- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
b. When timed approaches are being conducted,
the radar controller shall maintain the radar
separation specified in para 6-7-5, Interval Minima,
until the aircraft is observed to have passed the final
approach fix inbound (nonprecision approaches) or
the OM or the fix used in lieu of the outer marker
(precision approaches) and is within 5 miles of the
runway on the final approach course or until visual
separation can be provided by the tower.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-4-6, Receiving Controller Handoff.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-6, Parallel Dependent ILS/MLS
Approaches.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 6-7-2, Approach Sequence.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-6 Radar Arrivals
FIG 5-9-6
Basic “T” Design
IAF IAF
IF(IAF)
FAF
MAP
Runway 18
Missed Approach Holding Fix
Plan view
WRITE LEFTT
CENTR
#1
#3
#2
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-7
Radar Arrivals
5-9-6. PARALLEL DEPENDENT ILS/MLS
APPROACHES
TERMINAL
a. Apply the following minimum separation when
conducting parallel dependent ILS, MLS, or ILS and
MLS approaches:
1. Provide a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical or
a minimum of 3 miles radar separation between
aircraft during turn on.
2. Provide a minimum of 1.5 miles radar
separation diagonally between successive aircraft on
adjacent localizer/azimuth courses when runway
centerlines are at least 2,500 feet but no more than
4,300 feet apart.
FIG 5-9-7
Parallel Dependent ILS/MLS Approaches
EXAMPLE-
In FIG 5-9-7, Aircraft 2 is 1.5 miles from Aircraft 1, and
Aircraft 3 is 1.5 miles or more from Aircraft 2. The resultant
separation between Aircrafts 1 and 3 is at least 2.5 miles.
3. Provide a minimum of 2 miles radar
separation diagonally between successive aircraft on
adjacent localizer/azimuth courses where runway
centerlines are more than 4,300 feet but no more than
9,000 feet apart.
FIG 5-9-8
Parallel Dependent ILS/MLS Approaches
EXAMPLE-
In FIG 5-9-8, Aircraft 2 is 2 miles from heavy Aircraft 1.
Aircraft 3 is a small aircraft and is 6 miles from Aircraft_1.
*The resultant separation between Aircrafts 2 and 3 is
4.2_miles.
4. Provide the minimum applicable radar
separation between aircraft on the same final
approach course.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Section 5, Radar Separation, Para 5-5-4, Minima.
b. The following conditions are required when
applying the minimum radar separation on adjacent
localizer/azimuth courses allowed in subpara a:
1. Apply this separation standard only after
aircraft are established on the parallel final approach
course.
2. Straight-in landings will be made.
3. Missed approach procedures do not conflict.
4. Aircraft are informed that approaches to both
runways are in use. This information may be provided
through the ATIS.
5. Approach control shall have the interphone
capability of communicating directly with the local
controller at locations where separation responsibility has not been delegated to the tower.
NOTE-
The interphone capability is an integral part of this
procedure when approach control has the sole separation
responsibility.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-8 Radar Arrivals
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-5, Approach Separation Responsibility.
FAAO JO 7210.3, Para_2-1-15, Authorization for Separation Services
by Towers.
c. Consideration should be given to known factors
that may in any way affect the safety of the instrument
approach phase of flight, such as surface wind
direction and velocity, wind shear alerts/reports,
severe weather activity, etc. Closely monitor weather
activity that could impact the final approach course.
Weather conditions in the vicinity of the final
approach course may dictate a change of approach in
use.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
5-9-7. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT
ILS/MLS APPROACHES- DUAL & TRIPLE
TERMINAL
a. Apply the following minimum separation when
conducting simultaneous independent ILS, MLS, or
ILS and MLS approaches:
1. Provide a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical or
a minimum of 3 miles radar separation between
aircraft during turn-on to parallel final approach.
NOTE1. During triple parallel approaches, no two aircraft will
be assigned the same altitude during turn-on. All
three_aircraft will be assigned altitudes which differ by a
minimum of 1,000 feet. Example: 3,000, 4,000, 5,000;
7,000, 8,000, 9,000.
2. Communications transfer to the tower controller's
frequency shall be completed prior to losing vertical
separation between aircraft.
2. Dual parallel runway centerlines are at least
4,300 feet apart.
