航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

ATC [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

191#
发表于 2008-12-21 19:28:41 |只看该作者
T Tailwind Components, 3-5-1 Takeoff Clearance, 3-9-9 Target Markers, 5-3-3 Target Resolution, 5-5-1 Target Separation, 5-5-1 Taxi and Ground Movement Operations, 3-7-1 Taxi and Ground Movement Procedures, 3-7-1 Taxi into Position and Hold (TIPH), 3-9-2 Taxiway Lights, 3-4-5 Teletype Flight Data Format - U.S. ARTCCs - Canadian ACCs, 2-2-4 Temporary Moving Airspace Reservations, 8-6-1 Temporary Stationary Airspace Reservations, 8-6-1 Terminal Automation Systems Identification Methods, 5-3-2 Terminal Data Entries (Strips), 2-3-6 Terminal Radar Service Area, 7-7-1 Terminal Radar/Nonradar Team Position Responsibilities, 2-10-2 Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS) Alerts, 2-1-13 Through Clearances, 4-2-2 Timely Information (ATCT), 3-3-1 Touch-and-Go Approach, 4-8-7 Touch-and-Go Low Approach, 3-8-1 Touchdown Zone Lights, 3-4-4 Tower Team Position Responsibilities, 2-10-4 TPX-42 - Terminal, 5-16-1 Track Separation (Oceanic), 8-4-4 Track Suspend Function (ARTS), 5-15-2 Traffic Advisories, 2-1-10 Traffic Information (Airports), 3-1-2 Traffic Management Procedures, 11-1-1 Transfer of Jurisdiction, 4-7-4 Transfer of Position (SOP), Appendix D-1 Transfer of Radar Identification, 5-4-1 Transfer of Radar Identification - Methods, 5-4-1 Transfer of Radar Identification - Terms, 5-4-1 Transfer of Radar Identification - Traffic, 5-4-2 Transferring Controller Handoff, 5-4-2 Transmit Proposed Flight Plan, 2-2-3 TRSA, 7-7-1 TRSA Separation, 7-7-1

