航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. + i" p8 h2 h0 A9 h OSTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. : n. M! ]2 W/ oSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. . M$ r$ ^6 G6 l8 ?# L1 GSTOM System Test Object Model. * U7 U1 Y0 f: J( P' K1 v* d; WStorage, Handling, and * h, U1 _( w5 n+ O* P7 aTransportation 9 W8 _ S* R% I- H) FEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 6 } q3 [3 B% S+ f/ s* E/ eduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. 2 o! J2 F% Q1 `; QStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s 2 w o, n8 M# B3 n K& |Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. ; w; ^/ ?) X B" K N2 n' a, mSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. # m. O3 b) A9 a2 RSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic % \. D4 J# M% }Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to & H. P/ a3 W% k! ]7 \nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. " \9 G d# D/ s3 `& v1 X3 A0 ZStrategic Defense : [/ c. `/ z3 y' T6 ~6 M6 wEmergency % d1 M/ w A* V: v4 R, X7 I" V8 ZDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. ) o& Y, X- Y3 x- l# DStrategic 1 g# I' n# K* [3 @/ J: BDefense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ! n3 a: P$ H" x" T1 s7 R2 [5 Sballistic missile defense system. 2 @; v# K3 n$ C0 [$ }& C% A, s/ ?5 ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! q" R: X. |8 O# a1 `280 , L7 c5 [: }" g: _( LStrategic Level of 9 _* P0 R$ s( V0 Y( N/ ?) @( ]War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or & f' a2 e5 B( \% z' Yalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific " w, N2 g% T2 U7 Q% n% ^5 _Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, 7 E1 u. g) D2 Q9 X* \8 x) M' Y/ A2 ^$ dFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve % Y6 e0 N% s- V8 KThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to / Z& |4 S2 [& e- Z1 r/ @% j5 Ustrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic / }9 `; D$ P. w N7 u RWarning " S) m( [' w# n" ?; hA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time 4 w9 h9 P6 k5 ]# R$ |, ^" AThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ) a0 b4 T |3 f. F3 qhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic % r7 F+ `8 n3 e3 g" N1 BWarning Post- 3 A* O5 z$ J' S" u1 gDecision Time 6 i- F- h9 U J% @) d! }: RThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of * `9 ]: D" c6 q, ]9 F' Jgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 4 G( o0 B7 v6 t* L$ {2 x, }warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the k) c! e1 p/ t6 b! onational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 6 w6 o C- v) Y5 H4 l( R5 Ythe pre-decision period. Strategic / L( }' z: D4 |1 Q. cWarning Pre- * ]/ B( p. C/ KDecision Time 6 ^: A3 B5 I/ x+ O \0 N( T% TThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a ! h4 q& Z1 O' W6 Z1 Fdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 2 j/ W- @2 {& K( FSTREAD Standard TRE Display. * B3 B4 h( V% v( o' n4 k7 d/ sSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured # |8 `9 x+ P- @+ RAttack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely # p( v' @* i( P8 i. ^8 M, ?: ytimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design , T; U# f4 D$ z, B* _A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules * T8 X; r( z5 L2 [0 T- R% G; r) mbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program - V9 R. A5 k. j5 c* g+ xA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 6 V! N; P5 y- A3 Minstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. * L3 |; ?) R$ E/ fSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. ; f, B. Q$ ]. T. K5 Z; FSTS See Space Transportation System. ) w- J( u' Z: K3 r! i0 ASTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 4 J4 g E' t5 L1 L& e+ `STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. ! r" O8 m; p% D( x1 L) L, w9 XSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. , r, G, Q- ~8 l- O7 BSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. 5 r9 [4 r, v) e& b' GSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. ( C/ f& `* N% h J2 XSubject Security 1 {: B7 j, s; F$ @- [$ X% X. tLevel 3 |& ?$ ]% O6 ?A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. / x# o9 ?! Y8 W5 ^2 _$ d; ZSubmarine- ) `, V" q" w" x1 NLaunched ; }/ d- D/ A5 O* A8 y' N2 B2 _$ n* ZBallistic Missile (SLBM) , ~5 n4 G3 O a8 w# O6 ?. e: uA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive 1 _& ?) w, b" o' B7 k/ q9 xDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. " p+ c: N) d! F' _( D: ]2 X, \SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). 