航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user - i: `0 v# q0 i: y* u, d8 h9 _access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. 9 d- Z& c# e5 }/ k, F/ @STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. & @* _: m6 S8 B$ B/ jSTOM System Test Object Model. + a- p; b+ K/ x2 u8 ^( HStorage, Handling, and Transportation Environments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable : L! n) @8 g1 l0 qatmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed " ?) _6 Z3 W! ^0 Vduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. ! R- r2 A5 N d' Z6 G' WStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. 9 p4 I. H( z9 ZStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic 4 S+ K+ c. K# c% @Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to ' T* x$ \; m Z" H8 @$ {; j3 o8 ~4 inullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense ! Z# ^6 C+ u+ w! EEmergency ( J, E0 n; E7 n7 _% g+ ZDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. 6 n9 R; @/ b9 v9 ~8 cStrategic , C2 P4 i% V" K4 m, FDefense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 B- {$ c! X% ?) p280 * ?" t9 ?9 a& c/ H5 f CStrategic Level of # o: K3 e s4 E2 o) b6 M, @- B6 S3 v7 _War ; Z( Q6 p) j+ |+ x7 T" XThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to & ^$ E0 _: J! w/ D5 ^, \8 Oaccomplish those objectives. Strategic ( W; r# `! D( S7 d% GOffensive Forces (SOF) 9 r6 Q! _8 n$ t* Q' i- B* dThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific 3 ^4 b! a* w9 M& E0 e+ k3 ZCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve ! d: ~8 M4 J0 `" Z, g& F1 EThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply 6 s. o3 Y5 I J, ldistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. & Q$ E6 `' v( d+ PStrategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. + u, L0 N6 }1 g' FStrategic & @' L; S. Z7 C7 W( d0 X8 TWarning Lead Time 4 |! ~1 H# x0 F, l/ `) g/ A7 A: \2 DThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic : p! c1 y' l7 c* X- G( _; o0 AWarning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 6 L+ [/ u* ~5 J% h; ~. `+ lgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the # w* q, Y! w) ^$ [0 gnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. " J8 m" z' X3 f& V2 f8 j+ D; }Strategic 1 s) v/ `" q/ c- C$ y' h- M c; V$ uWarning Pre- 7 s9 K* V( Y7 K" O: w- lDecision Time , N: k5 L7 y) x Z3 Z$ rThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course 6 A1 ?9 j! N4 j$ u( h4 c; `of action to be executed. 8 b# c$ P) H; sSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). ; |, u4 M) W( s, d, v/ X } eStructured Attack " E. q1 a& R3 y' @ c0 cAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely - q) E1 k. w% B( j* E5 w1 Z) Qtimed for maximum strategic impact. . z9 s3 ?: P) G, b( F$ uStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one " c! n. `& y. R% f1 }entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more ; E! T$ i0 z. d# R' I* C ~instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or - ]: [' u( c' Z& ?sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. ) w* l1 M/ E; A) @% {! A- kSTSC Software Technology Support Center. & {0 a9 k5 e; P* }0 d2 e wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ' R1 T+ p1 C4 a \1 y281 ; S1 h; @7 c7 `STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. 1 L' h$ z- {3 R" V6 aSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which + W2 [- c1 w7 D' |is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ! R+ E/ E$ H6 q9 E/ p0 c0 DSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. & X; C. G' \* P+ Q+ S) P4 T" aSubject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be P3 z- m0 M# A8 @dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. ) {& j$ x1 M' a7 ?4 VSubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile . Y, w& X4 s; t$ G. o(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. & O# g# X. N( }/ qSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. , \ g- T6 T& ^Subtractive ) i. o- W2 w* WDefense ' P: Q4 V; M( J' M2 cFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. + P5 C( q0 V. R7 V% J, g7 s# BSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. ; i. x( [! a+ ISuccession of 4 y# i' ?