航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. * W: \8 q! X3 |. P+ uSTM Significant Technical Milestone. & y& W6 S/ Q! K, KSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. # `5 n" O! ^; j: p4 {) ZSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 4 K v; E3 a( P& m. r WStorage, Handling, and ! F1 w2 O1 j$ f1 u' M% |Transportation Environments % i1 h& S& d+ X* k& D/ P8 fThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient ! \: `- I: W" D4 Penvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ' g, l9 ~9 ?) o, G! ]atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. * b6 r. T7 D. j8 GStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target ! ?3 ~5 X) S# c W9 H* n& `% v/ h% W" D% MSet. 4 Y. Z, P, r( B3 LStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s ! k7 L. y! D/ k4 q; ^, MApache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense 2 s% A6 [" h { qAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat , e* h: l, S ?6 i( w3 K. vballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to * w, A( p5 l; B* m* j- {: }nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense Emergency 3 \ J8 I, }1 F7 yDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. % e8 \$ I: E8 P& OStrategic & v7 l' E% L4 W4 |: C) ^Defense System (SDS) : I3 o+ k8 C7 J8 W$ E$ \A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving 8 v* J' T3 N5 b- |# p7 J) @! Jballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ) E4 ^7 x3 ^% ~+ V1 Baccomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces 6 V/ D% c" m" F- G+ {(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 1 e6 A6 [& c8 Z) W, h1 rOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. / ]' z0 G3 ~; y1 l% M3 H* KStrategic Reserve 1 k# a- d7 w. Z P3 aThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 1 ^1 s1 |: z4 F2 m0 d5 a0 Gstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply 5 r: h6 Z$ }, ldistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. ) p Q* t) T5 e" O4 k" }# X3 z, rStrategic 7 X( }( O, Z2 JWarning 9 g0 T0 Y4 L2 C2 o/ ?( wA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time 8 \0 h v4 K) w5 C5 gThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ' L8 d2 w L* `) R5 fhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic # r' t, w! C! s$ \; d: }$ P$ j9 A: z, ]Warning Post- Decision Time % |0 S, `+ h9 x% qThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of * W3 r7 N. U: ygovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 1 Q; b/ n& Q( F1 kthe pre-decision period. . O( i/ C+ }+ W! Z% S$ s. zStrategic Warning Pre- - J: n8 p" j/ q% T: |Decision Time 9 |$ X$ h- q) a9 _That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time + Y* ^1 \5 R+ V! |# P8 havailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course * P. ~) O9 s. |, ]9 Yof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured 7 _- S' e- P8 C& ^Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. . X+ c( u- T% Y2 a2 S0 V5 m/ t2 FStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data $ b: P) t K; v$ w+ c3 B) ]flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 3 y) q0 d$ _$ @% F( \$ SProgram ) l( p/ O d- D1 f0 \A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 2 X' n" w' b/ R% Fsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 8 X8 I) |. {2 Q$ q5 U281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 9 g2 X5 _0 T, ?* h5 [5 NSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. . Y) G: e, T$ m; S; A4 X/ wSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. 4 a5 N- V$ ^+ j) uSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. & b& r! G. B8 f P6 @/ Q* cSubject Security Level # P3 A7 v9 R/ V' v; }: M7 b: s( J' SA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be h3 A3 s7 e. u7 G7 ^dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. - f9 |8 ~8 j. ^- B5 X& Z) W) lSubmarine- 1 m: Y6 q) c" U) j4 T0 f9 b% d# JLaunched Ballistic Missile 5 Q% u9 P0 b$ c2 [1 N! {' O: m(SLBM) ) t# G# N$ [( tA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ' a3 x# b0 |2 x7 omiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. * b5 |+ A5 @0 l& ?& i7 aSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function / R' Q/ V% [: r! b# t$ Z6 Xwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. / T) `! h4 F9 g5 GSubtractive 6 I6 u) F8 w, R, W7 wDefense ; f7 b- T5 Z! ^6 ]First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of ( Q6 {& ?- V; ^Command " J" X5 h- @ j1 @4 J# ~ @The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. 