航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |显示全部楼层
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O + d( \. w+ \. E% _" H2116 p+ K+ Q* |5 e C0 a+ { Operational- O0 p% b- B" _3 f' T( @) ` Assessment J6 k1 ~+ o. a. I& W- O An evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an ( r g* f0 \* S, ]# ^# C9 d: s9 W& aindependent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other2 D: S) @2 V, i* z# t' }8 c than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on , I X3 n% m/ W& `significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk,$ p& k& w% p' x% |) h, s" V adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate + C/ Q9 a8 ]1 J1 Eoperational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using # y8 M7 k5 }( ~7 ftechnology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development/ F7 s1 @& \/ K3 Z% [) ^ models, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test0 Y9 v( M- w/ ~: h, R and evaluation necessary to support full production decisions. , r1 i; f- t; K& aOperational: k* z2 f+ h, s: r Availability * D' v6 ]& ~4 h( c7 yThe degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect 5 I ~ H, }, B* C. g' d' wequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is: R0 W; G/ i) o uptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link6 A7 J. y% ~4 W( H1 Q between readiness objectives and supportability. 0 N9 G! e* G% P A( |' ^ r9 @6 WOperational # z) |* e) Q1 ?" x0 e$ o' gConcept 9 S. }8 L) N7 c6 E) O% ?An end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, . }" w' u" N6 F8 _organizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task. 4 f; \9 f) ?. mOperational ) W$ s/ j2 u4 D% QControl (OPCON) 7 Q/ k" R' d* |1 u ~0 p; ^Transferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any 4 I7 |, ]- L& ]2 q; X! iechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is5 w7 d" R& z% l# Q w v+ r/ p inherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to # w7 J, r( X+ operform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving 6 f& h* J+ R! e# porganizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating 2 Q3 c$ S) K& F# Zobjectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions/ Y* H$ K. l8 |4 D2 h assigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the/ _( j% Q" M/ t! n commanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised) O; ?% N/ ]9 L through the Service component commanders. Operational control normally, H2 Z, f7 d8 ]3 m, L) h; s2 ^ provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those" s5 P- O; p4 Z0 F forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to & D; R* p/ k raccomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself, , x9 D3 j$ Q! V% i# W; N; N& @5 [) W1 Dinclude authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline,# g! {) c7 ]9 O% R$ {' K internal organization, or unit training. , i/ [6 P* Q5 o+ TOperational " x' A, b: ]& @5 b$ yEffectiveness + d1 W/ F! X. W2 nThe overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by. E& o5 ]0 R) n( Y2 v representative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural, b) h+ q9 @7 `' s5 c/ S; g. Qelectronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering* D3 ~" L) g( w+ { organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including0 V& k9 `; X8 C0 W countermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and: F: n1 `- N9 ] chemical contamination (NBCC) threats). 2 b/ b* M* ~6 `, bOperational8 {/ f( K4 @( z8 ~ Evaluation; G9 O0 u( Q7 L The test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable : C! @; F h/ ]' D: o3 C. q* |under Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is' [5 U& G- z- e# ?! Y- @/ S* s warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained;( p" \2 L* w4 [9 r& ]2 d9 s and b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems, ' |, [0 w5 L" R! M- K7 c z: x$ u& mconsideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate% O7 v* q. @) a; ]6 T+ ^ the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy; B4 H _6 O- _) W capabilities in the field. % C# Z7 M8 h2 H; i0 |; E! |Operational- \3 Z0 W# T3 \) F! e Level of War & j& o" R2 \: s/ e! b4 nThe level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned,5 P; s3 c1 v& Q2 W( f# Y conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or; T7 [5 B' n# I* C4 l& ] areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by T2 B% `3 v& e& c) f( Destablishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic - r) x3 f4 D! robjectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating # w, t8 ] w9 Y* _3 ^8 T* uactions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These : J' I/ b( K& V$ Aactivities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure$ `5 T$ @7 k4 C6 E! ~ O the logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by' h6 T' v( O' B which tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives./ e( w) y* L% I( v6 o; z MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 7 V. N3 j ~$ I1 N212 % m. E0 T' |( v0 w' f. k' oOperational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the + l7 Z% `0 D L" ooperational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training 7 x. S/ w9 L S1 H) P( aconfiguration. 8 D' c0 h0 C+ xOperational 2 I7 G' \9 ]+ l3 d* t3 E& ]Readiness0 z6 r" O4 x" ?! ]: Z! b1 f The capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform, H' @) x# c7 s# c the missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in/ G% Z6 r- _$ A a general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness. + a) b. X# Q! k' g% wOperational 0 A5 `. V) q2 c- J( V* @: pReliability7 t7 e% t9 z N: p The reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment./ j* ^; i' _2 U& c Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment.$ _* O/ c! s* L! A" U& X' m7 U Operational ( w6 _7 V, ]5 j4 a7 E# v4 XRequirement % g. ^5 B0 l5 G/ V' q$ XNavy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected& Y3 r4 s- m7 O" a6 g/ y9 d by OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less. i- C8 r: B& y0 J' m. K than major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |显示全部楼层
Operational " [3 R" D3 |! g/ d* z7 k0 L& ERequirements' u: K e1 d- N) m) E Document (ORD) 9 F+ [. ]' d9 j/ J$ c& QDocuments the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for/ ], s% {+ I" [# c operational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and% u% X4 H7 ?# G/ f DoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components. ; ^2 k6 r; g( ^) J2 ?0 \1 T' A8 ~Operational 9 W' h5 z) Q$ Q9 x. Z j, @Suitability + q/ ^) V$ _) j; x! A7 nThe degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with( n2 L b: v% f. U9 k: Z consideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, : c6 J8 G2 E6 W4 w& c& K' n preliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower- j' D7 n# L. X* p: }3 D; m supportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts,6 ^7 p" `! [8 v. l/ b$ q" Q documentation, and training requirements. B( ` H; A+ ]3 I3 F0 ]Operational Test 2 a2 |; X) T/ O2 [' R6 wand Evaluation : G4 P r z# U(OT&E), ^: d0 Q; T9 H3 p; [/ m That T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational & S( \+ L j+ _% q) e% ]effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any) E" D+ @1 B) F9 c; c8 G modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the 4 C6 [' s, @; Y# O' {types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when/ u; ~- l; O% s" j deployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as- x$ C) Z; ]9 j& e' T- Q possible. * q/ K7 ?4 |" ?* A9 MOperationally ( ]" g) ^. ]9 i! G) ZReady; {2 i6 ?* \5 E 1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or 9 y+ p3 t) _6 _. W0 ]9 t1 Y+ Ldesigned (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both & e! r! C& d; b" e. Z( E) qequipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to3 j5 M9 F7 x% b& P perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel).1 Z3 w: U& N- L. D Operations and 5 u% o) j: E* D2 }. e6 cSupport (O&S) & l( ?. M' e+ X L+ ~1 \1 x7 XCosts 0 U( W6 A& a+ QThose resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a$ f" ?4 w& m- p major component during its useful life in the operational inventory." U' x( k6 |8 a3 X9 \3 U Operations3 l& b; h: v* [- ^7 E Profile 2 a2 p; Z8 B3 _1 x" NAn identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time : s! x) m8 T4 d) V' |! M; jthose actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational# X2 S) i r) d( X! E. z procedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are # _" p# p( I: M5 J" Sdiscernible. - j( L$ L' C/ t6 r8 dOperations8 O y+ i/ S6 S1 M6 d8 {% J( r2 c Security (OPSEC) ! `$ n4 s* {: |7 u9 `2 OSurvey $ M, Q1 A! v& i4 B2 {' MThe method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is+ P6 ~9 }# k, E/ n3 q# W composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or8 l+ f: E9 F6 K8 ]% p inefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational. _6 l; J' a& [' b1 G1 Q- v7 s effectiveness.0 U% }2 E* u: _6 G+ S8 y OPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy). 