- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Not all engine power losses are complete failures.
Sometimes the failure mode is such that partial power
may be available. If there is a performance loss when
the throttle of the affected engine is retarded, the pilot
should consider allowing it to run until altitude and airspeed
permit safe single-engine flight, if this can be
done without compromising safety. Attempts to save a
malfunctioning engine can lead to a loss of the entire
airplane.
ENGINE FAILURE DURING FLIGHT
Engine failures well above the ground are handled
differently than those occurring at lower speeds and
altitudes. Cruise airspeed allows better airplane control,
and altitude may permit time for a possible
diagnosis and remedy of the failure. Maintaining
airplane control, however, is still paramount.
Airplanes have been lost at altitude due to apparent
fixation on the engine problem to the detriment of
flying the airplane.
Not all engine failures or malfunctions are catastrophic
in nature (catastrophic meaning a major mechanical
failure that damages the engine and precludes further
engine operation). Many cases of power loss are
related to fuel starvation, where restoration of power
may be made with the selection of another tank. An
orderly inventory of gauges and switches may reveal
the problem. Carburetor heat or alternate air can be
selected. The affected engine may run smoothly on just
one magneto or at a lower power setting. Altering the
SECURING FAILED ENGINE
Mixture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IDLE CUT OFF
Magnetos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OFF
Alternator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OFF
Cowl Flap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLOSE
Boost Pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .OFF
Fuel Selector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OFF
Prop Sync . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OFF
Electrical Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reduce
Crossfeed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consider
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-21
12-22
mixture may help. If fuel vapor formation is suspected,
fuel boost pump operation may be used to eliminate
flow and pressure fluctuations.
Although it is a natural desire among pilots to save an
ailing engine with a precautionary shutdown, the
engine should be left running if there is any doubt as to
needing it for further safe flight. Catastrophic failure
accompanied by heavy vibration, smoke, blistering
paint, or large trails of oil, on the other hand, indicate
a critical situation. The affected engine should be
feathered and the “securing failed engine” checklist
completed. The pilot should divert to the nearest suitable
airport and declare an emergency with ATC for
priority handling.
Fuel crossfeed is a method of getting fuel from a tank
on one side of the airplane to an operating engine on
the other. Crossfeed is used for extended single-engine
operation. If a suitable airport is close at hand, there is
no need to consider crossfeed. If prolonged flight on a
single-engine is inevitable due to airport non-availability,
then crossfeed allows use of fuel that would
otherwise be unavailable to the operating engine. It
also permits the pilot to balance the fuel consumption
to avoid an out-of-balance wing heaviness.
AFM/POH procedures for crossfeed vary widely.
Thorough fuel system knowledge is essential if crossfeed
is to be conducted. Fuel selector positions and fuel
boost pump usage for crossfeed differ greatly among
multiengine airplanes. Prior to landing, crossfeed
should be terminated and the operating engine returned
to its main tank fuel supply.
If the airplane is above its single-engine absolute
ceiling at the time of engine failure, it will slowly
lose altitude. The pilot should maintain VYSE to minimize
the rate of altitude loss. This “drift down” rate
will be greatest immediately following the failure
and will decrease as the single-engine ceiling is
approached. Due to performance variations caused
by engine and propeller wear, turbulence, and pilot
technique, the airplane may not maintain altitude
even at its published single-engine ceiling. Any further
rate of sink, however, would likely be modest.
An engine failure in a descent or other low power
setting can be deceiving. The dramatic yaw and performance
loss will be absent. At very low power
settings, the pilot may not even be aware of a failure.
If a failure is suspected, the pilot should advance both
engine mixtures, propellers, and throttles significantly,
to the takeoff settings if necessary, to correctly identify
the failed engine. The power on the operative engine
can always be reduced later.
ENGINE INOPERATIVE APPROACH
AND LANDING
The approach and landing with one engine inoperative
is essentially the same as a two-engine approach and
landing. The traffic pattern should be flown at similar
altitudes, airspeeds, and key positions as a two-engine
approach. The differences will be the reduced power
available and the fact that the remaining thrust is
asymmetrical. A higher-than-normal power setting
will be necessary on the operative engine.
With adequate airspeed and performance, the landing
gear can still be extended on the downwind leg. In
which case it should be confirmed DOWN no later
than abeam the intended point of landing. Performance
permitting, initial extension of wing flaps (10°, typically)
and a descent from pattern altitude can also be
initiated on the downwind leg. The airspeed should be
no slower than VYSE. The direction of the traffic pattern,
and therefore the turns, is of no consequence as
far as airplane controllability and performance are
concerned. It is perfectly acceptable to make turns
toward the failed engine.
On the base leg, if performance is adequate, the flaps
may be extended to an intermediate setting (25°, typically).
If the performance is inadequate, as measured
by a decay in airspeed or high sink rate, delay further
flap extension until closer to the runway. VYSE is still
the minimum airspeed to maintain.
On final approach, a normal, 3° glidepath to a landing
is desirable. VASI or other vertical path lighting aids
should be utilized if available. Slightly steeper
approaches may be acceptable. However, a long, flat,
low approach should be avoided. Large, sudden power
applications or reductions should also be avoided.
