航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 2 ]" H" p: g# M- q; qaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. - T' B; S. d% N$ N4 B: CSTM Significant Technical Milestone. 5 k' ?7 h" s/ E) L! Q5 hSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). 4 l3 ?- v( V. O |( J(2) Science and Technology Objective. ( V7 V& v; K# `, U. [STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and 4 B& l! Z$ N6 r1 \/ K. g4 l8 WTransportation " O$ T% }! Z. |Environments # O+ z6 o* ~, J/ a0 n, w- y5 eThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 3 z7 R9 ~: H4 c; \: q5 t" ?storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable + R9 ~. A6 X" \7 w2 D ~2 r& {# d* Fatmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s % n! V: N- C: X4 U" T8 V5 X# K6 J; Z$ \Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). % H" `6 l* Y, vSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. 0 H' f, X( r/ m8 n$ m, h& K7 YStrategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic 0 w1 M7 F* ?3 B! a+ @- z1 kDefense Emergency + k% A& E; Q% t T& ?) j$ P9 lDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. ( l" D$ q% N8 ]4 ~# ]Strategic $ p! c9 N( |4 W& }7 x# z4 \Defense System 3 r! A3 n; `% I- a! m+ ]7 F(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 * V+ E3 B7 g: S, r: A5 eStrategic Level of , @3 m% C2 v' A# K. FWar 8 H1 ^4 Q# _$ |! |. g$ qThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or k1 _* U' Z% ]7 m0 X: m0 M' o, O, U! Galliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ; ?; A) @, G8 H- \ {. Q) Naccomplish those objectives. 3 a- A, T- P2 KStrategic ; m1 a+ {. E, Y* H$ G2 H2 OOffensive Forces ( J% w3 _2 [- O(SOF) ! u# W, D6 P& n! T( {! B0 B' \* fThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 7 a, D7 y* W; W j0 w" TOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, 7 v. s/ {. U/ f3 b9 ?' A, a( wFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. $ y) c, `0 a* r! ^9 I2 `& X% ^9 bStrategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic 2 o- k8 M X6 A! g3 e5 Q' b8 WWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic 2 s1 d/ S& Y( s& m0 A: `Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 5 W* m$ l7 d2 x8 t4 Uhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic 3 `8 D* N3 t W3 w# jWarning Post- ( L7 z: x, v+ ?/ U9 aDecision Time 6 h& Z2 {/ _- xThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of " F( C5 j7 p! e6 Rgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic 8 i3 a7 ?. l# c7 k9 PWarning Pre- Decision Time 7 L) n9 k2 ?2 ]" M( VThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a - ^/ t( Q- r8 x* ]2 v) c2 Y$ mdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course # U- @# w7 w" u8 [) U* Y1 ]0 U( G% Sof action to be executed. 2 G! P7 G, @. T6 k6 F' m4 CSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack ) p9 @# x" f% _! E, z2 bAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. $ @8 j, S& K( z+ NStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules 8 v8 X/ b$ {! R/ ]; A& vbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 2 |4 j, l9 a t! ?* {8 v8 |flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured , ?) n, P& n9 ^5 EProgram * o' \7 T/ t6 i! t" E# G# YA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. $ ?8 i) X* |+ w+ M8 M, g; h8 c5 uSTS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. + x* W$ Y: O0 `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). - E% m8 X5 j3 O/ ?(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. / O* A* D1 {! p9 Q0 n! ^STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. 8 v; `/ d$ S5 V0 [3 o5 C& VSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. + c! x$ o6 _& } {STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which # n) d. R% G# Y$ v8 k. V) l( Y* [) Mis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. # W0 @( N3 ?2 e$ XSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. 1 O4 ~+ u. W! O* m; {4 ZSubject Security Level ; m0 g% B6 {% zA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it " \5 d5 _' c# C* f. g1 lhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- , I; c9 N. G$ LLaunched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) ; B" q. o- q. B; BA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ; N- N( o! j! N* a$ Gmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. ; T/ P& Y1 G& QSubtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 2 d2 Z, j- V- D4 T% RSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. - L1 T9 t+ I! pSuccession of $ {. X0 d: J( @9 | x. E" NCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, # X1 ^, ] _) V) j) f) z5 Kbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 0 V& _; w: g6 D4 b" x9 d, R& w5 tis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two L) l g! ?