- {4 A" W+ z8 b; [Command * K) y# ]" U" n3 y( EThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, ; M* p7 u2 J5 m/ H) u$ Kbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 2 W$ p1 S% K) w4 a3 J# v [is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two * M- v5 z! B. \+ _alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. , K- G/ C* i$ }# n0 i. D' gSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 9 ?) k8 j4 X- ^! pSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. + `1 d0 J: e: ^1 ~Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, : H6 l8 M: I" I: {8 m( G. K! T3 Hthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super & C0 N1 i- N6 b# yradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as " ^4 W' e4 v/ |superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. " d( t. V6 m9 w6 n5 |- mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 3 z7 t2 X2 P2 i282 3 O; [, J$ e' DSuperradiant 4 W# u, o3 E' w' _6 u, W( mLaser (SRL) 8 d+ l6 K7 @# v& VA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional & P6 f( _4 I# L% p1 q" Wlasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from ! E% B4 m9 J# m4 T2 W! u/ |superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and 3 I) s0 o) U% N6 e4 c: {controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. . w0 i; H" c* ^+ \4 S& f1 XSupplemental ! g3 {( ~5 o) o2 h0 Q" lAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support / J& j1 ^1 C: _& r/ ?) ]5 i6 Z! p& LEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the - ^. F U W6 ?: _# K- t0 {mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 6 @% z: Y2 t; W9 C0 r8 }maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and r9 `, {& r2 u# qprotection equipment). : \# N& n- H; T% x+ X; z- ^Support Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous " W2 I7 E% i2 C0 z) o) ?& noperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. 9 v2 \2 H: f, a! `# G3 r \2 b( {Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for ' _1 @) E6 j0 Z/ Aexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. ! s: b; T" [( J: f8 [2 X( ]* ASuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, - c: h9 _) Z2 A: W9 W( Vbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 4 ~: V+ \. H1 m! s5 dSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items , s. q6 i5 T; ^, w: a% Kdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or ' @$ ?: V0 [$ }mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. 1 `0 j- o5 D, r$ L! S5 tSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, # V6 l6 T" ? m) U- `' w8 b; Y- ?( _and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for 6 t1 W2 E( ^$ g, q; R' mcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response : ?( j" n! [& R. zoptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, : L0 a U( T D. N4 Z$ ?+ d; M+ cSatellite and / q) W1 `/ G. {% `* R) AMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites # K4 q/ {4 X5 i5 k. ~* |and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. " u1 ^& g2 ^2 }) t- r5 OSurveillance 0 h q% T1 W* f1 P+ iSystem 5 l& C7 F) k9 z g: R0 NConfiguration ; |* W5 z( }2 C* Q4 W/ u! `+ V, ^The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 2 f8 ]& A8 y; k! g* x283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes / p: h2 q$ S$ K0 c6 Rthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and 8 j; u6 Z8 I5 ]7 }: W* l0 TEnduring ; J# s. o; P0 i- t9 ]8 ACommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ; F5 T! b2 a# \SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. ; v! \& Y# Z( B3 L$ S" f) oSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating ' q P: c8 H" G+ K2 k9 Dband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. 9 Q* j I) \9 U$ `SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. + \3 l$ T9 m7 Y$ gSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. - z& N8 n% v4 r$ V+ I& ] n. h+ KSWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. $ n2 ~( v: b4 y. o; fSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 3 r2 r! A$ z. f4 z w3 Z; F9 ^each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar 2 t7 M; `% M, h: Z6 |$ v(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points + a" o& J; `0 B9 [: Galong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is * t9 D, _. Y5 _% [% j `) q9 @theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 2 i& l+ F+ p& e2 B) jbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 5 \8 r- F9 y8 remitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. : H4 r8 a4 N0 X1 [Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. + K% Q/ w, m. n. S5 w' [$ f9 GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) u* O- t! {4 h! R' H0 M284 SYSCOM Systems Command. 