航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. * |5 z9 q% ~ f4 A3 lSTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). ) j" l: D6 f2 v5 W, y(2) Science and Technology Objective. # }8 L- ~4 f! b0 |% @$ Y( G* _$ CSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, ) {: U$ b A( s7 [% v2 j7 F: ?' b+ dHandling, and 7 y0 m) C, G1 u- F$ F- \9 |Transportation Environments * i# y, W5 s6 _9 s. g5 A$ d8 [These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during k* R( T( Z/ T- _storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed * B: f6 W _' Z3 nduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 9 u" r. Q: T/ U+ N; |Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s . X4 A* U# `0 N- `Apache missile. ! f- _' L/ `/ `STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). # P; R; _6 Q8 O& W% L: bSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. 4 l' m; l8 T9 R0 i1 @% ^* R3 A+ ASTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. . A, \2 s9 N! T/ YSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic 9 P) i# @6 l8 c9 v6 @ }Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ( F9 `1 o7 s: |& i. B2 g Zballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. , I* L$ o4 L" \4 @Strategic Defense 6 O% x, h* c+ L" y% Z# [Emergency 2 {" B6 N2 o; a" E4 \Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. # ]$ y6 C8 f& t2 t3 ^& NStrategic Defense System , P2 r4 C1 E: J8 Y* ](SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S - ^6 Z; P" {$ a$ [8 J3 b280 Strategic Level of War ; c( z! U1 z P: g8 d0 pThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or 9 X9 s/ j( o- Qalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ( q7 B/ n% x8 A6 {accomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces 0 K6 R q! b; O+ p. j* |(SOF) 8 W7 y( r2 { S4 ~4 S. HThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. " {, l. \6 h. Y7 v2 tStrategic 0 ^( A: k: A: n6 X" h/ l. M5 NReserve 2 @% b( ^' x% `' O3 G1 LThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 9 |7 C9 T! ` a( I A8 t2 estrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. % u( W( _7 b, }Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. ( w& O: W3 W$ `% t) u# d. iStrategic 6 m2 [5 B: s! j" c T' Q1 [. ]Warning Post- % ]; ]* T6 @* e' o: z. S) u IDecision Time ' f4 b$ H, h, \# r" \9 F5 G$ XThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of ' U2 J3 [1 Q/ ?' Xgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends c( i) O$ N! Fwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 6 j0 ^9 T% c6 _2 W+ uwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the " g3 K9 I- }% l7 s6 g* |national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. - T j* h' Q0 d% h0 T4 jStrategic & e B D+ T X& l4 A/ r$ u6 nWarning Pre- / N9 n) l+ ^. Z" MDecision Time / E5 n& s: ?# f- s( M w! zThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time , a( |1 i! s- Q0 |available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. ; [9 n' z, Z- ]) y5 g& TSTREAD Standard TRE Display. 9 ]7 U0 q! e8 N( x; @+ b# {STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). - j8 i( [) G7 O. Z$ hStructured 5 P( [! J+ a9 m( J" M9 p) x" |$ c& cAttack / ^2 `( W4 f% J2 _! q7 I0 @An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely . h( }5 M2 k% G1 v$ Z7 q' E qtimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules ; [) t4 V5 [1 ]$ |, i( Ybased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program & q+ _* o) g0 N4 \' p* O" oA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one ; M0 c- f2 o# m3 N4 |7 J1 \2 q5 x: u" Ventry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more # y( G- @1 ^0 x0 L4 Kinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 4 K, L9 I u I8 r8 R% i- e8 i* Osequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 4 d; d! N5 q! |instructions. 8 f1 l# L6 x* J( H1 t6 `3 mSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. O: T! J. J4 F# g) ~4 l( ASTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 o+ {8 t/ S: G5 D* r! J* v3 T281 2 e; m- v' N' p5 DSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ! q- Q- d* \. ~(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 7 t! b5 O) T; H& F: g1 _. i gSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which " x# o8 G" h, eis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ; k* s8 [+ O' x- Q% ]$ H5 USubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level 9 w% `2 I8 w- h* R' AA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be ( p1 }- w& [* c5 xdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- . h t8 o6 X, u- G' ]( kLaunched 6 E5 a5 {3 T7 r/ V5 a# lBallistic Missile ; ^5 r' C5 B: c8 i7 L: A Q" p(SLBM) * \$ e7 c! E G8 I$ j0 JA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. 