航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user , f7 a+ P! d t0 m- p" k/ e: ~access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. + e/ p# s- l( |STM Significant Technical Milestone. ! X: a& m7 _" i, S& M1 jSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). " ~, d( `* X' C$ \(2) Science and Technology Objective. 9 s" s3 W6 W2 e9 rSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 2 k3 V+ M- D; W; }Storage, Handling, and Transportation Environments 0 H5 b$ x/ V& }/ GThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient y# p6 s' A4 V6 `0 Lenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 8 i/ t0 U$ l, m- R+ N! }9 c, vstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ) O9 K: Z# ?: E7 J) b; J2 F, `atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 2 w. S+ k8 L! H) nshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). * S. \% s9 B1 k' r& n2 ?STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. 2 F9 U: d) B1 _) [! B# M! X( eSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. ; {2 [) m% I* X+ h5 p' H& ?- KStrategic Defense " q. w1 P2 M9 N; S( e+ z4 Y0 N( R1 nAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat & f" r. \9 S* |: z4 V$ a3 Y# Xballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense # h8 y& a5 Y9 C, y. |: n; g" X- gEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic - ]* \9 R& S$ T2 s$ F0 J/ p$ Q5 YDefense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! j/ d6 g4 V+ u6 S280 Strategic Level of J/ {2 n! l/ g. B' h) ?; OWar c7 q# t( I( Q8 EThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ) J0 d$ {6 A/ L* w. Lalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 8 O! j. u$ c/ @$ w/ h! jaccomplish those objectives. Strategic Offensive Forces + X. t* |- T6 e- u. w; i8 {(SOF) , _& V' f. t; j$ ZThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. , l* M- u* z7 @6 oStrategic Reserve - i5 F, h6 Z/ X: r3 Z& M9 mThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to ; }: y+ E+ J+ R% ~, g$ Tstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 8 Y/ S3 P) j" N- _/ Z# b: zStrategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. / M' M/ }. x7 v9 d* n( A8 aStrategic Warning Lead Time # ^ S; K( y' C, J1 a5 yThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of # |7 G# a5 B6 u7 fhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic % s$ R1 N9 `- Y' zWarning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 0 S9 C+ a5 ~( xgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends / R# } w: T8 F$ U" e! `6 Wwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 0 F5 S5 I9 m1 `; M. o9 owarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in / l% `" G6 w. u8 ? S7 lthe pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- * O/ v9 ]5 b5 `" ]8 `Decision Time ! U* g& q7 n% G) @- I2 SThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a / r6 u8 v& ^: }) k4 X) U O" Rdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course 3 r7 Y* M2 q x9 b5 f2 Z/ Oof action to be executed. + e# Z2 q5 z& p0 w# p& fSTREAD Standard TRE Display. ( ?# W8 _8 `3 U$ O- T7 S5 [( tSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured " C4 Q5 l7 k- HAttack 1 o& x! e! i7 `. {. p9 RAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely : F2 @) B) q, {. ^, jtimed for maximum strategic impact. 6 `: k- p* ^6 G0 p/ d c/ k" q& JStructured Design 9 Z" I4 i4 ~2 I m( u& qA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured & n" ?- c7 \" m) x) CProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: : g* `) I7 l; i: v7 jsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. ; C p1 y7 H U. o$ y6 i) YSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. / o! x1 b2 T r1 y, t7 k& ]& \( NSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + r3 } V+ i! e) [) D" Z281 ; G: w$ z: D8 w! t& e5 [STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). + _( C+ q$ R; |. b(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 8 p" ?0 y7 ?' z1 A; \. uSTU Secure Telephone Unit. 2 y) `. A; d# ySTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. : D& [1 J) M e6 [1 RSubject Security 7 \1 b) d* {" V( QLevel A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- 0 W% [" T: I6 A( L# }! t9 O% gLaunched , ^. o/ H/ i' Q4 |( {. z# qBallistic Missile ) q& {: K7 I: J8 O(SLBM) 4 m" {$ w! o# A2 {" Y+ q; }A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 4 F2 J `/ A5 `, `& omiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function ; n3 c! V6 I& vwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 7 c7 |9 |# T3 b+ W4 }& D! LSubtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. # e, v5 Y) I6 jSuccession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. ) g. f4 b; I5 J8 Y8 `SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. 