航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ; O2 W" L. G/ T) A: z8 FSTM Significant Technical Milestone. 9 q( h% K: w- S2 m. I. u5 ?STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. # W6 Z- P6 ^! NSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 4 D# T. o( M8 }0 s9 N2 t: k. M$ mHandling, and # z3 d- c8 M4 {% K# Y! n/ c" ]! j; ETransportation Environments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 4 L" S4 u6 k% G+ O2 U1 \environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 8 M" w; v1 c& G2 }- W- i% p |% ostorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable 7 }+ _- A# O1 Vatmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 1 H6 D! C) y1 xduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, & I7 B: n6 ?8 C+ j O' F% i9 kshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. . @. j9 J7 c4 \0 d! i$ b1 EStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s ) r" ~/ r1 o& oApache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense & x( N/ J! S' FAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. " }* [ r- E3 g2 r% uStrategic Defense System (SDS) : b4 d& a8 Z0 TA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. : [% K5 |- x3 [- f' h. L/ dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S / p& V; a/ K, a+ n7 Q! o2 D( T: V280 . P. J0 I3 F8 K; p w$ y. `" u, M: mStrategic Level of % v/ K3 H4 P2 c7 l5 XWar The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. , Q) @4 j& J: k6 M& \Strategic Offensive Forces 6 ?" g* O% T. |( ~; Q7 J' ~# E- X$ ~% e(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, " h% l" S4 B5 k0 d$ V1 F# J+ k8 Q* Kthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific & g- p4 P8 G" k' f* e' hCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic ; ~3 n8 N5 j5 S1 I% }Reserve : b0 v7 B# [" W N/ \: mThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to ( ~8 L8 Z4 m8 h' a8 vstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply 2 F2 @% a* @' j* j" U. ~distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic - B f" a" E. z' [+ }9 ZWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. % u3 M8 o3 a; A0 X- y% D$ hStrategic [# q( R: _7 _! BWarning Post- : G) v' \! U3 {Decision Time , C0 d7 B- B! k2 C# VThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends + y' S# k/ |9 Q' g, A8 Twith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 9 ~2 G/ C3 t5 t- }2 A2 [warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the , r4 M* i5 h# |national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- . x v7 k4 o# \1 ~" CDecision Time + p) o4 k/ g4 r) KThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. / \, Q t6 U2 d. r8 YSTREAD Standard TRE Display. 3 a+ i( O4 l+ r" a) RSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 8 ? ^- _7 ~5 P. Q$ z7 v# WStructured & f+ Q( I5 B7 MAttack 4 W+ E. L' \- uAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured 9 I6 K* E' L/ K& H' A+ \Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules " x& V1 T$ F" c/ k, C v$ mbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 2 O: j$ M8 f- |1 s$ zflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured ( [) a5 h# V2 QProgram . v ~$ |: `- @" s3 FA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one 7 G# D2 t; v, b8 S+ a* n3 M+ Pentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 7 m1 E: A5 P9 v8 Rsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 0 i. T/ r9 p" B5 \+ m( \- Einstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of , g& g; v3 b% M9 ]6 Pinstructions. ' @% Q4 Q2 w5 F5 S6 C7 KSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 ' u( C& \: Z: S# s* ?1 oSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). $ A6 n. c, M; n) d5 M2 C(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. 1 q2 S- {6 t ^) W$ U+ N5 v2 D- G, A- \Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. ) e7 C# t( U# ?( K6 s+ f) z2 XSubject Security % h0 W; E" a( U( i0 S0 eLevel , G5 i0 Z6 c2 e- X2 YA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be ' A4 l, F! }* |dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. 1 H" L( q9 k( n6 YSubmarine- $ t: z: H. G0 P' ]6 @Launched ; i7 w/ p- v" S8 L7 OBallistic Missile & y; B9 Y3 F2 [/ l2 V6 ^(SLBM) # k1 C( d) M6 qA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 4 N4 o* A; e' Y, u3 t7 ~9 u0 Ymiles. # j9 `1 K+ ?9 t! h* ?: E# |7 r; t4 lSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function ! F9 w% m3 a$ w7 W( g/ owithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 9 ?6 l: S. f6 j% tSuccession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, & U5 B4 {; n, [5 e/ S3 p6 E1 Ebecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. 