- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
! y. ~( t9 I, ?Readiness, ~ r M* d% L
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out+ }( |; X( ~/ j, e3 Q8 t. u( C Q
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
1 e& J# m3 V# Y. W4 ?along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
0 x( s6 p! }/ i0 e5 g0 @' ^includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
5 W4 D- |0 Q" u* D9 _6 D/ N5 Jstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
' p- P b1 y, X R Nverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the, {1 j1 v% Z1 D
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
3 t- s* @. s7 P$ g/ j) Rrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions& K1 H5 m7 o0 ]5 ?' c
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies7 D4 q0 c; {8 d' Q' E$ Z
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
- [6 n' u, p8 g& E; vhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results% u. E% V3 L7 d3 O9 g% k
status reporting.8 w, @4 `3 v+ m! M9 ~! P% @
System
( l1 X" X+ `( YReadiness
B% t5 ?0 x, d& V- M3 R) f3 A# DObjective5 J( S4 T! e! K- [* i: L2 A0 v; ]
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
6 v2 J4 ]8 @3 c/ o! H; ispecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.0 Z+ f* R2 H, ?8 @
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
. Y9 B8 h0 P# ]2 _8 Dmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support: I! `% V, U* g) o% [! V0 Q( z
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of' c% e7 T2 [) Q% o- V
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
+ `' |; K% _! C) B" C$ T" F2 [9 |1 Tcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.2 i9 Q! }& p2 P9 M
System. D$ N( f7 r' D$ L8 S
Requirements; U2 k+ h% o& f( \4 l& @3 \ [
Analysis (SRA): c/ |9 i: y4 Q9 W
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System2 l- E$ _9 X$ y8 ]1 }
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine b) ?. p6 Y8 R- `+ C! A
specific system functional and performance requirements.1 {+ v. F; y. ^2 \
System5 u, E$ ^0 O) X' S# D
Requirements5 @2 [5 r5 K8 J; c: Y( g$ e
Review (SRR)
7 d% M7 q8 D6 d/ {Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
- [; u1 [& k: Q, v& xDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the; h' i5 v: n7 k2 T1 }! t ?) U- k
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
1 B1 A& g1 j/ E. y5 i/ XSystem Security
! ]) ?/ k) y3 c( [$ REngineering
9 G: J {' R& u* b8 Y(SSE)( F$ P( `2 f, `/ G( ], d4 Y/ e
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
4 |. E, R/ a/ ?2 Z" o0 Lprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
. s9 t1 p& l; R! wassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
; N1 L+ F! p. k1 y3 I8 yscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
, Q: Z" E/ O! o- Y1 X" ranalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
" x: G U2 D2 V% W* ?3 ~security threats.
+ j2 g; s5 Q* b) W+ `) OSystem Security" ~8 S$ c1 U6 B# S" b, X- K# C
Engineering
0 _/ f; s3 o" h& RManagement
M. I, k- ]3 a% u |5 bProgram
% |5 q2 `- f: G! W1 a. v(SSEMP)
" y9 T; N5 N' B6 t- v' zThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical' W% l9 ~: k, N6 [6 O, ~
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
2 [- y$ t. I8 M( ?! [$ i6 Gprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the W x1 ?$ o' I7 e- M4 L
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
1 `3 \; ?$ }% w4 f2 sresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides5 ^3 f7 }1 ^+ h: C8 t8 ~3 h
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes
0 D+ g0 N5 V. K# I, O1 X h; rits own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
H% r6 F- W- s* A' ]0 Y' j- r& vSystem Security% \9 V* n8 N' q! Y7 F
Management% Z2 L; \- T$ w, O7 |
Plan (SSMP)/ W; f( {' j7 x& w9 M' y9 b
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to
) D/ o3 u) d' G( Wmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
0 K/ X$ I+ x* \. u* Zmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
# H4 U+ M3 Z; f8 N* {0 Dother program engineering, design and management activities, and related
9 Q, D1 {8 g0 E& Zsystems.
2 `. q0 S. R, M: k- Q* I9 vSystems9 D& A$ n8 o+ i% q" R8 C( M" v
Engineering- d9 a5 j# V( k% s5 M
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
, v6 e T t. B0 L% P! x" ]8 `balanced set of system product and process solutions.