Maintain VYSE until the landing is assured, then slow
to 1.3 VSO or the AFM/POH recommended speed. The
final flap setting may be delayed until the landing is
assured, or the airplane may be landed with partial
flaps.
The airplane should remain in trim throughout. The
pilot must be prepared, however, for a rudder trim
change as the power of the operating engine is reduced
to idle in the roundout just prior to touchdown. With
drag from only one windmilling propeller, the airplane
will tend to float more than on a two-engine approach.
Precise airspeed control therefore is essential, especially
when landing on a short, wet and/or slippery surface.
Some pilots favor resetting the rudder trim to neutral
on final and compensating for yaw by holding rudder
pressure for the remainder of the approach. This eliminates
the rudder trim change close to the ground as
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-22
the throttle is closed during the roundout for landing.
This technique eliminates the need for groping for the
rudder trim and manipulating it to neutral during final
approach, which many pilots find to be highly distracting.
AFM/POH recommendations or personal
preference should be used.
Single-engine go-arounds must be avoided. As a practical
matter in single-engine approaches, once the airplane
is on final approach with landing gear and flaps
extended, it is committed to land. If not on the intended
runway, then on another runway, a taxiway, or grassy
infield. The light-twin does not have the performance
to climb on one engine with landing gear and flaps
extended. Considerable altitude will be lost while
maintaining VYSE and retracting landing gear and
flaps. Losses of 500 feet or more are not unusual. If the
landing gear has been lowered with an alternate means
of extension, retraction may not be possible, virtually
negating any climb capability.
ENGINE INOPERATIVE
FLIGHT PRINCIPLES
Best single-engine climb performance is obtained at
VYSE with maximum available power and minimum
drag. After the flaps and landing gear have been
retracted and the propeller of the failed engine feathered,
a key element in best climb performance is
minimizing sideslip.
With a single-engine airplane or a multiengine airplane
with both engines operative, sideslip is eliminated
when the ball of the turn and bank instrument is centered.
This is a condition of zero sideslip, and the
airplane is presenting its smallest possible profile to
the relative wind. As a result, drag is at its minimum.
Pilots know this as coordinated flight.
In a multiengine airplane with an inoperative engine,
the centered ball is no longer the indicator of zero
sideslip due to asymmetrical thrust. In fact, there is no
instrument at all that will directly tell the pilot the
flight conditions for zero sideslip. In the absence of a
yaw string, minimizing sideslip is a matter of placing
the airplane at a predetermined bank angle and ball
position. The AFM/POH performance charts for single-
engine flight were determined at zero sideslip. If
this performance is even to be approximated, the zero
sideslip technique must be utilized.
There are two different control inputs that can be used
to counteract the asymmetrical thrust of a failed
engine: (1) yaw from the rudder, and (2) the horizontal
component of lift that results from bank with the
ailerons. Used individually, neither is correct. Used
together in the proper combination, zero sideslip and
best climb performance are achieved.
Three different scenarios of airplane control inputs are
presented below. Neither of the first two is correct.
They are presented to illustrate the reasons for the zero
sideslip approach to best climb performance.
1. Engine inoperative flight with wings level and
ball centered requires large rudder input towards
the operative engine. [Figure 12-16] The result is
a moderate sideslip towards the inoperative
engine. Climb performance will be reduced by
the moderate sideslip. With wings level, VMC will
be significantly higher than published as there is
no horizontal component of lift available to help
the rudder combat asymmetrical thrust.
Figure 12-16. Wings level engine-out flight.
Rudder Force
Yaw
String
Fin Effect
Due to Sideslip
Slipstream
Wings level, ball centered, airplane slips toward dead engine.
Results: high drag, large control surface deflections required,
and rudder and fin in opposition due to sideslip.
12-23
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-23
2. Engine inoperative flight using ailerons alone
requires an 8 - 10° bank angle towards the operative
engine. [Figure 12-17] This assumes no
rudder input. The ball will be displaced well
towards the operative engine. The result is a
large sideslip towards the operative engine.
Climb performance will be greatly reduced by
the large sideslip.
3. Rudder and ailerons used together in the proper
combination will result in a bank of approximately
2° towards the operative engine. The
ball will be displaced approximately one-third
to one-half towards the operative engine. The
result is zero sideslip and maximum climb performance.
[Figure 12-18] Any attitude other
than zero sideslip increases drag, decreasing
performance. VMC under these circumstances
will be higher than published, as less than the
5° bank certification limit is employed.
The precise condition of zero sideslip (bank angle and
ball position) varies slightly from model to model, and
with available power and airspeed. If the airplane is
not equipped with counter-rotating propellers, it will
also vary slightly with the engine failed due to P-factor.
The foregoing zero sideslip recommendations apply to
Yaw
String
Excess bank toward operating engine, no rudder input.
Result: large sideslip toward operating engine and greatly
reduced climb performance.
12-24
Rudder Force
Yaw
String
Bank toward operating engine, no sideslip. Results: much
lower drag and smaller control surface deflections.
Figure 12-17. Excessive bank engine-out flight. Figure 12-18. Zero sideslip engine-out flight.