6 V8 z8 k% g! K' _! D7 xSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, + V; E' o7 r0 q4 V1 bdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, + t6 A, y& D! Y3 Z# ^% J; t3 E" Fand delivery to users. * F6 Y3 p; q; @9 y(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a - u* U: M; D j7 h2 n. Ffunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. & j7 C8 K9 T# W) q' l# WSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System $ q: G" B% u* s# NControl. ; z) {' f, R' A3 {System Architecture System Capability Specification 1 s# n9 x" l, C% e1 a(SCS) $ O9 x5 N. U' Z& o! f! iThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the ; B8 V+ D7 H- P: X9 lelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional : y7 }2 a, u% d* u$ b$ h- ]+ l! especifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. ; E1 G, m9 A) _* ^* k0 [5 \: ASystem Center ( S: t; [6 C8 o! w2 r# z/ {(SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) : G" m% w) u# l2 Z, _OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 2 G4 v$ F0 u) n; T1 A; ~5 xconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the . r4 N" B0 P* ]8 F3 }demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other 8 |% R5 c! H* N% ]concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. & ]% q6 U: f% O4 p3 R2 oSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. 8 O/ ^6 {: [: M# eSystem-Critical Function ; b: ]# }, n! t2 b, N- }A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's ! E) n7 T6 h* e6 S6 d& m. m+ cmission. ! v- \9 j6 `" S) e- G/ a5 ?9 cSystem Definition ! l9 d/ X g/ E* kReview (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 1 F) [- v$ F* x3 v. Dsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and & {4 N& d; i9 w4 l/ X8 Rfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. * o: l! B9 Y! ^System 5 k4 d% M7 }# f( A. u) eDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) B- n' Y% Z% ~# k: J# O285 N) X$ }* H1 ]! QSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 1 F, a3 V" ^' mspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and ! Z7 \- P$ f! n9 m9 V7 X" Wcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 1 U# T. m, K) X) L3 T) @$ K* k; y! r# Moperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) 1 U5 n" o: x3 v0 dEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with * p& r ]5 O/ a) ]the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness / z0 F' |+ q, Q+ \- WThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set & H: R% l- Y& D8 a! Wof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 5 I# K. O/ W& Q8 S% s+ b; u: Wcapability. 8 j5 p/ a- A5 m4 k0 M" U& ?0 [System Evolution ; @7 |0 b7 o. K5 b- A. _3 R) ?8 nPlan (SEP) $ N* J' \. f4 W( C9 t& T5 p) EThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS # w w* ?- K9 F# }' f9 O9 k6 Xcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior ' P( A" I0 ?1 m; a$ @Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS " N( x# w! L! E" pDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 5 s& j+ ? P4 f0 a, ^assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to . D( o- d% B; a0 r4 vachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. 8 W) A B% ]; {System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 9 `$ E& g9 E1 `# A: E$ a' aa set of common characteristics. 6 B% d1 u) |5 R. |System Generated Electromagnetic 9 g6 Q: f7 I% ]* h" TPulse (SGEMP) 0 m1 c, ~; f8 T6 r: t- h& cTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the # @- S' K9 `, |) I. l( ~, vsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the - V8 `5 u+ {$ \! v3 D4 Dprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. 9 g9 |0 f, X3 t( r9 N1 @: A6 B; RSystem Integration Test 1 I. m2 ^8 k/ ?3 F2 a/ @A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual # G5 g P, D$ Q W1 j& |+ {5 omanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. System Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 0 a# u8 _8 y S, R- Z( ~4 pdeployment, and support of a system. System Operation and % v9 q/ s' \ _! [( ZIntegration / h6 h; b% ?