航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ( H. w( d2 {4 c8 O, J0 ySTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). 8 b) B! ^- u8 L8 W+ h5 N" L V(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. ; _: E! V- Z- o$ M* Q. YSTOM System Test Object Model. 8 f6 E1 S" |; ~% JStorage, Handling, and Transportation ! X3 Q/ B `2 e# OEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 8 B! W# x$ O. h" t8 \* d2 ?environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 9 Y0 s7 x/ ]2 c7 |: y* Estorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 9 y! ?# ^$ S* V# D/ aSet. ) E8 I6 y' d( H* O: B: m" bStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. , v c( ?& X- Z/ S* ~1 r" T: ^STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. * H1 i* z9 ?! z1 @8 j( j, tSTRATCOM Strategic Command. + y% |' H+ O IStrategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat " H3 k/ C$ V, \ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 3 n& [* ~7 S2 `- q- \8 e5 mnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense * L1 g; q% a& S# OEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. - ^3 b8 C( `* M6 Q- {6 b- h) z% PStrategic Defense System (SDS) " x" j3 g( H+ ^& `5 pA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving 5 k/ j$ B( |, {- z( |7 Z2 sballistic missile defense system. % d& q, l |1 f% nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 % l; o4 L: a! j9 ~# w, IStrategic Level of ; b# r$ H! d7 LWar ( _+ q0 u+ i0 g4 V3 DThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ' R2 X& D1 `4 F0 salliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. * P* e" p$ K# W! V+ q: `0 ~( q* xStrategic " y* @' d- @- d2 COffensive Forces 7 G# G. `3 U" l# N% W5 Y* _! {(SOF) 3 X/ j. Q. O5 `2 G2 g% u2 e0 ]Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated * T$ Y1 w0 E7 L4 q5 C' H) \! b% VOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, + e1 E; @8 P4 S1 e1 t7 n7 rFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 5 {# P) A4 n) A0 U( C) \2 Q) ~. KStrategic Reserve 3 V: V1 G' L4 ]0 e) b& b2 n' s- ]That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic * U- k3 I3 ], R; ?5 {) ?8 K& ?# LWarning ; m. a6 x5 a r% n. `A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time % U4 r. A. }- o# b% OThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. # q! b/ U" T: d5 A# k \Strategic ( Y' g+ V( q4 N, DWarning Post- Decision Time - n& F3 G" w7 z/ B# `# Z; @8 |That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of : R4 B7 E$ o* B( V/ L& [5 d4 egovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic - Z9 o2 g& w& qwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 3 C" G/ l# L6 b g$ ]9 f: [the pre-decision period. Strategic / [7 a" k! |" H& M) VWarning Pre- Decision Time ) x% e: u6 t* \3 Q) c3 A( iThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a 8 O I3 [+ o- q, i% {decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. ' _( N% R9 N' r( }" b- @STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely - e& o' v# Q [, W1 wtimed for maximum strategic impact. ' R; v/ T% L8 Q/ ^8 V8 y ZStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules : F. c6 q. _ Z) i/ Ubased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 2 J) B, D7 N5 p* `+ ?& Bflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 6 X) o: z h( X* D% asequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more . S/ \$ i2 {0 \5 n2 Xinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or ( I Q+ ]1 T1 o/ E: Ksequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of * O, t8 F" f% @& dinstructions. : k; a5 i) l- x% |: C" p: Y9 ISTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. / V8 T! x- M5 ~0 X( B; eSTS See Space Transportation System. ) G7 x5 `5 f5 t( S4 }STSC Software Technology Support Center. : n+ K9 u) ^3 \9 a$ HMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ( H9 W+ v& q- B1 |3 c/ F(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. / \/ @8 k0 A5 h$ X, l2 C h4 m% rSTW Strike Warfare. % m% {2 R5 Y' ?STWC Strike Warfare Commander. * E0 C7 N% {- hSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which : @+ T) ?