航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user x* k- ^6 r& R* i' s7 paccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. # G C! _' c4 p& {5 e5 o8 d" hSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). - o! r8 Z9 q0 r+ _(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. % e. A: t, t+ ySTOM System Test Object Model. / ?7 ?+ I0 O5 O' |& tStorage, ) z) F7 D- c4 v3 e1 u. xHandling, and Transportation ) @' P; [% N% ?$ YEnvironments 4 r8 B# k3 h; W+ Z2 [% pThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 4 { t) i* t, D- B0 H6 ystorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable 1 f( E7 Y. e: e' @& A8 Batmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. 2 }6 a3 y+ b0 r% ~STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). ) G% D' C, X. I1 jSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. : a$ u* B! t& @* ^3 O7 hSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. 4 f( Q/ p, h( Q" u6 F) n* ]9 O. ]STRATCOM Strategic Command. ' }9 r; y" d6 UStrategic 2 g+ u) v8 j; A+ o, YDefense 6 `6 m. ^4 B7 L8 o5 yAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to - z* u" Y! n$ w7 h4 U1 Xnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. 4 u" K6 {! V7 _3 U& lStrategic Defense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving * q0 N/ L6 t6 G7 oballistic missile defense system. & V' T3 e% n ?: }0 e2 x9 m$ E4 EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 " Y8 F- Y4 R ~% xStrategic Level of War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or # ]( C) |' L1 l! `8 J* Jalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces ( L1 `2 [ K( ~) m, W k(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, 7 {" @. O* l3 j1 I; V2 ~the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated C2 Z# _3 I% xOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 8 L p2 p' U+ g) e5 JStrategic * [7 F/ o5 ^+ a/ uReserve . X7 g0 n- T! q/ c( W8 M$ iThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply * [- \2 M q) c- N i7 H0 sdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic - `+ B. q* \. t$ i! D& L* zWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. # k$ | q& t9 q# Q7 n5 IStrategic Warning Post- . A% t4 Z1 u3 ^, cDecision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of % ~ \+ Z. \9 qgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic ( i6 O" N* C6 i% @ g& Swarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the " A' _4 t, B4 J. J2 `4 G' ynational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in - k: b0 _1 z) k9 R2 }the pre-decision period. 5 z# Z. w- a# z {( U( jStrategic Warning Pre- Decision Time 9 e+ O, d6 t! K4 L+ g0 X; C1 N4 IThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured * b) S5 {, \6 OAttack : \/ g- t! Y# J- |' t/ ?2 v0 BAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured 1 s: w( o4 a9 l* O$ TDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data ; M& c! `4 o( f2 h: ~flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 1 {& T8 R' R' _3 wProgram _- [6 F; Z+ M* \6 vA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one : ^+ X: G0 w* A/ qentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 0 q4 d" ]* q0 Y: q" q1 @0 nsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 4 Z4 Z9 c% r' Hinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 0 @% V) Q2 m M* lsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. : u8 x% Z$ E( D. SSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. - r$ P, W% t- R: XSTS See Space Transportation System. ' u: e6 Q) q+ d5 O) X* JSTSC Software Technology Support Center. - N7 w0 `$ e5 ]# xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : p# T9 @! U; ^% I- x9 d281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 8 t" h( I4 u7 [! m' P6 ^STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. $ o" `$ s4 m1 F; v% \" Y5 \STU Secure Telephone Unit. : Q0 s! b; I, u8 T% eSTW Strike Warfare. 0 W! i+ G$ C7 J4 U; BSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. ( i6 [" Y: e" hSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ( o) o# H: k. o. K& x2 D- r0 u9 D0 DSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security ) t, q; r/ f8 T5 p! ]Level ! A4 X& e6 k) s0 K8 IA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 0 c! {6 I( v: @( m* Ihas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 9 x h( X. O/ Z: ^5 A7 C7 Udominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- Launched 0 x, t: Z7 v% d! k- J" xBallistic Missile " K' k) |4 {' E1 C$ P(SLBM) ) v. A. I* w7 \6 r6 l, oA ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. 