航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. . W/ `. K* N+ G( xSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. . R) @( j6 H7 V7 D4 w8 _STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 8 @$ {- z6 K% \8 m# {Handling, and ! F7 E& l% r. D# [Transportation # _ S, n& K& [7 g+ u7 w& pEnvironments 2 \# q8 j7 S% W% N) uThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 5 @1 P; Y' M2 ienvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 2 ?* ?- E q% E$ _, o- K, x; @. Pstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable " y1 L; d- |0 I9 b% \3 watmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 7 {8 T9 D. O) A0 [during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. & i6 r" p6 Z8 v! D- r0 I$ C9 zStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. 3 b1 j7 y8 a& s( }. H: G0 P& sSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). * Z D0 c5 L4 T: J V, X% H, ^& KSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. - Y( D3 G* G, T6 h% k( nSTRATCOM Strategic Command. , B1 ]' k; T: U5 h" ?Strategic % e' {$ i+ b H. w7 N CDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 2 t+ Q7 O+ O: U( Y8 Q. N% L5 d- `# mballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 2 g# G9 b# K* P4 w6 `2 bnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. * c3 t5 C6 y: a5 Y/ QStrategic % Q8 N$ [! `( Z/ Y4 MDefense 0 J1 G& h& ~, ` I* e0 \Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic ! N& v" W% Z4 W8 ]) i: i' zDefense System ' s3 Z: B% K: ~3 S(SDS) ! F7 i6 k! A f2 O n" }. TA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. 2 u. D1 K0 _/ h- b5 B0 V0 F8 ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 5 g3 V8 H0 A* v; B& PStrategic Level of War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or X/ y1 S- C: E7 E# ^3 nalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to , @: j+ n: T1 Q8 Saccomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces * {. m. d* y; x, p8 A; m% V# `/ ](SOF) ) X7 g" ~2 Y. _% kThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, 2 X$ R/ |! |" g# }- t# O2 B) ?the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 3 {0 A, E. i) ROperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, 5 i. r0 _( `+ i# Z" R+ y9 ~FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. ( _ ~5 N) z% @$ N. [Strategic Reserve ; i! b! j1 a& G# D6 G& TThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 2 z% {- ~9 F' v' N1 t; n" istrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. % |* m! J2 E4 Q6 A2 CStrategic * \" {1 d& k3 q# A: o/ z* t/ ^Warning ( U% _* d ^& K/ S/ Y' o& t7 U2 BA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 3 _7 U3 w x# O/ VStrategic 1 w" ]/ j3 Y$ ~; r& ~9 \Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of ) t% I2 m# O# |9 c0 W, tgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends ' O& d4 e! \9 \* m+ wwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic E* t" o7 j3 j& e0 [Warning Pre- $ w0 w3 W' E4 R6 X$ wDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 9 {$ V! E% S H _3 ?! {/ [5 h& u% s$ nSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). * S) q; G; ~8 QStructured 9 a; S2 O. [( Y; j& u0 d: N5 VAttack 0 q; n6 b2 B1 a5 t! F& AAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured # C# R" V r6 O- v* KDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data . i1 g5 J, t8 Zflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one & ^* E+ ~9 U3 C) B" L oentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 8 u" I* _) H' { l& ~8 @2 ~2 r( Ninstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 0 P4 R/ D4 `% Msequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. + a) F& u$ y8 i, qSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 0 ^ v0 k4 D: P" s1 e2 E" X2 FSTS See Space Transportation System. b7 \1 a5 l2 GSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ' X$ m1 C% ]7 t- `9 M(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). - n& I) O: V7 T$ xSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. . W9 z+ B. W2 _3 A, sSTW Strike Warfare. . o, f) {3 B) { t% sSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. ' s/ C! d) `# u6 f ?' lSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which 4 Q+ G( `( I7 P* h7 tis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. - F0 Z6 o. w( s4 YSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security % P1 j$ w% M2 E5 [ JLevel 5 n* ?1 d2 x& b" C& ^A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. " C M2 d" J6 D( f- OSubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile . F# c/ t3 y! r* A- M(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 3 a8 o7 u5 p7 Gmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function ! C4 T0 s2 P2 Fwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive 8 r/ T, F) w6 [' t! j- R Z( ~Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. + e& k% H w% o; H" tSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. ! ^% W |: _7 ?0 cSuccession of $ z/ d9 H: \8 S. ~0 y" RCommand 3 K0 D& C \, ~The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, ; E+ l* q! H* mbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 0 l# I9 Y- @* Tis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to 7 H* M1 m5 L3 Idecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 2 F3 B6 W! M( n1 S* d- g" v8 ^! MSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super " S) ? w5 [1 [# y0 Jradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. ' r5 f( [- ?