+ Y6 J) `. ?, N, H/ ~is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. q# p6 Q& \0 |* r' ~1 ]' g7 \% \Subject Security Level . r/ a/ Z0 }+ W+ ]3 F, Q8 g" J$ @A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 2 j; G# x; ~# S# g! Zdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. $ F0 N" x3 S3 o5 DSubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile * f$ C' O5 A& _' u$ L(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 4 P) o# U' o. e& Q/ o% T D: B. emiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. - _ r0 I# H6 C8 jSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 4 q" E8 z+ o6 \+ \9 b: W! R% `Subtractive Defense W1 e2 p' |$ \0 ?First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 9 i) K' V" y$ v6 Y. LSuccession of 2 C0 `. H$ V9 s4 h( r% ]/ D' |Command 7 v0 R3 e, N! B }' b7 C6 s7 OThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, $ C# Z9 g9 w* L1 I% l: lbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command $ ^$ h+ \9 }; {. X5 `3 {is a synonymous term. - q* `/ h: o0 l' V# tSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. ! s; u! D6 q+ K0 s9 ~% T$ m% }6 A/ eSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 3 q! O2 V2 m" r* v0 _' B3 C, i$ f- vSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. A6 i$ ]% a6 w9 q' m& a9 P+ |Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, # M7 e$ c) |; z& o, f3 _through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. , D/ H. c7 T2 k( AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant ; w8 P" ?( [7 }" i2 hLaser (SRL) # v; O2 o' I0 L0 F/ b2 gA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional ; ]1 `; Y* l3 G' blasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from " R7 B O" |* G9 Rsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 2 f# I% B5 W9 |) g6 Jbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory . X# F+ B+ Z: N1 ]Programs & C+ F0 d$ g" ?' }8 K9 L2 `5 P nComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. / N5 K; G. K& O8 a% M+ vSupplemental Appropriation 0 r# E* M# x: X; O. MAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. - l- U, r' @* m, U! \Support Equipment * S: H; ^ h% T( }- FAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 4 s% w3 b5 [( N: M1 C% Mmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ' U1 H# s- a& O/ _6 kmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) & U1 k1 V# F* k! G y/ @equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 4 y; W$ `. o: ztools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ( {) V* |' O {7 R$ ]0 P1 pprotection equipment). + E' L" O0 F/ ?+ ?- C% e* pSupport Personnel * A& L" v$ u4 g, E; B0 _Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous # N1 p! z6 q7 Woperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, + e, P; J) L& r) W- U1 Nadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 6 b( H! h3 _ g: S, S* Hexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. ; X$ Y* P% r2 ?# B3 S2 O1 cSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 0 g n; m4 E9 ^7 L: C. mbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. - J& q7 Q) ]0 j8 x$ G7 G- @8 zSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items ! L# c& {1 E& q5 n. tdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess % q0 |- ^2 x4 N; Wproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity / \1 C8 l; O; I- Q- B' Zmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance - X t4 n. f( f+ R7 o3 D* y: `Requirements 4 b, C5 _( |, \# jRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for " \; z5 G% c. E, I6 S ?5 K0 F( S- _coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response : E* h' p8 k! a% \8 H) L6 zoptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and $ s9 t& }4 q D. O9 B8 \Missile 1 z$ q, t$ `+ ^& k: `The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance ; [0 t: c# j) z- a# iSystem 1 S8 Q. a/ {) i' _. z9 J+ a, b+ UConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. " [8 v4 q& a$ O& P: A/ ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! n6 ~/ n& s0 U5 }283 " a7 L. ~, P8 R- N; M H) C5 ?0 j9 |Survivability Operating Modes $ |$ c' v& T( ~9 x, U8 {6 oThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 1 {- s5 X2 T" o- s% ISurvivable and Enduring ( [4 E* c' r5 k1 x {- BCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 0 c! \- r, a* N. Z: ^, x, q, eSUS Site Utilization Study. 6 [: B0 R5 w0 M7 `- t. F2 ]Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 9 F5 k p B2 d* T# m8 p& R& ~. \0 BSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating 0 T) M( K9 E, N7 m1 Mband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. $ }, u2 P5 D$ e D' m0 ~SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. $ h- \/ Z# f3 F4 s/ x& OSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. 9 v2 `, Y" t. q* T! E( p# DSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. ]4 ^& O E1 A4 \& `& u4 V" q& kSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where . h0 K, \* @! K8 h, neach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points ) U* @. w4 V. o# h- S. Valong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance , D0 l P) p. f \/ vbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for + \2 [0 N) t9 v& f! Dtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's & j+ P4 ]* I5 q: r# H% msignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 9 V- g0 F0 u8 s5 {- Y: Zemitted by the radar transmitter. + q4 ~( S! ^; {: A7 w' h- y+ BSYS System. 