航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O* J; f' R2 S$ C7 o$ P6 z# r; t 211 ' E7 @0 k6 Q1 H# {Operational. M% O' I3 k+ n0 A8 d5 j7 ~ Assessment c) q2 [; p, ?# h9 i5 M An evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an 7 R: r8 K7 K2 K+ f- e+ k7 xindependent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other3 ?7 _! f6 ]8 O- y) o than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on0 `- I/ X0 u. o" m/ y6 b significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk,5 j1 i5 [/ e* T9 q adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate 5 b2 o0 B5 ]' _+ i+ ~operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using 6 E" ]6 ?3 `6 y) `' I' D/ \technology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development 7 P7 s' R5 b2 F% z9 O+ w7 umodels, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test4 w' R+ F! d) [9 f* q+ E) \ and evaluation necessary to support full production decisions.7 H+ v1 \* e( X2 z3 @* H Operational* X8 o' \7 |7 c# h. g$ d; }" j Availability. U+ p9 w! r- j. u/ ~/ Y- I# | The degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect . g' ^1 q0 @/ m, J. h6 A' tequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is 4 p! o$ j! ~. ?; f4 uuptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link2 z# s1 e: e' l4 a- a+ a between readiness objectives and supportability.# |' N! W* D/ }. w Operational3 H' t$ y+ w* p. @6 T Concept 6 X& m, B, ` `An end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems,( E0 ~4 A: c; j organizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task.' d6 b. `$ f2 S e$ n Operational 3 d* V' H- k2 j1 L- nControl (OPCON)& M$ W- ?; W) L( `0 q9 [* [ Transferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any - ]! p/ f6 i. iechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is. C5 \0 k; ~4 ^9 u/ Y inherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to / m( ?( b( }+ v! Q% `; |" kperform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving9 z) F8 K3 Q/ Z/ [ organizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating u# r% Q. N9 Oobjectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions ' Q, W [4 t6 i4 v- K: Oassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the% d2 L s( N) O% V( U9 G* V# Z0 j6 G commanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised $ J& h$ b. @/ P: T* d. t sthrough the Service component commanders. Operational control normally * R, ~4 a# P& O2 M" ^provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those8 r$ S4 Y4 b S) A0 f3 } forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to 7 I k5 `) N7 s) eaccomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself,/ K9 ]9 n1 `+ h7 U: c$ D; W( { include authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline, " {9 L- n1 w0 ~6 einternal organization, or unit training.3 J. e6 Q! Y5 ], }: _* x! D Operational ; |) W1 w; a; HEffectiveness - |+ r" Y! E5 M% m0 uThe overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by - H! b# N6 T$ A/ U/ D% zrepresentative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural,; m5 g- s! p. e U. G electronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering J9 ]+ |2 _8 O) Corganization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including # J S# Q: o4 @2 h. Tcountermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and J- C f. D ^chemical contamination (NBCC) threats). : o$ U: J! d- N/ R$ w# BOperational . U- B: w0 m% p) |Evaluation ' n2 s- p7 A) rThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable 4 t9 g+ X2 e* g. k) y% i- Eunder Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is 2 m. G3 d8 m5 w) j2 kwarranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; ! I. t) s M2 A1 o$ Wand b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems,( |* P: ^0 }. p/ G f consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate h0 L: T* c) [& [/ P the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy ! a. Y* P- ]6 `& ~. D8 kcapabilities in the field.4 L* M& t, w& s- p+ _ Operational / K) ]$ H1 a* g6 t0 w" |Level of War * Y4 f! D+ k# Q7 X. |The level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned, 4 f* a, `" N) \; Z6 l2 [conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or 1 _2 `% C( F7 @% W& i' L8 {areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by ! T" l6 f' b; `2 ~establishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic5 d! r! L6 k" F4 I objectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating ) C- F" Z! G/ O8 Ractions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These ) u7 B3 D2 S& kactivities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure 4 t' r; p5 |! h4 @" W& Mthe logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by & z5 e& \' R1 zwhich tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives.& l/ {& H6 P+ i+ y' N- j6 s MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O" T3 k& v# A# n! p 212 ) T9 L9 }: W/ C2 W0 _" B1 [Operational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the( p3 y% D( i" @- `6 ?5 k: G operational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training - a; |, i) V* l4 wconfiguration. . t5 c) z( Z5 ^. E* O9 POperational 7 `/ K/ X, Y1 l$ x2 }: lReadiness# D* I; s8 K. r0 E! }% |! \0 Y9 M The capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform 8 W4 i$ P( A" qthe missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in! j' g* D5 n Q; F6 ?5 O9 J p/ H a general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.+ d" e6 p( S. N/ z; y9 J3 s Operational: ?( M- `5 z' [9 P/ A Reliability p& q3 o9 s2 D* dThe reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment.# t% r0 F+ n' K. u# k$ s Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment.6 ~' d0 D* \# w5 K% o) j+ g Operational; ~( ^0 e( w: B9 Q. s6 i Requirement T' H; S$ O7 U: [9 e* wNavy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected # a. U# `1 L7 r" P' Y* x: S. P# dby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less1 H! u2 k% x7 U7 h: ^! H5 t! D7 m than major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |只看该作者
Operational: ^* P- T0 V) T% [/ x$ ]0 ~ Requirements) U5 h" l- T i6 m% e Document (ORD) & [+ b6 _3 n1 ]2 `3 g9 rDocuments the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for / ^/ X1 K Z$ N$ d/ }operational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and . ]! }7 N) c& c, C: @DoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components.0 {' ~, F) P y: J! Q Operational + _& c6 ?+ p& [3 |1 _) }7 tSuitability $ N( m" B# H9 x) X$ Q& [/ Y( O; tThe degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with ' w2 a' O9 q O( ?* r/ Bconsideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, 2 C. v& S1 x6 B7 y( greliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower6 ~4 R8 n; K4 v) v Z" Y. t9 D supportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts, 8 F6 V& ^% y, \/ e0 Sdocumentation, and training requirements.3 V6 ]3 c8 F/ i% H" P Operational Test ! j: T8 A, W2 L) n- H1 A* eand Evaluation * D8 F) _! o/ N(OT&E) 7 J" k0 { a* J5 o- _3 e8 MThat T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational1 Z* E5 W2 V, g* b effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any , L2 y# X7 p: l6 Smodifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the; @! B% V) P S7 h' H+ T+ Y# f types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when / ~- B+ I6 [) T: ^& I+ S! R; Xdeployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as & {! m; k) Z' K* p8 ^possible. + r6 P( _$ B- d rOperationally 7 t( I2 f2 p' gReady' x$ n2 r [5 W- h. n" N5 \ 1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or 5 n# g) p9 w! `8 F! ~designed (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both $ A' b/ B# z6 ~: L2 Lequipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to7 E E7 t* d& X$ f5 v* | perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel). H. W4 P2 ]" |/ }* x9 [: S Operations and3 p7 d6 i. F4 Q/ r1 n/ J. F9 r0 K Support (O&S) : W( O% T5 Z- @9 O9 rCosts9 G, r& @: ~- \& R Those resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a 8 d+ I$ X# |9 k9 Smajor component during its useful life in the operational inventory.7 _5 f1 {% u- L Operations + u5 ?0 k( M9 r5 {; Z& m. k' JProfile , f" @: b" W+ F/ sAn identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time3 w' R: L( |) d% J9 g" X& R7 I: _ those actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational $ C. w6 @- n8 Wprocedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are9 J% O ]4 ?, |' y: N) n* j w discernible. + |6 E+ Q/ O4 E+ J( e. u' cOperations9 y c$ j$ n- [5 t# x z( ] Security (OPSEC), T8 ?6 _/ @/ S# _# ^! } Survey 3 @+ z- ?7 L% uThe method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is 7 }# f: f: q% [composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or, u4 _5 s7 {3 G! X inefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational 9 W: B2 y* m' n, ^" C6 e; f3 Yeffectiveness. 