航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user ) Q" C) U- g# zaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. 4 W8 h- b& G2 B D2 ?STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. ) E' G! C) i @. X4 M# s& z" vSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. ' ?+ p' i6 ]# q8 ]4 C: BStorage, Handling, and Transportation 5 T( |2 s F' [2 C1 P7 YEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient : N1 z2 I8 g3 u1 E2 G7 L" b/ nenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during % K) _7 t5 c) |) D, [) ~* [1 Y0 Sstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. @' M6 j& v GStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s 5 y4 X2 S1 |' u: LApache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). : p0 p7 e1 c% V" o1 R9 r& C- Y# R% vSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. 2 s- q* F# C' u, Y/ ~5 { y% UStrategic 1 P+ B7 y+ H) Z( xDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. ) _6 D6 F& }7 q; t9 |5 KStrategic * S* W4 w5 B; L9 bDefense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System h7 s' d& D' ^- `(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of 7 K8 O) _8 K" t8 x" FWar % U1 s7 _% \. E. @The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ' q( R: @- `- A5 O- ^" W0 \ F, `) s. Palliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ; m, Q. {3 ^3 @8 l: n) Raccomplish those objectives. 1 O, B1 G1 t/ i; \Strategic Offensive Forces : X' N2 f" x% I5 s: m0 [' d" l/ s(SOF) 4 }" u; |9 Z$ @0 KThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific / S! Z0 k; Q4 |% tCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic * J8 u( s% M. ^5 I! a2 C* w' w1 rReserve : {6 t5 e* Q" Z: M- sThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 7 ` }& e: u( o9 H% q* D4 fstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic # K/ x9 x9 ^, M- ]" [2 {Warning 3 d% O+ X0 ?# ]' j, Y5 k) mA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic 8 Y# I0 J! f: E" aWarning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 8 P# N1 |$ r9 t7 }3 zhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. + I4 s0 J E1 V9 @Strategic Warning Post- ' Q) F8 C0 Q1 O' ODecision Time 1 w% P+ S) b( b* S& e5 x$ o- M, hThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 7 J" ]$ Q) d- G0 }+ g) J3 ^+ _; Xgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the # A2 S) l+ p; g' w! e4 r, Nnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 7 M" L- z3 `! c" X% |9 y) ethe pre-decision period. ; ], c( I4 \. [1 X: m) h2 MStrategic Warning Pre- Decision Time 8 Q# V1 I" f+ k7 o) }, uThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time ) U8 k' l' J, K& g) `1 x! Navailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. 7 _$ E+ U3 v$ R* s3 [1 lSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely $ W' D/ `& I; x" p: U0 E5 Stimed for maximum strategic impact. 6 ] Y; y/ J% c6 ]Structured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 3 J# M) M! E) \7 Mflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 5 d. Y$ ]8 E* g& r' N* iProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one 7 ^0 `. d& \% `0 a2 xentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 0 K" { k% ^' P* Hinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 0 Q9 P9 C. H4 Z! ~+ uSTS See Space Transportation System. # D/ g6 U" y+ O& H8 w* dSTSC Software Technology Support Center. ! k2 Y! V7 N8 p1 m; X4 ?9 g& UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 6 `6 G2 |) N$ @- {# x ]3 M: `(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). - v3 {, L$ z- F! X. H' C' HSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. ! w9 L, s8 T4 E* M6 OSTW Strike Warfare. + Q$ t( ]7 b* o4 W! M7 ?STWC Strike Warfare Commander. 1 x9 o# c- C; ~7 s' o* W$ ^& rSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which * }6 W8 O/ J: I& N( Eis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Y; g% N' H3 ]5 iLevel ; B# [% q" |2 I% W4 C, sA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. 4 _- C, e7 V2 R& c2 C4 USubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) 2 N8 U, a3 P2 u2 c% EA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ' X" c% n1 F7 m( g9 e. h. o k9 k0 Qmiles. 5 X- w& s" y v# rSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function ( `, _. |5 ?! x1 W& Owithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. & i9 E$ B# E0 T% p' ^4 kSubtractive 0 C. f5 W; L" P. m* W0 t& eDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. ' x6 l) z+ d$ g: ^1 j% oSuccession of 4 O) B ^9 o) x' NCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 7 x# R; @, s+ L0 lis a synonymous term. 3 R, `) u2 c, g& ?0 {. eSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two c* u" ^' Z" f0 a3 M8 Q2 m/ Walternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. 