- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
6 i2 y; S+ m+ L) v/ TReadiness- v2 p$ a) F+ |6 C
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out7 z9 b' a `1 b1 u8 ~/ J! _- R: {
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
" k/ p5 K* \* Y4 T+ S, V% d# b. g7 qalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It; Q: `7 X) P% `
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational1 d) x: P, E* |: p% n( H0 b
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the0 _1 y8 T, X( p- @: B# y! `# J
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
) @6 @8 ], w$ r- W4 g1 k2 ccontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under& y# `% x/ ?2 I3 q" V
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
j/ m/ a9 `$ H* B+ l1 c* Onecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies" Y4 V6 h' v& f8 x+ ]
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
! ~0 ^ s" x* o2 i' J: }historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
5 `6 }. t, b* z! F9 E2 Ostatus reporting.; P; `8 S6 s2 K+ ?! G1 B1 C, E6 |
System
+ Z V* q" p# F3 ]) mReadiness. \& t, z, ]! w6 y6 v z
Objective
, {7 l0 y/ x# b. {A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
K) _$ ^% M& o0 M2 s6 v3 Nspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.6 e; _2 ]2 ~3 n
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and1 [0 |6 H8 y+ t, u" A
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support
! v: r) t; o0 m* Vsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of- q% M6 ?; }9 D. U
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission% A6 n. |. @7 K; b+ ]9 _9 U; H
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.0 a% D% c* o; a( W. \* a7 T
System
" j6 F- n# ?9 U0 r, D! I, }Requirements- ?1 j6 H( t2 B) f
Analysis (SRA)6 `0 ~& O5 B+ Q/ a/ c
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
' X$ p. ^# o6 N) H3 D+ pConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine. ]; c/ r9 }; c, \6 X" P, g
specific system functional and performance requirements.5 U3 ` v s" n# V. I
System
5 K7 A4 d M7 y- ^$ P) X9 }Requirements7 X. a! c; E5 T+ D. `" c, D/ A
Review (SRR)
$ e! l1 C. X8 p8 AConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.# e& u& a9 z2 i# ~* i+ i: T
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the, \9 N( `, z$ K9 M6 @
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
$ @/ m- H4 `$ G7 G* ~% Q$ `- ?* ?, nSystem Security+ q& u+ w" S% Z1 q
Engineering
% S6 S$ ?7 u6 }4 k" d/ A% t0 p(SSE)
+ w. S, R U BAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering, t [& E( d2 Z2 U& o, i
principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks9 A. U$ U: \1 I8 k& k
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
# {8 X7 L1 u! i. n; m9 ]1 p9 F \scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and# T% O# ]0 A8 {% D) W4 R0 c: d; t
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
/ I( K; C/ S% E8 z; `! |security threats.. A$ i( Z, u- B, O: B- u9 C$ C
System Security
$ `* a% G' f5 [$ |% c" d7 fEngineering
( s' h* ~, T7 r; _3 j* V0 S% U' RManagement+ P, u0 N. d# \9 b ~% c
Program* ]1 S+ \# E- r# W' R. u# s7 o
(SSEMP)
2 k7 K* f$ t. J( E( SThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical' X- M! [0 [! A# \9 O9 J/ K0 R
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
3 A3 G7 k4 ]4 h; b1 Yprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
+ r+ u; }% y+ I' P. N( |6 ndefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the$ j* C, N; j o8 [) e0 C
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides/ a2 o) B; a, B/ P* T R/ e" r% P3 I! }
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes6 v3 c, b# [! F. n; S7 R- E
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.% J( M' r3 R0 Z$ [# ~
System Security
& ?, L1 q' I( U s* X/ NManagement. J9 B5 j9 z" o
Plan (SSMP): c% i# c8 Q- i% b( ] l: k
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to% c" k2 f+ g1 p! \+ P$ @' L
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,0 `8 Q* g! n' Y+ h* R$ c/ G
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with' C$ w0 y5 U9 y% x; c2 l. G8 T
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related9 _) _+ W7 r. }* @9 `4 m0 N( S
systems.