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-24
12-25
reciprocating engine multiengine airplanes flown at
VYSE with the inoperative engine feathered. The zero
sideslip ball position for straight flight is also the zero
sideslip position for turning flight.
When bank angle is plotted against climb performance
for a hypothetical twin, zero sideslip results in the best
(however marginal) climb performance or the least rate
of descent. Zero bank (all rudder to counteract yaw)
degrades climb performance as a result of moderate
sideslip. Using bank angle alone (no rudder) severely
degrades climb performance as a result of a large
sideslip.
The actual bank angle for zero sideslip varies among
airplanes from one and one-half to two and one-half
degrees. The position of the ball varies from one-third
to one-half of a ball width from instrument center.
For any multiengine airplane, zero sideslip can be confirmed
through the use of a yaw string. A yaw string is
a piece of string or yarn approximately 18 to 36 inches
in length, taped to the base of the windshield, or to the
nose near the windshield, along the airplane centerline.
In two-engine coordinated flight, the relative wind will
cause the string to align itself with the longitudinal axis
of the airplane, and it will position itself straight up the
center of the windshield. This is zero sideslip.
Experimentation with slips and skids will vividly display
the location of the relative wind. Adequate altitude and
flying speed must be maintained while accomplishing
these maneuvers.
With an engine set to zero thrust (or feathered) and the
airplane slowed to VYSE, a climb with maximum power
on the remaining engine will reveal the precise bank
angle and ball deflection required for zero sideslip and
best climb performance. Zero sideslip will again be
indicated by the yaw string when it aligns itself vertically
on the windshield. There will be very minor
changes from this attitude depending upon the
engine failed (with noncounter-rotating propellers),
power available, airspeed and weight; but without
more sensitive testing equipment, these changes are
difficult to detect. The only significant difference
would be the pitch attitude required to maintain VYSE
under different density altitude, power available, and
weight conditions.
If a yaw string is attached to the airplane at the time
of a VMC demonstration, it will be noted that VMC
occurs under conditions of sideslip. VMC was not
determined under conditions of zero sideslip during
aircraft certification and zero sideslip is not part of a
VMC demonstration for pilot certification.
To review, there are two different sets of bank angles
used in one-engine-inoperative flight.
• To maintain directional control of a multiengine
airplane suffering an engine failure at low speeds
(such as climb), momentarily bank at least 5°,
and a maximum of 10° towards the operative
engine as the pitch attitude for VYSE is set. This
maneuver should be instinctive to the proficient
multiengine pilot and take only 1 to 2 seconds to
attain. It is held just long enough to assure directional
control as the pitch attitude for VYSE is
assumed.
• To obtain the best climb performance, the airplane
must be flown at VYSE and zero sideslip,
with the failed engine feathered and maximum
available power from the operating engine. Zero
sideslip is approximately 2° of bank toward the
operating engine and a one-third to one-half ball
deflection, also toward the operating engine. The
precise bank angle and ball position will vary
somewhat with make and model and power
available. If above the airplane’s single-engine
ceiling, this attitude and configuration will result
in the minimum rate of sink.
In OEI flight at low altitudes and airspeeds such as the
initial climb after takeoff, pilots must operate the airplane
so as to guard against the three major accident factors:
(1) loss of directional control, (2) loss of performance,
and (3) loss of flying speed. All have equal potential to
be lethal. Loss of flying speed will not be a factor,
however, when the airplane is operated with due regard
for directional control and performance.
SLOW FLIGHT
There is nothing unusual about maneuvering during
slow flight in a multiengine airplane. Slow flight may
be conducted in straight-and-level flight, turns, in the
clean configuration, landing configuration, or at any
other combination of landing gear and flaps. Pilots
should closely monitor cylinder head and oil temperatures
during slow flight. Some high performance
multiengine airplanes tend to heat up fairly quickly
under some conditions of slow flight, particularly in
the landing configuration.
Simulated engine failures should not be conducted during
slow flight. The airplane will be well below VSSE
and very close to VMC. Stability, stall warning or stall
avoidance devices should not be disabled while
maneuvering during slow flight.
STALLS
Stall characteristics vary among multiengine airplanes
just as they do with single-engine airplanes, and
therefore, it is important to be familiar with them. The
application of power upon stall recovery, however,
has a significantly greater effect during stalls in a
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-25
12-26
twin than a single-engine airplane. In the twin, an
application of power blows large masses of air from
the propellers directly over the wings, producing a
significant amount of lift in addition to the expected
thrust. The multiengine airplane, particularly at light
operating weights, typically has a higher thrust-toweight
ratio, making it quicker to accelerate out of a
stalled condition.
In general, stall recognition and recovery training in
twins is performed similar to any high performance
single-engine airplane. However, for twins, all stall
maneuvers should be planned so as to be completed at
least 3,000 feet AGL.
Single-engine stalls or stalls with significantly more
power on one engine than the other should not be
attempted due to the likelihood of a departure from
controlled flight and possible spin entry. Similarly,
simulated engine failures should not be performed during
stall entry and recovery.