0 g/ a! n7 C% a& h0 ^Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. ; W. a6 \4 ^9 h$ i1 g4 O. JSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in ( j+ C" p, r+ |8 ]+ E; B5 e* da single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, 0 [$ _$ F! P/ G/ Nthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 1 o1 @; p% @- l6 i9 z& Osuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 7 i4 l5 M0 Q4 P* I6 H# O282 . q6 q/ X, x+ {# n, a0 NSuperradiant 4 H& m8 u n J; p3 R; nLaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 9 V& a) \/ M/ [: W& y; wrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional $ p% ]- @5 ^+ i5 I0 Elasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser , G4 o) c0 l, ]4 R! b( A5 z* m$ ibeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 7 F7 N& G/ J0 X6 eSupervisory Programs 9 R3 K m- _% NComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and & ]2 h" s" V* Ucontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. + j9 L; C! Y2 S) ]Supplemental ! L1 Z% U) z" ^. r: |1 i) Z7 K" N3 MAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment 0 h2 b! w! l7 N3 H" ~All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 1 v7 J H4 N' v' D& Itools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ' g' w3 z0 W/ xprotection equipment). 2 r- B" n9 |) c+ Q* y) Q0 E$ [9 gSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 6 [0 Y8 \' _" u9 O% M; \2 Eadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 7 I5 s1 i3 ]: z$ {0 [example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. % n# `1 ]. Z! T/ mSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 8 M+ X* C+ I( C9 J0 G: Z6 ?: fbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. ' _. a+ W+ ^# D% }: V2 BSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. 1 C* g# a( N* l2 |6 ~! x$ K. H5 P! FSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess j4 [, K v* m7 g, p7 } Xproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. [$ x* h5 t& R5 F0 v: QSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, + z- A( E" i: G" qand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response ! ]2 x0 F' v5 x v1 ?, A. zoptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, u6 v: ]% p0 i1 I5 ~and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites , Y6 {# N, ]7 I0 C7 b- R$ pand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 7 Q j+ i' y& S" b" ^% OSurveillance System ; y; P/ ^& ]; D b3 R* \ |& wConfiguration 7 k6 S( c7 L* oThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated % [& T, Y: y* j* Bin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 1 ~+ `8 v, a4 h: \1 {Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring ) l/ j5 Q: x6 d! HCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 0 w: g; K8 k7 D% r: XSUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. 3 y/ n U% @7 v p$ C) U' nSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. " G% i' s/ z ?; _6 B: USWG Scenario Working Group. / X h! z7 |; a' Z5 j1 a8 ?0 RSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. ; [$ d8 M5 r, h! e! c/ ^SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 0 D7 S. ~2 j: ~8 ]SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. * u0 n: Q1 w7 \6 U6 p' P9 R0 }. uSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. ! l! ]* H7 J) v7 WSynthetic . q' ]; l. V0 B. o P, tAperture Radar " o) |# B, Y: K H; w! k(SAR) 1 v# \& K2 c7 m& B* X! P" w' |" ?A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance - V" \- j7 m' _5 Ibetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's , ^: W) P: L3 @6 w" m2 Nsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal : u& G/ h( V: qemitted by the radar transmitter. ( Z; \7 B2 K0 T+ u# g; z% \SYS System. " ^0 \2 w6 Z, P! P8 USys C/O System Check Out. 3 G# z& O* T$ Q: T7 l+ i5 A8 pSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ; I3 S* Q$ e7 S( M284 3 f8 I: m0 \+ W' v/ I4 X3 _( JSYSCOM Systems Command. ! ^3 z8 Y p6 [2 m5 o+ z, ESystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, ( f- p: d G1 m2 Y& k0 C$ rdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, " f/ W' F N8 e5 w" Z* g7 a; J6 W$ yand delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System % j6 N d V9 R1 \8 Q vActivation 2 z1 T8 [' E0 C, x7 pThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System : c; o' a- K4 q' v, N" i8 `Control. System Architecture System Capability 4 p( i$ H& o2 TSpecification (SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system . s o7 }7 k3 u- z' Sarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 7 S. f2 ]/ r' R* `environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 5 ~: c, X/ T, uelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional . v5 ?" s5 d) m9 Tspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among - F8 l+ I& C4 v7 Othe elements of the BMDS. System Center 5 N Y/ Q* ^) `5 y# H' H% {(SC) 3 J5 o& i, e% p. f! yA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ) a3 p# {+ [9 H' @equipment in CMAFB. - X( B) z& g0 _System Concept Paper (SCP) & f& W; B0 ?4 R4 q7 AOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 3 M. u) B1 A" y5 \6 Yconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition , B& Y1 X, T0 w3 P9 Ystrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 3 E g( @: f( i. A4 f0 kdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 3 u, i+ ?# ?" qConfiguration Control Board 1 x+ t. S; n# ?2 H1 w3 p(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. |# d& y3 ^ f: NSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and & Q6 U9 [! O3 w) o- ?3 Ncomputer systems. . n0 z$ r8 s( K, T. [System-Critical $ L6 f/ S8 r3 g o+ [: Z TFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. 6 ?! D; e% f* r- xSystem Definition Review (SDR) ' o( G6 U% S a# ^* h! `# XThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the $ }. }3 D& ^5 hsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, $ S7 c3 i7 p q% d8 Z* v: qfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System 8 P9 f: X* o2 C4 P; gDeployment : W* @6 N- K) B BDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : C( F: U( x7 [: x285 - x8 J* }. N8 O" F. kSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. / h1 c8 }, G5 {7 n+ i& F(2) The result of the system design process. * d. l D5 s9 sSystem Design Concept / H2 U- f* j d0 e$ H6 EAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design 3 }( f' M( z5 E$ z! r; A1 r! D/ [Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with 1 [& i6 i6 w+ e; s7 pthe allocated technical requirements. # V4 O. K9 @6 |5 H# ^6 B+ WSystem * a/ [! e% J9 E j' D BEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. 2 U6 C( p4 e+ c/ d$ B2 FSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) 3 |4 }0 {5 J. d9 d/ i' ]2 ~The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 8 m3 I; ]% n0 ^( z5 _1 RExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 6 ]- a9 B( Q) E0 D0 `# }Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and ! P1 `3 W1 e& v2 @' o# ^, yassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide ) z( Y4 n- N( a9 @" \significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to + q# Z2 p2 u0 U- V+ Vachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 9 n+ O: M, e2 T. f+ p" Pthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System + |* ]! q: N4 @0 v! B2 NGenerated Electromagnetic $ B# T0 J% `2 Q& o7 E: W7 ~Pulse (SGEMP) 0 a* `4 W" [6 L, ETransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local & ~* Y! n: C6 ^1 `fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the ) f# v. t7 R+ I& ~& lobject in order to produce charge equalization. 0 b! z7 i1 `! R0 VSystem ; b I& o" {8 V% u* i& ? o& a8 Q- NIntegration Test 2 ?8 A* u8 g2 Q/ L; F) o BA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, : z$ L# T5 ^: e3 F% Y4 d. Csensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 3 l! Q( N: J3 C+ F2 o* Uequipment systems. ) ^9 t5 r' t" `System Operational - p- \3 {3 z& X: s3 } DConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 1 \' H4 E5 O' R# edeployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and I9 L& u3 @3 K! R3 y2 S+ ]battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic % ?. u0 w4 C, `' ABMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 9 v3 p2 I) c2 m0 B* {( _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program Office (SPO) 3 G& e q# B& s0 b% MThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 1 F6 i1 k4 F; a, F" _9 }" |8 xReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority 6 Y5 s; r+ w4 U" e, ~ Y- jalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational t1 y6 y. H0 R* q2 f+ H+ ~state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the ' P, _3 l7 r8 n; |$ N) o; G: Icontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under 6 p! C: s" }8 @+ u" Crealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions * z3 K2 X) T! \2 rnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 1 E3 Z4 v- m& o8 jhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. * O0 e- H6 t" k3 