航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H ( I+ Y0 r1 c$ V- H3 Q130" H7 @: e' i4 |( e Human-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system 2 V$ C: g6 e& |+ @0 hprocesses. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential I. n6 t% J2 L# M7 [high-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to* n0 H' g7 [8 D6 | A BMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal7 o3 j* I& R' Z/ O( f4 Z Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of # ^0 }( Z% e7 T4 Jcommand and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost! a* ?" e: m' C) o$ @4 U7 V% Z phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses% [6 V4 G% ~# [: e to initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human* C% d1 c' r; l! ~0 O decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) ; P" R' R7 e% o& {; Z9 z8 X* Y5 fHuman ' y+ Z8 I% K" `4 |& I1 CIntelligence" p0 Q# |2 F: Z1 x# I/ Z0 l8 C+ e (HUMINT) + H) F3 r" z. V' xA category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by# w2 y+ R% K. W( U2 j6 B- l' K- E human sources. 8 a' a9 x: f/ c P' K" N% aHuman Systems 1 a" x& t0 o! q" aIntegration9 O! v: N* T* Z. n5 P The human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel,; u; c. d- \, a8 E2 a4 | training, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort $ I' U* z) V, ?& }- o& Efor the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of & k) z9 o$ U( n5 G rownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier, 7 q& i2 c, K' Gsailor, airman, or Marine.: v) ~& F% N& ~ HUMINT Human Intelligence.$ M! z, f* i6 T3 K& d# D HVAA High Value Airborne Assets.4 h8 G' h6 [: ^, t) G0 N( A8 t7 K HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. ( o: p/ v+ h* h" D5 ~HVG Hypervelocity Gun.' U4 k( c! ~* G6 |! O: K HVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). 6 l* [4 i) w. d3 O* HHVM Hypervelocity Missile. ! M& O/ [, K* x& }HVP Hypervelocity Projectile.1 v( g, w5 d8 L4 B" r HVT Half-Value Thickness. 4 ~. Y! t- P3 c6 e: U UHW Hardware.8 r5 B4 A4 c6 K/ M HW/SW Hardware/Software./ O; U+ |3 S! l0 |* v+ q" H: v# m( O HWCI Hardware Configuration Item.+ u3 m J6 a, ?8 r/ C HWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop.+ ~" U6 R+ X% n2 f HWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test.+ d: B" V6 {$ B& q- F4 C/ |( r HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature.7 O# Q! c; ^. d4 u( A" J+ | C Hypervelocity : w# _! \% w. |1 ?* q2 I" G; a7 V) O' HGun (HVG) 8 ]* l1 Q) I7 C9 ^" ]A gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example,. q* F# T" M+ q% l2 p r an electromagnetic or rail gun./ D8 J( M, @$ V& u" X7 c' g% Z8 n- U; _ Hypervelocity / k! n C8 a9 K5 kMissile (HVM)7 d' i& Y# g0 N9 y/ b' } A missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second.' t# U ?! w e7 P HYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance.+ W- R5 p0 l% i% g9 G! U' J& S Hz Hertz (cycles per second).$ q4 W2 j/ M6 n v MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I7 g q' Y; F& v5 z+ w& H4 s; a& |" C 131 1 W( U: |& G5 wI&CO Installation and Checkout.$ D0 Q0 ]5 } t* _7 m I&I Installation and Integration.- }1 _ E/ k$ n) m) Q" a5 ^ I&PA Integration and Performance Analysis.8 Z( u. V& [- M8 c8 p7 X+ j I&T Integration and Test.4 U4 c% a) E9 I( F1 A: A+ ?% L I&W Indications and Warning.- O0 H( p8 [! l5 _/ B, R I-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.) Y# M9 `5 q9 h2 P( |7 K: G I-HAWK Improved HAWK. ; k, V$ B/ G4 n2 _. j) U4 `0 {5 [I-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term).( ^( a. J$ m% A, |, {8 G I/F Interface. 3 ^8 w$ Z( k" e4 Q& JI/O Input/Output. % I7 r! t3 c! UI/R Interchangeability/Reparability. 5 n2 a8 g& n/ f- _ H# v% aI4 International Information Integrity Institute.8 s( ?& Q% y. Y# ? IA Information Architecture.( B) c# O- z6 Q IA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations.; ] J5 d4 H0 J( T! N; } IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test. Q) ~, k7 ^8 O# B6 ?IAD Integrated Air Defense.8 d+ a' ~0 V8 h IADS Integrated Air Defense System.& f* e, [- s4 S, D IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.7 S) R. j4 v& I/ p( _ _+ E2 U IAG International Agreement Generator. . A# z7 O. c' z! H1 V% o7 kIAI Israel Aircraft Industries.( ]7 ^" {* o- W$ @1 L IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package.2 M1 i' \1 n: }; w1 k IAS Israeli Architecture Study. 1 [0 P2 s h- Z8 K# y2 V" IIAT Integrated Assembly Test.: d0 Q$ W# \0 ] IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System.( y! a; T) P1 }4 i0 c" c) e) ^ IATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out.$ J5 t* o! T4 L5 z* l IAW In Accordance With., I+ k1 I5 ]- l2 f5 W/ A: ^5 ~ IBA Industrial Base Assessment. 9 e/ _/ A2 f! \0 NIBC Impurity Band Conduction. * H& _- ]# ?4 R. `% B! _* ?- KIBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.' x# D* Y& x' _' F Z! v; M MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ) J8 t+ B3 H. s6 j6 P: j132 ! T' G1 }1 q: V6 _) Y0 J5 `2 r5 @1 F3 zIBDL Intra-Battery Data Link.$ @3 R- ^ S8 ~/ n5 o, |3 K% y IBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration ; L0 R" @$ G% k- aIBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System. 2 e1 u: j6 r$ S; oIBM International Business Machines Corporation. ; Y1 Z8 `; r3 _% nIBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis. 6 C/ A( H- \" K. u# b3 XIBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term).7 b0 H" D6 e* ]0 |. V3 M IBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US ! ? g9 a! S ]# ~% znaval ships.8 T# n1 ` ?7 Z! D4 I- e IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey.# p& A" m' l: B! K& u$ s0 _ IC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit.( Q/ X C5 P5 r2 E2 o ICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment. ( `% b' D0 ~3 I9 x; r- F. E7 n& ]ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System. 5 v, s0 ?! `0 r0 s7 u; IICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. + q/ D4 m% O- E! n0 b0 h xICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. / E0 ?. W' J- ^+ M' jICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control / \6 L; N6 q: o" LSystem (ICS) for US naval ships.) r+ i& Z4 l. V% Z. [ ICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering. % t0 G! ]% p) m! \7 U1 pICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.* {+ n" _6 b- w. \4 N ICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT). * q7 _4 z, P- k$ S2 x/ W(2) Item Category Code (ILS term).1 q4 }7 E6 U: o$ Y0 C+ l- _: R ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing.+ K$ ` D2 A0 J" Q* e0 P ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security.$ k( \- c# L1 x3 P& p ICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking. 1 H6 v% ?- C, `% D3 [4 C) FICD Interface Control Document/Drawing. ) V/ D6 x- W$ P) s; t/ ~+ pICE Independent Cost Estimate. ( ^" d5 u# q; I+ s% L! I$ C' R F; IICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO). $ E! T2 z8 E2 A' X8 HICM Improved Conventional Munitions. : J$ N+ X2 R R2 XICN Installation Completion Notification. 5 o3 X! L0 H3 N! C+ W& A% lICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term). 2 h% |' K, h$ ?" NICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures. ; I8 k* k0 Y+ W8 r8 K. Z& jMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I9 _' d, I: ]5 u8 Q 133( J8 l$ ^) X |: e6 P. h/ x8 B# ~ ICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term). 6 l9 m( N3 h- v( A(3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process. 2 Q3 [; F# Z& tICR Integrated Contracting Report.2 X2 u& o" U" Z6 i, r& A. k+ ~ ICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and! R2 R# W: ~) C+ U5 |2 Z control system for US naval ships.7 c! y. g2 ]' C( z$ W (2) Interface Control Specification.7 R; [+ j, z; N' w) ^) O( B& s/ U6 r ICU Interface Control Unit.) ^1 n6 l" i7 a) y& H: R ICWG Interface Control Working Group. ) |- N- d5 z' c5 ~3 @ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification./ t! l/ l4 D0 @5 g9 b IDA Institute for Defense Analysis.9 J- Q8 L: o( \$ b: ~ IDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term)., ~$ h2 K4 |$ s* ^1 M) D IDB Integrated Data Base. % p. l6 W8 K& n x6 |' Z4 sIDD Interface Design Document.* U$ o/ b) C+ y! A" t IDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis.0 m" B! G7 j" @. K. _4 y! @ IDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term). - L0 ^8 G4 s1 MIdentification 0 {* |) D' Y' k: l4 h+ RFriend or Foe# ?/ Y: ~! [. G4 ]. ^ (IFF)& B! M' U. r. f3 F ]5 H9 D A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by ( f; e( m$ Y x, cfriendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby 9 B U6 }0 g( |3 gdistinguishing themselves from enemy forces. 1 I# c, Y; Y. A. t# q4 h- BIDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. |# D( {6 U" e& b9 T, m" E: J IDHS Intelligence Data Handling System. . [! n# r0 {- N1 n' E' I2 G; hIDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.- J+ _4 ~9 e; x* Z IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System. # P9 L/ o! E3 oIE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise. Z; L. Q6 y$ p Q( t/ f' M. S IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination./ T, R- r; Z& L6 w& z; ^+ ` IEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. . O$ g8 r- K) g# P. KIEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure. & m5 q6 E/ \7 q+ ]IEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. 1 h% Q) \& D% O! u6 ~% S: n E7 ]IEP Integrated Evaluation Plan. - _2 @7 M) H& A( B5 bIER Independent Evaluation Report. & x E2 \8 A: `9 F, F E9 N# d! OIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group.. a) H5 ~3 U/ X$ y MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I+ L& r R a5 u! x; r- j 134 a! L" |( r+ xIETF Internet Engineering Task Force.6 {2 S5 ?( x0 |7 ]5 ` IEV Integrated Experimental Version.! M8 k) m& q( S( t: s$ D IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare. / P* b/ ?* d7 I; O N2 V3 rIFA Integrated Financial Analysis.# U# N* y \2 W2 `+ F IFF Identification, Friend or Foe. ; o R8 L- m4 E# j) p. b- ~IFHV In-Flight Homing View. ! S" e' C2 D8 Q7 h" S% JIFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the ( S4 i/ {& c+ p1 ucommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets. * S+ ~5 b, N; g4 E1 x& D6 \The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications 5 C5 f$ Q b6 `+ Q: j$ vsystem term GEP., u4 b Z+ ?. S3 j" h, r4 i7 o2 X IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope./ p7 r: d e1 t! i" {$ C IFOV Instantaneous Field of View. & L6 G9 L- s/ w% a) g% `& l! |IFSR In-Flight Status Report 4 `# N! x" y8 UIFT Integrated Flight Test. ! Y2 Y0 y5 J7 l0 O. JIFTU In-Flight Target Update. 