- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
![Rank: 9](static/image/common/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](static/image/common/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](static/image/common/star_level1.gif)
|
System) k- r/ F. X* W6 H/ z" V! U3 t5 S0 X* {6 a
Readiness* s( h6 t6 r. n, [' J" C& R: L8 {
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out
% `) u. |/ v5 O" C& P0 x6 ^5 Kthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
0 q6 x! B5 F% H! lalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
4 y$ p3 ?! v1 B! Y8 k; bincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
- Z- m2 B) I# R+ \/ i/ Qstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
$ S0 q. d5 |! J Y5 `verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
& ]" _" H/ w: V( [continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under5 l7 H7 S3 u* d, m$ J! P y9 M# e2 M
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions$ X; J, _2 T' h
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies( g& M0 g$ S" ?: Z7 M0 I
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
" s! v/ }- w3 @historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results, `0 T" `/ }' I2 l" V; H
status reporting.! Z( _. s+ m: c. i% `1 n
System; K8 x4 I7 r9 I2 L: R
Readiness0 k' G' g7 n2 Z, ^8 E3 E% M
Objective0 E, Y9 T' G/ W( x
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
" @& E" a! y/ H) u$ Uspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
' M, E' N; U" E6 I! e* o9 x7 I; JSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
) E+ @/ r" c0 s7 Gmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support+ z1 P- C6 u- W% X% c& \
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of8 t0 w9 f5 u8 e, _) v0 U
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission* P+ ~$ z2 s- \: y. q! v* t
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
0 ^% \" a3 u @2 q" [System
2 l8 ^" S" E8 ~. ?Requirements9 G% A) |2 P; ^6 F! v- k
Analysis (SRA)
* Z0 E- Z" a2 JAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
3 f. R& x; x, B( m. G s3 IConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine3 t3 q/ @) Z. F% l1 i
specific system functional and performance requirements.
1 M5 D! V1 f4 A0 u. \) n8 s: r HSystem, f8 [3 P, \9 s
Requirements
1 K7 ^( t$ W& FReview (SRR)1 M1 L' X+ S& f7 I" y, d# `
Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. q5 N! [% w6 Y
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
( A3 i7 }+ n" @: Z T2 h/ [0 odegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
( t: V, v& X# X# V( o6 lSystem Security4 M. e! d$ }, y/ N$ v
Engineering7 t0 ?4 i0 B" _/ u* {
(SSE)
- I' s' ~$ b1 K" oAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
8 k) Y4 _. f+ J. t$ o# u( W8 {2 ]principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks! P0 ^, [3 ?! ^6 b$ W
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related7 T! B. f0 l" R; O$ Q
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and4 \0 r$ b( ?& k. V4 l" V6 N( S
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to G, W' s% U3 B e; b m
security threats.$ s8 w) U* R2 c2 s% B
System Security' H+ a+ M! I% i) e% Z' \( W; o% L* l
Engineering0 C9 t1 {$ b2 x* y
Management$ x1 _( S# J [
Program
/ Y" P V# v8 U(SSEMP)
4 V; Y: p, H' D f4 G" a _" ^2 mThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical$ @* M T9 r' I, R H9 n
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
' @; D! U, R0 @8 \/ Cprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the% S9 ~1 Q& M2 ?9 O( O5 O4 V
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
5 {" e( |3 J1 C6 A1 {# Bresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
4 d8 t& b# P8 \- s" Smanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes! e/ B* x4 K& b) k
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.* D& W) s) o; V Z
System Security1 M% ]; m+ P! X! `! U' I
Management3 g2 t9 ]) z; u/ ~$ c2 c0 q
Plan (SSMP)3 o: N& X; F5 M% C
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to- I, p+ h5 g7 I; e! O
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,* D7 {. {1 g# i& N5 Z- y
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
8 R& X2 q9 K$ ]- E+ @, z% tother program engineering, design and management activities, and related
: H; r5 R$ s( `systems.
