航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 3 C4 Z3 c6 L4 e2 S9 oaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ! o, v4 r% X: i! [STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and Transportation Environments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during : @2 _+ X ]- u6 |' Dstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 9 M+ t( m' z4 C- P/ B0 ]4 ]' zshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. # r! `4 E$ |, L" u* E* PSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat N; W4 r J/ Cballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to - T3 r4 j2 o3 u; b# r5 }' D( G2 gnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. , K* ^, J4 z$ S4 Q% B6 [Strategic Defense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. - g7 H7 I) D+ [6 B! H, vStrategic Defense System . X* ]5 O9 C5 H- ^(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 7 M w- W) s1 f; _5 @280 5 e: x2 H3 @, t5 @, WStrategic Level of War 6 B! c- W% l3 ]0 O( `. u' _# }. LThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ' J# h' U9 s& B: Ialliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 2 |, @6 ?# d6 D0 Gaccomplish those objectives. 4 l' c0 j- Y8 z: {9 V- d$ _Strategic Offensive Forces 2 N% q9 v% z! |" _5 F k(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, 4 A9 A6 [# N& \( m, `) Tthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 3 P. w3 u1 x1 @: t8 @1 V: m/ eOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. : w* s4 ~4 g8 q3 h# FStrategic 6 T- R( v4 P5 @Reserve " j H4 B3 e* I7 ZThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to . n3 V# `% l9 |5 ]strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ) T1 f2 a8 G! z9 lhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. : p1 a; x7 O2 fStrategic 3 P, S5 @* Y. @7 R% X/ a, cWarning Post- Decision Time ) f- ~! H. W- N) R! I- DThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 1 s, N2 i+ n' t4 rgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. 9 h! u7 S' a1 u3 d9 t* x6 @Strategic Warning Pre- , _9 y1 Z: a9 H( ^: m$ j- [2 l( dDecision Time : {) @* ` [) j6 FThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a + c1 P& T! v2 pdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time ' \9 h! u- d) C7 B. kavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 8 d) Z/ x2 g ]& D3 JSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 7 f2 m. k ~( X' J1 U4 b2 ~Structured Attack 6 J* q# n$ y0 ]" ^: H3 A/ Z( sAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely 5 P8 X- d3 W$ C& z. d% S& ttimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured - r$ ]$ f4 j' G7 e9 t0 I' f3 xDesign " L( c2 e0 f3 v6 p# T/ {! m9 PA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program 3 E7 e+ W V0 p) A |A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one ' Q; F, e7 `6 h/ x" D( dentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more & h# ?+ }/ F; tinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 3 E- K; A7 v2 ]! a$ ^4 rsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of % j0 z& j8 H. U: V$ d( I5 zinstructions. / h% Y+ X( @# o# u- D4 kSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. ' F2 l( v, L4 j2 X: V9 GSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. ' [6 k* A3 z$ w0 L! {STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. ; j6 h+ B% t' j, U" hSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security 2 o! {9 y4 V# a1 e" m7 mLevel A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 6 q! c- x9 F; [2 \- N3 @9 i Lhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be & Y5 o& K5 b* [1 v. ^& Cdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) 6 ]! n# S8 l/ q8 e$ a4 c5 t; UA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. : F/ r7 e f0 y6 D& c- aSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 2 b4 x# t$ ]( ^) H6 V7 {Subtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 9 U8 M) g3 U7 T6 ?7 `2 W) E( i! `$ w0 DSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 7 j9 Z. {, a1 i: x- U8 V0 W- xSuccession of 0 r- |6 J7 i7 e6 wCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, # A5 o! f J `become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 1 R# Y" y7 u2 R9 ] S/ uis a synonymous term. 1 ~2 }4 G! m2 W9 Z' k$ CSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). 