+ Z- g$ z* a) UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 / B3 F3 _5 M+ Q& T& F7 HSuperradiant * n; O. q5 J7 }Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not ) [# \9 R9 n. b5 V: `( h/ n/ t. nrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser $ y, ~2 F. k( Z/ F) l1 Wbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric : R" ]) Q) U) v# C: m8 zor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 2 A: E! n4 h( s$ h! E/ {Supervisory Programs 6 V/ M* c# t$ V, fComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 1 G7 @0 G2 \& C9 \Supplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support 1 b& z* p- n# k0 ^4 }0 EEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 0 J( B# f) @: U0 y& i2 Zmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 8 t9 g# Z* y& L. X6 ]6 fmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and % g2 j- Y* J0 |. z+ sprotection equipment). Support Personnel $ I3 z4 Z+ d& _0 {Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly # w1 z! c9 M% \, wassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, # X) _( R! t9 \' u8 U- Q, X9 {. b2 Oadministrative support, and the like. , K) k' S* D# X, z/ w& ^+ CSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or ! n1 Q* c: w& W& Imobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. $ `- `$ I3 o( l9 o, ~8 pSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric ' r9 j5 b( A0 C* csensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance ! U( V f5 y8 V% ]$ i8 s6 B+ Q% \Requirements ' P) F6 W2 R4 h$ X( ?* pRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response , g* ?( a4 o U+ n# X" ]options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, / Z5 F, g$ y+ r# r0 U3 PSatellite and Missile 2 {; ^6 P' m$ N2 A, ?5 F8 b! sThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites , d/ p3 d5 @. E* R Z1 q8 K5 ~and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance 3 `& o/ a. L4 f* LSystem " ]( o3 t4 v' ~/ ]/ zConfiguration * [6 Y# _; F0 y; L5 P% }, E( rThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 1 E" j3 y$ `( b( ?; F( X/ Jin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 / J. s W/ n! D8 F. L$ rSurvivability Operating Modes , Q! H- P( ?2 kThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and & _- Y. t6 f0 @, u. X# O9 G9 y+ R& REnduring 9 }9 U( j0 \+ ~- r8 s' r" }# oCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 6 A6 g7 |' J3 Z j6 V7 F* n; _SUS Site Utilization Study. , J% `( C8 |) z. ESustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. * Q/ Q3 T; O; r: WSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating 4 t- E5 Z1 [. g4 c6 Q% p4 `band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. * c+ j1 c1 Z$ @+ P$ sSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. % s# @6 _ g" I/ ?SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to - f6 d# E' ~1 C/ T) }! L/ R- qone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar * M* h8 l# T+ e$ ], }! L6 \0 G; t(SAR) G; E2 Y( `( e" b2 d/ ^A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance " J1 ?/ k2 v( W% x: R7 ^0 a! O9 Q, Rbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for : V/ O5 T/ b& Q0 `( y+ J. `transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal ( ]1 u" E/ Z( aemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. + R1 V1 v5 S4 b; XSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. " @. A4 F, [ z( DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : a0 u+ `. Z4 h% f! U0 P284 . H# P" y- M: lSYSCOM Systems Command. " \4 a* y: q/ ISystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, & F* g R- Q* Q5 m" w3 J$ Odata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. 7 j' `: P5 \+ H' u: f(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 6 H" }# I0 p# i5 ]functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a * p. t* a8 \" ~0 w1 d4 Frequirement. , m* K9 b$ a2 v- Q3 f" WSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 1 b5 b: [& h( e0 a- v; Mimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System % Z* b! K5 t( `: m+ kControl. 