航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. - `8 R) r7 W2 ~1 Z- h4 \2 dSTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 7 B4 g+ p/ K( N' W# o B/ DHandling, and ' |. B( I) J& q8 g* k% iTransportation 6 B" a& {5 K) D! N4 Y7 J- s" QEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient % B* U/ a3 s! `environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ' Z6 a7 y( ?) y, d5 Zatmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 2 {, Q6 l( P& q; @0 Iduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, ' u0 T- ]% d' Q' }shock and vibration environments, among others. : n: m7 n \: h$ P% D; TStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s 3 j8 u- e/ }7 h' F/ m9 `Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. - Q g* s3 J+ g3 R. A5 _STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. + S0 C1 ^4 v a5 a }STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat & O0 C. N; R4 Q# B+ C S: tballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense ! c, h( S! J6 i" V3 b/ uEmergency ( T( c. l7 F8 c6 l9 {Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. + I- b9 c6 y" v9 U$ {, kStrategic 1 `% L2 t6 j$ u# X2 |- hDefense System . l' w$ v9 l4 r$ i& m+ ~- q L* E(SDS) " q6 |; P* o5 \ a3 B; P \- K8 FA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ( s ?5 w# }" l/ L/ Yballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ( C7 g4 [( t6 M5 _ r+ l280 " c% N& F( r0 X3 {' ?- V9 lStrategic Level of 3 E" D' y) y% \( a- ?! ~/ HWar ) g$ [9 P% `6 `+ M7 p9 WThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or 0 h6 J9 P2 c# }9 A7 J: ?alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. 1 q, G& z0 I7 B0 e6 DStrategic : g3 L2 _/ K W# MOffensive Forces (SOF) # e, W& W) t o, \7 U8 qThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, . ^ \# n* l' @7 x$ W2 R$ lthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific / j2 P& P& b& A; P# d0 o OCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, # m9 r& E. f Z& _FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic 4 ?: }6 Y; K2 D( k$ W& cReserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 0 j) ~: g0 D, N2 M# [ J' Mstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply " R% N+ f+ B5 ?2 F' E" Sdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. + R# ^, g, ^7 W, M8 l! DStrategic 2 }5 R+ k* g2 \2 u5 ]Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. / y- H. {- E/ N/ W* _9 h# P) B* I0 tStrategic Warning Lead Time 7 o9 R) K) E9 w) dThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 6 W! B# v) U3 O& R$ x1 dhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic Warning Post- Decision Time , |$ F4 Z! u' P: B+ n0 @! KThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 0 ]6 o2 G$ W. h r/ ~, S3 Z, [with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic ( W( ]+ K2 v9 C9 y! gWarning Pre- 2 l$ |* f- q3 B; @, ~( @& |0 dDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a / @- @5 z6 x, Q" v' F7 Kdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 0 U m9 T/ o% YStructured ) J% w5 n4 A1 x2 n5 tAttack ( S" l! B( \1 p( M* H6 lAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured : s* t- l b. l* iDesign * ]7 x# `9 K' a4 B1 mA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules & z, Z2 @1 c8 e3 K+ W4 hbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data " U' k* ]; i. Q/ Pflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program + o4 s+ ^' [) pA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 9 A' x% W' m0 u' k8 @ Y& Q( Zsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. 3 {! r+ D. [. A% Z4 bSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. * L% u' z# [7 e5 ]; p' qSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 ; W! S' N9 [4 O5 [! y' J& ^! z( rSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ' W0 c& k8 V* x(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. - ^! q% B4 D( L( ?: ]2 pSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. 9 W6 @: l8 K) P- G% bSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security $ N) J |0 ~ T/ v- @Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it ! _2 e$ y" h2 dhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 5 h3 e4 i* U- [1 Z8 Gdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive 4 u j9 g' F9 L2 [2 [- O0 s' KDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 7 Q: o$ Z) Q, C& _Succession of 0 J+ d: C/ G5 ACommand . O1 |' ?3 \( JThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command # p6 b6 ?9 ~( x2 g, _7 A* n2 _is a synonymous term. 5 N& p6 H9 ]% B( z" y# J- iSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). 