航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user G+ b. b# k! i! o+ R3 L0 eaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. + @! b5 i" M8 k0 W2 _9 i; U9 tSTM Significant Technical Milestone. 9 _* i2 J; F0 O1 s* E' W5 @STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. . G& y2 n/ `2 Z# z. `STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. 0 o- F2 U6 g; z# H5 w% LSTOM System Test Object Model. Storage, Handling, and 3 ~7 r2 n1 B) C J( o4 r( |Transportation - ~- E j! E& O, aEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient ' e4 E1 |9 w6 |8 F5 b+ Jenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during $ Y6 r. ?, e6 g9 |storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable + O+ h+ W+ G1 E9 Z' X6 Ratmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed , I; I3 w0 w$ J* M) O9 }during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. 7 @8 J5 Q. q. E$ k+ RStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 6 c& Y2 ], s0 o3 @Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). ! M1 u* S! G" }! k9 QSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. . }( Q7 u* K- C% Q- QSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense 6 U( |% ~/ N' N5 k7 UAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 8 l7 L8 n, M5 C r' ?ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to : I% d0 O( n; d. h& w& fnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic 4 |+ c5 N6 p, ]# E+ |Defense ( z) b1 J' _9 H% R( O8 K- JEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. - l6 [3 H4 ]; IStrategic ; U! K/ a: p9 Y1 sDefense System / f B# c. U: o: J) d* S2 Z(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving : l- p% H: _1 b7 ^8 l: Cballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 1 H: ~" g9 v2 ^5 a- }Strategic Level of War 1 H, W4 L( N, KThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to / ?2 J/ ?' \. _2 v. T& Aaccomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, : j) N0 r' y5 K0 athe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated ! r% l. ^+ w" O. R. nOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, ! I, W- ?: |5 v( v# r; T# VFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. - { C* }: h, aStrategic ( m4 Z: F3 ^8 D3 s& _) OReserve 7 O% H" j$ a: Q1 |" {* aThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 5 K$ L+ v0 K1 C/ X. v IStrategic 5 w9 t, U$ R# DWarning 0 d8 a _4 N. P0 }' kA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. ( Y, [4 \% V* f7 S$ sStrategic 4 w( C" w" d7 B0 Z7 o) W& TWarning Lead T9 }+ D% {3 j& qTime That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ) C0 e% e6 }0 C! zhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic Warning Post- Decision Time / O. f- F. ]0 t9 `" _That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of * y0 D/ V: U' ~7 o. @ kgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends ' S$ x: P& D" e* d# [/ d$ u" A6 Ewith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic . B2 K! @3 [- T* | }8 y0 Y- u5 t5 Swarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in , s$ Z7 A$ S- n1 h3 d) Y& ~ rthe pre-decision period. 2 a! ?/ j: ]/ N( x; @" hStrategic ' L @2 ^0 Y2 o$ a5 ], h2 f# ?7 [; @Warning Pre- % D7 q, k4 g( ]/ Q( iDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course ) T* K5 Y D2 ], O: T8 Sof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. 2 g% d. v, h( Q! @ N" F, XSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). $ h$ T* q( G0 K( a6 X/ W4 yStructured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely $ c! M( A! k3 W0 P& xtimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design ' J. I* ?2 m7 d9 G# z8 B$ EA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules ( j/ N7 [- h. S3 V# e' n- S, z+ xbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program 4 w% h1 l' v- \" q6 }A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one " ]) }# C. P9 h1 l+ i* z1 ventry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 2 ~0 b/ y, k8 L6 \sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more & {$ n3 u; ?. _. G% [ xinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or ! t8 C" S. j$ Q, u) N) o$ Qsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of Y0 D1 t' l6 V/ t8 cinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. " l# H$ V# ^2 k8 P! U6 \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 8 