9 x6 L. t: k7 H ]SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). 2 z% k* l8 G4 @% sSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two 2 O' N* Y. I$ a! U0 walternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to 9 x( e% R+ c- ^3 O: ], F+ cdecisions about future use of resources. ( y* @& D7 _5 @' ^& V9 H1 O* tSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). ; m1 e% d/ E0 ?& j( u* t9 w* {Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 9 W9 E7 p# X; J. O, ySuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, $ ~5 H4 [% Q. X0 ~9 K, kthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 3 C. f% i+ W+ hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 * ?/ M' Z' I* }4 g( O: uSuperradiant & Z- i0 i8 t7 _5 }( N% yLaser (SRL) ( o/ e! d+ o7 x/ C; e3 VA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser $ N: M8 n A6 l* i9 x. U- L- abeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 7 R. i) K+ a1 h' Z' vor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory ) ^9 N- M( O# M% Q7 `Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and 3 I/ D d# u5 H( ]3 w4 fcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. ( d" }" ]( ^: P" J8 USupplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. $ ]4 ~+ b5 B% m9 E' T2 r( E+ HSupport Equipment 1 d1 n- F1 D, f8 E' T, pAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the $ r% w" A% h5 I, D1 z6 a# \mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 5 x+ R4 Z; R( b% A3 zmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 5 C6 ]8 f2 t$ c5 r$ r: z. s5 kprotection equipment). * R7 A* T6 u8 m9 E3 ASupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, $ s: d( S( _" ]; B$ n1 Aadministrative support, and the like. 0 ]3 | G/ F& H8 ~6 fSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 1 d& K7 M7 @, J2 NSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 2 k& b& X5 z' K# ~# ?8 sbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items # Y0 v9 x- q q; i; j7 W3 \due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess & e$ P. h. v. G$ [$ W# Vproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, . ]3 @, C( ]( m" dand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric / N8 j* A7 c) ?3 |6 c8 Jsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 8 m! ]; |, D0 ]2 h. n) [( U) vRequirements 7 z; w. ?- ?5 sRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. & B7 |4 A1 I# GSurveillance, Satellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites # c# _1 ]8 L) r' H3 r. h* f0 Y4 jand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. ' I; H$ F. l( }8 L$ d1 I' c! GSurveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated # @8 w9 R7 R% O/ ~1 d, Min the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 {) F8 M" b4 Y283 Survivability : u( b5 ^, O: S3 ^: z" nOperating Modes ( M6 X# v0 p; V3 C1 xThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 7 v( P2 b, P) d; {$ \& s3 D" k$ rthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) 3 o1 E0 [ o D- r- A9 m7 s) ~5 HThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 8 u# I& z5 V$ a1 N' O; aSUS Site Utilization Study. 0 K" \: H. T& Q/ T. C; _3 lSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. + b( w) N( N7 aSV Space Vehicle. % S% d$ _, N7 Z2 S) d5 VSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. $ |$ r( V( |% \5 J/ C3 SSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. # y; F9 F7 Q# USWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. . M* i. D, L& S( kSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to # b! [9 }8 J, t( e8 E) vone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. 0 D o! y* F# b) W, |Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar 3 K* Y% @/ B6 R: k/ h, I9 R- f Q; e(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance . ]4 D0 G: e7 u! L nbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for # h% {" o* E8 H( p, l) [! d# B. jtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 0 I+ k1 b% B- k W7 j; W$ J( B9 memitted by the radar transmitter. $ D ]# l6 W& t, e( WSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. " m7 Z+ n9 G5 ] J2 X, VSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. ( K0 s. G5 Z8 UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) x0 R: M0 L; u" @/ ~& u284 SYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, ! Z( x* o4 R' _5 S- A6 b- y/ zdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with * O$ _; f2 Z+ Y" x+ Mspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, # j$ K! y8 m, f+ U; c s2 M9 Oand delivery to users. * W* `$ N7 x* G; Y(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a ! O/ W$ e1 ?5 K. ?% ifunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System ' W1 _) X |: I3 `0 c% y- b- h8 yActivation $ E9 ]' B9 s$ S# L- R, U1 HThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 4 ] c8 a0 V8 Q. B* Z: ^implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. System . Q. Q. O# n- Q l9 A, fArchitecture System 8 \. j! |' c3 f% `2 w" e8 XCapability $ ?9 ^4 r5 Z! NSpecification 7 w& x$ R3 k; R# t" E0 O, p# v9 v(SCS) ' v# J _7 R8 t9 v O& t+ _8 S- G# }The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational ( ^7 P" B; d$ a0 s; Uenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 4 ^! |! S) F, D! I* s Ielements of missile defense systems. 5 {; B0 {0 F1 v0 \The government document that translates capabilities into functional / T g: p) b3 S( E- Especifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center $ V# L/ R% C! g/ P% R(SC) 6 l+ n5 ]4 w R! G! s! NA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ) y* b( x0 e* n% \/ p: H8 ^) Tequipment in CMAFB. 3 ]( ^0 j* T. \6 eSystem Concept Paper (SCP) . Q& u( ~0 o' W2 `/ cOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other " {: P- ^* \/ l' m9 sconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System + J) S; z1 H' R/ y+ c: ^( x- k# Z' WConfiguration - |" L& w4 q! _2 yControl Board (SCCB) 4 W0 e; d9 f, D: t# jThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and " Y4 m/ M& w4 \) g! u2 a( Wcomputer systems. System-Critical 7 \) d: X T+ N2 RFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 0 @" V; f4 M: P( }. ]2 u2 r, Y/ R' fmission. System Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and ( R4 s2 ^; X; T5 ~8 Z( R( @: qfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential " V7 F F, t' [/ ~# _/ ?impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, ' S5 ]/ I7 e3 D$ Xdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, 5 Q6 H$ k5 _, A* J; Ifinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. 2 M6 M8 u) s* |# F( [8 J1 tSystem Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 9 Q$ x5 ~' {. P- S# w8 AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 5 V0 _3 M! w' d* f; O0 S4 CSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, : t( W" W& X5 d% D, A7 ~) ]9 @: hcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy - f C- H) C% _1 [. xspecified system requirements. 7 I# f2 @$ W4 V8 o+ Z( s(2) The result of the system design process. 6 m9 ~5 E. }% USystem Design Concept 9 L6 m# s! h7 @7 Y |2 @: ^9 GAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 2 I8 F' _( n6 v$ w8 Scharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 3 D' Y+ o* W; Y) u5 [! U+ moperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design 3 a9 ]/ ^# W; ]6 B! z) fReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with : o) H9 l- T, ?6 }the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set % x& B* r% @- a1 N- ~: mof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and ! N) t. W6 `! x) H. s( G$ L- ?capability. System Evolution . @* W4 ~% X2 q4 z: u, M1 Z" h/ lPlan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ( W! t$ n; O$ j9 j5 x5 w8 a5 Fcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior & y" n3 R6 C1 QExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and ' A' n, P1 D2 P Zassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to r% [. K; ]4 c( v. u5 Aachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 8 _' ?3 M- z. Z& Vthose challenges. 4 @, h, r) P* Y& f8 \! ^. ?4 tSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share ! ]3 r2 Y# Z$ ea set of common characteristics. System ; R9 ?% @. E8 E: y7 N( i9 y( xGenerated Electromagnetic 5 U6 n$ D t- g4 B& ^Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local 2 X, @# @/ V: A7 \1 e7 Dfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the 5 ]0 N' K( `7 f( u2 hobject in order to produce charge equalization. System 8 x# P' \5 V# }9 w3 IIntegration Test 9 e6 p+ _( C/ q; T1 b8 s, VA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. 