z& F! z* jSystem Readiness Objective # N& ~/ u* V5 ` {1 [* I) g/ qA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a : C; l6 t0 c# N6 D/ ispecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and ( H& W# D% d2 S7 Gmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements Analysis (SRA) 6 A, I% e7 a, ]! Z( h7 O3 SAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the # }- \1 i3 Z) m0 ~( c* cdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering / F7 i9 }0 [1 J, |# x(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering ) A/ s1 x4 ~. G$ T9 hprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and # |5 `' c. J7 A6 M0 Y& Qanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 6 I: n* @' `; r$ W" Nsecurity threats. " h! s+ u/ ]* g% ySystem Security Engineering Management Program (SSEMP) + u1 o+ Y4 U& b) n4 f' T* GThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE 8 M: u( j" J# r- Z3 E3 gprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security Management Plan (SSMP) - p8 U& T; Z) V4 V- lA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. ( V2 y0 Y1 D8 P8 G* {5 H' U B0 NSystems 5 U4 d1 H* m! R( W- {/ FEngineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S - r; }( t0 K* \) v/ [( K8 u' H287 ( Q) J/ r6 D" o6 V) b' fSystems % K5 a% |! N9 [! N! BEngineering Management % j" {/ A( M' y n8 m2 {" n. I7 \3 CPlan (SEMP) 3 H- j1 T/ w9 m& M5 Y7 t7 c4 AThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures $ @ ]" m% g+ Rdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) . `2 f; r* W: Q- M; O; O6 q9 e$ J9 LKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and . x* p+ r/ t+ x0 I! rCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. / D4 H0 s( U" ~8 c* ^+ c# K" C+ ~( s0 ]System Threat Assessment - w/ q9 U7 U/ V: Z/ n; FReport (STAR) / }! D- \3 y! f* u/ jRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a - D! K7 [$ P& [# a! j' ^* NService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. $ h6 ~3 D; @! uSystem-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to ! O% H$ B0 Q+ _4 Gthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. + o; G( H# A! GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. - @1 y* P5 J0 L: p, e. h5 bT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. $ i; m6 o2 A9 p) w. ~" ]2 r* gT-MACH Trusted MACH. 3 N: p: X. T* b" s0 d% D2 q8 bT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. 9 \, w% t% a3 u1 }T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). & a# k7 [% U3 H: l# e% ~$ nT , Y& T, [3 n& L: |& }/ t' R2 B+ O& @3 o' JTechnology Transfer. % u/ I7 G" A0 u3 l2 {1 FT - c* S2 F9 X3 a {% U$ H0 Z2 , c! o: ~* T9 c& y8 t: vE Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. " H7 x! L6 ~# { R3 d5 I; r% h+ E! A6 ?TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. ! S, H, r! v8 [3 S' tTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. " p4 J ?/ Q6 _2 \2 J# s& BTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 2 F! T+ I: n% \8 J2 nTACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. ) e$ m' g: J6 t# w7 yTACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). ' k9 ~1 v6 M% }; \TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 5 V, t. ~2 o! D; H3 ]TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. % u# T; w X* r$ \; {& GTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. 8 p5 ~' j* \; D1 I6 u: u! N; P2 kTACS Theater Air Control System. & }' \8 T4 l; `3 g6 wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air 1 `/ A. v% w+ U$ T! IDoctrine f7 Y' J/ a3 p6 SFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air ) \( D2 G; R" c# L8 w- [7 R: ZOperation ( }) F) e9 l8 }7 C- S8 \An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 6 a7 l; }, p. @. J/ P1 ]9 ?ground or naval forces. Tactical Air ' d6 y' X' O9 z) c- K0 @% bOperations Center / A; f8 m0 g" UA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air 9 d/ W; `! ?# Y, s0 n- {! P9 JSupport $ }* D4 W# m$ g w4 ]2 u" oAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. 0 [1 E* m/ l% oTactical Area of . U# z* O6 x: M, S0 `Responsibility - {. l! e5 W! z7 f. _(TAOR) ! [5 {+ ]2 r+ C. SA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the % c( C" O' g; Y% Ecommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic 1 ?* L& @. G9 f. vMissile (TBM) 1 k0 z0 m* B+ ]' n* JA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. 