1 A' \) i7 f' V2 h2 \: nSystem 0 y1 Z6 h& l. A4 B7 s0 J% o, U/ bArchitecture ) G: W E F* r5 |6 N z& wSystem ) C ]2 R; w) d9 jCapability Specification " q$ D/ m% U$ s3 w8 J8 a& r(SCS) . R# b6 L4 Y7 T5 d" B$ Q$ m PThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 0 w/ s; V% m( L; Z6 g+ oarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 2 [6 K, R1 f6 h+ E: D* F1 ?6 y4 Cenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. % w8 g! r& V+ j2 k7 V2 iSystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 8 g) r5 Q/ l2 T+ y) usensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition . Q4 A1 c8 b0 T& F2 ~5 Ustrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) ' `6 Y/ c9 `: H- XThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. x& f2 O( b( z# ^0 c& k) v5 p! q& h, _System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. : V* `' ]4 J3 ?9 Y; D5 n# NSystem-Critical ) [# c. k' K( j) f, G J" `+ y- ?Function # j2 [* r1 l+ ]' dA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's $ e6 g' @' W3 `0 v" hmission. System Definition + H2 `$ {, p. B' ~, E# i' ?Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 5 @% Q9 u$ r% X/ h' s6 zsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 4 |3 t9 M& y& S0 ~) P* V' Tfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 4 K3 J) C; B/ S0 K, g2 X5 Wimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 7 |, H9 t; w# k6 n/ ?detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, . T0 n* ^& o: E) a) N* _final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment / b' v K6 S; ^1 j8 e% Q; M# Z9 j. iDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. : E! C h; {1 I$ PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % A) A3 K. B% I! u2 M2 R285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy * g1 H% i+ H) x& l" jspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept * ~ V+ [" I( O; x+ B+ g( u8 dAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 4 V* {6 r+ U6 ~3 P3 ^1 f9 ioperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) / t, \1 T, M t$ B6 g' h, lEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with . K! R9 L: }) J! }the allocated technical requirements. System ! z1 K7 g7 W& ~. V6 L/ |Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set ) P3 v) Y3 f2 N& G# zof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and ! l: n, K2 v \% ncapability. System Evolution 5 B. u% j$ c7 O" I4 ~Plan (SEP) 8 g. ?2 c9 N5 p8 n; N5 j! N0 nThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS # `$ X8 ?* H- q- K3 ^% E3 Wcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 0 w5 Y& G2 X: A) o1 }9 | r2 |0 x( \% \Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and $ z+ u' T6 A T$ |! Nassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide ! j4 l+ F1 O- l Z8 Q5 nsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to # a+ f F3 q o* G# |achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share * y6 ]6 @, w) M; x1 \/ Sa set of common characteristics. System , _" ]# @2 A: S, ~; n8 m1 A, }! _7 AGenerated ) J2 m# t! j: Q5 w( ` ]Electromagnetic % E1 C1 d* S9 rPulse (SGEMP) ) e4 |% d2 _% ^! WTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the / b ]. }9 t1 q( e& z+ ]) d6 Rsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local - @' d) ]6 t0 o/ \. j3 ?fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. ( B& e4 S H% U+ u( d5 n7 k% o uSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks ( Y8 J. B5 u; M, \7 Land associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. System Operational " o; E% k- f8 Q: B" i9 n# cConcept 3 ^ l9 i M! D" _: \3 t' TA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, - N; o% j# p2 Vdeployment, and support of a system. System - q! k* E3 E9 n8 p. q! s5 I+ O* H* YOperation and Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and " f& t3 W- y( ^! L1 |: `battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). - C. y( {/ C) p7 ]( GSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic 6 [6 L$ i2 B# O: i6 YBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 5 k- u9 F4 t/ g6 Y7 z286 System Program 4 I0 m8 \/ P# JOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out + S2 `4 C9 V4 Nthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority # t: ~# G+ o! f* O7 I) w6 talong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 0 L5 ?1 [' j) l$ k2 nincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational ) f" s4 f- D+ M. K$ V* Qstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the " ?/ M/ d* {; a) Z% d3 _verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the ) M1 h$ U' u5 R/ Acontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions 0 p% J E0 [! w6 d2 E5 \necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, % @" b1 {1 S3 Phistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results " B& H$ a% N3 ^status reporting. System $ R9 t% X# x9 _! Q: q T% dReadiness - I4 c- i6 Q9 C8 u. U# x! F$ KObjective - P! w3 w. P$ i" }+ ^# W6 Z0 V9 SA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support # ^" ?1 e, F! E3 qsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 6 L1 ? J4 C7 |; tcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. ( P' n! W3 i# ]7 H* l1 aSystem ! E" [5 V7 _$ k8 B) C" wRequirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System + Q$ n+ r n0 X) l7 h- C1 q( mConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine - K* @! C5 d6 A' Pspecific system functional and performance requirements. - W& u6 `" E- h- n' l9 y3 TSystem Requirements 6 G& R) n/ A. `6 q1 {0 K+ FReview (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. 