航空缩略语词典

帅哥

Major Defense & d3 S/ H8 f! R5 q4 BAcquisition 9 r) P- y% L7 S5 T7 JProgram An acquisition program that is not a highly sensitive classified program (as 2 }1 |9 x4 f% R3 r' Pdetermined by the Secretary of Defense) and that is: 1. Designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology as a major defense acquisition program, or 2. Estimated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology to require: a) An eventual total expenditure for research, development, test, and evaluation of more than $200 million in fiscal year 1980 constant , w. G% H; N% d5 }dollars (approximately $300 million in fiscal year 1990 constant 2 D5 K' J1 L! z+ | A! l6 I, qdollars), or b) An eventual total expenditure for procurement of more than $1 billion in fiscal year 1980 constant dollars (approximately $1.8 billion in fiscal ( T9 e3 K+ r7 D* m1 ?: `' Fyear 1990 constant dollars). Major Modification - _! q$ u6 _+ d; z0 gA modification that in and of itself meets the criteria of acquisition category I or II or is designated as such by the milestone decision authority. Major modifications 7 ] n- E4 ?0 \ O; _+ A$ C) Y/ Xrequire a Milestone IV decision unless the decision to modify results from one of the alternatives considered as part of the Milestone I decision process. 5 O7 @6 m( e) v4 f/ mUpgrades are part of the Milestone 0 decision process. Major System A combination of elements that will function together to produce the capabilities : W8 Z( O; Z. U: @ P* p' o+ ?required to fulfill a mission need, including hardware, equipment, software, or any % A$ e' @! y& D! Gcombination thereof, but excluding construction or other improvements to real property. A system shall be considered a major system if it is estimated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology to require: 1. An eventual total expenditure for research, development, test, and ' l6 g' q$ z/ w1 P' Levaluation of more than $75,000,000 in fiscal year 1980 constant dollars (approximately $115,000,000 in fiscal year 1990 constant dollars), or 2. An eventual total expenditure for procurement of more than $300,000,000 in fiscal year 1980 constant dollars (approximately $540,000,000 in fiscal year 1990 constant dollars). MAM Maintenance Assist Modules. MAMDT Mean Active Maintenance Downtime (ILS term). 2 R7 n* G: H) B+ H- p( _9 m9 rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 M v7 [0 H( g* ?" |) f4 }8 c6 M175 , N& n; S3 U* ]+ t/ gMandatory 5 h/ E2 w1 ]- N' H" s% V/ pAccess Control 2 ], M% C5 S$ X) o5 a6 YA means of restricting access to objects based on the sensitivity (as represented by a label) of the information contained in the objects and the formal ! z( e/ q: N/ f% ~: R3 jauthorization of subjects to access information of such sensitivity. Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle / G: _/ C, `/ _(MARV) " H# l1 k( [* C; m6 h |$ p5 qA reentry vehicle capable of performing preplanned flight maneuvers during the reentry phase. The reentry vehicles deploy fins or other aerodynamic surfaces % t: I9 L+ ]3 o$ ~: u0 A# Pwhen they enter the atmosphere, allowing them to turn and dodge rather than fall ballistically. They have no ability to maneuver in space. MANPER Manpower and Personnel ILS term). 6 l3 h. l* n8 _' N5 a: h( lManpower $ u; i+ r6 ]6 P; `9 ]' ~# ~Authorizations The billets in the manpower requirements structure that are planned to be filled. Manpower 9 R# [8 c. _" h1 p3 C9 QEstimate Report 9 |3 F/ A" j% [(MER) An estimate of the number of personnel who will operate, maintain, support, and train for the acquisition upon full operational deployment. The Services prepared the estimates, and the SECDEF submits them to Congress 30 days prior to ( B( q. e* I" r/ _approval for EMD or production. 5 ]' r' X3 E2 ]+ r( wManpower, 0 B7 f: d! A; O# MPersonnel, ' S+ V4 K& Y3 [( n! Z6 k! VTraining, and ! X8 g& S/ S- z) W8 Q9 uSafety (MPTS) # L: ]) U5 u& o* V3 G; y9 mThe human dimension of the complete defense weapon system. The term 0 ^; [* H9 M. E' {$ xMPTS also encompasses the concepts and disciplines of human factors engineering and health hazard prevention. Manpower, Personnel, - R! }& y9 g, M4 p$ B/ {2 W. fTraining, and 1 P7 K; M' Z' ~2 T; ?Safety (MPTS) 0 m E: h6 A9 m7 UProfiles A description of human dimensions and constraints involving a major system throughout the system life cycle. This includes, but is not limited to, descriptions $ V3 g$ M9 D$ D. J5 u) Y9 } l9 Wand categorizations of occupations, aptitudes, individual skills and % U# q, ~, ^* n% d/ n5 m' idemographics, training system characteristics and components, potential system hazards, and other issues affecting the performance and welfare of operators, maintainers, and personnel that support existing, modified or new systems. 2 n, G! d5 F* O1 B4 F! H0 h8 Y wMANPRINT Manpower and Personnel Integration (US Army). 8 m& l3 ?; o# C! E( V* ]9 N" O rMANTECH Manufacturing Technology. 7 ~( K9 u" U# ]2 R7 j4 d* f; BManufacturing (or 7 a1 Y- m5 Z- O8 tProduction) Engineering / g& ^! s9 G8 NPre-production planning and operation analysis applied to specific product designs. The functions of planning, specifying, and coordinating the application of required factory resources including: performing analyses of production operations, processes, and systems; applying new manufacturing methods, tooling, and equipment; controlling the introduction of engineering changes, and employing cost control and quality techniques from the factory viewpoint. 7 F' Y2 Z9 s- I5 Z+ RManufacturing Operations, Development, $ M) M' K/ I; Y* ~2 q. @and Integration Laboratory (MODIL) 6 q: M3 z6 j* \9 j& n/ n* r% Z7 q3 gAn SDS-peculiar integration mechanism to link product technology development - O. k( }0 e B+ \concurrently with manufacturing process and control development for a costreducing effective SDS development. Manufacturing + R# b+ `7 E# ITechnology (MANTECH) Manufacturing technology refers to any action which has as its objective the ' v8 V! P/ N5 K( i5 U0 G# Otimely establishment or improvement of the manufacturing processes, techniques, or equipment required to support current and projected programs, and the assurance of the ability to produce, reduce lead time, ensure economic * c" i# `4 J% |, ]& K* i6 Lavailability of end items, reduce costs, increase efficiency, improve reliability, or to enhance safety and anti-pollution measures. MANTECH, per se, is the specific DoD program in this area. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 M 176 MAOC Modular Air Operations Center (JFACC term). MAOPR Minimum Acceptable Operational Performance Requirements. MAP Minimum Acquisition Program. MAR Monthly Assessment Report (BMDO/POC term). " [$ z) e1 l# G) ~MARCO Marine Corps.