8 u2 p) x4 N# p$ H0 lSys C/O System Check Out. & Y1 U$ X8 {; vSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 " g R2 \# a) R/ _9 W0 z/ NSYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with / ]) o; P. i8 B0 s4 I, e7 hspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, 3 Y c8 u9 L. Sand delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a ' |) C9 A4 M3 n5 q: H1 }0 brequirement. & [* `2 o0 T- Q+ LSystem 2 |) o5 m! j0 b$ zActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System , v0 {5 y3 d1 D* x! I- {Control. " s/ g7 I4 R. n% d _8 c2 aSystem , S; }1 d3 C7 O2 `4 _. ]1 f& VArchitecture System Capability Specification (SCS) 3 D# Q/ v& g( H( N) WThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 3 O ^ \9 X; Melements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional 2 ]' C5 ~, k& f- O1 Wspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among . Y3 @4 X3 l, w2 J6 \9 u- @the elements of the BMDS. ! I; H9 C# q. h; C9 bSystem Center (SC) - T, V3 t' @7 G# i- eA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of # K5 r1 U# v" |: E, S8 Dequipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ( n) `6 b8 ^2 C+ R* Cconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the ' Y8 n( q. J. i- z& Sdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration - J% [9 f' ^5 @7 o) yControl Board / H' @5 }3 B" ^+ q& I0 s: N(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. ' K& h2 Y5 d5 k. @' S, `9 ^System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function 4 O* `; a; j% [2 E3 E+ ]. ZA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. System Definition / n3 \6 P) F3 S" J1 N, ^Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 9 Z) G) R# r& G W% d: x6 Tfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. + \: I( W" Q* {, Y6 E, sMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, & e- K$ Z/ G& v( g/ H) `components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy - ?2 @! r+ Y! f8 s# b( vspecified system requirements. 6 ^, \1 K p9 c0 g/ E W(2) The result of the system design process. ' \3 p; Z" r' r) ~System Design & B8 }0 {7 Y# {9 [0 M$ d5 oConcept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and ! E5 F$ A; p& b# _0 {: fcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be * p' C4 S9 F# h! D1 x3 coperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. / G- U9 }7 \4 [7 T4 ~9 j0 L) ] @System Design j j e# B# n# c- r8 f$ p$ pReview (SDR) ! k% `* f" f$ U: `9 c& U, f% m) Z" TEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set & \. `: M( R( F8 A0 |9 yof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 8 M8 ]) Y8 B4 } s! T+ V, x' Icapability. ) {+ Z& i# G! f& U+ I6 USystem Evolution 6 Q' ~, O t9 Y4 _Plan (SEP) 1 X4 @4 v( G% ]; BThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 0 V2 g. i% u. c! [7 T8 I/ zExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and & Q+ s$ E& q( l+ W" B5 Rassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome ' D! E+ x) v$ J E4 Pthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 0 Q* I" z% j- a4 k5 R Ja set of common characteristics. System Generated ) y4 U. D/ c$ D6 J7 r O% YElectromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the / @$ R% f& R1 ^primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. 7 i/ X! Q* ?& v. N: dSystem Integration Test ( {+ K2 s# E6 G9 c- C8 K8 a( @8 s( e7 gA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 5 p7 n: y2 p5 D( v" lsensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual # A4 r; J& ` v8 p+ u5 B6 v4 `' V/ ?managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks ( ?( B, n, A$ S9 i: ]/ T6 ]and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or ! [5 i! T5 I' kequipment systems. System Operational Concept * Y# e* D3 J% i; xA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, + J% r( h; [" W, h& i3 I$ Ndeployment, and support of a system. System Operation and % c: a `. X* _0 T# KIntegration Functions (SOIF) ) _, ]$ s5 A9 i9 }9 ]The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 5 N' [" ]9 a, h1 G# |& Ybattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command $ c, I6 v- F5 S, l4 y8 p Rand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 1 l" t3 }7 ?5 NSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic , C d" `# c! H* H6 dBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 1 J5 I# R) b7 l286 System Program / U, j$ I9 p& ]; O+ x) d8 hOffice (SPO) # {% D! R- V1 n! LThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, ) C0 u4 ]; S: X7 agovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System , I( @# Q/ h5 \ O( a. uReadiness # ~. _3 d: [8 m+ \% x5 bSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out ! ~. a- l# s/ \( kthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 6 A" Q" X |9 I7 r( n0 ccontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. 