9 s: D& U+ Y3 @$ ?Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 3 I0 k/ U. X# G6 o# l9 MSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in ( D4 f/ o: |* y7 C/ Ba single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, / I9 z4 K; P) a- w# q: Dthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S . Z4 {/ r' Q3 a* f3 }* h- t( A282 ! i" ^* h& p/ l6 SSuperradiant 0 W4 C' q# Z% u' P1 VLaser (SRL) 0 D* S/ c1 p: f; s) r* H o* A5 UA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser : a% G) O% ]8 @9 W. x- B; ~beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory " _; ^# K! r# ^ IPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and % i# t4 M8 m; N d! E, w5 Wcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental * n6 @+ k6 Q# j* ~. yAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), " n$ _" z: f. z3 pmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) / [5 N: r; b+ O# X9 X6 bequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and / z1 U+ [+ L/ C2 n Hprotection equipment). Support Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous 0 ?7 }' m+ n8 Z2 L1 Z' M& ^operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. 0 g; b/ w u6 K3 v s! |% O6 ISupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 0 u, d% ]" \3 {/ F' X2 Z& T1 aSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. . F$ n& L$ g ^; n- }& \SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. / r2 z8 T$ h; l# }9 b. pSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or $ ]0 B, U( J' Pmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity ) t1 @- c6 ?" Rmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, & P$ [0 y, k, U+ C$ O% q7 i) Kand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric % H! ]# m2 A; ^2 T4 w% qsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response 6 ~ P; M7 m) |+ Toptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, ; }$ L+ d/ I+ ]" k+ S; m: P& GSatellite and 8 V! N, g) U9 N1 n4 g( PMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, " \5 |' a. K4 Z0 c( g6 c. Jand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. + j5 t; g ~7 i; y7 [4 ~Surveillance System Configuration , f* Y1 l. W! v; j# x* w2 _9 R! j! hThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. - q$ r& x' F) g' ^+ wSurvivable and , v0 Z- o+ P1 J+ R2 c8 ^6 NEnduring Command Center ) w; P/ m( |2 R$ L! \/ d(SECC) 5 {- Z9 l* v4 s) C3 J- wThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. " u" K) ^9 W l+ o" VSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 9 d- A$ {1 ]( Z7 L: a3 [* f5 }; nSWC Strike Warfare Commander. 3 @. u% |7 y8 ]5 g9 xSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating ; U) V" j3 m2 T$ ] ^2 mband of frequencies. ' j) ]5 K$ }1 t, @) HSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 4 l Z3 V% w0 w5 ?7 a; n5 wSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 1 ?) ~4 f6 u8 [0 o5 \- Y" Q% ~- iSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where % M0 L+ ]3 v3 j& H# o9 [5 weach module description has associated implementations. " b: e3 w" t. m9 xSynthetic Aperture Radar 2 G6 E' n7 S5 s& g% g4 X(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for ! i: E1 d* v0 H3 K5 ctransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 2 Y" a4 p0 e' H, J# }. lemitted by the radar transmitter. ( E6 T0 A9 l% Q' V" B( }& HSYS System. ' R& F! ?/ s3 f' Y) t/ ?Sys C/O System Check Out. 3 k2 J: z' J( `( ^2 ]9 d4 aSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. |5 h) N8 R9 t LMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. * a9 t- I; j5 g% T6 J4 L6 QSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, i( U( g- A! y0 _) Qdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with ! N9 t+ O& q: V; f: S% Ispecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, - V' J& Z6 Z' ^ Q% H s5 kand delivery to users. : P/ H7 k( N4 R7 ]6 x(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System # V! R( v1 {! Y5 y3 [Activation 6 I/ {: S4 u, T8 ~ O/ k1 S8 Y6 s% gThat set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System * o* R: v- e4 [& u, h, z5 V5 k& q4 v! W* bControl. System Architecture 0 I- [6 Y6 h( LSystem $ w( M* t' q! L6 Y" o9 [- LCapability ! ~& S. j" w- i* Z/ VSpecification . D3 W; I, e4 F$ F; G9 g(SCS) 5 q( i0 B# c3 c( HThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional . \6 y- L3 V! I' v2 p" n7 P4 d$ {specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. , C R5 Z; y3 e; Y7 M1 ~4 gSystem Center (SC) , C- P3 d6 p/ `: B/ S. p( y; R5 FA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 8 k: z F0 Z {/ [sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of % W& u& B# U# g/ X6 i( O4 P, V( Q8 Tequipment in CMAFB. 