航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 3 G+ J3 g2 A) z4 caccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. + F4 `* I7 R- R2 j0 ~2 g5 A6 W0 ^STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. : c/ E- x2 [' P' `8 x3 H$ }0 n; z; qSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. + k7 E/ L, C+ ]# iSTOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 3 ?4 I1 [/ C: G" MHandling, and Transportation ' b' a7 `5 x( K- C! QEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient / k) k1 @/ h+ L* T4 I" [environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during # F$ Z9 x/ \8 W& {; {) ystorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, ; s; ~: L1 _5 l* _* G# y. Bshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 9 j2 r$ M) \) J( F4 q1 u5 LSet. ! d! K* Z1 l1 B; ^% I3 u$ @% J; U4 kStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s . |% t/ |, {9 f/ O* OApache missile. 8 \7 p" @: N `2 A9 nSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. ' p4 b" c6 U( SStrategic , P) H& _4 G$ j/ I: R# ODefense - r" z$ P. g; h1 LAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ) k( L; k: i1 c! h1 ?6 _" a* ~ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. 8 V+ s0 H3 |$ [Strategic Defense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. 2 _+ d' _! r3 u% p! ?Strategic / Q2 q$ z, v' R( T0 ~6 z4 Z8 IDefense System 2 @% n5 s" j9 D4 l/ f4 o(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving 2 u2 v( {. v/ t! ]" Qballistic missile defense system. ; s$ b9 Z7 L" b) P$ V3 e. P: J# \6 BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 |' A' A$ D3 D7 e. l6 s8 @8 z8 K* e280 Strategic Level of " [6 v+ C- |* u8 A6 l$ {War , @* |* Z' Q/ W0 z( Y/ N, q$ j! mThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or . n; _/ y$ O9 }' J- _alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. Strategic 3 R. i/ K$ r/ J* nOffensive Forces (SOF) 5 k& Q* I6 \0 X8 k5 r# h( `4 eThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific 1 j T# p0 M6 M% GCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. + M% v$ p3 E! K, aStrategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to - |/ }4 U g. D: k; j7 V0 xstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. ( a C! Y- O( T% V3 _Strategic 2 b9 d% M' e* ^) J- n7 eWarning + Q; j3 ]0 U, cA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. ) Y" f0 q! ^% J4 n% pStrategic ! k- ]3 B' u1 hWarning Lead 0 ~; [! m$ S6 C" S/ CTime That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of # x( O% ]5 F4 n7 b* @/ V5 Bhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. # X# w: O2 A: zStrategic Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends * n+ S0 U+ U4 ?6 D4 Awith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic ; K; P3 D& f" f4 n# N0 b% gwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 5 ?& @+ ~! u. U0 w9 ~4 I4 Lnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 1 u( J0 H- x: Z+ M3 Uthe pre-decision period. Strategic 2 W3 |+ W* e. g) |7 L; PWarning Pre- Decision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a . D$ W9 u6 N" @7 Rdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course 7 ?) _7 |5 ]" z; fof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). ; c& _ C, t/ T1 e2 q3 f$ B3 v3 Y9 J6 jStructured 6 Y9 @: h9 S( [; H( i8 h6 f8 `Attack . Z, q, X: h/ ]5 nAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design 1 t4 `1 ?7 m1 f( c+ {6 {0 ~; d! dA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules * C0 ~1 C1 X" ]2 Xbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data x- `) Z* j2 _flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured ; b9 n s+ t* F1 k1 |) RProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one ' ~& ~2 ?" i4 i6 ?5 P1 L- Dentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or $ R' n( \( r3 i' j% z1 ?* z' Gsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 4 d8 d: T/ p. Y- W' hinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. ) x( Q8 R0 T- @5 o9 ~! r9 i4 BSTS See Space Transportation System. ' n* y; |: k+ b' \STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 8 q7 |: E* F% p: r# [* @STU Secure Telephone Unit. , J* i4 Y- l6 N0 }1 y5 d/ i# K1 MSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. . O: ] j ^" V4 d; `& wSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. ! v* a, T! }# L0 f d0 w' n) u( F% VSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. % h" k4 c' x! ]! SSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security , J# J v& ?