航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. / Q& j( r" [1 j) wSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). 4 L6 W+ r. J0 K: d" f(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. 2 c+ s2 }5 H+ T7 TSTOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 7 A3 A6 C: v# v" L0 WHandling, and Transportation % H2 {& X' C, T- Y/ ^6 y, {7 G' B: dEnvironments 5 F" X6 Y" I0 T J2 DThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 1 n) z7 s5 c; S, c+ A4 o9 A4 Tenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable $ y6 L- S# y k- |/ d4 U4 _! catmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed ( E$ Y, K$ Y9 V% {during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. 2 y" a+ k; A. |STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. " a- r8 O. @% i( QSTRATCOM Strategic Command. 7 g0 s: b- \0 C' G9 P* ]7 W+ C7 R# A( KStrategic Defense 7 C) Q" S: G" @6 C5 \/ yAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to q! Z) @# N# Q: Y9 U3 g! B9 q+ j7 U0 k; d) ]nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic , V! u0 |( {& m3 xDefense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic 2 D( w. O! ~% D) XDefense System (SDS) / k# W+ G1 `! l6 l% d; fA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 0 J' J% J' m! B8 K* M0 kStrategic Level of War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ' ^( W' b6 Q9 O2 ^, Qalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ' }0 G% Q2 U2 x. d6 t$ `; aaccomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces 2 h; T2 p6 ?' l& D P- V8 r: l(SOF) ^6 m6 N- |7 i8 N# m- \Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific ( l# n2 z/ o0 qCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. " {3 P1 Y, ?; n* m6 R4 M! ]Strategic % r* ?- g% b m8 b4 sReserve ! h, G( k0 z1 B5 Y- x* IThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply $ |7 Z6 b- f$ ?, [0 [; G& kdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. & M, J* H. ^3 u9 u3 n7 L8 JStrategic * l+ F, i U. c2 u1 jWarning + U) u# Y' x5 j+ W! _& YA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. 2 d* o/ y3 R# l7 tStrategic ; ]% @$ o. T% A$ ` SWarning Lead Time 3 K9 B$ y, w3 K0 O9 n" QThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. ) D3 D5 ]* Q2 ~5 \Strategic Warning Post- 6 j& [3 g+ M7 z) B6 Q# E* aDecision Time |( I' L9 d, j0 \4 j; b4 }/ SThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of - I4 Z5 u+ y% Rgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 7 K( a) I: r; J0 m4 nwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic ( X. Z" F$ `; J2 Fwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the ' B5 k6 |7 h! n/ J* Xnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. 6 p; I/ i6 Z3 V2 C! W$ J; RStrategic Warning Pre- # w, n+ }+ w% }* `% h' d0 d6 GDecision Time ! m$ O, K* P/ X, S; [That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a / _' c, o- o$ c3 Gdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course $ U# s1 N4 ~+ J- S' Cof action to be executed. 5 z) E+ W# J! P" S/ z6 WSTREAD Standard TRE Display. $ m! {. I, j1 w+ `/ ]- cSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured . N( M* G5 r+ F eAttack - R7 e& H* o6 M2 a7 q5 HAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured 4 E- k _' i# r: F. zDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules # o) Z# {4 R% P6 A9 F* Gbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program . c! T+ X5 j7 I* xA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one 7 ]" ?5 j" y/ k6 F9 r2 Jentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more ! B. @2 s& d7 Y; D: c- w+ oinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or + U" s- N& {) F4 f: Y6 l7 K! q5 Qsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 1 `0 w, T, @4 s+ l- \instructions. 0 S( G: p% s! d& S: c$ GSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. ; i5 h" t1 n3 k' C+ o6 H3 u4 USTSC Software Technology Support Center. . Q: j. b. G1 }; q1 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 0 T, I- r1 l6 y) _- N& _STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 7 |7 r: T% a+ U* ]+ j D, V* w' D- CSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. 6 L. M0 C q) v- bSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. 8 H" T6 {. C3 j$ T- C) uSubject Security 7 b o4 d4 }2 U6 c% T( ^ I FLevel / P8 N: e- T1 ?+ ^8 { {/ YA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 3 e; a J% {9 q1 N: j/ hhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be ; c% _5 d1 y, n v& ~. z3 ?# S' }$ ~dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) - O7 m/ ^& I% i2 SA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. P7 A. |4 e: M" Z+ c: K2 vSubtractive ' d- N; o w4 ^4 y y5 Y; TDefense 6 ^4 C T* `) @2 v7 ^5 H1 s: D* XFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Command ' ?3 z( q z9 E# h1 `6 \: m7 |The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. + L) Z7 `: C5 V. G) `SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. 