航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. / ~4 j7 R' z7 C L2 U# C* r& QSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). : k! A! R f5 A(2) Science and Technology Objective. ) \# m! ^. Z N" YSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and Transportation " r9 x% _) W& _ } F4 A" fEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient / k9 F& U4 T- d/ q& ~; [( Yenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during . H7 M9 q+ {1 {- m; R$ @storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ( x( P) v* |# b- R! z# ^atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 0 ]/ e6 r( P& f( O1 E! xduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 4 C, D, p3 S. dshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. " q* H7 N0 d3 ?1 E6 w: qStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. - G% q- w. |+ JSTRATCOM Strategic Command. 5 k7 P3 ?& I1 R* B4 c6 iStrategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 7 ?' w T0 Y2 n8 Z$ w' W lballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. - C$ t. a0 g% a& z# uStrategic Defense 9 \4 |* l+ y! T0 cEmergency % g+ Q" D; ?% J' o8 G( \0 q4 gDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System X8 a8 A" D+ u! W' [2 L(SDS) 0 k5 {! K$ p' w* F, `( H u# [* I* f' bA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of 8 Y( F* k3 W+ L9 j! b1 ?War * c% T7 a1 S/ M0 s9 f, c" b* R0 |" qThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 4 F; R0 K, b8 D" D& _6 Eaccomplish those objectives. 4 z6 l+ s5 ]4 a# T# U6 wStrategic Offensive Forces (SOF) 5 e4 x9 ?' [, X$ i" _# |. zThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, % S! ]1 A# ~% |3 g( Kthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific # k! J& y1 A6 `3 x2 t, C% gCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic + j e% H- g$ HReserve + o3 E- `' ?6 W) I0 Q0 O2 `That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to , j: [( V7 Z1 _8 S0 r4 y5 Zstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply ; O. `3 t9 [6 u( t# @( l) u( ^! K0 e7 xdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. ) q d# A" P3 e' ^8 X mStrategic Warning - A t, \( V; F/ I0 W( ]A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 1 c6 J0 ?) l; E6 \" X$ Phostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. ; x! Y% m! r' Y9 gStrategic 9 `1 Z# g9 G8 k: X2 j% \, y oWarning Post- Decision Time - N- e+ g, [! ?8 kThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 3 m8 L3 C/ O4 x( |' twith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 1 C7 g. N, [: Y. Iwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 5 K" k s. Y$ Dnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- Decision Time 8 p4 C4 y, e5 W* k. NThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time 5 l) w% S0 q( C0 aavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course {. M3 `: w5 jof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. % u* y6 o; Y/ ? z s4 J% B+ @* YSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured 2 `/ z( y8 @4 X* eAttack ) X0 G; d3 G4 L) N) M: `; c9 g7 [An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design 3 R1 K' G, \$ B' O& @$ |5 w- YA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules / c$ g1 S5 w' i Tbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured $ j7 X. Y+ u( c5 p, |" u) ^1 IProgram . @* W" X# K% b m& e( pA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 7 _+ C' `9 X6 r+ Hsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more # f/ v e8 q8 f H( ~+ jinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or $ @8 }8 W! [2 {5 g4 Psequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of ! c+ H; E% o. a; `8 |instructions. & ~0 B$ i& B8 x5 u3 {5 S1 TSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 5 J8 m4 R& C1 @3 s' bSTS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + U5 U; z1 V1 t4 _281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 3 S7 h; U1 V/ h YSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 8 o1 _0 v" h8 @1 ?) MSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which 4 m2 l0 g! l% B4 wis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be & e6 l) T% V) ^4 e$ W" ~dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. 6 K# c! n. z6 k' [" oSubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile 9 Y) n( S0 J2 h( J' \1 y(SLBM) / K0 `1 K9 c( E7 P; t6 X9 PA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. * p% @9 x. x, e3 ]) C' n5 @SUBROC Submarine Rocket. ! E' l0 V7 w6 j8 pSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. : H' ^) p4 W8 q8 H6 ]SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 3 _2 B( U0 ^! t4 A9 FSuccession of Command # E1 q b7 H# s, GThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, + ?: w/ p9 A! k* _1 z% k) D+ Hbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 9 g/ d( x* P+ @& D+ His a synonymous term. 6 N5 k+ K0 H& l. \' ?( WSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). 7 B$ O7 c3 B6 l" z0 LSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two + q/ k% C ~8 q7 M: j6 halternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to # P1 ^, { @6 b: \# ~' i: idecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). : t M# _( {' [% e+ B5 WSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 4 M$ O" n8 _ R, lsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 5 m5 e, {: H! l { F: ZSuperradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional - ^8 T* P( ~* `0 `; `lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser # {$ M8 E4 D* sbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. : H- J& R% M0 V( `, FSupervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. ) q3 h' k& x' ~) ^2 S: kSupplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. $ a4 ~% v- d, t- D6 ]% ESupport Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 7 \( s% Q9 e: d" ]" }mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and * B+ Y b; l, m3 N0 V1 D/ B* y& _1 kprotection equipment). 0 `% r: `& P# B# W7 c& M2 n# sSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly 4 E& e- X! E, w: G% u; passociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous & _, T" I* T2 moperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, ; k1 O3 F! r+ _7 _administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 9 f x/ ?4 B- f: a! u. Aexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or * b) r+ _; @( u3 nmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess & n5 d+ P! m1 H5 ?. _; d$ {production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. $ ~9 j5 q# S1 X0 }6 V' }Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance ! k9 N! Y+ u" v6 h! cRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. * z2 h$ A' O0 S# e9 \" `. iSurveillance, Satellite and , A7 L. `$ V# j1 T& M9 ?Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, . B: u! B/ n% }$ @* @3 }% yand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites , J7 F( Q9 W: r: Y3 c4 Eand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration $ A) x( A/ Q$ |1 u8 \The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated ; h7 z9 @* e1 _' a, Q; gin the surveillance system. ! G$ L) D a6 `1 [- u- ]1 _; JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; j/ p5 R+ f( F6 n3 T. M9 Y283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes - {* S4 N6 [! a7 t! {that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. ; y* k) Z2 y. n G% ISurvivable and Enduring 9 n3 R/ _/ g6 BCommand Center (SECC) + N: B/ }" P$ T# {1 D! P; YThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. . J0 M. I0 J2 Z: [- S" U$ a. ~- ^SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. . j4 Y" G' D! }+ [9 mSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating % g3 E. i3 _8 M M9 Nband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 7 Q; S. h8 e; N6 w- ]' KSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. - l' Y) l5 n1 o7 a! o) bSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to / g, V' F9 @. `. c m; Vone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. , r9 l3 c( }) Z! i6 ^) z2 K. WSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where l0 S T. S5 U8 j5 D/ l* L" |each module description has associated implementations. 8 N$ Q3 Y% j( V5 ?) r+ x e* k9 s8 ASynthetic , a& j" g, r1 b1 n" iAperture Radar # S+ z9 D0 J8 `* ]- w; |+ g(SAR) ) g) ^- ^9 [+ lA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points ; g& b' z% m+ m6 ]* z9 Malong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 6 e- S5 `- H K' S1 H* y. r: ctheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 9 ]9 Q0 r9 C1 k/ {3 `between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for ; C* H0 N e+ z! @2 A- b r( Dtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. $ L% A5 \/ Y+ L) G9 i6 _9 K) Q% n8 Q( LSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 % N7 [7 u; ~) z* T9 _SYSCOM Systems Command. / r% F/ ? }; _0 x s( YSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, % j0 Y" p* [+ {: L; J. ^and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a 5 c: _5 ^$ F" K# t# crequirement. System Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. : N; K8 s1 k9 jSystem Architecture System + J3 ^& I0 W7 L Y* W3 v& s6 jCapability $ s8 g" U& o% G0 j9 o5 M0 JSpecification 4 I7 L; A! O7 l; \(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational : G- ~. ]& n# ^) B& penvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional ' U0 P' I: l: V; q4 Cspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. $ \ B- }2 y& h- D/ h* ZSystem Center (SC) 8 N* I: s! u8 T; v0 }3 w1 DA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide ( g' h( `" t7 g7 b; C, }; csensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) * Y. l% S+ E7 `. hOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 2 s! L) g: w- t* e/ udemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System ; F! i0 n" Y- QConfiguration G, ?