9 M0 G8 f1 _& I& z# GSUBROC Submarine Rocket. ; W( V* N% f( ~- l- CSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 1 c9 A2 d: ?, Z" i% @# s# i% nwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. ( ^* p- ]; }' {Subtractive ) ^6 J( x# e1 q9 k+ SDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of 7 t" e5 x% U0 Z2 g6 I; b* rCommand 3 e1 E! z1 f9 D* d+ ~ eThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, , X, g3 h5 K+ J& ]# Mbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). U; h$ K$ B4 p) T" B# }0 OSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two 4 p8 j& t+ O5 F" p0 Z0 H" a5 U5 ialternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to * C" n+ v7 F Ydecisions about future use of resources. " K# C( ?8 J# MSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 6 q1 Z& u1 C% W- S) A9 s# d; r! aSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in " m$ w* k! V& U' u9 d1 }a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super / J( _/ Y+ Q' K: @6 _# rradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as - `9 o/ u1 E3 `0 c L4 ~% D nsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. : _/ X$ _. @) x) X" i* uMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 i' }9 x- x/ `! f3 _7 G282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not $ Z9 y: i5 s% [! t. M1 nrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from - ~" Z7 w* v( `- I1 Isuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. ; e, E+ F( E6 s M% _Supervisory Programs + e. c! ^) N# C v3 @% y& @Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. $ m7 G9 W/ _ v" |$ [9 _/ l; u' qSupplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support ; }/ X# z$ \' b6 {5 r+ h1 yEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 6 s# G$ \9 _/ ]! y) v9 g7 Gequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 2 v: c1 \2 _1 j3 }% w; w5 ]tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). Support Personnel ) ]# T5 Z) p/ X% b' \5 H A$ M; {Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly + M* C( J- S8 \5 k: s& Bassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. ) p7 z2 D H+ e& v/ P' {& |, cSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 7 `) p5 ]& |& X7 C1 B2 |Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. % F6 R8 H6 I. g5 R+ @8 A* g F& [SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. & x6 L/ j& G ~- u5 z( oSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items " E; s( j8 L1 r/ Sdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 3 z! d4 v3 I/ Y$ e0 T; f- Nmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 3 m/ G' n' U5 Z- L! M2 e& dproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric + ?) X, A5 |" J3 rsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements {! `% W- w# G, y! x7 QRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response N! P9 i; H' I( \0 Z" f+ toptions and current surveillance system availability. ! x! c) R1 T% Z. SSurveillance, Satellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, " V v, @4 ^6 j* l: Fand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. & Y. s/ ~$ |6 d) q" Z/ V* p) SSurveillance ) }: d4 T# o. _System Configuration 5 Q5 m. r; s8 @) N8 {- J# hThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. * V# i7 ?7 ?3 }" ^: }) X9 @5 i: YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + R3 x$ U6 U: H4 U283 Survivability * Z. b" ~$ e9 P' f- LOperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. $ v8 b; E! T) x' ?4 G, L# vSurvivable and " x; Q4 j& q- E& bEnduring Command Center 9 y3 L6 ~6 C( o# q# G(SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. & X4 J$ a: `& B0 G( d# G& wSUS Site Utilization Study. 8 ^/ g$ |; s$ U5 h/ K+ HSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. : N$ a! s# ?3 o6 G: |SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating 9 B+ I( h2 H4 q) Uband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. / E3 n- a, p( ESWIL Software-in-the-Loop. % M2 L" e( a* M8 @. W+ qSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. ; r, |4 i2 N/ R. `/ E9 RSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 3 Y$ C; {/ [& g7 |7 f& oeach module description has associated implementations. k; U" x/ L9 C) {9 J$ bSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) % S2 t( J5 m& L3 U2 N7 }. m7 v, ZA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 9 a8 J; E8 k) Galong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance . P( r3 B9 e1 t8 D/ E$ {between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's " L3 ^9 [" @* S/ ksignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal ! u% O4 u5 t0 j7 Y' J1 X0 Yemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. & d; h% U: C3 tSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 8 s. C8 x, ~ w/ t5 k4 x% KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 3 x5 k# B7 