航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H4 p: [: _* d9 n, h8 D 130: q: I3 H% q5 u" J2 }- U9 N& Q4 S {3 O Human-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system : y* \/ H! b$ oprocesses. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential 4 _3 k; S2 x" Uhigh-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to $ `! I: U8 {3 U% uBMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal; N+ P( w$ b; d- E$ t Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of 4 h/ F9 L/ r/ T" `+ C, u9 B1 M4 ]command and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost+ {8 ?, i$ s( n phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses , b% c3 ~ A7 _8 m, tto initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human+ e2 T$ w: {$ H9 G+ S/ I. s decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) 7 H7 }, G# C6 |0 B# Y$ \9 l$ pHuman " S+ g9 y% G8 v7 ^4 r1 X, i8 C; ?Intelligence 8 z' m/ P/ }# K* L(HUMINT)# |- [1 W$ D m5 R, T A category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by 6 X: i3 Y! O0 Y) Vhuman sources., `' k5 N/ N9 i3 _: Y# E+ `/ r Human Systems) _8 ?+ ^: j0 [* Y- s Integration' A9 v# k) v0 t( l The human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, ' g4 n2 Q) Z6 W+ Rtraining, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort- D2 W r7 M$ y1 @, S7 R for the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of' G* i( ^ _# G: O' M9 J7 x% M5 M ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier,2 e# S: k8 u) }; k; S! `5 x+ V sailor, airman, or Marine. ' M$ o; m3 \( Y2 w" }2 q5 }7 nHUMINT Human Intelligence.( V* L% \- Y" ?/ Y HVAA High Value Airborne Assets.1 e& h% P- T6 p4 b' j HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. " y/ U: M K& P5 \- K. F$ U- WHVG Hypervelocity Gun.2 d9 V/ ?6 f1 L$ F HVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). 4 N7 F3 S! ~7 ?: d4 C+ ^9 iHVM Hypervelocity Missile. 3 P: O, D( t8 j. P, E z+ SHVP Hypervelocity Projectile. 2 b4 D' f v/ [' g# j4 t, `HVT Half-Value Thickness. 8 V4 g6 _5 K3 ]' N3 v6 MHW Hardware. + i6 i5 L( Z2 S9 s, S" RHW/SW Hardware/Software., K9 e! ?2 U, i4 P' V ^% Y& g HWCI Hardware Configuration Item. * S! I2 F* P) j( U. jHWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop.' w- Q5 z2 x9 t! p HWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test.. K) Z7 |! U" `; s8 Q5 Y HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature.6 Q3 c7 n- W( N1 G3 L Q Hypervelocity 0 T: E0 x ~; VGun (HVG); \& Q5 S3 L e. ~ A gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example, . d. ]) d1 N2 G! z* ]3 |3 I( zan electromagnetic or rail gun.# N7 ?- B$ W' M/ N. | Hypervelocity : V3 ~+ n; b' D4 j0 Z5 L8 CMissile (HVM) % G, t& y) J, t9 D- x$ qA missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second. 1 e6 I/ V8 J* }) C. d# j, k1 DHYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance.. p7 R( P# t& r Hz Hertz (cycles per second). + G8 j, R7 n6 f% N2 x4 oMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I z3 N0 l; D- |5 z& W+ l$ b131$ D* R& J2 w4 G5 }! f q4 F I&CO Installation and Checkout.4 a4 W+ p, N( ?1 K I&I Installation and Integration.: ^/ j5 N3 `9 E I&PA Integration and Performance Analysis. ; e- j- W4 {3 n1 lI&T Integration and Test. 8 }5 _: A- g: G& a) p/ CI&W Indications and Warning. # S6 n3 N: Q+ p+ z& O5 l1 J+ j: K7 xI-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.. T B$ K+ a; d) C I-HAWK Improved HAWK. V+ c# \% E: h0 h4 n I-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term). # A) Q* E+ H' \( r0 ]4 y$ Z' K& yI/F Interface. ` ]& N1 P, G/ n* qI/O Input/Output.& Y3 [ E* O$ V. N I/R Interchangeability/Reparability. - y" F" l( f( I# l4 e: M+ a( _I4 International Information Integrity Institute. * {+ Z% c( n; h( s ^0 H; {IA Information Architecture. ' K C/ h& }" l- D5 cIA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations.8 K# ^" j% l$ G2 t' T" G IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test.- i; G" T, s. Q IAD Integrated Air Defense.' b6 T, r( }3 @7 K IADS Integrated Air Defense System.+ j) W& f) w" B: k$ h IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. }" N5 @1 S# {) d4 G! H: U IAG International Agreement Generator. % Y5 g; d3 E! F4 S( z/ b/ c" R( {$ {IAI Israel Aircraft Industries. 3 ]$ j0 Z+ {5 H5 A. Z+ F5 ^7 yIAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package. % z7 \/ U6 A. a, m- ^* g6 u/ dIAS Israeli Architecture Study. ; N0 X3 j& q- J9 h- C$ gIAT Integrated Assembly Test. 9 k; r5 w, y# V; U2 L. V2 }IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. & M& Y4 h o+ o: U g; IIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out.: c8 k2 d$ K" h; I' c5 J IAW In Accordance With. & a$ O/ ^& P) `' j+ x3 }IBA Industrial Base Assessment. * W% S7 [" L# {9 ~" U( L' yIBC Impurity Band Conduction.! P! e1 Y8 L6 V: T IBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.) m1 k5 ~- L l# W3 N0 R MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I% ?7 Q/ Z% K1 z Y: x 132 " H/ K2 z% j0 o" n, A9 Y" Z1 tIBDL Intra-Battery Data Link.+ B2 {5 E% D& R z3 }9 C" W IBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration9 k/ ]; {# Y; u' w IBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System. : W! w+ ?* Y4 a3 m* `" j9 U3 m% \8 yIBM International Business Machines Corporation.+ J: m; Y8 ^2 N' V IBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis.: Z3 T, p. R v IBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term). $ P, {6 [' I+ GIBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US ! y6 a8 i# I& V8 j# ^, }4 Y' T- Tnaval ships. 5 S4 K9 V$ ]* L+ SIBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey.# S) I' P k6 w6 Q% n! b9 @ IC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit. 0 |8 a# t, y# {4 v. i7 @# d" z8 HICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment.# ?: a- a8 E8 b* ] ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System. 6 N' n m/ ?" {7 E5 c% NICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. . \ Y6 C3 o( w$ z* Y# [ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. 1 t6 M- \. P7 V) ~ICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control7 R" S' x; U8 O; w System (ICS) for US naval ships. 2 |( a! Q7 V4 Y( l' T, gICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering.: p. y0 A" M9 v- E( z ICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.: Q4 Y/ T) P6 o2 } ICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).9 I/ k% ]8 c( q. N (2) Item Category Code (ILS term).; O1 U/ }; O; w ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing. 2 u0 o+ P: `% Q, ?ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security.- P5 h8 R( Q7 v" R u% y- Q1 H. \ ICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking. ' I' p( c* }$ lICD Interface Control Document/Drawing.: C& k/ M6 x; B3 _ e3 d& d& M8 \& W) z ICE Independent Cost Estimate.! q. M, _/ O n, p2 a4 @0 X* H ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO). 6 J, _7 W1 G; cICM Improved Conventional Munitions.: g3 m) h8 D$ e, l ICN Installation Completion Notification. # b$ E# V& I5 p3 g! A- Q4 ^ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term).2 A6 |6 i0 }# W ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures.1 o3 E) n* M6 ~: ? p MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 5 [, r/ r2 @# H/ s5 \" x133 1 `7 ~9 s8 y! B2 Q! bICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term).5 Z r/ o! O9 h6 Y4 t! a2 @3 m (3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process. ! [6 W! x" R9 J5 A2 KICR Integrated Contracting Report. 1 V+ H# x# C3 f! g/ GICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and& V3 Y2 v% p! E, [4 F control system for US naval ships. @, M' @7 B j9 T! ~, s(2) Interface Control Specification.6 {7 U# b$ h8 ^ ICU Interface Control Unit. ) C0 ~+ t# e, Q% c* L8 H" UICWG Interface Control Working Group." _. d8 x: w8 h0 }! Y7 O) q8 Z3 K0 k ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification. ) E- r* X; j' a6 i* eIDA Institute for Defense Analysis. , h; a, X8 d1 }; U$ b# B0 YIDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term). + n: W# Y) z" u' O0 V1 s& l8 i9 sIDB Integrated Data Base.5 L+ b! c8 U: p IDD Interface Design Document. + V5 u$ H( ^3 n" |# eIDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis. " r* P% d+ D; wIDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term). 3 r& w$ x6 S% u: t2 RIdentification' y1 p$ O+ T3 _/ \/ j9 t7 p Friend or Foe( k2 }1 b9 I* V& m# o ?' { (IFF) # U# G" K4 ~7 q5 o3 ]A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by ( o" y5 @$ x" ~% dfriendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby' z8 P) G& u! v3 R% T7 o \ y z distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. * d( j6 ?+ W' ?% R8 pIDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. & P* X o3 ]# z fIDHS Intelligence Data Handling System. ! a1 D7 A( n3 p4 L" _IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.3 G: `- ?' i$ q; a IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System. ( k L' c' L) q8 OIE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.2 E' r! U; R# N2 S: T( y# l IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination. - x3 c5 l/ |; q" g- VIEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 5 r! N: `5 |: l/ l) kIEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure.) f& k1 R6 M- x$ `' W IEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse.4 s: x |( }) ]# n IEP Integrated Evaluation Plan.8 D7 d9 t# ]% a9 G: |" B* c IER Independent Evaluation Report. 7 c! K7 ^$ {' l$ c+ CIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group. ' Z+ c( S2 W% [8 ~+ l/ NMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - H" ?; U" c* {: |134: b. U- J" N4 O0 k5 c4 H( g+ O! H: M IETF Internet Engineering Task Force. * [, v$ o$ s& f( I" q/ q0 KIEV Integrated Experimental Version. 4 Q; L8 Q M0 f2 IIEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare. s" o' S4 A& Q5 L' _6 hIFA Integrated Financial Analysis. 0 h: v( x! I$ Z4 T3 z. `IFF Identification, Friend or Foe. * d8 f; T1 x4 y8 R3 S3 IIFHV In-Flight Homing View.3 x& r) W2 w0 {( x3 g( Z9 s IFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the 3 h1 o M! H* @# Q1 ncommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets. ( }8 c% M$ R. z. ?1 rThe generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications & [8 z0 t4 W. d* T; Q! r6 s' k7 ^5 Tsystem term GEP.& r( S: ?# z; F0 Q9 s3 E6 u IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope. + S% R3 W- p2 q4 ^IFOV Instantaneous Field of View.0 @ W, a& o" A7 O# O2 N( V) @ IFSR In-Flight Status Report8 ^( |9 g: z0 Q% s+ S+ f/ T+ `2 y IFT Integrated Flight Test. D& c7 W9 ?5 R1 W: s) q8 {* o* n; `IFTU In-Flight Target Update. , U0 m. h9 B9 C) n+ UIG Inspector General. , d4 }# k) b9 ~0 r. x3 @: J) G9 LIGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse.( r! O# B4 t9 s6 e9 } IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard. f$ b1 s, l/ sIGS Inertial Guidance System. ' B* D# X$ \; w& ^+ [IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS). ; x; i+ _& m9 C: Z" k6 G6 IIGT Integrated Ground Test. % b4 D: k/ T0 {0 V2 AIGU Inertial Guidance Unit.2 V* m6 b- W5 E1 o9 D II Impulse Intensity.* k v2 ?7 V7 I9 _ `( n: T7 V IIP Interoperability Improvement Program. 4 j9 P6 K/ y2 b9 }! s- f& L% IIIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team.) E( r6 }! S( @8 O3 E; w9 G8 c IIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared." r4 G5 R/ s5 ^9 G3 d- K4 t IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).3 e0 ^8 b6 F* n K IIT Interceptor Integration Test.6 V; U: [! g: j+ Q1 M9 v% t IITF Information Infrastructure Task Force. 8 j* L3 v+ d+ n# PIJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon. # e0 ]. K9 y8 n- e0 v9 {) T1 ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ( F z1 U2 f# R& h5 C/ H) E135 7 X; [9 \4 R! M# B( |9 D0 a- eILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term). 8 z# o. }* o# E8 h! \ILC Initial Launch Capability.1 `" `% C6 r4 T$ g! b Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g.,% R: ~$ A8 z J; h availability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics ; c+ m. R. C9 e# e7 csupportability, etc.). 6 o Q# M- Y3 Z5 s4 dIllumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray ( n* s) t. P z$ G% s$ y0 Nsatellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. " Z) V5 i4 r* ]. p' A$ T% ?2 pILS Integrated Logistics Support." J+ o! @/ W5 h* F7 o ILSM ILS Manager. " \' H' J; }/ T% rILSMT ILS Management Team6 k. l3 o; H0 G: f ILSO ILS Office. ! w5 T3 T, d& c, D4 fILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan.; c) X2 T( o; c6 Y3 Z5 d# |. j' L ILSWG ILS Working Group.4 R3 Z. w: V$ ^ IM Information Management. 5 C: L( G3 K% F0 G- @+ AImagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical * f: ^1 e6 M4 d! }* S+ ]* O9 Tmeans on film, electronic display devices, or other media.3 ]7 `# V1 j( P) Y Imagery $ [; N6 g7 U- [1 o* VIntelligence $ B+ e8 C5 Q4 @; A; l(IMINT) 9 _* q* i: E. _Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography, + M# ]. \" g2 l3 r+ r9 oinfrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic5 |. i1 P* H+ ]3 \ aperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or3 o& N' @: C# d; Z electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media.3 f# j2 C& @% w- f* ]+ K/ I5 C Imagery ; R2 K. N, U& f; f& S/ ACorrelation- W0 }: j# u" K5 M8 o6 J! R( i The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from6 k, {0 e U/ P9 U9 q v different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics$ S$ X9 Y. s0 [8 l signified. 1 Z- q" H5 h: T* t& rImaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object.& o: X7 q1 }' A$ [, X IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term)., Y' ^2 [7 @: R" S c3 x+ L (2) Internal Management Control.: T5 L3 W! e$ j5 ?- j+ d1 U6 Z+ | IMDB Imagery Management. : @/ e( B, K1 c1 g! \! t4 kIMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of, a6 G; H4 Y7 L2 V Defense.: C0 H* [7 j9 ?' M( B IMINT Imagery Intelligence.- A- Z/ r7 b) O$ y& m8 K IMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program./ h+ p! Y: v1 P+ ?. R6 R% E Immediate Kill $ [6 ~ D B1 MMode2 R0 v! }7 N1 m8 r1 C+ ~/ h A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by . `- d$ \4 j& b+ himpact with the KV or KED. ! N8 x2 J9 a: u6 O1 B* SImpact Point r$ w3 [* T( [) r- i. SPrediction (IPP) 1 q# G1 T U1 Q$ O- GPrediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, - b+ B; e# w, Q2 t- f, S7 {& V: eusually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes 9 e' p2 F% c" s% g# J- r; othe perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties. 1 B5 M2 A) E6 X1 xMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I2 \) {$ L/ Q5 J% `- O# a. u 136! u6 D* ]4 h8 a3 U9 }- z) w Implicit . W# d! r& r) u* RCoordination9 ^1 V( r9 v9 ^' n Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to , s; L6 h( j- Z; O* w8 b1 cderive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations 0 H$ U: ^: i5 e: l8 C& j* awill be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical., \ Z9 _: [8 ?' r) C5 L& z Decisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers.- l T, x5 }6 U2 i! A9 \ o# q Impulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for ' Q9 _) W4 u5 x2 y6 Oa period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.) ( X. y; t# M7 |. c( tImpulse9 K0 \3 D! f3 M8 g Intensity (II) ( q* B% b9 \& F6 JMechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse j" B" t, K1 Z) s$ i% h$ n intensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of . O5 K* A( ~: k3 f2 [% Iimpulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter; ' `& I4 Y# M3 d% d! v! q2 a; E9 O2 Khence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s. 3 f# [1 X1 E; uImpulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The8 N. L& I1 Y. f/ _ intensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target9 n! o O( [, x$ S3 W @ violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of % E! l5 W5 V+ f" n7 T* |6 D$ @the target and causing structural failure. 2 l7 U; L4 g- ~1 FIMPWG Information Policy Working Group. ; _5 {/ K8 t F0 l$ @8 C, ?IMS Integrated Master Schedule.) E, Z2 U( S% L9 w, G! @5 d IMU Inertial Measurement Unit. ! ^& ^. j2 J5 a) ?7 u( j) s- x: NIN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse 1 |" I# b" ]; i# u* F1 a: lNoise. - k, K5 a3 X( fIn Inch.# H6 q8 z# `( m3 |5 J$ k* k3 C IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator. / ?8 P W; l1 n1 T5 gIn-Flight Target9 ~: R, v; N: }0 H) s Update (FTU) 0 U1 u' S! X7 |+ U; ^9 m) X5 IA report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control; E: h6 j" T) Y' s- y suite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. # S- a* m8 Z8 e2 e, ^& v xInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing- K; m' ~7 K/ C; f/ q: I0 J the orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has) n$ S7 ^9 o" V3 N$ ^ an inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite 5 Q6 M9 }% f# L# Gtraveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in 4 X- |& Q/ L% }0 r+ Xwhich a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An7 ?1 ~& R/ D5 U# |1 H8 [- o orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is( ?0 q3 Q, X, S3 m7 z called a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a / [+ W: A5 V1 vretrograde orbit.7 |: a: ?, K# s& Q1 t Incremental Q9 u3 g+ O* t7 \4 d8 n" G5 Z) M, u @ Funding0 I! ]: Q: C9 J6 |' ~' l6 n; X1 D9 Q4 F The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project9 H: B* p3 i5 V based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such ) s9 |7 E$ u5 y" E& a, Z! h2 ebudgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in; r* Y6 G: j$ C$ a6 u9 W7 n completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding, 8 k' M& u2 m2 |2 u! X& Pwhere budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated - g) B. o( i, ~0 f* oobligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification / n8 j0 ]( Y9 vFriend or Foe + s8 n4 P( M* l(IFF) 8 O, M! K7 k5 _0 tA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by + |) x% ] I- A7 O+ R K) O# Sfriendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby. @# S6 ~% u& |# C* g. M distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. ( v$ Z5 H1 c: x+ O% l( cMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I / i4 M. K5 a+ {137 " u( _( Z8 ?2 C+ _" C* {Imagery ' g {* h! I! L0 CCorrelation 8 L0 B- y3 ]( C7 zThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from/ M! U# h# F2 O different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics; K4 c/ g2 T+ d7 C4 ^1 M signified.$ [0 q1 a0 Y/ a) x7 v4 R" a Independent 8 R" R* b" M9 H7 p, XCost Analysis # b: e9 S- M% V7 Y* g! nAn analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body" e% v& }' Q4 B/ l( Y9 s disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United/ P' u) K1 R s' y7 i- S# v3 t States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational % Z: L' D; k2 Q8 ~, w& r( i' ]# fManpower Requirements.”) 6 v9 X+ v l6 Y6 j+ |& p6 NIndependent Cost% }! C5 f' [; f- w5 b7 c0 x3 I Estimate (ICE)3 z) {& W, O, J7 I4 t" I$ r$ K$ r A cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority0 @ \' L6 n- @7 ]: U* w W responsible for acquiring or using the goods or services. ! h2 B8 G$ \# @Independent& O8 H* ?' g8 n* c% O; C Evaluation! f+ ~ U1 K8 x# r Report (IER)$ [: {1 |. R' R- @ Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data,3 I0 `6 ^, t$ q- H; R9 \ reports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s 5 c2 n* r( d9 I- o* _: B" }assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on 7 z) [* h6 {. f) I7 {the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is . A; V9 j2 x7 u% a) ?' Iprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER " [$ Z, C4 U0 Y( L6 Gmay also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army)% }# N8 h( _" y$ Z Independent ) L7 b- A. x& r- ?6 `' ~; CResearch and+ y% W# i- j5 N Development7 e% w& {: a, a0 h4 z, x, P& K4 ~ (IR&D) - O! E' s) M" a4 L7 K. u) ^Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a ( t! R Y. \8 w! N4 I9 z) [contract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and ! }5 U: a& W3 t0 h6 P! Japplied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation# T9 @3 x; ?' u: b studies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See# q) K @% t' o. p9 B8 \; c8 `4 z6 N FAR 31.001.)" c# p% N1 q& h* A Independent 6 p4 V, P& z6 Z* tVerification and / M" q9 R2 V6 }/ EValidation (IV&V) 1 z. e& a. l3 }' CVerification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that : {6 Z" S) e. b4 i7 yis not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being 7 r; ]; V3 `1 e: z* A+ bevaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software * L8 ^. u3 M6 b7 e5 U0 adevelopment activities. % u+ ~: G. x2 b" ?2 D# iIndium a, Q9 X% D V( `2 g* ^6 `1 V Antimonide2 {% S% i) s: e8 i' p0 x Infrared sensing material. Q% X9 V( T- X4 i; w/ W- T1 z Individual5 A5 @; }) m. N1 {7 m5 w$ \ Acceptance Test P/ P2 f( w9 j- CA test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics9 M* e& S% V6 v1 O prior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using 0 W2 S- b& Q4 y" M3 k9 Wthe end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency. ) m) Z: ]9 |$ `& f2 o1 XInduced . ^4 G4 @8 M- e8 `" |Environments5 T* y a8 W5 b7 s+ r Induced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the 4 `2 j G7 A" i9 O& rnatural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets: O4 L2 W8 k: Q& X% s2 x (Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or) D* D! y* y* P' z the influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally- # ]6 N$ ?8 g* e7 F6 QInduced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E# u/ X! P9 `9 o3 q B Z7 S electronic equipment). - X8 z. Y! N! q0 A- nInduced # [# Z) l, V. _Radioactivity 3 M6 H+ j7 k) _5 FRadioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions, 7 J# ]0 y9 B/ z- ]* o% Z% q1 Gparticularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of$ y1 c7 K6 i* G4 V# H3 e [ unstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce ]$ b/ m+ D2 I( [6 A4 {% O* Z( N7 | radioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by( O' _. f% _8 m$ e interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and, G. C: Z6 o0 N" T5 c silicon in soil and sea water). 