航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user ' f$ N' G9 ?3 s% J& x3 K% n: g- v, gaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. " G! i2 `- [# ~( X; g4 bSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). / Z5 |% ]6 S6 b! M6 \2 f1 }" t$ a: E(2) Science and Technology Objective. + C+ K6 M+ |/ Z3 w& C USTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. ) e6 A" ^5 Z, J+ j3 D. KSTOM System Test Object Model. Storage, ) ]( E+ o! q: z5 M. g4 IHandling, and Transportation ( P3 P* u+ r1 sEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient . _! f6 y' U V6 Renvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable - H& ?8 ^: Z; batmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed [% V9 Q2 D, M& X+ I, qduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s 4 |# }: v. f9 x7 Q; [7 vApache missile. 9 c1 [# f& A4 a9 o bSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). - h. _$ s& @& q- JSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. " [1 n& e8 q: s* D- bStrategic Defense # b3 ?% q1 n$ y: k' hAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat , o7 \* {) l) j) T1 \% j$ _ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic / F& V3 F: j: X5 N5 n' u, M0 E# KDefense Emergency $ `" A+ u" \" w* e& x3 l7 t+ aDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic & H. m) d; I) Y, V- j, _ ^Defense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. % K6 C' \7 y; h# S) k# o1 oMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 3 w! M p6 Z0 ~/ [8 O8 ]! p5 |280 9 |; R4 N& @( v% ?1 \0 d2 NStrategic Level of + Z- S& [; o$ IWar : \* |" O; _6 JThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ' E& u' ?; p+ M* A" Raccomplish those objectives. Strategic ; U. N5 k* b% V7 J3 V0 O3 M1 O# \Offensive Forces (SOF) " `4 ?4 N: B- ?' L uThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, # a8 W7 `7 h* }- D4 Ethe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific , G4 w m% ^5 B* D% G7 P5 {4 zCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic " K ]$ R- D; {Reserve 3 M# l, _+ A+ H; w0 d, U" i# ~- }That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to * R6 `3 B7 H; M7 Mstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply 0 `/ T- L! ]& ]: S8 r7 C2 s0 Z1 Gdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic 4 [) w& D- J, J% h# @Warning 2 }2 _# }- \& i/ Q( m. {8 sA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 2 B* m( ?( ], x! |) R3 e9 x7 z3 Thostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of ; y/ P4 R5 O7 G9 Igovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 2 A* z3 S; j- K |# |4 H; Fwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic + Z0 V' k0 }. I* _( Dwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the - m1 U; P5 X/ n3 s; Xnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 7 j" I# I' F! Z4 jthe pre-decision period. , ]8 m% V# Z' W* D2 v) @% y* e; yStrategic " I- e3 \3 B& K2 `Warning Pre- 5 I% [) K. u) t2 f9 @Decision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time ' p- k5 y6 w! G0 t* D, V1 zavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 0 E) e# Y# f( q, K7 s' jSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). & A) o9 A, _* m K6 xStructured Attack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely X1 ~ T1 S" C3 [' |timed for maximum strategic impact. - X1 l; B# J) ^Structured % G- x. ~ x* ]2 q* rDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules " O! G& Q1 U4 }based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 5 w9 {% I: ^1 F" MProgram }" b# u8 t0 ?1 H! D/ j0 YA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: - n& m B* e+ F4 G) v; Dsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 1 L5 e8 w3 M# l% h) ?instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S & o3 q. [/ R Y) k$ ]! _281 # s! f, r/ R$ gSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). + _& _1 X7 o0 Y2 T" kSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. 0 a1 K1 t; @- ^3 s$ H$ SSTW Strike Warfare. : W, r& j( N# L9 J P* W! qSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which " w2 ^ \8 B0 Z, o% Bis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ' T/ k1 V9 i; z* h8 GSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security & E: f/ G& n) d2 nLevel A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 8 J) k) a7 X( h5 x' }. u4 ]5 mdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- ; D) ], Q* ^# k+ M8 C9 ~) ^( MLaunched ; ~2 [1 D4 ~" h% X6 |* {$ jBallistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ; E9 c' @ I" D5 a; z6 Z$ mmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. # @" Q2 B; ~4 NSubtractive + ]- S0 V9 o7 r5 z6 M- q, eDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 5 g+ P, `2 O+ @! P$ z R. ISuccession of Command , q8 o2 T% c2 d# A' T; vThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command / o" }! V4 A6 O7 M& Z8 t) His a synonymous term. 7 Z! P7 k u3 ?SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two 5 H9 p! A- B- h- J6 valternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. $ L; _: T' w7 nSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. " b W) {2 b" O9 l' s4 \Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % I# T o! @5 n# @7 [# ^282 % T+ J" E ~. I r/ c# D. D+ FSuperradiant , d+ q2 b" \$ ]2 t$ P, @* ALaser (SRL) 8 _3 u2 [ r6 A8 c3 B3 V! P5 K6 Y& JA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 3 F' S% ] L+ N8 Y& }required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 3 B* G, @9 ]- h+ T4 I( F4 x8 wsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 3 a) {0 Q& d8 v2 J# D+ g! g# c- dbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory ' J! s" h- X' l( U& MPrograms 0 Y; L2 o9 |* V7 ~0 g0 L/ [/ xComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and : ?5 n4 _6 J# l9 ucontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. " i$ j# ^9 t, @# E! [Supplemental ) r5 a1 B- I. \4 _0 f+ |7 t+ lAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. 6 A+ u8 K; Q) `! h( Z: r7 ~Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 5 u( {% Y' Q$ w# Z6 fequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly ! x5 X2 \. P- y: \$ Ytools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). Support ; M* y8 G6 {: |! qPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly : C; z9 G% d( passociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 0 ^) o: {9 C: ]4 G/ D+ v5 N( yexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. v% c" a4 r8 t! J$ l6 RSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. * M1 _2 ^' ^ H7 i! _% ZSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items - y1 X0 R3 f/ a* kdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess ! A" Y' P6 A# Lproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity 0 o+ _) T% N* F4 vmeasures. , V( U8 l E* ]% }8 dSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, E9 p' n; h" k3 r% J$ u+ m7 qand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric ; d2 P$ U5 l& Vsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 1 R+ T, X ?$ X; IRequirements 9 k% T! N _4 y/ vRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response # N' v8 d1 ^) N" f1 Doptions and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and Missile ( J. g( c( s7 S( N! {2 Z7 ?The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System 4 D) T) ]6 r( q$ V3 ~Configuration : Y% r' }6 F: jThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. & }5 E o6 q) T7 AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability $ B, R- `; y N- [: |/ a, M2 {2 POperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 0 C1 M( m0 R* ^# n, uthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and " y* a7 q. l2 V% h& w" W2 D/ FEnduring Command Center ) r2 p! q9 J5 Y6 H" ` R3 ?; j(SECC) 4 J% S. [ y5 Z1 p) }( wThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 8 Z. p3 F* s2 C& pSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 0 F2 | b: Q f. z, M# R" _) c8 a4 _9 YSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 2 S# ?9 ]( P" T& Z& \/ r' VSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. $ e8 P- w1 _# Y+ @! A( W) xSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to . |* H4 R% @5 c& a" qone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. 7 H( m6 T# s ]$ MSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. ( c# L7 Z0 x! BSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points ( H5 J7 N' P5 B& Xalong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 8 i z' R' K' O8 Gtheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for ( G5 w3 H. I, ], w/ K Utransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. ' A K" G% d; K1 H5 m) `0 CSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. ) c9 b! y1 P# L b; @9 Z) @! f oSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with * T" J. o1 X8 j; C' k3 e" T4 B" A# hspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. 8 d1 e- q; z# F9 ~3 R+ w f) r( D(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 1 n; g+ H2 e B7 ?functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. " `3 @9 n9 q9 V5 A$ \5 x7 P" ?8 o# H2 |6 TSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 5 w0 E) `% u* ?+ p# R, X zimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. System Architecture 3 D; Y1 [, c) J* k7 ISystem Capability + m1 W8 W! M6 o- m% C7 O: XSpecification 3 ~8 ^; D4 O+ N# I4 m. l(SCS) " T: B8 e% }4 @ X6 ^The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 1 D8 c- i4 {8 n) i! O& `environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 0 l0 e% b9 s* F/ [4 R: Melements of missile defense systems. 