out at the relevant altitudes and temperatures (that's 500 feet in five miles!). This means all obstacles— you can't exclude frangible ones. Runway slope Going uphill when taking off will delay acceleration and increase the distance required. The converse is true of downhill slopes and a rule of thumb is that TODR will increase 10% for each 2% of uphill slope, and vice versa (factor both by 1.1). When landing, an uphill slope aids stopping, thereby reducing LDR. Any gains from landing upslope or taking off downslope should not be made use of but accepted as a bonus (that is, don't use them as part of your planning). Surface winds Headwinds will reduce the distances required and improve the flight path after take-off. Tailwinds have reverse effects and crosswinds may even exceed the ability of the tyres to grip the runway. Aside from the handling problem, crosswinds may also increase the TODR if you need to use the brakes to keep you straight. Forecast winds must be factored by 50% for a headwind and 150% for a tailwind—this may already be allowed for in the charts. TODR and LDR will increase by 20% for each tailwind component of 10% of the lift-off and landing speed (factor by 1.2). Surface Performance information is based on a dry, hard surface. The runway state can affect directional and braking ability, and has been discussed already. Meanwhile, for dry short grass (under 5”), the TODR will increase by 20%, a factor of 1.2. When it's wet, 25%—a factor of 1.25. For dry, long grass (5- 10 inches), TODR will increase by 25%, and 30% when wet (it's not recommended that you operate when grass is over 10 inches high). For dry short grass (under 5 inches), the LDR will increase by 20%, a factor of 1.2. When it's wet, 30%—a factor of 1.3. For dry, long grass (5- 10 inches), LDR will increase by 30%, and 40% when wet. For other soft ground or snow, the increase will be in the order of 25% or more for take-off and landing, Obstacles Takeoff requirements also need to consider obstacles further along the take-off path which cannot be avoided visually. The area concerned is a funnel extending up to 1500 feet above the airfield elevation from the end of the TODR within 75m either side of track (with all engines operating). The Net Flight Path is Operational Procedures 141 made up of segments covering various stages of flight (such as when undercarriage or flaps are raised) and is so called because NET (i.e. factored) performance data is used to assess it. The NFP commences from 50’ above the end of the TODR, the imaginary screen the aircraft must clear. If an obstacle (including a frangible one) intrudes on the Net Flight Path, then take-off weight must be reduced until it's cleared by a margin of 35 (or whatever) feet, so this may be a determining one in calculating Restricted Takeoff Weight (see also Loading). You can make gentle turns to avoid obstacles, and not have to fiddle with take-off weights, and there will be graphs in the Flight Manual allowing you to calculate radii and procedures for it. However, you will need to be visual as well, so a minimum cloudbase is necessary. If an engine fails in the climb out, normal practice would be to return to the point of departure, but if you can't (maybe the weather) the NFP and MSA must be examined at the flight planning stage. It may even be necessary to climb overhead to get the height required before going for your return alternate. You must use the one-engine inoperative net flight path data from the point at which full instrument flying commences, or is expected to. Balked Approach Flight Path This is similar to Net Flight Path, and commences at DH above the upwind end of the LDR. However, you may not be able to complete a balked landing or go around once you have entered a low-energy landing configuration, without touching the ground, because your flaps and gear would be set for landing, you would be below about 50 feet, in descent, with the throttle in the idle range and with decreasing airspeed. Balked landings or go-arounds should be initiated before this point is reached – if you put your aircraft in this state, the subsequent board of inquiry would only assume you thought it was safe to do so. As there will be no performance figures in the charts to cover it, this is a high risk experiment – in fact, you are very likely to stall if you climb before your engines have spooled up. Diversions You must be capable of continuing the flight from any point of engine failure at or above MSA to 1500 feet above a suitable airfield (within WAT and runway limits), where you must be able to maintain a positive rate of climb. Consideration must therefore be given to height loss, and the likely drift down rate with engine(s) out is established from the Flight Manual. The charts will indicate how quickly you can expect to descend, based on aircraft weight, temperature, altitude, etc. If the MOCA is quite high (say over the Alps or the Rockies at 14,000 feet), you're obviously going to be pushed to get there in some aircraft with two engines, let alone one. If you have to go that way and suspect you may have performance problems, you could always work out your Drift Down with the help of an emergency turn, information about which will also be found in the Flight Manual. What you do is establish a point one side of which performance is OK and the other side of which, if you have an engine 142 Operational Flying failure, you make an emergency turn |