航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H" I* |3 z; S( R$ y/ j 130 ; @6 W: Y# r {8 k' K) rHuman-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system5 |$ P6 V) r7 m& E( J+ M/ g7 ] processes. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential X1 M$ n2 g o# K ? high-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to 9 Z5 h% h4 [1 @0 O7 I3 Y- @% b3 B9 IBMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal# z, ?, F0 `6 q/ L4 s! o* N% L Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of+ [: U( X6 q! F( [ command and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost) S" l1 y' }% _1 v' ~; u( r5 D phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses% c6 j8 ?; ?; \! j' A* { to initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human s( U, N6 ^- q2 {* Z- O9 G0 U decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) 4 M0 f' H, H0 ?6 w4 h8 PHuman - n7 z8 u+ c9 j# L1 M4 K* ~8 ZIntelligence ! F- v" Z' B6 `(HUMINT)" {- e- X+ i* O7 H# g5 t' { A category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by( I) C! a) j9 F# L human sources. ; a% S# d- N- N% ^8 Q! X. n3 lHuman Systems ; P7 l! I/ G- ?/ W; K- {* O6 VIntegration9 P3 E' w N. n# _: s2 D/ s The human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, . U* X7 j" \! ^- F/ t( }training, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort 0 i/ u* k' @" M% I1 Q% r6 V O" q" Nfor the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of, A; h d. @8 ~8 |7 @' p ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier, : O# y6 U9 T1 r' Ysailor, airman, or Marine.9 E3 H8 S. ~ A7 e0 A HUMINT Human Intelligence. $ b. }; C" W1 g) o6 jHVAA High Value Airborne Assets.- U& h* w o. @- N0 t# ^ HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.. {4 r; n2 r7 t$ ` HVG Hypervelocity Gun.( k/ E3 V* E+ G M" T; A HVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). " d( L3 t) l! p% VHVM Hypervelocity Missile.. X; U3 e% W6 _. W HVP Hypervelocity Projectile. - S5 ^3 k+ u. }# t% O9 YHVT Half-Value Thickness. / H0 I4 {7 A+ D6 }8 MHW Hardware.: H. b& B5 g/ L2 x5 A HW/SW Hardware/Software. 9 z; m8 b M6 e# t- L+ z; q% s9 ?1 X; DHWCI Hardware Configuration Item. % R7 x5 `# O; L( Z) uHWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. . T ]) d2 }) t* c) PHWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test." @# Q t! ], m5 E, @ HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature. }7 {4 f# k* Z' P' K" d4 x: v+ BHypervelocity# g: o; d4 V7 u5 h Gun (HVG) " m, k4 E8 T, _: k: G RA gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example, / o/ D$ l1 _; Oan electromagnetic or rail gun. ( y; q' w5 R# v5 q- _! y; _Hypervelocity . a, V+ }* E) H) i: OMissile (HVM)' \& T, D9 `8 i0 T. ^ A missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second. - G8 P( O A8 M; g6 P0 uHYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance. 6 X9 B' H: Q j1 UHz Hertz (cycles per second). ) P7 K8 a+ ? X: P& dMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ( e! K6 C& h0 v- v; m" {1311 Z5 V9 s2 X! W. \: J6 _ I&CO Installation and Checkout.' l" m- C r) p I&I Installation and Integration. + z/ K1 S# Q7 E( D m8 E3 hI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis.9 r' M$ e3 ?3 w9 c X9 w; x9 ^ I&T Integration and Test. - i8 b/ X* `7 |' @I&W Indications and Warning.& _% V7 g4 G! s) l& A% c I-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.+ H0 p+ `. b5 b; F, f7 M I-HAWK Improved HAWK. " c! l# O% P- @ \I-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term).# C( L( x: X, ]( t q# l1 U! c I/F Interface. 8 N( H3 H+ `1 [' Z- e4 HI/O Input/Output. - f7 m% p. @3 S$ S. R0 d$ e3 bI/R Interchangeability/Reparability. - S( i: ~5 j; ?) |- H& i. PI4 International Information Integrity Institute.9 @/ \) Z$ @- X& g3 f8 o IA Information Architecture. 9 I( n; X9 Q, H0 u) ZIA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations.) R' I" ^4 J/ N5 Y IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test., [$ k* s: { V7 r$ Y% H IAD Integrated Air Defense.7 d" X5 {% n, c+ J; i/ p4 J IADS Integrated Air Defense System.) w" I9 ?- r+ q/ d4 H IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.3 k2 n' \$ o+ |! H- V, e IAG International Agreement Generator. 7 N+ R! e& S m( m0 UIAI Israel Aircraft Industries./ p! n& x( L* z IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package. " G* [7 @ D `8 |. ]. n/ G: fIAS Israeli Architecture Study. $ r Y& U% o; s1 D! ]( ~+ D5 D" yIAT Integrated Assembly Test. 7 M2 O+ o X9 L1 bIATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. ) y/ ]; m$ n" ]7 C) a. QIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out. " y( Y6 W& Y. J5 T5 AIAW In Accordance With. 3 V8 h& Z1 r+ ~( B Q4 E1 z/ WIBA Industrial Base Assessment.$ M# F4 i! _5 q) @6 K" x' f. r IBC Impurity Band Conduction.: G/ E# Q+ D8 V7 p IBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.( f4 J$ E. N& c MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I" ], D! r$ T6 E% X5 ?9 }* p% J 132! U7 e3 F0 h# z3 L% @( o IBDL Intra-Battery Data Link. 2 p9 V. [" ^" m1 r% O, f9 pIBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration+ O' j1 y+ [0 ~ IBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System. o6 ^2 [5 r- Q# X% j IBM International Business Machines Corporation. ; g+ t* N* V% T; tIBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis.9 w0 m2 d- i2 G D7 g2 C0 e IBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term).' a+ n* C- e8 q IBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US" M4 x. D. P* d4 ?. ]. h8 Q% E( v naval ships.6 e' o1 v d: a" e& k/ a6 g IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey. % g" l1 {: ~( ]7 N3 tIC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit.7 [4 p* D4 P$ `/ L U ICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment.$ @/ o% z- |8 z- x$ A( C3 @ ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System.8 m4 l: T ]( E3 ^2 M: O S ICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. 8 ]- F7 i9 x8 _5 e F9 ~+ \ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. ' o; l+ I4 O5 c |ICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control5 V Y4 ]. Q7 s2 e9 x! u& _ System (ICS) for US naval ships.$ v& l3 R: c' H, V' c, c; q$ w1 E ICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering.# e; q; m) j `! H; g* D, `1 v ICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. # t1 x; X$ ^, c( x1 S4 nICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).! ?5 A) a, _8 W8 `1 N' d (2) Item Category Code (ILS term)." \) } y- ^7 ` ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing. , o/ D" x! O6 y) h" Q3 J, M6 [ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security. 3 W, R6 [( v3 p0 [4 E% ]. cICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking.6 k+ F1 u' H; c J* k9 K( T. \ ICD Interface Control Document/Drawing.' n& N8 H3 ]9 s2 l2 C+ \0 V* a! u- _ ICE Independent Cost Estimate.% G4 {6 T5 Y& g4 F2 _ ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO). 2 L' E( F5 T" M/ e& I2 b, d8 lICM Improved Conventional Munitions. - T8 _; Z! S+ V2 p2 n- e3 |ICN Installation Completion Notification.6 V5 t3 M. ^# ^& f: _" q ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term).8 L. ^6 M$ T# P ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures.% P6 j* w, d* O! X% d: z MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I7 ^# c4 x# _5 q2 P: B1 l4 \% A 1330 q* j# M3 } D ICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term).+ X: A9 D; ^! S (3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process.$ x0 u( z, j& g ICR Integrated Contracting Report.4 O8 q, B0 C, k) m0 g7 R ICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and/ `9 `- t* [$ y7 D6 Y control system for US naval ships. 2 c: Q+ I! x- _1 |$ p(2) Interface Control Specification. * E* P) ]" l: b, q% v. |ICU Interface Control Unit.4 `' e4 Q; s* y) J* h' V) O ICWG Interface Control Working Group. " o% v4 \ [: E6 Z1 s+ GID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification.1 U9 `! N x0 R2 g8 H IDA Institute for Defense Analysis. % K% W1 Z% r/ K4 D7 o7 B0 T! I* E( ?IDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term). . ~9 Y- r0 p0 f& r, F6 P0 ?5 lIDB Integrated Data Base.# _- }- t& t) D6 n! i$ T+ ]7 F IDD Interface Design Document./ s. y' C7 h: I IDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis.$ s v& _4 i X1 h IDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term).4 G4 |% ~& X! F8 y Identification3 R# c2 g- s) ] A. K Friend or Foe 1 Y: e4 q% Z: R% W: N(IFF) ' x0 y% c& E3 z* c5 V" lA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by: {* y C' n9 M+ ], z4 N friendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby; o8 u& j* M& I6 L+ j. b0 V distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. 3 c* p/ r! d1 B# pIDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres., {) V3 ~1 Q& P3 U; f IDHS Intelligence Data Handling System.: R; w& ]; o! |; \; _% u0 E$ r IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production. 0 P9 S" S; k' yIDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System.( i$ l$ E$ I( J' @+ G IE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.# F9 s5 _5 n+ b, O) {8 Q1 y6 D IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination.& A6 s$ M# T. _: R IEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.# i' J. _8 k! Z. c IEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure. 9 P' y8 E( V }5 RIEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. / B4 V7 n' l; C+ b. uIEP Integrated Evaluation Plan.0 X- D @! b& J% K9 s( B IER Independent Evaluation Report. 3 P5 u3 }! I$ H* g/ w6 I" HIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group.4 t& G- B! H& K8 N3 f4 m MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 5 T( o' N4 J {134* O- O6 y+ X! y; p8 x& }! B7 ~% a IETF Internet Engineering Task Force.1 ?1 o& f' o4 W/ h8 l& g IEV Integrated Experimental Version.. g! g4 y$ s6 Q+ p IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare. 3 w9 Z5 A5 B6 g3 H; f' ?+ zIFA Integrated Financial Analysis.6 W% ?* C" ^/ Z8 s4 N7 M IFF Identification, Friend or Foe. 3 x* i" X# F6 P! Z4 S! A/ v5 ZIFHV In-Flight Homing View. 4 m7 N' n9 L# ]! z" J R7 UIFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the . _" {3 H! L. p" R8 q) k$ bcommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets.1 y- ^7 K& `8 Q- h2 q/ @' x8 w* s& K/ ] The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications 9 {6 y5 w3 D- y% vsystem term GEP. 7 n; T3 U& u8 `6 }% b% K1 }IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope.8 N4 u9 u. m5 T) @+ C% O IFOV Instantaneous Field of View.2 V7 I* K! \& e6 y7 L0 O IFSR In-Flight Status Report . l- G0 T" y! M( ~IFT Integrated Flight Test. V- R/ \" E8 u/ Y: l: j+ H+ ~% H- H IFTU In-Flight Target Update. & e# C% q# j& g# ]5 I, h- K4 WIG Inspector General. / r8 J( u; h% c0 k E* N* nIGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse.: O* y) k/ m% N IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard. 6 a( j+ Y4 I+ u" Y. X- RIGS Inertial Guidance System.8 K1 I8 J j# ?