7 |. }# t {+ z% sOPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment. ' [2 X2 Z& w4 \4 F0 b9 g4 O- b; |OPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor.1 y4 S. ]% W. g/ o8 g- P4 }" J MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O" k7 d5 ?" Q% p: h 2136 I: f6 w7 J: C" P/ T f OPLAN Operation Plan. ~2 |% q/ u+ y" s3 b2 o- u OPM Office of Personnel Management. 8 }1 D6 h1 H, f( MOPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations.5 S0 e5 @5 g# u! i OPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction. ) z3 }3 q, P' L2 m) FOPNS Operations. + _# r, e( _! z/ `1 ?' p' g ~ nOPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. ) R7 m* L) H" I8 f+ VOPORD Operation Order. ( g# n) h6 V5 [* I3 ]$ IOPP Other Physical Principles.2 Y ^1 Q- t! V& a$ ~3 |8 j3 v; `9 C OPR Office of Primary Responsibility. z$ @1 L3 A( p9 _5 uOps Operations (employment). , R+ J" b1 _ B% k) tOPS Operations." X) b% q7 S9 ]+ X6 W7 s OPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies. 2 s% ^3 B/ d2 N4 z8 UOPSEC Operations Security. * B; n6 [2 l) D' }* J) \OPSMOD Operations Module.# Q {$ L; F5 `5 p OPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army) 0 v, S5 W; N. L& X: @$ r1 LOPTEMPO Operating Tempo. * g6 }# v9 N7 nOPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy) . a @+ F9 R& G/ w! {8 I2 o$ zOptic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. 7 V5 _1 \. K8 ^5 @/ IOptical Airborne : ]; f3 I7 \3 b+ U) W1 uMeasurement/ S1 `4 W* i0 a: S3 v" h3 B9 f Program (OAMP) 0 F h$ a, g5 e3 C# zA program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct6 W1 c+ \# o/ O R' S7 Y& }9 e surveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems. / K) U5 p* {" d" U) [(Also known as Cobra Eye.)* ]1 B- F3 W' L& A. `5 w7 T( v2 T Optical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the # {4 X+ H+ x9 i) kmaterial to which they are applied./ ^5 B/ \/ F: ~ Optical' F! z( F5 X7 i$ \1 T; B2 K Processing* l, b/ a5 o3 e% R A type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed % O; |. c" F/ @& N9 F: vthrough optical systems, is used in problem solving. 1 k% S8 v! ?6 }. i' lOR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational' _; N; q5 S5 k: c; h) \ Readiness. (4) Operational Reliability./ Q4 M. G8 V# L0 l: J& \/ |2 D! [ OR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis. ; v) A3 q. e! Y% h5 ]ORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser.4 B& D! [% G# k$ i ORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature. * ] R6 i6 B% F+ `# }" WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O * W( y0 i y3 T( i6 J/ u: }214 8 x1 R% O2 N8 T' R% v" }Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.)* {8 B* X/ k! l" N# t( u. Y used to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital 1 s! i$ o2 I, pelements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a; D4 P* a# x5 I# V5 W$ c Keplerian orbit at a particular time. , p- v r0 P+ a0 I/ iOrbital9 Q5 v/ z& @% \ Maneuvering& X# l' U# ^0 U7 P% n/ B/ I Vehicle (OMV) , J& N9 {9 j5 j# Q O: L7 W% vNASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing. ; R6 @9 a! n/ X1 x' s4 v0 ?Operates from shuttle and Space Station.- I7 x, X, s Q; V9 Q Orbital Suborbital# Y+ T9 u! y: d Program (OSP)9 k l9 u% k1 h- B; c+ _, k A strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the6 B/ H+ I2 l6 U) t# O( b Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |显示全部楼层
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites.1 q* c! ?2 ~ [- I% [9 I4 { ORC Operational Readiness Condition.3 }0 n$ g0 o: K, Q( A) \9 O s* X4 g U ORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment. 2 c" r s0 P" U+ F. d; e9 v) ?ORD See Operational Requirements Document." j$ M v8 E1 Q% W4 @ ORDALT Ordnance Alteration. ; c0 p- V9 @) n1 ?( g- d. POrder of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the 3 y* Y5 F6 r% w; k# apersonnel, units, and equipment of any military force. ! g3 ^# \* n, e: xOrder Wire9 ^$ }, J g% V, W% b/ q. q* i Message# g* h2 `, E9 h2 v* a2 D A communications support function for internal control of communications $ d9 }; Q. c2 y! Xelements. 3 F& t! A% ~0 c: XOrganic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic3 d& _6 ~* g' m: h parts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force,! k6 X" ]* X; z+ z, }6 p and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the ! g/ N1 U' \: \5 `1 w' P' r, ooperating forces for the Navy.! M' M9 E7 m1 F; X, U) E7 w6 i) g Ornate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. ' b8 l9 r& q2 T ?6 l( xORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN." q+ g1 \) q9 I4 s- _9 y. G ORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications.; W* X3 {% C4 W6 t3 ~; m: y/ _- l4 H5 M ORU Orbital Replacement Unit.( L5 T Q( U9 M D0 p J ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. 1 q' G2 n7 i1 Z( B6 pOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System. " b: r) f/ ` aOSA Optical Society of America. 2 T- K! v }$ r, wOSC Optical Signature Code.; k9 [. D1 o3 R" g! a6 a2 z OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe.: a# E, V" J: Z5 V, V( t5 r OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. ) T! W2 [: M2 N7 F/ ZOSE Operational Support Equipment.# e" }+ U$ D# g OSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool., v% r/ @/ M" z2 E# w: |/ U MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O1 Z" {' E, g0 n5 N 215 0 Q8 o/ J2 s5 }$ ~3 ^/ _OSF Open Systems Foundation.! P' K" S2 \0 R) R OSH Occupational Safety and Health., w0 E, o A7 Y% t OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. 8 b; t) C$ s0 ^OSI Operator System Interface. ( n9 ?% f( u; }5 { S5 GOSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC. $ B, Q4 X$ s9 e! j8 b, b- P" v. n+ NOSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term). , g* F9 i! l) b( C& _6 [OSIP Operational System Integration Plan. 4 A& V' Q' o J6 w; [ EOSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group. , R" S+ X/ S# z" i- [' T* F7 DOSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. : x6 S0 [; }1 xOSM Object Sighting Message.& d2 Z% E r8 [5 D) J3 l- c$ l B: @ OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program).7 ~( ~' y% ?) {6 |- A4 R# Q OSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy.# O& S9 N5 a2 P4 H OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research. 5 F" u' m3 B0 n. h% b7 IOT Operational Test.+ {0 e) t$ b8 F. U+ w OTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.' _ M S5 m7 P& }1 ~9 Q' ] (2) Operational Test Agency.; d. e5 m6 F- g' k! G5 q' f$ [ (3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA. * n! [- ~' A0 }1 \% @8 G4 eOTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term).2 |9 s+ k9 z& E OT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation., S! G s& {; y4 @# J* L OTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer.9 R4 ]. P; _ A7 Z4 w. ~6 p OTF Object Track Profile. ! ?( ^( L# S) |3 w4 _1 Z2 ^* TOTH Over the Horizon.8 H2 P7 L6 \; `# L OTH-B Over-The-Horizon. ( m% {6 J3 v6 U2 d, C% O$ \+ U V: XOTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting. - E, T" B7 E' s7 D# X D6 L& {3 eOTO Operational Test Organization.6 U2 q8 @ O6 u% Y- m OTP Outline Test Plan.9 S! U) l5 Q( [ E8 b& O OTS Off-the-Shelf. ! `) o3 q! ^* T0 H" \OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis. % x: X4 T% B! _$ |) [OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle. 6 p7 [" L; X) L. U0 E; e" yOUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense.; B0 ~( a8 j6 m) G2 M MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O. _ a% M7 d* I, l# J- j) W 216 $ o, u- X5 \ HOUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T).6 o6 R0 H8 M' d6 n; T OUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). 