3. Triple parallel runway centerlines are at least
5,000 feet apart and the airport field elevation is less
than 1,000 feet MSL.
4. A high-resolution color monitor with alert
algorithms, such as the final monitor aid or that
required in the precision runway monitor program
shall be used to monitor approaches where:
(a) Triple parallel runway centerlines are at
least 4,300 but less than 5,000 feet apart and the
airport field elevation is less than 1,000 feet MSL.
(b) Triple parallel approaches to airports
where the airport field elevation is 1,000 feet MSL or
more require the high resolution color monitor with
alert algorithms and an approved FAA aeronautical
study.
5. Provide the minimum applicable radar
separation between aircraft on the same final
approach course.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-5-4, Minima.
b. The following conditions are required when
applying the minimum separation on adjacent dual or
triple ILS/MLS courses allowed in subpara a:
1. Straight-in landings will be made.
2. ILS, MLS, radar, and appropriate frequencies
are operating normally.
3. Inform aircraft that simultaneous ILS/MLS
approaches are in use prior to aircraft departing an
outer fix. This information may be provided through
the ATIS.
4. Clear the aircraft to descend to the
appropriate glideslope/glidepath intercept altitude
soon enough to provide a period of level flight to
dissipate excess speed. Provide at least 1 mile of
straight flight prior to the final approach course
intercept.
NOTE-
Not applicable to curved and segmented MLS approaches.
5. An NTZ at least 2,000 feet wide is established
an equal distance between extended runway final
approach courses and shall be depicted on the
monitor display. The primary responsibility for
navigation on the final approach course rests with the
pilot. Control instructions and information are issued
only to ensure separation between aircraft and to
prevent aircraft from penetrating the NTZ.
6. Monitor all approaches regardless of weather.
Monitor local control frequency to receive any
aircraft transmission. Issue control instructions as
necessary to ensure aircraft do not enter the NTZ.
NOTE1. Separate monitor controllers, each with transmit/
receive and override capability on the local control
frequency, shall ensure aircraft do not penetrate the
depicted NTZ. Facility directives shall define responsibility for providing the minimum applicable longitudinal
separation between aircraft on the same final approach
course.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-9
Radar Arrivals
2. The aircraft is considered the center of the primary
radar return for that aircraft, or, if an FMA or other color
final monitor aid is used, the center of the digitized target
of that aircraft, for the purposes of ensuring an aircraft
does not penetrate the NTZ. The provisions of para 5-5-2,
Target Separation, apply also.
c. The following procedures shall be used by the
final monitor controllers:
1. Instruct the aircraft to return to the correct
final approach course when aircraft are observed to
overshoot the turn-on or to continue on a track which
will penetrate the NTZ.
PHRASEOLOGY-
YOU HAVE CROSSED THE FINAL APPROACH
COURSE. TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY AND
RETURN TO LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE,
or
TURN (left/right) AND RETURN TO THE
LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE.
2. Instruct aircraft on the adjacent final
approach course to alter course to avoid the deviating
aircraft when an aircraft is observed penetrating or in
the controller's judgment will penetrate the NTZ.
PHRASEOLOGY-
TRAFFIC ALERT, (call sign), TURN (right/left)
IMMEDIATELY HEADING (degrees), CLIMB AND
MAINTAIN (altitude).
3. Terminate radar monitoring when one of the
following occurs:
(a) Visual separation is applied.
(b) The aircraft reports the approach lights or
runway in sight.
(c) The aircraft is 1 mile or less from the
runway threshold, if procedurally required and
contained in facility directives.
4. Do not inform the aircraft when radar
monitoring is terminated.
