航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H ' g# l' [2 v, s7 G1303 c+ G- p; i- c Human-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system " x& A8 v6 [; D1 N3 l8 Jprocesses. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential ! M! g. D/ b+ i5 s# u1 Z$ ]+ Uhigh-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to' |5 C) a8 O2 s* M BMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal6 B6 r6 }) O& i Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of 5 g+ x$ Q! L7 A, [4 V* k2 }+ e( u3 Tcommand and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost. n+ O. @2 l8 e6 n( V phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses' w5 u9 ^2 A* g; c8 I2 } to initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human+ v3 z. B3 q9 y, x" ` decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) ) b$ F" Q& o7 `. t: W( NHuman2 G8 p) l* F# u Intelligence - ]* L% L" M' E3 T- O& Y(HUMINT). x$ J0 b- |" |& H6 b3 j A category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by# ]; C- k D& Z3 [) l& y5 v2 b human sources. ) k `8 f' [- {Human Systems8 @2 J$ T) O" z8 w5 I Integration ' D6 Z8 \' Q$ |6 h% P" ~9 j7 vThe human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, , `+ Y; d# C) etraining, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort 8 ?$ }# f5 G3 v" o# a9 Zfor the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of : z1 y0 ]* I$ a5 qownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier,6 b: p/ o6 m+ P9 l3 S( l sailor, airman, or Marine. : l( [9 A$ ^; c+ x! uHUMINT Human Intelligence. 5 N+ X. S+ u3 l7 p- |" y0 c- KHVAA High Value Airborne Assets. & {1 J1 D1 ~# W' BHVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.9 l' w+ [7 c" t( R; F% E7 T, R: I HVG Hypervelocity Gun. 8 w' C: w' n+ t% XHVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). ) O& H$ A. ^+ a( P5 U [HVM Hypervelocity Missile.$ o5 D' v! _. w5 n HVP Hypervelocity Projectile.7 L, y1 @) i/ v% s HVT Half-Value Thickness.$ ^. E" A1 c7 o$ F% ?* A# m HW Hardware.8 S; k7 i; e! u/ Q4 _ r5 X% C HW/SW Hardware/Software. m- n! }( R: n+ m4 A1 @, THWCI Hardware Configuration Item. % @" u5 P0 P7 |/ Q6 [9 hHWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. $ j) }( u4 y! u7 SHWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test.+ v; H, g6 x; H. T* T9 B HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature. ' Y, B4 R: _- g0 S6 p3 @Hypervelocity0 A; h- k* c" i6 h; _5 O5 B& p Gun (HVG)9 J" L& ^8 R& t4 [ A gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example,$ H+ s: D& x4 y1 z9 E an electromagnetic or rail gun.& |1 \" e% Q6 \. ~' t Hypervelocity# I0 y: q5 k' w8 P Missile (HVM) & U/ Y7 d% } l' a5 @A missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second.+ q6 t1 W- Z L; f HYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance." V2 s+ r; P, c+ l0 A1 i Hz Hertz (cycles per second).. k0 ?3 m8 A$ B" h( B. u* p MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I! {( B( y+ e x3 J4 @ 131 : D% a, Q) A! R/ G2 _8 I! E1 GI&CO Installation and Checkout./ S4 z) ]2 Z; G- S I&I Installation and Integration. 8 w' c$ g; ?* V* u7 YI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis. C8 }9 g5 N2 k8 N" q# R I&T Integration and Test. 3 F' ]. ?) ^, W; @# u \% zI&W Indications and Warning. ' Z; L6 H! ?" ~/ ?3 [I-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering. 7 ]* ~5 J, b6 P- ?- E6 DI-HAWK Improved HAWK. % X' @& N9 z% y% m6 A' Q& nI-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term).7 z0 y. X0 Q6 K, y2 [ I/F Interface. 9 K) ~7 k2 I1 NI/O Input/Output. 2 b* i9 L6 J8 p; aI/R Interchangeability/Reparability.6 ^3 e5 j2 b, n' \: g9 G2 q I4 International Information Integrity Institute.% I' x1 z; Y! O& ~* ~6 O IA Information Architecture. / W8 K) G+ ?2 [7 F( B9 B/ Y) x/ [6 AIA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations. 3 F# F4 a5 J1 sIA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test.1 h4 P6 Y7 d( w IAD Integrated Air Defense. ' `! i/ u; E; Q1 |& Q% S7 f& z5 WIADS Integrated Air Defense System. 0 r/ _! h( k1 i* q) uIAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.( F$ `( j: k' u& J2 a IAG International Agreement Generator.; g0 Y5 k# l% _; ~ IAI Israel Aircraft Industries. 2 I; Z5 `' Q5 _2 ]% ~IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package. ' O* i+ R9 W4 d# ~) w4 ^. G1 u+ EIAS Israeli Architecture Study.7 U" \; x- g& J! l IAT Integrated Assembly Test.+ r5 {/ K' F @0 Y) v IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. 0 ~* g+ @/ ~+ u8 }( Z7 UIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out. 3 g! r! ~, ^* @7 H. V! QIAW In Accordance With.: h( B, x# \4 O1 u! x IBA Industrial Base Assessment. ' D: S6 R, I |6 F4 @" n, y& xIBC Impurity Band Conduction. 5 E8 ~' G; @- u6 _& ^( BIBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon. 8 g4 E- k1 |" W8 V$ }4 x4 }8 C* w. pMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I/ D; N7 O; ^ F% y% U) m 132$ N( W9 z1 A3 x, [ IBDL Intra-Battery Data Link.( t) T7 K3 p: D+ N0 {+ ]2 D% G* O IBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration7 G; N4 H/ D x# A IBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System. 7 {: Y, `0 C# G7 X1 GIBM International Business Machines Corporation.; f/ M) o' o# S IBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis.% {5 R m% s3 Z IBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term). ) ]& z8 f/ d" r7 g3 TIBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US! |$ A) {1 B9 O. M" z) U naval ships. * G+ K! Y2 S2 @+ ~% }* EIBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey. : @* U6 y* w3 u) cIC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit. & w( f) o! T. kICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment.) l% B. Y/ A6 T# B( K( f8 ^4 a ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System. 6 \; E" H D) y( }8 fICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces.6 M$ i& E5 i: E3 ?! O" H ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. $ X/ ?- x6 |* j* v- i% pICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control 8 b( f8 G9 O2 d. ISystem (ICS) for US naval ships.4 Y4 n& {; }( {! L% Q. h5 H ICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering.1 ?8 g$ d9 z; q# c' Q! y/ p ICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. 0 h8 r) H- _4 l, JICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).' y- C2 M' w, n% ]: o/ X (2) Item Category Code (ILS term).4 @) V1 S1 [9 ]4 j1 m. M# V ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing.: J4 W$ G" s6 p; p# x% Q R' P ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security.% {! U* Q4 m1 J0 B& ^0 C) ~ ICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking.- P1 M% B$ o/ n" M/ b ICD Interface Control Document/Drawing. s: {- @* n, Q& t7 sICE Independent Cost Estimate. ! R- z n6 T) P; _6 C' C: ]ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO). 0 L8 D% f- @; W# rICM Improved Conventional Munitions. . A% K1 l7 F$ C) m" i& Z9 uICN Installation Completion Notification.& O3 b/ }5 C: @ ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term). |! \ e) P( z+ H" G ?. b ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures., R2 K7 R* Y" U1 X8 T( u MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I0 F$ z/ _2 R6 E2 A2 t; ]* O 1339 M0 J! v% X. `# T! c4 T1 z ICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term).8 r" v) u O G/ ]4 _! S- X2 i (3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process.0 d4 Q& m- i* F5 n7 z. k$ k ICR Integrated Contracting Report. " X: L6 D9 c+ N' [9 M5 S4 C- j. G3 YICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and 2 t4 V8 f" X* H# M6 [8 |7 zcontrol system for US naval ships.8 c" y2 W0 W1 Z) e, p. f/ O (2) Interface Control Specification. `+ ~; S" e( L; \, V" \4 G/ n2 HICU Interface Control Unit.3 f5 w7 |, w' Y- o* k ICWG Interface Control Working Group.' s* H; e) F, H5 m) ?* q ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification.# Z: j+ O! X9 O IDA Institute for Defense Analysis.. G/ T% W2 q$ Z9 t# k- [ IDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term).) ?( E7 m+ X0 {' j IDB Integrated Data Base. 3 [4 C: {4 ^" ~3 d7 E" WIDD Interface Design Document.8 M- @8 V) J' ~- I) d: x5 e* ` IDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis.5 K* \7 ?% y( X% [8 { IDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term).! s( ]7 Q6 R) `! @1 N Identification. I5 k9 U9 J- U) _0 X Friend or Foe1 y `, k2 h& k (IFF) 4 J. k/ O( l6 _& yA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by* `2 q/ I K+ n: u& L) E# Z7 V friendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby. F' I" A" B6 h( z4 q8 }3 T distinguishing themselves from enemy forces.7 m7 _; \5 t5 D: F IDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. o" o0 D. C' ?8 Y# T9 J* f% m5 ? IDHS Intelligence Data Handling System. 6 U% d0 n( S& pIDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production. / q3 q" a4 C4 o. X4 qIDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System.& K7 Q6 X$ ^- x2 l IE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.+ J8 z K4 n+ ~ IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination.6 ^# u* v, i. R; L3 N IEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.& h S$ S" _( F" i& D IEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure.) S- N8 V; K$ Z/ T, E' T IEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. # d+ {4 D& m% q# \+ W2 oIEP Integrated Evaluation Plan. ) A1 X1 i& \" O1 x2 e- iIER Independent Evaluation Report. & w& G5 `$ e1 `+ N- Y9 i( aIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group. 4 }) S$ F. ?+ W/ ?* rMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I, j, I/ I' ]1 G6 n: y/ ~ 1347 G2 B! q8 b9 h J s IETF Internet Engineering Task Force.; {; f! L( s5 U& p, s$ R IEV Integrated Experimental Version.8 Q/ B2 ~: X; B/ o2 X IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare.) g' ~( g) A( ~! _- c4 {' j IFA Integrated Financial Analysis.- t6 q/ P. N! d IFF Identification, Friend or Foe.) s9 l1 o; p+ z IFHV In-Flight Homing View. ) T5 H/ T+ p/ i2 I8 ]1 R) [IFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the ' S- E+ \% q$ V) ~6 Y$ G# {communications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets.% \) c+ A9 ?4 X2 G% k" B The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications * v0 Q7 i% N0 w1 F& ]: W0 bsystem term GEP. % H( H3 u8 `9 E/ |" \: m! m* ^& _IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope.% S' F; j4 E/ B8 N- Z5 O IFOV Instantaneous Field of View.+ }* E: h: h3 @2 Y IFSR In-Flight Status Report5 |7 Y) Z u1 c IFT Integrated Flight Test.% v, j" Z: M& D; o* H7 ]$ w IFTU In-Flight Target Update. ' {/ W7 y! [" p, ~. rIG Inspector General. ' _9 R& u6 `% O7 N: G' c$ pIGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse. - s3 N+ t" N/ f. |: r, K' h3 {+ ]IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard.5 B* U4 h& N' {) O. ~ IGS Inertial Guidance System.3 Y9 }3 _, J- @, d7 e k- Z IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS).) r, L' t1 V5 z5 ^5 Y IGT Integrated Ground Test.6 i+ n& u' r: q! J7 E IGU Inertial Guidance Unit. 7 S3 e9 g! F$ W/ A/ U( NII Impulse Intensity.