POWER-OFF STALLS
(APPROACH AND LANDING)
Power-off stalls are practiced to simulate typical
approach and landing scenarios. To initiate a power-off
stall maneuver, the area surrounding the airplane
should first be cleared for possible traffic. The airplane
should then be slowed and configured for an approach
and landing. Astabilized descent should be established
(approximately 500 f.p.m.) and trim adjusted. The pilot
should then transition smoothly from the stabilized
descent attitude, to a pitch attitude that will induce a
stall. Power is reduced further during this phase, and
trimming should cease at speeds slower than takeoff.
When the airplane reaches a stalled condition, the
recovery is accomplished by simultaneously reducing
the angle of attack with coordinated use of the flight
controls and smoothly applying takeoff or specified
power. The flap setting should be reduced from full to
approach, or as recommended by the manufacturer.
Then with a positive rate of climb, the landing gear is
selected up. The remaining flaps are then retracted as a
climb has commenced. This recovery process should
be completed with a minimum loss of altitude, appropriate
to the aircraft characteristics.
The airplane should be accelerated to VX (if simulated
obstacles are present) or VY during recovery and climb.
Considerable forward elevator/stabilator pressure will
be required after the stall recovery as the airplane accelerates
to VX or VY. Appropriate trim input should be
anticipated.
Power-off stalls may be performed with wings level, or
from shallow and medium banked turns. When recovering
from a stall performed from turning flight, the
angle of attack should be reduced prior to leveling the
wings. Flight control inputs should be coordinated.
It is usually not advisable to execute full stalls in
multiengine airplanes because of their relatively high
wing loading. Stall training should be limited to
approaches to stalls and when a stall condition occurs.
Recoveries should be initiated at the onset, or decay of
control effectiveness, or when the first physical
indication of the stall occurs.
POWER-ON STALLS
(TAKEOFF AND DEPARTURE)
Power-on stalls are practiced to simulate typical
takeoff scenarios. To initiate a power-on stall
maneuver, the area surrounding the airplane should
always be cleared to look for potential traffic. The
airplane is slowed to the manufacturer’s recommended
lift-off speed. The airplane should be configured in the
takeoff configuration. Trim should be adjusted for this
speed. Engine power is then increased to that recommended
in the AFM/POH for the practice of power-on
stalls. In the absence of a recommended setting, use
approximately 65 percent of maximum available
power while placing the airplane in a pitch attitude that
will induce a stall. Other specified (reduced) power
settings may be used to simulate performance at higher
gross weights and density altitudes.
When the airplane reaches a stalled condition, the
recovery is made by simultaneously lowering the
angle of attack with coordinated use of the flight
controls and applying power as appropriate.
However, if simulating limited power available for
high gross weight and density altitude situations, the
power during the recovery should be limited to that
specified. The recovery should be completed with a
minimum loss of altitude, appropriate to aircraft characteristics.
The landing gear should be retracted when a positive
rate of climb is attained, and flaps retracted, if flaps
were set for takeoff. The target airspeed on recovery is
VX if (simulated) obstructions are present, or VY. The
pilot should anticipate the need for nosedown trim as
the airplane accelerates to VX or VY after recovery.
Power-on stalls may be performed from straight flight
or from shallow and medium banked turns. When
recovering from a power-on stall performed from turning
flight, the angle of attack should be reduced prior
to leveling the wings, and the flight control inputs
should be coordinated.
SPIN AWARENESS
No multiengine airplane is approved for spins, and
their spin recovery characteristics are generally very
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-26
12-27
poor. It is therefore necessary to practice spin avoidance
and maintain a high awareness of situations that
can result in an inadvertent spin.
In order to spin any airplane, it must first be stalled. At
the stall, a yawing moment must be introduced. In a
multiengine airplane, the yawing moment may be
generated by rudder input or asymmetrical thrust. It
follows, then, that spin awareness be at its greatest
during VMC demonstrations, stall practice, slow
flight, or any condition of high asymmetrical thrust,
particularly at low speed/high angle of attack. Singleengine
stalls are not part of any multiengine training
curriculum.
A situation that may inadvertently degrade into a spin
entry is a simulated engine failure introduced at an
inappropriately low speed. No engine failure should
ever be introduced below safe, intentional one-engineinoperative
speed (VSSE). If no VSSE is published, use
VYSE. The “necessity” of simulating engine failures
at low airspeeds is erroneous. Other than training
situations, the multiengine airplane is only operated
below VSSE for mere seconds just after lift-off or
during the last few dozen feet of altitude in preparation
for landing.
For spin avoidance when practicing engine failures,
the flight instructor should pay strict attention to the
maintenance of proper airspeed and bank angle as the
student executes the appropriate procedure. The
instructor should also be particularly alert during stall
and slow flight practice. Forward center-of-gravity
positions result in favorable stall and spin avoidance
characteristics, but do not eliminate the hazard.
When performing a VMC demonstration, the instructor
should also be alert for any sign of an impending stall.
The student may be highly focused on the directional
control aspect of the maneuver to the extent that
impending stall indications go unnoticed. If a VMC
demonstration cannot be accomplished under existing
conditions of density altitude, it may, for training purposes,
be done utilizing the rudder blocking technique
described in the following section.