5. Do not apply the provisions of para 5-13-1,
Monitor on PAR Equipment, for simultaneous ILS,
MLS, or ILS and MLS approaches.
d. Consideration should be given to known factors
that may in any way affect the safety of the instrument
approach phase of flight when simultaneous ILS,
MLS, or ILS and MLS approaches are being
conducted to parallel runways. Factors include but
are not limited to wind direction/velocity, wind-shear
alerts/reports, severe weather activity, etc. Closely
monitor weather activity that could impact the final
approach course. Weather conditions in the vicinity
of the final approach course may dictate a change of
approach in use.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-1-13, Radar Service Termination.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
5-9-8. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT
DUAL ILS/MLS APPROACHES- HIGH
UPDATE RADAR
TERMINAL
a. Authorize simultaneous independent ILS,
MLS, or ILS and MLS approaches to parallel dual
runways with centerlines separated by at least
3,000_feet with one localizer offset by 2.5 degrees
using a precision runway monitor system with a
1.0_second radar update system and when centerlines
are separated by 3,400 to 4,300 feet when precision
runway monitors are utilized with a radar update rate
of 2.4 seconds or less; and
1. Provide a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical or
a minimum of 3 miles radar separation between
aircraft during turn-on to parallel final approach.
NOTE-
Communications transfer to the tower controller 's
frequency shall be completed prior to losing vertical
separation between aircraft.
2. Provide the minimum applicable radar
separation between aircraft on the same final
approach course.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-5-4, Minima.
b. The following conditions are required when
applying the minimum separation on dual ILS/MLS
courses allowed in subpara a:
1. Straight-in landings will be made.
2. ILS, MLS, radar, and appropriate frequencies
are operating normally.
3. Inform aircraft that closely spaced simultaneous ILS/MLS approaches are in use prior to aircraft
departing an outer fix. This information may be
provided through the ATIS.
4. Clear the aircraft to descend to the
appropriate glideslope/glidepath intercept altitude
soon enough to provide a period of level flight to
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-10 Radar Arrivals
dissipate excess speed. Provide at least 1 mile of
straight flight prior to the final approach course
intercept.
NOTE-
Not applicable to curved and segmented MLS approaches.
5. An NTZ at least 2,000 feet wide is established
an equal distance between extended runway final
approach courses and shall be depicted on the
monitor display. The primary responsibility for
navigation on the final approach course rests with the
pilot. Control instructions and information are issued
only to ensure separation between aircraft and to
prevent aircraft from penetrating the NTZ.
6. Monitor all approaches regardless of weather.
Monitor local control frequency to receive any
aircraft transmission. Issue control instructions as
necessary to ensure aircraft do not enter the NTZ.
7. Separate monitor controllers, each with
transmit/receive and override capability on the local
control frequency, shall ensure aircraft do not
penetrate the depicted NTZ. Facility directives shall
define the responsibility for providing the minimum
applicable longitudinal separation between aircraft
on the same final approach course._
NOTE-
The aircraft is considered the center of the digitized target
for that aircraft for the purposes of ensuring an aircraft
does not penetrate the NTZ.
c. The following procedures shall be used by the
final monitor controllers:
1. A controller shall provide position information to an aircraft that is (left/right) of the depicted
localizer centerline, and in their opinion is continuing
on a track that may penetrate the NTZ.
PHRASEOLOGY(Aircraft call sign) I SHOW YOU (left/right) OF THE
FINAL APPROACH COURSE.
2. Instruct the aircraft to return immediately to
the correct final approach course when aircraft are
observed to overshoot the turn-on or continue on a
track which will penetrate the NTZ.
PHRASEOLOGY-
YOU HAVE CROSSED THE FINAL APPROACH
COURSE. TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY AND
RETURN TO LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE.
or
TURN (left/right) AND RETURN TO THE
LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE.
3. Instruct aircraft on the adjacent final
approach course to alter course to avoid the deviating
aircraft when an aircraft is observed penetrating or in
the controller's judgment will penetrate the NTZ.
NOTE-
An instruction that may include a descent to avoid the
deviating aircraft should only be used when there is no
other reasonable option available to the controller. In such
a case, the descent shall not put the aircraft below the MVA.
PHRASEOLOGY-
TRAFFIC ALERT, (call sign), TURN (left/right)
IMMEDIATELY HEADING (DEGREES), CLIMB AND
MAINTAIN (altitude).
4. Terminate radar monitoring when one of the
following occurs:
(a) Visual separation is applied.
(b) The aircraft reports the approach lights or
runway in sight.
(c) The aircraft has landed or, in the event of
a missed approach, is one-half mile beyond the
departure end of the runway.
5. Do not inform the aircraft when radar
monitoring is terminated.