帅哥

MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 M 173 / J+ u; A4 l- N+ f6 l+ cm (1) Meter. (2) Minute. M (1) Model. (2) Million. (3) Mega. M&LC Missile and Launch Control. - Q0 L0 i7 a5 WM&P Manpower and Personnel. M&S (1) Materials and Structures. (2) Modeling and Simulation. M-T-M Model – Test – Model. M/LWIR Medium/Long Wavelength Infrared. : U7 F4 e0 ?7 y$ EM/P Manpower/Personnel. MAA Mission Area Analysis. 3 t/ f* m: K# q# _! mMAAG Military Assistance Advisory Group. 7 W7 H2 b; S" s1 @MAB Missile Assembly Building. MAC (1) OBSOLETE. Military Airlift Command. See AMC. ' Q0 r0 \7 J: z U8 O6 b* E(2) Maintenance Allocation Chart. $ x7 B* ^7 _0 i' I' nMACCK Multi-Application Command and Control Kit (GD term for IVIS follow-on). MACCS Marine Corps Air Command and Control System. MACOM Major Army Command. . {4 K; }( A$ a Q. ZMAD (1) Mission Area Deficiency. (2) Mutually Assured Destruction. MADCAP Mosaic Array Data Compression and Analysis Program. 3 ?9 f: W. U2 }: Q* wMADS Modified Air Defense System. " [( C) L% d3 T& Z$ IMAE Medium Altitude Endurance. & N1 @" h% F$ h( x) Q9 q4 zMAGTF Marine Air-Ground Task Force. Main Beam The primary directional EMR emitted from radar transmitters. 8 X% |( B+ s% b, Y5 sMaintainer An individual responsible for retaining the major defense system in or restoring it to a specified condition. Maintenance activities include inspection, testing, u7 u* f9 U0 V3 xservicing, classification as to serviceability, repair, rebuilding, and reclamation. : T# p6 k+ N+ y$ e t2 I8 O% qMaintenance Concept/Plan ! |0 }, K+ Z9 @: }; u6 xA description of maintenance considerations and constraints for system/equipment under development. A preliminary maintenance concept is . K9 e8 U/ C( |' V/ @/ zdeveloped and submitted as part of the preliminary system operational concept # O; y" G+ r7 U/ G( M- L) Afor each alternative solution candidate by the operating command with the , z' n1 B0 n' F3 s) |, L0 b: Oassistance of the implementing and supporting commands. A major driver in design of the system/equipment and support planned for it. 8 i1 q* U3 a- aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 M : D( F0 s) s8 X0 W174 Maintenance Operations The corrective and preventive maintenance operations that do not require a deployment decision; it includes correction and subsequent validation testing ! J- n6 V& ?3 |; I! J% r, c8 U8 pand the update of relevant status configuration, maintenance, and inventory databases. + D/ Y0 e. D/ U+ y2 w/ _Maintenance " @6 k4 w4 N* ^' t* \+ ~Planning w& t5 P6 f w% DThe process conducted to evolve and establish maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a material system; one of the principal elements + W! e# R: l4 [ Sof ILS. MAIS Mobile Automated Instrumentation Suite (USA term). MAISRC Major Automated Information System Review Council MAJCOM Major Command (USAF). Major Automated $ x6 K( \+ R/ |' A2 P& XInformation System Review Council (MAISRC) 3 _' ]* h) f4 s, O. j1 h& OThe Senior DoD information management acquisition review board chaired by 1 a8 G+ |" S" W( N9 @ ]8 kthe Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communication, and $ P5 p/ O5 Z0 Z) ]* MIntelligence. See DoD Directive 8120.2.

帅哥

Low Altitude Demonstration 6 b1 @1 M$ g$ m2 rSystem (LADS) Part of the SBIRS Low Program Definition and Risk Reduction (PDRR) program phase. The LADS will consist of a flight experiment and extensive ground demonstrations by Boeing North American. The LADS flight experiment will be & w/ u( E9 h6 O# Olaunched in late FY99 to demonstrate the sensor performance of a SBIRS Low " f2 U$ s7 h' N! d- v; h4 ]concept and collect phenomenology data. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) 4 _ Z- G7 Z& ^1 h" sThese satellites are at altitudes between 100 and 400 nautical miles. They have short duration revolutions (about 90 minutes), short visibility envelopes (2.5 9 F8 j1 S2 d( K6 Y) I8 d$ _minutes up to 10 minutes over a tracking station), short life spans, and are most subject to orbital perturbations due to atmospheric drag and earth gravitational anomalies. , v- g+ m2 J' s0 f6 b4 _: j5 @- JLow Endoatmosphere $ J/ c/ k# A, i. E1 n6 aThat portion of the earth's atmosphere, generally below 40 km altitude. 1 K. |8 Z. G; P t$ BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L * _ c w( `. C2 E) c170 Low-Rate Initial ; }' B0 d& Q+ m; H# B6 GProduction (LRIP) The production of a system in limited quantity to provide articles for operational test and evaluation, to establish an initial production base, and to permit an orderly increase in the production rate sufficient to lead to full-rate production upon successful completion of operational testing. * L0 r* P8 |5 C/ uLOWKATRER Low Weight Kinetic Energy Active Tracker. . ^. C2 m8 c; l* p# _7 MLOWTRAN Atmospheric and Interstellar Background Signature Model. 4 o% O! l4 M: ~LPAR Large Phased Array Radar. # W5 M6 L& i0 \LPD Low Probability of Detection. 3 m$ T) q* n6 E* ~2 M7 X I0 RLPE (1) Liquid Phase Epitaxy. : ~( x# d2 m2 J3 T(2) Launch Point Estimate. LPI Low Probability of Intercept. LPS Limited Protection System. LR Long Range. LRA (1) Line-Replaceable Assembly. (2) Launch and Recovery Element. LRB Liquid Rocket Booster. / e) u- I1 Z3 U n _& O6 KLRC Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH. * G4 g0 W( p. l" {' sLRE (1) Latest Revise Estimate. (2) Launch and Recovery Element. 9 P) N) N* i+ K# m4 [, y8 D) tLREP Light Replicas. 9 V% }9 ^6 b4 ^2 X/ J; `. f9 q+ [LRF Laser Range Finder. LRINF Longer Range Intermediate Nuclear Forces. 3 F) c$ |6 p3 k, m8 W7 q% YLRIP See Low-Rate Initial Production. LRIP-OT Low Rate Initial Production – Operational Testing. - ]3 O5 k, P: i* PLRTBM Long Range TBM. ' G& v. m, m, ^LRTNF Long-range Theater Nuclear Force. LRU (1) Line Replaceable Units. (2) Line Replacement Units. A. V* K7 }$ Y+ t6 h+ K) \LS Launching Stations (PATRIOT). LSA Logistics Support Analysis. LSAP Logistics Support Analysis Program. ( Z" q0 H+ W9 u: zLSAR Logistics Support Analysis Record. LSART LSA Review Team (ILS term). LSAT Laser Satellite. + |) E/ {. ^7 k- pMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 9 {* u/ M# z, X4 Y" D171 ) d& l3 [* l; _+ j/ C/ L/ zLSAWG LSA Working Group. ' P0 n% l3 T' `& Z7 l5 ZLSE Lifetime Support Engineering (ILS term). ) L0 [/ r" O+ u5 Q* S- Q9 _LSEA Lifetime Support Engineering Activity (ILS term). . N+ K- e; R( L8 P# ?8 |; C h. _LSI Large Scale Integration (circuits). / g3 i; x y6 vLSRS Loral Space and Range Systems, Sunnyvale, CA. LST (1) Laser Spot Tracker. (2) Landing Ship, Tank. LSTS Launcher Station Test Site. LTA Lead Time Analysis. 4 ?4 r- W K" K$ \( {LTBT Limited Test Ban Treaty. 1 |) N4 W, N2 |6 g! p! a) f1 _LTD Laser Target Designator. LTH Lethality and Target Hardening. LTS Low Temperature Superconductor LTV Launch Test Vehicle. ! R$ S0 \6 g9 v9 v8 J5 [& NLU Launch and Update. LUA Launch Under Attack. " V1 V! T& |: I) ]7 v# ^LUP Limited U.S. Protection. # l9 Z, Z/ ^$ i# z! A5 X: gLUT Limited User Test. LUT/OA Limited User Test/Operational Assessment. ' \5 q3 d9 w: zLVS Loral Vought Systems, a defense industry contractor. LVT Low Volume Terminal (USN/NATO/Telecomm term). ! |& M/ l$ y M* G+ wLW Laser Weapons. LWAN Local Wide Area Net. LWIR See Long Wavelength Infrared. LWIR FPA (PET) Long Wavelength Infrared Focal Plane Array (Pilot-line Experiment Technology). ( _1 v# ?* e1 j8 G' m9 Y5 r4 ULYTBT Low-Yield Threshold Test Ban Treaty. ; A# M) U i5 {' T7 bLZ Landing Zone.