3 p1 g! I1 ^7 SSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). # P0 M+ H1 {" s( Y3 VSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 9 A* Y$ @6 Q. p# ?7 m8 TSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in ; H( m* {$ E' Q3 ~a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, , K. R# @! x' ^' o% vthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super + z4 [7 _( v! ~% ?) {radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as , m/ W! W5 c. J: g, G( @* Q( i& {0 Psuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 & T/ |8 F* |5 E2 ?' KSuperradiant 5 n. U4 M& W& r" S0 @/ n% b3 cLaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 1 \$ Z) C! `" W, Irequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional & v' k" v9 h6 J1 ~: E" olasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory 9 [; }# P! R) R) p& a9 PPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental , |! x+ T# P+ K! Y% @6 gAppropriation 7 g1 {' a" O" W. U6 Q( bAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. 2 j* ^4 N* E; R" G% \Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the # k3 `2 q: @+ O* s( D+ ^mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 9 Q1 t7 s0 h# ?( ymaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 6 o; @% d; v4 c+ Gequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 5 [# q5 {, n: gprotection equipment). # V& F- A* ]$ m! o4 ASupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, % ?8 H- S6 g. ^6 q w, Nadministrative support, and the like. 5 i. b4 X" O$ v4 E3 a3 F; q4 v' c9 B7 TSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for ) M# l5 r6 a7 A' P$ V0 |example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. ) ?7 D3 y; k" RSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. % n4 M1 n0 O7 y+ m% m* U9 VSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 7 t- f( `3 i9 iproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 0 U8 F" \# k. ]% {6 b u1 O7 band meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for 4 K2 u! H& d+ r, v+ p4 ~coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response 0 I ~; _3 \, y" V( y- ?9 M7 goptions and current surveillance system availability. 6 Z+ A6 k0 V. B" L8 q, s. h' SSurveillance, Satellite and 3 u, z/ ]+ I* B+ hMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites : ?& Q; V# B: M* a+ ^and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. . a, i: P$ F+ C. R9 DSurveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; v& K/ t( ^, d- ~283 . f- k! v- R1 |) T* f8 aSurvivability 9 \% Y9 L: z7 N) U J& OOperating Modes 2 f* a( Y8 [* p- g" B, ~: r6 ~The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes ! d: h! c" C0 [1 Z$ wthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) $ l; `/ `, A7 T( ]% AThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. ; w+ G7 L% n* l0 u0 f! `SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. K8 r1 u! _+ ISV Space Vehicle. ' R9 M4 ~! A0 \ xSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 9 X/ M) _) K8 v/ A! @" T' hSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. % c3 \5 ~! Z( J+ I8 v7 f) ISWC Strike Warfare Commander. ( Q" J5 k/ h, |* i. d7 nSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating $ A5 v4 M2 ]% |( Qband of frequencies. 0 z7 V& J+ U4 b! W2 NSWG Scenario Working Group. ( _$ a/ N8 K2 B/ O) f% uSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 8 b+ E1 s" ?; s2 |" T. ^. QSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. # x: T1 j K A% ]+ Q5 {; vSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 2 U: \; Y8 ?9 ~& q2 D* I7 X+ p" p7 |0 QSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. 8 o$ P- r9 a' `2 H: R0 ~Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. & ~7 q3 L4 a" V6 { |% x4 |1 ^Synthetic 1 F, h& _) Z7 R S/ h6 DAperture Radar ) U8 k& K$ A, d/ U# P" G(SAR) & }7 K& p \5 x& r: }. KA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ( J5 m5 v, l3 L' u" }theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 4 v$ b4 w6 j: x1 u" l* ntransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 5 ~8 X; a. B4 Y% ?/ [emitted by the radar transmitter. 4 _5 ]1 u- d2 q* ]& F |+ GSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. 4 U( t8 Q6 l( L) u* f3 LSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 2 S! o' A9 d+ Z/ b7 q; x: s8 Q- ?284 5 u4 ~/ H5 x6 o+ a6 HSYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, / v; H4 L& O Q+ E/ e* Zdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. 5 T# k) o5 P3 F3 LSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. ( n$ P) h5 C+ L" s- A1 u( l/ N" j: |System 6 J4 ?1 P2 n2 E: l8 I4 ?