4 @; Z9 \7 A4 ]& pThe government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among & _) ]- H/ _2 X4 @3 C' Jthe elements of the BMDS. & }% z+ }/ X* @System Center (SC) * e2 G+ f1 w7 ]! X2 X! g1 V) KA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of 5 O4 o, i; I: e& zequipment in CMAFB. System Concept 6 c- j/ \8 M# [5 e4 R: E- aPaper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ) ?7 W% y; R' B7 Sconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the ) `" b" b) D& q# O5 ~, \/ D( _demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board . o* U. }) A3 @$ q(SCCB) , r7 L/ L$ ^% G* L5 G0 y) y& P% }The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. # x" I& v! { q( m2 `System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. - q2 d$ ?# R4 s( jSystem-Critical # [& P- {* Y' `) mFunction + o8 x8 S1 r, n3 \( kA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's % i" E% @0 o3 v# |; j' g" xmission. System Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 1 ~" C. @6 Y( o4 Ifunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential , a( t) d/ V( |impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System : T. ~" B7 X9 b. D$ k0 {& ?5 CDeployment % B8 U# _$ `/ v) _( bDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 2 B+ M3 z: T) `% Q1 NMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, * o/ \" i2 B9 i/ K( o- a: v0 ecomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design 0 f+ F! t. \8 X z* O- ?3 M8 |" cConcept " G5 f" \2 v) I# JAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. " p- w* c( K7 g: PSystem Design 7 M# B. w! {/ ^$ {$ ]Review (SDR) 3 {7 O' V% t- H4 D( z# KEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. 3 s$ [8 @$ H9 U/ rSystem ( f' H1 v' x1 P: ?$ j8 E/ tEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and ! K( i) W8 o4 A: K; Mcapability. ; O0 o7 N* z1 L# ^9 z% GSystem Evolution 4 Y2 q) u, X' ~/ Q/ Y1 u1 ^ ZPlan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS / s" F* K2 x# |7 ^% |" G! s- @% fDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and . H/ s# f2 P2 ]8 Q @1 o* x% [assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to ' f* J2 \5 r" l% S* Y5 @0 W ?achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. ; G) h, M2 N: k4 dSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System 9 ?$ F1 `) x% a- H. o: QGenerated ) F7 A4 M8 N. s' a9 ~- aElectromagnetic & d( m& S3 g. I, C* oPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the # F3 L8 u- K( ?surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local + u5 ?6 j( f+ u G7 G7 _fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. . U* x& X& r2 A! I9 C* Q: kSystem Integration Test " Y, o/ d3 k, Z; C) Y" S7 ZA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 4 I& C) ?+ o6 m! }8 E( Csensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual ' H- }2 Y6 S& N! Zmanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks , b. y2 U/ q" t/ X/ Rand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or : b5 c6 n! K2 p$ c0 _equipment systems. System Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 6 b q9 c: A2 r) D' sSystem 5 }* g( S3 `1 r ]4 xOperation and 5 {/ p% g; C" A& RIntegration Functions (SOIF) , q$ a7 U% V7 I9 @0 n, L2 `The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to ( V, _7 E& ]& [0 {' qthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). + [5 a. a5 i1 \System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic # r, V0 W* {( N: iBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. / a: a$ t/ O `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 2 y" } `1 s, R7 Z3 s2 o, q5 M286 System Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 1 d/ l! N' a* ^ x' Bprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 3 @. e: m: f& O3 ]Readiness 0 \1 [2 U3 Q1 ~1 w& fSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 0 y2 q: E3 Y3 S; _! z; qincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 8 z9 q, J2 W2 ?' o' Cstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 8 n5 Z* R/ }) C+ N+ K8 ]$ bverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the ( k1 H! Q+ J0 Z" V: ?* kcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under ( k0 W N- B" f0 Prealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions ( r$ b3 O( V; z9 i8 Tnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 9 O i* \/ P" I& dhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results - p0 z7 A3 |4 j/ }status reporting. System ( ?: I7 G! i' W, W0 bReadiness 7 X" ]/ v C% v1 S9 w' x4 PObjective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and 0 l" l3 ]( m6 w( g- k |maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support 5 H8 q: C& @5 q* ~! T; c9 zsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission & K# t) K# W6 r. G( Icapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements + N. d' ^% }0 \7 Y; q' IAnalysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 9 _8 Q7 ^. }/ k$ O e3 HConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine 9 `3 a$ ?7 B- e2 J/ p: ^& c" Zspecific system functional and performance requirements. d3 R6 X+ p# @3 m: V6 Q% @System 6 F, v- H2 u5 m) lRequirements + D2 R+ z0 t- F U% j sReview (SRR) " e. J* `9 ?5 X2 ]Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. ( Y. h+ j+ _( ?* X, R% j* tSystem Security Engineering (SSE) : V5 e. D0 m- o a5 @) rAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering / U! k; z G" ]$ v4 {3 e. gprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks 1 t j7 c* \, ]3 a- w! r+ o8 Sassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 4 q) \. b" ?0 N3 @7 v6 H" qanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 9 ~0 B( X! j$ a- `/ i4 Esecurity threats. System Security Engineering 7 r- p3 \; Z; v4 ^Management 2 b1 S: o9 ?+ ]9 KProgram (SSEMP) 5 ~: W& j. M w1 ~The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ) \/ S0 D9 w# |9 a' _defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides 3 |/ C! k, Q# J& ~& D, s; Ymanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes % F6 n K' \5 t- zits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. + w# b& v: T# c9 L+ ]System Security Management Plan (SSMP) ! K. m7 n" ~9 s9 a: Q0 U b2 y/ HA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 3 O5 |6 Z Y; W7 O7 J5 i+ \meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 8 S( ?+ B0 R+ W( kmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 5 c/ r0 }- K8 s" ^0 M8 a$ m0 zother program engineering, design and management activities, and related ( s Y: o* \6 ?9 ?3 Osystems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. ' i7 _6 j3 B1 m+ o9 n) xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S / k- k, |: W% b' L# P287 2 B# h i8 R3 S% a* I! USystems Engineering Management 4 ?; l! E& i" M: w3 [1 e: `2 fPlan (SEMP) 5 J' x- C; X- v) ]& t1 o4 uThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 0 X) E" L) W+ o9 a# tIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures * g# `7 a+ b, Y2 `development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) 2 m, e9 B3 \. _9 TKey engineering milestones and schedules. 6 `. u W) L1 a% c5 _Systems Test Integration and * D# Y8 J4 R/ G- x ]; } W* N. YCoordination 1 `! f) I) P+ |The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat 2 \/ y, U7 C% n3 xAssessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 4 r- y" _4 W; iService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency 7 b* m$ t( }; E* Y! T9 _and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 0 m A# U" R# y9 U0 N: @the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! A* L3 T2 U% ]8 U! `0 ~; R288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. : J5 Y2 D' s$ `# A9 j( \) LT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. - b; q! a" t* CT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). ; L4 a7 M0 o. lT 2 Technology Transfer. T 2 ' k1 q" m! a% F3 s bE Technical Training Equipment. 0 E) B' k9 r+ n& lTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. . i2 l! m: B0 D3 m9 W: mTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. * x0 i! L7 U, h# h/ p" VTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. * C4 t* z( u$ LTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 1 _6 H6 Z8 ~% h- ^TACAIR Tactical Air. : [3 Z* i2 k! kTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. ( l1 G, o' r, TTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). & C: U6 y3 j* c: a+ W3 _! p* r3 qTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. # v) F; L) @* c ITACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). ( O. }5 K' s+ o+ t5 g, I1 M" `TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). % D I6 r* \, X/ G& tTACON Tactical Control. ; i B2 V# s9 P6 T6 STACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 x7 `9 x) F+ p' {1 H& s( G0 c289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation : m9 P( m& B+ HTactical Air , C4 o' d9 j4 o) S/ ?Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air 0 l! k; V4 L: R+ C- b3 a. Ipower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. 3 ]. f# @' T' f! QTactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with - K( K2 t+ u! v. B% u) o; pground or naval forces. 