航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, / ~8 ]+ F. ?: N+ L ^Handling, and % C' P. A3 w5 sTransportation Environments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 1 h/ ?% \7 b/ H$ @4 ]/ r+ _environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 5 ?# V S8 j% g9 n8 Q# sstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable . C4 Z- X5 I; S: q3 b3 natmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 1 _- R- C$ h6 K5 m+ iduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 6 ]6 b( X2 t8 `/ L0 a: Z5 ?shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. ; Y2 y2 Z5 T! [# WStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. ) d1 U6 ]" B/ _0 j+ z9 r7 tSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). }. Z3 P/ \* N7 f4 B: ]1 WSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. . ]4 [* L0 z( g) ^& R1 J' pSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. A9 n' x: E. U9 j5 \$ LSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic 3 k1 f$ F% X t' [3 V5 bDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 6 C1 p! z+ m& ?- f: X: s1 u! ` snullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic ; l! [4 a7 O, Q2 RDefense Emergency 4 G$ w7 v$ e# E1 S7 z9 U+ I+ IDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. . k4 b* E6 k: {Strategic ' v: |) I3 P& F+ d8 U' s, B9 gDefense System 8 M+ z% q# N! W9 U* u: j(SDS) , X: c7 Y5 f* U4 CA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving 3 b5 w* ~8 h D o( fballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of War . O6 N& q3 U7 B: {, pThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ) a' c0 i7 y1 M6 i5 y2 qalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ; i: W1 V0 z/ i+ Raccomplish those objectives. Strategic ' \+ h8 y2 i/ L0 I' SOffensive Forces ( G; I* _! Z; j- o% A2 r! c(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, % E) `2 q% U% r% mFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic 4 S- s) u" Z- U0 V0 r+ t' RReserve ) t3 ]; ~( f0 c! Q8 i1 I$ cThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 6 C( ~9 u. {4 [& c: q( Gstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply . `9 t, o* z- P- l* n3 Z' udistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic Warning " J. a2 y2 X/ G0 S+ c) a. f7 e6 QA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead , \5 J7 J; {% z% ~: D# RTime 6 m3 n2 w( T7 M. YThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 5 p) X ?. U/ D1 oStrategic ( V7 p% O9 x9 d; }) j, zWarning Post- Decision Time , U8 G( |, |& c, ]7 ]: QThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 0 ?7 d/ a0 c' kwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 9 f: o. g5 ?' q8 Q: k9 A: Uwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the , t, U, k; E7 e3 v0 g4 Z' R' R9 Knational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in ! _" n+ L2 R0 N, ]: Q- ]4 ^the pre-decision period. ) {. z- x4 H0 y1 @- c- q9 {Strategic 2 K* x7 j' j2 h- {/ R- d I5 D% ^Warning Pre- ( Q, F, \/ m! U h3 YDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course f; d6 c# p3 ~/ Kof action to be executed. ! m" ^8 u9 d: S! M' f, v) D1 xSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 3 g6 |9 @/ M. d- O, ?* M- t! gStructured ; D& @9 `) }* UAttack 1 p9 D* \% I) O0 a2 aAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. ' s( r; G; X- C7 p1 ?7 pStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules 1 }' m5 a5 F$ \" I' Y8 jbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program ; u% V6 V9 X. ]' r% o1 a! T- fA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one " A1 P6 m6 H# ^- ?entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 5 j* Z; _& W c) Q' e! t2 j* w* N* X; Xsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 8 J" x" I0 f& G; c tinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of $ r$ X6 g# j$ g% M2 H0 Ainstructions. . G/ F: T9 t5 \+ USTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. ! b; S: l. Z; e! R, ~1 ^STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 1 y( n9 k9 ~; s3 Q9 y281 6 m* u! z/ }) a( ?* @8 YSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 4 W, h! ^3 \8 t, } ~STU Secure Telephone Unit. * \) e- R- |( D7 l7 C$ lSTW Strike Warfare. 