- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System! s% S6 s; G8 H/ O9 p: N1 j
Readiness" t% d8 j0 \% ]' @
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out
# a9 c+ R8 I5 f/ k- x. Gthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
& k y, K- q! X# calong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
) D, B7 I/ a& O& r6 A! Lincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
0 a5 w6 @; T& h6 x/ _ ?state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
3 v* M1 }5 k8 O& c1 Wverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
. Q1 A% [$ d9 m& E) ccontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under1 j6 ?0 x! O b' _( t. O
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions; z8 p2 Y1 o- l# L/ s
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies# P" {* ~# L" p+ Y% X0 ~4 \
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,& r- ^: x0 u% g. X0 G( R1 w
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
7 K+ ~5 ?; c5 B3 I( g8 hstatus reporting.; y, x, B5 E, ^6 k, k
System
( j i( n: }4 E( v8 f! c. M8 O! dReadiness
% i1 }& _+ Q2 y* ^' r/ bObjective
( n; `0 }9 v$ Z& }# l/ OA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a+ m, L$ l) F& r; P
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
6 t& [0 T0 q0 m( X! LSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
( m# J$ s; K- w+ e5 @maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support
9 y4 }0 D1 I9 Ssystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of% x) f! j8 S! R0 X1 x
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission7 c6 d7 n* A D, A- Z. A
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
! L0 E9 k7 H' N0 S# I/ lSystem
7 r6 ~' u# ^2 z5 s5 s/ c wRequirements
" g- {1 [; ~1 h% {: y& t/ }Analysis (SRA)0 m! m+ W. H" M5 ]* S" h& r! b: x
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
" w9 [7 j# C) D( \' D1 Y( i0 j1 O- ?3 YConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
* Y. g6 b; @# n- y0 d9 Wspecific system functional and performance requirements.
1 F1 m, H$ N# I, @5 a. j0 ^. N" p& aSystem
( g5 D" Z7 S5 e) [) P: iRequirements* _: B, i+ Q4 D; E7 l5 T) ^6 m- y( W
Review (SRR)
Y1 o# G0 X1 P, T0 j& kConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
8 J- ^" F/ e& U3 p2 y2 G1 jDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
% w- a8 S- [. S8 zdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
% i% n0 p8 Y5 ZSystem Security2 X7 q! h+ E5 U) G; g# C$ j
Engineering
$ j7 _4 `+ j' o" z8 l ^(SSE)
! C6 J* L8 I# z, j- {- [- cAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering6 a- c5 q, o0 b q* q
principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
" S+ k& S+ F6 }7 T: e. K5 Z7 Z, G+ dassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
% {9 H) u. N3 yscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and- J0 A; Y2 k+ L+ ?+ a
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
+ K% g: j* a* ]/ R' u* c4 |$ Isecurity threats.
; }$ s1 P( P! ]$ Q9 L& {5 {System Security7 w" M9 L; f0 S+ C
Engineering; A8 Y/ @0 C$ N! s: }, E+ i
Management
+ ]8 z5 n/ }/ @! }4 X$ bProgram
3 U6 g: z% y4 n. U( q+ J+ {(SSEMP)6 Q7 B! S y# _) J5 }
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical) M/ h, C/ h) N" g
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
9 [8 D8 _# O3 kprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
* P# r' p! \- hdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the K) f$ z3 q: q, \9 ?8 w
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides, l' i4 D4 g+ ?) X& Q9 W) W
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes$ \9 }5 f; D8 J5 l e1 r
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule." I7 ~3 A: H* Q
System Security9 h# Z" a4 b0 {4 G7 K
Management
( l: C! V' b4 cPlan (SSMP)+ E" W; P' E2 q
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to" @% `+ M' m+ G! W; P. {
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
9 E) ~. Z( i7 V9 O0 wmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with/ I, R" v, }- f
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related( X! o6 |' l E) R" Y" y" ~
systems.
% s' W8 _. i) P4 B0 bSystems
; f: ]) b9 F% U8 x9 D" vEngineering0 V7 n- {$ k: l1 D/ w, F
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
- N% W3 ~, d. W4 y+ m( N3 ^balanced set of system product and process solutions.. y7 P% N$ V6 @/ X8 @% O) |# x
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
/ p4 [3 U" `% V% ~) w( n( v9 I287
6 s# g) e H- U. Z1 NSystems, G$ ?5 S3 t: M: @' X6 w# J- z
Engineering- z/ A" W& T6 P) R1 ]; z9 n
Management
, E$ ?: p/ Z1 vPlan (SEMP)5 q( X; `. ]+ e
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
2 y3 m3 m6 P$ R0 u8 c" EIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures( C& Q s* ~% w- H
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)! l$ ]* W9 r8 r3 s' f$ n
Key engineering milestones and schedules., v1 N e: k' ^
Systems Test
' ?1 W% c( `8 ~4 I( Z" kIntegration and! r2 v: `6 d" H7 ^
Coordination
p) R4 x) O6 z7 U, YThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.
) ]4 j9 Y3 h! ^! K& q) gSystem Threat
8 U2 D& s0 a: A4 UAssessment* R+ l" d) K' F2 F: R! G- ]
Report (STAR)) `% w% R6 B' T. a9 O
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a- T1 Q) i# x3 r6 c, b- _
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
3 t3 M0 U6 e& }' E( o4 oand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when* x" t5 {1 f1 A
the threat changes significantly.
# O/ Y1 d, r- J. ^0 F* Q5 QSystem-Valued' W. Y3 N+ Y3 j, Z) ]
Asset
2 U! b2 `, P, b: qA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to4 k& |4 v; q0 l# `: x
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.. B4 Q2 Z$ M+ N* ]% y; m5 V
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T- \- C& L8 \4 }. ^# v1 b4 ?: w
288/ o- n7 O6 x, m2 V1 b
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
/ Z% C a; a9 r) CT&E Test and Evaluation.0 ~6 R: p( E: C7 d, ?7 `$ W
T&T Transportation and Transportability.% {7 g ~* E. ~
T-MACH Trusted MACH.. U1 ]9 C2 q2 X# w0 M
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
- _& y; L8 q) k5 `$ B: PT/R Transmit/Receive.# P, s& H3 P* D2 J3 q$ F5 ~8 W
T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).. u0 Z i2 l- }) B% o2 A& f
T J2 w8 J6 q* D. m7 r) a( w
2+ R: L: W$ ]; T% ]& w) j. @( x5 j4 ]
Technology Transfer.
{2 v( S. o5 PT) }; q6 F. I8 F" ?6 C6 M' C
2- q* n, c& Q$ n6 G" B
E Technical Training Equipment.
# @6 E' ]2 V, bTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.8 `6 Q* k. e' I2 x: f9 A
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.+ Z# c( ^+ s' M2 K( v8 {8 N
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
( Z$ t; c. D+ O9 g( T% ZTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.9 E, q: _1 y& f/ n8 a
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
2 K7 o: O! ^* ]! E# M6 }: j6 aTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.7 |& p2 O3 C4 ~, v+ ]5 C' q* ?
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
- [, _' u3 n! _4 u7 [TACAIR Tactical Air.' @5 D0 R. c n! ^4 `7 f
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
# v2 j0 d) E: V/ i" I9 I' ^TACC Tactical Air Command Center.
- t( H z0 G* }( m2 O: C, _TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).8 u7 a, i$ Z7 B5 p" w
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).! c8 K h% n$ q+ ]& u
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.) n+ l3 n) Q$ \6 ]
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.) p1 b6 u4 q3 S9 z% a) b8 |, l
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.7 Z2 o7 d. _* }: g) h
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|