航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. " _+ N( _6 m3 r. S8 nSTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. 1 a9 O2 r! w; \( x% d* oSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and . I$ o2 j, J; n# b5 `) `& nTransportation Environments " v Z9 V) E. C& y/ P3 F2 YThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed . K9 Z2 ~% E- u7 o) Fduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. 3 u+ O* _; E/ X3 I+ t9 bStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 4 `1 m+ f( }+ f9 O4 zSet. ' p' g& f, a8 u ~5 pStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. ( ~) j' o+ O' r0 J5 n1 oSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. - R: Q7 P, x" k2 s, Z$ ?8 tSTRATCOM Strategic Command. 2 t" f) g! E2 D; X: f7 aStrategic Defense 7 u" [6 ]1 C: @7 ^9 Z8 K" t! T+ o: EAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 4 `5 F' m0 S2 Sballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic $ M' q i8 E" z# c( q" nDefense ( U" o( F. N) N) X/ R1 tEmergency 5 L1 r/ o, z, g# S! `Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ' _2 E/ D# f' U: t8 ]9 x5 N280 Strategic Level of 1 c+ ~& Z ~" k4 V* IWar 7 ?6 Q( J$ V5 Z4 x1 XThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to $ [- N5 b3 N" b" baccomplish those objectives. 3 e/ P6 S5 N9 y4 q& J5 v& FStrategic * F' J/ v& V1 P, COffensive Forces ) Y* ^- `4 ]0 k. ^ M1 m$ N(SOF) ) ^% U/ L& V) m: [Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific - d# g, W: G; l0 \# _5 m/ H6 {Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, , |5 ?4 T% q2 _4 O% q0 aFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve : `0 |: A) `! J6 [. zThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic # j/ ]5 P# V( I3 o: r- S- bWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 0 L d8 s V8 A, ?Strategic Warning Post- 0 D0 Z& w9 M! J" [Decision Time ' N1 X' u. A6 xThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- * u: X- K8 ^# S& `8 EDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course ) g4 A+ ?* T8 G# q* _2 V2 B* A0 nof action to be executed. ( @) J( h1 s! O5 z7 YSTREAD Standard TRE Display. 8 i: W* f0 x/ dSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured 6 F7 M% T- M5 @- K; i. D8 g' O4 FAttack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely ) d% {6 C0 e. s& ?! xtimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design , o" o3 R9 R! a" sA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data # n* l! g& Y! cflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program & o5 V. C8 E; ?, r8 wA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: - y6 I) Q+ z, y1 fsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. + j4 i. a* e; D- L: q" k2 d) a' KSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 Q6 h1 H% g7 sSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 1 D% ]0 f) l2 t" G& eSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. 5 n! t! i# H8 z- N5 ~STWC Strike Warfare Commander. : k3 L7 ~' A6 c! T2 ESTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which * T/ z# J. p5 }6 `is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. % s) u% J# a! l( ISubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. * D; R! z! J( E- U# V) e+ O/ ISubject Security Level - f% |( g& x% X G( yA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it . J$ K- P: d) J8 Chas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 7 \1 u5 |) {+ n" y1 ydominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. ) [7 U8 ~4 ^) ]# p8 ?Submarine- Launched Ballistic Missile 8 F5 j" I: D1 ^% C( J(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. ! c' a4 P( x0 q4 {2 LSUBROC Submarine Rocket. 2 r0 ?/ l& l' u; Z6 K1 y5 d2 v( GSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function - Q: |8 E* E4 m- G; [) ]5 owithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 3 _4 f+ Z, A! C1 M, i2 h4 P" g" DSubtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 0 K( d; h8 z. f3 Y% ~SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. / D4 Y( O6 v* x1 XSuccession of Command 1 T; {6 [4 l1 r! q( D& F0 j vThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 1 u r, k+ u) ~" o+ t5 }( uis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). * J% Q, G4 L# O, Y; x( ]Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two & y% c6 h/ N ]/ ^; \# ]alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 1 c* ?5 d" W% rSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 8 R5 P m7 Z7 k- m6 P2 t, F, Z) ya single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, 9 o: W1 i5 {9 Rthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super * _0 q6 j9 h5 i E4 rradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 6 ]/ [, f3 ~- @4 l% Y! r8 h; jsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 3 V% _- o' P2 z) W+ h! mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ( C3 h: S; i, B( R( h* d( K282 : O7 A$ j3 l: SSuperradiant Laser (SRL) 3 M& N' q* t& j) J" K8 L3 \) G9 m9 `A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional 3 D! B e$ ~6 N# _1 y% X9 r' Blasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from , X D" Q. b* r% \superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 6 e; p: K; a4 Y! ]( aSupervisory + M8 P) I; ~6 L2 Z% Z$ o4 U' {/ hPrograms 6 q6 l; t. \/ u, N$ S, eComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and , L. f) k+ w" ~! E Q: Ocontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 2 l1 M7 {1 Q1 ySupplemental Appropriation O: d/ O$ U/ m5 o7 _' L( | D5 XAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment / r/ o/ ?/ [) r0 Z0 x0 e- |All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and % w1 c8 r s% N% U2 e) A' d4 s% Sprotection equipment). 6 l& V6 z) K7 xSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly & }6 ]& o- O8 v) Dassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. 6 t K2 B1 `. T" hSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 0 t+ b) ^7 |7 D9 |example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 4 }4 G; Y" S/ c3 d9 U, Sbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. $ N0 h5 a1 z/ dSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items " z3 M7 h+ m* V. r) J# w1 E2 fdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 0 ^ _# Y# ~& A0 p* ^mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity * J) `7 j `0 p4 A: }2 v4 @3 hmeasures. # p% |/ v7 y) NSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, 2 Z, t5 F1 e- X2 ^Satellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance $ ]6 t, k1 a0 Q' A( [System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 5 \7 x6 ^8 j# i' {in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes " |' h0 Z' ^* J; }& G# M, a Jthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. - {% _( n, _+ e, qSurvivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. ( B3 N4 {1 M5 l n7 x# n2 J/ x+ \Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. / }1 c& w( O* R$ r$ l L- zSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. ! V% z# J% N9 ]* u, D! |; ]( oSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 7 i, _: u _! OSWC Strike Warfare Commander. 3 S/ ]" I; w& {Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating " s* { l# C: M q2 E' J% _band of frequencies. - e0 V' B. N/ ^2 {" y2 l9 ^5 tSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. ' g w. i* \5 V. D3 d4 LSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. : g& Q7 w O* ^7 q5 LSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 8 E5 d" R( A' }/ w6 N# aSWSC Space and Warning System Center. . I9 T% C7 H1 S2 G5 `SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. ) l' C; N# M D! U) o2 ISynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. 2 L6 L6 m" Y, \$ l) wSynthetic # x' S' J, b: j. D$ UAperture Radar (SAR) 9 S$ A9 f) T% R$ W! k. e" PA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is " f5 k9 v }) h0 A- z7 ?theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance ! K; |0 H3 a9 O( w! ]7 A/ nbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 5 v* F, K- ]7 }) i2 m1 {7 @transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. 4 M' t/ p3 Q/ U4 A' E$ h( {Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. {0 ]( m: M- m. J" I' nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : ~( N1 d: j6 E8 i284 4 N6 X( z# i0 Q5 O2 _4 \! R& CSYSCOM Systems Command. 9 u' D8 a+ c; Y+ oSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with : Y: @7 W) P, B I) \) yspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, ' j k' V& G# J4 x! Dand delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a / R% g/ w" Z4 b. @9 l7 T, E2 p+ ]9 Yrequirement. System Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 3 j7 g8 L A4 \% N9 k- u( I$ Kimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System 0 K) @3 b" w# `7 z2 h$ g; GControl. ) \/ M4 J/ b, J) hSystem . Q9 X- w# n' P; V% nArchitecture 2 g; }; B$ {) F/ |2 \System 2 ]( N: R' f2 pCapability ! H0 B- j, s: E& SSpecification ' u1 z+ |# d1 v3 {7 O5 \" w(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 8 V$ ]8 [$ A2 garchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 5 y" ^8 d; {4 j1 ienvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. 0 @; \6 Y1 S$ v0 P: M* lThe government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. / L0 N* U' i' e+ JSystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ( p1 j7 A+ z2 I) m: q( `equipment in CMAFB. 