# r8 a IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS). + e2 X+ \( J- OIGT Integrated Ground Test.8 {; m/ n6 c" d" e) `8 A IGU Inertial Guidance Unit. L$ n7 D4 n5 E" A2 | ~% mII Impulse Intensity., |( f& t. ~' O, x( |' q, i/ y0 W IIP Interoperability Improvement Program.* Q" n8 `9 a. H6 H4 z IIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. * Y. F% w9 W! M0 }! s0 uIIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.! D1 I: C+ w7 c3 B( a8 Q IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).! N9 u8 `" c0 Q3 A IIT Interceptor Integration Test. 0 a% N9 s2 [1 e/ C% m4 j y: zIITF Information Infrastructure Task Force.) A. Q3 p7 e6 p6 j, h" I- Z( ? IJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon.' N7 Q/ q( |. t- l0 l6 u' ? MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I1 _6 N1 T9 n+ n* W& L 1353 t/ `! Z9 b$ D) ^' [ ILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term)., g7 P2 t7 P6 r. J+ N% A3 x: q* k( I ILC Initial Launch Capability.7 ?! o; z2 J% ]& I Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g.,4 r9 R! T7 S! S# } availability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics . X$ w: R g$ q, w# x$ n" ^: o( isupportability, etc.). 1 [9 D/ N" K' Y4 }1 V9 IIllumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray7 K3 e0 x- R( h satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test.8 J( T3 O$ ]3 D S# K- } ILS Integrated Logistics Support. 1 A4 J1 v( h x" UILSM ILS Manager. 0 F; `) i: u+ i- nILSMT ILS Management Team ; K# B5 v1 c3 QILSO ILS Office.5 a# _+ ?- T& @ ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan./ u0 c. n. u7 [. T6 K ILSWG ILS Working Group. 9 `0 z& i8 S+ o' |9 A. z9 DIM Information Management.0 O& P0 ] o9 r9 M8 W) S8 o/ Q Imagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical 2 s) ^5 ?; ^/ x2 @7 i# [* bmeans on film, electronic display devices, or other media. % W1 N* s! l3 V3 E3 N3 CImagery $ k& ]$ L+ ~( K7 s3 J6 AIntelligence - n# D8 H: g* p: q- \, @! {2 v(IMINT)9 _; {. L6 g5 J/ S, E* x Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography,% x+ a" v7 d' ^ infrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic& B9 v5 [# s* k6 r$ X4 \ aperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or0 n7 [6 s" y4 j6 I electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media. 7 V4 |1 ~1 i& x. b9 Q7 uImagery9 \$ E, i% G6 C+ x" n) j Correlation, a4 j' Q. O+ I5 H. y' B% Q The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from $ v# Y5 q) j3 L: Ddifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics3 r# j# l+ |! Q, _7 h2 @- T1 M signified. g& m" u, s4 M Imaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object. 1 Z, X: L. c4 J) ?IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term).9 V/ ~5 I% S; j) m+ F' l7 l1 h (2) Internal Management Control. & S2 N, v& R7 n5 B6 AIMDB Imagery Management. 0 T! L4 q6 R0 N$ }: {: H+ }+ TIMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of % d; o" q% w) |. ]2 KDefense.0 `7 z r8 i4 P1 U IMINT Imagery Intelligence.- w0 h" ^* v9 u9 y S7 s IMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program.: E& v7 `. d2 \, g Immediate Kill + _9 K" Q( n- oMode( L8 O+ ?) e; {) f% n1 G7 N: S" y A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by a8 k$ o3 G9 J" S s wimpact with the KV or KED.# a2 \2 M! t2 y0 }/ S E! E Impact Point 0 F1 i' C3 P. L d+ E/ @Prediction (IPP)$ f& B: i+ O+ E# E+ q+ L" H Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact," d# S: s! D/ U usually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes' G+ d9 [; M( n" E7 @ the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties.9 O; C$ C3 ]+ y MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - R8 c* \- A( U4 n9 G& i/ M8 C* k136 9 N% @' R8 d, _1 n: Q+ BImplicit # o5 X8 C4 b; ^+ FCoordination3 j4 u- g2 {* L1 _ Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to8 z8 m9 n' [( L% k" k' M% Q, V" u derive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations ! W7 ^/ W: L: g' v( x( q' Ewill be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical.7 [6 T6 S2 b5 V, ~ Decisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers.3 m; c# X. E! `; I" \% m# Z Impulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for: v' x2 {! o1 b& @ a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.)& f4 j% T+ `4 W& j, m9 d Impulse2 Y0 P3 m- K$ T l Intensity (II)% m6 ]: f4 G% g* Z Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse / u1 @* O" ~0 W0 l2 Y3 d( N( Y# pintensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of$ K4 D, b& E6 o$ [1 e/ w impulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter;" A5 p; G6 W" k6 \7 } hence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s.6 \8 d# ? O% c2 A, m. ~4 f8 ?, G Impulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The/ I) n, c" k) T# Z) F U# \7 C+ ]* P6 S intensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target" m9 A) e* h1 N: k- [% D a violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of3 \4 c8 j2 ~; _" w. I; a the target and causing structural failure.* H$ D5 A% I0 ~" e! U IMPWG Information Policy Working Group.6 ?, l! b# M# B* S3 m, \% ^* H; Q G( x) i IMS Integrated Master Schedule. 7 z) r; q2 c6 lIMU Inertial Measurement Unit.: {: v8 }- r* S1 E& R IN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse0 {) H3 {& F% r" J" `; `& a; a Noise. % f/ S" Q3 l: Y; VIn Inch." x% B7 u& W! g# U/ D5 ^3 ~ IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator.& a5 `. }* t7 c) A In-Flight Target & y+ `/ O' u3 }! p8 M6 e, R* V" rUpdate (FTU) . h/ X5 `! f5 [" aA report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control & x2 M9 Y" \1 n5 i& qsuite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. " V. ~. f3 n) x# [# a+ D! _# D% R2 jInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing - b; W K! j# Z5 F+ L- b- Z5 kthe orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has / x0 m# u0 ]# Ban inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite$ ^: @8 E( |( \$ K* } traveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in 2 M; N; H: W; o' F$ u7 Gwhich a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An, o3 A( n8 K" t3 h& q orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is 2 ]2 [2 z/ G) R# o8 ^; }called a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a( C4 a+ [, T. Q5 I2 c retrograde orbit.0 p% Y& h( B5 H7 @ Incremental$ B t7 n @7 x b0 X( Y Funding1 v8 J& ^! r$ U2 B& a- [- p5 U The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project 9 W: J. f* ?: _& m9 mbased on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such " B+ f; T6 G/ z3 S1 ~budgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in0 A% ^ V3 {( D$ i3 p completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding,9 O: A8 Y3 ]; j) w7 `% ]6 x: w where budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated! ]/ f. z: z# n( x5 c8 F3 ?3 c obligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification6 w. e/ ^! M( j, h7 o) ` Friend or Foe ! A- H }# Q/ |( p9 k9 i1 K t* d/ Z(IFF) ; _3 z7 g/ Q, T* l- b8 o/ }A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by2 R) y4 d. s* b5 p* `; T6 m friendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby( t( k* n7 ]: h f, ~' ^$ c. N$ c distinguishing themselves from enemy forces.7 X4 e+ v& z$ r) O, E# P7 [: p MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I $ P2 T! o8 h/ g: z8 [3 m w: w137 $ q0 {; e L. A& M/ sImagery8 R& _; z' l4 v4 m! s7 | Correlation + C+ b+ w' F) q: x; M- ^8 fThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from : j6 A; ]$ B! s2 L$ wdifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics8 n b9 G! U# F8 E/ w0 u/ q signified.& @8 D4 L( m: k# D$ ~3 A. T7 o Independent7 _8 B3 {. g% `: a% S9 C7 Y Cost Analysis* E) ^5 B! ]4 B: V3 D' U4 G" o | An analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body # w4 P& [, ^1 f( X+ s( _, v' i1 {disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United) {/ `! Q' }& c4 {% r$ O. Q% f States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational j6 u* p' q$ j8 C0 c9 aManpower Requirements.”) + Y3 d% e8 W; v7 `8 e4 A- xIndependent Cost 1 O4 S$ L$ H+ P _% H+ ]Estimate (ICE) : Q6 B, _2 c' aA cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority 9 ~6 J8 U/ g3 V3 p# p4 eresponsible for acquiring or using the goods or services. $ v% o& D6 S5 A$ o6 B' rIndependent 0 r+ j* Y# a2 vEvaluation " P& k( S4 {+ U; K& @7 xReport (IER) - q) ^9 o# w6 v' G6 V2 o5 T, B! }Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, " ]0 M* u' F9 B! c+ lreports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s o, O) ?+ ^5 x K- a6 U assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on' ?. S% T% R7 l& y the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is & e( s7 g6 n# c; R# _provided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER ( Z* I3 a- p( M, C- dmay also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army) s+ R/ ^! ]. H9 Z* R0 y6 E Independent " T$ v4 f1 _2 iResearch and 1 u) D: A, Z# }; M0 R: O _1 RDevelopment 9 E- s, A& L+ e# O- Z) A" ^" d(IR&D) / }3 X& V4 q2 {# U! u" p3 [Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a . |" |# p% O9 t6 acontract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and- v3 [2 y. ^/ t applied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation u! q( j# |& y- p5 ^' O( N studies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See- \# U- o- C& N3 G, E" V FAR 31.001.) * W! Q" e6 |" |% B/ B/ nIndependent , O6 @/ ^8 q8 T, b$ CVerification and9 l# E, c6 O& k Validation (IV&V)& P% U5 p: P$ [( R. W0 v) k Verification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that 9 f6 d5 n1 ~+ u% G6 X2 p$ Ois not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being ; I0 S8 X% Q& F7 P) v6 Zevaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software! K( O% J) f8 K development activities.8 x" V& Z) R b u Indium - Q# ~( J6 d: r; }4 S* ?, rAntimonide* s8 b3 O8 D* f Infrared sensing material.& o3 [) v2 V3 @3 p Individual B( L) }8 M+ ^) n Acceptance Test# C+ z( I Q; U1 V% T7 U A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics ) y, U& i! A, Qprior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using" g, _# s6 I) G3 B' ` the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency.1 T# J3 A1 O) g0 I" w( p Induced : k5 M* s3 B+ ]5 ^Environments4 S/ z$ i# l; u' E$ t: `0 k/ D Induced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the 4 z: p3 P4 F) N$ cnatural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets / w) D s i$ l( u; q(Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or6 y! y7 u, j1 ? the influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally- : B' E( s1 n0 z! ~) |2 A2 z4 S) BInduced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E) Z. P Y8 H* t% \ electronic equipment). # [$ e* v1 |! Q% M. S: q- ?Induced $ s/ Y( I% p' ^6 ?Radioactivity $ e- @' T" w E: D1 e& l) {Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions,0 ~5 K* P/ V' R: D% e particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of j: f5 ~! W/ W5 q, H) g; yunstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce4 v/ N+ |( i5 c# S( a radioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by) ^: z& Q# l' q, h; [& k) m9 Z interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and " b! c& _+ O& r+ m, B$ [3 e7 z9 Ssilicon in soil and sea water). 