As very few twins have ever been spin-tested (none
are required to), the recommended spin recovery
techniques are based only on the best information
available. The departure from controlled flight may
be quite abrupt and possibly disorienting. The direction
of an upright spin can be confirmed from the turn
needle or the symbolic airplane of the turn coordinator,
if necessary. Do not rely on the ball position or other
instruments.
If a spin is entered, most manufacturers recommend
immediately retarding both throttles to idle, applying
full rudder opposite the direction of rotation, and
applying full forward elevator/stabilator pressure (with
ailerons neutral). These actions should be taken as near
simultaneously as possible. The controls should then
be held in that position. Recovery, if possible, will take
considerable altitude. The longer the delay from entry
until taking corrective action, the less likely that recovery
will be successful.
ENGINE INOPERATIVE—LOSS OF
DIRECTIONAL CONTROL
DEMONSTRATION
An engine inoperative—loss of directional control
demonstration, often referred to as a “VMC demonstration,”
is a required task on the practical test for a
multiengine class rating. A thorough knowledge of
the factors that affect VMC, as well as its definition,
is essential for multiengine pilots, and as such an
essential part of that required task. VMC is a speed
established by the manufacturer, published in the
AFM/POH, and marked on most airspeed indicators
with a red radial line. The multiengine pilot must
understand that VMC is not a fixed airspeed under all
conditions. VMC is a fixed airspeed only for the very
specific set of circumstances under which it was
determined during aircraft certification. [Figure 12-19]
In reality, VMC varies with a variety of factors as
outlined below. The VMC noted in practice and
demonstration, or in actual single-engine operation,
could be less or even greater than the published
value, depending upon conditions and technique.
In aircraft certification, VMC is the sea level calibrated
airspeed at which, when the critical engine is suddenly
made inoperative, it is possible to maintain control of
the airplane with that engine still inoperative and then
maintain straight flight at the same speed with an angle
of bank of not more than 5°.
The foregoing refers to the determination of VMC under
“dynamic” conditions. This technique is only used by
highly experienced flight test pilots during aircraft certification.
It is never to be attempted outside of these
circumstances.
In aircraft certification, there is also a determination of
VMC under “static,” or steady-state conditions. If there
is a difference between the dynamic and static speeds,
the higher of the two is published as VMC. The static
determination is simply the ability to maintain straight
flight at VMC with a bank angle of not more than 5°. This
more closely resembles the VMC demonstration required
in the practical test for a multiengine class rating.
The AFM/POH-published VMC is determined with the
“critical” engine inoperative. The critical engine is the
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-27
12-28
engine whose failure has the most adverse effect on
directional control. On twins with each engine rotating
in conventional, clockwise rotation as viewed from the
pilot’s seat, the critical engine will be the left engine.
Multiengine airplanes are subject to P-factor just as
single-engine airplanes are. The descending propeller
blade of each engine will produce greater thrust than
the ascending blade when the airplane is operated
under power and at positive angles of attack. The
descending propeller blade of the right engine is also
a greater distance from the center of gravity, and
therefore has a longer moment arm than the descending
propeller blade of the left engine. As a result,
failure of the left engine will result in the most
asymmetrical thrust (adverse yaw) as the right
engine will be providing the remaining thrust.
[Figure 12-19]
Many twins are designed with a counter-rotating right
engine. With this design, the degree of asymmetrical
thrust is the same with either engine inoperative. No
engine is more critical than the other, and a VMC
demonstration may be performed with either engine
windmilling.
In aircraft certification, dynamic VMC is determined
under the following conditions.
• Maximum available takeoff power. VMC
increases as power is increased on the operating
engine. With normally aspirated engines, VMC is
highest at takeoff power and sea level, and
decreases with altitude. With turbocharged
engines, takeoff power, and therefore VMC,
remains constant with increases in altitude up to
the engine’s critical altitude (the altitude where
the engine can no longer maintain 100 percent
power). Above the critical altitude, VMC
decreases just as it would with a normally aspirated
engine, whose critical altitude is sea level.
VMC tests are conducted at a variety of altitudes.
The results of those tests are then extrapolated to
a single, sea level value.
• Windmilling propeller. VMC increases with
increased drag on the inoperative engine. VMC is
highest, therefore, when the critical engine propeller
is windmilling at the low pitch, high
r.p.m. blade angle. VMC is determined with the
critical engine propeller windmilling in the
takeoff position, unless the engine is equipped
with an autofeather system.
• Most unfavorable weight and center-of-gravity
position. VMC increases as the center of gravity
is moved aft. The moment arm of the rudder is
reduced, and therefore its effectivity is reduced,
as the center of gravity is moved aft. At the same
time, the moment arm of the propeller blade is
increased, aggravating asymmetrical thrust.
Invariably, the aft-most CG limit is the most
unfavorable CG position. Currently, 14 CFR
part 23 calls for VMC to be determined at the
most unfavorable weight. For twins certificated
under CAR 3 or early 14 CFR part 23,
the weight at which VMC was determined was
not specified. VMC increases as weight is
reduced. [Figure 12-20]
• Landing gear retracted. VMC increases when
the landing gear is retracted. Extended landing
gear aids directional stability, which tends to
decrease VMC.
Figure 12-19. Forces created during single-engine operation.