6. Do not apply the provisions of para 5-13-1,
Monitor on PAR Equipment, for simultaneous ILS,
MLS, or ILS and MLS approaches.
d. Consideration should be given to known factors
that may in any way affect the safety of the instrument
approach phase of flight when simultaneous ILS,
MLS, or ILS and MLS approaches are being
conducted to parallel runways. Factors include but
are not limited to wind direction/velocity, wind-shear
alerts/reports, severe weather activity, etc. Closely
monitor weather activity that could impact the final
approach course. Weather conditions in the vicinity
of the final approach course may dictate a change of
the approach in use.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-1-13, Radar Service Termination.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-11
Radar Arrivals
5-9-9. SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET
INSTRUMENT APPROACHES (SOIA)- HIGH
UPDATE RADAR
TERMINAL
a. Simultaneous offset independent approaches
(SOIA) may be conducted at FAA designated airports
that have an authorization issued by the Director,
Terminal Safety and Operations Support in coordination with AFS with parallel runways that have
centerlines separated by less than 3,000 feet with
one_localizer offset by 2.5 to 3.0_degrees using a high
update rate surveillance system with a 1.0-second
radar update; and
1. Provide a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical or
a minimum of 3 miles radar separation between
aircraft during turn-on to final approaches.
NOTE-
Communications transfer to the tower controller 's
frequency shall be completed prior to losing vertical
separation between aircraft.
2. Provide the minimum applicable radar
separation between aircraft on the same final
approach course.
3. Provide the minimum applicable radar
separation between the LDA aircraft of a leading
SOIA pair and the ILS aircraft in the subsequent
SOIA pair when the parallel runways have
centerlines separated by less than 2500 feet.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-5-4, Minima.
b. The following conditions are required when
applying the minimum separation on ILS/MLS and
offset LDA with glideslope courses authorized in
subpara a above:
1. Straight-in landings will be made.
2. ILS, MLS, LDA, glideslope, DME, radar, and
appropriate frequencies are operating normally.
3. Inform aircraft that closely spaced simultaneous ILS/MLS approaches are in use prior to aircraft
departing an outer fix. This information may be
provided through the ATIS.
4. Clear the aircraft to descend to the
appropriate glideslope/glidepath intercept altitude
soon enough to provide a period of level flight to
dissipate excess speed. Provide at least 1 mile of
straight flight prior to the final approach course
intercept.
NOTE-
Not applicable to curved and segmented MLS approaches.
5. A No Transgression Zone (NTZ) at least
2,000_feet wide is established an equal distance
between extended runway final approach courses and
shall be depicted on the monitor display. The NTZ
begins prior to the point where adjacent inbound
aircraft first lose vertical separation and extends to a
point coincident with the location of the LDA MAP.
The primary responsibility for navigation on the final
approach course rests with the pilot. Control
instructions and information are issued only to ensure
separation between aircraft and to prevent aircraft
from penetrating the NTZ.
6. Monitor all approaches regardless of weather.
Monitor local control frequency to receive any
aircraft transmission. Issue control instructions as
necessary to ensure aircraft do not enter the NTZ.
7. Separate monitor controllers, each with
transmit/receive and override capability on the local
control frequency, shall ensure aircraft do not
penetrate the depicted NTZ. Facility directives shall
define the responsibility for providing the minimum
applicable longitudinal separation between aircraft
on the same final approach course and the minimum
applicable longitudinal separation between the LDA
aircraft of a leading SOIA pair and the ILS aircraft in
the subsequent SOIA pair when the parallel runways
have centerlines separated by less than 2500_feet.
NOTE-
The aircraft is considered the center of the digitized target
for that aircraft for the purposes of ensuring an aircraft
does not penetrate the NTZ.
c. The following procedures shall be used by the
final monitor controllers:
1. A controller shall provide position information to an aircraft that is (left/right) of the depicted
localizer centerline, and in their opinion is continuing
on a track that may penetrate the NTZ.
PHRASEOLOGY(Aircraft call sign) I SHOW YOU (left/right) OF THE
FINAL APPROACH COURSE.
2. Instruct the aircraft to return immediately to
the correct final approach course when aircraft are
observed to overshoot the turn-on or continue on a
track which will penetrate the NTZ.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-12 Radar Arrivals
PHRASEOLOGY-
YOU HAVE CROSSED THE FINAL APPROACH
COURSE. TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY AND
RETURN TO LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE.
or
TURN (left/right) AND RETURN TO THE
LOCALIZER/AZIMUTH COURSE.