9 U* \! d$ x# l/ G s( y7 \System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 2 j8 Z" D6 R9 p; v3 \and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 1 f1 q; M Q% m8 @equipment systems. 4 w M% S0 t( c: L& A# sSystem Operational / j3 A8 T1 y+ h6 mConcept 4 {: C s V i0 P" G; a+ @; nA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) ; @- Y; n8 A7 g& T* ~$ IThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and . ~6 D3 Z' S- kbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 9 q; u9 Z; X" i$ U2 i& nSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of : X/ j7 G) X7 l5 \8 y+ G) fposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 " p- q9 [0 t! ?& c) cSystem Program ; e+ R# }" G2 }3 @0 k3 fOffice (SPO) }" u/ b2 V# w. `The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition " |7 s4 G0 K3 O' vprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out : h7 c- q% \" t* |& fthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 1 ?1 s1 y, K( U6 W$ M3 {state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the ' b; R/ P( w/ |: J' Wverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under 1 M, K) S! h) x. Arealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 0 o: ]$ @$ { X! A( \2 J% ? Yand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. 7 j1 `! y$ ~! R! r1 PSystem . V. A$ a$ C& x: U3 ]Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and ) j$ @) {- W- s& @: d$ ^) u& nmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ! [' K! W3 m& H" x D3 k' Asystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements 9 j# O1 c! ?8 g1 O4 C8 R" ^% mAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System ; k6 Z- S ~4 o4 sConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 1 m! o4 b @' d9 t; _5 Hspecific system functional and performance requirements. System . D2 J: c) f. E% H5 `& u) W9 LRequirements ; O' ^6 V# r* N! [8 m! W# QReview (SRR) ! L% `( O5 L0 q7 L& n! EConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. $ [" H' c: i, G; G/ b: YDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. $ {1 M( Y* e9 xSystem Security W# K( ~" c$ V% hEngineering (SSE) $ K: A: l2 f5 f7 w: yAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 9 h) R* W0 m( `2 g& sprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 2 f" R( s+ G, B \* P; panalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security Engineering % a- R9 q/ F; Z% @+ W: KManagement Program & s3 k% O4 R2 Z9 g/ i- c(SSEMP) 0 e- l: _ R& N* p1 xThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical ( v8 @+ i$ P& k5 {8 _' W3 I" \& pachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the , q2 j$ l; T9 n7 E$ o* Edefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the $ L& S5 P: [9 g+ Jresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security , m7 E! j& Y0 f3 P P% sManagement ; n* z+ |3 ~# O/ gPlan (SSMP) 8 d \4 G# |1 G" sA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, % o9 K. s$ x1 x8 X( ~4 xmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 4 W0 \! `' G/ z! g- X' u3 G9 d* ]other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems Engineering 6 \( w; z# P _) cAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle : ] `( ~0 J3 C/ C7 V( g f6 P$ k9 Hbalanced set of system product and process solutions. : { t- b/ |- eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems / q5 b9 Z' Z7 U; [! pEngineering 9 E1 n3 y! D7 T; X& K- F5 IManagement Plan (SEMP) 1 ?7 m4 }1 ^6 o+ K( CThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures % U4 ]- `2 ^ X2 t4 y. [development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) : c9 \0 t/ f7 z5 V) bKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test 2 m) f, M" N! S0 Q3 k% u( dIntegration and 2 f3 X2 ?2 w/ M: ^Coordination 5 J/ V2 g- P+ @/ I8 g$ O) ?The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat 9 n1 E: n3 Y; L: ?. t; A# RAssessment # r) \2 u9 d! s: |6 XReport (STAR) . R! G7 x" F! z6 [% KRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a # s" p) M; ~& S/ E) oService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency " _- V% N1 L+ X6 Y% t1 pand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued : U" L! l" N8 { ^Asset ( o9 f1 t$ y6 b! X, [% W" n# WA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. ) M# r0 N$ X: F& r! x% _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ u: u* ?: i& U5 _288 8 \2 `! W4 b4 t" O, ^T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. 