Z, N( k O0 ? H* w: Wdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with * c( \6 ~* T7 ^* w) vspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a . d7 R m/ {4 N1 w/ z. ^0 Cfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a 7 H! k6 f+ m% }, w/ a# N4 Q: Trequirement. $ ]1 k% ^: v- Y' y% `1 ~* H6 o' vSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 6 S2 }7 k2 w: {4 N3 Zimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System 8 t2 K6 u7 i' g# M" U, y& PControl. System Architecture - M; }0 C. T/ O8 J' _$ V: s. {System M' C& w7 i+ N# zCapability Specification # r' ?" w8 o8 V, h% d: w1 @/ |(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational & a K+ m; g. `( Kenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the , ^+ ?8 [2 i) M! t' g* ], y( lelements of missile defense systems. & k- ^3 p- c* b3 E/ b7 fThe government document that translates capabilities into functional 7 O2 T3 j. D, Z0 Wspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among ) I9 c$ H+ A' y, Othe elements of the BMDS. System Center 5 S, a: M6 ?6 i. S(SC) # K+ v1 \4 v0 F: f! g6 W- UA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 7 F9 X& c/ B) Z8 Y4 {: }sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 9 o: V4 n* ^& qconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition 2 H$ _9 \! v( a# F" a) Bstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the $ {( A6 u% }* y+ s5 Q W- p: ^6 jdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration 8 G7 ?+ x! J0 G1 ^( KControl Board , G' y! x+ v3 G8 |8 `; s. J(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. - E5 O' q3 c3 i( Y# BSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and $ p, R# |/ K+ x5 Scomputer systems. System-Critical ; R: [1 H0 t( y$ w" d7 J. c& X6 OFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 2 ?4 k- X; Y5 s( C8 y1 ]mission. 0 R9 B3 ?1 j! ySystem Definition Review (SDR) ~7 r& z- Z! N7 h6 a) }. oThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 0 L8 R! ]( n7 V' D, D- V" {, Ifunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, & ?/ I* X+ x" M6 | c- z* S. Hfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. . T& Q6 e( r* A5 ?System 3 ^3 z/ \7 q. EDeployment # ~+ X( ?, v* RDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, ' A5 @4 o7 Y! _- n4 D! Y8 F3 [components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy . S( E8 o r/ }2 `' K4 ?5 z' mspecified system requirements. : }) Q7 y- c2 {- F- {8 N(2) The result of the system design process. 8 ^1 B0 ^1 c/ c- j* K- U2 USystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be & ?# ]" B6 K! H/ p8 Q& M8 goperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design & i% X- B6 c# d$ e3 vReview (SDR) ! X- H" v5 u( d! Y" UEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness 4 }$ c+ l8 ^/ Y, n: i9 j7 SThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set ' z# p* l- j! a) D0 E% I0 Z: iof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution 6 P9 u1 C0 f6 \) GPlan (SEP) ) D& z. I- t) DThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS 7 k6 N& L3 `% p% _5 p Q3 Jcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS % c. |/ A8 O# p5 V; K- GDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 9 X0 _# x1 A' y; Ssignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to : ~# V: i! k, b8 Iachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 1 M- V0 ]5 d( jthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System 8 V# M: w$ s# \9 u9 W! r, y Y0 I& LGenerated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the R4 {! g, q3 _" bprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the 0 p1 ~& \) h1 W- Gobject in order to produce charge equalization. 3 N1 Z2 B- ?6 d' {System Integration Test " S/ D) v2 u) d( x. LA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or ' h# N6 Q* M9 E% |$ R5 g5 Z' fequipment systems. System ' u; d1 u5 Z/ R: t0 tOperational " _- h' f" W7 K; o; I @3 qConcept + Z. g' \) @, W" }4 I7 r# uA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 2 I3 M# K5 h! c; C, U3 m1 Gdeployment, and support of a system. 