8 B$ _1 N( P) T$ @- a( ASUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). : w2 z! N7 W8 WSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two + q9 F8 o; ~5 E) y) A. y' |- Palternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as ; O: G$ C$ J1 u% |; A6 lsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 3 l8 m1 S1 K d$ K& {4 H/ IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S / C2 ~8 p; c+ t+ `0 ]282 Superradiant " m9 x! s( h8 oLaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not " O& c3 V* R1 ~* ]! B9 krequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional ' a6 `7 S( s4 G+ P( \, blasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from ! a5 Y& R, h/ f. A& d1 B$ w( Dsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 0 @. Z- T$ |, k& WSupervisory Programs ( t9 z) [/ S5 v5 ]Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental ; `! X$ `2 f" mAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support " M8 h; Y. ]0 ~" ~' f4 P( zEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ( K4 ]# F) l7 d. x9 d! C6 Rmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) , Y' p5 w+ ?7 v: M9 P) kequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly : h$ A' B! [. Ftools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). . q0 x; z l5 o \Support : H/ r/ x- s$ s" }! w/ zPersonnel + m* S+ M* F, n9 I# |Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly % J, J) b4 }" e9 Q- {3 ~associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 3 F; V) D: \" W% m, E' dadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 0 e+ l G2 A3 c wSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. - ?2 M0 b! C$ q8 |3 |: iSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items / z5 t- C- M. L, Tdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 3 S1 H N2 t) Qmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. , T+ G. J9 q, ~8 X7 w uSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric 8 G2 ? r7 b* {) u3 {, Ysensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance ; B2 w2 C6 ~% }8 [Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response 7 b+ U3 i- \$ k# {+ L: boptions and current surveillance system availability. 6 J1 z9 m3 X, S+ {5 NSurveillance, M3 h+ H, ]) Q, _& ?3 Y7 ZSatellite and Missile 3 P* S& q# G1 F# G9 `The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites & |; S9 R- t7 [4 r, [and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System ) n# W' I% N0 @' n0 N9 OConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated , b5 }# [" n- s$ H- k' ]+ \in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; M# T! g9 |5 ]$ A8 D% Z283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes # c# B' |/ R+ U/ x$ \that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring 6 c) e* ^+ N/ U% m3 h8 jCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. , @" I& u1 U* `Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. ' }5 f- ?! _0 u8 `" nSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. % D. k7 [- w* t. d6 G6 c FSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 9 X' ?/ J8 D7 Z9 o6 M fSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating * i3 b! K1 F" D2 k0 fband of frequencies. * E/ W9 b* |* @+ s: [+ MSWG Scenario Working Group. - {8 V) M% t5 G5 ]4 zSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. " H, S5 T7 y/ o7 Y! R, H) d4 VSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. # L0 w' d# h9 Q. d9 F ~SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Q y1 X: Z8 @" zSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. 2 G. y: C0 {: X# J6 [2 u7 L$ H. ESynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 3 k0 I+ D4 f: C9 j Deach module description has associated implementations. 4 Y5 l* n2 f( U' {/ X4 u6 D z7 q" dSynthetic Aperture Radar . k) e& y' a' \- m(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points % B- e) S {: A8 S( w2 N) Talong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's ; @- j! w" h! Z) Y2 l. U9 B/ Psignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. E2 F. I9 ~6 f" I+ M* y4 ~SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. + h! H9 y, u( S T+ M+ LSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 4 r6 f5 r x2 Q/ v- AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 7 y4 h7 h4 ~- K, Y, @7 W5 ?SYSCOM Systems Command. ; A2 w/ k6 T t) {System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, & n* b% n& d+ |) M, a/ L9 o6 vdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. + a& G9 S7 v: i8 w6 }( H* T1 T(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 1 O8 c& H/ p# r* G# `functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. * h4 c& P( K! x" {9 u# [2 KSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions # T6 H7 U, ~$ _9 N& p, ], ~implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. ! }0 _ Y9 p3 h# g/ S- Q9 i- S9 WSystem Architecture System Capability 6 Q; T, }% X, Q7 T: zSpecification (SCS) ) M( T! m3 ?& Q% v: [2 ?4 E0 Y3 iThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the % D& h% A( D* X. R; n7 M6 v# belements of missile defense systems. 