8 T% p( x; R6 `System Concept Paper (SCP) % i; o# v) [ L$ q( q1 ^OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 8 h4 m9 H; M! q$ E E, w/ q0 wconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the ' u' ~6 x+ O9 _7 ~( ademonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other * O9 I& D* q' }# v0 Uconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 3 c" F5 Y3 ~/ n$ K9 M2 MConfiguration # q% V# s- u' f4 m5 q+ Y3 EControl Board * C8 R y0 ~. X. _2 V+ T# ?! v5 r(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 8 `" X4 z$ F: V% c& W: oSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 3 i6 k( v7 J& G* ?* G# d" Pcomputer systems. + [& P- f" |! |) {4 y: rSystem-Critical Function u& R( { \; @A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 5 p$ a; t4 d1 f; ~1 A8 rmission. . M' |. X. {- eSystem Definition Review (SDR) 0 u; k7 C3 L( `4 t. r0 i/ [The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the + Y7 }5 e6 T; n* e5 _6 N8 o9 ~system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 8 ?' S& t% J s, c* Jimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, 2 v" u' d# |. ?" Y8 y* Ofinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. & ]$ o0 |2 W0 w2 k5 TSystem 5 L/ z( c0 i7 zDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. - N5 Y3 S/ J8 B5 u( xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! J- a: ]* ~8 R- |; \5 f( E3 a# U285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. / E: k y' U q! B2 T2 [; S% N(2) The result of the system design process. ; s! z' a8 t3 Q" YSystem Design Concept 8 l3 v' d# z/ |' HAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 7 w6 M# c2 Q$ L! T( K: T' [( q0 echaracteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) + @/ \% e# D) J5 V& E6 l5 nEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with , p- k8 |* U$ M2 y! G* ?0 v( }the allocated technical requirements. 9 w. S& {' f9 B1 PSystem # S7 x6 M0 {) C7 `4 k9 eEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 4 q$ s6 d1 s: V1 o iof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. + l+ s3 Z3 I/ x. DSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior , G K# k* o6 P3 e' ]# J/ b5 YExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS ) y9 ~' x( f& G9 }/ EDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 3 F/ e! |0 X' N: q- B# u6 ?significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to / c6 g/ ~ \* \( u) B5 ?* G9 pachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. / y+ V" B5 C, ?, u# aSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 4 `- w7 r3 V, _& M9 v8 s, Na set of common characteristics. ) O% F( o& d# `6 h; kSystem Generated 0 e9 |8 j- c! jElectromagnetic , ~ G- A1 P. U) ?, k9 _& hPulse (SGEMP) % L0 l+ F6 O( s4 v; M" C4 ~+ ETransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the ! m1 A1 c) L( e' _ p+ i2 U% gsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System . I+ h( U+ [5 s( \Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, - r) u3 M& z! m) |2 s, bsensors, and weapon hardware. 0 t& b1 e* Q) r' K4 y; MSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks ' U1 E' h& z/ G+ ~; d( i0 ^' pand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. # k. ]9 ^0 x5 H( t: vSystem Operational Concept 7 x2 E W3 s. @2 ~6 c9 Q7 g) IA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, / Q- ^% i) C5 N" \2 x4 Edeployment, and support of a system. . [( [' }' L4 B/ p& M8 tSystem 1 d* E( w) B% `1 w/ B/ w8 D+ aOperation and ) l: b _9 S+ M2 f4 A( u) @/ TIntegration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and - E) G9 J- Q' ]9 ?+ A2 Rbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 0 l: @$ a' C, v' `the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic & {: K5 ~6 r6 I8 G' VBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of , u: K2 Q( r( F. ^$ qposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. ) ~0 U$ R0 N8 T) R$ \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program Office (SPO) 2 `9 x* E" G+ w# {: e& a+ mThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, : m1 T7 ?- @1 U+ D1 P# jgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition - }' _9 N: c) @; r4 H# `: X! ~) zprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 6 S! u. Z$ t! p4 D: b5 @Readiness ( ~6 M) s0 N& I$ J1 E, O. nSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority ! E% p+ x9 F8 b5 T! S, o* @along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational & c' l; S3 Q8 ?+ p& P! sstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 8 V8 B3 f8 G2 K ^# Averification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 3 M. n2 V% p, j) H8 w- y, Whistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results $ \3 U- |$ L. E; {( e8 jstatus reporting. & X/ r7 N% m* x( ?3 W3 v Z0 rSystem Readiness " w1 p/ l6 \! kObjective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 7 g; W) I; Y$ G6 _, f# k/ dmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission ( ?+ r4 I6 b( q- ^; pcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 4 y) |$ E8 L) T- j SSystem 9 ?