7 ^9 I$ W2 ?) F; E; F9 SIG Inspector General. # a) j4 v( C1 ?7 P: n# W% a" kIGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse./ }# C3 R |4 `$ c IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard. 8 g' m f. I3 y, G; g0 `6 {3 BIGS Inertial Guidance System.1 h l/ F6 E# |5 m& @( f IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS). . u4 l6 B8 G0 hIGT Integrated Ground Test. 4 X. j- w, C8 Q, G& K3 G" e6 ~9 pIGU Inertial Guidance Unit. 9 C: b" X0 E0 V6 d4 Z3 fII Impulse Intensity.& c5 D! X8 ~6 `1 o6 _' [" q IIP Interoperability Improvement Program.1 G. p5 }, a K5 p! }. W- a; g* N IIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. 9 M4 ^" v9 W7 J$ mIIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared. , x- i5 |) W- G* yIIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).5 A \4 R) I- a% B! {% N IIT Interceptor Integration Test.5 C; Q. X9 ?* U u. W$ u# e. [ IITF Information Infrastructure Task Force. ( Q1 K" H7 m: x: Z0 vIJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon.3 q2 E+ p( J+ I/ B) O MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I0 u) F! F; Y1 N- _ m6 _4 _ 1355 M) C9 Q0 n% [' m7 W. E* V m( o ILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term).! B7 o3 |2 J$ @* f1 Z ILC Initial Launch Capability.* {7 k; n* h4 H$ C/ G Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g.,& ^# p, b3 N( x% r availability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics4 `# E$ t& m* R supportability, etc.). 1 _. F) S8 [ h2 s" I g l& P1 LIllumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray1 q; S5 u3 K) R' E satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. , ]- P n7 Q7 a) i" kILS Integrated Logistics Support. 1 `; Y: C: r, D" oILSM ILS Manager. 4 h4 v* }, _2 ~) I# _ N: dILSMT ILS Management Team 2 m' x! x- V; }, B" j+ `; rILSO ILS Office.0 ` H5 D" h# I3 F2 ]; Z ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan.$ h: h( O( d$ x2 ?% `$ g ILSWG ILS Working Group. ) G, ?" }7 S1 _( v, KIM Information Management. : O5 V y4 a R3 h% _Imagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical8 A7 D. Q7 N( Z7 o" i3 B/ W means on film, electronic display devices, or other media. % P1 d) `! `8 \0 q+ ~Imagery 4 n# f H6 R% j4 d7 r% PIntelligence 3 f3 |" V0 D! U+ @(IMINT) / y* U& P% ?% c$ C9 |Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography, 6 ^) }* L5 _; { ~9 E7 b. _infrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic ' a& f3 L0 O' B- {0 z4 D0 ]2 laperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or9 T/ X! X. f2 R# U/ }' I7 r electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media. + @& p4 T/ i0 W" `" m5 bImagery G: x J6 }4 A7 c/ { Correlation# Z1 D) s9 X/ I+ B3 R; @! ? The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from ' B1 I2 y" k& Qdifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics * O, l9 m* @ G" lsignified.& m3 Q7 v- f; ], A2 h: h4 b; Y Imaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object.2 Y1 O( r0 o* j9 F" O IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term). 0 @5 L2 }5 y3 \' x(2) Internal Management Control. & `; ]5 G4 U: C' f' u5 u3 tIMDB Imagery Management. % O8 d$ x# C- }6 aIMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of " s- }4 r9 M: D1 J4 ~$ y uDefense.* @0 B, m* M' a! x4 z IMINT Imagery Intelligence.2 ~! a: L3 o2 ?! V IMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program. ]! K! Y) \2 {* f/ w Immediate Kill 0 I/ Q% L+ ?" y p* j# s8 f! zMode / a1 {4 |7 L1 O Z n# d% C% l, YA kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by9 W4 Y. V) Z/ Q1 {- D+ F8 z impact with the KV or KED.0 X0 o8 r) M) u) T; z Impact Point 4 K6 O5 w0 T; p {- UPrediction (IPP)6 Q. `. E. s; Z9 Z6 a Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, 2 g/ E; ] C5 d5 z6 E2 d! x3 ]+ eusually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes " f# G! p+ c d- o' c9 `the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties.: e) l p+ R* a/ h% b# b/ T MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I) p: ^, O2 F# h3 f 136; j3 v3 b) u `/ l Implicit' D( A4 u+ S2 c# T Coordination* ]0 G7 F) L0 C/ ? Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to( o$ W' V, I9 e: J4 v derive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations# Z" \/ Z( X. |3 ~- X4 A will be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical. $ S- [+ R0 A8 E& W# U p" yDecisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers. B# m$ Z M) G+ I" `" f Impulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for0 l1 m- k$ E/ K! ]3 f a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.), E9 }- \ X5 b Impulse7 H& m2 R# t& t5 U Intensity (II) 8 F' y1 q3 l0 {1 \Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse ! T1 c" W, m6 E$ ?5 J" b: @intensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of - w+ f6 E* s, F" Gimpulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter; ( c7 c' t3 o: Q8 n3 R6 C/ ~# Ehence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s.: s; O. @; ^9 r/ c8 g4 } Impulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The 8 X. {6 [ n0 |- B! }intensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target ' P8 `1 R8 h% E( p! {violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of# ?/ C0 O/ \! _+ g4 R H the target and causing structural failure. ' Q* W; S- }- c' q7 m* J% Y$ GIMPWG Information Policy Working Group.7 A! g! T" r+ }; X9 p5 K6 h4 J IMS Integrated Master Schedule.& ^$ z- t0 S8 i IMU Inertial Measurement Unit. ! ]+ r7 X5 \( E4 B. cIN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse: v, B7 j% x1 Q# n* f0 L% \5 [ Noise. \1 I; A m" F In Inch.) t! y4 s0 {2 O6 n IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator.7 q* H1 Q0 b' C6 }& R+ B In-Flight Target ( `, j/ c6 W* t3 o' R" f2 Y% }Update (FTU) 4 _9 ]. S' B: b0 ^7 y# v* tA report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control, c9 ?; f6 }5 V( v5 u6 }8 S suite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. @3 p* L' \0 Z- @" uInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing . N9 j: D# ^5 H1 @the orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has/ W5 |; Y9 ?: O/ Y" g7 S an inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite; G9 i; j/ }; P K1 I, c traveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in ' H) y4 k7 D, Z# ^, |9 P' Hwhich a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An 0 v4 M( {; H$ ~2 m/ @ Eorbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is 2 o! G" H+ x9 I/ U5 gcalled a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a + c. ?4 C: X9 ]" Fretrograde orbit. 0 }2 s; K! R1 C- X7 Q% iIncremental/ y9 ~$ s5 y0 i Funding - ]6 [/ X, |4 o0 [# X1 N$ oThe provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project4 a& _. }' Y- n) ? based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such3 D$ f- f4 N& f. H& l2 R5 I) I& r budgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in X# S# G9 ]6 a9 P completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding, " p; n& `& E( `* C; B: Iwhere budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated" _7 |8 V7 ^% } obligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification 3 l, c' }& ?6 x) U. T( H8 ^7 NFriend or Foe: `7 C5 [! M: u6 }# J* q (IFF) 4 o9 C9 L% l9 x( jA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by & \0 n& x- m/ T5 p9 a# k) H" R1 cfriendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby + Y7 @4 e6 z$ P7 Kdistinguishing themselves from enemy forces.3 X, a/ Q: w0 i; }% @7 e, N; ] MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I& v- F. E# @4 C# P( n2 z; h 137 ( A! Z6 L$ |4 C2 a* yImagery r4 f9 t% |4 @! I9 N Correlation V8 {6 n5 \0 t. f! l The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from + d% M1 W) Y5 w9 G- w/ k% k+ A" Edifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics. y4 u) R, Y4 J! L4 T/ T1 s signified. 6 u! u) n7 q8 t5 vIndependent* L& v7 e q. D3 R0 M ]) V Cost Analysis: S& ]' _, p# n) v- e2 l An analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body+ |4 q$ }8 ]6 O( [* L2 E2 l, r disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United 9 V$ z+ g9 U; dStates Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational v4 O8 z" B8 \. c% n: }2 V Manpower Requirements.”)0 X; j# t9 {1 E4 z7 i1 r/ t Independent Cost : c( x! M- S, }* DEstimate (ICE)4 R9 G) R* b$ F8 A5 j/ K4 L1 y8 b/ M A cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority8 c' l4 d$ y; ` responsible for acquiring or using the goods or services.9 P: v j& v5 j% }2 S' o Independent $ U7 D% y, p: |. `Evaluation& X( A; @9 l5 o+ ]0 N Report (IER) 9 t+ M$ m/ C5 b6 d3 }Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, y. H& e2 r# _. M7 lreports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s ) I' \# _5 ^6 s7 P9 iassessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on/ L: [/ g$ Q7 s7 u7 l1 @ the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is , o% V' Y# ?/ \+ y5 J- D" Sprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER y& N8 R0 ^1 p may also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army), y# `2 _- V w! @" ]3 l* h Independent/ F) l3 L+ B% J) ~. | Research and8 }" [# B9 l& L6 J Development; G1 w; k3 x6 ~7 D e (IR&D) ) K& K |3 E! M' P9 |4 O0 ?Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a 3 ^7 b) F* f1 K. W8 t0 ccontract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and : |$ `0 y' g+ R' f. japplied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation 5 ~/ ]8 e/ h1 pstudies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See( Y' U6 E7 D0 y FAR 31.001.)7 {. ~$ E' ~# N/ S5 j Independent 3 W( B% w2 r3 g7 J( QVerification and& ?7 A, `* S+ o0 k8 u1 s& _2 q Validation (IV&V) ! U) u& r& R1 kVerification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that1 P3 U3 D0 D, g) Z is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being5 W( g) Y0 B8 `$ F, M# S evaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software 3 U* f$ A* m$ E/ Z; v; Tdevelopment activities. * @& e" q2 L$ uIndium7 c. j& |( i1 Z$ @ Antimonide % d- N; u: f% J9 c8 u! E9 d# QInfrared sensing material.9 [! _$ b! v, n( x& Z Individual 5 G; h/ n; \& U- `Acceptance Test1 @5 o$ M7 t- f& Q4 L6 K& B A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics6 Y( T$ ^- |$ K; N* C+ @. [ prior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using) K1 {$ Z; s) J. O the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency. 0 {. V7 m6 n' j% [/ c6 N& mInduced * y" Q9 C) l/ D! z7 s* cEnvironments: \4 o0 W1 T5 V1 _1 u+ H# ^ Induced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the 4 ^" M( G" g- D! f" j5 r+ A' znatural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets / W. |1 t M7 ?1 g/ z(Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or / f$ T, ?% X( ]# nthe influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally- * |9 y: `3 n7 Y9 O) D. C8 yInduced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E & o; I: @& y, e$ X! l& `6 ]/ C$ Delectronic equipment).