0 B8 T' \9 J7 i+ ^1 @SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 4 e; [9 _$ B' c& _3 Q: T+ Wwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. % U! l$ U6 d/ t% C3 @3 b9 ?" ^Subtractive % [9 T1 Z8 _! s; LDefense ) @( c( M! l. b: U/ o- VFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. 6 c# o) T2 f3 FSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, L$ R/ y" U- M. _' e; R, gbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 4 x% A; K4 s' d8 @0 His a synonymous term. ( b8 F& N9 E3 |3 q" K z, jSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two " O# N1 \& s& ~3 }. w" Ealternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to - H0 b: W5 K1 M/ l. kdecisions about future use of resources. 6 l! Q8 X4 V$ h# \& I4 LSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 4 f0 U: A: P3 g+ |$ Y; ISuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in ( R& a+ @ g5 B! I3 ra single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, ) y# u! R0 u1 L4 Tthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super * @0 k* s. j# v; j% v0 Uradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as t1 o/ B7 [) o, I7 V. [$ Osuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. * x4 k! p+ R0 H: \4 d, ~- X+ \+ d7 }MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 7 k: g) X2 x( u1 ^, D" r, I! Crequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from ! Y) Z5 ^: B0 S; osuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental ! c7 E$ p( o; R1 C1 _2 AAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment ; W! t: g6 Z7 I) h0 n* ^* fAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 9 m# U% @" D! a6 mmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 4 b0 b2 u" I# nequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly , l* Q/ ?3 R# v% M8 K1 ttools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ; B3 Z3 _- ^8 D7 k* j5 z9 uprotection equipment). Support : N. _- [" G5 O8 jPersonnel ( @* R/ S' u) [4 G9 h; s* IIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous 6 w9 _+ t' J/ coperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, * Y" k; F6 s* s& a" Padministrative support, and the like. 9 |1 ^* `0 \$ YSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for % O& ]' \& W& S& v2 P8 g1 y$ T9 vexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 2 }: ^7 `9 H6 M; f/ V6 dSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. / }$ }, U8 r* J; gSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. 9 h9 s$ M) @( i, B5 rSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. , e" ]9 }, v- k+ m3 c& N, |3 VSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 2 T9 d4 V( ]5 X: p# Z2 u; t& t0 |production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. 7 C7 M, N: Y, \, C; c# {Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, . s3 i- Q' W0 U6 o' Hand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric $ q4 R4 @+ ]9 U2 M( |sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 6 |" w1 T% L4 ^1 v: MRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response " ?8 D- h6 W3 w& |6 _& [$ f+ U) Roptions and current surveillance system availability. 8 s: w& Z( g! ~' O; sSurveillance, 0 m2 \5 q; `1 ]6 O) p4 ]8 ESatellite and Missile 2 ]# ?+ q3 f9 A1 T2 Y8 iThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites ( s4 Q" y" T2 [2 R; I2 aand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration 7 C! n6 V1 e1 U3 j6 RThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 & B5 l: e: U0 U$ q/ rSurvivability Operating Modes # s6 z' S( v7 f0 T& }$ N& Y3 pThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 5 n2 V3 i/ \. Z3 [) M- xSurvivable and Enduring Command Center + ~! h! @* j. L% J1 U7 `(SECC) ' Y, U; I3 N8 \The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. ; _" @- Y) [1 ~; FSUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. 