- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C
$ ?; I7 X: M, D: u61
8 q0 ?! P2 H5 i, UControl and/ b- ]. v9 W- Z. H& R6 L
Reporting Center
+ M! p0 @" [5 q- F/ X4 q# {An element of the US Air Force tactical air control system, subordinate to the
7 u# [4 Z5 l+ Z6 x, H7 ?tactical air control center, from which radar control and warning operations are4 j9 |1 _ h. j% h. k
conducted within its area of responsibility.
: y' j6 l6 J3 ]5 N. JControl and% L" }; W7 f8 e5 K u
Reporting Post# R1 a$ t E+ S- v
An element of the US Air Force tactical air control system, subordinate to the
, p1 Y8 `9 M8 i' X6 F# b* t. d/ Acontrol and reporting center, that provides radar control and surveillance within
, k* v6 a9 L& ?$ j1 }its area of responsibility.
, n8 \9 f8 i1 D$ I( e0 f) ~Control Area A controlled airspace extending upwards from a specified limit above the Earth.
/ ~$ q8 l1 `, F) J) [2 rControlled
$ Z5 h) |, f8 ] D9 LEnvironment' y5 F1 M7 e% P' m2 r
Area where entry into the radiation hazard area is controlled.
5 ^( n& A' g- G3 c- e4 QControl
" i/ m6 } Q5 B) T0 Z" W- b$ J' qProcedure W8 J+ N) C* I/ `7 M0 h
The means used to control the orderly communication of information between
; U/ J! T3 [9 H1 u. s3 [+ t8 dstations on a data link. Also called line discipline.1 Y& r1 c; S& O4 I9 f
Control Station The station on a network, which supervises the network control procedures such7 s$ N7 j$ v) c7 `% ]
as polling, selecting, and recovery. It also is responsible for establishing order7 l) c6 o0 b- i& r5 K, e* V
on the line in the event of contention, or any other abnormal situation, arising
% H3 u( \: Y, [+ c( x& H: s- p6 ]between any stations on the network.3 X" ^& F2 H1 ?5 f C4 l( w. P+ L9 t
Control Zone The space, expressed in feet or radius, that surrounds equipment that is used to
+ N- l$ w8 n2 \* K; V+ Rprocess sensitive defense information and that is under sufficient physical and Z0 }: H$ t1 I) E- z
technical control to preclude an unauthorized entry or compromise.
3 `# }" }9 \0 jCONUS Continental United States.
+ a/ `7 V0 r+ G* p) J. ^Conventional Co-
0 r4 |2 T, {5 O, E2 X# Y3 E6 bProduction# G0 q0 Q$ E; l' l+ z' L/ y y
An effort between governments to produce the same end item, or components
& b: r; R! G" K5 g4 S* Uof the same end item, in concert.3 d+ L. j. ?6 u' D, _- l, S
Conventional
+ U c' N* f, A2 j; U; kWeapon
4 N1 v5 A3 l( D$ _5 P; Y x5 hA weapon that is neither nuclear, biological, nor chemical.
& l! L6 i/ e; t1 F2 P/ P/ j( c9 q0 }Coop Cooperative4 u' t0 Q6 x5 Y5 W t9 w( [
Coordinated
! s+ M7 V3 M" c* \5 aEngagement
! u) t" T9 V2 s' Z N2 V' _Planning/Actions" `/ c2 k' B9 B
Necessary coordination among engagement components to ensure maximum
; X. k+ Q/ _* P! A; o4 ceffectiveness of the SDS and resources are not wasted on targets already
+ Y1 n$ X+ l- U' dtargeted.
0 G. |' X! C1 e7 C( d( t$ HCoordinating% u# J8 X! n8 \6 e8 \; E
Authority
8 [ T* Q7 P8 W2 C% ]A commander or individual assigned responsibility for coordinating specific! t- {$ @" @) c5 V" [3 |; j
functions of activities involving forces of two or more Services or two or more
' y3 v# a8 c. h% o Lforces of the same Service. The commander or individual has the authority to
$ W" M J" @ ]( n% L+ R4 vrequire consultation between the agencies involved, but does not have the
( \% i a G$ R% N) B4 _6 gauthority to compel agreement. In the event that essential agreement cannot be
$ K0 U* N4 j. B6 s8 J9 Ereached, the matter shall be referred to the appointing authority.
3 d' I0 l z' H4 y8 \0 UCOP Committee of Principals/ f4 B2 b( `* t/ `4 b
COR Contracting Officer’s Representative. Contracting Officer.8 s$ _( Z! T% {: l5 O
CORBA Common Object Request Broker Architecture.