7 o4 n" c# k9 }" p& y8 r: } ESunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to 1 a! z" J4 e1 B- P, x8 _decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). . a/ d! N" G4 w- r5 X# f% Y7 YSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 6 N+ b( J: l+ m+ R% ]. v& Ta single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, 8 f2 z& I1 E3 L6 [/ xthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % ^! Y# J. a0 b! _4 e282 + l7 U3 F T Q: M; z& |Superradiant 1 i% D! [/ c3 w& @* R C* oLaser (SRL) 0 o% d9 Z" X4 \. `9 yA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not c* O2 Y- }, f# w* ?( y0 ]; Frequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 9 |/ \1 P; G, b6 c( j; A3 Msuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser . ]3 |! ]* N* jbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric " q% b/ r4 S* K* x* V- j0 k: hor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 2 V0 @0 h8 S4 Y+ uSupervisory Y. K% A2 G: H0 D' J$ ePrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and R& N/ ~4 a; Lcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental % C1 Q! y( \. tAppropriation & ~* s0 d, r6 A; h, v; ^. O5 Q+ ZAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. 9 |, |; u3 `+ |9 fSupport Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly ' V1 q8 ~# I N' C! i5 q+ k- xtools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 0 ~1 E1 @7 H1 Kprotection equipment). Support Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous - d' L$ f; _" Q8 o! uoperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. 9 J3 o0 ]3 Q7 B: H- V- X) i3 USupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. # e& q$ N1 F% u8 S% p' e: |% M" qSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. / N* ~/ _$ n" n, U# d; y: U- p; _. WSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. & N* c; a6 X0 \6 d1 ^/ eSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. 4 L. a# e$ `3 w0 B& qSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items ; X$ e) F- b; |* `due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or " U. B; n/ T4 m3 L) l3 ^' `mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess $ |, p( C- k* P# Q- l8 Oproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity 9 h' \( ~' s# v: i% Smeasures. 2 b, o$ O5 h5 n* O& }$ ySurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance : R6 T) ]. O1 L `1 B: LRequirements ( Q$ m$ h: \3 K4 t4 RRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for . H2 [2 u! l/ D/ y* Pcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response ! i" G' O4 t7 ooptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, , G$ Y }2 Y5 x3 V/ a) P3 V# ?and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. 4 v ~' ` e3 z& q$ \5 E3 ~ n( PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 # X( i% {3 y+ nSurvivability 8 N) w E& t) [+ W% Y5 a" d8 ~Operating Modes 9 H# w* k6 M- W0 aThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring % g/ B( e) S- {3 v( PCommand Center (SECC) 5 C& h6 T b8 n# H( w1 q- vThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. & M# F( t# i( oSUS Site Utilization Study. # C3 W1 N4 D3 C5 l# qSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. 2 [, y. m, o0 q; T4 uSV Space Vehicle. ( T1 c. c, f9 N- ~SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. 6 X" h' e; Q8 \2 m) \8 `Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 9 q, {2 l/ v9 y( _, K: ] lSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. - d5 S: v1 {) _SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. : _( r1 V$ C* r$ G- P5 oSWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. ) k9 b- `8 w) Y; B1 z& MSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where ( Z" B* F$ d- ~' deach module description has associated implementations. 5 B- H; Y! b6 ~Synthetic 6 t: Y3 n1 A) o+ E; a4 V6 p2 a/ ?/ GAperture Radar (SAR) ' P/ y8 N l9 n. v: aA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ; ~( H3 F* D4 z3 J. T! _: ptheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 8 X% J5 H }. f) X9 M" v! Lbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for - ?* I4 \0 |( R2 e8 t& ^& mtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's 8 s; ?4 B/ z% m2 a- N/ i/ q9 P nsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. . B4 j: b7 t/ ?5 {1 MSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. 6 Y! x+ z' L9 |, {& o, R% {Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. 6 o0 x, m1 C9 o3 Z9 F* RSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 8 k2 {- ?- H2 ?