3 m) _$ x3 l) V, [7 C Z! _7 `, W/ PSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. ' O7 U4 e/ {) B* KSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which ' Q( d8 _/ ^: l; O, O+ g7 \, j6 gis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. % f5 R# C! C: c; ?0 e/ }/ jSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. $ ]5 C# a" \1 k: @1 G$ I& u) xSubject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it : R$ W. B5 [4 O0 J9 i0 Xhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) 3 n0 W3 D! }. l7 pA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 3 {0 b5 p) \5 y& L- C; k% S; V0 Qmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. + S& f' K3 |& v) @3 B( mSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function / D5 S" d) Q% J, J5 }: I; w1 pwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. + _) D5 C6 H! n% }" GSubtractive Defense 8 t6 b& p% ?8 p8 t* ]% ZFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. ( U6 W" w' e1 F# fSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 9 ?% g( E2 b5 O& u r+ ~Succession of # T' t! r& R" P( L$ e2 [Command 4 Y- X9 g8 @4 [( vThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, 1 P$ T8 Y# o4 sbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command G- ~( p5 ~% K) W# kis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two 8 N1 L! h0 k0 W( ^5 F) lalternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to 3 Z; t0 E* n3 E9 L& fdecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 2 B6 I; L( E: u* wSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, 0 f; d1 N `& T' Q% gthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super ' X" u+ y: o; g6 R# }# u2 mradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as ( ?, C) l1 P5 Y1 M+ `$ K8 B& v- p! }superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. i5 D- |. D* ~6 n( xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) 9 {! r( b; V9 eA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional , ` k; b6 |4 _" Plasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from - Z' Y% F4 o& I; Jsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory : O1 e0 _) t$ \$ {4 WPrograms ) L4 y: _2 R4 m) L( S7 \4 z: F) EComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and 7 r2 A3 ~7 M7 g; k! u" ~/ Bcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental Appropriation 7 w$ m s I1 X# zAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support 7 M& Y- i8 `$ \, R) |0 r2 JEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 1 F1 X. J) Z& C8 Q) }mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 9 G# a0 O+ p8 l3 Ctools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and - T2 a. W$ L2 c. ^protection equipment). Support Personnel $ B9 M+ z% G, H# [* X8 Y5 QIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, $ K- g! {$ l9 Vadministrative support, and the like. 8 w" r: U; X! Z# `" j0 }+ p% R. {( WSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, ; c' c6 V- H1 Z$ w$ d" _below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items , |5 S1 D7 ]$ N, adue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 5 m$ e# r) W8 U' P o5 i9 lproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, , L; ? E! `2 A' K4 b: P$ Sand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements , o( U$ r8 y' ?+ F& y) l8 f) }; wRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for 2 @, |/ c6 b# Z9 O/ Ycoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response 4 A9 F6 a# l! G, goptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, : O( [1 l5 S* X( VSatellite and , f1 ?1 I# Y4 a$ I% X, f; lMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 6 Z% q+ A8 C& \and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance : Y( o: c, A% r% { _" U2 {, U% wSystem Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S * p, \& b9 j: ]- Y; P% u283 Survivability : `+ a2 B4 D- Z% o4 X9 a6 LOperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and 4 ~( z0 O: c! p ?: J3 H8 C- KEnduring : _& T2 o0 y1 Z4 [. U4 G* HCommand Center " Q" q5 P1 o7 V3 ~(SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. ' L. _) R; ]+ l( G" J/ kSUS Site Utilization Study. 5 s! W! t' ?* M0 m" s cSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. - ~4 D( R/ k* ?SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. ( u4 T: Z; h1 R4 @SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 3 |' }8 R8 S! @1 g. B6 ~9 bSWC Strike Warfare Commander. " L; q1 A( c( ?7 {+ q/ d" W) `Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating $ A% y) g& {! T) _6 c: k/ A0 Vband of frequencies. 