6 W1 f$ P& P( k6 o6 C) ^0 oDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 7 C. H6 R5 P% P+ z# P8 S' s7 w0 udegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering ! S; q( Z4 ^" c4 f! z(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks . N0 e- k7 ?2 ?: [- [; S" ^. a+ H6 Rassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security ! @6 P5 ^' C$ I0 s& ?/ rEngineering Management # b' G) P3 w4 K' s. E, B! G% EProgram Q3 D0 o: Y0 \ V7 L(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical - |" i" C4 S$ x( `- x$ [achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the * k. W3 Y& z+ \8 G: x! F% j. M4 Ndefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides $ _- E6 k. Q- tmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. # c% a" R* ` Z4 I) ]" ~System Security % p f+ g* V5 W+ KManagement ' V3 L5 Q B9 f! {9 j. B8 oPlan (SSMP) : ~) V1 p3 Y2 ?% }+ t; GA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with ' Z: }9 s5 B" k3 {$ i& @) F; u( tother program engineering, design and management activities, and related % I0 P! K7 C' bsystems. 5 Z9 G0 c) x/ ^3 h$ L# g/ c, M, z+ iSystems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. % T9 }1 S6 ~# N' o9 g( x8 C$ Z) dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S . |8 j3 @# Q* m287 % R. U6 c9 ^; K3 C/ ?9 d$ h- u. xSystems Engineering & @: `6 I% k8 `( SManagement / H8 g* G* s+ K9 WPlan (SEMP) 9 h+ g! i4 y: aThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) $ f/ r7 H ~: TIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) ' _7 o3 B" ]" u% S+ QKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and # u: [2 C6 @, {; J4 I+ P/ y4 yCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment Report (STAR) ' c3 `6 s: I/ ?) BRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when j8 ]2 I1 Y# B' S' @the threat changes significantly. / s1 i2 W* t: p4 Q3 @8 I5 R1 q( RSystem-Valued Asset - k9 A" m% A" f* HA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to % w$ X. n# D: A0 S8 vthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. 1 }- }! `* P3 mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. 0 e. l$ ]3 Q5 R5 ` F5 c* f: aT&E Test and Evaluation. 9 @/ x2 M; C! F; c- V& D mT&T Transportation and Transportability. 0 W9 k5 k& W1 m, g: T8 ^T-MACH Trusted MACH. 7 h) F) V0 \& i% O% CT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. 3 y0 k/ _" u' v% O- D+ cT $ ~ w4 I" k* |& h* M2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 9 _( A1 r/ R l- g# t& }TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. . g# T. y% D* Z2 k& _& b* q$ jTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. ; s3 }& A* h8 x% h" f- j# e% yTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). % x$ s. d7 }" N( v% oTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). " S- A+ i' z, ]. N8 [8 w9 {0 DTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ( _+ ^2 V. y2 oTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). ! I* \" h `; k1 @, zTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. $ H/ E, ~/ ^ r6 `2 `TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air ( h: U! J4 w, G8 N8 opower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 9 e1 @# N/ @! [( a }3 FTactical Air 6 D! S4 c. r4 p4 I1 d$ [( ^5 DOperation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air ! o* k6 d$ B' _: c: C z2 K5 SOperations 5 c8 K r( ?; sCenter : s4 U! R& X) b/ U! K4 _: k' ^# _/ [A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control 4 ^! m4 `. Z. w5 ZSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. 7 _0 @, a% M# l( ]; J pTactical Area of # d0 a8 u' l& RResponsibility (TAOR) - V3 {& h8 ]6 ]; x8 JA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 1 g! I7 Q% x+ |7 E" e! lcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic ( h% g% {. l* w) L' oMissile (TBM) 2 ~( Y2 ^* r& {7 W- R- T1 \2 LA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be / [4 R5 k+ M A, k- @employed within a continental theater of operations. " `! M3 S; ?/ P: aTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future " c; u. q7 N6 zdevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data / ]: i B; u$ U% {7 YInformation link + g3 U( \' c) I% v% O0 ?A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates * j& p) e# j6 Z/ g9 h0 T4 I* teach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War " X5 J* c; r& t4 X2 b" YThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 8 w3 Z. o- ~ K+ z: f$ Naccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. ( F! _" P# G( wTactical N9 B" P, w8 v7 i" AOperations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations : Q9 C3 H5 P: N9 x4 warea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission 8 {2 w/ s& O) S/ B4 Zaccomplishment. ; l; P& R2 N l. Y, ?) ?, m4 h cTactical Operations ( A+ X4 D3 ]: E+ FCenter (TOC) $ w7 |! D( `; }# z3 y/ [A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff 3 d( J# q. G7 B1 e& e, U# mconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. 