K }# h* V: R2 K' O- h* F" I1 m281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). + s. \ i; @) l, j+ X2 vSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. & e5 A" Y" K+ w g! ISTU Secure Telephone Unit. " S3 v7 W A7 W# W$ d& jSTW Strike Warfare. " K/ u, D6 W/ k* sSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. " g* Z2 a- Q9 k+ aSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level # g. J4 }' o) S7 j; |A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 1 q) k+ s& D/ l4 t* j! pdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. . A5 x+ O) M3 q' {Submarine- % r2 l9 Q# a4 C1 ^( RLaunched Ballistic Missile 8 M7 [; n* R* `1 _6 l; f7 ](SLBM) ! D% T9 T8 v* I% T. \A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. # [, ~" L0 x7 hSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 2 b Q' s1 o/ W9 X+ Z5 @within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 8 x; i* R" R: i; g7 K6 WSubtractive 0 `$ G. S# m* w' w6 B' {" L& ODefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 0 t9 x9 N5 i7 f1 T7 E ?SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of : a& |. J8 u( L hCommand % U e7 _3 k; R v0 k1 q" rThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, . h9 t8 h# ~* Gbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. + K' V: A. b" {8 c% v) ]SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). / Q1 H+ i# D8 z+ eSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two & x0 `) [; Y" h- n3 K/ x/ walternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to # B) u* _2 k; A9 L. R2 S- `decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). ) s& {9 F2 g$ y" i* _Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in . A1 u) F* F! E' p$ b# b# m- P% M9 ga single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 5 d) e! h; T+ I8 b1 |radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 0 t" C6 Q% u' d. ^superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. " ^" L# v- v1 }& k3 r: fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 S: m* ^# f/ B4 B9 u W, l# e282 6 {( O0 W& o( o1 q4 a5 R3 GSuperradiant ) d$ C2 T# i* M, P4 w& kLaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not ) H" O7 {2 l* V4 R7 ^) erequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. ) J5 r" y7 a8 K/ x7 ?Supervisory - y: I2 r# \7 z: O. k, IPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and 3 L# q$ n* R; a( S8 Bcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental Appropriation ! O; E9 E/ D* N* d: hAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support ! v- E( }2 E5 tEquipment ) s0 J: c; X" n$ RAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the # ^& c8 m2 Z3 x4 t7 C1 w: I* Dmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 6 ^% S8 U5 f( F1 [& A+ gequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ! C1 V# A) z0 D2 O8 ?protection equipment). - y7 _" `" i# M0 ~% ]Support Personnel 1 D& A' c7 F6 G. b, [4 kIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous 4 ]' } e, g; u4 G- L/ xoperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 9 u9 l5 T4 p- I$ ?administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, , I( J6 A5 B" p: c _% abelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. - Q+ m5 p E+ q8 F* sSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items ) e9 k. c, _- e5 Ndue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess ! s' Q }; j: h2 ~! Q1 Z( kproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. - G G! u+ S1 S: }8 }/ x4 D; ]Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 6 i0 c; X1 L. K! a9 x; sRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for $ S5 \* m+ q Z, }" r2 I$ Z' mcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. : t! @6 R- S! }4 X2 s% {- I; jSurveillance, Satellite and Missile 8 ]2 |! N. V3 hThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System / o0 M" B8 }' e/ E+ m! h$ fConfiguration : a- a- q6 D+ F% KThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 - x: A. i0 ?