+ m4 G- j6 s8 Z4 z) Ealternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 0 I3 y* i' p I" I" g4 U2 MSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. / j: [: \8 p- a+ l T3 ^) x: ~Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in / S0 T: A9 L3 Za single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, / \7 { i- x* @. k% S) ythrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 1 _$ C) _$ ^ u' \6 h, k9 _radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as & W2 i5 \! u0 W) }. P4 Z1 C* m7 rsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. ) q; q$ S/ [, q i2 F# wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 6 n! p$ P) }7 l( V/ _, l' ?required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional 8 J- U/ S$ c! @* llasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from ! U3 L6 Z4 G: F' g% ^& Ksuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. : z# v% B! {$ JSupervisory % Z" ^' ~5 K8 z+ M/ z- e+ W% f+ nPrograms 9 S$ y" R, y3 M) v; lComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. + ?6 n6 W; `' V- hSupplemental 1 m$ d6 L5 T' T# S. ~Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support " Z8 U- y3 S% F! _ @Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the # f n9 y3 b" j( Ymission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly + e8 `9 ~5 v6 t# S( O" t1 m& qtools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 8 A& s2 l9 H5 v" {& \8 h3 m% q3 \# ~ rprotection equipment). 4 S9 ~$ J: i8 a! WSupport ' m6 T! [- i2 T/ [Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous % _2 `/ Q( W% }operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, : z O) \" R7 o! ]( Tadministrative support, and the like. 9 u& e2 [1 C* A$ k/ K8 d& b0 PSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for / b; w V$ w5 Fexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. . z2 H# b3 \1 ^/ g, O0 A: R/ tSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 4 |$ B2 H+ B. Ybelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items ( B* d9 |/ x/ Z! J6 Q1 edue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or , n/ X* v) ` nmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess . M; ^5 o% E. Lproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity : C. u' y. v7 o9 Wmeasures. 8 Z- T' n$ |( ?' NSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance ' V1 w0 t* u6 T* C qRequirements 9 Q$ d- c1 y6 H% ?- cRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response . L% [& a6 {, c# x; z% E' qoptions and current surveillance system availability. . u5 X9 c1 O" BSurveillance, Satellite and ' U5 b) ?) w2 J& RMissile , E" P6 |5 m0 Z3 V& ~The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 7 C; ]" V. Y& T- [1 q, N( y, r8 Nin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S # Z" F& Q- X4 @; Q" `! M. R1 a283 Survivability - m9 q2 z$ C( T4 t# r3 zOperating Modes 9 [# ^& W1 z, A1 u: c1 v' a' jThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 2 W7 L( ^; w" ethat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 9 P8 N l2 p; USurvivable and Enduring Command Center - m R) } _+ y' t6 }) \% a6 g(SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. " ?- ?, @( _+ G! H% ?SUS Site Utilization Study. 5 M" L7 m; G( bSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. ! L3 |" }3 q2 u; JSWG Scenario Working Group. 6 \) q6 M1 v/ [, DSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 8 o. X8 L2 Z0 u6 g0 c) dSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 8 g; S5 ~; P$ o% C5 f2 BSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. ) X/ {, l6 n" XSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. + q1 V' ]( b$ p0 I6 d) y' lSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar ( o+ G& n; r2 r& e( D(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points * [! a9 L" o% v4 Aalong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for ; }( {9 R- Q$ J8 J# G. F9 Z' jtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's / E; w+ z- }3 G4 Y' M4 Zsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal * s, z I7 J8 U4 i Cemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. ) ?/ v7 q. [% b/ W3 H$ p3 mSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 8 E, d+ S# v; l6 B% _/ IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 , g9 W: o2 \, lSYSCOM Systems Command. * c8 l. L& d1 y/ R- PSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with 0 C$ L: U+ f9 s( r1 j8 X- f" mspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, " {8 F0 D% _0 iand delivery to users. ! V9 _. ~, ^ A6 _( G(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. % q5 \- K4 g) y+ P) q! V5 I9 f' hSystem Activation + j8 Y$ R2 `' T& ^3 U; ]5 zThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. N! J( \" |$ n8 d8 \) k- rSystem 7 e0 @9 \# \( K1 ~Architecture 1 c9 R( ?7 O9 D, B( o- F7 j9 jSystem Capability 8 u! P+ f8 m0 |2 w2 I9 g; pSpecification 4 l% ?