- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System* B1 A8 U0 z; O7 t" y1 M
Readiness: ~! c7 M9 E5 T- ]# O* [+ Z" u) E
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out
. a, K7 c' J, ^" mthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority) N7 Q8 R/ G6 a
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
& l* q; ~/ l8 g1 Rincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
/ k+ R7 b/ H) i7 lstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the5 S, _( Y0 K8 A0 C
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the6 }6 o( K4 K6 i$ ?. G
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
+ T% f$ p$ G, Q5 crealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions! [$ p* D* M: F! j
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies* k3 ]; m9 D$ b) W" v% \% i
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,- j) f4 }( Q( } m7 U( F \, W
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
8 G) O- C1 Z" Astatus reporting.
% F; l4 W0 y" q' W- ~$ JSystem
/ ?* }- v8 ~4 ?8 N- o3 kReadiness+ O9 }) D8 `0 E3 q" d
Objective
, c/ o) c, s% v/ FA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
: K2 i1 c: H: k( f1 j" f I' Uspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
p- y- B! ?- ]2 r6 _- JSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
4 t* n, F8 I: t/ i+ [: b. P& jmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support
9 Y! v8 V% u) `9 y, lsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
2 m" O7 O. F _- esystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
+ L% s! O7 v R; [ Ncapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.' M, U1 z3 I! _& U: E, j$ Q- h
System" e- D; X0 r$ E) G" B! x! w; B
Requirements1 h; c- H' m. D4 y \
Analysis (SRA)
t \0 k5 |: `3 T; ]. bAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
- t5 c: q, ?% v3 DConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine! B# u# k; c4 I' N: ?1 q
specific system functional and performance requirements.
8 d3 ^$ u' `: F% bSystem
* @$ x# C) R2 w! c% ~4 K5 hRequirements" ]) u8 P3 s# T1 L+ U/ `0 Y
Review (SRR)
& _( P2 \" Z7 W, HConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
) l& D" t( O, O# B* P4 t7 n% Z; sDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
% Q/ A4 T2 Q! E! ydegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.& @& ~1 N# Z9 U) [) V2 t% m1 u
System Security% w4 e5 L2 D% b* J' |4 V
Engineering* X `& w2 C$ }2 J
(SSE)2 x# R$ t; K% e" t
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
) r; O$ S) x+ w& v* Vprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks8 U0 e( z& j6 A7 K& g2 W
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
. m5 j# r0 | [+ D8 Y! bscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
) ~' t8 V1 e% @( Panalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to" e8 q5 Q5 q N: d
security threats. e, f/ F$ n# T) E' L- m- ~
System Security
- v- u" e6 ]2 _, |. W2 mEngineering
& X! S8 _; [- qManagement/ } J$ o' D# n( ?( ^* e7 x
Program
. ~. S! s0 D4 M d; Q(SSEMP)( A/ E4 ~& b- r: s2 r/ u/ ]7 z5 b
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
3 b% S+ Y0 d# `9 v9 [1 j3 Machievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
W6 ]! o) u1 l# O( ~; [program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the9 L8 G1 o" F2 J% S4 P
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the* ]& r% J% |+ {3 f. \$ C/ U$ Y5 R1 s
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides* a, X$ ~5 N& L3 C9 \, ?
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes0 f* B: r8 h e. h/ G c6 P
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
- l, p) v% m; J% M+ oSystem Security3 p7 }9 f4 d! a. Q3 }1 l4 x; b& i
Management
. i+ Q' V4 @) g* w' jPlan (SSMP)6 N3 C& f( E1 B+ r) [" n
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to
5 O- r/ h( B2 A2 f4 G+ }meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
( E$ A- z9 ^( ^1 U2 s4 P0 Ymethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with. Z6 ]$ t3 C& r) T' C
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related( y$ w5 p1 N9 N7 p
systems.. G, R3 G! M5 U$ ?8 X
Systems
3 a: v0 k0 o' \& x) I, v7 |3 zEngineering. [, w3 o% h U$ d& K; L; ~& w* {
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
1 M* U$ k1 [) l# c7 p' p1 pbalanced set of system product and process solutions.
% j$ @# k. D+ U `. CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
. I* v$ [6 V' e8 I5 Y* ]287$ m$ p7 z. T M! v" T" t
Systems8 D* P$ L9 ?) `, N" E$ C0 W4 D5 S1 @
Engineering
% ?, _5 v% A" X+ n+ FManagement
4 ~' Q" g% n" `2 X, }2 ]9 XPlan (SEMP): ^: E& w- p) B, y) z6 l
This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)* y. O* u9 R- w3 P. m' {2 z% d
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures P( Q2 l f4 k3 V) Q& E; v
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
- [8 ], I( [* S# OKey engineering milestones and schedules.( L: s1 _- P: s+ g U0 B
Systems Test
Z. x8 e& U( t9 BIntegration and# G9 i9 V1 L8 V( m a C8 b
Coordination
6 p0 U5 G2 ~' N) U9 zThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.' B/ i3 } `& F9 G
System Threat* y% S1 z5 i f! \' S. w0 M3 l
Assessment# o& n( C+ n6 T. a( t9 p* B4 W% Z# `
Report (STAR)
. z: h+ w2 L K9 K' ?Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a- W. a% \% U+ l- K- ^* B
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
6 V6 E# V9 K% h0 g" @! N+ Land potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
1 U% ~, g. C$ q0 t; Dthe threat changes significantly.
" ?8 f8 _5 g+ b( R, BSystem-Valued
) e4 Z8 v0 a7 X# Q G$ f1 aAsset
9 R: b& [5 o. i6 b& {A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
2 z: y" @* H9 i# T/ a8 F) j Gthe proper operation and well being of the SDS.
, S% d! B+ s' _* J4 S+ [% IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
: ]0 W4 H8 ~: f8 r% o6 v2881 B* v2 q! B' ?
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
, d8 K& r" y: {% qT&E Test and Evaluation.8 }& A# I$ h/ m) R5 r+ ~) T
T&T Transportation and Transportability.
# U* e9 b% D0 x% _, C) W& l3 Y/ R3 o) vT-MACH Trusted MACH.9 X) k6 V% S! A, I9 X& D
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
. R6 {% v5 Y/ \* H% d7 t& PT/R Transmit/Receive.: v6 A& { s" q U* \
T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).9 H5 i& Z! M) A* I! s; ^: S6 A
T
: e3 s4 U6 j3 R& k2
/ t) O( ?( G6 a/ G6 y) q% `Technology Transfer.) v h* M$ T) Z9 r' x
T
# Z2 E T- E8 s! B9 }& Q5 F. a2
0 j3 H+ W: T: s$ \* wE Technical Training Equipment.# d& f# O: S2 R1 k
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
9 W3 \6 d9 W0 Q) ^4 ]TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.0 v$ u& D/ d. Q5 b
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
( B+ y) I! y* Y# bTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
% Q: |' \5 V' |6 }$ ~9 r- M1 ^TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
0 N9 i) M: U1 L6 F( D kTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.8 i, c& m, j, b
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
1 J$ y) j" i6 @+ C' f Y, r3 ETACAIR Tactical Air.
1 n& d1 d6 n7 W. l% rTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
$ o/ ^! B+ U& VTACC Tactical Air Command Center.( [- Y) O: H# [5 Z! {7 l$ q6 \
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).
" D5 x8 i: [) o' d: e2 U- d! K/ fTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).( m$ p5 j( E3 y0 D
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
+ P4 O8 k) Q3 w3 R+ g4 STACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
- ^0 a$ _ m" u1 x' _. dTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
. \: L9 a P8 m8 K* J; A# _& U% STACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|