- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition. ?$ H& @6 ]; {8 o5 i# ?
Categories5 c+ z& C' L* l5 V1 s! I! O! a6 N
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
- z- B8 P0 M# _$ D5 c6 Tand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories5 j) q }8 A% M! `. _
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.# U% `- E- l* O/ A; u
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They$ B9 |: y* _9 V
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting) \0 }+ x/ F2 v$ {6 E/ v( f& `
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under, z% N9 x$ O, ?8 M4 e. X" u/ R
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
. N: U6 }1 q& f) J' L$ }(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --4 h: b% d5 [0 b# K: F3 `
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
9 F0 V& j/ O3 ~Component Acquisition Executive.
1 {# S3 r5 V9 I( V7 IAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
8 g2 w" i5 z M; Ddelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
8 n* Z& ]1 ~; Q) l5 [9 L7 u/ Eunique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area b$ ]( Y1 |% G2 i
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
: ~! r: | r0 E# F% K# kcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone& c' @/ z$ L- R: u
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
2 V2 C1 l+ M6 W( p ]within their respective organizations.
$ b+ j& o$ R7 Y& ~- s' l# F' jAcquisition$ m O( q2 a% j* S
Decision* {( b; Q! t# Y6 g4 x) R1 t
Memorandum
" H" g7 n5 i. F! g1 }/ N(ADM)
# m# t2 l, m2 S) G& f3 o7 G; L2 H4 BA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents" @- @# t2 k( k2 ~$ y1 L- c2 J
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone0 f' Y% M. _9 |0 m" `6 p) _% J
decision review or in-process review.. m4 k& d, @4 w Z. q. {" M0 j' w
Acquisition
/ n' U9 P" ?$ K4 M' Y) }% \3 LField of View0 _8 K! Y& Z$ O/ G& [) h8 M
(FOV) ~ K: \, O) {+ F
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process3 b+ o, [8 q7 R) e( X! z) e
of searching its assigned volume.9 h# T9 g9 Z4 p0 |# E* \
Acquisition Life/ |( l p' h6 u# L0 b
Cycle [* Z, g3 B D, B. b! ^! D- _
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
; q& s8 r* f9 g! ~! K" I; Y: ^a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and' V0 D( N; X# t
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration8 F% n' i- u6 H0 v# d; e0 Y
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
; n5 u7 @% i6 j/ J5 b. WDeployment, Operations and Support.- M, Z* Z3 A6 o8 G, y1 p3 ?" J
Acquisition; c, B! q3 \# k# B& O
Logistics
' l+ U) Q* p, ]Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
4 \# L. O& l5 o9 T3 S% i6 Zanalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics+ v2 H) l$ {- q6 D5 d
support throughout the acquisition process." V; Q. ]% Y; C, h
Acquisition( ]+ V F, `& t* t7 k! L
Management1 V0 K" ^6 H/ V$ R6 C4 [" @7 P
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of5 [- g4 V# M. w5 o* _/ @: v
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense! ?% q: G0 t0 n* O: @ G
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense# w5 Q( Q- G. y* }7 C5 F* U: }$ f" |3 a
acquisition systems/programs.
3 y4 }3 M) J0 d7 CAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute5 {- Y8 i/ A- z' ^5 S ?0 J
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
( W' m) v, w) j! J! S1 C( l5 xcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
& Z) z: I4 p1 [+ YDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)6 x o$ O; F; a* V0 m
Acquisition
. a1 l$ y" |8 QPlanning
4 @( V+ t" `9 \) n0 A; m0 FThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
; u/ E/ \8 ~7 w/ d' P) Z4 ?; Vare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
4 I1 Z# l; K( o9 {need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout0 }& M4 V* u7 t5 B" N) X
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for5 y' x; {+ V$ R, V/ q% l4 T
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.% x0 w: D; s) I( B
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
% b1 b' z0 N; i% { g7 T5
1 {7 v$ ^ \* [/ ]2 D& X, F2 CAcquisition; {3 c6 y0 }/ M$ h4 b2 W2 M8 f
Program
. M' y" t7 z/ W2 K0 {4 BA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
7 x$ r3 V) F& \& C3 C6 ycapability in response to a validated need./ h; f4 I: Z0 H# D" h4 c/ B1 H
Acquisition
3 x- t G8 H) T$ ?Program+ c! O& P3 x" _' t- q: @
Baseline (APB)
' \* v# B3 W5 p6 T' kAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
( L+ q1 _" r! L! }7 sobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
9 ]7 x0 D' s2 I/ [ y' n9 ?authority milestone reviews as follows:; ]% m5 R/ @) e/ M4 Q6 r7 `
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
1 P' f% Q& q* O- @( H; MDemonstration and Validation.
2 c4 F* \, z9 n+ p•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
6 E' r: q& S" p! I" \2 GPhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
( b7 E- a# f- m• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in o' P7 n) B& L: w; p
Phase III, Production and Deployment.8 g6 r# q* [' M4 \
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
" U/ G" ~7 ?7 U& A& Yparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
2 Z+ p( N9 H9 D: [( Kthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be" E8 t3 ]6 U) A' Q0 U
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of) y: U. l" R9 k" d
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline K1 Q' A( j; a7 k) `6 D
deviation.5 ]7 @1 E: o% ?( r3 K+ q0 m0 J! V
Acquisition
/ T/ Y2 A9 a+ W1 v7 i6 [- H( a9 x3 r7 rRadar
' f# E! z( U4 HRadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
& D5 G$ g+ g- A) Lbackground and non-hostile objects.
! |0 z4 w8 O" l. ?- VAcquisition
4 L% r+ }1 B- KRisk
! E+ h& Y/ |$ }) D( m- bThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
3 i1 |% X8 h+ |% d5 Nunintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
0 j5 T$ i5 a/ q% {cost, or availability for deployment.
5 ~3 X+ f( L. L5 O: _Acquisition/' h1 {% v, L& f1 p2 \+ F! E& G G
Reacquisition
~$ n; F0 {% q* } i& jTime0 j, y( p" {2 m8 ], ]
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
- t7 O: r2 y5 B! V6 @, S; rincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|