% BSurvivability Operating Modes - D3 r/ q7 n* L% n. U4 Z9 S" G6 v" IThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 9 ` V; N. ]" ^8 `that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. , ?7 D' B8 b7 _8 u* x3 {Survivable and Enduring / g% y3 Y5 [; E2 L4 X8 p: T% K- ZCommand Center % U5 C w2 B/ {1 y+ L(SECC) 4 F, d, H! c# Z& a$ YThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. $ Q0 ^) t m! V5 v- I. ]SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. : Z* ?9 M& {$ F# N( P Q. M& kSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. ( \ |8 g; m+ W" y' M( ?SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 1 [) Q6 F8 ~4 z8 |SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 1 j& m0 E1 {1 a4 Y* kSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to & S% Q0 G5 A9 n( q' t z% S# Aone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 6 z, `+ Y" W! P1 ^/ G% l: Feach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic 1 H3 V4 M5 d' e1 w1 |1 j' z2 ~/ G3 eAperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 0 T2 Q% q) L- r5 T* o# c Lalong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ; {" u# T$ E" Y2 N, r# gtheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 5 Y4 w4 P/ J4 e) dtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's 3 |# j9 \) q7 r/ Psignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 3 K3 l$ V* a; z: Bemitted by the radar transmitter. + @! P& F+ Q4 H8 C* V, NSYS System. - N& C+ S' h& RSys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. h7 y7 U, D: H: ^, dSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 : K# ~' e! u2 g) N, E4 ?SYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with $ ^6 z6 J4 i$ w; N7 aspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. / i+ `3 p, f" |- O J# Z/ m(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a , b2 r& J, r, N; z6 Lfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. {6 U+ n! c1 f3 f) B, A2 ESystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 1 T, w( v- I1 z4 n( u7 Mimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. * X& x) u5 f( |System Architecture System - e# h' k6 F, g5 H$ I- z& UCapability 4 T1 n) N, P# x* [- RSpecification 3 n+ v1 D7 @. r; _) Q(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system & l9 z1 Z0 n( Rarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center ; l- X" A/ Q. ~. _6 X. C3 H(SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide - y$ [/ d9 r* X9 \8 ksensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) % o3 M+ K' p+ v( I; C1 QOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition . ~+ {2 m- v+ i: u1 Hstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other & k7 l+ w9 s) H, k% j5 `concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System * L0 Q$ y" n' F7 {5 [9 tConfiguration 7 t+ ? N1 u6 L2 ^9 d7 f8 X/ V: O- t* RControl Board $ X( Q$ _$ \) ]- v+ E(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and ! Z% j8 c: @' G Mcomputer systems. System-Critical . {4 g5 M3 o& J5 X8 T, ZFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. 1 R8 ~5 Y- _4 bSystem Definition 6 F$ d6 m$ V5 g/ B1 |Review (SDR) ; q7 t! ]; g* a9 }7 s* P" qThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 9 _* l, M# [, W7 k7 Ydetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System % H2 r; v' { t. G8 _3 p0 lDeployment 9 w; d8 k4 {4 PDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. % {; S. i! w' R! l. @4 ^4 [0 oMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 $ d' p. s! Q3 ~. _' Z3 \System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 6 @# K* {& |( t8 l, Xcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 0 e# Y" u8 y2 {2 {5 b% ^9 ?+ Ospecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept * _3 L# @$ M/ i; m1 H4 l1 y6 p8 SAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and $ f, b( _1 ` A S$ Z) V" echaracteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design ! `& ~) `& x# F+ x# z; j/ F1 ~Review (SDR) ' w9 W2 ?5 W' _6 ?3 x$ A% S$ XEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with / U4 [4 l, `5 B$ }6 jthe allocated technical requirements. System ( s5 e( }5 j4 O( p/ z$ x" LEffectiveness / E; S# P( y9 i# A$ d# U3 {7 J, D2 h! IThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. : e$ R% m( u" ]! z- xSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior * b6 E3 v, Q, H2 h4 ~" N0 N5 FExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 9 D4 F0 B) Y6 o- u7 a; ?* kDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 6 P" f6 ~, D9 ?6 D" Rsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to $ d" p4 w' \% V6 ^+ l8 y oachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome 0 \$ C+ [6 d9 S& {, i) S* T) G$ [8 u7 Nthose challenges. q# a9 L `- I- d9 dSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 8 J9 u9 M3 F6 Y) d: ]: @: Z+ ga set of common characteristics. + H' ]. g6 B" Z! e2 O% N$ P X- JSystem Generated 1 r( s- y1 @/ b8 h* PElectromagnetic i+ \$ u. S0 }7 OPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 4 ^- ~8 _: W! K$ C/ E& ^surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local , e. x6 J" u- H) Nfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the 4 k+ _; q% e" N3 Tprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the . F4 w) k6 k1 m' r! x vobject in order to produce charge equalization. 4 T7 N7 r7 v5 d0 _ \" w. aSystem Integration Test 0 J' j: q( Z Q' {6 O- I2 DA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 1 f# O: e& Z n L1 isensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 6 C9 M4 [# x2 S2 n" zand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 4 m A/ Q' E4 p/ lequipment systems. System Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 2 V0 \4 p- g+ h1 G* ~; Q1 ?deployment, and support of a system. System + x" H7 B: p3 U# e E0 X2 F1 ]2 l9 dOperation and 6 ~3 ^' b1 @2 eIntegration ( @8 J# {5 B, PFunctions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and ) L6 E! t5 T& w3 A2 hbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command 1 j9 _: \; E d" W9 i& kand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to ; ?5 O, M" G# t( vthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic ) u$ e) ~, o SBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of - j0 g+ V; L9 R& B; l6 Eposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 1 a# n/ z" e6 m7 D! i" b6 V$ PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program " o) m* d+ J8 Q2 N) s6 b k" d! i- ZOffice (SPO) & W7 T) C, j" z, M. C/ TThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 3 h' Y8 P- Z* d, V% rReadiness 7 O/ Z& r% G) nSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 9 E6 J; E. t+ W1 J- jstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the & M) Q4 W/ e* R" averification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under ! z o1 q$ e2 |0 J. K* Z, trealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 7 O3 ?/ ~3 k! Z/ _ a. r+ I0 Dhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness Objective $ J2 n0 y% U# K! hA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 8 D# Q" P1 {7 f" D! NSystem Requirements Analysis (SRA) ! t% b" X8 l2 C( qAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System ?8 Q: j+ X% w+ K+ w3 i" rConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System ' r. X, }" z) X7 J) j# ERequirements 5 m( R' v' t. I- n- S' ?Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the : ^1 R x6 d9 U/ p2 G* Rdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security 2 q1 Q9 C3 S. u- l) gEngineering " @% r2 u+ T/ V' |: v(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 8 O. s/ Q- P9 N7 J D3 R* Mprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related ! V. \; ^4 s {& g" rscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 6 q: Q0 r% X6 W& q$ Panalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 5 N) C4 b" Q% ]security threats. 8 r9 c$ U. R3 C m5 h& G, p. c$ g8 i }System Security Engineering 1 n! j& m$ t1 `+ o! }- uManagement # h" \; i& N- z, T2 `; @; mProgram (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE ) ?( i2 I2 P9 B }# V$ Vprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes 4 S' _. _; O9 D# ~% w. y# [0 {its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 8 O; `( k3 B1 M+ m7 b3 t5 M4 FSystem Security - r. s, D+ p4 q% k, O1 KManagement * y, C: P. ^+ Q+ T/ G+ ^- cPlan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, / C0 e* I' v! G4 I2 X- K- y, x6 Smethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 0 O8 f( n1 L+ u; @systems. Systems Engineering 5 K }- l6 Q: {+ hAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle ' Y- h$ \5 W0 \2 I2 W4 j0 ybalanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 * a# w3 s% `3 eSystems ! @% p" s/ M% G( h2 s+ u& H* ~! nEngineering Management Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 7 @0 C0 j) M$ z4 u: D1 bIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures + r0 h1 i% O {9 K8 Gdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. ) l8 n0 C8 l" P" pSystems Test Integration and % G& k6 H) c$ J$ p, R3 D9 d' o3 uCoordination 2 O. p4 E8 i3 q2 i0 a, IThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment + U+ p, h7 y0 I" j. MReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 5 i( |8 G' H# fthe threat changes significantly. 