7 O% _9 d) R1 S E9 p3 i9 H8 CSystem Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a 4 U" Q9 Z3 C7 x0 y' I4 v, Qspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and , b" K) X6 C. {maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support % T- T, I5 C8 o Q. _system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 0 _* @, }2 j+ dcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 8 L# n0 a/ K7 w# e% LSystem ( o4 a7 R3 h5 p& vRequirements # c7 X# i( t8 b0 T8 a, r9 tAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine ( m! w+ a; ]! k! o0 Q; zspecific system functional and performance requirements. ( y( b* l, }1 G$ z1 [System Requirements 0 |6 z4 z; g0 S9 O0 F: n$ M- G5 JReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the ) u- y( _( V7 a0 g6 _* N2 gdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering (SSE) , H: Q9 C% R- ~9 N$ g) `) uAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related \. a; D. |5 }& v0 _3 Qscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to ; o! R0 [7 ~# bsecurity threats. System Security Engineering 3 V$ [' T! H# j0 O. b( AManagement ; {+ S6 w8 L, \* A7 Z3 h7 HProgram (SSEMP) 9 O4 ~7 Z" [. e5 {7 E) G5 `3 Y2 dThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the : U& _1 ^4 A6 ~* {: n2 |. D4 adefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides + U% g' o* | Q& P( pmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security & V5 v. g' A' M* A1 P k) jManagement : s T& Y4 X7 n4 c" {Plan (SSMP) 6 M/ ^/ D) }8 K" ~5 OA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to % w# \. I# w2 `( f6 ~meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with d! T N- u- W% _3 n# ^$ tother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. . q' m) I; i; f% h) i, VSystems Engineering , Y* b9 u" v9 U5 QAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. * N9 a3 `/ o0 o7 h. H4 QMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 ( o" x. C- ~7 E3 q/ w( ~4 e6 SSystems # K' v, y8 j% {% f" x% ~Engineering Management 8 t3 m; t* {1 Q9 u. U, tPlan (SEMP) 8 x% a5 M3 {. b, y% Q3 k$ ~This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) % C) {7 e& U/ V9 k- MIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) $ E; d( w: B* I' v6 V' @9 NKey engineering milestones and schedules. 3 E, d* {5 c( I: b# @$ dSystems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency + S9 h! u9 D6 N1 {0 }0 o0 m% yand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. ! @' N4 L4 o: L0 E7 E+ RSystem-Valued 7 j! ^+ P- t3 l- N& a/ RAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. # K+ N: V+ w8 l: W- G# WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 2 _3 w6 \1 O- H1 T1 V2 w288 2 }6 e) B. `: u& uT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. / Y. {4 b4 {" u! B$ r0 E0 GT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 4 h/ t: i- P7 S( _% IT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. : E/ {2 ^8 v8 P" L5 z) l3 eT/R Transmit/Receive. * u8 w! G& o0 u' s7 JT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. & R/ S9 M$ ?* b/ R- ~. q! ~& CT ; W ^/ J- ~9 I: N, H4 b+ Y- C2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. , ]5 u) }+ N5 L5 [1 P- }! {TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 4 ~; D2 c& a: e: X6 Y9 mTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. 8 f! ]6 `8 d" e0 M) X: CTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. $ f& ?; |) ]. ?. aTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. 0 X( r9 E, K% H* B/ w. zTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 4 j9 H- ^1 _9 G( h9 E' G; P3 YTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). , b9 r1 \ E% |& K0 s) V8 ?TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. ! o7 s7 G% S" v7 B+ n6 ~TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. % s* M, G6 t- y' j; J, {4 aTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 3 S; T( W% Q- G- R* W) PTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. 1 r7 e% u* W2 R4 T; @6 zTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T . D4 l3 L+ ?6 N! X: C; B" `9 v" [! S289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. $ K' s! C% e: [& I. F, o6 GTACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine 9 {0 o% u- W. `. `9 [Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. % W" u3 R& m1 l' |Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. 7 Z% R; c4 n2 x0 J. B3 \Tactical Air + T! Y h1 Q" ]7 a0 WOperations Center / l9 D7 E8 G5 P3 G) b9 {A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ' s1 t/ ^1 q- Q; K" e0 gdefense operations in an assigned sector. 