) J# R( P7 Z0 T3 z% _Systems- T, o% D# P0 Q. [6 c8 E( ?
Engineering
% g! h0 |' i( T, WAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle. e" u8 @" G* i& w
balanced set of system product and process solutions.
: B+ g! f( ]5 r/ v, JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
! u( v/ ~# x3 w2 Z; ?2 @1 z287
) H, R7 G% _- y0 P2 eSystems
) Z/ ]/ z N2 N6 b( bEngineering; w( X/ S' l1 S. }$ @" z3 G% L9 c! u
Management/ }/ \" ]; u2 v- i- I" w
Plan (SEMP)
/ Z9 A" |, |3 k* i* LThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)) Z6 [/ c9 V- W2 ~' W' X+ r
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
* F* M. v% c. X( A. s6 v, I$ Gdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
( I& l! \- e. K3 y, UKey engineering milestones and schedules.
8 Z# S4 i. H& y9 I- Z4 wSystems Test
% N! j4 u% c( y9 G/ G" A5 CIntegration and& _( \6 m0 r" ]% o; }$ A
Coordination# g. e3 t+ @* W' s
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.3 B& ?! f+ J) ~* Z) s' z, N
System Threat
0 L0 U! R |5 j* e' M, G! TAssessment9 G7 d w; X" ^% L: Y
Report (STAR)
. E; `5 T3 F. URequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a' k, i b, c& Q, H% k
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency2 K8 }# |# \0 K1 A: ^* o6 W( d
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
. v+ [. j, ^- d+ o, m1 c3 uthe threat changes significantly.
4 d, ~2 c' y+ |* J# B9 ]* X% z8 Y% z6 \4 ]System-Valued
q( L- C6 K& ?" o/ [( k/ FAsset; ~1 R9 _6 y7 R& l. n9 Z
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to D% L6 K- U. K/ R$ V+ s) W, t0 i
the proper operation and well being of the SDS./ K3 u+ o- X4 F4 b% a2 l% K
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T* \/ L' C! `: E% a" u1 }5 l
288) U# {, J& z5 J1 J4 @
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
+ J# |' v0 N8 kT&E Test and Evaluation.
1 k$ J* k0 A1 IT&T Transportation and Transportability.
8 X4 l8 ^! l* o5 ^: yT-MACH Trusted MACH.: y# A8 c3 C* E* s5 {
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
5 } U& Z: x" GT/R Transmit/Receive.
' g6 c. z9 g/ v3 t2 wT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).% f. `! a0 ~& j0 {" @
T$ r( n# W" V4 ?; }6 V. Y% H, @
21 X7 ? g: V, U. M0 w- ~9 X |
Technology Transfer.
! z# C2 L5 n5 {% ]4 a/ x8 BT
# K2 T O! l: q: |5 p" ^0 k27 x3 Q' a G' O8 V0 _, W z
E Technical Training Equipment." p# W% {# b$ i- s6 E- k v
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.8 @; G. {( b i3 c4 m
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
6 a/ A9 U/ h, a, t& U' ?0 PTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
5 l# E0 L, R: E' uTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
8 K: e& i5 X8 z" v/ K3 y2 Z6 {3 cTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
! D+ E4 t! R; VTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
0 e2 e# `1 |" y+ V6 `TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).+ b$ Y. {8 q+ ^2 X2 f
TACAIR Tactical Air.
3 p% D. n" ~( R9 C0 {. HTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
: J1 [) s" u8 q. h# yTACC Tactical Air Command Center.1 l3 i8 C: o; o, O( ~( X; A. r
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).8 ^1 n3 T* ]6 d0 }' l6 M$ w$ n
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).2 f' P9 |/ [& T8 m/ g3 a
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
5 b, i: v1 r, B4 \, U1 p" BTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
# x1 l& d4 J& ^" I L( FTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
) k: ^( ^' l; M& L: RTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|