航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user - j9 O+ e8 W: caccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. 2 C' Q: U5 z) D5 ISTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. 8 s* ]& u1 D, u( W5 G9 t. ]; rSTOM System Test Object Model. Storage, # S8 R7 Z& A/ J5 O) a8 a' o& xHandling, and ! R2 a1 n# X" Z# Q$ PTransportation Environments / f. M- F r$ _$ k1 z* ^1 D: p3 RThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 3 D- O$ S' e$ w* K4 h" @$ tshock and vibration environments, among others. % h# C! t3 {. B; E- LStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. - ?( R0 n2 F7 b {: c# hStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). 1 h! A* m' n3 w; ~2 p( k+ bSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. 0 t8 P. @# V% f; a# nSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic & @% l: ^. E# L3 SDefense " p3 W; ~3 X7 I; \# Z9 C' oAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat % U. Y: l; S5 M! S& L1 Jballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense Emergency : [# u& S4 U- J3 O) y; b5 P/ C% y& hDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System (SDS) * q" A5 H3 W* e# h: v w. H, zA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving & h: D- K( X0 u: I/ J' I# M: zballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of 3 X {" e1 H m! X( b! X! o- E, jWar The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to , l( B* R2 x" r8 x# K! Waccomplish those objectives. Strategic - D+ s0 X1 F0 w+ M9 ~$ m! A" oOffensive Forces 5 x7 I& U2 f$ b( ~0 V* g% A(SOF) $ g" W( p" e/ N/ ?) \& `Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, 3 e3 X0 }. C- e' \* O# l; ]# y& K3 Vthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific 3 C9 h/ V7 ~' y+ v! d8 y* QCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, ! A! V/ N* b) s& v ZFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply ( a) c1 |" B9 q, qdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. # b, e) \. s, Z# g; oStrategic ) H g. n% B; N, U" W) o+ GWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. & N/ n6 x9 [6 i' M& Y: JStrategic ' m3 p) C$ q0 D7 S; H0 D* EWarning Lead Time 3 R# @2 g. L& nThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of * w3 U4 j' N) i- W7 F; r4 J6 `9 {hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 3 M8 q9 B7 \) K1 r: o0 AStrategic Warning Post- Decision Time 2 y* n, R. N8 @- O& S4 S/ l9 WThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 4 W3 U6 j: Y1 g# F* j* P5 fgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the - i& m: b5 v5 Vnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in - L3 }* ]/ b1 d% d2 r" |the pre-decision period. 1 Z! Y1 y3 T1 A- k! K3 U, D$ ~* i% qStrategic 6 z: Z. ~; Q( F7 R9 E$ m* gWarning Pre- / d+ G# a, A. P, {. V1 VDecision Time U3 j* O; w1 b6 C" v8 fThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time 7 D/ f9 _% m$ P7 bavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. ( p- \1 z, y* c' j9 z! OSTREAD Standard TRE Display. - z7 y( B( A8 f% W: X G' ESTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured 5 x# p8 g$ L* N0 |4 m) j6 m; A! T" K! KAttack 8 f. J( z2 i; i/ n- S# @An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely 2 R% s6 o. `; g3 Ctimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured 2 A6 j1 @9 a% {/ m7 nDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules ( e( B7 A* z# P' ubased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 2 d- @8 x& t3 S' ^flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program ' c8 _) W9 V$ x1 R oA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 1 x K- M+ C& y4 {7 ginstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. " s; I% N% z1 x2 L% BSTS See Space Transportation System. 9 o9 e7 h: w, Q* s/ I; N) r6 w4 zSTSC Software Technology Support Center. $ a1 y5 [8 k# W0 LMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 0 a" Q/ Q, D& h* d" x. Z(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 6 {& C/ }8 M" U2 R* J+ ~6 CSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. _) a$ a' c7 ^/ m! i7 jSTU Secure Telephone Unit. ! h) P) D) `* j' iSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. 