& { W# D' }# Hdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with - b8 h- `( ]6 x/ w1 b9 v+ Z1 B% rspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 1 L. I( _. X- e" J4 efunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a 9 v, v! U% p/ D8 } x4 e! m6 }requirement. System Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. 9 @! e, H4 Y! T# g5 T/ NSystem G1 q0 }, |3 P- W) pArchitecture ( B9 \1 K+ N+ l& f* e5 n8 h. HSystem 8 F i# x/ ?0 e2 p" YCapability : J5 r% |$ T0 E" aSpecification % c, B. e+ E! W( \(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 4 H1 n z4 I8 w5 j- z Harchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. * s! A, ]: [6 I* gThe government document that translates capabilities into functional . \9 V9 N" A: ^4 V: |0 @: W. Y2 z8 fspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among 9 J" k' G5 |2 E+ X; ` Vthe elements of the BMDS. & Z- j- u/ h% e4 T. [8 uSystem Center ! P8 _1 n0 ^2 Q3 s |+ `(SC) ' m" v' Q) W# R/ |% G" W% wA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of * a u% H! A. B( r0 eequipment in CMAFB. # d& u! A* J( S# M$ W# ESystem Concept & ~+ [% ~$ R, a% k2 JPaper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 3 e+ W0 v: p6 A/ jconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition 1 w) I4 q2 m7 I' N- kstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 9 H" K( z# L. X) \demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System ( j, ^! j3 J& o" |# o; nConfiguration 1 T( p6 |/ k: n9 U; Z6 s7 MControl Board * }' S0 X( @" O3 A* N* o0 v(SCCB) & c6 ~; q/ e1 A* l s; hThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function - c) R0 r1 |/ k9 ^- A! f. WA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 2 R, y& o+ I; i7 Z4 Xmission. System Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 3 q- |- n9 h, y9 W1 T4 Uimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment 4 {1 A5 _* i) z1 I0 PDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 1 i) w# x# M4 v$ x285 2 a3 A4 j* f$ q0 l" @System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, * [( I% o- l$ Z, G! ^0 p. H; [/ dcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. ( z/ x6 b; F4 t! Z! K9 `, N" c+ e(2) The result of the system design process. System Design 6 s9 o3 J# m2 p& L l" a3 w9 }Concept 1 g! K6 Y+ v9 C7 x9 q* I) b# A3 cAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 6 X- [% k, Q3 _characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be $ H' a9 A |" Q" V3 K+ [% ]operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design , H0 k$ b& \2 z% KReview (SDR) * G4 N1 V+ x3 I) U% R% }Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. " Z1 \" }7 i0 i- }) c4 @2 SSystem Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and # A: t' ], U: I L! U2 i* j: n' Ucapability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ( t8 J' i. y/ E; q# N. t) pcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 6 {' \5 v+ Q3 _. Gassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. $ L* K' L6 }* K% }6 sSystem * g M2 ^4 R- a2 d: J4 R4 tGenerated Electromagnetic / Q9 d4 w- ~7 r8 L E, _Pulse (SGEMP) ( M$ O [( h8 Z" L( hTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the & K1 I. t* q6 k; s5 z) g! |primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. ! ^4 g g3 X! d- ZSystem 2 C2 W, B& D3 Y# QIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. 0 p. |/ p% k4 D, n$ b# }System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 4 x4 H+ [$ L* C& L' y y k3 O+ |and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or . C0 s- c/ Z: u7 |2 m {equipment systems. System ) U$ V% ~+ H1 f' _0 ]Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. / n8 {$ x, \: D8 W5 wSystem Operation and , j: L9 _( L; FIntegration 3 Y% G0 K1 J& H9 |) G" B2 h; cFunctions (SOIF) , {$ K: L- l( l# ?The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ) u+ j3 b8 h4 `: \4 {+ U W I5 gand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 2 Q, ], a+ g" J. E V6 u& N' gSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 2 |- m$ v; k- c/ ]! v& Q d6 iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 V' N2 t4 J+ a. M286 4 r6 W& F3 s0 D& w O LSystem Program # U5 ?6 E+ F u' s6 Y8 nOffice (SPO) " A0 ~8 Z) t3 ?5 u3 j# `+ k2 `. yThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, 1 v- A. t" H0 n* t" k. jgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 1 @4 r4 H: }, H% |8 N" TReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out & B, v _- M0 c5 h# q' mthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority # L6 C K+ U$ {7 H/ p: Z6 A6 aalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 8 V" k- Z4 L% D8 Astate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 4 a8 D7 D \; |( z+ {; qverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under / A; q# j. K% G0 lrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions 4 Q# X$ B/ B# K4 p, |necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies * m2 q2 o6 d9 [& E" Jand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. 