3 S' ]! ~+ p9 f7 }3 MTactical Air Operations 1 E- M9 }( k5 [) h h! vCenter : A: ?4 g& ~: C) g2 M6 B vA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 3 c+ V7 ^4 @& |' t7 Q7 Zdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air 2 N) n9 W- y) Q# F4 U3 CSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly 4 l5 W4 L0 n; k7 bassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) - R- }# F) C! v' w8 m8 N4 }3 dA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the G' y) \" q) J2 j- Fcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and $ ?( l2 [3 r# Q6 }9 I/ z; k0 r1 I6 ncoordination of support. Tactical Ballistic $ c V2 S- F# Q- V# X' zMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. ! h+ A& w$ ]3 m1 {Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future . l/ s2 r6 Z; R8 l2 o- P' t. L% ~development of tactical doctrine. % i# n5 w, Q) B9 G% ZTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 4 t9 D6 d W/ {% i" bmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. : r3 v$ \; L E8 \Tactical Data Information link ; w6 K# F* |3 n& l, D6 Q0 IA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates , ?4 V$ p7 Y# Beach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. ; H( M) I1 V4 `) R; bThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. ; j7 p4 k0 I5 `' k: @; b4 hTactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area 7 d! G: C: G$ R. k& A: @(TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations : d, {, o1 v" g4 B- `; Garea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission ]' I0 \$ U# x: X! _# yaccomplishment. Tactical Operations ( x2 u; g7 `5 o2 j# O2 O4 T, FCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff / K+ P/ {4 @6 d: W1 F: ?0 uconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. $ j- B4 }5 V3 x& ^: y* y6 @! ZTactical Warning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. 4 I+ ~' ~& ?- b5 A q6 ~3 vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T + {% N4 d' F& y2 F290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. " ]( m+ v( ?$ ^( D6 [(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. ! _/ i% n! Y& I ]5 B0 f5 {; C2 mTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. / z* |+ E: d. G9 A5 r5 u1 O! mTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. - ?; N. Y7 |* ZTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. 8 t# f9 O" y) a, ~+ k* I0 v h8 zTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” ' ~3 _8 |0 }8 f& NTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ; ]+ O, d+ ~2 \8 S, ~2 FTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. O( z; Y( A9 {5 Z4 N% W8 ZTADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 4 V0 g( G& t! @$ U# T' n% rTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. * X; G0 U$ j" s8 j! W ^TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. ) `: C5 G" v" f7 vTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. : s. H% d7 l) S4 f+ _: q) UTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector " u6 }4 `; D8 j1 V, Nand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive $ R8 C% {0 m% l$ w- S$ hdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. / |* \' X- Q7 T( ?. `* \& BTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 6 v, Z- `$ S) t: {' K( ^Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 7 [( D6 K6 G7 K, kTank + f: `$ P" E& U5 F- dFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 1 B9 K T6 A% Z: X1 ]TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. % l8 V: t) e# W2 y6 ~/ v6 r) VTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. + R! V. p6 y ^(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. + O8 ^& s) Z* t6 K4 kTarget Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. 7 m7 X! o4 ]% I# GTarget Classification ) i. i5 j6 N4 m# K% v7 eand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target h' F/ Z6 p3 ~+ l& HDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one . w* J6 ]4 {* starget when multiple targets are present. - a: ?5 J+ q" i) G6 ?) yTarget Object ; X1 t5 H7 X9 D$ oMap (TOM) 9 D+ o# Y- M' H mA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) : K5 V3 p6 G0 c, F2 ~ f3 ATarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and ' M! W0 p- M* Y2 [! g' P: p* Hidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 0 q' H0 H. P M; I: n$ W5 xpassage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements # U3 `' e) q6 s3 ?5 w2 Z4 nDocument (TSRD) 1 b3 t+ z F; U/ [$ \5 iBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. O: h9 z( |% }0 ITASA Task and Skills Analysis. 9 \* A2 ^$ ~# E3 N. I7 CTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. 