( y, D7 e4 ^5 S& B IIP Interoperability Improvement Program. ; r/ [. _* M ~7 }- bIIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. ' O- a B. x6 J! T. i3 ?: q' z5 TIIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.0 D7 n R' ~) q8 D% R IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).$ C* F" g6 t& i- n IIT Interceptor Integration Test.7 Y2 N/ |, D/ U1 }2 u+ o% V IITF Information Infrastructure Task Force.# |* V1 T y1 f& z5 Z IJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon. 8 Z7 O: \& b4 _5 WMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - A2 `; A k+ D, I# s135 ! Y" a" U. I8 n1 c$ ~; L- eILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term). " k: O' T- Z6 ]3 D/ M( t2 MILC Initial Launch Capability. - G0 p) N% Z7 w' q; hIlities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g., ; K/ w) O* r5 o. aavailability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics + ]6 P( W2 r6 y5 a Csupportability, etc.). & @4 U1 q$ w2 R4 M+ yIllumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray, a* F- g0 N% l satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. 0 ~6 @* f4 y! {9 g' R6 _# uILS Integrated Logistics Support. , ~$ I0 P+ Q: ZILSM ILS Manager. 7 ]; S9 y, }3 T/ }ILSMT ILS Management Team+ L( q% w3 N K! p6 Z1 C ILSO ILS Office. . l4 ? U1 p3 l. m" }7 LILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan.6 H0 t; I. `+ E$ w& {$ m0 M( x; E- I ILSWG ILS Working Group. p9 L8 z/ p# ` D ^6 j* I IM Information Management. 9 t0 E" U d* p8 ]6 ?$ i/ WImagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical1 L+ r0 Y" w$ e# B# J, t means on film, electronic display devices, or other media.9 E: D9 w/ G$ ?2 r' ~5 }1 H Imagery: Y6 U* N7 l1 p- S* B7 Y& W Intelligence $ w6 C8 L4 l; R$ c# e% Q(IMINT) 8 y6 z2 A) t, F6 m. f) g( [Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography,+ K4 Z) Q% e9 Z6 E n5 X infrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic ' g! Q" p2 Y4 T6 S: O( |" _% {7 S6 xaperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or # r$ a, G2 Z. \3 O; n6 belectronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media.9 s" U' o# {6 t( `& j8 } Imagery; V) b0 a9 D/ t: D5 ` Correlation $ I# p2 i9 C$ O1 R6 H( IThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from ) M3 Q R" |/ ^0 h) M5 `" a$ Z7 odifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics6 O! i: X2 {/ k9 x5 H* E signified. 2 M P0 I7 g# l0 k1 B1 W; R. IImaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object. # s2 F1 m! e/ H6 D% ^IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term).$ D! [2 @* P+ j (2) Internal Management Control.! Z5 s; g. A. f r8 ]3 U/ D2 L IMDB Imagery Management.( K2 f& j1 L+ P7 r3 e$ o) r7 U IMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of & a# g3 B/ R5 g0 `: QDefense.5 i k; d* r9 ]9 J IMINT Imagery Intelligence. ! N7 C) _) l) ?/ cIMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program.$ ^ P9 `: L% d l Immediate Kill! _, r1 l- h: X( z8 w' _: Z, W$ G0 t Mode8 q0 I" J2 d3 S/ W; Y A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by ) C* j. T# Q himpact with the KV or KED.9 c$ e+ Y5 @8 i4 D% [" j$ h Impact Point 2 m, a1 z" U |0 QPrediction (IPP) 3 @* c. l% j: k/ m, ?Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, 4 _& E% {) }# m1 m" g6 Busually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes* l( i& C8 r6 t' D the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties.$ J. p5 g1 {2 q5 H! N% L6 G# { R MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I . o( W) |4 ~% H# J! [" @9 f" a' b136 ! h& k' j0 D- y! {Implicit 7 J5 r( _, r- XCoordination ! L n& ]0 V7 u! P: U) eMany independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to - o! q6 f3 M" l3 Vderive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations& D+ P6 S3 n0 p3 L, k' f8 ] will be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical. / ?3 k% |: E! s5 u" Q8 x5 RDecisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers. $ w" v6 q! u6 o! _+ t! MImpulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for 6 K% M4 H4 T. ?a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.) & |8 C/ c4 Y3 A: @; k, _Impulse* H8 x: _- Q4 s6 ?) O9 z4 @* P Intensity (II)- J0 M& j* h* _% Y Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse ) r! B9 M4 w( A, aintensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of: }. a+ ]( K; r. k! Q1 Z impulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter;% i& i. F' E: Q* o0 l7 n hence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s. ) d! Q7 f( ?& `5 p9 Z$ m- ?% jImpulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The # F$ E! Z& E% x' X2 e Dintensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target' t8 R$ G- U3 g4 f( M* w$ _1 I- t violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of 5 }) `" m: q# U1 Nthe target and causing structural failure.4 W7 B% A9 |' m: |# D7 S: l" T1 S IMPWG Information Policy Working Group. # z. b+ v+ K( X, W3 T4 A C$ A% ^9 ?IMS Integrated Master Schedule.7 a* J7 f: v' j* g9 g IMU Inertial Measurement Unit.% [3 ]( ] D% z9 T2 m6 W- @$ K; n7 t# P IN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse2 Z- G3 f+ C. v; c/ v& z0 ^ Noise.. E) z1 _5 l( S- m In Inch.; u# `% b2 Z3 ?. }2 \2 K IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator.; k. b( z$ X# c( h; ~9 O In-Flight Target7 D( h1 V. O# Z4 G) G- a" s Update (FTU)3 v- z: w- p" ~! G' `* A. k A report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control 2 _9 C4 _+ K" e$ d# esuite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. % j. l. L. @: z8 b' |( XInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing , \! m9 A( h' p- ^( Othe orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has * X/ c: q2 D% O) j) G( @& xan inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite& E) }7 S$ c2 O' P0 V, l1 { traveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in 3 R! u9 q" l; o9 Y; q. Swhich a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An: G ]: s' E7 \ orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is ; |2 m# O7 ]2 d% \! E5 ucalled a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a) g6 W C7 i) y0 F2 ` retrograde orbit. : \/ e4 l. d4 j a4 IIncremental. E, @$ b8 p& I3 P9 D Funding. `7 J; \. }, y2 |6 a* f3 [; y The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project- c- U8 Y/ A8 }( ]1 `& R based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such( E+ }+ ]" v* Z budgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in! R ~, [# M& y9 a completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding,+ B9 n# B0 v- o2 c1 N1 X where budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated" y6 L6 r! B- ^9 r7 q obligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification ! B4 D8 Z( R3 gFriend or Foe4 W+ l# G' Q; \" V (IFF)/ s9 v* c5 ~$ q8 {" P u A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by" W5 b/ R& }' p q& b friendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby 4 I6 H: R) A5 j: F3 _distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. % Q, M$ s3 x2 i' Y; v6 C) pMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 4 O( A1 P0 m( r+ v y137 2 p4 |; M& L' F' nImagery * _- b8 J; V& ~ o: L. vCorrelation- W$ v1 S5 q0 i+ z# M2 m The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from ) J* M9 @8 W6 I: Ldifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics " ^( r* ^9 C! _8 c" b Ssignified., O. a+ A0 J9 D' |: ^& q( q+ M4 z' j Independent9 H8 h3 r7 d6 q( K, p* D& t' ~+ K; S. l Cost Analysis9 z# f& y4 ~+ @9 E An analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body 6 X7 k, V# J' W2 S1 b3 `0 qdisassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United " l' O; l( Q; J- }0 N5 \States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational / n4 {& |3 W( VManpower Requirements.”)' y/ A5 R- e, M7 H- j& J7 Y Independent Cost + b% p2 D0 Z4 KEstimate (ICE)3 ?5 i$ f8 [3 M3 q5 p; M2 h/ ~, P- p A cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority; Y8 J. o5 B3 a" l0 L4 _" B responsible for acquiring or using the goods or services. ! A) c& \/ o) b- JIndependent - f* t V6 Y% i2 r( GEvaluation2 c; |( f. |' s, N8 O) [) Z Report (IER) - x; r6 m3 p" C2 D9 V) cDocuments the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data,' C, R# s% d8 p6 X reports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s / {( i2 p+ N* ]3 b0 p; `! Eassessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on. y8 l& x4 f' N5 \: Q the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is 5 Y7 {2 R$ z: X5 Wprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER0 Q' ?$ U8 d9 J5 w+ ?' N: n: a may also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army) " F: V6 K% R- m1 sIndependent r( q7 Z, ~8 oResearch and V0 b7 d. d8 q1 @. Z WDevelopment& Q. {/ G E# H3 X% h (IR&D)5 k3 g- v3 ^& s1 { Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a : \. G4 h6 {6 S! R8 R3 ]; Z3 |2 Pcontract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and5 n+ r0 V* K& A# `; Z; g0 u applied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation ) N$ ^. c C+ k ]2 u( fstudies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See7 j6 u- L- E; ^1 r1 A9 o( x FAR 31.001.) 4 S ^& a: F( X" u8 bIndependent 6 Y' s5 _- |) B, {9 SVerification and * O$ \) h1 v0 s% F9 {0 PValidation (IV&V) % T3 \0 z3 e% M7 c4 Q4 cVerification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that5 U5 G/ k+ b1 `, m$ K8 k/ e is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being " Z0 S" h" Q; [- ]evaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software d5 B( h; \7 W) m8 ddevelopment activities.8 i1 K" C1 H- v Indium 7 `: j# x7 L2 ]Antimonide# X; k! U E& Y" z Infrared sensing material.0 B$ b8 }; X2 c6 {" O: O) { Individual ' ]* ^ ] X! e+ |Acceptance Test 1 q0 ~. m$ T6 B& i/ ZA test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics : w1 \' m! p9 w1 c4 yprior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using& n+ p* d( o7 R/ k5 f( v. I9 Q* P the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency. & m6 {5 N8 @4 ^* ZInduced: k3 k9 o) W E- E. L: C Environments 3 S3 }) ?, E, Y/ \2 M* l5 j7 sInduced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the$ C" [) L' S; R natural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets e. [8 u* E5 L/ y* p& ](Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or2 @0 ~2 k* t$ j* j4 e7 C* E the influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally-; k) w, p; K9 V' u x3 a/ F Induced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E( k: j3 Z' |8 I- k U electronic equipment).. o* T* g4 ?6 F Induced/ n+ L- A' C$ Y% Q% w Radioactivity1 _0 t5 z- d% ~: D# x7 p Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions,- `5 Y4 |% V4 _' ^0 Q$ f2 |' x0 u# c particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of 2 K( b0 M; E' k9 z [. wunstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce - k( P( ]6 Q) @6 L2 T7 \! Uradioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by+ g# F, W7 s( ?0 P$ F w4 O; y interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and I# j8 Z0 b" n' msilicon in soil and sea water).