- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition, N! N& I8 e6 |2 D& {- L2 F$ I$ j8 l
Categories
+ q. f& X# v! @, X! qCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
# N1 C" I/ d: t* I: P+ [" ^+ y2 N, Tand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories l) r" d9 x7 k k+ d0 u
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
4 v4 O+ g8 y. d+ \! YAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
) p* m7 _0 @% D. C8 O: c* Phave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
g8 d% c: l& e$ u6 L6 Crequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
) s+ m! p+ |* `# {3 b( h+ q+ dSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;) [) \! V8 V9 i- x2 v+ l
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --8 D x! P- g/ s8 C! D- N
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
0 S6 o0 v& U5 ~) k5 z; B" W# HComponent Acquisition Executive.9 C" e1 y, e7 S ]* s
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
8 m0 q% b8 V6 @# P0 Z2 X0 B/ Gdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
& h- B. k+ J' @* Funique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
; e6 ]0 x1 p( i) W c2 H0 oAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
+ e% _! p4 F0 N% z! tcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
5 q& Z0 @% C4 k" Tdecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
% X6 p( B1 c9 U+ ~ M$ |within their respective organizations.2 ^$ K3 m9 M- L! {6 N( a7 @
Acquisition
. }6 K+ f7 ?* ADecision
$ C8 F6 B$ v' N; m' gMemorandum a+ ~9 ~" [; {7 o; ?6 o% K9 O
(ADM)
[9 D9 B+ g9 ^- m) a- OA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents' f4 F5 Q* g9 H4 ^" [1 l" R$ h5 @
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone5 P0 k2 P; b. f8 U
decision review or in-process review.
; Z$ I9 r9 e; @6 Z( c4 b! K" bAcquisition
4 g W- A+ n$ C, ?1 h) b0 X. ~Field of View
0 |: W9 K; F( f8 u3 Y(FOV)
- E$ ~) ~4 g7 F7 V4 MThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process7 s$ T3 @2 k, W2 k
of searching its assigned volume.
& n! M+ d8 N0 r% ]3 ~Acquisition Life* L+ s. v1 N z& |
Cycle
6 r R. d F+ y! g; i) B1 m6 X$ sFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which! E4 U$ f+ x8 Y* }
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and9 D9 r% n/ r0 ]
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
4 J. L& m9 b2 J' \$ tand Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
P9 \% |5 G* s; Y1 [Deployment, Operations and Support.: y9 [& ? K5 t3 O
Acquisition9 y k2 S S9 C7 \9 L* i
Logistics( n- z/ r/ z9 y( _/ R8 I4 N2 S
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
0 n2 ^# U! ]$ M/ y1 H8 J$ Danalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics
8 X# H! |+ h, `6 Bsupport throughout the acquisition process.
% T$ w7 @$ b6 x( v d0 L6 wAcquisition% H# X3 [5 Q+ u5 R% A
Management
# F6 P i. x8 B0 J& I" fManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of3 r- e4 p; Q6 d- i2 K: M
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
+ q% g; }4 z, W! \# b8 Hacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense3 V: x S/ u2 I4 c
acquisition systems/programs.5 q$ S7 d# B5 V) [
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
' M1 L1 b& p, N9 xthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
0 N- z1 b5 G2 \; s6 A8 hcontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and: W0 M# K4 ^2 h
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
5 v4 H7 j( W% Q% y5 N- W+ gAcquisition* m, {0 b, U6 F9 E; E
Planning+ J+ Z- t* K! p& B; F. L) x
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition& |- I$ @& S7 g# N5 o& j
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the8 f; [* ?; H! p; h h
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
& Y p" R4 i$ t* hthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for2 i) x& C* U: L( a
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.2 q% |5 [# V2 Q) e
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A; \+ }' H8 E7 S% ?# Y: e3 y
5
, A. c( e5 `! N- g) {+ ?0 WAcquisition
% S& t" d. J$ D" JProgram
. ~+ b# }0 \- p9 N- qA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
9 K& l( m. ]% d: T/ B. {* Ccapability in response to a validated need.; H7 p3 {3 q& O0 y5 j6 k: _! ^6 ?
Acquisition- i' B+ w' f, j4 w( M
Program; H" k$ E7 L; |. a' c3 y
Baseline (APB)
% ^/ E; R" [" B- S! F8 }+ L2 pAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance G" _& P! P" c1 ]- h6 }
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
1 o0 d" v; p5 n2 W' n% X+ _5 Gauthority milestone reviews as follows:& k' O: e6 B# |
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
' I4 O: c, F3 RDemonstration and Validation.
& m. r) _9 v# B& w! X4 }•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
4 v S( G) f( S9 P0 Y _Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
2 Y) X" {6 G9 `- [* S; J% ?# {3 d0 p7 ^• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
3 z& Y' R, i& |' Z5 s& _, W6 r3 FPhase III, Production and Deployment.
$ i! ?* i: H2 r- l: f! D! E' W) PEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance; x5 e1 p7 C; P4 i5 N# I
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called: s, Y+ A! M& i* P: q( i! I
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
5 w) V- f0 c! H) o( Jchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
0 | f1 j% o) N l; _the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
- |. G5 J1 Q3 m) B% Qdeviation.
0 C; w: P% Q% A& }+ dAcquisition8 p+ q8 U I* L3 h0 k6 o
Radar8 e+ i2 c: d, A2 g" `' Z2 J
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
) @6 Z, J, `. {4 W% ^5 ^4 Xbackground and non-hostile objects.
( C0 E" W: D! p+ ?+ z9 dAcquisition1 s/ O! v% r1 i# l* {
Risk
& Q( E2 A" J3 s5 L z( ?6 WThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an& z' c' x. D0 `4 c. T
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
! r. h- H2 ]" {; @$ ^cost, or availability for deployment.
0 v$ e# {4 {. y. d+ ~; R/ \Acquisition/
7 J& h5 d3 X1 N- FReacquisition
/ y5 s Q7 [2 a4 ATime
3 ]2 B$ J8 q) t4 `/ M: u% UThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This7 M! i* G6 j$ i. K2 ^# l" |
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|