8 O/ s% s4 F( i O- q. y# ?The government document that translates capabilities into functional 9 C3 a) e2 i1 G& |! }) a, wspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. & h' q& q! z& p/ Y+ i' S* I+ y* [System Center * `" m/ I3 o/ c* c1 F6 x4 o(SC) " S% Z1 s& L8 S1 j4 c, B& A0 ~A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ! K2 j/ j$ h6 X; c; z d! E8 u4 Z" Xequipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) / Y. Z- g# Z7 nOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 5 N8 k) }1 {9 T8 c$ Hconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition # i0 K# a9 e* Z/ G6 Dstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 3 i& J: _- T! B* r$ @demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other " q- x) W6 O ` `- Sconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System . [, _0 T G" I" C( p9 SConfiguration Control Board 0 |9 i A0 B+ f6 n/ U8 ~# U1 a7 }+ v(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 9 F9 P! r* A7 I6 OSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and G6 h& W; U K+ f) E. n# r" Xcomputer systems. % S# J8 V* K8 w# j* k3 z- V TSystem-Critical Function 4 [& o* a# v2 m$ |- e% l4 m6 [A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. System Definition + o3 b* P4 A$ S0 k/ Z- R& GReview (SDR) 4 q- y8 o( @+ l. d9 |9 @The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and ' n, J- s9 ~5 ]funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. b9 _, W+ V7 T P; `System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 / p& P/ E1 Y+ T2 v8 y$ u) ESystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 0 U6 `. |' V* e4 vcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept 3 h& v5 Q/ E3 R" b! vAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 8 s. ]6 b% x4 Z' Ucharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be " f0 s4 A' Y6 o3 c( G3 ?/ Zoperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ; T. t7 l" F* ?# V/ m5 lSystem Design 1 S! T v! U! J1 ` z2 a: ?Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with 0 P+ S7 j9 j( v0 u* D X( Y3 b, {the allocated technical requirements. System 6 [6 {+ f1 o7 L A ZEffectiveness ' ~) }/ Z' i: l$ BThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 2 e( E% K9 ]0 Z pof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. : W5 L2 i! D% N) |1 D* JSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ' J5 d) l' Z* O+ Hcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 2 }/ U; T) W: z% g* ?assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome ) r5 W$ r# F' x% [$ o0 qthose challenges. & g D, S5 B* }0 B z3 P% C% e7 BSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 6 \! G2 c; G, Fa set of common characteristics. System Generated 7 ]" k( Y& I/ UElectromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local % z* c P; x' R: k/ ufields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the : v$ H$ ?4 k# a* {4 c# Z" m( Kprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System 3 Q y& x: c: m& }Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, - G' z* v: `. n a0 f/ B7 _- Csensors, and weapon hardware. 0 ^: `5 I7 ~/ U: s8 D* l/ d3 k; OSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual 0 u0 U0 {7 P7 {3 Amanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 4 ]( G# r. d% U4 F1 qequipment systems. 1 H+ J1 q3 m, }; [0 f+ x! x* ASystem Operational Concept * M. h+ g6 j) F2 A$ P% q1 z7 AA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 3 ]1 q4 Z- P- _5 q; D$ f. J0 OSystem ! b1 f7 r9 B* `) v3 iOperation and Integration 9 Q0 a4 w) L$ c; z3 e4 F8 {8 S: KFunctions (SOIF) * A6 x z# { X) zThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 8 l5 }+ U9 Q; h: S5 z% p- j! cbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command 1 _! v O+ ^! p6 P4 Z9 j1 Aand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to ! I$ x3 a& c& Q: l7 t( }% `the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic , V+ Y. b; q% e9 XBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. $ N' D, n% z; m( rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 p @, f. D0 ~% d0 ?6 Y286 * h/ s; j T9 G# L3 V: cSystem Program 6 q, V7 T1 G' K4 vOffice (SPO) - d' K" e+ g: L9 Y" l( M, {The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, # W3 m. W0 A. W# j* Kgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System % f) q2 y6 J( I) _8 [Readiness 3 c: B, |) n( r* Y9 R( a& rSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational " H: c0 @* r' @( j- h( Ustate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the , b7 p1 c N& ~ M7 v# W$ k9 qverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the / b6 N; A; Y: ~* lcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under 4 _* ?& D" c# ]( Brealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results ) I; @: \9 O# _4 G9 z1 J) Y0 G* T3 zstatus reporting. System / ?# d' x5 G' Z" Y8 B# @0 r8 jReadiness Objective N7 @3 ~* |1 D- c; YA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a $ G6 l! V3 g, ~! @' Jspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support 8 }/ V. a) X9 g4 A6 ^# S; x1 Lsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 0 C( G' K( [, q% LSystem Requirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 1 t( m+ F+ N" Y4 N* G+ F8 V1 C l2 m, Pspecific system functional and performance requirements. 