- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System9 j$ |% m6 a1 ]: Y/ f
Readiness
/ v4 C: s4 C, _System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out, z+ P0 n* ]7 N- B4 {6 K
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
" y1 e4 L" R* g: @' E S* `. C2 palong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It5 N8 E% c- i' Y$ P6 o! ?
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
3 j. c4 l9 g2 u2 vstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the; ^& b2 A2 h. T* Z* ~, d8 x' W
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
" v0 W. w" V! u: d% \continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under" m' i) Y8 {) f! ?3 g
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
1 |9 R) M* G& p% {" S5 Ynecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies
. X, Y: A3 @! d( Y8 g, l: xand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
8 R, Q) J* h% ]4 _historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
0 r+ A, v; q) c, `; n; nstatus reporting.
9 P! \. O& p: B: R& u% j- TSystem; H2 \6 U6 o1 T: i9 k5 N8 d
Readiness
3 B" k. Y, ^. j) ~Objective
/ |/ j9 z- |5 p; b( `- DA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
& X/ l e ~& s: W/ x+ Z- Fspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
+ O% g# N5 M& U4 F4 y) E6 P( C6 PSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and0 [0 a+ T' S2 Q& N/ }
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support9 p( n* g$ h* G
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of1 X4 b- m1 [5 N; X. n. n. ~
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
6 b. ~$ T% o5 D8 w- v9 w$ C0 rcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
* W0 @% w: u2 |2 `" k8 jSystem
+ ]# j0 A, @- l! IRequirements
; k4 C( _ B ^! Y# k/ K4 l, PAnalysis (SRA)# l8 i/ w) ~: ^) s+ t: W
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
6 b: ^; q5 H. j/ Q3 q6 t/ Z0 l* n& lConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
& g( S: j- f4 Xspecific system functional and performance requirements.( h( ~, E. x+ H' F
System
4 f& T% u2 b) f3 w4 kRequirements N! p$ D' s% m" V# t2 ?9 t R
Review (SRR)
* V) ~7 _. o1 }* W# S: e) q; bConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.6 t+ W3 `0 S( I0 p, t( D' e7 V
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the% r) h% O6 M* y
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
0 F, E" a K+ v" R) \6 }System Security
0 |! J: s* ^! K, mEngineering7 |& i! Y. J- J0 N0 h# z, M D
(SSE)' V8 c! Y' C. ?4 y. [# G; K* Q" k
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
7 a9 p X0 S; y7 f4 l1 tprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
: J! A# E9 X7 i2 b9 K- h! Cassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
3 z/ a3 Y, ]' ]- B$ B* y, rscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
8 j: O' e5 A; Hanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
( r$ G( |+ D/ k& {3 H* wsecurity threats.1 x9 c& T5 {; T2 `
System Security
, C6 S4 y- [2 [7 T* I) u" t) f! p% PEngineering
1 \3 p) n- Q. b% j4 n: C _Management$ h7 Q/ N6 [& _7 j; c& N
Program
- v# i$ @0 R8 C% w* ^(SSEMP)
: O/ f7 w/ ^; }) bThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
! L w* g8 ^6 J6 _6 bachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE& F5 s% n) `5 S' n
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
0 k( Q3 E3 d0 q, k! k5 ldefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
% z; c9 X+ ^9 vresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
/ n. Y. w/ B* I" `management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes
5 D1 V( o+ H+ ]8 m4 L5 ~3 xits own impact on overall program cost and schedule.5 X4 E: u7 L X6 x
System Security/ }) w2 h' |9 R; l% S
Management3 \, W# B- m: b
Plan (SSMP)
: k+ o3 A* k* h J+ `5 H0 l) K/ qA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to0 l& O$ f, n- u. ^: R# ?
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities," q$ n( u% t+ Q5 ^, t7 ?