% N& v' ]7 fLevel " g$ s3 M) Q& t' Y% \0 U9 e; SA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- : I6 ^8 t9 [- A3 N* K+ ^7 R* u2 xLaunched 8 a2 T& z4 ]# Y5 g9 W/ FBallistic Missile 7 w9 w7 s1 p) k5 W+ B(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. % O5 K& l; d* X* C% c3 s" h, _SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive $ j# ^" H: r6 X7 MDefense ' U" r+ x2 q( C/ W W" [First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of 1 O; P# M$ s" A- W" a, H, k1 R" {& N5 jCommand $ Q: [! s; ], h$ oThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command - r; g c- o% q3 A, fis a synonymous term. ; P @ l' G v. Q( v, jSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). % i0 M9 V9 J, u$ i# |Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. : Y4 p: g+ _- X( x" tSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in / I0 l) h* O& G2 \a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 9 C( w3 w; g) b [) N& S uradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 6 y- l( \' _9 tMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 }, {" Q( A1 _9 v282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) % V2 S4 _4 o0 _A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 7 x2 N9 W' x) I' I! @% e; lrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional : B/ H! G% _' R. llasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 4 ?+ P, r; Q. O6 c1 qsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 7 j7 @' B' |/ \. g# B$ Hbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 9 } o& @! S/ I" yor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. ! s$ L5 |3 X6 F0 o, |Supplemental 2 I# _; c5 t% D: Y8 G, [Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. ) K0 @- d9 ]7 |% q) H2 u6 FSupport " w/ O8 ?7 z3 P. iEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 1 B4 H( d0 @3 n1 vmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), $ S9 b/ X/ _: [maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 7 {8 \! X- [+ \' H' b* _equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and $ o- Q2 n* I1 p$ n- Aprotection equipment). 9 m' s; }$ m3 X7 d, USupport ) |& O7 i1 M* k4 ^* ^0 Q3 APersonnel a2 X' P2 Z! B& a7 e9 ~. i+ d9 AIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly * W3 {0 s: \2 v, v: H& sassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous ( H. y% |- g3 goperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. : x) m0 L6 C K- A% W# [9 YSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for % C( L; W W& I/ r- R9 Uexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. + F) O5 [* D2 E$ z, v7 ]) {Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 9 M0 ^: ?) p kbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. + S3 E( r8 c E5 x7 [5 [Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items I5 E4 o, O% |' n# ^due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess * X9 e+ ^ J1 h0 Iproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity R1 a( R! C* E) A1 fmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 0 O6 Z! D0 k& x: K1 g/ _and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements 1 }4 W; x2 d! Z: RRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. , r& z" p4 Q* RSurveillance, 8 `' w) ], l4 ]: g' TSatellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites ' M: c r% p5 o0 Uand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 2 b) Y0 E" R! P9 A1 l+ CSurveillance System 3 s0 v; H5 a# L) O1 \8 mConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. 1 W# f. ^3 n+ W1 ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 7 [( e" n4 r- q283 9 B3 Q; v$ l; g; v, SSurvivability Operating Modes 0 d, y$ A& C- T, W, vThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes & r6 ?2 P! K3 g4 [: X. z7 {that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. \) Y3 h1 f7 RSurvivable and : a% n& Q/ |" @. I* @Enduring 4 @6 Z9 @# o' C- r' {1 Q( rCommand Center 8 ^; U8 ?+ F( E2 Y(SECC) * K7 R6 b, u6 u; N2 ~The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ) d9 E3 ]- H, o" `# |- K7 eSV Space Vehicle. ' L- f) L$ L' M% T& Z7 bSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. " i( V6 R; c; P- v3 G2 K9 NSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating ( j: \1 T1 x' {6 X+ `$ `* N5 iband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. ! f4 g" ]6 O* e9 X9 m8 C7 [4 @. |+ l) rSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 3 {& L# e# h7 E5 O- F& {3 p; USWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. ! l1 y4 ^- ]; ^8 S$ ySWSC Space and Warning System Center. / g$ {. h, L2 f# S l0 ~- p+ l/ cSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. # Q& V Z) `& k4 j- f/ \9 [Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to ; p: }) H7 d6 `4 G$ ~+ [one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. ( l7 p% g- H" \7 M7 _7 j2 N; J, USynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 5 r: F5 m- A3 b& ?) s [1 talong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 8 S: r2 A( B& j# ^' M4 O3 G; ntransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's % r O8 W( W; d* z! Psignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal $ t- [2 |. C) p% S, C" {1 i temitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. I0 G1 k9 u' d8 S; lSys C/O System Check Out. 4 y! P/ T+ @# I; F5 H% @ FSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. # ~* Q% U" _ g5 H& l+ i R ]6 f( z: Y6 OSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with p+ `9 }5 x4 `1 K- a e! U9 v- jspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. 