3. Instruct aircraft on the adjacent final
approach course to alter course to avoid the deviating
aircraft when an aircraft is observed penetrating or in
the controller's judgment will penetrate the NTZ.
NOTE-
An instruction that may include a descent to avoid the
deviating aircraft should only be used when there is no
other reasonable option available to the controller. In such
a case, the descent shall not put the aircraft below the MVA.
PHRASEOLOGY-
TRAFFIC ALERT, (call sign), TURN (left/right)
IMMEDIATELY HEADING (DEGREES), CLIMB AND
MAINTAIN (altitude).
4. Terminate radar monitoring when one of the
following occurs:
(a) The ILS aircraft passes the end of the NTZ
nearest the runway threshold.
(b) The LDA aircraft passes the end of the
NTZ nearest the runway threshold and has reported
the ILS aircraft in sight.
(c) The aircraft begins the visual segment of
the approach.
5. Do not inform the aircraft when radar
monitoring is terminated.
6. Do not apply the provisions of para 5-13-1,
Monitor on PAR Equipment, for simultaneous ILS,
MLS, ILS and MLS, or SOIA approaches.
d. Advise the pilot of the LDA aircraft of traffic on
the adjacent ILS approach course, if that traffic will
be a factor in the visual segment of the approach. The
provisions of para 7-2-1, Visual Separation,
subpara_a2 concerning visual separation between
aircraft being provided by the tower shall not be
applied to aircraft conducting SOIAs.
NOTE-
Once advised, the pilot is authorized to continue past the
LDA MAP if all of the following conditions are met:
The_pilot has the ILS traffic in sight and expects the traffic
to remain in sight; the pilot advises ATC that the traffic is
in sight; and the pilot has the runway environment in sight.
Otherwise, it is the pilot's responsibility to execute a missed
approach at the LDA MAP.
e. Ensure that the LDA aircraft is positioned to
facilitate the flight crew's ability to see the ILS traffic
from the nominal clear-of-clouds point to the LDA
MAP so that the flight crew can remain separated
from that traffic visually from the LDA MAP to the
runway threshold.
NOTE-
After accepting a clearance for and LDA PRM approach,
pilots must remain on the LDA course until passing the
LDA MAP prior to alignment with the runway centerline.
Between the LDA MAP and the runway threshold, the pilot
of the LDA aircraft assumes visual separation responsibility from the aircraft on the ILS approach, which means
maneuvering the aircraft as necessary to avoid the ILS
traffic until landing, and providing wake turbulence
avoidance, if necessary.
f. In the visual segment between the LDA MAP
and the runway threshold, if the pilot of the LDA
aircraft loses visual contact with the ILS traffic, the
pilot must advise ATC as soon as practical and follow
the published missed approach procedure. If necessary, issue alternate missed approach instructions.
g. Wake turbulence requirements between aircraft
on adjacent final approach courses inside the LDA
MAP are as follows (standard in-trail wake
separation shall be applied between aircraft on the
same approach course):
1. When runways are at least 2,500 feet apart,
there are no wake turbulence requirements between
aircraft on adjacent final approach courses.
2. For runways less than 2,500 feet apart,
whenever the ceiling is greater than or equal to
500_feet above the MVA, wake vortex spacing
between aircraft on adjacent final approach courses
need not be applied.
3. For runways less than 2,500 feet apart,
whenever the ceiling is less than 500 feet above the
MVA, wake vortex spacing between aircraft on
adjacent final approach courses, as described in
para_5-5-4, Minima, shall be applied unless
acceptable mitigating techniques and operational
procedures have been documented and verified by an
AFS safety assessment and authorized by Director,
Terminal Safety and Operations Support. The wake
turbulence mitigation techniques employed will be
based on each airport's specific runway geometry and
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-13
Radar Arrivals
meteorological conditions and implemented through
local facility directives.
4. Issue all applicable wake turbulence
advisories.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 8260.49, Para 13.0, Wake Turbulence Requirements.
