航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 9 i! F) ]1 U& u" oaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. " n( q2 i1 ?. X5 Y# c9 dSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 4 E+ S9 u( V3 z4 ~2 x8 z3 {Storage, 6 ?. j' B+ y( C$ H% O7 g* pHandling, and Transportation 6 u5 `# Y/ h s5 x! QEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient ) a% ]5 d% F. B* n# ienvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ; |5 u% }, H+ _" z) \1 V4 batmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed $ l+ r& H g/ p+ [3 a% |4 ~during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, ( L/ ?& Z e' |1 }5 eshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. 2 z L" _$ N& u4 P: [/ JStrategic 9 Q) i) a Q6 XDefense 6 F" S- ?& @- j) n& p; h1 UAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. ) b0 O/ g2 s' fStrategic ( k9 s( X" x5 \" e' m6 RDefense ; m+ |- u$ L- W% W6 J8 g: W6 VEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. / H7 f) `# r1 y. n% mStrategic Defense System 1 H' i1 k( M# X+ A+ U(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ! `& G* Q+ Q2 Hballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S & \+ j+ ^8 K" P2 C1 Q280 Strategic Level of War 1 f2 [, h& G9 O s) P2 fThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or $ S5 A- Y0 ~. P; e7 C+ l9 G% ^alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 2 q% u, C4 b) f9 w2 Laccomplish those objectives. 3 b3 `3 M" k( TStrategic ' Z* l& i& `2 t' G, M4 aOffensive Forces (SOF) 0 g% v7 f3 C4 W- G* bThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, " B* y) G+ k5 A9 U& Z Zthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific ; Y: [) W5 Y% w& LCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic 7 m' N$ S: {# \! [3 UReserve , j7 `7 H3 t1 v" l1 x( aThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 4 Y% _* ?' Q+ @ `! {2 Kstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 2 w& {, o: R9 P7 A# f# xStrategic Warning ' q" m" I3 P5 H% XA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time 6 c8 Q5 d; w. n) T4 KThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 5 C& H6 K4 {8 O F/ m: W1 OStrategic Warning Post- % N; v* ]3 n. ~. \" S( KDecision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. # O6 A2 H0 y' @4 P7 Q( u+ Y! wStrategic 6 S x, |0 |6 e; W4 `% \$ v, O pWarning Pre- Decision Time 3 X0 T+ U% i1 f: t+ x8 h" S2 ~7 |That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a : ^$ t2 L" h9 J5 ]decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 0 f9 M1 |& t/ N. G, S+ ]STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). . G% ? T( O* WStructured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. 4 N- A6 e+ U4 N, [Structured , B' ]7 D4 c# m9 yDesign . S2 H7 p- B7 o9 Q: e/ `0 \A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules ) @. c2 |. [' B! _based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured # K4 ^) P3 X, \2 @) rProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one : }' u& N; g |entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: $ |; _- V' Q# T4 L4 ]& } }7 `sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more / B- p3 ^' ^" Iinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 6 `9 u2 T6 ~, a2 U5 l" rinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. ; r* [8 o+ ~; v! QSTSC Software Technology Support Center. 9 x$ {( @5 r5 A' N9 kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ' Z! w: W9 L6 M$ ?0 D: o3 V& G281 2 Q# z% `: J- S8 M WSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). - f9 {% t7 f$ x) o; h(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 6 h( x5 h$ V( M( nSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. + |# k+ i- D( ^2 u, n6 ISubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. # g1 k U/ ?5 }* {- C9 \* h1 `# GSubject Security Level . Y& K: Q/ x2 ~ i, lA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be ) L, Z" c6 P: E/ l8 }dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. - i9 ~% M( j$ b; o: f* e0 d1 NSubmarine- ) T4 V1 J2 K8 L3 J# T: `Launched 9 M! I7 ~% C/ `1 O: O6 X8 RBallistic Missile (SLBM) - Q4 M$ g, _9 _& ]A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 " e. Y, E" b1 @2 K; \miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function ; j1 V& m6 |: X! u7 @! ]within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive ! p: \ C, T1 f2 F7 ^: D( nDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 4 e3 q1 Q, T$ e1 `SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Y) T) j( g( U- t3 M4 {$ pCommand , _6 J d1 r$ I* dThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command , [# r1 H! A( D* K e5 }is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two ) y; m5 s, W% W" ]" Kalternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to , G. K5 R f$ D! w; u {decisions about future use of resources. 