5 X* m# J8 P* h% h/ r4 kOuter Space / ]0 v7 G/ h& V: ~. }Treaty of 19676 S A. l6 T$ Y& p2 B" } _ A multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the : Y+ q, {7 }8 i! ^' [" k(former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing& } [, J# }" V8 ] nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space.# r$ }+ V# ~$ H8 ]4 Q% v; ] Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or " K; e' b7 e$ ?( K0 n5 a; `# A% j; rother payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays $ c* q2 U1 r# P, `# K* Aconsist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget,; [5 @3 H9 n* X% v" L6 P9 } L2 c minus receipts.' X' v- w Q6 ], k! V5 c Out of Band7 U/ q2 |" |) S3 ~, f2 z Laser Flux/ I$ c* z/ v9 c; P* u. @% d4 ^ ? (Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt 7 U- I) x1 Z. K2 M; ?5 Pthe sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth. * {4 d: [( I* |. B! z( \Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget.6 k5 Z. k8 ~; p. H2 ~. x" h Overlay BMD! ^1 r2 |) o5 c9 J0 v0 S% _ System* @/ U) x, x9 ?# A* \6 g+ {; z An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of+ w" ]+ h; u" ~, i3 f ICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear2 P1 U5 `$ e! [, { homing interceptors.) v) {! ]+ B% J0 r7 ?6 ? e6 y OWG Operating Working Group. 5 w1 _3 A' d" o4 ]3 I- T2 T# A& YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ; k8 J' j% C. ^5 q s) r& e217) {3 A8 Q0 }7 q! H: g P&D Planning and Design (MILCON term). 8 V7 Z% k+ \$ d4 HP&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture. $ g- W( i' ~* Q2 {( L0 ^P.B. President’s Budget.) a) b6 q0 u! o& O P2 Pollution Prevention.3 z- _7 q; Q0 a% y& N p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation.* @( [6 Z. e, W$ I/ g P3 Pollution Prevention Program./ F( }! _6 G1 s* _( K" E' D P3 I Preplanned Product Improvement. 7 i- `3 E4 w* r* b0 VPA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs. 1 \* P* T& Q0 g/ Z: Y6 ?7 LPA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation. 9 T: H- h1 ?; T9 x. N4 V5 l9 m$ pPA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate.% X8 t) ]* k/ |, Z& r PAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA) ' K/ t) u* F) M& E+ X# f: b& \# dPAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-29 b5 B: _ ?. X( T1 Q6 h PAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT. " z/ y' M9 K$ ZPAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 9 ]! }% z: R6 o! c. dPAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL." Q7 _6 i6 o5 V8 F7 q PAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4. 4 [% q' c& ^2 Y! u* K& nPACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. 5 c: N2 V Z6 S& [4 u p6 U* g/ NPACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific.& ^. g( P, M% R! [1 ` h! F' K PACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier. 8 ^5 B& s) Q5 v# q8 L+ q1 NPACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |显示全部楼层
Packaging, . b t' u. `3 ?7 H* U) r& E2 e8 uHandling,+ P" A# V0 a& r1 a& a Storage, and [% ^/ d$ f- j Transportation. ^" y2 _' @7 \- i (PHS&T)/ ~& _# i- |- H* t7 f The resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to5 I+ S( k% v5 p) z2 M; Z f ensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, : L; l( t2 g3 Shandled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations, ( D6 h ]: m8 f* Qequipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and0 R8 \, M- n0 r- Z% c6 x transportability.& E. V; R" J/ X+ o Packet Switching / M' b+ W2 U) e, k S( R4 M0 D(PSW)# j+ O! p: m7 Z A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is& `) B# k* {3 P j6 v3 D3 x) {4 T occupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data" w/ }! G. n% Y& n communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and - N# k0 }" s9 V* A# Y+ \! @then formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment. O/ y) p0 y9 B5 @5 X5 _5 I$ z or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes., m, X: B! m, u) B7 L PACOM U.S. Pacific Command." F! h& Q$ P2 {$ V/ n PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures. 5 B3 O2 `5 G ]PADIL Patriot Data & Information Link. 9 t* ~1 }( K, C( H% f4 ?: LMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' ^1 ]; }: j- L" f! j218 3 g0 ], F9 }# d; W9 s9 _; fPAFB Patterson Air Force Base. ( a' `. s: t+ y: v: UPAL Permissive Action Link. 7 T- ?" ^" U5 A- X" HPALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term)." B. O1 F- h1 @! Z. Z( D PAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation. ; C$ d8 E' j: ~8 w# M |PAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber].* }( l2 I8 [+ O, T& L. ~ Pancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to( L, Z9 N: q( T$ \: q the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown. j7 v' H, Z2 J' Q+ D$ c PAP Predicted Aim Point.& N+ F& D7 H& @ R3 h% |) k3 f PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar. . F) L2 J4 E5 o" S! \5 G2 C4 u! x(2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.) % d& ]7 @6 G# a% ?(3) Preprocessing Analysis Report. ; }: d1 K0 w" R" f7 \7 C(4) Program Assessment Report. 8 Y: P1 U+ ]5 l(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar.% s1 T/ {* z; q7 X. V, r7 o3 i$ f Parallel2 q6 M# R# ~$ P; g/ |, d Processing . M/ J' c+ \8 \In parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into U' U0 O( x! f; @ smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that 0 l. | n" `7 jmuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained. . x( ~2 j/ G+ m7 R7 [Parametric Cost: u/ r5 f) c+ \/ Y Estimate * a/ G, u: `$ n; }# XA cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical 6 J: M; v& u6 h; lcosts and other program variables such as system physical or performance. _# ]+ }( h g; T# n9 ` characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also 1 [/ u, X* r* X$ _( mreferred to as a top-down approach.2 L. a' U& C, `, p7 `. ]; ? PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System.1 |; f. E! L3 q0 f$ r& w5 r PARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs. $ ?. j8 y0 O% ? {. l! @$ f( fPartial Mission 6 u9 ~( J% D# WCapable5 J u1 Y, L$ B) s0 w" h9 W% M8 D Material condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at 1 c, d- y9 u/ nleast one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission & r. i" @2 l4 A9 {$ v- ~% N7 ^$ |Capable. , o& {' W0 H0 N- Q- aParticipating ' s8 u; s9 \3 J3 ?" @) H! S( \Service# N' y8 m8 l) [0 P& I% t; _+ ~ A military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint 9 E& v0 p i9 U, ~" Racquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds. * ?+ y: R4 T2 p4 i" ~/ UParticle Beam, ?8 r5 S" C% g) m+ Q# P1 q& M- Y (PB) ; y& x* ` ^! |% nHigh-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or( w4 x; m! I$ g7 G* m2 u: Z' L neutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light.' v! Y: ~, }% x" ]; k" C, R Particle Beam1 b# i3 f$ H% k; c% w: X( u' h$ _ Weapon (PBW)7 ~" K& `! N) m0 \% A A weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers)" W9 k- ^" [8 ~9 d& V to emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of9 `6 F4 O. Q" r8 Q3 f1 z X1 g light. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g., 9 `& Z; Z( J# ]4 i& ]! `+ H8 O/ felectronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor1 x9 b9 g% q; F: b6 _ damage, and initiation of high explosives./ A8 x9 `4 J* }$ u PASS POET Advanced Submunition Study. # H7 T9 C$ M9 i* Y/ t4 }, k0 tPassive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no : z- ?! ?' W2 o2 A8 Uenergy capable of being detected. ) ~* [4 |+ ~6 w" dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P . E# e- q3 R' X9 M0 ? x219/ L$ T9 a4 [' G f: m, H Passive Air! E+ q% m9 \: h0 X Defense / k! |1 s1 F* e8 iAll measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness& G$ z$ D+ ]) ]& G of hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use0 t4 @0 n6 Z4 Q9 y# ? of protective construction./ F5 @+ k3 L) |: Y: i3 g4 v6 h/ U/ { Passive 7 \8 ~0 \, L7 G- _ ECommunications9 a7 } _& [( n4 g6 C Security Threats 7 J& l, M7 e2 t5 D% M: VThreats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through8 q1 F8 @& Z C4 [ intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic9 v/ w; X) k' `/ e0 ] emanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications( c+ F/ r% F$ ~; b- \ interception and direction finding.5 H5 }5 }8 M; q4 V# U Passive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects Q! y1 A% K6 `2 yof damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the & Z8 \' I/ x' Jinitiative.0 M. u9 y5 b0 N0 G! ^) v+ H (2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile ( e7 ]" e2 ?8 d4 \attack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing( |9 I1 C3 M( Y0 _ the vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the ( G$ f; t" `9 D- p" }/ h8 fpotential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive6 ^' i- \0 ^, n* _' h; N p- g3 r measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and0 |3 j. V" b# V4 H% c; g concealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and8 D7 Q- R8 R% n2 u7 R: O9 q; E4 _- p7 m- ] redundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of3 C8 Z# J- s- v8 A; w0 r' W TMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS)% ^9 q# Z2 G7 P$ d, c! ~. R Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking: z' X5 q7 M- Z' d+ w. u and/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |显示全部楼层