5 f: m, n5 ^) N6 b6 bSystem Requirements 3 }( |" g: x2 c3 k, T7 F+ R$ J" pReview (SRR) 7 |: o# A7 @2 p% T _$ P+ D% j, HConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. 0 I7 k3 }! A5 A( V/ \Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. / C% W2 V1 i1 U6 {8 ?7 hSystem Security " v4 o) n! a( Y$ Y& t( P- b- ?Engineering 3 i3 f2 e+ h) S7 R(SSE) # ~7 p4 g3 m$ d. H% Y9 }. ? F6 u6 H# EAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering / w" x8 V$ `! N. gprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related 6 l0 Z# G7 Z. d& z' \scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. ' W* [, i( ~) F, ]System Security % }2 r. f1 w# h; ~1 Z5 OEngineering 2 Z7 z8 \+ p9 V( P( I( {+ iManagement 2 I- m" W6 m! LProgram (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical + F4 ~/ `7 e6 F" j0 y6 Sachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE & I1 P7 Y2 ?& N% |: ~program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the . I( ]7 k5 ^$ O( a+ I8 }( y) {defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes 3 A! ]/ f3 w- |8 Xits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security 3 v) ~+ O$ z0 T& j V% n, |Management $ @, i5 R& y9 u% {Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to , K X/ W$ O) O. k4 G+ Rmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 2 g2 H0 T& O1 d. c2 ^other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 8 [7 Q& f# f! esystems. Systems Engineering + d# w; q0 ]1 [. EAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle ! Q; [; E q# n obalanced set of system product and process solutions. , ?1 \) o5 a8 H2 b$ ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S # ~% q/ F% G8 [6 ^$ Y* f* O287 Systems Engineering 6 c+ O' ^' A E& J& H3 b* K# e# v9 ZManagement 4 ~2 X9 O3 K1 H, r' NPlan (SEMP) 4 P) x9 f1 y% T( f4 FThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures . G$ K9 O* j! |7 E5 udevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. $ e. c& u) \2 {7 v& ~Systems Test % m/ X0 H7 u& U; q" }, |6 MIntegration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment 2 c; y. m2 U3 F6 F0 ~1 |Report (STAR) . g4 N3 w$ r* O5 BRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency : g4 V* W+ j$ n" w" W4 Uand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 9 s4 J* X: f' _4 b0 S% W' Nthe threat changes significantly. System-Valued W" X2 K" [7 W" Y# Z& @% F4 UAsset : B& @' X: [% V, o3 g$ f$ eA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. 5 J( r: J& P9 U- {* x6 U! PT&E Test and Evaluation. ~8 s; p, c: d( Y4 \% {T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. # `) c3 b0 k% e0 aT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 1 y: Y* v, |$ b; A* K5 @5 H) @T & l. R2 J, V! {0 E4 W! C2 Technology Transfer. T , v" Z8 W7 h, t. e2 x _7 _2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. 2 y6 K/ {2 |( jTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. f/ ]0 H9 s% i; Q0 h, Z% M R: FTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). " j p( H6 ~9 d+ P; z$ `TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. . `5 Y; ~, P& f2 NTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). $ ^$ r- l( t; j5 iTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 . T, g9 Y7 \+ ^: J8 I' y- YTACSAT Tactical Satellite. * b7 I9 A' @' c, X. O6 @TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air 2 R* H- C# @1 X' ]9 ~* |+ gDoctrine * M; k+ x2 G! W/ p+ QFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air : p) M" }" t5 W0 WOperation 9 U5 K; r# E$ I$ k; P0 ]An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with , r! p7 E0 q- O8 Mground or naval forces. . V6 p* S! [( KTactical Air Operations Center 4 m* f$ a1 {7 ~1 V: R# ?" MA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control 2 r3 @1 y7 W: d) uSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly , j- P) J) y/ Hassist land or maritime operations. 9 M( i3 ^" H3 u6 i" i8 K/ \Tactical Area of # O% U j9 c3 V, u/ L4 [Responsibility ( \: Y8 `0 @7 R7 W" |% ~(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the ; C9 Y/ ?# ]3 Ocommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic 6 K0 V5 Q- x2 c Y# O7 O+ W$ XMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be " ~; W5 [& R! F' m/ U. \1 h6 temployed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future ( e/ K( _0 a0 m; i6 f3 T/ p4 Zdevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 3 G; C" r- L$ x) j3 U1 E, Tmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link 3 b; m" q% F1 m, L, V! s oA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 9 q6 A0 q, s8 \5 ]. P% |. Yeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. % Q7 Z( `2 K/ O6 c* g$ ^4 n2 f7 c- M. hThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. 7 {' v+ w4 C8 |: r" @, pTactical Level of War 3 H- Q( {4 T- ^3 I! N( \' z5 eThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. 