8 S- R7 n5 D- b/ a& e+ s4 {% XSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two * g: W+ D% Z3 xalternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to ( _* T$ \: Y* [% M' ddecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 3 l. N! l' ]. U; f" aSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 2 K9 w" q" i/ S) W' R" ]- ~1 ya single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) ! [6 f2 _1 Q; t/ K, nA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 0 S. z* p; O, y# H( Crequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 7 Z' x; Z+ }% r' ^superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser , U C* H% F3 _ Z, lbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 6 ~% S- d7 R, n1 C7 h2 |3 @& l* Vor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. ' i* }9 I/ N- Q9 ~; hSupervisory 5 X8 l! ]9 P# T: z% q* ^Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. ) d* T4 q/ x/ c. }4 F+ C8 ySupport Equipment $ S, \5 n, N0 j* wAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the ! r* [# B' C' ?% b L+ Tmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly % r, P- f# i! Y. i- ptools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). Support $ y( _ E8 ]# L; p* KPersonnel 7 h0 w) Q1 h) [; K1 ?Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly ! U+ r, f7 W( D6 u, T- o; hassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 9 @( N" I9 q P: V. ~. q$ F* {0 }5 Radministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 0 H" G# t+ L* x( F% M% mSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. : }/ |2 V; h* `' ]* ~4 v6 ^SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. 7 W+ D" _/ M6 y6 i" N& y. DSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 1 b1 J1 O0 J, Q/ d$ T% A! qmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 6 h( N5 U/ }/ g5 H8 s4 P1 d% R7 Vproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity 2 k8 A" E, ~' R; R3 i6 O/ I dmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, % `5 _$ M9 l, g" }4 e. X% A1 dand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance # ~0 s9 Y9 `! E/ q( |Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for $ ?5 L9 `- `. N8 Icoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and ( @" o8 j) M- s) A$ @7 M9 O# cMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, ( P! m. ~# }0 r& E( C$ u5 [and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System 4 u1 W3 Z& w1 D7 D7 x* B% m, ]" XConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated t8 X' l% U7 N d! Sin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 v$ ~4 l+ \0 V. ?. X0 gSurvivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and 1 v& ~& N, @( v3 f" M4 j! IEnduring Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. % \: D# u6 y' h4 e' JSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. + }& L8 P, e& @2 F! |) \( @SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. - {/ Q F/ W1 _ uSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. 3 ]! @9 |7 X, T( i; e' Y9 S M+ {SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. / S1 y, R% \7 z) r( V3 [SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. " @: K- E9 v: w5 v. VSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to : ^+ O7 ?0 v4 }/ d( y! `one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. * P3 o6 O% _. P6 L0 H7 qSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 7 ~" ]1 v G6 g4 ?3 M+ l8 teach module description has associated implementations. . ^# s4 m% f" `% t: n. RSynthetic 5 d6 W# o4 `6 X+ {0 SAperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for . M) U. Y, s& q# Gtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. 8 Z/ d2 y! P1 k5 E6 y- Z) B1 F# rSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. 0 L" \8 L1 a9 l& N! x* hSys Cmn System Common. - W% H8 Q" D, e8 N* f: ^Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. / E% x& [# |3 V4 D, [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 r! r, ~; [3 Z6 T2 [ l284 SYSCOM Systems Command. + l7 _$ p4 G& Z' |, gSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, 7 x3 L3 J% {- | {! band delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a ; M! T5 Y& ~! V1 [) i( l. Jrequirement. 0 F, H, P$ H' |. ^: \System Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. ) [" m+ _" }8 G( ~System - T( A4 ~+ G8 f x& HArchitecture System Capability Specification (SCS) ( m7 [8 E" V& u1 f! b1 ^* D) g jThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system . m) G/ t- w( h1 Aarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 6 N a/ O9 k8 k8 Q, v$ P; oelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional * i& Q+ F3 v' s' S- n' Especifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. * G/ Y% `; \ F# fSystem Center (SC) 7 l D8 k+ _; uA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide ! O+ l" b, |$ T7 C# {sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. & W/ A7 }' {+ O! H/ n+ K/ LSystem Concept & H) q3 N' W0 m/ [& _0 _2 Q: BPaper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition # z- N& W. W mstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 7 D+ e2 [3 ^5 Kdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) 5 v' v4 N9 L. ]/ ^The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 1 p: {9 K3 t8 c% Ucomputer systems. - \* s; v9 E- m% J- XSystem-Critical $ T) q3 L$ d6 P5 N. |" L) l+ XFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's - n3 N& `9 p& w8 @mission. S& O" C K$ k& q- J% DSystem Definition Review (SDR) 1 i( \1 }0 z7 G1 nThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the ! k/ [+ _% E' j( N% D3 Vsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and ( m) x$ L4 U2 c+ W; xfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 6 s& _3 t7 n: \( O8 b$ Q2 Kdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System 0 {& B# u# {8 b5 l, UDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 7 A+ s7 t6 ~9 Jspecified system requirements. ; l4 P. b- N2 O$ t(2) The result of the system design process. ! N, O% [ v3 p7 `System Design ; a$ M5 G& |. H+ GConcept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be % h9 S$ P8 ]6 ~ `5 Foperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design ( n7 }% k/ K8 \+ p. N' K0 j9 Y6 e3 CReview (SDR) ! i" B) T3 D' s8 b' V+ [0 t v. GEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with 3 }! Q3 m+ {9 s- ^/ x$ Z2 ~the allocated technical requirements. $ ]$ r& k- J0 o" ]1 O7 d: S2 bSystem Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set % R) R8 ~! K/ H; mof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and % G7 J# P6 H" i r/ h% j! |9 H/ g" _/ Ncapability. 1 m' O) W8 z( @8 {4 h& ]: |System Evolution Plan (SEP) / \( z- Z, }% _% e: f! L2 zThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS 0 a6 f, U, {. X4 \/ Z, b a7 X. w' K0 ecapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. 9 o, g" G/ w& F' m& I. Q8 w) HSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. 1 w( \& `9 k5 l- |. k/ S) L6 ^System 5 m: Z- G! u, eGenerated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 9 z; q' B. m& Y0 d9 | Ysurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the ; e5 v5 q0 d0 x+ @object in order to produce charge equalization. 5 I* r- ^0 z7 m. P6 wSystem Integration Test & O* q: _* o" q7 T! @! WA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 9 Q# p8 y! K4 X l; Usensors, and weapon hardware. 0 E* j' D- j; P) R: Q. j" ]- ySystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks & }7 J' _+ q7 z% L8 ^and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or * Z. E/ Y( }# `* K& ?; K0 mequipment systems. System Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 4 W M8 N6 k: u# Z6 O9 vSystem ) P K* @6 H k/ L' ^; U! y5 SOperation and 3 S6 R1 O) o1 ^Integration : R( e; S3 d) O4 s. I3 P& r6 jFunctions (SOIF) 5 M6 m! X2 Y9 iThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command , ~: L) s$ W% u9 ~5 @and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 2 {( x0 N1 n8 B) D% {' G) w0 Athe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 4 B" K; A$ |' G+ W+ g+ u+ D5 QSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 3 R$ _, U# v6 @ t, F% N# wBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 f5 @4 ~6 l5 |286 * H# t0 `2 K. lSystem Program Office (SPO) G* c( ^1 F: d7 U/ _6 x; y; ]The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority - o: Z/ Y& S& t) I( b+ galong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under & t/ I( M$ r2 {, Y' I. l2 krealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions 2 t! m- b8 b8 Z- E& J) ?7 h) y$ Anecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System 2 h: {" ^7 _) V2 b w4 n% oReadiness ( X& Y$ l6 y8 [4 o5 P( K' E! }Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a $ t$ W4 b @3 } Z% m% w1 B+ ospecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. # X& s* j, Y3 `System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 5 L! Q8 c; |& P6 {0 v. Vmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission ( G' o( W# r8 L+ scapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements 9 d9 v- J* g$ J- F+ a2 W' zAnalysis (SRA) 9 y* G/ |, ? ?3 u( wAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 3 _1 B; `; T4 }: T3 T: G0 YConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. ( l0 H# u a; S1 V, q$ J: |/ ]System . N: D- e' ^5 _3 X5 QRequirements Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. & ~5 B. j+ Y+ t% X% k" eDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security & w- v' r8 {3 I9 C$ ?6 dEngineering / {" L3 z# }5 z7 h- l: M(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering & B6 @5 `: m5 S+ dprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks , `. S( _% \% F% N2 i5 v: Cassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security - S0 w) }; y) i/ ~% s: `+ {, wEngineering + z. z" W) G; v. o- g7 i7 X, CManagement Program ; G( a/ T7 @! b(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical H) p# [, M6 j @9 L. ?; gachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE # T; g) y( n+ q' xprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 7 O2 u$ w; f# }2 r5 c# K2 kresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes & `5 {: a8 G; P/ o+ |" A$ pits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 5 V4 X5 d* Z- xSystem Security " y- ]7 s# K5 _Management Plan (SSMP) C! D, s8 K6 LA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to ; p V$ q9 F6 d$ J+ s0 Cmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 7 \* e3 O* m! Vmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related ! v* x$ X- a2 D L* f6 Usystems. q2 }- n" X% _' P# GSystems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems % [% q" K* b OEngineering ' J: J0 j' P; d0 n9 BManagement Plan (SEMP) ) S* u1 j/ }* M2 Z/ kThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures # k2 y; `% S/ i4 Z3 [+ f$ \5 ?9 Qdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) $ d% m1 ?4 L0 v# K7 X8 J! NKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and 9 a7 {# z; y! _( U' P( SCoordination 9 t; M' q) K5 ]* Q7 m$ bThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 7 C* j$ h: q/ |6 d& JSystem Threat Assessment 7 P! [) r( z; _0 }; I8 JReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 3 i5 V) d) A) ?Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency 7 l+ q! D2 U" r0 a+ [1 h- oand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued * R R8 M$ A9 q6 }. Q& y/ b1 A4 nAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to , U7 ]+ s) e" `* h% Lthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. # u0 f c/ c g1 U4 C, I- s6 i& eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : b2 G" J+ B% d; Y: W) }288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 3 e4 J3 c& H! ?4 E- _0 p, S! rT . D$ {) M2 Y9 Y2 Technology Transfer. " N& l9 V2 m2 S, T7 @! ]5 PT * K5 ]& {. e. C! I- b( t2 E Technical Training Equipment. & T9 p2 f6 x u& @. H5 UTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. # d" r5 y4 V6 Q! z5 z6 S* q# cTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. + t$ `+ \! g. Y( w2 K$ {TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). " p0 r+ V: {1 R! r* _4 ~TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. ; ^5 `, [5 x4 h! `- a4 e T U5 i4 c+ ATACC Tactical Air Command Center. 4 L; W" O' [+ U& \" A$ rTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 8 i; B' e4 b/ J8 yTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. $ a2 R' Y+ L) c8 T) m3 d/ ATACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). . A& M% l8 [* ATACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). " g: @3 q# l) q% b7 w# m- b0 XTACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. $ J# ^6 }, B$ e1 }: X7 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. " Z$ Q0 S: ~, e+ rTACSIM Tactical Simulation + g( ^5 J( }3 a) P) `. Z4 dTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 4 r: c! G' Y2 R; V6 tTactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air ; d- \1 p: g% fOperations $ ^( \; d1 p' e7 Q6 WCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 8 u4 e) V7 M x3 f' [5 @defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air $ V8 ^3 v5 ]" h2 tSupport % C" \" s; E: D( c# y; j6 q. bAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. - ~) F1 ^$ I$ O: o5 [$ m2 `* rTactical Area of - [' U# H' M7 d9 ZResponsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the \' F8 K; A! v. {commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic ) n1 c+ q, q. [% Z2 @Missile (TBM) ) n( [+ C. F5 d. p% _# k( ]7 oA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be , Z! b2 T/ `+ k3 P3 f' r0 `; d! uemployed within a continental theater of operations. & s; y8 e! v7 V4 oTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 2 z$ Z" t3 C3 c# o$ zmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data + n0 C; |/ U" I: H2 VInformation link 4 y$ U! O- M6 ~ H, H" \, \A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 0 M7 R+ T& a. r7 \! a! [( z( s" eeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. + }# A/ a [( @: B; B8 o! {# ~0 STactical Level of # a6 r3 x' D1 X0 e# lWar " P5 E3 x7 ?3 aThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area (TOA) * p3 m. v- u) u8 X& _9 uThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 3 r$ K+ t% J" g \) Qarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission 8 U2 B/ c" I8 X4 X9 U* {accomplishment. Tactical Operations 9 B2 L$ k# y* G# m3 ]; {Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning * a4 g& _: U( j0 P(TW) $ X8 P2 C* C: g(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component 7 s4 ?0 H# {: u) W& selements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type 7 t8 a5 n' j- D2 b) ?