8 l( {9 f, Y$ H3 P" R' bTactical Warning ' ^ ?% b' ~ ]; q(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an % _. W4 {2 \% M, x, e$ ^evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical 3 E$ W# E( J: f* |! H1 j$ pWarning/Attack / S, b" c/ h) D: E/ J. P* K2 @- NAssessment (TW/AA) ! e, t. h) l' t. [5 P5 ~A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 7 [) p5 A% j1 V1 B0 lTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 9 Q" c0 L# i& [, t7 N5 |TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. 7 Y [8 W4 X h& R+ o; {" i5 |5 G$ lTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. 3 _/ C! q5 ?) [6 v% B5 @4 R6 t3 m6 vTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. / [/ b( u4 w% Y( O! F( _- i# z) ~0 ]4 pTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” $ H: Y4 u% q* @1 C( Q; @6 [TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ! q. z' ?3 P& O2 l, q; L3 X( n$ GTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. + P7 n. D; L5 [# X5 y: S3 i; ETADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 2 _* m4 h u0 O1 D( s0 N% s5 OTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. $ F$ I8 _8 A7 J2 ZTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. 2 M; e$ R. v" W3 e' DTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ( p9 v6 J2 Y' UTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. & E, U2 o) l+ V _6 l* fTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. 1 e* u& z, e7 E0 f9 j$ u4 JTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. - B- ^' y0 C. \ E. X: g2 B# X1 ^, O; PTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). ) i+ E: j- @0 q- i, H) { A( _Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. ; b! f" S4 p8 S* }Tank . m8 Z3 Z _" I' oFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a . z* S% C4 X0 W5 M0 `result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. & ~5 A* I; W- u) I; a! o5 j( JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 4 I2 ?7 i, K. \! m4 t2 i6 GTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. ) g: W1 x& ?$ X# G' uTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. - d* r5 B) r1 q6 } \' MTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. : v. h d% j {6 j8 v" sTarget Acquisition % j$ w5 R& t' g6 r" o- {* \+ y; T7 UThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, ' z' r2 j% A o5 t* Q& ]( e8 ndiscrimination, and intelligence data. 5 B$ ]5 y* P7 D) [: N' }& q3 MTarget Discrimination ( v/ I- c6 W: h, t& V; G: V: SThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one / y& v; p. A5 ` ^5 v% vtarget when multiple targets are present. 9 E% A( C/ D$ D3 j2 u) W$ STarget Object + s6 c6 O/ u- F5 TMap (TOM) + m% l) W' v4 @0 u7 e$ E1 o! rA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. ' M# }9 u8 k. e0 i# pTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and " X' |. @; V( D7 U+ c2 c0 Aidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 1 s. |! M' e- k6 f9 H3 J- @% A' {passage of a ship or sweep. % }& y; u: z* P$ y3 ITarget System ) p. ]% s$ i- ]# e" ]( e2 aRequirements ' k0 p) P3 Z; n8 `& ]9 HDocument (TSRD) # Y H( z- t Y0 jBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD $ H( O/ ?* d' Q1 i9 C3 a- u7 jProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target m5 R; H9 q6 p4 s0 drequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. ! m" u. Y4 K' dTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 0 |) [4 o2 a, V8 u4 Dengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 7 W' p( o# s! I+ ^5 r4 r! c& Arequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. 0 Q% ], Y' I) E# W* b. ZTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. % j. c& O; v0 r8 X& KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * ` E# w6 Z5 l! F9 H2 H" Q292 / z0 X# x1 f2 W% E9 TTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. , i7 j, |3 n2 P7 `$ CTB Test Bed. ) P7 {: Z. J) B: N, n2 ZTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. + l5 U2 d9 M. b1 w" aTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. @! V; \% Q! r5 OTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. * e4 r( v6 `2 hTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 2 L% s% G/ @: j) c A(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . : _1 h- l" y, I& g) U8 ?5 L% b2 YTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. ' F& X; F% W# B/ YTCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. + X; E6 p: a- G0 U4 {' N/ o) [, oTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. 2 i4 N# b: Y' X/ ETCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. / }- G' a& a6 ~8 ?