8 h# r8 _4 S- uTactical Operations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission / N7 i6 g5 b5 Aaccomplishment. Tactical " |2 {) }+ q: ?) G0 O3 [* t; A+ NOperations Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff 5 D$ D; I5 n/ ~concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. u0 r. B% Y" ITactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an `7 a5 X+ Y; Y4 Qevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command + ?6 A" g: h5 u* {* c, Icenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. * |# H5 ]* [" @; b& ?, d5 n% {) dTactical Warning/Attack ) [, R5 m- F9 e3 t8 ?& |Assessment (TW/AA) - a/ [) A5 T/ U: F6 JA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. ! \" e# O: {2 p3 A0 YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( c( d# ~1 Y/ t1 W" w290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. 4 T* \5 Y# B4 Y! S+ F) I4 M(2) Theater Air Defense. ; I: h" @+ B6 p' |' N# u(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ; N0 W0 Z- y, D7 GTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. 0 l, a0 q( A, D8 A' O/ gTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. ( P+ p8 u+ p1 oTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” , @4 ~' t8 m* s% _TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 0 M e8 R& |& E4 j" D, kTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. + H! i/ S: ]9 O- LTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 2 E1 S. E' K4 o! I4 z" y r6 i- ?TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ) S9 ]) O T2 hTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. & p1 [! Q/ U) F# f$ H K5 JTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. n8 ]! `, Q+ J. {8 ?$ t# nTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive , j1 K ~7 }: P" E. odefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 9 [+ j+ T# |0 ~: f; P( fTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a ' g2 g8 y" k. q: ~, Y* H/ p: xresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 3 C; t! t# _) v$ s" cTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. ! H: g) K" `, @TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. ' H; \% a0 z1 k, l- U0 eTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. ! K3 }5 a# Y. j% X(3) Target Acquisition Radar. $ m; k6 t/ Z! Y. BTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. ; v7 d/ R( X5 d0 [, d) d+ E1 ATARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. % F' M" U0 M$ z5 |. E6 L+ ZTarget Classification ' X- b7 z0 h& m& i8 o0 Jand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, 8 L, x6 F6 ^( b8 g* ~& kdiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one 7 Z" @# {3 v5 @4 e/ s% w: e; {1 y ztarget when multiple targets are present. - G" Q5 q$ X- G7 ]Target Object , Z7 d/ I. c3 w: G2 z; ]Map (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and # ?9 {$ Q7 ^7 C0 y3 @/ X; A5 Yother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 1 g) ~* S2 Q% F; K3 xtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. * i5 v* ]4 P' f5 J4 l* c" K( n Z/ oTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. 1 Z$ N; H# m' r( `, b2 H' j(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System ( L. D1 h3 Z. ?* p' q( z9 JRequirements Document (TSRD) , H. w, S H. f8 `% u8 bBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. ! M/ e# m! Y {1 {+ W9 G+ UTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) % }' F3 f- n6 {5 S3 t" aengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. ( C# M0 m0 e5 yTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. 7 S) `) S4 [/ s/ V0 ]$ M' FTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 8 T/ W2 J5 l6 a$ |; M& ?% n) NTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 2 y2 K: P+ V1 {( |9 B @9 aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 ^% n: P" O, D$ d1 B; E# I292 # F8 E0 M$ m' q9 i1 Y- W9 @TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. 1 w$ e- E1 x8 S1 a, YTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. ) W( ^/ Z; ^# \8 P8 R( GTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. ' z3 Y( D4 g# R2 ^TBN To be Negotiated. , }7 h3 p! D% P! G# z. m3 fTBR To Be Resolved. 3 C+ ]0 |+ I: z# z. N# B, _$ ]TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled ) N' T% {" H, R, Y9 i$ P. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. 4 O4 {8 S* }0 z ~; ~TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. " j+ s8 a% L6 I' UTCF Tactical Combat Force. 4 m B6 t1 E# b" y0 q1 xTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. $ I9 i+ Q7 e5 K! ]0 M; A' t( u$ ?TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. # Z! N6 X3 C7 m) X' k+ Z6 i! |) P8 ATCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. ) p! x) h4 ~' T. P(3) Technical Director. $ i T4 Z; Q& T(4) Training Device : ~# f- ~9 r) c2 U7 LTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. / y. G" _/ I: F8 g" [5 {TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T # |5 [6 V2 p% ~8 W5 G6 l# ?5 g: H/ r293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. 