9 w! N$ m5 y# |( Y) W; R Q" s! `T&T Transportation and Transportability. 2 |/ @+ d8 I$ g: bT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 4 H$ B% X7 ^( ^2 F4 d& Q" F: nT 2 Technology Transfer. T 2 E Technical Training Equipment. ( x, x7 P; i5 J! YTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. & i* S' g# s$ @& CTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 6 E) J- o- z# E& W$ vTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 8 f# c1 h, B+ L/ U$ j& w: CTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. + |- d5 Q' V, A4 g2 b5 \- nTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. , d( w, t- X2 _- D) eTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 1 v% O- l' C: v7 PTACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 8 {0 m1 l: ~& D6 [: ^* O- {# h& yTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). + e% v* i1 f4 PTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. ) A ]* w, |/ A, E2 F* YTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. : k2 ]/ B8 V0 PTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). # |+ M( q% S+ ?& TTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. * |* S6 `! [1 C- V) S7 w2 fTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 1 e9 T* @! c5 Y# QTACSAT Tactical Satellite. 9 n) N0 R) M/ ^# T) Y0 v W0 iTACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air ( Z: ~# w$ {. P/ t5 y: JDoctrine 7 a p7 z/ N2 Q; hFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air ! @- k/ W3 [" |2 `power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 7 V n% s) X% r. C) J6 zTactical Air ; s& B4 M, v; nOperation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air Operations Center + ]4 p* ~# `; B" H! r. lA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control " I: L" B4 W: ~0 b$ [; GSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 5 R+ n1 w2 Z5 h+ N# {2 `defense operations in an assigned sector. + | w( ~& I, U7 e2 JTactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly ( e6 l7 c! Q) `+ L7 [assist land or maritime operations. , o7 G/ e( ^8 I, j# |5 tTactical Area of , l/ s; y4 \; T7 f/ CResponsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the + n: { @( x7 c5 Tcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. ( i7 x% y7 D5 q N! @& B9 b8 c9 mTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) ( `* J; |. ~0 I0 o3 dA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. 5 D4 }2 a3 A1 b4 L! u( wTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates . l. [6 a* c D8 Q0 Meach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. : _+ {8 F! W; K& gTactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. ; v3 \; R: ? ~$ e% P5 e7 xTactical Operations Area (TOA) # r0 b9 Y3 E+ I9 c& }8 e8 x# pThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. * I6 a* r7 y! }" I. R3 Z9 d( j9 w3 X; GTactical 3 b6 n( K9 r0 |/ @& NOperations Center (TOC) 5 a% ?+ U+ B$ W ~& t) ~A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning & y' s, f( ]( ?# t, C(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. - [& f1 _$ c$ b1 y, T2 K(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. " L. U3 T4 G+ K- k8 ETactical Warning/Attack : [7 A7 J( s* J/ u! G) [0 y9 r& m2 cAssessment $ @( J; F2 u- z(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. + K" m, s4 ]: D5 z' ]4 kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 - ~# S$ }& ~ w) _9 ]7 Q- Y8 `6 p3 QTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. $ C b( ?! R* X* c7 G(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. - i6 m& C4 ?0 d% H( _! Y& wTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 1 o9 }& O8 k" D8 q; F0 RTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 1 O) R9 P9 @# h8 p+ Z. u3 r. W( _TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” - H% W. t. A z- l a b+ iTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. + k8 m! j- K8 I' [/ }! Y5 QTADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. - ?% r6 A) ^2 ^' R+ YTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. , h; c A5 \3 ~* W" b4 R' o" @TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. 1 M! c! X6 S" F5 M; }1 FTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. : C2 o0 }, d! U8 _- dTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation 2 u* l k7 g0 M2 ~+ q4 VThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a + ~8 w6 s" y; z h ]result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. 