(2) Technical Data. 5 s7 X0 u/ s0 L(3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device $ G0 h+ A- }5 n X. I0 v' ?TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. % B, T" b; h" c1 uTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. / r& X1 t5 h9 m7 X, B, A7 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T - ^' j) E6 C- z! G! n7 L1 H- a293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. ' k( k! E7 j6 k! O; qTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. / j2 _7 r" x8 e1 z: D5 a' o(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). / ]7 D1 i# Y0 @4 R# r$ LTDCC Test Data Collection Center. " w, [' m% G- d/ G6 P) u& WTDD Target Detection Device. + V2 V! R& o4 D/ Z, \9 K1 n2 Z3 kTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. / N* @3 V% @ K, p5 G' \TDI Target Data Inventory. 8 v1 q# F m1 QTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. X3 G. X+ k l, a6 T: yTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). + J1 Q+ |; O- X2 l) X8 Z$ Y# lTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 1 P! j/ x# f; @TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. ; P; i+ c4 L+ v! q4 D4 ATDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 4 G# ~. H, g" H; W9 }TDU Target Data Update. % m% \& n2 J+ ^8 Y: Q9 b) sTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. ! b5 j, b) q9 t; I" t" H7 x(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. v6 @$ h% f [TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 7 t$ f: c1 Q; F$ \4 b5 i$ GTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T / s6 C# l0 p* f; B0 Z! f294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as ) N' |3 r% A7 `( t. `2 F6 Dmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not ! J. M5 F) K# D$ ]. |: ttechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract - ?$ C% I; M* T! U2 b8 `- oadministration. Technical Data Package (TDP) 9 T; Z- a9 q: Q; ]; ^/ G4 e4 qA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 5 v; B3 g% @% w+ H/ wassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality r) N2 q# @# E1 v, b0 ]) S" Hassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation , X( V7 C, E. Q& G" |The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to " J" j6 ^( j4 C% m' pdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 0 @& m; y8 V, a! TTechnical 4 L% K( m( u. h" P, H- H' cObjectives ) a- [1 Q$ o; n$ }The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available / h. {3 f: Q5 @6 gfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical + e9 i+ x% O: ]& g0 |Objectives & 9 k' P5 x) q0 FGoals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical ! U4 N$ l2 b# N$ @0 ^* n; EParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical 0 d# ]* k5 O9 `1 r. Q/ k" f( JPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk # e6 t0 S) K7 h8 Sanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 1 q7 Y% H+ s- m+ E1 O8 G6 n5 Rmanagement. Technical Performance ; A; X. c. O4 V/ n( i1 CMeasurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 9 c& q9 A; \7 s, i; rbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance ) `# j9 W- ^; m8 ^6 v1 ^parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures $ ?. g3 E% O3 cdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical ; K' r* e" ^3 R5 K6 `+ zSpecification ; e' t6 b7 E" _2 c" q' mA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. 0 }( U+ y# z& b: ?3 zTechnical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or : S" e% a- m+ J' M6 K( W/ Z) demanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. $ ^) F# N: g0 cTechnology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management " |, b) ^/ V2 {# d$ Y/ F6 Hresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing ' Y$ r9 U$ `& W$ jAgent. ! T' z# |5 h; T: V. l/ c8 bTechnology 5 b2 W6 t+ h0 G5 ZProgram ! x/ k: J9 u/ I8 ], @" BDescription m4 z+ S# ~- }/ NThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. $ Y3 u8 A Q5 @8 Q9 N2 d) UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : T; P+ l2 y9 V3 ]6 g" f, I3 r* c# h295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. ( M; a# ^$ Y+ I3 m* LTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. + c& E# c* d! WTelemetry, 7 _8 f ]( M8 c5 b" zTracking, and 9 Z7 e* V1 Z5 GCommand (TT&C) 0 Z+ ?0 A0 J; g' gFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ( ^! F5 j5 s1 X4 P: Q' q4 u! V8 {mission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the 4 L, j* R5 s; r3 A3 l' Xautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 3 l; n# b" w1 u; p3 hTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. ) V; T* Y" B/ J8 p6 d, T. N" UTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term / v6 a7 v7 q6 ?8 G. _" I9 V"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 4 c0 F3 u5 _' TTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. - Z ^$ z5 X5 I8 h6 @# K. l7 zTER Test and Evaluation Report % W5 I$ B# k) l' s9 S% T2 FTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. " s0 X' j1 W$ M. B, W4 E7 rTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ( m4 g7 s9 u1 N, H+ ?Terminal Defense + a' {0 g' X7 ^ H" i' VSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between " K5 y8 U! w/ }3 N6 ^atmospheric reentry and impact. 