- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Weapon
6 j7 G) o' T) A; t6 V% sEngagement1 e: H% v# G/ B% L; K$ F0 G) H$ a
Zone
, N$ r C- h _3 K4 pIn air defense, airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility
/ c% T8 e' L0 e# J8 A- F4 vnormally rests with a particular weapon system.) A2 Y+ S" I, q+ P3 H6 B- P2 I
Weapons
1 z' N8 k5 E6 z3 c4 [0 u, n2 b: i, ~* _Allocation
Z' G3 n8 N' x+ l8 w6 x0 u6 iDesignation of a certain weapon to attack a certain threat after Engagement7 k, ?& ]& v4 L. `/ O5 G: H; X
Authorization is given.( [" a6 {" B5 b# q. ~ a& ~: U
Weapons' h& S* |3 j) {8 x: z7 B: _" ~' l
Assignment
7 Z1 L$ M% P: F& \: L) UIn air defense, the process by which weapons are assigned to individual air+ r, b/ I2 b5 \+ C m9 G8 ^$ r
weapons controllers for use in accomplishing an assigned mission. Assignment6 Z5 g% _" V2 f- ?( t$ g9 w
of a particular interceptor to a particular target.
% z: S9 ]1 e9 v6 z" PWeapons5 h6 w$ r; K! v; X
Commitment
) `0 b$ y# p2 v, f# E9 jAuthorization to allocate certain weapons to designated targets thus permitting
) A. _& t+ |6 }' ^6 r* |checklist actions to be taken.- {0 N. k( U. f" @
Weapons Control The varying degree of formal control an area air defense commander exercises J) A/ @& o- H
over all air defense weapons in his area of responsibility.
. \' C! g0 A2 k/ }7 `3 Z, c2 pWeapons) |6 r" g* M4 U2 ?7 y1 `- x1 h
Enablement h3 V3 U# \, I1 J9 ^/ `0 k2 }4 y+ c
Authorization to place a weapon into its most ready state but prior to release.
7 f& _* U+ X! o9 {2 e- I iWeapons Free A weapon control order imposing a status whereby weapons systems may be, p- c1 O2 ^: }* B$ n
fired at any target not positively recognized as friendly.) n7 L4 q: J, i8 S# E# P
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 W6 q# B1 Y& c0 B9 V9 J$ V v
321; K% e! G6 y) W* o4 [
Weapons Hold A weapon control order imposing a status whereby weapons systems may be8 g8 U6 Y5 b3 [7 z$ i) W: B
fired in self-defense or in response to a formal order. P8 P% I1 d. n6 H, M5 D% G
Weapons+ s @) o8 N Q: r) Y
Initiation* J: c9 l1 ^2 m0 A4 l% Y
State when a weapon system is to be placed in the highest state of readiness# E8 t1 b' U0 q9 Z- L
shy of weapon allocation. It is possible to go direct to weapons allocation or' Q" o5 H9 w; W. v# S! S3 i/ ~/ O6 ?
release without first initiation or allocation.
