航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 4 L- i1 C: K. {# N+ b: d! \access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. ' k4 T/ d6 o' ^STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and Transportation , x6 N1 X3 e. ?9 x% w7 uEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 8 N. p% v) {) [" i0 @/ }storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed " M" T) ~6 ?" |! o5 O+ E( V$ G/ G0 [during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. $ L; F5 O- Q/ V3 i) `8 d, r; pStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. # Z. |# j1 y0 c6 S9 y8 x8 ^2 XStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. % Y. `2 W4 q nSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). - U# n, ?& h, ]$ D. j0 H% gSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic ( I! l7 c- f) l1 l4 |) p- Y% {Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat + R1 l; U8 i* ?! H. \9 k; Lballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to + P' H8 @% l% }+ ]" mnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. 4 A: b& v( h4 |* y# F. |2 AStrategic Defense O+ Q% I# }- R) eEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System (SDS) ) }) {9 v/ p w( i. i' C' U# UA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. 9 m2 \1 W7 A* w) J. c* cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of 5 @& F' ` I+ W- C% v- hWar The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ; ^0 M2 O& O# u0 c6 Laccomplish those objectives. Strategic ; v8 @- G% U% r* Q. I2 VOffensive Forces (SOF) / ~; `& B) Q4 _8 \+ ^) g6 UThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 9 ^6 J5 U% E( u. w: g( ~, Y# S% hOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. ' b- A6 ^* B% |( z0 V8 z' wStrategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 2 R9 S" n/ r# b; |0 kstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. , L. _4 ?# _, _9 ?; |, A/ cStrategic 4 Q9 G* M$ t9 p8 q0 Y1 y7 ~3 s7 I: d BWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 2 e; P; d. A6 G; q* h0 ]' w# C" [9 S/ Ihostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic Warning Post- 6 J/ b7 v7 ]- c8 tDecision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 3 {6 X/ e; U1 N1 W, Q egovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 2 t3 Y1 {' J3 P) lwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic ; S. a K; G" F9 H' Cwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 4 B! N+ d- u9 W; S7 D* gnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic ; G2 O) y2 R) s, r- ~3 R$ X$ AWarning Pre- Decision Time . H3 u( ` @4 S( P* XThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course * z( x5 I8 \2 o& x! ]& |; @of action to be executed. * L) {/ ^" o: M y. D0 X5 @1 R# ZSTREAD Standard TRE Display. 9 E8 n) [0 B* J% r5 t/ ISTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack 8 X5 _& x# R% U; H' [/ sAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely ( ]% o# N9 A/ K( p9 ]3 O% I+ @, ~timed for maximum strategic impact. % C. ~ R; G5 J9 L) nStructured . T! N+ U# k% Z% dDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data - K! ]8 i$ Z% r- H% bflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 9 Y' K, w& T; [5 Z- m) {Program 4 V/ ^7 i2 Z5 s* aA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 6 C( C6 m7 |0 V, h% qsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more ! H: W( a, p; I9 pinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or : d) ^8 b* Z7 y1 Jsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of . s6 o3 F& H6 M6 G' H) ]* Oinstructions. , m$ J+ `4 |* o, p6 \STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 5 I% u% |- t2 u( FSTS See Space Transportation System. : w% y. o1 B* D2 u4 ]STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 + U! ?2 @5 ]0 W* {/ J8 h8 wSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ) P* U1 u, `" d! z( ?2 v# d) N(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 9 b+ x- r' _- ]4 H* h8 I0 GSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 5 e' [: x; E. h4 FSTU Secure Telephone Unit. 2 H0 R+ V }9 s ]STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. 2 N% H" v5 p( ^) K* P/ L: J4 kSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security 3 B1 U+ } q" x: P/ }2 s* X7 n% V, z2 TLevel , j! A. M, i. G2 q- xA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 5 _. x7 h3 ?, t' A: W( yhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched 5 t6 N) g, N6 P! c. b* U3 O0 hBallistic Missile ' C* y; Y2 Z: \' T9 d c4 H(SLBM) P5 o' C! r' G4 q/ H7 J, lA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense % T# {9 P. h# @2 b2 L4 j; V cFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. ( ~: W; M: J. m6 ]6 a, R, eSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of ( X3 y5 `' {* n) C3 NCommand ; q# \" z2 P+ b7 |8 F1 JThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 8 C# ~! D3 P; ` l6 u8 Z4 `" |is a synonymous term. ( {* h/ s# G5 L' mSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to ) k* l) x$ D- U5 bdecisions about future use of resources. 