- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
Reliability and
9 j7 d) t5 L4 B( t7 ~Maintainability
( q- O, A4 I; A' k+ G7 [/ |(R&M)% J: I$ X- I7 R6 y6 w: w( F
Reliability and maintainability design parameters are key factors in the design of
& [+ w) e7 h% \$ F w1 S, K( saffordable and supportable systems. R&M parameters provide inputs into the
. G: I* L1 W0 X I3 h. Q' ^design and LSA processes that quantitatively link system readiness to the ILS
- n+ j2 A/ o+ P: W2 [) |5 ]elements. One of the principal elements of ILS.
* u) T6 _8 S% zReliability,
: p$ z: b g" ^, ? w! SAvailability, and! i# k; l( Y+ B. L4 `
Maintainability
[7 k+ Y9 T: }) P" u(RAM)
6 ~9 R# h" ]! l* T4 T6 _5 M1 oThose requirements imposed on acquisition systems to ensure they are
/ @# {" l" T6 o/ d. e* toperationally ready for use when needed, will successfully perform assigned( W. N$ o; c% @$ ^- r& e% o
functions, and can be economically operated and maintained within the scope of- ^1 g- g) Q w7 Z6 M- h' s- K3 V
logistics concepts and policies. RAM programs are applicable to materiel
& L7 M1 n, H" H4 `$ v& M2 [, h+ \2 b/ xsystems, test measurement and diagnostic equipment, training devices, and8 }, F% g6 r3 k8 T' G, ^5 I
facilities developed, produced, maintained, procured, or modified for use. (See% @1 j3 G, w- [; p3 _$ B& P( @/ B8 A* r
individual definitions for Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability.)
7 b" h+ s" q+ _6 A# V" i' GREM Roentgen Equivalent Man.
( M6 ^$ d' Q% H: O# [: LRemotely Piloted; f! b& S0 Z7 G
Vehicle (RPV)
( F* D: k# X% ?% ]4 j! f9 SAn unmanned vehicle capable of being controlled from a distant location through- f& V s& @: c) j' R! [
a communication link. It is normally designed to be recoverable. See also8 I7 o* g8 d( N1 F# R
Drone.* Y7 m N$ }9 \5 @ F6 p
Repairability The probability that a failed system will be restored to operable condition within a
+ y" v" b1 e$ C/ p1 o7 u% `specified active repair time.
' ?6 [( l q1 p% j* G8 w# fRepeater-6 T0 R$ M4 W3 P+ G
Jammer( d L$ r6 y0 v6 Q0 `' Z
A receiver transmitter device that amplifies, multiplies and retransmits the signals
" N" Y- U: }) l! h) q+ \8 W" rreceived, for purposes of deception or jamming.+ O( ?% E1 E* H7 G4 s" R
Report Back Information returned from system elements that verify that directions have been
( D7 A5 Z. n3 d- D- B9 r7 Vreceived and carried out. Also includes information regarding system9 l. C3 N! g: ?
effectiveness.0 c9 S: K0 X, L+ w1 G% D
Reprogrammable x e; x1 _% f& ^8 }# p
Time( @4 v4 \+ K( P( F# Y
Time required to re-target an alert missile.
8 v g$ T3 L( v6 \' J) sReprogramming The transfer of funds between program element and line items within an# ~# v( @0 ^+ A
appropriation for purposes other than those contemplated at the time of
9 `2 S z! D8 R/ `( ]& s) H7 Zappropriation. Appropriate congressional committees generally accomplish
1 y$ O0 i4 |3 [& X' k* ]reprogramming pursuant to consultation with and approval.
; L \. W/ h! Y/ g& S2 NRequest for; K& V6 c {9 l( I
Proposal (RFP)
6 y5 g# }3 d$ A6 M- u" bA solicitation used in negotiated acquisition to communicate government
4 w* M8 t) k! Grequirements to prospective contractors and to solicit proposals.2 @! F! ^: N& J( x1 u# D4 J
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 R3 y& k7 |' H2 W* b. J* H
2477 Y# U. H" W7 W
Request for
2 ]! r8 ^$ Q: N3 }7 K0 p1 lQuotation
" `: u( {/ q# N$ ~A solicitation used in negotiated acquisition to communicate government
9 g$ d9 J+ G5 }- Irequirements to prospective contractors and to solicit a quotation. A response to/ I2 F# G. _2 Z' b* c$ M f
an RFQ is not an offer. It is informational in character.