4 f2 i3 o! m3 `& R6 BSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 4 g4 F) y' M. U$ R0 MSWSC Space and Warning System Center. 5 f! Q+ |6 g1 h2 XSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to ( P0 y9 w0 S) ~* |: w+ m6 Aone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. , {3 ?5 W5 M" I$ T% uSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. U, u' E7 T s% `8 ^: zSynthetic 3 p9 c( R/ O; e/ m/ ^: UAperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 0 Z# j9 ?8 [; t7 X+ N% b: a o1 N$ falong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance " w! D, m1 \( _+ dbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal / i( e7 x2 V `( Xemitted by the radar transmitter. " E% K5 }; b3 b5 G. WSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. - Q: [5 S1 A8 w( W8 W1 B" BSys Cmn System Common. 3 f; f) n0 }- C ^% A4 ?( D8 c% G# aSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. : q+ e9 S% F. }' R0 W$ f/ ^5 iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 1 }% W+ M9 X0 H, g- q3 c& BSYSCOM Systems Command. ! x, i+ x. t% U+ }& o2 tSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, . U/ _9 [1 T. n7 |) e" Idata, and services needed to perform a designated function with ! g/ y" R# y* W5 E' I' Sspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, 9 v$ o0 [3 e- Iand delivery to users. ; n1 C: ]4 ^ ?/ g2 ~(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System . ~0 P7 B: D1 D5 lActivation & d! S& I2 ^1 g( T" E8 R; T+ MThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System * h. |: k5 f/ g5 f7 _Control. System Architecture System ( m C' ?$ `- D/ H1 o. H$ uCapability % c; Q4 z5 Z X1 c- bSpecification , @( d4 c' k# K6 t(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide & \7 a1 u# g0 i: y# Z/ c$ I2 tsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept + \2 d: s3 {: r [+ Q( uPaper (SCP) 6 o- q6 H2 R1 ^% _& lOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 2 |5 |+ h6 e7 N. Y3 g Tconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other + B3 l# V* c p& q( r" zconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 2 a0 Y: L: z/ y4 ^Configuration 1 j# ]9 U1 o7 w% I+ tControl Board # \/ f% D' B( v9 r2 _# t; Y* f(SCCB) 0 t' B/ n1 t* rThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and ) W/ ?( ^0 ^- O) U8 T( }computer systems. System-Critical Function ) g2 }7 W! d7 S" VA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's ! {& P q5 u( ]; T1 Imission. 0 R8 r: S/ e8 PSystem Definition + \. c6 O6 \2 [8 kReview (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential : t- `' f* e) E$ C3 \2 A( d7 o {+ Wimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 9 o9 F$ v% \1 ~) @6 [detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. 7 @# h) j. n' z* T; t- pSystem , D4 y7 u& Y7 x! d$ b& fDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, ) a1 h4 C. g( r) ecomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. / }7 g2 a0 @+ [; j1 N: \' ?(2) The result of the system design process. 1 R6 T# F* \- l" s0 D0 s2 j/ cSystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design ]/ U4 }! v5 MReview (SDR) % L, H4 z0 i( O1 ~* G4 DEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System ; w. ]1 `# X5 `3 Z. |3 sEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set + J5 d% X8 Y6 x3 bof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) 3 d6 a; E7 Y6 \/ Z% aThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS & L- G/ j& I* _: O4 D+ i5 ?capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 2 f/ T4 E! p$ e4 F* B% L4 o/ d8 DDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 7 e) |; C3 r# O' fassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to , A3 e! j+ ~" ~8 l9 F$ Sachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. % o' S+ v6 M; \: X8 \System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 4 z. ~6 ~# N. }: [9 Z1 ya set of common characteristics. System Generated " O9 U+ [! p. ~Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) 9 D; w; r9 Z1 q, HTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local + B' v2 e1 r4 ]! i$ A* y! {" j% ^fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the 8 ^; C; k' c' k4 o, K* e, |/ `primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. ! Z' l! r% W* D8 |$ |System - H( y7 d2 y$ W$ \; @Integration Test # |1 ? W; F$ P+ g0 d) TA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, ; x$ L B! e7 z" ^! wsensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or $ M9 e6 q3 W" Aequipment systems. System 1 x; H S1 N, x5 X2 P; Y" sOperational & V+ I9 N5 B5 K5 JConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, % P% a- r& `; ydeployment, and support of a system. * H( I" {, m" U: ?