5 J! ~# b2 o0 ?: _3 V) x zSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. " o5 j7 Q) p. A7 o& A" k( XSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating " B' Z3 n6 }# R( _5 }; lband of frequencies. : Z! A% o2 P) ?) _* ISWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. Q: k- |4 B4 G* [2 L1 d0 GSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 5 r+ r7 U; [2 n+ x( E. qSWSC Space and Warning System Center. & T8 M7 k4 {7 x8 ISYDP Six-Year Defense Program. , A( E! C. z7 hSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to 1 X" s; z1 G6 x* {, A. U2 Xone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. ( q! v1 W' E" o4 v$ N, XSynthetic 3 A: s/ a: k. d. W: }" J- Q% PAperture Radar * @; {# b- l, o0 o- U1 A(SAR) " A9 \7 G# D: H" sA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points / s9 D+ p; L4 G$ V$ J0 dalong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ) D# I% C& [' p6 q) Itheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for 0 O& K5 c# ^- f3 u; Rtransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. # K4 U" b( Z: k" o. ~7 X2 vSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 ' I" f& O5 c3 Y5 V. B% @3 |& _# M" BSYSCOM Systems Command. & }$ _- n# @+ i. @! F3 j& RSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 4 Q4 z$ L/ C0 L$ Z4 ^8 k0 wdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with a, P- }! U7 p* t; lspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. 0 a0 P* d l! E(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a , M1 V: A8 W( ]6 `6 ffunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. 3 K: i @. i# i1 i* QSystem & g5 k5 S, F+ c2 U7 o. IActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System " ` V1 l# ]; H* g# c4 [Control. System n- f* M; o0 {' p4 L( Y8 X* iArchitecture , q0 R& n/ W7 y0 j, w CSystem " V. u+ Z8 Y9 {& N0 yCapability 4 z5 g0 K% ^2 e& A2 {) i& g( e* ESpecification 3 o/ v2 f6 \4 H) q5 m(SCS) 8 ]1 S# q* m" S# Q& ~The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system 9 A1 A# P( |0 karchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 1 T. q% Z( n4 q: Fenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. ( G: p. h3 i$ w% EThe government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among + ?6 q1 Q2 \. ~8 E9 Xthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) : _. b& Z$ [8 h; @8 FA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 5 f: I; a+ K W, k" Msensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of : H* b: X' \; L! _equipment in CMAFB. % A6 F t8 Z1 U* i6 Z6 a$ @9 ySystem Concept % H& z' o0 P0 i/ }) aPaper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System , k- h7 |+ ?0 v* vConfiguration : V: i& ]- a% a+ a; R' MControl Board - A% V. v3 S0 U8 K& Z7 {(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. {! a9 [/ {, I, F; |7 SSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical - k- w; J1 s g# k3 d/ uFunction ) T& W) J% y" r' S; d; GA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's % m1 K& U& U6 @5 ]mission. System Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 1 {" m$ V3 Q2 o" fsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 2 r h' W6 P4 V) mimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, ' m* o( f$ x& V- edetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. 7 V. { `& z: b0 x0 |0 U( YSystem " [0 S6 v" {% X7 |* J( \* hDeployment $ }& y; D$ f+ kDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 8 E" U! g# i- ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S $ c- \+ D9 s! `$ q8 E- Q# i285 / }& L+ K& M4 c4 `, k. tSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. - u. P& v& A' n; E) z8 E- M(2) The result of the system design process. ' o0 S! ^- O% ~2 Z4 pSystem Design ; g0 m6 Y, [" i8 Q+ h wConcept 2 G$ n2 ]% R% |) K3 _2 L: `An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and . [8 ^& t( `$ `' t6 gcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be - W/ G" H/ i2 n+ Q6 Eoperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ( f; i0 s, j$ I3 ZSystem Design 8 k! A9 c0 y) I. o. F9 XReview (SDR) 4 P5 K+ E, o P* HEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with " e4 r# x( ~/ G; E* nthe allocated technical requirements. . F. h' y( S' h" K C0 p7 ZSystem % t3 G7 |( r9 }) i7 p- DEffectiveness * Z6 M/ ~% ^3 XThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution , P0 i. j4 d- a* xPlan (SEP) ; J6 ~# R: `4 w$ |& c: hThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ( f2 {1 B0 N0 i+ F+ Qcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 8 a @) Y9 l% D0 q5 vExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide - F$ f; P! d) ^; esignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to # Z# p; ?, t2 h0 