1 z- i3 S9 t5 _; ?/ ] |3 S+ t2 pOPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy). * I0 x* C- e3 ?8 p/ bOPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment. 3 U4 J F6 y; M. H. ` F3 s8 gOPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor.# T* U M0 T" @6 Q7 r+ d: G MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O0 i; q; n% A! J4 L# F 2139 p- [( @# p, Z9 H# M OPLAN Operation Plan. : s3 i$ J2 w# o& V5 C1 `0 k3 OOPM Office of Personnel Management. 4 C7 ^# b, a% ~) DOPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. 8 _2 \& D* ]) ^7 ^OPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction.( o$ l3 L$ J2 w! j& { OPNS Operations. 6 l8 D# x+ d0 SOPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. 3 W+ r$ P2 ]% SOPORD Operation Order.9 ~ V$ D0 U2 Z5 w0 k0 X/ D! A OPP Other Physical Principles.( H6 T1 \9 H3 C" c: Y) w7 | OPR Office of Primary Responsibility.$ U6 w" Y3 I$ E% Z0 I" N Ops Operations (employment). + L6 X6 t) a! U/ ]5 bOPS Operations.% e. |8 \& d7 X# i1 `+ }. | OPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies.% \& f6 w: i' p3 d) Z9 `. h3 d. v0 L OPSEC Operations Security.# c1 Z( a5 Z7 { S6 p OPSMOD Operations Module. 1 S' d; {6 |) p1 q! Q% D DOPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army) % A8 l, ~3 b. z Q3 iOPTEMPO Operating Tempo. * c: Q2 T& w1 nOPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy) ! Z/ P& i0 G1 D7 ^2 \ ]Optic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.9 l k+ p+ P V6 L- N8 _! o Optical Airborne: _* K" P3 i0 ^$ v7 W Measurement, n; e# t* E6 B Program (OAMP) ) z8 i6 N0 H! F6 p o: [; L& ?A program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct- D1 K5 N/ A* x g$ a- `! z surveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems.7 ^# _0 W# I, n- j (Also known as Cobra Eye.), P7 Y1 N9 M. y7 ?5 G! {9 M Optical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the % W5 f. ^; ^- H! C' Kmaterial to which they are applied. ! |$ h% V. L. u, L5 s! e; Q, OOptical' w4 p2 p l6 d B Processing9 [6 {! t2 N& l" g, b: | A type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed. R& w/ h( W5 h- T% P, q* E: _ through optical systems, is used in problem solving.+ r8 z# M# U- ~1 U OR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational , v7 x, A; g1 CReadiness. (4) Operational Reliability. % x6 f% t9 A8 {. x. f VOR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis.5 h2 B1 h* j& E- F4 S ORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser." }7 l$ R" v: M- c* c. W ORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature. ) k- ~5 h6 A5 g6 J- |( hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O * x/ c: F, M+ ~$ v {) M214 6 t( Z1 C1 R- L$ J3 _Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.)8 u8 U' }) I2 U used to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital ! }. N4 C1 V4 l4 helements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a " {0 e7 V1 Y3 |( @Keplerian orbit at a particular time. 3 S% J4 u8 f+ M1 VOrbital # v, {: \/ b- T1 NManeuvering 2 K1 Y# S `6 |* |! u. iVehicle (OMV) % d1 n* t3 |2 K/ @% d! h" }0 \NASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing." ~8 f4 i8 Z9 \6 X u% v Operates from shuttle and Space Station.7 H9 e2 [% n: O. S% F- u S: \# S Orbital Suborbital 7 E2 I% l# G2 M+ J& k& R6 p9 HProgram (OSP)- j5 v6 k7 x# f5 d% d5 N A strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the# R8 x: Y% n3 z% T Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |只看该作者
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites.+ q6 G5 ^! w* j8 h/ l ORC Operational Readiness Condition. ! {% a; w: x) t, ]- _, o; M& \% P0 vORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment.; U, c9 h; z e$ o ORD See Operational Requirements Document. 5 X, m i2 H# w8 R& R6 G% o* c1 TORDALT Ordnance Alteration. # Z" |9 `; x. |Order of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the 6 u4 m0 b) j' E; J$ t/ Z$ @) zpersonnel, units, and equipment of any military force.. U5 O( w |. U1 E/ ~: S Order Wire 7 c& K$ g! O0 [* RMessage 5 o5 o( U' r& T) p; a0 w1 [A communications support function for internal control of communications , e z+ O& Z+ x: Kelements. C" T' |2 j" p0 H2 M+ l0 K Organic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic * f' }6 d- ]' z" e6 e- `' B, kparts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force, 8 G4 D7 t# b$ |0 {9 n5 [and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the 1 d$ E- K% ?7 o. zoperating forces for the Navy. 8 T5 G4 }8 H& L3 G% {( ^Ornate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. * s! ?- u2 Q& U' ]4 D# wORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. 0 p) h, b. \$ G2 g5 dORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications.. h! U7 H8 F* {; G( S ORU Orbital Replacement Unit.4 Y( ^. C% z) q1 D+ T Q1 ` ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. # P9 f5 ?3 S+ ]) n! f' x5 z- b' E6 |) TOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System., u0 X5 {1 R, }& I0 E OSA Optical Society of America. 3 `# k' {; S1 g" ]! ROSC Optical Signature Code. % A0 N/ g: e* d0 d2 ]OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe.# i1 s7 n6 P9 m OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. 5 s( A& l$ h) EOSE Operational Support Equipment.5 F: G5 |, y7 B- D# N, l1 y0 z OSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool.0 d3 K) U3 s- a7 B7 h$ P. M MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O ) u3 }' m }: R; @5 b215 ! b" s- q- Y# \# `OSF Open Systems Foundation.3 p* R% Q5 Q& n* E OSH Occupational Safety and Health. ) P7 S4 s. n/ COSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. * @- }7 g8 ~! k. C, GOSI Operator System Interface. \; M; W3 U, W: b# I% Q OSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC. 7 A) Z. J& ~, I" l6 @OSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term).' o' f; C2 @- p' D6 M1 J OSIP Operational System Integration Plan. * Q3 }# ] I$ a/ f6 Y9 sOSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group.0 _4 `* c' Y# ^0 J& \' r8 O OSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. . A2 I8 O7 l6 K3 f5 bOSM Object Sighting Message. y. N* i2 c3 B0 \- x( P& bOSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program).4 `+ {! D! a" u9 Y OSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy. u; ]' d; j7 T8 ` OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research. & _" r$ N4 Q4 d# O8 mOT Operational Test." [3 C7 U6 }; T3 @ OTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.5 v1 L t* d1 {) |7 { @ (2) Operational Test Agency.2 g s4 v+ K3 M1 J7 l (3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA. & b% W3 ^' S, [* V3 t4 lOTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term).( |! e3 `. }5 u' c0 S OT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation./ M& P% y( K5 e8 y" ~4 m OTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. ( t4 h& q3 p% e3 K' W2 _: _5 VOTF Object Track Profile.& H( a4 Q8 r+ b4 a/ w3 c7 B OTH Over the Horizon.' a' _8 U. m* ? OTH-B Over-The-Horizon.9 Y/ ]4 `& R* M+ b; Y- P2 g& x5 ^& H OTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting.- {2 ^, f( o/ `! C7 _( ` OTO Operational Test Organization.+ W" f+ P8 c' ^ k OTP Outline Test Plan.( M+ L* r5 A E7 B OTS Off-the-Shelf.( u5 b$ ~2 @; P1 ~; W OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis. j* x" x- {1 j7 o2 B) B OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle.8 \" e) [* P/ c- d& U+ E _ i OUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. ; r3 Z- ?' c, q: M* P: n! D9 R% XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O# L h% s$ l X4 Z X k2 G A o 216! Y- E+ d) u2 ~( w: }: l0 o0 M+ O. W OUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T). ; P! s$ f3 d- |6 ?; ?5 FOUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). ' J+ o, Z: T- q& P# S8 e: IOuter Space 2 H) }$ Z5 ~2 r. O8 G; R9 VTreaty of 1967 7 e( {% }" I! NA multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the8 U3 G8 A: }# i5 r; s (former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing 3 [4 q% A) B* ] F5 l* m! W0 z- Dnuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space.