4 m) ?' x6 x% v5 L$ N+ GSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it % K) w" j% |( b3 J h7 C( D! Dhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched : s( M n3 [6 b6 FBallistic Missile (SLBM) % ~9 @! ]2 O" R; H' ~0 M/ r# b0 k+ sA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 9 P: F1 M" d9 d+ ^0 ^: ~miles. & Z8 R& X8 j+ W$ G% ?SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense 4 S0 Y# @5 w. O7 V0 l% MFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. / Y# ?: J% |* Z; h3 [* g; ?1 X* oSuccession of 5 }. A1 Z; Y% p7 E# vCommand ( ~+ @, |' q' z# M9 G/ d+ r* QThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command % i) q- Z; K/ H+ Kis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). , K; Y6 R2 Z* o1 K$ rSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, & A$ [% W! H( `- Athrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) 6 V2 B( }; K uA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 5 B( L' Y7 |0 F0 ]required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser ; M* G2 `% u! H) V7 {beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. , ]/ j) e G2 s* w+ gSupplemental ( [ g/ K- O' q; d2 iAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. - A/ O+ G( G3 {1 Y, v8 {Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the ( O% C6 x0 R' j: A% r0 G# T; o# Q* Tmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) * _% V/ a3 X& d: Hequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly n! B* z( ?& z1 B% t1 h9 Ytools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 7 O3 y) M3 O) o6 k7 Aprotection equipment). Support Personnel J, L0 v$ y9 {1 ]/ a( u$ @Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly * O) l6 v) _; Y; ?associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous F, E' ? V2 `! O$ Xoperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, ; p, \0 o U+ W" d" b; B# ]' Vadministrative support, and the like. , W w4 s& W' O1 ISupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. ) I0 Y- |5 R8 T2 pSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 0 r' _9 K* x* @ cbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. ( A6 F4 A5 F' j' [+ {: _) K: C4 B$ b8 ~SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. # A( @) ?$ l* Z1 I" MSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or - w9 A9 Q' A& u0 ?5 |$ \# bmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. . R7 s6 q8 Y6 d9 s/ CSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 6 Z) E- B3 E7 J, Rand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric 5 H; j8 x- I0 U. z! L0 ^sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance * z7 [* y5 T. K6 W8 J% KRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response ^& w3 u! U- V1 Q3 eoptions and current surveillance system availability. % z, q6 z* R* I5 l3 {' mSurveillance, Satellite and * D2 ]& [& v5 v+ l; JMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, 9 |+ @5 S- m' N+ {% Q4 }( band characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites / d. _4 q0 G" [" W% Q8 ^and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 2 t& F( y3 m* Z$ b$ W; O( SSurveillance # Y4 s; T' [6 t1 t6 @System Configuration t6 A. I% D" J! P9 w9 K2 @The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 l% j9 d' j1 Y9 G* t" d283 " U6 C6 ^- o4 p0 R) \( M/ @Survivability / w" w' t- W- E% Q$ B3 LOperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes / m1 M" K: w k [) E7 Bthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and ) J: P3 r2 o& sEnduring 9 E, z% c4 }' t6 JCommand Center 4 k* s( v. M3 H: o& _(SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. * J8 z8 Q! e+ l: a9 oSUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. # P" j8 m5 |; z$ l% fSV Space Vehicle. ( v: s5 n6 ?/ OSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. - E7 Q* g+ Q- eSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. 9 _& h, d% o+ _- n: y5 u* USweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating " u _" P1 @% H2 \( u2 Z9 {band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. m8 y$ I% K$ O* hSWSC Space and Warning System Center. ! }* m0 Y% t7 g8 fSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 4 j, w- G% M6 y R7 Oeach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) ; r; H3 `, _) i/ C# y4 iA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance ) \) ]) w# J" l \' lbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for ! }7 a5 C$ z# etransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's & z8 Q- \1 f V( @7 q) K s% F! asignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. . `$ Q* I. T" m. G* {" o& sSys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. 7 X4 ~' g7 W- C- u+ NSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. # `3 T/ R |% CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 V3 T& M$ O! I+ c4 Z" }# z284 SYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, : E2 X7 w' _$ W3 Z1 {; `0 Pdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with 8 N# g3 n6 m4 C$ J9 w4 m- Hspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, 5 ~8 ]$ C- k: G+ @% W" ?and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. ) u! P9 B. H, \" T0 r! p, ?' I4 sSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions & ~3 w* b6 k! J$ v( V/ ~implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. 