4 t @9 m, y: m& ?( F% wSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 0 ?- V% J# u* M) j( sSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 7 p7 u( \% r) z9 C- D7 Da single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, ! k% ]; X1 q) G( othrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. * x0 i. B8 H0 o6 {& O& l6 d" XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 5 ^( _4 D% } c! [- H5 erequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional + l% ~' a3 L( l4 Z+ e4 elasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from N% A. \" a. D/ s: ]# Fsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory 7 V \6 M$ m8 m5 iPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and # G$ L9 t, D2 V2 ^. f; mcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. , i8 Z8 M3 m' K/ S$ WSupport Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 6 q7 e! ^+ P- y% Omaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 3 d4 ?) ^( |$ {, G2 c+ H5 sequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ; N- y4 D' D; Z) p# n9 p0 T0 nprotection equipment). 1 k' X v$ @: H2 n [5 c' ~Support 0 X; N( K' P2 k: k9 MPersonnel 6 _. d" S7 I w! R) UIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly ' E# |" P# K- hassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. ' E- m1 D) ]/ G4 h8 |Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 6 o: }! n* ?/ o% g' j8 g2 e4 Iexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. " s W8 \. ~# |* vSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. % x9 K( ` h- Y9 K8 @( }' CSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. ) o" s. H$ e9 P" SSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 5 ^ C6 S# @# o, [& B# [: {mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. ; f o5 K0 N0 X# k. kSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric & S7 a) W: }3 x; y* O2 p X: Lsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements : }* y2 e0 ^% y+ x, c. `& qRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. / T* g! R8 [! J+ W. y5 s1 wSurveillance, Satellite and Missile % t$ D- j( s* D8 Q3 ]4 m- EThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, ( ^1 d! s- R n& S8 u. nand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 8 F$ ]: F" d" B( \; S, ]7 yand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance - g) C* u( l6 n3 P) SSystem 3 v w" a# {# u* z+ sConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 2 E$ p7 N6 f0 r" [7 E, F% ~! F- lin the surveillance system. + |: P: E2 x# X8 N* D+ yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability 7 I1 `1 t1 P. e! j8 A3 POperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. ; s3 m9 B5 l5 P' T6 |Survivable and ! j4 K+ A5 ~# I( KEnduring 8 k. c9 m! L' y0 Q b# ZCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 3 [ u) J3 V' BSUS Site Utilization Study. $ E; \! [1 R# ^2 u9 r( b6 qSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ; A' Y" R" V4 m) rSV Space Vehicle. % }7 u! ?' v! _; Y5 q5 n5 ?0 z- P9 LSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 2 _* |2 P' ^" B% eSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. % A4 j9 Y3 Z* b5 y5 f$ Z- q3 XSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating & s# _1 K* `: Z' qband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. ! ^) Y0 h9 x, D' K) ASWIL Software-in-the-Loop. $ I! U5 D- h C# @* B9 BSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. ) p. @+ n9 t5 y# F0 BSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. # k* p& V5 Z# F: Y. f BSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. X) `4 ~) x9 c0 x; f1 {Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar 4 F% j) e4 \$ w1 l, V(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 9 @- c3 `5 X- [8 K) Tbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's : u e8 a; Y0 Z1 Wsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 5 N; j! r' m2 {; v) g3 A. Pemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. + }+ v& J$ D0 X2 m& Z; jSys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. - O, E! k/ |: G# dSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. " U* ]6 I# M7 n9 n0 a1 e0 CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 M) X9 l, u$ Y6 z, I5 t) e0 ~ e284 SYSCOM Systems Command. - s" I$ I0 Y# r! zSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a 2 }* b Q& Q6 e: S, @( Krequirement. System 0 @; P1 f1 f( M# P5 H% ~Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions $ m% z( F# _) ]$ w9 S) ~implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. 