$ r2 SSystem Operation and 7 E0 D) k! H5 _* J0 dIntegration 6 P( V8 a' ?0 mFunctions (SOIF) 5 f( w F* W K/ @The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 0 R' }4 }$ ~" x! d5 Cbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of ; E# U3 E2 s! l6 Rposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. , u/ _6 z& O' ?3 I9 i' m+ g8 XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + }/ {2 v; r' u286 System Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, 8 L% i# u8 |9 ?& igovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition ) O4 a% V% v4 J/ s7 ^- j8 h" Nprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out " c5 }+ x& L/ [/ Othe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 2 W1 H6 l8 a" c/ }0 ]state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the ! ]7 I5 P3 V5 G. ~ wverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 6 a$ K7 N4 k4 {) E9 pand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, % \6 b3 ^9 i) l+ C6 Vhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. " V4 w4 g1 e+ _; jSystem 8 c: K- @3 H% D4 g5 E! j; j# b6 GReadiness ! W3 z- i* ~4 B- lObjective * A. q! v0 i! @3 ^0 h: i9 M9 b7 n% mA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a & K R" J- v+ j) c0 G' C2 i8 n) hspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support 5 j: j4 v5 k4 Fsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 4 t* n$ ]) z8 z* U1 U8 v8 Hcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. " r" R# n' H5 A/ b7 t! n$ HSystem % T$ Z) K2 u6 f% Y! t! nRequirements Review (SRR) / I9 q2 w1 i3 M1 \' t" n9 R& zConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. 9 w: W# H+ W5 M0 k( `& t" H6 xSystem Security Engineering ) |' }6 h1 u/ ?: W0 w) w8 |: |(SSE) - P7 ?8 l9 i0 u0 A/ X+ m7 x: UAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 1 k' Y( V+ h9 fprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and " n' w" R- f$ q9 h: sanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 1 p0 ?- O# l1 zsecurity threats. / r) R% L. E, s9 z! USystem Security U2 i4 G0 e3 J$ VEngineering c( t" u+ }- n) H, tManagement ! `9 G8 P8 U2 S* `! t9 K( W/ tProgram (SSEMP) 1 b- z" F1 u- ^# ^The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the ) g W: T3 f6 W$ c$ s3 V% Sresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security , d# z8 N Q: C2 t i; k pManagement Plan (SSMP) 6 n! u4 l/ y/ h! d* q. i$ H, W5 yA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 2 W; R. h# v4 x! _0 C7 jother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. + [6 P5 I; ?. N& W e1 Q, fSystems & F0 b; o! L$ ]6 u) K2 m! aEngineering ' s7 }9 X6 w' _2 j* F# ]An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; ? I$ q8 R% M- }) z287 Systems Engineering 4 w% k6 G2 z! \$ ]! T- ~Management & d; E- `; Y( ^Plan (SEMP) 9 Q) B& b' @# @This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) ) {5 S6 X) c' c9 B& OIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures : W) @# i5 ?; i# M* Q6 c Vdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test 3 p' l1 v3 }: b# i MIntegration and 4 `. T# u, k) e R& ?% g6 UCoordination ; w% y6 z3 Z( [, LThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 1 N# c* J8 q$ F* R% M; }& _System Threat 5 Z! _6 X: q4 x/ o! NAssessment Report (STAR) : b/ ?5 n( L, w( dRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 9 K) d1 J4 @1 P3 c- R( l6 Y/ o: Z: \Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency ( p: |6 y7 X f/ b6 qand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 7 `! v0 r- y# Y5 ^the threat changes significantly. 8 L" a( e0 X' V! ~$ J$ U* mSystem-Valued Asset # ~ O* d% X7 G z0 B: S. k. K$ [0 ?A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to ( f, o6 l" Y( E" A. fthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. 8 g% n: q D/ S5 _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 $ ^- J& _: s9 e2 j) e5 yT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. + E5 }* f+ ] Y6 I0 Z/ @( e! eT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 0 l0 u6 V: H8 B% V% Y% t5 ET-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. " _% b; F$ L; UT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 . V2 _4 S0 \5 g9 C; r2 ?7 ]! E L( hTechnology Transfer. 