C L C L
D1 D2
Arm Arm
Inoperative
Engine
Inoperative
Engine
Operative
Engine
Operative
Engine
(Critical Engine)
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-28
12-29
• Wing flaps in the takeoff position. For most
twins, this will be 0° of flaps.
• Cowl flaps in the takeoff position.
• Airplane trimmed for takeoff.
• Airplane airborne and the ground effect negligible.
• Maximum of 5° angle of bank. VMC is highly
sensitive to bank angle. To prevent claims of
an unrealistically low VMC speed in aircraft
certification, the manufacturer is permitted to
use a maximum of a 5° bank angle toward the
operative engine. The horizontal component of
lift generated by the bank assists the rudder in
counteracting the asymmetrical thrust of the
operative engine. The bank angle works in the
manufacturer’s favor in lowering VMC.
VMC is reduced significantly with increases in bank
angle. Conversely, VMC increases significantly with
decreases in bank angle. Tests have shown that VMC
may increase more than 3 knots for each degree of
bank angle less than 5°. Loss of directional control
may be experienced at speeds almost 20 knots above
published VMC when the wings are held level.
The 5° bank angle maximum is a regulatory limit
imposed upon manufacturers in aircraft certification.
The 5° bank does not inherently establish zero sideslip
or best single-engine climb performance. Zero sideslip,
and therefore best single-engine climb performance,
occurs at bank angles significantly less than 5°. The
determination of VMC in certification is solely concerned
with the minimum speed for directional control
under a very specific set of circumstances, and has
nothing to do with climb performance, nor is it the
optimum airplane attitude or configuration for climb
performance.
During dynamic VMC determination in aircraft certification,
cuts of the critical engine using the mixture
control are performed by flight test pilots while
gradually reducing the speed with each attempt. VMC
is the minimum speed at which directional control
could be maintained within 20° of the original entry
heading when a cut of the critical engine was made.
During such tests, the climb angle with both engines
operating was high, and the pitch attitude following
the engine cut had to be quickly lowered to regain
the initial speed. Pilots should never attempt to
demonstrate VMC with an engine cut from high
power, and never intentionally fail an engine at
speeds less than VSSE.
The actual demonstration of VMC and recovery in flight
training more closely resembles static VMC determination
in aircraft certification. For a demonstration,
the pilot should select an altitude that will allow
completion of the maneuver at least 3,000 feet AGL.
The following description assumes a twin with
noncounter-rotating engines, where the left engine
is critical.
With the landing gear retracted and the flaps set to the
takeoff position, the airplane should be slowed to
approximately 10 knots above VSSE or VYSE
(whichever is higher) and trimmed for takeoff. For the
remainder of the maneuver, the trim setting should not
be altered. An entry heading should be selected and
high r.p.m. set on both propeller controls. Power on the
left engine should be throttled back to idle as the right
engine power is advanced to the takeoff setting. The
landing gear warning horn will sound as long as a
Figure 12-20. Effect of CG location on yaw.
A
B
Inoperative
Engine
Operative
Engine
B x R = A x T
Inoperative
Engine
Operative
Engine
A
R
B
R
T T
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-29
12-30
throttle is retarded. The pilots should continue to carefully
listen, however, for the stall warning horn, if so
equipped, or watch for the stall warning light. The left
yawing and rolling moment of the asymmetrical thrust
is counteracted primarily with right rudder. A bank
angle of 5° (a right bank, in this case) should also be
established.
While maintaining entry heading, the pitch attitude is
slowly increased to decelerate at a rate of 1 knot per
second (no faster). As the airplane slows and control
effectivity decays, the increasing yawing tendency
should be counteracted with additional rudder pressure.
Aileron displacement will also increase in order
to maintain 5° of bank. An airspeed is soon reached
where full right rudder travel and a 5° right bank can
no longer counteract the asymmetrical thrust, and the
airplane will begin to yaw uncontrollably to the left.
The moment the pilot first recognizes the uncontrollable
yaw, or experiences any symptom associated
with a stall, the operating engine throttle should be
sufficiently retarded to stop the yaw as the pitch
attitude is decreased. Recovery is made with a minimum
loss of altitude to straight flight on the entry heading at
VSSE or VYSE, before setting symmetrical power. The
recovery should not be attempted by increasing power
on the windmilling engine alone.
To keep the foregoing description simple, there were
several important background details that were not
covered. The rudder pressure during the demonstration
can be quite high. In certification, 150 pounds of force
is permitted before the limiting factor becomes rudder
pressure, not rudder travel. Most twins will run out of
rudder travel long before 150 pounds of pressure is
required. Still, it will seem considerable.
Maintaining altitude is not a criterion in accomplishing
this maneuver. This is a demonstration of
controllability, not performance. Many airplanes will
lose (or gain) altitude during the demonstration. Begin
the maneuver at an altitude sufficient to allow completion
by 3,000 feet AGL.
