ T9 e2 m/ ~& Qindistinguishable from the decoy). Probability of False Alarm 7 e" ^8 `. D! T(1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected ! I1 T8 F+ y5 y9 `/ L# d# qwhen no object is present. (2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a threatening object will be identified as one. 1 {5 j, R& E# K$ M+ M8 B8 _Probability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles, # K$ x! m9 E( c% u, I- _( L: j0 M1 Z* nordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate ) Q* W& F' J- \- f, Jclose enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense Systems Management College) Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS. PROC Procurement. ! K _, N2 N+ n, FProcess Data 7 _ \) ^) I) mSensitivity Label (PDSL) The sensitivity label for data contained in a process. 6 g% j$ f6 Y1 L$ qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 231 6 j+ d( r6 M E% E& I0 ?PROCMT Procurement. 5 I% Q& s1 K( CProcuring 7 h' V( ^/ |+ T7 w% c$ q9 c; sContracting Officer (PCO) The individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on ! E* t" ?, P5 N/ T3 nbehalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for overall procurement of the contract. / C) ?% Y( K, e# KProd Production. Producibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing techniques. Producibility, ; A n0 @9 Q7 C, x% MEngineering, and - G2 X; p4 c/ P/ gPlanning (PEP) Applies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering transition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning engineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required quantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will meet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification 7 }! o: v$ N3 N" Kconstraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to identify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production + E1 N% E9 _* s( h5 R' echanges or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process. Producibility, Programming, and Issues Resolution Strategies ( `$ D! B0 X+ [8 |/ g% o(PPIRS) A semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M 6 |4 ^ _: U# c+ y0 _# sWorking Group. + u/ p+ N& z9 u8 i) TProducibility Review 8 ?# J; O5 z6 g2 w6 e$ M" `4 |A feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to * Q0 t b$ x+ }8 N7 ?& v9 M3 mdetermine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology . @* H) Z7 s. l" _considering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a 4 s0 [* M& H. s( {- ^0 C$ \generic term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system & U5 Y, B$ Q4 h* U, f# \/ p9 f+ Vdesign reviews. Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration item. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline (type E spec), type C spec, and drawings. 1 n/ a* X. ?* k& @, U C(2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical documentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a % j" R1 f9 X% y6 `1 [( `configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and logistic support of its life cycle. ' b8 ~# g r8 z: F, v3 j. |1 M8 m' s% vProduct Configuration 8 `8 g& T9 \4 j) B- M/ B" MIdentification : N! I9 z( \5 L: cThe current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and + q+ O7 T! Q& {4 u8 `, k( qlogistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for: $ t6 x% U# Q3 Pfit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected 6 T4 {3 e7 S/ vfunctional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production - H. h! W. I( p7 |+ kacceptance test. 5 ^) ^1 j' O/ p2 c. Z0 z' f' pProduct ; M% z4 p# X" a$ b* fImprovement Effort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on - J% y9 B' H$ r) r% F+ ~end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than developmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend useful military life. Usually results from user feedback. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 232 Product Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority ; S% \: }* |+ ]+ |7 \4 Z9 U7 Qand assigned responsibility for centralized management of a development/acquisition program that does not qualify for : d% ], z3 m, y7 x2 z- M8 ksystem/program/project management. 8 `4 {( {) E. x) L$ t2 t/ zProduct Security (PRODSEC) ( k; [0 {5 u) \3 }. J# F1 s7 yThat physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost, politically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of Defense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential to the delivery of uncompromised systems.