航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. - J' ], J# O4 D# c2 L7 }1 F# [STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and Transportation Environments / u$ I& P1 r9 C" qThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. - b! ]* \. S. fStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target $ d8 O; G6 U N2 x- CSet. : s7 O+ Y" @1 uStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. 1 x& y: z8 s: ^4 ^6 wSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. 3 |7 `3 w* c8 T& h6 i7 t, JSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense ! O6 k( r* B! H$ xAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 8 J q& B( F, H. {) R( p6 t, Uballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 0 _5 G7 L) F+ Jnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic 5 I5 d1 O- C' ?/ @9 ]Defense & g# P- W! p0 {( _Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. # `, T, q2 c" j' |% W# s9 tStrategic 2 S4 Y9 {( O' N* R6 ~& mDefense System 1 P5 ^* X) p) e# F! U' x(SDS) " X, M7 `3 Q d4 pA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving # L8 Q# M }+ f1 c2 `# r& |ballistic missile defense system. + K: A0 Y7 w+ y" r: D7 ^3 J( fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 1 K4 ~) q- ?8 E) U280 2 m4 q/ M2 L, g* |Strategic Level of War 8 k4 I. [1 W" j, M5 |- l2 ~The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to % a7 o4 F' r+ W% O6 e; H' h8 faccomplish those objectives. Strategic 2 o. w5 `2 i3 S3 k' N5 aOffensive Forces (SOF) * ?. y; ~. E* gThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, $ N% S' J; ` ~2 @" ^1 Othe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific ( F8 R# A' \2 d( i# `Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, $ G4 \ Y- I( z+ K$ L! xFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to " w/ S8 d$ `" y8 o& [7 Ostrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 4 |! b' w0 }& r0 Q! HStrategic Warning $ Q* J. t. K' b# O6 {A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic 4 N7 a3 w: p& s K8 B) p/ M& NWarning Lead # Z( ]+ ?% @# b" E; a5 G- wTime % @9 j2 h2 n. X" A- W# q8 C! uThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ! |9 m% x6 i9 j( d9 s. v0 Qhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic Warning Post- Decision Time 3 a7 o+ M/ D2 \That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends ) N4 N# O4 j! }- ?with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic t( i$ g. K! z; z' v$ b( O Cwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 7 ~" @" g4 k+ G W, ?5 G% Nnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in ) E. Z! ?! ^; l2 Q: c' Bthe pre-decision period. Strategic 4 @6 t, g0 `- x/ a; yWarning Pre- ; E: M$ ^5 j/ V+ T: y' M, p6 C3 uDecision Time # g" Y! K+ p0 z; |% \That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course 0 O1 |# I, Y% o& I- C1 H! P5 H" pof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). ' [: b) d& d S7 {" `& }2 dStructured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. : V5 a' Z4 P+ D5 @" X! wStructured 9 O0 ~0 H7 J% A/ K5 ZDesign ' f' n8 ~) m2 Q* `. AA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 5 H+ {: U8 Z p3 `* @8 RProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: : G8 Q3 ?$ ~3 Zsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 2 c" i- R0 H8 z" E! qinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 7 z9 D7 r2 I% g! e& x/ B v* ~/ }sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. ) r3 c$ [' T/ @STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. 9 Z: ]/ p7 Y# B( {STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 P* U5 }+ A( ^) Z281 ) ^" f8 E' b; d* O7 ASTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 0 d8 a4 @/ t0 x9 H$ B! G(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). & I+ G: D/ L2 U6 ~( R; o& x0 kSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which + [$ K8 }: I! o9 \ wis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. 0 q& U) y2 C. \! a5 g: GSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. ) Y$ h" O* `; k7 LSubject Security 0 E8 F; T9 K: [( e- Y. QLevel : R; F7 E. ~- J" n9 {0 \; LA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be ; X( W7 ]6 e5 C5 h/ j, Xdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) 5 ]8 Z6 u+ {, SA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ! s: Z# T& K j& ]miles. {) s4 b& }0 }" j" q: |% ]. ESUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense + e0 z3 r S C& s, S9 T" @9 q0 uFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. " D2 H/ T/ e, N8 ~SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of 0 K. O, z& y/ h5 p; Q; m# dCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. n& l& S% R W# M7 m# DSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). / y8 s/ I' V0 ]; c# ~3 ]Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. " _8 l6 v( L. l) W2 G; Q8 T7 jSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super * ?5 I7 \6 Q# C/ G' R& n9 ~, uradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as ) u) K4 N, j% U% i$ r! Ssuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant ' C: w: w4 E5 h/ @Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 2 s- p5 m9 z( B1 ` u0 {! `0 sor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs ; n! b. E# T) i$ \3 Q+ J! C' n OComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. " W' ^0 x4 U/ M: A: oSupplemental 6 ]; V3 ~' Y& i; m/ q |9 K1 t. \3 _Appropriation 2 k. y. T7 e0 ]/ ?' W# j! cAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support 6 j) b0 ^0 n+ A9 _0 {; [' \Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), % I$ j. j( _9 c( b# b# gmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) ' R# y4 I. H: O: oequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). 9 m1 }! L) P% MSupport Personnel ' g+ b* r8 ?9 m) Y6 o7 t! e; O/ u# qIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, / y) Q1 z% T$ A; t" Wadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 7 z& Y {* @. a$ n# U, |example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 8 }3 g3 f. h! w7 T, x0 m& ^% N6 dSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, : ?: @$ V/ R3 ~8 U+ z$ U3 Tbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 4 l7 q/ f# U: ?% M5 BSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. 5 s3 ?8 x$ O/ H$ Q# hSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 5 V+ n. ^6 Y% Rmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. 2 m) _: Z& i% M% |Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 8 U, o% B+ a }7 H+ land meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for & `# [& |8 i! p! |* tcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, $ A7 E; F' }" }# C f) N6 K3 TSatellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, 9 @) W2 s! t9 V( ^' C: _and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. $ {( w' I$ Z) [0 ~, h( L6 NSurveillance 8 X$ y* t; O# m) r5 B6 NSystem $ b! L1 N* q4 Z$ W5 I4 {' E& u4 gConfiguration ( P [6 Q& Z4 W& v( y% g4 V/ ~ d* gThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated * T. l3 S! H2 a2 g' Kin the surveillance system. + r5 g1 S/ B' `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 , ` U2 x) t% c2 a7 O9 o! ASurvivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and 9 V* b1 p3 r' P8 j) } rEnduring Command Center (SECC) a8 s R. R- ^! S( F& }' \The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. : V1 {2 S/ c$ \( X' ~5 NSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. : i' w! W4 V, ySW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. , {4 d+ a- J$ }1 Y) U9 a$ eSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. % R P" d- f4 GSWG Scenario Working Group. : H7 ~+ r: f5 S9 T, N% K# ]! \SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 8 t: t3 I1 \$ d! h6 `, bSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 6 C9 W9 n; U) a8 W# u7 CSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. ( u2 e9 c( Y2 H& hSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 7 s: E4 b. g ~3 t, d9 d2 gSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to , @# n! P5 w% s+ u0 L7 u& r2 Yone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. * K7 e0 s5 ^& \ c+ NSynthetic Aperture Radar 6 t; K+ P: _% `0 G7 q(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ; f9 k& D% i9 K: l$ R a$ atheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 5 U: L3 \) C4 _. Ytransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal " P* M. L9 @9 v3 A' c) s8 }$ H1 pemitted by the radar transmitter. ) G/ l5 s2 g F& ~9 cSYS System. 6 n0 B7 @, R1 o2 _Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. 1 } T8 Q; i1 w" M& X E9 q$ L* `Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S / l7 z* Q! M- j% V0 Z3 B0 K284 & ^+ Z& [8 z a7 u4 v# f% B/ [- gSYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 3 g4 Q: n3 _% |! w6 qdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with + c& Y: W* `- A+ [& D! Fspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. ; A2 @" x4 ^/ T0 C. ^" l(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a y. L, Q! @$ ?% N0 W1 }9 hfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System 6 h1 z( N; T& S, fActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. 1 l- h" E8 V% i, i* DSystem * ^( S# w6 \) R% Z4 [* {Architecture / T' [' Q" V7 w, \, g' ^System + R$ s& g" S0 t+ n) I) ?Capability Specification ?" A& g r. n0 S) L(SCS) % |9 p$ O0 K( O1 l/ oThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 3 F6 ~2 O, M, yarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational # e) Q+ l2 R+ }6 `. i4 e! Benvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 0 m7 L+ ?