8 r2 f/ _. |2 D* H2 s4 x: `* TSystem-Valued $ F9 g) [5 |6 O9 E/ v4 M& ~* HAsset 9 C# k% d8 w' e: c% H2 m% zA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T - [( U7 v. a* J, A) Z- F, ~288 # J* O" |& U+ e' W: pT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. ; ?# I6 g& w- ^9 |9 ~) ST&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. : i5 Q; ?; z4 [) r+ S6 h# sT-MACH Trusted MACH. 9 K. I7 a; x2 G; }# J1 }1 ?% N7 VT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T X. }, S: ]# ~) Y; `, z2 5 v; x* G" W0 }- @2 d# ITechnology Transfer. T # w5 }" g' G" L1 A8 M2 ' X$ L" X5 E' W9 qE Technical Training Equipment. ) x& y& c; r& h7 ZTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 7 L4 m# ]+ L# n) z' `: |: @4 |) ETAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 3 {5 i9 m, @8 w, M8 x* nTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. ; U: o/ d d% E2 T7 Y$ M7 E! CTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. & ^, U+ W) N$ s9 }/ ~( W* J2 ATAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. 8 f# w2 T- }7 j; z+ Q2 w1 eTACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. " _; l a# _- E4 s6 N" \' YTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 7 ?2 {( `6 H7 X2 r: BTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). ' I$ X$ V& l; j0 l& Z" cTACON Tactical Control. " s% c, v0 _7 h VTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air 8 H1 P; k1 F: ]$ P1 xDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air , h8 V# h/ c" K# {- \& [5 UOperation ~ b- e3 m3 x# \An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 0 y( Y1 e1 I" t D9 U$ mground or naval forces. Tactical Air 8 |- L" T7 f @) C9 P2 T9 ROperations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 4 L7 Z. z' b I6 c4 Ldefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air " C- P, u k. w. `- S% [" `/ n* ASupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly : C$ t4 O+ b" Vassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the " N# Y7 d" Q% _* u% o: tcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and . m6 j0 H( p2 S6 L6 c8 f% `coordination of support. & X7 N3 x! q l" x' @" G5 CTactical Ballistic 8 E4 W7 q/ h: i* g+ I7 S7 A. @ uMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 7 f4 K, i' o+ semployed within a continental theater of operations. + d5 T, g m' y* m) ]( j/ GTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 4 w4 ?; c2 U8 B J/ D; W5 S; M- h5 Odevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 2 ]# k' V2 j6 W1 D2 p9 A$ r& Pmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data 5 Z/ j& h; m7 KInformation link . i& ` |, X. w4 |" v) ?; V3 bA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates & c3 a- d2 k2 Yeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. ) B7 L& m5 o# [% t% ?This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 6 |( ?$ Z- V% |' ^5 FWar The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. ) D: O- c! P& Z. L9 O8 }) Y$ `Tactical 6 h; ]3 ]$ J' F O- }, Q% G" iOperations Area 2 k1 F1 O# K+ Z+ t) f- f, s(TOA) 0 i. Q) c- ]1 cThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations * l4 S8 j1 m( Garea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission 4 k% j3 k. J) V' zaccomplishment. Tactical F d: q4 B1 }- _1 YOperations Center (TOC) # l1 Q" ?" Q: ]( T4 O2 ?A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning ) C7 ]$ e* U+ j8 Y9 C# R l(TW) 6 Q3 l$ b5 e4 J(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. 1 |# s T, I( G, Y; s/ Q1 J(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component % ~: a* Z! T9 E+ f6 g7 Y9 Zelements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type : ]% L& s: I; h& k4 [, ^6 hand size, country under attack, and event time. 5 u: X1 A# e# I! f* E3 T8 z. ~9 HTactical Warning/Attack 1 |8 X. l# }* k+ e; LAssessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & V9 t3 O, Q! x, g7 ^& A% @0 @; j290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. : m$ @7 l8 U6 s7 p9 B8 u# j(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. " N- Q; s/ {- o0 q/ ~TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. , T0 E5 \+ E& |8 V4 x z( P' v# HTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. ' E3 ~! ^" r( x* F9 s$ HTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. Y6 w; b3 I5 s; `7 rTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. / |* f4 g+ K( L X/ L S* _TADS Tactical Air Defense System. : p& X, n0 J) }+ G* iTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. ( w Z+ y w0 X! iTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ) g' c& c2 f7 DTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. $ f4 s. U5 d7 K& d7 O' N) CTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. . |! |% g7 x, ?