0 w$ T: ~( G" s+ h3 C: ?Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in ' b# K! J4 n7 l' @, Q0 sa single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as ' l5 w* k2 f6 N: K) Fsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) + q3 a& ?( X) Q6 zA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional 4 G. g7 X- v& A7 o6 F! Glasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 8 O- S U/ N3 v2 J$ N( o+ LSupervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental 8 a5 d. S, f. H* E8 W4 [3 CAppropriation + v" n/ o! G4 i. C- hAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. 2 d, m$ |! P1 I, _8 dSupport Equipment 8 r8 x& U! s3 b3 \6 I9 TAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the & b2 h, o# W6 K2 ymission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), $ H. h9 J% H+ z% w8 H, J! ?maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) K* a: b, ^' ?* c0 D: Aequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 6 Z* w+ }$ f$ X0 U, }5 k4 c6 Gtools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ) C$ M( D7 c8 z( o' k/ wprotection equipment). Support Personnel * ~- t& f7 ~/ R) k9 I+ iIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly - B& x8 D9 }% ]% b# H1 Massociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, : Q! a: S; e# R# O" B! a8 Badministrative support, and the like. & I5 W3 r% _- @4 W& I( nSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for . X* o- |! e6 N n0 F9 G uexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 4 q3 x$ l$ ?- L; p2 k. @- Rbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. # K8 Z% @9 T: X3 wSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. ! ?% c! F: c, ISURCOM Surveillance Constellation. p4 w2 _5 L' `" J* {) t8 hSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items / n" W3 d/ M% d3 H; q4 e/ v" Adue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or $ a) u. {6 E5 c( g0 V5 S2 h7 vmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess ' N& |6 ^* K4 W- }9 o. Eproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity / y, c) {: H4 ~2 a8 R. W9 `) Lmeasures. @- g* ?+ E. ~4 P1 q/ VSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, ' s. A1 C, x/ u, D" Q8 N5 J6 i% b) pand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric ( v. H. f; N* q) `* |; ] ~7 E+ usensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements 4 {* P) _5 ?. GRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response F2 e6 a2 D, T! `4 p& z/ xoptions and current surveillance system availability. X6 C/ d9 D& zSurveillance, Satellite and - M; J- {% a8 [# _+ p5 c( LMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, 8 ]- m. } t& S7 N, a' n6 gand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 6 U J0 A2 \0 e8 M* B( U$ Hand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. - ^1 D; k# W% s' R( ~Surveillance System Configuration & U1 p$ T1 U8 l% qThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated " n: @0 h" p Qin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability Operating Modes - ?7 o" F& G2 `1 EThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 5 x5 F, L4 ^, k! o+ ]5 r" |that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 3 `6 `) C; m# U a& Q( X y% D7 ySurvivable and - g. a) S) L* W' ?, @Enduring Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. + ^/ U" s: f$ M) G5 ESUS Site Utilization Study. 3 d5 X/ \' ] ?/ fSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ) _* h7 j1 g# p, |" J! w7 s( y$ TSV Space Vehicle. ! e. @; H2 R# L1 _4 }7 cSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. % x0 i, a9 M/ |0 tSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. ! K# N8 P8 k1 j; lSWC Strike Warfare Commander. # Y. U6 e$ a& d7 e) E' gSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. 2 W& k/ b% M( r6 k6 PSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 4 |9 O8 W$ u6 l) Y/ Y9 ]. ^SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. ( _9 g4 P* O6 G7 K h# P' DSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. ) ?% Q$ d; ~! U% k8 ?3 X2 ]SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to 9 R* ]1 H# T9 a4 _5 oone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where ) w; `3 @ _* e7 e5 N. e5 j* ieach module description has associated implementations. 4 f7 E. z$ b' DSynthetic - G. r' ]9 |, V jAperture Radar 5 w% O& O& P" c- D4 ^8 [, }( F! [. M g(SAR) ( R6 u# M& D) T# _' aA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance ' }* A7 S6 E# `8 { M( lbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's 9 W0 H* r( S2 b* a: Asignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal : r5 i9 J( k" w4 \+ lemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. 