- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition
. O3 m% f7 B# LCategories3 m' D& H/ y* @0 b# |
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution$ p3 u3 u' O8 O( e: A
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories6 i8 ]. {& b% }4 l' ?8 \6 [. A
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
; w7 s1 v; c* f+ q1 h/ wAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They8 l& n8 \: ]8 B1 \$ b) J4 l
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
. T6 P: d) m& }requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
. U5 N" a( D7 U; S1 gSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
3 \) l W- l9 E- }/ g6 I; ?. X(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
; m3 q; }9 S, L* O# K- V* c# xacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
0 L+ R, L, G* h6 F" i! rComponent Acquisition Executive.$ f6 Y: J9 ]2 v, N( N Q
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is; x! Z( A1 V6 p/ G6 ]1 e
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have! Y5 A2 r# ?% M/ |* b: M: X& b
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
9 x' s$ N7 S5 A& K4 {6 Q8 _Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
6 r- ?: p7 U$ ^% `+ tcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone" c2 p6 U' o2 b9 t
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate+ d+ @6 \, Z* D0 ~* {
within their respective organizations.: l" s- q' o$ X* s" D8 X6 x
Acquisition7 J3 ~% a9 z# k" M; Q3 Z# O
Decision
& G$ t. H+ J# n1 s- vMemorandum6 z" k4 z- q( ~$ U0 c; y
(ADM)' k2 U( T \: F' I# l5 K
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
) P) t4 `5 |# d/ X# m# ~" Ydecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
% c! s& B. \0 s& {* D( i3 e6 Mdecision review or in-process review.
6 s3 T0 Z+ C3 R7 jAcquisition
6 m+ `1 M4 K0 t! ]Field of View
) Y; S. n" Y$ u(FOV)
x4 A7 |/ M; f$ W* tThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process4 ?$ M! {/ j4 A% Q( I1 N6 p
of searching its assigned volume.
, N8 d& j- b: H2 \4 FAcquisition Life
$ C. P u7 i! u7 K4 r8 ]' R; N0 R6 ZCycle
. C/ o4 X: m* Y" \1 y& JFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which1 K" c! q4 j8 b* ]6 h
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
4 b4 B( U8 V1 v. f5 J, C* f2 hproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration/ ?) p- ^; d$ U' O3 v: w& @
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and( P6 K y7 ]4 D) C* L( C( _
Deployment, Operations and Support.$ x3 y/ E7 f+ e8 D
Acquisition" X" }: @5 P6 k& K, j: q( V3 u
Logistics% b. X. k% C" y" `& v0 r* a7 [1 ]2 G
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,5 c t6 ^ `3 a6 D* m3 |
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics8 l1 M6 x. U1 F3 g
support throughout the acquisition process.# E; t* |' T" d4 B A
Acquisition1 q8 u, _- S+ `9 i
Management3 j4 U6 B x/ r, m# Z% n0 |* g' W
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
8 n7 [' U; P3 V& n“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
; s9 ^3 D/ S* q, B; macquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense$ F; ]7 }" Z" v
acquisition systems/programs.5 D/ o7 {; ]2 L1 b, [/ x( S
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute2 B; Q' B2 k- D3 v# S- ?" t6 `, U
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
0 U2 c8 m0 X9 |contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and% ~" A# |+ m+ i; {) \& u
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
. |6 t8 h- ]/ Y5 ?# F. pAcquisition
& D! I) h! s8 [8 y. Y3 p3 CPlanning A( m) v+ Z) D
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
9 K" x& r& ^8 i$ T# C% Mare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the1 E9 E: t8 P; k; i" f1 N4 v/ `. ~
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
4 P+ v" W7 Q. U* N$ I" Sthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for g& e! r9 {% u# ]* {) i7 [' Y' Q
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
# f4 Z, f2 |+ o F/ iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A1 d9 h M' w0 J1 c$ }" j
5
: L4 h, z, ^+ [- F& u; nAcquisition
. S$ U( F6 |- p: k1 K: ~Program6 `; t8 s" v5 M; Z
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
# {5 \& o$ h8 l, Q/ {capability in response to a validated need.
' D3 `+ @$ {/ }: ^' v- a0 n/ cAcquisition
! a2 _, q9 U* E1 X* yProgram
C/ a- `0 A# _9 i' cBaseline (APB)
8 D4 s3 L! D+ QAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
z A4 o4 e( G! Iobjectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
, D y" P1 C0 m7 Q9 o6 \authority milestone reviews as follows:
. N) x$ T7 o. J+ b$ |•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
( _2 G1 S) T' a/ @& eDemonstration and Validation.
8 U- {& [0 }) s. ^9 V•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in6 H; W4 O8 P8 P* L5 [; \
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.0 k( C+ ?: G8 B1 {$ u! l
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
( u! J$ Y! }1 U8 I4 XPhase III, Production and Deployment.2 a. W7 V" Q3 S! ]
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
6 Q8 l9 Y+ k* \; h! \1 i A$ Kparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
. S5 H( N" ]$ |! a2 H7 L& ]7 k! jthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be2 G' {* A8 I3 v! @8 E
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of7 `' ? C% \$ y
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
% o D$ z0 ?) g; A% X% Tdeviation.
, A3 b k9 u! Q1 N$ lAcquisition
: z% t. C- \$ ]6 fRadar. k: [9 e; U1 x
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
" P. E# x" c) obackground and non-hostile objects.
- F1 d" r+ r% ~; ^( n. kAcquisition
* u; W( |/ Z" ~7 r2 V/ ~4 P' y% uRisk# v" H$ h1 n7 r4 v9 S4 ?% |
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an/ Y: C8 v# h1 B
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
6 B- e; y3 u; i9 m0 r" Rcost, or availability for deployment.
+ e6 a8 x2 ?$ u D9 I5 _9 D6 |Acquisition/1 n' y, g0 u1 d
Reacquisition+ V; P, @+ B: G9 I8 @/ ~: j" g
Time }9 H( t2 t' O$ K9 t
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
# K/ ]: }5 w- b# _% Gincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|