& L" ]9 C! e2 F9 w Induced / j, G( D' l+ d$ }' j4 U% B) e& DRadioactivity, d9 z% r$ z( m5 ~3 c Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions,7 T$ J. B6 x* V particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of, ?5 j/ y' K# G! C- T/ J$ t. p0 g) ^ unstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce ; K/ x5 ~+ @9 H X* c8 U" |3 aradioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by5 ^% J3 r; F# L2 V1 l/ |. } interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and3 `# N+ l; h0 s! D% ^& U* u silicon in soil and sea water).. n- L: ^0 Y8 I+ `# f; l; g MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 W3 F" Z% K) e: x) ^ 138) E1 r5 o; B/ S) X6 S5 T Industrial& c7 F6 X! B, A9 o% _4 Z Resource- V; |- G) O; X. q/ d Analysis (IRA)7 q" U7 {4 u; w A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory 9 ], E e- N0 Lcapabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to 0 {! c, ^, D! y& n% ~( Isupport SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and 6 w; V( {0 }% L. W; j" y4 bspecial tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the5 t: u/ G( ^+ I% ]- j u range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies,- ?' R/ ?8 k+ y# l* L producibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in9 f" x2 P- ^% Y# C. u2 j IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and+ q7 S$ t6 a7 V0 M become issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues 1 \. ^, w1 V) |2 x: SResolution Strategies (PPIRS) document. . i3 }7 d7 |4 _7 v, d& C% xInertial) ~% W1 w% T2 i+ E Guidance 5 o' i1 B9 }7 U( C0 }/ F0 SA guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,- d1 T( c: O. d1 n wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly ' N: i. W' W) R9 q% |5 N. twithin the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures + e2 e8 x0 ~) L" s" |7 zand converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain 0 w6 g2 H5 c7 N, {" s) [direction.5 q" D. U# `4 h2 V, ? Inertial ! Q# I- ^+ ?4 f6 F E. VMeasurement ! G) y) n K2 `! C) i4 `3 h2 ZUnit (IMU)0 W4 Z; Z* P x( k& \( G A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,2 j4 O& q3 d" w( ~) r- e wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly1 N6 q4 p6 [2 e0 p0 ^ within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures" P4 {: X5 F1 `. S9 t and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain ) J0 g. W+ g4 Vdirection., b: e3 M7 K/ [ ] ]6 k { INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability. 9 V' d5 O0 B/ Z+ f6 g5 @1 rINEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). & A# r+ W" r8 X) O$ O! `" `, IINF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR H$ U$ K0 V# o8 o- i Treaty.# I7 f$ @4 V# {# R# M In-Flight Target( C0 [+ f9 L0 F" C Update # r4 E; T' e: S1 R* `+ q! F( pA data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and9 J, l" u! _& k* N7 W velocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. ! K# ]7 ?$ T1 j- l4 j(USSPACECOM)4 Z( y6 O/ V$ W" T5 | Information( u! i$ P! \% F! ^ Architecture (IA)) k$ g7 I. w7 a$ I0 G3 w# J A description of the information that is needed to support command and control # s; G( M8 M3 P* U3 tdecision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing / @9 ]. N$ Y2 i8 jthat must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description ' v& I5 B3 \/ A# C* i/ Pprovides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design ' G2 u( x# B* C Z4 J) mflexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability.) c I& [ L7 u( D8 a$ d Information ! j, G! u5 R" K0 [+ [' g5 v3 h5 pResources, B& `0 M. u' c7 m! t2 [# ~! P Management6 m5 y& b, @' I0 ^/ C0 v" K The planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling, , w# X: f- \+ k1 C3 |+ Gand management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, & L3 Q, Q7 I" O: o, qand dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of , X* S) W; N4 K" p$ O3 Rinformation and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information 6 U* r" [! C. ?( M' T5 y; A& G8 i0 WSecurity % T/ x8 h' |; G$ {1 `2 G(INFOSEC)$ x7 |* ~3 G3 p0 I" b, H. M: ~ Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and, X b0 ?- p4 w! _! O- n7 h protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or 7 F8 u( O9 ~. N6 T+ {& T3 Q. h& Hunclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical% C- V; X0 m, h/ n: M7 Y( O G; @ data and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned 1 T5 F1 `8 ?' j$ b: J) L+ k- f' Awith security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, ' Q# K6 c) ]3 Ydowngrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring. ; O4 A( i$ d. }4 F1 w* NInfrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,000+ U4 _; Q' H# h3 p1 j( B Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic 1 D" d( d Z4 I" ?+ X! [Radiation.)& r3 _$ s+ v8 c$ q Infrared (IR)- \1 c- t. b0 L0 z2 K Electro-Optics ) h$ _/ s) z& j) P* CTechnologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength 8 {. A% w9 z" x/ q; I+ S% b! o3 ospectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.! u2 C; I3 m3 s8 r3 n G MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I# V; `* ?0 r0 v) |% s0 H( @ 1397 u. z. T) g% Z Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted % J8 S# A/ N5 v; _4 U7 R) }# ]or reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the 4 ?3 x: d. l0 {! e; M: Belectromagnetic spectrum. ) w: t! c4 ~( c# wInfrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength - v* \. M1 u6 v7 gregion of 1 to 40 microns.! o- B0 R' n f( r( t0 {& \8 i Initial $ f- v+ c* E, _4 p1 R) H$ n: h* e2 eOperational 2 O: n2 A" w* W4 tCapability (IOC)9 J, }9 _. g5 ` The first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of6 \6 }, x' }3 p8 b. T6 P4 s equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned1 N/ y- R. {1 V or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. : ^+ `' ~5 l& IInitial/ P' g' z0 C; }, p Operational Test * T7 D2 c+ O+ o- V' Jand Evaluation , w$ a' u% m1 K2 }(IOT&E)! W% L9 Q; a2 [1 i' l4 }* @ All operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production. g3 G, r* w. }& U representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial+ l( }. i2 f% W# N1 P/ ?' |6 P% M. @8 u# L production. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system - y; g6 a$ [3 h5 q- i: `operational effectiveness and operational suitability. & L( L' i' \/ A( ]INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite).2 g' @, D2 S3 q6 P+ d INS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code. - N2 ~- ]5 f( a- z, r/ x, X% tInSb Indium Antimonide.7 {! @. F8 Q4 \. K INSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. q5 l( o; q! p+ OINSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments. : j% o: q9 {% {$ V4 g% BInteg Integrated. ! ]0 W' ?# B2 n" B4 j; F! n, LIntegrated * |& Q P2 v0 w1 s' uContracting% f( s: @* E: f, M2 G Report (ICR)9 E! @6 k9 g7 v! R+ S A quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and# A' t4 @$ B0 u$ _! O) p' C interfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a 3 ~5 z9 R) }- b0 P7 W! U, Emechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as 0 c6 X5 M, v6 f! OIntegrated Contracting Plan or ICP)., Z+ b% z& Y. Y% m9 D3 t Integrated Fire1 P5 M8 W8 J, w- Y z. t Control System & |" v# D1 m. t. Y: w9 oA system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data ) @. j+ a" [2 U, Gcomputation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted + T7 [- |6 @# g+ h& j( H# Yby electromechanical devices. 3 ~ i3 S& N. J* |& HIntegrated : c7 ~ E. w8 J$ YLogistics Support5 Q: e4 j* @( X( J' [$ M (ILS) ' p/ h% g g9 q$ s0 s/ w(1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and$ A& ?- b6 ^' ^8 u technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into $ M& t7 l5 H& ?. k6 wsystem and equipment design; develop support requirements that are* q; S5 C& O0 l" W" Q* p" t related consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each* d, c) ?! ]7 U* R other; acquire the required support; and provide the required support $ g$ r0 T( _/ L! Fduring the operational phase at minimum cost.+ C p2 }7 j1 Y (2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the : X+ A4 k' P) d$ J+ _effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an 5 B+ i! i# D5 c( t. s, @0 z/ kintegral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation. ! M: S; d& A' `8 eIntegrated a( U- D1 k0 f% U+ `: A8 SLogistics Support 0 t/ F* a B' V( r" k# p2 G' E/ k(ILS) Elements. p# e, p( A: H* F) G5 T* X Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish2 N7 |( o& ]$ {3 W5 X7 _ maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system.4 I7 Q1 ?0 O& {8 X Manpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and. ~& B! _! n( c civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a- l# m3 |+ [* r% G4 S materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates. & v: y5 o, z7 j! q, GSupply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to+ L/ z# ?4 h0 P% C determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and/ [5 ?$ }+ m5 \* q- V6 t m dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well e$ T, f- K7 | as replenishment supplies support.# R* ^! p: c7 \# T4 y MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I2 x6 k' R) u3 N0 n4 D c 140! [, f" o& @, ] K! R2 n! w Support Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the ; f- g( Q% ~' `0 ^% p( W. o$ F$ boperation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology : x) T- S& y" e- [) Vand calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It7 u9 ~+ k! Q; B, K% i* L includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment / O6 f" o: S/ p4 |3 P6 hitself.0 b$ ?; |$ B# \ Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as 0 J# S. ?* O" p! {& Omanuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs9 D9 V( x% D/ |. Y* l8 ] and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer' I5 w" {+ f4 E) ]- z programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other3 B9 L5 s% V0 h1 L* H9 \. M: ~ information related to contract administration.) U8 k4 K. c* `8 g Training and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training 7 T, a9 N# v7 i: Z7 rdevices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military 8 G S3 B/ b5 W- f+ c7 Xpersonnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual $ j' }/ T# H" H/ Q. e/ D: Jand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; - y; I; y( x2 band logistic support planning for training equipment and training device & x; K: D3 @' U" ` f: Lacquisitions and installations. 