- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition
4 O* j2 }- ?; G" U& \% UCategories* V0 ]0 h9 ]# R
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
9 c) y8 \8 L( t+ Q$ tand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
c/ U6 N4 n- R* |2 V) cdetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
4 Y' G# v; b6 FAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
' N- [* ~5 @/ S- {( t& Jhave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
; n- F- K9 d' G% P b6 {8 d: Lrequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under; x9 R* c% R! z
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;% S$ x9 `& E# W
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
& @5 c' S$ _, ?' V* Facquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
5 c8 F4 P4 ?+ o9 H: @) H2 l0 RComponent Acquisition Executive.) F3 ?. x n8 x* \( `* d) ~
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
N. W8 M; V' v+ o' {delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
; m1 J B* D, ]3 a% w _2 Q! aunique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
2 q0 T2 ]% \: j" @* s1 zAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
* e- E5 p' r8 y( j( b; ycategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
3 U8 S1 u; {$ Z' x2 }decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
/ e4 [$ x& q5 ^5 w9 }4 g% G* V* Bwithin their respective organizations.
! w% a. \) k6 R: CAcquisition! {9 e D9 D! ?( p1 ^
Decision5 E" b2 u4 ~: a; W& _6 H
Memorandum: S5 H5 G- l3 h$ F* J8 |* Q2 r! j: D
(ADM)
# A5 T& f0 C% I. f% \" BA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
, Y/ D" N8 Y4 C6 T7 k& z7 P3 |decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
, _' W7 e0 j& \3 M2 _! Idecision review or in-process review.
; r7 e( S) b/ z: K/ j$ jAcquisition
0 s3 G8 ]: F' J9 j, O' N$ T* W; wField of View
, H" _8 p! A9 _& F3 x(FOV)/ R% P; V" e* J
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process5 j8 s7 ~4 P- e) y) C, K
of searching its assigned volume.
, W" [! |' O, H/ q0 G2 f8 r7 m& QAcquisition Life. a0 Y) p# X* @7 R% ^3 b. Y( @& Y
Cycle$ ^' b( m' C& q! |# ]
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
% G- t$ y! ?0 [+ za system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and2 o7 W" Z# K# @' q6 Z- s
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration
; E0 r+ H& y: M) j9 ]and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and# O O1 z# r0 k; Z6 L# n; V4 s
Deployment, Operations and Support.. W6 A, @7 b7 G$ o" L; Y
Acquisition2 }5 ]; O. j, N( Z* t
Logistics4 z% h R- m* N4 f$ D4 A6 _9 Z
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
) x M, a, F0 S- Tanalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics+ \' e: `( P7 g" X) p* ~3 L+ e# L
support throughout the acquisition process.3 @7 x) V8 E4 [; s4 a d+ N
Acquisition0 y }) W! X" [+ b, u1 w. [! G( k' S
Management
4 Y1 w# ^% B, Z0 Q# \6 A, ^Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
6 ~3 _+ W, T1 @- u* }3 g4 N$ m- u“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense3 L, j( N+ Q I( Q# l1 H7 ^7 @
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
' _% P. ]! ~1 I+ |* G0 ?acquisition systems/programs.0 o" w( K+ h& y- W. b% J
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
! a1 i+ G& ~- _- s/ Z5 W5 [the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
/ o- z# u4 D: h0 b1 F, Econtractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and# X" f4 m( X5 X
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
( |9 M, v0 w' uAcquisition
$ e( A( b, I( ~/ s TPlanning$ r# I& n4 t" g5 f, f8 j
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
- ^" Y3 D+ y0 N, rare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
5 D/ a) `( w5 Q. Y: u5 Nneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout9 ?& ^0 j6 b( h l0 v6 u& R
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
1 l( @; `8 I+ d' y/ x- R& Q0 Dmanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.% b1 q, r0 b0 T* Z' i" v
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A' w2 T1 t/ f# `- Z' t
5& r, G; c- c* b0 D
Acquisition( @: H3 S3 Z4 T2 x, ^
Program0 i7 g. @! @2 E0 \; E: a
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel4 k# Y! h* ?9 n2 v
capability in response to a validated need.
& S' U/ j: w. n! ?& Y+ h- |/ |Acquisition
6 m C2 n) [1 p/ HProgram
# @) p& o3 f! K$ F( C- hBaseline (APB)
1 J; j$ P4 k5 S$ Z, oAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
% g# z( h9 m& hobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
2 L( U p: g* gauthority milestone reviews as follows:3 a( I! S& B+ t. Q2 ^& U
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
" F6 ~3 x/ x0 M. I. ^) z( vDemonstration and Validation.
* E# {/ ^/ r$ I- a6 ?. M•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
, f: I0 ~4 G6 s4 R+ DPhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.! e2 r. I# I# D- {. C0 c/ }
•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
$ b* V- B/ ~! j' w( V) E) S: RPhase III, Production and Deployment.* |* G' n+ ~2 r( }& w- N$ P( f
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance+ d/ ?4 t: d& P( Q" p
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called) l" F/ \3 O$ @: ~3 ]5 P
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
# k; F4 ?3 g' `# _7 Mchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
! g% [7 G, b; Bthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
0 e# J7 y$ ]8 i- l# \deviation.2 ~4 o; v0 }% S1 U: R6 W' Y8 d
Acquisition' \) g* \2 l& j
Radar1 V2 w# M. H2 s8 w3 S
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the- N: ]6 o( j; o# p
background and non-hostile objects.
; x9 D- ^; W4 ~4 Z* ?' \, T. ~: jAcquisition
$ \# w. C, E, g! K$ A1 @) O4 q+ n7 ZRisk
0 A6 ]4 f9 }5 Y8 {+ F+ s8 MThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an& @! V& I& i# K. l+ T' ~. Q
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,( y- d$ ]* {$ m3 W0 o1 v! S& H
cost, or availability for deployment.8 x9 Q1 C/ \1 r, K. o" N
Acquisition/
: Z9 g4 j$ A3 M9 G. cReacquisition
/ E2 a; @5 [% `: ~" fTime
5 g' N# \3 Y% ]+ q9 c( u' a" VThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
5 G) ?% B* S" Gincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|