$ I& z2 |Functions (SOIF) . e8 r" y7 P' U$ iThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 5 j) G3 T' W9 Vthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic ' q4 x! B# {9 J) R7 @" ~2 xBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 1 [6 _/ I1 l* u; f5 D5 g& j; cposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 2 B; [: [% d; H8 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S E: X5 l* H$ e# j& ?286 0 t, }3 Y! `/ C! V7 rSystem Program 1 T3 \6 m8 @* Y( G; z# g9 F: ZOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System - [( g8 b1 h( Z6 ~( e bReadiness : Y5 L7 c, e6 w2 N% oSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out + ~% n' r/ K- @1 W* Z& }the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 6 [ g4 A% e$ o) u* x3 q- b1 hincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the # h) Y$ m/ h0 N; j! ?$ fcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions - I5 _3 j* b4 E9 Bnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results ( k* n& H" a* O- F9 bstatus reporting. 4 R/ ^2 I0 L4 d. t+ p1 V! E8 eSystem |: |9 k" W; E/ c# u dReadiness Objective 5 c1 Y% {0 m$ B3 m4 ?' mA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 3 l' I" w( w3 f* X zsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 9 L( P0 N4 ?) V8 |7 Hcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System % R* l. ~/ H0 l0 m* SRequirements 1 Q+ V: R# @+ M) c, q& |Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 4 }% }( X, d# bConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. 4 i& j) R* Z! fSystem Requirements {. g0 p9 c, k0 P5 s7 tReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. ( w7 }- X: f# @ ?3 l. v, ^Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. , R- F" {& Q/ K( X6 h; ySystem Security 1 j" O I% L6 ?( C# ]- `Engineering , c- I9 j$ r2 ?* p5 I(SSE) : [' ~+ }# m+ p9 g8 i- ]: XAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks ' Y" {; e1 ?. W6 `, e9 r3 z& uassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and ' l* Y$ ?* b, Q+ yanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to * h# ~# U7 S3 o* U3 _" qsecurity threats. System Security Engineering Management Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ( p, N3 Z2 j" G5 M1 i7 v( ddefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the ! u ^4 X i! B2 W5 a4 b2 w! mresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security ) M, ]2 b4 }0 ?Management Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to ! D B9 h; V" i5 A8 J. U, Qmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. 5 @+ @; h4 d2 n/ ~/ F2 ASystems & y3 N! `$ F; p# R7 zEngineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. ) \5 ~) s& O' [. a/ C, J# UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + J" m. s, `& Y: |; `' Z. s287 Systems + U* b( p3 e" WEngineering Management 1 V4 U% U* O- j/ x! d) M5 _Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 8 A1 s: x& }3 u0 D5 m+ H' M) d9 |Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) # w8 j' z7 d' @( K! [- _. D) EKey engineering milestones and schedules. ; V" W; Q. v! ?" C/ l# rSystems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. ) ^5 a- ]& x, u2 B) Q, Z9 |( r9 KSystem Threat Assessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 5 k( s6 ~# i% q( G6 D& x2 c' g" N2 v1 ^Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency ) s, } R3 X9 B) e9 s: ^& r# Dand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. ! J7 @5 e) m$ N3 Y& R% x6 k5 xSystem-Valued Asset 4 u& e" [" u) E# I3 W T6 O2 e# W- eA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 0 n, p. H- @. L7 C) O7 Sthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. & Y5 k2 n2 e! I9 w" hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 ?) |2 u8 y% d* q+ ^ f288 0 c2 S4 C& _- yT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. ( a9 E9 R, B$ P9 J5 zT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. 5 n+ P R- B7 e9 N' {/ D0 X+ q# I: gT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. ' \6 Z* O" n9 pT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 3 L/ S; l4 K5 IT 2 Technology Transfer. 1 g7 ^3 S F$ r# Y7 AT 2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. ; c: o9 M) i5 ?/ [8 `2 kTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 9 j }, p) V+ i1 r$ r) ]) ^TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. % n% z0 ]0 z" A5 w+ W; C! tTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. # F' b, ~' i# Q* |8 ], A( VTACC Tactical Air Command Center. 2 S& `! P- h/ ^4 z7 STACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). " H- K' ]' g. k' p- X7 fTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 7 A5 H+ {7 s9 C' UTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). $ B$ f1 }2 u: T# K& P3 NTACON Tactical Control. * _# M: D: `( I( u% g. ?