1 ]9 r# f2 L6 n6 ]8 T' {( r1 XTerminal ( k, n5 L) r' {' v$ a; kGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the $ R5 `& T1 |0 z" p; tvicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. " w9 ]1 t- e& l5 y/ ?( pTerminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. 4 U& {/ T9 ]+ r6 jTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. + S+ B/ V4 [; ?9 W' v& u0 C4 Y0 i& mTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 3 h8 e$ L# r" n3 \- R296 : X2 [) j+ [2 Z2 j1 O, TTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 2 L' `$ |8 P! r6 vhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, + |5 }- Q0 g0 L0 `* fanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. . C/ {! L9 A9 Z5 U0 e" A6 iTest and . u1 b; B) W) u4 s! O: `& nEvaluation (T&E) ; ? S0 b1 J+ o( y7 G- o5 T! uProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three N" @1 S4 Z& \! l/ D1 Jtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a . z3 P) r6 n0 rsystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel ) _: v# G7 y0 \5 Y! }' vrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 4 S5 T4 o0 Y! Y |! ?7 hor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 5 x. M( k: W; a4 {! U6 V(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test " z/ g1 a/ R, Nconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic ) h' r% R% f8 I( Z: ~environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 7 h) y4 N% S y2 A; U. Kand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation ) V9 y1 s+ s$ ~( a, [4 d! V T/ W) ^4 yMaster Plan & h# L5 q. [( _" _% Q(TEMP) " \ M1 Q! e; i7 x6 u9 oAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate / x6 q4 F+ ^5 B* A5 g+ a! o6 O n, Tobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 0 E* E' m6 n- eto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 7 E( w' l/ C) mprogresses. " `! q7 a, L; a) ?; x/ n7 T: TTest and 9 D7 R, }0 O9 Z- T( iEvaluation Working Group - C) r- ^- f6 P(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the ; j) n7 H+ ]6 ?- l( sAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of " g# o c# ~0 K9 D gtest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test , V P* X$ v! s$ i* jintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 7 G4 o& x9 ~) f7 J! uprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling ( k5 ]4 p: L, Y) x9 L& bproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and h9 V* W0 y8 ~0 T+ K$ ^7 q6 F z( Yrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals % X2 k/ J/ e& B% J; kwhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 1 x% ~1 G3 q/ ~+ g4 Gand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. & m* X& a/ l! `, lTest Integration - p7 D4 l% h+ n0 Z: rWorking Group (TIWG) 7 y& j; w, ^- rA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in 2 m5 q9 S9 @. g1 ]order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. ( o) X. w+ r3 T: dThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 4 l- u# e' L. `7 r( @9 N& {test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 4 [% A% t% U1 ~; ?" u* l1 acriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. w% t8 p7 x5 V& I/ t) O) i7 AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T % `9 w$ X( K, l0 l: P9 t$ E297 Test Target $ {0 E" T: Q; n' _/ G" u: k) V4 T/ zVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 8 M: h6 j9 t# A3 h9 K, iTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 4 @! C6 H, ~) N5 A3 r- H- S, v8 bTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. ) ?' U2 a/ r5 C9 l7 v- R0 s' {TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). & _* s+ d t1 z4 H( l; w, JTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. 7 H7 U1 z9 {4 ~9 @ kTFC Tactical Fusion Center. . J. ~% e1 k! ?1 R" o3 M$ x" }7 y7 vTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. . r. B1 _4 g A, M- U9 tTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. 2 p9 X" a( e0 l( \ f' qTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). : j8 g7 o$ U* v2 y" [& R. t! e% M: z0 tTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). , z5 p" c3 y; Z+ ?. R0 \TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. % J) ~0 I# n) h0 yTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). / r, p, t2 t6 o! o, R1 iTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 4 m! L8 C, ^* L* R6 |5 l. ]" nTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. {$ J* J) H- \# gTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. / F( F- h K% xTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. % [( t7 ]- N: lTheater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System 3 {2 Q v, ?" T& [The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 5 o/ V7 d x( c/ P$ P4 W(USSPACECOM)