* Z/ V! {& `4 W; n Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or' u1 ~8 z' O$ q/ g other payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays * U$ D0 b7 [( p; Z+ W( nconsist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget,8 o/ m" K) _. d8 M8 F) w minus receipts.; A+ q3 h; G; E5 V" u r Out of Band- y2 H% C( \' d Laser Flux, x, Q( L/ r; ]7 _' Y; ] (Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt 0 D9 v. j; Z' o8 C, Uthe sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth. & d! e' R$ V- E( V# ]' g* {Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget. * d; I) `) z/ s" v) i I TOverlay BMD: @" m" T; B( R* w6 \; F5 B5 _ System% I$ Q9 P/ ~% V- q7 f An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of + T4 J- d4 U8 S! Y# o7 bICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear; ?2 l; @+ h- \# I homing interceptors.+ T2 B* e& F; ?/ s! B' C0 F OWG Operating Working Group. 1 \' H+ _: e# k9 v; L( B' Y3 PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P8 _. o4 }0 t2 E* A 217 0 f* z0 V* v' K" }( P4 ]/ fP&D Planning and Design (MILCON term).1 L7 k7 u: N# I7 ]2 o5 ^( L P&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture. 5 j/ l/ E; d# {0 ^P.B. President’s Budget. 4 |( E8 I& Q$ c& t+ rP2 Pollution Prevention. $ a: Q; y+ c7 X! v9 y7 ~p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. ) {% y. e9 _0 \. g' vP3 Pollution Prevention Program. & \% ]( |" I! h# A9 ]- E% C4 O1 e& TP3 I Preplanned Product Improvement., r- O* |: e8 N9 h. ~' Z: n/ _/ g PA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs. " l# q. W- G5 \7 x+ O2 T2 OPA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation. 4 X; k2 P5 W3 \+ ~# U! [PA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate.1 @7 @' Y( {) i- X4 g/ j PAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA) ! [8 v# L) }! M6 i2 w/ lPAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-2+ k# P& B, ^- g9 k3 o PAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT.+ p* R! z" o! y: ?, X" ] PAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 9 b% y( G( }0 m7 ?PAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL. % r, a; Z |# {8 G+ T/ |- APAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4. & R+ _# r/ t& c( hPACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association.8 S8 R1 b* Y P' W7 R/ S% B, P7 C9 K PACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific.' A# U: i2 M# z- q' p4 |2 V PACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier. 8 w2 ^, ^0 B5 j3 HPACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |只看该作者
Packaging, c" r$ ~* W3 {1 P% e# ?Handling, ( s# N- v9 |1 \ b% tStorage, and- u4 }' }7 I2 u, q2 g Transportation! L! s+ X Z* ]; f (PHS&T)$ B# o7 D, s/ K: r. Q" y3 G* f The resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to 5 ~: N# C2 s$ Lensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, + {6 G/ r4 T/ w) W- Q whandled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations, 0 M/ p4 [0 Z" ^equipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and - Z% S! [' ?: L. X+ Z( O% rtransportability. 9 t+ Z* x5 q5 C! S0 N. L+ B8 mPacket Switching ! u! x% q) W: C3 }4 n9 l+ M! m(PSW)5 X3 B7 w1 I# n A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is ) k/ P8 ?0 k* u# B: r, o7 {occupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data - s: P$ v7 h8 @communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and& B0 s% v" h2 v/ i, k then formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment2 a9 I6 ^5 Q2 Y( \) o or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes.( k* s. {, n9 ]* C { U3 \ PACOM U.S. Pacific Command. 8 r: v- {+ C! b6 T" ^+ V8 r+ D3 R) {" FPACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures. + s: r1 V* u7 b2 }PADIL Patriot Data & Information Link. ' j" S) h6 [$ u3 D$ DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 6 }( q7 F- G Y$ W2186 C6 h) c) Z9 z& V7 a, u PAFB Patterson Air Force Base.# E( k6 b6 N, N6 k: [$ ? PAL Permissive Action Link.- B- ~, B& j0 B8 B! C* T Y, F PALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). 1 H% Y' Y0 |3 ?6 UPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation.: [& k9 D; t6 K2 }/ n* _* A PAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber]. : |4 e9 W: i# g/ q& a- Y8 x3 tPancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to% b6 S; q8 [8 C0 q2 Y9 T% ] the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown., Q2 }! f" s* ~6 ^2 z. W$ n PAP Predicted Aim Point.) t2 l2 P9 f3 {4 N PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar.+ Z2 G/ B: g) _, j* @ (2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.)& e- B( S, v% A7 R2 z" v( b4 e @ (3) Preprocessing Analysis Report.4 }: V% w, E4 |# {( }( J6 Y0 l (4) Program Assessment Report. 5 {3 T0 H* D$ R9 R# J# s(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar.3 h& Q* P* H4 c) i2 Q' z1 F Parallel8 C4 B3 b5 {1 V- u# u Processing+ Z$ w6 Q, o" }; x9 g i/ {8 D In parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into% V; I" z7 x5 J9 f: M smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that 3 u' R7 V! S+ Vmuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained. * N& Z4 [1 M( K* V6 p# o+ W- ?, cParametric Cost 8 E) s$ E3 ~. C8 w0 lEstimate 6 h# R* s' O) V$ ?# Z! ]A cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical( t# M. |3 Z, Z, \ costs and other program variables such as system physical or performance. q5 O& c% u2 z& N7 n characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also* S4 O% ~8 @( C; ` referred to as a top-down approach.& {, K4 V+ Q& @0 [4 k PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System. " d* _& v& K* _6 ?5 xPARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs.& r9 u( t0 M( N {; G Partial Mission' D/ E& Q6 i; d Capable 6 E+ p$ u% f: R' y$ w5 n$ J7 W) TMaterial condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at0 |: u3 s9 r# r k) G least one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission ( F9 M3 i# ] H0 D% c% gCapable.' P( k9 ?! o8 A! b" S% [' O Participating ! `5 j$ ]5 D* r/ R7 Y- p- G5 E. qService 1 y3 g' M- Y% x: eA military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint. P G6 X1 o. X3 o4 I |" y$ P V acquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds. ( U7 N/ B6 D; G' J# gParticle Beam 5 f2 l0 u' Y; c- f(PB) 3 {; g1 ~/ E- V1 J) PHigh-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or ' o3 a5 g- o- |3 n) V, F3 Aneutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light.; E0 {; I- B' J2 g+ ~, C Particle Beam & f0 q1 G# Z6 L1 \2 P+ C2 EWeapon (PBW) . E: ]6 [4 B! L2 v" t- m# `/ bA weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers)1 O9 X2 C5 n6 H2 w- t6 W8 j to emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of8 G. B9 l% q1 } light. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g., ) n d$ [+ f2 I6 ^: Helectronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor6 O2 `8 t, L/ @/ Z& U0 ~& h( o damage, and initiation of high explosives.7 n3 l& f; d8 }! G0 C5 w: W PASS POET Advanced Submunition Study. X# | t' [3 }' }; U Passive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no 2 m* q+ F, V8 d7 s! X( genergy capable of being detected.) B/ s% A7 F. P' x. x! o MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ) j+ R z# `0 e6 B7 ^219 " C2 D# a: _8 D' {$ d6 u/ pPassive Air 4 H0 u5 C: P: A- i) Y' VDefense * S. F3 l, I3 G$ C1 B; X: F7 iAll measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness2 v9 B6 r5 }) _. Y of hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use 0 T# d1 q& y0 ^5 @% v- s+ O; c9 Oof protective construction.& l0 b" o9 w" I% D! y Passive : j; o3 A9 b: tCommunications 7 A: o+ c9 P1 }Security Threats ) s# v0 ^9 Z/ p/ Q/ h; U& _Threats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through8 ~) x# y7 z% i) n# n3 d1 j; B intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic+ f) B2 w+ O l- x0 m( U% m emanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications 0 h, @5 \! `8 U4 |interception and direction finding. ' F* P& B" a; o8 G" \2 N: uPassive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects% i/ C4 a8 v/ E! j) ^' n; S of damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the# ]# d/ i. a4 S8 I. l; L initiative. ! I% N* `. ^' T, j* a0 u! L- I8 P(2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile 5 T1 o3 n* i! k* m/ b6 O' |attack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing 9 B7 |7 l a1 N% B2 V1 i: J# Lthe vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the & V- q7 B; B* [potential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive# m9 E1 V/ G; N r measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and 3 w5 V: g* Z, i) gconcealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and % h. o; o: g7 n$ t. y) Qredundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of ' A# U9 [8 J" _. MTMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS) ' d+ e0 C! m$ l+ s. x/ u9 ^Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking( [6 x# k7 J) {9 b and/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |只看该作者