4 v- w* W L$ x: `) ATactical Air Support . K: o( U# K( t: g; nAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility & l8 o; ]2 e. T1 K(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. 1 }$ u! w9 B) gTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) 5 K/ }( P: t% G- B- F" J% \A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. * o4 a- {6 A$ \) f6 a; H3 r$ oTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 3 z5 _+ e, t& a, ?maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. % K- a- y7 b) N5 u# G2 ZThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. 4 J) g) e) e9 M. u" B# A% ~Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to " Y+ z0 O/ j' M9 G+ f g3 |; Haccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical * P# d3 g: t4 J1 B1 }: JOperations Area (TOA) # r$ x$ I& l3 a7 W- ^That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 1 Q2 t0 B! |* J7 _9 \0 _area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical 9 e7 F9 C* B. ?' U3 j( q7 Y" }+ wOperations 6 g9 B$ Q6 f7 V2 s$ _) R+ |6 B, ECenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff 4 y5 z- \/ g0 qconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. 7 f3 M2 h( k- c1 X) k0 A1 ^# jTactical Warning (TW) ; H- D* z' R9 r, V(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an , M: O. M; Q2 k5 g% R" d- Xevaluation of information from all available sources. 3 ^! ~& V( d) q' U! j(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component / z+ A; Q, B0 ~& J3 ^' f% ~3 Q' g2 C0 zelements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical 8 |' J( O1 Q9 p' U, r0 `6 ~& }2 p* SWarning/Attack / ~- `. P+ e% A; u+ D0 H2 S; L) KAssessment 7 R6 b- o1 }4 R5 D(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. 3 J" F+ r: ?( `# NMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. : i) I7 Q V- p* p( L(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. ! B9 y' S$ B( xTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. $ l: n$ O" {. zTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. / T. G% A3 K% L f" XTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. ( Q+ N7 v, g+ a* jTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ! B# q) s6 t) ITADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. ; k- ~( K0 l& \/ W; f; W1 a" FTADL Tactical Data Link. ; A: K/ T, Z( B+ N1 R1 l$ fTADS Tactical Air Defense System. ?+ g9 i- u$ |TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. ' c1 L" {$ J+ WTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. # W8 }/ v/ O2 a" B7 ~TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 1 W; H! l5 X' X/ w' M( |- O6 eTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation 8 R( ]. j9 U' n; d& h5 aThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. , S/ R, D' m' R3 ]( J5 aTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. + Z6 b$ O Q& g. j! o; ETAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. 2 {+ x+ p" \4 f5 DTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 7 v" p3 Q W- q2 z+ k3 ^TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target 4 Y& |- p3 _* cAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. ' n6 M% u& z2 p( s4 q7 KTarget 0 W% d; i; ?/ D- S( J: n$ MClassification and Type 4 I+ S" q# e1 P& n$ `Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. $ F E8 {+ @2 W: |) b; f6 ~ l( _8 mTarget ' L, M: B- J5 H0 b. J: GDiscrimination 1 M( ?2 S2 ]8 @! ]# LThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one : c+ n# x @7 s- e/ T$ K" ~9 Ntarget when multiple targets are present. $ O# {4 b8 C7 K% ^7 H. L( `+ vTarget Object Map (TOM) 5 x. |' I2 k8 R3 A$ DA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and ( S, U, P& B- I3 |& D+ nother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ) j+ f) a/ N1 V/ Wtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) : f+ u1 C2 x; XTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 3 O: m) N U/ U' b! cidentification equipment. 5 a8 i3 ~7 T' v F1 r1 {+ Q3 }( H(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements 9 X& e3 B' P" ADocument (TSRD) ! _ H2 T& _1 R l; ~8 ^BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 7 J& D; ?0 C" [1 ?9 o$ g m% oProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. " s) P: N, q7 v9 S- g- ~Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance 3 m8 a$ R" H& M/ Y* E% Zto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and ' Z' N/ P$ r. @" U4 | Y) U0 r4 drequired performance. + I' T. b2 Q) O, N1 }TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. # c6 b* ]" W. I YTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. - z) b+ u; u# LTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. ( A3 [ ~5 D6 @/ zTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. 