PAT Process Action Team.% V( }8 L$ M! l3 V( l PAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation., j) l! O: M& r6 G' F" M( l PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor.$ X2 u/ c. r9 w) I) [8 H% ^. c PATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile). & T5 b6 t( G3 z7 G; S/ ~( WPAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System. : s! H6 Z& ?; F: h7 o) m6 QPhased array SLBM warning system. Four sites: 2 K* ?/ i( K8 c5 z' H$ ]a. East Otis ANG Base, MA 7 V: l0 E. q, j; V9 C9 xb. West Beale AFB, CA( x9 I% v3 t% n6 w) e7 K; c, A" }# V# x+ w c. Southeast Robins AFB, GA7 Y' a# v& ^( G: o d. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX- v0 a" ~ N7 }2 T+ H; K4 A. I { PAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term).+ S( I% \/ B, l; }( C2 f) R1 ?$ C* y Payload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile.' Q# y" i. ] s/ l6 A (2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile.$ R( x, ?7 z0 ~/ B# F (3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry 5 x( _8 F+ |: a1 J" l* Z% n' Pvehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon)' Z3 g. G* U' \" E% X1 X0 N Payload Build-up - M, o# X/ u5 V/ Z) b(Missile and 0 I( T: M( A: {0 vSpace)0 D, A1 Z- Z0 ?' C5 L The process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and. Y: L& R4 W- _. \. x necessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a , X! q/ Y) @* @ Y" @7 ~: E2 a1 Ycomplete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of9 S! |1 S/ [5 U$ z! s the mission. * G2 ?1 @6 n5 b3 T; T! L- m5 HPayload0 F4 Q/ n6 g5 S! N `* K Integration ! C6 D' s3 l& \. \4 c" m(Missile and 7 ?9 \+ b; `6 d3 Q QSpace)6 I* _4 C3 ]( J The compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft . z% }7 F: y! K# cand space vehicle.; y! `/ H* G/ c/ o/ W6 s MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P! P+ ^0 U: D5 r 220 4 u+ z: u' i8 m8 j2 F3 nPB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget. ~# Z% j$ y, `# ?. d (4) Program Baseline.1 s2 N J% x/ [ D PB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD. 8 t L* d6 P4 G& {+ GPBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer.3 J9 N6 I; X/ f( T: }3 {7 y PBCS Post-Boost Control System. , m" H5 r( U( E4 Q: f$ HPBD Program Budget Decision.) Y1 P; t0 D' q5 O! i+ m+ M, c PBI Post-Boost Intercept.# V2 o$ s. D. J$ F PBP Post-Boost Phase.8 J0 b" t' P% } PBS President’s Budget Submission. 0 A0 W5 i* H( \PBV Post-Boost Vehicle. ' l7 ^ x! r7 m! E' s, v0 MPBW Particle Beam Weapon. 5 L# V$ @ y/ [, xPC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee. ' p x% P' l; N8 CPC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term). 8 y& ?( F& d6 a6 V6 r4 KPCA Physical Configuration Audit. * r' X- k! [% F+ I5 HPCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology.1 y5 @$ r3 K; }4 v# j PCB Printed Circuit Board. ! L; R% S# {! h6 l5 L6 w9 uPCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term). " g2 p R: `& t6 b7 cPCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term).3 A( P7 h9 d+ R) C, T) q# ]& A PCE PLRS Communications Enhancement. 8 j& ?$ |. @* B; c: `$ {; I$ rPCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team." v# }/ Q" Y* h- X# { PCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term). 0 ?) S% ? g3 d% MPCI Peripheral Component Interface.* B1 y! z( p, ?0 H2 D, K& D' M PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language.' j# B/ L6 w U4 d5 D# w PCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation./ F) r! j2 v6 _/ `$ N5 S6 q5 @+ {5 u6 ? PCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. % [% A* Z, G% B/ X4 ZPCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term).4 ?$ ]+ S# T2 f0 I, F+ K PCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative. 2 l% b) l) R! R' j5 p: r' J( K: JPCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System.4 I4 K* S( y1 b4 H. l1 b! ] PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure.0 i# x1 t* r& |! a' x. z$ B MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 5 c, s( P6 Z7 |/ J221 8 k% G1 h: ~6 ~- @PD (1) Presidential Directive. 2 h4 F8 p$ x4 h) F/ h( j3 A9 T(2) Procedures Description.* L; e- d [, | (3) Probability of Damage.* {3 `. f5 f3 |1 u" l (4) Probability of Detection.# W* H6 c& i+ Z( X' x' S% s (5) Preconditions for Defense. 5 W5 Z8 ^# y( G5 G' z- d, X(6) Program Director (AF).8 d. S+ g |% ~5 ]% D1 ` (7) Production/Deployment. $ y( W' [5 w+ U6 i( r, e(8) Phenomenology Document.5 v& s3 ^/ a2 f+ Y) V (9) Passive Defense. # Y# i' a8 T, m2 Q0 z% r7 A6 ?, RPD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term)./ g2 g' B( ~2 C PD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term).3 e& }8 g) n) N( K+ U8 ?9 c PD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term). ; K) q/ Z. S; K7 xPDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT). & Y4 a" ~0 U; x3 }! a. w9 D4 YPDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN. , |$ T/ E% o& P- W" hPDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive. / i- M+ [7 R6 f4 g3 Z6 q! P( `PDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term).3 Q$ r: s* ] _. I0 y4 h0 r PDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). 7 r, Q; _6 k$ n0 r4 x' [2 _PDP Pulse Doppler Processor. 8 e, k1 s5 e6 nPDR Preliminary Design Review. : Y* u S9 |$ [6 Q, F. fPDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2).5 t# g9 l T3 K B* Y0 F c (2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction. ( I, p# A4 H2 d0 JPDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. , Y! |& [$ Y! ~PDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term). 8 O9 G8 b+ A0 P. c( q% ?( [PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense.. a6 n, v! G4 X7 R% l- w$ o PDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology). + f0 z: e8 F% s" XPDV Program Definition and Validation., ~# k3 p2 ]; ^/ O1 P6 ?( S PE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |显示全部楼层