2 M, y, P$ b3 ^! c, gMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I D6 G8 f9 B. D0 u7 m4 n 138 , H/ \' v4 r) S6 MIndustrial ^& z( s8 ^- c9 u0 ^% ~ Resource9 Y1 q" H* c6 _; T: F Analysis (IRA)8 G6 f) G u( Z0 L A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory' u4 i; P+ t2 I6 Z8 Y+ k( V capabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to ( x7 J! P, ^1 N' d! ]1 Msupport SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and2 K) G7 }7 W6 o, R special tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the, o, W ~" ^% s9 i range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies, & P* S' h8 i1 ~% n8 }( M, Dproducibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in5 `8 o* v. s- P! ?+ O! p3 j2 Y: R IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and) v) Q' R0 c5 f- D1 d become issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues1 N9 M$ o0 b, X; e6 [ Resolution Strategies (PPIRS) document. . }7 T R, ]$ H, MInertial 3 X- \: B H$ H5 F7 g1 F y! {Guidance6 E( A$ Q1 |3 ~& ^# N# l A guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, 2 [/ R" z; J' F6 H& |wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly% T) p1 q, F- c within the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures 4 H1 e' p4 d6 p$ U4 Band converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain & q' K. m. `$ o% sdirection. 4 |9 e3 ]2 j* @3 {; u6 _: T% tInertial+ C- V& `4 ~( _( r Measurement $ R6 p5 O6 J; E RUnit (IMU) - _6 ?( X$ H5 ^2 ?/ G1 W3 l- ~A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,; a" v- e2 C" ^/ O: {( v! `) G wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly! Z+ g8 D- o: `& k* t within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures / q3 M, k+ p- Sand converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain1 ~6 d" t9 U6 f0 ?$ |+ I# ` direction. 5 v0 V, C% W; [/ J* v [' BINETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability. / z/ A$ w" i% C) [/ e$ h9 pINEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term).& B; W" a* p6 ]# h INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR4 F' b3 P# V, S8 Y2 \3 i# @ Treaty. 7 H3 b8 w6 @3 e0 g% \: }. gIn-Flight Target+ z8 b. \% C `+ k2 T' ~4 p" n, b$ r Update! ^, @0 }: c. |/ M: c8 E4 a7 F* w A data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and4 l2 V; A* g6 I# q! x `% e velocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. 7 l3 Q$ M1 J4 ^7 q$ i(USSPACECOM) 6 {1 w0 C( `, T+ bInformation 0 \. W9 h6 H' TArchitecture (IA) " k( V; x. E6 f! _- OA description of the information that is needed to support command and control$ S4 ^# @; V, F, }8 [! V decision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing& f% A! G) s3 j2 z- S- a that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description 8 t6 u, }5 {, c: X4 Z4 eprovides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design2 A# f, [: E8 h R+ C2 Z% D flexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability.2 b1 n. L- S0 [' m$ d0 @. l; M! `0 w# s Information * U1 M# s, h t! M' ?4 f( CResources ! o5 ~' `+ d. l) v8 K2 w. UManagement 0 i- L1 `" U& D$ Y/ c( \% A; ?The planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling, ( q* S: F8 R# i3 k" ?" K( |9 Vand management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, 5 v. g( g# U, h4 E$ ]7 Pand dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of / w3 O- }7 q7 X) {information and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information. M* {9 m& Q' Z/ Y Security y3 o6 t; w; `3 D' b(INFOSEC) ' D: S& B8 Q) q' ^; C& h7 PThose measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and, ^& q8 d6 ? \0 d5 A protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or . z0 C! @* Q: `7 ]unclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical " C5 ^1 n" c! H4 x: k; [6 H# ~) cdata and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned / f& [; `1 H' _6 ^& v5 v4 @with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, 2 H+ l3 J! {2 W/ o( d6 zdowngrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring.2 l& z" q9 r8 J" Y6 r8 X Infrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,000$ L) W$ v; J9 H" B! P Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic+ l; h- ]! P# R* u, f* v Radiation.)- c6 F) ^" z7 U' i# z Infrared (IR) ' c. Q, A* m4 O/ n" [, t8 n1 t6 T* qElectro-Optics/ R- v" j8 W1 ~* d0 o1 [" c Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength2 x: ]; O& H5 o) m spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.& D* y% b) W8 ?# {0 D MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I: j5 R/ q0 s7 O' T& S/ c7 ? 1395 K9 K/ U# q+ y Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted 5 T& D5 u0 L5 {5 i& Nor reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the - P8 S% n1 s' ielectromagnetic spectrum. . z5 A% K* s5 W$ ?( d- Z- UInfrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength 4 e8 v& ]! g5 `, u; qregion of 1 to 40 microns.5 L* e6 e9 W4 b Initial9 p6 T4 M6 a* t3 L6 t Operational , t/ F5 |" [2 _! I) Z) {' Z2 TCapability (IOC) + V f0 f* g P' nThe first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of* @! t4 o5 I0 \5 [ u8 h equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned1 ?; |* t. X8 G or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. - S. C5 i; D: }& hInitial' V5 W! `: y2 C$ U; v4 [ Operational Test- ~/ `: i) K* {+ Y) E! y" k3 u and Evaluation ; ^! L/ Y! b) C+ N- @(IOT&E)! {0 h# P/ i7 w, S All operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production3 m; C1 S$ ^1 ~ representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial. ^. h# b& @$ j6 X production. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system0 y' t% y$ H; c6 m$ i6 L4 D operational effectiveness and operational suitability. , V: ?; O1 a' W; F% |INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite). 0 M0 N7 h% v; B; _INS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code. & i1 J. X% A8 ]- dInSb Indium Antimonide. 2 v0 Y8 }% ~9 f# l$ }INSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.' Y8 i8 L' m0 k( v0 y# n INSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments. * g* u& `5 c/ IInteg Integrated.- U3 [- \0 V. ?( m4 b1 D7 ^! s Integrated9 Y7 N) a: o/ q- q) ~+ I Contracting 8 ]( X2 z( \( t4 y8 x' v( _& |Report (ICR) : ]( T6 f" \! u; @6 w; ^8 iA quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and / ^( C5 M+ [* p, _interfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a( q; W& |+ A# O+ i- O& _. f. R+ [ mechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as ( s6 R9 \; r% y% {; u; UIntegrated Contracting Plan or ICP).: E$ z' V, G% I6 m! w% d: w0 l Integrated Fire 5 Y, X( T2 N$ E1 Y! xControl System8 N' n" D" L! @9 @8 p A system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data 3 y- D, [8 `! Y* |% ~computation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted9 J0 a: @) } \- Z& Q% Y: k by electromechanical devices. 9 l7 A. q3 j6 |0 }; {6 z! S$ ~& BIntegrated" |$ U* e1 q7 w. O Logistics Support 1 v/ l2 H/ t; p4 d% ~(ILS) 4 B# ?5 e, i- h9 b. `+ j(1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and/ z- V6 O3 z/ K4 \ technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into ^: b- L7 P/ M) u# ^ system and equipment design; develop support requirements that are $ l3 h" X- z% D4 I" Z) Y8 O# trelated consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each 6 i! F( b3 S4 T/ x* F; u- oother; acquire the required support; and provide the required support " \% z/ ]; v' Mduring the operational phase at minimum cost.4 ?* D; w* d! W) X ?2 n" Q, B9 l (2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the- Q, b0 P. r& b& ?& I7 U effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an J- A1 L) i- |3 j7 {# D! y integral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation. 3 B9 B5 m# `& c) M, A: I% KIntegrated . g/ a+ G' d7 B4 `0 y! vLogistics Support & C9 U* h8 L, N+ K. X# L% O% [+ t(ILS) Elements2 G# c, M& o0 } Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish$ g0 K- _2 Y& n! y maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system. 5 U$ \4 a% [# o7 w6 l; q; C5 L6 MManpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and * G. {; Q" S+ c+ }8 Z8 [civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a Y. I7 k# f2 ] m* r! K+ \materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates. ) O8 {7 R7 M/ {, @4 @4 `Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to 1 @. o% m0 M0 z& r7 ~4 e8 k6 Tdetermine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and9 M! U8 C& z: E0 d- C dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well- U- U# X% ]' V" w1 H- Q# C as replenishment supplies support. & L7 q8 N' M. B7 y/ V, X! tMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 a) L& k2 W O6 I9 K# h+ V 1401 @1 _! J2 W# @0 ?) K/ v# X0 ? Support Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the : L* s9 i8 N3 q6 x- _operation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology% X4 Y9 `& S# ? and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It1 C1 _, v' A/ L3 i3 c includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment 4 K e2 O. d" ~3 C' Qitself.5 l$ L" G2 H9 k; [ Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as " ^+ \& ~4 k& m% p8 `1 Wmanuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs) R8 H) v+ J& t# Y/ n and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer 0 a3 V' `" ^5 \programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other , f+ w% a! g7 m! | | b1 Z, winformation related to contract administration. % p7 g3 j* o% GTraining and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training 4 f0 W- U" {1 G0 Pdevices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military9 x; R3 z. c8 f) A personnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual / x+ A4 ]' y- x+ r1 ? Eand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training;; s; K" L/ P% W( ~8 v1 Q, J and logistic support planning for training equipment and training device$ ~& T5 y+ K) ~4 r- @ acquisitions and installations. 7 H7 J$ M% P5 { Z" [9 J9 d4 ^Computer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software,1 R% I$ ?