- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
System9 [7 O( a4 `/ s; A# }8 R
Readiness
2 F2 Z& H- |. s3 [) ZSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out0 z0 Y0 ?* b+ u' [
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority' z' | k7 b) I9 @. h
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It4 W9 @' J, ?9 t. b. h H
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational5 {: |$ o4 x! t- l& ]' X( X, S, [
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
/ z$ P/ Z0 H4 H- X& ]2 uverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
, c9 \1 X1 Q! {5 I5 J3 g0 Kcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
/ n4 [) o0 v* Q; i0 w8 l/ {/ Drealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
0 {7 Q% r- b1 a' Enecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies' J7 R- ~! p3 \
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
1 D: E$ U7 D. |+ o$ S# Ehistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
6 }/ M& Q* W8 U3 N: jstatus reporting.+ Q" D% b( F$ Z0 U
System
: R' \3 N# z, s: b5 ^0 _: iReadiness8 n; W6 Z+ L0 o$ G
Objective9 I) z- X2 _& ^# ?
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
9 ^. _, D/ ^; r% ^! J% |* H8 d) ?specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.7 n. N: |. }0 P" `& M& A
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
( P- n: i$ b: [4 l! `3 s9 lmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support" K, a- z% V/ I) p7 t C, }
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
* c3 y9 H5 A2 J& N4 t: psystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission: y7 V, }; d* N0 x/ V
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
# A1 W) j( P5 g7 _! Z& P, C# \System
h" M3 k1 t- ]/ e4 iRequirements
" U0 X/ y1 D/ `3 V+ s0 K5 B' W( ZAnalysis (SRA)2 i7 n# }: a: p Q' r+ G
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
5 p: p2 o; V4 x4 s5 ]9 z! G5 F) ~Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine) Q8 J/ `$ C& k2 p* ]8 N6 G
specific system functional and performance requirements.
- ^) ^$ x( T; g: ESystem
" c6 V' `& s! B' g; ERequirements
! [: \' z. S0 H8 i/ R* u. k7 O/ ~! QReview (SRR)+ f& B9 r& C" Z/ |
Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.) d$ N* Y# g. e& ?% l
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
& V& B, ?* I0 _1 P% o% v+ }( b tdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.' Z3 E% U0 w3 M J. F# p
System Security3 W5 Y# P+ F" G/ O6 ?
Engineering, m k; v' f# [ q: i
(SSE)6 V6 P. \/ l6 }$ R$ ^( c7 j3 \: ]
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
6 n; {' Y; o7 B/ i) {2 G7 Bprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks, q1 e4 E7 a. ~) G) [( p# a
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
; o! U6 f7 |" G# w# }9 b/ Rscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and8 N8 Z! n8 _( h" ]* R' ?6 \: y. V
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to" K& ^( x6 X5 j3 @/ D
security threats.' x/ a% L. z; ^4 O, u
System Security
9 K# ]" B0 m1 v8 H W# }Engineering9 m/ w: ?$ m5 l' q1 ^) F
Management7 g9 f/ B" A! x4 v% R
Program4 ~6 X% B! |3 ]" G5 A
(SSEMP)1 c* X) W& H5 c8 U, c# }& g0 p' u
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
* D% }9 u' i9 Q& Xachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
" p7 |$ [' C! |8 M" S3 \program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the1 H _, f+ E7 |& K& B
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
, D4 W$ V# ]- z7 f! Tresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides' \: r5 B+ D o" h D$ E N
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes) c$ o; j( E0 {8 c8 @
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
' d/ C' H; V; a4 ^5 H U% v; Y+ ~System Security2 \- n- r7 q" A& y
Management
- C3 j' D, J0 r& \ {# f4 C0 ~Plan (SSMP)
' \, C- |, t$ H y& JA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to! Q/ l3 `6 M) A; Y9 o
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
3 Q( y8 Y I" I2 Smethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with8 A8 n" B; H( i
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related
% N6 O$ U' R! J, n" isystems./ \# a, A0 P1 Y5 r* ?0 y* z
Systems
8 Z3 F" H, C" z9 f( v1 OEngineering
+ a2 n' | n' t2 o F7 xAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle/ ]. B3 J' Q8 g" L% \; e
balanced set of system product and process solutions.