4 k) }0 _) Y) j& c" G8 a; nSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). + r/ ^! v1 j9 W$ e4 SSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. % ]$ W! l: R& l$ a1 D+ H& W4 [Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 4 Q9 ^& Q9 g7 o0 k, P; Ra single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super ; V' s+ F9 t2 Qradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 4 O l& C$ F9 {3 l& n8 [) Jsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. ; L) E( f, Q$ F$ d" Z2 hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % @1 E1 r- _/ _# i6 h3 S6 t282 Superradiant : u- k; w) _0 W. b* @% |4 ILaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not ) j; R! s3 o$ W( Erequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 9 c d+ p' C p, E% X/ g3 p8 {+ ]or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. ) `+ i3 f7 V- X6 cSupervisory Programs " ~1 `) j6 M0 q0 V. {6 m5 I5 [* [Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and * [6 W* P; ?7 W. N7 U' G3 Ccontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 9 |' k5 J2 c$ oSupplemental Appropriation : o8 Y% ?: o+ b- u lAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the ; h+ s% Z+ I1 g1 J1 Rmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 7 J, n" m: {$ T6 K6 p, Qmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). , t% C u, T; j9 p+ \$ ^3 xSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous ) Y# D, B! b7 h( Roperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 1 Y5 `1 y( |$ i" Y2 g r+ j' tadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for - I b3 U+ M ]+ v! \example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, + v. I" h, w! D- h: [, j0 y) v! Y6 Abelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. 4 p1 [- _; }0 W8 D5 o: NSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. 0 ^4 ]: k. p1 ]+ [* |3 z) v3 pSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items + `( ~5 H* ?* Z/ D* F3 @' V$ c x( Bdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or , z/ S. z: |$ z! zmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 6 d# a. w: N3 @ [production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements 6 E3 p' U' h# @: k" U) MRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for 2 {4 [. u. ~% x4 I n3 T+ }" g4 b6 Ucoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response " s* E: s+ t$ g. p& d. u( r6 T0 d+ foptions and current surveillance system availability. 6 {6 X5 z9 ^# x2 ZSurveillance, ( |4 c2 Q. w5 ^% w' u! D' ?Satellite and Missile 7 l% y) o$ ^. }8 f. j; FThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration ' |$ M6 _. v3 R* @! SThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated ) B1 O. n, O1 P u" uin the surveillance system. ; C* Z3 c0 H# x" w# o% MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 4 s; m' |4 h/ \7 O5 b4 Z2 DSurvivability " Z( p( v- f7 j: y. X/ IOperating Modes , [) M) m7 x+ ~% y( a% L) ]- pThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes " F6 }: g4 Y8 Z+ K; i' f/ c5 dthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. / L0 C4 l) _' z/ Y2 fSurvivable and Enduring 9 r0 E0 C! W1 g* a& KCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. 2 j$ J" H2 O9 P6 W) _2 g' a! {SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 9 B0 S) {( `" J3 N' m& E; RSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 8 F7 l$ p9 ]) v8 Q% W$ vSWC Strike Warfare Commander. ( V+ g* k" y8 X2 M- K9 rSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. " `9 t: P( H5 s% I- [SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 0 V: b5 ?9 n( k! H; b2 jSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 2 F2 e$ g- ^ G- E1 }SWSC Space and Warning System Center. + i/ z5 e# x t" `SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 7 P8 D3 t' @ {. N: bSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. ! Y$ k! Q) a. s1 U; h( T6 ^9 USynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic . f6 M& r0 w; GAperture Radar I6 E& S7 U4 U8 G(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points * n' S. V; I# d5 K+ d3 K5 Kalong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 2 i6 _1 P5 A# a0 f& B Stheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's ( O4 G0 N3 L4 Y& Gsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 0 ]$ J% g l r V0 ?, C, femitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. ) r5 Z0 o/ u# d' F: _6 K0 kSys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : V H# ~! G( H8 L% o' b1 t284 SYSCOM Systems Command. 