7 I! H5 _6 Q2 }/ ]4 dMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I & H! ~; l5 H$ _. u7 E6 ~, ?9 f- p138 9 B9 W3 V9 `8 \( Z' F! ]Industrial ! @% q- f& L+ F9 @9 XResource7 o: W& e$ ~1 \ Analysis (IRA) * S6 W* s$ C2 E) lA quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory ; ]7 K+ A5 @/ i& j4 w3 k# Ccapabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to % z) s) N2 T7 q3 S0 d' ~support SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and ( Q4 ^5 v2 }. }' \2 _special tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the 4 x* ~# W* A2 U/ xrange of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies,, Q# ?! k& \ X1 L0 g0 B) Z1 C producibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in0 c. ?( `1 e% S' D( x3 n7 X IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and . q: Q( d! |9 d( }become issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues 6 h+ f4 Z/ j6 V' tResolution Strategies (PPIRS) document.4 C% `8 T& C6 z) K8 i4 |' L Inertial) H R C: K( B6 }2 [1 M Guidance 2 k& r# d8 W4 m0 HA guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, ( N7 p4 X" `, x, t4 j7 j2 \3 |wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly ( F4 p' {4 I/ l+ P/ lwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures3 l8 x* l" ~2 X% l and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain- b+ }7 e5 t0 a/ { direction. 2 ^" m0 E' Q$ M0 h: W8 S- j+ g# m3 hInertial2 ^; U9 W+ O* [2 z7 k3 m/ e9 D Measurement) `) a/ c# s9 _, B5 R! Y3 S. S Unit (IMU): |8 U3 s: a1 v; I A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,7 l2 u( {. ]+ q5 e, z4 B: Z& D% e wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly & N9 E$ _# ^6 Q; m" l: N! \within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures3 l3 a, ?, n$ w* t8 V% I( w5 a4 | and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain1 n! g! L* ?0 F3 K1 W direction. 2 z( h9 Z3 _7 l9 h5 v+ [INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability.* c' K9 U: X8 @, P INEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). 4 A6 `& U. v9 i& O3 M$ l) \INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR e+ Z7 @; b- S! e8 C9 y# } Treaty.3 a$ t k$ U! v" D0 W, b5 K$ v In-Flight Target & C1 ]8 q, b: P- [$ cUpdate ) x; J8 x8 z# r. q& UA data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and; S \) g" Z. P# ?' b velocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. 5 i4 K, F4 g, C! `" Y( Y% `(USSPACECOM); D& t" n4 m& ~% W1 M/ N Information & N9 X+ t, w& ?, L( RArchitecture (IA)7 F" t' d4 a8 k' Q8 B A description of the information that is needed to support command and control , f2 r& V9 f! q: t* V }decision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing % i& S- F5 {: F P1 [1 E( r& Kthat must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description ) ?! L6 o! k2 @provides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design , D. _4 i; O4 T/ V: u* Zflexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability.6 N' b! `4 s1 J7 Q& ^ Information' ?. _, A, O2 N/ Z3 i Resources # Z, _: w8 }+ F) `/ Y+ a# i: eManagement / e9 t3 b/ q$ X, `The planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling,7 B3 q4 S5 o5 B4 v: D and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, * x- X1 m" g; B. P7 \- band dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of" @) D# W* _3 h+ G8 ?$ n f8 ^4 ~ information and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information / G8 M6 ?2 [ H/ i; g, z, USecurity 1 o2 Q+ N$ N& j5 {% k" o) d1 H(INFOSEC)$ T }, I' e, A& `- i Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and 4 C, W+ `# P$ z q* R( M" Hprotecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or* `, Z0 J8 V! S8 O) f2 \ unclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical ) a6 ]1 Z+ |& _8 }/ B& Edata and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned& T3 u8 A3 w n with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, 8 F2 k. l2 x, A3 m, B/ Z- }downgrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring.- E- F$ v9 `' H; d+ S' h Infrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,000& k' i5 d) W4 l Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic 2 N, P. d0 R$ Q5 B! V7 @Radiation.) # G: N7 \& Z; tInfrared (IR) % ]3 O7 N3 w/ `) F2 m" jElectro-Optics + i! ~7 e' _" }! w' ]Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength" S3 @* H# D6 X spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. % X8 _- s5 M6 ]' pMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I; P; o/ s. ^' K" }7 e0 q2 T7 p, h9 \ 139 - ]. Q% k* Z) D5 L. ?4 iInfrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted / Z) L1 [5 \) `- ^or reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the % J+ Y' E' Y. Y9 \electromagnetic spectrum.8 D! y4 ~1 ^2 z, p" Z* k+ H Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength " ~) A0 J( ?- Q, `( R0 P2 ^region of 1 to 40 microns.0 l5 s' c: u$ T& E) g; @1 a Initial8 L' p# P0 [) I Operational9 K8 K- C1 C- ^* z Capability (IOC) * k3 [; t1 B4 pThe first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of , { F2 w' q) |3 d5 W1 Jequipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned% L& w M" s2 T& j or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. & @( I/ _3 M4 z9 F5 ?8 bInitial" M* Q: w( G* ]7 ` Operational Test) x5 p# `& G2 s3 z) w and Evaluation6 G8 n# e9 f* S9 ` (IOT&E) + m' ?% h9 X; [' U9 ?. dAll operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production - `' u) c0 x. R9 u+ ^representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial" V& o! t! u- S production. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system 6 ]0 V; R/ |' L4 z7 A8 roperational effectiveness and operational suitability.1 i |; l1 ?/ @$ F$ Y( o A INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite).0 Z* J2 m; E6 w5 A& U# g INS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code. ( c- ?; Y0 v' `$ E5 U3 c+ C: @' A3 kInSb Indium Antimonide. / Y8 S/ `( X5 r$ e! A' fINSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. * X o" J9 N9 U3 TINSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments. + L% M4 q2 w- E8 o; G( A/ wInteg Integrated. ) I6 p8 ~# H R& O. N, z! HIntegrated 1 |' G* @* {( W1 D2 R$ ?. [$ }" lContracting/ q* v) V, [* g" Z+ B Report (ICR) & y1 k& q( S) O7 x$ BA quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and - W% r `2 U+ J) F0 K& a$ M( Iinterfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a 9 Y" `1 x0 v" ]' N1 {! nmechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as/ k. j% J8 D% Z( x Integrated Contracting Plan or ICP). 5 m/ b" G' h: N+ R3 NIntegrated Fire* f" A8 y- {, I" V+ f Control System B, v! [$ n2 j) ?; E6 V) q& yA system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data : V2 Y; E3 R+ rcomputation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted8 U: m. X; ?& O- ~ by electromechanical devices. ( h, X! g/ F7 a E% \. JIntegrated , i. N6 r+ c4 i; K2 D4 h3 J$ yLogistics Support * ^+ `) C- T) A(ILS)& f) w$ Y5 ^5 x4 t" n (1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and8 ~+ |( P: g& P3 U0 ~* J" @ technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into* u3 @; ?9 n; R system and equipment design; develop support requirements that are - |* k9 p$ }9 }& T1 mrelated consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each2 d, I6 Z2 L+ o3 e other; acquire the required support; and provide the required support+ K2 D" |$ Y+ t* T( }& B during the operational phase at minimum cost.4 P& I6 Q$ L, L) g (2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the ; y" @0 n* r- @effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an + z: ~3 ]2 `1 x7 g/ zintegral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation.5 e# a( U8 K2 d* a7 l Integrated 1 k6 [* b6 ~9 F9 ~Logistics Support. u R$ F y( @3 k b/ |! n (ILS) Elements - E4 K* i& t/ X+ {: w& C' KMaintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish( X+ r, k& x6 W& f) | H8 J maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system. : Q: R) `! B [Manpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and& ]( w* d/ x8 ?# H- @ civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a4 {2 B, e* t. L: y8 C materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.' T$ J4 L% @9 G; \4 C/ T$ Y Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to1 b1 y6 ^ R8 ~ O" |9 \9 y' n determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and - p% Z& A9 @9 ~$ O( y ~* E# Rdispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well; l5 L1 T, r+ ^; \8 o as replenishment supplies support.4 ?' a" {7 d3 e1 n( s5 ? MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I . `- E2 n3 C0 E/ Y6 U u9 ~; Q4 S, U ^3 d1406 d) z3 S9 A7 ]0 Q Support Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the 7 P( w. ]3 w, `5 N' k! F2 o6 [; Ooperation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology+ d8 c* F$ n0 }) A' |/ q* a0 ^) m and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It; I7 b) }9 r: ~ includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment" ^, x8 W! x: q" k/ i) r itself.* q9 I& [% F& ~9 i' d% d4 I Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as$ w& x( R6 \- E0 m( j manuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs1 P& M- X' d% X and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer * ~0 d5 M8 C6 jprograms and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other . z. q; J) v1 Finformation related to contract administration. # H8 z; a% L7 `8 A B. mTraining and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training8 a6 @& B. [+ s) F# m9 w: B3 Z ~ devices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military( y% Y5 n! t) M8 g personnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual " c+ C% y2 z: } C5 zand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; : J1 w0 V3 q3 v* Y( u+ ^1 |6 dand logistic support planning for training equipment and training device + v) y7 R" q8 n+ u' Xacquisitions and installations. . q0 p. J% M! O' t! V! W. D/ _Computer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software, , U" O) J3 U; @documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support $ h1 ^* Z t A; D& n2 _5 lembedded computer systems.. R5 |$ N+ z% N c( y Facilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets Y; g2 G h* F& b required to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define! o8 m. ^) @7 Y2 t2 B- S& _ types of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities, 0 k) v' u4 h. b$ i* U7 benvironmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment.8 `8 n8 ?