7 J; h$ G% ]0 j/ W# iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. " J4 a! M8 z" Y6 D$ nTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 4 J% [/ H* @2 S. c; d- q8 OTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. 8 I) U8 e# j$ l$ `6 Q. v(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 6 P. \, I# w% ] H7 Z' [; N9 }Target , Q& @" y% Z; T# U; oAcquisition ( p4 q/ j$ O, `The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 8 s1 T$ O! [3 s7 ? p* oregion of a sensing system. ( A0 H$ p$ X# z N5 {8 S' P1 [Target Classification * V' n+ g. [8 B; \0 b: T( F' {and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, $ g4 Z2 ~2 Q' S4 B) O& k1 Idiscrimination, and intelligence data. , s: e) n3 Q- w4 r3 ?4 z+ X0 ?Target Discrimination - s( ]6 z' D7 K( ~7 @3 VThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one : ^5 n, l! d- b% Mtarget when multiple targets are present. 9 J$ G: F, w y$ b, ^" \9 o4 X. FTarget Object Map (TOM) 4 U9 B- x+ H7 bA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and # G. E& }7 B4 t% }other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 9 ] ^7 c$ L4 m# l& _$ o9 D. rtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 4 `6 Q( Q! F+ u: _) ?" W" ~passage of a ship or sweep. 4 o7 J/ E! Y- N+ L" F7 |* eTarget System ) X$ Y& Y+ ^2 n! ~, I' l% J+ YRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 6 {* c# M: i3 d/ M' T0 GProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target 7 A7 ]2 \! V: m8 K& }& Srequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. + Z# u8 K* N& v( C7 e/ UProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. 7 n8 \7 Q7 G( ?9 ATasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) & C6 b" j' a1 N9 c) d. t% P3 {; Xengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. 9 b/ W, l' E' [4 C! ]TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. ; e: Z+ G/ v. P( WTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. 0 [ d. S/ E3 F6 k2 m* b( NTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ K, i, h; `3 X- _292 1 y- s4 @' p" X" j: q3 w$ `+ xTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. 1 H. H! ]/ a m; L: f# ~' S% mTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. 7 R2 [. ~) r; s$ y, y& vTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. & Q3 v! a9 |1 M( M4 ? JTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. $ x- o" Q2 y! o: yTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. / D1 ~9 K0 `+ Q2 w; W2 D yTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. ( K2 i8 Q& [; |; O+ yTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 7 z$ l) I4 X8 \" P2 ~TBN To be Negotiated. ; z q$ \3 S* W. I J2 ZTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). $ m8 V: D5 r6 z3 p1 Y(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled 3 j% w! i. V: C: X [. 0 a3 t& Z8 C" V( q9 qTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. 1 z n! z. u9 a$ Y4 a' ^TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 8 t0 i! y1 U/ R3 J; w% O8 q( _( t3 aTCE Three Color Experiment. , J; ~/ D' E! r( mTCF Tactical Combat Force. - y8 ]' p; H/ R: ^" aTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 3 D5 b/ c8 P# J9 U" a/ e @5 R8 x! CTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD : {+ R/ X! F5 m1 y2 d8 j5 [Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. 1 p! m8 x& H2 D* ^(3) Technical Director. 8 ?3 A' ?0 _% t6 x(4) Training Device + I# }- A/ l# g; j: g% yTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. 7 q# `( X% w2 N0 Z+ i: BTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. . X4 A. d' C0 A b$ iTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. / e: \8 [% S% G2 W( W" e5 \0 oTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 - S4 ]1 i; w0 A& J7 [4 oTDBM Track Data Base Manager. 8 D$ |/ J( D& D) V% fTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). / ^) X2 `- f: j; {8 ^, s& CTDCC Test Data Collection Center. ; Q; ]. K: Z+ J4 DTDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. 