# K; B+ U" ]. |5 O( v MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I. Q1 e6 G% A3 B: h2 c- _9 X 138 ; f$ T l0 @1 u% cIndustrial% k' H. X+ @6 I% z0 n6 i! ^ Resource! Y5 k$ x! G2 B% ~3 W Analysis (IRA)4 Y- Y4 _ m+ o7 ` A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory % Q4 P: r) r: w0 l! @capabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to ; S" U* r% f$ B/ p, I5 T" _( Xsupport SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and 7 h, }7 B- L1 _0 Aspecial tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the) `% P, j8 a7 A+ b range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies,# ^ o" C" Y" b% x3 H3 G producibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in- L: W7 P; y( P( h! _ IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and : j; v' e H+ L: Vbecome issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues- O" R8 N3 t" C, L Resolution Strategies (PPIRS) document., l7 n: G: @, ]2 E8 p2 J! N Inertial8 J" [% g7 k) `" I6 h5 i Guidance3 t% k6 B! f) y1 ~* n- ^. f0 _; y A guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, d) `' C5 O, y4 F7 i. D wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly & w1 b Q& `9 c1 E' E2 a1 J: mwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures% _ J4 n4 P/ d# m4 r" _ K and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain r6 Y( u; T s; Zdirection. ; ?7 x3 r' o* ?+ @* Q2 h4 U* p3 YInertial ; o7 P4 w6 ` `) V2 e8 C* MMeasurement" b6 g4 o4 T: w Unit (IMU)4 v( a" H Y8 \/ z) s A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,2 H+ K8 W( m" _2 e wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly# `! M. u b. q* [. f3 _ within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures % k5 v1 d! R! r' H" Kand converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain7 C2 u* }( W6 o: H direction.& L3 Z0 v8 V7 T% z, W( ^1 | INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability.8 l6 V p* o" l* O9 ~: G- ~" E INEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term).! _& Q7 P8 Z! b. w+ m INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR + v" V( O9 ^& p: `; QTreaty.4 B3 y2 I) N' g$ Z7 M. } In-Flight Target 9 K, S' F4 i, b0 \2 c: U/ o/ |; pUpdate - j* k; T* I" ZA data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and 3 s8 Q) R( v: N" N" Vvelocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction.2 _) y( S& y8 S: ` (USSPACECOM)1 f3 l3 `7 r1 i, m Information ; K4 |: r+ T" ?, H. rArchitecture (IA)( X. x7 y# q2 w A description of the information that is needed to support command and control1 m9 T; k1 O% X; l/ D4 D7 [ decision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing9 r* @+ v1 m5 _7 Y$ }* Y1 ? that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description 3 l1 L n& O/ ^# @5 r$ x# qprovides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design ; y+ n$ w5 g9 X2 O2 @flexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability.( {) y: ?( n$ x+ w9 {4 c# A# [: b Information 1 C" v+ c- \3 B+ R# _4 S5 zResources. K( L) L- i0 J+ y4 W- e) R* v Management ; i$ I) _, i3 {8 tThe planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling,7 H7 q, V5 b8 A- |) H1 q7 n! O and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use,( u+ Z! W8 Z% J7 h& h+ Y* A and dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of, T% l$ r2 `4 G; }+ r4 B! B7 a information and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information3 i8 x3 p0 r: q9 _ Security1 o% r$ g( d: g6 a/ ^ (INFOSEC)6 ^# c! g4 U( |1 v e Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and : I( I, Y# I) A3 X# \0 Z/ ]protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or + t% _5 t B8 _+ k# ?7 W+ Lunclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical0 D1 @+ b% S0 M( t% A7 f |' Q data and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned, z9 D( o n Y6 p with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, : c. U$ s/ ]. n% A: {downgrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring. 6 R! ?- c) k1 {! OInfrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,0002 s6 i% ^$ ?8 P+ X# I& v% x# R0 W Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic4 i! d+ u6 ?) L1 t9 T/ o4 B Radiation.)2 c2 U5 i8 a5 o. I8 n3 \ Infrared (IR)! k: j& p" ^& d Electro-Optics/ F. }5 C# l% ?' l7 x( E) j" Q Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength 9 z+ u; M' _5 Xspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.9 q9 {6 }) Z" N5 D7 [- q4 I8 U MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I# i& i- C$ b* F( O 139 X( V1 p* C( n1 s' s8 p. K* s Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted% c; V- {& l% O: Y. b- ^ or reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the 7 W* J; o. Y: G; j& l9 H% K+ R$ Belectromagnetic spectrum.- ~1 M {' B1 D, p# j Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength7 M" [- S, g, E5 K region of 1 to 40 microns. y; H' v2 Z3 `6 h( A% j Initial. Q1 [/ L5 ?0 ^2 ]1 E( F Operational G, y$ U' G6 e7 W Capability (IOC); ~# Z9 K5 l! Y0 U+ |% p C The first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of5 R: N% r6 k0 C6 s' j6 ~. ^, I9 ` equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned8 H, X" ]5 ?. Y9 q5 R or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force.& u) x$ r" a- r1 A5 E! Z4 P Initial. u7 A9 H. b/ i6 a ` a* \ Operational Test ) K7 f' c4 ~, v1 `: y6 Hand Evaluation : F$ J& ~7 a8 z8 y2 Z(IOT&E)+ \% H! p. l" X& B/ N$ G All operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production , M2 C1 [( d3 Q9 Urepresentative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial # |) R- O* B4 h* K: H0 Uproduction. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system F& u3 D2 ^7 m operational effectiveness and operational suitability.& _. g t. X( c$ e z: E1 Q" j INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite). & r& h8 C9 W# K) ^: O. i C0 n7 lINS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code.; v) v& Z" \9 X InSb Indium Antimonide.2 t8 Q1 s2 \& i INSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.0 N1 D! b/ y, d2 h INSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments.; w. |8 ~+ g( `; d Integ Integrated. 6 |3 R/ p" e: x! iIntegrated ! e! O! y# Q# O- v6 F7 qContracting2 |# ?9 L# i. c" Z; ~, f/ f% ^ Report (ICR) # M! c ~* m; E& ^4 hA quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and: E n2 C& O ^8 D9 Z$ q interfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a 1 }( Y4 b5 E: I# xmechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as5 m$ L- B7 q8 c$ M6 B Integrated Contracting Plan or ICP). ! x, C3 p: P! w* Y& ^! n% |3 }+ FIntegrated Fire 0 z8 x# J ~ uControl System3 @* i. r+ a) J2 @: n" w A system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data ! P7 M7 Z$ i) ~9 ?" l( o& P- Mcomputation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted$ u; }$ }4 [8 w by electromechanical devices.0 ]/ b. v1 ^, D3 R5 I Integrated 6 q3 y n# M: Y2 `8 hLogistics Support W' w$ k3 g+ @ (ILS)2 t2 _) i/ s2 g7 ~1 S* `8 K8 f (1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and ; U# Y% H {; P6 y# ]technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into; a }3 J+ X2 P ]7 P( ^! N# _) O system and equipment design; develop support requirements that are1 {! M: j, h8 P/ V- I( u related consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each 1 w9 c6 d3 @0 `1 b8 Z$ p1 ?+ Hother; acquire the required support; and provide the required support 0 B6 k# J4 O9 {& o( r9 yduring the operational phase at minimum cost. # V5 n0 n& P; I(2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the + T2 m% e) W' S% h. seffective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an6 C/ @0 s1 n5 a# ~ integral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation.; f% W' ?) F9 G' N$ y/ q* ]. _; ~" E Integrated 1 m/ x$ W+ s2 [5 L) p7 JLogistics Support8 g8 v: }7 r6 E0 L; R0 w0 e3 { (ILS) Elements 1 z7 F, r3 s5 \Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish8 {5 u' I5 u# J: q maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system. ; R; w& X1 l; f9 u( r8 D4 A' aManpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and0 |0 W J9 r, M6 g civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a# m, h7 A4 M# O9 V/ ^& e4 R; C1 L materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.8 _8 ?- ]7 m9 b8 z. G Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to 1 U, J+ F, z, N. w) f3 zdetermine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and n$ ^3 R7 R& l" N6 o2 T! F: | dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well # c4 y0 [9 z# X N# L2 Was replenishment supplies support.* I% h/ h1 S: d MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 0 r& u, g8 Q+ q, N/ ]9 u+ a140) x2 b) @/ Q1 E$ |! `7 [. Y6 Y8 c Support Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the ) J' m+ }+ ~9 k+ {8 Yoperation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology9 z8 f9 m$ V( g/ Z and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It: n( B4 M: q4 O9 E h2 H includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment0 T- D) r) z: a% A itself.) A c% X. S- a; R+ G Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as ( P( h/ {% i, J1 d+ I# v2 g, xmanuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs : S) V$ z/ h9 nand related software are not technical data; documentation of computer 0 w) N/ W2 S$ d8 z3 W iprograms and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other 2 h+ n, ~$ A! h8 pinformation related to contract administration. 7 O7 X: [) B% k/ Y/ v2 B1 ?: FTraining and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training1 I4 p! h0 L( w' r& K devices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military 1 C6 k5 W- D0 Z+ j+ Hpersonnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual 6 f9 ]* b& T$ ]6 y6 yand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; ( j8 P7 k1 T; P5 J$ q) g' {4 g8 Aand logistic support planning for training equipment and training device- T% R9 r) K2 s, I, m/ ~- G acquisitions and installations.+ u* L6 E l8 T% U( a4 Y+ m4 r* Y Computer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software, # u% `5 ?