FAAO JO 7210.3, Para 10-4-6, Simultaneous ILS/MLS Approaches.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 2-1-20, Wake Turbulence Cautionary
Advisories.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-5-4, Minima.
h. Consideration should be given to known factors
that may in any way affect the safety of the instrument
approach phase of flight when conducting SOIA to
parallel runways. Factors include but are not limited
to wind direction/velocity, wind-shear alerts/reports,
severe weather activity, etc. Closely monitor weather
activity that could impact the final approach course.
Weather conditions in the vicinity of the final
approach course may dictate a change of the approach
in use.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-1-13, Radar Service Termination.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-9-14
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-10-1
Radar Approaches- Terminal
Section 10. Radar Approaches- Terminal
5-10-1. APPLICATION
a. Provide radar approaches in accordance with
standard or special instrument approach procedures.
b. A radar approach may be given to any aircraft
upon request and may be offered to aircraft in distress
regardless of weather conditions or to expedite
traffic.
NOTE-
Acceptance of a radar approach by a pilot does not waive
the prescribed weather minima for the airport or for the
particular aircraft operator concerned. The pilot is
responsible for determining if the approach and landing
are authorized under the existing weather minima.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-12-10, Elevation Failure.
5-10-2. APPROACH INFORMATION
a. Issue the following information to an aircraft
that will conduct a radar approach. Current approach
information contained in the ATIS broadcast may be
omitted if the pilot states the appropriate ATIS
broadcast code. All items listed below, except for
subpara 3 may be omitted after the first approach if
repeated approaches are made and no change has
occurred. Transmissions with aircraft in this phase of
the approach should occur approximately every
minute.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 4-7-10, Approach Information.
1. Altimeter setting.
2. If available, ceiling and visibility if the
ceiling at the airport of intended landing is reported
below 1,000 feet or below the highest circling
minimum, whichever is greater, or if the visibility is
less than 3 miles. Advise pilots when weather
information is available via the Automated Weather
Observing System (AWOS)/Automated Surface
Observing System (ASOS) and, if requested, issue
the appropriate frequency.
NOTE-
Automated weather observing systems may be set to
provide one minute updates. This one minute data may be
useful to the pilot for possible weather trends. Controllers
provide service based solely on official weather, i.e., hourly
and special observations.
3. Issue any known changes classified as special
weather observations as soon as possible. Special
weather observations need not be issued after they are
included in the ATIS broadcast and the pilot states the
appropriate ATIS broadcast code.
4. Pertinent information on known airport
conditions if they are considered necessary to the safe
operation of the aircraft concerned.
5. Lost communication procedures as specified
in para 5-10-4, Lost Communications.
b. Before starting final approach:
NOTE1. ASR approach procedures may be prescribed for
specific runways, for an airport/heliport, and for
helicopters only to a “point-in-space,“ i.e., a MAP from
which a helicopter must be able to proceed to the landing
area by visual reference to a prescribed surface route.
2. Occasionally, helicopter PAR approaches are available
to runways where conventional PAR approaches have been
established. In those instances where the two PAR
approaches serve the same runway, the helicopter
approach will have a steeper glide slope and a lower
decision height. By the controllers designating the
approach to be flown, the helicopter pilot understands
which of the two approaches he/she has been vectored for
and which set of minima apply.
1. Inform the aircraft of the type of approach,
runway, airport, heliport, or other point, as
appropriate, to which the approach will be made.
Specify the airport name when the approach is to a
secondary airport.
PHRASEOLOGY-
THIS WILL BE A P-A-R/SURVEILLANCE APPROACH
TO:
RUNWAY (runway number),
or
(airport name) AIRPORT, RUNWAY (runway number),
or
(airport name) AIRPORT/HELIPORT.
THIS WILL BE A COPTER P-A-R APPROACH TO:
RUNWAY (runway number),
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-10-2 Radar Approaches- Terminal
or
(airport name) AIRPORT, RUNWAY (runway number),
or
(airport name) AIRPORT/HELIPORT.
2. For surveillance approaches, specify the
location of the MAP in relation to the runway/airport/
heliport.
PHRASEOLOGY-
MISSED APPROACH POINT IS (distance) MILE(S)
FROM RUNWAY/AIRPORT/HELIPORT,
or for a point-in-space approach,
A MISSED APPROACH POINT (distance) MILE(S)
(direction from landing area) OF (airport name)
AIRPORT/HELIPORT.