Peacekeeper US MX Missile.. v; g t7 u6 G8 j( @2 T/ D3 t Peak Gamma: ^: W- t& O" }: l9 Q9 } Dose Rate $ S* D7 m$ `" _& D# f& nThe maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could 9 L' `- ~! H, H" E" Tsurvive and continue functioning.5 ?* C; L6 O: j PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria." j: ~6 t' c, ~! B3 Z# l/ C- ]. O PEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation.5 V3 v& e( b# J! M4 m PEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD).3 F- j/ `$ p5 m0 ] PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement./ Z' \9 S# f1 s' X0 [$ H6 S* A. Z MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 0 I2 {' }7 }5 S( Q/ C% \222' X0 O% `# [7 h# }' z0 I2 z PEM Program Element Monitor (AF). x' u+ F3 D" E9 J5 k PENAID Penetration Aid.) {/ H5 z. h( K$ k Penaid: X$ }9 W# |" g: w: V3 S$ j6 q (Penetration Aid)' w. o) [/ m1 b2 H (Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by $ ~/ {4 h1 {9 m5 R% ~& v+ Coffensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating; J9 @4 H* w# E# L, S* I3 d! S enemy defenses.; W' {% }' {. o# E* ~ Penetration & E1 L+ x7 M( e- {4 S! Y3 OTesting + }" @9 u* W) V6 o, x" ]; UThe portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the 8 n8 q5 y% P& ?! d5 U/ D! o+ V' fsecurity features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all4 f4 L N+ g7 S: L" o system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of ) X. _- [9 m' g4 J4 ~) csystem source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under& ^) P! l; ~- g0 E0 P' v5 Y no constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. ; ]% \4 d; D" pPEO Program Executive Officer./ n0 Y5 z/ g4 U0 k( {. a PEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army) 2 l% d, S& K" j: g) x t/ IPEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program.# `0 W4 m9 I3 b PEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy) 6 L% A4 Y* e! ] R1 VPEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program 7 g6 m2 D0 J# BOffice. # ]8 S5 e. A( gPEP Producibility Engineering and Planning.+ m, |. G, `) C' T/ v PEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning.4 C" z- P: `4 \0 i/ |) h% k& u, H Peregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. + j# R: A! B' L$ bPerformance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to4 y) s6 Y. K* Q8 D/ L- X effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support / }* J& T9 H2 G; Acharacteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design % e' S- R; ~9 C+ Z) U6 o5 @6 Land the support elements necessary for system operation.7 T2 }- a9 N1 I* C3 S Performance& m! I+ r% ?6 R( p- a Requirement ! x! K/ s1 }# D% p P) @: H& v: }A requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system 6 }; S7 b e7 H V* e6 ~& C! n$ \0 Jor system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency. : u" W$ w1 u% K, `& ~9 |Performance( c) m0 C) j6 F8 ]1 B# M7 ? Specification 8 w' I8 @0 g5 X3 c Z) X(1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system- O2 v( `8 D- p or system component.3 ~7 A. j7 K) j9 o (2) Synonymous with requirements specification.2 N5 F7 u" @" [/ ] M6 P Perimeter 4 n0 M5 ~+ ]1 T" ?& g$ o3 GAcquisition 7 a& m) k& V7 h2 `Radar and Attack9 h; _3 S2 A6 C2 `4 }3 m6 E6 [ Characterization: b/ |/ |, N3 i" X System (PARCS). S/ i( V3 U7 d' i$ D AN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and 8 j) P& A* b2 M, j- A; @$ T2 z$ O. iattack assessment. ' z" l8 {) n) ]* X6 D% ~" kPeriod (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit.) l. Z6 }: T- K, J Permeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something. ( V, F2 K# Z1 ~/ U5 ?- RPershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe. 9 C. \4 O6 F- ]! IPERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique. , I+ T4 V) }+ ?9 \* JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P " ~5 r' b( {1 q$ b1 E1 \: B223) [& [2 L6 n) [2 F# J. \( J PERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other3 q0 S, P2 D1 \5 ?. R9 U: q6 x, K activities for completion, and depiction of the critical path. [ |: |$ W: @5 ^PESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation.1 w# u5 n2 c; P/ W# _$ A7 N0 C0 x; Z PET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test. 6 g, j2 E5 v7 `, M2 c* g9 r2 gPFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler.& i0 _ R9 R" r; z+ { PFD Preconditions for Defense.4 p6 y8 c9 o$ s PFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.- @6 J5 g2 Q6 x% e) F0 u PFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD). $ F4 s' U" G; |3 g- p- _PGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term). ) |/ _+ S1 y/ T+ S' V: d" uPGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term). * k; W$ ~* ^9 g _& u: i1 OPGM Precision Guided Munition. 8 j4 n1 l5 B4 C! FPGU Power Generation Unit. 9 f7 Y* h- B6 @3 ^5 r' @" M& E4 k/ VPH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).3 h: g2 h1 E5 a# D6 B' b Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically , c) S c3 N; J' L! m" e1 O7 @stationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to * q% _$ |3 E5 B% A9 E7 a. J6 Sanother (e.g., phased array radar). 7 Z r! H5 Z2 H9 V |Phased Array , X# {4 c/ E/ FTracking Radar+ M* ` ]8 O% x( l8 Y) z c Intercept On9 i4 z# J+ D0 S+ \ Target (missile)5 A# c v |0 ?) o (PATRIOT)5 {: _8 z) L3 a9 s* p1 A4 O* \ A point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 & u+ K# f( \, F' y9 x3 g* A$ o" J, rimprovements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles, - G' V/ ?9 d4 Q# l' _include upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either / v1 ?2 K* t) J+ lPATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT.2 t9 K: q7 H: C) f0 _# E$ D Phased 1 l* m; j o, l7 s! _ hDeployment4 j) |* O- P" r" M" j& e The sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system. g# W4 r4 r6 {. f$ j' e% {: P: D capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints. ; K X$ o; @7 Y% J/ p- JPhase One2 Q. ^3 [+ O9 T- E Engineering 9 a- {8 V4 M, h7 G; b; r/ mTeam (POET) n7 r3 R* i# H! { OBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program+ s; j5 ~) ^# k8 m" u0 A$ R0 x Office. Now referred to as POET.' N. N* ]9 c* F+ l$ } Phenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts : p; F8 k6 W( I: \collect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena+ _" l3 O7 u9 V& t8 s required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. 6 I: n9 u4 N" K( x' u/ RPHI Photonic Hit Indicator.7 d: c" _; H h; Q* b( b0 d+ Q9 S PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. ; f6 q5 P9 R2 h/ N9 o( b4 QPHOTINT Photographic Intelligence.+ w- Q6 V2 N+ y% U7 k Photochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light. + {1 o2 _" h( O! _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P3 A8 L9 t& B3 e 224) A0 o) p* \& z2 a Photoelectric 1 D. ?; y' ~! M! x4 Z+ f. @Effect , W, o9 H% M4 r' ~6 F+ bThe process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat; v( k7 a# M+ O' x* p+ f- D greater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its + a* B! O% }9 A/ Tenergy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it" w! w, C) I* X$ Z% r; M& E has lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.)$ K. c' t3 y* G3 {' \: k Photon A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy,/ m% D Q# s8 k; B" l3 J which is characteristic of the particular radiation.1 W! B( T* Z0 n* a7 T5 a4 t8 X3 q } PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. 5 h" g; R% @% I, Q' h% B5 hPhysical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic 8 A6 q+ N* X0 q: i. ofields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris, 9 @! B$ a" U: H- b) K: {: _and extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |显示全部楼层
Physical4 E( y( h6 B8 ]5 T4 U2 h7 F Configuration4 x. D z6 p' F" j7 v' [. y R Audit (PCA) ; q9 ~. a7 \6 k3 x+ s+ ]; r0 SPhysical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to$ K% a r% e4 N. t the technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government! B" f; M2 L8 O program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this $ E- m( k( Z2 w/ t" U% ^audit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production6 D" \* N1 N& x0 n$ ]7 l1 q' \ or first LRIP team.2 i9 ~8 W3 N/ X; k. ]0 z PI Program Integrator. 3 H( {. K, k, O7 TPIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term). + @0 V& l G1 [. p0 |0 p$ oPIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term). . v; o& H6 q6 o# |(2) Policy Integration Committee.! |8 I$ p6 T% N* \7 R (3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term). . C5 d7 R7 h* r+ zPicture Element 5 ?, T7 i, {5 g% k- W5 y(PIXEL)! N. ]- K2 U% M8 i, s The smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned * a. ]; r2 l( l5 R6 ucolor and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a0 a4 c0 n% E* M$ B- V recording medium. # u5 h% |' @# [4 D; c& `8 ^# mPIDS Prime Item Development Specification. - Y; F: n, k4 `( R0 LPilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing 1 N( h/ N' w% Q) n6 lmethods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. 6 @! R4 h$ f) S9 w3 [- GNot the same as long range initial production.$ g! I/ d4 N9 C5 Z( X8 G PIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term).3 A5 m+ k! F! E: P PIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System. ' E7 J8 v3 G$ ~) _; f6 ^PIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point. 4 R; P/ b* q. @) _(3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program.