& V8 T$ G; s+ U# URequirements 3 O. i3 ?9 d3 [/ Q0 L: a2 r5 XAnalysis (SRA) $ W3 m! N6 [: z5 `' B7 S; NAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine - N9 F! z# W4 z+ zspecific system functional and performance requirements. 4 F( k, T6 j& u0 ESystem Requirements Review (SRR) " T7 ?( v! `. r& i; T/ ZConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security 3 K% R5 \9 B6 FEngineering (SSE) # ^( M. K* S1 cAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering / Y! G: a8 ^* d" Y; h2 n& ^/ Uprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks & X$ j! d* F* c+ N" Kassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related + r* J, V8 X* f; E) Z5 lscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and " J# f! s% W+ }2 Manalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. . O2 ~# Y& q& v5 _' ASystem Security Engineering 4 J# d8 o1 L! W8 M# ?Management Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical 0 O* t9 e$ F$ Y1 z1 A' O( W! D1 i- A) rachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ( A, k, c3 t, wdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the $ L8 } r0 L7 z' _8 q( ?4 J0 `* F/ ~resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes + [5 ~, s; z2 j. W: c" w- Hits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 3 d+ H6 F" t( G2 c& E7 I' o9 E! qSystem Security Management & ?! @9 Q5 A7 I8 G& ]9 RPlan (SSMP) / B9 ^9 P* u% V4 s A8 F# ~A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 8 _3 n" |% M+ b9 L8 J& Xmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems % X6 H- C3 s1 h) |. iEngineering ) F/ ]# g/ e% D; z0 K8 yAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. / p9 F+ |6 n, n6 e! [. [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 ; G0 T2 Z" g$ U& rSystems Engineering # y5 K8 u) L6 `2 e) SManagement Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) # ^0 F) @# ]5 LKey engineering milestones and schedules. ( r% J7 H2 `5 F9 TSystems Test Integration and 5 p! W+ F' `3 r( l; {Coordination 4 M# d' |# G5 K' |2 f0 Y) O4 QThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment # t. f; |/ [ M! S2 m9 J8 VReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a # r( y7 @! K& uService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency & a- }' c5 O6 o3 Tand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. 5 e- f, c/ |4 T4 W( g- QSystem-Valued 6 f1 D' F) N; G p$ ~" r, T& MAsset # A) W" ^5 e6 |' _1 s$ k( b; KA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. + \8 l# V6 M B7 EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 E7 m1 @6 ]/ u( x288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. . _ y8 q6 T6 J; q/ Y* iT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 5 ~% E# P$ K* I( A5 B! [T-MACH Trusted MACH. ' z, K0 `2 N+ R. B$ T, n4 Z9 S, rT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. 0 L" a1 O2 P0 k7 GT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 7 n. B4 x+ X" m& h& QT " y$ g" p3 B# i9 F2 Technology Transfer. % Y# O3 L B& `) O' l2 G: t! kT % |# c0 c/ s2 X: F! X# H2 E Technical Training Equipment. * K5 ~6 x) i' d0 e7 j3 @TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. " o* N) Y# A' w7 a: T) @' U( zTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. ; o* R4 p0 C& F ?2 wTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. 9 h" |5 N, y) @, J* I7 z. V1 KTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. ' L% o4 w# i. f' `- `TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). , R! J4 j9 b3 j% ^5 O ]TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. & F6 b6 k5 G6 W% ]! rTACC Tactical Air Command Center. 1 K* Q7 L$ p: E3 M$ STACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 1 q* _ o) `) c9 NTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 3 Y+ ]. y9 H% z: dTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. , c3 d* A8 r) X2 ]: ITACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. / m; o1 ^, ~0 gTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). ! Y2 v, K( b, D. A0 JTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. L; ^4 y+ p Y' D) v" yTACS Theater Air Control System. . j+ L' F; Z7 J* Z2 a7 B( |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 @% B( y. }" O& {% l2 i% n" a0 z289 8 C, H8 [! z9 ?* iTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation % i( V G2 G$ xTactical Air 5 R4 p& ~. C5 P, n, k. M* sDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air * ^+ @6 ]/ D' `7 ?. M% H+ TOperation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air Operations 0 L5 ]3 Q& S* B+ i2 w5 ~Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control & |* \6 T: n+ G8 s; ?System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 6 T! s- a8 {$ v4 h& Q7 l- g. {defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support + n& g0 u b: X, R3 W1 a9 yAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly 9 a+ {( ?0 z. u% f# Q, fassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of ; t- _% t6 B' e- @# JResponsibility ! B' M; u; ~! Z(TAOR) 5 m7 _, k) A9 ^( C6 Y- Y) \A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and % R, R/ q+ W! Y) B3 Y+ Q8 C3 ycoordination of support. Tactical Ballistic k( x Q( ^1 w* m6 hMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or & E7 c: f/ J# Z" O7 S Y* [4 Xmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data 4 Z9 A2 g$ d4 Q: yInformation link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. 