[4 x6 P3 ^. ACORM Commission on Roles and Missions.
+ U0 \4 k& }8 Y2 R5 N. N3 K+ L% uMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C" M6 z3 {0 B: v/ y' W6 E
621 g1 Q3 C J% F
Corner Reflector (1) A device, normally consisting of three metallic surfaces or screens
! n1 t, I3 }3 p y) @perpendicular to one another, designed to act as a radar target or
& K" Z" w8 L e, r" m6 u% L# R; amarker.7 b1 F. r N2 s& w7 o1 D4 }
(2) In radar interpretation, an object that, by means of multiple reflections
B n, Y% a# s. Q7 N0 r. Hfrom smooth surfaces, produces a radar return of greater magnitude than
) {2 v9 N( }' F0 Y k: Umight be expected from the physical size of the object. J4 n H5 R8 r9 W, C/ Z/ r M
Corps SAM OBSOLETE. See Medium Extended Air Defense System.+ Y; T, D7 ~, L
Correlation (1) The process of relating observations or tracks from one set of data to
9 f# o% p( A4 G( robservations or tracks from another set of data, i.e., collecting data from$ `7 I; L1 K) h$ P m! }# X; x
different frames or sensors that presumably relate to the same target. (2)
' T: C- ?% M3 }$ W/ l- o% J/ ?8 DIn air defense, the determination that an aircraft appearing on a1 D$ j6 f+ @4 Y# Q* K- ~
radarscope, on a plotting board, or visual is the same as that on which! x7 K3 g9 Y3 F* ?9 O
information is being received form another source. (3) In intelligence
9 b7 ] }5 t+ G- E- J6 [usage, the process which associates and combines data on a single
- L, |' B7 n# Q8 C, N1 x( z1 Fentity or subject from independent observations, in order to improve the
o" `4 Q/ J) v* L3 Ereliability or credibility or the information.
$ z7 K% b; c# x# G2 I( }COSEMS Evolving architecture operations support tool.
1 a: S& \& |1 w3 ]COSM Computer System Operator’s Manual' }+ z* M2 @# T( ?, j1 ]- k
COSMIC NATO security category.
/ w# ? ?6 O7 ^$ |5 f2 GCost Analysis
' |+ e, f4 G- Y/ {6 dImprovement
% e" a$ J! I6 `% W0 M" X U% N IGroup (CAIG)
% [* P6 T+ l. O9 B- BAn organization within the office of OSD Director, PA&E which advises the DAB
; O/ ^/ @7 ~3 G$ L$ m- n; U( ]on all matters concerning the estimation, review, and presentation of cost' ~! C# V, I& M# R! R, i5 m" S
analysis of future weapon systems. The CAIG also develops common cost
4 [, B0 ^& M+ G! Vestimating procedures for DoD.; @) J( b& [: J) I7 c; l; l2 q
Cost Analysis$ w: a, J/ F# K. q S
Requirements+ w3 k2 K; g; t, Y Y. s7 O
Document9 I. B9 F% Z: T3 I$ C4 w4 s/ ^
(CARD)$ z! ^4 L5 Y/ |2 O+ o, b, B# A4 a- {
The document describing the technical baseline, which is a subset of current* r' K2 o: [; x, s& L
system technical data and is used to generate the baseline cost estimate for an
! l' J) z; r3 O |( E* r. ^& dSDS element. It includes, but is not limited to, the element description,
% x' M) {) K2 p* k5 ginterfaces, operational concept quantity requirements, manpower requirements,5 T5 o# Y! ~3 {. U; F' {: x
activity rates, schedules, research and development-phasing plan, and facilities
/ J/ B: |4 ?$ Y) ]* ~requirements.