帅哥

LM/GES Lockheed Martin/Government Electronic Systems. % T4 N& p& l4 S, L: GLMA Lockheed Martin Astronautics, a defense industry contractor. LMANS Lockheed Martin Aeronautic and Naval Systems. LMC Late Midcourse. LMFBR Liquid-Metal Fast Breeder Reactor. LMIS Logistics Management Information System. n E6 E, I$ |; M1 h& dLNA Low Noise Amplifier. LNC Local Network Controller. LNE Low Noise Exciter (Electronics Engineering term). LNO Liaison Officer. LO (1) Local Oscillator (Electronics Engineering term). $ e% i, t: r- w8 T3 v. i W4 }+ N(2) Low Observables (LODE-related term). : C3 v7 G- _0 b% BLOA Letter of Agreement. LOAD Low Altitude Defense. LOC (1) Lines of Communication. (2) Lines of Code. (3) Limited Operational Capability. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 8 [) V+ e0 G' G, `) f# [6 C168 , m9 i7 F1 U3 v: u: DLOCAAS Low Cost Autonomous Attack System (USAF term). 9 p2 e- ~* s8 B- ~Local Assessment of , d& p; n" @/ Q EEngagement . L/ F9 o+ f B: }) nThe assessment of an engagement by high-resolution fire control sensors. 4 v6 Z/ K' d y4 [% @4 G5 Z3 g3 \Local Environment 7 O; l& ?- p: ]# F* X4 F- mThe ISTC Local Environment contained within each node simulates the element to the degree necessary to generate a realistic input to the Element Processor of * f' S$ J! o1 |Element Processor Emulation and provide a realistic response to the Element Processor or Element Processor Emulation. Lock On Signifies that a tracking or target-seeking system is continuously and automatically tracking a target in one or more coordinates (e.g., range, bearing, elevation). LODE Laser Optics Demonstration Experiment. $ ^" j3 y* N6 X" {% qLODTM Large Optics Diamond Turning Machine. & s% o% |7 U8 U8 d- n" Q. _: g- eLOE (1) Level of Effort. (2) Letter of Evaluation (AF). LOF Lifejacket Orbital Flight (BE term). Lofted Trajectory Trajectory with an apogee greater than the minimum-energy trajectory to the same range. : X" O/ I0 J- V( I6 [8 oLOG Logistics. LOG.WIPT Logistics Working-level IPT 5 @) G; Q/ C* ?2 V3 @- dLOGAM II Logistics Analysis Model II. 5 a& k8 }3 F& l2 J( OLOGFAC Logistics Feasibility Analysis Capability. LOGFOR Logistics Force. Logistics The science of planning and carrying out the movement and maintenance of 2 p7 W! m! G$ C7 ?# \1 Nforces. In its most comprehensive sense, it includes those aspects of military operations which deal with: (1) design and development, acquisition, storage, movement, distribution, maintenance, evacuation, and disposition of materials; % L9 s% B( L9 o1 V3 M* Z4 C/ ?0 T: M(2) movement, evacuation, and hospitalization of personnel; (3) acquisition or construction, maintenance, operation, and disposition of facilities; and (4) acquisition or furnishing of services. : k7 `- x. [+ W$ q! E. w9 V& `Logistics Support The supply and maintenance of materiel essential to proper operation of a system in the force. Logistics Supportability , X. q8 Y6 h! h6 pThe degree to which planned logistics support (including test, measurement, and / i- H6 g) R, Z' p9 f' ediagnostic equipment; spares and repair parts; technical data; support facilities; $ w* v; { s' q+ L6 c1 W$ k* Etransportation requirements; training; manpower; and software support) allow meeting system availability and wartime usage requirements. - p3 }1 t. @9 Q6 B, E9 AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L . l0 d2 r, w$ C4 M+ Y( V169 6 w! w% i$ K0 L. H" |% B. BLogistics % k; |& z6 A0 B) pSupport Analysis ; D/ y. K8 T; ~" V3 |% m9 @(LSA) / Q( x& {) [8 y }The selective application of scientific and engineering efforts undertaken during the acquisition process, as part of the systems engineering process, to assist in: 0 g+ J& v' r" _/ q; wcausing support considerations to influence design; defining support 2 ^2 H- U' |- C& ^0 e1 C$ d( mrequirements that are related optimally to design and to each other; acquiring the required support; and providing the required support during the operational phase at minimum cost. Logistics Support Analysis Record (LSAR) 1 _3 W, O! u5 I! U; |A formal tool under MIL-STD 1388-2A that uses records/forms to document / i& M/ ~+ t! C \% Foperations and maintenance requirements, RAM, task analyses, technical data, support/test equipment, facilities, skill evaluation, supply support, ATE and TPS, # s* }4 U5 D- o6 }- qand transportability. LSAR is the basis for training, personnel, supply 3 ?3 y* m2 d0 G- S0 J$ V8 zprovisioning and allowances construction, support equipment acquisition, , U! B/ u' T" n: }facilities construction and preparation, and for maintenance. LOGPLAN Logistics Plan. LOGSIM Logistics Simulation Model. LOI (1) Letter of Instruction. (2) Letter of Intent. " ]4 K5 U! P" O9 d+ M; H4 |LOMEZ Low Altitude Missile Engagement Zone. Long Lead Items Long Range Air Launched Target * P' D' ~! _6 ~/ z: L! P(LRALT) 1 D- x$ t/ F1 o4 v: TThose components of a system for which the times to design and fabricate are ' ^& E5 q) ~0 | Gthe longest, and, therefore, to which an early commitment of funds may be desirable in order to meet the earliest possible date of system completion. Two-stage, air launched ballistic missile target being developed for MBRV-4. , H" i- a/ X, t, S5 dLong Wavelength Infrared (LWIR) ; r$ s& w& Q# e o2 k2 ^4 D3 ~Thermal radiation emitted by a source in the electromagnetic spectrum encompassing infrared wavelengths of 6 to 30 microns. LOR Level of Repair Analysis (ILS term). LORA Level of Repair Analysis (ILS term). LOS (1) Line of Sight. (2) Large Optical Segment. LOTS Logistics Over-The-Shore. ! y4 x5 r& x+ g8 F; o8 T bLOW Launch on Warning.