EXAMPLE-
Helicopter point-in-space approach:
“Army copter Zulu Two, this will be a surveillance
approach to a missed approach point, three point five miles
south of Creedon Heliport.”
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-12-10, Elevation Failure.
c. Inform an aircraft making an approach to an
airport not served by a tower that no traffic or landing
runway information is available for that airport.
PHRASEOLOGY-
NO TRAFFIC OR LANDING RUNWAY INFORMATION
AVAILABLE FOR THE AIRPORT.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para_2-7-2, Altimeter Setting Issuance Below
Lowest Usable FL.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
5-10-3. NO-GYRO APPROACH
When an aircraft will make a no-gyro surveillance or
a PAR approach:
a. Before issuing a vector, inform the aircraft of
the type of approach.
PHRASEOLOGY-
THIS WILL BE A NO-GYRO SURVEILLANCE/P-A-R
APPROACH.
b. Instruct the aircraft when to start and stop turn.
PHRASEOLOGY-
TURN LEFT/RIGHT. STOP TURN.
c. After turn on to final approach has been made
and prior to the aircraft reaching the approach gate,
instruct the aircraft to make half-standard rate turns.
PHRASEOLOGY-
MAKE HALF-STANDARD RATE TURNS.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-12-10, Elevation Failure.
5-10-4. LOST COMMUNICATIONS
When weather reports indicate that an aircraft will
likely encounter IFR weather conditions during the
approach, take the following action as soon as
possible after establishing radar identification and
radio communications (may be omitted after the first
approach when successive approaches are made and
the instructions remain the same):
NOTE-
Air traffic control facilities at U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force
installations are not required to transmit lost communications instructions to military aircraft. All military facilities
will issue specific lost communications instructions to civil
aircraft when required.
a. If lost communications instructions will require
the aircraft to fly on an unpublished route, issue an
appropriate altitude to the pilot. If the lost
communications instructions are the same for both
pattern and final, the pattern/vector controller shall
issue both. Advise the pilot that if radio communications are lost for a specified time interval (not more
than 1 minute) on vector to final approach, 15 seconds
on a surveillance final approach, or 5 seconds on a
PAR final approach to:
1. Attempt contact on a secondary or a tower
frequency.
2. Proceed in accordance with visual flight rules
if possible.
3. Proceed with an approved nonradar
approach, or execute the specific lost communications procedure for the radar approach being used.
NOTE-
The approved procedures are those published on the FAA
Forms 8260 or applicable military document.
JO 7110.65S 2/14/08
5-10-3
Radar Approaches- Terminal
PHRASEOLOGY-
IF NO TRANSMISSIONS ARE RECEIVED FOR (time
interval) IN THE PATTERN OR FIVE/FIFTEEN
SECONDS ON FINAL APPROACH, ATTEMPT
CONTACT ON (frequency), AND
if the possibility exists,
PROCEED VFR. IF UNABLE:
if approved,
PROCEED WITH (nonradar approach), MAINTAIN
(altitude) UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON/OVER FIX/
NAVAID/APPROACH PROCEDURE,
or
(alternative instructions).
PHRASEOLOGY-
USN. For ACLS operations using Mode I, IA, and II,
IF NO TRANSMISSIONS ARE RECEIVED FOR
FIVE_SECONDS AFTER LOSS OF DATA LINK,
ATTEMPT CONTACT ON (frequency), AND
if the possibility exists,
PROCEED VFR. IF UNABLE:
if approved,
PROCEED WITH (nonradar approach), MAINTAIN
(altitude) UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON/OVER FIX/
NAVAID/APPROACH PROCEDURE,
or
(alternative instructions).
b. If the final approach lost communications
instructions are changed, differ from those for the
pattern, or are not issued by the pattern controller,
they shall be issued by the final controller.
c. If the pilot states that he/she cannot accept a lost
communications procedure due to weather conditions or other reasons, request the pilot's intention.
NOTE-
The pilot is responsible for determining the adequacy of
lost communications procedures with respect to aircraft
performance, equipment capability, or reported weather.
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-9-2, Final Approach Course Interception.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-10-2, Approach Information.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 5-12-10, Elevation Failure. |
|