$ I% \* N" A. Q/ k0 F8 a documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support: L( P, a }- j embedded computer systems. & A z, R5 z! B) ]1 UFacilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets9 }9 T0 Q! k ^% A$ r required to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define 3 V( n+ j/ A+ T: C6 n" qtypes of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities,1 e5 a$ k( R7 r# @% a/ G, v environmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment.6 M- t/ K5 F6 w" R) f& H% b4 L: ^ Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes, ! P) w/ M: l# D/ Rprocedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system, 9 ]1 t! H% H# t: {1 i5 Eequipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and 3 |6 Q2 J2 o* A. X8 w! b% ]5 J, stransported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment5 i- Z/ N1 D. M6 F3 l preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability." T* w# W* o, ^4 a& a Design Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as& u. E: N v" S9 C; N3 j/ C reliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements. $ ]/ B' o6 I" T, r% i" m7 K( AThese logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms/ g' y8 A6 R, A- }. V) z* E rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness. ^8 d2 d& f1 m$ i% M l objectives and support costs of the materiel system.. x" i/ _" |# P5 D" A% B& A Integrated : N3 I3 W. | }! G9 q$ G0 HLogistics+ {. K' q$ F' n8 h, e- p' K) b- k Support Plan 3 f- B3 D9 A5 b# r(ILSP)1 A* x3 U/ @; N; P4 Y0 [ The formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the8 w0 _+ i! Q' ]7 K# ]1 S8 u, V program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed # y* p y, c9 v4 j; |ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with % |9 w( x( C) n* d) K) o* vnecessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and3 ^* ]7 r. h$ `5 W' @9 R production, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications4 l) X5 v. R e/ C4 | RFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs. 7 Z0 t. b' [( ~9 JIntegrated - f8 d* a3 G8 Q$ O0 ?% W( MPriority List : R1 Z: f& {! x1 ?$ v' n# U& l6 tA list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized0 p2 N* d( P4 {6 \) p across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs 1 u3 G+ y7 J$ h; y" d' Wthat, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the ! |; N- @! s" l& bcapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated2 p5 [5 @: V6 a7 k6 [: a0 c; a1 k priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for 8 w1 c5 |" A$ H3 d( A2 f6 C0 B" Pprogramming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System & I5 k7 m- K6 I* T7 lprocess. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated 9 [: D8 M; N( f% I: OProgram ' ^& O0 X, R4 t+ U# h7 ?9 r% j) FAssessment( |7 }% O7 K; ?* u" k% k (IPA) ; ?& X9 D9 h# y: }A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone 5 d7 W- ]+ E$ Z9 L) X; ndecision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an% m2 y! T ^1 o! h. H f independent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into ) T' r" {$ M$ ?& f8 t% @the next phase of the acquisition cycle.2 F: a6 x. |4 \! I# c! y MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I* m1 j& t% ?. p 141* T; T: K% S& W( A& C' \! z5 v% s Integrated 1 y! S; e0 f' c0 m5 R: ^8 wProgram( K* f$ i. x2 G+ U Summary (IPS) ) s/ Z/ F r6 k$ x0 z& _ {% ^A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision 1 z r/ c" f) Fauthority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights/ ?8 g0 |8 m4 D. \ the status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the; V- N. D7 n; h& b0 }" c8 N0 I acquisition cycle.$ k7 O) \, a5 \# G) `7 H Integrated) X% T- i R1 s) l7 }, T& j/ \+ I6 R Tactical Warning 5 ^- _5 b2 n' M! {4 J! q/ Iand Attack7 n+ d; N2 e8 T: Q1 ` Assessment' }/ B3 Q+ n1 y9 j- n (ITW/AA): Z- o3 p) i, [2 G& i7 Z ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and3 G5 ]' v! Y. m" d/ Y atmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack , O7 s2 J/ J8 H( b: hwarning information, strategic and tactical. n. U$ M! R9 o; K4 g$ o: m. k Integrated$ Q8 M. {+ K0 c Warfare. o; l( t, P5 b The conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing1 E9 I; k: f2 H' S forces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional 2 j. n1 f' D9 @3 x1 U6 R- d) S6 W& b+ zweapons. ! Z& h7 J+ Z/ h+ eIntegration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such * I' c- Z- e9 A" S5 Ia way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without5 Z- G# z- f' @' ^' L adversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM), l! L3 B: E/ }5 ` (2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a - w, a7 b" N/ ^" J, fsystem. 0 d0 R7 w E- H# g3 x! G7 Y0 dINTEL Intelligence.( E. Z' P7 P/ U6 l Intelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis, + r: R' s1 u8 O/ h! O+ f( Qintegration and interpretation of all available information concerning, D8 y! _$ `# P ~- O foreign countries or areas. . T3 Y# o! U6 }5 D' O8 t9 V(2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through% |; Q: p5 _1 }# ~4 D- [ observation, investigation, analysis, or understanding.3 y4 z" b7 p2 P2 Y% P Intelligence) Q( R4 h( V4 N Indicators3 W4 F& T2 I T; Z: b7 ` Classified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that,( u" Q0 f% a; y6 W, | when properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and # F% P+ `9 j7 gintentions.) A' D4 F% l' d8 m Intelligence) |9 }: |: e, j4 \! T' x: J Operations 7 C9 X* Z( y1 M' F" ~Center (IOC)/ U+ x3 v5 C! h+ ] An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB.5 C [7 y n" i1 l The IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational % t- B2 Z P* s; q6 Z5 lIntelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) , j9 E% ]/ e8 @Cheyenne Mountain Node (JCN). 5 l0 T7 _7 h9 Z2 ?5 i7 hIntelligence 0 V0 j0 g, D3 M* ^! P7 sPreparation of ) i0 ~+ y% b% F ^/ e& e# u5 Nthe Battlespace * ?& \1 T6 r% a1 r3 ^An analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the ) O% \1 A9 w Q0 P7 ~7 \enemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence( g, M4 ?! T8 M8 t( l1 O preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential2 R5 h! _: _) ^( y7 ? area in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed; F9 R9 F# z5 L3 Y in detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on $ z' U/ ?+ y9 u. E5 toperations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle9 X2 p7 A6 o+ c0 R" H, l! d space is a continuing process. Also called IPB.9 y( r5 V; L8 j, b) @9 P2 S3 Z; m2 d Intelligence/ s% N3 G9 [) r8 P: U$ f Report (INTREP); G9 q& q5 o0 T' O! n A specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of! c' @( K' p0 k* D4 K9 ] command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in4 k: ~, p- \, n" F3 b3 e N keeping with the timeliness of the information. * Y3 ^& Z6 x6 e3 w2 J+ e" xIntelligence) m# R# Z6 J" ?, t" ?9 b Threat / U+ `4 f l2 R' T7 \: Z2 HAn identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and 2 Q' Q& [* J' t( d6 @7 ~. R, L; _exploit information from a given or similar operation. 7 y! u6 o5 D8 S9 o+ S3 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I8 W% Z8 Y3 J) z+ W. B" ^ 142( g( G) M6 y$ E6 ] Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit- H8 N2 V' x( v: G area, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal / u! K. V" q% Gradiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second% v9 w* r, S/ Q7 W falling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation,! Z) h, r. E5 Y$ f! b( W2 R' ~ ~ the term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or 0 |& [. b S# x+ w M. jdose) rate at a given location. & @4 c) I" r$ uInteractive ' x+ i3 `5 e' R* sResponses6 b) ~0 c* w0 T( ^( h3 J Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification. : q0 g' F! ~* J( iInterceptor 1 _( T& Z& U3 T, O0 e9 V* c( f1 sCluster 7 O1 q( E- ]) QA group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor. * @4 ]' Z0 I$ vInterceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and+ W% L. M3 U1 q2 o( D3 x velocity in three dimensions.6 ?) c- N- U$ F$ P( T# R& F0 | Interceptor Track3 F4 A/ D6 g3 e$ P; d Range (Max)5 V* w% Y2 R. Q4 H9 x+ L( ^ The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function& H8 K- F y- c on a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit 8 k( Z6 i7 X, W5 W2 ~3 Ky8 i& p) b# m7 @0 {4 l# [ A condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and; l$ i% t: L; H* d8 F! { Z9 z physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and+ h. P- R: M5 D2 Z: P2 | are capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items - X7 s- [; O' Z) N" e; z6 a- b$ Tthemselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for; Z" `. r$ }; w- [ fit and performance. 0 F9 j& Z# n8 T; i0 F9 tInterconnection The linking together of interoperable systems. `9 y: {6 T/ v* F4 A( Y0 s2 _ Intercontinental* Z u+ T' P8 O, d; A; y Ballistic Missile+ k( j/ [# ?9 T }2 {3 h (ICBM) % ~# Y( N' V, t( L; {A ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The , }* ^8 L3 M8 ~% J; v* iterm ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from 4 e) [5 N& `" N8 A3 z+ a; Ysubmarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.)$ G: k1 J3 G: R- d4 Q Interface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection # T3 S4 H. v# | dcharacteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged- |4 w/ Q! D3 O# f; k, [# x( [ signals. # u& S, N% V0 r0 n2 l(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two - N& V$ ?6 A" M& @2 O0 H- C+ G6 I8 _! e. csystems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register. ' ?; `8 Z# |6 f7 B(3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. * M7 s7 r8 H$ |5 {4 _(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between l0 r& M4 @: W. b2 g0 O systems, or between persons and systems.3 d# V8 ^" m. l/ s5 S+ {) _ Interface Control , H \7 o& @+ t1 g. c! R( k6 tDocument (ICD) ! E% _$ | N5 i0 p; N N7 S1 s+ B(1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must8 Y1 l" F& j1 s9 W; C9 c \ exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer- c/ Z( ]7 S+ ]0 o* r5 ? software products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an; v# l5 T1 C, V4 Z7 w7 T Interface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD). 5 Q* q$ {: `2 N6 X( G; `(MDA Lexicon) * j1 ?+ J+ L: u(2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control8 S+ { X$ b7 E2 C agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements.0 P T" K; n* ?+ ^* F The ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification. * K: }5 x7 s. G+ S4 e! b$ n8 rInterface " V8 |# N4 V. }0 N" h7 ^8 @% F" k0 f5 kRequirements5 y( R( [5 P" l2 W0 y3 {% t1 e5 w Document (IRD)) F" L* w X+ @; s: F; P9 @; a A document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system8 d* K5 s0 |+ z component.5 w* h H; D( r% b0 a6 Z% l MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 6 Y6 q, ~: S& b' {0 q6 A# \143 " H7 F8 z2 o3 F& J/ {Interference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to + Y3 v, s2 p* C( D1 t0 s, V0 z( w- hform a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum ) M0 S' J; v3 q/ Z, uof the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point. 