5 e! E+ T$ P$ ]: ASystem Operation and ( l8 ~ M( q* O" j0 x) Z; hIntegration : X5 D. o7 z" n6 H" H* L' x% B4 ]: j" ?. sFunctions (SOIF) . e! Z! s) k5 @6 WThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and " B* C5 @8 l1 J+ f6 X6 ~; I# _battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). # s0 {& q+ p0 iSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. - z* z% K% f* T1 a2 w) I& ]0 I1 wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program 9 K" t# K+ ~5 ?6 h& b* yOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority 9 J. U" {- r- @" S/ Nalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It / N8 w# g. O3 Z5 T7 m. Gincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 2 w1 G- K$ {) S' Bverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 4 N9 Z: ] O& F! Scontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under + @' t. y7 e6 p8 O0 _0 z7 vrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, . \& M8 V' Z6 Ohistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. # T+ P6 P' b( B/ d$ LSystem $ {3 h! z. U# rReadiness 8 X+ ^# ]0 a7 B7 _; UObjective # g) [: l$ E2 z+ z8 s2 NA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 2 D. S; D- j+ w* }& N& z# uSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 7 c8 l: S3 }& s9 w* y! lmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support l+ E. B- e9 f: xsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of M2 I- [' m W. p" W G, ^1 ]( x- ysystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System 4 n. L' Q: l) ]Requirements & _% I$ t3 _0 X9 B6 D0 NAnalysis (SRA) ! K4 r6 e# u+ G7 zAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 4 L- p `$ a8 u% y- @ l8 `4 ]specific system functional and performance requirements. System . e' ?( |) p1 p, q; g1 TRequirements 8 j( E% [1 ~2 f* y2 LReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the ) O2 r* E& A( q9 K g& i. R2 Kdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering (SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering & p' I e2 w% G. Z# lprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and - m$ C7 K9 U7 D6 r4 nanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. : a: W; M Y/ T8 ]7 T% aSystem Security Engineering Management Program (SSEMP) 2 l" o+ b/ w8 ~+ K. }: m" h& q, I0 kThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical |( Q5 ?. _" ?9 Y. E: o! hachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes 3 V) t0 S" Z5 C l' Dits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security Management - m( E1 M& {" K: ]5 u3 NPlan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to # t4 x( Q( L5 W5 U) _ @meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, ) z# L3 C* e4 ymethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 5 m' M) A P; y0 K4 a. gother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems Engineering ) e- {# d+ e+ q& p7 |An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 & g; z: |6 |8 r3 |3 P) w' NSystems # X; G" h& i+ n, t2 OEngineering Management 5 S! R! X6 L: j5 CPlan (SEMP) " V5 a: Q1 T$ u4 z" p8 yThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 9 B. p6 c, `- q1 L3 H8 u0 h# mIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures ' {8 L& b* f; J7 r, u% Hdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a / I7 n& X% b2 p0 T/ `0 z5 x' B" E4 uService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency & }& [: o3 `+ G- h* U+ uand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. 7 o' `4 Q/ V7 `7 ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 ?- V( J* B, \' n; [% l7 q288 7 o+ D7 f0 y9 `4 h% |/ ~+ PT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 2 y' m) _# p" TT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. @1 c C+ ~0 z2 m3 X+ a; aT/R Transmit/Receive. 1 z/ `( k/ K& U5 q9 S" AT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 / t% X* q7 h- q) w! B4 _Technology Transfer. ; ~" K+ I( q# T! X1 z% ZT 2 # w+ U* ^. L, x- E, z# \: B/ e% Z9 HE Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. ! S+ z7 F) K5 STAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 4 m; Z- ?& p; F% d9 p8 [! _TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. , u B' \% o& k6 f) a8 ^TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). : f! ~# Q) n* m# w( j( v$ sTACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). + g% I8 A" F9 z4 G- yTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 7 h$ m: `9 r' w1 g$ B; LTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ' W8 Q9 L# A/ h/ I5 P0 bTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 7 h( F. p3 q/ ATACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). . N3 `. I5 c# C6 jTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 8 o8 h6 \; N& }: X PTACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ M) }+ s& f8 i* x+ v' B7 s289 8 J: \! C5 K3 J( \& d7 k: MTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air ) e; f, M7 ~- J% JDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air . s/ d. `- j( u5 ?( m: T* i: ypower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air ) R/ {! j5 D. c* m. O( a( HOperations * |' F8 x( j6 x! `3 JCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control / y) n7 M6 i& ?# DSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 0 i/ W3 _3 ~4 ], }& P7 [ g' ]' [defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air 6 p% y, u, k) U, QSupport ) p. L/ ~" J, R4 p. h9 ZAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of 5 g. p( Y4 S, `& Q( C) M* dResponsibility (TAOR) 8 K1 a. f6 u( y" w" V4 X8 Y- CA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. 