D9 |+ w$ Aachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. - L7 C+ b3 Y# Z2 l$ d# q) LSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System Generated V5 w) h' s; ~: M) ]Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) p% H( W5 T$ u6 STransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the ' L' Z' D$ `1 l8 l3 mobject in order to produce charge equalization. System * y5 N) \) E: p' Z" HIntegration Test # J' w. W; N c+ D# b6 c# \A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, : F! a. e" U$ e) [1 @5 c9 |! l9 Qsensors, and weapon hardware. # J1 k6 x5 ^5 b$ O0 Z5 ~) ], QSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks $ S4 I, q. H) R0 j f1 pand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. System Operational 2 y/ I; o d& g; t. pConcept ; ^5 I! f& P6 Z' f+ Z& H5 d* g) k) x0 ^A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, , f, w# H" W0 j& @deployment, and support of a system. 4 i/ r& t0 j6 X/ u. oSystem Operation and Integration 1 f; s n% s1 i3 ?5 R3 qFunctions (SOIF) * N. F3 T+ ^$ b, Q: F NThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command " s F5 m9 a: v5 z8 Dand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to ' ]0 W* E2 r; v* Y. lthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of / M3 f0 N3 J4 v" Nposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program Office (SPO) % ~& H5 f& i6 v) iThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 5 z7 L0 u$ v- I5 i. Y2 @process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It ) a' U: h3 ?/ Cincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the * D, h- j$ R5 \0 c- E3 Mcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under $ \" Q4 W. C- ~: {" @realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions " j4 ?8 K+ S5 D+ ]3 `7 P) Jnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, - T. C- K7 n# g' Q0 |1 vhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results & L) p2 v5 y% i r2 ]3 F% q9 cstatus reporting. 4 M* e: ^' y4 \4 B) Z7 U) TSystem ( P: i! \' g d7 e+ WReadiness Objective $ r! g& s( @' i6 ]5 n. r) fA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and ) d; |! ~5 Z2 R( L9 T H" Fmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ! g0 N2 R. R* Nsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 5 o9 v% s2 Y' }$ ?capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements , }: b$ B$ J( w* E KAnalysis (SRA) 5 h2 f4 f; `* |1 U7 n: E% X8 |An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 8 [5 G: S& u3 A' i5 z _; I$ J% FConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine / \7 d, V9 m* L& Z- e& T$ B7 ?specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) z/ `% E. |# G1 IConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. 8 d D& ? N; [) h* EDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the + F* d; q+ B) x; \( q6 fdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. # _: r7 o1 |/ x% fSystem Security 5 _6 c/ I4 z! S c; D- t+ N! w, LEngineering (SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks 5 |9 }7 x% Y2 Y$ S# I3 L7 c- nassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related + m$ o- d5 [% ^) p+ Fscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 8 I, B1 Q: {/ c) A# Z( _4 Eanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 1 @- W0 t: o9 u ]1 isecurity threats. System Security 2 ?% ]/ S: a1 _# W6 b9 pEngineering Management ; E* V! t9 F$ \+ oProgram (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical ; Q! g Z, c5 ~3 @achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE ( o# W8 C2 q$ ?+ L; Pprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ; i0 M; P7 v$ p; U2 G* xdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides 8 t, `2 M/ W. t, M3 hmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 6 Z0 V/ Q8 U `* X2 y" S' tSystem Security Management Plan (SSMP) ) f: O5 _: Y2 k2 NA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 3 ~1 V. k/ }# C7 qmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related |5 ?/ U* L: h4 U, s$ |, e7 _systems. Systems ! E1 N* d# S! |Engineering , W7 ?0 L' I; a- YAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. . c" |4 A1 }: dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 & ]& q: I# N; J1 s6 \% j& FSystems 0 e8 `# }! G9 C2 X) UEngineering Management Plan (SEMP) 4 c9 p: u9 b( k v) KThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) ( Z, H0 G: G2 v# Z) f. ?Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) . ?2 q- j. B0 A# N9 V+ OKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test 4 A; V% ~. Z: `( nIntegration and $ p a( p( z2 T6 V0 y+ gCoordination + [ ^5 F/ \5 ?7 y* S& ]The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat V& w: l0 t+ ]5 { y* yAssessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a & P `' \* H2 l# V& vService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency 7 S; k0 b7 g2 I o) g" ]/ H' Z$ ?and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 5 z' x& N# x( q( D% }0 }; |+ Ythe threat changes significantly. S/ ?) B/ A* a; F0 {* uSystem-Valued Asset / V8 Z% i/ L2 `. g- @1 Q5 U( ]- @A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to + u t/ V2 G" b/ `4 a" tthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. " s/ X( {0 _' H* A7 vT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). * g: k- g) X. q; z$ C2 lT 2 . O+ K% j; J6 |' W3 F3 VTechnology Transfer. , _+ {) [) S+ w+ ZT . d b: @; G$ g/ e& l1 S3 v2 E Technical Training Equipment. x: |: K+ @/ J4 L1 [TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. ( r, e6 [3 O* b/ ?5 @. jTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. + f: d8 I' X, |( f9 O3 _TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. # l4 m3 X2 g+ KTACC Tactical Air Command Center. / }. w2 J: c( b @TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). ' a- r& ~, y) ZTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. : G+ j5 ?/ p- H0 f$ X) mTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ) b! v5 }8 ?) m$ D J* R kTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. 9 Y" u0 d6 k% [( A, F bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. 2 B; J) B! ]" Z: S/ E# _: x" K1 xTACSIM Tactical Simulation + D. y( S' N( Q3 ETactical Air , R) S1 ]( D( _3 U/ mDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air 4 T0 q5 Z9 h1 ~2 Q9 B' v" Y8 YOperation * r; ?" `4 F3 \( u' a5 O9 sAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. 0 n5 | {% o7 V& iTactical Air : {9 i. A2 l+ h, |, gOperations Center 0 c. o0 W! K; U3 T; r* m) S, e# pA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control - b o" G8 _9 R7 }& X2 MSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ( ^# ~2 y* S; A n9 Zdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air $ ] U/ v6 J7 F$ a* l8 m' g9 iSupport 0 N+ U+ u" P# sAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly , f' m7 ^ ]( o# qassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of ) ^; q0 Y! ]. Q! J8 b' V; MResponsibility N( {4 ]* V4 k+ F(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and 8 z' P* U3 c) ^9 z/ l" |* Zcoordination of support. Tactical Ballistic 4 |9 N G( A; Z; NMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be u/ P. D* G( n5 Q, q9 n; \1 wemployed within a continental theater of operations. 0 |: S3 i( a. K( J1 ?; i% u; x' KTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 3 v( |+ A% h( j/ N3 a) \3 F* cdevelopment of tactical doctrine. 8 ]+ R1 I4 d8 p! dTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 1 s/ j4 F, ]" d& a5 P2 U: d# omaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data ( u2 Y6 M4 z0 }# ^" vInformation link $ Z' e) h4 H1 z& q" S% OA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of " m0 O. x# J8 g3 s1 ^/ @War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. & J. l: R# l) WTactical Operations Area 4 C6 g7 D4 F1 k0 S9 H( g- s9 A(TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations ! w5 ^/ k# S" R4 S% D/ u, Xarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. 9 A& J0 K, i2 B1 WTactical 6 S/ z" J7 Y9 jOperations * J1 S1 }/ p7 O( _1 H2 j) {Center (TOC) 5 {! k" d) k0 H/ T4 KA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff * N# j! }$ K1 R3 _, N" `6 Xconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) " r# U2 P+ E# F. W9 X1 t# U& ](1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an 0 ~( ~$ H( K& l2 X/ N) |evaluation of information from all available sources. ( Q2 c0 r6 w4 u$ Z! K) U& ^(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. " y- A6 f! ?' R, }1 T; tTactical ! N# }. k9 e% E' YWarning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack % M. v* b& I: j4 w! }( yAssessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 6 W, e' F# m( H$ OTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 6 H! Q' R1 R7 H5 Z- Y. kTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ) s' ~! N; c. \TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. 