7 e$ c% z# H8 j. DIntermediate& Z& N( V+ n( x( \+ U Range Ballistic + L( q4 E8 j! l! BMissile (IRBM)- E. M. x' h& b A ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles. 4 N0 w' n# P$ T1 aInternational+ |) s+ j9 }( A! Y0 v: h3 M" R Agreement ) V& }; |8 a9 A+ yGenerator (IAG) 0 F6 [1 x& N! ^! r! X- Y9 {3 {1 O2 ]! tSoftware system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD / [$ q2 O. e+ r$ Uinternational Agreements./ i( b( P( L2 I; j4 n International3 w) j! i, @( l, I Cooperative( A4 f4 x( P0 d; U& l: J Logistics $ t+ k4 r8 A; s( x7 ] L+ b) GCooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination; M5 y, h, i9 e C4 i. L of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply 2 W1 q( s0 w5 o) Band exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and( |3 R1 A0 {& [0 D b+ X6 F multilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions.7 n) I) p7 j; ?; A! q6 L6 ? International ( e) {! _0 q. M* J8 T- Y0 LLogistics5 Y+ N3 x0 b. t2 r# i The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics) i) y% c8 w, E6 k1 T arrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing- h8 L5 Z3 l/ U* K( o. k logistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign# c8 e6 v2 ~" `9 } governments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without* D4 r) S& }* C% K. G, J reimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing 4 ^& d* r- F! W/ F; n0 y8 V9 G6 vof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or 7 |0 R8 B. Z6 a. Xprocedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,, T& d: A7 x2 G: O n* o+ |$ b international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. ( o2 H. H; M1 L! z! q9 wIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States! e7 n A/ x( f# j logistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or2 E* p$ Z. I6 X more foreign governments, international organizations, or forces.5 k: A0 C @% S0 f International* y; e# {- ^& w6 f2 H Logistic Support4 S4 Q5 d4 l$ _. N+ M# r7 R( Z The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or# o4 w8 o; d/ s* w8 T# y more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.0 N% l; T1 w( L+ k8 N5 b) x3 O Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services 0 A% A% A- v1 P3 A4 X5 zfrom other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to - o/ M' w4 }# [ B- U" uoperate effectively together. ! G+ g& x1 r* \( @0 m% pINTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization.- n0 w3 d& B1 K/ }' V INTLCT Integrated Electronics.1 m8 c- `5 P( w- v/ n7 J Intruder( x1 T) h; f. _. T! N( s Operation ( p6 ^% |: a3 b XAn offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary' A# I/ t; |5 _! B object of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases.8 l4 q) L. ^3 w: @# c/ i, t INU Inertial Navigation Unit. . r5 w" K) C. D1 l' GInventory Control ( B3 L2 v/ [; [5 z% Y1 b) JPoint 1 C9 C! t7 p- q1 FAn organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the 0 w1 Z6 j% D- E% X5 \; c. iprimary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a$ W8 i5 w0 y! r% S% J: U0 h particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management* F7 `; `* [" V2 @. I includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, 3 s9 t" ^! x2 D( @distribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction.1 n |0 b. y, l: ~% Z9 S Inverse Square # `0 d% R0 t, z: ~' iLaw . G2 X) U1 |, c3 P5 ~" L& U! ^# IThe law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a f9 E& c# Z' q" i# x& e/ p+ @) x point source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the+ L/ b+ M7 h x& O source, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that0 `$ t/ H" U. t+ ]3 M! [ distance. * f7 Q3 ^& B% F( l1 UMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I: F$ d k3 y7 Z1 o7 S2 d$ a 144 , U2 v8 S' t7 Y: OInverse Synthetic7 W5 E% M# P, f Aperture Radar) e2 q; l. b7 c. ]1 C (ISAR) ' t$ i7 [# ^$ M; n1 ]* K& _/ ?3 ]A type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from: O9 { x% h' l; P- x; H# i the motion of targets to provide high resolution. ' [3 s5 R) I- H# RIO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic.- |8 R/ B+ r) O, q- ] IOC (1) Initial Operational Capability.; N+ u5 t! m/ A" G8 q (2) Intelligence Operations Center. 2 d; ~6 R1 u# n: O0 i(3) Integrated Optics Chip.3 `4 g7 g u9 a2 T% M IOM Inert Operational Missile. 7 s* o+ J9 O# e" {4 M V3 A# V4 ]- SIONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US). * h0 ~) I( q3 t! o7 IIonization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition 5 ^" F0 k3 B$ F5 hof electrons to atoms or molecules. * R9 I. v$ B) p) L' tIonizing" K5 g$ L: U& n% @3 F6 u- T Radiation * Z. N- f! R' {& X4 jElectromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or : K# e a- J1 kparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of & ^8 k& v+ c$ Y- a4 bproducing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its 5 O5 _7 k; B6 i' ?$ q( A- zpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.)4 l! r, N: k8 h( t5 Z5 P" V \8 M Ionosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers c# v( g- O4 J) G1 c. g altitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect ) h; y/ L# }% v/ l& e& ~; ielectromagnetic waves.' U, w" w: ^+ H6 a! m# D IOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff. & S9 l% }4 J. f p& f, }0 o0 pIOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation. 9 e/ C/ K% w& l, U kIOU Input/Output Unit. $ A6 X; |1 S8 F! }IP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol. ; L F& c2 f! T4 Z6 ~(5) Interconnect Protocol. " Z5 I, E" C: L( [( X. u, N2 P" ]8 vIPA Integrated Program Assessment., B/ U5 l0 ^: w1 b6 ^! n1 f IPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace. 6 l1 ^, v& l; c( GIPC Information Policy Committee. ( X; x7 X3 d( @, V& Y; m) S+ iIPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. " q' I+ ?8 P4 p+ EIPE Industrial Plant Equipment.+ W: L I' H( ~( {/ J IPL Integrated Priority List.$ h! N4 O Q0 w) k4 `' X' l IPM Integration Program Manager. , y1 }! T. |' k7 [IPMI Integration Program Management Initiative. y8 b. T7 w3 R6 C# d# S IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program.4 }6 p# h; A1 d3 x! @) {1 q IPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.! x) i7 r0 f1 x3 V1 \; ] IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review). + z8 L$ O. {1 M! d8 R s. o5 Q WMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I" c( O& T S' ?+ ]! x( e1 L0 K' _+ t 1456 w$ P5 H, @7 r: ~! Q IPRR Initial Production Readiness Review." R4 N8 C1 P J1 z IPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. 7 H+ i: K/ ?+ gIPS Integrated Program Summary. 0 c. _5 v$ N; J; qIPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit. 6 L* G) O" w1 d' j* PIPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated - k; N* I, u y0 O( M7 gPlanning Team., V$ a' ]: K- f! D2 k g IQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term).6 D, T) I9 g- X) {0 j+ D IR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4)& p9 C8 o- U4 u( O2 P' | Information Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope+ o& N7 W% R4 p/ L: c' u( T9 h" W Radar. 8 A4 f+ y" W3 O1 DIR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength ' y2 Z: w1 T8 A& O( Uspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. 2 J" [( f- e* H7 K8 _9 p4 zIR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).: ?$ @$ Q% [! ]1 | IR/Vies Infrared Visual.5 I4 |) u& I% ]% g IRA Industrial Resource Analysis. : l2 V; V' y1 ]$ `2 ?IRAD Independent Research and Development. - i# n3 b* J1 QIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite.2 `. ]% `+ k0 x+ V1 m IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile.% T/ O* D) T) o' q$ b6 c! v6 @ IRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. - h! j8 Y! y2 j0 uIRCM Infrared Countermeasures. 1 n- U/ I% Z4 {IRD Interface Requirements Document.: e7 t7 u! D9 G+ A1 c) U IRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term). * f! X! m; ]5 W/ TIRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array.$ |, s" }) V& ]$ K+ k2 ] IRG Independent Review Group.: P E4 ]3 w4 b6 I IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center. ' u/ x2 E2 M, B! mIRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group./ l* r& v" W, @. L6 d2 ` IRINT Infrared Intelligence.2 Y0 F4 r4 ~" y! U: S IRIS Infrared Instrumentation System.$ y1 t- k% R# M$ Q7 H* O IRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). ) Z+ H9 z/ z( w6 o9 O D9 dIRM Information Resources Management. & W2 S% B' v5 o8 ^% B+ T7 RIRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I , ]% E6 R, s* n4 V/ [1465 g% m; k/ k5 S1 i9 t( o IRMC Information Resource Management College.) a |1 T3 g; O: A; B! Z IRR Internal Requirements Review.) T: U1 X8 ~5 K+ u M8 Y/ r IRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System.& a" U4 v2 e% B0 Y! T IRRS Information Resources Requirements Study. ' R% v/ \1 E% \/ s+ `IRS Interface Requirements Review. [. }& v* Z$ C% Y( T IRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). : h0 G% Y _- I0 C0 R' b- EIRST Infrared Search and Track. 4 C. B5 x* ~" a. J5 W% m3 {8 C; vIRTF Internet Research Task Force.9 Z/ V# H9 K/ W+ s4 T ?/ Z! ^ IS Information System. ! S: U( v; o2 |$ r7 F; @* eIS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. 6 t) n9 x" u3 K+ g* M: K# |(2) Innovative Science and Technology. ! s5 J% @# S# ^4 i7 L(3) Integrated Science & Technology. ) F& P, a5 d5 H& wISA Inter-service Agreement. ; V. D5 |. X# m$ A+ G, R3 FIS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. . \4 C; c6 v# A- L0 D+ ?4 [(2) Innovative Science and Technology. ' N, T! W0 y% R( A6 }& ~ISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar.7 O) L9 A9 v Z1 L9 W, g ISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). * L/ S7 j9 _" i$ }) ^ISC (1) Information Systems Command.1 |& i# O- c& |5 i0 J7 M (2) Irvine Sensors Corporation. % M+ H: T/ G/ n9 v! U! `8 a; A' GISDN Integrated Services Digital Network.1 I1 w+ S% d+ d ISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment. ( p. o( P Q7 cISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration.6 b1 g0 @' v. N$ i1 Y ISG Industry Support Group. 5 _( K3 I( v4 m9 O! X/ c& _5 M" _, kISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model.- V8 Y9 |9 G2 b4 T: V5 p# x$ B ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group.6 x6 A* q& ~/ I8 G# m) t9 a" O ISMO Information Security Management Office. & C1 P( O7 r1 g5 C. _. eISO International Standards Organization.1 o2 \' p [3 } ISOO Information Security Oversight Office./ M Q. C v) m( S" v; C' i* L Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with ; A% A; l! @- R* o& m0 cequal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional).& L8 Q% u U" b MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I7 K2 p& B0 Y. \- @' ~# f1 I 1474 E2 k7 S8 }9 X4 O2 b; v) S Isotropic f4 c7 H6 c5 I Nuclear Weapon) ~& H9 [# ~% t" P1 S- @, ` A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with+ m L+ W9 l6 n" I3 N approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to 5 n! I8 g; q; A5 x$ `4 @6 y* mdistinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons.) n, _; @3 J$ a# ]9 O/ n; A; r ISP Integrated Support Plan. 3 d; Q& Q' q) |2 M9 qISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. 4 i* @6 k. Q3 q" L" S zISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System.. X" M7 Q4 y7 T0 z+ F ISSA Information System Security Association. 0 O: _) u3 g, `$ I! U3 C; G, ]$ EISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency.5 U! N' o' C3 R r! c ISSC Information Systems Security Committee.% M" [3 U* j7 m8 g ISSM Information System Security Manager.6 b' G" ?& h M9 l- A6 |/ P! O ISSO Information System Security Officer. ( t' V$ s+ ~) x0 S6 k4 H7 sISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications. v+ w* \) A6 f/ u Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and5 w* z1 y- N0 Z# @1 M- Y extends into July.* |; k5 {) F9 _" s8 ` Issue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM. & P" ~% v. y. c' Z- K3 C" zIST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test.- s3 O( C: ~- a( S ISTC Integrated System Test Capability.1 z- R x& R8 N- H3 |3 V$ v! {% K% { ISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. 2 i4 t6 C0 T0 ]ISTF Installed System Test Facility. : H0 z6 t9 d9 AISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle.- u: k; H( Q4 e2 w1 ]: X$ v ISWG Integration Support Working Group.2 q0 f% d6 {: v* ?1 p) Q* u, r- i* L IT Information Technology. / t# M3 s: R! y+ W% b7 d5 jITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center. # h7 J' b; Y! [" A& m5 ?4 _* V: j( T) GITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations. 3 c+ E% z/ H8 C/ lITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed.( T7 X9 Q- z& N D6 W ITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations.5 q$ @/ V8 K/ _7 V5 W: k ITD Integration Technology Demonstration.! o( L+ M, r* N$ f) h3 M: `( C ITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan.( }0 k: c6 N/ B9 b. O1 U0 _* K (2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan." C; y. _6 K, Z F! K Item Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such$ B# n% B4 z, x3 i organization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items5 a$ D- @% j: p5 I of materiel.. ]7 x! x* a8 H Q- w8 u" y4 j3 b, z6 C MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I0 Z" t, J# ?3 J4 N 148; E, N! ]- ]( l ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. / R9 t+ g0 ~) x3 E% R1 J. VITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch, q7 o% }! U4 |3 z& t+ Y ITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council. 2 @& G* ?' j% s; _ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team., }( {0 Z+ v! H" r ITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term).6 A9 r/ j$ {7 f D, Z0 S ITP Integrated Test Plan.# ~: q# g% @) G" ^+ U1 @" f ITPB Information Technology Policy Board. * l! }6 O( M2 X7 X* L9 IITR Information Technology Resources.; C5 i9 Z; p& r! @4 l. x4 D ITS Information Technology Service. - @; M0 s% k! f- U! G1 } ?: a$ eITSD Information Technology Services Directorate.' \+ b1 F" ]6 K& @ V+ {% F; I ITT ITT Corporation.9 w6 ~5 X* ~ s1 X7 y ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle # z( H% w# W# i0 ]6 c2 oITW Integrated Tactical Warning. 9 [6 k* {2 u( ?. ~! fITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment. / q! x* D. u9 h2 }: b1 _5 F* U! ?$ kIUI Integrated User Interface.3 n" {7 d. S# [% D IV Interceptor Vehicle. - V& k" z3 Q) {IV&V Independent Verification and Validation.$ \8 x/ d/ j9 `9 M& y IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System. - {# P, j/ ?- V- g/ I4 rIVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).6 s4 l- o; L$ B1 t4 K" v6 p IW Information Warfare. 6 w8 ?* ~, s4 `1 DIWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration. ) ]$ c5 G' h5 p& }' O2 GIWEB Information Warfare Executive Board.+ k% x) `( `, @! y IWG Interagency Working Group. ' i# j; |& |: `; u( S3 O0 W( _IWS Indications and Warning System.$ R9 h" a7 H, P: J8 `" U$ N IWSM Integrated weapons system management.3 a: g2 s( t. F1 T5 E2 ]$ h IXS Information Exchange System.( g) l0 P6 P& d$ R MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J- R) i, O7 R) f5 Y; ~9 K1 X 149' F/ u+ t* W6 J4 U% _ V- M) v J&A Justification and Approval. # j" |) {8 {) ?5 g# @1 vJ-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. 0 i( B4 M1 @4 w1 w& X& i$ QJAAT Joint Air Attack Team.4 `6 l$ I. N& r& q% A JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. 2 t, I6 T1 F- w* r( mJAE Joint Acquisition Executive.) v) k# b+ k6 }9 a$ s3 A/ n JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).: _& H6 O8 M8 @& U1 D e9 c9 Q JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term). ( X% X! C) m1 X* FJammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the" [( H! @$ G" P" X- z same frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals + ~' U/ G2 q+ r4 l0 J8 wreflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming: r) J" G. E7 R( [3 G/ L generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude,, b* G, H: A0 ?4 P: \% Q and with increasing radar power.; s; x7 z6 H: V& n4 S2 N2 }& p JAO Joint Area of Operations. ; E3 i: D& U% s2 LJAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). 2 Y# ]& T( E! L/ N- y1 XJASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term). - q8 O& h: ] |7 c7 k9 HJAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program).. [/ P: D/ h9 q5 m) D JBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term). ! P! j. `9 ^1 C7 U/ cJCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US).3 v# p% ^; p. _+ y4 X8 P JCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions. ( \7 T6 u5 @3 s: v s" L ^JCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US. 5 c- E) I! J" M, T' P! a! Z) `JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. * S) D& M. |6 _+ K( F$ {; {JCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network. ( i' X( f2 ^6 n4 L+ ~! f: K8 @JDA Japan Defense Agency. 0 N+ ~3 J8 ]' S# _# e) a/ r. x/ DJDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon). ; u4 `$ u3 b) { X4 _5 U/ sJDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community. ( ?0 ?7 `" H( U- q% p( ~2 I2 JJDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System.7 r: [6 |$ x" N4 j1 U: P JDN Joint Data Net.. P3 Q" K4 S8 o/ k JEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA).2 K) q0 u* i3 A! `6 j JEC Joint Economic Committee (US). : |5 g- T; }: x4 r; {JEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. 4 p* V! i3 q1 [( K$ B- E& s* LMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J & n% z! v3 J8 i0 S150 * x! t* N4 Z1 }# y* H) YJEM Joint Exercise Manual. 0 ]2 w) `' k7 c) V) Z! NJETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis., X% ?7 ?2 _% B6 }) V/ K$ H9 { JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center.% x9 c- |3 q4 C$ _9 j2 J5 D+ h JEZ Joint Engagement Zone.$ \6 Z; w% ?8 C9 p. R JFCC Joint Forces Command Center. X3 @0 \& A7 V& l. _2 cJFET Junction Field Effect Transistor.* `: K% m' p: _7 u" { JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).& U; }8 k; A' P i/ g4 G JFLC Joint Force Land Component.0 G4 f1 j- j! T# I# A9 J9 S JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component. 2 [* S: e0 Z& ^& x# PJFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA. $ U* I# b8 A. dJFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component.( n# G n7 Z6 x3 X) z JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention.& ]& O4 b9 k" K& H9 w9 _ JHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD , T+ J& n3 }2 v& s& {4 VJHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD.' s# ^ H7 f7 h3 V JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.7 q0 v* S* N" `( j/ r h3 ~ JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). & d3 U8 z( j7 T5 @8 }$ `JIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. + w% g8 ^$ Y6 z3 J% U+ {JINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems. 1 Z" @" |: y& \7 {4 |JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures. $ j( M" s: |3 W& I/ e: G+ _ qJIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms. 5 t: S6 P$ o! y, o: K+ W+ sJIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). ' J; x( P# x; L3 e5 K, YJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. ' x; `' [; T! b; c2 @) }' XJLC Joint Logistics Commanders. 7 E6 \- \8 l% e& Y" [JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. e2 H' Z4 l: \( l JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. , @8 a$ K/ [- Z' B9 ]; MJMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. d" T( g% X- [' a: v: V" RJMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. * W: v) T8 |3 n; A- w/ vJMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. 0 G- b6 R1 u/ C9 k6 e- M- J4 ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J / w6 p7 ~& K3 b8 L! C151 $ s7 Q, k7 G1 @& W* LJMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information . G, y' N: f5 o9 a7 tTechnology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded9 f0 H$ W: J+ N) ^) A7 B by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major ' u$ E/ l$ }. i8 C$ l Ecomponent of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN),8 G c, a5 c' n& [ operated by the JNTF. + m: t- o( p* l1 x3 HJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual. / c- e% A/ K/ p8 b% ^( w' {JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement.' R' M8 i3 _, T1 o! w( F$ i* B JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement.0 c% K3 ^7 w5 R- g" U( D: _( B JMO Joint Maritime Operations.# b: U. t& N( n JMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start.3 q4 s1 ~' ?4 _) w- O( e9 A JMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. 5 ^: J0 E: _4 Y! L2 Y8 K(2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group. - [3 M- z o: B' w* @JNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service.. Q8 ^- }1 P. Z5 O5 f) [) x1 K+ q( _ JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System.4 M! ~# o' i5 S$ E R" |/ { JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. 6 p1 Z$ i" b* c& g) T5 Z4 [' o; AJNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. * A. f M: Z# |JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. L9 C; \! }9 C8 dJNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access. 2 Y0 ]% ~8 V4 xJOB Joint Operations Board.- R$ U$ ^. F# i JOC Joint Oversight Council.$ S" X9 y* ?' Q& e5 M. X$ n+ t JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. 