1 ?. F- I, v q" A* x8 kSystem Architecture System ( `* a/ }% A$ h4 G# ~Capability , f% @) H' j! m% M$ c' `4 KSpecification (SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system * w2 o9 x2 l4 j7 K+ P1 U. b7 d. Barchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional " ?* l+ @* \( aspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among - y! h; e( o2 j+ `0 @/ K) Athe elements of the BMDS. N" E! B) D" P; e" G% a3 B6 gSystem Center (SC) 4 ?% x1 C1 R0 V' @) I- hA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept 9 F/ t! `5 H9 S- d) Y2 @6 LPaper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the / H y& j+ Q1 ^8 ~' s) f2 s8 ~demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 3 G6 q5 U; ^/ P" ~Configuration 7 M' a, k( i8 T# E& @ L6 iControl Board - x% r- | c8 G0 H, a8 e' u+ A# Y3 I(SCCB) 9 z) C" z" \% ~, |8 G- `The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and - D! Q* l' W: O6 e0 [7 w9 F' [9 Xcomputer systems. ; O9 K, K' O" N1 KSystem-Critical Function ; s9 D+ Z8 E2 l) t7 d, u6 GA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's - ^% a' N0 x3 _7 s; e8 T; Bmission. System Definition % w0 \ q+ ^( ]2 ]& E9 q7 cReview (SDR) 0 l/ V1 {* \' y1 ?: p8 GThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, , N9 r0 W4 n( D" d' V( E: R9 [final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System / t! d7 ?8 f; R6 l# b6 xDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 5 P' T7 T# \0 V6 U; i. Y2 @System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, |6 j) l/ H% X1 Q- C9 Ecomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy ; e8 S( Y) I9 s% z2 dspecified system requirements. 6 B7 \' o' k) ?8 C! _( W) R/ {$ R(2) The result of the system design process. * \6 c1 t3 e$ eSystem Design 0 t( w3 x- h) P2 V$ `Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and $ l. `5 S, ]1 fcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. % a7 ~& e& b2 w( N. VSystem Design ! _0 k' d E; K2 I( J# lReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System E1 ]- h- n0 b5 }7 @% B/ n$ {Effectiveness \- C* o% k1 n$ zThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. : Q! A6 a3 ~. n5 H2 K7 [$ C5 L2 X0 kSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) 0 R$ [. J0 U3 _8 h& B" {The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS 5 X& q. ?/ h( Y7 G2 C/ s$ vcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior / }+ Q+ Z9 x A/ d8 @Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and + H- m' \, J, \! vassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide & F* f$ x- Q% S, ~- F0 O4 `& Bsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 8 c$ F r/ Q( @3 vthose challenges. * T6 F, ^ K& ?9 J% o; jSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System / F+ y3 ^" g% b' J3 DGenerated Electromagnetic : a/ b* p, b& N1 \4 {Pulse (SGEMP) - ]- B0 u. q* w& z. k3 L& f9 ?0 _Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the - F6 i" q3 E3 I! f S& `8 bsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local + N6 R3 Z4 O& Cfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the $ Y, ~: k1 Q& X! h8 p5 i$ ?primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. 0 Q& A+ L9 M4 p5 Y1 y+ a8 nSystem + o* a6 I% e. X# T5 {" m/ X+ xIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual * M) \4 _( ^5 H3 Qmanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks & d' g: A5 Z- e. {! e0 `and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 3 S% k; {) [! v9 Eequipment systems. System ! A. |8 U: P! R) [; S0 EOperational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 9 X3 |1 f2 H* M7 @: r& G5 ]deployment, and support of a system. System " R/ Q) I3 `0 X3 B5 V' DOperation and Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to $ P4 _, f* q0 s1 I8 ~) G: Pthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 3 F6 F; |' C/ A0 r. O- t( ?1 CSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 0 A# h" t W8 A4 \) d& B) sposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 7 _* N ], o$ t6 m G! i% a: }System Program $ t0 A6 y3 A& Z+ y6 BOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It . z4 K# C" R% _. P, l ]' Eincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational . R0 _# X' b* |5 ?: _ vstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under ( o, C. }/ J6 B7 Q/ A3 a0 L( o5 O+ Yrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions ! M. u/ u( Z$ U+ F) Q* unecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, - L# I9 L+ d$ p/ jhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness O9 \+ T9 e' i9 }: j2 f4 h: j* }. dObjective 0 y) @* Z1 V. X) w3 E5 F