% A. R9 I5 m$ R8 Helements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. 2 p$ t4 ^1 E$ D( S( h" gSystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. 3 v, [/ I, l- r" aSystem Concept ' T# H% Z, W6 q- t4 T5 O1 zPaper (SCP) , `; F- D- g! j0 G: E# AOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ) y# s+ i1 |; m4 Vconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 0 A! U, P1 T. m2 ^0 N2 ]; ?demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other ( E) |+ n& o% t! q- t- Dconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) 2 v& Z7 V/ Q! q* b. X; ^8 g: O" Z% ~The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and : ?/ o6 y- t; U! n" ]7 @) kcomputer systems. System-Critical ' s8 s$ e* W [* ~6 RFunction ) P( p7 ?/ K1 j, O& ?: U3 A4 ZA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's & q1 L6 V( W5 Emission. System Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 6 y6 |+ \+ V2 v' lsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and + z$ P/ Y8 E+ L! efunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, * u, {0 [ @2 U# D& O) F3 l5 Ndetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. S' k3 J. ~4 O" uSystem - C$ @# @) ]' fDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. ! f5 g$ E R; K3 mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; k2 P) M/ S" k) g0 w+ [285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. 2 X# F k$ u" F(2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept * b( w6 ?3 x. P# b* A9 N# I, ZAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and * ]! o, |5 H- [( i5 O8 l- hcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. 0 m9 ?/ L0 T, g A! J' q" T1 ySystem Design 2 g/ t3 {2 x$ M+ ^Review (SDR) 1 V* a3 w* r) c' IEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set * } `3 z: y5 F( ?' Vof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. + Z1 K* X; ~7 |" oSystem Evolution 0 N- X1 U% l7 C) n; n0 _% ?Plan (SEP) & Y0 B H, Y2 G$ k# }& _+ M( f6 gThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS # H1 T' d9 R1 G5 ^- H* G2 vcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS ' c0 N6 x$ a6 IDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 0 `/ B1 j% P; `1 n9 u9 B% Massessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 5 Z6 i! T: P# N7 ]2 P9 L: B9 {1 bthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. $ {, m3 s: y4 H- `( fSystem , j* R' F: @+ X* }1 }- j5 S! AGenerated # }( K5 N1 r/ L( |7 g: zElectromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) ( W' Z; L) f7 U6 D( rTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local 4 i9 z' t+ J7 ]" r; s$ F% \fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the / J- J9 o- ~& k. C% p7 Iprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System Integration Test $ j6 D$ `3 q8 I; s; q" gA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 3 x# A+ G- @5 I8 [% P1 dsensors, and weapon hardware. ; d, z2 M9 v' RSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual 0 m9 p% q$ D" ~; Z0 U. P0 Zmanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. 0 {8 w. a( y. @5 J; wSystem 1 c6 R' c$ [: ~, F, H9 `Operational 0 }4 r- p" x& ~* Q1 hConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System ) G2 {$ q& m rOperation and Integration k( E/ {! ]* } [Functions (SOIF) % q# ^1 c) W9 I: ~The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ( _1 q4 C( @/ T9 m8 p6 k% W' Vand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 4 u' y0 s+ s& p5 tBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 ( ]" b6 l( F' i2 [- u" |System Program # W0 G+ L' g o. t" MOffice (SPO) 0 Z m: b7 y' w& |The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out 1 t. S2 K3 M7 `( c3 U" W6 |the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority / ]2 k# o' l2 _# Z5 Walong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 4 t p. o8 D$ Z& ^2 oincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the . q/ N$ H, l/ `9 H/ |4 uverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions - K) G, Z8 z% K) h6 knecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 1 \5 }+ | k. ^3 s! cand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 0 R! ^# \& e: Q, h; |$ h3 Qhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness ! M# l+ K+ L6 M3 ]; O6 c2 s5 Z. fObjective 9 _* l& w5 q. r0 w- g m. S8 O7 [A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a " S2 x8 u6 W! g# C) x0 dspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and : H* \9 o5 {6 b2 L8 q) b, E, K% cmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 1 d8 I+ K8 A3 Y+ U2 ocapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 5 [8 p* z2 a! d5 e5 mdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security 3 D$ S/ H( t% [4 M/ xEngineering (SSE) , Q! F1 U) y+ P* x9 A, K) g6 _An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 6 j: C" l% q; A3 K$ n: ?: p/ pprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 6 ~4 K+ |6 Q7 A* L2 d! ksecurity threats. 