% {9 Eand size, country under attack, and event time. 8 g+ |/ V: f# G+ X" V6 ?5 l3 FTactical Warning/Attack 7 n$ b1 _9 V$ l0 ^' @Assessment 4 l2 H& U6 l* k/ X1 n% I(TW/AA) * X" p8 B* }! TA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 7 X9 a9 e* S+ A5 K290 3 ?5 t2 u7 W4 D: _; w' }# Q0 CTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. 5 N2 `# {8 L* \& J8 K6 q4 _(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. # S% H; [ P$ a/ @$ A9 ~6 _TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. / e' q! H9 w- ?' ~4 ZTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. $ Q) B7 b2 ?# T" T& p' B5 jTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. # l' ]) {) e3 cTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 6 F5 ~5 V3 j$ V0 F' |TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 3 i1 \/ G) f0 p8 h& }+ q; |( |TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. 7 R1 R# z' `5 i: E$ B- xTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. & ~6 e4 D# _; B0 sTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. . ^& Y, Q- k2 d* X: s, Y; cTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. % O( w5 I r1 T* ~, W" T1 l/ p3 x! bTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. , a2 e/ R5 U) B2 BTank Fragmentation + D1 d. B- D! j u# zThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. ) W( b. R& q3 OTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 6 r6 c) H7 P- f) n) w4 gTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. - }' h7 ^: {/ A+ ~) p(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. * W7 o4 J9 o, B2 a& j0 r6 U+ {TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. $ E9 m- Q/ e( J8 }) S0 `TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target + X( }) m: U5 Y' ]# kAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. ( O) H+ ~1 Y/ Z. YTarget / S( W/ W- c! rClassification 4 }# `3 R0 _: ?+ l! iand Type : F& |# {& ^0 H: M8 K* ?4 rIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, * `# A m2 f3 W! D# pdiscrimination, and intelligence data. ! V# B0 w2 q; HTarget |) c/ c6 a) v& Q3 lDiscrimination 1 @; S2 L' j u% uThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one ( y' L" r) p4 V( e' Ltarget when multiple targets are present. Target Object % \# ~5 C% N; _: A9 h& U. _. k8 aMap (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ! b7 `! b( n3 f! h, r2 W) C8 ]target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 7 b( X- b W/ {9 u* JTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and . a, ~9 b8 f) T7 x6 @) Midentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System ( E1 v$ @5 t: QRequirements : P( e, L) V* e9 o rDocument (TSRD) 9 Q! k8 f* F% M3 DBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance , h" f- p4 q9 ^; y c- \# Q/ yto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) + w8 |4 f' u/ J: ]1 s3 zengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and ) s$ w$ D" q* ^ [. t+ o) P/ Mrequired performance. 3 m5 d+ A. {; z" N/ e* M! e6 b1 GTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. $ e* X) l/ p) JTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. & B# H' [; e9 M3 o* y" lTAT Technical Area Task. . b/ l3 W3 d% K' Z: |) ITAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. & h8 o( d/ [1 v4 o; O5 {9 PTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. V; o4 T. L# d& C7 L5 k+ y6 IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 ; b0 G0 \ B% T$ ?* x" N7 oTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. 9 V: Y8 C4 k: K/ |9 U R" MTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. * w: V9 \1 C8 W/ l9 Z) f, dTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ! p* `; @% ]& S7 l! X8 K+ WTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. 2 N$ H$ {0 E9 T: D( @/ W% vTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 8 z" B) b# m9 i# L+ t7 U5 eTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. # P4 r. I% [, M4 aTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. ( N5 z& Q; t8 p$ g0 O, x" qTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). + |4 y) Q! Q. M- ~: V5 N, b$ ~(2) To Be Supplied. $ w$ Y: t( \2 ?& `7 i& p(3) To Be Scheduled 0 R" f, Z$ O& N. ; Q3 O( w! i# e1 d, R, r% E* N, g0 MTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. * h' [; G; O) K" aTCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD , J% y; d# w" K! e1 YCountermeasures Mitigation). : e0 s* B( A& |TD (1) Test Director. K |* s- w/ k+ |(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. & j; s, X, h) M0 f(4) Training Device * Y) \$ q0 x# l+ J0 l3 ~% qTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. 2 n2 l& d, T0 m9 kTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. ' i- o8 A8 T* ?