+ s6 ]- _6 r" i+ _4 \TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. + b" z9 }+ J; ]0 o8 M- e7 u5 oTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive 3 n( F% m) P8 d) j1 l8 S- xdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. - Z5 E/ U1 h: N1 A3 \# ^2 GTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). - [& S& W ?& V+ {Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 4 A( q7 v+ l7 z# A3 PTank - W9 k& A& d5 s; GFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * l2 @ f' \) z$ P4 s291 ! |0 F; \- |% z' L# z/ C5 J9 H5 gTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 0 a9 [& u' Q/ P% zTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 5 n. ?) f, _/ q- tTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. / \' A( j d; v. z2 O8 H$ P(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. / x- r) t6 u. D8 Y$ @3 vTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target 7 [$ H& q9 L4 G: [Acquisition ' u) `. S V2 G$ d" X7 v0 kThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. ; c3 v% j9 x+ W3 pTarget Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target ' E; R/ x+ R6 @0 {; o9 iDiscrimination / ], a3 z3 X2 g0 a. xThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. 1 U5 E7 k w5 ]' LTarget Object Map (TOM) , H' k" ?" _$ U- PA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. # Y3 \8 U! ?; t- K+ I' T0 [2 N. MTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 5 V& R- e8 _, G+ [, ?4 H% l8 hpassage of a ship or sweep. / E% e4 H/ ^, e& p! o7 F) n3 iTarget System Requirements 4 n9 [9 _% a) G% C: h8 z" X: ^- rDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD & M6 m- B. b8 ?2 dProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target + u6 m3 }# P3 H0 Brequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. + K+ y7 o b2 r2 rProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 5 b/ l7 a2 T& r# Z" xTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 2 e0 }/ H! I5 ?required performance. # O1 H j7 i* T2 }TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. # x4 H8 b9 |% C9 u: R2 OTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 8 G! l% q5 @- b; W1 dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. , x% U+ A0 C# B5 ATBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. 8 w. f V, _/ Z/ {TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. " y5 j, D& D. H+ t" x* v- ^& `TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. }' I4 r4 {" {4 |7 RTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 9 O3 \8 O# _0 BTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 3 {/ ~" ~# n2 B; ]" I6 f" ~7 `TBN To be Negotiated. 7 N3 N8 h$ _! [- p3 L# CTBR To Be Resolved. 0 m+ J7 v9 q: `! aTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). * h1 D" x, j& U: P(2) To Be Supplied. , h8 q: H5 ]2 X7 k' Y( S' R1 ~$ ~/ g(3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. & O; k" y# q5 {. g+ k2 DTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. $ `1 T/ ~4 v" y1 C) ~TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. 7 P S3 n0 l" I% H* g2 gTCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 0 x+ x H' W4 S4 W( S(4) Training Device * `# V! D2 I0 n7 F8 i. }. ITDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 r" o) v. w: d0 N293 6 t. Y; [% d$ {TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. 5 J) L3 y3 A; z% J, x(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). : |" }4 _# J" F7 \) hTDCC Test Data Collection Center. * t+ D \4 k2 Y4 T! S8 ?TDD Target Detection Device. 