6 A0 U& V8 L; G2 B0 P6 p(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 4 E/ {% J6 @5 N6 U9 c5 q- F; \. ~functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a / R2 P' {8 y/ Trequirement. System 9 h4 g+ C( w* I& l9 ]Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. * p' F7 n2 p( @4 g, V0 f) n8 DSystem Architecture & n: p, N! T# i- cSystem 2 R3 J l' M# L- [3 s( k; \Capability 2 R. R8 y/ h( R3 ASpecification 4 d% z# S+ P0 j3 P, P( F(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system . O. S& H% j1 a6 _' y% f, zarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among , {$ B$ f: a# c( [4 R8 F: mthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 6 b/ [% t) @! A. L) Asensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. - m& E2 ]2 m" Y1 Y/ P0 `System Concept ) V; W0 K) Q3 E9 S! qPaper (SCP) " M: |0 v @6 N: b" pOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 3 l" U3 C# `: J- _' E/ Fconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. / g1 t. K1 j5 d0 I0 n, Y' oSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. : M/ o; Z( I. {0 ` O! VSystem-Critical 4 U4 v* I) h5 e' iFunction % W& ?% T: r; o9 j8 E% VA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. System Definition Review (SDR) , q8 [! T* ?$ _5 UThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. - i, u5 K: e0 R/ ?System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 & L/ t' v# ?! r5 S( I& }7 NSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, + d1 i& U/ T$ y" m1 ]2 U9 f$ F2 hcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. : J! A5 N) l$ N9 F! T3 U9 `7 nSystem Design 5 U9 U! e0 a0 w2 \0 bConcept 1 t2 B, N) S8 ?0 w- a6 \: NAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 9 E0 ^, _/ X6 z6 u6 boperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. % E& o5 M/ {3 G& o' SSystem Design Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. , w# |$ t5 N, }1 `+ _) ?2 y- @System Effectiveness * }1 j6 Q5 B- j o5 MThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. x& O: Z! f; d+ ? B6 CSystem Evolution + | e# t5 ~; \* G- K: }' W _2 ?Plan (SEP) 4 s3 ?. P: P# q0 z0 J! g) B: _. iThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ( L% A( O/ l$ ?- ocapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior ' _. R, Y6 ^2 vExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and * p+ Y. Q8 S; u0 `assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 1 ^. z4 G8 b* }$ ~. s8 Bsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 0 S) Z0 g- |5 s9 Y8 ~achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share ) o( a' z$ U* u6 B5 h$ [, u- c9 va set of common characteristics. System & ^& e1 h( r# R6 y8 tGenerated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 5 [2 ~% C: y# a) Tsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the * d9 Y0 u' }% X5 kobject in order to produce charge equalization. + d$ h! v" j: ~/ [- F% ~5 z2 @4 ?System ) Z) M3 R: r; `. s0 X/ yIntegration Test 6 R5 F% n% k5 A- @6 U& N, PA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, ! H7 i/ F( v% j# m# o1 qsensors, and weapon hardware. 0 D. D& a6 D# q5 G, i( @* a( _; jSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks v$ N& o' ^8 T3 Wand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. ( X! z0 d' R- y& Z \9 BSystem 6 m- P; D9 u/ h7 P" FOperational Concept - X: D* H2 h9 V& ]$ s: a5 _A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration * f; l9 E% N: j, y8 S' n+ gFunctions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command 9 r1 J4 X' Q q) E- A& Tand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 4 E3 I* }4 v, r4 ESystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic ' p, u& h+ N4 X: n& C% HBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 0 ]. u/ \/ y5 y0 `, @8 d Bposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. # T8 \% m7 p6 V. [* N% IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 W# L" I" e6 k) I* a6 P2 t5 k3 K286 / O5 `% s8 S! H% l9 tSystem Program / k2 L0 W6 D; r8 }1 LOffice (SPO) 0 r, {9 t. o5 T7 v) \The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, - e8 v2 c/ S6 U/ Ygovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 0 ]8 f7 ?7 m* q) Oprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness ; Q, ~& K6 ]; M g2 c" }- h* mSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 8 u: m b: M' D9 F# ustate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 1 R3 K3 Y6 [, W6 ]1 F5 [verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under + {2 `/ C! h7 L: o2 [realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions 0 t9 l- g/ R5 Q+ D; Anecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies " A7 O, u; N: U) Dand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 7 s) z7 l+ J( ^6 Khistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 