4 \7 N7 x8 \! V) ^6 h q: ETactical Ballistic # n/ {7 R, N5 @7 e% eMissile (TBM) 6 Z4 l# D2 x0 e' W/ oA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be " r0 t5 `; S4 Q/ o% W- q4 j! \employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link / Y; Q9 a$ n$ }* sA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. + R$ z9 L4 v5 a, W6 w+ s& ]Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. . m2 B4 Y6 v, e' k+ y0 `Tactical Operations Area (TOA) % y! }4 t3 Y/ d' T' sThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 2 s* ^' Z2 w5 M o4 narea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. % g" Y0 l* t; R& A9 gTactical $ {1 ~) W6 a% c2 w. R$ yOperations 4 G+ p6 o" G; ~+ ?2 R3 x6 OCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) ) h! u- e# b# G(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an . g4 e: N1 K0 w$ Z9 Pevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command % M' L `1 u, |) V. }centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component # M& ]# D* x4 w& \) x' h4 w- delements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. , V4 q( y$ W3 W3 `3 `2 LTactical . O& K2 L, I6 e9 c' LWarning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) . e- s: ]1 B( uA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. ( o3 V! n2 d- @: e% @ ]3 h, gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. $ t* E# l6 m# y" I/ E(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. / {6 \$ q# H9 z3 z; K# nTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ; A) \# |" F" D7 LTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. j; q) F1 m# D) P( J4 g xTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. 6 b4 H9 @" B" C0 oTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. / Z8 N3 T! y4 D- n+ }9 v" T( fTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” . J2 w0 B+ c! r# O- wTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. + U0 {6 N5 y3 n5 p" }, W q6 Z. BTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. 8 a& f" J$ s; i6 N* ]# A7 W7 C$ _9 d6 gTADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. $ b) y* h) g' z9 h% d* f, JTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 1 w/ J3 z( ]4 f% g5 p( F5 a* J5 WTAF Tactical Air Force. * f& `& |$ g% g) Q: ]5 {! v0 bTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. $ @5 a4 ?( e2 e6 _7 ~+ M; g b# PTAI International Atomic Time. / {4 u) m r- k' B5 bTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. 2 O' ?8 l! ~* {+ _) x" Y. I% JTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. + {) j$ j( |% Z: a/ E3 oTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector ! J% i1 j5 F" U' A$ oand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. , Z8 `4 U* _+ C- D& h5 @# B* [: STAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank % |% n* p8 E, x# ^0 [8 k0 v9 J; ~Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. / A8 M( T8 u! A- K' zTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. 8 V4 e8 f* l$ k/ }% k' Y. q3 U" STAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. 7 Q2 |, h" G/ e) Y! o0 ~0 r' ~(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. , c; Z! U1 b. b6 A9 k' |: lTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target * E ^7 v0 Q( ~ Z) K0 GAcquisition ) R5 W/ ] m) }3 a1 EThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. 7 T7 h3 d5 z, T3 L4 |Target # B. `# p" E) ]9 F5 s ?- gClassification % W! }* u/ p; x9 H. I5 {# m: @/ mand Type - E+ c! }$ i# i7 bIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, $ Z( B S7 q6 q. N6 p* a! Xdiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination % t9 l1 [+ u8 Z5 {8 F. f1 DThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object % ^4 p* q) I0 N) o) W) PMap (TOM) 4 K( d! m# L3 m' I3 S; |A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and ; W5 o3 Y0 r4 p6 \other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 7 [3 W* _# K$ ?* C) a; w# w3 j9 {" ntarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the " l0 L0 z5 d- N7 r; O$ \- upassage of a ship or sweep. 8 v/ J$ w, q+ d5 m; k5 WTarget System 9 B3 ]* X7 D" W, WRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD . s/ j# r3 [5 v7 y8 AProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) & Y2 {; [% n eengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and Y* ^4 ~1 K* w+ f: Hrequired performance. # m* n. b6 _# FTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. " t# w% ]% v) C# c( o5 UTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. - v0 ^. ? E# V0 l2 d( yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 7 K4 z9 Z" _& k7 K292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. ( `5 ?8 |4 G7 o( E" tTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. : Y/ p% c' q2 L8 @* b# ]. \0 ATBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. % O }3 @* z' }- p- JTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. : j% e6 P4 v. w7 {+ O( B# s. KTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. ( x) F. a. S) @" i3 sTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. ) J+ d+ ]" {0 A5 H(3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. : w& m) j/ y* B/ P2 qTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. 