$ Y, GArchitecture 4 W+ |, F& z% W. z: qSystem 1 q/ [; N9 U% {6 s7 t0 Q3 XCapability ' Z, ]% Z. ]$ Z9 A6 [7 K) U& Y0 SSpecification (SCS) . E0 u# f; V7 x& h( R$ ^ Q7 K* AThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system ( v, h3 _/ ]$ ?3 F3 q/ parchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional ( w. [, q" S. `6 Zspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among % [0 J4 t) |; E; E; u2 M1 tthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) ( X7 E/ [* n$ }8 \* Q$ k2 R9 w8 z' w& IA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide ; A4 w* V/ W/ wsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of % Q( |3 j- P9 P& j4 B Z! tequipment in CMAFB. System Concept / X8 w9 \( \# J3 TPaper (SCP) ?( r7 H1 ^5 y: W: e8 g" J7 x4 N/ lOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the - D1 V6 H! I4 V2 O* odemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System - o& ~# h5 \1 x9 ?& G$ c# dConfiguration " v7 N! n' Z2 S& o0 j1 `8 z5 iControl Board (SCCB) / f+ D A- x1 J0 D2 j: L1 W, G* [The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and $ j# F. M; O+ _7 g* F9 _% wcomputer systems. 1 R* A" M3 ]0 t) S rSystem-Critical Function A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 6 L/ J4 T! d% T1 [. ^2 lmission. System Definition 7 l" H( u ^* ?7 p. IReview (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 4 W) C8 Q# L9 j. }- r5 vfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 4 i9 k1 U1 @& E$ Wimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 7 H5 i6 b* @4 {$ u5 _- hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + k1 f' q. C1 N1 x5 {" S285 . g( [ U6 y7 K0 J2 Q1 ^System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 7 o9 J3 b! F6 y' q* W% [specified system requirements. ' B* G" r+ s/ s" }3 \(2) The result of the system design process. / ~7 F7 e9 j: k. ~System Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and & B. U% E+ v3 \# z( Q9 Echaracteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be / u8 a% e9 I5 Y8 B$ h) Boperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ! D3 ]' M7 \3 e0 K3 J, ASystem Design Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with % C1 M m. V* K9 s. u9 {% ?9 ethe allocated technical requirements. ! b" k! b' t5 C$ L* U$ z! M# ^System S5 c5 h0 U; w) m; ^/ B5 c1 U# MEffectiveness $ w- A) l# U8 e! [& t6 D" ~The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set % `1 P8 V+ T9 p+ V7 P* T& @of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS % e, L, {2 Z& d3 k- n Dcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS W! `+ ]/ {! v5 K9 R- _, GDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 7 u+ f" l, O4 K+ v3 U: Iassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 4 c! `/ I& ]' M+ W' }) Osignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 7 f$ y/ X. }8 z% Eachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 8 W# j/ X$ r" q; t9 T/ z/ i% Xthose challenges. 3 m/ ]" x! a _System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. e7 h e0 W5 Q4 \System Generated Electromagnetic ( Z c- r/ n% d0 OPulse (SGEMP) & h, H6 r" N, r: C8 `# `Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local 6 ]3 `) c# L. s7 lfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System ! {( h/ g* q5 D; C; QIntegration Test + H0 F; u# E, k; I2 ?" K6 R$ HA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 5 F* S# n3 ~, ^1 K0 H8 c* isensors, and weapon hardware. 5 ] ^( D/ s6 K' t5 nSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 0 G! i# g' c6 C0 p' Gand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or * ~3 B% z3 _$ E4 Y& M/ J0 A1 D+ ~8 gequipment systems. System Operational ( R+ q+ T4 w3 K/ mConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 0 {7 G$ H: r5 C+ }; B- GSystem Operation and , H% N3 @3 \5 aIntegration 3 \8 l* t8 y' CFunctions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 8 S& B. z' I) P r) I+ ? V, Mthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 2 g" W7 C! X: ?3 X6 QBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 4 @4 o( ]! B+ s8 {9 g& a6 _posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 b7 j8 t" F/ ~286 System Program ) X/ Z+ Q3 e; \ d9 `/ kOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System ( V. L- F- p! S1 D" |/ X G. H' MReadiness 4 {# k' K& T5 x( m6 V7 M. ^System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority - Y( n8 b! `- E3 ~# N7 b* ~along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 9 q5 V: u: T1 P6 }; }includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational ( o4 ], J+ Z' U5 b8 ostate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the ( j ^) j! c, [9 Kcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions " N" w& g4 J, B- p" @0 R8 q( E9 nnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 3 g1 S! t0 r0 Q8 v5 qand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, - m, G/ b' L A. D) k. \# }0 qhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness Objective 0 K5 w) }! h; [4 t" V. ]A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a # ^: K5 Q8 u" o( kspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 9 o: ^3 ]1 j c; t' Lmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support 7 m7 C6 k/ B7 usystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of & v: [5 u/ M' Z; q* {4 e, fsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission / L4 }% P8 k: Zcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. & p, @ h( f8 _% eSystem : Y: O! [& ?1 H/ e0 v! WRequirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System : t" O5 c: [0 L: u( iConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 8 B t" m! w- d- s" x9 Nspecific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements / D8 m( i/ T" a; ] N- NReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the ( a% G! [0 b+ G& Vdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. , f+ \ ~6 O3 q6 s FSystem Security Engineering 2 S6 p! K- L4 g S1 o% k(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 8 W& d5 N% \8 r! N; I, K( \- hprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks : a0 M% c6 A w+ h# o; Fassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related 2 J( S2 o# |3 l6 xscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security 2 Z. q! _7 p8 b$ k! l3 SEngineering : ?: w" j6 N3 q0 n, L- |Management Program & Z; J. t) F Z2 {. h7 |9 v(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical % F c. u3 b7 b# F3 { V% Lachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 5 r/ h/ O+ g, Q3 n( bdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes 3 s6 A7 k$ R8 n4 p2 q3 }1 Kits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 2 L+ Z. ]2 u8 ^7 _System Security ( L, |- O- C) s5 r/ C9 G1 DManagement $ _5 N3 P8 M. d& a% c/ OPlan (SSMP) - |$ J5 N+ q: g2 XA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, . D2 X/ v8 k2 b p h5 [methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 1 W2 j5 M( c' Z$ z, v6 v) i3 s/ P3 Vother program engineering, design and management activities, and related ! d! x8 D) ]/ {& u0 [( o9 Q- Rsystems. : ~4 ]$ e# \0 d6 T5 D4 ASystems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle 3 c5 b: B! }! v, D) `" u' Abalanced set of system product and process solutions. & o1 z5 [) f8 t6 P/ k4 H- q& {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems Engineering 7 `: M4 y; H- fManagement 2 u. y' X8 A5 s! M0 N g+ J5 q6 N4 sPlan (SEMP) ) I2 t( d7 `) O' k& n0 m4 W' pThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) + ?$ N. d6 V' [8 p7 h5 c$ W# oIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures & P2 l; B# S F* g( G0 adevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) , m% w. ^$ n* }4 ?7 oKey engineering milestones and schedules. ! S3 f" P& v2 J2 nSystems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. ) _* d9 |7 p- y# V1 U( H( mSystem Threat 2 z; f% Z, w2 h u! J$ C2 ^Assessment Report (STAR) , h+ X; Y7 p: M5 \Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 7 y' H9 D9 |( n; ~) \* L' j$ KService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency K: D; z2 s# F4 @0 y3 a2 k, [and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued 6 J( C# v6 o+ yAsset ) m# e1 d% E3 S% YA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to / |" ]! f& D7 Z7 `the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 3 w& ^8 M" n( T$ q5 s% i, ?8 g5 ]288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. + `, }) E% d3 S4 @' q/ PT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. " N- P1 _8 [/ i/ Y! O; cT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. T - S& C# T( M$ L2 _) P( ?# X/ I2 E Technical Training Equipment. ' |0 w: u6 N B) W7 A5 WTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. ) m, E2 l0 m- r9 `8 ?2 {9 J# JTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. r: s9 y# G ~: {) jTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. 4 d, o( X6 g' k$ T& ^0 jTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. : J1 I+ z- A, f/ |2 E2 y2 h7 v; oTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). , t1 ~: O V- G1 L6 `. k l, X; aTACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. $ H& r7 ^. Y3 M% `TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). ! f. Z7 F- X0 D2 uTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. % I3 V) M2 G# e3 h3 iTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. ) _% e. K6 ^4 r0 l* jTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). * }: a% Y2 s9 W; k# ?0 {1 zTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 9 a. A/ M8 h2 M5 g0 a2 s2 |* K1 E2 g$ `TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. - t& A# H5 r3 K7 W5 f7 r) `4 E4 ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) a# F( t* a6 e# Q+ u289 j3 u$ W) K1 _ {* p) STACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation & J/ j7 \& n+ X _6 MTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air ' v0 G9 J8 [+ G2 k* wpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air ! | }' |2 K* o# \" _Operation ; I) ?3 B$ |" e1 b SAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 7 t3 ~% L6 d( {8 J: H& cground or naval forces. ) ~7 V9 @! X- v! K# RTactical Air c; s r5 x" @5 G3 v9 BOperations & Z( `% N1 e4 [+ H: |! C/ wCenter : t: G( N9 @, z( O1 N, ?) d% ?9 y% UA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air + K; j2 w6 o( N7 y/ C6 b- Odefense operations in an assigned sector. ) J9 I; B9 J% hTactical Air Support # f6 V3 b) q; J0 n! Q" F8 pAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility ! y$ q# ~' F i n0 Z5 D) U(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) + C0 N9 G) I8 ^- @A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. 8 o' x: x( l* m, {Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 9 r) L7 o* @+ J# R. peach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. / d- i0 K/ {2 J- ^$ x2 E8 R, b2 AThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War . m8 G# a+ ]" b$ @1 h s {0 B k$ UThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. 6 ~' p" I, N9 F/ d3 F v pTactical Operations Area 9 a% d7 U. I' t. {6 O(TOA) $ z# e# a# g* ^& R4 n3 s$ IThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations : P& N0 P( G% z" u$ iarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. ! T, f8 v [' \5 jTactical * i# S: L! w" ?5 y1 OOperations 4 l0 r& L0 {1 J1 nCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) 7 x$ h9 m V$ h, ^(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component - Q* P" H6 t- u# Q( Celements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type ; [' n: w* q2 t1 Dand size, country under attack, and event time. + a% {) H; J/ wTactical / y/ @( v8 O4 W7 P% N, I3 z+ CWarning/Attack Assessment 5 w7 u2 O, m0 n(TW/AA) 1 t/ g6 w. @- W4 Z6 cA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack ! X- g0 Y# y: Y5 G, _) c; QAssessment. % g/ }" a# o+ \5 z; K3 L vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 * I9 u6 f! P+ K8 A4 sTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. # n' w ?- N3 i c(2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” ; d* k2 o5 ?+ `# Z# z) Y6 TTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. * C6 {0 {4 B% r+ D! S( MTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. # b/ }0 O7 ^2 U5 oTADL Tactical Data Link. : _9 J9 H1 f1 S+ z+ ]; G- rTADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 5 C8 D$ Z( e0 KTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. 7 k7 Q6 Z0 u8 _$ I% q. |- R/ c/ ITAI International Atomic Time. . ?( x, p h/ N6 x. dTAIS Technology Applications Information System. * z6 Q# b. F: ETALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. & ? I: {% I/ Z/ t. T7 V6 N: wTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 7 H+ w( Y. A( X6 DTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. % h* T5 B6 j+ H5 oTank Fragmentation % M. [% f7 a. A# P. f4 {9 l9 K. nThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 2 b& R: H9 F1 @) A6 X) X+ P2 t. z) Iresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. " M+ Q2 g) ]/ B- R(3) Target Acquisition Radar. " D* M! u r+ x# T& e1 LTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 8 G, H5 |3 r+ |0 ATarget 0 n+ I# N9 W9 Q8 y# F) ZAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target 2 \" [1 p: k( }$ C% r3 b' b! T2 Q5 _Classification / V- \$ d! Y- y4 _( J- U ~and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination 4 V+ g" ?# D& v0 HThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one ; y+ w* o# K& A( P; h6 O7 `$ [target when multiple targets are present. 2 N: m" E! w# Z2 }$ }: [Target Object Map (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and ! b" B" Z8 ] G- Tother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements 6 S9 c. M- a/ F9 tDocument (TSRD) , ?5 [6 ^% e9 G1 G0 V( [" XBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 9 n$ r5 m: U0 u/ r& j+ a- t9 n# @Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. , I4 b3 S |( q. V8 GTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) * I) G* D& y# d; Q& X2 Y$ Gengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and + \. ~5 ?) S* V/ G0 ? @required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. ; y7 F* i, T" c, ^1 y6 b3 k# dTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. # c4 A8 t' i1 a# w$ }0 i. J# MTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 5 j) p7 n' e3 zTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : n6 V; j! n; }( S+ k3 O9 p" R1 M292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. ' H; w! y, T. A# ?+ R6 uTB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 1 X* A; h' c0 h4 I5 N6 U4 f; k# E5 kTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. ( I# r | L) F$ v- OTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. ; V! R5 f1 z' j0 ?