8 } U# m. {8 |+ c' X ]* uSys C/O System Check Out. / s, _: k, \$ ~/ \Sys Cmn System Common. & H1 o/ A6 x" w5 PSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 3 h, \$ x* ?) c; P+ BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 m* l7 t% M1 w284 SYSCOM Systems Command. / }6 K& M' n+ O5 e: mSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, & |' @1 t* q: U& d6 |1 O/ \data, and services needed to perform a designated function with 5 `& x- u$ `, R1 I, H9 z+ w, pspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a $ a; o8 G/ A& g+ ~ _( ]& Erequirement. System & Z) E3 x w' [; k: g' w0 lActivation 8 c) E; v9 V0 yThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions - H9 j0 b% e3 ^) ximplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System ; }# |$ `' q3 {; B' C/ E3 uControl. System Architecture System + Y0 p( V/ A5 r* g; }( _' CCapability : R m5 L( n$ m: M# W/ }# }Specification (SCS) + ~( c% j$ {" B2 E, YThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 0 y+ j4 i6 F; l- T h; B" tarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational Z% }3 u4 D5 c+ Uenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional 5 e! W x% }5 P" g- \/ B/ p$ e7 Dspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. % w0 ]# c b3 j: w6 SSystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of 4 y( `4 Y' ^, ~+ c! ~$ cequipment in CMAFB. System Concept # S6 C0 H# U& y; f% CPaper (SCP) 5 K$ \$ j) j2 R# G+ }OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the / K* H) _) R4 I1 _( e9 L% K- |4 {! y& rconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition * i8 d) I6 b" _8 `( Fstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 9 q' w J/ T' `& s5 WConfiguration Control Board (SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. $ r. P8 t" c' o, q+ gSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function % B' G3 M4 z) }# ^3 |, Z% |A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. 3 x/ m: S7 a' l! i+ G: KSystem Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and / t: Z0 F2 A& [ y7 x1 ?* Ufunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, ! b3 U; f C$ Wdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, + |) ]' l( w+ m4 K3 ^final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment 7 v/ d Z$ S% b1 r% bDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 7 A8 v8 [3 j" N- T _+ b u+ A285 $ i0 h$ W: l: ` dSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. & k4 ~2 o6 W8 l5 J1 p m(2) The result of the system design process. - L$ N4 m% t$ J, USystem Design Concept ' \; L( r* s3 R! `4 A+ O' dAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and F. _7 p' \7 b- Z, `characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be . l. g1 _/ c8 e$ H; e. ~3 }operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. . \3 K Q! T3 i. G* _5 pSystem Design Review (SDR) 0 ~+ x- x `3 V; \, n% K D9 JEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with # l, C7 [1 k2 Rthe allocated technical requirements. * h3 r/ e( m/ F% ]System Effectiveness 2 I7 K& e, q+ d* l3 X* ^% @3 F. XThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS + k, X t$ G0 G" ?- ?capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior + T2 j7 H( A# }. hExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 7 {" |% T) g& g/ v% g8 passessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 3 ~# I: ]; G1 R. F2 G$ _significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to + T: ?9 _1 @ z( Hachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 9 n% W! ?" {6 {) _, ?those challenges. . \3 H3 \3 A/ B: m7 hSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. ! X% M. q4 E/ I1 C6 t2 pSystem Generated 4 X; p- l4 |" h' ?" ZElectromagnetic . J- p" O& i+ u7 _) K, l$ cPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local 8 n! Q% c! w8 E% G. S; t* cfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the + W5 V8 I8 p- c7 x& p; X2 Hprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the 8 R f' ~7 Z8 I: cobject in order to produce charge equalization. System Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 1 Q" H% }0 z7 Y' O$ ^sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks ( q* \6 U2 s( E$ I1 H+ jand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or : ]3 H; I# q1 Z( R fequipment systems. - @/ Q( ]5 a, x6 n( d- b0 eSystem Operational ' {- g& A! N: o8 ^1 M* ?Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. , J- y, E6 W `# t, l7 SSystem 3 k1 [4 x, q0 I0 Z) ]; M7 DOperation and 3 @/ _5 H$ {. s9 J" g1 g" ~- z FIntegration : k9 i1 E( z" |8 @$ b3 I4 TFunctions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 3 e$ w' K8 Q& Y# T$ Kthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). : i- z5 @2 [9 i: L1 z0 x2 `. pSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 a; J H. G* A: n6 z( F; b286 System Program Office (SPO) % q/ a5 L. U, x: w6 N: ^The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 3 N1 z# T2 F+ o: HReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 9 R% {% r1 R5 yincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 0 C/ w) T$ x; |: j0 Kcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies % G5 o& ~- d2 X9 Mand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, # `( P% r' `7 H& l" Q! ihistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 9 c- b$ S; q: j% d! B; O9 `& Pstatus reporting. 1 g4 K6 a9 B* ?! v1 |System Readiness / I9 Q! ~' T' c; |& f6 {Objective & b& f+ T4 ?( v" J9 [A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. M3 I2 b0 _7 ?System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and # G! e% V# p' V5 u" N4 U3 ~7 zmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ) u9 J, ?: c7 M7 G' e; tsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission K9 z% t u! E x9 o* qcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. * {6 k" o" Q* x# \9 |System Requirements ! O1 V2 f. U9 v' u9 t+ D2 y. [- XAnalysis (SRA) 7 e7 O7 r5 b1 B% X' C: L: [) lAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 6 z& n! r' U [1 n0 q% ^0 PConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine ! G; {- z- Z$ g b: R: yspecific system functional and performance requirements. : u2 h4 i/ j' ~$ qSystem Requirements # h0 c% l- K1 E5 x. RReview (SRR) 3 k) Q: L1 h( g% LConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 5 f0 p& ]2 R& l+ tdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. " h) b9 m4 S3 o, U1 H3 D+ ?$ KSystem Security Engineering (SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering / X& p2 W' H5 P0 V( R8 W. i b' b8 yprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related ( n: }* v1 J9 \" M0 M& Yscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security Engineering Management Program * q9 v! {7 Q) {2 c(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE + N7 y2 G$ U G) E) a# M) }program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 1 Z' B2 I+ F, N m# Tdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides . @% d/ F0 c9 |management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security $ N" e; Y) L$ q4 aManagement Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 2 w) B/ n/ S5 A6 F6 s" k9 m4 k- T) qother program engineering, design and management activities, and related : _. _$ \" y. s( O+ `systems. / Q0 S# D5 {' nSystems % D6 K. S) n8 w) Y6 bEngineering % r0 k9 T6 d2 [; }An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! B- e8 `2 M3 [" [9 U0 V% f287 ) N7 p! B2 I7 q0 J/ v" \Systems 0 K, D5 }. q) l6 b, l6 I( `, XEngineering Management Plan (SEMP) 9 P6 h) E! k0 k: iThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) $ m3 o) I( U3 O9 {) l' bIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures + A3 W" a3 `) x8 {development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test . w. ^" y8 U& ~+ a9 @Integration and $ H/ F4 f i" V! x$ C# ~* HCoordination ! b: f0 F+ a: G; K# tThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. : g( _4 S' `& Y) BSystem Threat Assessment * H; S: B7 r. c( `/ M4 D# I+ qReport (STAR) ! B" g% J% n8 U7 iRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a " Y! Y" r5 N0 BService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when & G1 X9 X: S3 H& z/ ?the threat changes significantly. System-Valued % k( ]' e3 D' {% X: r. G' nAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to % v* w* U( B' s/ R* B% f+ m8 pthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. " `9 ]! I; S7 G: ~. LT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. " M! e0 k5 n6 v2 A4 MT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. T 6 d. h4 m- r" c( Z; U, z2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. : L: U5 C( E! HTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. + `6 H4 i! V) X/ K0 DTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). * \( ?$ Z0 ?/ E* ITACAIR Tactical Air. 7 w0 n! t; \5 m: p* DTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. & z& S1 G8 [0 z6 |TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. - P7 g2 W* }9 N* M7 ITACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. 5 c; q; \8 M" O# z) y# k, n2 l1 ^, RTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. B }+ o, N$ b2 ?; w. l/ M YTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). / F: }/ ?- k0 L1 tTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. 7 K6 t9 M% j7 G4 i! N) bTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 K9 l0 a' C9 W7 `( o# |289 6 J' g1 D2 F9 N6 ]/ \2 r" P7 nTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation 2 J) f6 }' a' l9 ` r. D8 VTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation - n( \) l/ v' z- a$ |An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 1 g/ A% ?