& P/ d0 X Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes,) q g6 l0 E7 j, x/ E procedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,8 x, N" f2 y4 A' ~+ k equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and 6 y2 R9 d+ p7 o( v) ]7 }transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment3 V. e- j7 J4 ~7 d- P/ F0 j preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability./ A1 K: C y! @( b" ` Design Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as8 Z/ O3 Z& U" F; E reliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements.: Z( J$ a5 i1 d6 E These logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms : w+ {1 B% e. Y' ~* P+ Srather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness 8 ]6 R, w+ p) b, F6 F" Wobjectives and support costs of the materiel system. ! a5 m6 ] L$ i; I9 [2 m- O) DIntegrated. P. S' t5 H. k3 B1 R1 K Logistics& ~& V0 K" {+ D R1 Z Support Plan 9 J" m, m; r/ Y' J5 h' r, V2 |(ILSP) * i2 q& @. r7 O3 _! e* TThe formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the9 D: g0 X# v: ?( R program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed * j) c( o/ C+ N; h% M: N2 SILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with# f" h0 s6 p ]9 z6 B necessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and ?5 q8 e; B) s% Z9 z _& v+ E: }' @ production, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications , {" _' D0 [1 t( N" j: VRFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs.) S8 `# C. @ M) ~3 o5 [6 C4 | Integrated 8 X; q* \- H1 w' X8 B; i, |Priority List; X0 ?: h+ i7 g) ^) ~5 T A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized3 B1 u4 P K r1 \ across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs5 d5 r2 Y* R% J$ W. @# s that, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the D) L8 O* m4 p) t+ y+ w7 p+ dcapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated1 S2 s9 w; h7 G priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for& L- T0 Z" f; L, | programming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System& _1 C" H# r/ z5 Z process. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated 2 _) ^. K) L' AProgram 7 z; f" K6 r/ H" d$ W- FAssessment, O# t/ l7 V6 n& ?$ S (IPA)* A8 M) W, Q' s A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone ! F% }& A6 M/ m3 h& Z% a1 n1 tdecision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an# v( f. u3 u' q$ w1 B6 [ independent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into / d. _* I( t+ m5 j+ _0 v3 Qthe next phase of the acquisition cycle.$ @, I, }3 j6 X& ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 c+ @8 I0 B5 \8 G) O 141 2 ]* n6 B+ O/ RIntegrated % a3 D5 }4 R! J: K; fProgram " T; q: w7 I) c a" K4 y" W8 \Summary (IPS)6 K4 S: f. ?; R/ ^& R7 x7 R; M8 S: e" ] A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision ; a% A8 X, f C3 t8 I5 v1 ?authority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights 4 S+ S) Y) _" D' e0 Bthe status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the # M7 B* d! }$ ~& S3 W5 aacquisition cycle.' _* |# L1 }2 n1 @4 _! k* Q: I Integrated! X5 z& l: @$ X, L! A7 ?% B6 s Tactical Warning q& L2 S. ^7 D& v& r and Attack- e0 s" w$ j' C! y0 |+ n Assessment : W+ P9 i0 ?5 l- Y' R$ m+ Q(ITW/AA)" N; N B5 z) H: v4 ]9 ?( L ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and $ o, l( T) A9 |0 Aatmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack- M9 r) Y6 p7 }( T) \2 o3 P warning information, strategic and tactical. 0 r3 a( O# N/ k1 V* |- S% MIntegrated. J- d# B: @2 J* d- [ Warfare 6 t: d5 O/ a: h* y0 F: MThe conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing9 ]+ k+ X$ x$ `: } forces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional/ ~; O( k- z: z3 ~7 f weapons. , P, t- X( p2 IIntegration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such 7 s: o0 O ~! ba way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without 7 g; _: G ]9 |# t0 Y# p+ H. k0 Fadversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) " @& L) s3 ?% \ k& }( P! f4 [% E(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a & q' s& }) I9 A- Ksystem., i9 H, j1 F$ `9 Q+ @ INTEL Intelligence. 1 H3 J0 x* D* d# }/ g2 o) xIntelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis, * D& D9 H" a+ \4 @8 Zintegration and interpretation of all available information concerning7 O( f+ k$ Y# e3 X foreign countries or areas.5 z5 m" ?5 a# _8 o: C6 b (2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through, N3 y% v# c$ [ observation, investigation, analysis, or understanding. * n7 C0 ]4 P( m* J0 TIntelligence 8 i6 R- c2 U6 w0 {8 t) tIndicators " X1 L4 s+ a4 F% Q( {Classified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that, 7 Z5 v- U! z1 \/ ?7 u' zwhen properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and . y1 |+ ]# r- Uintentions. + |7 l& X. I& }/ s4 uIntelligence 2 W1 L2 @: K% u% I6 qOperations * n5 ?8 C5 W/ ^: e. Q" I: NCenter (IOC)) s5 |. k+ O- e- H# m An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB. , O6 `& o) p% r. f+ `* A0 o$ LThe IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational a: V0 J- O9 g, A6 y Intelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC)5 k3 `# `# F% F) Y- q: i Cheyenne Mountain Node (JCN).; x) `6 @$ s3 b5 q" Y0 I1 S6 a4 M Intelligence" n1 l1 V1 v- A% r7 U% g( G0 x Preparation of1 l7 r2 d/ }* r) ~! A the Battlespace+ ?- }0 `( ^& e2 L An analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the 5 J$ t1 J/ L G9 i" }- Qenemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence $ X( A* D+ H. D1 ^preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential 9 L8 R7 k5 B. x$ f' ?5 rarea in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed) W5 F) v' K; v: S% }$ P) b in detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on9 \) \4 f: `" E& @% S operations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle* k6 ~3 n) U( ~% S space is a continuing process. Also called IPB. & E* Y4 q% W8 o2 |" V% GIntelligence- J# y: r- L5 n% X4 f Report (INTREP)7 F4 K: \9 t0 t. W( ~ A specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of( G8 y% e* ?6 h. I. n! [9 _ command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in 8 w; @. u8 A W. ^2 [keeping with the timeliness of the information.% O& j( O+ U( V% E0 y G/ p- T- b Intelligence 2 O d, h9 @1 h; n' q, C H M/ J1 OThreat - K7 s0 B! X* ?: I8 ^/ x# n# j. X/ P4 UAn identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and + R7 Q* E! H; V/ W2 `exploit information from a given or similar operation. ( ?6 R" ^0 I7 P: s7 {! XMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 3 R, M" p. |& n1 F1429 `3 K) U, c0 d+ L M8 P. } Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit4 U/ {: |6 X$ p% y! F( m: y: K area, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal ) I, \$ B' g8 I0 p- lradiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second 4 n0 X5 S; C0 c8 Afalling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation,* p( J; y8 z. W2 n( n the term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or : V" f& L3 [1 Y# M; t$ ?6 C0 xdose) rate at a given location. * h3 V& _, s) I3 f+ l2 H8 ~- \Interactive8 ]: [' K& m+ f2 R# t. |5 R Responses ; O) J/ [# N1 X lInteractive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification. - `9 _3 J8 T2 z- ^' }' e9 d- KInterceptor- I2 }$ P7 X- D6 ]- l$ `$ e Cluster: A$ \: n0 g# n$ p B) T. Z A group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor.( i; v6 v3 Q c' B Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and U2 L n" D# @2 m' B rvelocity in three dimensions.4 R( O% U4 x* H1 w3 ? Interceptor Track 8 G" s( a9 q4 z/ xRange (Max) / W8 `" _# C) tThe maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function / {$ Y. ~' {9 y) x/ J2 Don a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit 1 b( s7 p n( @8 Ly * I8 V4 f& C5 \" n; }A condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and ) {* B ^6 I0 X$ ]8 i9 ~) ~physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and0 B; ]* ?4 |, k" r5 P, G: t are capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items5 {' ~% G9 S4 X; I themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for # v" c6 @' X4 [3 Afit and performance. # }" S4 C- b5 b6 O" Z: d TInterconnection The linking together of interoperable systems. . T3 l% f% C( J( C; M! K9 HIntercontinental ' p; Z, D! p4 k, F' e( hBallistic Missile, t5 H* Z1 H P (ICBM) c9 D2 q6 Q0 jA ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The # v1 A5 G8 o9 gterm ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from * j# H+ J" v5 O1 k6 p; H& msubmarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.) * x' o+ x/ v8 D, qInterface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection 9 l5 f9 t6 _2 `7 Tcharacteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged- s/ L0 f6 z ~. ^) R( Q7 D signals.1 G- d8 O* m1 T6 n" I (2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two. N+ E) k3 ?4 _, P2 \9 U# M' y systems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register.0 y) N+ t1 z; f6 ]0 U% [' s. n" Q (3) A shared logical boundary between two software components.5 O& i) Z+ t5 w1 ^( C' A (4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between 9 l, p# b$ O/ r0 ysystems, or between persons and systems. ' `3 w/ j5 F3 u7 ~: tInterface Control5 j& P' b Z- q Document (ICD), t; W/ x. c! v$ C0 `5 T (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must7 ]* h9 f- y, g+ [1 w; Z exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer 2 _) S3 C' o& xsoftware products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an+ _) J- D/ f& u$ {& X! _ Interface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD).# f- {) L4 o( y1 P8 b (MDA Lexicon) _3 }' q+ F( s6 _$ W% X) C* [+ i# ?(2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control ' _3 v" s- {. h3 l) c) z8 Dagreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements. / G& q. [& J- b) PThe ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification. ) q& E8 i. P$ H: m1 _Interface / `0 s7 }, h4 ~5 G% R$ |Requirements- o+ E$ a$ U! b- |# r/ w u* X( F Document (IRD) : o1 F* j4 Q5 s& {/ |A document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system* _8 f7 w7 `9 |) o9 } component.4 B+ F; g \: w* ^9 w. @5 C) t; O MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I: N7 Z: j0 X. K+ ]2 z 143 ) z$ i. S C8 Z' e5 u5 ~ t6 bInterference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to/ k! k" M* N* G: p. @ form a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum 0 V, K" U1 e- g3 fof the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point. 