As discussed earlier, with normally aspirated engines,
VMC decreases with altitude. Stalling speed (VS),
however, remains the same. Except for a few models,
published VMC is almost always higher than VS. At
sea level, there is usually a margin of several knots
between VMC and VS, but the margin decreases with
altitude, and at some altitude, VMC and VS are the
same. [Figure 12-21]
Should a stall occur while the airplane is under asymmetrical
power, particularly high asymmetrical power,
a spin entry is likely. The yawing moment induced
from asymmetrical thrust is little different from that
induced by full rudder in an intentional spin in the
appropriate model of single-engine airplane. In this
case, however, the airplane will depart controlled
flight in the direction of the idle engine, not in the
direction of the applied rudder. Twins are not required
to demonstrate recoveries from spins, and their spin
recovery characteristics are generally very poor.
Where VS is encountered at or before VMC, the departure
from controlled flight may be quite sudden, with
strong yawing and rolling tendencies to the inverted
position, and a spin entry. Therefore, during a VMC
demonstration, if there are any symptoms of an
impending stall such as a stall warning light or horn,
airframe or elevator buffet, or rapid decay in control
effectiveness, the maneuver should be terminated
immediately, the angle of attack reduced as the throttle
is retarded, and the airplane returned to the entry
airspeed. It should be noted that if the pilots are
wearing headsets, the sound of a stall warning horn
will tend to be masked.
The VMC demonstration only shows the earliest onset
of a loss of directional control. It is not a loss of control
of the airplane when performed in accordance with
the foregoing procedures. A stalled condition should
never be allowed to develop. Stalls should never be
performed with asymmetrical thrust and the VMC
demonstration should never be allowed to degrade into
a single-engine stall. A VMC demonstration that is
allowed to degrade into a single-engine stall with high
asymmetrical thrust is very likely to result in a loss of
control of the airplane.
An actual demonstration of VMC may not be possible
under certain conditions of density altitude, or with
airplanes whose VMC is equal to or less than VS. Under
those circumstances, as a training technique, a demonstration
of VMC may be safely conducted by artificially
limiting rudder travel to simulate maximum available
rudder. Limiting rudder travel should be accomplished
at a speed well above VS (approximately 20 knots).
Density Altitude
Indicated Airspeed
Stall
Occurs
First
Yaw
Occurs
First
Recovery
May Be
Difficult
Altitude Where
VMC = Stall Speed
Engine-Out
Power-On
Stall Speed (VS)
VMC
Figure 12-21. Graph depicting relationship of VMC to VS.
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-30
The rudder limiting technique avoids the hazards of
spinning as a result of stalling with high asymmetrical
power, yet is effective in demonstrating the loss of
directional control.
The VMC demonstration should never be performed
from a high pitch attitude with both engines operating
and then reducing power on one engine. The preceding
discussion should also give ample warning as to why
engine failures are never to be performed at low airspeeds.
An unfortunate number of airplanes and pilots
have been lost from unwarranted simulated engine
failures at low airspeeds that degenerated into loss of
control of the airplane. VSSE is the minimum airspeed
at which any engine failure should be simulated.
MULTIENGINE TRAINING
CONSIDERATIONS
Flight training in a multiengine airplane can be safely
accomplished if both the instructor and the student are
cognizant of the following factors.
• No flight should ever begin without a thorough
preflight briefing of the objectives, maneuvers,
expected student actions, and completion standards.
• Aclear understanding must be reached as to how
simulated emergencies will be introduced, and
what action the student is expected to take.
The introduction, practice, and testing of emergency
procedures has always been a sensitive subject.
Surprising a multiengine student with an emergency
without a thorough briefing beforehand has no place
in flight training. Effective training must be carefully
balanced with safety considerations. Simulated engine
failures, for example, can very quickly become actual
emergencies or lead to loss of the airplane when
approached carelessly. Pulling circuit breakers can
lead to a subsequent gear up landing. Stall-spin accidents
in training for emergencies rival the number of
stall-spin accidents from actual emergencies.
All normal, abnormal, and emergency procedures can
and should be introduced and practiced in the airplane
as it sits on the ground, power off. In this respect, the
airplane is used as a cockpit procedures trainer (CPT),
ground trainer, or simulator. The value of this training
should never be underestimated. The engines do not
have to be operating for real learning to occur. Upon
completion of a training session, care should be taken
to return items such as switches, valves, trim, fuel selectors,
and circuit breakers to their normal positions.
Pilots who do not use a checklist effectively will be at
a significant disadvantage in multiengine airplanes.
Use of the checklist is essential to safe operation of
airplanes and no flight should be conducted without
one. The manufacturer’s checklist or an aftermarket
checklist for the specific make, model, and model year
should be used. If there is a procedural discrepancy
between the checklist and AFM/POH, then the
AFM/POH always takes precedence.
Certain immediate action items (such as the response
to an engine failure in a critical phase of flight) should
be committed to memory. After they are accomplished,
and as work load permits, the pilot should verify the
action taken with a printed checklist.
Simulated engine failures during the takeoff ground
roll should be accomplished with the mixture control.
The simulated failure should be introduced at a speed
no greater than 50 percent of VMC. If the student does
not react promptly by retarding both throttles, the
instructor can always pull the other mixture.
The FAA recommends that all in-flight simulated
engine failures below 3,000 feet AGL be introduced
with a smooth reduction of the throttle. Thus, the
engine is kept running and is available for instant use,
if necessary. Throttle reduction should be smooth
rather than abrupt to avoid abusing the engine and possibly
causing damage. All inflight engine failures must
be conducted at VSSE or above.