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with4 w3 `4 d% h: j, u, i* }0 x
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related: s0 ^0 k* e& C) F% p8 i+ [: l2 D/ Y
systems.
v6 V& B n, r9 `6 XSystems
8 Z2 v" c; a: V( `/ A0 g- a' pEngineering
' H6 s/ M D- p' I! F( p" O- l% D( ^An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
9 L8 @9 {9 M1 k" L, l2 N7 Ebalanced set of system product and process solutions.$ e+ }' |; N9 P* e
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
# n% @' o) f! { I% U0 _287
2 U+ E5 v4 a$ H# k3 X; [ CSystems4 Q: N6 U6 C# { P' r
Engineering$ g: v! `9 ~0 ?
Management
6 A6 V0 u% ^) P' gPlan (SEMP)3 {* X- `0 x& N( w6 E" R
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)* M: m( t- h" ?6 h! _. r
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures( [- t' y: ]9 W |
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
# {* V7 H, z3 q3 {4 v: c' j) Y+ I( Q/ nKey engineering milestones and schedules.
l$ d W' z! @, L/ Q0 q" N+ NSystems Test
" y* [" [% L' \8 ` ^Integration and6 R3 v, j! i( V, b% ?$ Y
Coordination" `( V- u3 p! O6 g# L- V
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.1 w5 g+ D5 U ~0 ~0 P% y
System Threat* d7 h p/ V8 B1 L4 q
Assessment
& ~/ Y2 L& H/ U+ q8 z, UReport (STAR)8 d" ^3 ]( u, J( L. Z! j+ j
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a: b) C8 z2 u5 N+ |; w0 t
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency3 w( s( j8 l1 K- _: f
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
$ E4 P5 b$ T( e* P6 M# L" @1 f( Wthe threat changes significantly.% ~: z( r: h9 I
System-Valued
* ^1 S/ \' h2 U2 ~5 oAsset
. Z9 h9 q( u7 ~- T# G, x% zA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to w; T5 h( T, }+ h$ B- d9 b$ g& V
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.- [$ e! f0 M: E3 b7 f% Q
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T) J3 w7 v7 Q" @
2884 W# V4 ^6 z' q" N2 L9 Q+ |& i2 }* i
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
& m$ E: n7 z# F% zT&E Test and Evaluation.
; F$ e3 {3 U1 p# H7 }( |T&T Transportation and Transportability.
: {) {2 K% i' g5 J, bT-MACH Trusted MACH.
* S$ G- E6 g0 r( g+ z6 fT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
. H$ ^! J- a5 R: H; jT/R Transmit/Receive.5 _" z5 r& Q, Z1 |2 u/ P
T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
% m1 Y; y) _. e! {1 ?- s5 y( q# CT
: D8 ~) d! w8 U4 }: S) h: u" y2
" }! r2 {" i) O4 pTechnology Transfer.
; A) S8 v& S* l. ]+ I0 X- ~T
4 l, A2 |0 T# D. |; W2
2 |; ]& x; M/ \. ]% d! EE Technical Training Equipment.
, ?" o q8 i% Y; t0 HTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
2 X3 [: d5 G3 j( P n+ ~TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.: n; a! a* E% _6 u
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
6 `7 L9 S3 F s! [! XTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. ^) O9 l0 j; o: Q/ N" f/ U
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.! a5 @# M d; `; Q6 Y6 m
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.) H- @0 ]( m4 s. k
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
4 a9 _2 f3 j. U9 ^0 h* o, n9 \TACAIR Tactical Air.4 o# Y$ ]8 ~# s$ Y! r( U
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].6 P/ G: O/ d0 J& {
TACC Tactical Air Command Center.' B i' T5 _8 g8 m* U
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).& ^' H! d0 j5 y! n1 U8 u
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
3 B, b8 _, u! z# A* f' J! a( g7 {TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.$ g4 a. }: w8 T6 L! k. g0 j( \
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.5 \: M2 `1 ]* m% C# N( z
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.) o V+ E- n" }- e R1 U1 L
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|