8 T- e8 o7 Z! x/ u& B2 e' o1 ]/ zSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with " l: X8 }, }' S# Fspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 8 o+ j( B' H6 Y- [/ ?! Sfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a ) `# F) y2 [. I) L5 v" t ~. l8 Z% brequirement. System Activation : d6 r$ p+ i$ e" ?That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions / m3 i8 k% \7 ~0 E) F0 Aimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System * {: V/ z3 P& H, Q* VControl. % J; B" T, p& d) z7 K& [$ fSystem 4 W. E6 I8 \0 {. SArchitecture # o! K% i% S4 M# ?. [System $ \; m4 f ~. r$ L/ @ m3 SCapability Specification s) ~, c( T \5 L3 g/ N7 h/ k+ a. k(SCS) 6 p9 i/ O n8 @6 K3 u/ m" tThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. 0 g% I7 ^+ _) a# GSystem Center (SC) ( q2 B7 a& R2 x9 d% e0 |8 } |A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) 6 g4 w9 r" ]' v3 q4 D0 r5 ~OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the , Y8 }5 |# ~* G, o7 {% W* Rconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the & g+ S% B9 _+ T4 Udemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System $ _% ?3 }( R* iConfiguration : l) g8 \3 x6 n* G3 x9 J* C2 yControl Board (SCCB) % d3 j' Z& _2 ?# @* @4 o2 @; M: kThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. & V: k5 T8 d. ZSystem-Critical 3 o4 n" T5 V" A+ U$ ?# ^Function 3 ~0 \( e# M: |; n9 bA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 0 F/ _( H7 r) C) fmission. 8 [) I3 y" k4 ]/ o2 B; q: MSystem Definition Review (SDR) 7 h3 b) g; U* i. J* z4 rThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 7 X2 `6 @8 e: X% V8 z" lfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, # a% U5 c6 A. c' R/ ]- o A/ Sdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, 8 Q7 v0 ]) o$ C2 P- e! Y) Kfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 1 w# e: [% R& s8 w$ U' MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 ' K6 |2 L+ ?' V$ b: N. w1 A3 O: M: r' kSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, ( [+ N k; O; ]. acomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. ~& X8 H4 B$ ]) N+ |(2) The result of the system design process. ' W [" r( @+ V; [' U" _System Design 1 h1 _8 x O2 L. o' N! AConcept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 3 [% o. c2 `3 P$ D( \; Lcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. " A7 A% p ?# g3 i' }2 E4 WSystem Design 5 H i$ a: G i$ A# Y. m" {% FReview (SDR) 8 n% {9 U) S- UEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with ' @! u* o$ S0 h! S1 C. \the allocated technical requirements. System - Y5 k- H( e- \Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 9 C3 D* U2 w- E2 u3 ^7 m! Vof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution 6 n) Q( _8 C: o. q/ I' y; BPlan (SEP) 5 q1 ^8 t) h i+ b& ~The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS % P7 _$ _$ N" X7 `# @8 c8 Scapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 0 A, r0 y1 `; P Y7 @. k& Yassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide ! o% g* N7 h/ o; _2 o( rsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to / ]( t% X4 f4 d- h; jachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome $ l* `% A# D Hthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share % h; }) Y+ ^5 `8 oa set of common characteristics. ( k/ J- T' G) o r8 A; NSystem 1 D" v" u9 p0 j+ c# o" K3 EGenerated + w6 g$ d# H% Z+ g$ t% c$ U2 [Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) 4 h, \- f5 Y0 }* QTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. 7 l( O/ U% @% r0 n4 oSystem " _1 ?7 F# g" Q7 I( E9 WIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, . m# r6 j$ I; I: S) T) Vsensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or * L' v8 p( s/ `. \ Jequipment systems. System Operational Concept 8 t6 \. h# {2 O, z2 o! J) D- |/ \- {2 SA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 7 f+ m$ u$ A+ t- uSystem ) G) s: A3 o( S1 B; p( KOperation and Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command Z6 S; N9 U# }7 g. y! P5 u% band Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). / @% F$ O$ S) f0 e: vSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 5 G/ Q0 u0 ?9 R, q' E: j# D3 J0 qposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program Office (SPO) 7 d6 Y/ H8 N2 l; i! I! FThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 9 q. ]0 {, d9 w; J- {Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out $ ? Y1 X' r. m" h& e* Pthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It ; s4 J- Y* ~+ V2 mincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational # z, n/ I- q: W9 h* |' p! C/ Ystate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 0 d5 j0 I- t* Z. M: Sverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the |) q& t T& H, gcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies ' A, y' B2 k$ g4 L ^4 z; Yand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results - Y4 \* d( z% O" Mstatus reporting. ( B* `" }/ n8 f. H1 W* l% bSystem Readiness $ v1 F8 o, C% Q2 O2 v* zObjective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support % ]9 J" K5 e" l- T$ ksystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements 4 |1 R: d, }* N; i" fAnalysis (SRA) v7 j- E4 V, Q! H. G9 yAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. ( I A$ L& [: r5 m1 [1 Y oSystem / T0 e+ W, Q! b% mRequirements Review (SRR) , c- E5 K% B/ C- ]5 lConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. . u5 O- _$ m$ m# k9 ?2 A* J# qDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 3 }& X2 J" e, Mdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering (SSE) ) v4 X1 E! d7 x @An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 1 ^3 E& F1 F, u7 p7 H5 F. canalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security Engineering 1 k4 C! f& ^, B/ P7 EManagement $ O% C& g: g8 ]' e/ z AProgram 4 R- P: C+ _' i$ { B4 T) j# Y(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the + j8 e Z2 ^& h" Vdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides & e4 |+ D2 ^6 c# H4 Q' Umanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes ( B% y" R% @) o nits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. ; [0 A' V. B/ s5 u, d2 bSystem Security / G9 p/ s9 t$ b Z! Z, C( GManagement 7 s+ k+ P- I! A: ^. ]9 Q# jPlan (SSMP) 8 F" I& l0 q$ dA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, , Q9 e+ n( k" L! d1 O/ Y$ Z- Cmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 6 I& |( f6 v9 ^& |( }systems. Systems & }: a/ x. X4 A8 FEngineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle " |, B/ S) w1 F0 u/ Abalanced set of system product and process solutions. / c$ N4 b. w2 Q1 CMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 - `+ A# w% b, U; y$ E( V7 J4 N; aSystems Engineering Management & a3 V- G7 n3 \. ]* \0 Y, NPlan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) , ~% f; l, G- X! dIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures 8 d) ~2 o5 y1 Hdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and R& S6 c* M% l4 ^% t3 uCoordination + L& [# n1 L; Q9 kThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 7 e+ T4 G9 Z' w u& e& @; iSystem Threat * r8 H3 C" i) o1 |Assessment " u7 G A$ L+ d5 gReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 8 h' Y$ ~, A# g- i' A4 H: _, ^Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when * U6 n3 t" M$ W1 J9 i1 ?the threat changes significantly. System-Valued " e" @$ F) O# q5 W; m' H: JAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T # ]/ c3 C8 x+ b2 Technology Transfer. T $ e* y! J" {) R/ A0 z2 # b7 m1 w, d. rE Technical Training Equipment. , d9 O1 h& o$ E2 h2 T* nTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. , v4 i4 h: Z8 I% c+ p, @, uTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. ; l9 q' S: h4 C5 }TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 7 d$ b- P1 }6 l* _1 ~TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. # H9 p- I" e7 u, Y% w+ XTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. 8 B# {/ T% _8 Q3 QTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. ) l+ ?/ U. A+ bTACS Theater Air Control System. " j: L* |6 C4 ?0 \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ B5 N B2 z/ ^" C% p3 h289 2 U1 r: _: l' v( ~9 FTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation / }' p5 g' x, O8 {4 P) fTactical Air * t) I( W' s. j4 C; UDoctrine 9 Y! S$ D! }' |! [/ rFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. # \2 S( |4 F4 E1 Z# rTactical Air % ?; q: b' Q' D q7 iOperation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ) _/ o# {, ? L% I' i' G' _ground or naval forces. % C4 }& t. S M8 ^, ^1 kTactical Air Operations 8 c2 S8 I( ], _Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air + k; k* N2 o5 I$ _) Edefense operations in an assigned sector. * ?2 Z: {" R, q& H* @2 ITactical Air Support # ]& N. k: ~ ?$ l9 {" iAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of R5 L, S2 g) y3 VResponsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the 1 x P6 p P; I+ ~4 Ucommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and # f; Z! {& L& @! k G( ?coordination of support. / ~: K. }% p" U) ]) f! ~Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 3 |' w; \/ ~) Lemployed within a continental theater of operations. ) B2 e6 |. w& u3 fTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future , x* _. G, U- L' w) `development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or $ ~# y% J/ q2 U! w6 S$ d3 ] _maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data 8 }5 p+ X% b/ G1 xInformation link ) z# O* P: c' h( {, b: Y; m. q0 RA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates : K- h. v, C9 ^, a9 |each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. 