4 c+ F( A- \3 O# K$ dThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War 0 N8 n5 T/ j u! b' X8 @The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. 2 p4 a4 x7 @8 x2 h4 i- S$ H- X, ~Tactical : E$ y$ t J DOperations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations $ l( I+ y" _3 h; N; n2 N P4 L1 marea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical - g) |# L5 _5 E7 h7 ]Operations Center (TOC) $ I# U( Z, ~5 [/ b' f( B6 `) K. xA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. ) j6 S1 f5 I+ p+ j7 dTactical Warning 4 Y' A8 R5 |% Q% ~ `5 }8 C- }(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an 2 s4 T9 \( J& N* y3 X( mevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component ' \- X- W- m) J$ T- ielements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical 1 C: r# {$ {# i% hWarning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) 6 }7 ]( |7 r" L) k" P1 N- u7 tA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack 2 [$ G4 y. s: s8 U& uAssessment. 0 U" Z* s% ~3 b- w: ?0 J3 n& _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & u0 k) W2 s0 b ]290 % x% \" d6 A" i1 @ A/ MTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. ' J4 h5 O8 t7 \1 n(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. & i3 K) _: F( c A' r. u7 ZTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. 6 m2 O( u. G% n* o8 nTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. K8 _! `; q3 A5 x- A6 k, jTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. . E' {4 b, P- ~) lTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” r8 h7 ]2 o I9 ?/ H- L3 e8 CTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 6 m! V$ j. \/ BTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. 3 C( R8 E0 P$ h* zTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. " q/ g6 k) R r: E% I& oTank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 0 o$ e5 E# A0 `) h' jresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 3 j: I" |: o+ b% cTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. % h! v' x9 h! P. cTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. , v( d4 U# _4 [( J5 GTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. ' `: n9 L* b+ M U+ e' G& q2 WTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. 9 y M% b- n- `+ o. Z* |7 n(2) Threat Activity Report. . W0 Q9 s. ~* U- F% a4 [, a5 S, u. E(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target # @" T2 H( q; H: AAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 1 b' f3 ]/ ` j% Y3 t' F$ \. m; \: oregion of a sensing system. Target Classification - m. b; G7 _5 i5 {% m% Mand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. 4 r+ z3 ?7 z% l; g2 i( g1 T! XTarget 0 E% G9 T/ P" |9 {) W3 mDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object 0 K6 H" L# E, l, U! c$ U) XMap (TOM) 5 B/ J! I* B$ Q* I* eA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in - e8 U9 T% E+ ?3 ~target designation. (USSPACECOM) 7 ?$ c0 U1 Q* P2 K( |( ^7 BTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. ! f1 m( L1 S. T9 STarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 5 {9 [# |; k& [+ _. D5 iidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. ( I% n+ ]' n7 P. L! {/ _Target System ! M% r; s7 n% E% j4 }5 S, t2 Y/ c" LRequirements , D0 h3 d, f0 q aDocument (TSRD) . E, c/ g! ]1 j& O: QBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD ( u4 i6 Y9 E% }. tProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. + b4 o* F- J, }' l# fProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 3 ]1 s3 j! _$ C5 u2 _/ ZTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance / U8 Q! x/ l" ?2 i9 D/ Uto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and ( @; D* R' B( o: J9 a) T8 hrequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. : S+ Q. [' f+ a. HTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. , O! G" E: j3 {TAT Technical Area Task. % M) [" E- T8 V! H, v6 y/ B- NTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. & I! D: q# z* S/ d& JTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 6 N/ h1 U; i7 _ M1 mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 O1 T: O7 h$ A8 L( j% E Q292 - O2 v4 S; M! A0 tTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. ; z+ Z. X- C. M4 DTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. c. W4 G" a) H8 n! d8 ~TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. ) e* G+ W/ C. p3 wTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 8 \7 _1 e' _. {1 a1 W3 TTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 0 E- A, }+ F. m0 G( B' lTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 5 F( g- T/ E4 s- C, T2 MTBN To be Negotiated. 