7 c* Q! s# ^$ u! ?6 p- ~status reporting. System ) {$ F+ |2 h0 R* o$ uReadiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 5 s* i& u1 y& Q3 d, g ESystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 9 @( D. N6 I$ d0 ~maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 6 q. K; P4 c9 M5 r/ R( s8 ^system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission * \9 r2 R* @8 h7 t e& hcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. . h+ v! |4 R0 MSystem Requirements # B7 V" q8 C) m- d% i" uAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System + L7 o* K% O3 q0 FConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 5 F* n4 k! P, z) Kspecific system functional and performance requirements. % d) y& B* a$ rSystem 8 @" z0 k0 X: s, N' c% iRequirements 5 H6 Q2 Q0 S& c! x9 VReview (SRR) + Q4 B" Z4 w$ d* r9 ]1 T: R5 @Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 1 f6 W# X' Z# e! L! ]degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. % B' t) a# V$ F* r+ I: sSystem Security Engineering (SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering ( Q2 `0 b+ i& F& d7 _/ V' Mprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks & L* E2 G" Z( c0 N; m% Y" u! uassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related . x7 L9 f/ m, x9 g( U, I# w9 b. Jscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to $ S/ I( |3 X& G v% n) p$ Isecurity threats. System Security Engineering 9 x$ L7 m' p9 j8 W, q% aManagement Program ; O9 u O _* f2 Q) L(SSEMP) / C+ f8 E& S2 e) g; s# M iThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical & u& ^7 ^& S9 D/ \ gachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE ' [4 F7 }8 r3 v" V N3 J- Mprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the : ?) N( U) q* D! u. @& n, X# Q( fdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides & C- e# W" H Y5 s# ]management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes : t, k# H1 m. v* _1 hits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 4 V2 S/ [( j2 o2 nSystem Security Management Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 6 S; U. L/ Q2 B7 { isystems. / ~8 @3 r: ~3 n: O+ ^' B( `, [Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. , W7 F1 J" U% @7 q% fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems ( E' V0 I0 V3 Y6 E7 H/ ~Engineering / I, g: K# X0 B N7 GManagement ) F R0 G: Y4 j% |1 }5 uPlan (SEMP) ! d f+ [- N0 S' c2 b# UThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) , I, f& i5 n; P. V0 `Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. ) `2 x8 X: R; ^$ v' e" FSystems Test Integration and % ]) H+ q$ U9 x1 p5 _% @Coordination + Z0 H: G" M9 b$ CThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat 1 M- a7 a8 j* Q" fAssessment Report (STAR) : y& C Z/ L; ]! `* m- y! O0 f% ?" VRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency 3 f p; V Z: n% I; j' H2 uand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when : u8 q9 r8 F* `3 A& Vthe threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * r, z# Q- e& A288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. ) t9 [$ \$ v$ B; p& \2 WT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). & a6 R" Y) l4 nT 2 Technology Transfer. 8 N# Z# f) T1 b4 F! {' ~T 3 {4 O6 u8 N) L) f2 E Technical Training Equipment. ( j( C) B/ G* \" m' VTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. ; N: x. x& i2 nTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. 5 a. W) f% Z" NTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. * c/ ~5 F. d( ]. M& JTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 5 Z. K1 g- M& B" x! L- Q4 L& PTACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). + S8 r# u3 m) J$ pTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. ) v, v6 | | S8 b+ iTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ~/ z ~$ ]5 ~' R3 j/ ^/ `4 J) qTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. . e' I: E1 b$ M gTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). # p, H/ J" Z6 o3 qTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). $ u. m. D" q7 J( F! QTACON Tactical Control. ! Q* W" ]$ e# q* U1 ]TACS Theater Air Control System. # h; T: [3 A: RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation - m* M# _# U$ V: lTactical Air Doctrine 6 N6 c9 H) [* qFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air $ |8 L: q8 k2 B V8 Tpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 8 I$ \! _! K& d4 n4 Z% Y: k/ bTactical Air 4 E/ w! n$ Q) f9 `Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 9 n" w% Q5 ]# ?ground or naval forces. + l# |3 _' w) A; e8 ?2 F! pTactical Air * t8 b ?% e; nOperations Center / T/ R2 K1 O6 M# {A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control & k$ k: K m W+ U d4 Q" oSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly ' H4 W1 @" W/ Kassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 6 V6 ?