2 q8 g* m( k# R* P- j3 F: gTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. " c7 i) y) B( u1 D6 O# mTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. * {) R! a$ A; f3 R/ E0 RTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” 9 [# }4 n; v @9 B6 h- x1 {* m/ U. tTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ; r/ _+ ?' `- R; p" wTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 0 A: G$ m2 Z1 l) y6 e8 a" N4 [% BTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. " {6 N9 v' M R3 N0 hTAF Tactical Air Force. $ W6 u1 m8 M& v/ |( W/ {& ?6 j& dTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ' I0 E; [1 W. YTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. 9 P5 o% G( i N- c1 C# hTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. , Z1 i% \& Y) C ^3 T+ ETALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector , ^6 n$ [7 ^+ G7 T. P- P! z" f3 aand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive / B) i B' W, b8 i, e, Zdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. $ K2 l o3 g( uTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 2 n! n- a* Q+ I# WTank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. . a5 v+ T+ G e1 XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 p) l7 j& M1 g# o291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. ; c7 S) P9 p( d; U$ ?1 e4 a(2) Threat Activity Report. 8 c- O: q+ |& ^1 Q% I! ~& g(3) Target Acquisition Radar. - V, c" o8 X3 `TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 9 P% O) r1 m h9 ]TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. 7 l) F: u' Z4 l+ O' U5 g' R3 wTarget Classification / H6 Z$ f$ L6 g3 yand Type . G0 u6 x' }) ]2 RIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. M( ]) A$ R- ]* \; C$ e) VTarget Object Map (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in . ]' g: G$ ^+ q! @* h2 N5 y/ starget designation. (USSPACECOM) S# v: h: H7 H# x1 w2 e% \Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 4 y8 z" D6 s, f# G# e- l- Midentification equipment. ; d b( r+ N( y( x" X(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. ( s5 I0 v5 m" ETarget System $ j. N8 h/ c- p/ t% v4 j bRequirements ) G, e+ ^& [4 a( Q4 |& L' cDocument (TSRD) 1 ^' s( n, z2 Z- s/ u. [9 dBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD v$ G& g- @; y* `% D$ _( nProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target . l* W! D$ r% Q7 F- A, zrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. ' Q' [3 V; ~& k/ J% JProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. / H( E- ]' @6 y) l0 WTASA Task and Skills Analysis. D2 P* N! P! Q/ Z: pTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 6 e. L- X% n& ~& P4 x! h5 h5 h8 n8 c5 Mengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 4 G# N+ W/ q _7 Y) Krequired performance. 7 v7 u$ l! K) ]$ I0 HTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. 0 U; ?2 e" J( M( l' BTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 4 e0 Y: W; K% j$ |( AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. # y* V: M" [ H, _- TTB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. " J3 g( t: D9 N7 ~( ETBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. / i. N A" |7 L1 j# ^+ `0 J3 C& ~TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. % y- B0 S3 ^1 W f$ E; `( tTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled % X# w4 ?6 ]- v. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. / K2 c' \8 {8 t7 ?TCC Tactical Command Center. 5 e" x: Q$ h2 s7 F5 X# ]# ~TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 0 x2 Y2 Z f# j; f' o i- bTCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. & o' l& P! u, V% ?: v6 O) zTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 5 _3 N) L% Y7 I7 i3 t; XTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD & y7 w7 Q) X# c0 F/ WCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 1 D2 j, ?