4 m: E% v& @% `( ]$ @4 h7 mT 2 / k4 c9 U% Q8 n- E2 m- c/ BE Technical Training Equipment. 1 F7 E: ^1 [6 ZTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. C- l+ T$ L$ q) D" lTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. / G* I' E$ m4 }1 \2 N8 UTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. + `/ B9 m P% E# Z) @2 ~* S& HTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. ) ]8 Y3 l# g Y6 V! RTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). $ u- F7 U/ y& b! s# X9 |" FTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. 6 O; O& {& Y* u8 LTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). . m7 Q: ~) l+ M; mTACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. & [$ l% J' a. ^/ y+ nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. . d- I$ F) l9 Y) N& qTACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine % S" f/ t1 T% Y+ hFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air 2 J; R; i) b& M2 tpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 5 B* ?! [% @9 B, h! PTactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with - l' k/ _# f- Q7 ]6 h! ~$ Qground or naval forces. Tactical Air Operations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 6 \! i4 D3 Z$ ^' z7 E; Q6 Wdefense operations in an assigned sector. ! b: M t3 q% o, `8 q/ BTactical Air Support ; e% W* ]' x+ eAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. + l& f# d* ]( W9 i. Z3 @Tactical Area of , z0 Z9 P7 j2 DResponsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the ' n' D9 T0 P4 n8 v+ w! ycommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) " L- m7 g8 T. O( X( kA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be * }3 S1 f5 ^( X& Y# {employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. ; [# C# [: Q; nTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 2 v( }) D0 J) [* z$ tmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data $ e; m; E' F8 q! H; PInformation link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates . \" O$ H) n- {0 z0 V# Leach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. + d" m# _ V7 n7 ?Tactical Level of , w, O! j4 p; X1 w4 f' yWar " o0 c& |2 T& m: O* lThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical 1 P8 ?: b/ v1 S7 BOperations Area (TOA) 7 A$ F7 h. { _3 T' ?# {6 NThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. 5 [0 h3 M+ O& Z! h; WTactical Operations Center (TOC) ; c& }7 F5 V( i3 V! E9 h' e, S* fA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff 5 Y4 y5 q" K( d6 ^ R1 Gconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. : ]' v; E( a# L9 {Tactical Warning 3 [0 I; q+ _4 ?# u8 A# ](TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command 9 V1 F. j* u5 |8 g; E wcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack & \( l1 r8 p% ~Assessment ' W2 V" H v4 f( P% T0 D1 C(TW/AA) 1 }( M" l4 Y' l7 |A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack % F3 x$ B$ |9 E7 C4 G$ m! G2 |Assessment. . v1 G( Z! P! f5 ?& f% Z# s6 WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 D1 D7 I2 x! Y# D% {290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 0 c$ E0 W- x" A5 vTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. 5 S8 H" ~( x: \, y% tTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. $ U5 a( }) t3 A7 |. DTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. 2 g6 a. h, }* p6 r: I+ hTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. ) {; r' S9 r' t, ~4 dTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. , o) T- c+ y& L- tTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. ( p6 o4 H3 Q! b! X/ Y5 bTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” , e4 I1 |) I9 A. ~& R7 r9 mTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ' S3 u: [+ k9 |' TTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. - R- P) a# j' V: {. UTADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. + Z" ]; n$ |% f b" |* rTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. / p5 e% F) W6 ?# E4 ETAIS Technology Applications Information System. " L9 D$ D2 \$ i7 |- M2 W* @1 ?/ YTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. : I+ n% l9 ^# W% l' n( _* r0 rTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. ' O# {% N- P( A/ CTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive % i/ [) E0 `' l9 T- mdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 2 c5 a5 {0 \& OTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 1 \5 d' S8 H( N$ b t7 n4 NTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 0 y; J5 k Z! X: o: R9 A& u( _( }Tank Fragmentation # L" D* ^% q: x/ E( w8 f% n; f2 ~The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. ) R2 c& d9 R; \0 |8 U1 b/ q* cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. * s# X+ o: s2 r! |5 |+ p9 ATAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. $ Z7 `! L9 g0 }* m) O+ lTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. 7 C2 v) |" b) G6 z4 ~" s- ~(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. & ?; A, l! j/ ` q: HTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. : S: e; }8 k9 ~, d+ iTarget 4 m: Y/ Z4 t$ e+ `# O+ Y# K, ]Acquisition * K! C" D" ]2 |8 s$ W: R; fThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. " ^. y5 t+ K* _: u% u2 j7 k$ |6 oTarget , i* p/ O& W, @$ H/ XClassification and Type / t4 ]# @0 o; z$ iIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, J" x& M6 D7 s7 adiscrimination, and intelligence data. # [8 f/ o: f" {9 s' W# _Target + Z. z& J0 A0 y6 FDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object 2 ~" ^# f9 h* E9 \$ S5 vMap (TOM) 9 Y. @" C/ Z0 q5 \A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in - r& T' [& m5 `* ?& ^! ?' Etarget designation. (USSPACECOM) - @2 R8 v. @/ z1 BTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. ) [9 c; @; S3 ]# pTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. , F6 K1 H# x& u8 s& O% y0 |7 \8 a(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System ; k) y- U: b3 T- s2 l$ n5 ~Requirements : t1 d7 u, v6 k) v: u# a" ?Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD ( k& O; e* c' k/ GProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target $ W9 ^* r8 s3 G- O6 c2 C0 M* Xrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 0 w2 Q7 r' c+ h6 J+ ]# GProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 0 b& q2 s- W. }' Z( G' u# ^, ATASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. 9 c' |- L6 P% ^TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. : O7 t' d5 z* [# l4 a6 BTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. " L6 G5 S+ [* o5 e W6 w0 ?4 }TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' r Z* H5 ?! |; w; g, {292 - c* i( J/ x$ X4 V s0 t zTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. / C& p2 D( n& _# @5 h& M% h- kTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. + R1 c- d2 f" C3 e7 L0 bTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. ; J- ?5 x: a6 r4 iTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. , Q+ l- }+ z- {. F @" n; `TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. 7 O3 e# x# d; Y, U& u( s, N; e8 NTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). & h& b) P( [7 l1 i# k(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. + b; a3 l8 ^2 ETCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. 6 e9 V/ o- U" t q- vTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. / _$ [) O6 A+ z: v: g! t* v; cTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 4 {/ r9 s5 s, Y4 ]" [! H% U, hCountermeasures Mitigation). 7 M! m$ w5 J6 [3 g2 [TD (1) Test Director. " J- ~- u$ K) {0 r4 z' h1 u1 ~. J: O(2) Technical Data. , N5 y7 N. P8 u# d! S( o(3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. ) C" T3 {9 x1 @8 ZTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * j2 K Q+ I4 N/ l# z- ~& P293 1 Z7 _* M7 J( w7 j# bTDBM Track Data Base Manager. / y# W9 v, V5 w6 A& ?$ sTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. 6 ~+ J r$ o) W, q(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). & O, }& G; v& {& N2 _TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. $ v* C v& u2 gTDP (1) Technical Data Package. + j: @( {6 h3 B0 O, g! h: X% n(2) Test Design Package. + }) B, l! [# c9 {7 J. t. e(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. 2 G: Z- Y+ f: l4 ^* O6 U9 s& I h7 ~TDR Terminal Defense Radar. 