% _0 uTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. # W- b2 K+ i9 \! {TBR To Be Resolved. , Y& {7 ^3 S. P8 L) UTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. 8 ~- Q) X5 C$ m8 }* K; l7 \& X4 B(3) To Be Scheduled 5 Y* i: ], i" Y; b& O; G" o. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. 7 I. [+ U& ]& E" C$ ^TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. : ~" i9 G; d# K8 N% O. K& a: aTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD - m/ U: W! p6 ^, t" s& T' |8 {Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. ; `% I4 P I! V: [1 F6 y(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device 0 i$ b& z% d( x+ E1 M; D7 K( \TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. " G$ E. h( W/ W# }2 ATDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. " K: n: S- b: u: z |0 d% [TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. : w8 N/ m; b) j% wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 D8 z1 v) a/ s( K& J293 0 A% n+ f0 ]1 g$ ~0 pTDBM Track Data Base Manager. 2 F8 P1 X. e. c, n5 C8 [8 KTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 1 g1 C+ @' \8 A( z( P& PTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. ' T+ v( n, u2 _) }TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. - Q* U2 ~4 ?0 N# m" e3 x! ]* K: NTDI Target Data Inventory. ' {$ d/ D& F% k b* m. cTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. 1 \2 A- {$ j' o/ Q4 Z& U+ NTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. # u1 H! d1 D1 R q0 x0 ]TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. , q. R, G/ ]; j4 v(2) Test Design Package. 9 G# w5 r$ w( q6 L1 h1 t(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. $ I9 o5 d( W4 z+ w- A( i& GTDR Terminal Defense Radar. # F3 S$ i; D6 v# rTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 6 _: q2 z4 u5 {0 t! r% oTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. # ?: h- q5 c3 o+ cTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. * o7 Q0 ?0 _- U# R3 |TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. / G) y5 _& s' ^: }TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. , E/ V% y* B3 F4 ?/ s- I, U& pTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 O- f; u" S5 ?+ l294 $ N w- o. {, W, J8 f/ T+ sTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as - A) l3 Z$ J! [: G3 H9 U0 Y) s% Mmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. 6 p% C* B! D1 X3 rAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract % Z5 m% F6 H5 _5 `) e2 xadministration. Technical Data + R1 ^9 f- M) \0 u; i/ j# i+ M1 yPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition ) c4 B0 B# B. M0 w& b5 m/ Estrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines ) E) f" P5 W* X( mthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 7 n4 r' {2 z, @" V6 Wperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) ) o# l3 b+ s7 d- [7 f* ITechnical : z8 P9 s; | pObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available $ f+ J |6 ~& V/ L }; a6 h: o% S# yfor stating binding technical requirements. ' ]8 ] D2 t) ]' x+ ^# DTechnical Objectives & . L2 E; O2 M9 ?3 R! X+ l0 zGoals (TOG) 4 e: M t1 |) t' A. l- ?& fHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) 8 [ Q. G$ \+ T: c u" L7 r( `A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk 0 M, E, D3 z) @6 Q$ _$ U$ G5 Lanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 2 f& j- {7 d" w+ E# I1 f* Lmanagement. X" J( }7 q0 t, k5 o- T: Q" XTechnical 1 n5 ~& f5 {3 K2 _1 b( }! A5 s7 VPerformance Measurement (TPM) 6 {5 {' }' D' wDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status , r4 d5 k5 U: s% |beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design 8 ]2 \5 N. z) C1 v( R. }assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance . p) u, ^- T) ?( G: Vparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the ) B8 ]# K9 R' ]; Bvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures ) A M9 A5 ] J# p8 R" B9 w Edifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 6 A R0 O: N. P! H4 |element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these : B6 r2 l' o! M" \# g& G, @differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form % z3 A: w* ~( I* P7 Z2 h# ]the basis for actual design development and production. Technical ' c# s# o. ~. T$ I& U5 k: WSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or ; V+ m$ a& s4 e! Pemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. # D2 s8 o+ ?& j( H* tTechnology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. , |0 _* w6 @. d0 w; c. ~. k8 oTechnology C: d. X1 E D" qProgram Description + y' F5 X$ D) eThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ; Q' g: [2 c$ ]! s' ssupporting technology. 