9 t+ Q/ c; Z7 nTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. ' C0 `5 M0 q* i% e9 B& w# yTDM Time Division Multiplexed. * M- d. K8 c) l+ ~ cTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). - x* i* M. B, o! l3 oTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. ' O5 h% |, ^! A; n4 U# j* oTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 7 S9 c9 t( H- G: V1 }(2) Test Design Package. + c8 _- I" b" T* C+ s S- y(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. * Y, b2 b) Q2 f5 r/ DTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. % J" p; \3 D: uTDT Target Development Test. ' i \0 A. n- _+ z/ FTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ' R! l0 P# s8 _( a1 q# `7 mTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. * e" F* N$ i4 V* YTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 5 ]0 Y1 a4 Q- b" uTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. - w# Q) r( G, |TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 K3 P2 R% }! |/ |294 . e" f R% [- y2 xTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not 5 T, V" H' |3 ^5 q' Stechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data ' x# t) ~& v1 T8 D( I$ s0 C QPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition , A2 [, j% F: h1 Vstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines 7 h7 S7 j3 d* |! m" m) kthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical # {3 |) K9 [6 s+ rEvaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to ; k9 s# X' C8 Kdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in # ^6 A8 Y) i8 d% qthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical B. T5 g2 r# a$ z: cObjectives ' X. D: {* W+ l& T4 Y8 k: BThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available # y8 ^/ l" l# b Q1 H$ N; \for stating binding technical requirements. 1 u/ H$ R7 V+ yTechnical & g, ^1 H$ k" w/ @5 wObjectives & 8 s- ~$ c* K( Q) I7 h9 nGoals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. ( Y$ u$ ]$ c/ Z7 e% |4 J4 S1 S7 J- vTechnical 6 r' A. T* s# @4 e, U+ i; LParameters (TPs) : O0 N, U9 `9 ^ s/ pA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical ) w1 l: U% N2 { ]3 e8 ?* L0 yPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. 4 q# S) O c9 o, p7 w' cTechnical 7 Y4 r$ G2 W' [! G$ ePerformance Measurement $ G5 b7 L: N8 _(TPM) 3 N$ F2 u2 F f) {& c: x" [Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 2 ?' f: P% M/ Y% Y# Q$ w; Wbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ' ~" o! a/ d: A4 y4 J, q' Oassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the R# u4 O0 d/ X% j/ Tvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product # ]) J+ T" e3 {" gelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these O# k2 z2 u4 d9 v) t9 |& H: @) [% ?8 jdifferences on system effectiveness. Technical ! u" ]7 u: D; R3 |# `Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 8 V$ S# J7 ~6 W% n, xthe basis for actual design development and production. * B& k* I( _: }/ QTechnical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology $ n$ P2 H3 F- f6 n$ gExecuting Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing ' h) I0 y0 s I2 n! eAgent. Technology ( E' `; v- `3 C2 B3 J/ OProgram Description 6 D; [7 X( e; a( p) ]The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ' T6 @* ?0 L: E% H/ k1 u4 ]supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. 7 |1 h" i$ y$ Y+ J' p" d4 o0 D, RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T % T2 f' i3 c2 _- W% H$ {295 6 x% O* J% D( d- k6 F: L* XTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. / E3 q* {6 d1 @: B" hTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. ; v# E5 V+ r+ C8 M2 A7 d& lTelemetry, ' ~4 ^& \) o K! A, l" t! C9 d7 U' |Tracking, and ' n8 _4 x/ ~8 P9 K+ o5 k, r4 ?Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and . K* q* B$ ]# A$ C3 H: D! \$ ystatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a G6 O9 ]5 _" p7 [sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. / c6 S _, X* QTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the * e+ G9 d* f& ]# ~% t8 s6 m5 r* [automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. & L/ g) E( {; `# eTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 2 J; O, i) }6 `# F( |"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. ' Q: ~; d8 Y; c6 S; {% w8 yTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 6 E4 a2 v+ ]9 F/ j, }8 _3 bTER Test and Evaluation Report 1 I) y. r8 k8 z4 M" ~& ZTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense : ]; \; [# _& Y- z1 SSegment (TDS) : W0 ]; z# s7 l" t! bThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal : K7 C) o! @7 a# l3 mGuidance 3 y/ I% d/ J% M" R# h/ B2 _The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase ! ]% d- C3 ]) D: ^1 g wand trajectory termination. ! m! J7 V& s9 C; ?