- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
! d0 ] M' S2 |* U! n( zReadiness
: V; }/ @. b S/ ASystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out" n4 k& [2 c( d5 ^3 n( I4 r( h5 g8 L
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority0 X% e+ n; n. ^6 p
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
+ [, E$ E: _- z8 eincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
! P5 m& R3 a, y* l% Lstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the1 l* t7 f! ]( I* E% F6 X; T
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
8 b+ e9 g, { Jcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
# M$ Q5 R# m- b% m5 ?: u) j @realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
. X) \5 Q/ m5 i( Lnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies
! C5 M2 @$ p8 Q+ dand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,+ Z' |6 z" ^8 [& X8 }
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
% N9 t( f7 e* O* C7 z; T: K# i: Mstatus reporting.
; D7 r3 i0 ^6 M3 `, M- KSystem# }' O. o& X' V, H/ t1 N: k. S
Readiness
# n& r$ I% J; ^Objective I# `6 u& n! p/ S* X: y
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a2 Y9 g- q) \' j, _
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
/ ]$ | a+ ]" q6 h- X7 ySystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and/ l g- y! v" r, g; j% m
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support& O2 F4 H; C- d- l$ r% [1 l
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
& t- k; x* P) K& d1 Lsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
! Q9 ^) r( _$ y. j5 P9 Ocapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.% Y' f) a7 }% |( B
System
1 Q; u. C, F/ lRequirements
4 a: w( }( o3 c4 EAnalysis (SRA)
8 b, e5 n/ a6 I' J& w6 cAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
! S% l7 b Q+ j5 o, V0 oConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine* F+ Q& G7 j0 F
specific system functional and performance requirements.. i' k/ @( y. s0 @$ T5 |
System
/ a4 T) q. E& ^* \# T, j5 M rRequirements) @4 \- T. X, j5 u, `) J
Review (SRR)
) j' p% }( `1 Y# JConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
3 ~. v( F8 h0 r* C5 i5 @* F' KDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
- [7 @/ f# c- w# ]/ |/ A8 A4 U) @degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.# u4 Z( s' ]: N2 i
System Security4 l, v/ C, f+ q
Engineering7 w8 U/ [+ U5 I; A9 k
(SSE)( d6 V3 s1 e; o
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering0 ]- ?: q/ C( ~ ^0 u0 I
principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks: L9 M: ]; y$ o8 \ C! o
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related+ }0 C1 F9 `5 R. q9 s! g
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and* l: h, d& D( c" x+ L4 U
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to/ v2 f# b1 ^/ [( P5 e& L. G/ j
security threats.
6 l9 I+ `/ s4 N& E" V& K) r3 sSystem Security0 @% \6 U) ?' V t
Engineering. v0 G6 U! p+ v6 E( X
Management9 q. o" G, h! Q( v/ j3 M* }& Z# {
Program4 V+ D+ {6 w9 l
(SSEMP)- q2 M/ a0 v$ q/ c
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
6 d: j# D% d+ c0 x$ sachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE9 `* `+ q2 i8 e/ i2 F" [
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the0 Z" L! Q) }, e* K: M
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the( Y8 }+ i: G+ d9 C( w
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides& ` h2 O' ^8 j( X. A, S) q
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes2 @9 \% ~3 I5 y$ v
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
- C& d' C, p* ZSystem Security
; d5 r/ X, F# e+ p7 C7 Y7 ?Management
- a c9 A' v2 @+ z4 E8 kPlan (SSMP)0 j* S$ e) l- V6 P4 Q
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to" Y) ~7 F4 h) u8 C# }
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
( O& m) o% e9 f Z( smethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with2 D9 Y; e5 f# U% F& |: y! L
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related
$ Q' X* ~: l; c- j8 C, ssystems.+ E: ~( O2 A8 Y# G* N$ S, Z0 [+ R5 D% q
Systems0 ~# ]+ U' l: u" s
Engineering
: T: e* [/ X* y" ^+ l$ e1 Y7 ~An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
( R$ n8 i% R$ i6 I+ @. pbalanced set of system product and process solutions.
- B" t3 _# S: ~, B2 y/ e/ GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S1 k2 q8 f* L5 u, e, b* ?, c
287
1 \8 w1 `% _. x( t* E% U2 Z% ^0 N' WSystems+ b+ S6 d5 ~% G4 U
Engineering
$ [7 S3 B6 w7 {3 d$ o8 r! I, } PManagement
; O) \6 U6 r/ f5 w8 M& A- tPlan (SEMP)
8 `3 }9 c _+ C* CThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
: b+ j* N0 p* _+ B( d/ H% P, p2 sIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
( w: _2 @2 m$ ?/ [ k( ~! Zdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4): ` o6 n/ I5 j2 |2 S h
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
& j7 i; G4 i# E4 ?Systems Test
% K: u( C5 ^ a- E2 ]4 w- p1 s* C" a$ |Integration and9 k ^. q% a9 ?
Coordination# `; X# Z4 c9 g4 R; x t% x
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.# Y f1 y' l3 O3 ]2 T n1 \" C
System Threat& R- v0 n5 u c' D4 g
Assessment6 [# D& m& ^7 S( B% h
Report (STAR)
! J( _% j' k, A. M$ P1 x; H, Y) VRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
% C* Z" T/ J2 z$ o8 WService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
7 M, h# C' u* E# p* K sand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when0 `- Y d! r$ @8 S6 D) D
the threat changes significantly.! g$ X9 I9 s. `# S6 }- @
System-Valued& ~, r( T% n1 C5 m
Asset; e. S9 ?3 k6 {6 U m1 K. {1 H
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
; y/ t9 V1 L$ g8 w7 Y9 l2 Fthe proper operation and well being of the SDS.
: K& h7 i$ g2 l, [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
2 A8 c2 ]9 a, g- B( J2 K% A288: `0 X1 T# O7 Q. ]2 _
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.( c3 [- Q1 B, [3 R
T&E Test and Evaluation.% j, y+ U$ b3 n9 |: [. {3 C
T&T Transportation and Transportability.6 Q$ J P- W' f6 r
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
. O2 S, w. f; Q, G, ~; c9 h. ST-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.. h- O9 \6 H4 Z" M) I
T/R Transmit/Receive.
& R3 H5 l. I! FT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
7 Y+ ^2 |# o/ ?9 M: w& k8 [0 F; FT
2 |7 ^" r% A/ I& B+ R2
( P( b1 A; ?# e# C& i% qTechnology Transfer.
" [0 C0 R/ E/ |1 A& j& o G. O3 @T% T) D% ~# C" J5 U
2
1 v$ o( v; K) b" dE Technical Training Equipment.9 g0 W, R% }# ?4 V+ N6 B# L
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
* z* @2 v2 D1 W9 ETAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
1 M5 h( J4 D2 K% aTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.7 D/ I+ H9 D9 g1 q- K' E( h$ \
TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.: P- S! F4 S6 I7 H9 I
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix./ L& r0 ^# j5 u& _* I! H/ V
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
5 F' w1 T% Y# c2 u, n7 C' N3 kTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
# Q5 O" b; v5 y* _$ W$ ^5 O- aTACAIR Tactical Air.. P! [% Y) A, M0 N0 @
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].6 @0 R( \- J1 T6 t
TACC Tactical Air Command Center./ Y9 d( M8 B! m1 ]) S0 I7 [
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).9 n5 O+ ]0 W) ] e. p. I
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).5 V$ f5 d3 b; N& C6 c3 k
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.1 X+ O) U7 V5 B( w
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
$ J4 N i( |7 f* OTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.9 |5 e/ k; J8 j' D. }0 D9 h
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|