9 e/ a0 w$ R& N1 uTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. ' S/ O* M& L6 D2 J$ q6 Z0 RTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). : i( z5 C/ A! Y3 ^* rTD (1) Test Director. ( w. }/ t1 X+ s' ]9 `0 {(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device 2 i* l) a* L$ I. O4 s6 q: ETDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. # {; `6 `1 J6 q1 R- A6 e( ~8 LTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 3 Q& T% p% N3 V E( k293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 6 M' R2 N9 ?4 w2 H) K9 E1 D6 LTDM Time Division Multiplexed. 6 }' d+ {* a7 v! O0 Y Y* }TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). / b( o. S$ e L3 w7 a% sTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 8 b) ] n" C: k4 w% a M) D: z: \TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. , {# V7 z$ k+ [6 Z$ }(2) Test Design Package. + i f' a* W8 F6 s# ^. a, H(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. ( ]3 V1 P: U. x4 x7 B3 rTDR Terminal Defense Radar. & z; k7 ?1 _5 i: X0 N. f( gTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. , `. a/ X/ M& [9 R2 ~TDT Target Development Test. ) W! Q7 Y Q# c. PTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ' E2 i$ T R- G, L. L& fTDU Target Data Update. 9 S5 i4 e" u# \5 i8 \. YTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. , }0 m) Q1 Z" N7 @3 n- KTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician , o; H4 A" N& uTECH Technical ) }% ~& k e+ \TECHON Technical Control. # R6 b9 s# n5 R- b9 E; ATECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not 1 |1 h5 |' o* d, @# r6 }- ?' Z: _5 B" @technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data $ S; r+ i; Q7 m9 ]' B: ~; n2 VPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, ; B+ o' ]% S+ r" v7 _. tassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation ; ]6 c0 Y8 K* x2 F; V/ hThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to $ q/ _7 O$ N( i, E; L/ F8 Jdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives / j( g% T/ _+ c% g5 [( kThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical ! |0 ]$ K/ D" I0 [Objectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS . Z! W6 o8 g0 B: a Ndevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. # ~5 u5 ~) Y+ o9 `/ W: Q! U" _( e2 sTechnical - z+ y0 h1 f6 C. b- eParameters (TPs) , p, k1 Z# ? }7 K5 zA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk ( h2 m% K6 s" @( C {9 k manalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. Technical Performance 8 U+ \( r% t& A+ d- I+ iMeasurement (TPM) * a, o3 D* c% m5 T5 }3 yDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 5 k, p+ Q a2 l' k7 q5 _beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. " M' i/ P4 a5 q1 ^( P' k9 lTechnical ) h4 V/ T+ L9 u. Z2 o/ k; @! VSpecification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form ; _8 I& W0 @' ^' I1 }# E& l2 J: Pthe basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance & B# ]9 V! V9 [, JIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology 8 A+ Q) k( i& e7 B& i) r4 G( }. iExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management ) ]; A7 P a& Q% D% {# Qresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. : Y2 P; C/ C+ L7 Z/ |Technology 7 r$ l' J5 Y$ L( r$ c4 CProgram / B5 A6 }5 O: b4 s- p7 R, XDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical % Q2 d( d, Q7 d& ]# E l8 |# Isupporting technology. 7 s8 X9 v* K2 P' ^! o, {0 L6 E; DTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. $ g4 A2 ^4 @0 n/ @+ r) s" \9 M$ D# ~TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ! Z2 t! h7 W4 T) @. S" eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 % ]" b' L. s- v9 `& V6 @; `TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 4 n# R3 |, M% j. n0 `" oTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, ' d" ~. G7 P, u: k' tTracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a - f/ F* O0 F6 P( Lsequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 8 w+ _1 X9 i3 Z) Y# Smission commands to the satellite. ' V/ t ~/ x0 f% _Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. , v) F- j0 _) y: w* vTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. - X2 z( ?