( b$ Z: hTerminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the + ^1 j& | T0 A' c! N9 P# Bterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) - u# F/ n: ?* |, x) X+ gTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 3 A+ e( ~9 q1 M; m/ }6 jTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. , A% t; N+ u" LTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. % y' ?; N6 ~* _5 D& J# b dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T + L0 Q5 |- w! ]# f2 p296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 9 q5 |3 {- r9 l7 Z3 u* vhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary ) l+ U' D3 v; Oconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and * R, k( m8 z! f M# AEvaluation (T&E) 4 p3 O' C1 h- a1 ]+ wProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated & O" j5 ^ h: x, Q3 k9 u( d7 vto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three 3 v5 m! k; b5 \* Jtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production ( z8 i8 T: }# c% `/ K$ aAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof 5 m$ z) K3 B6 N9 k' `, A0 \manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, `) E$ @3 H3 S; O- J+ Iand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 9 W( i8 C4 @9 D$ ^3 M2 e3 b. S' P+ Q5 gor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational ' Z( _0 j9 t2 v: B(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before $ E: @1 f; p+ ^2 I7 d8 _the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of : |5 C1 p- H: \* C2 Roperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test , O" Y! _1 Z" k: K# Hconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. . R" s0 z- y6 i+ }/ V/ ZFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of 3 i) a! e2 G- |' Q" Vdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and " P( e% q6 B) y; UEvaluation 9 `3 ^9 Y4 A5 a+ n' J/ TMaster Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as 2 n! w8 [6 j$ V+ _8 Q0 aearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development - L1 I* X" i; d, G6 Z5 |progresses. * p: z7 j) [% g BTest and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of , H, W9 ?; s/ W2 A, G& Ctest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the , \ Y. Y) ^5 [; rprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling & c# V/ r$ w; G, u% Vproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 2 {. Q' A" }. Xrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. / O/ l( v' _0 Q+ j9 i$ tTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ) k1 e! {5 I9 oTest Integration " c; w, W& R/ |: u& w' TWorking Group (TIWG) & g4 ~, ?# a% y, ~A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ! i: e5 K/ L2 p1 x/ z n' morder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between + p* j. ~& A8 [) ^( c7 @# Fdevelopmental and operational testing. # y$ O# j& [2 L7 L3 cTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation - n6 B, H+ Y5 q' j$ n( lcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. : V$ W/ `. U* ^# fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for % i' N; c/ x4 ~# ~0 q! @SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. % T# ~: t/ k6 d: {4 R8 ATEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. 0 s+ l: r" C g, jTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). / V6 l* k/ Q7 z/ WTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 8 ]3 S9 r! h7 M/ C9 \' aTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. - h" G) v8 @0 g* S$ S7 F* z6 F0 a xTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). % A) u$ B9 d) GTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 8 l0 b# h3 O+ q% cTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). ; s. s9 v1 T* s' @4 G' K2 f5 A( lTGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. # u' A- f2 W2 D1 x7 Y" \9 l4 ]THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. / |$ p6 ?1 y9 f: ZTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a . [0 Q0 C. r9 E0 R; N2 v5 g" Bcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. . \' F3 O4 Q- [8 O f L0 }! fTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 6 |. l' U; H& Z- {- _! v7 z( qMissile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. * `, v6 B% j% {+ M4 i4 L# B$ F(USSPACECOM)