* r- A# T) F4 i( s1 tControl Board " D6 y' ^) s9 L3 |(SCCB) 1 K0 }5 o5 W* q; {1 tThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. G4 ~: {5 o, G5 T. DSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical ! u. m# Q% {) P% PFunction ! o" [. O/ A- g+ f; [A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. 5 z5 j) u7 L" i( jSystem Definition Review (SDR) 5 O- Q' J+ I$ p2 ^7 hThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the " g/ \; e$ `# }; j$ bsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, ' z0 B& ~$ Q9 ]8 _( m8 S8 N7 Qdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, ' x5 K$ }& d' Z( Yfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. % Z2 N; Y8 R% k# u' b/ mSystem . c# A% C/ p% {& q" f( |Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 0 `5 w: B+ {; i0 X7 f d9 C: ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 $ p& }- |8 g3 }: t* rSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, " p3 b) W( L$ `, r: Jcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy ) b0 W3 U/ k' k$ }specified system requirements. $ E0 t2 U3 Y9 S9 \8 t; C(2) The result of the system design process. + ?1 Y n* j7 P; `3 Z' JSystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be ; h7 Z( S( m% i" hoperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ; @: D6 X6 x- @7 u' d8 pSystem Design Review (SDR) 0 e0 ^) Y& Y- Y9 Q! UEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with 6 A. T' [" [2 ?9 J. hthe allocated technical requirements. 2 K B1 A6 Z) u: i2 VSystem Effectiveness - c' v2 f+ d- y7 T" ^5 Q: ^The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 3 v* [& t6 {+ O, F! [ G; Pcapability. System Evolution ) I; v1 [) e: Y% b2 a$ VPlan (SEP) 9 f4 |, M$ D; X3 Y( {' ~' CThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS + q5 i0 b/ o% D" D0 Tcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 9 z* L! d" `7 Gassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 0 |8 v# O* d/ V# a3 wsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome ; i7 F/ [8 q# U8 w$ B j! Mthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share : Q4 V8 N9 J o7 ^- k1 R, pa set of common characteristics. 9 t2 m7 I3 ^* W% S( [/ USystem Generated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local * g& N8 D2 C- L& E- m4 s- Q6 B1 Nfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the 3 A& V% X% W9 J3 F0 z3 [primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System + j, O+ }" a9 QIntegration Test " r! \% u0 z/ ?+ T7 NA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 5 k; n% I7 s& a3 _/ Isensors, and weapon hardware. 7 q- g% B) e% S/ S' C5 q' T# kSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 8 E. [: k6 f3 Hand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 0 J$ ~/ y# r' t6 O, R7 t. \% ]equipment systems. - N0 y9 z* O1 d1 w3 sSystem Operational Concept A5 _/ |" v# @$ nA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, ~4 e* W* _6 k7 J, c+ p8 _/ d; pdeployment, and support of a system. 3 j# k: x' j: f2 o. H$ R& y4 USystem Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) 8 r9 D+ @" q5 ]% }The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 6 B8 t3 b, M7 Sbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 1 G" v, D; [( M+ ?/ f+ h; j0 KSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 8 I# r3 E& s7 r' a" L" e/ k" ABMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 " S. \1 d' q+ w' n3 VSystem Program Office (SPO) + D G8 R/ m# ?: y; Q n5 a) @The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, }4 N, u9 Z5 f9 p0 g! {$ Y; hgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 5 ^0 O7 F4 V3 u5 W! Hprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness * ]" j: \1 w% Y, P7 I0 p" i7 e' PSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out + d. _% L& V( Z5 e+ Sthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It - @! M0 ?5 p& w" P- Xincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational ' u! m; P- K S9 }0 Y/ mstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under 8 x/ Q8 e- n4 Qrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies # C1 V6 S# y" U% i+ sand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results ' q# T, ]$ {9 I+ c5 b) Hstatus reporting. ) g$ R' f9 d) RSystem 4 h0 Y/ [# y: n# v: UReadiness Objective * o, [5 |2 O$ xA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and % k' {4 P' M' I# f# M* mmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support & d4 ?5 N u `system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of ! O6 X$ j: n, Y2 lsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements 9 p8 K+ |& J! f7 N; i: U) NAnalysis (SRA) 8 j/ R3 P/ B: d% O: ]& @An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System * O6 x" D; i0 y! dConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) ) Q7 }, I. A3 ^1 h: g, `6 V0 oConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. / K& d" a" K+ A- E/ iDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security $ a+ Q: a" X: d/ ^: h. O5 fEngineering (SSE) , P0 |/ p9 Z6 v( |( L5 _An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. , Z/ q- K6 v+ }4 A0 ^System Security Engineering Management % O, C3 v1 w* YProgram (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical 6 X- W7 o/ A8 Q( [: T$ rachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE - h. m8 e( [" [, P& F+ {program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 6 `" i9 A( u0 a# E! G3 }resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides & w+ \5 E: k& H3 ^% Cmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. # o- x; N! r7 x; DSystem Security 1 }5 x# i0 O. H/ ^+ j7 }6 y7 Z8 WManagement 4 ^ Q& q5 a3 z; YPlan (SSMP) ) l) G$ }" [6 \) v$ T1 W2 C, j+ GA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to $ h; z* v' S; L2 q; C9 m3 c) S: Imeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 4 f& H6 R% R3 J* Z! ~: nother program engineering, design and management activities, and related $ c! Y: Q N" r: ]* B5 {systems. Systems . [- _& Z# x6 z2 X, REngineering 1 d0 q+ T% E& V& O# {. qAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. . n( C4 M. u7 o- qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 7 m# j: A# P" `! r ESystems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) ! Y8 y3 x5 W8 M9 R+ lIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) 0 z7 ?9 W' d& b& g% E( s7 |: O) l" I, QKey engineering milestones and schedules. . s: q. m' \. {2 l: cSystems Test # }2 X8 {9 [) P0 V2 x( E NIntegration and Coordination ' C! O# w+ b- A, @9 SThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. & ?! W* [# k9 o, Y3 WSystem Threat % R3 }3 e. H6 L6 e3 ^6 |Assessment * G. p: w; A9 D0 {Report (STAR) , |/ p1 L$ i; R6 I" c0 \Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a - y! U, t, e% x# GService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency ; e1 X; Y# H& N% |and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. 3 f$ E0 k. a" o0 y# _5 BSystem-Valued 0 Y7 l& `+ Z7 i) V& j4 v. x* `% HAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 0 w+ f& @( n8 E$ h" z0 T" n& P j3 mthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! n- O6 G2 v6 U288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. " N$ _+ a4 O' C/ V) |+ iT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. ) `' K; ^# U% G. M; d* y/ |0 \T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. ' d5 m3 C" c) S7 E8 b/ F3 \T/R Transmit/Receive. 2 s! \7 A. T" q8 A1 LT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 8 @3 C" T7 k& L% p) j! P* w6 XT ' w) G! L. h0 F& F1 m7 a/ P2 4 m! J% J# Z8 u) i( ^! tTechnology Transfer. T ( y! L& O i! m/ |2 E Technical Training Equipment. ! {+ N5 B6 {- ^TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. ( J' p+ x. P) F, s4 XTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. 9 d; ^; }* m9 F* @) S* l& fTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. $ f8 {: ~$ o( }$ x: f3 v/ d" m7 XTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. 3 k) B' ]( D' cTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 7 P# S3 U/ b! I2 Z/ q HTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 3 x" |/ `7 S' p: |9 g, Q3 KTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. 0 D& U3 [7 @ x/ p* R8 pTACS Theater Air Control System. + M$ @6 f p0 w4 C' P/ VMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. " K3 e4 m* l7 e5 G- P- o1 ITACSIM Tactical Simulation % v; r) w$ M2 @4 J7 mTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with F; B( k. U1 B' K8 n3 uground or naval forces. Tactical Air Operations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control " h: ^! K) P, ?; Q/ j; ~$ ]- WSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ' ^( O5 V6 X, }; E; ]" Kdefense operations in an assigned sector. h4 o. s v& c" R+ A& m# ~Tactical Air ! R- ]0 C2 h, _1 e! R2 qSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly " Q }7 _* h; J" z9 x+ g4 Y* I1 I! \% oassist land or maritime operations. ) c! w Q4 |5 a/ f. N" L }Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) $ n" Z- n& J# U) U+ jA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 8 [; U7 D+ r" aemployed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future ; H0 e# I- l' {1 \7 t' l, Qdevelopment of tactical doctrine. , [4 z: ? v' G6 x" W E: YTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or % X% J K1 h7 n2 a* ~) S5 v+ K. Jmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link , @7 G1 T' J+ ^6 z( [. NA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area / k8 X8 W1 v @$ N! {(TOA) * z, ^& R& Q+ K1 h, Z( f3 ^( eThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations $ T% i9 n9 \) _) b, uarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission ! W! Y- h8 F! d* \7 M" Q2 x# K: daccomplishment. , a) Q8 y c- L% O9 _# x4 RTactical # q5 v& f% X- q' u- g3 A' L VOperations Center (TOC) O4 v: h g9 |5 @+ V0 e% LA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. ; I- _8 X" S8 ^4 H, HTactical Warning " h4 }/ S% c/ l) U* {' a$ d(TW) 7 h% z& n- v3 l2 d2 D4 ](1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. 1 V8 G6 N# v7 ]6 d7 L(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component / ^9 v! d2 c9 G. C/ p' o& Lelements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type 2 V8 K. E8 }& k* Z" }and size, country under attack, and event time. 3 `% a+ J9 C8 q9 X) Y3 w" L3 P3 eTactical ) r) i. N) s& X; _1 W) E# FWarning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) 8 n: U2 ?$ q" O) s2 NA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 4 s; W; {1 X" r3 O290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. % c g1 b# [5 j2 Z0 V" u; ?" ~& p(2) Theater Air Defense. 1 n ~$ x; j E! F& h(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 1 T, g3 D; o3 D$ ^: t/ w% rTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ( A" x$ k& I$ T/ O9 cTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. $ |! U, y! ?7 L) ZTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. . @1 C, \/ w; R* DTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. ' t+ t4 E* X3 p# ?: _2 `TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 6 ^* r& m C8 G) pTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 9 o* Y9 K. A% P* F7 hTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” # b8 T0 a. g8 h ETADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. # @9 k3 @) K" VTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. % E# {) b( ?! |/ i* [% i/ C2 ATADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. 7 r3 N5 F3 h4 YTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. # s4 `+ o% L4 r$ d# H6 @$ lTAI International Atomic Time. : \/ W: u/ w/ B3 sTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector 7 t' C5 |+ O8 v6 x) rand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. % d% I* d- b( o; E8 \" i* O% vTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 7 _7 v( y1 u4 [3 d4 m9 JTank Fragmentation 5 |- F, i* k& B- N" f& L& hThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 6 C% V, G6 E8 E [TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. , k: G7 L, q$ s a! h5 vTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. : {# X' ]6 A n- E6 DTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. - M, C( J9 @* K6 Z& q(2) Threat Activity Report. , b0 o! S3 ?4 _8 l7 P(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition * ]. L9 d0 x* m1 S" Y8 p1 |The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 5 e# B! J4 j3 f1 j% x" r" dregion of a sensing system. Target " C w+ C" d: ]Classification : u! E7 D; j5 Z! z9 X: wand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. ; Y& n6 V0 m. g4 b0 N8 MTarget ! j0 x: i4 V2 h: x% T! }Discrimination / p- n; g* m# [1 W zThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. & ]4 w0 ]# L; K0 q3 ~% h! ]6 ?/ rTarget Object Map (TOM) 4 U6 \$ c# @! s1 SA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) % J! C5 b4 W& G! R9 W$ O- q+ \Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and ) d0 ?( q7 |+ }3 Oidentification equipment. 9 _8 ^& h/ x" o1 A(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System & x2 _7 {" z7 a; aRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD ) u: n+ @2 G* h) `& E$ DProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. ( A+ e0 {3 u x6 PTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance $ c; N. c' R# ?- V8 o9 m Kto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 0 C E. V8 P! _; {- A& d- Y$ {2 w) vengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 8 H# @( C8 w& Z5 wrequired performance. 