7 {( A6 x) Y/ z$ K0 ^Intermediate # m* v# {1 m8 {2 v- T1 XRange Ballistic) }! b: H' l7 k# o5 u2 O Missile (IRBM) / |* F5 z* _- e. K+ OA ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles.! C/ @* k* ~4 o. }# h9 L8 S0 } International ' ~1 a; B5 n# H" tAgreement \0 c- X) z8 P' _Generator (IAG)( R; D: Q! `" @' \. ~7 { Software system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD- [4 o( |% X7 n G; K1 e/ ]0 Y international Agreements./ l- ]6 A2 s4 ~+ b2 R9 m0 s6 p International5 Q7 L. l1 A: T Cooperative 9 d6 j/ L9 d+ n6 D3 y' DLogistics , C$ m2 O$ C% T7 S) _' q4 F$ SCooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination- [* \3 N' }8 i1 F- e of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply7 i" D7 R+ |) | and exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and! S: g) D& Y5 R3 B1 G3 Z8 X% x) { multilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions.. T% ?: }, x; M* F/ S% C0 G: o International4 X& c# [& ]$ Y! I Logistics 3 R/ o, i1 H0 A, e9 R) ?9 VThe negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics 4 `5 X0 O* _/ m& B1 ^, W3 u/ uarrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing ! p4 V: o" q6 i1 Zlogistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign ( [& X0 t; o5 C- A5 e6 [7 I! Egovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without & \6 Y0 P& X- t* O3 K" Wreimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing 5 h7 k5 g) T* f( ?# W( ?( Qof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or2 a6 L; y- V* W procedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,0 V! e k, |& g% Y6 {% g international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis.5 q# Z9 H- {* E4 b It includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States0 n" Z" O$ a5 e$ z& F* n logistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or 0 Z# u3 S B* u: mmore foreign governments, international organizations, or forces. ' r) Z( e ]) F4 U7 vInternational 5 I1 B: r, ^( P# U2 KLogistic Support" \0 C, @6 |' g0 g& ]4 J5 f The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or& f; I: F+ A, y more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement. ! t4 H `% t! G8 b8 AInteroperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services - D- b$ r/ W* j9 H. N0 ~ ^8 Cfrom other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to 8 ]1 K4 ?5 G5 M+ a+ ~) J! yoperate effectively together. - Y, K9 l$ s1 a# d* q% |8 u: TINTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization. . ]' D, `# f# R- v; [INTLCT Integrated Electronics.& I# i) F+ e9 i5 O- ~. S Intruder: l, x" {4 y. G9 c! w/ v! z/ I Operation . [7 ]# Y( }# A8 U# a4 C' W/ s6 _4 `An offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary# n+ h7 t9 }7 m6 f3 q m2 q object of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases.2 s: O1 q/ @2 W, o% |$ G: ]3 d INU Inertial Navigation Unit. * G9 B: E |. p* i4 j, qInventory Control 5 Q! ^0 r& M) \4 D V, v1 FPoint e6 ~ y3 m& w, T! p' U4 ]1 SAn organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the! ]- d- w* ?9 I3 O8 n primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a, \' d0 t# J0 t- F particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management % J7 y3 { M4 y( lincludes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction,) h. ?( u+ W! \7 J/ }4 C distribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction. & r* i/ C- Q( A0 m( o, G5 j5 LInverse Square 8 v4 b9 c y4 S Q, A- ^% S- uLaw }) w; ~9 K) e8 I The law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a. r: J4 G& _* j7 h% p2 Q9 p' c+ p point source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the ' n8 W3 U2 J3 j% N, W- Zsource, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that3 }! W) d+ @) \$ K0 Q# u6 e distance.5 n3 S( K. |( w& T( [6 s# X+ `3 u MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 0 v8 P2 p Q3 o6 t144 + [ i. U, A2 t! OInverse Synthetic8 t0 |' Y7 L0 n$ q+ y) a' f Aperture Radar / \* a c8 Q+ ?8 a* S4 ]# x(ISAR) - g) g; c! m) [A type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from 4 `. y% V4 ]8 q/ ~7 g3 [the motion of targets to provide high resolution. 3 y* b' y1 X& E* w6 C6 }IO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic.' z, N* Y4 l7 j- w! K6 V7 k IOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. 5 h! R0 a$ [6 L6 Y+ w* a; X(2) Intelligence Operations Center.+ q3 c) h5 k/ x1 x, { (3) Integrated Optics Chip. $ u: a D% w) |- ?IOM Inert Operational Missile.7 {) S l$ v' `5 H( ~( C IONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US).! L& Z# c9 }' O3 [+ ~ Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition & G6 M' }- t1 Uof electrons to atoms or molecules. - g" u" p0 [3 p: eIonizing B- A! U ]5 a7 M Radiation* L+ P! t1 J+ }5 W Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or: j3 y C) C, ]9 {) Z: G particulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of $ v+ x- k* t4 nproducing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its( b9 J# v# d& k* K/ D$ I passage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.)4 X6 M4 W& y# e* @ U& d T$ b Ionosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers : ~) x# I5 g; r- Q) Qaltitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect, n; M+ i6 ~2 |9 X electromagnetic waves. 2 b4 ]: R/ _6 k0 ~5 Y, o2 \/ Y" cIOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff.) E/ L9 B/ s4 N. t( b IOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation. 5 z! d6 W' D( r0 YIOU Input/Output Unit. " g5 R% T6 k' N% d" e6 N( {IP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol.) L+ c- U+ @0 Q" k e3 Q8 R (5) Interconnect Protocol.% E% C! Q" J- X6 i1 K8 W IPA Integrated Program Assessment.8 I# S O& i# ] IPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace. % C; }/ v: J% C$ R# w' K' k. t7 gIPC Information Policy Committee. 0 z. \3 Z' ]$ a& D% S% sIPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. : N+ I3 K- _$ ?- xIPE Industrial Plant Equipment. & Q. L1 }8 Z$ V4 eIPL Integrated Priority List. 4 ]$ u2 K3 {5 {7 w" h9 _1 ]IPM Integration Program Manager. & R# @" ^1 o0 t; SIPMI Integration Program Management Initiative.6 e# {7 _: f& p7 C IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program.. D" p @) [' k+ c6 V& g IPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.! P" u% z/ B. r IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review). , N1 w$ s' A, q. F) U, A3 hMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I) L" A9 m& h7 x# D. Y 145 # ]1 f5 z. w, A8 G, V2 b% d0 sIPRR Initial Production Readiness Review.# \1 g7 d* a8 C1 s: Q4 | IPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. 0 F4 b$ x) T3 l1 nIPS Integrated Program Summary. % c- \7 ?# m' }IPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit. 7 m1 C, U1 {- J3 wIPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated 1 h- @& U# {1 W- Q! CPlanning Team. % F! ~4 R2 r$ |) ], ?; VIQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term).- s- Y; |% W- _ IR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4) 7 i: R6 o' x* M, K W3 g' W. d2 aInformation Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope" \% ]$ U' L) Y% E9 S Radar., ~/ A" `5 B5 z4 Z4 j IR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength4 |$ y u+ I6 M+ a- F" T" q5 I spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. g$ Q6 r' h" Y4 a6 e3 }: y5 r" x IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).# r2 x9 Y3 {, ]8 |, ? IR/Vies Infrared Visual.% d3 ?! h W, G6 F/ N IRA Industrial Resource Analysis.% `) b0 _3 V+ w IRAD Independent Research and Development.! i6 F' m+ i8 T+ C! B* A" h( x# {2 k IRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite. . b" } V% _, s/ f1 e$ u3 Z5 SIRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. 4 s& \$ |( q1 X1 E# `# {) QIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. 9 @; o5 j: h/ L$ s9 [+ g* S5 uIRCM Infrared Countermeasures. ; d; h( }) |, o7 W LIRD Interface Requirements Document." u2 m; N$ B, x+ t IRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term). , w6 L6 F" h* @# M. G0 _IRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array./ R" u4 W( \% t" w3 [3 u/ K& o IRG Independent Review Group./ s* g1 d# i/ u3 M6 c IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center.! q$ c/ Q& X( P# O6 l) S; J) \ IRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group. ! ]5 U* R$ _0 M, Y0 _. s+ ^IRINT Infrared Intelligence. 0 Y, Z W! x4 K# h- F# u0 o( v2 ~3 wIRIS Infrared Instrumentation System. 8 T+ E: q8 ~6 F2 x; y; `4 L, ], MIRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term).0 ]; Q8 c4 a7 O9 x7 t k2 j+ ~' V( Y IRM Information Resources Management.$ S! R3 D* P, P) P! j5 H IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 8 n8 j4 O/ Z' |" S) Y# i4 J146 4 x$ }' e/ i) X: ]IRMC Information Resource Management College. " p/ B# c$ Y8 P2 V% SIRR Internal Requirements Review., V! H t% ^9 r1 H IRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System.$ r: x/ p( }8 f" H0 w1 F+ H0 |7 @ IRRS Information Resources Requirements Study. : e8 N5 M4 `! u" C' u; p' C+ ?IRS Interface Requirements Review. ! {7 v2 S" C# l* h. a$ tIRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). 6 i( r, e5 O! P4 A+ yIRST Infrared Search and Track. " y" ?* O2 L+ }IRTF Internet Research Task Force. 9 s# |1 J) H) k6 K2 k5 ]) b7 YIS Information System. 4 Q8 P0 q2 o! l( H/ g; x/ b4 K# nIS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.1 ]* [8 G3 j+ _0 o9 q (2) Innovative Science and Technology.$ ?/ n- {( F6 |$ Q) |! z- h (3) Integrated Science & Technology., b) l0 B* E% Z' ?" o6 Y$ W ISA Inter-service Agreement. ! O+ C/ D$ J; O% L! ?IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.6 |) G4 X( p( w; _ (2) Innovative Science and Technology.$ @4 Y, a$ a4 O) U ISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar. : n p) f# H) [* [% x, i$ FISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan).: `8 X. j0 W8 E; ]/ X4 Z/ s ISC (1) Information Systems Command. - e2 p5 m$ V1 u% e, n2 I! X+ Y n(2) Irvine Sensors Corporation.2 D4 e' p' `$ m( P ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network. ! i5 O$ o" l5 w7 t# nISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment. l" q1 |4 G [$ L" p ^ ISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration.4 F) y* v& q \5 l* ?) r, U ISG Industry Support Group. ' ?$ }' z1 X% VISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model.* ]! J: P4 f$ z! o# \& A: [ ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group.: L- e9 k; r7 S+ p7 y ISMO Information Security Management Office.( d# s' L' U1 G! n ISO International Standards Organization. 2 p# }, w+ h- t, E- XISOO Information Security Oversight Office.9 {# ]6 { _' Y' Y Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with/ w1 u, ~2 w! m( Y( K equal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional).( X' m: \$ k; w) X* [8 H MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 h3 S; ^4 V2 O5 D 147 3 q* B/ M/ a; m t! q: BIsotropic 3 t" V. B# k- n% T; t6 @9 I v" U* KNuclear Weapon, h: z4 a9 X G9 S7 O A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with ; w. P2 Q8 {! y# }approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to / K8 l* R1 X! k' r5 i% ndistinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons.2 y- f" B2 O: m' u% k ISP Integrated Support Plan., Y `! v7 b& ~" {/ f ISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance.3 c: \. j" i- o1 U ISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System.8 c7 y. V) ]/ I/ _. E8 V! { ISSA Information System Security Association. ; A) r5 X2 D: q4 p; y2 J% MISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency. " u4 f5 y$ k; Q& p5 ? OISSC Information Systems Security Committee.( L- n+ u! q7 ^( N ISSM Information System Security Manager.4 }5 |' h! d, A* ]3 K; F/ S ISSO Information System Security Officer. 2 ?4 F t n6 T/ ^- i G; }1 I- [- uISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.( Q; t/ E# i' h* n Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and 3 v: o4 g" G/ c: H% T" J2 S& U: Fextends into July.- u [; ~% f% M1 a( c* |* O Issue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM. * z; K* P& ]. s4 q/ Y- ^* g. ]6 PIST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test. [- e1 x# B# |+ b: z# }+ e% oISTC Integrated System Test Capability.; E, r0 z& g7 e, J0 q ISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. 6 ~' f! i1 T$ U* w$ I% f% wISTF Installed System Test Facility. 5 c$ j' \5 `6 oISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle.% y" J0 d8 B0 G S ISWG Integration Support Working Group. 0 w- B' K& I+ _6 s8 x1 oIT Information Technology. / k+ P6 x }! S- C4 R gITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center.) \$ g& y( d+ O6 O ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations. 0 S. |4 e7 v$ B) \8 J# s2 I C& vITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed. O. ]: j1 ]+ @+ [. u z H+ J6 u ITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations.) q9 e$ Q; o) O1 E ITD Integration Technology Demonstration.( I: r3 E X( K: q2 o8 k4 A ITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan. ; u/ C( h# J% _) D) F, k(2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan.7 N8 M- ]2 g0 c' O# V. U! i Item Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such ; `& H% F( e3 a- D9 Lorganization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items! q& @5 V1 Y) P& w of materiel. 1 s+ j' L, |+ C3 b# [MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ' ?" I; f5 ~: O+ I1488 H8 _$ E F7 p" c* C" |. v! ~6 P ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. , z5 O% }7 m0 _9 f1 b! `" y$ L VITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch 2 d' F, ^2 H8 C3 W6 t* ]" F r1 n7 eITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council.+ O) @2 K$ a2 M" T( s ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team.7 L7 Q/ C& B2 p5 ?- B ITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). ! c/ ]6 Y" b% l5 g* \, gITP Integrated Test Plan.. v {6 U/ U: W6 P& ?3 O& w ITPB Information Technology Policy Board.4 T: x* d# u6 ?5 ` ITR Information Technology Resources., u% s+ g5 O! G7 E# a ITS Information Technology Service.2 @1 F5 A8 R; e1 i ITSD Information Technology Services Directorate. / j9 Y- Q% |; X. n% k1 ^# YITT ITT Corporation., X0 Q8 [0 O( L. I1 ^0 s2 C. K ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle 8 l" w. { a( q3 N6 `+ VITW Integrated Tactical Warning. $ y |( o" F' R# S+ x- Q6 zITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment. + W8 r; b7 p( p" |$ K& f9 C: o3 z+ SIUI Integrated User Interface. % ~* i8 o! S7 J2 p4 a6 ]IV Interceptor Vehicle.1 I- z% ]4 b, Y9 ], W IV&V Independent Verification and Validation.: _% W5 X, N! \) h( R- U' s) g IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System.3 x- }5 E6 H. J( J2 ], s IVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).9 H& w3 ~* Z0 K! P3 U IW Information Warfare.2 z& ~ J1 `4 [: Z IWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration. ' m+ N0 f6 I7 u' @IWEB Information Warfare Executive Board. ! q/ y( `4 G" H4 [9 H4 j: XIWG Interagency Working Group.5 V, ?- d1 _0 @& M$ @. ^ IWS Indications and Warning System. ) b" x5 w o* H- p7 R/ p7 t) wIWSM Integrated weapons system management. ]7 b: L6 w# T5 f% ` D$ ?6 z IXS Information Exchange System. : R, A8 B+ q1 \5 \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 1 H% c# j) o2 A3 `4 b x$ b149 4 @" s. f8 ]0 k# zJ&A Justification and Approval.5 i/ u3 o2 D) z- O J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses.& ^6 Y' ?* ~& g JAAT Joint Air Attack Team.- c& P* j2 X, g1 j, A! @ JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. 3 a5 n0 W* g7 }% k- ~# A4 LJAE Joint Acquisition Executive.* q8 a) {2 Y7 E* R JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).# v4 d' q8 o! e. z& x4 T; K JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).2 Y. I: ]7 X% k' D5 T. e Y Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the 6 p4 E! I' \5 y$ Jsame frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals5 o: x2 D) s& Q+ [$ } reflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming* z/ n. Q3 P0 ^1 S generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, ) e/ \" i/ G, P; F. z6 Nand with increasing radar power. y4 O: j" l: {/ G. M [9 P JAO Joint Area of Operations. ' Y8 d3 n* O* i9 v' \! {, ]7 vJAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). . t0 c9 x: E9 y* D L: x, pJASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term).9 U5 x- j" h! a r* P JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program).( m3 F, J. t. J$ m1 m5 _! r JBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term). n) @. ~& ]7 E' t8 yJCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US). + w. } p* C) U8 QJCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions. ! t' }3 |, D E+ V' s1 i* IJCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US." f% Y; a9 y4 w( @ JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. # e. y8 D+ |% M) s) S9 C& p Y$ tJCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network./ N. t- l: m* J" i& H' k JDA Japan Defense Agency. ( y2 u1 D2 D, ?9 YJDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon).* |6 e; w# d9 T+ n( U% c JDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community.% j( C$ ]+ z! _% y0 V JDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System.- x# O, m, r7 T& O* A3 c- q JDN Joint Data Net. j0 ^1 {3 d* Q4 M3 [7 t* pJEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA)./ {4 M% K1 d5 w' a) c JEC Joint Economic Committee (US). 6 e$ ]/ W3 l; F- RJEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. 6 Y% f, z4 |7 z/ b6 _, `7 K* s& ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J% f* D x& p+ x( }) W" E# @0 L 150 . X4 B8 ^4 O6 vJEM Joint Exercise Manual.& t, m3 t! I2 Y% J JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis.7 V: h0 z- m6 B" E+ u JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center.# ?2 G) \% @. R" c+ r JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. / W' G3 n7 R5 Y) X6 f# ^JFCC Joint Forces Command Center./ W% x' t5 S1 k JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor.2 H0 o; V* [* A& L! o4 F6 J JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).8 b0 `; A6 G/ u$ K0 k$ m JFLC Joint Force Land Component.2 a! c. C$ v' d8 m% X7 ? JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component.7 E# U R. ^, B& x2 z; Q JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA.) m: c- A$ Y$ q0 |. l JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component.: v# x/ {$ d# a* _' s JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention.- Q' \1 M6 @5 q* w% Z+ P1 x! s JHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD + c9 U( e& Y: ^. w) @3 k0 N+ F, NJHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD." G Z; X; U3 O$ U, ] JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.& T$ c+ H" W! o% O4 J$ K% X& t JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). 1 ~) E. k- X$ C( o! \7 m4 G6 V/ RJIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. * |. N) f6 E: b1 Q' M8 R9 s, hJINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems. - \2 g& b$ F' }) C: AJIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures. ( `6 ], B& z- J# s- @JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms.. u( C+ L; E3 U JIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term).2 _& ]+ V+ X: ]4 H* P9 r( W JITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. ' h$ k1 A! E3 j5 kJLC Joint Logistics Commanders.7 R/ h' B q/ @3 P1 E) } JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. ; q; [$ Y0 P& N6 N! M7 wJM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. 5 v9 K3 k. H6 t! }* ?3 E4 OJMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command.8 k" Y. Z$ v3 K( c7 H JMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. 5 |# `7 s# I0 h' z; Q$ hJMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. - J7 A$ Z: s' J7 e1 eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J % h/ i5 [# N' y- [( b( w+ ~151 6 r$ q' ^$ p5 a" n ~2 oJMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information3 H4 u! l2 a1 I$ C Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded* P. D: U9 J: v) G/ X% g! }6 L by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major 7 m6 W8 E9 E: K* ?component of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN),1 C) y2 J7 }, w" \9 X% d operated by the JNTF. " {- w; Y, Y$ n5 iJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual.* R: X6 K" |. W7 C0 \7 ` JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement. ! w: ]) v8 J* G$ I- KJMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement.2 C* R9 A1 {; H. [ JMO Joint Maritime Operations.) B2 f9 @% A4 t4 g g JMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. 9 M8 G! ^1 ]. e; n; [) q2 mJMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group.; j. t2 \# h: e m( n0 r (2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group. ) e+ M6 I9 u& nJNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service.' c4 s3 F: O8 {2 t, E JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System." T- T% G, p) O4 a8 m# |% J JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. 2 b* w% H6 @0 [: Y. \+ e: pJNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor." o2 y# E: }+ Q JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. 8 R* x) F9 i# dJNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access.3 W+ {0 P" d& N' _& w+ b JOB Joint Operations Board. ( u/ s9 ~, Q; a- ?9 p& ?