/ m# z+ U5 s2 v. Ncommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and * u. `7 B3 u9 D4 s4 {coordination of support. ! Z- W+ G! S& j8 G1 P+ C/ O2 oTactical Ballistic # `+ _1 n* [' ]# m( tMissile (TBM) ; J4 O1 E2 ]2 C- \6 o% I rA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be " E! f9 a! y7 |" ]; k4 r; g8 Temployed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 2 x( t# t! U/ \$ _4 c) Y9 Wdevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or , g4 R% ^2 Z) n/ x4 z. [maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 0 @2 R. T$ k# ETactical Data C- t& M2 L2 [% w& K( V- X9 xInformation link . q' O9 ^. a4 N2 \& @) eA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of ' k: r0 i; z" x. mWar $ u1 g9 y( o Q; ]' R+ cThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. 1 [6 h, d! S- Q3 K. ?4 BTactical 0 ]' D% U) M1 d- U! R& q! ]Operations Area ; ^% V8 u+ w ]0 e(TOA) 7 L' |7 S) I0 b# gThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. + G2 P2 [6 \# j# `% H; A9 S+ ]Tactical & [! b, Z6 l3 d$ d' r1 c7 l" XOperations 3 U9 ?$ Y5 G. x( l; ~Center (TOC) . B9 m }1 z% s0 o4 k0 D( |5 SA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) - w1 Z0 _9 d U) t/ X2 t4 O: m% `(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. " b) q% t' E( R: A2 `(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. # I) L, M, U, v, s* q+ o P vTactical " d. k6 X1 i x; e! y! ?! IWarning/Attack Assessment ' f* ?! _2 |3 S9 I8 U- ]- R" e(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " y; P+ f* G m- Q0 F+ r290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. 8 E9 D: u& j+ M; x L$ m(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 8 z9 K; F2 ]) jTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. - p6 q# R! e& U7 r6 w& p5 w+ ]% fTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. " S9 d6 B# m3 f' W2 l( s6 rTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. 1 M& S* g% u( c9 W6 a9 J1 FTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. / N- W+ H. x9 _' Y" ?TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. - k" x0 W4 ?0 |: V0 h8 a5 DTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. ! j8 B( V m: hTADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. + J- z: J- h1 [$ xTAF Tactical Air Force. ; K) q% w) g5 ^, S% DTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ) Q5 J8 N5 d- r5 `" ~TAI International Atomic Time. * c, ]. o( K5 h2 q9 c0 V; MTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector " M: K/ q6 |" kand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive 9 _6 C5 V H( P4 f9 @& a' [) g, D. \defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. . v9 D: T! s# R! d3 C, @TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. * s8 }$ s# a5 x8 e% iTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 6 H, U9 i' y8 J7 fTank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 " [2 q+ F2 |2 G7 {& |/ m& mTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. 1 e5 X0 Y. T* T p8 E' w6 _, R+ \TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. - B5 o5 F- {% @: \6 E: s. k% L(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 9 }, T. Z% A8 J7 t$ B' b" ~Target 6 d7 I1 O5 g5 ~; B3 OAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage ( [9 c b0 |) i5 \3 F# D- Mregion of a sensing system. - p2 f; B; A0 Y" FTarget Classification and Type 1 W$ d$ S K/ @& _ U8 ~Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. % z1 `) [/ z) J6 @; j" J/ S1 _Target 8 n* J X5 s; yDiscrimination ; }; p3 {" U' I5 C* t: HThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one ) o! |5 Q8 M4 j. ^" i0 R% ltarget when multiple targets are present. Target Object 8 p: G* T& t& t: E, e4 p' l0 y9 s- yMap (TOM) : g2 A2 r# i- e+ r/ d A: IA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and ' A4 b* s' [5 {) [other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ; `% z7 u6 M9 q! e: X) _, l+ S; n/ Etarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and % g: D8 Y# m4 O fidentification equipment. ^; }7 F! E8 Z: Z1 p* D: Y(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the " y: |! I2 y% P; b1 S! S& u y# cpassage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD & u) Q4 R" ?3 g: k! }2 tProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target 5 |* W0 w1 W2 L: N7 P- D' Yrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. # V( M& R# m8 t* l2 L; lTASA Task and Skills Analysis. ?4 _ F/ Q8 H; @( d7 Q0 Q% aTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 7 b, K& p2 e% x+ X0 F7 Nengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. 6 U5 M8 |1 E9 b& a+ OTAT Technical Area Task. , ?! b: y1 u5 {8 j) W# F) NTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. ( X! E) q. S& I* C. ATAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. - n: X8 [% V1 h, mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. 9 G! d' L9 ~% r5 ]" Z: `TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. # u/ W9 Z4 x2 OTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. 