帅哥

Light Replicas (LREP) , g: Q) i! P4 a0 ~Decoys that, by virtue of shape, closely approximate an RV’s signature with little 0 r+ r( T+ z) _1 \off-load penalty. LIMIDIS Limited Distribution. ; U% ]+ o+ O! C. H% L! I+ @/ }MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 166 , J! p" O. J9 S, i: @ Q3 d7 f& cLimited Attack An attack on the U.S. and its allies, which provides a stressing timeline, and is 3 s; j/ J4 E1 A! X; ggeographically distinct. Not an all-out attack or mass wave. Limited Defense System (LDS) The development of systems, components, and architectures for a deployable anti-ballistic missile system (as described in section 232(a)(1) of the 1991 Missile Defense Act, as revised) capable of providing a highly effective defense of the United States against limited ballistic missile threats, including accidental or / F* A+ L5 V3 ~+ t# G" Z- tunauthorized launches or Third World attacks, but below a threshold that would 6 `4 ?9 O3 V) p! D( I" h' mbring into question strategic stability. Limited Operational 6 r, r- p) ]3 G: M7 J; U% x- n, vCapability (LOC) A point in time when the first set of sensors and weapons can be employed to 6 _$ A- W- ~: @6 G% h. u4 B) @% |provide a limited protection system. A# w" D* W; N& o# W/ XLimited Production ( Z7 F$ G) L ?The initial production of a system in limited quantity. Part of an acquisition strategy to be used in test and evaluation for verification of design maturity, 1 X1 H5 v) x8 F3 N3 j( N7 o$ w, Ymanufacturing process final proofing, and product engineering and to verify a ' Y, b' I2 s( q4 Y. ffactories capabilities prior to a decision to proceed with production. Decision - L" |; y4 t7 G5 R4 zusually made near the end of EMD or at Milestone IIIA or equivalent. (Also $ R7 ?+ o, ]9 }4 ?called Low-Rate Initial Production or Pilot Production.) ) L: j j3 | X6 P9 A/ PLimited Test Ban Treaty The bilateral Treaty signed and ratified by the United States and the (former) U.S.S.R. in 1963, which prohibits nuclear tests in all locations except underground, and prohibits nuclear explosions underground if they cause & d/ j( \- H$ N, ^ aradioactive debris to be present outside the territorial limits of the state under . m: p7 t9 L- Z) fwhose jurisdiction or control the test would be conducted. LIN Line Item Number. ) D2 l0 X9 a* W/ G. B5 z8 U" vLinac Linear Accelerator. , h' K. i5 B, x! v0 Y% T5 sLine Item + ]* w/ l2 T, s4 M1 S: r. e0 O, D(Budget) ) v! T8 P+ v% j M: W7 TA specific program end item with its own identity (e.g., B-1B Bomber). ( g( W/ z- y. C7 nLine of Sight 9 }' f7 \) V# c a(LOS) ) i" x r _ DThe line from sensor to target necessary for the commencement of the detection, , G/ f+ R9 }+ C$ N+ a1 [- i# |acquisition, track, and identification of a target. Line Replaceable J5 L# _" W+ E6 S9 D1 X: iUnit (LRU) $ T* S1 w- D- [9 ZAn essential support item removed and replaced at field level to restore end item to an operationally ready condition. (Also called Weapon Replacement : J7 E( Y w5 @; X, |& z( r/ CAssembly and Module Replaceable Unit). Link-16 TADIL-J. : d p9 `3 Y$ h5 e7 o4 ZLink Quality 1 c6 _; y+ B+ w0 yEvaluation 8 h4 R" o6 G0 s9 i8 n" C9 SThis testing of links to create bit error estimates and monitors natural or induced link interference. 5 h4 g4 p# D% P9 g' h, yLIP Lethality Improvement Plan. Liquid Fuel & X. C+ Y2 s/ W! ~9 z! pBooster (LFB) Target booster being developed to mate with current reentry vehicles and emulate the short/medium range threat. LIS Laser Isotope Separation. LITINT Literature Intelligence. . r. y+ L5 y& [" N2 G gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 167 ( j0 d6 D, K9 ^4 K/ N3 k. U9 wLive Fire Test And Evaluation ( I# f+ r+ X1 m+ L) b(LFT&E) Survivability testing and lethality testing required before full-scale production. / L1 K3 v8 [% I& i! k, kMust be conducted on ACAT I and II programs for: (a) A covered system (a 4 G% {2 x% e4 n; H) Yconventional weapon system designed to provide some degree of protection to 9 @0 M+ X! M; s* o* p9 |the user in combat); (b) a major munition or missile program; (c) a product " M$ J% y9 W; @4 G" zimprovement program that will significantly affect the survivability of a covered system. ! Y! J3 \% N9 {8 u# ~. |/ ^LIVEX Live Exercise. LIWA Land Information Warfare Activity. LJ Life Jacket (BE term). LL (1) Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA. (2) Legislative Liaison. # d- z! V8 b4 ?3 V) f" rLLM Long Lead Material. LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA. , F3 [* z8 M3 |; g; ~& @& | v2 JLLTIL Long-Lead-Time Items List (ILS term). " I5 P! u1 F0 r, [4 S1 s7 ~LLUM Low background LWIR Uniform Mercury Cadmium Teloride (HgCdTe). " `% ^& z7 _! i. h, J ]LM (1) Lockheed Martin, a defense industry contractor. (2) Logistics Manager (ILS term).