% p7 qJOC Joint Oversight Council. / } H2 V4 ]# \JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. $ E6 u3 ~. _+ S6 K8 m9 cJoint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one ! h' F+ r/ j# E7 y* x" T8 _Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the p; d; H( N& I8 f. i `1 U' k; ^, q participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy).9 N8 g# r$ S9 y3 k+ q9 ^/ R; i Joint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more- O$ ^$ _: Q6 g [3 f$ I Services in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be 8 n( [) }: i4 ]: dpromulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the 0 e; Y0 T3 `1 r4 o5 X" A9 A: qcombatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint $ G2 ~+ _& i* jChiefs of Staff. ! U3 d+ O8 A0 x4 L0 ]Joint Doctrine - Q g0 d* x; [, B. z. NWorking Party# F) q$ D$ d; U# J: O: P- [* [# Z A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands 8 Z' d* d, Z' f7 gwith the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, + E# b3 P9 O; A" Z+ B6 o" \% Rtechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ' V$ u" m* A+ V1 M4 R) l) J1 tproject scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation. , ?4 l5 }* d9 n7 e9 dThe Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director,! X. Y7 |3 u5 s. A- X- u6 { Operations Plans and Interoperability.- T9 f3 ^0 ?# l* ~ Joint Electronic( J4 A0 M, W3 M& O) B Warfare Center7 ?8 }" H5 U5 Q8 G K8 e) a (JEWC)! D6 _) B) ~1 l. [3 f Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for / M) U9 l7 d$ \investigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground3 b& @" B4 h6 l0 r1 d. h systems. 8 ?9 P# V1 [: m1 g3 gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J $ G" `7 O/ U: g' a6 z& u0 |# \152& k8 |7 q& E- R1 L Joint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or, [& A& X& D% V9 [& S ^ attached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or/ M- b! Q6 p3 D( S more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to- {1 m2 ]! s- K7 k5 F exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander. 8 x1 p* d# a' h' @$ U0 LJoint Force Air ) P$ r4 X9 ^7 C/ z4 mComponent8 X/ z7 _. n" @ w& n Commander/ e7 K3 ~$ c. y! b, A (JFACC), i. U! L3 B6 e* M1 G The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or }& o* ?* d, E joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making ; s+ `4 V+ R8 g0 J- K( Orecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and : I' X" ^( X% E% e1 X: `6 R/ E! Zcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may ' d0 a5 W. Y, B% {1 E: v' _5 q, Ibe assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority ; L8 g; [4 G- U! T) a: t! jnecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing$ F* h, s+ t* R0 m# h commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the 4 ] W- v# E2 ^" O1 S; Fpreponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities.# r- \% j! q- B N ?( Z Joint Force" K8 ?% T7 F' N Commander1 e5 K* b, d4 w2 n% \ (JFC)0 N R9 v6 E( ~4 \" i3 f$ Q5 t A general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant 5 a" Z: y. I# O' M( N8 B3 Mcommand (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also + I9 I6 b6 J! [called JFC. + N; g, e- \1 o8 ?Joint Force Land5 [: P# y- x; S' P0 f0 J* x3 A$ ^7 v Component: V/ [* a, z {- C Commander9 L7 J3 P3 R% L" w (JFLCC) 0 K8 c$ U1 P' dThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or# q% ^- B w1 N$ } joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making, h* A" S0 D& m0 n+ q- z- ^, X recommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and " d. K8 \1 S: y. }3 Zcoordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may/ e3 Q8 x/ f9 {% I: i2 R be assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority; b+ |% K; _( ^6 T% | necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing , y. }' b$ F$ Mcommander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the * D9 T" v/ o: ]preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control, d3 ?! G4 H( b capabilities. & X! ]4 I. z0 [: p; d. t7 jJoint Force 9 H8 t4 P5 n J* n$ g% pSpecial4 f2 ~1 s0 H h, `( [6 ^ Operations# \6 W0 e* e& g6 L Component / `* h1 o B9 b' h; FCommander8 [( f$ D {- A2 v2 o2 l, @ (JFSOCC) _) i8 Y, V) D( Y8 fThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or 7 X3 b! j% l, f; O* j) Qjoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making " ]: ?) ~7 a* l1 ^7 Vrecommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and" O( `. x- k8 Z9 k R assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such ' G0 D5 ?/ s E- S& ]6 ?) Eoperational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority! w: `; _( l7 P- q3 x necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing ! a& B o# `3 I6 Pcommander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the " U3 @' T+ D; D+ J, y/ i+ O E6 Mpreponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and 0 w3 {/ p, @5 H+ P% ~" Scontrol capabilities. 4 Y- }0 I. q. G5 r1 \$ A! I( D# EJoint National & I% e2 P/ v$ ^5 `' p1 e/ v5 lTest Facility S# x; A' f; K& V5 u( b (JNTF) - N3 h _4 c& p+ T! C9 bA large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado0 x/ j/ w2 Z w4 k1 b7 H0 l3 e3 _& } which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the 8 A; ? {$ J" U: tNTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF) 3 b; u7 u+ c0 j9 w8 [ HJoint Operational0 n7 ]- ]; V8 t. q$ C: @ Planning and * j. m# Z# e. W! }4 r; r& ]Execution8 ` Q8 L2 {6 K+ e3 d/ M5 ? System (JOPES) ! Z. l. X: Z/ f" {* }A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration : [" K& P& S7 Z" z' R+ Yand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation2 D, G( t0 m! j1 ?1 { Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for# y% @$ }; t/ J! n; G9 H3 O conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders 7 w! P% }$ u1 P& E$ _( U* r9 kand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct) V0 H' ]' w* ]% L! I of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning% z6 I! B; \ N* Q1 p policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and# G: f0 {7 Z* _% ^4 V% _ automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and* P% p4 p% c6 ~8 D# F$ W) L8 I execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities + x0 ]7 T5 \+ y' ^; r% r8 sassociated with joint operations.: u" C1 D8 a" m MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J n; I; x d8 { ~- i/ Y) b 153 * |4 P } \: y. S( _2 kJoint Operating 9 c8 g$ b: u2 f5 g! J; R3 kProcedures1 u. I. r# @$ J7 ?6 |' P (JOPs)/ X+ M' D, Z3 K$ O; E These documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions ! }( ~4 {2 \8 Y7 b. k0 J' Xnecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs9 ~0 f/ B$ u5 e3 Q# @; {' e) K may include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability,& d/ G* Y3 _3 L Vulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting, ; E% c* R( D2 K" I2 qFinancial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement8 k. g: F3 V% Y. g) h4 i9 r& ?- S and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program & D; D, F7 m8 z3 ~* X( DManger and the participating Services. 3 v" Q0 B9 R! M# T' q0 jJoint Operations : v( L$ i& J2 @Area6 H/ I8 F0 U% E That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military; Z& X( j, P7 {. b operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to% p4 M6 |" t, t' V: b such military operations. Also called JOA.5 M5 \* c2 o, F- E) Z Joint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program ) h& z* `" I/ h! a. Wthat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component ) i% [; v* T" P* w7 F% O8 P1 Lduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle. % o1 w* l8 W' m% g% ]Joint7 H4 M) A) U7 g+ X/ |/ B4 ` r Requirements 5 _* ~+ {# G7 R! x: U6 ZOversight ( S9 m9 C3 ?) X% c! z4 H5 LCouncil (JROC)4 p' m& b. N0 c9 Z& z! _$ x y A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts8 ^( l0 P* I Q' v requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops, Z! C/ T9 R' `: N: V recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates * e: B" j4 X* ?* ~performance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition & W, q, @3 I+ ?$ ]2 cBoard. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air/ b- t! U! l: x$ \( R. I5 D% P/ T Force, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps.$ P" m6 D2 {; X3 X. O& G# ~; L) a4 I6 b Joint SPACECOM : r- F5 S8 @6 G3 GIntelligence+ I/ o& m3 n, }: P- a0 p Center (JSIC) 8 y+ w# Y+ @. f1 t: {0 z' n- OA USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational : @$ K! m6 b: L( t: zintelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for 2 [, M9 z/ v% `2 L7 W+ l$ Q4 wthe DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production3 ]* ~3 v; F3 E9 t/ M' Q includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and 7 d# e; I: s# O d {4 sSatellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB. ( ^2 t1 t3 |3 J# H6 w2 e) nJoint Strategic 4 T( c& Y, n7 |3 W. s3 t4 e* pDefense Planning ( X, N1 h$ N1 G+ P3 r6 \Staff (JOSDEPS)) i' K V- k0 d/ g8 Y' r6 V# }, J A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for * q1 u5 |# e: S9 @integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive 4 {/ Z# Z* g% Zand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint0 X. g/ I3 K3 s+ I% r Strategic Defense Planning Staff.0 | x) h/ O/ J Joint Strategic % e2 [; t v8 Z6 b7 hTarget Planning ( d0 Z7 k) N: `( {6 l( C$ ^Staff (JSTPS) - p, y$ X% J2 S7 _* r* BA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing,. P/ y6 q7 O% A$ U( c6 J coordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). ! |. R' J9 r5 A* X/ u5 KAlso responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The % z3 h% C Q- g# zCommander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target # D" E- U' c* p: f' t$ L1 O4 N, |Planning Staff.* u& H4 {, S( g% i, B4 x# I Joint + y" D5 S& _- d& m# u7 v0 jSuppression of , v4 L6 |4 s' d- g% ~, H' P$ VEnemy Air2 q# t1 W* v3 w- Q Defense; h+ t4 y4 S/ ]6 b& ? A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities. S9 B, _4 j# [, @) _ t provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called 5 k) k6 P1 h' C! M: H4 vJ-SNEAD.2 D" _4 p8 b6 s( v A" s" p0 x Joint Tactical : w1 D4 E+ r. \7 e- a! ~+ y' _% f `8 QInformation# G( l/ Q1 c: ~6 l9 k5 ^3 n Distribution5 z, E7 i1 ]' T7 x/ b- R+ b System (JTIDS) : T* f' J' ~% k' sA joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the . G" ~2 r. o" P" J! b6 }interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, & o* R ? D' u" j1 s' Jand mobile or fixed-base land stations.9 c2 c5 F+ ?6 z" N5 v; m Joint Tactics, 4 Z+ ~( A/ g+ m; K1 VTechniques, and1 |, @5 p3 K' T1 |! c Procedures0 |2 f0 K+ I2 {- p1 _( B (JTTP)7 M+ c, E2 u2 W4 h9 ^- W X: i9 m The actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how6 O$ ^% N y( l9 w forces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, ) w) h5 N: x8 U# E2 {3 I7 spromulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and% Y% H7 |) ?8 Z3 X Joint Staff. Also called JTTP. 9 N" l8 i: B, ~. `% f) xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J* q) Z: a/ \) w0 r+ v# L% S 154 ' ^$ M/ p @ t: @$ v% QJoint Test and% ?