- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System, g. \+ A, [3 P1 W3 R$ D
Readiness7 t( c9 q: I. v. b
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out U+ k: a4 y1 y3 a" o& j3 b
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
, |4 V+ D3 U& ~; E! L) Aalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It* I" `$ D$ |* I9 y5 [, L! q+ q
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational) h( {! G1 k0 C0 I
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
% _! W. e7 D' ^" kverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the( h& S2 a" B$ g& V
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
7 j' ?- s* Z, _: l# P- Irealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions6 ?/ H* G5 j5 N2 x$ f2 O h+ g9 S
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies$ g3 ~( H: X" u1 s1 A
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,4 D! @- e1 `" `" u5 T& L: y* J
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results+ F. u$ g# P) l, C. T4 Q4 p
status reporting.
( o Y0 q! s+ M/ @, m% F- e4 o$ T' hSystem7 X7 h {: V- P
Readiness8 t- s: U1 K1 w: w( S: ^/ g& O
Objective
$ J# ?$ t+ Q6 F8 XA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
1 E" y& M# K: d' t- ^specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
( W* E9 E9 B, E( `, k$ G( U/ USystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
* x- o" _- L1 [. Y, O5 rmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support4 |$ ]8 {9 F" p t
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
$ r0 y2 E7 i* j E1 @; o3 t8 z/ zsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission* ~) r4 G- o7 ~) ^+ t! j5 X1 n( g
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.9 y- Z: W# D; I m* r, R; L
System4 V/ C3 K- A# i4 t) m. }# H
Requirements$ f( s8 ^9 w. U" T3 ]
Analysis (SRA)" H- @+ a, c6 u$ c' y- b
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System- t- B3 j" X$ G; ^
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
. u- F+ ]+ E6 n5 Y& O* Z$ @specific system functional and performance requirements.$ w+ {2 F6 E1 i6 H/ k7 I2 D( Q/ J
System
- y7 f, \5 C+ W, tRequirements( b5 K- x9 s9 ?, P
Review (SRR)
a1 n: e, O+ UConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements., v' Q* ]% I, B% V+ R
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
% g( ~8 Z* l+ Z' l I! gdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.% |" B" Z' u+ [
System Security
0 m1 P) O. B6 O$ h' `( u" UEngineering/ w' | U+ `4 }) I+ l. j
(SSE)! I4 k' v& ?9 _% L! q9 \; t2 M
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
|% d4 h8 B* {& n+ I% H, `, dprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
# }9 J! z9 X7 s- u* b' nassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related2 y! ]* I; F7 u/ e
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and7 H& w' ]- @& u2 Z8 M- {& R
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
) d( H) g7 K( C' i/ Osecurity threats.
. ]0 o% q1 G: _ |System Security
/ V3 x: k) J' X( U# S NEngineering
: M c) R3 X! ^8 d9 ]Management/ e4 N* d: ~- Y
Program) V9 n$ ]9 r u% c
(SSEMP)# F+ J7 n% w# C$ G& L
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical7 ]* m. |# Y8 [9 r2 {! K
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE2 T1 |" m9 T9 r$ Z+ ~, f
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
3 ]" X: {0 v$ zdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
4 e9 E9 }; O" Z( m4 \' M fresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
6 M/ R) ^6 c4 Q8 i5 ^# {# amanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes+ Y' e+ c9 W1 ^ p5 z' N
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
7 e: l$ W* w g; b- c/ WSystem Security2 T! p% R( \+ n: I
Management
( X; B' P4 b: u3 [, ~6 MPlan (SSMP)
u: c/ R) c# v C+ S( ~A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to
1 h& n2 Q% `* ^7 A* Hmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,- i3 w3 X/ p; b8 a6 T) J
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with3 v5 T% a; P) g% p
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related' A; N- m+ T X2 s) u& R
systems.
! w" z2 V8 R2 f; S/ r4 `) O8 d S2 ^4 HSystems
0 X/ J5 _8 t6 i5 WEngineering
K" Y" l0 a/ DAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
; ^( E0 L6 a S' j' H/ Z$ ubalanced set of system product and process solutions.) {; C5 N( u9 K2 v
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S5 d; U m2 \7 b! z) h
2875 }2 J" C: B+ B' _4 h/ d+ U2 e. e9 \
Systems
! y0 t& ?+ w7 o6 Q6 IEngineering9 T3 ^! L# [' J- w) D, @" I
Management4 U2 p: N) d2 g% }
Plan (SEMP)6 ~/ ]; d# J# \* C& `
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
# B2 D3 c9 u7 i. g" R% JIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
G& t K2 K( Y2 S; q1 udevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)7 B* {7 m. ^) d
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
! W! e4 }! a) l* sSystems Test
( | O9 ?" @0 E5 E7 o0 E5 K& ~8 h7 fIntegration and" V) m! m) B3 Y7 |
Coordination
* a9 T& P4 C; J: {; w* t) LThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.
& S) X$ C! C P- eSystem Threat
4 ]( O! i# l, Y8 e7 w" SAssessment1 \" x. @, L8 M, J
Report (STAR)/ {" ^% Q" [$ |# [& V8 G2 q" F
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
, o" I' ~8 j, L( eService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
/ k u' ]/ w- zand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when* q* ~3 `) |5 U4 h5 X) o: `! y
the threat changes significantly.
2 @# t" J+ o6 {; u; ZSystem-Valued
2 }8 S' C9 a% t2 V1 vAsset$ h0 Y1 n2 t k% o3 U5 H
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to% Y7 {9 n" N3 m# Y& o) K
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.# a5 f, d2 x" l) J0 J! B, m- M' Y
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T- r4 f2 _: ]( c6 J
288
$ `: E, r+ x( E7 B2 VT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
% i! q+ m0 U9 D3 GT&E Test and Evaluation.
2 ?, _- ^$ ~* E# a7 }& w! G1 VT&T Transportation and Transportability.+ V! \% Y# m% ?5 r
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
$ F& T! H" m7 q- p' m. I& Q" ~T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
( O4 z1 R6 @/ rT/R Transmit/Receive.
. ?# ]7 [ J5 w& ]; L6 n! o4 j, p3 QT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).; S! I/ Y* G1 Y
T
, B; o0 Z# y: Y2# \5 C4 N4 R3 B& O) _1 Y% l K
Technology Transfer.
- S: o! ]; g8 p3 NT5 m0 S7 N, W2 \- ]! V# ~' \
2
7 }3 U4 }1 e! Q7 v+ n i- o- xE Technical Training Equipment.% a5 h) s) g, a& D7 e
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
! S3 r( r7 `) b* O( h# \TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
7 l% G: A( r0 i# [( NTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.7 z, n6 R: q2 j; y+ l+ S* ~
TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.) a2 ]2 B) D, c4 X* x2 ]' y
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.6 f( q" O2 ?; u$ Q; C
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.0 x+ x0 j. {3 {. i! m9 z
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). N \/ j" u; D& _) ^
TACAIR Tactical Air.
( o% k }( A/ |) Y5 b, `TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
$ w$ C/ y* m% ^3 cTACC Tactical Air Command Center.7 G7 ^' t0 L. I% [6 v r6 J
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).! _& V% o: M; E8 M( K7 s7 r) U
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
* v5 w) |9 P( W4 P$ \TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.+ ]* ^" C& O- ?; `
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
0 ]6 V1 `5 Y& jTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting., G0 ~: X1 I- X& |5 ` `4 y. u
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|