1 j- Y. g8 S0 r9 |5 u8 X9 C# kTB Test Bed. ' h w# q, ^1 j+ `2 H* G `' k9 J }& [TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. * S) q+ k5 y6 D1 g! [4 _) t) D. X) JTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. ( T& {; t& p. b# fTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 6 }$ P. q4 [8 k1 v. k+ o. A9 s- @TCE Three Color Experiment. 2 \) j% v8 C* g1 Q2 D6 uTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. ' K( F; p5 z9 B, bTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. * g, j& o& }- L- _8 ?TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). 3 w% u1 H/ c# W. eTD (1) Test Director. 6 V' r( z4 N, l- T# I9 C7 c5 A# K7 f(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. & n( `/ d" j" i4 ^(4) Training Device - `6 a7 N. i# E( L$ P gTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 3 @( |1 u2 m( ITDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " O9 K! W: `8 _2 a/ F293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. 7 W6 _! I, \4 o2 w/ x/ u2 ATDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. - M A9 M5 w+ _/ |# [) `TDI Target Data Inventory. 9 [" W& p5 b" f7 e$ h9 H& u5 o& u* fTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 6 F1 u* Y5 [$ B7 t( [TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. . A0 ?/ G5 f; R# xTDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 1 j. f E8 x6 u2 W! JTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. . t, }) S* S/ _, D; \TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. + [7 Z. {) k( BTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. ! F4 s+ h+ p! ]$ W& l(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 1 F7 X- t/ z+ r# v. _4 RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , Q# L2 I, V C& V7 y/ s5 e: H8 R294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not $ A1 Q0 n9 ]! qtechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. : l/ T6 w+ ^; BAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract ; A c6 ^: Z: R% K6 o0 Cadministration. % o: y# l" f% a# ]Technical Data Package (TDP) * [5 {+ I- _1 ?A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 3 O$ \8 B3 V. o) d! B6 V) L- E$ p: cstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item + F8 Y% h! c# ]! }" b0 Z% @performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation 4 f* [8 ]. I6 o+ k. r2 ]The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 1 ^& X C( N& O6 ]Technical Objectives ; y0 {5 `+ A v, u& {9 X6 bThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & Goals (TOG) ) z) r& H K, @$ y' t" r* i, r$ M/ lHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS ; i( K6 C, a+ sdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical 5 G; M2 v$ T1 J5 |+ jParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical / ?# l% V/ X; P! m( OPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by ' r f/ ]6 m1 zmanagement. Technical \! H, e0 N6 q8 v. z TPerformance Measurement (TPM) ) ~0 [/ T# c! u4 D4 gDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 3 N \$ H1 x" c0 d/ Q+ d$ obeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the - r! F( x! p+ k) G. kvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product * z( g6 [; } Z) relement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification 6 }/ [ n- J; c) T h* V4 QA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical % x( k @1 ~- R- G) h# D- DSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 0 X* c5 l+ K( h1 k& Zemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise % g# M' H y9 O8 W7 E" D% Gtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. 4 ~, z! O/ L0 X- a# M$ [+ {4 NTechnology 8 d* V5 T' \7 VExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management $ v, t4 n7 c5 r. ]* ^; kresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. 2 W5 [0 S- q, c+ iTechnology Program Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 1 R8 K7 a3 j, `supporting technology. ( e L- ]1 x2 A7 cTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. % @( W/ Q) m' \2 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and $ P' i9 ~$ r8 f8 PCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and + @* C- P) {7 B. R. {0 vstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a & _# s6 R* U5 h" b( N: X7 ?9 usequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ' c) G6 ~+ q; }" C1 R6 Lmission commands to the satellite. 5 n6 D9 V! {3 A/ B$ t2 FTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the ; h( o* I) j3 a0 ~$ V( j. bautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 3 Y) Y1 e1 Z" @9 cTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. + y. ^, _+ }& a- eTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of ) Z0 x3 N- w/ M! V7 s* \compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 9 A4 ^2 ~3 l4 c9 |: I1 d& DTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. + }9 G- ]: c: ?: G# @" STEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. / A% N2 U' H% a4 W+ u( ATERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. 