2 v+ C/ r7 g- h( X3 k L# sTBR To Be Resolved. 4 X; c7 {1 X. ~- e" @0 UTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). / t, u! M8 R j" m% E) ~* O(2) To Be Supplied. # b. [' I1 c e( b(3) To Be Scheduled . 5 g% J. Z. j2 @& H0 {. HTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. + I k. v0 H* c( _" ATCC Tactical Command Center. & U/ a! k" O0 |3 v3 j; _0 xTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. . {# X, N& Z; l# @TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. " u& n$ u$ m5 ^( v3 vTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. ' L( R' c$ H; a; e- K9 RTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. ' v: _# I3 ?6 ]: ~1 N7 P+ C; e; JTCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD - ~0 N$ c1 d4 H G7 e0 zCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. $ x" h$ P2 w' F1 H' {% ?(4) Training Device 5 J+ m1 A* L/ x5 b1 u9 L* ^( k9 vTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. . i) ?) z- M8 k6 }% [* m# n' w) [& j8 sTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T t$ F; n* b) i) o+ @293 % q, q0 J1 Z- `, A0 B* ]TDBM Track Data Base Manager. 7 R" n8 ^. ?& `TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. * |6 Q- f1 ]; B4 {, ITDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. 5 O) i$ h0 C5 K5 v! eTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 7 M5 \5 L5 x& NTDM Time Division Multiplexed. 2 k* `; U* Y! E: ATDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. % F0 u- A. e2 X- QTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 9 N, D4 W' C1 k) [) S7 r7 E O( G(2) Test Design Package. * J" J8 q V3 f(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. ! ]/ R5 b+ H) {( TTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. 5 L- }% @& r. _+ P' _& ^TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. $ t3 k9 w5 M2 ?TDU Target Data Update. % M: ]; Z9 j6 m; e: P- ]TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. : y4 q2 g7 w/ O* ], I9 ITE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. / U# H: t6 G! s+ c* I ]Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical 9 Y0 I( S. _& r- o: G2 B, N I6 b/ vTECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 N2 u0 N N- [: P% V9 j294 2 p0 F* B: E7 k/ n6 y/ ]5 C* ^8 QTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ; o5 z1 j( C5 f" z6 Q6 a1 J. I0 @Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data 3 A6 @0 u, W6 h! R1 a% R) F7 f" nPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 6 M7 g8 n' C1 F% a4 Q6 Rstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available 1 n! J4 K9 p; H wfor stating binding technical requirements. - A) h+ O8 t5 c4 u" e" n% aTechnical # t& s6 p' @' E( U; ?" e2 U iObjectives & " A; r8 d' p6 r7 P: m8 B1 m* kGoals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical & D/ e: Z3 [6 a: P# l- M& @- eParameters (TPs) 2 P' t" g3 G y' L# bA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical 2 w: d0 k k' W7 F kPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk ! L- V$ o* b6 zanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 3 k! _4 S9 q* d' y0 h( C/ Qmanagement. Technical ) Y9 k4 `$ S" A+ c: tPerformance Measurement (TPM) + q3 W, Q, N# b% QDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design # w5 [* k; a2 G% z [$ Zassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance " Q9 g# [7 a0 v. T, |parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the 3 L; l& g* [8 ~8 x1 yvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures ' V9 T' m- {& A4 N! Edifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product + [2 f( f( |7 |/ a7 pelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical " K o2 D2 D/ e/ T0 F* r. Y/ YSpecification 1 f$ o) C. \ w1 `" i( O# i& q& cA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 3 g# Y9 {# x8 n; Z9 Demanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology 1 n( b* l6 m3 v& m1 HExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing , |& e8 S1 _# s% M; l+ oAgent. Technology 1 _' O* h" r; K1 X ^' DProgram 9 ?; F- d' L6 P8 P$ {4 N0 MDescription " Q1 |- J9 M* V$ n. b! K5 JThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ! K4 q1 o- F9 h- D+ T! _# Csupporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. ( q) a" G9 \, ]2 \9 ITED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 6 W; M& w4 e* B3 @TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, ' x" B7 M6 V! R6 ]6 bTracking, and Command (TT&C) . f; _/ A1 L# P/ A/ p8 i) T- n/ xFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit % N$ H9 F% q! C$ s2 _4 y$ X5 ?mission commands to the satellite. . A7 C0 {% K( Q" X" m. b2 l( {' t" KTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the $ `. ?