3 V( _- T1 Z$ @) U) Y* p3 ASystem 6 L7 E9 t( ^3 g I1 H1 uReadiness ) O6 j! P0 w6 \" Z7 H) W8 jObjective ) [' x9 l4 J, ?3 I; NA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 4 e# w- [/ ^! b" m( K* x" Vsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission / k/ s/ Z& q* O5 V( ?capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. ; I' W) N- f NSystem , ^% A+ {. m$ H/ m. c1 _Requirements & x( z( I/ h5 ]/ n$ f4 s' dAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 3 u' |. d+ U% N; nspecific system functional and performance requirements. System 2 a: N: J; s% ]9 v3 Z9 TRequirements - t- U G! E% Z, C& I6 bReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. 5 V# j7 L* a- |6 n# p' f6 NDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 5 Y( C! ] q, @! v. H! Zdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. 0 \$ B: C2 R" I9 b1 l2 {+ `: ZSystem Security Engineering (SSE) 7 e3 R7 m) H. v% u/ A' |" _An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering + X! I5 ~) J; w9 c2 pprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks ) P- f2 q& P5 e: ]% P) `associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 1 i" ~$ s8 E+ S/ b) ssecurity threats. System Security 8 w1 y A: s8 N, k- F: GEngineering 0 L* Z7 }6 t! L3 P5 JManagement Program / M! x3 A0 N" n: u: E* w(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE ) `) c) b3 w1 O4 @; m( @program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 8 j& W7 {( h/ T8 U" x8 Cdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the $ _, H+ F+ J. K, U4 m; a8 W% U: t) zresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides . t( e5 e! M6 ?( }2 Rmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes " ~& F' l4 O. r$ Bits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. - `2 e9 k6 j+ R0 H7 tSystem Security Management ; G% B" F# G1 ?3 \Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with % w) S2 r( o8 l b4 Tother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle ! R2 W: R/ g% i" Ibalanced set of system product and process solutions. + W4 ]1 h" A, r$ }MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 ( N! ` J- f$ H2 w: Q) `* w% USystems Engineering Management & C) F1 c D# C2 EPlan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) & _' R' Q Y) b. m7 G' p5 _$ SIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures 0 b4 N e9 S7 e! S4 Q9 D9 {7 c3 L- I) gdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) 1 H4 {0 e# c6 g/ JKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and $ C' D! l1 _; gCoordination # k K, G; G7 [& Z2 n: i L" lThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment Report (STAR) 4 u+ g8 ^' D/ Y( S0 R( [6 q5 D0 dRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when J# I; x& n: f5 M0 k: Gthe threat changes significantly. ) l F( X' {2 zSystem-Valued Asset 3 x* _) s- X, y3 a9 _A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. $ E. `! d0 h2 F& |( oT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. ) Y* |7 J. H2 f/ r! t5 W+ IT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). & ^' H% H- y" e2 Z( _/ CT 1 g; R" g# Z0 M; P2 1 R) y1 ^2 b7 O A$ W+ iTechnology Transfer. ) u% p c3 e+ F% s4 GT ' t/ _! V9 N4 N7 j/ x9 H9 [- S+ J/ H2 E Technical Training Equipment. # ^: {% n N! [ FTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. & r4 F/ m; `: L- p8 W+ oTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. ( O& E- X( }( B0 iTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. 8 X' N7 H& Y- i4 QTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 0 j0 @3 D: f, m( J% DTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. 