7 ~ ^2 r% ]" ^, ?7 [Computer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software,# S4 X7 q0 X5 y5 c q documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support& S1 R7 H) {1 I( ~% N! Q3 j; Q- F embedded computer systems., b: R/ g) _) Y1 ]* P3 N r Facilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets ! ~. v8 b7 a$ N8 j* V$ R i& zrequired to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define) F) O$ w# L: g3 O) y2 D0 G! K' ^ types of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities,2 R7 A' Q' B0 W/ z+ A( U% `4 R environmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment.6 w" P9 @; v9 P0 b Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes,* N7 [+ t: l) _0 x c: A procedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system, ; U* Y T7 r' R2 k) F7 Vequipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and& J6 e1 Y0 x. E- O) `5 R ] transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment 5 N1 R7 Z! S( F3 k. j* G4 q6 k/ ^preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability.- G+ y/ b& Z1 Q Design Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as t0 E2 q1 m2 U/ K! O1 h reliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements.5 n% {2 D$ W& w3 O5 H These logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms7 v% D/ C+ r9 L8 [1 n rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness \% \4 ?. D' u& t& ]9 F% y# fobjectives and support costs of the materiel system.5 k p* @3 o. ] Integrated" F4 V; U6 D2 C9 G' G Logistics7 {4 o* C2 P1 x+ _ m Support Plan 5 l7 |% K! K' U(ILSP)& X E! I; ^; c The formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the- E, w0 a7 _- u8 i& w program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed+ T) x1 }, Y/ g3 I/ s" u6 C X& L ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with ) |! r" [( n* _7 t9 n- D# c- jnecessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and 6 ~0 z/ j) `/ ]" U1 kproduction, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications; n/ u2 \8 X1 B& f RFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs. / ^* v4 ~" G9 H0 l, UIntegrated% J, W' P* U% A8 j* X9 P Priority List * U0 T, ]0 \4 {! x/ O& S2 @A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized6 a0 d" }1 L" f/ O8 Y; i5 Z, E8 u across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs ; z L# q% |4 Tthat, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the6 |. M! C9 l" Z7 ~, d( Q: q capability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated5 l/ t: D# V9 r) `9 o/ _/ \$ P9 }' R; H priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for * r" ?) J) j# `- T+ m. Oprogramming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System $ p5 L8 ^. t9 [; Pprocess. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated . I. r) Z" ]; c* ?9 L/ HProgram # M2 g8 {# }5 w( @: PAssessment ' q* m9 M+ {% O% H& A- O(IPA) * D' S+ Q$ p8 A9 K. {A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone ' \: x" W' |& Q) |$ ~decision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an 8 z) E+ d3 S7 oindependent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into( h1 T- \* u _ E# D' N the next phase of the acquisition cycle. 0 g# x+ o8 k" j7 ~1 e5 Q& wMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I # W7 n+ s5 w. Z( t& G" o9 Y) E141+ v# {; t) {# |' u+ x Integrated ; ^/ I$ Q5 W6 t; i# a. U$ yProgram " L! h/ L J% D' I0 y. s. DSummary (IPS)& B e( E C9 K) S8 x A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision / u/ a% k+ l/ eauthority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights4 D* N4 f& t8 [+ I+ \ the status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the% G1 Y; J9 m0 i" [+ @7 Y acquisition cycle. 6 R8 \7 a' `. m' dIntegrated: j& z+ x" m" ~+ j/ d* v, v h9 u Tactical Warning k7 _8 H0 V6 d5 m$ {and Attack) `1 f5 X3 V2 v Assessment- J4 W! t9 }* {; Y, Y (ITW/AA); H) v9 ~% N, O K ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and l2 A! v8 `! K- A) M K atmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack [9 \- _8 u. d# l' c9 G5 Awarning information, strategic and tactical. ! ^) Q; V: s1 Z% QIntegrated ' a5 a" t, i5 F# QWarfare . A) ]% a& Y$ JThe conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing 7 L/ E* D& S, W9 m3 i# b7 R& sforces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional 2 q% B! V" s S4 l$ ^8 |+ Xweapons. H; m- L( J* s7 R. M0 R9 N v Integration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such* J5 C0 H: o/ p8 E7 H a way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without ; q# R6 a' E, K/ b$ `' eadversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) + {7 [/ Y; x$ V(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a : C. I1 g- h( W( b- wsystem. 4 b4 T" M' l/ s! UINTEL Intelligence. * u% W. b% c0 |/ bIntelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis, " B" q+ A5 \1 |integration and interpretation of all available information concerning " w" M1 i& H* D& L; I# s, V9 b- w0 `foreign countries or areas., m$ o" v* L! l C4 S6 o( e/ G (2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through ( E' {) [: ?. I$ i1 Lobservation, investigation, analysis, or understanding. # {. \; j# f% k: L* c1 C KIntelligence 9 K' F/ g8 ?( oIndicators& P4 d! z( X. f+ q* p Classified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that, ! _: Z L9 I/ K# O9 }, C+ Kwhen properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and 0 Z0 S& R4 K# {1 f5 d# Y' @intentions. 9 \, A' N0 q$ T9 V/ y% k6 YIntelligence 3 Z& y+ H: C. T+ X8 ~( eOperations; K0 b3 v, G/ |6 f7 K" a$ ~ Center (IOC) # E( p8 O, k6 m" H* T& h! R' `An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB. " o. l- i- B9 i' cThe IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational- y! e5 C- p8 X9 h Intelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) ; r* b' i' L( m( ^4 ?Cheyenne Mountain Node (JCN). & E7 R0 w; a, \% x9 IIntelligence) N% l0 q3 K1 x8 j ~) E2 _ Preparation of ; _$ W; P# V/ B6 b8 t% Athe Battlespace * I; L2 ~/ I3 U2 pAn analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the : l% G% ^, s9 h1 Ienemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence% ]- j q6 G8 }/ ]9 U preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential 6 F( b& _1 n. C5 U" Yarea in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed7 z$ l& H/ X* M* q in detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on3 O9 D5 t6 p8 S. \$ u operations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle- V& Y6 t% z H( S space is a continuing process. Also called IPB. , H) M; y( `/ Y0 q. h* n2 J0 {0 iIntelligence" I* E$ n' f T+ |$ S Report (INTREP)# B1 w# h' `' ~. t5 N& j A specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of" L8 W" Y) ]" R( _* ?9 N" H7 A command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in0 y j$ V& {1 Q* p% l3 t5 } keeping with the timeliness of the information. % M5 P) s6 q* W- Y- q+ A( T t5 bIntelligence ( P. c2 f7 k8 s0 i7 xThreat! W( f' a2 f, j7 g6 H0 V An identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and8 [5 i D t# c C+ Y exploit information from a given or similar operation. - R' |5 [6 A( d) ^. p' {MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I: t3 j: F4 L0 q; h8 y 1427 ~0 A- X4 @7 v X' z/ `1 b Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit6 J7 t1 Y9 _; N9 Y area, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal# K: o! o9 Z4 \, `4 B: t/ t radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second$ L' m$ J, g5 y. e+ | falling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation, Q; @8 t# |) Y2 ]$ w, `: Sthe term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or & U: ^. F1 \3 h1 J1 J; ~8 e1 ddose) rate at a given location.& z4 y+ J2 J3 S ~/ a Interactive 5 N1 l2 x' t- a& x) P' \7 ]5 L7 J! qResponses2 e E# J5 D, i0 h. M7 H- J Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification.! _9 D! i8 _$ w+ G Interceptor' q! Y' y9 Y1 z$ I. F Cluster% m5 U% U5 Y+ P2 U+ q A group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor. p, A# S: u3 O- VInterceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and" X8 |9 f) u6 F/ _* B8 b7 g8 U6 M velocity in three dimensions.. o: U- Y! ^* n2 U. G* s Interceptor Track: ]" c# N& J7 i# @ Range (Max)! U/ I& w! }* T% G The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function . f# F% m- p& ?; kon a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit ; s$ f/ a' ]. Ky - ~& e5 x9 C, v( q# W# n8 zA condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and# a9 H# \1 j, [; q physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and + n; v, K2 U7 r. O# n+ I2 `8 Q2 Yare capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items1 y# z! d5 J- j& O% ^0 c themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for" B+ i& S" o ?% r fit and performance.1 g7 V# D( p% m' f5 W Interconnection The linking together of interoperable systems.1 f Z. Q: f8 S# I Intercontinental 1 `7 P& P% ]- D! \, Q8 G9 R: gBallistic Missile 6 ?: Q' q4 ]' [(ICBM) . V: P- Q1 @4 k/ PA ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The ! ^' \; ^- H* |5 \+ F' f" n) ^term ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from7 j5 S9 H- b' ?5 g/ d submarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.) t% k! Z2 d; t. s" l; MInterface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection " L$ x+ L ]3 ^; q4 Wcharacteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged$ i: `1 S$ b, {5 `3 \- ] signals. ' u% S: a+ i+ U& ](2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two! Q! n G" U7 @1 t' R: E( f' n systems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register. % h' d6 ~& d4 N(3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. 5 t0 S6 m9 \9 D. ^8 y2 u(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between # A0 K; \+ R/ l# } ~$ u: qsystems, or between persons and systems.! q9 E; J0 A: x* x8 n Interface Control4 J9 ?) B) W" e8 S2 X8 v Document (ICD)6 t/ A0 n' s7 {" w4 T (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must$ Y% x+ F5 j6 E& f exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer 3 {/ }% P% c! T& y; usoftware products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an . G1 Z! k* y* l; ]6 l" p( fInterface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD). 0 Y* c/ C( Z9 f% W(MDA Lexicon) 9 X% r! t5 v. P3 M" `) Z- h(2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control( h1 ~& w$ n6 r( } agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements. $ A" n3 I. G) XThe ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification.' k: j- G" J5 z6 P8 E0 l Interface / s3 F3 Q; {/ m) [0 R' [' Q# jRequirements % ^! Q5 Q/ h3 j) n& Q# U$ j/ }Document (IRD) % Y! }, p9 ~; I0 g; J( q# CA document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system 7 C1 D: c: D: H7 v4 G& m; tcomponent.( C0 ~% s3 [8 p5 I3 N3 q, R MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I' S( L1 y: c3 v, r 143 - H7 f. x1 l. ^4 HInterference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to / l d( J S4 @$ F" o8 @% Fform a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum 1 t$ Q$ x0 k# c7 ?% M7 gof the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point.7 V F/ X; _6 H/ [/ I Intermediate 3 M/ [# G! G9 e$ `8 }3 [2 TRange Ballistic 5 x/ e. a0 H. \& h/ ?