2 q0 G. A0 j7 Y0 Y; i6 P: FJoint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one / @6 t" @0 c7 l9 Q3 AService of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the 8 Z S2 [- M# E: f, q% Pparticipating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy).' J, N7 a+ m7 e. Y3 j. Z& ]6 g/ D0 y2 k Joint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more $ a8 O& c! X3 w4 A+ lServices in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be . u5 R& z7 f# k5 N- |% ipromulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the ; Y, _9 ^5 ^/ X% s$ A2 w7 ecombatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint' g I1 H, X2 i* ]* P$ M( T Chiefs of Staff. $ T+ z2 G- Z" ^$ @" Y# Y5 dJoint Doctrine 8 k$ l4 X7 n, e2 pWorking Party, m6 m H* f1 @$ O0 u" r7 O A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands; t4 J+ u* X" k8 `7 h with the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics,0 C7 P1 x( f( v8 S) A0 K1 m" b techniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ^$ ^2 \8 {. V: U7 v8 }& Z6 P& s project scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation. 6 Y6 L9 R, v* j4 {The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, 2 a: f5 L0 k- {+ l7 Q% r& i- V# ?6 tOperations Plans and Interoperability. ; B6 u' h2 l c, X' w2 }Joint Electronic' ~5 C6 x7 a$ a9 b2 u& y6 Z. W Warfare Center2 v+ ]; q$ j& H$ w1 R (JEWC)3 n5 u7 I& d, c5 X4 c Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for & P8 m% S1 g& [; Z: ginvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground/ Q9 y u1 x9 Q systems.0 |, K( _8 J2 \& f. j% G MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J$ C9 r. S7 f( j" R3 Z5 r7 h4 A& P 152 8 r/ i' f3 u7 ?; _* g' ?5 p/ H' HJoint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or/ @9 p% ` t# s attached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or/ i8 F& F" I9 b6 J/ O more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to! I& [! Z# ~6 z& L exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander.0 o1 q, P+ A( j3 l5 F9 i Joint Force Air- g: V2 a3 i1 y/ C Component. ]4 c1 p1 t2 y3 U# [, H Commander' Y# K' i8 B! ?! T2 _ (JFACC)8 W7 f, d+ _ ?+ w* Z. _( U* A The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or F; v! W/ V, k5 s0 L$ _9 V joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making ; J. {' K! I: o* h+ H4 |% Mrecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and# {4 T+ D, j- L* G% e7 h8 ^ coordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may) M& b1 R9 P, i4 P3 q E be assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority5 a, a# w5 t6 v) r! D5 j necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing $ p: C" G) D! Scommander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the& |4 g/ P2 u6 c preponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities.) a. U% |$ M+ `/ x5 ` Joint Force& E1 e. V. ^# g Commander7 p6 V7 w8 u6 K, ?0 f# t. A (JFC) " ~" j7 U0 |" C* B! c# n2 G. `% pA general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant 4 d$ t2 P% C% Ycommand (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also : W9 c8 ^+ J6 f @called JFC.( n5 z; T$ R' i! s Joint Force Land / W; V. B& g& wComponent 0 u9 o8 V) M, X9 WCommander 5 N; G% v% e+ O2 E6 ?, A(JFLCC)- q Y7 M s0 U7 j The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or " J1 ^( h7 E. }( [5 z. G: rjoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making & S# n* F7 u2 L: N8 n) Brecommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and. _ ~) R* q% [/ a7 ?3 ?: k coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may $ j% J. ]: |0 E7 ^4 m5 d6 C+ C! rbe assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority $ }( ]6 J5 k' d4 d8 K! d* snecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing ' K) v+ l$ z, N% |5 C6 W7 n% ]commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the : S; P$ ?$ C( U2 y( @ \9 ^) Xpreponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control * P# Q& o/ q" M* Xcapabilities. 3 _$ ~. `6 v8 J% }: G$ YJoint Force ) v- }* Q F0 A* SSpecial' s' S* G- M1 g0 M8 I Operations & q# }) T, r, p: h5 bComponent ! c! g' P. `3 O4 e5 W- _Commander0 T/ P6 G) f3 R+ B: \ (JFSOCC)/ N2 Y0 G& R+ U! X The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or / a6 q" I8 Y( ^, `/ O0 N pjoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making 1 H( t9 |5 |0 b& Lrecommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and1 C- A& C2 P) z- G assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such ) Z8 Y! L% _& P4 V% koperational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority" R; P7 a9 g0 B6 I* B& p necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing' f q j- ?% I4 d# D commander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the ] n4 ]7 z. d. Q- ^preponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and/ p3 x( T* X: X1 h; \ control capabilities.% ?4 J- m" `* j7 l) ~3 b9 w$ u Joint National- p( n: A9 n% d1 u' X, l/ }6 q; l5 j Test Facility 3 w9 `/ e* `) o4 G, ^0 r4 V% k$ k Z(JNTF) ! e; x- o) c2 l& @* a2 n B" {A large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado2 D: v( o8 W* O* o which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the1 g# `$ t# h% R& n+ v NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF) # y# k, D( c% bJoint Operational 5 f$ S- c+ V* P" G5 uPlanning and4 d' H+ F: K) Z; J Execution " K3 ?: c3 ]4 J, C- S/ TSystem (JOPES)8 |$ H" C* r% C( a$ n A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration2 H, e8 `5 {, J7 Z8 t and enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation3 D9 G5 ^: n |8 ^: ^. _; R Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for; v: r" }! P0 N, x' `9 }5 u conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders 6 d1 D! m' v6 P! w5 Tand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct) \( U* k3 N" Z- i* m; Z of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning3 b/ e2 u3 r; u0 s9 R5 x: W1 y* v- J policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and 3 i3 |( x! K/ i b+ `6 r: |automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and* h! Z0 [% m) ?8 \+ C7 [ execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities$ d9 m0 V* H+ T/ ^; l2 c associated with joint operations.: v, t d8 U* i z; \# Z, u MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J5 z- M0 t4 z2 W* ^/ ~0 _ 153% k, c# m1 c% J& g Joint Operating / L$ y' S$ k- ~2 h: OProcedures& u9 Q# ]3 ]+ B( Q) d (JOPs) $ Z* s4 N, q: bThese documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions , g( \6 s2 m" X p1 r/ R0 a; E# Q6 o4 lnecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs: U$ I$ |" B l may include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability,2 i7 W8 ]" ?! }* b+ } Vulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting, 4 q* i% g1 ?% Y3 Z# MFinancial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement 8 c2 f8 r: ~- r1 q1 [9 ^. F. ~and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program $ l/ h$ ?* Y: N9 }9 ?# aManger and the participating Services.8 ^ d! b( |' F0 B( Q. c! l2 I; l Joint Operations ! c4 c: y( p# F. p$ t" AArea ' B o* I: [# f- L. P5 yThat area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military t/ _& E4 {& I3 N operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to$ r" M# B, e5 ~) b- B6 U4 E/ k# S such military operations. Also called JOA.8 ^+ u! H) U5 a* q! Z Joint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program ! M; \2 H4 \6 O9 athat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component 1 K! P+ y" K3 L5 k/ V4 ^# W8 E, x4 R. iduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle.( Q1 w1 q/ V0 f6 L Joint - u1 B [. U6 N* w2 @9 q6 FRequirements; G$ s4 z+ K3 U7 E; Q: V3 ^- X2 u Oversight9 n! {9 Q4 N. e& G2 d& j Council (JROC)- }; c( d8 o* L( Y! ~4 Q6 g2 e- s A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts' ?* B! W5 Z& Z. ?2 {! h/ w# O6 q/ h8 L requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops/ o, ^- U% K" ?7 U recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates7 ~6 v U0 F. P f0 ^6 ^- M2 i performance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition - f: N7 `1 \: P, X; \ T' iBoard. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air, Z! [7 n F+ h, ?: [ Force, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. ' Y, X1 o5 [/ u' v* pJoint SPACECOM " ^; F* j/ K$ X w9 S1 E4 UIntelligence( _2 z' m c8 T: T- \; d3 _ Center (JSIC) 3 C! ?+ |4 n/ f; ?+ @A USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational5 b* T0 Z6 }: \! j1 w intelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for $ F( L/ v1 k- z* qthe DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production# O. z6 K" f( a t8 B+ o! u includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and 8 O4 T' h% v* u5 v1 k$ bSatellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB. 5 y3 A, r1 Y8 [2 ?0 c" ^Joint Strategic; f# f) c0 B! E+ ^+ A9 i Z( \, R8 F Defense Planning3 @2 \+ B6 ^6 Y4 t* [ Staff (JOSDEPS)3 i0 K) r6 i1 u1 ^2 C M A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for ; q0 z2 `* }2 f N- aintegrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive - ^/ d. o& ~5 l. nand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint 8 x8 V ]( S! I. N1 I3 RStrategic Defense Planning Staff. 5 l) L6 M+ |, y5 l. N7 S8 x, i- mJoint Strategic ( g; m3 c- @! U6 e% jTarget Planning8 ?# i( j, S. i' V$ e, r$ [4 r Staff (JSTPS) - h: l M! a" p( T/ YA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing, 0 @8 h9 x, p1 ocoordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). " `# K5 s2 D9 ~; m2 |+ H0 FAlso responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The # \% ]9 d2 r, o0 ~& ICommander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target 7 g4 D; O/ E- g# p# |/ ~* xPlanning Staff./ V; F4 M4 l& _" S, j. D3 X5 y Joint 4 s; ?( l" U' C$ Z$ bSuppression of 6 {( m6 E# s) i2 d$ L' J* AEnemy Air & z! D+ m K; I% g7 |# ~ ODefense9 d' R% a; A! K, h9 m A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities- N) S0 G) i2 O2 e1 D provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called2 p! H, L' s, @ J-SNEAD. 4 G2 T; r, r. ^/ YJoint Tactical 5 E# a$ i I, N ZInformation. V9 l+ n5 K# S Distribution . G% E: W, h1 U4 A4 h h- E' q+ ^( OSystem (JTIDS): m) o( D/ J. _" k g A joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the ' ]1 S* n( W# k5 T" g( V. H0 F# iinterchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels,1 E8 w% M8 @# [) L* c: K and mobile or fixed-base land stations.2 r0 D0 B8 C$ B+ R) E Joint Tactics,$ p$ W1 O) m* }% U4 n. | Techniques, and # X- I5 z. o! p% m# L4 d1 ^$ F- hProcedures 3 {. Q9 E4 i0 }2 y1 j/ o' _(JTTP)! u- [5 u. K8 ?! L7 m, Y/ x! a The actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how3 ^7 d6 W1 L C. X forces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, 4 p9 Y" Z# Q7 f$ npromulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and L* ?9 _# [" A0 ?