PAT Process Action Team. 8 N! ], c( H" ?- j: z# ^$ A8 sPAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation." ~# T- n$ ?3 t5 R3 `9 \( a PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor. - _1 n! Q' @+ L5 t) P: y- o' D$ EPATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile).9 x% C3 T5 L. n; X, G. P& n# X PAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System.% B8 @" X$ {; {! | Phased array SLBM warning system. Four sites:4 f% o( D$ D/ [# x: K. t) B/ Y a. East Otis ANG Base, MA # q- _2 K9 I- N$ h1 ~1 fb. West Beale AFB, CA- `6 R. }: W) x" D c. Southeast Robins AFB, GA9 _# l9 q# K0 J1 f8 P1 Y* L7 j d. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX8 I; t4 F' f& r& U2 _% k PAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term)./ H' Z* b2 R, F0 m |% T Payload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile.5 `( S4 M, J: c4 l (2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile. ; J( r1 u0 C( }! d5 I, N2 x, ]+ ](3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry& e' ]- R p7 R% q! R; x) R vehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon) 3 y% n, W" U4 |+ }$ ]. {Payload Build-up ( a! a, [1 r( H0 l(Missile and/ P3 {* G! v6 X9 w# q" B Space) 8 y6 |% F/ v; Y: g* _# o9 RThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and k; Q( ]$ V' l necessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a, _( K$ Q' l. ]0 W complete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of 3 m) T; j5 x$ [. j" s0 Mthe mission. 8 h- i% @0 o2 q# ?Payload+ x }9 r# z8 ]! ]$ w! a2 G Integration . l0 K5 @% l: [7 x+ B% Y(Missile and ! h8 k# z7 K7 C9 b" d* R. a' J& [Space) ; z- g' Z0 S) l# Q" |1 DThe compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft; e: U. [ Z* x5 |0 F v; b and space vehicle.# Q& k! o5 i& ]: p6 ]& a- P& v MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P * s, _2 N2 m( y' H Y220 E/ `* D: Y- v PB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget.2 x4 X! `' V0 ]6 x, | (4) Program Baseline. ; _3 [& S p7 Y( b2 B4 L }1 tPB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD. 6 ?/ O8 c& d" h8 J* n$ RPBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer. # S0 V* L$ X9 @0 M5 b+ J9 n( z' _PBCS Post-Boost Control System.- a) g6 a ]4 c! R6 |& n PBD Program Budget Decision. 7 A4 `* F) ^# VPBI Post-Boost Intercept.3 `3 e0 {# O) k- F( q8 B+ p PBP Post-Boost Phase. : g; L& a/ K, q# F0 z# R- z: DPBS President’s Budget Submission. " j5 M1 ]* p4 }- w% i: F! CPBV Post-Boost Vehicle. ; C0 X9 J: M* g* E+ `- m6 L' aPBW Particle Beam Weapon.. ]# y' D3 W0 |% `8 T/ p% m PC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee. 8 Y% m! B: y: i+ W4 ^PC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term).6 b. p1 t* k( Q- Y* A PCA Physical Configuration Audit.4 q) q9 m; u/ X# O; C PCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. - L, E, P j. y7 e5 tPCB Printed Circuit Board., {8 Q4 G% i |( G* f# ^ PCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term).' W' ^0 Y5 T @" s8 d$ s! p4 a# r PCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term).+ M8 C2 _2 f" u) P; g, ^6 Z+ {" @ PCE PLRS Communications Enhancement.4 G+ l/ Z5 X1 M0 v. T: c! `' p PCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team. ' U i! }8 j- F% ]PCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term)./ \ o6 T3 D7 E4 o: O0 Q5 O4 Y PCI Peripheral Component Interface.% ^3 o) a! Z+ c5 x$ g! r2 a PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language.5 V& H' s3 }( G2 A PCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation. 4 k. ?8 S, [# }6 kPCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. 8 m5 B9 Q6 A. `. n/ R' xPCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). 0 U* ]. o% l: j9 O8 t$ `% BPCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative. ; h7 q: T( g/ F* n; @% e% jPCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System. $ W- N+ t# ^ h( t% ~PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure.- w5 l: G" e8 R: H5 |$ ~* i! g MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P, d+ Y+ Z+ a9 Q; _ 221 & K/ u, p4 u% p m: o7 S7 PPD (1) Presidential Directive. : k/ Y# h u: B8 {1 D# p/ z9 E(2) Procedures Description. % V: q/ c# H; V$ L4 d' a(3) Probability of Damage. / d% W) M9 z, ^$ n(4) Probability of Detection. 7 V! ?; B1 J8 ~1 H) z(5) Preconditions for Defense. + g+ k% c8 ?8 V0 P(6) Program Director (AF).4 N9 e" {# ]8 G (7) Production/Deployment. 1 y( e5 ]5 {# z Y7 n; U2 U(8) Phenomenology Document./ K1 h* x% t3 r, l6 O0 { (9) Passive Defense. a" ?9 i. B. m/ ~) Q6 Q# CPD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term).2 |+ H/ F- F- K5 B4 s$ ^3 @, b PD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term). ( r5 B4 L' @* x$ ~0 u* oPD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term).0 w: V6 q; B* E9 w* a0 d7 ?- G PDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT). 0 j- q1 l6 J, t/ A# K% pPDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN.: U9 L6 w8 i# v4 _ PDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive.; H4 R. [ x9 S6 U* l6 ^" V! ~& U1 [ PDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term).) x2 x w2 b: I; c0 ^3 W" c PDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second)./ a: w/ l4 E: ?3 `# q+ |$ t PDP Pulse Doppler Processor. & x# ~) C- V3 DPDR Preliminary Design Review. 2 o. k/ ~) s) h ~0 nPDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2). ) r. V. Q/ ~4 d1 w# H9 S% Q(2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction.- ^. W: H* l; s. c# c1 B: @$ u PDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. ) e: N* P5 r4 c- IPDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term).( b* i) c( s3 S/ ?; N% H PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense. 9 z+ a6 A+ w: b% @+ dPDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology). ! P" H8 F, i8 @PDV Program Definition and Validation. 4 v2 _6 J, ~7 h+ k" S0 A* HPE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |只看该作者
Peacekeeper US MX Missile. ! L L+ m; ~ h0 \Peak Gamma 5 j1 A+ s4 H( E$ O. F4 q3 P9 YDose Rate% K) I! ~' E5 W The maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could 4 V0 ?9 W8 X, q! B/ Ksurvive and continue functioning.1 {9 I! a, g5 K# r9 J3 x7 _ PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria. 6 D) e) y2 G4 w: sPEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation. % B! k' h4 k% z( FPEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD).' o0 ?! _1 G2 [8 l N; D" y0 O PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.0 ~; E1 R7 U; _% @ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P & E; ~- A2 a8 b0 a6 [) }% _2223 C: @% C! A/ e& Q4 u1 D+ T PEM Program Element Monitor (AF).% Y/ M% W& K* b0 d. F3 e# [ PENAID Penetration Aid.; v7 J* O6 E- f Penaid1 M% T* t C8 U9 J (Penetration Aid) + O# y* V/ U9 ~4 X5 s+ D7 P( H(Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by7 Q7 e& L, Z. x5 P offensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating 1 m; {5 ]* i5 f4 q o1 Y; n9 aenemy defenses. & {2 v7 p1 K0 z2 p$ xPenetration . V- z+ ?- e# d# i) bTesting 9 p* ?