7 [; j" @* u9 kSystem Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 8 I H6 {# M% ^7 Econcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board 3 W2 a% r) v2 V- b9 ? s4 }(SCCB) ; L7 j; r8 ?* x( F% N, z# I; {The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 9 p& B5 L+ j& ?! y; q6 |computer systems. System-Critical Function A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. System Definition 9 p }2 @/ V4 o8 A/ @$ X/ {# {Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 7 ]' W. G S% x" s4 `system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 9 d% f! G6 ]% f$ s4 k9 Rfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 5 b1 R7 g9 H2 ^ N8 K$ P) k* |impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, ; I* z7 N, k3 n. _2 U! h9 _/ i7 @detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment $ h7 h& W1 @/ ^Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 9 p) O5 f' ]5 d0 gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S - O3 C1 A! ~/ }' u7 L/ [ `2 N285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy # l- i$ I+ f. `. U7 gspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. ( P. l) m: S$ d+ j0 I) m( B7 lSystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 9 H1 S, M7 G5 q/ a, n/ e1 [+ Fcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be * i- O& |% a$ L) i4 V7 [operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ) [ K! I" G$ V2 o& C8 [1 s Y; |9 KSystem Design & x, G# l+ E5 H( f6 ?7 E1 ]' JReview (SDR) : E! M+ X: p# j$ U% cEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with + ~# E# {% t9 P9 M+ Cthe allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. 9 ^: F0 D/ U9 y |; N8 Z( ESystem Evolution & C; t5 C) V0 c, K6 YPlan (SEP) 7 s7 k2 e2 C- p2 ~6 ]. ?0 U: FThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS . R) Q8 A( b/ F. Gcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 4 t8 k) j7 [* a: FExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 5 w2 v0 _' n! h5 h; Kassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide & L% F. H/ w: L, ~5 _3 xsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 1 G$ n' w) |' B* {achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. 8 t) @6 z$ U3 I( S& lSystem Generated ' ^/ m8 C) l. C( |6 |% HElectromagnetic + L( D: a7 x5 O3 CPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local & I' }7 ?. W+ f" A: dfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the 8 S* p" k; {9 f1 V( Aprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the , [! ]+ \) R$ c9 {5 S5 `object in order to produce charge equalization. ) f7 i, l9 w, P( ^" G& T$ TSystem 5 ]- }$ p' K$ B6 z- ^! G% CIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. 0 ^( [2 I+ P$ n; v/ Y) jSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 6 C' c9 h: L% R2 ?0 b0 Z7 Dequipment systems. System ' A4 c3 _ Y0 u) EOperational ( C2 g: `; K5 |! T, ^5 Z% nConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 2 }2 ~5 A" i, T& z& b- Rdeployment, and support of a system. System 3 d* k7 i w; Y9 L/ l) WOperation and & r' p' ^8 y; R0 o; KIntegration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ) K* `, i. o; [7 b/ Xand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 5 D8 J* {) q0 q. ^the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). . T9 M9 ~5 L( aSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of . F: M4 i, [+ r& [posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 7 E! ?+ h* ^9 f: ]+ q4 m7 pMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ' F1 x: l" ?! ?: }4 @286 % j s* R. M: y% `8 i) A+ lSystem Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, * H: u. A/ t2 i/ k$ n1 F8 jgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness : p, b! `9 {/ C% v4 }6 ~5 bSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out % }9 l0 O7 q; C9 D6 }3 F4 \7 g5 q! f5 \the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational . }$ i2 Q A* _" m+ ystate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the / |4 K1 q& K' W, O6 a# C a/ {verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 6 H+ K$ @% q+ F7 G. s9 fstatus reporting. * a" E, J6 S. s6 `, ySystem Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and * d6 J8 m/ ~; {maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support % W( Y8 c+ C$ E* ^* H0 z" nsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. : N) U' J+ F" T* e% w0 p- M1 gSystem ( i. H: m# f! r- e1 ~Requirements Analysis (SRA) 3 n! R9 V [7 L0 W( l; x" v( x" GAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. : y3 M& R# }, ~8 F& [( Y' s* t, USystem Requirements 5 u8 Z( _/ F. X" A% y" K! `+ v |Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. & a" d, w0 i# x" u S$ H& L3 @Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 7 S- d4 P6 R' ]- y9 ?6 C. q" xdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. 