hA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a - f) z5 o X6 S6 ^" Uspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 1 X0 }* Z9 K; e$ i8 u, K m: Q! JSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support - Z, `# `, t8 e O9 B" lsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of ! v9 [" @% H4 ksystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission ' f p* E- f9 _2 ]" h0 R. Gcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. ! B2 s7 X# Z7 s: r1 v6 k# f. b( {System Requirements & P' M: z) W* O: g1 \7 FAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System ! J/ j2 q$ Q" C$ GConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. ) Y0 X7 [3 m+ p2 }Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. % O% m; D- w2 ^; [9 j& dSystem Security 9 z: e+ A5 y- ]" V* ~- d5 OEngineering 5 Q3 ~: w7 r( r4 T+ t/ J# Z1 |5 G(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering & Q# K) F$ g8 P+ T* O5 Oprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 2 r3 q5 A k( q& X: Hsecurity threats. 2 S, U" I) G7 Y" i$ `System Security Engineering 1 U+ Y* j n2 L N1 r/ lManagement ; U4 q0 s4 D: s' `+ v& VProgram ; E( R, z. T4 ?2 Q9 i8 P(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical " E k! e" E# t$ w& Z+ Iachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 9 X; G" ^( N% L7 G' R2 Udefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides 4 N9 k a" d- C w6 J( _0 hmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. ; L) q" E$ S+ ]' i. @2 OSystem Security Management [' U2 v# L5 nPlan (SSMP) ( i( `1 D+ a$ [6 }/ l2 j7 V. _A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 8 N" l: z u+ G& c" u Dmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related ( e% h- L; Y# \1 V# B" ]: D( Y" B" tsystems. Systems 6 e- _1 @7 R: p& H v0 R, k5 xEngineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. 3 n- R- e7 m: h6 @% @ BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; i- e/ h+ O7 J' B1 w287 Systems Engineering M- P3 X6 p! ~6 F8 {* C* L, FManagement 7 L D; g/ C9 N$ {0 kPlan (SEMP) . | g2 J: ?: P# Q: t' j& pThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 2 ?- }" N8 p* t1 S! f# xIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. 7 ^* G5 R$ \) |" d$ ~& L2 TSystems Test Integration and & Y# ]: A- i7 k+ a1 p+ p3 WCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat * g% I$ R( i: I( JAssessment 4 k u1 O' k9 l: ]Report (STAR) 9 [6 S: s- ?2 f; A3 D; K8 p& SRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 5 d5 ^9 ]/ N: f" s3 NService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency & A1 L. A, H2 t1 xand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. 3 z! b2 m3 D {1 {- G" ?System-Valued 3 M; M/ g. H3 W4 H; HAsset 5 L$ C/ R1 C$ Z+ ^( XA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to . V! K9 j0 I! f# n7 L: gthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 % D0 w9 a: Y- m, x/ HT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. 1 j2 }: N' N7 c9 s( M# m& v( wT&E Test and Evaluation. 9 N9 _2 E; S* W1 w/ OT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 5 T9 Y2 Y) x9 p! ~T/R Transmit/Receive. ( S7 Z+ G; Q: o6 sT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T " J$ A6 o2 e n" k9 @. `2 Technology Transfer. 8 i0 x, `* l1 F9 z$ [3 e c! dT 2 8 k1 g* h, I0 U4 ^E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. 8 _( ^4 A% o. j1 v" I% A" f& Q& gTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. " U5 V4 O" e$ m2 w: C: qTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. # B# G. _. x) d: d uTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. % T; H5 ]" h3 {4 t' o7 [, YTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 3 m, W3 J s( B$ F8 N( `9 qTACAIR Tactical Air. # m3 u8 L e$ o% L8 gTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. : g3 O+ N5 d g- |! m. U6 fTACC Tactical Air Command Center. " {0 O4 o* e1 a! `TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). ) `5 z- l+ L6 fTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). " _4 O0 f3 b( Q. {9 k* S( CTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. 