- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
. y- T' g- D$ R, N9 O; l2 l& ]& QReadiness
/ A( x7 d+ |3 }% ~+ p% USystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out( @7 b- H9 ?+ I4 i. P$ |3 u* a, I
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
+ a1 s9 l% ^1 [: L' E1 ^9 D& Yalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It; R1 n" o. a) T4 y q$ r
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational' }' f7 k* D8 L* q5 W# V
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the' r# f0 R5 T0 r6 j7 T) S. c9 n
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
+ b, `7 e. ^/ r7 h) ]! s1 m* Econtinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under1 p9 F# V5 v& K1 m5 g
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
6 R& @& f4 ]/ O0 J) r- N# bnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies+ ?6 d& x1 Y) {0 ]6 |( h7 ~
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,4 E) v2 w+ s& j# b' F3 b
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
3 x% H8 z, V- M4 a/ h- wstatus reporting.
5 ?0 S3 N9 L* [# Z) B4 BSystem
, y: g$ {' A' C$ `Readiness
1 \" D' ]$ }: ~# y3 jObjective
8 B( B1 U+ q% I4 E [! b* f* mA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a l( H$ d' \) N$ L/ C! E8 p
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
; g8 ^7 x6 ]5 Q- G# LSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and/ _9 ^: b* t/ ~. U" Y: b( R
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support& U2 f0 n; o8 w0 V9 P4 ^, G) M
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
& n1 O' O& s8 ^- ksystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission, A8 u) a2 c% u8 k: W+ N" f o* x
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.5 }; `) z2 \ Z, p+ B. Q
System
! O+ m9 ?: l2 t( }& [Requirements
$ n" X7 J9 _ ]- \# h# {1 B$ Z; e* gAnalysis (SRA)
$ T5 }7 F; I M; tAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System/ p+ i/ f8 L7 N1 ?9 x" v$ v
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
) R- ]9 q# ~8 wspecific system functional and performance requirements.
9 @6 }, y) v9 L( |. ?5 d: H5 lSystem) X1 L" F) m) C1 u6 H K& m
Requirements
: ~. W& O: ^! y, {+ J4 B" K; gReview (SRR)- Y7 i+ z/ j/ {* z
Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.- O: f. H/ `, c; B
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
2 A; t3 p1 K2 N9 p% `degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
( K& K% g' w- z# M. q% hSystem Security& |/ x6 A' C4 O: |
Engineering
$ V8 I: p4 D8 F( ^1 C# n0 x(SSE); d" Q7 r; ?- ]. t) p, R5 k! S. p
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering+ }, C1 ^7 s; |9 j) B' O/ B
principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks' J% M0 Y% O* P
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
' D! `7 n7 F9 {6 ~# dscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
6 \) }1 [9 f7 N, |! A$ C! Q) {; Vanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
( V5 ^/ f E# T4 Msecurity threats.; F }: S$ b. z
System Security+ J0 `) m- X4 L
Engineering: r+ n0 M2 e. ]
Management
& ^( @+ N) |4 ?- }3 i& ~Program1 S4 Q5 ~% W! i+ L
(SSEMP)9 _& ?; D9 f/ J/ e
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
$ Z4 O2 `9 ~" Y* z7 Z2 v6 Jachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE8 S& K4 s f- o) d0 ^9 }2 ^
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the, M1 G; B' J; T" w
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the4 P4 a3 o: R) d- y9 I6 L
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
9 ]. T3 A2 x. `. D) ~+ x( cmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes
Y& j( |$ x7 ]# Bits own impact on overall program cost and schedule.0 ^% n$ Q7 k/ o& ~8 m
System Security
7 i) G4 m" @- M3 G$ ]5 m* H/ OManagement( l- T1 z5 Y( e4 x6 ]& O e$ U
Plan (SSMP); ]. I! ^" J! ]( i, Y: L0 X3 D. Y
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to
4 J2 J$ _* h( N, o. Nmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,/ S) A. U8 S" q4 m) F: J5 i
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
, |6 R+ E; v3 \* X% n5 Q7 B; dother program engineering, design and management activities, and related! ^2 g4 Q$ l7 }. p; o$ n
systems.5 Z5 a5 j& u( Y4 n3 r
Systems; u. i7 G, L. ^% [. r) o- u
Engineering. E9 \6 U$ e" O4 x4 D" o7 C
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
; h. v8 f% }+ D: D, Ubalanced set of system product and process solutions.