. s7 j( C) }0 xRequired
$ S' j3 l4 q( \: VOperational
; j; V7 n( `4 H+ X- I! }Capability (ROC)1 W$ O6 L+ G1 S8 e! |' N" V
OBSOLETE. A document stating need and specific operational capability.
) f/ g! H8 G$ w, v- m5 D# uReplaced by the Operational Requirements Document (Army, USMC).
& n7 j1 q( [3 K4 ?Operational Requirements Document.3 }. o1 s; h" L* o8 y# L% B% o
Required& e% G$ j" M. }- A7 ]4 |
Operational2 |. Q9 r% d1 q& z0 w9 \
Characteristics
! F6 ]4 j' s" p s+ U0 WSystem parameters that are primary indicators of the system’s capability to be
7 t* F$ y# e+ z$ i) w: |; M: pemployed to perform the required mission functions, and to be supported.
E' o* k# v* e! |1 w6 M; g: tRequired
; m- f3 Q- K- y* k6 {+ vTechnical- P0 M8 U# ?! `- z0 f% C
Characteristics
7 Y* T; k+ L4 Q X Y" k" h, iQuantitative system performance parameters, approved by the DoD Component,
: T4 |/ Z( H, W1 ?that are selected as primary indicators of technical achievement of engineering
, d2 t: S/ ^- A& _+ j* l; Ythresholds. These might not be direct measures of, but should always relate to,
0 a! h* K2 \$ ^8 E& R Ca system's capability to perform its required mission function and to be+ X5 y. y8 \. H; J% J- }
supported. Required technical characteristics are usually tested and evaluated
+ s+ R8 u y0 ~ Pby developmental testing and evaluation (DT&E) to ascertain achievement of# D6 o8 \1 ~- s3 I3 j
approved goals and thresholds for these characteristics. Critical technical1 J# W5 i2 |3 e& h D# r
characteristics selected for a DAB program baseline are reviewed and further
7 [7 x3 Q3 M4 o, Eapproved through the DAB process.
0 F- T6 c1 r, S3 P! VRequirements' Z6 J u8 V( F6 u" w* L2 `- `
Analysis
4 X, U& G" d7 ]) W' s w* N6 K* E/ TAn analysis to determine and document the need for resources to perform the
$ p/ G3 w& ~. Y5 Hagency’s mission.0 a. F* e" j) X2 b' x
Requirements D" @' u4 h8 x& M( J0 K
Document, K# M2 y& ~; q7 o5 n5 u- X# j- y" ^: [+ U
A document that sets forth the requirements for a system or system component;0 U" u- `' D& _. E, G7 d
for example, a software configuration item. Typically included are functional$ p0 z# p# P& |5 W7 P! v
requirements, performance requirements, interface requirements, design
( E4 b1 w" P% V! N: Z8 xrequirements, and development standards.* g# |& S9 l2 B5 l; D0 r, _- L# @ Q
RES (1) Remote Engagement Section (HAWK TBM weapons system term).
# R# e5 M* j4 R/ x(2) Resolution.' _/ q+ m7 d1 T( {
RESA Research, Evaluation, and Systems Analysis simulation facility (USN), San Diego,
% A" v6 t# H' t! a( hCA.
B0 P$ z* f* ?) Y* ]: T/ URescission An action by the President canceling budget authority previously appropriated6 U) V' A- z, p. d
but not yet obligated or spent. If both Houses of Congress do not approve the% {1 Q0 _# p' b+ w0 ?5 y3 e
proposed rescission within 45 days, the President must obligate the BA as
$ ~* o! v/ G9 Q6 a+ V/ a ?intended by Congress.7 v2 b% \6 Y; ~/ A- A
Research and2 l; j# _5 c% R$ `. o
Development" H$ n _4 M* k, S+ d8 q* P
Costs' u- e4 w7 U% }# N: G0 i$ s
Those program costs primarily associated with R&D efforts including the
) P: D1 x6 u4 odevelopment of a new or improved capability to the point where it is ready for
* s7 H+ K8 `4 Nuse. They include equipment costs funded under RDT&E appropriations and0 {4 c& T/ K9 w) D
related military construction appropriation costs. They exclude costs that appear
( D8 V$ Z0 ~. Z, m0 ^in the military personnel, operation and maintenance, and procurement( A- R: B% b1 @! x( h
appropriations.