- J- d5 i/ j+ wThe portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the$ j# S& \7 ]. Q security features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all1 \6 M' G9 T- \6 K system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of - i: s; J0 T; r2 W" W# [/ Jsystem source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under 7 g$ V3 ]1 J& N A4 c u- Ano constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. d2 N2 Y; {7 O. ~) a- ], o PEO Program Executive Officer. 2 g! E$ X% [/ F$ zPEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army)0 w v8 N. e1 d V3 v+ G PEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program. 8 ^2 ^( F2 e+ j) ZPEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy) 7 C% g; f8 i2 IPEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program * t8 T1 r! p5 X. X4 b" IOffice. 9 A& H3 r( a4 ^- \/ }PEP Producibility Engineering and Planning.5 i: i! D' o1 d8 L z* F PEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning. , S9 w) H( Q" F' [* r4 l9 J/ aPeregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. 8 r$ J" i$ X$ qPerformance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to8 R9 t5 A0 w3 U' k effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support ( f6 V- ?8 u5 Y+ l0 l# X! p1 S; icharacteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design / \, |- G7 `; i/ s( w/ T6 sand the support elements necessary for system operation.8 _' H; u' ?2 b4 G5 _8 f Performance; V4 k; O- G [. m z8 J Requirement 6 k. q j+ p( [! _7 kA requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system , _/ C Q. q$ q% X/ }+ @$ Hor system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency.% ]7 m m; S4 h; _. @5 A Performance 9 _% q9 d3 Y- _- r! s# r7 v7 o9 GSpecification- @2 r; ?4 R3 p: f) {. \ (1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system% _$ N$ l; }7 R2 ^6 d or system component./ M; D5 y6 I" @0 G! R! G (2) Synonymous with requirements specification.& m5 \! b& x7 M8 c+ M" V8 p4 A! J& F Perimeter1 \' H# v- f* L5 V Acquisition / ?0 C: _% X! KRadar and Attack8 w& X5 o. D% C' Y: a Characterization6 v7 H# ]/ k# a( J# {( [ System (PARCS) $ }0 C: l8 J" U7 f. qAN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and1 c; P6 r% G7 A' @1 s attack assessment. & {; A. Y' K# M# a& d) @4 G4 lPeriod (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit.# N4 }8 C$ y/ U, Q0 } Permeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something. ( G0 R) w2 M9 m/ F1 oPershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe. 7 f* d/ D$ e4 w- FPERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique.% w' n( Q+ D& y; y+ A MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P O$ G2 P! J3 y( O+ m 223* { m3 Y7 q" w" O7 R PERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other8 P3 G- O6 Z4 n6 U _$ V activities for completion, and depiction of the critical path.3 J0 g. m. E! X; W# E) x PESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation.3 |7 B" ?0 j5 C) k PET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test.: M- i8 D( S$ {" y" Y, K PFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler. / r5 k! ?$ |; \8 j" r I, \0 R6 _PFD Preconditions for Defense. : h; [. R; A* E0 lPFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. ; E' a1 S9 h) oPFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD). I$ W4 e9 w$ R$ j% lPGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term).3 f3 r# u/ r4 G/ [ PGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term).3 U9 ` E0 B6 S+ R PGM Precision Guided Munition.& j3 j( i( ?' m' K( z PGU Power Generation Unit. ) n3 F8 B$ C. ^4 C# ]0 ^3 v: YPH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).# y+ }: F5 g' N7 ^* T* u+ q0 i Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically* y. s1 T; V9 |- |6 b' f! H. N stationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to* C) A2 e: x, m; `# R" x) Q another (e.g., phased array radar). + e$ U$ n/ R" ~Phased Array 8 `# L2 H, a/ \1 a/ t$ o zTracking Radar $ U/ }8 x8 h* d' o7 e+ U; E! WIntercept On . i) a. j& m$ hTarget (missile) 0 C: x- i6 n2 i; R& ?(PATRIOT)8 t5 r$ S; k! j A point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 , ^% Q$ F6 D* c, R' Y) nimprovements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles,1 p7 O' S3 f* b! Q8 o# f$ H include upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either) o$ K7 ?8 C* Z, h) g! H" e PATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT.0 d: Q7 [6 u& B+ K+ r4 `* }0 l Phased" I3 I+ i5 ^7 Y! |8 {0 K Deployment 6 h# y9 z; ^* P* N; F4 R. DThe sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system2 f9 K8 E6 j" D% B [ capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints.- T2 _( R6 F8 b. e Phase One # s) k) a' \& A) `, ?9 tEngineering 6 g1 n6 h E+ }Team (POET)" E$ W* A" @5 D OBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program 6 R$ R) V+ ]% ]/ ?- ROffice. Now referred to as POET." {* o1 p+ L) r% | Phenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts" E. d' J, V- v0 Y, w collect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena; }4 \( p3 U+ k% F required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements.. J3 V4 y% z! e! R2 S" r0 X4 s) V PHI Photonic Hit Indicator.% A& L0 ~: o0 n& p6 \% ~% _ PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. - d; ~' x X/ {5 \* T- w5 p5 YPHOTINT Photographic Intelligence.( I+ Z. Q$ Z: A" y Photochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light. $ {+ {/ V/ Q- N3 JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P , Q9 V$ t7 z9 Y. ^3 D* |224% b, {/ @0 v9 H5 d; U* r Photoelectric 1 Y* ?( u- {5 H% eEffect 6 U2 B, s" g6 P0 n& |The process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat: {& y3 V7 L# D0 T. I* o- j greater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its : i# }/ T( X5 }0 |energy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it/ K& L- ~. K" m1 t has lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.) ( f& E; [) m& l9 T1 U, ?Photon A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, 7 r, @3 s( k$ X3 a6 d3 Awhich is characteristic of the particular radiation.! ]0 N5 [. u9 i2 U PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. 1 Q" w9 ?% P f7 bPhysical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic 4 k* t0 [( I- wfields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris,1 f: E. J% t) m4 z8 E# H6 i9 U and extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |只看该作者
Physical- ~( Y9 i$ i+ B B, ]/ f Configuration- p! V3 @+ d( ^8 c Audit (PCA) 1 L6 b) U; u. d: E5 e4 {; ?Physical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to 4 _& v3 C* Q3 r. _: q5 r: zthe technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government" j, ?$ c/ U$ { G5 J g9 \) g program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this 0 w8 o& n& ?1 y- W3 y8 D) |audit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production5 l, y m$ {5 b- z3 y p or first LRIP team.: u0 ~! U0 W" P+ h: q1 U2 Y6 y PI Program Integrator. 4 w( h8 m5 w% H. g$ TPIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term).! \# {( M, M4 E$ ? PIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term).! ~, Z! }+ u5 H9 Q (2) Policy Integration Committee. % s! J% {1 K* R" ~/ s8 h(3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term).' f! K5 |3 E& {! u% y2 a. V, d; z Picture Element& {# j/ O6 {; R, t. I( Y4 a (PIXEL)' X: \! n8 ]2 Q5 ~ The smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned) B! H7 h& H k% t8 R color and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a1 O1 P/ f# l, K0 O; T recording medium. 8 c4 E5 I" ?9 c+ s* o( ePIDS Prime Item Development Specification.' f7 Q' ^7 I& \$ A+ o5 S Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing) W6 t) c1 C) j* s; N" y' ~ methods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven.# k; z8 B* M; w; y5 o$ H Not the same as long range initial production./ `9 x% V" |. }! p. H. h PIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term). ' ~) G' f6 d2 f: j9 U9 v' H$ x8 FPIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System. 6 e0 D! U2 \4 E- T oPIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point. 9 ~ N, N; B# R" \& }# `(3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program. , k" P! n5 ]) h- N; _; iPIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team. * \2 G% S, {5 m e3 }% M7 _& zPIR Program Information Report. ) o. Y9 C6 ~4 j/ Y4 D0 R2 r5 K; v ^PIXEL Picture Element. " `: F( x- U5 ^3 u7 ^& W) dPk Probability of Kill. ( L! a7 R4 k2 ^6 oPKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard. ]# c$ _- z0 q; Y1 B; [. ]PKH Probability of Kill, given a hit.: e' r& C3 |7 a6 |) P( Z' h MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P( W4 d9 ~) ?9 q 225 % C7 P/ U/ ?