1 T* A+ K6 U9 o# }9 ]+ FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S* e" D* J- }9 Y; S( S
287$ |; z. N5 l, M; a r/ t
Systems
% g5 t% {# f! Z9 `$ E7 t' AEngineering
( ~6 \7 [2 X; m8 }0 Y9 ^ l1 k1 nManagement. U4 ?" P9 q2 A0 G
Plan (SEMP)# c# f3 d9 A& I2 K! L+ K) p. Y; I$ z
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)- V% C" Q. n, f9 y3 h* |
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
3 R% k: ?' B( t( J, _4 Idevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)' j; V" i5 o# j; l& `
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
& |5 f& B7 w3 b7 b# ySystems Test0 `# Z- F! Q& s! S) }" N
Integration and
& T- J+ Z( ], _0 j; Z, W& VCoordination
. l0 |) k1 Y; m+ v, V/ n/ K p4 YThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.3 L6 _8 o' q) U7 z! h$ A
System Threat
, K3 [# w3 i) s( r) L: W1 M7 u4 ~& jAssessment( Q. g6 h$ w0 d: I' n& {6 I( v
Report (STAR)7 J/ }$ A4 v" g; L' d8 B2 w7 I
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a& }* }& h' s7 ?& [
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency) R5 O/ v3 i% s- z! y
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when% H9 V# m7 i/ \( U5 g! L) p' O* k
the threat changes significantly.8 z8 Y* e% t: _: V/ ~
System-Valued
3 d' g+ ]" A: c& j7 p; B$ uAsset9 E+ y. V! x( C: m/ X
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to: M) _" h' \9 }$ e
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.
+ V& t4 Q- l6 w' g7 j) [, y5 q: {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
* G7 d. `3 N6 r0 X" P; s288
6 O. c/ d7 @" y1 ^ E) \, kT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
/ M, q. g3 \1 e* a0 p2 c- `T&E Test and Evaluation.6 h% z. r4 d) Q0 p6 K; t& Q
T&T Transportation and Transportability.
; ?0 I3 i* s; F% IT-MACH Trusted MACH.% @: U! ~+ a2 \" Z% l
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.( f9 X# G, k* `* N% M
T/R Transmit/Receive.
1 g j( |( i8 [- `5 k5 ST/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
Z ^1 {9 m% T) ~* m9 d! a- t9 M4 wT8 n3 E) y5 q& J$ f, p
2
" E2 }' Y# y r4 p( BTechnology Transfer.# d6 ^7 x4 n! P& @/ P
T
, ^2 `( N7 E! g8 `: `; J$ F2/ l: @8 I- l" F8 g1 m2 F% d! Y
E Technical Training Equipment.# R* s6 ^3 P) k6 x0 z3 `7 V
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
- L* e1 \9 e7 D1 E$ T" STAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
0 ~1 v( l Y! m( ~, t* GTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.! O; t. h. }/ l0 r
TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
, ?5 Q! d- y) t: d) t! d- x; gTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.6 f+ @, S& p2 s$ @- a
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.* \! O) e8 `/ X3 r- `
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).4 I: d3 ]$ ~, C) N
TACAIR Tactical Air.3 k0 f3 j9 G2 l# e( {' m. o7 T
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
* E" I- e4 E) Y2 P, ~TACC Tactical Air Command Center.
7 M5 [& F1 q4 g JTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term)., J# H8 D/ }1 T8 D
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
, F/ r- x6 @$ ]8 t. l k3 M" qTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
( V9 |7 }! ]6 F! q, w! dTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
: _+ @( `9 N0 H6 LTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
: y: N8 ~8 |) G7 y# }0 ^- l; oTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|