3 l# H( J1 }9 U" m; }System 0 Q: n$ I. ^6 k6 p8 a; w& qArchitecture ) a, t0 S* y1 d1 n7 i! \9 p" USystem Capability 4 }. I2 C* ]! y! p3 }( lSpecification `' V0 v4 B3 |, v( P(SCS) - `: I. l" p5 {/ \. L! i7 zThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the # c E% D! Y0 O6 o( `' Belements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. : H. ]! r2 r G) BSystem Center 4 H# C/ v: E; R$ ~) n; p(SC) . w) y: k y% ^; k: XA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide * K6 V) v9 K- Z8 Q3 usensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition - \2 d; S% e$ E6 k6 z Sstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other : m" s1 r! s8 d2 d. G9 Rconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration % }( I* ]! L* b6 V# fControl Board (SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. - J; P$ s8 U9 }! H5 n. E; N5 }! oSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 6 B+ [5 F. [: R) K9 ~computer systems. System-Critical Function 5 o. A+ E9 T6 Q ]! c, qA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's / E+ U+ ?4 x1 F5 vmission. System Definition Review (SDR) , e7 y$ \3 j' d2 QThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the , J2 N. i0 i) I+ g/ csystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential # H( b6 N! {# F, _0 d( k I) s4 w' wimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. . T# l; x% P7 @' j; oSystem Deployment + d3 P! n( L& _% j# DDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S , y9 y4 ?9 {- e* G" U6 H& M285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, m# X, \: A3 i, y7 Ecomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy - J! n$ O# H+ H0 _. L" |+ Cspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept + Q7 y- H- v1 ]7 T/ V! Y5 tAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 8 Y: F$ d! E% ?8 w8 x: l( icharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ; T) w2 K9 C7 a& \. ?5 i' TSystem Design 5 h5 p; o1 ~) V7 F' tReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set * Y1 w, T. G1 l+ Z; @8 _: Q# zof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 6 i! ?0 W+ Y1 _$ k3 ]0 Wcapability. " g* H/ j2 t8 u9 LSystem Evolution . A7 e! l) U/ l" u7 ~$ a+ O6 |% c0 TPlan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior - G. G2 k) ~4 |$ lExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to * H, z7 l$ z$ L. b6 ]achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome : L6 z9 `1 R5 j8 s( Lthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System $ M; G& I5 K, l5 dGenerated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) . V0 e" M! {5 `; K6 l, vTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 8 E- I5 }# N; z i* j3 w$ l) b. Vsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local ; o/ u% ]6 \! L/ Yfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the 7 _+ Q9 s' _, N. ]primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. 1 o- D y; _1 O6 Q# n! P. _System . O+ I. y r/ B& w: I. mIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or ! I" n9 v! h/ Z4 J6 _0 lequipment systems. 8 n& p/ V& p0 @; @& h vSystem Operational Concept 3 I& g, J: H8 ]) C, QA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 9 F0 v @( G+ Z+ Ldeployment, and support of a system. 2 q3 e. z* D: S" @2 Q8 fSystem 8 E3 r' z2 ]; u/ g7 ROperation and Integration . ^& C. `1 k. r0 y! X# a, q4 e% i |) gFunctions (SOIF) 7 g: t$ k2 m3 k1 K2 Z3 \The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and ! d3 ~/ v+ j: A+ c. f; }& x. ~) t$ Abattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command " t9 B4 Z9 H% t# A0 N$ \5 \and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of / }4 d2 P" X/ v# I! nposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. * v& R2 }- U; x5 s7 Y' bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S - F: o, A7 A" u- @286 ( Q2 \( c: u& o. ISystem Program 6 @2 n W0 o9 m( A( v+ H8 A, wOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, 3 ~) n$ E* ]# N7 u) B; r n9 r' Rgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System + T i8 E; H2 c; Z" G( }% NReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out & ^7 J, V! i% i4 r7 nthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the - V; K T3 P2 z9 c6 p& \verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 3 R. M$ h' Q7 R5 C9 Lcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under # s4 ^. b$ A1 ?- Hrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 3 k3 l# y" ]$ o; X2 j" G3 E& qand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, * B4 U$ P O# i; Z9 f7 thistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. - }" M. ^4 s# X5 H, [% S% G, M$ xSystem Readiness 8 @1 ^$ Y, Z, w1 K# e" O5 V9 m5 _: ]Objective $ _7 U1 f; v2 _6 H9 \A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. / `0 }' e/ u$ a% Q# y. B9 nSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and . i1 ~+ l& J; r9 u, @maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support 7 o- ]4 j& a7 l; Nsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of ' ?' N. w; T4 M$ Y, `' Nsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 7 I7 I: K9 J0 m- H7 ~capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 7 O) V- w% @! [; U1 l, A" z- z+ vSystem 2 G$ @4 H- g6 U* ~, z1 HRequirements Analysis (SRA) ; J m+ a3 {* M( B+ y0 hAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 5 b& n3 V ]1 `Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 4 W5 x' n' `( Q' K" k; Y Wspecific system functional and performance requirements. ; Y% g) U( E. w |* ISystem Requirements Y# Q* U7 l' B1 u- j: D6 Z+ i% iReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. 