帅哥

MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L $ D4 f. R* \6 K4 j5 B2 v% ]163 9 C, R* J1 t+ l4 I- eLaunch Azimuth Missile launch location measured in degrees clockwise from the local northpointing longitude line at the launch site. (USSPACECOM) Launch Detection Initial indication by any one of a variety of sensors that a booster has been launched from some point on the surface of the earth, with initial characterization of the booster type. (USSPACECOM) : O# W9 P# a# }; m7 ~Launch Point Determination With computer methods, uses missile track observation to estimate the point on the earth’s surface from which the missile was launched, expressed in terms of circular error probable. 1 z& R2 @# X9 {; x, w3 FLaunch Under Attack (LUA) Execution by National Command Authorities of Single Integrated Operational Plan forces subsequent to tactical warning of strategic nuclear attack against the United States and prior to first impact. Launch , m! q1 ~! L# `3 nVerification Confirmation of a detection of a booster launch by receiving a report from a 1 I6 I) Z# Y% y' g9 g: r _+ F8 Tsensor separate and independent of the sensor that initially detected a specific 3 r0 q0 F5 M; i! ~booster launch. Layered Defense A defense that consists of several sets of weapons that operates at different 7 ~0 z Q. ~( H$ I: d3 ]phases in the trajectory of a ballistic missile. Thus, there could be a first layer , S' M; r! c. D3 I(e.g., boost phase) of defense with remaining targets passed on to succeeding & B/ U% \% H, h+ Y7 Q$ Clayers (e.g., midcourse, terminal). . }8 f5 Y3 i4 o# A" `# Qlb Pound. LBL Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. 4 N, \1 d, q$ @8 H5 n$ FLBM Localized Battle Management/Manager(s). LBTS Land Based Test Site. LCC (1) See Life-Cycle Cost. (2) Launch Control Center. $ Z; l7 V- K* xLCCE (1) Life-Cycle Cost. (2) Launch Control Center. (3) Land Component Commander (JCS term). LCCS Life-Cycle Contractor Support. LCF Launch Control Facility. . N" y+ v% Q8 {LCM (1) Life Cycle Management. (2) Lightweight Communications Module (USAF TelComms/Computer term). ; X0 Y; F( w2 L# X' HLCN Logistics Control Number (ILS term). 1 |& d3 l4 t- I+ }2 D: }LCOM Logistics Composite Model. % w# z- U, q* z, V- i! g# H0 n. BLCN Logistics Control Number (ILS term). LCS Laser Crosslink System. ( D4 [6 h* s; u# h v$ t7 [2 tLDC Less Developed Country. b( ]4 t) l7 a4 @* dLDS (1) Layered Defense System. (2) Lexington Discrimination System. (3) Limited 1 A& T0 W1 ^7 |- RDefense System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 164 8 f6 x! R) Y" ^LE Lethality Enhancer (PAC-3). / J! u& E: p6 V E: J0 `Lead Component/ Service The DoD Component designated by SECDEF to be responsible for management ' s4 v( i* `- V8 d; u3 l5 pof a system acquisition involving two or more DoD Components in a joint program. LEAF Law Enforcement Access Field. % i9 D) F" D, T8 g8 m% m/ Q* J$ oLeakage The allowable threat objects passing through a BMD system expressed as a percentage of the threat. To ensure overall system performance, permitted 4 g" Q% J) ?, Q1 n# Jleakage is “budgeted” among individual BMD phases and functions. Leakage (Max) The maximum allowable threat objects passing through a BMD system expressed - @4 J8 [4 {& x; b7 H: ^* ias a percentage of the design-to threat. To ensure overall system performance, ( K& v8 Q& u1 H1 ^7 Apermitted leakage is “budgeted” among individual BMD phases and functions. LEAP Lightweight Exoatmospheric Projectile. LEASAT Leased Satellite. ' ?6 ?# q5 C- C: ]7 `2 FLeast Privilege This principle requires that each subject in a system be granted the most ; I+ ?( N8 |( nrestrictive set of privileges (or lowest clearance) needed for the performance of 2 \+ ~. o* _ ?6 C' V' _authorized tasks. The application of this privilege limits the damage that can ) R; u' w1 @; {$ w1 Q' y% X5 \: [result from accident, error, or unauthorized use. ! D4 O1 ^8 d, K+ n; z% jLED (1) Low Endoatmospheric Defense. (2) Light Emitting Diode. LEDI Low Endoatmospheric Defense Interceptor. 9 [$ s! K6 R0 S8 ]$ o4 uLEDS (1) Low Endoatmospheric Defense System. * X$ m. v( ?& k/ M" y4 h& Z(2) Link Eleven Display System (USN term). LEI Low Endoatmospheric Interceptor. LEIP Link Eleven Improvement Program (USN term). 3 ~! h+ m1 B Y5 bLEL Low Energy Laser. + K6 e, g( g i* n) A. T* S+ ~0 A; qLELWS Low Energy Laser Weapon System. / Y% q' r) s# j/ N* \* `4 LLEM Logistics Element Manager (ILS term). 9 n5 z( p l$ ?3 kLEO Low Earth Orbit. LETS LWIR Environment and Threat Simulation. - C Q& ^' n: F2 c) R/ k) yLevel of Effort (LOE) Effort of a general or supportive nature that does not produce definite end # U* I" Z0 `; f1 r2 pproducts or results, e.g. contract man-hours. Leverage (1) The advantage gained by boost-phase intercept, when a single booster 1 g z G s* nkill may eliminate many RVs and decoys before they are deployed. This could provide a favorable cost-exchange ratio for the defense and would reduce stress on later tiers of the SDS. (2) In general, the power to act or influence to attain goals. & K- C- u6 u$ ]8 W, u8 g' L9 ULF (1) Landing Force. (2) Low Frequency. 1 @' T- d* u9 K5 L) S: ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 165 0 c, ^) i+ T* W$ q3 [ v0 sLFIE Live Flight Integration Exercise. LFOV Limited Field of View. - P1 e- ^! a' B, N. n- r2 ?LFS Loral Federal System, Gaithersburg, MD. " S& y2 L$ z+ r, |5 [. R) q6 [; ]5 ULFT&E Live Fire Test and Evaluation. LGB Laser Guided Bomb. LGM (1) Laser Guided Missile. (2) Loop Group Multiplexer. LGSM Light Ground Station Module (USA CECOM term). LHO Amphibious Assault Ship. Li Lithium. / e) n- s2 t! M% m* uLIC Low Intensity Conflict. ! V5 d! s% R0 \4 Q: u% x6 YLIDAR Light Detection and Ranging. / o4 i B1 B9 l& {: ?Life Cycle (1) The total phases through which an item passes from the time it is initially developed until the time it is either consumed or disposed of as being u% ~* C' e+ n `. m) e1 iexcess to all known materiel requirements. (2) (Software). All the states a software or software related product passes through from its inception until it is no longer useful. Life-Cycle Cost ! z. w- p. a3 k W" \( J(LCC) : l/ t0 f8 J9 Q7 ]( yThe total cost to the Government of acquisition and ownership of that system ) ^' O3 V, e0 _" U/ Cover its useful life. It includes the cost of development, acquisition, support and, where applicable, disposal. 5 V8 Y. K$ ]( ]: D h& OLife-Cycle 9 [$ y) W% F6 O" mManagement Process for administering an automated information system or hardware support system over its whole life, with emphasis on strengthening early decisions which shape costs and utility. : D( I* q M3 w8 F& p( XLife-Cycle Model A framework containing the processes, activities, and tasks involved in the development, operation, and support of the system, spanning the life of the system from the definition of its requirements to the termination of its use. - f% [& z% n( D4 A7 Z3 O' ^Life Cycle of a Weapon System ( s# x9 l" s. e$ z9 FAll phases of the system's life including research, development, test and 6 d( {4 t) J- E9 s4 tevaluation, production, deployment (inventory), operations and support, and disposal. ) x7 L$ W& o1 |7 p1 yLife Jacket The life support storage container for a Brilliant Pebbles singlet. The life jacket & a! K7 O5 e" }' mcontains subsystems that perform power, communications, and environmental . D: v7 A1 ?( kprotection functions. Light Detection and Ranging 5 m5 P# V+ }% t* a(LIDAR) 1 M) M5 ~6 T- a" m+ N VA precision probing instrument used to measure concentrations of different + x9 D3 W5 B% f9 p7 k! ggasses or particulates in a given amount of atmosphere.