$ t* nTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : z* U5 R: S- N( w3 F289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation ! g1 V6 B i% q* D3 l- TTactical Air . d: ~+ o. `" o6 ]# i1 oDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air . J8 \; G2 z8 y( `0 t; ipower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 7 V" V. w. y( _Tactical Air # l' l4 b& n9 M0 IOperation T" Y- S! X+ rAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with % O- Q9 s c' s( E! e3 _ground or naval forces. + x ~$ t8 ~- U& m* v; `: uTactical Air Operations $ g8 C j, [" f, h% g. R+ S/ q/ a3 NCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. 8 t( {# X* w9 FTactical Air $ ^6 q# S" G3 c' w# OSupport 5 s4 y8 D/ v' Z- EAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly % a2 B. p0 T$ ~2 B# Eassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 7 W" C; b+ w" a$ q5 l' z, Ocommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) , W- L! Y; E/ }7 H1 o* z! F2 fA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be $ q: J& V, E, q, m6 u3 w* r* p# [employed within a continental theater of operations. ) v* h; Z; S9 d9 q8 z1 q3 @Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 4 M" m" C/ s. j2 ]6 E7 I5 Adevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or ! k% Z4 R7 o xmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 7 _. ~0 Z& g9 t* kTactical Data Information link 6 t3 }# \2 u" a/ Z3 Z, FA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. ! F& ~% S- ?5 W! f; OThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. % w. _) K6 x/ D4 _8 e$ T/ w, mTactical Level of War . q$ A7 p: S9 v- K. o0 MThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area 7 [0 u. y, O+ O3 E% L+ O5 k(TOA) v1 y# P) q$ }% V, y( d: WThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 7 O! v2 [7 ?$ v6 ^* L) {: [area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. # I3 K: j% p) q; ?9 _& w) ZTactical 4 {- q7 @1 E8 g% X1 U" UOperations d) O7 a4 ]1 S4 T) [Center (TOC) ( [3 e: a! J x" W2 q: O- y( JA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. / I1 |, F# N9 b* q2 ZTactical Warning 3 B z; M% N/ m(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an 8 Q3 r ^; S" S) e) |/ w- W8 eevaluation of information from all available sources. % X/ s* ?3 @* u(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type " i1 z9 J2 _/ \# r( Oand size, country under attack, and event time. : H X2 M/ y% @4 s# y/ ?; F% c. pTactical Warning/Attack Assessment 1 t3 _# _, @% L8 `0 \(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack 0 w( d5 O. i* f4 h0 ]4 K0 f, [Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) W1 ?$ W9 u5 y* P# w8 M) Z* G290 2 [5 X V: b; b0 Z rTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. 2 J. K: v' W. w$ OTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. & e" |: v% U9 a: r1 ^$ qTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. & N" @5 e- p5 p( F N6 U' \, mTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. 4 N1 ^0 J' { h6 zTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 9 l0 s8 E2 r9 a5 n( P) I$ H: kTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 0 M7 v- H! k! z5 \0 hTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” ) }0 u1 X0 ?+ W, j; {# L9 @; o$ dTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 2 s# v! x' B3 r$ E8 E Y3 DTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. ' A2 b. I4 k- D BTADL Tactical Data Link. ; N$ C- q# {9 o' t2 PTADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 6 K8 k6 V; t0 ^7 QTAF Tactical Air Force. : _7 ]/ ^4 s K. V; xTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. 1 [5 r! F2 {" I6 ~TAI International Atomic Time. / Q4 ?5 ^- N7 [ Z/ ATAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector 8 K4 v, U1 \ G( q( C, c+ ?and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. * q1 ?) u- [3 p L, S6 N+ KTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. ' Y5 l5 l' V/ d7 x8 ^. w @Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). / |: ]* c: @) _8 _4 y+ HTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. h* f: f! E" x5 y- `Tank Fragmentation . ]$ ^6 J7 x2 eThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. $ \- a" ~) B' BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) K( F0 C) p7 O& g4 ^291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. 