0 D$ @8 K7 e; x# NSystem Security Engineering Management Program " Y+ o# D. }7 z6 ]8 o. p) U5 U(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical ' H1 `, ~; K2 u3 Nachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 6 z6 ~5 l7 I# H; B4 ndefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the & u3 k8 A5 ~1 k/ s+ iresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides ; @ X( q: V" ?0 h. H* Imanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes ; a0 b9 p6 M3 X4 b$ Yits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security 7 H" s; u: o$ h5 k0 m9 oManagement 4 j8 r S8 I5 A, b6 v. _4 `7 }2 EPlan (SSMP) $ y* B& q6 B/ h( \ @A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. : K+ C: G* i& o4 Q3 JSystems 6 _4 V& Y; ?% d0 [4 z& PEngineering # L1 X0 m/ F9 a7 b9 k* |9 Y% d# Q( qAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. , z4 e6 I) G1 d5 Y/ N1 N! ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems * o V8 x* o' ^9 o* Q/ g2 V; QEngineering ; o9 V6 n, Z3 ?. H7 MManagement Plan (SEMP) # R) a; F3 ~3 }" P$ e$ UThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 8 \+ u) k+ m8 A4 X2 T& fIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures - U3 c* A" j4 b- {# Sdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. - @, A% g" Z1 X" @/ K1 h% sSystems Test ( j! j4 b) G. Q; S& P1 ?" ]2 ?Integration and Coordination . {- k K0 a! c) MThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment + ^9 z( q0 j1 ~& E: P6 u8 |Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency , D3 W* G: @. _* Wand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when / H: o& y# Y- D4 K% u- `the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset 2 D5 V% M, D1 M+ [- ` u. kA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to & R0 b5 z8 O7 Q8 o$ H8 Uthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. ' w+ C P) p: v+ b. O: J4 qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & C3 N& _+ x" }% i# ?. }9 O3 @) R2 c h1 y288 2 V* ^! c/ ~5 M B+ ]0 a$ RT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. + R( R0 }0 H0 H( DT&E Test and Evaluation. ' y0 v4 H" J$ F8 dT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Q7 c0 ^9 s3 J- K, zT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T . J5 V+ [' [# U# n6 d" t2 Technology Transfer. T 2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. , Y$ k& g, @+ r( D1 eTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. 9 D# m4 b) N' s' N& lTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. 2 c; \2 U+ E* R6 L3 TTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. 1 R, N$ v$ c* A% _TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). " g# m3 n0 a P' OTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 7 ]' _8 F% c: H* O8 B( HTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. 5 ]- c! x6 l9 o& ]1 a2 f- T- {TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). % h- y( r6 W9 P4 h; fTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). ' B( C5 P. g' k5 h7 o* f0 \TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 _6 c; e# \* {; ]289 1 U/ M e3 U# R& p" L( XTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation 8 v* `; E3 ^$ _: RTactical Air Doctrine 0 ]; m% v( i: Y, ^# z) Q$ N! b. M1 rFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. . A) P# S! h# b$ r- CTactical Air 1 n/ W# z6 f( I5 @Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with + {3 p* x* k5 Eground or naval forces. Tactical Air 6 | K$ N" }, H$ EOperations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control $ r$ N& O( Q6 A% m/ K( Z: I& lSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ' D! }, S- K# Y' {& `defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air 6 a/ J+ p+ L- _/ dSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly 0 D& B6 k6 Z. r! ?$ gassist land or maritime operations. # P4 I1 [& V* ]& k+ `6 VTactical Area of Responsibility 5 `, _, {' Y& N- C- Z% R L(TAOR) , v' V% `6 E! i9 W8 w' V# l" g* e* `A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 9 f+ Z" d2 s1 v/ g$ a2 u. Xcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and / S. {' @6 V1 f# ]! ~coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) # @; M& f# T( _5 T5 v1 F4 hA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. 