& |; T; z# O# n6 h Joint Staff. Also called JTTP. % j7 t& _2 e( E6 l4 GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J6 L, G+ X6 B" t 154! x: y$ H( H+ b: ? Joint Test and2 o5 Y; R+ I+ L' J7 |& v2 g Evaluation % k) a, r2 v/ e9 I" K& m) }9 \+ a- xT&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be 7 W5 z0 K+ s' ?4 d. z4 yacquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have! H: m' o5 K8 P. H F& Q interfaces with equipment of another component.% j5 F8 P2 @% ~% k Joint Test and ( y# ] e7 l, Z6 lEvaluation + Q2 j- {, |; ~/ l+ }, y+ G: @) aProgram7 y; ?7 I( c- W8 O6 U% b$ a9 X An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on5 o5 T- O+ C( f2 \; c system performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements, 4 T7 k3 ` y! m' v4 Osystems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for $ ?# A+ q7 S+ cforce structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. ) t' h6 M5 }: t' ]/ pJON Job Order Number. * ~8 A. X1 Q) a/ P* V+ }" UJOP Joint Operating Procedures. . h( q5 k; e1 i, Z% M, AJOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System. 7 H7 W8 p. O: c; k# M, O' eJOPS Joint Operations Planning System. : a. O9 N& [$ Q8 P& A# JJOR Joint Operational Requirements. 5 M' d8 s Q& eJORD Joint Operational Requirements Document.! m& j9 c7 R) \* \% I JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff.( b5 u$ j3 v- I1 Z0 { JOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). # w) |: Q/ L0 [) \+ d7 B7 kJOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).! o9 l6 d; N+ O" W4 Z0 ~ JP Joint Publication.- e: c: u6 p: |) ]7 a% t JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. " ?% c2 M9 H% K1 X& UJPM Joint Program Manager.2 P& z# b( b# f Y) d8 I7 Y5 b4 f7 W JPN Joint Planning Net.* ^5 @5 e: x# w* f# W) N JPO Joint Program Office. & \/ ]6 ~" I ]7 X/ IJPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra.1 c4 S5 k9 `9 f: ]) y' i2 f2 E7 p JPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact$ ]( A4 [3 k! _$ G JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle. - F8 G& u/ G& Z( L: i" jJPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. : U6 g4 r0 ~) V+ Y+ vJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration.4 A. S. ^: ~# N6 C JPT Joint Planning Tool. L2 C7 u( ]' O, u+ f) V6 s JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). ) v% l T# h0 E. [$ s/ `2 sJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term).1 [; Q+ W8 G) Z3 m# S# H& d JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term). 6 @0 n* ]& @6 [( p( GJRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J: V$ d0 E' L( B! S8 A 1558 a2 M$ S4 n) m" [9 E JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council.3 m3 C. u* l4 S. X& _# c0 O2 u JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group. ) ]/ H8 g8 W+ UJRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications.2 M* x9 S) N, @! W' M: ] JRTC Joint Readiness Training Center.8 L0 y( Y3 _* O4 ?1 O JS Joint Staff. & s" ]1 A S; I7 oJS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. : Z! c! {7 n' V# Q9 v8 N4 sJSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term). ; t0 N3 N5 @+ [% bJSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan.# T9 K' u9 p* p& O$ r0 c JSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term). . T3 T% @- J9 `! L2 N! `2 jJSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). % M/ M+ w' R D7 q: t/ Y(2) Joint Service Evaluation Team.; M3 B7 D0 H1 x, F+ O# e8 }: Y% H JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). * g! O5 N$ P- M3 h; iJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center.' I: D$ B# R2 C/ F. w8 S4 T JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term).% n2 r( `9 g0 n# _# ] JSMB Joint Space Management Board. ( t1 B: t2 w+ CJSOC Joint Special Operations Command. 2 S) K. B R3 C2 c% T+ oJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement.2 g+ U% n0 q( }7 D1 v0 O JSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document.( ^8 w0 B* V1 F) Y JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System. 2 r, D2 C4 S# d# ]/ v& y9 ]JSS Joint Surveillance System. V3 r7 u2 ^& k JSST Joint Space Support Team.- I) b9 H) d" C5 x# t JSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System. % K* W4 R8 t! e" d/ v& OJSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. ' x. _% t+ C0 ^& iJT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting8 \9 X+ U5 M0 t3 d; q0 y0 I JT&E Joint Test and Evaluation.7 x2 S; C9 Z1 X2 A- r JTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term). . K1 {; o* J+ _& zJTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station. ; M; Z2 ~( G. y; U# W% m4 c' `; K' bJTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. " a$ q& B, |8 _' ^/ p( \JTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center.* P- H- C" L3 x" K' c" |2 F MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J* N; N6 g! x' q" s' i& M 156 R5 E& O" W$ q# @/ nJTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). 1 P0 t5 b; a) i( Y* m `JTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture.2 @) F+ m/ p1 a1 f, Y, F9 Y JTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term).5 N4 @$ w& ` a% t JTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).9 l: }: ~ F% l. _" ~ JTF Joint Task Force. + e% t$ H, g& {9 X9 ?JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise. b: c/ l# u j3 K/ H3 wJTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System. + _& ?; X# B1 L) G1 \' VJTL Joint Target List. / n7 P8 N4 L; {: C$ g) \: R5 iJTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense. & e) U2 ^/ j$ f" d+ FJTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. $ F0 |- V$ ^ H5 qJTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]. b% A( Q# \/ m& S' Q# ]' S, k JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council.% E% a! d I+ T) d( J4 @ JTR Joint Travel Regulations. " R& m1 b( s- y& a& }2 [; iJTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board., b* ?3 B6 j e" U JTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). & n6 d4 \2 e' R) SJTT Joint Tactical Terminal. 5 @# d- c# ?/ h# vJTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. $ ]* q- `( A9 e5 ~" A. w+ b4 a, ZJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft.3 A' K. a4 k& d( Z0 Y JWAN Joint Wide Area Net. - O" ]0 f/ T# P3 F0 [) W' F" E5 gJWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model).0 A+ m# c% j% Q. b) i6 T4 N JWC Joint Warfare Center./ ^& Z0 z: u) ?1 z" a+ @- k JWG Joint Working Group. / a9 B' E) a6 [3 rJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network. 5 o- [3 T% }- Y" z$ rJWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration # a9 t1 ~: e' A( B# PJWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan. " [0 @; m6 o3 T7 x) PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K8 l3 J( p' O( P4 H/ \% _# I9 n# u% n 157 6 g9 W% x# z6 s3 l# ~6 b3 U( m( xK (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo.5 l W6 u6 n! m# |! u* A$ q K Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another.; c7 U M7 @1 t Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of # L+ Z8 }/ j- I) U" ]& V- B8 f3 O* a( etwo observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both! G5 V% y1 i9 j- L# r$ |# p1 L objects.+ @7 E5 p+ I2 Z3 g3 Q; A KA Kill Assessment. 1 i" L/ x2 p7 @: xKAPP Key Asset Protection Program. 5 V+ n1 D! l- P& x0 E) `KB Kilobyte.5 H+ i+ x* I$ w% @! N Kbps Kilobyte per second. 7 s4 h6 F5 Z1 i4 y& Z7 ~: mKBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). 1 Y5 r, u" G4 I2 O; F% Z3 I0 OKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion.# G/ f9 f, I' m. v6 l+ M KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. ! l. R/ Q- v8 o- e% E8 Y9 {; G& rKDS Kwajalein Discrimination System.% b7 G7 I) }8 B5 n( t KE See Kinetic Energy. R# ^8 n( E# m& ?' M4 m! { KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon. J+ A. N! @* B' v KED Kill Enhancement Device.9 |* Y' z7 G7 N Keep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the0 o6 r' G0 d* ?- Y3 s asset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to7 f2 n5 A3 L, K% q: C8 _ defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones 3 x% P( M9 ~ t9 e7 g8 Eunder the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined. ; }) n9 B' G9 ?+ jKEI Kinetic Energy Intercept.5 b2 b! p: T& `" k4 z KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool. 7 g$ t! j$ x& p; _8 M- c: XKEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. & F! c. x; ]9 p5 m$ F3 zKEW Kinetic Energy Weapon.3 e6 d! ?8 z# l6 }* w& H( W$ Z5 d KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion).$ O7 k9 Z2 M! o% S" l, F KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). $ T4 @# j, z1 R3 h; T: [KEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. + {+ f h' ?& Y% @9 wKEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. : Q7 w* R1 s6 @: ^* GKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a1 V6 N k. t" _0 ]" A2 M sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption. ; Q! W) G- ?2 Z" v+ z, WKg Kilogram. 2 j7 }" J- x! S3 w7 A" L: r3 E0 EKHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL.( Z, ]! Z3 o- {/ ` MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K + W+ }8 Y' {, P( I1584 t# A/ D6 a! \ KHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test.+ s3 ~& e, W, J. F" E1 X# p KIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution.$ W) p' e8 B- F, t; f: {" X' i Kill Assessment ) y7 B, Z( t* N! A9 u: w& p(KA) - _. N/ a, y( q, F0 W% MAn evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV 9 V1 A/ P1 A; n cintercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and1 q' s5 Q2 l; w& s; s! j: j+ n re-engagements. (USSPACECOM) 5 H E; v8 ~* ?4 q* L3 k+ vKill Enhancement7 _* Q8 Q$ a1 S! j( s! X Device( E) F2 _$ n' n$ e% e A device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. 7 K7 j9 ?, z5 t$ p6 I/ R/ AKinematic% l8 @6 Y- r6 y( y- r' E Battlespace+ |6 @3 _" l) g2 O! k: \6 h; _# Z The planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor- V$ ]* U2 x, l- @) c9 M timeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and " x& k+ n! j( I* p$ S" d; _& koperational constraints.: o2 M, U) T! C1 e0 r5 ~ Kinetic Energy" Y# t( F. X7 c (KE)4 @# D" \1 q! s0 N: e% l) o- k& A& ~ The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion.& N/ ?) b7 q' a) q# n* P' K Kinetic Energy3 x6 S# y- ]) l" [4 a2 N Weapon (KEW) 7 T) s( s' T# r( Y' rA weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object. " p" M0 t* H) _7 g9 X5 J; q9 P& j. eExamples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun.& S$ A" ^8 u2 m% o. t Kinetic Kill ( r; p) C0 O q6 KVehicle (KKV) - ]5 o) E9 M* C+ FA weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy 7 N( Q, i- x* K/ v) P& A/ Pa target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board: c" L' v8 @, q9 s/ P. i rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell" Z; F+ W0 C7 w* ` launched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2026-2-11 21:55 , Processed in 0.046003 second(s), 10 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部