9 A: f5 ?8 c, j+ d" ZSystem Security Engineering (SSE) # F- b9 D3 _# N6 c4 N7 S" yAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks * V% ]4 ~$ G, _. o9 xassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related : { k0 ~2 Z+ l4 Oscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 9 p |, G' U( {analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. & j* g9 P& Q+ M7 h/ X5 NSystem Security 8 m" Q8 A' i9 _; I- X q- ?9 q3 PEngineering Management - w, n" z: c; i# n* l- f0 v3 WProgram - Z6 y. F. U' V) D0 W2 h, ?" c(SSEMP) + |# D" ^8 h0 s9 X5 |0 X# sThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical 8 }, Y' l: y/ N; J8 c) g: v. |achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ! \5 k1 c L/ Q4 ^' ldefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the ; Q, i ^; q+ B$ Fresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes $ d* U+ f# w+ D/ iits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security h3 m2 y' ^* VManagement Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to " v, S# w' m q9 d& h/ V/ N! ~meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related ! e7 I. M! ]! O0 M" S Vsystems. - x4 s& A- `2 ^0 c, ?Systems 1 e! y3 t: v8 ?3 C0 e/ c3 ], K) B) G: REngineering 7 T/ c! \- ?: w& x) eAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle 9 O( k/ o* q) b8 |balanced set of system product and process solutions. 4 E0 j- R x4 G kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % L4 t" a( \# w& { ]287 * M5 u/ @- ]% ]5 m& oSystems Engineering # o7 C! e: v" C7 cManagement Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) ! j" T& A/ l# ~. \! @Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and Coordination 9 ?! G, k; `9 NThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 9 ]1 V" i9 g- D" l3 e" H: _0 ]. }System Threat Assessment 6 k2 v& U& c3 WReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a . F5 h# H- s- z; D. XService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when " j" Q; y \8 O( u# cthe threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset 2 a' \. p- Q1 x+ RA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 7 ]4 z- V6 Z( n9 m8 j0 i5 }the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T . V* j M4 f m) C' Y- Q0 P( r288 1 @( r/ Y4 x5 i7 e, t: DT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. ! Q# S# [: Y, U- jT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 5 E( e1 f4 X, H- W' iT-MACH Trusted MACH. . }0 ?' t7 D) ^' C, T6 zT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T : k I4 C" F1 k7 c0 y" g2 0 i+ j4 {& V& y- Z$ Y, n- ~& U# WTechnology Transfer. % H8 Z1 O% G- I( WT 2 t2 g9 B \5 c% U8 Q# [5 d* ZE Technical Training Equipment. ( y' d6 Y1 y6 Q3 O# }/ t+ WTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. ' Q1 G0 \2 p9 `+ y# `TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. # I5 K8 J6 i4 ?- i) g7 aTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. 4 s; T/ W0 ]/ u, o; z) {TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 2 m2 P6 J$ m2 x# c* KTACAIR Tactical Air. % I- g c; g( j# \6 @; qTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. 8 t$ Y, A( s. I* H4 d: Q6 iTACC Tactical Air Command Center. ' l" d" f& Q! e. X2 ZTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 2 J; [3 j3 ~* h: X3 J* T! eTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. # F& V, X7 B2 Z" E7 ~TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. 4 S2 f4 r& c6 k/ I0 RTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). , L+ c" k/ o& i2 @0 ]9 KTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. # z0 A$ a: y& H' z1 dTACS Theater Air Control System. 8 g& y9 p) R1 X8 H; T' T0 j0 _9 T$ ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 4 W+ w9 c1 c s289 5 _% G5 {& T- N, `- M: lTACSAT Tactical Satellite. A8 w3 Z% ]. G+ O' d* b3 u0 DTACSIM Tactical Simulation 1 x9 m' H% C* `: {5 R% OTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air - V3 s. a( z* E. Ypower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with & P9 p7 h& ~' p% X3 @ground or naval forces. ( ~; ?6 Y E+ l- j8 VTactical Air Operations 2 s1 l; e' G% B' jCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control ) f( N- v& @' X1 ?+ p0 [8 g* nSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. # K3 C0 v: c- J2 ?( X* U NTactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. & i/ D' Y( h" U! m ~Tactical Area of + G! t+ G* p" N* ?+ | wResponsibility 7 R% A) A4 i$ n(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 8 z. x( K9 i" d% z m7 [commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. 