2 Y1 _1 D: e! j$ ~Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. ' f% _ [! E& k0 r% I5 PTactical Data Information link 1 H- d! E( o) S- ?9 g( \A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. - }) a/ ~" [2 c) L: JTactical Level of 8 [! R5 Y& `" f, w9 H. X8 OWar # q8 d$ n8 X& X8 ~: d q1 i0 NThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area (TOA) 5 P% E% m4 ^1 XThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 9 \" ^( m/ F) D) l/ ~& ]" k& narea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission - a$ {* Y& l& T5 a8 \accomplishment. Tactical Operations 2 O7 o: b; o3 ?* e: pCenter (TOC) : I8 E0 `0 t) Z @A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff ) }+ |- C; N# p$ ~' s4 Cconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. 7 g1 p( ~1 b M. nTactical Warning 6 ^5 i/ _0 k1 e/ S5 i5 _/ I(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command : P8 [4 _: {6 @, D( J! Tcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type ! P, \8 K: d$ E/ c5 yand size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical - d1 P! | K/ Z9 _+ r+ Q& S- sWarning/Attack Assessment 8 J, _1 \+ P8 e; i% t! m* F(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 - D$ S+ Z ]- W( Q. r8 }. Q2 eTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. , y) u- a: d4 `! `: \# W2 ITAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ' i' K" B9 `* b. N, H4 G4 jTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. * R4 {" M- y/ v& O' wTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” ! \2 L+ G% v5 f* xTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” * V6 ?& R' F7 ? g6 q) K: U7 M w uTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. , i$ L5 h, D7 [+ y \TADL Tactical Data Link. % K5 ?4 |, J4 u/ yTADS Tactical Air Defense System. 1 P5 B; o1 w: X7 _, \ ?7 r7 V/ oTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. : T- f6 f+ X& T% @4 \9 P4 ]" hTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. ( y5 ~2 Q7 ^- z7 x3 Q0 {TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector 5 f/ F3 K7 P5 k [3 Oand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. + m5 n+ b: K: f% }0 eTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 5 v# s* P4 x$ X" f. [/ `& [Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 2 y6 s+ S6 E' z* h D. R# w8 r6 i% ~: Tresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 5 \& L! Y7 Q/ |& iTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. . A7 P+ t y: m5 _6 pTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. 5 {6 p- N4 S# K) E7 c7 b% d6 I(3) Target Acquisition Radar. 4 m) G$ K1 O# N- HTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 5 O0 y! U, g3 S' KTarget Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target 4 |& |/ O1 d5 A" h* C. b) w9 T1 RClassification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, * C: Q# x8 E. q6 Ddiscrimination, and intelligence data. ' K7 Q* g/ L+ r L/ xTarget Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object Map (TOM) 0 a: ~) S! z" _4 S6 R" }0 aA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and B2 [8 s; h9 b; @3 P, a* k# N- mother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in $ ^" ~. }6 `2 z9 F. m* q' }. z9 dtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements 6 ?4 I9 Y p1 V: ]Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 9 J2 L! @: M/ L, F) C& jProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target 1 F& d: ]/ B( ^ l0 k* u* Brequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and * V& R$ j, F3 O% n! B* erequired performance. 8 y( x3 x5 ^- F6 o) Z: iTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. ' E2 X: ^$ h( B0 |8 ?& W0 Q7 K1 F# ?TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. + L- `9 j! t2 A' RTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. ( W' h! K, |9 b, B+ x% DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 V& t/ s8 O7 o292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. # P3 g8 S3 ]# [$ P0 h1 z% y/ ^TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. 2 {# p; ~" c4 t- `TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. ' o) R" Z( S1 S5 mTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 2 x4 B6 I( G0 FTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. " d. P0 Z! k1 f! P$ |! yTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 4 k$ e! Z& |- DTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. ) P# C/ c+ [4 {! L/ S' m8 j(3) To Be Scheduled % r- ^) i8 A: b4 K% D9 @. % ~2 h( q- A. {( z' b) d3 n* LTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. # j0 S6 @4 v3 ?- q" pTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. 