* L& b0 i5 K: Ydocumentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support2 T- K# z, w/ L5 L/ o embedded computer systems. , H U2 X d+ c0 ^! g% E- MFacilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets f& D3 ]" E- U required to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define 9 G! U9 }0 z1 L8 S3 ?types of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities, 4 J; r/ i4 p+ U1 lenvironmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment. 7 w5 n! a0 Z. K p; b5 PPackaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes,, |+ y3 c' Q" Z* E( f. G procedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,1 u/ w. [) v6 t5 K: L equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and; k# ]* m( k+ v0 M2 `' m0 ^( _ transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment $ l8 l5 Z& Y& w: Opreservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability. # ?7 ^1 z# h: [Design Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as 1 |) F+ ?# J; xreliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements.+ Z3 R; s2 E u' z! n These logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms6 u7 _; t# }& p; n p5 x! r1 C# o4 } rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness + A, f7 E" t' Vobjectives and support costs of the materiel system.: E1 M: c- c) r# R Integrated- b8 A, t" b n* j* o7 @/ z Logistics2 K P4 J/ w1 Q+ \ Support Plan , i" j8 o" x4 {4 g: I(ILSP); M" G; v/ G& o( ] The formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the& V! }7 U& {: y/ {3 V7 S: o program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed0 f) A5 ]9 ]6 q1 x/ G ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with5 p; D/ J3 }8 B7 L& H/ X3 b9 y necessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and. A& d, \1 x5 M* ?5 [+ E5 m" E production, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications# U; i' L, p1 G1 u) o RFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs. 9 {9 H- S- A6 u) O# rIntegrated : F) B( l" D0 F& R+ }/ S9 b0 {Priority List l* j7 o" r" g9 |3 m7 j' H+ ^" jA list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized ! l! W9 v. @( {+ a$ C Jacross Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs, O! U7 k' W: F7 l that, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the / [( p) Q! f- g3 x0 d% d& H, Hcapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated0 I+ Z5 O* f. e% j; d priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for/ C. ^. d/ C. O2 S programming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System 2 c! M1 S* o, |) Iprocess. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated ( W3 ]; X: d+ c! @4 RProgram 3 r; v1 }: U6 r- KAssessment- C* M2 }% i& c6 v. G( ?) A (IPA): a& G' f1 w2 L0 ` A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone% {$ i. @. N3 @6 u" U! ~1 F/ T! L decision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an4 \" B0 B7 g# Q: ]9 X6 i independent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into * t3 C( g0 S q) cthe next phase of the acquisition cycle.* s; ^: y) |( f8 ~3 u! Y' `( ^ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 1 X+ `: O D! }9 k2 S' i8 ?141 ) ^5 ~& M+ j; v% \$ lIntegrated 0 G% I0 M9 b+ q6 J: \8 u4 yProgram / A, ~! J' ]2 O2 w3 {7 [; YSummary (IPS) ! s$ A Q, C5 H- l& tA DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision / }6 K4 d* u" m3 G* e) U( Aauthority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights 9 Q/ t5 ?: E: I- Tthe status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the ' P' N+ n4 J, P( `3 f2 f" z) uacquisition cycle. ( J! p" ^1 ^* u+ h6 u5 M) V0 yIntegrated 2 r% k3 q% e G* G2 _Tactical Warning ; u! F8 ?8 S9 c/ X# J4 K% qand Attack" J& p W0 D- r Assessment( S: |, e& }1 |0 M' I (ITW/AA) 3 }! t/ o8 v% ?$ EITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and 7 ^, z0 a& o! _% a$ }- catmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack : c7 ?) f! c2 Z9 _6 Fwarning information, strategic and tactical. + P1 R0 b, J: V% KIntegrated @ Q3 S* h7 Q: C4 sWarfare 0 I! u4 ]) m2 ^$ f% O. d% sThe conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing' y3 i9 m9 _8 p) l8 Q; H6 W forces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional! d2 V3 V5 ]9 Y$ z weapons." w F' B/ Q t7 b; l* y3 @7 E Integration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such$ S1 G% q- A4 k) _ a way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without2 X6 U9 ]6 g( E0 ?+ s adversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) 5 L% A4 c3 d/ k1 @$ a(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a ; q% P! ]2 ~2 h$ Q- _+ ?system.: b9 _ n/ y8 b- c2 K1 G INTEL Intelligence. . b2 H0 W1 Z4 e# N5 KIntelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis,/ G: V3 Q! w8 b! r# @( f' L integration and interpretation of all available information concerning- |" C [- l4 @5 N0 v* [ foreign countries or areas. ( Q& ]2 v$ M$ m' P, ]% W7 B(2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through1 b, ^ c% b. G# J- o observation, investigation, analysis, or understanding.0 N0 c0 h* S" K0 j Intelligence 0 m+ n+ C$ o; h) A8 fIndicators 5 K8 G: O# m7 o A% GClassified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that,$ ~- e1 x- l7 k: y) |( J when properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and! O2 y; X& l0 T" j! k) U8 m intentions. + n- J& s% O0 fIntelligence/ ?6 \4 D* W7 I, n+ O7 d Operations ) b9 f" O5 O5 I( s) OCenter (IOC) C% \ X/ w7 |# K. J( h1 [: e! s9 x2 p An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB. ' ?& j5 i; }# w: F* X/ iThe IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational8 [8 ?8 H* f. }7 \, d+ z Intelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) : ^+ D0 v. }3 y/ ECheyenne Mountain Node (JCN). ! m& r* ?) ^- [Intelligence ! ? `, S r, q. h7 H$ EPreparation of 6 Q5 G N6 z1 ~the Battlespace, t5 I$ u; n4 `2 ?' ?+ r# D An analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the " u% C1 `5 F6 q' {6 [2 lenemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence % I; v0 @! R6 [# L2 _preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential2 K4 s% T2 `! l$ K( R9 }! u9 q area in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed 8 `" R% H0 x G1 ?5 a% Nin detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on 1 a5 G9 j0 i0 U5 g+ h' loperations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle8 C" h% Y# k9 k$ h space is a continuing process. Also called IPB.' h# v: B6 h8 w$ |7 u Intelligence 8 h( d0 U0 N# d3 QReport (INTREP)$ j+ v4 R* J0 V& e7 H# c" W- F A specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of1 f. e+ y9 y/ {& A command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in 7 S8 I. z* k; q1 Y6 Ckeeping with the timeliness of the information./ z) N! a1 Y( l( Z Intelligence 2 K. }- H" Y+ |+ j: YThreat + R# x: U' ?4 LAn identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and 7 k/ a# }$ K" wexploit information from a given or similar operation. * B5 [# i% N, \, `0 a* |MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I . v# [ c& s3 z3 A5 p142 ( G8 U- v) n8 L5 a! S3 |; EIntensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit0 c" _, q' I# w* m/ | area, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal8 z8 x* X G" H- ]& g radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second & y# f1 o3 m% Ffalling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation, + x' G- }0 U+ l5 b6 tthe term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or$ S3 V. U4 r4 ^2 G' M* n2 U% z4 r dose) rate at a given location. 9 S7 g, j- S% KInteractive ) Q, Z n! L, I) y) B% @4 cResponses+ J6 F! D! S/ R. k1 } Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification.& n6 g) _* h% d5 Y Interceptor - F6 F; e6 c0 A) u1 T2 a* ]Cluster # P G8 U% V2 o0 T7 e$ rA group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor.1 W' b9 l% h' w9 u5 @8 h, O! F, ^$ O Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and ; l: n9 ~3 l. H1 vvelocity in three dimensions. 8 e0 S% l, }0 vInterceptor Track / M5 b: G1 e7 N- c6 Z1 yRange (Max)8 D8 h5 M1 \7 a$ l- P; j4 h1 A The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function5 f" C- u! E, [$ J5 j on a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit 2 T$ U3 [0 U. q1 ~& ^/ Yy 6 ]+ V/ b2 \% }8 ^$ ]# i$ K7 VA condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and ; P9 B4 Q1 y: H" Cphysical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and: E8 e O% g1 u1 J; s" D( x are capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items; T7 a8 h7 t& t1 s* f themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for 1 i9 {- @$ e' S' |fit and performance. 1 C! U, F/ x! \. m1 w) bInterconnection The linking together of interoperable systems. & m% M5 ~& L/ Y! m) R6 r; oIntercontinental 0 b8 e! Z3 |4 M1 i( }4 s- KBallistic Missile: u/ e7 o ]. c0 d7 w; g (ICBM)4 I( s( ]( \- k: w6 w; E A ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The ) ?+ i! g. z7 }1 Dterm ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from 9 F; h) P, q0 v- e0 Ssubmarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.) # o5 A* L% ~! C* z3 vInterface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection6 v- `3 u3 D# R4 f' } characteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged8 Z7 f, d: ]# Z, J b* J9 m2 p signals. 3 w O5 p6 Q) V(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two ( D( N. A; s! ]9 l0 ]6 usystems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register.0 g! ?: p5 a5 P1 @; q) T0 U (3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. % @ k, W% }% P, M, I(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between , E! j2 _# h+ `systems, or between persons and systems. - m4 U3 D; } d- {Interface Control ; a, {' _+ \; H# }Document (ICD)2 f. A# A; s2 x, B' E( c m (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must 5 I: A: h |: a" t1 l4 o& a9 \, |exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer- r L& E2 M% E8 N2 h* Q( Q* R software products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an 2 v; R" y3 C8 D5 H* ?Interface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD)., k* S' J* P/ [9 s* |5 \ (MDA Lexicon)* J9 @7 {+ i0 M$ E' S (2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control L& c2 g9 J- I- p7 z t agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements. 0 s! Z$ s1 Z$ c' g+ m" MThe ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification.) {8 C3 @9 n1 Q: d0 d- A6 V( r Interface / o3 n" w E; Z: c4 `8 dRequirements & A6 c( n2 ]' t1 Z' _* Q/ X/ bDocument (IRD) g& e: n. Q" D2 y* ? A document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system- F) b$ g; E4 Y1 `$ g% f" \ c! w3 T component.2 U" W' x: z, s+ a) U2 X8 K7 s7 f MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I) i# e) H4 ^( u; c$ Y. D R6 L6 Y4 z 143 9 ] q3 D5 |( }& {* T) F1 }1 WInterference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to0 M/ H$ O% L a; ] form a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum 4 ?2 v g d+ |+ V N# |% n1 wof the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point. 