If the engines are equipped with dynamic crankshaft
counterweights, it is essential to make throttle reductions
for simulated failures smoothly. Other areas leading to
dynamic counterweight damage include high r.p.m. and
low manifold pressure combinations, overboosting, and
propeller feathering. Severe damage or repetitive abuse
to counterweights will eventually lead to engine failure.
Dynamic counterweights are found on larger, more
complex engines—instructors should check with
maintenance personnel or the engine manufacturer to
determine if their engines are so equipped.
When an instructor simulates an engine failure, the
student should respond with the appropriate memory
items and retard the propeller control towards the
FEATHER position. Assuming zero thrust will be set,
the instructor should promptly move the propeller
control forward and set the appropriate manifold
pressure and r.p.m. It is vital that the student be kept
informed of the instructor’s intentions. At this point
the instructor may state words to the effect, “I have the
right engine; you have the left. I have set zero thrust
and the right engine is simulated feathered.” There
should never be any ambiguity as to who is operating
what systems or controls.
Following a simulated engine failure, the instructor
should continue to care for the “failed” engine just as
the student cares for the operative engine. If zero thrust
12-31
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-31
12-32
is set to simulate a feathered propeller, the cowl flap
should be closed and the mixture leaned. An occasional
clearing of the engine is also desirable. If possible,
avoid high power applications immediately following
a prolonged cool-down at a zero-thrust power setting.
The flight instructor must impress on the student multiengine
pilot the critical importance of feathering the
propeller in a timely manner should an actual engine
failure situation be encountered. Awindmilling propeller,
in many cases, has given the improperly trained
multiengine pilot the mistaken perception that the
failed engine is still developing useful thrust, resulting
in a psychological reluctance to feather, as feathering
results in the cessation of propeller rotation. The flight
instructor should spend ample time demonstrating
the difference in the performance capabilities of the
airplane with a simulated feathered propeller (zero
thrust) as opposed to a windmilling propeller.
All actual propeller feathering should be performed at
altitudes and positions where safe landings on established
airports could be readily accomplished.
Feathering and restart should be planned so as to be
completed no lower than 3,000 feet AGL. At certain
elevations and with many popular multiengine training
airplanes, this may be above the single-engine service
ceiling, and level flight will not be possible.
Repeated feathering and unfeathering is hard on the
engine and airframe, and should be done only as
absolutely necessary to ensure adequate training. The
FAA’s practical test standards for a multiengine class
rating requires the feathering and unfeathering of one
propeller during flight in airplanes in which it is safe to
do so.
While much of this chapter has been devoted to the
unique flight characteristics of the multiengine airplane
with one engine inoperative, the modern,
well-maintained reciprocating engine is remarkably
reliable. Simulated engine failures at extremely low
altitudes (such as immediately after lift-off) and/or
below VSSE are undesirable in view of the non-existent
safety margins involved. The high risk of simulating
an engine failure below 200 feet AGL does not warrant
practicing such maneuvers.
For training in maneuvers that would be hazardous in
flight, or for initial and recurrent qualification in an
advanced multiengine airplane, a simulator training
center or manufacturer’s training course should be
given consideration. Comprehensive training manuals
and classroom instruction are available along with system
training aids, audio/visuals, and flight training
devices and simulators. Training under a wide variety
of environmental and aircraft conditions is available
through simulation. Emergency procedures that would
be either dangerous or impossible to accomplish in an
airplane can be done safely and effectively in a flight
training device or simulator. The flight training device
or simulator need not necessarily duplicate the specific
make and model of airplane to be useful. Highly
effective instruction can be obtained in training
devices for other makes and models as well as generic
training devices.
The majority of multiengine training is conducted in
four to six-place airplanes at weights significantly less
than maximum. Single-engine performance, particularly
at low density altitudes, may be deceptively good.
To experience the performance expected at higher
weights, altitudes, and temperatures, the instructor
should occasionally artificially limit the amount of
manifold pressure available on the operative engine.
Airport operations above the single-engine ceiling can
also be simulated in this manner. Loading the airplane
with passengers to practice emergencies at maximum
takeoff weight is not appropriate.
The use of the touch-and-go landing and takeoff in
flight training has always been somewhat controversial.
The value of the learning experience must be weighed
against the hazards of reconfiguring the airplane for
takeoff in an extremely limited time as well as the loss
of the follow-through ordinarily experienced in a full
stop landing. Touch and goes are not recommended
during initial aircraft familiarization in multiengine
airplanes.
If touch and goes are to be performed at all, the student
and instructor responsibilities need to be carefully
briefed prior to each flight. Following touchdown, the
student will ordinarily maintain directional control
while keeping the left hand on the yoke and the right
hand on the throttles. The instructor resets the flaps
and trim and announces when the airplane has been
reconfigured. The multiengine airplane needs considerably
more runway to perform a touch and go than a
single-engine airplane. A full stop-taxi back landing is
preferable during initial familiarization. Solo touch
and goes in twins are strongly discouraged.
Ch 12.qxd 5/7/04 9:55 AM Page 12-32 |
|