- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition7 I i" E7 ?' S2 G0 Y1 t3 v
Categories
0 U3 G! h; n& G6 Y9 KCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution2 b8 Z$ i; b' T8 l7 r9 N
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
0 L7 l% J3 o3 H. Tdetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures./ j; J' E2 q& C5 G+ d& C
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
, q) d3 c4 C1 A( b2 fhave unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
i4 g( L5 ^* frequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
9 j6 \! a8 p* p Y3 r7 bSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;0 Z; j) C3 z" I, {2 w2 ]
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --. X, x# s) l' u% _; A# T/ {8 i
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
5 p4 V6 u# V/ j; C! {Component Acquisition Executive.
9 m5 l b' y; J3 Q/ T) R- W" g+ @: TAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
3 x" p3 z! W& e% P, z9 X7 Vdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have4 N' @' \; y. N! k1 Q6 Q7 x
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
9 N' v7 v* g4 T. ^Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition* X+ \5 I% F( p% o8 x! c! \, J
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone
$ G( t) S7 M" X$ Mdecision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
$ F3 W% ]% r; ]within their respective organizations.
1 C. o$ z8 U* Q/ l3 ]0 f* XAcquisition7 {; T0 a, r1 i. C
Decision, ~( B) u0 i( [8 ^- e k+ k
Memorandum, o d6 u/ P- B$ c+ c" V
(ADM)
5 X. I) S- H8 a' h4 xA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
- x) k! e6 P8 n0 y6 |decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
3 w b k; y/ e6 Y6 _3 t: A7 k: sdecision review or in-process review.
8 Z+ B: d' k& p9 Q1 O2 A, G2 RAcquisition: q+ M- D! u6 h. ^2 z7 f" ~9 c
Field of View
2 n; Z3 u' I0 B/ q- L(FOV). n' j* t9 i$ t. r( v7 Y& j1 e
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
, K2 N7 s: t1 A* x) ?6 }1 [- wof searching its assigned volume.* M! N+ B/ ^5 l1 g: R* Y
Acquisition Life
$ z" h) K5 i2 y' [) ] ICycle1 Y W7 S% X3 W- o, Q
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
2 ~* y8 b/ s2 va system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and4 I6 ~' E- v: G3 G) y# S0 W1 C
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration$ i' o3 O' {3 C. Z; G
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
! K ^1 }& y# Y& W8 f' s. W' ^Deployment, Operations and Support.( u0 n5 r% p! N" d9 r3 l
Acquisition
7 W" C6 d }& q* |4 b; y2 b3 K( p* |Logistics4 j, g$ I6 J+ |- I" J4 X4 j2 [
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,2 q' Q7 K# n2 ~- q8 o" D: X
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics( W, U$ \" A* B4 ?5 G0 ^
support throughout the acquisition process.
1 w7 d7 u6 S/ f! KAcquisition
' n6 q4 O: ?8 n6 j+ I8 e% |. oManagement
; w% z3 z( C' ~8 \& ]7 X/ pManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
6 k( o! j) X2 _* d% t4 l“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
& G. p5 r$ \4 o# c* t4 cacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense) L3 A( K# a) k
acquisition systems/programs.
) e+ E2 @+ \0 G/ JAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
. |* u- Q4 g/ X$ Fthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding% x+ \* ^. ]+ f
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and3 e! ]0 S. W& E* z: Q' k1 Y; o! o
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
' m& H6 x: X9 F, pAcquisition
4 _0 h* H: e a& c1 G- DPlanning
% t" B' Z! s/ n: a+ tThe process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
& x# q$ V' [2 f& l1 Lare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the6 P" R5 I5 k' ~" a, a$ p+ C6 ?
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout, u _) |5 l0 o* p
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for/ m* h1 x4 q( d! N2 @: I+ T
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
# A% h6 P) B k! Z# K6 dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A4 C1 s) m1 l( F9 O( Q
5
* C2 n, r3 u2 l% Z* AAcquisition; a8 J* e2 e0 Q8 a1 ]/ \
Program0 X. [2 c4 e1 V
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel1 D4 H$ U/ a' I
capability in response to a validated need.8 c: h9 m" U' B6 e3 N# L' y
Acquisition. K0 G* ?5 n) }! w) C, `
Program
, w" | b. R) r! y1 G6 U1 s9 ^8 OBaseline (APB). t9 ~" U8 K0 D1 E p; L
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance( ~( \8 U5 V1 d: P# F" ^; b0 \) b
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
! U+ @& W! ]& u0 R; G2 l) Dauthority milestone reviews as follows:8 e( S9 b- f. \% F/ l( F
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,8 l. B& @9 z3 f9 \
Demonstration and Validation.
! O+ V4 |/ E& k1 c1 e( k, [•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
) P! T3 `! z: U( c3 k* APhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
: o& S2 H; y6 t$ J4 i7 L. k$ J•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
. R" S7 N7 E! E$ f& @5 W# jPhase III, Production and Deployment.
& K) [: Z p) |6 TEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance6 ]% H r( E) m6 e! Y, H
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called( f# L4 Q# Q" \
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be" u" O9 @. w) V1 |. z1 k" S0 p
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of- l& j5 c ^; W$ ]( @
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
G" p0 ]8 L6 ]& z6 C' Q' \: [, tdeviation.6 H" t- _5 d9 C; k; S& g2 H
Acquisition y$ |, f* w( m7 Q2 V
Radar
8 A/ y9 Y3 E8 v: @2 n! H4 _Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
/ T/ w% \& k% ^+ I2 abackground and non-hostile objects.& i" U" i5 y, w( v& q6 Z
Acquisition
& i2 d/ Z2 z( X2 ] g* ORisk
# |8 ~4 [6 v2 O7 y) Z3 {5 {The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
3 i F. T# K8 m( P3 M- \ [unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,, b# l. a4 |5 |/ i) p! z
cost, or availability for deployment.
4 J5 u- y; j. s J& t" K8 a7 SAcquisition/. k! |# _! o' v
Reacquisition. C7 L& P3 Y* w% f! C
Time; m: y, w7 L" q8 h0 g$ g" S4 ~
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
- F$ ~8 U* t3 r. @2 wincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|