8 L/ H$ a4 w$ T1 }+ mTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. * [, O; R# C4 m9 {(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). : Y5 j# {& w) cTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. 3 d% q! p* l, E7 J3 `TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. 5 k5 x5 x1 ]! S5 oTDI Target Data Inventory. , ~& Z8 x- U" Y# d4 |TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 3 P; }1 o, N# b7 T' a- a' uTDM Time Division Multiplexed. 6 U- l7 g1 u- _ i4 @$ [$ vTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 2 h2 u2 c- @4 R3 k; T4 o2 ITDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. ' ]* E2 W# u- t6 j8 J(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. ; W- z: b. O, T* b* [TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. / i1 s7 U' s, iTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. $ }" C" G; a3 mTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. : S" K- j! |/ g! k& w- XTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 0 K& a7 |% v0 j* |9 s& a) }+ G \TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. ( m& ~1 c/ [2 J(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. - e5 v0 [1 R5 y, ZTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical 7 ?0 B, `/ D5 Z1 B/ }TECHON Technical Control. ; D0 P% W7 d/ `: P8 Z8 r( m8 @TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 3 A& N; x# V- [( w' [5 _" aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 N- {# L4 u' ~# s294 ! g# U7 o5 [5 N8 ATechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not : O9 A0 Y p/ c$ F0 Vtechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. - @7 I& N+ z( T- Z& C! _8 G8 ~Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines ; b; V3 s' p6 H$ `0 {the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation ; f$ L4 L! b3 t# VThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 3 G# b) `0 X0 q8 Z8 ~the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical , k4 [6 M# T: _+ C; j. M$ lObjectives 7 O! V# e( w1 e8 g% {The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available & g2 y$ _* Z0 rfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical + A6 L& s) e. k! Z: r2 EObjectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 6 E7 d9 u" b" d8 Adevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. ; ^( i6 q/ q4 E( g0 \/ i1 ]; J4 a5 m5 BTechnical ) [" N/ x) y; ~: Q" a9 ?9 p- a5 nParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk , O9 M, X) Y5 M! N( A( U- u- Yanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. 0 I, H% J1 k4 W# ^# g! o; ^Technical Performance Measurement (TPM) # J* R) X& C3 g, ]' S DDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design + [3 d* Z6 r. i9 y/ U5 }assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance * K# O# W. q1 @& F+ Tparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these 3 F! d2 @ k8 B8 ?) [# |differences on system effectiveness. Technical ) h) S' \3 Q( ESpecification 2 A- B: Z+ {3 E/ oA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical , N8 l1 B1 P6 _& L7 k3 XSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 2 ]$ {' H6 s. }9 x/ ]targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent ! W. z4 n: d' P0 T& KThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 0 G# P" y6 A6 E! IAgent. Technology Program : _3 u! P& N' n# X6 |% s+ D$ k& yDescription ) Z c* A# `. jThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ' v {5 M8 r! Y' _' Msupporting technology. , M# n- C! M$ E+ t0 H/ e6 TTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ; N5 l4 b. e+ y" G: ^1 PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 6 J) [+ Q- M5 b3 y0 _ @7 Y1 {1 H: aTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. 3 E$ e: V3 L7 K7 NTelemetry, 7 X; S' I8 b1 I, c# G4 j( u0 ATracking, and , K2 F! b* Z6 X& F: x, M g: kCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and * ]. `5 E5 y3 u, [status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 7 {, J+ Y, E- i# [+ V6 Omission commands to the satellite. , i. W* h- y) LTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the ( P; i4 _. ?# o% O) aautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. . y1 i$ h4 P7 U0 D& c% X% uTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. & n8 z. _- I/ W! ^1 ~' I$ YTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. / _1 e+ ]1 a7 ^TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of " D4 h' e* A M ]9 q* @( e: F) ~compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 4 w9 @0 h% V# m/ I+ k; T"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See ' c {( i+ k# d9 j$ @1 aCompromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. * g* L9 i1 ^3 x9 T; ?