* p# n1 J- y/ C: }+ a2 y& F2 `: d1 yCost and
f" S5 \5 b' _4 ^6 G& L. LOperational& u1 A+ w2 o, |3 N
Effectiveness6 \' M4 d* r% _, k4 H: G
Analysis (COEA)* Z. B& D+ Q6 O- X0 u
An analysis of the estimated costs and operational effectiveness of alternative
4 R8 w2 ^7 O* p: Q( }materiel systems to meet a mission need, and the associated program for* s+ D# N" s, K+ Y
acquiring each alternative.( Y& q: v8 h, _" y8 J4 {7 ^
Cost Risk Cost estimating risk and schedule/technical risk. Cost estimating risk is the risk, E! W/ Y& f# e7 M4 Z# a* E+ p7 k& z
due to cost estimating errors and the statistical uncertainty in the estimate.. `; c3 z, O: ?* h" ]
Schedule/technical risk is risk due to inability to conquer the problems posed by" a; o6 A9 r, Q+ _! n
the intended design
2 B# a9 @. U- [' mCOTR Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative. See Contracting Officer.5 x5 r0 B$ @2 q6 M: L" r
COTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf." l/ V+ n, M6 P8 K
Counterair A US Air Force term for air operations conducted to attain and maintain a desired1 w; t7 m& p: b7 B! k U# ^2 O: w
degree of air superiority by the destruction or neutralization or enemy forces.; d- z0 U( ]' `7 s+ e& x7 G, l
Both air offensive and air defensive actions are involved. The former range
- K" D2 Z- |1 a2 M9 @& Lthroughout enemy territory and are generally conducted at the initiative of
& H% b% f5 z g. e5 e+ rfriendly forces. The latter are conducted near or over friendly territory and are# f, \9 X' x. o/ Y: F4 P% }3 d
generally reactive to the initiative of the enemy air forces.
3 Z0 d; z* t7 h( w9 \0 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C
2 f; |: r9 c1 r) ~3 Q2 e63( u6 s. ~. u, P' Z% B8 C+ q/ u( T
Countercountermeasures C5 l* Z+ t# K
(CCM)7 R+ q, } Q& J0 }
Measures taken by the defense to defeat offensive countermeasures.
. e/ \1 Y' [2 @$ t+ R- SCounterforce The employment of strategic air and missile forces in an effort to destroy, or
. @+ U/ f0 w9 I% @% Mrender impotent, selected military capabilities of an enemy force under any of the& Z- I# G7 _1 t2 R" ]- G
circumstances by which hostilities may be initiated.
6 j0 N/ g2 O6 b& u# ECountermeasure A design or procedural measure taken against covert or overt attacks.
. u0 E$ c! l, l ?% pCountermeasure
3 h: V. z7 S3 o5 a, rs (CM)
o: c- p/ c4 t) I+ GThat form of military science that by the employment of devices and/or4 |7 Z; b* L9 ~! A; ]7 y
techniques has as its objective the impairment of the operational effectiveness of4 ?+ J2 ]$ q5 ]* X* f6 b. ~/ K
enemy activity.! ]; J0 w7 p2 e2 g9 A: @! s Z
Countermeasure/ H5 Z/ C! P' x
s Rejection9 ?8 M2 c# G/ D
(Surveillance)1 l" @$ [, s5 N3 l2 [$ Z
Improvement or rejection of an object signal in the presence of" a0 {) K! ^3 ?
countermeasures., p) w' l0 |1 w. w; ]8 i ]; j
Course of Action
# d0 |2 u4 A, n9 ]8 ~5 R(COA)
; N% Y3 I& L- I# O(1) Any sequence of acts that an individual or unit may follow. (2) A possible. J. V3 \+ {6 d
plan open to an individual or command that would accomplish or is
: f9 L7 Z5 Y% ~/ {7 C( U8 u' B8 W) zrelated to the accomplishment of his mission. (3) The scheme adopted& N' Z* V8 |+ m2 o( p3 Z
to accomplish a job or mission. (4) A line of conduct in an engagement.
' k6 H! g; M& t e(5) A plan to accomplish a mission. It describes the execution concept
& ?, \( w) |; @+ {: Ffor BMD of North America. It will specify the engagement priorities,# p9 ~3 P E' `5 E# } `7 d
resource allocation and desired results by Area of Operation (AO).
6 W- D) [9 L& G c(USSPACECOM) (6) The scheme adopted to accomplish a task or
' S9 }0 S! @1 X( @, x' Cmission. It is a product of the Joint Operation Planning and Execution
) S! @& d8 }! eSystem concept development phase. The supported commander will
, |# p8 [; @" M9 z/ G, \' q8 Binclude a recommended course of action in the commander’s estimate." i7 ? ^# |5 G! @4 T- q* }' X1 @
The recommended course of action will include the concept of Q4 e; F% d9 K; X, ^) A% l4 u6 t0 J* h
operations, evaluation of supportability estimates of supporting
0 X% {8 S+ Y' E+ ?, i5 ?, c/ \organizations, and an integrated time-phased data base of combat,0 H$ N" t! r* n0 B% Q0 u, \5 Q
combat support, and combat service support forces and sustainment., T F1 `* R) v$ S. {7 O; I
Refinement of this database will be contingent on the time available for8 ^1 _1 k# p+ ^4 ^* @. X
course of action development. When approved, the course of action
* K) V& G. U5 d+ R6 Abecomes the basis for the development of an operation plan or
1 \ [. r) p4 [operation order.