* o9 G( F# i- z7 ~ PIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team. 4 l4 v6 L# R) \PIR Program Information Report. ( Q6 E. L3 p" O( R" {PIXEL Picture Element., L# i) c$ B- Q5 x/ h/ V& S Pk Probability of Kill.$ h. A; F' ^2 C: J2 a0 X& w PKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard.6 A5 K% T- y$ I' v3 G PKH Probability of Kill, given a hit. ( e6 f O, k8 c- V2 N2 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ; f" U2 Y C+ F0 V2253 s4 P; ]3 o' f7 a3 w& O, u& l PKO Peacekeeping Operations. 4 Z, f( p% G4 J- fPkss Probability of kill -- single shot. - ^7 w6 M x1 W; t1 yPL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public \2 o! \. {' z9 p* f# x+ y6 \# E Law. - O t% f! |; d9 A* o0 w' nPLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement. 1 m. F h% U: v; ?% WPLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military). . q& D8 a$ o; Z, G, QPlanning,& j( h7 Y9 b# {+ m# x, u Programming,# w7 L; A3 n) [, i+ ~. f- J9 m Budgeting 4 |0 P8 A; q! Q6 r6 qSystem (PPBS)7 a7 E/ F: B% ^ The primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic : b! L+ _1 k8 k" I: q istructure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces. O( G2 k3 q T" ]% }' | and capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process & `6 p' C# C5 N( v( a8 w3 y! N6 wcontaining three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the + E8 R1 m4 S$ \# c0 S4 p8 PProgram Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and : t; O* l2 _; a7 W/ v! D# WDefense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the. A: G5 v% V, @: V President’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each % S1 q: W7 q* F" ^odd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning3 e" T. ~5 y. T2 C( U" ^+ a6 G phase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the2 ?7 ^6 [6 E6 S& l President’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management; I: }+ ?3 h; f College)1 m* b. f g( D, i K7 P; U PLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate. ' Y3 E) ]) e1 d* p2 z. U& oPLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term). d y. ]% a6 N* |8 _PLRS Position Location Reporting System.5 ?1 ^% P1 U1 a% P Plume Data# y$ }. o5 R) v" I& P Center { c+ r, W% I8 Q/ N AEDC, Arnold AFB, TN.- s0 @' u- P1 v+ h8 J7 a9 C( W6 S6 F PLV Payload Launch Vehicle. ' x* Y3 z+ E; CPM See Program Manager.$ c9 u8 `& h8 g) E. X PMA (1) See Program Management Agreement.2 h; j- @& o- T: ~ (2) Post-Mission Analysis. 6 v3 N4 @4 |; m# I0 G(3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station). . j; G; r: [! o {" Z# W6 L) oPMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool).6 j8 o/ c7 I( \+ C PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term).0 ~2 |- x% R v4 K" f' N PMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF). 1 h/ \6 V! A" C6 P+ r( pPMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory. # _6 |7 J$ Q/ b! u6 c" xPMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection. ( g/ \# u! P: HPMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term). 7 x, U/ T* X0 j( M. e) LPMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group. 7 J- _, _3 i; u$ Y/ D" X( Q0 H! S) XPMO Program Management Office. ~+ b" _5 q* Q5 b% w. DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ; ^! p) m! W( g% W0 ?, x, W) I226* {9 n9 M" p% ` PMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP). % T! w* E2 F& V0 o(2) Program Master Plan. [% f' o: \ D. z (3) Prime Mission Product. : M# q" c% |: q9 n E(4) Program Management Plan.6 d$ I: \5 |- H4 E PMR (1) Program Management Review.. @. M5 z5 u" ?- S" @! G' T) ~' X (2) Pacific Missile Range. ( ~ r% @& {+ t" q; v+ \(3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term).9 R6 H2 A9 y- X0 V; o+ \' t* f% P PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI.' C7 b, x* C* p# }! N! } PMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term).1 J. S) T, W ?) F% N0 H (2) Performance Measurement System.- I- h6 o1 t1 J, l6 \& d8 ~* D PMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA. 1 m8 f$ Y. e+ e4 r6 W8 E; j& R, xPMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group. ( _4 j0 p3 u3 }PN Probability of Negotiation. Z, z, ^; r; A4 \( U8 y8 i PNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. ! s5 { Z. Q; a$ b6 c& pPNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty. . o! S+ y/ p. ~1 Z0 rPO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office.4 ?& u0 Z% ~; m J (2) Purchase Order.1 s0 H' M- ~* k% ]! w POA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones.. o. E! R7 d9 b: O POC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept./ ]% C( s/ Q. ` m/ } n POC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile% P1 C# n# j: {/ s, h( \( Q T$ ]6 @ command post).2 S# j8 P7 T B/ t: l' u: j; F POCT Passive Optical Component Technology.; y4 ~: d3 z! L8 O0 G$ j3 f POD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation.8 W: U( l9 g# A; L5 `5 l' O9 x# _ PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance. " h, |- G2 ~/ p$ P' J! dPOE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment.. w7 U3 J! w4 t3 O) k7 l POET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support + N$ o; q: l# Vto the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.) ' a: P8 H( n5 s* o$ Y8 tPoint Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g., . u4 H& t [ J6 u, e; [command and control facilities, air bases, etc." I+ Y/ G/ g9 W+ L' X+ U2 C4 O7 e; ` Point Defense/ F3 n& o& ~$ ` System : B$ \% N6 w! g! @- fA terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles9 k: k5 ?7 u) c4 d' i1 h M4 N to defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s. & t& {% R* s( O, N$ OPointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy7 @! ?- U5 K% v7 e6 S' ] either to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing & M+ l% V5 a; @1 G' Y; K6 Tand tracking are frequently integrated operations.3 {' R+ \; H; |, I0 g: ], D POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication. : e: W+ a$ Z! \7 sMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P8 T+ @8 t2 [, B, G4 [# ?; i 227; k& G8 \5 D% F% M1 B! M1 ~ POLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |显示全部楼层
POM Program Objectives Memorandum. 0 ? T4 h$ ]9 r$ n, o2 XPOMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets. 2 a* v0 T/ p/ O l1 h5 w XPOP Proof of Principle. A1 X7 T, Z) l! z Port Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems. 0 E7 r; b" d F4 J& {! a1 U3 {9 DPortability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on+ |6 p' i, D, j one computer or operating system can be used on another computer or: l5 k# {( u, D9 X5 w1 l0 w$ e operating system. - o' S0 K4 ?+ {& x3 xPOS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position. 5 R+ V- z5 L* o _( }Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). 5 c8 `' s! }( z- B" l9 e- ^( k. x& _POSIX Portable Operating System Interface. 9 j8 k& \$ y# D HPOST Portable Optical Sensor Tester.( k: i9 l" K: s1 b# ]$ l& p# D Post-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. $ Q+ e w) O6 t: m$ |Post-Attack0 {& Q+ r5 R2 _' M& W6 e$ g# u Period# h! M% ~" }0 |2 K# S In nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final & y! I9 q2 ?* r" Hattack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities." ~1 e$ r% Q' { Post-Boost2 z' {& ^! e T2 m Phase (PBP)- |: P+ l3 {* X1 n That portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered8 f: ?0 R F1 k V9 A flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic ! B# O# V: k. j8 ^missiles. (USSPACECOM)8 f4 ~1 q# b: {5 Z. a Post-Boost7 n# E% S- E0 J% d: K Vehicle (PBV)( j1 e ^+ j. S The portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the! e4 h' V$ Y' N* r7 W9 K maneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final ! ~2 C2 N& C4 |+ n4 J8 utrajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus."& \( E6 D( A% N; @0 K2 u5 g/ q/ N POSTPROD Post-Production.. f1 S7 _" e4 z& U5 G; _ POTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification.8 l1 P7 r8 J) F PP (1) Parallel Processing.$ n4 Q) d8 p& V3 U/ m2 ~4 |7 c (2) Principal Polarization.+ ~3 l* L# Y6 z; V5 V2 l% ~3 s (3) Post Processing.0 b. J% S* n2 U; _" b8 M; ]2 j7 a (4) Program Plan.8 A) U) R# g) _* Y3 Q2 ~5 Q, ]- M& H PPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System.! u% w% F6 [6 G a (2) Program Planning and Budgeting System./ D$ x$ m) G: v k PPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System. 