2 S+ ]" ~( k& W! o- mTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. : h# j. P- J# F/ KTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 5 Z# \8 V/ I7 A2 W; ]TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. / C& Y; M, {. P3 j+ B% m8 }' `(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device ; I$ ? s8 C2 Q1 `. GTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. . b! C5 a* x6 @$ o3 ], t& SMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. * \+ M$ R8 g0 H0 Z M1 a! GTDI Target Data Inventory. ' X o% Q( _+ {! J. `TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 6 Z5 P- R: A# ^TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). & b7 c' f1 f, ~ S c4 X' qTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 0 i8 Q" S4 L; C( _TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 7 z* a) K" N% \- V(2) Test Design Package. ) n6 _0 ]: C0 p2 f, s" R$ o(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. $ g' C8 m4 V' C' X( y$ tTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. G$ k5 Y3 l! @- [( h- d: ?" |+ ITDU Target Data Update. & \$ j$ _* T+ R7 ?3 O1 c$ z& WTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 3 F! x/ N7 k* T4 ^(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ) h4 \1 @9 s: b# V4 o# P, STech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician 4 I5 T0 }4 X' u( G8 p: C) iTECH Technical ( ?' h$ ]: L4 u6 ~' Y+ G. p$ mTECHON Technical Control. ; H G' {' s# { ~ H1 eTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). % T. N- V7 T; }" P4 KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T - ~0 Y6 b7 K* n7 P294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ; O% z8 w- e( S f' I* _Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. * L$ t0 H4 E' X. f) eTechnical Data Package (TDP) F6 ?3 f, d; n' D7 m ]4 [( \& IA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 1 L! e7 q" _- x I! @% Fstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines h" u) d' ^- W# x5 d* E2 x' H8 k4 N' Gthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 2 z i9 I$ W4 h! F) h/ `associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality * ?3 T9 U* y4 c" e3 A8 s5 ?" Zassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical , W6 ]# j+ M: ] p0 sEvaluation : K0 d$ `' S: mThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to : L8 V& F/ U% v. S$ L: m! Y% a* A& kdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 4 e1 a+ ?" Y9 _4 O; L" ~the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 6 X$ v, l C5 v/ ]Technical / j1 y1 E% ?, W: L/ e* I$ xObjectives K7 |# r, L( _( R8 cThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available 3 C3 q. D7 V! a j: j; ?+ F4 rfor stating binding technical requirements. 5 _( Q1 |) P2 _% ?Technical Objectives & $ d: v, h" r! k ^6 z8 o5 x& D0 fGoals (TOG) $ d! Y: X5 n2 _High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS / `5 f1 f5 r D8 G9 J5 C* A8 tdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical 8 D+ l) K8 q& i1 JParameters (TPs) / D: P, W' A& H! m9 i& i* f/ |A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical , ~# P% j: W0 j- w3 Y" TPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 6 n$ n9 a& W* r; y1 J; g3 ]management. Technical ' y. z& n4 d$ _! A) \Performance Measurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status ; \& y* p0 M r2 G1 z! e# Abeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance $ V ^- H) B7 p N+ P$ p6 J( ~: Wparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures ! r8 _3 m& i2 l: k4 T6 `differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. / r7 Y J" U; p1 E) ^. vTechnical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form # T5 |6 a9 \) J- wthe basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. a0 X5 V+ x: J3 h: t; v; I* {" PTechnology 2 A. Y4 N( m B. T4 s) ]2 RExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. 9 b- w! G2 j o' q3 f+ jTechnology Program 1 X9 Q% I9 A! _% t6 PDescription # [- i' j$ G7 e( T9 J( ^/ |The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 9 N* d$ @- F8 f4 q0 @0 [9 Gsupporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ! G/ S5 z1 I$ g4 g M6 cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. : j1 w+ L; E3 z4 a$ M" d# y& NTelemetry, ' m& U# J" \( X( g( uTracking, and Command (TT&C) , u1 q( P/ L3 r1 g4 X: MFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a % h- R' O5 q: D ?sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ; w' r- c* i- {" ymission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the : K, B4 Q) Q$ \+ jautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 8 {1 H! |2 d5 Y- lTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. 