% s( o6 A: w `PKO Peacekeeping Operations.$ v0 ~3 s" u+ t Y) _- P Pkss Probability of kill -- single shot. * b4 s6 F4 k; E3 S6 x1 f. K0 e) t7 cPL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public . A4 Q9 f8 R8 t8 }Law.: l0 J% Q( v$ t( K8 i7 N1 a1 a c PLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement. I) Y4 Q0 @' h1 V4 N5 B PLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military).$ {# R' o0 c3 \' H Planning,5 c, O) T2 J) M: H$ F# }; s" y Programming,7 U0 |2 u$ r( P" @* f Budgeting. B, @& Y3 L+ B; F7 ^' d System (PPBS) # v+ S, Y. I3 E1 [3 JThe primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic ( r* i2 M! \2 `3 B) H! [structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces1 d) E F5 T. f! d$ |" q and capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process 0 G0 m% O# Y6 s+ `" H, I) Kcontaining three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the; }" a! H2 d: x0 B' N+ } Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and, o$ g' `" C6 n* c) ? Defense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the U- `: T) F, vPresident’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each % w" m4 Q1 h' kodd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning & I/ K8 w5 s: |5 pphase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the 6 M& u! e% F; g8 U4 I% qPresident’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management ! U2 o; V( X4 vCollege)& Q* O% R% M) |5 H6 E; t PLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate. 4 v9 C; @' u4 K5 {; M9 U @PLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term). 8 G+ W3 t( t% }7 T7 R- s) }PLRS Position Location Reporting System.* u, w% v2 Y8 c5 \$ R Plume Data 3 ]3 K4 l9 Z2 d7 v# O R- e8 wCenter 7 q& f2 l' i; V" K+ M3 _- cAEDC, Arnold AFB, TN. 0 C* ^/ B8 C' q" i7 |' ]% f. w, A9 NPLV Payload Launch Vehicle.. _: c7 c3 q' w PM See Program Manager. 5 k, b6 e4 B# Z) hPMA (1) See Program Management Agreement.% Z% t; C2 }) H) K9 k1 H (2) Post-Mission Analysis. , w0 k# m9 X+ ~(3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station). 7 l0 c# y7 m+ ~' Y9 dPMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool). 3 e \# D2 p7 A6 a4 }PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term). ' D- T" E/ B0 X# w* APMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF). : l0 d! _( q& K; M* l: [PMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory. 9 l1 t9 a$ D1 \- [2 BPMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection.' b8 f8 T, m0 V, B0 ^ PMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term).& [2 a9 w" J/ { PMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group.2 h5 c$ T% F! g" m; g3 ^ PMO Program Management Office. & r$ `4 u, `7 f; `5 Z3 _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P+ M% y/ v7 W1 Z | 226 3 z ?1 f( O0 V8 U, KPMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP). , O! t0 r& @$ W, z* o2 @$ A+ U" r(2) Program Master Plan. ' |5 f8 I% p+ C8 h2 E(3) Prime Mission Product. & a/ f3 e/ X$ i4 o(4) Program Management Plan.* l9 l: n' M0 p C# W4 j PMR (1) Program Management Review./ \1 i! I* o6 L3 E! q1 L' C; U4 Y6 ` (2) Pacific Missile Range. " P" G Z0 E/ j0 y6 b0 [8 I1 @3 }/ K(3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term).. c6 l5 P# |) R9 T4 h PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI. 6 h( _3 L! q% L, QPMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term). 4 N0 V. N/ D/ R; ~. [- }(2) Performance Measurement System.1 Y6 x: [' N$ {; F7 r! F$ ~1 }2 `2 y PMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA. * L% S, O/ w% b& ~3 pPMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group.( H1 b" B+ ~/ \ PN Probability of Negotiation.$ k# ~1 p% @7 _- u. U2 | PNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. . h, y$ o6 [: Q: zPNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty.4 d5 E4 Y2 [7 x, b PO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office. ! @7 @8 `, @: \- r# R& P(2) Purchase Order. 7 r- Q& c' Q! H7 n% iPOA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones.* \! D" r) i$ r# R l9 O% l POC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept.) a! a$ r: q+ q POC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile $ i# [; w" D; B" l" Fcommand post). ( }% |4 c# o1 \3 J5 l$ Z4 ` OPOCT Passive Optical Component Technology. / V: I1 V" _" X: G. n4 T' [POD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation.$ R( R0 d% H4 y: j. @5 a PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance. ! S7 L( ^3 g- T0 h: x9 lPOE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment. 0 F" h2 `$ Z" Z% u- Y2 IPOET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support ( H7 L0 Q7 P+ a* zto the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.) 5 B( J/ H J( P- V7 oPoint Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g.,3 h& V0 g" C& f3 O5 ^3 R2 J command and control facilities, air bases, etc. . ~. w( L% |! ]3 B V+ y5 u* wPoint Defense " }: L6 U$ X# v7 K- q( jSystem0 g$ s# w6 Y4 N3 K' G; W) D A terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles8 I* n# m5 x- h4 c to defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s., {+ e$ l8 G2 [. P- s! k2 w Pointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy- ^0 c3 k' ?9 m0 \ r either to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing$ m6 p( Y. z L- Y8 D' h$ w6 A4 l and tracking are frequently integrated operations. 7 t2 T3 k+ p% p( x) _POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication.7 D$ q! A$ Z# N$ u3 |2 W1 Z/ p MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P/ g0 f0 L* J8 G2 e2 x 227 4 m7 X8 L) P7 C9 ePOLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |只看该作者
POM Program Objectives Memorandum./ I. Z1 U: _; q/ K+ F POMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets. , M( H9 {! y: Z6 t4 mPOP Proof of Principle." |$ q8 w' ~6 S7 Y, s8 O Port Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems.$ J, V% N) q0 w, I+ F Portability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on! c: W5 F) ?6 u7 H9 e1 H one computer or operating system can be used on another computer or 3 w. Q% d) y5 p2 }' Q/ voperating system.. j0 _% D' F+ z1 f POS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position.' n* K! F% }0 I% T. |3 s Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). $ q' Z2 ~+ [( @8 pPOSIX Portable Operating System Interface.5 S ?5 `/ `; r POST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. " B3 G1 s$ Z. W3 l2 @Post-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave.. X% n6 t0 a* {1 q3 \5 b* {8 n8 B9 V Post-Attack. {5 @# q4 H; P; @% n1 G8 ^( }4 O1 a Period 4 h( g, p5 w9 j5 q5 S/ P3 oIn nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final R; v8 } s' [' R( ^- g attack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities.. j6 T: F* s+ _/ L( ?8 ~ Post-Boost! d; D3 q ?9 s' t& \0 F Phase (PBP) : Z+ e% N/ \0 ~1 {) V% s5 zThat portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered . M/ t9 V; F3 i/ ^! B7 |flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic _6 k3 a; c+ p; B: f; Z4 |+ |missiles. (USSPACECOM) 2 j6 m! v9 U. O3 kPost-Boost! V3 b- Q2 \$ N6 o- K Vehicle (PBV) - }( I+ ?3 [) s; s( N6 m9 A) YThe portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the2 j: v+ X- M! o maneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final 2 D7 S/ L# _. B2 u, H7 {- X* ^* [trajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus."% a' |7 i9 U, A4 u POSTPROD Post-Production. ) E4 M) _2 z8 P5 rPOTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification. 1 I$ P9 M6 ?3 L4 M1 ~$ L- H; s" I& tPP (1) Parallel Processing.# |, W5 V# R; ?$ d2 I4 }+ L (2) Principal Polarization. $ i, h$ }* \$ N+ z5 {1 M(3) Post Processing.7 ~9 ?5 p& f, L8 P- [0 d4 M8 | (4) Program Plan. `% y/ l6 Z) y; v3 xPPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System. 0 D& {/ r3 _' S8 _(2) Program Planning and Budgeting System.) R& D2 }6 W0 m/ Q: h3 L PPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System." E/ _$ M% ]1 m. m6 b PPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance., O d& f- x& T2 @5 t PPI POM Preparation Instructions.