6 v' O% W! x; I; S7 H- tTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. - B9 r: \; ~% }5 J3 L$ d4 J. qTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ! }! v' Y- K5 c1 @9 T3 F! g/ G, L3 }TAT Technical Area Task. 7 Q) [* S$ i$ d& {8 ~# fTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. ; B; ?) v0 U6 X& W' A* ATAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 ' L7 P( s+ Z7 a: j9 aTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. * R" N6 V7 A, s: P4 e0 FTB Test Bed. 2 M( ~$ E# E& J, b7 kTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ' C) q0 d4 D7 o% \TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 9 C, h; z6 A; a8 I- b3 PTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 5 W2 q; k1 g& d3 n8 r' _; GTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 5 o9 {+ W. z+ h, U& z6 L. ](2) To Be Supplied. 4 F: S9 H+ A% |9 } Y6 o(3) To Be Scheduled . ( W4 R% M% }( f vTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. 5 @8 ^: k7 d* ^- x* ^/ bTCC Tactical Command Center. 1 T U0 n1 Z% r1 T+ |3 D% O9 LTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. ( t6 P+ u6 ]) `2 G& c9 dTCF Tactical Combat Force. . ?6 Y/ J1 h; L7 s8 Q, P. q* jTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 4 j6 j, {1 V+ G* _TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. G9 `5 r0 t) U(4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. ; |$ M% i* Y1 j) p9 ?7 RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 ) ~, \+ b& I; R8 _: KTDBM Track Data Base Manager. # N Q; k! ~2 i5 A, A7 O" lTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. 6 ]+ Y6 G; P# L3 L/ H(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 5 H! t; Q2 i2 A, zTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. . `7 S" t; I! z3 w6 `TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). ( E9 V2 y, b# M% y# pTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. ( P! d6 F4 r" m/ S6 o+ \(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 6 x2 n, d6 c( p. }; h) ^TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. {. h3 w) J+ ATDT Target Development Test. / n" O2 O) ?3 N& i5 H% A. STDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. # S+ D! q _# Y8 eTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 0 E0 {; U; T; p g+ n" E/ DTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. 7 m. j7 T0 b0 l7 y" O& R$ j" tTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical * i$ T, ?/ C" d2 U; xTECHON Technical Control. % N% k# B% e. n8 X* wTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). $ Q2 [" P$ d7 {4 `# TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as ; d* X# s# l) \5 I6 e6 n( @3 O2 ^manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not + J( L( ~9 s9 i, w( _" t O4 E, itechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ( A- w9 g6 @# }$ J# GAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines : ]0 a; q, k G9 o% y3 othe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 7 h! T4 o- A' B3 W \) Z% pperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, * n3 Y1 r: r# c( ?- lassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality $ X: l. N6 |: t! Yassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical 2 {( V7 l, O" sEvaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) * e3 ?" C, h( D4 PTechnical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & v- g. C8 H4 |; I: LGoals (TOG) ) n' X( K( ~! CHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 4 n7 u: }4 G' P# E9 H `- idevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by - p- y* a! m. Y; D1 _1 o9 Fmanagement. 3 o/ g6 ]4 p+ p( a; a% [Technical Performance 7 X! A3 y \0 h( j* BMeasurement (TPM) : d# h- J* H6 c SDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures $ H8 Q8 W% O/ l6 H' sdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product $ f0 D: c9 K9 A' W3 Yelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these . @5 s* y! _( ^% ^4 H! zdifferences on system effectiveness. 2 w( ]! N- C n: r$ d7 _Technical 9 Q7 S5 |8 I/ B' K! ^& ySpecification 7 ~4 q& q- y7 m! A XA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 5 L& P* z2 p1 L, {the basis for actual design development and production. ' h: K% q3 ^/ U6 STechnical Surveillance 7 C* e9 i- }( Y7 R# X5 `0 PIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise $ ^2 z' I/ B6 r$ U6 j. etargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology ! n4 S* K6 A9 `* W7 }! y5 g0 Q, oExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. Technology Program Description % }3 f1 \& ?9 }) \& H5 H( L: OThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 7 C- Z$ y. R- G4 m, Q# zsupporting technology. 7 N8 G9 V+ J7 P8 c3 UTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. * g) x7 G1 y2 c U9 {5 \TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ' b8 q- J* Q) e, ~1 JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , h5 }( S& d9 F7 ~0 D295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. * | x: |" U' l1 d. bTelemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit " U: t/ K9 h* imission commands to the satellite. 