/ Z" y, ]; n' s$ H6 F Evaluation 0 C. k- K' a2 sT&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be- x' y( g1 P" W0 D# e7 L acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have ! y9 x0 j, t/ xinterfaces with equipment of another component./ d; u8 ?, t' d Joint Test and ) e) c6 h% \4 e/ U) T# EEvaluation, q2 m5 K8 n+ h' L, N4 [ Program 4 T. B3 r( I: b$ n, a! DAn OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on ( a% O9 l: p5 }" _: J: ?system performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements,) m- R. T4 f1 D9 ?6 x# z systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for! _! n4 k* P9 x3 } force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. & t* q8 C5 C" y- Q2 _& I: sJON Job Order Number. d/ @2 t/ U; o7 S: m1 B. y JOP Joint Operating Procedures. 9 [7 ^- e2 b& ?* W8 ~" Y e/ BJOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System.8 J+ L3 T" v4 h8 t3 o/ c+ b JOPS Joint Operations Planning System. " @9 p& [3 u7 s, SJOR Joint Operational Requirements. & c9 v) L3 i6 S9 q! D% C+ P. HJORD Joint Operational Requirements Document. 4 Y3 F6 s ?3 q- N; n, A- D6 ]0 ~* J JJOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. * a1 q* i! g) `* |JOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). 3 b, I: `# ]& \2 K: f) a' P+ xJOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).5 h5 G% l1 Z+ P- F) G JP Joint Publication.8 M n" P+ x( c0 i JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.: o6 _; }- v$ _, y1 M9 C( A$ e JPM Joint Program Manager.% ^5 e; F b2 R( V: o JPN Joint Planning Net.2 [5 m: E$ V; [ g8 _5 b JPO Joint Program Office. & g- v3 ~4 p$ C$ wJPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. & T% o2 P6 B# n0 OJPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact( D( [0 ~6 {& S JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle.( s/ W5 V; E) V JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. 9 W6 d' s% C; W. r% GJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration.9 n: s9 X7 ~/ j JPT Joint Planning Tool.' h) h/ L" h8 a( C JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). 5 s+ }5 P* v( T! g# _4 p6 j4 X! M( BJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term). 0 Y& b& R- ~# C S+ ^JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).1 l# y0 l2 y7 K/ T$ L2 |7 T JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J) L; l: j( b u T. m. [2 S Q 155 ' B6 Y6 Z A/ M! ^' pJROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council.5 A2 _; T) Z% d" o0 L P JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group. ! j4 d5 z4 U7 K$ wJRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications.1 F' H0 ~$ U5 x( i' a7 V; l JRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. / [" _4 E) p' C4 h" @. xJS Joint Staff.5 u% n2 R+ ~( Q7 V% e JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. - G- N, Z( g9 s' M% }! k. yJSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term)." F5 R; z( c- c4 a% I JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan.! i! c$ F/ o4 n+ R, ^5 F$ m% L JSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term).; K+ c2 q) {) |1 }. l$ `# Z( q r( a JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term).- n$ x2 n. b7 U, I4 z/ ^* _0 e (2) Joint Service Evaluation Team.( b' ]3 \# i9 ?8 w JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). $ j( o L: ^+ UJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center.1 \# n- F5 |1 ^" F( g$ [4 E! ] JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term). * k" P) d3 [ D. wJSMB Joint Space Management Board. ' _$ w8 ]7 z( `( R' s4 gJSOC Joint Special Operations Command. O! w- z1 A. iJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement.' o* q/ e! e' V- f) C/ j JSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document. , l) B% Z; F% T6 n- g; w3 G! zJSPS Joint Strategic Planning System. 7 `3 v. R% t& mJSS Joint Surveillance System. ! C' G1 c% C! I: IJSST Joint Space Support Team.$ ^2 i. i% L8 E! R; e9 B JSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System. 2 E. i4 T* ]- y) w) pJSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. $ F0 t( n8 z; Z% m1 a YJT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting: \* z8 K$ L- v0 ]4 O+ }8 H4 b JT&E Joint Test and Evaluation. " X) L4 a/ g" e! ]$ {4 {, yJTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term). " l, N z. @3 q. Q& q; m4 s) QJTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station. - Z3 v2 L1 w: V: VJTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization." X( t6 p( C8 P+ b; x JTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. ( k# r, C. X; R) E: \1 TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J & f$ o p2 d/ T P+ w156 # B3 e, y3 d$ l) B1 }) V# V6 eJTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term)., s4 U$ Z; `8 N1 ]' D JTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. & R4 u; u6 ]8 |/ z) Q* K2 f7 tJTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). 5 Z. \& j" g4 ~) Z: C; iJTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).4 ? F& e2 _1 \& X) L5 ]) V. D JTF Joint Task Force. 8 i2 V- @3 s8 B1 M) CJTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise.5 B& m( `/ v0 A# s. q JTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System.1 e) x" p* w. ]* b' L& ~3 O JTL Joint Target List.2 s& R6 n% R3 j3 | Y K JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense./ J7 B. A% c9 T2 ^ JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan.2 b7 U# e6 d: e JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]. ( q% i2 r% r. F- G+ [6 c4 J" PJTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council.! i8 h0 ^* Y- a- f7 s( p+ ?; z JTR Joint Travel Regulations.5 ]8 |( D0 ^* C% z) K, Q JTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board. . A3 S' O% n! L6 N. B1 M4 MJTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). 9 ?. {" O4 W3 F) \ PJTT Joint Tactical Terminal.$ g, t$ ^( h! S0 H# r% ~7 B JTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. 7 N0 G8 O1 ?& e4 \/ j6 F9 xJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft. 1 w$ I5 ~+ d& R. u( kJWAN Joint Wide Area Net.* z2 p. C; ]2 y/ }8 o& g# F JWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). ) L: Y! i# u3 M; l3 Z1 x, f: |: H, eJWC Joint Warfare Center. + g7 x. F# f* Q% {# l( E) d4 oJWG Joint Working Group. & A" c8 s3 [; S! @3 XJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network., _. `/ _. l: M: a7 w JWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration1 n* c* m! B! G, _ JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.* e5 F+ Q* i% C1 h MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K: f. {! i6 g5 c$ \( s! V- F* W 157 3 }& @% F& Y9 |4 F$ u% wK (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo. ; K4 y' X' \% \; e7 n8 mK Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another. , ^+ U% a2 m$ l: STheoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of6 R; [* x% d1 ?. d: H two observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both ( J6 s- F3 C8 v& a0 d3 iobjects. / ^. s5 h) _4 d, ]KA Kill Assessment.) o: y8 J" t+ O! [0 L# P! Z( f KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. : }* G- i( Z `' vKB Kilobyte. # D2 }6 b* b3 G+ u! U. h8 P* D2 ]9 R# y0 oKbps Kilobyte per second. : K% t9 C0 o& [1 H2 k/ u0 DKBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). 7 _( J) x/ V: ?4 IKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion./ [# ?% A' r+ { KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL.+ \/ O- x A: X. R } KDS Kwajalein Discrimination System. 8 M, G# [, S, N, W/ VKE See Kinetic Energy. : Y0 {2 i( O1 R% g2 g5 E( E& g8 AKE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon.) F: i& E; b, c KED Kill Enhancement Device. ! b! `! _4 i7 k2 T, dKeep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the+ `5 ?4 M- c l0 s- i asset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to# w' } }) ~) n, M- Z defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones 5 _5 r! J4 g& y; e0 ~. Y8 _+ zunder the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined. / R' v. z. s) ]% \ S- U7 A2 JKEI Kinetic Energy Intercept.: K w% H2 N7 t) J KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool. ) R& V8 F& F& H1 z& @0 gKEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. 0 H3 l7 x4 p, G3 O% J" LKEW Kinetic Energy Weapon.8 j' @, o& B( o0 B0 \2 n KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion).2 {" y0 Q$ n( H. o: s4 h/ p KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). - v4 f5 R2 e( x5 \4 L+ ~" L) Z" vKEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. , W }- y: R3 \% g" `* NKEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. ( m. P9 u/ {' h7 D6 a0 ?8 DKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a2 D: B( M" Y2 y n sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption.2 L# w8 C" |/ X! V+ R Kg Kilogram. 5 [ ^6 ~, Z/ \) eKHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL. 2 c' K% F# C& W0 V9 s( |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K! H: Y/ h% P- Z) e% \0 q; o 158 - d5 p; a1 r+ n P9 k* y& Q1 lKHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test.' K. Y2 f' ?+ h KIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution. 6 S0 z" b/ `- v; a) N6 b" VKill Assessment 9 F6 D: _2 N8 P0 E% p+ N(KA) + h8 X) W1 l/ W w) \An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV , t6 f& z6 a3 d9 H& z- rintercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and 9 r! h1 r1 g6 Pre-engagements. (USSPACECOM) - N4 |* B0 A# C% e# jKill Enhancement4 t- K) m b; N2 } Device, ^) B$ {% q( v3 B A device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. ' j2 Q% m) q8 k( tKinematic7 |1 ^5 u" ]- d& T Battlespace ) f0 I" I9 t( _0 H4 k, f" B) hThe planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor & x H# u- _+ }& \3 q) rtimeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and / N* o4 O8 z; v+ ^* toperational constraints.% d/ x& z2 r. Q3 x6 W; E/ o Kinetic Energy 6 g4 v$ Q) M& O) W, M(KE) 6 {! \, u+ W/ n5 ZThe energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion. * l) Z) M( g+ j8 PKinetic Energy 9 Q% o: h9 b( J) G5 UWeapon (KEW)( u2 b! E% Y# b+ R; y5 Y6 Z3 ~5 R A weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object.% `3 M7 Q' i* e' y4 v* i Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. " P |" F+ X$ y2 rKinetic Kill; D! l# s7 K8 L7 M; | Vehicle (KKV)9 @! T( J2 e( a5 h1 p { A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy - [( W& o4 p) I3 la target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board* ~# n+ N% F9 A) n7 Q" ? rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell9 _9 \' k$ h. f! ^. p5 ` launched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2026-1-22 17:47 , Processed in 0.048002 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部