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

192#
发表于 2008-12-21 19:28:50 |只看该作者
U Unauthorized Laser Illumination of Aircraft, 2-9-2, 10-2-6 Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) Reports, 9-8-1 Unmanned Free Balloons, 9-6-1 Unmonitored NAVAIDs (Holding), 4-6-3 Unsafe Runway Information, 3-3-1 USAF/USN Undergraduate Pilots (Strips), 2-3-10 Use of Active Runways, 3-1-1 Use of MARSA, 2-1-5 Use of PAR for Approach Monitoring - Terminal, 5-13-1 Use of Tower Radar Displays, 3-1-4 User Request Evaluation Tool (URET), 13-1-1 V Validation of Mode C Readout, 5-2-6 VASI, 3-4-1 Vectoring, 5-6-1 Vectors Across Final Approach Course, 5-9-2 Vectors Below Minimum Altitude, 5-6-2 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Index I-9 [References are to page numbers] Vectors for Visual Approach, 7-4-1 Vectors to Final Approach Course, 5-9-1 Vehicles on Runways, 3-1-2 Vertical Application Exceptions, 5-5-4 Vertical Separation (Nonradar), 6-6-1 Vertical Separation Minima, 4-5-1 VFR - IFR Flights, 4-2-3 VFR Aircraft in Weather Difficulty, 10-2-2 VFR Basic Radar Service (Terminal), 7-6-1 VFR Code Assignments, 5-2-4 VFR Conditions, 7-1-1 VFR Release of IFR Departure, 4-3-7 VFR-on-top, 7-3-1 VFR-on-top (NAVAID Use), 4-1-2 Visual, 7-1-1 Visual Approach Slope Indicators, 3-4-1 Visual Approaches, 7-4-1 Visual Holding of VFR Aircraft, 7-1-1 Visual Separation, 7-2-1 Visual Signals (ATCT), 3-2-1 Visually Scanning Runways, 3-1-5 Volcanic Ash, 10-2-7 W Wake Turbulence, 2-1-9 Wake Turbulence Cautionary Advisories, 2-1-9 Wake Turbulence Separation for Intersection Departures, 3-9-6 Warning Signal (ATCT), 3-2-1 Weather and Chaff Services, 2-6-2 Weather Deviations, 8-9-4 Weather Deviations in North Atlantic (NAT) Airspace, 8-7-2 Weather Familiarization, 2-6-1 Weather Information, 2-6-1 Weather Information (Arrivals), 4-7-3 Weather Reconnaissance Flights, 9-2-9 Withholding Landing Clearance, 3-10-7 Word Meanings, 1-2-1 Words and Phrases (Communications), 2-4-4 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Index I-11 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration JO 7110.65S 2/14/08 Initiated By: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services BRIEFING GUIDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 2/14/08 JO 7110.65S Briefing Guide BG-2 Table of Contents Paragraph Number Title Page 3-3-5 BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3-6-2 IDENTIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3-9-9 TAKEOFF CLEARANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5-1-3 RADAR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8-9-3 LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2/14/08 JO 7110.65S Briefing Guide BG-3 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3-3-5. BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES 2. BACKGROUND: Flight Standards has implemented a new policy for airplane operators engaged in air transportation that requires additional assessment of landing distance requirements based on the conditions present at the time of arrival. This policy requires that the flight crew calculate their required landing distance accounting for the runway contamination type and depth, or most recent braking action report for the runway to be used under the landing performance assessment policy. Some aircraft will begin to be restricted when braking action reports of “fair” are received. With the current Air_Traffic Control (ATC) threshold of “poor” for placing advisory information on the Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) the flight crews of these aircraft would not have any indication that they may be runway restricted until actually making radio contact with the tower controller. This late information could add additional workload for the flight crew at a very critical time of flight, and potentially lead to an unnecessary go-around with the resultant effects on the ATC workload. Therefore we are taking action to change the trigger for “BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES ARE IN EFFECT” on the ATIS to any time a “fair” or worse braking action report is received. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 3-3-5. BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES 3-3-5. BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES a. When runway braking action reports are received from pilots or the airport management which include the terms “poor” or “nil” or whenever weather conditions are conducive to deteriorating or rapidly changing runway conditions, include on the ATIS broadcast the statement “Braking Action Advisories are in effect.” a. When runway braking action reports are received from pilots or the airport management which include the terms “fair,” “poor,” or “nil” or whenever weather conditions are conducive to deteriorating or rapidly changing runway conditions, include on the ATIS broadcast the statement “Braking Action Advisories are in effect.” REFERENCE- through b2PHRASEOLOGY- No Change 3. Advise the airport management that runway braking action reports of “poor” or “nil” have been received. 3. Advise the airport management that runway braking action reports of “fair,” “poor,” or “nil” have been received. 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3-6-2. IDENTIFICATION 2. BACKGROUND: ASDE provides a display to controllers on the position/location of aircraft/vehicles on the airport surface area. Its usage for providing positive control instruction requires that false alerts be positively identified as false targets. Under certain circumstances, such as rain or multipath, the radar may interpret and display false targets. Temporary Track Drop is used to temporarily prevent processing of false targets in specific selected areas without a radius of 20 to 100_feet. A Temporary Track Drop Area remains active for a specified amount of time from 2 seconds up to 24 hours. When it is activated over a specific site, new target tracks will not be generated. Therefore, after positive identification has occurred and Temporary Track Drop is activated, it shall be noted in the facility logs. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 3-6-2. IDENTIFICATION 3-6-2. IDENTIFICATION a through b No Change Add c. After positive verification that a target is false, through pilot/vehicle operator position report or controller visual observation, the track may be temporarily dropped, which will remove the target from the display and safety logic processing. A notation shall be made to FAA Form 7230-4, Daily Record of Facility Operation, when a track is temporarily dropped. 2/14/08 JO 7110.65S Briefing Guide BG-4 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3-9-9. TAKEOFF CLEARANCE 2. BACKGROUND: Radio communications transfer may occur prior to an aircraft crossing all runways en route to or reaching the approach end of the assigned runway. Stating the runway to be used in conjunction with a control instruction to an arriving or departing aircraft also enhances safety. Restating the crossing clearance decreases the likelihood of an aircraft departing the wrong runway. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 3-9-9. TAKEOFF CLEARANCE 3-9-9. TAKEOFF CLEARANCE a. When only one runway is active, issue takeoff clearance. a. When issuing a clearance for takeoff, first state the runway number followed by the takeoff clearance. PHRASEOLOGY- CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF. PHRASEOLOGY- RUNWAY (number), CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF. Add EXAMPLE“RUNWAY TWO SEVEN, CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF.” NOTE- Turbine-powered aircraft may be considered ready for takeoff when they reach the runway unless they advise otherwise. No Change REFERENCE- FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 4-3-1, Departure Terminology. No Change b. When more than one runway is active, first state the runway number followed by the takeoff clearance. b. If the takeoff clearance is issued before the aircraft has crossed all intersecting runways, restate the runway to be crossed with the takeoff clearance. PHRASEOLOGY- RUNWAY (number), CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF. PHRASEOLOGY- CROSS RUNWAY (number), RUNWAY (number) CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF. EXAMPLE“RUNWAY TWO SEVEN, CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF.” EXAMPLE“CROSS RUNWAY TWO FOUR LEFT, RUNWAY TWO FOUR RIGHT, CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF.” 2/14/08 JO 7110.65S Briefing Guide BG-5 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 5-1-3. RADAR USE 2. BACKGROUND: This change incorporates editorial clarifications to subparagraphs_5-1-3a2(b) and (c), previously addressed in GENOT 6/08, N 7110.437, Change to Order 7110.65R, Air Traffic Control, Paragraph 5-1-3a2, subparagraphs_(a), (b), and (c), that expired on February 15, 2007. Additionally, this change clarifies that the requirement in subparagraph (c), to advise pilots when secondary radar is the only source of radar data, applies to terminal facilities only. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 5-1-3. RADAR USE 5-1-3. RADAR USE Title through a1REFERENCE- No Change 2. Outside Class A airspace, or where mix of Class_A airspace/non-Class A airspace exists, only when: No Change (a) Additional coverage is provided by secondary radar beyond that of the primary radar, or No Change (b) The primary radar is temporarily unusable or out of service. Advise pilots when these conditions exist, or No Change Add PHRASEOLOGY- PRIMARY RADAR UNAVAILABLE (describe location). RADAR SERVICES AVAILABLE ON TRANSPONDER EQUIPPED AIRCRAFT ONLY. Add NOTE1. Advisory may be omitted when provided on ATIS and pilot indicates having ATIS information. 2. This provision is to authorize secondary radar only operations where there is no primary radar available and the condition is temporary. (c) A secondary radar system is the only source of radar data for the area of service. When the system is used for separation, beacon range accuracy is assured, as provided in para 5-1-4, Beacon Range Accuracy. Advise pilots when these conditions exist. (c) A secondary radar system is the only source of radar data for the area of service. When the system is used for separation, beacon range accuracy is assured, as provided in para 5-1-4, Beacon Range Accuracy. TERMINAL. Advise pilots when these conditions exist. PHRASEOLOGY- PRIMARY RADAR UNAVAILABLE (describe location). RADAR SERVICES AVAILABLE ON TRANSPONDER EQUIPPED AIRCRAFT ONLY. Delete NOTE1. Advisory may be omitted when provided on ATIS and pilot indicates having ATIS information. NOTE- Advisory may be omitted when provided on ATIS or by other appropriate notice to pilots. 2. This provision is to authorize secondary radar only operations where there is no primary radar available and the condition is temporary. Delete 2/14/08 JO 7110.65S Briefing Guide BG-6 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 8-9-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION 2. BACKGROUND: Change 2 to FAAO 7110.65, Paragraph 8-9-3, Longitudinal Separation, allowed 10 minutes separation between aircraft operating in the Pacific ICAO Region. Notice 7110.472, Longitudinal Separation, clarifies that 10 minutes separation is only applicable to turbojet aircraft on the same track. The basic longitudinal separation between aircraft remains 15 minutes. While Change 2 was predicated on turbojet aircraft conducting operational trials in the Oakland Oceanic FIR for several years, the same safety case can be made for turbojet aircraft operating in the Anchorage Oceanic FIR. Consequently, effective with Notice 7110.472, FAA began operational trials, monitoring of data and appropriate safety case development to support the application of 10 minutes separation between turbojet aircraft on the same course operating in the Anchorage Oceanic FIR as well. Therefore, both Oakland and Anchorage Oceanic controllers may apply 10 minutes separation between turbojet aircraft operating on the same course. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 8-9-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION 8-9-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION In accordance with Chapter 8, Offshore/Oceanic Procedures, Section 3, Longitudinal Separation, apply the following: No Change a. Minima based on time: No Change 1. 10 minutes between aircraft; or 1. 15 minutes between aircraft; or Add 2. 10 minutes between turbojet aircraft whether in level, climbing or descending flight, provided that the aircraft concerned follow the same track or continuously diverging tracks until some other form of separation is provided; or 2. The prescribed minima in accordance with para_8-3-3, Mach Number Technique. 3. The prescribed minima in accordance with para_8-3-3, Mach Number Technique. Add 4. Reciprocal track aircraft - Where lateral separation is not provided, vertical separation shall be provided at least 10 minutes before and after the time the aircraft are estimated to pass or are estimated to have passed. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration JO 7110.65S CHG 1 7/31/08 Initiated By: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services BRIEFING GUIDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Briefing Guide BG-2 Table of Contents Paragraph Number Title Page 1-2-6 ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3-9-4 TAXI INTO POSITION AND HOLD (TIPH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3-10-5 LANDING CLEARANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9-2-10 LAND-BASED AIR DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION ZONE (ADIZ) ATC PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Briefing Guide BG-3 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 1-2-6. ABBREVIATIONS 2. BACKGROUND: The acronyms FLM/CIC are used in Paragraph 9-2-10 but are not spelled out. These acronyms are not in TBL 1-2-1 thus causing confusion. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW TBL 1-2-1 FAA Order 7110.65 Abbreviations TBL 1-2-1 FAA Order 7110.65 Abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning Abbreviation Meaning Add Add CIC . . . . . . . . Controller-in-Charge Add Add FLM . . . . . . . . Front-Line Manager 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3-9-4. TAXI INTO POSITION AND HOLD (TIPH) 2. BACKGROUND: The use of safety logic systems as a sole source for issuing landing clearances in conjunction with TIPH was reviewed by the Air Traffic Safety Oversight Service. It was determined that safety logic systems, as a sole source for preventing runway collisions or incursions, removed the pilot from the safety equation. The conclusion of this review resulted in the stipulation of ceiling and visibility restrictions which allow the pilot to perform a critical role in runway safety by direct observation of the landing environment and thereby providing an extra layer of safety to this critical phase of flight. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 3-9-4. TAXI INTO POSITION AND HOLD (TIPH) 3-9-4. TAXI INTO POSITION AND HOLD (TIPH) a through cEXAMPLE No Change 1. Landing clearance need not be withheld if the safety logic system is operating in full core alert runway configuration. 1. Landing clearance must be withheld if the safety logic system is inoperative or in limited configuration or conditions are less than reported ceiling 800 feet or visibility less than 2 miles. 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Briefing Guide BG-4 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3-10-5. LANDING CLEARANCE 2. BACKGROUND: The use of safety logic systems as a sole source for multiple landing clearances was reviewed by the Air Traffic Safety Oversight Service. It was determined that safety logic systems, as a sole source for preventing runway collisions or incursions, removed the pilot from the safety equation. The conclusion of this review resulted in the stipulation of ceiling and visibility restrictions which allow the pilot to perform a critical role in runway safety by direct observation of the landing environment and thereby providing an extra layer of safety to this critical phase of flight. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 3-10-5. LANDING CLEARANCE 3-10-5. LANDING CLEARANCE a through cEXAMPLE No Change d. During same runway operations, while TIPH is being applied, landing clearance need not be withheld if the safety logic system to that runway is in full core alert runway configuration. d. During same runway operations, while TIPH is being applied, landing clearance must be withheld if the safety logic system to that runway is inoperative or in limited configuration or conditions are less than reported ceiling 800 feet or visibility less than 2 miles. 1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 9-2-10. LAND-BASED AIR DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION ZONE (ADIZ) ATC PROCEDURES 2. BACKGROUND: For several years, the Air Traffic Organization has supported national defense initiatives in the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area Air Defense Identification Zone (DC ADIZ). In accordance with national directives, this change prescribes standardized procedures for handling aircraft in all locations where security services are required and establishes approved communication for security tracking of aircraft in security services airspace. 