7 _" U; _, V3 P. M. z: Q+ d( XIntermediate # i. F$ f8 L/ c- x9 Z) T# ?0 dRange Ballistic . t5 k% w- }. c# p5 n, Z+ kMissile (IRBM): v, E/ @1 K; `+ m A ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles.; ?( h, K$ k5 i U International 4 X3 t" R) ?1 x! L7 T6 k/ h2 \Agreement - R* G. y3 R1 a' SGenerator (IAG)9 }# J2 A" Y' @6 x& |% t/ U3 L+ E Software system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD ' c- Z8 p7 ~ g& \3 \ M& `international Agreements. 4 s u r- F: y( d* h3 v5 AInternational + I3 I) u* C) { f& V: I7 K7 D! lCooperative 8 q* b* }. ?+ M; I; c* KLogistics & i* f. ]5 X @: g t7 Q. \Cooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination . S- H: }- {" j( l8 ?: Q5 ~of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply# j* e! J& a6 z: ]2 H' M and exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and: ?. D8 b7 h" Z6 N5 j multilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions. ( |0 `- b0 ^# SInternational/ A5 F* K% ~% n$ P f" d" h6 h Logistics3 E! ?. S6 \- {8 p$ @- L The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics 7 M) ] d, W" L5 T: U5 l$ ^3 B- warrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing( @9 {1 o o1 A; W. Y logistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign & V3 Z9 Q" Q& X, Q) lgovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without7 i3 B% V5 X" E2 Q reimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing $ t5 K# n, R- ?7 Iof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or : d) E& i8 {# o8 C* a4 f( d/ K" Z% mprocedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,* q0 d' ?0 W6 p4 H! c. k international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis." z* L4 o6 P C! v It includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States+ Y& T/ Z4 x+ r9 F: B logistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or0 E9 x4 O3 }3 f+ r, y; Z more foreign governments, international organizations, or forces. ) |* F% H5 ?2 n* w5 H& XInternational1 W! s. K4 D3 \* e$ q0 s% P, ? Logistic Support7 P) j3 q# K" ~9 i. S$ M The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or6 |8 j2 u( m6 d8 j/ N: Z4 _3 Y& n& h more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.0 m/ F# e5 M5 C" {2 N8 ]/ V Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services - g) t2 D9 I5 p% w8 ]6 c9 R* _ ofrom other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to 8 E! ~1 ~; g7 q. }( {operate effectively together. . ?, C& h `$ j# PINTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization. - p8 C8 Z" i2 m" F8 i4 C! y+ O, xINTLCT Integrated Electronics. + N; n, `; y% u) m. c& jIntruder P) C* |3 x, p8 W9 E# Z! o Operation ) A8 F1 m. J& yAn offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary 6 c. V( f- S: p" P2 N8 ^/ R0 p6 Aobject of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases. ' m' H$ v( V, T P& @INU Inertial Navigation Unit. o" Q/ }* d; ] Inventory Control - u. i0 C; @) K: LPoint 3 E L! b2 V' S# {An organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the6 ^& L* l' l9 I2 S6 s% g primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a - R, y" a2 M z0 v8 |& {. Sparticular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management+ D/ N% E7 m6 h" e6 ]3 ] includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, $ H( x) T! a4 G- fdistribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction. ]* d: p' }& D/ |, sInverse Square , B7 b; M9 }1 U% m5 ?Law ) y+ O9 L6 B, z8 l: mThe law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a( h5 e* l) ]6 Z# @6 G point source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the6 H' ~. {4 `9 ?3 E) p source, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that 0 U3 K1 a/ ?6 X- d( Ndistance.) c" n! i; F% B7 ]# `8 w( Z& Z MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I2 T% x9 y$ c! G+ J; [9 N* Y* u 1444 ^) o6 G: F, o# P4 o8 l+ E) f Inverse Synthetic - w% ~6 S- {; }4 j. T& I: b/ i, x* iAperture Radar 5 j' L: l7 w- T& k4 m7 h(ISAR)5 o' Z# X4 e4 @9 h A type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from' z: R+ ^6 R2 u: K1 M2 {6 ]$ S the motion of targets to provide high resolution. ; B" ]6 W S6 L* M. T0 k& F% dIO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic. ; ^8 ?8 I# w4 ~1 n9 h; q$ qIOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. . l4 P$ x$ `2 ], T2 g+ U(2) Intelligence Operations Center./ p) x7 s- {, R: m" }/ R: |* q (3) Integrated Optics Chip. 5 x: o* J: c0 FIOM Inert Operational Missile. 2 Z6 H1 {' l9 z8 v( e) aIONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US).# G$ N6 a5 b) `) b1 i Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition3 o( \2 G) Y! R2 ^3 y3 ^" d of electrons to atoms or molecules.4 e% D- U% j3 K; Z' I! H6 v Ionizing - {, n0 H0 a# b- u, n* |. BRadiation/ E4 t% v% q: B5 \ Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or 2 w" Y4 q5 z) @" `7 ^. Q9 Rparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of 8 N5 ~6 k" o4 f' j8 h. c5 j# G; cproducing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its4 n* w2 ~$ C7 Y4 W; _& k4 U7 s passage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.). t2 F- y3 f9 M; P# Y0 N Ionosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers + M- c" N! G) S7 F! c( n. Oaltitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect * }2 N9 @) N2 U/ w9 selectromagnetic waves.' z {% P4 r: c" R/ g0 K, l IOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff.3 D' k8 g. ?! o IOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation. # I- N/ S$ e$ vIOU Input/Output Unit. . E& F f4 M" t1 A: gIP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol. " S& t: L8 K4 n/ s(5) Interconnect Protocol. . d6 ^4 `. m8 b1 fIPA Integrated Program Assessment.$ R- i( ^! ^+ w1 Z8 V# F IPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace.! |5 u0 \$ O, d2 E IPC Information Policy Committee.3 ]' Y% k. v- u* n6 c1 _ IPD Integrated Product (Process) Development.3 V1 ?- X, c. `% H: A IPE Industrial Plant Equipment.$ k3 D+ [3 M) ^1 v* @ IPL Integrated Priority List. / c& Q; h g$ |" l+ ^1 PIPM Integration Program Manager. ) {" w8 a% X; @+ G5 H6 sIPMI Integration Program Management Initiative. 7 _' h; z; [# Y; S* bIPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program. & W2 W1 Y; N" k. yIPPD Integrated Process and Product Development. % ?: L& J( b2 C7 IIPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review).. b$ F8 Z# @. \0 ]9 p' M MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I( v' a+ ?2 R5 f 1452 m2 C5 a) X* A. P C; B" W IPRR Initial Production Readiness Review." G# g, e1 o# r! [6 \0 U IPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. % |8 m) B5 D! v# uIPS Integrated Program Summary. 0 a6 u1 b/ @6 q7 |! h4 n" k$ Z% VIPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit. 1 Q5 A# _! H# o5 v7 r; b1 kIPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated 3 w: s; D6 r( h) cPlanning Team. % m6 m+ O/ Q+ l( P* X3 CIQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term). : Y' ~8 w( [ w: y K& L% M }" BIR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4) 1 P D9 R8 O3 q6 E3 rInformation Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope , p" m( F* f4 I) M1 ^ ^Radar. 4 E% O- O% t1 S* N- T6 o" ?IR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength" f" H4 X" e* y& C( v P spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.1 j# `8 v% R9 ~( h5 ? IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).( B0 p; v. x3 _) T IR/Vies Infrared Visual. ! b+ H( C4 i( l; R( XIRA Industrial Resource Analysis. & Y: X3 Z# ?& y" oIRAD Independent Research and Development. 2 E8 \( e6 ^$ Q. c- ]% R. x8 Z* EIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite.8 Z+ R! r* }& }9 F IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile.9 ]% p0 q# i- C2 B8 R IRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. $ e1 K, [: q1 W2 t" S; m/ g9 ?; UIRCM Infrared Countermeasures.6 y$ n( ] X1 ]5 Q8 j) x2 Q1 N IRD Interface Requirements Document. , ?' @1 o6 w% o$ bIRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term).8 C3 Y% k7 w/ q/ i$ Y' S- h IRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array.5 |! F' I7 Q5 n, @# Q/ Y IRG Independent Review Group., z' A3 T3 X z; H% M- o IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center.% K- Z1 U/ O0 U4 A# [3 n IRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group. ) G+ N4 g& y- J4 C, cIRINT Infrared Intelligence.; p4 p: D' }9 N3 N IRIS Infrared Instrumentation System.% w' a" L! A1 |/ q& h1 g IRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). / d1 I4 F0 P' f: S) C. _* `+ J: MIRM Information Resources Management.: i- |0 D( u+ Z3 J1 o3 d& ] IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 6 b. U5 Z* K0 l. B146 p: C( ?( i) J/ h1 U, {( \4 H' a: t IRMC Information Resource Management College. . }$ B1 o% e2 V9 r V4 G1 HIRR Internal Requirements Review. - v4 e0 K. `3 x0 j" K( mIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System. ! Z5 I, o- B* j* k1 R c9 d( K" bIRRS Information Resources Requirements Study.5 }0 a- R* H: t* X6 m IRS Interface Requirements Review.4 S" F) h& h4 F! z2 h8 ] IRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). 3 B! |3 o" ^3 K- Q, D. I7 p! TIRST Infrared Search and Track./ D' u4 S, l9 g5 q8 P/ D IRTF Internet Research Task Force. ( L% g+ K, {( [& C; U+ n: p! e" ?IS Information System.1 _7 r+ P N! l" c, @ IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. & V4 A# w9 t7 X* B3 ?' P0 F(2) Innovative Science and Technology. 4 U- h' B. w3 J( s1 @+ w$ J(3) Integrated Science & Technology./ W2 i% W ?; o; Z4 U ISA Inter-service Agreement.) i% F1 r' v, k3 B2 Q/ v: G) a IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.- H3 a8 t o I2 n$ n2 i (2) Innovative Science and Technology. # z: |* Y. r$ b6 i/ m7 IISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar.( h3 E1 F. {9 M. n3 R) f ISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). + u, Z9 [5 X8 z" ?" | n. eISC (1) Information Systems Command.5 F! g: o2 j0 y. ^6 k% } (2) Irvine Sensors Corporation.6 F5 K. ^' Z. |7 f# B$ n ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network. 1 ?' s7 E5 z" A8 l% tISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment./ S1 l+ N0 Z4 P9 N ISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration. / ? F( M# a: { W5 o! d; G$ H% ^8 nISG Industry Support Group.8 l# E6 H+ d# e" s+ q ISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model.) |4 d! l1 p; ]) S; _, f ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group. % c6 n7 B: o, k3 PISMO Information Security Management Office. . r% S6 x) x) Z" UISO International Standards Organization.4 m9 N( z) R8 g+ k, ?9 s4 j ISOO Information Security Oversight Office.5 N8 g& d( }! w" q V7 F$ q) u) i( ^ Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with Z0 ?