& U! b, d: r3 ]TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of * x: S& z! Z1 {# l3 ^compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 5 f, P/ W- v/ f8 e2 B; STENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report ! G; O" W) y* @- |: YTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense u) S# {( }2 u2 ~ |3 {Segment (TDS) 5 L( z3 B9 F" ]9 G' \ |( i3 q3 NThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 9 V' ^- T' ]$ S- _5 J( Z6 latmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal 2 l" j* G+ L6 T/ [. yGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. ) T6 ~- g5 G( ? K \- l0 f. gTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase 1 O. F/ g" Z5 G' G0 c* ?! k7 a2 Q5 jand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor # I& U( n+ e' `* A. e: w2 YA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the & T+ ^" D( Y1 E* Y; y3 iterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. ; z1 P7 q; g* \& C3 h: I ]+ g5 fTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 D" @7 w6 A) T1 Y) _* v# s7 D296 8 k2 y6 W+ i! {2 g$ d3 ^Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system ; f% S B& T7 A A& h! ?& Thardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary & S6 Y* x! q8 ?1 s Y7 uconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all - }, X( U6 P( @. m/ soperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. " [2 x9 f1 e2 ]! ~5 D# _) C' k( [Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated , v8 e$ F3 ]' \: O' oto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three ; m* A+ x- {0 L! r( \8 itypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof 8 E% O5 ]6 [3 W% h) U+ pmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 1 x2 }7 P7 p3 d& f- q: Q2 tsystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, ; o. O$ y4 H( J4 gand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts - B/ `5 n/ F- h2 D) l4 Qor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational ( G* E0 s7 [3 w* C$ p a9 n. Y(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of : s( @* U# a: g. e% @6 boperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 3 T; u% r4 z! w- b4 E& ~conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 6 Y# ]4 q" d$ `* f& WFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness O' P; B8 L7 X4 }- K2 Pand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and / f$ T$ M4 g, n% X8 YEvaluation Master Plan 8 A' W! M! A5 |8 ~" [: ?(TEMP) 1 s* ?& U) @: J" S6 RAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 6 @5 K8 u- G. a* ?/ i4 `objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ! n/ A' U* F/ C. |early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and , X5 G- _* j1 i9 r8 gEvaluation 8 p% P2 M! ~6 x ^4 Y1 dWorking Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the . T: R G& h8 B* _( _Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 1 V; f% ^# z. f, vprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling $ B- m2 v0 ^0 C+ G- u9 Y9 nproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. 8 M: V6 E5 s+ g& S" P0 ZTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ) F/ w8 ^& D- W0 e/ F. UTest Integration - {1 o4 B/ T# V% CWorking Group (TIWG) v8 \" P- u2 `9 w' e9 FA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. 3 \' ?7 [& g2 B8 qTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, - a% f- x' c$ G d. Ytest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 0 _3 I- _/ O. c. |criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 4 {# j) S2 u* i; M* W# hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 ' l3 g5 w8 o7 C, L8 e ZTest Target Vehicle (TTV) ! ?% l J' A y8 O6 USingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 3 R( W; o0 C) D' ^- w8 ^; a0 [ ?SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 4 Y5 S, `# z' y; ETEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. * K- C9 i/ q6 m0 JTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 8 H; \1 O; S) G) u( t8 }( g1 ]TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 9 @ c/ Z2 Q0 CTF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. ; c1 ^: e R9 H q- F, ]1 C$ ]/ HTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. 1 [3 G3 ^2 b7 q9 V* T8 jTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 4 Y3 J1 c$ X# y1 L* r/ NTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 8 T/ v, x; L( j; RTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. ( }' Y- } |) D" s; f* YTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). 6 D2 B! v$ [' G# m$ bTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. 9 P, G# }$ i' j2 RTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. + f7 d4 _% \( Q: \Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System + D E' O0 D" \% qThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 5 E6 x# ^; |/ m1 r6 ]$ F! xballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. " o. M: b$ i$ t(USSPACECOM)