4 g2 p( ^3 x/ N! r, t8 D/ y, ZTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. - {! H. O# a9 o4 b. q2 Z# \! lTactical Data ! m. w/ l' T* mInformation link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates / `3 |" c$ M4 Y& u& ueach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. $ }3 M* `% H4 \+ J# l* q1 {( kThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 3 n0 T1 m+ f# W3 H+ wWar The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical 7 A* @; X9 F0 p' EOperations Area (TOA) $ J! r7 A1 W2 |7 b8 kThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations : I. H0 {0 J4 n& E3 c* ?9 \" i5 k4 k0 varea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical ! e$ F P8 ?. M. L* X1 ROperations Center (TOC) ! k% l9 C+ }7 ^9 p* e. t) c+ HA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning . n }5 l! @( b: t- t! k: ](TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. & G; k$ e1 q( P" {- x/ ~: ^3 u(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command & j) J# r. F$ `' E" I. Gcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type J7 `4 M; a% q8 |and size, country under attack, and event time. F% H0 _" U; C5 P0 Z; e- k; KTactical Warning/Attack Assessment 7 g( @+ x5 Z% p1 G% s" t(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack 5 V$ Q% [0 X3 u1 ?' ^Assessment. 9 `& O3 t; w7 f2 |- c) ]9 v& ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ; y; {$ _0 p* p! g290 % A' V1 p6 `3 ~" T9 `& p( mTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 5 R( h* n7 a) `# ~TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ' x( O" G1 R" uTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. : g6 H" K# S# f( _7 _5 s0 gTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. I# o# m9 Z# Z, S; gTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. 9 ]) w" K+ O3 v. K3 ITADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. & j8 \+ i% _( g+ kTADS Tactical Air Defense System. 0 n6 j* M5 u/ @/ S* O7 ~$ I, GTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. 3 }9 [* b4 i7 o% j1 x0 UTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. - v" m ~* ]* F2 }$ h/ H# y' N+ OTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. * i6 g; H4 k1 _/ ZTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ) {/ r3 i3 H8 ~# oTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector o; C3 x6 q1 Q5 f7 ^; R% @and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. % F, R$ i6 [' X4 ATAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. " J: |$ m) I5 @: aTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a " B. w, N1 g2 V# q5 g: xresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. : V! c4 B/ [: v+ zMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 % u/ [! `$ M z& t, eTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. , m+ X5 X7 g* x1 @TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. ( B2 B0 e' m# h) \$ STAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. 7 g7 r _ Q: a7 U- s8 UTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 9 V; e9 G+ f; S3 L8 MTarget Acquisition + N5 V5 D5 X: DThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target Y/ j1 ]! k. H$ _Classification $ P2 V) F* Y7 f1 ~% `and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target 6 _4 i8 X m" `Discrimination 9 f1 }% Y2 H5 B# DThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object Map (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and 8 l) [6 b& ^5 ]other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 4 m: W. j, b1 L: Htarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 7 N/ b; R: [+ Aidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 6 x/ x8 _% {5 O# }3 f0 t M' |$ v" T9 mpassage of a ship or sweep. Target System 7 T" D3 @$ T6 g, C- @Requirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD : }5 d6 c6 L" o/ t+ @, l, lProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) # [" @" R! o: P( A. C& @* eengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and ; \2 R$ Z' i/ V A8 ^% qrequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. " r5 m) S0 v9 ~1 K% OTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 K' v- H p* w- b* b0 q- G5 V292 " C0 j r% _% d6 v, DTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ! ?" t4 S4 }* c* gTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. ( A: V2 Y, H3 P! n5 bTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 1 P% r2 {' T7 R1 T$ H6 l' {TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. ( j0 Z( h, M% R i% J9 xTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. * `: Y' B0 x- D' ETBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). # D6 i& d, z [( n& s1 a(2) To Be Supplied. 3 Q7 j/ `( I/ T; S4 y(3) To Be Scheduled 7 c' ]. d& S f- l/ n- ^. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. p2 j% w; E2 |7 G- oTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. + J- Z7 {! G6 N. W! e# U4 V; pTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. & m- [% M! K% T k2 [TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. , \0 {$ Z; c+ wTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD @9 i. g( \7 XCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 5 p& v, ^1 c3 o: H(4) Training Device , \1 `- W. ]: H. p+ c. n$ `/ QTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. / h) _* o2 M9 Z/ v3 \2 L6 ^6 T" GTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. # H/ g1 J1 t( \9 O! C: Q# K! lTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. * a4 S& j e# f' ?$ M7 pTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 2 {$ b* ~$ z4 ITDCC Test Data Collection Center. $ S' t% j" L; t6 m: rTDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. # t- K6 g$ s2 C7 _$ H" q6 [9 fTDI Target Data Inventory. 3 R# m1 B, \# [/ \; n8 L1 DTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. ; l- Q, A, b3 E/ O0 @$ OTDM Time Division Multiplexed. 0 C8 H$ o) J! W) t' D% s+ oTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). 9 e5 j( {7 z$ k: i7 nTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 7 Y0 n' G- h3 x) M" z8 ITDOA Time Difference of Arrival. ( j) i3 w8 S9 |+ B( b) v RTDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. . ~# S$ x0 k8 h5 xTDR Terminal Defense Radar. - K# A* ~& T! y5 C" BTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. + f' ^' q' I0 I2 e9 RTDT Target Development Test. 5 U5 ~ n: E1 A9 H* C) U& l3 bTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. : y4 w: G# f& i7 S7 S* n5 f4 }TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. + u# ^- r# g( U) [1 XTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. - b u+ j. ]) N* K' M+ C0 d(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 3 {4 F. O5 S% f$ k gTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician . p+ T3 Q9 D6 r) s' {TECH Technical ' X) J3 ? X; E* PTECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). $ j n2 @; D& k0 h; V* s AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as - `: Q5 h4 Y; N; j3 b. ~manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. & {1 X5 o9 I$ H8 B0 XAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines ) a& @ J3 j( w* U g* G6 o+ [the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 9 J0 j1 j9 n( S8 m2 \performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality " |2 Q9 D, q6 eassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Z$ J+ |5 R$ i9 V) H% ?0 E- PEvaluation + |) n X- S9 B$ g0 VThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to 5 G# m& v* b# x- H& sdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical ( g d: U& ^) i( O2 QObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available : w5 c1 t0 R5 H1 ], r; z5 ofor stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & : W5 ^7 e4 C6 Y7 z! ]7 [, _Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) ( \# `0 Q3 Q: C2 vA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by - X/ }, u3 z1 v cmanagement. & Q; ]: R9 i! D( f: Z0 BTechnical ! U( x% P3 ~6 Y# kPerformance # i3 J* }# d: Q0 A& pMeasurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the p7 j7 Q7 F( A uvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 8 _+ E' k, l9 L& H: t2 b9 P6 zelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical 9 M t. O/ a: B: E, eSpecification % B8 G y1 z i8 i9 }* ZA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. $ V; T; W+ T' cTechnical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 9 K- ` ?5 Y1 Q, t" x7 a% Uemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise ( S* q# a% h/ T9 G& W8 rtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. : u- t! q4 A) G" \3 kTechnology L8 c) @& ^* X+ H2 f. ~; bExecuting Agent ) h) K% ^% q# q4 Z6 |* p4 t2 pThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management ! w( @; m5 M) N7 D+ d6 V, uresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing & a- x: o5 N" e C$ K, ]Agent. # ?2 _# X6 L% ]1 E; c/ hTechnology Program Description 0 s, B6 M/ Z- XThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 1 \. D2 L. D2 w' Q* b* c, msupporting technology. * g' |7 B+ v B4 W! q3 UTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. . a. [* k' A2 i8 v* fTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : t$ e' K/ z& {4 R295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. 