4 Q$ k/ q" L# G4 I+ g- g1 l pTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. # a/ B3 Z- q- Z$ E0 a8 gTBR To Be Resolved. + c: b) l* Q) k. A# ATBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . , M3 O5 q3 ?! |+ h4 ?TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 2 T1 Z; l2 B$ s/ A; jTCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. ; X4 R6 ]8 s9 r( u" ^0 MTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). ! `) c. {* u) a6 Z4 hTD (1) Test Director. 9 r" p: K! k" B) n. k+ z w0 w(2) Technical Data. % n% Q. [' Q0 M1 P1 _6 q(3) Technical Director. 2 P6 \! u" H; t/ I6 i2 L(4) Training Device 3 y' H# I6 [9 n; |! I {! MTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. " B: Q: \+ J3 i7 k# PTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. / J' T8 N! ?, i B1 \- eTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. . Y( {% H/ c8 BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ; @/ r2 K. ^/ h1 U' p293 ; ^+ T6 t1 ~. M$ i$ tTDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. 4 `; _5 Z! r" {(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 8 u3 ?* f) s( I2 M) P" R& I7 xTDCC Test Data Collection Center. % ^8 N9 K: O2 i" cTDD Target Detection Device. ( c6 h$ C6 _6 [0 B0 z$ CTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. + M! v. z5 K& m' nTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. / h: a% K/ p1 M# vTDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. ]! U+ C p6 ~; PTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. ' B0 n: D* Z y) [TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. " ?$ a& O1 c6 cTDT Target Development Test. & I) S" N4 O8 \: c/ sTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 4 R4 I, b& S7 S/ GTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 4 [$ F- q& Z& W; y) tTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. ( t6 _1 E/ E) X! G8 z F2 i( j/ V1 u(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. & v* O$ K- V5 A0 H: xTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician ; X& S' C) `3 _ GTECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. ( ?* L, W2 R1 T) L; n7 ?/ j/ [TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 6 l* X3 G, \8 J5 }8 @MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as k5 k0 D1 `: e7 t2 ?' u' Dmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract 2 F$ s! ~% T, {1 o& sadministration. $ l# C& A2 {5 x) \4 iTechnical Data Package (TDP) 7 n8 n! p' v+ \1 \A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 8 ]0 m$ \' a1 astrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines 1 N) r1 v' d4 u" I( x Xthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item " P& ^ n3 l l! f5 Sperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 5 w' ]% g2 c: j& z- Fassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality * @; ?1 Y- n: Massurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical # M1 S; g$ u& o8 O d" i) c0 fEvaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in * \+ n) d9 N: [9 U2 \the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives 8 A1 q1 a5 x8 \0 UThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available 8 o5 E; F$ y) n1 d! Nfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & 0 [3 @1 \* \% g2 P# O0 nGoals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 5 J' j& w% Z3 w6 X4 ndevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical # G4 T* u; o$ M4 x6 ]Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical & {' Y: l" y# h P3 @' xPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by ; v& q4 d/ H F' Umanagement. Technical Performance + D3 `7 E. q( j- w+ zMeasurement (TPM) ! S3 \$ Q% E1 y9 H# x$ ]Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status . B8 O' T/ k6 `( O, Kbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ' ]. W$ J0 R0 S: N2 D2 i7 [assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the % u5 i+ o) c( S0 m0 |* Y& kvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 7 l; _/ Z" |9 |9 t8 R0 ]. y! }element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these : s2 M: g1 s% ?0 J8 s& o) Odifferences on system effectiveness. , n: I+ X# G, y3 ETechnical : J8 C- }+ f" Q* @# C7 jSpecification - l( s7 v$ S4 O' h3 y* h: S4 {A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 2 N& g" P m( v u' ythe basis for actual design development and production. Technical 7 c0 X. e9 M- i5 k5 r: ?" M7 \Surveillance * E. I' K) d8 p. ?$ a9 XIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 7 ?