- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition; ]& l% J" i7 B. Z1 Q+ j( ~: d
Categories* |* D# v6 B" U8 }1 E; P* p
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution2 [+ h/ F" V& c. Q# j
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories9 D( i1 B c) t4 l/ c0 F
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
- y8 j# b* Q. T( h! PAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They9 u$ _# _; F' Y2 O+ y
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
+ P" a X' J# Z* X, C$ |requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
8 _! z, A# W9 l% }. TSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;! C& R1 Q- u$ ?' }' w
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --- |1 K' Q+ q" @/ i; s$ _" x& p
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the3 @. u' X5 g0 P% d
Component Acquisition Executive.# w! {6 F4 q' f4 B' F" j, L+ @( u; A
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
$ A7 G1 F$ A+ M8 Gdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
1 @. F5 F; ~0 w8 w$ @unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area" i. j* S! W# j+ M% e
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
?, }2 N% \( r+ m- p- Q8 rcategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
& V6 D( V1 r" i+ a' _/ mdecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate2 i; a A5 L- W# n8 `; `! ^
within their respective organizations." \# j8 ~& D6 X0 r7 J
Acquisition# ]+ [& ]9 Y5 X. s# b3 [$ e. ?
Decision1 F% K2 A) s; v% |/ W5 i
Memorandum
9 _4 N/ F6 O* N' q& g% v/ ^' j(ADM)
0 E1 L% K: G5 f/ ~A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents v4 T. {3 K* }! g. q
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
+ T; f7 _4 l0 t; i+ ~, Udecision review or in-process review.
7 B8 o% m( p9 Z; R+ @Acquisition2 \$ g& C6 E6 T! ^
Field of View
3 W* i% }3 j& O6 I" x(FOV)
. V8 G+ ] R- J/ u+ Y) _$ _4 fThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
x$ t3 v4 U! @9 B5 n4 nof searching its assigned volume.: x2 e- C6 T9 J- ^; ~5 x
Acquisition Life
& j. S( g: K: \/ q4 OCycle
1 S! s( \" R, U k' {. N! m: E4 c" ZFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which& d2 ]# n; J3 Z
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and# g; g, N0 {1 Q9 h- p( h
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration3 J' R- b. i' d, z( b7 _2 P
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
! E3 E4 O: R6 t; C% yDeployment, Operations and Support.* l+ U3 _' F" p' z/ `- Z2 j8 @! b. p
Acquisition- C# I7 ^ g l) k% R% ?2 h/ q
Logistics
1 L0 s) A/ j7 T& Q$ AProcess of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
+ P* A$ @1 }' a% z/ W: a5 R1 ~4 c0 danalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics. x9 o" K5 s5 Y" C8 t
support throughout the acquisition process.
2 V. d: E' B( Y7 o6 l/ LAcquisition$ r" @, ~# k# I, _8 T
Management1 v) S- M- |/ U2 I
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of3 `5 ~2 h4 C. h
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense" {7 D/ l; L3 s/ t! \ R
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense3 X4 X" w2 z; \7 ~& |
acquisition systems/programs.3 k; Y* ]; ?) x7 n! Z. `
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute4 a7 r1 b9 @9 q s: w: h m& M
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding) F& s7 S4 W7 U" R- [
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
/ Q/ G5 y6 B) ?# z9 E6 i- {Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)0 N( V. L) q6 } m. u! T a
Acquisition' i$ o) r# R2 S5 V4 M% ?1 c" j
Planning4 o4 G0 A m: d5 {! e1 G/ L
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
3 j0 q" _3 L. m8 _are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
) q* z; _3 K1 p. o3 kneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
/ _( R2 S( L. o9 |7 Jthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for q! o+ q {! {4 l
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
+ R( i( E# z: o9 |+ J7 JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A! U8 J/ |/ J. {* f. x
5
. }1 c" z0 J& \, {( I3 V: ?1 rAcquisition. s! a' p$ D/ w/ c7 m E
Program, K8 q0 Z/ n7 G2 w
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
0 ?, K) _ l5 qcapability in response to a validated need.7 A% t% ~1 A" Z7 `% H0 s
Acquisition$ X; K! P' m0 O! T( ~& y
Program
* Y# L& @* G1 \5 yBaseline (APB)# D% W( m x6 d9 A
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance9 F( [# `& Y1 M) X3 i& A
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision9 m4 X3 J2 `" F, i& F
authority milestone reviews as follows:% y! t2 C& r0 \. b; x1 j; F/ K
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
' i* T% y* O9 X( J9 TDemonstration and Validation.. B2 k; B% n0 {# V
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
/ ]1 F$ h+ r$ z2 h7 C2 L" U0 dPhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
. w3 ~( z% y0 O0 f( @; q. Z$ s•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
& V$ G: H& n8 F! Q( {, J n# yPhase III, Production and Deployment.
& c7 r6 K, X9 k2 GEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance, t7 z& f7 w$ J* u9 f4 ?
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
% n) }: h' N* u6 V |' Y/ \/ T5 @thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
* v' q! T* K0 nchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of% g6 E. c! a8 n; P3 o. R8 q$ o
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline+ i6 ~- J" E/ m e
deviation.
6 `) c) J8 b* G: ]9 AAcquisition
. r7 R/ F( x$ v0 iRadar
# F, u: [0 L% y' e V, R$ u5 ]/ `" j* XRadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the' q! y+ p9 e" l* z
background and non-hostile objects.
6 I5 ]4 p. a. d% X/ y/ XAcquisition
0 Y: n" I: F: C* uRisk) e6 C% |% F8 G* S
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an, b* B8 `9 ~* h- z% k' i
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,+ E! ?7 C, B% h; {9 r) E. E
cost, or availability for deployment.
+ `: d" C# G- D$ I8 a! Y# F SAcquisition/5 G6 c: s) N3 H2 Z
Reacquisition
: i l0 K+ k& q. ]1 Y* }Time
, I% i3 ~. F! X7 k- {The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
, n8 m; j _9 o. Hincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|