1 W2 O: v, b! fTelemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) % y8 B* p3 D% b6 AFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and # v/ V' W4 Y: a/ M' Bstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. & M) m: V% A) e5 v/ Z! \Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 5 j; Y7 a3 M. S/ S y) v9 vTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. + P2 ]% c6 a5 o$ {. b; |TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of 5 e0 Y) l% l dcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. 4 F$ r3 [$ x% H( B% s UTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ( |5 q5 G" E/ O2 oTER Test and Evaluation Report & Z) j4 ?2 b9 D0 @0 D- @% tTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between & p1 d" S9 [' ?8 ^2 k! @/ _atmospheric reentry and impact. & b( k& J- ]7 c5 ?6 a1 N' RTerminal / U8 \; p4 l yGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 5 ^3 Z1 v4 |- P) P9 ~vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase , z% Y* v) u. PInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the & r, K7 I; E. B: Fterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) + e8 j5 B9 N. X1 Q5 CTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 1 _& v- c: z! _+ C3 L9 X" rTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. 7 b% t. q$ W/ s1 Q2 n& Q5 O3 x qTES Tactical Event System. ; h4 Q0 J/ D' t: p" ETESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 3 x. k) B/ Z- NTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 3 U. b2 ] t, xTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 9 }& j, O# I% s# o$ L2 t+ [consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. ) T G# g, ^- g& L/ oTest and Evaluation (T&E) ; h8 _9 q7 T1 e0 hProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production 6 a& ?; }* n- K* UAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical ' m( ]: {- B- U d% C9 vperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a , C9 u! V0 M0 [! S* _' Isystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational % q: v2 d2 D2 x1 d, }7 Z(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before - q! d& i: B; Jthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic / c/ x2 h3 x% R# I9 G- p: K1 oenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness ! s) n8 e0 @5 S9 z* z9 Dand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of ) H! C; @2 J+ |# J! p0 |deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation , ?3 N8 z8 y( JMaster Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. / B3 I, d% M1 C4 O. Z' yTest and - L# v, J& i# S! OEvaluation 9 Q+ f+ n' f7 Z; ^Working Group 4 g D1 Z3 `0 `( J* n(TEWG) ' e+ p9 F! @# GThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, * [# d( k+ z; b2 s. O! `7 Kplanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the 1 l$ d j; T. ^9 y5 g; s! J" BAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of , f8 c, X& O) Ntest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test x- G9 W5 G; M& l7 a( _+ R$ Nintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the ; h! [2 T( {- u# r, qprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling 7 z/ ?( H" E0 R& T$ Y3 Aproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 4 u8 I% ^) n2 G+ Z6 |related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ( n; Q; C! m4 R- V. TTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) # \1 s; M) b; dA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between ; q I+ ?% B. q: P0 J- Vdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, + @9 s1 U n$ J, B" ntest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 2 y/ c. j3 c% ~! X, lcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. ; [# k* K. U: H* v) W! VMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) % T2 D+ h$ W9 I, ySingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 3 k+ x+ ? m4 ESMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. 6 c' U0 }: t" F% U& GTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 5 k3 A$ |! ^( D$ WTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 7 \ f' h7 S0 ~5 D0 JTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). & u. J& T% D0 I+ c3 oTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 8 q3 ?/ W: m9 oTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 9 x; u2 B) m K% m- ^TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 2 a0 b4 I# J# A1 rcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. ( f, k5 m# F: _% k1 Y9 e& { wTheater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ( p9 I0 H! \( q* ^6 B0 I, J: vballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)