2 h* z9 |+ ?# f( [! E1 hSystem Security % O) Q( T7 l+ o' w5 q, I7 vEngineering - i0 x- |) n7 B/ u(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering . }( u. ], E$ o: m1 A" F6 cprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks ; e3 b8 y) M5 }$ Z9 i" |; }associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related & g7 ~! \5 y$ d- vscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to # u5 g0 U9 |* l$ N4 x/ ^' _+ \8 Qsecurity threats. System Security Engineering Management ' ^. I9 ]7 n8 x5 V* \8 ^Program . [" d: \5 G4 z! a& ?(SSEMP) # J% H7 m3 |0 w- V* g" X5 X* EThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical , n1 I- f5 s2 F0 d; nachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 0 U: V G: K2 @6 ydefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the . R D. l, Q' z' Fresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides ; S% Y: o0 ~' Q @0 rmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 5 C. w. j5 e+ v! a5 VSystem Security 1 c! h/ m* ]; U4 x' eManagement * q" [* L! C& p: R! q# d2 pPlan (SSMP) Z, }% O& z+ G n4 EA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 8 m& L- d) F; o' p( hother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. 0 |5 i9 G3 Y) q6 r+ YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 " K! Q9 p5 { [* k$ C3 C5 TSystems Engineering Management ]5 Q! e+ [$ F0 [1 tPlan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and W# t% _+ I, z* sCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 8 q: G H8 a5 s3 ^2 hSystem Threat 6 s5 |0 e6 k' s, o' [ r& kAssessment Report (STAR) 2 n! F4 w3 a2 Y5 m* NRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when & d4 X- C7 T3 S- r5 e$ @* pthe threat changes significantly. ( a3 }8 B) m( s4 D* }. RSystem-Valued Asset , D) w' ]2 T" Y* q& ?A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. # k/ }' p# f2 _) h# y0 `, R" A( n% }: `T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). , F% t3 i* K1 i, V4 N% UT $ E( a) D$ z' Y+ R* K% `7 d4 p2 ) h3 ^9 L- Q2 H: ?; M# f) w& ZTechnology Transfer. 7 X& U% L, y) g# BT & q5 m6 q* w/ Y0 \, g: o/ J; j2 E Technical Training Equipment. & V; c% U4 A4 ?4 MTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. " D( L {6 x7 l4 D6 ] STAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. " R( }7 @7 [% j1 KTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). % q# I: ^8 i' K2 {+ x/ w+ C' uTACAIR Tactical Air. 6 i ^7 Y+ B( [5 JTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. & d: r9 j3 U# ^2 R9 F* jTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). . D1 A8 m: {: m8 s* m0 G9 w/ n. ITACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. / r* k( v, L; p7 z6 F3 I$ ^TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 9 E3 M+ N3 n6 {8 s1 yTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). * y# C) `. J" r/ D( g) p" NTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). $ d# P8 N# R* A9 C' S" A& \TACON Tactical Control. ' I# ]9 R) V* Q' `TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 X. L1 l1 M8 @& v% l3 V8 d289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. $ k' G& e7 B5 P- V Q+ y4 ETACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air Doctrine - h6 _* F7 r6 s/ TFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air 3 `0 E7 _+ j7 X1 hpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. ' y: N, s" y0 O3 ?) RTactical Air 8 L% C# _2 ~* ]( P: yOperations 9 G9 r! W+ }! ^- f7 o G7 l: n# L uCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control 7 u4 ]* W; O- w& @System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ! o; X* p1 Y+ H9 tdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air ; j' ]; q+ p7 L) ?- ]$ X# eSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and . `3 R! h+ T3 t# D$ ocoordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. , O1 o2 n" j1 y7 d. NTactical Data Information link & x; L. r3 [& _" o- W6 k5 XA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 0 p4 b5 t: X" V. @7 X. m% ueach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 3 I4 p/ n S/ b5 w( ]War 4 K1 |) y* ^0 O( ZThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 2 _. u0 r3 A) y) a3 S0 Faccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. - W& ?3 n0 w: L5 U$ ~" }Tactical # x' Z4 r' G( x4 _) D/ A, MOperations Area 3 _8 B3 Y) K3 ?: o y(TOA) - Z# m, M- f# s" |5 P; RThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. * A0 Y Z* ~% \9 X, h$ c% @Tactical Operations Center (TOC) 1 ]- j. \+ D% nA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. 