$ Q2 B3 OMissile (IRBM) : n4 F7 ?& H3 y, b; i% m; p! lA ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles.+ E) |- f$ o% Q+ G/ R$ ]6 { International * H P9 r2 L! m2 I" L( d* _7 a) PAgreement / q/ I3 Q( }$ i" a6 @4 ~0 SGenerator (IAG) ! M7 |9 q- f$ { w; X g3 ?6 X x7 T( WSoftware system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD ! }6 X% v% V) q7 Jinternational Agreements. : w t9 [4 R& T: s; ~% q$ x( @International& F9 I; M. }$ R( z+ E" H Cooperative( i; f: r9 U, c, s8 j( ~ Logistics ; Q5 [4 |0 T& K. _. c3 MCooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination) T( O% V+ x+ `( z6 J. s1 X1 A! n of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply 9 _8 k1 u/ Z7 aand exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and 7 F/ [4 p6 ]: ^0 Cmultilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions.8 I7 h* D, h* n8 u# m# S8 E3 E International - j- p0 W# z, f8 I: T PLogistics ( _& s' y" E0 j j! _The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics 5 U- z( \4 ^3 rarrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing 6 n+ m0 w3 y* a0 B2 Z" Ologistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign : s) m1 [9 o, H4 pgovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without x5 L! A/ i3 K, Z$ L# V# \reimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing 3 K! I3 h) r" }) H7 \3 u7 Hof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or " q4 s* O5 j& Q5 }# Jprocedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,5 L" a& t' Q- ?4 O D international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. ) ^/ L" ^# Z, o! u1 z7 fIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States 9 _" Z; _. ~$ `1 o t7 @$ Nlogistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or : p7 g# m6 j7 [9 b5 f( h$ M) dmore foreign governments, international organizations, or forces.: }5 g/ C/ Y" n/ Q) R1 C2 F! ~. { International " F$ T! s+ B9 Z: \Logistic Support : w2 l7 O, D0 B) hThe provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or 2 u% A. `9 H- S; N; w3 imore participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.2 C0 N- f6 {# E1 Y7 p: t Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services 7 B6 [. b5 e' v& [$ hfrom other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to $ f2 V" ]1 \. z. B1 yoperate effectively together.+ w+ Z( }$ e5 s# f% b5 Q INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization.) l/ Y- n4 j+ N! Q$ U' |8 U7 I INTLCT Integrated Electronics. / T- Q3 I! M9 d0 @1 _Intruder& z$ x, F. S8 m+ Z Operation 5 L! U, ~1 B3 ~1 BAn offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary 7 y. }# u' Q6 W3 B ?" b# S) dobject of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases.' {' g, e _/ y: C INU Inertial Navigation Unit.; Z) J( K9 V1 k5 W" e Inventory Control ' r; t" Q3 R: c9 D* n: ZPoint 4 `/ `4 S0 V& O! ?! B! z5 tAn organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the 6 I( n8 e y! pprimary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a4 {- u, `) ]7 P, A( w% @ particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management1 |1 G1 {+ a7 f1 Q: `% L% X! P9 ~ includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, : ]' [$ Z8 q+ Bdistribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction.3 K0 _' ^5 J+ x" A) X3 ^6 j6 v Inverse Square & Y& n2 N( n+ uLaw5 f4 c+ t8 [: b4 h: K: } The law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a 7 H" e) Z4 e: W) K& K3 mpoint source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the 2 V( B6 z A1 wsource, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that * ^7 k6 g9 v8 |; Z! rdistance.# C3 _9 v1 i! z9 s4 D MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I) X8 q+ O9 ]# o. X8 e, o( l0 ~' J 144 P* {" K" `# B- b2 m2 J Inverse Synthetic1 t R1 F, t; C' v: g& T. W Aperture Radar9 x! T# X9 j6 S6 n (ISAR) , m! ^( I+ V( H* t3 NA type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from 8 r% d( r q0 t6 F" f- ]: h+ cthe motion of targets to provide high resolution. ' {9 h, d; |+ g q4 J# ]3 _" L0 ?IO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic.) [6 s8 Q3 J# _5 f# i IOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. ! R; c; r1 _$ c' b1 F& P(2) Intelligence Operations Center. R* b2 ? k0 L C. i(3) Integrated Optics Chip., m7 k. Z! j$ S B IOM Inert Operational Missile. 7 i2 e, ~, Q! |IONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US). b; h+ `8 c+ S( g+ q7 k+ K Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition7 P& H0 D6 `; M9 T of electrons to atoms or molecules. 2 r# _# }. T4 HIonizing7 q/ z$ G2 J3 N Radiation8 @* ~. M/ X3 l o' ^: W Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or 0 v' V9 ~) V' D6 \7 D# ]& dparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of: i3 x* F" q! C' t! z producing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its % r7 b w: V ?4 j/ o8 D8 zpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.) + Z9 ^+ e$ E8 gIonosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers7 g/ |* [1 H8 e7 C) B, B$ ?. N altitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect 2 n& |4 x# L7 ^' Kelectromagnetic waves. 6 ^" S0 r& H6 ?$ k' I& {7 ZIOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff.0 d$ {# C8 y$ W/ W8 ]' Z& u& |9 M. ^ IOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation.) K& N0 D% C8 @" I$ { IOU Input/Output Unit. 3 K% D4 L% y! P, EIP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol.: ?7 f; h ?. C9 t (5) Interconnect Protocol. 4 ~+ q! c/ e5 Q& N$ R, lIPA Integrated Program Assessment. ( g1 \* W" c0 N _8 @, v' MIPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace.+ |/ e( V( C! Z IPC Information Policy Committee. ! `6 \+ ?: `% E: e( RIPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. 9 P0 E- Z6 O6 ]" w1 ^0 \IPE Industrial Plant Equipment.! ~9 ?! N& j* a& Q0 V IPL Integrated Priority List.& r* S# K. f6 T$ n" R8 I IPM Integration Program Manager. 5 y) G {+ G, F4 c, TIPMI Integration Program Management Initiative.* m3 B6 z/ } u IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program.9 u) z! }& I. W: O$ R2 q* r IPPD Integrated Process and Product Development. ) N- M0 i* ~7 p: pIPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review).: r) n' N6 c+ y) r' \' t- G+ q$ b MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 6 g( \' ~" J$ S145 , C* D2 R- y2 {% N, _IPRR Initial Production Readiness Review. # E H/ g M* K1 h. mIPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. ' E; @& e" P& J2 g* h# P R% h0 \IPS Integrated Program Summary.4 B8 G" H! T @7 C IPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit.0 l" Y( f7 B+ q" f) k IPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated+ r- ]$ ]" E/ d Planning Team.: G" |& M9 n3 g7 k IQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term). 6 C& R* c, g4 a; A* Y% T6 |" rIR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4) $ Q( x5 d& W2 O6 \/ qInformation Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope 0 J, l' p; Z- }5 b) d3 O: s5 \8 D) nRadar. ) n5 Z. K% U [) OIR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength 6 M9 [! Z$ a, ]/ D7 i: F1 ^1 b0 [spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.+ A! _4 Q. q3 t" S IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD). 3 b M+ I T1 }IR/Vies Infrared Visual.0 f& i3 W- i! z* L/ p: h IRA Industrial Resource Analysis.7 _( X7 R- m: V, }! ] IRAD Independent Research and Development. & t8 [# m( p. C" _# j; oIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite.' h# H. E" a/ ? IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. : X1 E! [. G$ R! X/ \- g. V" p% W1 rIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. 4 [6 S) |" ?1 w7 s$ gIRCM Infrared Countermeasures. * `' J% H9 h: vIRD Interface Requirements Document.; T" E `- \+ x IRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term). 3 G6 U8 X& s3 ~" M5 C- Z/ N9 nIRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array. % G. v9 e8 m/ N, p- a0 P" }9 J4 ^( nIRG Independent Review Group.5 ^% Q E m4 o" C+ y IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center. 7 n) J' k9 H6 K" X) M* [ X# eIRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group. ! f) m! z0 J% O8 [$ \4 xIRINT Infrared Intelligence. # G2 t' [3 m. q8 eIRIS Infrared Instrumentation System., D1 Y4 a' I" ^. Y IRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). ; M v- `% X+ P8 YIRM Information Resources Management.$ v8 m1 Q8 Q$ s' [ IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I9 d1 d: Q8 \- X+ w+ U& v0 n4 ^ 146 8 l# B: O C ZIRMC Information Resource Management College.2 H. v! _! p* V2 O& @ IRR Internal Requirements Review. d# s3 t2 ~& r0 @8 m/ y# XIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System.! z, m/ x( j; a$ q7 L IRRS Information Resources Requirements Study. 6 d1 Q4 g& Y( v5 f3 N7 h/ c4 E/ n) kIRS Interface Requirements Review. ) S2 G4 x$ b8 mIRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). ' a, T' D, {: k& ~IRST Infrared Search and Track. 8 M! s/ V N9 _# a- ^: bIRTF Internet Research Task Force. $ Q& S! q5 @. fIS Information System.5 f6 K. z0 e+ { IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. ; R8 O% x1 ]4 t(2) Innovative Science and Technology.1 Z: y, B; X; x/ Q W" j (3) Integrated Science & Technology., i$ G1 L6 ?: A5 _9 s ISA Inter-service Agreement.; t! `7 j* P* f) N% t: K0 f) G8 k- e IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.7 s r2 D& E0 W! y (2) Innovative Science and Technology. 2 S$ [. p/ x( P* u% z/ c8 tISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar. . f9 m# d' t% ^. d' Y; X" n QISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). g: c" ]2 _# H& s. mISC (1) Information Systems Command. $ T' t; \- t$ P3 J(2) Irvine Sensors Corporation. b; m& [: G1 v: V+ l9 z* | ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network.1 l/ W3 z8 z0 I: y2 o0 p ISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment.* g( y2 _" t5 ? ISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration." N m5 V) m% u" W) r7 M; w/ J ISG Industry Support Group.3 O# T: P9 G' ^3 @$ @ ISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model. 0 B7 r# S. J; U) m! P! w# g# T' {+ _ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group. ) p. e# u3 g7 h7 j& u7 hISMO Information Security Management Office. 3 Y9 S" Q+ g8 v, S: r5 e3 X0 rISO International Standards Organization. - U% n9 T, V7 |6 U# S! ?! {) k* dISOO Information Security Oversight Office. 6 E1 x7 Q8 j3 ~2 ], VIsotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with* R# s, p! T+ l equal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional). 