( Y8 _9 t8 P( t5 d. ~' e(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system - L! h" O! U; l6 A2 e$ I* parchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational , i8 }3 I- J) X+ \$ z9 e; Lenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. ; y$ j" X5 Y8 K0 @( p6 d5 @* J% AThe government document that translates capabilities into functional 0 }# \. J. Y8 ]1 [3 I: |2 q% ~specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among " C& j1 i; e" Z" m9 t: z: cthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) 2 E( d }3 |6 E. } E9 ?6 q6 X, {, gA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide / a- a7 W X" g u p, }sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of , v0 v/ O; o1 P- w \+ G# y4 e {. A: i* nequipment in CMAFB. * P/ u% g+ [9 G5 l* eSystem Concept Paper (SCP) ( G6 `8 L6 v5 C w% R/ ~1 gOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) 5 R- Y/ l: B( p: [: {; ~/ \4 a. K# `The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. - A) c4 @; [& c# I$ }System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and ! B4 G0 a F ^! u2 ncomputer systems. System-Critical # t* t R* c0 P2 K( O* ^Function u: R. y. C* G- g4 M' I( v2 BA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's " e; L/ Y% v- b9 p* R8 {mission. System Definition Review (SDR) : F' K7 ^1 t+ h$ VThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 8 \ y1 o- r# j( Hfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential ' l. u: K2 [; o) A( T/ Bimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, , r: d% e' B* ~9 P; s) Kdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System * Q( s1 k6 H$ F7 RDeployment ; @: C" [, J5 @4 P" }% a ADelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. & r. p" j, Y9 D9 l0 x& RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 % X3 E3 Q# w7 F& X7 ?System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design ( q* v- J' s& W8 Z; z5 {Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 2 x/ g( u( \* Aoperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. 4 E5 [2 ~/ j, A1 v' HSystem Design / F' h0 ?: W2 y ?- ]5 jReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with ! U, D. K) k7 N! `' d) Lthe allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution % g+ n* L! k' K( A+ S2 H( o/ `Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior : C8 g! E# Z9 u' |+ Z0 v2 xExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide : B" Y; A8 `. B/ isignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to + N; B5 i/ J, F N8 v wachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome ) t! Y; M, }: Dthose challenges. # A2 Y8 c8 Z' ]5 g6 c5 `3 NSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share ( _6 ~: H. T' ka set of common characteristics. - g" S2 ]" @- d7 k7 JSystem Generated Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) 4 Z- c. s6 a( i: ^3 |/ ?) lTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local 9 x& ?3 Y$ m* j2 [. f# M- j- n* Gfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System 3 M$ W. K/ Y2 E- n- kIntegration Test " c$ ^$ \1 J- l) YA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, . j P' v& z# f! isensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual / t. B9 T3 o* Q* ^managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks , f& p' P" O( l7 _4 F# dand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. 2 ^9 q8 b0 M8 s F8 FSystem Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) , M5 Q& @5 ?% }' ?! gThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command 8 E0 U8 r' H, cand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to & u" W8 m8 k6 rthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 2 h, M u3 q3 K6 z( f7 c2 ?BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 2 \6 U+ N- E8 MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 r. k, ]+ p* D286 System Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness l2 @; Y6 U$ f: s/ i# B5 qSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out 2 c* R, ?( x% P- ?