1 w% Z- {' I1 L+ y' [/ Z# eTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. ; H) D* z+ Z4 D6 v/ z7 G( r5 yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 * s" {+ n X* x( ^7 ^TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air ' k7 Y* ^9 N: z3 \. l. @power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. ; W4 m0 b: c0 z4 m3 _& iTactical Air Operation " ?; [9 ]0 H* z. q' r( KAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 3 [: ^( \9 t2 ~6 c0 k1 rground or naval forces. ; m. x5 D2 y; T: M$ kTactical Air Operations 0 A7 H. b( K0 s7 ^8 _ KCenter 2 o; Z# h( ]) V# v% T9 YA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control 2 G1 \- {3 i3 X) @+ ~$ |System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air $ O- |. k7 _- A7 M& C9 t* Q" Tdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air * P( j1 _$ D" [; vSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility ' _" ^& v+ F$ H, A! z1 B+ y(TAOR) # y( Y4 z" f7 a) F* kA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 0 |( }; R6 z5 ~8 X. w% T) T8 i! dcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and 5 f" I# A0 p2 o) @coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) - N* D" W( m6 n2 }' b$ e2 H+ jA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 0 |7 F6 p+ ~# H5 K! W! ~employed within a continental theater of operations. ! X, {% t- a$ m" W, L, [1 ATactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 8 I/ V- s! o: _5 z* n$ V0 ]maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 7 t9 f2 p; h6 [0 q- d# PWar . }/ T+ U- k) V2 I* l* @The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical N* I. U3 h L! M9 R5 KOperations Area ! ~0 _* a' O3 i' o- [" ^( y' U2 w(TOA) 7 K+ O" k2 o5 U3 rThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 8 G) p2 d; ]8 Z4 f* o; B- A: Rarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. ! r% G) q$ f- F' h: eTactical Q3 F4 F5 _+ SOperations + u- o$ S, S9 e' k1 M6 PCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. 3 c# _. C& h; Y8 h+ [8 [Tactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component & q g+ T/ j8 C @elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical 7 y+ }9 b( w* m8 LWarning/Attack * ?; q; Q) p) x( c: V* ^+ z9 K! [, LAssessment . W; I( E: l! [2 z- O$ ?; S( y0 o7 L(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. ) a( ?6 D; G# |; v$ ]1 _" X- b; gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 U7 @3 e" \; S- a: R290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. 3 A; P8 F3 T( e* K n(2) Theater Air Defense. 3 V& l* G, B& M$ D$ l. V V(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 1 ]' L% @/ f& I, e8 L+ V% Q5 f& MTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. : O2 K! a1 b5 ]$ e2 U% k) WTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 2 n: P: C! J' s5 ^% I& f/ M; aTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. ( [" O; i8 o, bTADL Tactical Data Link. 7 k( e- g) v6 K' eTADS Tactical Air Defense System. # H& f% [& z! ]( b% G( P! y9 Z, ~TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. 7 O4 t. V" p& r8 K1 u% p- C2 y0 H; fTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. " C7 [& H% q# U% B3 F6 nTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ! v [, v8 n* cTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive & p, Y* I4 S! edefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. ) O7 e8 Q2 W5 [. OTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation 0 z+ t' c& w' F! d3 g9 cThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a J/ I) D! L9 z& h+ ]result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 0 t; J8 m/ T8 `* h( t4 n) `TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 7 [5 i/ ?$ [/ u# {& \& b0 eTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. * y! M0 D# Z- ]6 q- w# F2 V+ l. j# q(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 1 H4 B; W; v7 C9 }( yTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target : ]' V7 c/ a+ d3 k# O% gAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. - k7 u8 C/ W. D% kTarget Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, 3 w4 h' z) W1 T! }: Zdiscrimination, and intelligence data. 0 @$ u* {& x8 C v( b# b- a! pTarget - L- E% ?" I# `( m# q O2 ]Discrimination + }2 n* M& E: W. D9 h& SThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one " l. i) R8 V0 W5 @* ]! Mtarget when multiple targets are present. 3 U! l; s. x- bTarget Object 1 d/ [4 X0 ^/ [; O! j; aMap (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ; |# F3 ^) ?# O1 W+ V; O+ z; }target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 9 a V( _+ G( w% A1 ?" i: Opassage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements ( ~6 [4 S- u) V8 {$ P% ODocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. j& O( P8 |! B6 jProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. ; W! `6 M: {5 T* CTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) : f) B& |8 `+ S( W+ M4 @2 Kengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. ( ~& d) r: u% v" W5 |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 o: V/ w1 a7 s/ U292 5 s) w8 v X* \& ~ F3 vTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. / m8 g, d; O3 X; d! h& fTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ) S; a/ {: ~' r7 g# iTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. ( ~7 O5 G! B4 n* R& z' q1 I S1 HTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 9 {% ] j( H( W3 ]+ W- eTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 6 W" r- y* w' s& V0 O3 ]3 JTBR To Be Resolved. & p1 `7 n0 @+ r2 ]7 o* A/ z. p; KTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. 