* l/ X4 T, b. \0 V6 \ PPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan. ( j; q( ^) u6 w7 `# {) hPPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies. B! r. Q4 o/ Q: [: ?2 S2 `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 0 h# i3 m$ M: j6 `) N+ `$ i6 [228 - g* J2 _6 }( SPPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term).; H- A6 p2 R ]& `8 i. f PPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term).0 j2 h0 Q) Y( H& U PPP Program Protection Plan. $ X9 r8 w- R4 bPPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test." P# }% E! `" Z% e/ C! q# D1 R PPS Precision Positioning System., i( O8 q1 _0 C" S6 i' T PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD). Y# z- U+ V' I0 W( n, ] PR Procurement Request. 0 R9 w* v% u8 ^8 e" z% EPRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board.+ h; B! G! v* E$ v( O+ ^$ G2 w& u PRC Program Review Committee. ; {! y; L/ P1 Y+ o% l( y. NPRD Presidential Review Decision.2 W) f9 t2 ~' i, [) t/ ? PRDA Program Research and Development Announcement.- c' }" t ^: R$ D PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review. 9 J! N3 `) d/ J) F0 TPre-Allocated. {! v7 O( @' F/ M8 { s7 z* X% Q4 y& s Defense 1 f) W% z& K; T8 t. b$ RA preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be3 W8 j7 Z+ z4 E2 H used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or( x D& a0 y* W& ~: S set of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the " V6 S" {" K n* d4 ^number of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets7 ~7 d& o" ^% Z5 |2 C under attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack. : l2 ^' e F, v4 c. O' nPre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off. ) r' B9 n3 x# s+ U, q: \" WPre-Authorized# |1 X8 m8 w9 S* z" t4 H Engagement6 s2 O. w2 P+ h+ o5 B! s$ N Criteria (PEC) 7 y/ A: Y; H; J+ t4 ~/ p) _Pre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when% U1 }. N _, V6 `3 M surpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled. " F5 Y5 i. x; d/ D) DPre-Commit! N" `0 K' z# e1 u. ^ Strategy ! T5 e9 _9 a* _! [% IA tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed 2 a/ Y6 g% {# j1 Z' Tto specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the ; O; i! X7 O8 c! V9 K6 d7 |defensive weapon’s trajectory.- `' S% d2 E9 X8 Z Pre Launch0 _! N0 k, a0 ?# |; S Survivability 0 h9 c9 K$ I2 v$ V/ R n: aThe probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack: J% t, Y6 T [% s% q& X: E8 B# R under an established condition of warning.6 u- r7 q" K! ]$ U5 ~5 _ Precedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall + f. `% R6 e( h3 qbe served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the. H; x1 w4 X, w L highest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served! ^* W3 ^8 N: g first and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence4 p8 @! y. h, f. @7 p levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance) 8 v Y$ d' u% c& N( }( `) x0 b1 mA letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance3 o6 \% |8 u$ Y" L+ o missions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established; z4 R& R% d. ?# {0 X( t T priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |只看该作者
Precision5 E( L$ u, S, f) n" l6 R Decoys 1 ^! I8 T7 l, Q: H# b4 W/ h, jDecoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or2 S5 v0 K9 \/ P endoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting 1 I( c; J; d. [) r/ [( l0 Q. e( bthem./ G; y# h0 J$ g( f7 s7 {* k" c: w MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P; U. n; P* N, i$ x! d 229 9 C% i/ L7 _% QPreconditions for % F+ o8 f3 u( |* \6 ~4 V7 K; CDefense (PD) $ k* Z: h- L- U( i/ zPDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate9 V9 q; a* @, M$ C( X2 e circumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue 2 L' D% }1 v1 P& ^combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks2 ^+ ]! W: m5 `( n% w' t4 [) u directed at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and 8 [. m+ K0 x0 @- {/ O; S" Gwar. & z( F- k6 M, M5 U5 r( jPredicted - v- w% F5 U' S; f5 e6 n+ d0 pIntercept Point 1 F& d2 c. f7 Y, I5 f# O(PIP) S O% @- D1 i R: l2 Q7 j' D5 ?The calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide. h! r5 \% V9 z6 r1 ^' V* v Preferential : l+ w6 h1 d- C- X z9 kDefense9 Q( G2 v$ ^" Y0 f8 T Preferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect . \' u; k- \& [) Y9 Zgiven facilities or capabilities. 7 _5 A" @: Y7 ^5 X" y. T0 ^Preferential3 P7 o5 }+ N. e& p5 [, R Defense Strategy 4 r0 W( J" H: ~; Y; D+ l; h. v. q# C8 BA tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and 2 S4 V# C3 o$ [$ G" o lsensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while6 {( Y& S3 K! n" E temporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the # B' S$ C" T. [+ Toffense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has % \2 \- C x! l' i; b6 Ninterceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction,$ z' \/ B& F5 i, V, n the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can) i' f2 ]9 \. U& V. ^2 Y maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. j+ P6 g% n* f5 t6 n( l/ C Preferential y$ j6 ?+ ^ q" c1 L5 h5 Q0 o, X1 [- {( R Offense7 C. E* b1 [7 B2 P/ k The concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets.. @: c# P( c/ B) l; K( w; ? Preliminary , a" x8 @* \2 J" fDesign Review5 y% S! { T. P v2 h7 b (PDR), ^: d. Z0 X0 m# T: Z7 m6 a# e p A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress, 2 Q! I/ |8 V; [( \5 O3 Y5 ntechnical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to 7 k" j6 S% E m( r' ?' K$ m1 N: }determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the( {+ W6 K6 U" q+ ?! x, [3 |/ Z development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of ! p1 v- F1 z% \ U! k/ Fthe physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of. {+ q+ r/ C# c: P# G8 b+ [8 Z1 { equipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during3 `; Y( [( ]2 b9 b Phase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II, 4 z$ h7 ]& `( S! n1 w% BEngineering and Manufacturing Development.& R9 w- P' S7 b% f4 f! `( l4 h Preplanned- r; E% k6 N( M1 W5 Z8 E" C Product1 |) M c9 U( W# S' Q r Improvement . V: H+ x9 |0 H0 n v(P3 I)! \1 h, R- E7 b5 i Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which8 G: n3 W( v' s6 f design considerations are effected during development to enhance future. ? ]6 y! C% V) P6 m application of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing . Y. [4 S& i- asystems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed1 [! K2 z" z3 ]- G$ I operational capability. & U# |4 P9 g. s% }9 TPreplanned& N5 V6 c4 o8 j. ]5 b1 U* K Response+ U4 R' r; _6 U0 N7 ^! C9 [ Options (PRO) " ?. y: c3 ]' {9 S1 @Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned,% J# f5 v4 t. ?& L7 t) b analyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO,4 ?& y1 |8 h! l equivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment 2 A6 _8 p7 e6 A S3 sOptions (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces , q3 r6 e4 i9 r+ v' Q+ J, Rbased upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status,. J* n' n' u) V" a0 m { and the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time6 v# U/ h: ^6 b, [6 x8 { human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution. ! z# I, R/ B9 |$ ^, e1 d2 `4 A$ rPreproduction7 w2 H# D7 \1 E0 j Prototype6 f; a7 U# e3 M4 Z An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be. R! e- B( I4 t+ j; S produced subsequently in a production line. & R- O, ]4 ?4 r: NPreproduction4 w7 G9 o. ^4 |- p/ c* \% M& ? Test6 q9 y, j9 U6 ?" D0 i This is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production0 N9 O7 t$ q) Y: S+ ~3 c tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware.% n% Q2 l) M9 L& d) a No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of , _: d1 K! }: d6 Mthis test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware ! K5 a) p. @. p5 u1 @is going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported 9 A" a. m3 J$ p" ~7 J7 u7 J* S: Hby the user; and that it is not over designed.: }) d, [; ~0 @. T* B7 } MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P0 \+ I$ ?