5 H- @" \- z) P- N- uTactical Level of * M" c. J" B8 DWar 9 t ^3 y, k( @+ e$ j5 ~The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 0 A t: C( h, F8 @* y& G* L1 kaccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area * }% e" A2 B, n4 C0 H% \8 c(TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations # E1 U- l/ |' K1 q) f3 v6 oarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. ! H7 B0 h0 }& r1 E5 ?# UTactical Operations # O0 D* U3 V, s8 x2 JCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) , J" @) A4 g* ^8 c( U1 k(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an $ u; ]5 ^' I; o U1 Oevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command ; c/ h! |, L/ }6 v/ e- l- w3 acenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component ' }) e1 o, y% k- Jelements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment # h7 e' |$ a6 t/ N; ? U9 \(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack . {3 R7 F* w' g7 O- a1 kAssessment. 6 y: p: R3 K7 X3 RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. 9 t4 _! O* L6 y" G# b2 O(2) Theater Air Defense. 0 [' C: t1 g& p$ R(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ; U+ v% ~9 h( e0 q2 l! ]0 T2 ]TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” h- u; ]- @9 {) a( A, L2 T& \TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” . W( o" u7 d( H- i+ zTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 9 B! s! L! g" ?& Q' K7 j# VTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 4 @) K* r& @0 ~+ jTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. % z w) w7 y, _* f% T$ U0 a2 ^TAI International Atomic Time. k- R: f" Q8 t0 H6 o# ]$ f7 zTAIS Technology Applications Information System. 6 _9 |- E1 i! w7 s# Q7 E ?& yTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ( q5 t% |, b' {/ r" T" NTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. + G, k* W$ K+ I, W0 uTank 2 ?+ B% L* Z# a1 x' N. aFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. * U4 s5 u+ X! R6 ?" F7 v2 @8 e5 OTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. - c1 _4 _3 O+ Y& J(2) Threat Activity Report. 2 A9 }! {1 k' v9 V1 S) D(3) Target Acquisition Radar. & A( z) J N1 \. w; \( _TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. ' a# X7 ^+ y5 j5 ~/ w5 zTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition r9 i" W# ?+ @5 _1 kThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage + @' ~4 D% C; v* nregion of a sensing system. N" S- k; {, |, Z# YTarget ) }* y& M0 }# i9 n" ~# NClassification and Type - j3 Q) w. I, I- J; NIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target $ z+ f+ \* @7 {5 W& R0 O* ~Discrimination . u7 p) F! A* g6 QThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object + p' J9 }# R) NMap (TOM) % p% D Y7 @" p( NA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in % |1 X% {+ I) S9 E6 B. mtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) " H: A0 ^* I2 uTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. " Z" I8 A! r5 U' b0 g! L(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. 5 X# h- A/ T6 {# Y5 u6 [* wTarget System 1 b0 @2 Z1 ~3 x4 S0 ORequirements Document (TSRD) 0 H C4 e k/ iBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target 1 C- V$ y. `# j9 `- E( i7 srequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. . |) Q% w; W M) j: o' Z7 OProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. ; w1 U4 P1 c& Q! l) [TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance : z9 \& U! b3 B, ^ uto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 7 ^" f' M8 X& u" vengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and $ L1 M1 e/ y! p1 ^5 yrequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. , J3 ?+ o- g% K' e: _TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 * J3 U) F$ d, uTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. ) \0 _; @) u( P7 nTB Test Bed. . r! J% l3 q( B0 aTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. , q; Z/ a: {9 }8 n8 T5 MTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. 7 S! P; J# D8 P8 XTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. 4 A6 O% _, u2 U" W a/ D$ |, ~TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. $ r" J: p* ^. D$ j+ S) LTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. : N3 L3 c+ C% o* {& h) ^ @TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). : z1 H* s- \. z- V(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . 5 | N0 q1 O& CTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. % C/ r& m' R* c% s$ D8 JTCC Tactical Command Center. * L/ I) ?9 q2 h1 X1 YTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. # }6 e+ w; d$ V& S ATCF Tactical Combat Force. 4 E9 M- s4 P- Q& Q. K2 h5 K; xTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 2 t% m! k& f* I2 z- y& uCountermeasures Mitigation). * T, {% |+ ~: h" U0 QTD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. " K) `( ~: R7 l4 s6 ?2 g8 b(3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 6 `; h. `$ p3 S6 S" F8 qTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. # d: \( {3 U4 }8 Y) o! y% D. TTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 9 q8 k2 @: @9 v6 z/ b: tMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. $ ~3 v' m9 [1 a8 W. DTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. 3 |# q# ]: z- U0 ?9 l(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. 0 a1 g8 E* s' f# zTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. * V: |" q( U+ Z. Y4 n [- y, PTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. + U' u+ u: y$ k' V; FTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). $ S$ y1 y2 s; OTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. " [0 e: Z) g1 p: _0 S(2) Test Design Package. 4 X8 @ \: q2 ]& D: \(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ) D% N! b6 E! T" L% Z7 yTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. / z+ p6 y$ _& I2 wTDU Target Data Update. # {; g6 X1 } g6 Q6 kTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 0 b; l* z8 k( b! J, R7 {TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ( W/ v# ]7 p! @# f( r$ f( q3 BTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. X! t7 M9 ~. w z' eTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 9 F3 p1 Q" c' ` TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as 0 z9 ^+ ^8 q a* o5 T) F, cmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract * c$ H# g& H# E9 _4 z, L$ nadministration. 0 z# l( D/ Z. {: U; `# mTechnical Data Package (TDP) 1 R7 r. r+ q- H b5 H( C! p8 x7 D: s# }2 [A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition ! J6 j( M$ R# J8 Y) I7 n8 tstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 0 B; \1 U8 s6 O1 f5 K% Yperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, % x+ X, B+ D0 J$ j3 zassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality : V, d5 X) H0 b" passurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation * L9 L3 s/ D& M0 `9 b+ `The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to $ W$ j. \& o! I3 ?+ Sdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in " I+ |* ^+ ^, H& Y; W h& }4 j9 vthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives # q+ e1 N, i* e2 L3 ]* i* K- VThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available # H' j3 v1 l5 _* s- V) @for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & Goals (TOG) ! x5 b S3 @) Z5 w: o9 z% vHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 7 b4 k6 k/ g2 S# W0 y5 {1 B7 `8 g0 Vdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical - |" p1 [. L& `$ H/ |5 o( aParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. Technical Performance 6 `$ `2 P& |2 s3 q1 X8 ?7 C: y4 ]Measurement (TPM) ) x0 @1 M- M7 n* y5 [: bDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ) J5 I; Z' n! H- i6 X! p+ Zassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the 5 I4 Z+ e( p1 g* o5 d5 W0 Cvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures $ L7 T5 }! ^9 K6 {differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. $ U& J& \; L* ~) y5 ]Technical Surveillance % V9 d# l2 U3 H7 PIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 6 J0 p4 d5 O( y- k4 _targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 6 q0 v5 q! n7 s$ i: J3 q1 Jresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing / H7 n1 [! E" N! E$ f3 TAgent. Technology Program Description 9 a; i$ ^+ |8 C" N: n4 ?The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. " a5 Z$ T6 _8 ^0 z4 |TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. ) ]$ U' I/ P; q, B0 r0 z1 f/ FTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. # Q M: X: P7 q7 STEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and 0 G% R" ~" M ?Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a / O% @" k/ x# psequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 1 q# _: l r/ l2 E$ t: nmission commands to the satellite. / r8 G# M8 r8 X% k( b0 xTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 4 O$ ]* C( x5 ^0 P- ]7 rTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. 2 y( `4 j1 U+ \9 f! pTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See * ?( K( |( o8 U- U2 \* eCompromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. 