- z8 |6 s2 y- g j" @automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. $ d c5 [. n4 H( v( n& ?7 m+ pTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. & Z k7 I% ^- z0 x* H+ ITELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 2 C0 v( w# H0 t3 Z2 n; ?8 g- vTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. 2 J* z( B* @( |TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of , i4 y; M6 e1 o$ J, l9 _4 n3 Mcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term ) B" R I) K7 A2 f; i, s8 q' ?"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See + t: Q7 p3 Y: L8 |7 ?3 BCompromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. $ Y- Z2 P, D- nTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report " e" d( m4 Q' Y5 }9 V! qTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ( E8 N# x, l1 F7 kTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) , t; \0 u& I% A1 a1 M( tThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. ' B* X% L, x( k+ f( ?* @/ a0 Q/ F2 OTerminal Guidance 2 t. N F( D8 o& x% S3 Z/ ^) H) ^3 ]The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 9 h- z. A) F6 B: D& Lvicinity of the target. 3 @. b. g- P% `6 v% _Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase $ k" \0 D: b6 ^) I& b* N6 jInterceptor * J) q Z8 |2 SA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. , d/ P8 ^5 R) gTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. ) i) g# C0 N1 S8 ~TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. * m, R9 ^# w1 w" PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 7 e. E7 r& e& L/ F8 ]7 YTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, / G8 }; |& B6 M X0 danalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) " [. M) f8 p( _( iProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production 0 E- l3 P. N' f3 w ?" p: qAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof 2 V4 g# {# Y4 ymanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, $ P+ [! w/ B4 _5 u+ Rand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel # E7 o1 a" p2 g- K# H. f: Qrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that % {0 H5 p, h% C- b, @those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before - e E/ I- y) z5 q, H6 V. {( C& lthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of - s/ v! V9 Q# Voperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test ) E5 R& ^) D# K: E0 kconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 7 D _5 j3 D! V# N' I) KFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 9 _4 Y" U* q. E& uand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) + G% ?( |8 ?" `* V0 ]! |An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. 0 n6 N) D- W7 j( |; y6 aTest and Evaluation ; b8 X L8 _, m5 u! e- `9 u3 sWorking Group (TEWG) 4 x. M% o# q7 t8 J* h% \The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 9 J6 G9 o' O, ointegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and " ?0 x2 w9 d [6 B% l! [related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. + F. |. }9 P# Y3 mTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software : g4 e1 Q! t6 J$ R5 y0 Band partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. # j$ Q$ l- P1 JTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 3 b( g, A9 T2 r2 {5 n: KTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) ; ~4 V4 d9 h. J J& EA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ' r; i3 g% h2 ^6 X5 p! y$ d7 sorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 9 b9 S% F% t& N* Q3 g1 Fdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , j- ~: p+ B6 w5 Z297 Test Target # V1 C, R4 b8 o2 L A8 D2 kVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for ! E8 H! l& z1 Q; g! P TSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 3 c" G+ z6 Q0 ^% v/ G0 @TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. % h8 o2 c \* R1 w H/ n, `TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. " z7 T9 M |% x, \* B HTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 0 k- a6 Q' n& |5 g G CTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. ! N5 T1 o! v- `: N1 l' y% d; _TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 7 z; _3 ^, }- t, fTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. " C' a% K0 C8 X2 g) X# ^Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 1 o* L/ K4 X: [, Icommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 4 \! Q) \1 C( o1 ]Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 5 ?( ]' w& ?/ _5 nTheater Ballistic + [, u) E) k- d7 ^- l* ] B6 jMissile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)