- M; K1 @& O- B 230 4 d2 W& e5 X [0 D# |Preset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the/ u& B! z* |, s1 a/ W N; [3 Y control mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching.2 r6 {8 k6 Q) G( \" ^- N President's0 q, \' I+ w* E5 ^) ^* x. n% L Budget (PB)( {# D! D* u8 x: _) d The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in + n R$ {+ u* L* k9 kJanuary (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in% G& H* R6 N" } accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended. 2 b- Q: `& W* v9 {Includes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial2 C0 s8 h+ d6 m e1 h' W branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.)1 K, l+ |. N' G! _, s: Z PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency. # J% F# V# [3 d/ Y! SPRG Program Review Group.2 U/ Q: B7 M) B* B% _ Prime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or9 }6 v p, c; \- C2 q( o" I( P equipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles,% s0 T0 l9 C1 j3 N* u ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and! ]8 L, t4 [6 j test equipment." @/ o m! T, W; `6 e Prioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type,8 D3 E2 @( D& L+ f7 O& D) B predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact.+ e7 R# n. n: n- w8 `5 f) b( u6 B PRN Pseudo Random Noise. $ Q/ T. ^+ }* R. ~7 PPRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office. , D7 y5 G" [# f X, uProbability of / I- P# o$ j7 yDamage {$ e) t2 ~# w1 \/ QThe probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or + K& N) \7 a- B/ ~+ t0 _as a decimal. ) w9 g! H) o: I; }% S4 p, N7 RProbability of % d& C9 i" q. p& C* E# F6 cDetection6 d q* r' X$ A. v& k (1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given8 b, E/ Q1 d n& s conditions if it is in the area searched. l5 j# i; s! [. k4 n# p( Z, h4 Q! v% H(2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise e5 k# t8 q6 S" t0 Osources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |只看该作者
Probability of ) z4 @$ O9 u' U3 S7 @" {! eDiscrimination % A7 j7 C' R0 @4 NThis is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly : n) j0 f0 Y4 A) ridentified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is ; g& ^5 P1 \# P" Zquantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the ( B' l. V8 z$ u6 hprobability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is # Y/ G5 _+ r9 w* @' c3 kindistinguishable from the decoy).6 v& r: z# X3 B+ y Probability of $ r: U2 M4 r8 z8 T. U& W4 DFalse Alarm1 o# S e! F6 i9 ?" y8 r (1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected 6 u6 J" J- `: \7 @6 Nwhen no object is present. : W- A/ {3 |( U9 Z5 k(2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a - S/ X2 X0 m, ^$ M8 t1 |0 Zthreatening object will be identified as one. ; R) N! E7 v: ~# I0 C6 CProbability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles,8 W+ C5 a8 y6 ^4 E8 f$ ~/ z. g ordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate ) T% w$ ]) |3 A1 o, j6 g& uclose enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense) N" d Q- s. A& s, |6 V Systems Management College)( j- m8 ~4 O& N( z9 x R Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS.$ w; @, G! n$ C PROC Procurement.; O* p1 U) [9 [' ^ Process Data 7 u, N" Y( ?/ U. o1 I8 B( vSensitivity Label' h) |) P3 X1 q# W+ f1 x1 A6 {4 f (PDSL). T7 d4 Z$ D8 Z The sensitivity label for data contained in a process. * [4 P* P$ L+ F+ PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P% P ?3 n1 N1 w+ T4 X' u; H$ s 231; X0 P6 n+ R+ | }* X) v PROCMT Procurement.0 p$ c& o+ J0 _! z# g/ V Procuring ! |9 V% v. @1 c' ~2 J6 |; r% y, CContracting9 v, \5 P g T: ` Officer (PCO) ; _* e: U+ p, a6 G& LThe individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on 5 V2 }- E7 U- o sbehalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for" q0 V1 ], H! @ overall procurement of the contract.5 O. W+ j2 c, {- \$ w, H: g Prod Production.1 v- D' V5 A: z" v+ y/ m Producibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is : G2 Q: |' A6 Y" Rgoverned by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical# l, ?& i# |4 c* y! U* a7 ?- L fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing+ Z* B4 { J% Z techniques./ V0 V; M- G; L$ k7 ` Producibility,; X8 K* V/ }* e( S8 n Engineering, and 3 M# Z) t; G, j5 v$ E/ DPlanning (PEP) 1 T* O$ H4 m& b, AApplies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering 7 k4 L7 j% H% ]/ c: Qtransition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning& _8 _4 Z5 `* N7 |# H engineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required ; L8 F+ A& K' W4 W3 c& z {quantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will. j2 A: r$ u0 H+ P( Y3 S meet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification 7 V- F& I9 w4 v" ^constraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to, G+ N* G7 |: {* |$ Y$ j3 K; T. E identify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production 1 q6 s% W% K; k6 @9 x9 i8 \ echanges or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process. . D2 `8 x [' B9 A7 g1 n+ a1 jProducibility, + ` [+ a- ?, N7 lProgramming,, [. r% T; p* k- x8 ~, O F and Issues g8 K, S. p7 y( [; R+ m6 k# @ O. _; GResolution # O3 L& k' T4 @6 ^: m# yStrategies; \3 Q9 H( [$ \* l (PPIRS) O% F4 P/ m! }9 o M& _, R A semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium. ?) i( w- C, X" z% J1 P0 B0 I and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M ' h* u8 s: M: f, x, tWorking Group.+ z8 X$ s, `" B" q& N; ? Producibility1 d! y" f; k. {( y0 k" s! ` Review' V1 [- _* F' h- O X3 m, U A feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to2 t: R- ~1 _ r4 d. ]/ z$ o determine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology+ f L. v) b. [ considering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a 1 c1 g6 t% w( j9 X; vgeneric term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system $ S" B4 d. q: l" j7 hdesign reviews. - [( e r, n( h7 P% V* VProduct Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration3 M/ P" t5 K* r# B2 k D item. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline, ~; B( c: a& ~8 `8 ?7 J8 K (type E spec), type C spec, and drawings. 8 ?1 T6 x; }: o; ]1 N ~4 U(2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical' Q, X' i( O, R: d documentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a }# |' z* j( v1 Lconfiguration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and& q3 K- x2 \% }# E logistic support of its life cycle. ) T+ N- v; a. u wProduct2 a/ U; y/ N+ y* U# V Configuration - ^" a. {4 ~- H4 R' W7 M0 mIdentification / j7 I) a; H: W) V# s. ?The current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration, Z- S$ ?3 Z6 m* s! D of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and, c0 L0 u* G. y/ X. ` logistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for:, o% o U7 y" \; Y fit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected * b; V. B9 a2 x& q$ |8 nfunctional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production" ~) z }& U" d- @' ^3 v+ ~+ h$ c acceptance test.7 e1 X5 s& F! j4 e6 t( q/ F Product8 n/ }& x: Z+ w6 n {2 H Improvement# K3 C& u& R( T r' Q Effort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on! D8 i: K! a$ y! N end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than , H: n; t: f6 @developmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend1 b( D4 w& _% T useful military life. Usually results from user feedback.: v h0 X+ ^) A& I% i) ?1 ]9 p MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' p! d3 { X5 `232/ }+ W, L; X. {6 Y- o6 m Product Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority " |6 ^! ]+ A$ c' y% cand assigned responsibility for centralized management of a6 K7 \9 N1 E# f" N4 g e5 S0 ` development/acquisition program that does not qualify for3 o$ P0 s$ O0 f8 ?% ^5 J: v: U system/program/project management. 0 C% t, o3 z( }4 c* J5 E# C7 kProduct Security % ^6 A B9 A4 ~2 P8 |9 W2 e(PRODSEC)9 m6 A, p8 L/ c _ That physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost, 9 P! S: U+ A( a2 h9 m) u. Z% X' bpolitically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of 2 U4 S. ~1 r( t. G! s- ]Defense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential 3 g/ u5 W8 U; Zto the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-5 14:31 , Processed in 0.044002 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部