- I- lthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It $ |4 _# G3 i% t% ~1 Kincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 7 \+ \, S- o- x6 f2 fverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions : e+ q: l/ [* L9 h1 K4 }; O! |# jnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies ) t* B0 \- T$ j0 A: ~and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a # e, p- A/ g4 a |5 `* Kspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 7 I% w/ P' T7 YSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and ' p/ k1 x, N' g8 zmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support # }0 k) x8 d5 ^9 m8 o( t4 i1 f0 ]system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System + S& E3 o- W+ zRequirements Analysis (SRA) }8 d9 {: R1 ^9 a8 cAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System , h* n# p8 S: p4 A! AConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine % a5 n" x# n2 F7 P) C, g. ?specific system functional and performance requirements. 6 _6 K1 i( g/ c4 ^: ?System Requirements 2 u' E" @) ?8 J& p9 s. v1 hReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. % t f- ?3 C ~# ~5 s1 K2 r$ uDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the , a* a, Y' o4 B% [% e. Q7 `" ~degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering (SSE) ' z) U5 y# M" J/ EAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 9 B1 y" [2 c1 P0 J) B- ?principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks ; W2 L1 k: O# R$ r+ ~+ sassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and . m; B% [! H7 R$ Z8 u- yanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. 9 W# O0 f! q9 Z: PSystem Security % ~& d0 k% r+ Y% wEngineering ' J" m3 x1 t& Q7 ~0 S H0 i, c. mManagement Program 4 D/ D* e# l! P( R(SSEMP) * R: d$ x+ D7 t% aThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical - N7 K. n- B$ @( ?achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ( t' D4 G2 T, I3 tdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the . [* ?& i' O. p1 g- e5 {/ uresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides - M# w: L7 n: S1 Dmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes + q; ]+ X# C: A( _1 S- W0 Iits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. , b0 K! ]9 {% h8 D. o/ L" f7 G# ?System Security Management + }1 k: a3 t! |& v6 B/ k, xPlan (SSMP) 3 ?) h8 ~* B% j/ tA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with . q3 w( ~& V" T. i: X' Iother program engineering, design and management activities, and related ' L7 ?2 ]- E; Y: [* x4 \- p) Ssystems. 5 K6 W s: b# Z% t% FSystems Engineering 5 j2 `% y" y2 T# G( W+ SAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. + d: e3 q0 O k' |* p2 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems * R7 N) P- a+ B) A2 K a5 XEngineering ' {* _3 j4 z9 \- N' c$ DManagement Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures & ?$ \$ X# u: v6 u+ z: Q S Rdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. 7 p6 B+ v1 _/ T; X8 R/ |/ d1 rSystems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 6 C! y4 d4 ]3 ESystem Threat ' x5 ?" p7 e, n4 T FAssessment Report (STAR) " | x* N# P# z( t2 J! j6 JRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. + U3 I/ u" @4 }4 y8 A! |: DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T # E$ y, [9 k4 t% N7 u288 , m# w6 ~3 U; M' }0 ZT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). ; V: S# q$ |& X0 T9 E$ F) {' o4 fT + n7 N$ w; a8 M3 y. h9 i- ^2 Technology Transfer. , a; I( [' p9 j# C( F! r$ v; LT ; g1 D% r. u( k# T# m- |- c2 E Technical Training Equipment. * \1 w, M, E5 ?1 L* F, A8 l1 RTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 0 p0 L3 v% ^! q' x3 `TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. - ^9 C4 m# w: @% A: @. @& BTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. 9 F' D" G7 @, |1 \TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. 0 o5 u/ t3 j6 c1 {TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). + o/ E: F8 c vTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). : t' V0 @2 Y2 L$ Q! QTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 1 i+ v H1 \- n7 n, GTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation 1 W* K6 s$ a! B$ F: E( l' W: y/ gTactical Air 9 p/ x5 x/ s( wDoctrine 6 H% }1 x6 l, QFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air " B9 k( }& ]" H! U5 ~, `& P) spower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation . f# c3 j" x& w) ^1 k. }An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air Operations & d. K* ~( l* A! l* @4 nCenter C0 n* B a6 ?- S4 C7 g- QA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. , w! L( n( |( P1 q ?- jTactical Air Support . j+ _/ [# H' M, j2 AAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of $ \, B: f; X+ |- i5 @- SResponsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and 1 }4 ?6 G6 ?5 Kcoordination of support. Tactical Ballistic ' y% t2 l. @! ~; @5 Y @/ xMissile (TBM) # I% {2 O# U/ z: [% hA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 5 T& g7 d' n9 C3 ]employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or / I4 n( y2 Q: E+ W+ q5 cmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. + W2 M# ?