6 B/ P1 s$ k2 l4 s) f: m' \$ _MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 3 E# ^4 N$ h4 l- u. n' x8 c147 ' Q* S. y i% ^/ k: _Isotropic 9 V# z* a ?1 U8 g& C+ QNuclear Weapon " o U% [- M+ @3 t# p% A- e( ZA nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with+ C) V/ Z. `6 j7 S' \0 n, Z, ]% s approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to $ y1 i5 L" r2 X1 q. P- mdistinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons.3 Q' t2 c0 J' [8 a, T. t; i ISP Integrated Support Plan. 0 ?# L: s* k0 x; y' L* ~8 BISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. }! x8 ^; j& x" v r. HISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System.' m0 v$ j( X5 C- _" _0 V1 ` [ ISSA Information System Security Association. 7 d4 }3 y6 \* b1 Z+ i7 RISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency." a% \( u, G2 y1 z% n- } ISSC Information Systems Security Committee.; I& m4 l! a( e9 u# I9 B+ Y ISSM Information System Security Manager.1 U, P' W- l: g* @1 I1 X ISSO Information System Security Officer.# J9 E# q" b7 e ISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.7 [; l% n R3 [6 j; r2 ]' C* e Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and3 c- b: e' v) C$ @ extends into July. 5 {" Q1 H% D$ W$ FIssue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.% T3 C9 _4 F7 |1 n2 e E- Y IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test. 9 [$ l, n7 u5 X1 H' @ FISTC Integrated System Test Capability.* A& ^' ?4 t# {* @ ISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. W& i A/ Y' V8 W# ^& U& k6 yISTF Installed System Test Facility. - n- D( ^* r6 |- r- \9 }3 R1 z* [ISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle. 7 r5 J X6 x- ]1 u+ D# VISWG Integration Support Working Group.; q' [: c+ z+ W: `$ [ IT Information Technology.* P6 [7 b* p2 F4 e1 [+ u3 ` ITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center. ) N5 D E- r WITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations." C7 R8 Y& w+ A$ d ITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed.3 b+ z4 N) q9 F+ t. Z ITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations.8 x0 c% p$ `* c4 k$ L* ~6 R, B ITD Integration Technology Demonstration. 3 B H1 r& x E! _( b( p/ GITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan. 8 K$ G& O. U1 r6 \+ [" X& N(2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan. / ?& F$ i/ \ }; K* V' fItem Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such $ j- V8 D, K* B0 porganization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items5 O+ o- H9 H1 D4 e1 U. v* u of materiel.% L& i9 `6 i' Y1 b. Z, I MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I% s f( ?2 E8 D. X$ t& ^ 148, l8 H% i4 S! A+ A ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System.3 K1 M7 v8 X# P( x5 Z ITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch9 V0 d, |4 {& ]9 Z8 k% n7 `; q k ITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council.- N( R. J$ `$ E4 L% ]3 y3 w/ D ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team.: I: {7 g% G* L# F' p, n ITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). 0 y/ t# { K/ D# p# b( L1 rITP Integrated Test Plan. . g9 \4 H6 z |* x, FITPB Information Technology Policy Board.1 k F, s6 B1 {- Y. @* H3 J3 f& t5 R ITR Information Technology Resources. : l' f" Y7 M$ G: wITS Information Technology Service. . u9 {1 u+ a! j8 r. J- d- YITSD Information Technology Services Directorate., R: T: M9 k% F ITT ITT Corporation.% O! B! q" {& \) g* G. F ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle 2 j r9 X ~+ p& XITW Integrated Tactical Warning.9 d8 ^% j6 f- ~* { ITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment. / L6 s }& E, w- dIUI Integrated User Interface.- V- V) {5 _0 S+ s! v IV Interceptor Vehicle. 8 V# _5 T4 a% S! _/ v0 [, {+ |- GIV&V Independent Verification and Validation.( e0 G' [% G; _& A$ s IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System. ! s4 y" R& w# Z2 O! F. tIVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).7 s( Y9 n8 i% T3 R$ `- Q* c$ k IW Information Warfare.! a( E3 |/ G! j: L8 ] IWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration.; `; U( X4 v3 A; R! ^4 g5 p+ m IWEB Information Warfare Executive Board.* t& n& O3 \9 E7 ^6 @9 R IWG Interagency Working Group. 7 p7 {7 P7 s. J5 X# c7 HIWS Indications and Warning System. 1 x0 g6 b0 J) J. u0 H* mIWSM Integrated weapons system management., K' g& h/ M' @* r& a" C2 W& H2 `5 ^ IXS Information Exchange System.' n% o, o1 [$ ?3 V% N7 A MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J " m+ m% @9 _7 A0 G6 F$ z/ ]6 s( k$ [1497 N3 j% y) p1 t4 P& k. T J&A Justification and Approval. ; ^- c ^! z' R% y; |8 P( ~# h. z# w- CJ-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. 7 v j, t* _1 c0 LJAAT Joint Air Attack Team. . s0 \! q" J! K: Y3 ^/ b) Y. UJADO Joint Air Defense Operations.6 C7 j) |" G; D JAE Joint Acquisition Executive. 1 `& l2 \0 {3 q8 W9 ?JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).0 F3 X/ \! O0 f' z9 s" S) d1 M+ S JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).. w/ [# i9 E, a) r1 p Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the " T7 K/ Y7 I, `. \' S$ X; d0 {/ Lsame frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals 8 F" K5 x9 Y3 lreflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming1 I6 y% ?8 l/ M9 c generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, 5 `1 v: K! O3 Dand with increasing radar power.& e9 ]" E. W, g/ W6 U6 R JAO Joint Area of Operations. 4 r, X! G: a- x5 L' x+ _) q4 UJAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). . U3 [0 `* c9 b4 |" H1 g$ ?JASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term). 3 T7 p" a% c+ W3 Q( y$ {1 vJAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program). ; H2 W1 I5 V& J# L' mJBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term)." v4 d+ [$ z# |; D: j JCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US).7 ?8 M4 U) L; y# y- o4 k5 R: { JCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions. # f" m# N( `) T/ y; RJCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US.: E: A- k8 {- X! R% ?0 K; H JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. $ c! j9 L# V5 C4 k: n( W& dJCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network.( F# f. Q+ A" i) d2 n) N4 u JDA Japan Defense Agency.# Z3 x% `# H; v7 q6 O' F) s" s& X JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon). $ [: i5 J4 }7 YJDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community. . o) k9 B8 u! @6 h1 `- fJDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System.. O$ u3 U( z' s. t( ]& }" W JDN Joint Data Net. 1 A F# x; c3 mJEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA). 7 |7 \& J# R/ a' g8 c, q4 vJEC Joint Economic Committee (US).) ~+ s* i2 u/ `( Z- T$ U3 C" ] JEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. " \7 s2 v0 T/ c" V# O5 {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 8 n: U% N8 U# ]) T# N4 Q& |1 P150- k4 F9 C$ y; o1 p JEM Joint Exercise Manual. 8 p" K. k/ C* V6 j @9 a/ x$ `9 }- g, NJETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis. + |$ h% i6 n+ t" t, \JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center. - w" G1 e6 R/ @9 l/ u$ `9 B8 f" sJEZ Joint Engagement Zone. 4 Y8 e) T3 @5 r: k5 `JFCC Joint Forces Command Center.3 }& N, P( ^2 n1 x/ f* | JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor. ! w2 p# ^ ]1 L3 a: MJFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).+ ~ K3 N0 j r! ^+ ], `, t JFLC Joint Force Land Component. : O7 T/ o! L5 _. M3 I( s Q& }JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component.9 K: H1 Z9 ^5 P# G" b: S JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA.& U! u8 E1 Z6 l+ ~' _0 J' x0 ^ JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. # q& J7 w/ o' g6 Q! \JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention.+ K, e4 J% _4 l& P' U3 X) U" i9 g JHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD- M+ M: }( R+ k$ B! g8 t/ j JHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD.0 S8 A9 G) Y ~' o* w3 c: X% i& i" ? JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls. + l' F6 w3 e* UJICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). + U- A- i2 ?1 e. MJIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. 0 L8 k6 e9 L3 f6 K; \% p2 uJINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems.- `: D9 O' p" _: Y0 f9 ?8 {5 d JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures.3 l1 U- Q+ O+ v2 J7 j JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms. ) T) _/ E8 R0 X1 b, ^5 x+ `JIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term).( _! W3 n! G( {6 v/ w5 }& K# f: F1 x JITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. 2 \5 x$ [7 {: A6 IJLC Joint Logistics Commanders.$ V8 p; M5 t1 T9 L* q JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. ! T0 B* _( {4 R2 L+ \JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. 8 z4 y$ H# T- \# [) @JMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. : [9 W, W: c( }% U3 C! LJMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept.% i0 A; T7 x( `1 I3 p0 _" j; p JMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. % P3 E( M( k1 [$ w, iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J6 x- j8 b) a& V 151$ o1 Q7 g, @7 N' o& w JMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information ! l4 M8 L3 O+ \ l+ s/ q6 I/ w7 ]Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded# g/ X3 c2 N, r( y by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major7 g$ P) i4 {3 P! S/ P" V5 \ component of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN), # Q. y+ h. b* Q- M& `operated by the JNTF. ) r1 o7 {8 f4 S D% p: R, wJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual. 2 u9 M8 n% f+ I* `( N% q. GJMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement. & B& X9 g* v I1 H# }JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement., W& A6 ]8 ?/ Y+ b JMO Joint Maritime Operations. * | v6 y/ r8 p- M9 e. i, xJMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start.+ Y/ V9 S0 o( d) Y1 v, t JMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. 8 H/ i- S& x, Z" Z( }+ x(2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group.2 l& [, }: p6 h! d& M6 M JNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service. - d" H& Z7 p' X, ]JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System., _7 @4 X! p0 r' t& R/ ^. h JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. # G5 g, T, } V8 pJNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. 2 I- J, a5 F% X) L9 w+ m: ?; D p: PJNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. ; |" k9 e6 s3 u( h2 L* aJNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access.; S0 S% L. w" g/ n/ y+ I0 p' y JOB Joint Operations Board. 8 ], ?