2 j7 V- H" ^3 u0 m; [) [- B a( cTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. : i" S9 d/ ]' U. r) OTerminal Defense 1 K( y8 z' t: b0 ]6 g0 cSegment (TDS) * g2 w# `& m' X1 l1 L" h. ^* vThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between : I7 S+ ?% ^- Patmospheric reentry and impact. 5 G6 M' ?9 C' s7 U" z" O& _Terminal % f+ ~' m, D m9 L8 KGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the : A+ @- Y0 S. \2 [* X& B6 b: pvicinity of the target. ^+ T; F6 J6 G0 i& jTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase . U K! F& n3 X: mand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase ( E; ^; u1 F; ^Interceptor ! g( ^ \2 E) N( C; h- mA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 1 @- N! P. r' [3 i: A: k) pterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 0 ]5 u. i- ]& \5 N' pTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 3 O5 w* D, L7 u6 o1 x0 |* [TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary . h" @2 p {* [; M8 v% ~7 r7 ^consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and . l8 s: s% e% lEvaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production ^+ S$ r3 O: H1 m, xAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted / b2 @4 m3 b5 E7 w; qto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical " J1 Y# \8 X3 ` c, @performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a , \+ [2 {$ G/ r, w+ S/ D& [2 L" hsystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, - W: V, n& Z5 ~" Uand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 4 i! a+ V" x1 z% E8 s/ @. w# @0 Krequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 3 g8 V1 f3 {6 R$ K(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test % E6 X! L' Y( e$ u# i$ Yconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic ) ?0 v# P; E. ?3 M* penvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness * J9 V; C8 u/ xand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of ; p% M9 ^. A5 d7 A/ rdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and 3 O& Q' O! h& E6 v2 g3 Y0 rEvaluation Master Plan 6 t! Q2 ^# h; x5 {1 b(TEMP) 8 Y' ~1 A5 H0 S: [* {An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation / y$ R4 }3 L2 A; C& f6 s+ r+ `to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as . F W6 m' s2 t; Y4 Xearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and 8 {" o- B- I3 s2 ]6 O; }Evaluation L5 I3 l0 X) W9 Z3 lWorking Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 2 B+ _4 z' e, ] W( m/ H+ a8 splanning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the ) w; Z" n% H1 C# G/ ?. c, H r1 @Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 9 P T$ h8 \) j) Lintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 5 D P" E$ r" f/ M, n. p; R, Jprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling * a' y" @7 |* S% S1 Kproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 2 w3 K( ~% g. Y0 D: P& Orelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 1 a) S- m0 i* d+ A( X6 iwhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software , g& B* T I( c7 y8 E4 |and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration 6 H1 w/ [( V0 z: b3 YWorking Group : d# ~5 v" r+ @, N+ T+ h0 f(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. 1 y- }( G4 Q B1 e# x3 { B/ RTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, * M6 J: C) U' U0 i- ^+ U( ~9 Ctest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 $ \/ Q4 F) M2 V+ VTest Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 5 u6 P A* q& iTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. $ K8 E7 |7 n( R% F$ J3 d0 ?2 sTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. ! K Q6 i% W2 V P8 }' V- YTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. ) e2 z7 d" y0 H4 E& V; a/ r7 nTF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. $ b2 w* h6 M, M# fTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). % n) }. x% r# c, ZTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. ' S- a- @/ R0 d! y; q/ q& HTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. ! U; ~2 D, D7 [9 E7 t% vTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 9 ? V* A+ f4 i8 U5 tTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). . q8 l7 R( o3 P xTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 2 K* k- ~8 w0 \. @TGS Track Generation System (USN term). ) f" V" q7 r, A, z& f8 }- NTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. # M; Q9 M) u1 H( uTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic # s8 I$ L; g9 Z! H3 Z U& yMissile Defense 2 P7 F* Q2 y( Y- ?(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against * H2 C' S( ]: @6 ^) Jballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)