7 I, q: y+ r& h4 Q, f& vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
. d7 L) w. f. ]; ^287! \+ E! \/ r* P- [
Systems) ~1 B# N `; Y# B& c
Engineering$ q7 Q* V c' |8 C
Management& \, p: |: Q S8 ^0 P6 N
Plan (SEMP)! W6 O( M L/ l' k% g; \1 _! T# j/ x
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
$ z, ]0 E# n; g& p0 p$ `# \Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
4 v4 s: \+ m" I9 sdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
2 g; x8 h* G! d$ JKey engineering milestones and schedules.3 d* o; {# d6 p5 r% ]
Systems Test* ?! g- S. R5 n
Integration and
9 ]6 l# W, o% i9 vCoordination7 f- \1 }7 q# j" W4 @# D$ J6 L1 V
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.
& q: P* w: f' fSystem Threat
E6 h. ?$ _8 T/ {! ?0 v! [, _Assessment, e1 E, D# ^8 c
Report (STAR)
. `- i6 |; s1 a' tRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
8 u2 C1 j, h$ R- K1 l+ W0 ?Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
' y- f6 m5 }3 `7 ~) n9 K% Land potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when& f* r' Y C' v) i, u. D
the threat changes significantly.# j1 ?) o& ^, M( S- k/ q
System-Valued
+ {: y6 K$ r$ o4 `Asset& j$ b# H' ?& k8 \( o# U: s; }
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to7 f4 N% Y# k1 m Z: ]
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.
! e* O& B/ v. ?' ?, n* DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T& A) U5 l- F2 Q& _
288; O. t8 [) {1 a
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
6 H6 F: n% `' k. z- JT&E Test and Evaluation.
& q. p# f0 Q# u$ H1 ?T&T Transportation and Transportability.: |3 o) k* H" R6 G1 p4 I% I
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
+ ]2 I0 I& f) x' v" k# |$ mT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.. X* Y# P$ @/ b: }& w
T/R Transmit/Receive.
* Z5 q7 t, j' t; W. o. X# z5 BT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).. b; c6 V# ]! a7 r; R2 {
T
4 U& x. x2 J+ s* L3 m) W! M/ {* o27 u6 B7 t2 D. u" q( @, k
Technology Transfer.
$ s' K+ x/ B: V3 p, c! m5 d5 bT
* l4 K6 \4 d# }. |& T# o# ~2 o- _2" B' L! t; O0 T. O( L
E Technical Training Equipment.
* i5 G2 x. [9 w# Y5 y! {TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
: U4 p5 A3 D$ z7 I. u: i2 H6 `0 U5 TTAA Technical Assistance Agreement.1 o9 e7 v+ o( K2 U5 F; `- y! u) W
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
4 ~! ]' O/ I g8 p6 l5 zTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander." k7 M- h' I$ y- D, o
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.) `8 {$ |) j" |5 U4 o) `2 @5 j5 O
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
! e8 N2 a: q; [% M" G' ^5 x7 @TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
, D7 b/ S: L% q9 b0 G' G$ c# x2 ~TACAIR Tactical Air., p: ^, n& y$ c9 i
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].( n( d5 I2 E8 A+ n2 b1 r
TACC Tactical Air Command Center.+ ]' s! H3 C C
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).
5 y7 p& O; R8 H, F* W, MTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
9 D( Q! t8 K, v+ @TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
# Q) A$ v( o/ c8 d3 S, l: T. yTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
) e; J3 i: J2 U* ?/ H0 {# {# ]TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.: K! p# _' S& m2 ]
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|