帅哥

Kinetic Kill Vehicle ' `5 i7 o; q/ U4 n2 ?Integrated ' Y. j2 Z/ _* Y- ]6 |Technology ) x6 _) j; E/ L4 H& S: h& k* f' cExperiment 3 |. [+ H6 R& n+ U(KITE) / v0 ]6 O/ V8 l9 f, H4 eA series of test flights at WSMR to demonstrate HEDI technologies. KITE (1) Kuiper Infrared Technology Experiment. (2) Kinetic Kill Vehicle Integrated % a( D7 q/ D0 ATechnology Experiment. KKV Kinetic Kill Vehicle. ' P4 n3 L( l. rKKVWS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Weapon System. 2 _; w# r2 [5 l# S2 @/ l6 e% aKL Kill Level. ! S' F7 Z& i) f4 n) lKm Kilometer. Km/h Kilometer per hour. 2 @7 I0 u- `+ [( G+ \) k0 I0 OKm/sec Kilometer per Second. 5 T8 e# o3 M5 \2 z: v" j0 r4 HKMCC Kwajalein Mission Control Center. KMR Kwajalein Missile Range. KMRSS Kwajelein Missile Range Safety System. KPP Key Performance Parameters. & n! r. p+ K) e5 u. KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K 159 . l* K& O0 _ E# RKr Krypton. * \: k4 x* `: a/ O3 b3 l6 eKREMS Kiernan Reentry Measurement System. KSC Kennedy Space Center, FL. Kt Kiloton. ( K7 F; Y- t' v* R3 n$ tKTF Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, HI. KTP (1) Key Technical Partner. (2) Key Test Partner (3) Key Technical Parameters. Kts Knots. KV Kill Vehicle. 1 B) L4 }( C! W: g5 L% d$ l* pkw Kilowatt. & c4 X1 r: Y L2 N% J" ]0 e& fKW Kinetic Warhead. / W7 M$ u* u% T; p. U% RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 7 @% w7 ?$ [; Z7 z6 z" o161 L&TH Lethality and Target Hardening. L1SS Level 1 System Simulator. L2SS Level 2 System Simulator - NTF. $ q# D5 o$ p" X( x9 A, R# qLAA Limited Access Area. LAAD Low Altitude Air Defense. ) v# `3 F1 n$ dLAAFB Los Angeles Air Force Base, CA. 6 Z( Q. x2 {# ILABCOM Laboratory Command. 0 I: F+ ? q8 a1 q0 ALABM Local Area Battle Manager. , \, H/ M+ O# w/ R9 H4 C. B8 LLABP Look Ahead Battle Planner LAC Low Authority Control. LACE Laser Atmospheric Compensation Experiment (an SDIO/NRL satellite launched February 1990 and turned off July 1993). ' c& n; d/ m8 ALACM Land Attack Cruise Missile. LADAR Laser Detection and Ranging. Laddering Down A hypothetical technique for overcoming a terminal phase missile defense. Successive salvos of salvage-fused RVs attack. The detonations of one salvo disable local ABM abilities so that following salvos are able to approach the target more closely before being, in turn, intercepted. Eventually, by repeating + d/ ~, o& F |6 i N% [3 B" p3 athe process, the target is reached and destroyed. LADL Lightweight Air Defense Launcher (USA TBMD term). 8 S2 \/ n3 X8 Y5 BLADS Low Altitude Demonstration System. q$ n- y4 E; ~0 }% G, ZLAFB Langley AFB, VA. , |3 e$ N1 ]1 h; r8 O8 [LAMP Large Advanced Mirror Program. LAN Local Area Network. ! R& H" l! V% M3 @; P+ O& [- JLandsat Land Satellite (NASA program’s satellite). : R3 D" w1 J# v( U: ^LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM. 5 l1 c) G4 o, d! I! wLANTRINS Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared Night System. LAO Limited Attack Option. LAPL Lead Allowance Parts List (Navy term). % |. H; w! s: W# x, [9 C( k3 [LARC Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA. , {+ Q$ u8 ], ^/ G' y. o& pMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 L 162 . X ?( V e0 W/ v/ oLarge Optics The technology of constructing and employing mirrors over 1 m aperture to direct and control high power beam weapons/systems with large coverage, or to provide high resolution or high sensitivity for detection and/or imaging. 6 [" `/ c3 e1 x$ {# Z8 HLASA Large Aperture Seismic Array. . V w4 ^, g Z7 J% M# t) V! ELasant A material that can be stimulated to produce laser light. Many materials can be used as lasants; these can be in solid, liquid, or gaseous form (consisting of molecules including excimers or atoms) or in the form of plasma (consisting of ions and electrons). Lasant materials useful in high energy lasers include carbon * `- h3 @) b# w$ I$ l3 Vdioxide, carbon monoxide, deuterium fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, iodine, xenon ) j: Z3 G7 L: T f5 N' ]) P- I4 kchloride, krypton fluoride, and selenium, to mention but a few. LASE LIDAR Acquisition and Sizing Experiment. 6 C c7 w( R C& l% V' qLaser An active electron device that converts input power into a very narrow, intense + Y G8 _6 N9 r$ f( Qbeam of coherent visible or infrared light; the input power excites the atoms of an # s7 O, ]5 L7 e: loptical resonator to a higher energy level, and the resonator forces the excited 4 y6 t* W a1 O9 Q0 |* u: Matoms to radiate in phase. Derived from Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation and classified from Class I - Class IV according to its $ U0 |; [, u2 ?) F8 {potential for causing damage to the eye. , z/ t+ v% G) s+ Y" {Laser Designator A device that emits a beam of laser energy to mark a specific place or object. Laser Detection and Ranging $ K& Z2 @' W( ~* D1 `(LADAR) K, v* B& X1 u3 m. }1 JA technique analogous to radar, but which uses laser light rather than radio or . o% S& o3 q. Kmicrowaves. The light is bounced off a target and then detected, with the return beam providing information on the distance and velocity of the target. : ?2 U" R+ z9 g: y- eLaser Guided Weapon 7 ^) S# R& F5 L% }6 Q4 [/ {A weapon that uses a seeker to detect laser energy reflected from a laser 7 C+ m& i J8 Y* y3 Q {marker/designated target and, through signal processing, provides guidance % B! l. N* Q! e- s/ Y- f: h- Rcommands to a control system. The control system then guides the weapon to the point from which the laser energy is being reflected. Laser Imaging m6 f- Q" D4 c6 l. g% j9 JRadar A technology whereby a laser beam can be used in a way similar to the use of a 3 L2 f: |! p* J* S. r4 I9 Fradar beam to produce a high-quality image of an object. Laser Optics Technology associated with the use and control of laser beams with flux greater than 1 watt/cm2. : I5 D' }% }& b5 @Laser Seeker A device based on a direction sensitive receiver that detects the energy reflected 8 V9 F9 M, d( Rfrom a laser designated target and defines the direction of the target relative to + h% z7 T9 Z, H+ }" |the receiver. See also laser guided weapon. ) w: L7 @0 y, y$ g4 e* w& ULaser Target 0 X8 ` b8 G0 _ X# tDesignating System A system that is used to direct (aim or point) laser energy at a target. The % V, c; D7 D/ K7 t K$ x( Jsystem consists of the laser designator or laser target marker with its display and 3 V8 s. h3 W( e5 M) Scontrol components necessary to acquire the target and direct the beam of the 5 y0 C- c2 e0 r5 }& Q6 z6 Qlaser energy thereon. 4 F0 N0 X1 B) j2 M+ ?( nLaser Tracker A device that locks on to the reflected energy from a laser marked/designated and defines the direction of the target relative to itself. 5 R2 x) _+ m- v: OLaser Weapons Devices, such as photon generators, which produce a narrow beam of coherent radiated power greater than 1 MW. 4 R3 ~& y) y. Y1 R7 T/ M NLASERCOM Laser Communications. LATS Long Wave Infrared Advanced Technology Seeker/Sensor.