- B/ h1 c2 a$ LTactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates * ^1 W) @! I! @( Z$ qeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. + k( q4 q3 W c! k1 l( H/ CThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical + [/ T: J+ `$ x' ROperations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical 3 {) \* f4 c# mOperations 2 C: K( G3 M( P+ q/ ?Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff , ^. o! e7 h; |concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. ' z: S, n. T3 C* j6 i" [Tactical Warning (TW) . n" x8 P) O; ^(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type , N4 V$ R, K" s( N8 |$ Kand size, country under attack, and event time. & `% t/ `) I+ C! J, A! A$ H7 aTactical * e4 c4 e6 z9 sWarning/Attack 4 L/ `4 I- l9 l/ d% R4 J0 jAssessment 6 R1 ?& T" V7 p9 ?" k/ \. k+ h2 ^(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( y- J E! r8 a290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. 9 I: ~ m) ?1 a* N(2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. & P; K+ e) b! E8 B6 QTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. , j" g/ c! I, s) Q( `TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 7 h2 \. m P+ \' f* b, H( \TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” ! i9 \6 o3 u$ B" p- Z5 XTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” ) j. J& _$ U4 ]; |" S. STADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. . ^% d# v- [7 t4 ETADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. ^ V2 W4 ]. x' H3 o0 WTAF Tactical Air Force. 0 @+ q, a# X& n( RTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. : G% H/ V* x" f! q1 [TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. ; y* _3 X/ N& e# }+ J+ }. _- hTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. / ]5 o" ^1 i, eTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive * F y9 Z5 k+ n: J6 F: O1 O }& r9 ^6 ^defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 8 g, z6 q' R1 @, `6 m4 G$ OTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). & E4 n# x0 {/ q6 K# A0 JTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 5 m- ?9 I+ V, {7 oTank Fragmentation 0 z1 h/ ^+ @- F8 i( g* v: a" oThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a + B: ^& g7 l) f4 F' ~* _result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 - E$ F( H% i3 `: P9 c% dTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 0 z" A! D$ U; ^1 ^( G( s5 {TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. : L, E) Z3 m( {, E8 ?TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. ' v9 O0 u' I& F* j$ s/ B; B* VTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. : T3 o b2 p5 ?5 X- |(3) Target Acquisition Radar. d$ }) z) ?: x3 q7 DTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target # s9 f: r/ M9 ^1 jClassification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, 2 Y% k8 X. X6 Z, udiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target . X/ J- \( E8 p _+ [" b8 y. e- W7 o7 BDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one 9 w5 Z+ u( H% ]+ Q1 x$ v) Z( A- Htarget when multiple targets are present. " b3 C: f1 E* ?7 xTarget Object Map (TOM) 2 b+ e ?4 `( K1 o6 ]A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and 4 _! W9 t/ |+ V- B. Uother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in & \1 d3 e1 z% J5 z" S9 }' Gtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) 6 E4 Z2 p; Q% x, B1 U4 xTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 8 F3 j' V |) s5 uTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements 2 j+ F8 Y& p& b# M4 h) aDocument (TSRD) 8 Y+ w" X, U. F0 g3 iBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD + m0 U6 P3 X: g- UProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target , u6 a, W) q: k. w0 |% Lrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 9 E ]7 m- m+ |4 |TASA Task and Skills Analysis. " P# R. c8 c( _5 }" D! o$ M3 }$ F0 QTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) ) I% L8 R' Z! H6 {& [* N- o/ [engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. 8 T( W; C' ?, j2 t7 XTAT Technical Area Task. 5 H% x3 X; J: ]& o5 }. F4 X0 RTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 2 ^1 M: F! f9 F* u qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. , F* Y. M8 f( k' @/ \TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. . L! t, N7 P: kTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. . l6 L3 s8 T- c, pTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 4 w" r8 [5 Q$ ~" A% [# x% L(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . - U8 }. ?' } t* j. A [9 kTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. 