+ X- T$ x' mJOC Joint Oversight Council.! _ N: g9 r9 f/ D z JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System./ v$ J9 S" [" z* V1 t$ W+ M Joint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one7 R" q: E- ~3 Y2 f Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the7 }* n" Y( J* N participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy). & }+ {1 y- h7 j; C/ r+ eJoint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more 0 m7 _' N5 A5 l$ ?9 ]Services in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be+ {4 r; j1 A& m: e promulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the" i# ?, {/ [! W combatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint % B: U/ _8 T$ Q- e3 O! gChiefs of Staff.+ B3 ~2 J, B5 u2 ]. U: ~ Joint Doctrine3 t, W: X/ r8 ~8 H Working Party+ u( M" o% x! Y A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands ) |7 g% V! I3 q/ ~4 Nwith the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics,2 {6 T g. Z _: m techniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ' {# |# x7 q4 x# g. E3 I$ {( jproject scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation.5 n T( g/ `7 G The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director,0 ^6 N) [1 C* y8 h Operations Plans and Interoperability.+ ?8 K. }5 A* P( O* D( } Joint Electronic / }! W# _! O5 [; @% x) }- sWarfare Center' q% Y1 x, c3 \" F (JEWC)! o% ^3 d9 P+ }* o. g8 Q3 Z/ A Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for : i0 @$ R% [) Ginvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground 1 B- Q4 ^% ^* [: I, Rsystems. 3 r/ @" M) {) i) GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J$ P5 i+ O! t* |3 W; H8 K 152/ H- ~% b% \9 h, g6 M% ]3 y. a7 j Joint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or $ _8 Z0 T, U( w: {attached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or 9 b; Z# A; w: A& w% ?5 Cmore of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to - g$ q( c e' g7 J+ Mexercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander.( f6 X, J/ ~; A. U o( z' t+ L Joint Force Air 2 Q2 q# ^$ ?+ l; {Component( L, s1 F4 B& y2 X& k Commander + H; H( X7 @2 s0 Q' \/ n. k- K" E(JFACC) 2 l" n, V M! E- @/ b* kThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or 1 ^) y4 P9 c: Ijoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making + l7 S, \2 ]. _* n# |2 |recommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and ' ^5 l( S2 P, mcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may / A x6 f' x5 `8 ~( k7 fbe assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority+ n, b2 D) }( S0 P necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing* i0 X# x9 B3 X a5 U5 u commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the . b4 l, N) b; D' Apreponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. + m; @2 Z% B6 C9 L% t" NJoint Force: E* [% ]0 M% E, P2 b! Q# @ Commander ; k3 ^. |! D8 e* P0 x4 c- b(JFC)6 O7 w7 e+ i3 g1 q& Q+ u7 L% P4 ` A general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant 8 R$ ]- W |9 xcommand (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also& K6 t4 k. k* K' H! x) C called JFC.# S3 R3 B0 c0 I, I. Y: [& I Joint Force Land% W9 ^% X! G9 _# g4 ]4 Q. z Component& O: P+ d; T' Z. g9 C K Commander8 I& g+ l0 B& X3 P( j (JFLCC)# m N! \; C7 K; \5 O, G' [ y The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or7 m% {/ m- k5 l) q8 e joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making 3 S: _" u# y) L( ^' ?1 F3 m- r9 A$ xrecommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and8 w& c# A ~$ r/ B coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may( n: U/ V4 u0 [: } be assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority* ~; S1 Y3 ^$ \ necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing ' @0 \, j o8 Tcommander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the . i8 ^1 K. l2 ^8 `; b" Npreponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control2 F, t' @5 c' K& u capabilities. 5 L; Q; x! j" sJoint Force, V& w6 v7 J( n+ U- I/ o+ h* A Special % M' d. e# e8 g5 O; A- @Operations! ~6 c1 H/ a! y+ U3 S Component$ h8 G4 {# M- T2 T# E- f Commander7 `! t& l& g) y: X. l9 _ (JFSOCC)' W. j k$ H+ ~( q( U The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or $ {+ A0 w. [2 u4 ajoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making l3 e1 W8 k8 e: U6 C7 q* b- ^recommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and+ p- J) z+ w0 V) h8 _% a assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such; F* c( F/ f5 [( ?/ s9 w operational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority4 G2 l( P/ e9 g- o1 S K0 e necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing # S! U/ Y, S R8 B! G2 T, Ycommander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the * k; N% y+ f5 F% o6 P$ Mpreponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and( u" v* ~; G+ d* @ control capabilities. ; x7 M; ^& w1 PJoint National 4 C: ^& @2 {) k8 ^Test Facility$ d& O# |3 `8 |. l/ n (JNTF) # a$ F1 m/ g q( S! j. a2 vA large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado( o; ~. G7 B8 C4 C% E! p4 u& ^ which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the# t4 a+ F- K. W! Y NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF)' o: q+ x: m; z9 V, O u Joint Operational ' B# L8 ^- b3 _ i6 T% @Planning and ( e6 p; \9 [- ], k. X1 NExecution w3 T" F% Y5 A$ f0 m System (JOPES) & D6 W& n8 S8 ]$ }9 C6 dA continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration ( b1 s' Z( W" p6 n/ x% e' Qand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation . d6 v: h7 }* m' T$ { l) f4 qPlanning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for# @* p) m/ O( j. N) i; ] conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders # e' h. \2 C2 r6 @; aand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct$ q1 B7 T6 A) w/ [; Y4 H of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning 8 _# v3 B1 f: B' X8 ~9 tpolicies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and- Z% l. \* h3 Y1 V# l; o* P, `) Y9 z automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and* u5 z( Z, n+ z' _1 x- B execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities ; d' e+ G2 _8 Q5 A5 r3 Xassociated with joint operations.$ Q4 `9 | J# F( Y q3 x h8 y MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J; q( j7 ?7 _8 a; \; T 153 s d* T: a6 X( c" AJoint Operating/ k/ @' F. m3 v' N Procedures . G! [4 m3 i9 j8 ^- _& N5 c(JOPs)" p3 O" R$ Y8 l5 r$ a$ @ These documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions& Z2 h' c) _0 P% \ necessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs 3 U; b% x" S* Bmay include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, 8 {* o+ g5 Y" R+ [0 yVulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting,3 W& ?8 L) s* u2 f4 j6 K8 U! ^/ Q% r Financial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement: _' `. {5 }. `5 e and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program# M- Q9 R; m `+ K. Z& v- q( i0 \ Manger and the participating Services.. [0 h3 W4 M, z# }& B- Z* } Joint Operations ; j; M6 r5 N0 [# R/ D& v5 KArea, y0 S Q, g) ^6 j' L4 n That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military" m0 q$ M( l! y a+ ? operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to / j/ ]' a5 j) gsuch military operations. Also called JOA.5 y3 J+ W6 N2 m' Y Joint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program ; l) j: z6 G* o8 F. s0 _& |that involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component , S$ V U% L# M# N4 {8 u. O5 eduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle.: ?5 F* }: N/ a) ] y% Q+ l6 V Joint. G9 a, i& V1 {4 y" @ p \) v# [ Requirements + W' I, L- p/ A4 P2 X# {$ T7 ~8 P4 cOversight 9 h. J' B8 ]) iCouncil (JROC)1 _6 T9 e- \2 q3 `- V A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts" F, S# ]4 H7 l, N5 G( A* z4 A requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops- B, R3 @% c! F" H6 X' { recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates. F4 f0 n3 w" H0 g: Z performance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition& s- J* H% W+ g7 {+ Z- m; R( B Board. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air 5 G3 U3 y* X! g( N! a' uForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps./ `8 {1 A! q) V. j7 l! l* R' g Joint SPACECOM 6 P* I* S0 c) p3 }* ?Intelligence2 v5 E( r+ _7 `7 ?& A Center (JSIC); ~- O7 F0 y2 [" G8 T A USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational 0 Z' K" Y+ m% _intelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for% ?1 t5 n6 M% q0 e% m: ~; ] the DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production 1 l0 R2 o/ @- r2 f: xincludes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and+ [0 A7 u, h+ r$ i E" O Satellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB.* e2 h* Z; q7 U& j1 _ Joint Strategic: S! K }( p5 \+ S8 N4 } Defense Planning - B& X" ^, s% ~! I# T* Q( i7 pStaff (JOSDEPS) 7 r) c: j: x+ B) j' QA special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for % X4 _7 U+ [) \1 |4 h- z2 Rintegrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive C% s* D" X' v9 u# n9 nand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint 4 h8 V& n" J! g5 v; l6 Z( M3 x G |9 NStrategic Defense Planning Staff.7 Z7 r0 p% e, {8 ~! C2 i! ? Joint Strategic 5 ~6 w$ M( g% e! E1 I cTarget Planning# S1 F' c2 s$ K N Staff (JSTPS) - }) V8 \/ ^( ]7 R' l7 d3 j- JA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing,' H1 o8 c2 ^- }/ W9 n coordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). + z0 O5 g+ T0 Y" {# a; D7 fAlso responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The 9 A6 d" ^# Z8 O( ?& vCommander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target 6 d" M5 O) {( N% f Y0 `Planning Staff. + t( n4 z" \8 a E! g* Y( ~Joint ( F, E3 w" }% Q- nSuppression of0 E: l% j9 R+ V Enemy Air# e7 v. G0 Y# i# l Defense- B! k) h5 R( {$ H0 s A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities p3 K# i) ?$ F% \& }* A provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called . G4 w, P$ ~2 f dJ-SNEAD.4 i+ E" h$ _+ w5 E" ~; j Joint Tactical ! Q% t0 y! u; N; D* X6 A' oInformation 7 o U% D _7 hDistribution5 T( A N* V- v System (JTIDS)% s. p# I; p) p7 } A joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the% E- t; h$ d3 n# z interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, {/ _/ M; d& I k3 x and mobile or fixed-base land stations.* K5 Y1 w6 A* K' R' `0 P6 q1 d Joint Tactics,$ R; E1 |6 \# i# r( c Techniques, and 2 \" ?& |+ O6 D2 f0 U& h% @5 _& _, N$ |& HProcedures - v' p" ^+ f: S(JTTP)# C) {7 u' w- q' n2 |9 | The actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how ) Z3 V9 ?) m2 C" `. S% pforces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,- N$ F/ A8 r1 C# I! F promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and/ Y& J# M( Q2 w' R Joint Staff. Also called JTTP.* R1 [. V! `: f7 k, Z4 T: t MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J $ B3 l; b4 R$ W/ x/ z154 # n6 I- B9 [/ ]Joint Test and& X4 {1 q3 P7 V# k3 X3 r: o Evaluation' a1 @9 u7 o4 `2 W. }, D# g T&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be 1 U% P1 g4 G# n7 p9 }acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have [% N% T2 P! m4 ginterfaces with equipment of another component. 