3 Z7 l* M( \' ]1 m1 {5 e(3) To Be Scheduled % z R! w8 @) u7 f/ B. : K4 j) j' @. x- ETCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. ) v) ^3 t, }0 s/ L2 C8 |" M K# WTCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. + F; z; Y& u, E) b8 [# hTCF Tactical Combat Force. " }0 d7 Y$ G: V# y' T# X8 x% XTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. " ^ ]; |# b" a7 U8 I% fTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). - Y; k; c7 `7 w& l' ^4 xTD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. . z7 t7 k1 N E% i0 O(4) Training Device 4 R! o+ o4 M- Q9 KTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 8 i- T( ^. G( K: ^$ @. C/ CTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. + I1 A/ W2 m( T0 B6 @MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 R7 D/ Z9 o6 t. [" W293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. + L! Z: ]7 J% U/ m. D9 ?TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. # z& C6 P8 b- t(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. / J: m7 `( g" L* \2 D" bTDI Target Data Inventory. 7 B) i' G6 L% g$ ~TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. % q% w& r7 K" b% o9 {2 j2 S4 J9 bTDM Time Division Multiplexed. 2 P% p( c! G" L# J" W U8 g7 \TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). Z. E0 o0 b& G1 ?" I/ OTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. ( |3 Q. B) v; \& q, G* y/ {0 |: ?TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 0 [0 k' e4 ~( f( nTDP (1) Technical Data Package. 6 p# R% Q& V: \! O' x(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. ! ?& j/ X9 C! A- N0 h/ V! MTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. . A) X! j, S7 r1 @) ]+ qTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 2 [; u5 M' r5 {8 {" v; \/ C& q294 1 e8 c3 r5 k" p/ ZTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. / Z+ q4 L: C! Q" I+ S3 uAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract Q6 @* b7 A2 _; A# w: f9 Cadministration. 2 W P' x8 j2 [" m# A U- D+ aTechnical Data 6 n1 z; J5 n, h8 J6 YPackage (TDP) * {4 s9 d" F2 Q5 a. w- pA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition $ c, j: m; B, Y' rstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical 5 l$ ]0 ]+ p) w) `9 BEvaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to . R6 p, r. _ H3 n, m! f+ K8 p5 Wdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in # y, m! G7 m" Fthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. $ e: [5 t9 B9 `& }9 @' ~Technical ' ~2 s6 `, M$ \# z# GObjectives & 6 n& r4 O% B2 \$ v2 \$ k- nGoals (TOG) ( t: A9 l, G$ GHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS " ]7 |- a# }* w! F; O: r- idevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) 6 l: }, P* k- V7 P9 \6 fA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. ! _, k; r [& F$ F2 W$ ]Technical $ O, s) K( M' `* r% h, u0 n2 I6 APerformance 9 j" w# M' H5 j* M; VMeasurement ) O" y7 ?; p2 `9 W(TPM) ; e/ e) P/ x- fDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status I9 U2 r) @( x: ibeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 0 m& m: |" w- F0 L8 `! v* yparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures ! V# `% q8 H9 I9 G+ tdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 6 _. b) ~9 k6 K5 lelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these * D, s/ G# V. J, ]1 s/ v* Z2 ~differences on system effectiveness. # x; n# k+ M* h3 }* ITechnical ) V: g2 y4 F& ]* ^Specification : d. v- H! i7 T; U8 ~A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form * O3 Z) o" @1 E3 R3 Nthe basis for actual design development and production. Technical / a3 U1 k6 ]2 n! ESurveillance ! c: q* p0 e9 J4 k7 AIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or # q: ?5 e& ]- u2 e/ }; iemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise $ R6 \7 I2 U1 X7 m" x5 jtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent 9 A5 s" w0 [& }5 v( eThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management ( Q% k( y1 R; ]* N! @# Q8 Sresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. 