* _; ^6 ]3 u1 Oground or naval forces. Tactical Air / n8 `$ I8 e$ x3 `6 U: @+ COperations Center * s: x3 s! y; X. x2 D" EA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control 4 Q! j; j+ _1 F5 Q5 ~7 v, p5 ^System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air & Y% H3 ?8 M/ U7 W8 b0 P3 j8 r+ aSupport ; A! K, A( f/ B! M7 Z9 f4 WAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly $ U; L1 }1 o. f6 c, ~$ { Hassist land or maritime operations. ' L# E- X6 j. \& fTactical Area of , n! J% ?" E4 i# p) wResponsibility 4 c: j7 G- d$ z+ r- J, c8 n(TAOR) : h- [1 G9 A* y& r" I# TA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 0 Z: Z+ J' j- @commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and # k& T/ V4 K) E5 }coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic ' d$ C$ z" d1 e; [# b% @Missile (TBM) 5 N7 V; R5 I% [2 ~! c7 `A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 2 |' d# c, D4 t6 Zdevelopment of tactical doctrine. - o7 z. W7 J; G: I+ ]6 n5 L8 \Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. ! q1 L( F2 D# u# jTactical Data - o# l$ @, N% r+ O- `Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 0 s( P* r* U( Yeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. 1 e+ B1 n% |( r" ?; ^" a xTactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area (TOA) . w2 w+ J1 A! I/ E6 ZThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations - ~+ w5 |' G9 U9 p. P) xarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission ' t" U$ w( T7 f5 J0 vaccomplishment. Tactical Operations 7 M4 R5 D" |4 C: L, FCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff / _% C+ M) e2 f$ s9 Gconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an , v# D3 @, b. R) i Wevaluation of information from all available sources. + f+ p/ }3 w0 p0 H* y; }(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type / g l4 O; H. Mand size, country under attack, and event time. 1 w, G0 m) l$ \# |4 s. K' g# X7 fTactical Warning/Attack Assessment # n8 y/ Q* _9 ^/ T8 l0 x9 X0 w* ?(TW/AA) : m8 V" f% u' H. ^- iA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack + @8 {+ b; X& J2 X% x) B& ?' n# MAssessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! P o( Y$ \/ x; f8 g$ b2 r g290 1 _$ O2 x4 A4 ?1 {/ MTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ; Q5 Q( c3 M$ F5 ^# qTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. ' n/ T# ]0 \$ n, E6 B7 LTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. ; r1 w9 s2 z" ~TADL Tactical Data Link. - i& P C& E9 S# STADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. $ b; ]0 h* x* N, t' U+ VTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. 6 K3 ^$ k) c! L9 pTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. + k8 i4 [7 M7 _) O' c+ OTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. * u t, g( o2 nTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. : Q. u4 ?9 d* `5 W0 C2 R0 I8 K7 FTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. ( S) u" C3 y8 A, J9 n5 E: xTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). ! r: [( ~0 i& P; WTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 4 Y& S: b$ [4 O- j, X- i2 w4 ETank 8 k" E$ C. `$ h4 R" g* a4 d+ O# fFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 9 u7 _9 n# T. Jresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. $ O5 G1 H$ v$ d* O- \(2) Threat Activity Report. ! V0 w: S, B7 @6 m(3) Target Acquisition Radar. + n! ~, p, F* o/ ^6 cTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 2 j) o% E# @/ X( mTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 8 E5 @+ k6 e2 Z0 X# lTarget Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one % ~$ U9 o, ~4 D; N8 t0 j, k) G8 r8 _target when multiple targets are present. : d9 q- s; \" y6 ^/ XTarget Object Map (TOM) 2 L: Z; e( p' u) G1 jA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ' w6 L& m+ L; Q* ?$ [6 j6 y! ptarget designation. (USSPACECOM) 0 P3 G- ?% X6 J) h& v8 L" _Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. , k- Q0 N. c% t( sTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 7 x7 V$ F/ _7 v; [7 iidentification equipment. ( S% P) f! p6 p3 m1 v8 I# S(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. 6 N; } V) u& ]$ R8 BTarget System " d% |2 t1 _1 xRequirements 4 Q2 V& q: s# aDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD : t& G1 ~+ ~) f! dProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. 