7 K% Q! r: m4 ~- r& ePPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance. , _3 @2 a4 T+ J' G( S& D) ?PPI POM Preparation Instructions.5 ~% D$ t R: T: d8 v PPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan. 0 E% E4 b2 a# h" M9 M4 yPPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies. 7 S( }" Z( _: u2 ^# d2 PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P/ d) M1 Y' {7 L5 l3 n) N$ f 228 5 X% B, Q1 k6 BPPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term). L, | r: m1 c% `( L PPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term). 3 w0 ~& u" N0 Y2 t+ l% sPPP Program Protection Plan.: p8 s% h& E# \) N8 Z' W$ ^ PPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test.3 M. ?2 a5 g- ~3 k4 Q. b2 C PPS Precision Positioning System.6 ]) ]2 x1 Y& g: k1 {5 G4 s PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD). * M) j6 [) b" V CPR Procurement Request. - v* P. d2 Z( i+ ~2 hPRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board. ( N+ Q* W4 ~0 C& e( k0 [" w# hPRC Program Review Committee. / K5 { P) B+ s( H3 kPRD Presidential Review Decision. ' \ Q2 n9 v2 qPRDA Program Research and Development Announcement.' r t: T7 U' s PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review. 2 a8 P9 S! [" C _Pre-Allocated z+ X9 @8 M" J Defense 1 e1 x9 r1 _0 EA preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be; _# O; o. P% J1 l; i7 o6 y used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or0 l$ v% z2 N% p u; y, o6 y* Y set of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the ! p1 p) ^' w/ p; K" V% r0 Gnumber of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets9 `! I5 s- m* G& B3 R3 s* f* i under attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack. " f9 e' K/ k* T- W+ n# rPre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off.# l. z- q' j1 P4 W3 m6 u: O Pre-Authorized7 L' A0 ]2 {1 H( @, e Engagement " e% ~* G4 U! [: yCriteria (PEC)5 M6 @, T0 B, Y Pre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when 5 j G: G, D7 t6 B7 X0 A/ Msurpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled. ! v1 O& ^* G( KPre-Commit * I8 r1 ^6 |4 P" o4 Q- AStrategy8 S3 x5 H9 U0 S A tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed 9 k) m+ Y2 G4 c% lto specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the7 i3 g7 u# Z5 q( p% m defensive weapon’s trajectory. 4 Y M8 R) w! ?Pre Launch 1 E( o% S; N8 o( A2 `2 ESurvivability& |' X, o q4 D2 Z' _0 E The probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack 1 O7 s( U' o* |; Z9 g4 gunder an established condition of warning. 8 ^7 N' L; L b. ^Precedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall , y" u' y( Z- tbe served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the6 s6 Y T5 }0 S2 C: S, _, Q& h4 H% @ highest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served1 f4 f* C5 X4 d% } first and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence : ^; X, N5 u G# \/ Z! B6 ~levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance) 7 q4 V1 q9 v% B: ^" F; [A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance4 V/ {' f+ \/ m: X* K4 z missions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established 9 L, m; J' u( u. C0 g. ?priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |显示全部楼层
Precision P5 \; d* m2 H2 t/ J( w" b Decoys " n5 w" b$ o6 JDecoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or 7 d- z/ y( H2 ?6 r! S" zendoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting * k( C& d1 x1 J A/ D. X# Kthem. ; Y0 e% b- w: n) P9 G* c* aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P & b g. c) T v: \5 F229$ R* H: \5 s7 d9 l7 S6 l Preconditions for. `" R% Q: [2 S5 S4 G( H Defense (PD)5 X# V' L# I3 d8 j7 C% a PDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate W+ W+ _% _9 T Kcircumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue : z" Q1 s& W( d: O* |combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks# a! Q+ o' C Z directed at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and 1 ?# V* I% x: C9 Cwar.! { G* y7 R: w1 c' z" n' I9 c Predicted - A5 R5 p1 t* L+ E" ^Intercept Point / _& Y9 }& o. Z3 X" c) i# p* [(PIP), H; D5 I* a* @+ Z" \* _& Y8 N! c The calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide.: @6 @. t* x7 s' i; w Preferential - |; U4 x5 M2 ?& `1 LDefense ' W5 n% x: I" k6 k, `5 J8 HPreferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect% X m5 V A: X given facilities or capabilities.) Q4 n8 f) ^1 r7 @ Preferential 4 w* p" x# s7 \9 C7 W* |Defense Strategy , R& t0 `" p# D# a! kA tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and: i v, I% S5 [8 ^; K2 P1 u sensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while( \. ?- e. @% q. f6 N temporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the - B. s+ ~& Y" H* o" O/ Y6 M' ^offense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has' x; E4 {+ Q9 A0 K( e" x interceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction,+ y4 g# t3 t/ P% F. z5 n the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can; ~6 [) l- U/ `+ w1 u maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. $ n( O ~+ w$ F& XPreferential, |# ~& v# c( q6 f Offense # j6 F l9 J* b' UThe concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets. 5 i+ S: O- K9 g0 M XPreliminary- O9 l( y& q1 _5 X0 p) p Design Review ' C' P# @ c5 o# a+ b N(PDR)4 Q2 @& Z4 \7 u3 M7 }1 J& ~, s A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress, : p; c4 ?+ _5 [8 J; V* N, w) Y, `technical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to* W8 N( w( n5 y determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the5 l: m- S0 E, l i" b6 | development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of , Y" T' m0 |, Gthe physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of1 P0 | v3 y9 Z* v1 _ equipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during0 h" d4 p& l- q; A$ @; Y0 \ Phase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II, v9 e- S8 I* I; DEngineering and Manufacturing Development. . X: s' U7 A( T1 h' wPreplanned( `9 _* U5 f: V! r8 Y Product + D9 T9 F" K! t6 uImprovement! G+ v: w' K5 O! E m- v (P3 I)+ j: T4 |9 |2 L/ E Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which ) g+ m7 `$ ?/ U# S. z& P X Y' wdesign considerations are effected during development to enhance future8 r) _" T7 R) [* ]& L application of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing/ U8 [. B' t) ?$ E. [ systems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed & h5 N# U3 {8 g1 Zoperational capability.6 }5 l4 l0 T7 c4 B% E Preplanned 1 y: O/ a J' t( w& h- n+ W/ `Response+ I2 w6 R/ e3 H2 R8 c! B Options (PRO) 7 w6 D, r& d& X+ ?8 uBallistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned, ( m' Q" r4 O9 I! yanalyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO, 4 [6 T/ F& f% C t: Q8 o' O# B' C9 s8 Fequivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment# L+ ]5 y+ p# D- y$ n1 L/ ^. | Options (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces i; K5 {. S |6 ]) Cbased upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status, 3 Z: C! @% x4 ]; d* t" T* \/ a! n: {and the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time: W3 G% c4 t5 _7 C4 I human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution. ' g% P( k& u/ J9 K+ k, j+ H4 dPreproduction! i( ^; b8 K, r% |( W T0 X& m Prototype, U1 g4 g5 \8 w' K+ ]6 x6 D An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be- y* L$ j3 R& s8 ?' ?5 q$ M! {+ M produced subsequently in a production line.4 W+ q. Z9 ^5 Y7 t8 j5 L F Preproduction ! r2 i: o$ @) ]3 M2 UTest + V ?4 @* f4 X5 Q" [This is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production' A6 Q8 h- |" B1 V" b1 Q tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware.+ J5 D, {0 |% u: W; b) l# g No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of , e& w, L0 k+ K4 m+ a/ Athis test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware7 u: C; O( T5 u7 V' Y is going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported/ o g( D7 m' B3 j8 I9 B* ]5 F by the user; and that it is not over designed.