2 c+ R( p1 g* QTCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 0 w' Q8 u2 ~" U1 M& BTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. # G; ], J+ j6 P1 U7 A(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device 2 t; k5 B% E* z8 s" t a+ J8 c6 rTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. " S( j' w7 G, ^" ^7 h" OTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : _- q& G3 I+ A( U293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. ) X6 b6 d" `% O8 b(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. ! Y& n: _; y+ cTDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. 1 R" R; _ _! F: D" M- d; lTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 3 |4 y, d. k! E( U }TDM Time Division Multiplexed. 7 t c* h/ q7 d( l- |5 T' I6 uTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). $ j4 S- B1 I2 y- F( w9 YTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. - r F( S! S$ e: q! M1 eTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. - {4 S* W6 m3 t( |* Y/ j! a" C2 |(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. - l# _2 C3 N2 F& ?% C$ MTDR Terminal Defense Radar. 5 y( O( A! W, ~: ]2 Z, f* ]TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 4 T% v' ^/ V. g: h# kTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 8 U. E) ?; Z& Z7 [. GTDU Target Data Update. & V# T7 [. z+ ~! b; n/ F: @* J& KTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician ( ?( N6 o- B* x' KTECH Technical + }1 A9 k7 s' s% T" y1 f0 YTECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) M6 O" J2 ~; \) Y! u# Q294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. 9 w% V" Q5 ~' ]% p; \Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract & l. ?; n6 E3 j4 m: X7 ?administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) 7 r. I7 d7 k3 E E/ _* h9 TA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition $ f2 ?4 ~2 b2 K" W0 t; o$ |strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines " v0 K0 q/ {# S% _- k1 i) G7 nthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 1 q, o- T9 f" ~& b0 a( n% `performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality 2 O1 @* }7 a' T, Q2 wassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in # |$ I4 x4 \: I0 h& O/ t& ?the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 9 o j5 k5 s$ ~0 [) X4 ]8 j1 nTechnical Objectives 9 N2 _' D# ~# Z) ]The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. 5 S. l) x$ T2 B4 Y" ZTechnical Objectives & Goals (TOG) 6 C- f( k- n( l# V) n3 A$ g" KHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 8 `; ?6 g& z4 c" ^! z9 C7 Bdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical - @* `5 X: @5 L2 G; W! lParameters (TPs) $ J% [: u( \. Q3 X: @( h1 t% o! QA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by ' F8 N- E/ Z$ x9 g) c: x( J- Nmanagement. Technical Performance Measurement & x) z) m; J# A+ _! C# H: a(TPM) + A! K( N3 u6 ]0 r- YDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status ( f$ h' ^( c7 B3 Y, S0 G9 r" wbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design . f/ {9 a5 ?; S; ^, [assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance : e3 T! T4 k% }; C+ h1 Eparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product ( L' r1 c3 g$ u2 Eelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these ' g% n! e8 b# Adifferences on system effectiveness. Technical _" f( Y8 M; [7 _/ Z: `Specification 4 L3 z8 V1 `( F, K7 l+ W$ z" AA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. 2 g: P4 N$ B5 o% K# bTechnical ' I9 b. ]6 ^! u: A+ V$ ASurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. 1 v; J# a6 B2 `4 `" j) {; s& aTechnology Executing Agent 7 f0 }5 R% {; N) N, M# f, t8 `The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management , @- f; Q4 E: K/ V4 i) dresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. - q7 [4 F3 H! g6 x7 F; Z# ATechnology 2 t2 G3 V& y4 h# U8 mProgram 9 `/ T$ N$ X y: ?$ T" WDescription ' b8 j+ Z5 A/ u. o1 ~' B9 oThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. - z3 w3 L, k# I8 YTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. 