9 R" T* C `+ }5 B h; `- D! ^Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 0 U. x1 n3 M% q% l8 sengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 4 w# x3 v% h n/ ~- f8 `% krequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 5 _% e$ ~. m* N, n4 l; W- V/ X7 m5 S" ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 0 U5 ~6 V2 p1 x9 dTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. , F- m8 d* ^/ V2 `& t3 oTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ) R6 l# b5 r5 b) {: |2 e+ MTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. / A- h! n7 O& KTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 2 J1 c9 Q! {" Y: L2 b, j$ UTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. : ^$ u7 U" c; f1 FTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 8 Y6 W$ V% w. |TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. 3 p% l! B1 q+ z' C. M* @(3) To Be Scheduled ( J! L+ E9 Y# I4 i0 h" @& Z* U: X2 u. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. * `3 {/ _+ T5 u" d; f. dTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. # b* P5 e' [$ B9 N& j% @" KTCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 3 y6 \6 C: K8 n: @- M) fTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). ; E P4 n9 f; O- R6 O" v% e( gTD (1) Test Director. 3 |0 Q+ a2 E* m8 q* n(2) Technical Data. / Z6 w) D0 r5 F: @ x(3) Technical Director. " h* b/ U0 }7 s0 m- a5 l: n(4) Training Device 3 H. x( j* m6 t7 ^- h- o5 KTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 8 T) x3 R- Q: S( x: c5 E1 z) n3 jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 3 v9 d. l9 N% s2 o5 e6 z1 d i1 Y( F9 tTDCC Test Data Collection Center. ! U7 i% w1 u/ z/ NTDD Target Detection Device. $ [8 T% w X1 T9 cTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. 7 x1 _, o0 t/ V( g) a2 UTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. ! q" s% j0 D5 J, U+ z6 s(2) Test Design Package. + ^9 k. w! H+ a. h# i4 s(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. ' ^! D0 L0 l# P" J+ W6 g7 P" YTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. % Z; Y2 T! E) P# E) iTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. 9 \, n, a+ ~; z L6 P# ]& TTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. & F* |$ S1 a+ x* L# ~! K) KTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 1 T& m/ e2 g: K, [2 @(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. # `- l- W( _6 \/ n" m' pTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. 0 S8 m- W" R( Q7 vTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical # j' B5 @# g* A5 k+ ]( c8 i0 ETECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' w! t! o5 u1 S* [( r9 V1 y294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as : H1 W- B' B" p1 C" lmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not ) X+ ^2 X/ A& @1 C3 jtechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. ; n4 ]& e; @, n8 Y0 ^ jTechnical Data 9 T# i+ [/ F" E. a: y7 fPackage (TDP) / j& z' ^1 u9 \$ WA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines ! G# J7 o4 j: t4 p }7 M' V1 J7 Athe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item ) P2 ]5 S; _/ i4 r4 Z8 Vperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 0 R* w6 T8 p7 d* q5 d4 dassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality ; ]6 q) x1 o, L, `! B/ Jassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to : m+ E" D/ `, q0 O5 Q, x& g' R; edetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in % h2 Q* a4 ^4 u( \5 i/ xthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) ; F5 ~9 l4 m: _3 y. q4 r1 KTechnical + X: |% ], x5 x$ U+ jObjectives 0 C) V& ?7 W8 {$ B* K+ z- [The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical 0 h( B7 ~# O9 h2 JObjectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical / y R3 w. D/ Q# d, |( l3 NParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical 2 {" O4 q" O3 P# C7 @Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. " U: J" `- k( I: OTechnical 4 H3 K ^1 b, NPerformance 1 g4 v, k5 o7 A" f' T @% t* ~& UMeasurement 3 j' @/ ]1 L" l$ X+ I; Q' g3 C) S(TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance ' R1 x3 b* v: t5 K" m1 wparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these : M3 ]; {/ P |$ ]2 E5 J3 o9 v! |differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification # i# V! X# T* K$ T5 iA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 7 m! j6 ~, _1 }8 R: I ethe basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or " }$ A4 A8 ?7 \1 m' F# [$ ~emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise - D p0 ~/ J& }8 Jtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent ) W) r* j, ^5 m2 i3 Q) F8 N# `* tThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 3 i, r, t G: q% q3 Gresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. Technology / L$ p% |" O W) p6 EProgram Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical - W& J( O6 X' I A- \) J! Wsupporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 7 L0 ?$ L; h2 V+ _6 |- {% h4 L3 s zTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, 8 q) Z; B! J5 ?