3 ^% B/ d# ^1 b$ ]Tactical Warning (TW) ' _5 u v, a' Q1 ]! n! ?( {(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an , s4 w8 l2 C- d$ t+ [evaluation of information from all available sources. . w/ r3 T! t% o(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command 7 F( h2 j' e u& Y; Jcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component ; C7 p2 a5 L/ y5 belements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. - u* q1 F8 Y- F( k' s6 f(2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. 3 y6 D- o+ M% B, b7 ~; ]7 iTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. % o( o% h' B; W% S/ J6 CTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. 8 q: {/ ~/ ^4 G* ZTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. B' X( F/ g5 E4 vTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. & {& _6 L& R$ C5 oTADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. # T9 N' Z8 Q/ v! ]) S8 ] \# G* UTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector : ^. k5 l5 ]* _" }9 f5 Xand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive % j% p# l3 K5 Y0 X) sdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. # Z& h- Z5 n; Y d) w0 DTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). f& k9 o+ P- e( s, |1 XTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank , c# v6 C& e+ {5 H. SFragmentation 3 v; a7 W" w/ z& U6 FThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 5 O$ b3 `; r9 Vresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. : j6 r, ]* `% i' BTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target / @+ L) r+ R; M: @7 p* A- GAcquisition 3 r4 Z3 D% M3 i- D: E. PThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 0 |8 z2 Q' |; H; h# M+ i% nregion of a sensing system. * S8 |$ }# _5 O8 i. hTarget . C! B) o# V( f2 ~2 @; J0 jClassification and Type 6 E! T; _0 ]+ V& iIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination . y: ~ d- ?" X9 o+ kThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one 2 i& F$ `" \. x Atarget when multiple targets are present. Target Object 0 p0 H, P; b5 b. b4 k# NMap (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and * t1 f) B8 }4 I& a& W F0 _2 A7 X' Jother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) , @; P4 L0 }, v% T* jTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and ' `( s7 p1 {) m3 t5 g2 }+ U* m0 S8 cidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. ! ~5 X; h1 W5 ^# I% o) o! X0 tTarget System 6 m, L! Z/ }% NRequirements ; S5 A, h- d4 y9 L# JDocument (TSRD) , V1 n# k) A8 g2 j7 iBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 1 ]4 F5 o( V1 nProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. ) z2 U4 c! L! ?7 u: ZProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. 0 T3 p0 Q! l3 i: cTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. 2 r. u9 r+ z$ x9 j! |7 fTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. - H1 F* r) H# t4 ~TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. * Q w' y* j0 o: `TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. . D1 T+ p$ [3 E6 k3 Q6 P3 U: KTB Test Bed. 3 c& i4 A0 f4 zTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. ( _! X5 {9 @& u2 jTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. . k3 [+ o' I/ G4 w# d( yTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). ) l% p# S* L" b2 \0 V1 S(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . D- c4 d6 n& T3 D9 }4 D. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. # O3 B3 S3 T) P4 b) N; u( BTCE Three Color Experiment. 6 J+ D& Y) ^1 x. H+ a4 mTCF Tactical Combat Force. 3 A2 p/ h2 Z) ]) uTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. - N$ r7 p6 ?% D/ |$ c% jTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. " Z. R5 [) @( V* e- t9 O! nTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. + @: K, h j! x6 k. ~( C- d- A# TTCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. ) K/ R$ F- Q" _4 z, }5 T(4) Training Device / A! E, i' J& K0 |# l+ ` t/ uTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. + d: K+ e' R! t. L ATDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 3 m/ v* [9 p/ x4 ?TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 5 p9 A/ e& V) e" H/ A& H6 VMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! `6 e8 e7 B# A" p, z8 f293 % m$ W0 y$ S- w& P; O Z8 oTDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. - c& ^3 }6 Z& r2 G& B h" o+ e& K(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). ! k: R. i9 e" |0 X2 h& U, `/ ETDCC Test Data Collection Center. % Q. {" R8 m5 D* ]7 K7 NTDD Target Detection Device. 