帅哥

MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J / B+ w3 W* \5 W" P3 J1 P7 P( I155 JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council. % t. J- }* F9 e N5 x, [JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group. : u- _5 d+ J) g$ Y8 b; aJRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications. - Q: g3 e" Q* }; n# nJRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. + `0 ?* o6 {* ^ x: \& LJS Joint Staff. JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. # `2 I3 @+ o6 J+ L6 y( [# }. YJSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term). % ]( q7 m2 D9 @& x5 m# SJSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. . [/ K- Y% J7 y6 \( x& E8 vJSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term). JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). 7 [3 o A* v. w0 Q# j( L6 w(2) Joint Service Evaluation Team. 7 | a/ s1 }8 a y& cJSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). JSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center. JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term). JSMB Joint Space Management Board. JSOC Joint Special Operations Command. JSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. JSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document. JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System. JSS Joint Surveillance System. JSST Joint Space Support Team. - h R$ z- l, h$ I# P6 P8 r, i, eJSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System. JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. JT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting ; u0 r1 I$ r4 Q @JT&E Joint Test and Evaluation. 2 X9 O) j' }, E0 d" P) O+ RJTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term). 9 o/ d+ D6 Z4 S1 g, t$ B- pJTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station. JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. # F9 D( i1 Y- z1 `% p5 s+ g1 dJTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. - s7 k" K, T; H* B8 P/ y6 Z( IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 156 " i' z: r' j1 T8 L1 t' Q. d! eJTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). JTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. JTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). JTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term). JTF Joint Task Force. . `% f0 q! b- Z) @JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise. % X. L1 n& [% h) x, Z6 [/ FJTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System. & v( A% P) F+ w* lJTL Joint Target List. JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense. JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]. JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. JTR Joint Travel Regulations. 3 o5 c2 _1 ]/ ?! n2 b% ?% h4 k7 xJTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board. $ r; } j/ q/ Z& i/ eJTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). - l, ^# W9 S5 S* P8 p2 yJTT Joint Tactical Terminal. JTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. 3 n1 ?; N& B/ w. RJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft. 7 h8 L! }% X/ L1 P2 b! I0 ]JWAN Joint Wide Area Net. + O1 R2 z! T7 e) \$ DJWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). 0 K$ }$ I' f3 m T; B& v3 x1 PJWC Joint Warfare Center. JWG Joint Working Group. 8 u+ ?' T2 _ W4 R% e; f, t+ f& iJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network. 7 w+ d- }( H' s# l, }* f2 ^3 n% jJWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K 157 K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo. ; }' A" _5 z; M) \0 r: t$ CK Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another. 1 p: Z( E0 L( q1 U uTheoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of two observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both + U8 c) j. |# |8 Aobjects. KA Kill Assessment. & A5 m/ X1 M; s* h# l# ]- n8 M) J8 @KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. KB Kilobyte. / M/ x& s- h. V/ WKbps Kilobyte per second. KBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). 5 S$ g5 y& z* n# ?+ BKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion. KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. KDS Kwajalein Discrimination System. , u0 U2 G4 b4 r7 f v3 s4 d; ?KE See Kinetic Energy. |) q1 W$ I5 VKE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon. KED Kill Enhancement Device. % M6 }6 Y! ~& e# P# FKeep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the 3 v7 A% P5 Z+ H# m( u* j7 Dasset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to ) D6 w5 K7 C/ O: }4 \defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones ' m% R8 b% f6 q- w+ qunder the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined. 1 W5 K% ^: M. W6 ^KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept. 5 }' Z8 ^( b3 d% E' I0 E1 E7 BKENN Statistical pattern recognition tool. ( _6 d7 J0 |6 PKEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. / G, y0 g) b% R j0 WKEW Kinetic Energy Weapon. KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion). KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). KEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. KEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. ) a+ v1 |. J6 L6 U2 @Key A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a * s; s1 V. ?' U" F* nsequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption. 0 {6 I4 ]& b$ B# \, FKg Kilogram. KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL. * a/ i' U b+ b& x. ]7 v. I4 `3 gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K 0 g6 n& p3 ~% O5 ?, z% V158 - E e0 }& d7 @5 s2 S J4 nKHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. # q; k. o! ?3 y9 k8 zKIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution. 3 t! b/ V5 c! J* \: yKill Assessment + m; ^" l4 O. U. \. F2 y(KA) % L0 U' [% N- V2 a; {/ {! rAn evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV intercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and 6 M# V2 ^4 V1 nre-engagements. (USSPACECOM) * @' Z$ B W2 q' o1 c, p; hKill Enhancement Device 1 o) |) ]; `: SA device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. Kinematic Battlespace 3 m7 X* u& [3 CThe planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor timeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and operational constraints. Kinetic Energy 4 N+ A: l$ w! [, w! C(KE) The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion. Kinetic Energy # h" J/ h+ i, k! T9 {! `; V' VWeapon (KEW) 6 X% t& A" e ]' t3 i6 V* AA weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object. Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. Kinetic Kill Vehicle (KKV) A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell - g1 b2 M* G7 o3 H8 Elaunched from a gun).

帅哥

(Former NTF) Joint Operational Planning and Execution $ Y6 x+ o; j* s* u. o* O: u! @1 d, O. ?System (JOPES) A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration % i5 O( x) m7 e, w6 q5 o& Pand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders and their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct 8 z: E! w2 e) L) g4 ~8 ~of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and & W# j+ q" T! x; T iexecute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities & z5 [5 ~' K y- y3 u2 z. L* dassociated with joint operations. 1 Q) _* W2 u! R$ c* ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 153 7 i4 j& T( H8 a" S: a& `. Z6 l8 AJoint Operating 1 k# X5 L. i+ e o; w: k/ q) wProcedures (JOPs) $ r+ t" Q% Y/ X9 B4 oThese documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions ' K& l8 @3 v- _+ g4 [7 x* l" z& ynecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs ) K* r# u: x+ @' L* k! emay include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, Vulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting, ; h; c5 c7 a; E0 s& TFinancial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program + W/ c+ H. |* q* d& K& |Manger and the participating Services. 9 J1 E$ c$ I! ?- @Joint Operations / k& y3 x+ o, K* H& J, @9 {+ Y5 F/ ZArea 4 g0 Y- [7 w2 l6 F" ?That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to such military operations. Also called JOA. , y0 r2 l2 w( c& W8 M/ dJoint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program that involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component * C& f* O% }6 [7 e$ l- |7 C( Y7 ~during any phase of a system’s life-cycle. Joint Requirements Oversight ) |7 K2 G, y$ [2 i3 D3 gCouncil (JROC) A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts 0 |3 o% B* m8 ~3 Lrequirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates ; V3 a9 Y z/ T8 y& J: n* T! {1 aperformance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition Board. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air / M! q$ y* V5 hForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. Joint SPACECOM ' v* L- X. V- r" I! pIntelligence ' r# @: h* r0 Z2 Y# n u. \/ fCenter (JSIC) & W2 U/ _0 [4 W% i$ FA USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational intelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for the DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production 4 d* o6 l/ n7 U1 H( p% `1 Bincludes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and Satellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB. Joint Strategic e( B- b6 l. SDefense Planning - i3 E) `+ V0 @9 o! u' ?4 y i8 `! qStaff (JOSDEPS) 0 e$ Z' H, f* V, zA special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive 6 Q( n& v; [* m @and strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint 1 s6 H( a, y; l2 S/ LStrategic Defense Planning Staff. Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff (JSTPS) & g, ~; w3 x- \8 E! rA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing, coordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). % U0 B0 A: ^. a% ]9 X) o0 Y% ZAlso responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target . y, O3 I/ p; A; `5 v' dPlanning Staff. Joint , A; O+ ^) b1 W! ?/ J" xSuppression of Enemy Air Defense A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called J-SNEAD. Joint Tactical # |% Z4 U; a% q) v& nInformation Distribution System (JTIDS) % I: b" A0 ?. L; S! sA joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, and mobile or fixed-base land stations. Joint Tactics, , N5 X( ^/ s5 O1 B. g0 f& YTechniques, and Procedures 7 b% T: @$ \- z. E& j1 R. i9 [(JTTP) The actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how forces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, 5 G" w1 S1 o; i0 u4 N# Z; z! a/ {promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and 3 I9 }# L/ K9 r# d- [; F1 F) x6 J4 r1 ?Joint Staff. Also called JTTP. * C. K7 ~' ?8 r0 A, jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J : R. K0 w7 e# @1 c9 U6 R154 Joint Test and Evaluation `) C5 W. m5 S; fT&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have 1 U" ?: J, q6 B6 s: ?- @/ w A' w# yinterfaces with equipment of another component. 0 l9 @1 P$ u% ^( _, VJoint Test and 7 e; y9 F2 |& ?Evaluation p: Q9 J6 f* |/ XProgram 6 v1 i$ M& ~5 P2 c2 ~: S' w* B! ?An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on 8 J" M$ m4 Q! |! ~5 ~system performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements, systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. 7 B z( u) F$ q1 N) AJON Job Order Number. JOP Joint Operating Procedures. JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System. JOPS Joint Operations Planning System. JOR Joint Operational Requirements. JORD Joint Operational Requirements Document. JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. JOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). ; T7 d4 S8 r* d3 d- R. G0 A- I% ~JOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term). ( Q! F" _: s6 n/ Z/ Z" H0 qJP Joint Publication. 4 s$ Y) L) k U, s8 e1 p. ]1 V! jJPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. JPM Joint Program Manager. JPN Joint Planning Net. JPO Joint Program Office. ' u. z* k9 x/ ]JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. + l. b9 _9 }. _3 p7 v0 yJPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle. JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. JPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration. - b6 Q9 u( ~( M* M t* w; i; FJPT Joint Planning Tool. . k- a$ J! ^7 I/ ZJRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). JRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term). JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term). JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