8 k7 k- M9 k- ~: VTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 3 g' X" }5 v6 O" ]" p# H9 ?TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 1 T- v0 l0 U1 qTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 2 ]8 L( c' |- d) w: l(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 5 r0 U# F2 s* ?) W% bTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 3 n1 I9 n7 P9 N8 V: |TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. . i9 |+ n, H2 g2 W3 Q& ETech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician 4 H4 e5 N6 e# H- E# n8 Z. j9 rTECH Technical 1 L6 Q- ]& g0 e! R" ^; S% G# zTECHON Technical Control. # L. Z) }% z' d4 n& r$ ~TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 7 N! K+ F/ A0 G0 t+ |2 V3 l294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as - N' X; z7 Q- p) Mmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ; ~, V% A0 ]! x" k, _8 ?& e/ bAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. 3 X# E: h3 d; Q+ p+ O# {Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines # k# @+ @4 p4 Bthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 1 q6 ? d% W7 W5 I% T( z2 A* _performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation + q( D7 X- l/ C0 W! h, T7 m2 VThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to ! {7 E5 `$ `3 k0 E7 ?9 ?determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) ! F/ E" p$ | DTechnical Objectives - d6 r# K3 y. qThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. , d z- Q& y- A- b5 PTechnical Objectives & Goals (TOG) 8 G2 X8 U5 Y I0 ?* d& E, \High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 4 ?8 N$ _ L* h; ~7 M9 Udevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical / i. g6 R7 p' t! `9 y; ~Parameters (TPs) ; h' i- N: q+ Y% RA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk 7 p4 D9 \6 h" o0 Z5 }analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. ; g! | P& G8 ^0 V9 P: I7 |9 t2 }- mTechnical Performance 9 |) X1 ~5 c4 {' z6 A g7 iMeasurement (TPM) 1 z. O! p' A# T) lDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design 5 i( A3 w. R- t$ N! V. dassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance " @ |4 W9 A8 b' j" O, ]3 j0 bparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 5 g P( J0 _2 g; Celement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical - {1 t% T3 V- |Specification / H! ] ^1 c+ {5 }1 eA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. 6 p% v+ J5 P k0 Y) L1 W: l' w5 sTechnical - V# G6 a' [: X0 PSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 6 V$ J4 V$ h, _. X) jtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. & E( ]% M0 B+ v: x* o- m( ETechnology & r( r8 |$ U+ p' c, A% f# nExecuting Agent $ _: U* T( Q) i- Q; Y* b, O3 N8 ~. fThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management + L6 q' X- z ^) P& eresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing $ t6 b( c0 H5 f OAgent. / F e* }% C: v- e9 Q; ^$ ^" bTechnology Program 4 Q) v& Y- ?' H1 j( \Description , d, L- [. I0 ?8 e8 L7 DThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical & z4 w9 \- Q* I/ p3 Gsupporting technology. 2 k3 w. }* E! U9 e u& oTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 5 F3 ]2 U% ^" jTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. + J, Z0 Y6 u. E' V- L( Z: }7 wTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. ) A; v" V+ }9 x0 C! N& xTelemetry, - s5 ~# ~5 L% {8 OTracking, and / T5 X' k- j0 T+ xCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. ! V% _" M) a3 F$ v) m' C* E- KTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the 3 p/ x3 A# e* L' |: ^4 t! Bautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 4 f. D. m' l& v; ^. @5 C0 UTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. 9 t5 q) H: k0 W$ _& u) oTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. ' N1 _& H+ u4 }( N9 P# uTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) ' r+ y4 M% x: d5 y( zTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. + `$ p- d6 j, p7 d2 f5 V6 v4 iTER Test and Evaluation Report $ H! J, P( U( a- b/ oTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. ; J/ q6 S7 _. @- B- I! t# N' Z7 WTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) ; c2 Z1 P' d8 U% d- S2 FThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between / [* N; J u0 S, A4 f' X) watmospheric reentry and impact. ( I# H, \ W- N+ e. A8 ~Terminal 1 J/ v/ M% ]$ _6 C) U t9 Y# U, FGuidance - B& `& t$ X$ j: \7 CThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 1 S4 E7 r$ l9 h' u+ ^& R, o3 e- mvicinity of the target. ' m3 u3 S5 @. O9 w! P) mTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor 5 k+ I2 B" n2 K9 FA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy , a6 Y. |1 ?8 q* N! T Q0 G+ TPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) . v2 O) k6 f! R* p! _3 p1 R3 d6 B0 oTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & @& M( H9 L, q4 ]296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system * P& Z1 j8 `! p; v3 xhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary $ Q" e% b; v! S5 aconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all : C& g4 U0 h6 {0 woperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, : j) R% n6 c- [analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 2 B5 e# c P) @3 ato assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three ( U5 r: F( X" d" j# E' ]types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted 0 e8 I2 e* k5 H$ J, T% [to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a r' q, C q6 p2 e: d. V+ {1 ?" msystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, % g8 e# L4 b, i, _and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel ) Z7 _, n8 w: T3 ~. e0 `requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that 4 Q+ e# u4 }& m. S$ k7 Tthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts & L$ [5 {7 V2 `or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before - V% b9 m3 U9 Mthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of 9 T7 e8 i- W/ eoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic ) U2 }7 G, x: j ^' _environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness ' e N( I! v c1 kand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of ! p( ` g4 [5 | _/ @) b' e! Q; O- Cdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ! |0 k, G9 [% G* {* t( q8 d; kEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development $ h. q E9 N6 y0 w" q$ N8 Yprogresses. 3 o+ P9 [3 }, YTest and Evaluation Working Group 3 q s: E/ M" }/ f! f6 \(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 3 v0 S& u; {9 pplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the , D0 u7 w! n% t4 `) f0 U& U2 w" f7 R+ kAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling + N) D7 |" \" e1 M2 E# M, K. r" Yproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and . o& [ T. @ A$ `0 i3 E7 t& k; ~* Mrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals ! |, t0 ^& B1 lwhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software * t y4 |. o; z* c2 aand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ' r3 Z3 D: B/ Z4 l; d7 p4 z P8 kTest Integration 0 a6 o. r l1 t' }3 O6 N3 X* hWorking Group ; t' D: U% U" e c+ j4 x; A(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. $ t( l* A3 r. sTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. ; f% P( k: d! d0 k# SThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation ' H5 o% t9 O0 l1 Q3 M" Qcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 9 Y& s. ]; R, F* ?! F0 D& A; T# A1 H2 ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & o8 T" T4 G' w2 v# n297 ) g3 z' J/ m1 t! K# }' N: `% NTest Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 1 }0 B* E* o6 b- Q8 ~Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. / A- ~6 \' u8 D JTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. % ]1 P/ Z$ ^' {/ rTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. 8 ]2 e' S5 l2 I7 J( NTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). % w7 ]6 e* v7 r6 A% ~8 j0 tTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. ) n1 p# h* ^9 p/ uTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). " Y* I2 B' u! ~; ]TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management ) y+ s0 i! y; x+ B& VTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. : l0 i1 E r% B' D! xTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 4 E! A$ q+ `" Q) gTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). % [. Y; J4 m6 pTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). 0 b9 d: P7 M/ S; ~TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). & f) s2 j/ T) E4 E) ?% B) s8 uTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 5 C7 L* \+ t+ T9 K* x# S8 Z2 iTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. ) N( \4 A D: `3 E; g8 [Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a W! l0 f" b- O/ _/ F3 Dcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. " ]$ m, @& n# t6 R: dTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense 1 C7 p! i# h, C(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 8 p, ]# }" S2 ~3 N$ I$ Q(USSPACECOM)