1 `. I- Y) @7 ~0 e6 ?) u) N4 n2 hTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) , s9 C J* R* R! R# [# JThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 8 j8 b/ |7 u8 c# a7 ~3 fatmospheric reentry and impact. - s3 u. a; u& T4 g( h0 t& CTerminal 7 c# K* R7 S6 h. b' j' m6 o: ZGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. % A) d, g8 ] s" gTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase + x( ~$ C& j) K8 ^and trajectory termination. ( T& u4 q' r ]1 zTerminal Phase Interceptor ( l1 ]0 L5 b; o# BA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the ( s5 t. Z8 c" y, b+ d) B3 Cterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. - [2 o: L! r; p6 @) k! }. ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ P( }8 O/ N: ?; t4 R296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 8 [. v4 p c5 u4 y% p0 X5 {hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, + |& C, `" x0 S# danalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. * t$ ^, n w$ o6 s7 w# L. OTest and 1 {, G" D k. ]Evaluation (T&E) * S2 X: Y0 J: Q& i" tProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated / X- T) R1 j. ^$ `; V* t3 Hto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three . H2 p) Q- U5 r6 L, Wtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof ! C# y0 G; q) u7 o0 I) y% r, dmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that C6 }2 u. ? e' D( ^those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts . ~2 ^, D, C$ qor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 6 d/ t' x# W, E2 C(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before + G2 R8 F! D. I% m% |the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of ) C7 W5 w, ^, c- soperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 9 B& A1 F0 m/ _" bconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 0 W! \: S- h/ r1 g% W8 _: FFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness ; e: ^" L5 P6 E/ I: Xand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation ( E) T/ x% Q# ]0 r& YMaster Plan ! U* { _2 c0 m% _0 w' m% S(TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation % [) ]! R1 h8 x( C9 r8 |/ pto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as : ~* p0 m8 e0 r8 b' X) V4 u; Oearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development # [+ R9 n4 Y- b/ d& ~& Z- f. C1 R0 Bprogresses. Test and & U0 g! S" G( S% ~# ]7 s) UEvaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of " K0 x# u; P/ K. E# k" @9 Ctest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 2 B2 X0 E& i/ f; u; q) iintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling 2 T7 D/ `( T7 z: Jproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and ) g! V, X+ N" ^related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 6 [0 R% n# Q% uand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. ; C; M+ g9 t* xTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 8 r e4 `, T- e) J% g& STest Integration Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation % b9 {1 [3 b8 W9 o/ wcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. ; Q' u* n7 o, v8 X" C/ ^6 ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' { }( p' M9 R M9 p5 i6 M297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) u8 M/ T9 b" M0 cSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. + _) u' w9 r) CTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ( o# V6 L% a K, @TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. ' P4 e- ]( z# ` e6 ZTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. $ [4 v) a8 L' k3 T* WTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. - C4 y0 d# U3 p$ q" W# rTFC Tactical Fusion Center. 7 _# h: v- y7 O* K! w0 lTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 3 g$ w3 ?, W; [9 rTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. " q: q {" }: R9 R* h6 lTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 8 d4 \+ G/ ]2 e; S, BTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). 4 q0 ]( @6 X0 F' r: _( J+ GTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. ; L8 V. L' ^( STGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. " E* H5 D) }, y1 Z2 QTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. 1 @3 J& F$ y2 r8 \4 Z% \3 iTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 6 |2 M' h1 C, N2 q' xcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. $ |' {6 D. w* u' k$ FTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against , Q q( i, `& g7 K5 o' Uballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. $ [ k0 k6 X5 H: w" Q" @! M(USSPACECOM)