9 K, Z# A& G* yCoverage (1) The ground area represented on imagery, photomaps, mosaics, maps,, L0 M0 a" ]. o ~) Q# ^% @ u f
and other geographical presentation systems. (2) Cover or protection, as
' `* `$ y' S: c) @2 ythe coverage of troops by supporting fire. (3) The extent to which
- S2 w4 F3 C8 [intelligence information is available in respect to any specified area of) @. x+ e7 d `! v
interest. (4) The summation of the geographical areas and volumes of
$ F. y- f4 U5 @) Z' Yaerospace under surveillance.
% E; m7 Y' {6 n, O4 kCovert Timing+ |" |" Y6 ^- V" C6 `$ Y* N, r! ?9 s
Channel3 j% }* ]8 B! W) S' W3 b# f
A covert channel in which one process signals information to another by* l0 t/ D: y5 s6 y Z
modulating its own use of system resources in such a way that this manipulation" M2 D& R I) [9 l, `+ X' r1 M
affects the real response time observed by the second process.- F+ f& W% U/ A7 f( m
CP Command Post.
! B1 F/ p2 B) oCPA (1) Chairman’s Program Assessment. (2) Closest Point of Approach.
) r( i- j, I( g2 W9 _0 d. `& a1 ?CPAF Cost Plus Award Fee.2 a# A `( H: s/ M
CPAM Chief of Naval Operations Program Assessment Memorandum (Navy)* e- s9 _9 y, S2 c! D( u+ O4 b' z
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C E7 h+ ]$ u |+ R! c; T
64
) ?8 R" i6 y7 M xCPAR Cost Performance Assessment Report.* l3 B: a) }: L$ w9 {8 M, |) k) M
CPAT Critical Process Assessment Tool# l* N1 w1 V8 Z
CPB Charged Particle Beam. V8 i U1 l8 r3 I" Q& A
CPEV Communications/Processor [Network] Experimental Version.: k5 f5 a" V: L0 E3 }2 r2 N
CPFF Cost Plus Fixed Fee.
: D9 D t+ H" ` b7 W; BCPIF Cost Plus Incentive Fee.
5 L c8 b: e" f4 {& @3 KCPIPT Cost-Performance Integrated Product (Process) Team.
: C W2 Z/ Y; r ?CPM (1) Critical Path Method. (2) Contractor Performance Measurement.
" a4 D" p6 b. t: v- n- gCPP Critical Performance Parameter.
7 E0 S4 O9 F! c* U4 XCPR Cost Performance Report.
# a M0 ~. h+ O' fCPR/NC Cost Performance Report/No Criteria (Contract management term).
$ {) C# `: j' c" ?. {" j+ ?$ _( zCPS (1) Consolidated Program Summary.9 {8 M+ e5 C% i
(2) Competitive Prototyping Strategy.2 c/ S% f' S$ n/ a! p: e6 A
(3) Current Program Status." f/ ]' {. Z3 f7 B2 _2 f- [# ]( V7 j
CPU Central Processing Unit (TelComm/Computer term).
, i. Z+ V8 f5 E3 HCPX See Command Post Exercise.; n: ?5 ?& i6 F
CQAE Chief/Contract Quality Assurance Evaluator.3 d4 t$ U0 q, b
CR (1) Computer Resources. (2) Continuing Resolution (US Congress term).! R' d7 E+ G* Z$ w
CR-UAV Close Range Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.2 G5 m: f4 m& _7 J
CRA (1) Coordinating Review Authority. (2) Command Relationships Agreement
$ O+ V+ ^1 r0 @& \CRADA Cooperative Research and Development Agreement.( P6 M' F) [! ^, I
CRAM (1) Control Random Access Memory.
) t" X- [4 K# c(2) Cross-tie Random Access Memory (Computer term).4 |. T4 \5 \# z# \, E+ l* {8 E
CRB Configuration Review Board.
/ r# Y& @2 l" x- q) w) dCRC Control and Reporting Center.
+ Q9 @/ g8 q3 oCRD (1) Capstone Requirements Document. p/ m: l4 J5 z. K4 @
(2) Component Requirements Document.2 V' L( ]. C7 N I0 n
CRDA Cooperative Research and Development Agreement. J" J- i8 Z9 u9 M
CRG Communications Relay Groups (PATRIOT).' W. L, ^ D% p! g% ]; \
CRI Classification, Recognition and Identification.$ T- q3 Q/ A) o6 l4 F/ L
CRISD Computer Resources Integrated Support Document |
|