3 R3 N: `- x9 KTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. . z3 H' S2 A0 t3 _4 bTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. " Z: F. ~5 }4 T3 o(2) Threat Activity Report. ) O& f: z7 X6 t8 ~8 c- ~3 a) F(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. ; k, m: E/ x) }5 uTarget Acquisition ; K$ L1 a* m# w8 ^7 E7 W4 N; z( Q& gThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage ( l4 D- H0 E. H+ fregion of a sensing system. ) }1 ^5 N+ k. b& v/ b% sTarget 9 q! O: A2 o W9 LClassification and Type 0 J8 \/ c( u) ^5 PIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, ; g! f0 i$ r. K" y$ Adiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target " J8 k/ \& [; M8 g8 c* NDiscrimination 2 [* j- u0 B; Z6 D. F& `, X% dThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object 2 @/ p$ ^. V1 ]0 yMap (TOM) 0 Z9 @5 v$ @. y p! C: D, i5 yA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 9 O, w# I- f# W0 p" a1 ttarget designation. (USSPACECOM) % ? v1 g. Q# A0 j% g. NTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. , M: }. o: R) _; o4 l( cTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 7 f9 U3 B+ {" ?7 L7 Nidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System . ^! X/ I; I0 m6 DRequirements - h* N* \& D. H) eDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 8 }, {) a# C) ?Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target " u" j3 T* R6 T% Urequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. & o/ o& w2 d& X! ZProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. - _9 @' `+ O! w- x% K$ XTASA Task and Skills Analysis. 9 ?7 R% ~$ S4 d( o/ A' F9 P: ETasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. 6 I' ^0 k+ Z3 X+ B* s: ZTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ) L- @1 l1 \8 ]! aTAT Technical Area Task. 7 z4 \8 u: U# ETAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 3 S* ~: k& f/ F: MTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. : c. g# V5 T1 Y; D7 y1 k& kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T - @6 g' ~+ {/ g2 R292 3 o/ |9 ?% o; @1 a! hTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. " Y _% i; k) STBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. 0 x; ?1 `2 r. e/ @& O3 n! h G" nTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 2 A" m. F/ |) R5 U( K! P! hTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 1 H6 V' E! ?7 P( O& m" H6 G+ Q( CTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. % Y$ N! o& ~4 J6 }! r: o" e3 VTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. ! r6 ?1 D$ g; ]2 o5 oTBN To be Negotiated. 3 {- G" w6 M; J6 i) J1 yTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). ( H; m' w( _, n0 k2 o(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled * O4 I( V8 _& e. 7 }5 I7 _3 i% f" q; O* v: jTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. % J: i* A/ L6 z0 }) a- LTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 6 J* ?+ u6 P& V% a0 I& @) k# r7 vTCE Three Color Experiment. # e2 \# a8 u+ \# R# yTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 6 b! W+ S9 A/ K: `) w' @! LTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 3 w/ w6 g0 e7 c' U/ rTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD , h2 A2 t% K& ]7 c* m# _7 {Countermeasures Mitigation). . |4 ~% u4 I% z) oTD (1) Test Director. 7 R9 h! Y! Q, B8 ^(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. : H' T# l/ `; h' E7 R1 w$ ]TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 L, u, }" @$ R% m293 5 [* v [ g1 S5 ZTDBM Track Data Base Manager. , V+ ]0 Z% s: A& B4 eTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. , F/ {' d8 M. J. c, Q- y: A3 d(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). . N L! M2 F, H% b! ^0 wTDCC Test Data Collection Center. , s3 a: Y6 S( h; `( `2 MTDD Target Detection Device. ) e; \" ~% l9 CTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. 2 Y' Y$ B: W0 D$ K' s gTDI Target Data Inventory. ) J, ~( H+ h3 \. I+ D9 k! J. [TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. ; {7 I% R0 [5 d: p8 rTDM Time Division Multiplexed. : F, j0 Q/ l4 a% M8 `% p8 VTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. , P+ ?. b0 C+ B3 {4 ZTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 9 o; o+ p# m* q3 u/ RTDP (1) Technical Data Package. & N4 ^+ T1 M5 R(2) Test Design Package. * V% q2 Q- y# e& q" g: N(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. * ]9 ^5 M9 _ `8 A- ~& z# jTDR Terminal Defense Radar. 