7 U0 q% ~) J' w9 `Systems
& c( K& t- }9 j7 k0 UEngineering
1 S0 D' m% Y; Z1 U% C0 _An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
, X. P- ]- t& f6 x$ Vbalanced set of system product and process solutions.
8 G5 m, N7 G" p# B$ ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S* X" s2 s5 q! d
287$ [8 g, v! k4 A# b, p% W! C
Systems
! ]5 \* M# m B7 ~/ WEngineering
2 x% V1 |9 D& x- jManagement
: @/ Y# x. @* F6 z# k) E0 W3 s( ]# HPlan (SEMP)/ p- u4 p9 Y, F, }
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2); {% B/ ?- K$ Q' j
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures7 K8 L6 D: l9 r: m7 K. S
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)) S* P: x! p" N5 s8 d( W; |& ~
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
4 B8 `' ~% r/ [9 ~$ b1 V3 jSystems Test
* e. ^( l2 Y9 [5 _+ c, FIntegration and! ^# L) ~2 z P/ i+ ?
Coordination/ Z9 d. G8 C( ?& P& u* U" a/ a) _. z
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.% N3 x) z% Q- D! B( s$ D
System Threat5 A& t6 v' K' G, _, ~
Assessment
3 z2 x7 m7 v! oReport (STAR)
) L5 D* O6 N. R+ pRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a* j9 `% l; W |1 a
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency( @" ?, F! n4 D6 Q2 y
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
; i5 F+ {% B% D9 Uthe threat changes significantly.
6 |" q; E* H$ U& {0 ]2 [( H# ySystem-Valued' v+ i/ U% j) `. n% j a/ m
Asset
( j) L1 r3 G7 k# _* N* e: u: l/ cA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to1 {1 A7 U8 G0 k
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.0 L; X6 j' w s6 Q9 n
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T" V4 G$ t# q8 u/ F
2883 p! K+ D: m- k/ m& s8 _
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.7 W5 t5 @" z5 A0 k' g8 ]( u
T&E Test and Evaluation.
U+ Q0 S9 ?' R6 y/ E' A, {T&T Transportation and Transportability.4 ]8 D6 a: ^9 y. H& n) J$ ~$ J9 |$ [
T-MACH Trusted MACH.7 s2 H4 H' @& _; v- R ^ ]" q
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
6 V2 J1 B. z- s& m4 ]$ L3 }6 kT/R Transmit/Receive.
8 r* @* C6 ]# YT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
2 v/ R% T( Z' G% tT( X$ `/ [/ [1 i6 q( [; o; {7 u
2- r6 x7 U1 ?8 J0 L
Technology Transfer.
6 C( }+ @$ h0 p" g* {T
# g8 Y: |2 S& B+ N9 b. F- P y+ {2
" r: T1 a% O0 O0 ~- sE Technical Training Equipment.: L+ J: e. k: U" b
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.2 @4 o! K% X9 ?: D& a0 ?
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.( B* X* a d a4 ~' `5 N
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
3 b- ?7 l: F) V( O- HTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
{4 `5 O' s% L U0 r1 l1 OTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
! `, I5 e( }7 U' R# O! h# vTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
# O5 d$ S) M' cTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term)., L* e, x" Z3 `5 _' x- u
TACAIR Tactical Air.
' a( I* x9 C, C- H% @' oTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
% Y% J. Y, ]0 S( K; G4 B eTACC Tactical Air Command Center.
1 \& b, Z- c# {8 W! [) hTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).
4 b; o7 a3 `6 DTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
. a, }/ x0 F' \. A. mTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
+ ^7 V9 Q+ G" A& q, ?TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility." \% c, N6 A. `1 T1 ^
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
* v S( q# J0 [$ ~TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|