0 A' O- s9 @- B; N/ A0 WTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). " s0 e: s. l9 C! F4 W: dTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. $ E2 j( s5 v" f9 @2 A" |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 6 J# R9 x! n/ E4 D& X4 K& d; eTACSAT Tactical Satellite. ; E" [/ N% d7 s5 N6 eTACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine 0 O: ?" U6 V" X- r4 HFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air & L- g0 _' |/ F$ |% vpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air 9 F( L" _7 G7 G: w$ N0 ?Operation ( a: y4 b+ `4 n$ \) O- S4 r* |: tAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. / T/ R9 b/ z+ L I+ {( g9 |" xTactical Air Operations 9 [3 _/ l. c7 I$ K, WCenter ' W: t2 L; \( P0 I2 O l% C# lA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. 1 u- i% l0 p6 q4 PTactical Air Support % l1 W9 p! {. c6 [: `Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. , Y9 J: ]8 U& O$ W8 RTactical Area of : S4 J3 z3 Q6 E- LResponsibility ( p, Q8 t! u# L4 z6 I/ \(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the * K$ \1 s1 s# E8 Ccommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and l9 n B" S6 @coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) ; v0 N, j$ C sA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. 5 {, Z1 w5 W3 H1 Q; cTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 9 b+ g- j/ X2 n" T& m' Adevelopment of tactical doctrine. ; V& f" j' F: h( W: x# X- M, _Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 8 w- i+ z. @! P O2 v) U" XTactical Data Information link 6 w4 k H5 ?: _8 }- X7 EA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of % I2 P( S7 R* g/ P0 i4 BWar The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to & v$ [0 {6 p$ Q0 A f* r1 gaccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area (TOA) , b7 s2 P2 I) M9 t+ n" A& aThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations - {+ h$ Z7 _" r; ]" Varea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission $ u# ? Q3 S3 c- Qaccomplishment. / a3 b# W1 T+ uTactical Operations Center (TOC) 3 ~4 f* ]2 A! P* u7 {: s9 jA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. * F8 J7 f8 E9 c4 I9 U+ Q JTactical Warning ! x! z. q) g! a% G# e" F(TW) ! ?# C0 x" B& Z(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. % s- w) |- Z5 B9 ?/ ITactical * S/ Y( k# x1 j1 H# @: bWarning/Attack % w/ a a j- n0 z( W$ Y5 {! JAssessment (TW/AA) " q( c( C# ]- i! yA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. ( |0 Z# L* B& R( ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : e! K) `8 }: K" u( ]0 t: c290 ) B2 ^# y" J2 r) s! s( ^' x3 sTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. % E, o7 G2 f! ?, J v4 c' Q- ~5 _(2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. % }/ Q4 ^$ H) R0 @8 C* kTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. . }* V6 b# b' f8 O5 ]( h* S; wTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. 4 i( m5 g0 o3 f* }# P. L4 XTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. # d0 o; J/ q: l/ b7 PTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 3 j) v8 _9 M- E% U# i7 G( bTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 2 _6 L2 j9 G( `, a8 |TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. + z/ o, Q5 m5 P. E$ o( [TADS Tactical Air Defense System. ! s5 P( i# y/ F/ b; u* DTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. 7 @) c6 l2 L& R! H* Q$ XTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. - l* B2 e9 a! i; \9 }6 ^3 j YTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. 9 G4 A% e/ O7 S/ o& J4 qTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. 5 g% F0 p3 f% x7 E! `- e, PTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive ( @6 l' ^: N: T7 I3 k! F5 mdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. w/ L& I1 i/ x- k: s4 w2 q1 Y* MTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). ' ~# Y2 {4 X/ w" NTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. 9 x" i8 K' {8 F% P$ G8 q7 wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 + Y- f3 J* j2 \) b* sTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. % @) d! Z, \* Z# B- s% vTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. ) r% a9 t+ g. D, `( FTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. ' B4 ~4 R, l' U(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 2 g9 R* U! x8 V" i; ]TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition . b( v& S- t4 J& y; h: u* J8 mThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target 0 y- C6 {2 k1 e: J4 T3 [3 mClassification , e$ G; p" X0 band Type & R! I9 z; V! m& h4 U; mIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, " e7 t) P- q7 ^* u, U' V1 ^" ydiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination 9 T0 j2 |( J) D1 n r; @# S; RThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one ( k0 _2 D% C7 s, A3 ytarget when multiple targets are present. 