9 N/ e' j, d; Z1 _. Y0 H# F. @; q( mTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 5 {& j' \. Z, P7 dTDM Time Division Multiplexed. " M+ t( @0 s. {TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. ) ]8 ~$ s6 X M' v- \TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. # r/ p, [" w9 z# u& g4 @0 u9 V(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. & I" U- t1 U \5 g' pTDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. " q/ u. v4 t; P' CTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ) O+ N; v: I: A9 G; O6 ITDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 0 f8 Q" x$ v' e+ H( MTDU Target Data Update. 2 w' z& e9 z/ h% x2 g. ^* C! U. }1 cTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. " g. t @' {" F8 F1 WTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. . z0 F. C2 }2 S* B; \9 e9 `# UTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ( b! b' \' ^: n- H$ L1 h% ITech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). ! l* W: A% j2 n" R. k/ GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 S& j# ]( ?! G/ Q% \294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. % ~" m# [$ h7 i2 q7 ~, F* f8 xAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. ! Y9 G* y: H3 Z! o fTechnical Data , s8 Y( f5 m( g j9 p9 j, jPackage (TDP) # h5 H9 \2 E- U; ?" m% dA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition : U8 M( m' x! A) Sstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines / b# e* w4 ?& G/ F. Ythe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 2 e! h: L8 [0 K$ V2 s, zperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 8 s: q5 V$ I) `6 qassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation " l* q# g( Q0 u2 v: s/ ]The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to Z! A4 C' r3 cdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in , d7 D0 k4 n$ p3 T7 Y' s5 H2 d- @7 Ethe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives 6 V! L. k4 z2 Q7 R7 ZThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical 3 R1 v3 }) B9 B" k2 q: [" j0 R' nObjectives & ( ^4 a) ~+ B5 o6 G8 `: V. SGoals (TOG) 5 a; S. N5 t$ q2 X% fHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS + U) R6 @& o! Q" fdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. / i: U1 n# l# H+ U# a9 CTechnical Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk - ~) Z8 D/ C( Danalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. + |0 V/ E) j6 C1 lTechnical 3 ]+ C* J, g! B) kPerformance ! O( L8 s9 T( m- w, h6 FMeasurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product + G( T y! d) K% ielement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these $ E. n3 n" P! N/ l: qdifferences on system effectiveness. 5 Q+ J# A4 k7 p% g" vTechnical ' ~, L; K* u6 OSpecification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form : v5 i8 r6 A( I' G* wthe basis for actual design development and production. . M& @1 z% o2 N \Technical ' C0 U9 ]' `$ ?% j4 ASurveillance 0 D4 Y7 H0 r. l0 l7 B. C! a0 ?Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or / B. o" E' F) h* Z5 ?8 Memanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 7 Y' L) W* K3 q$ Ztargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology : ]- [) t: t. z! {/ q' Z/ @Executing Agent & _' |: U0 P) b$ YThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 6 R4 w6 |5 M4 TAgent. " i L2 M& N2 A- _( f( n( pTechnology Program * K% q0 Y( k3 G2 T5 w, h# [" QDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. & d8 K3 T/ f1 A8 ]& KTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. & d/ ~% q$ y' V8 _TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ! x/ k+ Q# g$ zMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 1 r# u# F, y5 g% d1 z: pTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, 6 b* { M N( j- ^Tracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a * N$ X' j2 }) Xsequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. ; D. C* O* f+ s$ v& o7 i) |Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the . |. M4 ~& ]# }# pautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 6 A4 v9 ^3 ^6 |( wTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. " N) m% K" F. m, V, o3 S( KTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term % V& d$ @, a1 z1 ^"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See 1 W% K8 p* k& f0 R( _# }Compromising Emanations.) " W4 n! J0 