& y5 uTracking, and Command (TT&C) 9 y1 K. y# n% g( `Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a 3 x0 v) }# @$ j# U" y0 hsequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. . a* l3 I+ i) d# @7 m9 cTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 6 K) l- E( [: Y2 s& f3 J1 ]TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. ( w! j% T9 R5 o/ e, p1 pTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. 6 K3 g# _2 v* V: B0 f$ QTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. B, @ j/ G, Q7 V' CTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 9 ^( z+ Q8 Z( l" y5 e; ~"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. 0 n3 Q& g* {6 I6 c! z+ OTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) ) X5 [8 o4 k1 {$ u+ BThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 8 c8 l5 t7 V+ v( J3 q7 |5 d: patmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal ) y8 I7 k; q3 F' V% YGuidance ( k& p) z" b$ I0 F) e" c0 HThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. - ]4 E/ T3 ]" F; C, b0 z$ oTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase ! Z( |2 I. \% [ R0 ~) bInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 4 ?4 S0 {# [/ y0 H9 i0 o% U9 Pterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. . U0 p. |- F K' m% P/ @6 C2 PTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 ; }/ n/ u! I0 ?* bTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system : n% j. Y, D0 e& _4 Nhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 3 u9 `1 n' ]. N! Q# Kconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all ! j& @' W+ V$ f, ]6 y# w3 H" |8 n* r7 a7 Ioperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. ( O# d) T7 i5 b. o9 i3 XTest and Evaluation (T&E) / P, @# ~5 [! s7 r8 lProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production ) V; j5 W) x, b1 u4 ^Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted . A* S( O0 I" Z) N) hto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof ; r, y. C& _7 }: Tmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 2 T" X. D# I% Z2 v1 wrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts + Q* ]) i: o& {0 P! ^or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 1 f; s# [ |, o! B: R4 h6 ~(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before 1 x- t) x. A3 {( `. C! R) {6 xthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ; w) R; O" r- X% D6 { \Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation , j9 L. l# h% ?/ |/ W4 Dto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. 8 f" O l( c3 B3 w/ w- r, f1 eTest and Evaluation - N% f6 x) A! U3 ~( hWorking Group w5 m8 m. q& t8 U+ n! U; T4 y(TEWG) " e4 [# D: W8 h# X. V/ rThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, & u6 s& M: m; G8 S% Rplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 4 m/ c$ I* i/ k1 c8 t- v0 |$ e6 aintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 0 g( D2 \% f7 t) i1 ~program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 2 S1 c& X) ~0 X7 i, [when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 6 Q% Y+ b7 Z+ Y9 E2 M: P. Z+ I4 TTest Integration " b1 B+ I& n9 Y; T% s! P7 S, UWorking Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ' k2 z# ~! N9 u% |, worder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. ! j8 k/ X0 v7 x7 ~/ p# F' lTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 8 s- E" L1 H8 o* _" ]3 m+ K! u2 ttest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 6 y* d& I$ u5 e$ tcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 7 {& F' p/ S9 u( ?( ]+ FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : x/ P) l* V* W# v/ Q- B297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) + A) F' G4 ]% hSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. # `9 l- k( F& z$ C1 YTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. / D3 U8 n& c1 {9 C& ~$ j7 |) wTFC Tactical Fusion Center. $ z$ Q5 M* d" R0 O& BTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). * u' A& L% ?+ j6 bTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 3 N7 s4 T* g4 `" h& T" h% p1 fTFOV Theoretical Field of View. . M Y' c. q! ^* cTFR Terrain Following Radar. f M5 _5 J, g2 h8 R# fTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). , a) L6 H) ]2 S2 T- dTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. E/ K3 ~ ?/ D* w* [TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). / f! `! t- p, S8 }1 Y( }TGS Track Generation System (USN term). # o8 Q+ I1 W) w: G' `+ _5 _TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 3 j( H+ J" Q& u$ Ocommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. , d& ]( t9 _8 OTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. . j' p2 d( @. N) r, N0 R. F9 iTheater Ballistic Missile Defense 9 G* ^: G1 J# x( O, w(TBMD) System o1 h; Y$ m/ T; v' U) F. QThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. % o# E$ I9 Y* V( [(USSPACECOM)