9 B; T+ i4 L: L! Q4 e* a8 u8 LTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 0 e1 r8 t; T! nTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. ) y3 f6 k$ e) Z" A- F2 ?- h! vTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. , m, f3 @, X( g3 p+ Y2 M1 LTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician - d5 O7 H* l" e) X/ j% z* }7 YTECH Technical / m: \7 w% \: F$ O4 k7 QTECHON Technical Control. 4 `6 e/ s, H/ z$ M2 G8 Q6 yTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " U) j, R& G3 P) U( O1 X# g2 g294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract 9 T! b6 p! J- y) {1 E& cadministration. " B/ a/ |: @' o2 cTechnical Data # l0 s6 k& g- ]9 {Package (TDP) 1 e( E6 U/ q% D6 OA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines 5 \3 A) w; q& f6 b; A! ]5 d% [the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item + u% ?3 _4 u0 C- Cperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, " u# ?! d0 C/ _4 \* t- zassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality / e6 Z' C% t3 t/ Wassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation ' _. G1 ?9 Q" L6 c4 A! k/ g+ wThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to $ O( j& D: e5 ldetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in # V9 m6 ~8 N' ?/ ?the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. % y& \+ S( W6 u* k: WTechnical 1 k. c0 t( B m) Z4 U% N) xObjectives & 5 ~3 q3 o% I) @Goals (TOG) ) y: r2 c+ I; g) W8 vHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 0 {5 g4 m2 A) [# n3 m* m* fdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. , }# Y; i" w9 T5 C4 @" {Technical ( {8 d4 `, Z! d- V( ~) W9 A! c! @Parameters (TPs) - f+ ^! i3 H) U- uA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk 3 w2 P0 l3 w4 V4 R$ o- Qanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by . P; w1 k# U ]' g8 M; P c- Gmanagement. 4 n3 B) h8 d( L3 @, s8 e+ }Technical Performance * b- ]: {) ~& N* Y N9 o/ KMeasurement (TPM) 6 E n$ A* ?! q" C9 SDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ( k0 p2 \( ^8 P& m. o, Jassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the . T4 x( ]/ _$ H. n) E. c* bvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product # Y' Y" n" M2 _" a7 E% _3 O9 Nelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these 6 \# u) u5 t( e6 @9 C! _differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 6 r0 Q: x1 Q1 x5 j8 lthe basis for actual design development and production. 6 Q& d/ ]. z4 z3 w5 U8 DTechnical - L# G; B! _; @+ w8 ^, \+ T& ySurveillance * _3 P1 f" U5 S4 Q$ H3 R" g/ QIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 2 T2 f: @& W7 b8 @# }$ |4 }0 C4 gemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing " H2 G6 u/ y5 j' F. j9 EAgent. " ~! I. p. ?3 g9 e5 b8 c M( KTechnology 3 D: z5 D4 }$ R# B- hProgram 1 v/ k6 R, I4 D+ K8 r0 {Description 1 X7 ?( M9 Y' ?# x) H+ c c$ wThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. % ^+ [7 P9 b" I$ b+ f: n- ~/ p) VTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' X7 z4 c: u6 Y% O* I9 ]# X295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. 2 ?% P2 Z& C) W: W9 w' \Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) 4 r3 ^$ C: W' S" F* ~Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and * b! N7 q" j/ h+ C( Vstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 8 n% I$ c3 V+ b5 q6 G& tmission commands to the satellite. 1 F4 o- i. n; W$ d; ]* LTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the 1 R& ?: u* V( _, @3 ?automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. 3 D* _2 `# S3 s& w* ~" o7 k* dTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 3 \; u/ B# w4 h8 y) p JTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of 9 O: M' w* F8 o2 R0 R8 r5 o: F- w, Fcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 2 r. F! B; x/ \"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See + j. p6 f+ u ~4 x2 _2 _Compromising Emanations.) 9 z0 u8 \) p5 _/ \) ITENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ) c( C& t6 T/ x6 d' b$ j0 eTER Test and Evaluation Report `9 i& u$ g9 OTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. " I0 x7 Z' c4 ]& R; a$ ` cTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ( ^0 j! Z/ D5 u4 I- yTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) 6 m% G$ t' Y i" ~; N0 M1 MThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 7 ?0 J% H# S# m; W3 ]( G2 j0 [atmospheric reentry and impact. - K W( ?