+ m1 q! a(4) Training Device . r6 x; T$ P2 k. G: ~( d6 |TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 0 t B1 `# g6 S R5 ~4 ?8 n9 L6 z yTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. ; G# P0 q. U' @) z3 t9 {3 uTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 4 f1 W. ^9 Z& GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T _, ~; m% n7 X. K293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). , z: I1 t# ]4 @4 |& LTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. / W; F/ M5 }- m# A- o/ f% U- OTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. % k! G$ c, c1 kTDI Target Data Inventory. & d0 m- ~! C: t9 ~4 O) D2 Z- z* QTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 8 h1 P; }; a/ W7 |0 g) o5 ^. Y7 pTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. ; a1 y9 h. N8 ]# F0 B$ h+ mTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. & X2 m) d' B: X7 h2 U; U6 XTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ! R- R, S1 ~, e. g# V/ B9 XTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. " P8 ^; V0 z+ X/ A& PTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ! K; k: S2 t5 z# {Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical + p, ~" q& r& u" T: z( J4 TTECHON Technical Control. 3 X4 m( B2 F, m* [2 x! O" O6 ZTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * ?! h U B6 i, M& h* M: H/ ~1 R294 * h2 t7 k3 A1 E. tTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. 0 g! r0 `* l5 |1 M; L6 ^Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. 8 N6 e' Y6 K; I) y/ l. @ ITechnical Data . k1 [9 d& S5 X+ I( {/ w& F0 IPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item & C. F* ? @: sperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, / q5 A* @7 `8 fassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical 2 |' O! a/ J+ W& M0 V1 }3 fEvaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical 9 S. ?. W$ U: t, Z" f- `Objectives 7 m& Z2 O8 j, y# a( u* wThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & Goals (TOG) : x4 X0 z0 k7 q9 k( G0 HHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. + C; A1 y0 _5 ETechnical Parameters (TPs) " q* u# D& y, B, f8 p, R7 J0 RA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 6 B" H0 V" _) S/ f1 w3 R4 x, Jmanagement. ; r* h% F+ G' z3 J) t ]" eTechnical Performance Measurement (TPM) 6 ?; y8 w4 g, N$ I# A$ K; k3 q: lDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status ( W& M9 x- G& \* {- j* |beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 5 h6 I0 x; P, Oparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the ! q1 M' D0 J+ }! e* u0 Dvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures - i5 I4 S9 ~1 F J+ e2 Odifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product $ @. N1 @( f8 {0 l/ P* velement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these % j- O! K/ E/ c7 Z ]differences on system effectiveness. Technical , q: b. c; Q5 j# g! N6 i0 [& T- zSpecification $ w2 E+ L+ ~0 M8 m$ CA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical / A3 h) F$ w% Q9 N7 G; ]. `Surveillance t3 V+ U2 R& T0 w: N0 `; t. `* D1 gIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 1 D/ E. D e Y" L8 W% Hemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. 9 u' B: N7 U- I" X* k( S4 l) U& C- yTechnology ; n, F7 y, v# Y! v% uExecuting Agent + ` Y* G5 U' Q: YThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing , \7 L5 }. T" H* r0 ~Agent. * Y& K5 q# m# H [Technology Program Description ; x: {" Q# M7 V' ?) yThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ' e0 w0 G, _$ a* r X* a2 t! fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 }' W* D5 o2 ~; H; n+ y+ |3 RTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. ( }. p! n. P+ W* P3 u" M+ kTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and 6 w# s g# \, t2 G8 d: Lstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ( [0 _- W4 n! D3 P! s8 v1 v# Hmission commands to the satellite. ! f4 p, E2 { B5 s, l) B" BTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. , D) U6 w. }+ t8 Q; @TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. * b5 m0 g, P% j9 J& GTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 0 X2 C; q. n8 |. i* I" M3 P7 e3 ~TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. ( Q3 O9 w$ D N0 X. R9 ~TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term ) R3 M/ S9 N0 S# |8 R. a"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. : p1 i. t8 c! T0 g1 ^( w- X9 x3 CTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 2 y% ^# l0 v2 Y$ K3 [$ c. _7 zTER Test and Evaluation Report " l$ L0 A, E* c: iTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. - Z4 n6 y6 n @, W& h$ UTerminal Defense # a5 h l& W% X* @5 x7 i9 u7 d: ESegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. $ Z# R8 Y; S# M& f! WTerminal Guidance 0 u& ^' ^& C4 l+ M% v d+ qThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. 