. P/ _/ Q! f$ B2 A# X9 h7 ^Research,( l+ \, l1 X p" {0 z- }
Development,
( n& {3 E; L) O! OTest, and
d3 i) Q- | T ]8 z# cEvaluation
) Z+ q1 p0 J. F: c# V5 C(RDT&E)0 U+ ]& v7 @( X! U" d0 x3 u
Activities for the development of a new system that include basic and exploratory
0 F4 s- V/ `1 w+ n: v# `8 gresearch, advanced and engineering development, development and
) G% t8 ~. F3 y8 A5 h6 O" Y8 Q+ ~operational testing and the evaluation of test results. Also, an appropriation/ h+ e6 @7 ?8 b+ w
category that includes funds allocated to the FYDP major force program 6.
+ U( S) q+ C# R0 X0 J% h( J% w(Defense Systems Management College)- b$ u. [% i/ [3 E- a
Resident Space
! K, i# M* b# ^# ]2 ~, fObject (RSO)
; O$ j% S" f9 MThe Cheyenne Mountain Complex maintains object, which is currently on-orbit
. q/ p, T, p9 {' S$ Eand whose element set parameters.
8 U0 y) I5 E5 D8 w3 v2 eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 R4 h9 d4 J1 K9 Z* N/ F5 X' m- N. \
248
% @& |8 Q6 }" p0 {# \RESOL Resolution.
5 _" B* m1 e, [* Z8 NResolution (1) The ability of a sensor to measure the separation of an image into its
( c& W, g i" k8 Y ?# x# oconstituent objects so that single objects are visible and distinguishable.4 o/ p/ D* r$ [2 E
(2) A measurement of the smallest detail that can be distinguished by a
4 c! y1 U& L/ L" S6 qsensor system under specific conditions.
; l [. T# c& L, P4 l5 M' q0 f# ~Response Plan
7 i; i% ?! K5 _" RSelection0 s% {' z/ a8 j9 |# ^; g% g) ^
The continual comparison of the nature of the observed threat with the defense
0 q+ [* t& O! C6 |" S# l9 v H' Vsystem capabilities and selects the best way to attack the threat in accordance! P" m, x* D% C: e4 \" M7 ?, e7 ]2 I
with established priorities and specified strategy.
# p1 j1 ~0 g8 ^! IResponsive$ r5 p/ V' n4 N
Threat3 v, s6 t/ n0 {6 }, O4 L& y
The threat after taking into account modernization and countermeasures
4 c# @, d6 T# V; a* S. Y! Yintroduced to offset the capabilities of the SDS.
/ Z0 q! `! m0 f1 N( P6 CRestitution The process of determining the true planimetric position of objects whose images
! q% \, N* W% d" g8 ?4 u1 ^5 h9 jappear on photographs.% k1 {1 W& t4 ~0 w
Retrofit Action Action taken to modify in-service equipment.
5 S) s7 E0 {4 w0 m! MRetrograde Orbit An orbit having inclination of 0 to 90 degrees (See Prograde Orbit).
" J2 @, d, t9 g1 E$ AReverse. K" a6 }% h' u6 q8 Z# w* @7 h. f
Engineering2 f/ P& ]4 l; Y; t4 E
The process of analyzing a computer system’s software to identify components: k$ V; f9 z" e8 Z
and their interrelationships.4 m7 O& A7 }3 _ M, ~! A* a4 S
REVIC Revised Enhanced Version of Intermediate COCOMO (Computer term).9 I! |6 [0 u+ ^% U1 c# S" K( G( Q
Revisit Interval The time that elapses between successive observations of an object from a
- q( s$ U4 _4 U% e/ lsingle sensor. |
|