- 注册时间
- 2009-12-25
- 最后登录
- 2021-7-10
- 在线时间
- 3302 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 10
- 帖子
- 13416
- 精华
- 1
- UID
- 2036
|
SAFETY REGULATION GROUP FLIGHT OPERATIONS DIVISION COMMUNICATION 32/2007 Applicability: All Operators of Airbus A318/319/320/321 THE HANDLING OF THRUST LEVERS DURING LANDING WITH A DEACTIVATED THRUST REVERSER FOR AIRBUS A318/319/320/321 AEROPLANES 1 Introduction 1.1 The CAA has been advised by the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) of an operational procedure which is thought to incur an unacceptable risk, namely the handling of thrust levers during landing with a thrust reverser deactivated. This FODCOM is issued to advise operators of the manufacturer’s recommended operational procedure to select idle thrust on both engines during a landing conducted with one deactivated thrust reverser. The term ‘A320’ is used in the following paragraphs to refer to A318, A319, A320 and A321 aeroplanes. 2 Background 2.1 There have been at least three similar accidents/incidents that have occurred because the flight crew failed to retard both thrust levers to the IDLE detent for the flare and landing when the A320 aircraft were dispatched with one thrust reverser deactivated as allowed by the Minimum Equipment List (MEL). The thrust lever corresponding to the engine with the deactivated thrust reverser was left in the CLIMB detent during the flare and touchdown. MAX REVERSE thrust lever position was selected on the engine with the operative thrust reverser. In each instance, the auto thrust system remained engaged in the speed mode until selection of reverse on one engine disconnected the auto thrust system, and the thrust system reverted to the manual mode. This resulted in the thrust increasing within the range of the CLIMB limit thrust setting in order to maintain the selected speed. When the auto thrust disconnected, the thrust remained at the last commanded thrust level per the lockout feature. Ground spoilers did not deploy and autobrakes, if selected, did not activate. The most recent accident resulted in 199 fatalities. 2.2 The A320 auto thrust system utilizes six detents: TOGA, FLEX/MCT, CLIMB, IDLE, REV IDLE, and MAX REVERSE, to establish the maximum full authority digital engine control (FADEC) computed thrust for the ambient conditions. The thrust levers do not move automatically but are manually placed in one of the detents by the pilot. The A320 design requires that both thrust levers be retarded to the IDLE detent by the pilot on landing to disconnect the auto thrust system, to initiate the system logic for the deployment of ground spoilers and the activation of autobrakes, and to avoid an undesired increase in thrust during the landing roll. In the case of dispatch with one thrust reverser deactivated, the Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) and the recent Airbus Accident Information Telex (TAM JJ3054 AIT 4, August 2, 2007) each call for the pilot to set both thrust levers to idle for the flare and after touchdown during thrust reversers application, select BOTH thrust levers. In all cases, the systemdesigned logic requires that both thrust levers be retarded to the IDLE detent for flare and landing. Pilots should follow operator specific procedures for the selection of reverse thrust. 2.3 The MMEL operational procedure was amended in 2006 to require both levers to be set to maximum reverse at touchdown when operating with one thrust reverser deactivated. The intent of the revised procedure is to mandate a symmetrical selection of the thrust reverser levers when one reverser out of two is inoperative. The procedure requires MAX REV selection in accordance with the Airbus Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (see FCOM 3.03.22P5). An Airbus review of the published MMEL operational procedure 02-78-30-01 is planned by the next revision to take into account long runway, no contamination configurations. The planned wording that is to be introduced will be as follows: "During thrust reversers application, select BOTH thrust levers". (This new wording is already contained in A330/A340 MMEL.) The revised procedure was introduced to standardise and harmonise with the normal operating techniques when both reversers are serviceable, thereby minimising normal and MMEL dispatch procedural differences. Operators may wish to incorporate the guidance resulting from the Airbus review in advance of the MMEL amendment, since the requirement to set MAX reverse in all FLIGHT OPERATIONS DIVISION COMMUNICATION - 32/2007 2 circumstances adds no safety value in less limiting circumstances. The level of symmetrical reverse selection may be decided according to prevailing conditions. 2.4 The standardised procedure contained in the MMEL requires an additional 55 metres to be added to the scheduled landing distance required, which is caused by the slightly increased N1 of the engine with deactivated thrust reverse. In practice, this increase in landing distance may not be observed since it may be more than cancelled out by the reverse thrust selected on the engine with the serviceable reverser, but this effect cannot be acknowledged in the calculation of landing distance required as credit for the use of reverse thrust during landing is not permitted. The MMEL operational procedures also contain the instruction that reverse thrust must not be selected when both thrust reversers are inoperative. 3 Applicability 3.1 The information contained above is applicable to those aircraft dispatched in accordance with the MMEL for Airbus A318/319/320/321 item 78-30. 4 Recommendation 4.1 Operators should take note of, and ensure that all affected personnel are familiar with, the content of this FODCOM and of the relevant section of the MMEL. Operations manuals should be amended to reflect current Airbus procedures in this respect. 5 Queries 5.1 Any queries as a result of this FODCOM should be addressed to Head of Flight Operations Policy Department at the following e-mail address: FOP.Admin@caa.co.uk. 15 November 2007 Recipients of new FODCOMs are asked to ensure that these are copied to their 'in house' or contracted maintenance organisation, to relevant outside contractors, and to all members of their staff who could have an interest in the information or who need to take appropriate action in response to this Communication. Review FOI(A) February 2010 |
|