2 `3 \/ B2 p) k5 Z4 aTarget Object ' S/ ?2 _9 r9 {0 v/ B$ I" yMap (TOM) ; H+ D* @3 K4 h& R- K$ K, gA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and + u- S' i. E% D6 L2 ]# kother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in & J; F, G% V, x g5 ?target designation. (USSPACECOM) / A0 Y) v( I. PTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. + Q; G4 V% A3 g$ Z4 Q+ [- [/ d(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the - n2 R! x" B. e3 V+ ?passage of a ship or sweep. z1 O' J9 o! w: e9 WTarget System % _5 L6 D7 v* V' cRequirements & w( v; \- z4 c7 CDocument (TSRD) 2 E8 \6 H8 h: _: q# `6 k8 t( ?# N. }BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD / {& G, x. q) QProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 7 e3 d, z! M. @! _7 [Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) : r: E9 U; g! O8 V" ~% qengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. ; B7 Q+ O# @/ q5 pTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. 2 |0 _* c: \9 ?9 Q8 w3 C) t( lTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ; n+ _" t7 {( k' sTAT Technical Area Task. 0 N1 g, E# l% \( lTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. . m7 D! m- }+ ^/ l2 P- \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , J5 K; y/ C2 B9 b8 ^( A* T8 o q292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. 2 i" p# l: ?. rTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. $ ]- j9 d! G; [" N. _9 P* zTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. % H ^, M! B7 pTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. + c2 F0 `. q) _TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 0 n1 A& C [( v. \, q6 K: k" cTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled 7 w: r9 E! q. `2 i2 s' R. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. " ~, Z; ?: q, p' aTCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. : c; x R3 }/ i2 u4 R: ZTCE Three Color Experiment. / ^5 q& O, C+ _; ^4 sTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. * A+ V, U4 A( d, g) J. CTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. * e$ e5 q Q+ z$ `TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 1 |( m$ I1 }1 N: t" SCountermeasures Mitigation). 7 o% b" A4 j5 c+ z; _TD (1) Test Director. " J" { X1 f7 d p/ U, H& M(2) Technical Data. 0 j" Y( l! ^! q# Q9 f' { g& f! m& j(3) Technical Director. ' N* L3 S0 y# ^, @(4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. + `# ^9 s6 I6 S# o7 D' A6 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 8 y) D4 r! Q( m9 t0 W0 cTDBM Track Data Base Manager. / v) L7 ]. i+ T/ w9 G# K B( Z8 H1 ITDC (1) Tactical Display Console. # |! n0 U# s b9 u(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 2 q5 T F Y! XTDCC Test Data Collection Center. 5 W- m, i0 Q8 |9 w. T1 STDD Target Detection Device. % r; A' `" Z W# Z6 zTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. 6 K8 P* O0 Q; M B% WTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. ( y3 H* U" W" S6 o \' L. iTDM Time Division Multiplexed. ) s; {, |, A6 ~7 @! }: jTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. - d( g3 O/ m2 Q- x: B% E2 N! BTDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. % ^3 u `" m4 V! sTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. 7 R, \% ]! @* R2 d: dTDT Target Development Test. ! X- @9 c+ U' _: _7 U9 c( kTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ' W( K0 h5 ^. R: i: @# F7 q9 YTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. ; B8 w" M" j' E& l/ L, p! L, ?# J(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 8 H4 l; f8 U8 q) `/ wTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ; j% n+ \2 i4 u! E3 J6 N/ C! M3 VTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician & R$ ^1 k0 G4 w# ~4 K' bTECH Technical 7 j9 r' [3 H' D# X! s7 h5 b) tTECHON Technical Control. # M3 X4 {7 A9 u5 x; g7 v2 jTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). # N; R2 m# s3 J/ ?6 q6 D, b. ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as 5 g- S6 I n' ?" B+ S# G4 R; Hmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data , y* M/ C( }5 @6 lPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 0 t8 h8 S) T+ q/ _: vstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines - u. @+ m$ ^: r N7 [) p) athe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 8 v. k6 K1 e: T3 Nassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical * \# K& ^0 f8 y2 K2 tEvaluation ) z" d/ q3 S9 L8 WThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 2 t, a0 d. n8 D" a( P; @* `% O: c) Ithe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available 2 g2 ]5 @6 m, T/ e1 Xfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & " K5 N4 q' V4 }: I4 GGoals (TOG) 1 _. N, _- F- h6 i* H( vHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 7 R" R' T' B9 M5 odevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. * @; O2 w4 o0 ?" C0 p3 QTechnical / K- J4 ]$ k: \: SParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk ) k: P3 K8 j/ Y7 O0 C6 ranalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by - b6 z# a3 R- [* _& @management. Technical & c: K2 x) r5 T2 @Performance 6 C8 k+ U8 Q+ I) l& }) v0 AMeasurement % S( y$ ?7 o8 h. k(TPM) - }) Q f) q$ l; ^7 Q! f2 ~Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status Z1 {6 d/ u. ], tbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance % E: U8 t, s Z/ S Rparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the , Z) ?9 b0 J) y& R8 ^# p# Hvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures 3 x' l& g1 |; kdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 0 }4 h* R0 d0 r0 U5 h. r/ jelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. . ~; R7 N. w/ u* w' w0 K1 FTechnical , X. R; r% G$ v- i5 tSpecification 2 ^# s0 g! Q% D! {* w EA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. $ y; z1 c( P0 z! qTechnical Surveillance - t% u5 H+ N0 W( n& X8 T) T, qIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or : Z7 e/ `+ _& g; @ Lemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise " B) f+ q2 S% ptargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology 9 W7 M) U3 j% M' @7 m. m: xExecuting Agent + I$ b. U( `9 G- C. g0 z$ sThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management % ~+ j' \( Q6 Y* Hresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. , @5 k5 I+ \2 @2 G( bTechnology Program 0 x2 y7 Y- p" [' ~Description ; R6 c" U# q6 ~0 v) |* @" Q3 X9 g3 ^The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 7 I) s3 R" w% B* R8 j* g. Zsupporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 5 y% O2 B. [* t# E. _' OTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. 6 Z. B5 a- L' f3 U+ EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ i3 p6 ?- Y+ K; j; p8 g295 3 a$ C j: a% ~9 p+ Z& ZTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. Z5 `5 @5 T4 zTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) ! G# x0 e0 w* q$ KFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and 4 f3 s0 {/ f. T% Z8 e4 _2 ~2 L8 [status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 8 @0 G1 Q" O' n1 L, z5 I4 fmission commands to the satellite. . ^, y- H# E [' r$ ]( [Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. & a3 H% d: ^! G$ f/ DTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. ) z1 U* D7 b8 H5 L6 z. ^TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. " V4 H9 b9 j4 L) ]TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of Q9 D* q( b$ j) P9 pcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term ' L/ D* w+ s+ \6 w"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ) n$ q# T4 G% d' bTER Test and Evaluation Report ! ?8 x2 c" M& _- p1 ~3 Y. hTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. ! n* N, h$ O9 K3 M8 h1 rTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. # ]9 L* ?. V% e$ f. u" j. W5 tTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) * n8 q" U E9 N) R9 GThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between - m" L! h4 M: U. patmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance E5 M C9 A5 v: H3 ~6 f7 FThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the D. e# l+ ]% ^' w0 svicinity of the target. 