% y; P: L' ` j equal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional). " z( V* U4 h( V0 q" L M# HMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - Q2 d9 O1 f: `- b$ K: K+ F147 + R: @& m0 [$ J3 w9 b! ]; YIsotropic 9 I/ w5 v1 ~7 t) O \Nuclear Weapon* P- m3 }& q& g A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with * G" P; C2 b8 [7 }4 {7 capproximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to ; G, E% C- b5 y( y) M# Ndistinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons. 1 p! t2 T) M* u5 sISP Integrated Support Plan. - T( v: K4 Z, W/ AISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. ) c+ I% C' c7 ^" X3 vISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System. 1 ^2 ?. y3 _5 f% |ISSA Information System Security Association." T( W/ B+ G8 t, D$ u" V% N ISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency.( r& t+ d0 p- H E- f( M% P ISSC Information Systems Security Committee.6 p, u9 o# T3 K. n2 e1 k3 P! h ISSM Information System Security Manager.& |/ y9 G5 k3 o2 N8 U/ A( m ISSO Information System Security Officer. 6 G" W; ^6 I! e; C8 X/ W: fISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications. ; d0 U0 o0 y5 `$ q0 r. z/ F, M/ PIssue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and 7 J ], v9 S8 M8 y& Oextends into July. - {0 x: e$ x$ q# v0 D6 hIssue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.4 m+ c/ p4 v. G9 {1 \5 v IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test. - Z! X) B% M( a6 U: x+ ]5 t$ W; KISTC Integrated System Test Capability. ) C* F W9 [6 W7 K2 x6 AISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. / i2 S" J! I$ d. n& UISTF Installed System Test Facility. 0 C! i! A( Y2 j3 ^5 W3 rISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle. / K/ J( X( |, b3 B$ ?+ ]ISWG Integration Support Working Group. {/ N$ G' O1 w- u9 x IT Information Technology. 1 [. F Q+ o+ x$ ~5 U; kITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center. * F2 x! H$ f3 R6 D8 g+ m6 n, u0 sITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations. $ F/ z- j& E) Q- aITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed. 4 \' B; u6 j* D% R( ?ITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations.6 p% b m( D0 @ R ITD Integration Technology Demonstration. 9 L8 |" ~' T. N/ p4 W" ]ITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan./ q9 i6 V2 p) Q, u8 z) s7 M1 e6 x+ F (2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan.3 `9 e# y% E- Y( s+ L3 P6 a/ Y Item Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such : S, f8 Y0 s7 m+ x+ p( K3 h) ]6 sorganization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items 6 I% r( Q h; n1 Cof materiel. ; T: T& j2 M: |. o5 E1 yMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 7 `8 Z9 w0 Z7 _1 L1 Z/ Y148: Y7 s% j; ?/ Q2 ?2 N" N ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. 0 B! T, s& b5 h7 ~0 iITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch( Z* D( H; M- l ITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council.% j/ j% h0 B' h8 p7 q ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team. 7 S$ f0 R e$ u) eITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). 0 l7 _& J# p1 y/ m F& _ITP Integrated Test Plan. 0 B9 ~2 d- o; Y( |* H" e( GITPB Information Technology Policy Board. " j6 F' m' X. n" i9 l& `8 g2 ?ITR Information Technology Resources. 6 t% M2 C3 s8 ^, aITS Information Technology Service.( S0 S: X! Y% N7 L( f ITSD Information Technology Services Directorate. ! L$ m# E6 U$ X5 L8 g" mITT ITT Corporation.: U8 ~$ T2 _" c# A) I5 i( M ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle- y3 |$ i" u, n2 b& z; Q ITW Integrated Tactical Warning. w' b5 n4 Y3 z# D" YITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment./ ^( M& f! ?! d( S IUI Integrated User Interface. ) X! w. w: ` i3 r0 A' UIV Interceptor Vehicle. ( {$ a1 h8 z" |4 e- e2 yIV&V Independent Verification and Validation. # C* u5 P1 t; ~# U9 ~0 w7 c$ rIVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System. $ q( R( c) U5 f' DIVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).+ K9 Y! i2 u7 S# b; a% r3 z3 q IW Information Warfare. 6 v) C, G, ~/ n4 u% @0 ^* yIWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration. 8 d% Z3 z: o7 `$ qIWEB Information Warfare Executive Board. 7 l9 V7 I( m1 T( fIWG Interagency Working Group. ( g5 l6 s$ P! `! y) zIWS Indications and Warning System. + `5 H1 X2 _- v6 JIWSM Integrated weapons system management.* G0 q; X0 S; G4 G3 M2 ~2 v9 | IXS Information Exchange System.4 E6 Q+ J6 d0 k: y- s+ L# R MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J + K/ S4 _% d. j. @8 R/ `149& \6 S( Y' z) p3 F0 A$ Y J&A Justification and Approval.- P5 {% Q! f9 j* P6 F3 o J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses.( \* f! U0 Y$ k& \% y: | JAAT Joint Air Attack Team.; t3 }5 m& I% [' x- ] JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. 8 V W* |" A) d6 ZJAE Joint Acquisition Executive. 1 ?4 u/ g9 c2 L2 b" G: n) s9 OJAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).. f' n; V) D5 Z( ? JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).0 K5 R: t# H8 ^3 V) ~4 ]5 b Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the 5 {9 M% ^' k" d% }' y4 v( Z$ Ssame frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals ; X4 U, X8 v8 F; k: [6 n# }, Oreflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming 5 E3 d& z* @9 [3 r( Kgenerally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, # G8 V Y+ I! J) J oand with increasing radar power. 3 x8 i' U( W6 X+ cJAO Joint Area of Operations. : u4 X5 e) j5 ?; cJAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). . h2 S9 B3 Z# C TJASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term).% {/ k1 }1 M" k, z- V& r3 X8 ^ JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program). 1 E/ A/ U* Q2 H2 e* ?JBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term). " L0 }* V" [0 y6 j% vJCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US).) a' {) H0 t* r7 n$ k9 O: s4 b JCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions. * e/ E4 {/ k; Z9 y% z/ `5 MJCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US.+ p8 a. S" z2 D$ m- W6 b5 e6 Z JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum.) v: V* Q) v t JCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network.. U* V3 |5 j# m I. k" Y JDA Japan Defense Agency.9 M% f2 d/ p& v8 H0 U' a# N JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon).& L) a/ a, q3 D3 ] JDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community. - U# d* A* E& V0 P1 L. n8 `' BJDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System. 0 b8 V4 a, R+ G* }0 k6 `9 d0 DJDN Joint Data Net. : q7 ^+ V: e: z- ^* w6 L! ^JEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA).& D5 N) B" t0 Q8 @( U) F0 [ JEC Joint Economic Committee (US).! Z: P' d. d. `" ?7 X3 C2 C JEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office.! p2 s5 Y" S t) q `5 i/ ` MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J# |/ N0 a) i6 }6 v4 G) ~ 150 ' Q; K0 E ^- AJEM Joint Exercise Manual.$ h. o6 l; {- h1 N; q" ?+ ?2 k0 m JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis.+ O2 d; J& e; W7 w& @' e JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center.8 U' S9 g. W/ j2 H5 R JEZ Joint Engagement Zone.2 q# @; d$ k# h JFCC Joint Forces Command Center.- x" m; o1 [' g: p6 V! Y JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor." @1 c# @5 Y6 O8 f F JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).7 y4 E$ _8 k5 y8 q: Y6 x" { JFLC Joint Force Land Component.) p2 x7 D7 P1 R5 G+ p+ x" l1 \ JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component.* }0 M6 N; A) L; w$ L/ t, @2 i JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA. $ k+ {( W+ K) Z) |- [JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. $ {2 X. h2 m! c& E9 JJG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention. + X8 s2 o; O& t. A$ J6 y9 R1 `5 ~$ SJHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD2 O7 N4 H8 @+ r, J% L* E JHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. * V' Q* r+ C {1 ^& ~3 @JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.! B0 x( o, a0 C$ [ JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). & B3 V+ F) T- S- j5 h( Q) m* K i4 G9 QJIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization.4 s; A, U0 S9 L$ G JINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems.3 Y5 _; g) C$ L0 w0 i3 C! Z- O JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures. 4 V G a) {8 C5 q& wJIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms./ Y \0 A2 m( _5 n JIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term).0 s/ g* T6 \, {' p JITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. 6 u& c, u* C4 P0 U8 X. a( iJLC Joint Logistics Commanders. 5 L( ]: X% u( P' ?& F8 P6 ]4 ^, ^1 oJLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. + h8 y0 }% _. t4 a9 L' Q- lJM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. & T! q" X) m- j) H MJMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command.: t- t4 O" m# S7 L8 q8 h2 i JMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. 4 n# D' }# q8 D5 n. W4 c [JMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. & W: B, {) Y! iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J7 o) w0 _6 [( `0 J 151 ' \; ?: g( q: x; l% w" jJMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information# q7 u: }7 i% R5 [3 O4 X! p Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded5 Q' x, u7 Q- K6 q. c5 j by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major . J4 ^, _ i6 l: _9 [0 {, s% J* a, ucomponent of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN),! q# t% H4 L8 D. J& n( J$ R/ o operated by the JNTF. 4 i& F. `+ }3 u7 N5 yJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual.$ |" j! x2 X( w' Z- ~ JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement.! v! H' b. L/ s" c- }6 \) V JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement. ) A, \: k9 C1 E3 g1 GJMO Joint Maritime Operations. ( R, \7 Y/ G+ ~9 k* F& X8 fJMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. : j h3 [) q6 ]+ EJMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. 2 K' X) `( ^) y- ^: S2 I$ m% o a(2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group. 7 M3 y, @; B2 \. WJNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service. , m t' P ]5 A& O; u- y7 o5 T' xJNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System.% i' v T2 u. [- r( W% A- b* B: a JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. * Q; Y0 w, |- A; l8 g( q; O3 qJNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor.; h8 M/ T2 A7 W JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. " k) e* H* r ~6 R: |2 l" qJNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access.9 \, M% ]1 E) @ JOB Joint Operations Board.9 r5 ~; s1 B* t JOC Joint Oversight Council. ' v8 m0 u. B. p: m$ y- Q3 |JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System.3 z: A8 o" q; s0 o Joint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one" H2 B; s9 @" a( ]; Q0 Y, y Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the) ?; Y) o5 ]. o# |) Y participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy). & i- U2 ?