8 G5 H9 y! f4 j$ ^6 Q0 E, {Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase 4 s* e) ?0 A2 x( I* U Yand trajectory termination. H8 J _1 l5 L1 W F4 s% K4 UTerminal Phase 6 ?0 m* T: z% K; V4 aInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 3 I6 v6 E' n" r7 {+ lterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy * b% H ^5 I0 o6 pPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 0 m$ w4 U: S# R+ MTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. # c+ t# k4 V+ N8 o, q' Y7 a+ x6 `TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. 9 f) n# M8 G: xTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. $ a( V! n; x8 D. NTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 ; @% u: n# ~- G. x) hTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 4 R4 E" d% P/ v; |1 _3 z4 U* ]& Xhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 9 A6 F9 ~2 B2 [- oconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all * F j3 X2 E, I5 [. ^' y4 doperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. * L' Z; l& c+ E8 A( t! K: GTest and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated ( u* L' l/ k! f+ x. Rto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production 1 d- E Q6 p1 C3 U0 xAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof , S9 S& ~3 O0 ?( E! B/ M( b0 D$ lmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical , i6 G ~2 K1 G v4 zperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel # t! X/ M) S. J! W( i1 orequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts : ]& m8 V# i# a% i5 z: cor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational . Q2 h" B/ c2 m' h# i k(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of 1 |, r) T) u! F6 K2 ^$ roperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 2 I3 u7 a/ {8 R0 }$ C4 \8 b% renvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of + S) O- ?2 U! Q- Z- n1 B, I4 mdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ; ~9 ]' L# F/ o# R2 j) GEvaluation Master Plan " i3 B4 [! j$ K n: z+ t(TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 4 d# ]1 r4 Z' n* P0 ]objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation ' s% x: h$ H; ~% wto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 4 s0 L) d* B- K- D% t: L1 }progresses. Test and / U( ]% W5 ~3 j" U6 b8 NEvaluation 4 ?6 D5 Q$ Z6 `5 ?2 |5 n% OWorking Group 9 r( g% `, H, k2 c" R$ l5 N(TEWG) + ~( I# _6 R. L) ^& C; cThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and ! p3 j6 H; q: @' Jrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals ; ?8 y6 F6 _' I# Ewhen there are T&E implications. g1 v2 w% n+ H" d% k0 u/ QTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 7 b9 U- Y6 Z' N% s- x% k3 ETest Integration 4 V+ _3 a$ `% M7 xWorking Group ; F M5 W/ I4 N3 @0 M8 N(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, . h# @1 [5 I% j: Ztest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation , L! a$ o2 `% p/ [8 W" H, _7 f1 Wcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target ; c- ~5 k, e" I" {0 t9 T5 Y+ `+ NVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. ; d4 ^; C- U1 D- u+ UTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. $ O( w4 ]$ y3 m. M/ x1 vTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 5 J- @9 A$ \' p# k M4 @. e' bTF Task Force. $ ~- d+ {6 z# PTFC Tactical Fusion Center. 4 O: P& @- c) r3 b+ n( kTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). : [+ H. p U& H) K* ~& H8 E2 vTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management ; h) _9 O$ E2 k# Q7 |TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. . \ [ |7 m( Q$ o4 CTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). ( a2 y& _( l5 i% dTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 4 z; P U! p3 j- ATGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a + y" Q2 R1 o7 y+ t- Dcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 6 p; M0 M2 _( |Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 8 R9 c! c0 B4 [- |8 [Missile Defense . z4 U) ^, c. G( U4 O8 U(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against . P' S3 a3 x+ Q' P& W3 }0 m& G9 B3 Nballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 6 N0 j0 L& n6 |) y, X: h(USSPACECOM)