8 a. M* @: u, _1 h2 j- uTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase % n9 `+ C6 [) X# T! l; m9 g( sand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase , A3 z! V1 [9 ~% X' R+ k: tInterceptor 1 V/ a# U3 W9 _( Z y" L, C+ oA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy 8 W3 a. f4 e' w& Q6 b8 vPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 4 E( j) T1 a B: a- h9 zTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. / v; e0 u- w; a7 q! g bTES Tactical Event System. " K/ A$ u3 [% m1 v7 fTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. # n: p9 x; `. {9 a% p+ Y! ?; uTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all : K% Q% Q w4 U8 r, I& Yoperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) 3 G* Q$ ?! s. t- T; w7 b# E( }: R* @Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production & _$ \* q# }: |% @: FAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted * P8 v. S; z9 @9 t9 Y8 z% Mto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof 5 S. ~, x. @8 t* h2 umanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical * u9 c" z: [; Y% Eperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a / n& J0 g: v% R9 W# N+ Wsystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, - ~, P* u( p, p0 Jand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel # L3 r( l1 c6 m: N) ~requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that / Y* C' ~0 }. q: B. `those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts : I- d, x0 X* f, ~ J7 aor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational * v# M6 N; x$ ~5 C& h; Y$ \$ {: _(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before + h K) ^! {: D/ p: i! Pthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of - J+ _. z8 C- b Y+ W% T+ \2 Qoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 8 ^- u: r% i g0 B uand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and 2 \8 R' Q' F) N5 {" ~2 ?Evaluation 8 @- E: P; n: Z+ lMaster Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 6 P, [; j! j9 H5 K; uobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation + R: f0 A4 B' X% E( gto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and 1 J4 B) k6 b* ? _2 x' }Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) 1 A2 w u3 p8 G W: JThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the " l# n, [' Q i; E! y Y' d3 tAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 5 S/ _+ O0 U. j6 }, Xprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling / K) U" d0 ~/ j. Oproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and # o h- ^$ G" }3 Q. ?1 irelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 4 p$ s6 k4 g2 K B8 z3 b* Y7 qTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration # j& s1 E: n; p M$ AWorking Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in * n( t% L4 t( j' r: B4 |4 Border to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between ) f! ^0 }; P+ j9 W1 _developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, : @7 A a; q' M7 x H" Utest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 7 J$ Z/ x* s$ l# b) l. S5 Dcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 6 ^5 W0 N6 ]# ]3 v# }9 B6 T+ D, c! KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 3 U9 C' g* {8 u9 B- x, \3 s( e: ~ ~Test Target 3 c! E8 v8 R* r" gVehicle (TTV) , z* y0 ^$ u) M+ X9 E1 D q+ d$ hSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. / _! V N3 s Q- {# F% dTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. " f0 E) N; V F5 {TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 4 Q# r& A, o% `, G9 u+ \# w, ]TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. w- g$ W1 K3 g1 |( A7 JTF Task Force. ' P+ e5 P$ p( v* u% L/ ~- tTFC Tactical Fusion Center. + x0 F0 x/ _$ k0 W1 [ pTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). : ]( d; K+ }/ n. d; v: KTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. + H( ?; K1 ~3 w d6 MTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). - s; [& |( T& l) E$ F7 E/ G# r, vTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 3 e+ [* y) f& W: n2 I0 N" qTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). ! D! M; x* c: C! S: q$ E3 s% VTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). ! Z- ^$ P( v0 n$ k$ X7 F5 }: RTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. ' a( q' | N, J% RTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. ' T0 C; N3 q0 E2 g3 g0 v5 }THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. ( ]7 K+ b6 r6 e/ YTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a - z- h5 b7 z3 p" S( Y u0 Jcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 2 R1 L! `6 A! [# yTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 5 h! I- d7 k8 c# C8 DTheater Ballistic " I/ W( ^& a( w6 b$ e% WMissile Defense (TBMD) System # }: t, w% o+ i! Q* ]* eThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ' a* t4 `/ m0 _* ?' l! o5 D# Uballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)