3 r6 f2 d/ s& O+ _Technology ; N8 b% f- w, T$ V* Y" ^8 yProgram ( Z0 a& Y$ \# |" GDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. * B; q% v( O+ b+ h: ^TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. ( [' i i1 N' _. NTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) # ?4 r( J, b- _7 `Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. ( M( e% _' _, r1 {$ s3 KTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 5 H" S- j( p6 n, ~! C: PTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See . q( V7 m+ n& J' @1 ~, c6 u4 ECompromising Emanations.) 5 z* Z; Q" Y1 X0 T/ X, |! T2 tTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. " ^2 y" ]" t0 A2 iTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ' h' b: c; H8 a# I% ?4 ~# vTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. 1 D& s1 q; P8 ?1 [) w1 c$ e; ] V, m4 WTerminal & t/ N- h, h( KGuidance 7 ?$ e7 O2 }) Y. I9 d: J7 hThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the ! K8 V- E$ i6 Z! O& H# avicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the & b9 ?, N; n4 E- cterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy - p0 ?, y4 V6 hPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. % r) e; u4 A9 m* E1 X- {+ iTES Tactical Event System. 1 C0 }2 b+ T1 z7 `% kTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ; m x7 W& A/ ?2 h1 q296 # x1 L0 U* {, O7 C4 p$ ]Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, X! Y% N8 p$ |# z3 Z! P0 U; hanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated $ z7 P9 j+ T1 S/ v" n0 }* I' Mto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, 5 a o$ j% c1 z$ W( `and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that , ~; j6 ?, ^6 h f! Gthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational , Z3 W8 C- M9 H: u) E(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of & F8 {9 i* a9 ], c7 J7 {operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 9 F& `4 v4 g3 j& W- x( \environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. * G+ x4 p4 x2 i3 M+ a. q! hFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of " v: n' e) D w* v7 e+ l: L5 _deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) 4 f7 y- d8 \1 x9 tAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 1 E; i3 o; u8 }: i! ^objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation ( e0 j9 H, K$ C& k! E# [( i( c, `to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as " _ `" V6 g. i" iearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 7 |: u( R& ^% R: D- yprogresses. % B5 K9 z7 y/ m9 R/ ?Test and Evaluation $ W$ L$ @, H8 t' k. v q% u+ dWorking Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 5 _. [( u0 {+ j9 g2 b9 gintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the . C' U4 e! n1 S6 Z8 F% Z. [program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling " c, J- b; O6 |: K& ~, y5 C6 {problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and - P0 J" _9 c2 r6 `related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. * L' A' [/ ]3 y, I/ t# uTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration ( ?; k' F! ~3 b3 @Working Group : B X- R0 Z- _2 u(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, + o, d+ E) ~4 v; c% G+ m) ztest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( `2 K5 y8 A4 W& _( I2 c0 }297 - j# L3 I. r' {& e% z" [Test Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for ( u6 A; B7 `' v0 O3 Z" xSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 5 \/ I, u8 E7 ~ N* XTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. - K# q4 f# ?! ~TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. ( _) |6 p4 O8 DTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). - y8 J% U8 U4 d5 Y/ b8 ]8 n9 }TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. ' ^4 r; |' S' b$ N4 `: m+ ZTFC Tactical Fusion Center. ; N; U' W5 N: _) p+ T& ]$ xTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management - G3 e. w! [0 J5 m% \TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. 1 [ J% j: Z6 }TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 5 v7 d; K* M+ f( \TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). r+ ~8 m' b7 c: `( R! t% F3 G6 k4 \TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 7 Z" Y( f" {' t- `0 i/ STGS Track Generation System (USN term). 8 ?" ^ Y, |$ GTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. l. ~& Z; g) T. ]# {, [# NTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a : T* E3 H. o2 Y/ o- Y4 u& dcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 6 c- y9 s' @( S/ F% t. {Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic - R$ p: l6 s0 [! P( hMissile Defense 5 ? M1 I- ?* }( X4 A/ N& c(TBMD) System 3 B* h5 R1 L$ w( z0 ]. ]. ^2 WThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 9 ~% v6 `( v$ D: B0 p y# Aballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)