& t3 E$ I7 a. N MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P0 p2 Y1 Z1 ?8 p0 T' o) x2 a8 r; O 230 . p$ `# K5 R) h0 [Preset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the- s8 `6 Q8 M. E- Y" H. @! L5 N control mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching. - \: [. b; N5 APresident's 9 u- W0 w a3 e m; JBudget (PB)& P" k) a3 Y3 N4 {; [; ?" { The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in( m9 O5 T! J" u9 c( d& } January (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in4 c9 E7 m' Y0 i1 t& `% C accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended. 7 p9 W! K9 P, m/ iIncludes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial : J5 ^6 W$ X7 c( F* _8 D2 ibranches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.) - [& s( z# @) Z/ ?7 YPRF Pulse Repetition Frequency. ; W; J, T1 d! F2 D+ F6 ^PRG Program Review Group.2 I8 ~4 s% @6 h5 z7 N. k Prime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or , J# [# F; ?" W$ B4 y Hequipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles, L/ N$ B' f3 X; ? ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and0 H& M4 l8 T7 K1 x# A9 S test equipment. 1 F2 y+ F; b3 q7 C- }5 Q7 VPrioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type,! ^ j- p8 j- ]; O) p: ]- t5 |, T predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact.7 z5 h3 w. j0 y% e, k PRN Pseudo Random Noise.7 ~+ y! b9 ?* H5 ?9 r. V3 d PRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office./ d( ?2 E2 E! G1 x3 j4 {' k Probability of 9 \9 C; T' @& \( m7 w; Y( v$ i0 GDamage . u# U0 p- T! S: e1 eThe probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or- Q/ G2 Q B2 o as a decimal. , q' \( A& f0 ^5 yProbability of $ |8 v. F% N8 g+ c# |Detection 9 Y* _, ?9 H8 R5 q( [8 }(1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given! {# t" t. j1 d& g conditions if it is in the area searched. % I6 R- m2 x" ~9 J. L; @(2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise 2 a, l' f2 m2 C4 T, M6 ~sources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |显示全部楼层
Probability of 6 ^& Z8 y, y# Z, n8 K% ~) jDiscrimination # m5 m l( e7 r( \1 d6 g, nThis is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly 9 Y% d6 N6 _: ]0 t. k# T4 ?6 |identified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is5 s/ `5 g7 g9 T( g9 Y quantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the - @$ L, i5 x7 a3 W9 ~4 U& n; ?probability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is7 r, q0 g) H6 a) x1 l( W indistinguishable from the decoy).2 S0 J$ T: u; G3 C8 R9 o& z7 Z. t Probability of # M, g% o: a* O3 H8 OFalse Alarm / ^5 J6 b0 ^, G* u# I# Y- w, d(1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected ! _( {, Y* \6 T- w& G1 k( h1 {+ Zwhen no object is present. ( N* @* O" h( }* N(2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a 5 x8 r( v: I) h5 k- ~! mthreatening object will be identified as one.+ m1 o% r" }8 |4 N) e& _8 I Probability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles,- A# P/ H1 s; o2 l7 p ordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate- U# B2 [4 _0 J& }: x _% h close enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense. v. i7 [& D- |2 Q+ b Systems Management College) 2 L9 o; \0 K: {# M2 f- r$ W* ~Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS. 2 F% _$ K% B: o9 R. [/ @4 ePROC Procurement. 2 Q+ d4 n% C/ i- X2 YProcess Data( K4 J* t; ^& b$ d6 o9 n ^ Sensitivity Label' t$ Z5 W0 ^' h8 q; O (PDSL) 3 m% Q6 V) B8 d. }' HThe sensitivity label for data contained in a process. 3 k3 y% F; n: i9 O6 eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ?( E0 x6 Q- f5 h6 a8 F, s 231) \/ n- K& o# m) o- t8 ^* b PROCMT Procurement. # M8 \, s0 ~8 TProcuring 1 Y) U- l/ q2 H8 x( AContracting 7 [- x' G; n- N% f. M! }+ E; X- _Officer (PCO) {( @. S6 b0 s4 b/ y7 ` The individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on/ k2 x. y3 i. f, H' R behalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for! y! g. O1 Z4 d) n+ C% t& ? overall procurement of the contract.6 \5 @# ]2 _( Z: l/ q" I Prod Production.3 j4 W |' m" M3 O6 h Producibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is- @& R: w v4 j: O governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical 4 b( i9 m u; h+ h- ~fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing 4 b2 {( |8 H& {techniques.( y- ?7 h. t+ S6 z4 t Producibility, : k8 ?( H% E( M% |Engineering, and 0 x; h. b# ?3 ?Planning (PEP) ) d; y0 U: ?7 o9 N9 XApplies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering% E- e) E/ Z$ O- T t transition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning% L6 }0 A+ i: d* V2 c engineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required & T6 `, o) f* P2 e- ^6 T! Xquantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will ' Q. l1 [$ Z0 m7 Cmeet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification- G6 |8 s7 J5 m- L8 T constraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to# s9 X- D! _, Z, F- A$ c6 Z7 z identify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production4 T& v) H& H$ Q6 W changes or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process. ( Q; v; ?' y0 B) }( nProducibility,6 W- g4 x* o+ H Programming,3 U( r* E- o' \( Q T" I, _ and Issues ( q, U4 a" X2 }8 W: b7 g4 _Resolution" T+ P! ~- U) T- T6 i$ u Strategies 2 {. r5 c) m: E! \+ J(PPIRS) ) L5 v1 C% [, R. Z1 {. t6 fA semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium6 }( J/ }7 ?7 v# I1 H+ W and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M6 R# a3 p5 \4 @1 X" t Working Group.8 \7 B1 E3 m# G' \# w- ^ Producibility * G5 m, F) D* uReview 3 h7 b6 J& B* P4 z* b9 o5 _4 ~4 g3 a. `# ZA feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to% d7 ?" Z m% x; X& q0 h+ A determine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology 2 D6 }: U3 c9 ~: x6 d Lconsidering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a" `7 H- g; f0 y generic term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system7 O l3 \5 R4 c# R. e design reviews.7 |- F7 d' O" r Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration * j0 j9 I4 l" Aitem. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline z+ W7 \- p: F2 H1 r/ w3 E# g! C- P(type E spec), type C spec, and drawings.9 `3 C) k; i* E$ B (2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical1 w% N1 n: q1 ^9 A( b) o documentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a8 f/ q# Q) K1 q" G/ D/ Y& Y configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and+ o0 ]/ ]- h, i; ~) e- I logistic support of its life cycle. 3 n) ~, Z ] I: ^! s5 N% TProduct2 `, Z; h* H2 `, I1 h, { Configuration' r0 ^8 z0 w* N Identification 5 r v6 C! h' aThe current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration6 ~/ v) \- G2 f! t8 a of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and 3 O: N! c3 \ E8 ~9 S( ]9 Tlogistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for: 0 s& S9 Y) A( N k2 e: P) y' z8 dfit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected# w2 n3 L1 M- ^ functional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production 1 M- z; l, B/ D& macceptance test.6 M1 ]1 i! `' W' \- R Product 0 x' a' u/ w5 B" q1 I% B; nImprovement h. H7 [/ y5 t5 O J4 P! B4 y dEffort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on ' S4 B w7 b* ^& qend items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than $ B8 E- o' d- O% B# j x, Jdevelopmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend $ p, W9 D% v; [0 Uuseful military life. Usually results from user feedback.; M5 p+ m$ \9 l8 c4 W MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P- P# V" X% a: p; }5 O1 E 232 5 ^" v' O4 C) O0 m$ q' ^ uProduct Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority+ e, v$ ^6 A6 V, j and assigned responsibility for centralized management of a! l# K2 V. u# I3 O# h& B development/acquisition program that does not qualify for, i& L @8 g7 v& F system/program/project management.5 s" ~7 @; M9 X' B Product Security & w! H* t7 P, U7 q7 O2 V+ J(PRODSEC) - W4 ]' w7 B, uThat physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost, 0 f8 ]8 P% ~! j! V6 upolitically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of3 ^8 a+ Q6 ~5 d" z( Q3 V9 r0 f Defense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential ) ]: G$ @$ r+ f# I' Yto the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-20 22:25 , Processed in 0.031200 second(s), 10 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部