& C) C- VJoint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more 0 N9 O- T$ {+ H* K- W) _Services in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be& d$ _/ q6 v5 J4 _- ? promulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the . x1 k: A) `7 \% |. ]+ \2 ~combatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint / C" s4 D0 j `6 U; @7 J& IChiefs of Staff. # e4 }' `0 W! J* n2 g$ C. D3 BJoint Doctrine 2 l4 d2 B7 \/ H3 eWorking Party 3 j, P, K5 S2 C6 v% ~; a& VA forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands; U4 [% b- y7 L8 d/ g with the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, " R; m) m w ~) A. gtechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ) m( R; r, c5 h3 Gproject scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation. # M6 T+ U o- d o) A/ {+ @4 OThe Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director,6 S; f$ L- }( Z/ v Operations Plans and Interoperability. 2 R0 Y# v% |/ M/ UJoint Electronic ) _( N- [3 d3 f+ EWarfare Center ' `/ E5 D1 k; I6 Y) }, ?: Q& ]! l; I2 z( \(JEWC)3 e+ C8 K: `* \- z% j5 n' A# J% G; g Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for. Y4 i7 V/ P6 r* k1 o$ a1 T investigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground0 S5 [: ]% h! G systems. 0 v, n# X d; V+ v1 E; AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J! d" t* t9 ?$ ]' \ 152) @) p( ~; l5 z. }) h Joint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or( ]6 z* K8 @- e( a- {: ~, o# z( k3 W attached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or " T: w6 u0 D% jmore of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to' R0 v0 V4 Y* J5 K+ C& t exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander.7 h! j- I) E+ k: ~( s6 \ Joint Force Air + Y4 |' |" g7 E" }Component ; T) m G0 g+ K ?/ M- @4 {" y+ BCommander: n8 ^/ J7 J& _" s1 R, Y( ]+ T3 Q (JFACC)! A8 L1 @4 W4 e! I9 i2 Z4 F" x The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or) Z' w' s( B1 Z) C+ o joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making ( Q$ p: y; o2 A1 c! ~% l* d# z% zrecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and ) [5 {$ y k4 c# p2 M) gcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may . y8 J9 e3 Q& H, Z) `0 Zbe assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority 6 W# g6 T" Z- a: ]* Unecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing9 v, X: p! M* A. ?4 C) H commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the' U" E3 {5 a4 A3 n" m preponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. 9 Q3 l8 O9 ^. X1 a+ W4 DJoint Force! T. e4 t! M/ E, f$ m- n. E Commander 4 D) @( d a/ o% w( p1 p0 Q(JFC)2 b5 U% b7 s1 a/ | A general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant" t7 W2 g* q3 {1 I command (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also0 j3 @) q# S+ W3 |; { called JFC. 7 J5 g9 X, \9 m; Q* RJoint Force Land w: p# l! x& p! y- d8 rComponent 7 x* ?& @8 d8 a/ LCommander + D# t8 k& ~6 q. [. x6 V) L(JFLCC) . @% q; h, ]* s9 r8 b( {% X5 oThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or# y' i" ]$ \5 b; @ joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making) i" l& f3 u0 ?( v: S recommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and 8 T' d8 t7 l4 B# v5 e5 H; f; Fcoordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may1 _" z8 _" r$ ~& R8 j: S5 v. t) E be assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority 2 O( u1 H. ]% h" ~necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing* K A; \% g$ L9 g- m commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the% W/ {" q" T8 I6 b6 o preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control 4 o# j; s! c0 ?2 dcapabilities.+ x/ |) [) G, K5 W Joint Force - X0 e! d4 I; k d, ^; @& |Special $ {0 T2 w" {) g5 M7 W: A iOperations 1 m2 B- d. h. [( `) \: nComponent ' E; a7 ]. i3 b- e( b; n) rCommander ) R" r, |* ~1 ?+ R(JFSOCC). d, E# w; ?+ @) C+ q2 g6 o$ x1 f The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or+ W$ d4 b6 j3 h. m6 y& u \ joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making) N r: o3 A- b! S$ k recommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and . m9 Y8 ]1 Q+ u$ W6 m0 g" oassets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such , t' v1 U7 d4 ooperational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority& m/ U! X }- L% Z) [5 K! p0 R0 u necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing 9 c8 V& c4 q1 w: O( i1 ^4 H& ycommander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the/ B# t0 @' F( A4 p7 D7 K* `# Y preponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and : S' Z' u. m0 M) tcontrol capabilities.' U3 w% P% l$ A4 ]/ v Joint National; J) V! J6 s9 r2 ]1 u/ Y Test Facility$ b6 Z# N( w K7 m8 c (JNTF)/ U F }; W+ k A large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado: l! {# a; ~. p. C/ e8 R5 e which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the8 n! x) l8 e& W! L9 Y NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF)8 a7 {, `9 n$ h3 y" Y& C Joint Operational9 ?0 x) R5 G/ \' U Planning and " k% z: e4 @7 y( R$ OExecution5 b: k3 J% N8 B6 [2 t, u6 F System (JOPES) + V0 Z/ M' @4 m7 {7 |A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration$ _+ ^% X7 ?5 a- y" t1 q, \8 e/ C% Z% b and enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation; t# K3 D' ~& ?8 y3 y* K# I Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for8 H8 E* n* O" H9 a8 [( [ conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders - T' G- z' S: \$ fand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct& ]0 K2 ~6 p3 f$ {' n } of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning4 v3 V+ \9 S7 E5 s policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and U/ C8 m. |8 v3 ~" iautomated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and ) G7 H. M+ \6 X$ C! y2 C* sexecute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities$ C1 t& C7 H5 j, x. w associated with joint operations. 1 k1 o; S: X1 p( v7 I1 i8 ?0 J' o# KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J# \7 V/ D( d3 q' \& C 153/ Q' X2 H8 Q. J# @3 Z6 P @1 ] Joint Operating 6 \# ]" }& L. z. ^Procedures 6 l2 k" O4 ~, n( G(JOPs)' y U2 K2 L5 ~* v# O8 M These documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions 2 O2 h' x/ d* M+ l5 g Anecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs* D% H/ _8 t5 x' f may include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, ( y( L& S @& [+ c, rVulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting,5 f" J& z. f, d& F- A0 h5 G' ^, t# q Y: g Financial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement ! l1 c# a) o+ ~4 I/ sand Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program ) C% [. h6 @* f% a. a( AManger and the participating Services.7 H6 z9 u0 i2 D Joint Operations & Q2 h T5 |# YArea 8 {7 y. @" @ }6 X4 z0 rThat area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military) x& n) A: z# r+ f operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to : a6 b' ^5 g5 J$ x* P4 f! Ssuch military operations. Also called JOA. x8 q2 O: z6 F4 y' E3 vJoint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program + u! e% ~4 Y) F/ H6 D9 Rthat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component ( V( U6 `5 \( b( [6 c8 ~during any phase of a system’s life-cycle.8 f! W1 b9 o) Y( T* e Joint : K- n+ a2 u, E% {1 j w$ q) Z$ fRequirements- ~6 r, ^2 L# y/ u0 z Oversight, P) W' ~ }$ e, q4 \" O Council (JROC)2 k8 g M7 i1 t- j; G A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts8 o1 N4 a e# w* ~7 } requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops$ u9 r+ F: @) I" S" F9 ~ recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates - @% I6 Y) h" k. E$ R) Tperformance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition $ S. I# k1 G- J* H% g: `2 HBoard. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air , {: m! R7 L' m9 G5 iForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. . Q8 X" [- |% a. N9 v1 oJoint SPACECOM, M# L: i% x4 W6 P2 K5 X3 n! ^/ j Intelligence: x) c; ^$ P2 o" Y ~ Center (JSIC)0 k& ^8 e" a* H- ?! } A USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational ( ~ C( b( b' c( v7 u8 ?intelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for * Z B- L9 ^4 m& ?- b4 W. xthe DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production. r- {# i: u1 P7 j/ V includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and % B, a' w/ ?4 z/ b3 ^Satellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB.( ^3 @8 [ q; [- u* Z8 O0 N Joint Strategic0 [. N* A, C/ @% i) T' j; u0 C& \6 y Defense Planning% ~6 y; k) e8 q- K' D8 B Staff (JOSDEPS) $ ]7 d+ `- O V) y( u& U. ]A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for$ m# x" j7 g7 T" x integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive 4 W& Z* f Z( g3 Iand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint2 ?# `3 q, q. n% O) s' N' q9 b) V Strategic Defense Planning Staff. / _+ T4 i: s+ I# N7 ~Joint Strategic. j+ f' [' x$ p7 J& a' e; P8 b Target Planning- K, O5 U+ Z7 B: S& d Staff (JSTPS)- K: ]8 z' a/ n5 U A JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing,7 \) F- j5 E. I Y( N coordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP).! T G; a* a" ~, h% R Also responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The) [. w+ _5 f+ | ~! X( A Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target! H! m2 P( u7 s. c. | Planning Staff. 1 }% u4 L' s# Z: ~ @0 IJoint8 ]; N' w$ O, k4 J Suppression of0 ]8 b( N/ B& e Enemy Air . o2 U3 d. C* u/ i P0 NDefense# U, V6 ~0 b+ W( M& ~) U" Y8 p A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities6 Y2 A, Z) F' I' E2 J/ R4 c provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called 4 F5 @; k2 w' N. m4 ]J-SNEAD. 8 d+ j/ H. O2 b) xJoint Tactical 6 T. T) [& H- SInformation , T- _& L9 x! K, ~Distribution! M; r" r }4 b H1 q6 I System (JTIDS)- Y7 w2 H0 V! Z: F3 g+ o' h A joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the ( ?- T% C: ]: p O7 r( ]* W* p1 sinterchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, 3 B; i& ?2 x6 [2 e) ^$ Q% Pand mobile or fixed-base land stations. 4 Q" f k2 b& K: L9 XJoint Tactics,# o' a7 _' i# R; a0 S Techniques, and# F1 n8 a% q- c Procedures 7 H* a0 N5 d) w' @3 q @3 U- ~(JTTP) & ~5 w- ?4 V* U# K- a- A: t4 `The actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how" ~& M ?$ M* j" W/ J forces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,3 |1 c' t8 N/ T$ t/ g promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and" U0 N7 \4 _: q; D2 l. [ Joint Staff. Also called JTTP.