8 U: c8 R; Y( x( r" B9 f* wTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 Z% f. y9 W6 r8 {4 Z5 m295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, % r) Y, N: W4 e0 G) LTracking, and ) e0 H* B R+ {0 t cCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and . L6 m3 A5 u# T% m: ]status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit % d+ R# C! `7 {2 Dmission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the % P: P( b7 o, o0 L' X1 k; [automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. v {6 e, g8 t3 gTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See 3 V( `' H! F [) wCompromising Emanations.) ' m: ?- b# K6 x( D. FTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. 3 Y+ I* X1 ?! ~TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 6 [( l$ g }( T4 ]. \" yTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. , y- k3 H0 Y# R3 M- c X3 n* `TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. 6 D2 k2 r, l& D0 i1 `+ }; FTerminal 7 v8 G0 V) @ O' J8 V! OGuidance & V; L' Q8 i7 d1 w) r2 S, m7 }8 SThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. ! }- Z8 \& K. C" @( GTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase 7 R9 C8 y' N5 a+ t' I7 Dand trajectory termination. 1 A, P6 I8 C. t- B6 aTerminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. * i: v. v' f. h+ Y$ |: WTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. . T2 ]4 `- i+ c+ HTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. ; z/ L, S' W5 y- R& m4 |5 @6 iTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. 9 k5 r l4 i$ _5 |% x6 XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system , T+ o8 R2 j( \# U, T, ]3 Dhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 2 `3 n) U1 ?' p D. k6 Pconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all $ j; S8 z1 i, ~- E4 U3 b$ koperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 9 P1 a \# Q4 ~; aanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three " j. A6 O# N8 ]8 C9 h. x1 y& x, }types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted - U+ z* n+ a0 |# bto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical & {& f s* n1 c8 f0 Aperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, + {" q% G9 i. v1 Oand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel ; n' Y8 z5 y, g# [& ~# S9 crequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that ) ^- D! K9 _& _- }9 h5 O( }. ~those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before ) o( Q! d( o1 k# S e$ {8 a6 M% T; ythe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of I* l6 }+ O& ?- ? Roperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 7 |+ X& T$ M; j1 l& q- WFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ( L7 `' G. O/ O& A- V) }- I4 i, kEvaluation Master Plan w @7 U" _0 Y3 v9 E, G(TEMP) : l% J8 y- q& A8 B z1 K LAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate Y# ^" j0 c4 V$ e2 Cobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 0 i" G1 n* b: _. Sto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. 1 r- q% H1 z s$ u% q+ N: Y: M- i+ ETest and . M7 R8 L/ b1 F$ W% I/ a& Y2 mEvaluation Working Group 6 l. o$ ^. O& A: ?$ e/ T9 q! G3 W! G(TEWG) 5 | v- G( ^' N$ |/ Z8 z: jThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and % M* B% U) v# [% \related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. & s6 A# ]% i2 P( j0 aTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration ( |- W4 {" p: L+ k3 x" a, AWorking Group 3 c. x/ ~- j# S2 x) _! N(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. ' D. |) m* D+ x5 ~) D9 O, {Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, " L1 L' |" {, A R) [test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 6 s, B& m; S6 W6 @2 A) M* K5 U297 + @% t+ ?1 A. v j- ]' L* A4 X' XTest Target Vehicle (TTV) ) w* l. h1 U( W9 m) lSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for " ~8 }$ V$ U* h6 S( R4 A7 TSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 6 L6 w0 P5 t+ @: D7 e7 NTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). ( ]- @" p- D8 L7 r3 s; ^1 aTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. / P+ j8 m: N3 l3 b7 C$ J& k9 p; K/ u. rTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. 1 A' ^9 u$ w" I" ]TFR Terrain Following Radar. 3 `# i6 _! B0 [( S- A! ?+ LTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). / f+ O/ `( s$ |, v4 VTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). + k/ @7 C9 L* C0 RTGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. % o4 O( X1 r* o. P' {* ITHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. ' V" \( n5 ?$ |5 ?4 u2 nTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 2 I3 h# O o( G/ P" E* e; b1 Q+ ocommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. + T4 _7 m8 l0 n! J0 BTheater Ballistic Missile Defense ' D2 I% x0 N6 B; R/ |(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)