8 R T5 P K. u" F5 F2 l0 ZJoint Test and H0 H6 d9 J6 R. ` Evaluation$ Q& W9 i9 C- A' i0 f$ u Program f s/ f7 a9 n; O5 S# y5 S/ J5 |& @An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on / d( r* t' d% s9 w6 N8 g/ V! Msystem performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements,' K5 j' E1 C# Q$ Z( W! m systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for( O# I& _ M$ O/ r& t( G6 u9 v force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures.$ D' V+ S9 w$ u9 y7 L JON Job Order Number. 3 F. |9 F. k, s" hJOP Joint Operating Procedures.; w! H0 W8 D8 Y/ ]2 [6 [. w3 K JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System./ d1 ]$ B4 m# ~7 ]- {1 N+ Z JOPS Joint Operations Planning System." p/ k8 j' L x' P0 Z: `6 K JOR Joint Operational Requirements./ b% D1 O% w+ k. u" e3 v JORD Joint Operational Requirements Document.! {$ ^# Q" v- i+ C! d/ |4 j& S JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff./ q- L8 @4 H ?4 T: l, T JOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term).9 g# _) k1 y( P, ?6 { JOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term). 0 J3 g2 J7 e: Z* N4 [2 @JP Joint Publication. ' Y7 O$ a6 V* g2 A6 a" N9 CJPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. 6 f. a. _/ P+ S4 }JPM Joint Program Manager. 5 Q7 r9 v) q7 B; p; O' \JPN Joint Planning Net.9 {5 a! q) s0 ?) { JPO Joint Program Office.' X& y6 b. z3 @! N0 i JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. ( P" r* b+ l: B. j, K* ~JPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact . M7 N/ `0 Y* ~6 [3 @& W7 ]$ `( o$ }JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle.( z5 a9 T, ^* e5 m$ g; T- ~ JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. ( q1 i5 [. }# f, K# M6 G+ Z; gJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration.$ H. v# D# h* } JPT Joint Planning Tool. / ?/ r; a* J% r( ]JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term).5 l/ a, p% r. A5 c9 F8 Z JRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term). 0 ^8 o" v* k% U" E( ^' x O nJRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term). # e( k+ C5 O) b$ P4 O5 E. LJRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J + w+ y* i ?6 b1556 C) B7 g' p |( Y" U JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council.% W. b. V! X: S! `7 z( i2 d8 g JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group.) R; K3 \3 ~+ D8 a7 N- E4 V JRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications. . j" ^' R/ f6 F( F3 jJRTC Joint Readiness Training Center.. }8 _9 a& G. \& R JS Joint Staff.. V5 G3 o% c% V0 ? JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center./ F6 C0 @- k3 [4 J: q5 _2 y: y7 _& s JSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term).+ K& V$ N8 g3 T ~; g JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. 1 m4 i2 l* l. l+ _3 aJSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term). - L q* O( ?. D( _2 I5 qJSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). 7 t. V3 l [& e/ w(2) Joint Service Evaluation Team. & J! ?% F1 O2 _- p! Q. t3 dJSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project).+ Q& ?. S9 N, I( w$ p7 H; ` JSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center. 4 ^$ n0 E( G5 H7 j, XJSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term).1 c2 I, ~! G+ ]/ K8 w JSMB Joint Space Management Board.1 x0 `3 w! _0 K! d: K" s JSOC Joint Special Operations Command. G1 V3 q: j$ ?' d0 [; s JSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement.7 m( g Z# J- X- H/ b( P JSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document.: v/ z3 t+ a" h' j' e JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System.0 O$ d7 I' v- a% J1 H8 T) C JSS Joint Surveillance System. 2 \$ I# u6 C- a/ ]" v6 L7 OJSST Joint Space Support Team. " E T8 `2 p" X! ^+ _0 O+ Z9 FJSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System.1 A6 t5 j' a! O6 Z JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. 0 O5 V. `6 D( K( \& }JT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting # X1 g/ r3 f0 J/ `& cJT&E Joint Test and Evaluation.+ b- t. Y/ ~. r% p0 L JTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term). & | s6 D+ U$ N! f" h5 NJTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station." G$ G: A7 M+ }6 P JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. & H( J, Q' q. u3 L! l" y/ k8 GJTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. & q7 V$ @7 n5 R5 bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J ! W7 G8 c, ~! Z; j, L# A1561 A. f9 h! U; Q) q/ ]1 z JTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). A/ ~! f; g0 U' y G( N JTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. 8 e; w$ C1 c" r' IJTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). `, `8 B7 l# x% l' y0 q4 D$ m/ yJTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).$ @7 r+ z$ _( P2 V8 z; J JTF Joint Task Force.4 g% V' J; j# M/ q0 {) F+ C JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise. / X7 L# b q. uJTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System.3 a h' `2 H! o+ _+ T' `- }( c! N JTL Joint Target List. 5 F! X9 h" r1 O# l3 }JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense. ) z. k G. a- {8 I2 @, w$ pJTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. $ z) a! k; K/ v% V, j) o% U* ^JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]. - Z, c A6 C2 i+ @& e! ?JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. , y1 ~ a6 t1 `# c( ZJTR Joint Travel Regulations.7 }2 r- Q- P; S" P) N JTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board.: O0 q, W( L( r( K. { JTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). , p. O5 g1 E5 vJTT Joint Tactical Terminal. 6 \! N! v4 D9 T8 F& k+ hJTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. t% d+ U$ z6 N( ^4 D x. IJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft.) c% O* Y3 ]& H* {' y0 M JWAN Joint Wide Area Net. ( {/ A5 C3 H4 KJWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model).* Q* Y0 G0 X2 _- v& F) y JWC Joint Warfare Center.4 P+ Q( k+ p! m$ h- n1 M9 C. H, ^ JWG Joint Working Group. , `: o4 K* R/ l7 j- ZJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network. 6 D. }+ Z# ~1 B/ WJWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration " f) n' K" _- K8 ]- s) ~JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.; Y1 s1 { Z* E$ o3 z MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K2 s# `- \' X: ^$ E3 X 157 - w6 C1 G5 w$ @K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo.+ E: `$ j9 A" _3 |5 x K Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another.! v4 Q" r; @! X, I8 R) n Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of1 Y0 l. }* V5 t3 b two observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both ' e6 y3 f+ W7 J9 ?4 Nobjects. s( L0 c" }+ b$ e/ B( O+ L! e* [KA Kill Assessment. * Z5 C6 w, v1 j$ [$ |KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. / q- u: B4 X+ \0 ]; {3 W ?& E) EKB Kilobyte.; x( m+ I2 o6 }$ n( W) k Kbps Kilobyte per second.0 \0 ]1 p: x, P( L5 c; T KBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). & P4 r7 I5 @. ]1 P' q. E' AKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion.9 M+ j5 N* p8 x1 U KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. 7 A4 p; e4 i5 V$ l+ Z- c: h) J( LKDS Kwajalein Discrimination System. , I- x& J/ |7 j( N1 O# }KE See Kinetic Energy.) y/ |, U8 W0 {* r KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon.' Z: G9 [6 W0 {, O3 Q4 B KED Kill Enhancement Device. ) U+ w- m" ?8 O5 @/ O, w: w! ]Keep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the 5 U* c; j+ |0 J1 X8 h/ p0 o1 e" easset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to+ Y, j8 T) ?7 R0 q defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones, I B: ~! `6 ]2 u8 F under the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined.0 F) J" l5 f; F( K$ w' x KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept.* d% e6 N( k2 S! V- |7 i KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool. ( U0 ^# L) j; M; ?+ a, @) FKEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle.. b) @1 F' |8 G$ P# X; [( @2 } KEW Kinetic Energy Weapon. 9 S4 M. M7 h. a0 w3 `KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion).) l6 r5 \2 H: J KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion).. Z3 N4 ?. {0 g8 W# `. ? KEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground.1 K# ?. Y5 D" |) J, w4 ^6 r KEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. # Z# Y8 v2 \( Z& P5 O w) m: m T+ qKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a7 t- [1 r& n* G( d7 t sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption.% f/ r# q W0 z0 [1 I! A Kg Kilogram.) [- r* |) H* h) s; s1 A KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL. 2 K2 D, K2 p$ C) PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K' X2 O& }' ^9 W7 h 158 2 ~; [% ^' j4 x" [& j/ M1 X4 q8 AKHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. 9 `7 m6 b0 R2 b& Z% D+ W! I+ JKIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution.6 H+ {0 [! z& |- t# l0 F) u Kill Assessment + `3 e' G3 s! t: f(KA) - ^3 f, ?/ ^- D' e4 S8 _# @An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV- a4 g3 R! n% ?$ \; h1 A intercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and6 M. c+ X% h' G# x+ d9 h re-engagements. (USSPACECOM)' [- V3 ?! D* v2 d" c2 E Kill Enhancement / V6 \; b; q- {8 g5 _6 qDevice & v1 w$ o& F: q$ i' t$ k9 x& VA device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. 8 A% r5 C6 Q8 N8 BKinematic / x# \7 }1 l9 S/ X3 NBattlespace 3 R, t c" {! r* ?The planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor / q: n& ~) T% m3 Etimeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and . `- U- p6 @% _# k' loperational constraints. ! l; K; u( k" ^5 u* F4 S0 h& v B# yKinetic Energy! f. n; V6 e5 k) D1 d+ @ (KE); w. j3 p5 Y- D a' m) ^' c2 } The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion.$ o' J, Y# H8 H& K! s/ z& Y Kinetic Energy' u3 t. G; n+ M ^3 m- e4 R6 c Weapon (KEW); ~, k0 D6 O2 R M! ^- M A weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object.( Q6 E5 j/ Z; n, J6 x Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun.& F9 D. t' {, z/ J( U" B/ A Kinetic Kill; F. b1 @$ {8 |/ p" | Vehicle (KKV)$ V9 ]/ O/ E7 n7 ~. S& m A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy; P, X0 | E$ Z( B! x a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board % t( \0 E0 M; a- n; ^+ M6 Orockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell 3 i% ?% T) @- ~$ qlaunched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-12-22 20:49 , Processed in 0.047003 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部