帅哥

JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US. % b7 e0 b( |2 sJCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. JCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network. JDA Japan Defense Agency. ! L2 t8 C+ U: ?JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon). % S7 \2 C9 [) Y( Y: BJDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community. JDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System. JDN Joint Data Net. ) j2 a: q$ o- ^6 _4 g1 f3 }& \8 |JEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA). * |; E6 q% D, Z1 m D( bJEC Joint Economic Committee (US). ; N* A6 H, B5 J/ a! vJEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. * s- M! m+ f2 z' A1 h3 wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 150 : _- }1 t) A3 R9 }' SJEM Joint Exercise Manual. JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis. JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center. JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. JFCC Joint Forces Command Center. ; R+ J3 ?+ G9 r8 H& x- ^JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor. / s/ {$ r/ l: F+ t4 ]) |JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term). JFLC Joint Force Land Component. JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component. JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA. JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention. JHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD JHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. & p( s% Y4 _1 a$ v5 C* IJIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls. JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term). $ P+ e) {1 r9 ]: X6 z5 [# d9 s0 ^# nJIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. ) D+ M2 Z1 [/ x$ X7 X" l# GJINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems. JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures. JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms. 2 G5 s4 e( L( g$ |" l3 ~3 k3 BJIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). * G! @4 @$ c% Z/ D# E" PJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. ; t% n6 T. K. {JLC Joint Logistics Commanders. JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore. & D# m. f- Q- N/ \JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. JMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. JMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. JMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J * S1 Q; x5 p6 ^5 _6 @151 JMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded 2 {! @# ]" ~; \: Y u" d0 rby MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major 5 w$ [& H8 C+ P" x3 A9 |0 x' ucomponent of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN), operated by the JNTF. + o) a: m1 ^$ ~3 JJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual. JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement. JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement. ) r. D$ v3 [' m2 y5 k- G+ z3 a5 oJMO Joint Maritime Operations. - T/ U+ r" y. G8 uJMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. & A" T$ |3 e; c$ e: H- _JMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. (2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group. . V" y. c# S3 d* lJNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service. JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System. JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. JNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. 6 S0 Q$ Y. [3 [JNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access. 2 C! C- \0 c$ o% z! u/ U, T7 }% LJOB Joint Operations Board. ; T1 c& W! r% ~/ y" SJOC Joint Oversight Council. JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. 3 B3 o8 M2 x7 cJoint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one + `, g% w: i" x" l8 E9 l0 dService of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the % c& M( S- b& ~participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy). / c# l- W: d h) Y5 G2 ]5 j5 d. KJoint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more Services in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be 6 K8 @# i! l2 N$ t: v( q, ^promulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the combatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint 1 Y6 u8 c$ x# Q$ I+ XChiefs of Staff. / |! ~ {* F& L# }* P" RJoint Doctrine # T ]( F2 l) w/ nWorking Party A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands 6 t% N5 j) o9 x; Vwith the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, 0 ^1 X: v" V3 Z" k% ttechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination, ; M2 |6 M" t" \. n$ p4 Uproject scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation. The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, $ U5 x& m9 l, `Operations Plans and Interoperability. 3 g* z% I( X' @2 vJoint Electronic Warfare Center (JEWC) Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for investigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground systems. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 3 {; ^4 T+ h' W) {- G( k152 Joint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or ( Z" e% |( C! e; r- k2 W- b) Mattached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to ) d3 h c3 X% T zexercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander. Joint Force Air * u+ y r, Q v( x9 r" ?: JComponent ; l$ Q5 z5 c$ j, j a3 RCommander (JFACC) The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or + n9 L5 \9 I+ e2 H2 i; x0 G+ Jjoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making # e! O& e$ q" Y4 f% xrecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and coordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may be assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority 2 e8 F7 |' }- s, Rnecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the 1 r, j$ U3 Y& t: n2 q# g. Ppreponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. Joint Force Commander 5 Z' e! N: i: ?2 C4 k(JFC) ) j, X+ h6 L8 i5 V7 r9 IA general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant command (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also 6 v- g6 \& A3 R3 b% l% acalled JFC. & r m9 `4 F) U, O4 v, u7 g9 XJoint Force Land # o$ L6 C$ W$ Z$ g8 q9 y* \. hComponent Commander 0 I& j! |9 y+ J, {5 a9 e4 o(JFLCC) The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or . l2 k- n- c) P# E6 U: j9 G& Ljoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making recommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and p' t6 p, X M$ A8 ecoordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may / @ `' b4 g" x, j1 tbe assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority : W/ I! @# G C- m, I1 c7 K9 b3 Unecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the , k5 N* k7 Z3 Npreponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. Joint Force " [0 O$ v* i: R2 U/ L! pSpecial 7 a5 R( } y2 X/ J, l# n4 WOperations 4 v5 n7 E0 g7 y- [6 cComponent / n. @4 O0 W/ |Commander ! a3 \8 I3 ?: y7 n. X' v(JFSOCC) The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making recommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and ; w% S j$ ]! U- Q9 _assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing c E( c1 Z0 M0 b2 jcommander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the preponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and / _1 j- ^/ R) d( a* M \+ lcontrol capabilities. Joint National Test Facility 2 W7 m( f# T7 R; j: F9 x- ?; b; ^! H(JNTF) . \+ A9 b8 @# c& a0 h# q6 l: B( f; m6 LA large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.