* v s5 J; MTerminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 6 I% ?1 P) v; I9 b4 M4 \6 Nvicinity of the target. / P2 U$ U$ M/ H6 J z6 nTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase 9 P0 C# f3 t# a, [" z' |+ pand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 8 R- x# I. @: l; }* D# B7 Z" {terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy ; g; k5 y. K4 APBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) ! r& O' b8 a$ B; E, tTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. ; |- m( H- ?4 _2 o/ FTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. / X4 ~' R7 I* r: _& C. ^; tTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. + p0 e9 o& T6 M) F& _, xTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. 8 L+ U/ ?* F$ g6 Q; XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary ! ^9 }& T* P3 c2 O- _0 p( S: j) d/ kconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all + j" h {4 d; n1 xoperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, - }% g* _6 `7 ^# ^0 z; hanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated * K: e9 [, i6 Nto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted % z% L4 G9 z/ P9 h$ w& wto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof . D9 a+ V6 `( L7 K3 |manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical , \6 B- g, j. D p" Yperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before + U u3 r* F% ^) e3 Bthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. ! r3 c. O3 o, c5 H/ T2 mFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of 0 P/ X; _ O2 O2 @, ^% i( Edeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan ( h* p7 z( g6 A q U1 }! N/ w(TEMP) : A: H1 ~* `3 ?. \0 \An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ' q: ?* W$ g2 }6 _6 Aearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and 9 j: _3 N( h* ?" ?, }0 IEvaluation 6 K4 V) ] \- b, mWorking Group (TEWG) * ]2 @. b' M; W# }- LThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the , l: Q- z' z* w1 NAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of / ^9 w @4 \1 d0 a' F+ ]- X$ Mtest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test / M l) t. y) ]; J: y. \integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the ' s4 T5 p/ I- d6 D+ l8 C9 ]program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. ; Z! \4 G% j' u) Y, GTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software . l# j4 @+ F& F0 Xand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. T" v* F. f% Z+ `6 R# v g9 V( JTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. " ^; j7 f# R h+ W( K+ Z0 D$ `Test Integration Working Group (TIWG) # @8 }2 S: W7 k' v" k% W; P* q4 ?+ DA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between $ _4 {1 F( ~' P# jdevelopmental and operational testing. - b9 h) j1 \' X) i2 t0 l& X4 ZTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation . i Z9 j9 e2 m" p0 \) L$ c: v3 l2 Xcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. * i# @0 A2 l: h: s8 K, AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " o4 A+ R1 R* R2 Q$ y! e297 Test Target 4 `6 N$ i4 H# ?. Y$ KVehicle (TTV) # @; k% E, {& o- {Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 1 _# h& j, x* b- _2 xTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ! Z! L2 Y5 g+ ?. _6 O1 @" NTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. . R2 y. l$ L2 y. d K- BTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). . {' W8 _6 l# G( @) P3 sTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. ) s5 a/ w5 J# Q- d; m* T' w7 Y TTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). * F9 v& m% g, D& eTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management # x- ]# ?% n0 q. V9 u$ i# y& X( qTFOV Theoretical Field of View. : Z) t$ B% a! X# nTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). % d P B" |+ KTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. & |2 ?- L( y& u. I, \9 [2 I; ETGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). 3 Z& Q; ^ J) K- d ~- eTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 5 s7 ~- j8 _# oTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 3 G# f3 {! t ?* a& MMissile Defense * u2 a- F7 k% r3 f) z7 i& p(TBMD) System $ d4 V" c4 O/ t$ `( B& F. w bThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)