/ ]! _8 t ~& J" `. }4 }responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. + n4 g& ^$ V; |Technology Program ' M* v7 {' h5 p4 \Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. ( t& l! ^7 o) q7 B; UTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. / [0 v' B5 [6 ^8 r# YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and 1 U+ v; ^! P* I5 }, _! v% J4 WCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and % `! {* R; ^7 ^* P& \' g+ lstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ; l% m% E& @. A% p7 T7 Dmission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. - Y' a5 I4 \" mTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. ! X3 i, j2 ^; i4 f% T" _' F9 H9 g; jTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. # k ? }" G( nTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of - B& g# l6 W& e$ o mcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See ) K+ @; L/ b" a, kCompromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. & h/ o" f a& e% V) B4 x# Q/ qTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ( T$ x2 y" h. NTER Test and Evaluation Report 2 E, g7 ~. B5 R; _5 h: |2 E$ _TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 5 z$ {; v7 m$ T0 [atmospheric reentry and impact. _( Y9 h: y3 q+ W7 W% ^ J4 K% jTerminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase ) u3 P1 L0 k7 D; BInterceptor ; O- [5 @3 A" S7 SA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) ( z% W. C& Q6 YTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. " k7 m% U: m" P% J9 e: T4 ?TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. t& S6 ]+ u' ]2 q0 wTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 7 C6 C! b! h4 B6 }$ KTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. * Z, n! I" L( p9 `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all " r$ W4 M) |/ `: G; ?" }operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, , j u* \. G5 i4 q- h$ z8 }( G |8 `7 V9 kanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. ! W! a0 H& u4 t( A8 _/ u& W- @Test and 9 I @ ~ ]2 W$ P4 j3 qEvaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three + c( w! F1 d1 Otypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted 5 X4 a) m+ \- Cto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof % ~- M% f! g7 B) r: o9 }manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical , N1 W6 y7 ^, N C! Z5 \8 |performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 8 I1 ]7 V( A6 {( g) N. Ssystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 6 _4 L" ?( R" V1 F+ g1 @requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts ! @8 {" J S4 l. k2 ]: ~, Kor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational + M9 @- L9 L# x" m$ c(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before 1 o" _5 Q' f- E. m' wthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 8 t( c3 O/ b& r9 Rconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan $ Y7 x) a. d# |2 u% @ N(TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 3 \0 e6 G! C: N2 D! U* {0 P" Iobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation - O. W8 r+ i, s, T- c1 S) q, N$ sto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ' j! C6 O- i& q/ Bearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 5 J/ q5 s; z2 o }$ Kprogresses. Test and 4 T5 P# }6 M3 [- H' WEvaluation ! @. N7 K+ t- r+ x+ YWorking Group p3 w& b; b. O% q' ]4 @3 E(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 8 k4 m5 E# o9 J+ \( c1 Z6 uintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the - f3 a+ R& f/ [+ b" [/ }program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling + ^+ `* q% o- A P' M& Qproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 7 _8 ^' f, V# J' ]% n8 l: s( g2 J) iTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 7 m" f/ D( l: E/ [9 }! dTest Integration % L' S' M% T, o! ^+ iWorking Group (TIWG) 0 y9 l2 U4 |7 m8 @$ IA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in 3 B' _5 R6 Y7 [" J; a5 }( Gorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between ! w a9 w$ e" S) F( r2 u& Mdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 5 D0 ]' {# l1 uMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 z. U. s, S: L0 H; j y7 l4 K0 w297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) : q* y2 A6 U) J5 s- G: @$ l+ ISingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. ; j. M- y! T) f1 x$ f7 P" GTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. # T1 V+ j" v6 S" PTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 7 Q2 L4 T( ~2 |% c5 }( yTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). * l: l3 z* s" ZTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. 0 K' _# k7 M7 a" l# WTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management P' s& [7 d3 k6 m. BTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). # k; i% }; {* V" \4 HTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. * `1 ?1 `; F' k8 C, i% lTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). % @8 t5 S; @; E, ITGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. $ \. N2 E" u; m$ {4 O' gTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 2 ~ Z, W/ A P \- o3 ~( Ucommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. . ^5 u- D+ Z7 z7 K$ M" V; Q3 Y U3 YTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 6 p3 ~2 V1 m2 A- q- XMissile Defense (TBMD) System + d0 k; P" K) ?The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)