3 w4 [ D9 U" g' N+ m; N* n* UTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. $ H9 T3 s, n6 M$ H. h4 N- XTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 2 C7 p1 A) F: a! C+ DTDP (1) Technical Data Package. , Q0 _* m" a" d" V(2) Test Design Package. + T h3 |/ t5 `% Y9 r/ Z( J(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. & }# m3 G) Y3 |/ P8 ]+ UTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 7 N+ |( H1 X1 x I) `7 YTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 0 R. D7 u% c2 V gTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. % s: f# I( _. m& v+ l* hTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). " r$ n e) |6 u4 c" BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! V1 E2 p* X. O( P/ @6 `294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as : i% h/ f: V" _* ~$ \manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not $ a8 ^0 D5 D' U& ]; u! ]technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. % r0 M; f: ?6 R8 m6 b2 s0 vAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract 9 t; B8 @0 C- P- W3 `* Xadministration. # W r3 x% e& g Q! vTechnical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition ! a x, Y$ n) U# R* ]9 n E' {strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, % S$ [4 y1 I) a% i: J$ rassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation # b. K3 D. N0 K& m' `) bThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to " u2 V' e4 Q5 U2 R) q$ Rdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 2 `2 Y1 ~. e0 qthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives . j Z2 X Q9 n2 S: K9 M5 \The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available ! ]$ l; m& P) c( }- b% A7 yfor stating binding technical requirements. 2 L( {9 T4 W6 G6 I# e+ bTechnical ( Z; r& ^! R, z( P/ LObjectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. 0 j' @* y! ]& V0 C4 x2 h- Q8 ]* cTechnical & g6 m1 @1 A8 X+ _2 q; v/ C/ g4 MParameters (TPs) & A6 J5 |9 J6 \2 D$ _% Q7 LA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. : n! @* A7 l! o" |Technical 5 I x; T6 b& e& a) hPerformance Measurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 0 _3 P9 M# f' z V7 v' z) w/ Vbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 4 ^ a7 }& w) E/ bparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures . Q$ j- I/ a9 ]" xdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product ! d! C) `* o- B/ L1 x4 d7 ~; Welement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these : y! ]) i' u( W4 ~ y% Q& @' C- m# wdifferences on system effectiveness. 8 m. V% P' L: X, [7 Q$ {3 N& ITechnical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. , P; d4 \" Z: Y4 N: p4 c: cTechnical : v l% y p$ i- {$ p7 MSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or & a$ }2 u# n- t# i. C4 [4 q f t6 Q& f9 remanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise ; j. S9 n3 X6 R# O( j- E% ftargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. ) e; Q* I( Y$ X( b* d$ fTechnology " p" Q9 u) e7 w5 M% `( j) h4 fExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management ) A3 O( f" o1 c$ G0 X# sresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. Technology 1 n7 ^( X( G* pProgram Description * ?. r5 g! x! _' g. B H; zThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical " X8 `) _! h* U6 w% U6 o1 `supporting technology. $ U3 ^- V" [+ H$ r. LTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 3 d# T# e' x; y& x) o1 S- H+ O. \# ITED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. - s% F7 q- H: \4 `$ bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. " b. M6 E3 P8 QTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, 6 r$ w2 f6 f% G: v' N: s0 C- p& nTracking, and Command (TT&C) ; N& [7 u% X; F z, ] V3 a& b) t+ v; DFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and ( _4 B' {8 U" Q, T& K- _status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a , ?+ Q7 u% J, msequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit : ~ d3 q3 d4 l3 S2 x5 Emission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. ! X2 @0 p& U# P: @4 A7 g. ZTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. + a7 _9 M6 f" @0 N; ~7 g4 STEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. : q$ {1 u Q: J5 nTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term ; R" o5 ~+ t6 F7 w2 {% p"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 3 `: y3 R/ B8 r- u5 r" ATENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. . l( i+ t! I1 ]% {: s7 j! oTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense - q0 u% ~) |9 k U- Z+ p1 `Segment (TDS) $ k2 A6 g) ~1 @. e% VThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between ' |! M" G; g- E8 ~atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal " I$ r R6 x* W1 U+ i4 aGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor 5 A# }& x0 `) V v! fA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the $ h ?4 _. e1 A" Sterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 0 d& v$ S. a! y+ E) w& }. d& z! u& w+ yTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. ; i/ f; D1 A4 C7 u2 B0 P( BTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. ; [% K8 A5 W4 ~' FTES Tactical Event System. 