8 m+ T0 X# F8 Q: e1 Q" EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
3 c, v( _7 U/ `) v( B" d287
6 f3 a. f$ Y9 u1 ^/ {Systems
3 ^( P* U2 ]# U+ }% YEngineering
7 ]8 T$ B6 `, b2 _$ LManagement
3 A% S! @9 }8 }: q. W" L# X7 w) BPlan (SEMP)% i1 h1 F) i- b9 N) n: s
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
: Q2 F" H+ z3 f7 r4 w# VIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
5 b/ C1 k3 r4 `, B( a/ Zdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)% i) ~! a2 N- m0 D
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
' q1 q' O7 H; f8 `Systems Test2 e" W z, ^! G# V2 ]3 n
Integration and% U, V1 x# [4 l
Coordination5 B. T6 e- j7 {& Q' v5 u7 V
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.9 m3 s2 B& M7 m! f6 [# k$ K
System Threat1 P* _4 S/ X$ Y) I1 u* B
Assessment+ {+ ]9 D7 K: }! j6 z
Report (STAR)
/ @; W" U( h. z* C7 b8 v, O3 i) y7 BRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a) [% Q5 p/ T* @% I* u; ]
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
, m' a% w3 ~: [and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when h! ^8 Q: m, e: L
the threat changes significantly.: ?# c7 b: P2 W( q6 r
System-Valued5 [, k4 D: u* W9 b; m" u
Asset6 j* [( q3 M f0 t6 C
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
. C4 A P4 i! Y0 N: {the proper operation and well being of the SDS. t# m7 i/ ]% z% q$ A9 C
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T b8 I6 g, n" C, @' R1 \3 O0 ]& ?
288# q9 ]' Q. G% g$ ^
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.4 w0 m, U8 `* c5 p
T&E Test and Evaluation.% m, E o: T9 @5 S9 n
T&T Transportation and Transportability.3 A" G& X& r) G- |: c) i* E
T-MACH Trusted MACH.0 F( p0 T! Z; ^3 X5 s7 x+ n+ M
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
: i( \! n. s/ d* p% y5 X$ CT/R Transmit/Receive.3 \8 M T* k0 i/ w
T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).* \8 g7 ?- U1 Z" g
T
9 q1 |& u0 A* l5 g: g# _! }22 v0 K; m, S* R1 G; `
Technology Transfer.! k# n) R0 a+ q- v2 m
T7 s+ L6 f& |5 W
2
: }- b9 W' \' X# U7 aE Technical Training Equipment.
, c3 Q. _! S+ V" v. L9 f$ xTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.8 r Z2 m( b. g5 c6 S) p
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.+ @9 [5 @0 y- x) u" @
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
% U) k4 \0 q- B/ x1 \2 rTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.( _% F: D$ p. w6 V
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.& ~# W, ^: g8 h8 v V
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. w0 g& n+ l1 F/ j" V+ o% Q, J8 g
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
& W! @$ p$ |% `TACAIR Tactical Air.* C) v6 c/ S! s5 i* L2 u
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
7 P! z8 ~7 C& l" e- _/ y* ITACC Tactical Air Command Center.' \% \9 n" Q# d5 u5 ]6 E
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).
0 r8 ?7 t; r e! m0 VTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
$ Z( Q7 \: k7 t1 \$ t: X5 PTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
. z0 Q( I0 ^# `, e9 vTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.& x. O' y& n; \* E
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
+ X( X: U8 K* WTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|