6 ^- E/ V! F6 X9 Q( I6 VTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) C, C5 j. ~3 dA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be / Y4 x5 O2 x0 ^# e- X# |employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 8 `7 t4 Z l0 I; s! O( a. ]% z8 JTactical Data Information link ) E0 Z( F* U5 {! I" A2 VA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. ; X; ]0 R* @3 C! y; g+ pTactical Level of 1 F' C+ L6 a1 g' ]War , p/ ?1 n$ Y a) L' oThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. : u. L% ~& u( _* BTactical * E" u% ^% @1 s h, @& _ gOperations Area (TOA) ' r; r* ~! r3 g6 PThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical 3 B3 I; a7 }/ G# r- V0 V! XOperations $ N( w4 {" W) g2 O# FCenter (TOC) # V+ ]/ a3 l- W# G/ \! T6 PA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning 6 w8 q' O# z3 m(TW) ) t* i5 {- g3 b(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an & M1 O4 ^5 Q( x5 ~7 tevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command ; y& P, R0 Z; B* Q$ Z2 i ]centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component 0 z; m+ G8 I9 Selements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. 3 ^5 }: I% f9 t1 k d2 J, gTactical Warning/Attack + L' f+ X! J& m9 A2 J% C% JAssessment , j0 x) e' d) C0 a* ^/ @(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack ! V% E. M# ^% f" |) g& ~5 v; J, `Assessment. ; m6 l" F! }* t+ E1 @1 r# p/ j7 `4 f7 L5 jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 7 T- k- x M- ?TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. 0 d- Q7 q/ k# B7 F6 K( d* t, [(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. 6 S5 R/ B1 z, j. o+ r" wTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. $ D! L: d8 j' d; ?8 A+ wTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. . v8 _$ \; p# c& \1 J% WTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 3 u+ T4 G/ f% V& JTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” , C. q6 k; C9 }/ m/ V, L/ `' LTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. 4 o2 y+ p8 A. p$ u3 y( N4 [TADL Tactical Data Link. - U ], ^3 l6 {% G; J- F5 a' @TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 4 [# ]" W m. K% s9 ^, ATADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. . _$ A% w* G9 A) H4 MTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive - e/ M: C' E7 fdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. 7 `- P' J& r4 b, T- {* s% |TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. . L9 D2 O8 @. u" ]Tank 1 n9 r- a" X, mFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 4 k# E& c' d9 u+ c" Qresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' e/ z& E9 F2 }9 x" \) t291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. 1 y" W0 O* [* ~8 g9 ]6 b! ]TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 7 _3 ^0 k. u5 _: \. P4 p, vTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. ; h* G" G/ l1 x& H' s6 }(2) Threat Activity Report. : M$ Q! _; u7 C(3) Target Acquisition Radar. : R7 O" R+ H) s6 e% y' N( v4 LTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 5 C8 Q/ P5 Z3 BTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 5 S J- J5 R7 s, L- ~5 `$ ?Target Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage & D5 T$ |( _+ ~region of a sensing system. Target ' J8 x6 o/ H+ \- \$ v5 t- G F' HClassification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, 4 t! r9 `7 B- i v: b- f" w. _. Ldiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target & H! a6 v3 @3 i2 y7 l, T. A/ N+ QDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one : v8 X( Z4 T- F. c' @target when multiple targets are present. Target Object / d8 I, J/ y) E W3 X9 VMap (TOM) . K; H* Y- t" R7 ~% l7 v# OA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and k+ G: Y( ^: b% z1 y' B0 g, Wother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the + _. r( g: G+ c' qpassage of a ship or sweep. Target System - ?# o5 k) l4 c, @$ Y$ h( lRequirements Document (TSRD) 1 M7 C _' X- x, e; uBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 3 k* ~0 Z) s9 c: kProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. % P; Z' Q: O3 W4 O: k! p3 \Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance 5 I$ B& q' \% J; s( `) V* O$ _to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 2 ^% l2 \$ p O7 u) F. W4 ]+ [ Y1 mrequired performance. : A1 W; e4 r8 lTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. 5 J- \) b9 |+ q4 z, b; UTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. 