3 U$ t4 D' ~- V4 G# TTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. : x* M/ I$ R; ~5 |: C# W2 bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system " @7 w$ v* g. g0 _( rhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 8 p" j/ a8 N! I! Pconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 6 ^8 P; p3 O% W: s/ yanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and + O" Y; a# w$ D' o% A" OEvaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production - [' @6 F8 f& b% }( SAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof * t1 J* m: Z2 K. c1 T1 Zmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, - R' N* u' b$ @1 e4 @7 l# eand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 1 r1 q0 U% @% Ior agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational ! T D: ]# I5 H+ @4 `(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 8 P2 _7 L! C% Q3 Y8 x7 Econducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 9 Q) c% Z2 m9 `& N" x' i2 R$ a& `environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 6 p1 c- }: r% \and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of % I5 n4 J: e! g0 T; `deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and / A$ e8 I- B" NEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) - [5 I5 f& H) Q0 hAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 8 _5 Y1 h' h7 t! Pto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 5 H7 v6 U, x* ?1 Wprogresses. ( ]4 I1 I" ^4 u- H, W% Z! yTest and Evaluation Working Group 5 l- i3 Q: F1 m/ k0 A9 ?/ P(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, # u6 ^+ t1 V3 ^4 Z3 v& i7 I( Iplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 7 x- \3 _) ~. ?2 C& E5 dintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 1 ]' h3 y9 t! c$ aprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling . |) L, v2 {3 ~7 z Rproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. 4 p* X, W6 X; o. \3 zTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software ) ?& ?" w9 c) l. y! j2 k; }and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 9 |# m" p( S. O6 Q( M" Y8 oTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. / N o$ c* n; w' m4 uTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) 3 d' ?$ S% _9 LA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between " `* e) R7 E7 }" idevelopmental and operational testing. ( M7 }! W& S( K$ ]- \4 ~Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. ; [$ q: S8 H! L9 U0 R7 uThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, % I* N4 E$ A, v3 Itest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. , I( ?' t$ r7 P; b% GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target + b0 `8 C4 ?* rVehicle (TTV) 5 \! z2 a. k6 O+ `# }/ e" tSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for . E4 }* s3 r7 p9 ?SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 9 r J' t# o! a/ wTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. ' m2 U( |6 Y6 ATEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). . x* F2 T; D) Q5 `/ t9 P% ZTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. $ ]9 J; Y; G( H7 A$ LTFC Tactical Fusion Center. : E6 k \# V; X3 Y" hTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). $ U) q7 V( V; X0 b0 d S; G5 F7 s; GTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. % I; C8 W: A5 q# C }TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 4 }9 W, W! @7 }" pTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. , S0 d4 `$ ]5 j& _: PTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). ; e/ b8 {) a- T7 u# O' }TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). * o" [, o% s- i' W/ vTGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a : c8 z+ }$ C }/ Xcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 0 m( V7 A" {; V! k/ Q, PTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. ; L+ a4 K$ P( P5 o, t2 W; sTheater Ballistic & G$ E# W' O6 [. t$ P% E0 [Missile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 0 V: B, D' J/ z, ~! y1 B( wballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)