# D) a* M8 n8 STDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. & n+ Y$ G8 E u& b4 A2 wTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 / F- E4 M* ~; M! Q2 B( C+ W$ e# f- @7 HTDBM Track Data Base Manager. ( J' j7 _8 a4 b8 ]& b+ L5 } R7 nTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. # w( w- p1 Q0 I, y; z2 S(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 7 \0 W& ?3 j, xTDCC Test Data Collection Center. 7 g0 S; c% Y5 y! \7 G8 DTDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. / {* x3 @0 B! \0 vTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. # f' V( R: _* t) k% r# mTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). 6 L* l! B+ d9 ~7 r' `! VTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. % }; ^( v& e$ z4 {TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. k! P6 G' O$ `TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 3 f7 G# J8 k8 \1 O5 g9 c(2) Test Design Package. 3 }. D- S Z" `; m4 ^' \(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. 5 ]9 ^6 ?; L4 f& KTDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. % B8 m2 u2 F) r! t+ ]7 `) dTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. , o9 S2 z, n/ c9 N) k9 N) ^TDT Target Development Test. 8 h# k, D" ^! C0 z5 eTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. * N: A2 p* ~7 z3 d* t/ T Y. DTDU Target Data Update. ' D, Y" {7 ~5 O- Y2 s, B3 o# _* s cTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 3 H- }0 ]# U9 O) C2 c7 w# E(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. - j1 q2 D, T n: G: W" b7 Z3 {TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 1 p' f$ L/ {" H8 W$ h. `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 ( W8 l# U) K7 P0 ?* z! A4 T% ATechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not 1 H4 i/ R0 b8 f9 d$ btechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract * Q7 t p- V$ l: A! vadministration. " z! |7 B: `' r5 BTechnical Data Package (TDP) 9 }9 ?( l$ s0 j+ x( Y; _) T+ sA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition ) Y* Y3 b( `1 ^8 lstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item . P4 p: h' v( ?2 {performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 0 {$ b, W" w- b" w$ z: vassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality 9 n5 A. }) X# Fassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to ' E9 r# e" t. @2 \determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical . B- l* e0 T8 |% ]/ yObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available 0 Q# i' C s" O7 \9 zfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical 6 ~( y q' ]8 J T/ j, OObjectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS + @" T7 B) b( Ddevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) 4 h' n, m0 d" XA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical ; L1 Z7 ~$ ?9 N( z# \Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk 6 c+ b- ?6 a+ p8 ~# \' |analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. " ?" N2 Z$ y9 Q5 D4 o5 U. [9 zTechnical Performance Measurement . s: i9 `* b; C+ u! L; ~(TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ; B2 y4 ?1 g4 t+ y" S# J% tassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 2 _' j( i6 u9 Iparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures @+ y; |/ ~; Y$ V. g% @- g: cdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these + p8 ~. K, z& T `differences on system effectiveness. 6 \, _; y0 S& j, JTechnical Specification 0 u( }2 a6 [! W: _* oA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical 2 y4 X) g( h: {6 ]# R. q" v+ ]Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or & A1 |1 W/ l; p' i; R8 t9 Nemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. % G) W, I5 Y% k9 q$ b/ TTechnology Executing Agent : w0 }" T2 z: ^- x ZThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management / c. f2 x! Z, V$ R$ ]# B$ qresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. 7 ~- U& J1 V5 t( mTechnology 0 @" [! Z/ I O; dProgram 5 z+ r! S s% S' \8 B: u5 XDescription : p) Q1 {: p' o7 q2 Q1 pThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. h4 o+ l0 u) i YTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 e/ F* e5 }* ~1 l. |9 u" D: R295 8 Z2 ^4 ~. T$ R" W3 G$ T( ETEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. , N! |2 G- T! `, l# wTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, ( t% t5 N( C6 Q8 L4 [Tracking, and 2 c7 q+ K, Q e# zCommand (TT&C) 1 L# I; `% J: f J2 J- PFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a , [" e+ s2 A, s! p* e/ `sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit . v2 R) |: ^ ]5 |7 C! amission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. , \2 a/ @9 J+ K' r* xTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 1 X# B6 c/ K+ g. f$ Q) fTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. % z% N( R" | x4 j6 G v2 E) ETEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 6 V# d; n# U" ~' ^ L' W. ITEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. 