3. CHANGE: OLD NEW 9-2-10. LAND-BASED AIR DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION ZONE (ADIZ) ATC PROCEDURES 9-2-10. LAND-BASED AIR DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION ZONE (ADIZ)/AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ATC) SECURITY SERVICES TERMINAL No Change Add Provide ATC security services at locations where procedures are required for the tracking of aircraft in security services airspace. ATC security services are designed to support the national security mission of the FAA and other agencies. Two-way radio communications, flight planning, and operational transponder on an assigned code are required for operations within the designated area. a. Verify, by direct observation or pilot confirmation, IFR and VFR flight operations entering, exiting, or transitioning the ADIZ meet all of the following minimum conditions: a. When the assigned code is observed, advise the aircraft to proceed on course/as requested but to remain outside of Class B, C, and/or D airspace as appropriate. Add PHRASEOLOGY(ACID) TRANSPONDER OBSERVED PROCEED ON COURSE/AS REQUESTED; REMAIN OUTSIDE (CLASS) AIRSPACE. 1. Two-way radio communications are maintained at all times prior to entering and throughout transition of the ADIZ. Aircraft operating in an airport traffic pattern or landing at nontowered airports are exempt from the ATC communication requirement, provided they monitor the airport common traffic advisory frequency. 1. Maintain continuous security tracking of VFR aircraft operating within the designated area to assist security forces in situational awareness. Immediately report all instances of loss of radio communication or the inability to conduct security tracking of an aircraft to the FLM/CIC and await instructions. 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Briefing Guide BG-5 2. Aircraft is equipped with an operating transponder with automatic altitude reporting capability. Aircraft is squawking an ATC assigned discrete beacon code, with altitude, at all times. Do not allow an aircraft to cancel its flight plan and/or squawk VFR while in the ADIZ. 2. The provision of basic separation services to aircraft, i.e., IFR, SVFR, Class B, Class C, TRSA, is not applicable to ATC security tracking. 3. Aircraft with operating transponders, but without operating Mode C (altitude) require specific authorization from ATC in order to operate within the ADIZ. ATC must coordinate with the Domestic Events Network (DEN) prior to approval. No Change 4. Aircraft flying too low for radar coverage shall be instructed to report landing or exiting the ADIZ. Maintain flight progress strips on such aircraft until pilot reports landing or exiting the ADIZ. If a flight progress strip does not exist for the aircraft, record the call sign, transponder code, entry point (e.g., north, northeast, east), and time of entry into the ADIZ. No Change PHRASEOLOGY(Call sign), REPORT LANDING OR LEAVING THE ADIZ. No Change 5. United States Military, law enforcement, and aeromedical flights are exempt from filing flight plans. No Change b. Pilots unable to comply with the requirements of subpara a, above, shall be instructed to remain clear of or exit the ADIZ as appropriate. When equipment failure involving transponder or Mode C is experienced, and the aircraft is operating within the ADIZ, the pilot may be permitted to land. An operation such as this may be permissible when it is more expedient than exiting the ADIZ and no additional security risk is evident. b. Establishing Two-Way Communications. NOTE- Specific operations may be exempted, waivered, or verbally granted by the appropriate authority establishing the ADIZ. Delete Add 1. Pilots must establish two-way radio communications with ATC prior to entering the security service area. Responding to a radio call with, “(a/c call sign) standby,” establishes radio communications and the pilot may enter the area, provided all other security requirements have been satisfied. Add 2. Aircraft requesting security services should not normally be held. However, if holding is necessary or workload/traffic conditions prevent immediate provision of ATC security services, inform the pilot to remain outside the designated area until conditions permit the provision of ATC security services. Inform the pilot of the expected length of delay. Add PHRASEOLOGY(A/C CALL SIGN) REMAIN OUTSIDE OF THE (location) AND STANDBY. EXPECT (time) MINUTES DELAY. 7/31/08 JO 7110.65S CHG 1 Briefing Guide BG-6 Add c. Termination of Service. Add 1. If the aircraft is not landing within the designated area, provide security services until the aircraft exits the area and then advise the aircraft to squawk VFR and that frequency change is approved. Add PHRASEOLOGY- SQUAWK VFR, FREQUENCY CHANGE APPROVED. or CONTACT (facility identification). Add 2. When an aircraft is landing at an airport inside the area, instruct the pilot to remain on the assigned transponder code until after landing. Add PHRASEOLOGY(ACID) REMAIN ON YOUR ASSIGNED TRANSPONDER CODE UNTIL YOU LAND, FREQUENCY CHANGE APPROVED. Add 3. Using approved handoff functionality, transfer the data blocks of all security tracked aircraft that will enter another sector/position for coordination of aircraft information/location. Upon acceptance of the transferred information, instruct the pilot to contact the next sector/positions' frequency.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

193#
发表于 2009-10-8 13:40:04 |只看该作者
这个是好东西。 感谢楼主一片好意

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

194#
发表于 2009-11-4 22:03:09 |只看该作者

7879

hsuidsfjlksd

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

195#
发表于 2009-11-4 22:03:48 |只看该作者

回复 1# 帅哥 的帖子

帅哥 的帖子

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

196#
发表于 2009-11-7 11:26:34 |只看该作者
learning learning

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

197#
发表于 2009-11-7 11:58:52 |只看该作者
很好谢谢继续

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

198#
发表于 2009-11-8 23:22:55 |只看该作者
好帖子,顶一下

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

199#
发表于 2009-11-16 03:28:12 |只看该作者
看看先 辛苦了楼主

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

200#
发表于 2009-12-9 10:41:37 |只看该作者
thanks a lot

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-12-23 21:39 , Processed in 0.029002 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部