1 |& T0 }4 k, Q6 dTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 8 J+ G) O6 [% q P: u+ r qTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. ) S) k ?3 n6 j- _* ^( W. {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 + {# D2 s. ^- V- @& XTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. . o; m4 n& [/ O9 jTB Test Bed. . y, J) |6 k% c6 T c' Y8 r, ITBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. . S `/ H& G; Z7 D- n3 aTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. : H; l) w! V/ A* ATBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. : k$ ^. {" V" L `/ c5 f: ]0 ZTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 1 ~. e! x; c+ \* K7 J7 jTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. ( l9 ]8 j# Q0 u' b) Y. h, s4 hTBN To be Negotiated. ; Q& R {8 t. R( q$ j! g( H) J. zTBR To Be Resolved. 5 v. q* \8 X* N6 e# gTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 0 t5 Y) X* C& B5 ~! j1 R/ K. M(2) To Be Supplied. $ M; R* o; g7 }3 D(3) To Be Scheduled . 3 f. ?- M8 s# t$ W. DTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. : `4 M5 h( Y- i4 @, e; m- kTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 9 P1 D4 C; U. S; ]% _TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. B* ?: l0 W; R3 [3 ITCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 5 ~6 D* K. G, k$ m. r7 OCountermeasures Mitigation). 3 v: p' g. \- y2 vTD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. 8 } z6 y J9 @: j, M(3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 9 t0 a1 T$ e$ P3 p6 V4 MTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. ! D4 P( q( t% ^0 b* ETDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( [( H0 C* [( d ^3 I# Y293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. 3 a/ A8 x2 w: Z3 l' Q: LTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. L+ q6 ^+ E2 _! I1 jTDD Target Detection Device. . C& g4 u" A1 `9 C# I$ FTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. . e. G) g: b5 }: o. a/ X( MTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. # A' u. A& Z+ STDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). ; h$ `& S' ?' `% _; P4 T( I" [TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. 2 P' L* k4 a3 q0 S3 V: `5 ]5 g! Y(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. 0 {5 ~2 ?, M' R& V, |TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ! G* V2 n. \" |0 W7 S' gTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 6 b3 A0 q6 N9 Z: u$ QTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 8 s6 A0 b- Y% l$ h( s(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 0 P$ s* w6 H* { |3 t, B* l& iTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician ; |1 I) @8 G9 b) UTECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. : F6 f5 m* x2 C4 w6 Y3 WTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' D/ ~! P, v6 G) g3 {, L0 m294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as + v& o4 y1 m& n' ~- M. O# ^0 smanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data , }' T: X; U$ o1 _Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality " i' a5 {2 S3 K* A1 v' _assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation 9 r* I T/ u. _" N+ K, eThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to 2 ~4 G2 p. U, F" zdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 3 } C3 m Q/ P3 h1 t, i9 {8 U* Qthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 3 X- m' ]0 h0 zTechnical " q& M/ o; m7 p3 T' a+ Q% ]Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. 6 F, m+ g- v4 R9 e- CTechnical ' Z0 w3 R4 u, \7 g& j: y: PObjectives & ; d0 h% S9 L' x# F% ZGoals (TOG) ! D: {. U' `& d3 ?8 THigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical 7 J( X% _4 `8 V3 dParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk ( x Z$ K9 A$ p: Y* i6 e) J- V @analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by ' Z. ~ u& u5 D# o6 w* C/ Wmanagement. Technical Performance Measurement 6 u) l/ @- x; u$ W(TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status ' ~+ p6 ~; ~" M `4 t) Wbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design 1 s5 A7 b: N2 y3 z( gassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the * @, ]: F' g; p/ ~8 yvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product ! t! m' P9 X: P+ Z0 |8 \+ u) G2 n; y: Telement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these ! t3 ~7 R* J; r" _/ l8 Pdifferences on system effectiveness. Technical F4 S& h/ |+ E b t7 g4 TSpecification % b, I# y1 c5 _; q4 Y" S9 R5 eA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical r3 s% N+ U6 z# J' O0 FSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 8 z' ?2 [3 A! ?targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology ; ^6 s' |5 f0 T( t2 O) B7 eExecuting Agent 4 o+ x1 d) `" s/ @, P( ^, F6 H+ CThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. % o' _: G1 T: q+ R4 ]) f( r1 WTechnology Program 8 f" R+ ^, B* [6 QDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical % R! ^/ `* @. M7 f9 [, fsupporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 0 V, [% P. @. ETED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. . ?2 w5 m7 {2 ?9 B5 \: _( bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( f" }8 z+ y! {9 s6 ]295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and 8 }, w: X8 a- p; w GCommand (TT&C) " a, v' U/ A4 h; C" H% Y& X* q7 kFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and % i& H+ ~# q* I: @3 n% zstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit * D$ N9 S" I( emission commands to the satellite. . E6 z |+ C2 \- L7 UTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the $ [: {3 Y# I# X# V+ p2 h/ Eautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. ' c& b/ p* Q( g; f3 N9 XTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. - P; D9 Y1 x' X9 c( E, ZTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. - N" Y" |3 b; bTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See # T6 v) j3 R4 n8 a/ qCompromising Emanations.) ' l( j: t) ?