0 }" D) K# ^% }0 J8 ]+ BTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 0 ^2 ~. C4 W, L' P+ bTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. & N) u% D' A& ?5 d2 _0 i1 N5 wTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) ; P. S+ n: Y ATENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. % S( j3 |: @* `" S8 Z: gTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. 6 Z) R' K+ q9 V6 R" Z) ?3 FTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between & W" J6 q* G# @ h& R0 ratmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the & _2 G- k. `; E1 ]( evicinity of the target. 8 o1 A' G. N- e$ ?& R6 @Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase 6 s+ {) N( s' t5 h# VInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy . ^$ m9 ?5 S5 K8 U6 ZPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 4 }/ G. B x6 S+ G2 D3 hTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. # M! A- _" S% CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , k1 l2 d/ i: `5 @# P& g296 / K3 f D! q8 v. Q5 NTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all 2 T$ {' |1 k5 p, U1 L* {/ roperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. / g8 L5 X4 q1 _* }# ETest and $ ]& D/ I1 G- q( QEvaluation (T&E) 9 ]; _) T1 u* r' |3 G" k+ jProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, # x( @$ Y$ M( [8 Nand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 2 L' ^7 k \- E" n, A+ \requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 9 M9 U* i: s$ ]$ `' A) c8 Y7 ?or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 8 Q# B Z: o4 P! [) e(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before & l* l {% o& Z( \the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of - P3 i; A( |6 ?* Uoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test * F$ _: u2 b7 ^) d0 sconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 4 {" l x8 z* K7 K% {& B- s( _- Oenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 7 L# W# m% w1 e9 mFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 2 k" n( }$ G7 j' rand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of K3 |4 g- H( d; o) edeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and & q9 u5 n" Q6 C# j* M+ L AEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) 2 @+ @% U7 U% _1 h3 a# GAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate $ d& ?' w6 N! `) u' Wobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 6 ^; X9 m& N% i5 B+ ]+ Bto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and 6 j, b9 p0 G( h5 wEvaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 8 |! H" ?7 Y: X# M# tplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the & d, _, q" l8 g9 V1 L! a. E( YAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of 3 P! R8 v6 n6 f3 D1 [. v \test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test $ ^( Q: z9 z0 }) Z+ `- Tintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 1 W" S5 U+ ~% b6 a3 ^( }program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 3 f6 v; I, X1 f8 w* U- Nrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals : X# V. y* ]7 \* y$ Mwhen there are T&E implications. % K) v [9 M/ q& w1 s8 OTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. - |* d/ Y2 F6 D9 L" N, CTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ( q3 U" \0 X9 E: I; Rorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 7 y7 O6 f8 \7 D" ~( jdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation * m. U! G z, d$ _criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 7 V& p+ |: f% `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 2 J/ g) v m' U4 E# {! CTest Target Vehicle (TTV) $ e3 {* y) P, f" sSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for $ a5 `; u' i n7 _* r" }SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. / l6 _& m# _: QTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. : S$ l$ y" h! d! h) ~$ V) ?TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. " U7 ?. ]) I: z, ^: Y* UTF Task Force. ' Z2 A) W+ h' H; |% ^4 A2 `TFC Tactical Fusion Center. / t O1 S3 q, O' DTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 6 ]9 U3 a. O" L& rTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. & q% u, k s G/ w) L9 b' kTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 9 T$ b6 p- b+ ]4 c$ R; h2 N0 j! LTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. ! R. X$ b. b( A- f/ _TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 0 E( `2 j$ T# o1 G0 p: q7 y3 mTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. ) ]6 m& ^ ^# S0 F" e9 N) V: n- ]" R* YTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 2 `2 y1 u* O/ J* {4 a* G& H: a& Y {Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. / L H6 o P2 A& O+ F& d(USSPACECOM)