+ E! Z' Y3 sTER Test and Evaluation Report ! s d1 L8 S( S: s# {# QTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. , l, g, f p9 QTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) $ @& M4 d1 o' QThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between # D! J" g; l. V8 Matmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. - F/ g% a- v. _& @- }8 @$ [* \Terminal Phase 7 Y! J* S* {3 K# ]. q8 rInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the * ?' p. L- ^% X7 P4 o0 M! t8 U, Oterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy ) t" \2 x; _ cPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) # J) W }' A d. ?Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. # {' M4 S) ~; t+ CTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. 4 }" P R0 e9 V. P$ VTES Tactical Event System. 9 Z" Q7 M2 v- C, {4 w) _' zTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary # C: z. I! c: `, j3 z2 V; Econsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all 2 v% g1 A1 S6 w% x7 I9 W: l2 C1 u woperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 6 V6 `. [& Y2 [. o+ ~0 wanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. 7 |4 V1 b- c4 P# R- D" YTest and Evaluation (T&E) , Q% p4 N' \' HProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 2 k, Q; n) x$ T. Fto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production : n8 m) Q- \2 S. @1 w/ i1 \Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted & P) X0 T4 J: b" G/ B2 @+ K1 ^to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof , x; t" H; J) t; @! u: B, amanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical " ~. g& d! _* Q' G. Sperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 0 K. a$ q- Y! o( O) }# j- _system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, ) I4 l/ q0 G4 v1 p. v1 O% _and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that - K( U# G9 Y1 M6 pthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of - j, h) G# [' [" xoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 3 T `: W; ?. M/ X" g* Qenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ' S2 s7 g& } v0 C- @Evaluation Master Plan " M d' k1 j8 D% z N/ c(TEMP) 3 f( c: e4 }: L9 x. o3 a' rAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate $ h+ @) L# ~1 m( l9 vobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development ' S' y4 X$ c; u' Aprogresses. ; w. D' O: U4 ^. _- h+ j0 W* X* UTest and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) 5 R+ O0 X) A* b+ CThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 6 X! ^# D8 Y9 l' pplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test + d2 d, x i8 U) nintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the ) a" R! w" p7 J; s' Rprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling # t; f4 g9 Y! D9 n4 _8 |1 Nproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 0 m% ~% @5 f/ [! V& \related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. 5 {3 b) _4 s/ ]& [- BTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software $ J, ]5 z l# _. b4 c; u( [$ q! l$ [and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 8 O8 D+ p, p& ~$ Q8 YTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ; A( Y2 {( R' I$ i9 j. ETest Integration Working Group (TIWG) 3 Y, D& J7 B; P! e7 RA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in % n: p) J5 N4 r% ?' sorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. 0 a( c6 F3 E. f) [2 @) bThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, ; q k1 h5 Y$ q* ^4 t( Ltest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 7 z' z6 E$ z( a" d* y, I% r9 ]: xcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. ) g: \# S+ G) X: F( cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 ) j/ A# }1 ]0 w! A# {2 [9 x/ ]Test Target 1 y" `4 H3 }2 J9 c% R3 O4 o; IVehicle (TTV) * H/ F7 h( e8 ?8 ESingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. ) O. M) f. k* F+ l) u9 |/ |$ tTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. - w3 W4 j* T8 X* |' a, V$ `TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 4 i! B4 }; y! \1 S p" T( DTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 9 O& ?# P' T: T" c% kTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. + I8 V# ]7 Q* \' oTF Task Force. ( G* B! m0 D+ I) Y! PTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. " p6 C9 |' x) ]TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 9 j- g! V( b! E9 ?" ATFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. 2 [# n, }6 E- iTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. # V# i9 H2 s, G' w. R7 l. F5 j6 ]# xTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 5 {! n. P& @* v& W9 b7 oTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). / E3 ^( G+ ?* C- C" |3 i' T) i6 T: ETG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. * u% h0 ^ s0 f1 ~* f9 pTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 0 E2 Z4 j" W- w: dTGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. + m' u" W8 X" G, r8 k& P$ XTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 3 @& r" b3 M1 M9 B8 X: W6 VMissile Defense & d6 W( A. t* o9 b3 ^(TBMD) System , W! I! P2 ]# P4 lThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)