* {# m/ h$ U8 ITENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ) j* E# j0 J: y4 |: Q5 {0 L( fTER Test and Evaluation Report \( n* f: }/ mTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense " Z" h2 c( H5 u+ ?Segment (TDS) 1 w1 Y+ g* V4 H5 |5 x; ]' a/ p% wThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between % k* i4 ^6 d: X1 tatmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the : n* q$ |2 z' B s' Ivicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase / k7 Y7 J9 P2 b0 E+ g. dand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase : o" `) n* ?- T, h6 A/ ?# qInterceptor 6 \& T' j) r' V" m7 W- mA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy ' D' z Q4 _+ L5 |3 |/ }3 lPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. ( R$ a1 b9 H; PTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) v7 |, M0 _4 ?7 `7 i: T296 ( c1 T% q/ K& ]0 e, HTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 3 _6 Y; g5 R% {2 Z" Nhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary % o0 p6 p2 V, ^consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. 7 E { h: i7 y1 ]) L, h$ x" cTest and * M2 N" L% G- s8 {( z' NEvaluation (T&E) / A) I/ c4 ]- Y0 y- b- U( ^Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three # z8 I5 j" Z6 M) @' J) D( Ktypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 9 M3 p+ o0 j, ~- J8 ^: V, y. zrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that 1 ~9 e( B4 [; j! q8 E/ s5 f( `/ q3 jthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational / V7 b) d( c+ p: H) }! ](IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before 6 d7 x& [5 m: ^the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 6 B; M. ]- h8 J" ]: oenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and 8 A. E% y/ S# BEvaluation ) `- v( W% B3 LMaster Plan 1 U2 O# ~$ O$ p" G; b0 F(TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as / ]* q9 f. m; ]) |1 J. Oearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, " h. V6 {6 L* Z) j5 P/ y$ T1 W4 h% n3 fplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the * ?* d; C: |7 V; V1 E+ f6 VAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 5 a2 h& ?3 I% Sprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and , t. `/ C' Y8 U6 k. E/ {related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. : |6 H7 Z, z9 h! c2 OTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 4 j" r9 \ B" Z8 o$ o% x3 l; hand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 3 \$ U! b0 ?; F) r/ V% ATest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration ) t7 X( A1 f3 G1 e6 z" }Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. / P* F/ B8 Q) a, B& \Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. / d5 s- l$ E( \+ Q# b: `. FThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation . s K8 X/ T; C% ^& i, K+ V/ qcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' S6 p! d9 U+ f297 % c' `0 s. H2 o3 j1 x4 yTest Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 0 O0 i. w% n* R$ v: z8 Q, i% eSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ' t: j$ ^1 b, G8 R1 z/ l$ N# uTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. 6 u% b' a# Q1 @' ETEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. ! W$ |! ?+ j5 L- u1 [& ~, pTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). ; Y7 L3 K4 v) F+ H' `1 S" VTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. ( ~5 @2 e; Z c4 [) ]TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 8 t6 C$ j4 O$ U$ {* CTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 3 M9 _$ o' Q* UTFOV Theoretical Field of View. 1 f( M S8 ?3 JTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 9 P" ?5 S* R) O1 j. oTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). ) K! i/ K- V; F5 ]! H) ]6 MTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). 0 s. p; X9 c ^( ]* G4 gTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 9 E& j! G* S- k, B9 D, ^THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 4 B' a5 M" }# f' L( l& FTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. % c4 q+ K" {* Z& M" V( nTheater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System & z3 [' W2 o1 M0 zThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)