& u6 u, k) O$ z6 W/ B3 H MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 3 |+ Z6 I5 L( T5 ~3 o; f154 4 M, J3 n, c" k! |8 a+ K, FJoint Test and* W) g; E4 m4 m8 r Evaluation) i/ A7 p2 F v# @0 c T&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be$ x6 A$ t$ G1 D# E acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have 8 w" S8 V# @' k% h2 T# W, tinterfaces with equipment of another component.& S, I$ L; Y$ o) p Joint Test and; ]$ _! E A H Evaluation , b) D1 B ?1 y4 ^3 D0 G2 J- xProgram' ?/ W& |- v: I7 m' L An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on 3 P& G0 c' |1 x1 A4 osystem performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements,6 l. K$ A% h1 m% @& g5 J systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for 9 a/ T: w- J: f4 U( `force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. $ y5 t9 p, w. { hJON Job Order Number.+ Z" ?* v8 }4 q4 v* S JOP Joint Operating Procedures. ) s" C0 P" o4 z% }; VJOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System.; t: y4 e/ J* q# [. y8 m, L JOPS Joint Operations Planning System.3 O7 s% o* Z2 s) t0 Y3 M8 W JOR Joint Operational Requirements. 8 H! @) W' Z1 b* d: vJORD Joint Operational Requirements Document.3 E9 z/ y; c+ k1 y JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. ! v1 }4 h* e- C7 L. RJOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). - M' `' x$ P: j- ^. c4 `$ oJOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).5 W% B8 W! ~' [' t2 h4 T0 K' y JP Joint Publication. ; H0 z2 Z' n" ^4 rJPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.& {+ W) V1 N6 [/ `/ F1 F JPM Joint Program Manager. ! V, ]; ]) ?% |% D% k" VJPN Joint Planning Net./ {$ O3 s8 Z, b1 F! D JPO Joint Program Office. 0 z# W0 v) ]! r5 `: d5 |JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. 0 H [5 m+ s) H* @# ~# hJPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact / @# N5 T" Y2 k3 w: dJPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle. 4 s( L8 R- i8 r# h5 X1 h! _JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. I8 F- a2 M( JJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration. . b$ g, h( A0 v J8 ?& kJPT Joint Planning Tool.9 X U, P3 t2 ]1 L JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). + w: D- B9 C- b; aJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term).# H9 r& g$ J( u% ^* @% X8 ` JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).* G8 |- z4 ~* d1 ?/ } JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J% T p9 P. J5 B9 ^6 S 155/ v( w- w5 d { s4 o JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council. , M+ \5 u8 M ?JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group.8 \' R: ?5 q- I3 j, p JRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications. . f. q0 e5 x. M/ @" C) jJRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. 5 u; ?* M2 y8 n7 t8 G) F" K+ L" ~JS Joint Staff. ' [& [0 H) `) z0 a0 ^* bJS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. . G w- o, y5 X# F& _; d+ |. ?JSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term). : d+ F9 G# {3 F# n# hJSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan.& ?0 H+ |- ~& p! r0 Y9 H9 r JSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term).: M" |9 p; x F# D; O; i JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). 4 r6 H8 p, |( S(2) Joint Service Evaluation Team.1 B8 } `1 l, D$ G7 I2 l Y. z JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). * e8 x$ T7 d) H) u- UJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center. 7 D, w" ^. h' l$ rJSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term). ! U& j. E- e+ e3 e4 v0 s8 {3 cJSMB Joint Space Management Board.1 k4 e; u) p. ]/ Z7 D JSOC Joint Special Operations Command.) Z8 e5 n, J5 r# i. c JSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. 2 E5 A$ a& Z3 h& m- G, O" s& ^' b( Q8 mJSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document.- s' _' c8 E( U! p JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System. 8 ]2 b" F% q$ D0 yJSS Joint Surveillance System.) U4 ^0 H' G' E* u t JSST Joint Space Support Team. ; N$ i+ N+ C# W/ L$ m4 ^JSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System.) a9 M* l+ e1 D0 i: D/ y+ j5 v JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. , @# Q+ n6 R+ ]2 C( RJT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting 4 ?7 I+ _2 J" x" p" q, n. B" bJT&E Joint Test and Evaluation., J+ S" z' a) @: E% @. r6 t% E JTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term).; O% t; }, ^) ]' n+ z5 k9 w4 | JTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station.8 I8 u( q6 e7 R3 h JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization.5 E( M6 h* ~, |5 P U JTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center.3 }: B8 f7 L4 T4 [ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J8 ^! G7 S$ a2 B 156 4 {5 J, L% \7 @* \JTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). F8 {) o/ {; o T, W+ d JTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture.; D, V# p) ^- g% C5 x O) y9 u h JTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term).0 L) E: ?* x) ?7 j/ {( x* @& q2 b JTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term). * g* `( {+ J: j [( _+ U4 xJTF Joint Task Force.+ ]( [& \4 B. k4 E JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise.) C8 j+ b) I4 l& w+ y9 @ JTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System.$ ~4 C. l5 V$ o/ r5 i. L d/ H; j JTL Joint Target List.( X% r. {( G. x( ?7 \7 u JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense. 3 f1 @: b% Y, Y4 l# t, @- r+ Y. [JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. " i0 P4 s1 M& s# |1 s; y! [JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys].9 g& b9 T( w# K& {7 m JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. ' X( V& Q; C9 g- `% O9 N: e2 kJTR Joint Travel Regulations.8 G/ u! @5 J6 U' p6 ~7 D3 z5 l' b2 \ JTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board., f9 y# q" w0 u; i( { JTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). T6 P4 S" J! c! w& l+ q) K$ rJTT Joint Tactical Terminal. 7 m) \* }: l+ M9 D7 S: ]; @. l4 ^& }JTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. 4 C. X9 h. m9 ?' r/ nJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft.( I+ j, L0 P7 Q# ]( l. } JWAN Joint Wide Area Net.. R3 H& F% U) l& W JWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). . U' M5 e% D6 z4 u xJWC Joint Warfare Center. 3 p0 E* b6 ~% k: K2 n: VJWG Joint Working Group. - h; ~: D! E' N! H! s/ HJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network.& c0 T q" d) k+ e% }7 n: @' o JWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration" R. v7 ]' ~2 F JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.% w5 ~- v# V9 z- N( U MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K. `/ m/ s6 p- ^& `* V 157 $ X" E# d( ?' E' c# _K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo. # Q8 |$ M0 e9 \, x! qK Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another. 3 w1 y) p. R. k* y' H/ [. n7 c% j' PTheoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of4 o* Y# m; y- | two observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both. [4 H! A6 |. }: y! y9 U objects.* F8 b. m8 m8 V9 q+ c KA Kill Assessment. " B, Z" D% Z" v ^KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. + t8 w' k3 e; }6 F% H! Z, d2 z7 H sKB Kilobyte. / Z4 {" u9 l" s' A; v4 p7 \Kbps Kilobyte per second. % l. m: e" \' u& gKBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD).; H! d$ m8 k. @% u& { KBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion." w1 u. d+ n% H+ }' r* b KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. + z- g5 u* U* J5 z3 E+ jKDS Kwajalein Discrimination System. * r! w$ D' d' ^+ ZKE See Kinetic Energy.+ T7 o* o+ L) }6 X( y KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon. 5 a" R$ ^4 H. i, xKED Kill Enhancement Device. 8 l. L8 c4 t9 ^3 k' yKeep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the " Q1 Y* U3 X0 s/ Q1 e0 E$ F5 \- i9 kasset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to ! G7 N2 V* w" }1 d6 N' U, bdefend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones3 A/ `8 D. ^- F& [5 ~3 I under the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined.9 p4 t& d/ L) T( T5 P9 o: { KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept./ F. I! u5 z% f4 N KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool.- w4 o7 c+ Z7 J& u% |0 l4 z KEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. # J5 ` W# Y. |KEW Kinetic Energy Weapon.0 E6 Z# ?, `6 { KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion)./ S+ B# i7 F6 ^0 w; o KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). ( m) f% ^2 D2 ]" CKEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground.% y( d! E& Q# E, F5 z9 j( s KEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital.# h1 e. R& }0 e Key A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a& o9 U6 n/ M* C* F sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption. " S5 d- t* Y; w7 |" u2 l: T8 Y! QKg Kilogram. * W; |. q- Y( P* l& JKHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL. + H8 S: T* F* s8 y+ ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K , h, j) |8 u) k o9 ^, d0 K158 + Z: P" W( {$ C: r7 s+ ZKHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. # W) ~) D B& ]% l4 j/ j2 LKIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution. ! |7 n1 B8 `. [2 h8 W) GKill Assessment9 @) [8 r; Q" Z5 B/ U! ^ (KA): F5 z3 E8 P! u2 P% s. [4 m An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV 4 M$ ~7 m* o$ @3 j3 vintercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and K* V, R; R3 T9 Rre-engagements. (USSPACECOM)) ?7 D+ K9 s5 w# T# V Kill Enhancement . _, O' j3 O3 iDevice : O5 Y( D# R& E6 U* H2 sA device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. # y6 L& {. X; @3 ~ ?+ H/ AKinematic 8 J0 u+ K$ C$ nBattlespace9 r% l9 t4 W9 Q, Z9 l" G8 _( u The planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor ' y0 o( r/ I8 n3 m9 H- P" Ztimeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and) l3 G' ~* R4 }4 H operational constraints.; G( g2 t) Y+ x. p+ ` Kinetic Energy + j7 j% j3 V6 k0 ?0 k3 D* t E(KE)2 }' V' g( K6 d5 | The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion.9 J0 V# Q! F3 f( r5 s8 d Kinetic Energy - q6 d1 ^9 p" V& A3 e. r4 Y& SWeapon (KEW)% f/ n5 u/ B9 ?( ]! U& ^ A weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object.! h6 A! N. Y) b" ]9 z: k Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. 8 m5 d8 n& }. [) D( FKinetic Kill* n4 R$ k9 k4 a: h& E Vehicle (KKV) x; s1 K. U1 f0 i6 e6 t: ^ A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy + W' Y, L: L5 N+ ?6 |4 v, K6 ia target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board1 d; o5 I* B& y3 Y3 ]: ] rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell* ^. y- S. l7 r1 X2 d6 g4 ` launched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-3-9 09:37 , Processed in 0.050003 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部