8 |, M5 F% |' i7 }TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of ' V q; Z4 v0 E! E8 b5 _compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term / b6 H9 ?1 j$ r5 [7 U"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 7 B3 `" }- ~% @; k, t6 jTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. 6 D) Y# a2 s' S# m5 j+ ~Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between + O, ?6 O9 j/ a% }; r, A. R0 s3 d" uatmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance e3 \0 j' N$ U7 }7 a+ i0 B' N( VThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. 1 E. x5 s' O$ T5 L& \5 `1 vTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase ~) h4 e2 N, k. z" cand trajectory termination. # T8 t! g; a' u4 K0 `9 E4 `Terminal Phase Interceptor + }& G) |! J$ P% x4 tA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the ) s1 D6 c; G# w1 ]' \# g3 q u% n6 Eterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy % |& A6 t! `- C7 J. ~( hPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 8 X% c" Y$ p4 q, E" ATESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 7 A' g. p1 H7 Q5 Z, _5 r( A6 w" c- oTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary / [( y$ \9 d+ X; Qconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all 0 R* S, B( ?+ D! [2 s/ {operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 1 X8 @9 i3 X9 M6 H, }analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. 5 j9 `- J3 ^( v1 u. qTest and Evaluation (T&E) + k3 ]# {4 Q2 b$ R( \# SProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production % \3 @4 M( ~6 u- _9 x5 ]6 p: tAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical / x( e0 b9 s. R) d4 Kperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel ; k: z3 b! L0 k: `* e8 c; [8 c( f' Hrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of ' k& R# p6 W" `% s9 F8 q0 _) Xoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test + U0 k" U! _, h9 Lconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. . f1 u; l% t7 }, A5 v' ]8 B4 }! ?FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and - o. i; T5 f+ t$ p. K) v- OEvaluation . g( p" u) { Z D7 R* J( Z1 x& t5 UMaster Plan (TEMP) - c: B1 ?& D2 W9 [" {6 @An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 2 H1 h: ~0 j% F3 t* F3 \0 H6 kobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation ; [# G, P( \ h7 p2 U# Wto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 1 Q3 V3 y( p, D. t$ tprogresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, + S3 m* X$ r: S& D, g8 ^9 `planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of 3 X A- A, B, \& ttest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test * Q- D6 O0 M N o, @integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the - a& L, @% b k7 rprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and ! ~! q) ]7 B- e- Brelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 7 m. n4 B! v3 y3 U9 `; Ywhen there are T&E implications. 2 S% M7 v1 U8 j2 M8 \4 pTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 5 i, u# A- [9 I# l: b2 n! FTest Integration + L. Q" J# X4 F1 EWorking Group 7 r! v8 |) C$ d2 F4 J2 _(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. : O- |+ I; H8 K9 h) E2 K( G% v) w. iTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. 8 v/ {9 {7 ^& Q: _The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 ! }. w5 q( o6 Y m7 aTest Target Vehicle (TTV) / s# a4 C9 p- {8 E5 dSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 3 s% h. a" T7 |. Y) }SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. % B! H4 K) U3 W, Z- w- O% Z" v6 TTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 0 V( W3 N1 O- MTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. , n' k' z: o Z6 a4 A6 B9 x4 w2 OTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. 7 \& x; {0 D% y, H. }2 o z; l( CTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 0 }: g9 Z6 S, M+ k- o* L' X6 ZTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). . ^4 I6 m& I7 Y4 g6 _: U4 T3 KTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 4 j" f" m v+ Q2 [7 XTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 3 Y6 {/ n: e. G) xTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. * Q; N# F6 H- S$ n8 h% NTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). # P* W" K# M# r. ^: H4 dTGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 3 r+ b% d4 K% t0 b* w' L% ETheater Ballistic + k9 H/ a" W5 H$ P0 Z6 w$ IMissile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 4 L, B, p( e5 L, w, d(USSPACECOM)