7 Z& O3 A( ^3 }$ G: W3 nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 9 m* f2 ?, J4 `7 s; G, O2 rTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, % R( h& Q8 k) V, T2 k% eTracking, and % x' |' X0 X$ i: HCommand (TT&C) + z. b1 B* c) f& F4 ~+ T2 vFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and ( c( S0 K! `, m" Z# `# S. ^6 o" Astatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ( B# o: |9 q$ m* p- Vmission commands to the satellite. / f2 C u6 p6 u7 n" O5 i5 |Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. , y0 F( b- {* H" G. ITELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. , P" t/ D8 g( I* e$ s. j8 ITELINT Telemetry Intelligence. . {8 [" H! ^1 ?7 j7 v8 p# JTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. ( K! q/ n) q( M/ \2 `TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 6 q2 G" P+ a6 b! F5 M8 A"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report / N( L" P9 }5 W/ ITERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance 2 t$ y8 e T: p6 oThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 5 M# `# U6 f# z2 @ `+ q$ {vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase ' [5 \* R3 n3 xand trajectory termination. ; N* [$ v. @( [, c+ ~" u, zTerminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy ; i! U# n: ^. V$ d5 C E* SPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. $ u1 G N7 U% c3 K" k. d/ G' U7 YTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 8 ]+ v2 w( n. v5 s# K2 n* bTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. + s% j5 l0 V2 G& [) P9 Q( }( z gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 * e# s' }# L3 O* |; z fTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system . n+ ?+ H# i- t4 Hhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all & R3 k. F6 C; Q. U1 H' o% Toperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, / Q" z% P3 ?+ }1 e/ manalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. . S/ F, O2 E* m2 K3 e4 xTest and Evaluation (T&E) ; l, U" z8 ?1 a9 {0 U, o9 L/ O" \Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated . P) @5 m4 y* F' m- Dto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three 5 F* q3 k6 C. d9 O) m) Mtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof ! ~7 _( g! J7 H( ~& Y/ [manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical % Y( {% s( e! A) m' b, d; Pperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, 5 e" H, U5 M: M4 I7 `: P5 Q; C; Gand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 4 E2 J2 ~( ?! M( r# Q* Qrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts . A% w7 o' _' e: M: Dor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before ' T z6 } o: S7 x* Vthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 8 k, w `2 j4 `" _8 a9 V' b y* Hconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) 4 T+ ?- ~7 N* d/ R- f [An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 7 v0 u9 {" \7 g/ tto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and 6 V: {* H3 _. V' | \Evaluation 8 Y. B! |) M! Q, Q; XWorking Group 0 `) k% z9 O2 P4 z& p7 a) }' ^! O(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 3 g. |% P r2 p& nplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the 6 S- p% R' `% z FAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling / G L/ q) T. _* s+ @8 Tproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. / u' I4 _3 q( F/ x! ATestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 4 B8 z: n6 T/ @Test Integration 5 I7 Q9 o+ C* }( P1 N+ PWorking Group 4 i0 O7 n1 e7 {& D(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ! t, X" S) K1 L' torder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. 8 A; N- v% G! r: B9 o9 x& D6 i8 h/ OTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. " c) ^" M y+ \$ F+ {* [The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 8 h# U8 d/ P7 m& q$ itest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 2 i" a0 R3 T( F7 h& Ocriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target $ C, W7 M# r7 V$ v+ X- h. hVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for ; R7 H" T! F+ H% A. O }) NSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. / Z; O0 t( p' W' Y# ITEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. ; m7 y# m" k/ M; E' BTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 5 W# `1 C& `/ g. D( ^0 F+ ?. FTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. - M. J* l" }: W! ITF Task Force. 7 E! \1 c5 s/ i+ T$ L( qTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 6 Y7 O8 P& H5 T. c+ e: VTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 3 t' S$ g/ E0 B5 `TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. 4 ?1 S% `7 v8 r: q' K6 s, X! sTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). " A6 d+ p h) [TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. " g% p' x8 P$ LTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). # P& T, G$ b& ^. ^' |5 ^TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. + V: N, T( {& x0 l: j; hTheater Ballistic % ?/ q ?7 U$ e5 O! ~* x. v8 U8 JMissile Defense (TBMD) System 1 v! M" J% f( M: W6 S+ J1 C \The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 4 M J. p* B: J1 hballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)