4 ~' d% ^* ]- D' uTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. & @9 D5 A0 ]# g$ K8 r/ o6 N. g( TTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of ( M/ P( m3 k+ w* [! W' C1 N1 O. T( Fcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ! d9 C0 X% ~* D& H, ATER Test and Evaluation Report : V; o- s/ r1 a9 J! ?TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. ' d& ]+ d2 R) `( a0 w$ V( S) Q7 gTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense $ W9 e5 f9 u8 V9 u# g a( lSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. 6 {" }% l9 b* Z! [Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase / [' o! x0 R3 ~( t w6 \& cand trajectory termination. 4 D- X: |2 ?7 y* U. rTerminal Phase 1 s/ t7 p2 }0 E* u3 O0 ?5 qInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the ! U( @5 P& y8 m# l, [- o! C& Oterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy - U. F( o' @# [& s9 |! iPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 3 [; C ]- N( }: b) {1 m0 ?: o* wTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. . {0 R1 u9 }, \2 T0 Y. H; wTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, / r: C8 T) U+ L( m' M$ u$ |analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and 9 K% f' H5 x8 Q2 z# C% g3 P! LEvaluation (T&E) 1 K8 i5 j+ J, `' f8 m, g/ VProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 8 R4 `" x7 ]8 |8 ` U3 Q8 Z6 tto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three ( P, O1 } q0 ?7 w, etypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical 0 u6 Y( O1 B" _: l: ?% i2 Eperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, 6 |8 O, }8 g; i4 F* o( E& H# }& W6 ~and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel ! S6 K/ Z+ G m0 x' b% d; trequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that s' w& @8 [7 z. f( J0 rthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before 6 `7 w# e3 a3 J, y% ]$ Rthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic # d' v/ y) m: xenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. ! H( @7 F* H2 LFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness " J$ O5 b C1 I( g* e }and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of & k' H6 d5 J% n1 Z3 wdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation l% ?& \! u' T1 mMaster Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation & J, T6 M5 M6 B6 Fto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ) b2 t6 m8 W( vearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development " ^& i& e+ l, K) \+ tprogresses. Test and % `, ]" T6 V$ s! b# q; n* L2 E2 P' \" wEvaluation 0 r D! ~ D- P" q/ f, {0 pWorking Group + @- [% b1 R- P& s5 b(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 0 U8 R$ f9 h0 _1 Rplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. - p2 k% n. U N3 aTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration Working Group $ M0 B C n& ^8 J+ ~; v(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ) T \! _4 H" a$ q7 V4 oorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between : q( }( T; ]- h9 _9 K; ~6 Sdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. % [) n5 G8 m% o) j9 z; Q7 G1 q9 |4 VThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, $ X! ]: }3 S, V' S! q% e- ptest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation ! y" J2 ~/ s) m+ }0 ~( P! [' y! {criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 3 ?3 y2 C2 ~; N. s, M+ D' bSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. , |! V( X- _- b `/ k/ TTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 8 F+ E6 c3 ~+ x5 j8 KTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ' l7 j/ a3 I3 V- ^. Z! FTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). : v2 g: y9 G5 D% F+ b( LTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 0 F: K' `% d" B! N4 wTF Task Force. . N6 [' G, l8 {$ X0 K0 p+ N- wTFC Tactical Fusion Center. ' E( W! `) I9 v7 {6 M. oTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. " B0 l( n" R# S+ g2 dTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). ; F6 K8 `: Y( p" H# ETFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 6 w) N2 x2 g/ M) O, J ]TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. " ?* }1 f7 E+ ?8 d/ y! h% y# GTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 4 V$ L" V& |* f: NTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). 5 l4 F. N; C6 m" j% bTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 9 E3 y) J& {* \- B n K, I; `TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 7 e3 I% m: O+ dTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a + l c: o9 c' P# m" v4 b) jcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 4 A: X! q7 v+ VTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense . z, R7 `$ t G0 Y, Y(TBMD) System 5 T6 w" F1 y0 C4 X3 ^/ |3 qThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 1 d6 D6 c7 E- y! O9 e0 ?ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)