J7 A1 a6 l1 J% [5 ^9 nTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. # W4 Z( e; G( u$ r/ d( ^4 tTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. / Y+ y. r/ G. X) G) iTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Z! m/ P- T1 @% PTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. , U" V" o* I+ I8 [5 iTerminal # q, `+ ]) R9 k. aGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 0 N- @7 d& |8 \1 A7 |vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase 3 R# k- k! ^- _$ FInterceptor ' d0 L- `( b5 K1 w2 _6 n. Y0 c2 DA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the / x g- F$ \. D; ^terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) % V2 Z8 d0 z. @. N# MTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T # j5 y9 P( e8 o* s4 M! T3 P- `296 ?% p! k( j8 C1 A) G& F# RTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system ) j8 _( @" |2 b3 Nhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and 9 k3 m2 v. Y8 C. z7 ~* xEvaluation (T&E) : r) M4 b2 ^' n3 BProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three $ [9 Q% y* ~0 k6 X1 mtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts ( i( o9 A- ?$ `9 _or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational / m5 y0 H Q" S1 Z* s(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before - G, X4 F6 s, A- d) Vthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of & g! S9 g4 w1 S& u# Qoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic * E+ n. B) W- w# b( Q0 Kenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 2 M6 \6 P, i# X. I5 r$ tFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness * T1 W: R5 R1 w! Yand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of / o# ?& X7 e$ K: _( M9 t7 Jdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation 4 w1 r' \9 h& E' b1 O6 lMaster Plan * D" E \+ k4 s(TEMP) 5 U1 X7 l1 D! |An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and " t+ G7 p1 V8 G% _/ r5 c* F1 [- mEvaluation 0 p; t$ d4 L) c" F# k. B& MWorking Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of % C6 U1 U7 E% S, L" ~: Dtest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 6 y. o2 j+ [4 j! U) ointegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the ' d/ b. W, `+ F5 \; A1 Iprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 3 ] J+ m9 ^7 Zrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals ) t1 E8 V' u/ Q$ Iwhen there are T&E implications. " {3 i; @ S; _! r- ATestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 7 T/ w4 w* e* q0 Z: T8 k8 V/ ZTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. " n5 L( s/ D7 ]Test Integration / l& v% P4 x1 ^8 R& eWorking Group ( a: N/ h* w) D(TIWG) 4 h. t2 ?4 h l& D4 G2 `A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between % L& w0 _2 V7 e; f5 O* d% edevelopmental and operational testing. ! q7 N2 G, {1 X! a v! z! yTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. 4 l/ s) b4 O: W" p2 @The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, $ ?1 n+ ?3 H7 v, p7 P, Ztest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation . ^: W. A- p' c) k$ acriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. 9 j3 x( O. X0 K5 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T / z& v2 C) e4 F1 H6 B( |. u& {* Q297 - A# G% R0 |* x* r. m" aTest Target ( e: t6 F( F+ _ O0 H# c2 s- S, _Vehicle (TTV) + m6 q) L+ k2 Q. |6 GSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 5 f( f# E" e& q! S& J9 SSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. # G6 x- C' N. U6 ~' @9 mTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. ) a' X1 H+ V. ITEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. * p; k" j# l( g7 \6 z, oTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. ) {7 G7 ^, P3 R9 o6 Z) y1 {. ]5 |3 ?6 ^TF Task Force. 1 R4 |4 a6 B# O6 U3 HTFC Tactical Fusion Center. * Z$ v8 z+ @2 t6 ETFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. $ e% f7 _6 X. v# s& STFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. 7 w2 u" Y3 ]* ]TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). : O' S8 Y+ `9 G% s0 ?3 QTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). ; W# }# L: K- n; s' Y8 j' ^) X- ^% GTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. " l5 \9 l; F g' j+ Q! e$ F5 MTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. ( }2 ^# D( i: x9 @) hTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 5 @. T; G4 L; m8 b& dTheater Ballistic Missile Defense 9 I9 Y- J+ a" P I(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 0 N n% W$ `- ]2 H: iballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 1 ]% _& u% u/ w* [; f! X(USSPACECOM)