9 E% |1 T! R0 nWeapons of Mass
) ?/ _* Q8 Z% o7 q! \( D, aDestruction
! O8 P# p5 s% |( l% K/ @ M" P(WMD)
& |6 `9 e& f( V# q4 RIn arms control usage, weapons that are capable of a high order of destruction% S i# v! D9 r; T
and/or of being used in such a manner as to destroy large numbers of people.8 Q- N9 X6 \5 Z5 ^6 C$ Y& U$ C
Weapons4 J/ U# u2 i. Q/ f5 _0 Y' w; w
Readiness State
8 ~* L! n' _/ ?# q* k5 y; kThe degree of readiness of air defense weapons which can become airborne or% M( @; R0 a6 g( Z5 C
be launched to carry out an assigned task. Weapons readiness states are8 M- O4 k1 v# E5 z( e
expressed in number of weapons and number of minutes. `! e) q, c5 e2 Y" X& m
Weapons
- o9 R/ \3 B% o0 H mRelease
9 v& Z+ w3 y- j3 S" X3 a! W8 oAuthority (WRA)* P y' G! q9 P
The order that gives weapon controllers the authority to fire. (USSPACECOM)
$ z1 O0 m. l! o/ \1 d6 WWeapons System Items that can be used directly by the armed forces to carry out combat missions
# [/ a0 B+ V2 S7 w. o- M/ tand that cost more than $100,000 or for which the eventual total procurement) z. x% Y+ U( q4 y* d8 H! y
cost is more than $10,000,000. That term does not include commercial items' J. N# e2 J6 a* T% h, U+ G a
sold in substantial quantities to the general public.6 g) v1 \5 O' s* r/ L/ _+ q
Weapon System" p. P" i/ Y9 L/ e- X! |0 Y. P7 _
Control
) o1 l" v5 G% n9 ?# e- vThat set of assessment, decision, and direction functions normally implemented
$ f2 G2 K( g* I1 V7 w* u! r1 Aautomatically to assure that individual weapons are pointed, fired, and guided as) f% P8 Y9 h% N$ Q+ ^. a
necessary to intercept the designated attackers.# x! \" f# K3 I, }# b' g( d
Weapon Target p$ R( x; T# J# i7 |) _( z: r
Assignment7 V& [4 R; l! w }; A4 a" \3 i
(WTA)
, I) X8 H3 K* p! w- l* AThe assignment of an interceptor to a particular threat object. In Midcourse, a
' b! I& V$ \/ W" @2 rWTA requires in-flight communication between the Battle Manager and an inflight interceptor. To ensure the Battle Manager maintains the ephemeris of the* v9 N! N& i* B6 m; s: t
interceptor, the WTA will constraint the interceptor’s flight error. _- z5 ^3 _$ ?6 \+ `0 n3 @
Weapons Tight A weapon control order imposing a status whereby weapons systems may be) X; u' m% L M6 I5 A$ |, x5 h- P2 L
fired only at targets recognized as hostile.
. |1 z; U3 W( W b- F5 uWeapons System
# |- N5 F6 m: ^8 N: O( D5 s; E, NEmployment
$ ^2 Q# H+ u5 S/ T CConcept
3 Z( n7 {6 U+ ~( TA description in broad terms, based on established outline characteristics, of the3 F8 p% L h0 y6 F7 W4 N
application of a particular equipment or weapon system within the framework of7 ~, T: T' D, c5 M" W8 l% m
tactical concept and future doctrines.2 h/ B: w) B7 a( |" f6 `1 | _% M
Western Test5 N0 r9 K( @2 [ ~6 H2 c) Q
Range (WTR); F, B& N! X/ g
Beginning at Vandenberg AFB, CA, this range stretches halfway around the. w* ?1 H# W5 v5 r, Y
globe where it meets the Eastern Test Range. An array of launch complexes,
0 E/ G6 m1 k9 w0 W6 rsensors, and tracking sites makes up the Western Test Range. It is operated by
; N; t" O) j$ e3 c( q. P; k; }) j# e" Bthe Space and Missile Test Organization (SAMTO), a unit of AFSPACECOM as
8 t5 W" ]% E3 K& ~8 y( ?9 xof 1 October 1990.
- D+ j w. ^7 sWESTPAC Western Pacific.
3 G# ?1 N1 j* l2 Y* J+ IWEU Western European Union, Q" Z3 ~& ^$ U
WEZ Weapon Engagement Zone.
& p4 T5 n% m, B6 oWFF Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA.
- J6 i d6 k4 d$ C5 j8 dWFOV Wide Field of View.0 X+ |' @+ n5 u
WFX Warfighter Exercise./ ~# L* G3 D, |. o3 w
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 W4 y$ ^% L/ |% r" s5 Q/ W: t0 F
322
* p: E$ w# m5 PWG Working Group.
) _$ s0 T+ C7 k1 i. K2 o; DWGET Working Group on Encryption and Telecommunications." F; I' J5 `+ b6 m7 b
WH White House.
# P; t5 X: \9 i& _9 {0 {WHDEVAL Warhead Evaluation. |
|