4 z2 z$ ^- L0 F4 r4 d, q& yTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. ; a9 Q4 T: c ^6 G9 x1 D6 kTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 1 X7 \7 s( p* oTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. R0 Z' p" J0 G9 D1 E" d" } p. Y( AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 6 ]' _" d$ j$ Z$ P292 $ ^& U+ L+ H# NTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. ! p0 H& f: T5 r: xTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. : d4 o9 d3 p' _! L9 w8 T2 W7 LTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 0 y( o J, @ dTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). # ]1 ]4 q. r- S/ M& ~( h- }0 G(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled + R/ R* d8 @& j( Q6 l. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. 4 C) a- c7 a) `- L6 c' qTCE Three Color Experiment. 8 N& _! R1 m$ K+ r- P1 F) K% MTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). ) p0 {+ D" M. FTD (1) Test Director. ! k4 c" z# [0 v0 p0 z+ h6 ]" t+ ?" ~(2) Technical Data. 2 j6 H# R: f+ q# f2 G3 Z7 J, _% p(3) Technical Director. , h W# X8 F' B; I% d(4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 3 t q% ~* n, p+ H8 |) h/ R$ DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 % `* m' |. ]; R/ w" k9 F2 vTDBM Track Data Base Manager. ; E8 P/ A4 L1 k( K7 H' cTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. , V# e% ]" j, G- Y: g(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. ' ^" Q, |8 ^1 S0 gTDI Target Data Inventory. 6 v1 r: b8 u5 w% j' k; {+ ?TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 7 U7 X" T9 R: A" M2 mTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). + B3 ~& O: h. ^ S1 Q* CTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 0 W0 y: n! K; ]' ^- `! u(2) Test Design Package. ) m, P4 C8 l, [( x, F0 S2 K3 i9 i; d(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. % p2 S7 Q: L1 X p& Y3 |TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. % S' z! c1 h' d# Y6 m1 J8 lTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ( _6 U6 j6 B$ |: XTDT Target Development Test. G- n q* B7 }TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 1 A0 E( J3 y* G: FTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. & {0 O9 ~) O5 f: |/ H(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. % W& T& Z4 g( i* d, k; hTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. + m$ b. x/ ?( e6 bTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician ) g4 R5 W: O: y; B. `! H" QTECH Technical 3 Z0 M1 ~% N" DTECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 5 ], b7 S+ p: o/ o1 Y# x8 mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T % D% p6 L/ _6 y$ y2 @294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as & W n# ]8 r) umanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not ( n: `% n# j4 Y+ J! P" b) c$ v, ~technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. 9 h7 D7 u8 h# X3 h2 e+ D# vAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) " G6 O6 u& M$ z1 J% `A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition M* p! }' Z4 J Ostrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality ! o, g$ E9 B! C, I. u7 T) |& xassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical # b2 ~& ~3 ]$ X0 L7 Y2 SObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available , x5 A3 L1 M3 u) E2 i0 Q9 _: b& zfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical 7 z7 U. Q2 {0 a) ^1 ]Objectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS ' M) |9 t: t7 B! ?. Udevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. 5 J; v- |. _/ D4 K( ZTechnical Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by - z( N+ n& H0 S% T' }( p- w* rmanagement. 8 I& s; h6 ]# [3 RTechnical 0 {3 m0 v+ ^ P5 F! o( ?Performance & [ g7 u: J8 J) _Measurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 6 S! i; T( k8 i3 Z8 G6 W( Z5 b" Bbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design 1 d& t% i' J2 L3 ~$ k7 yassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the 5 Z# ]( b, q) R: t8 \values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical $ o! j" O9 R& D2 o+ CSpecification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance 3 T5 D! w+ J2 k: d. B* gIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 3 s9 e1 q) \8 ~' Ptargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. " Z4 N. V0 z0 }3 G3 Q1 F1 KTechnology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 3 d$ H* m* p+ r5 e! Eresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 2 M0 R" Y) {$ N1 yAgent. - f7 a) E( f! ~3 l7 z5 g) h* s9 WTechnology Program 2 y. N3 m9 @+ |' PDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical 1 w7 T3 r/ w, _) g- P! J. Esupporting technology. % `5 Y* v3 ~* g4 d; P9 lTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ) V" }& w) V' s& ~' C: vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 8 P# L: q$ V; kTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, / j0 G+ F) D( J; G1 H8 _* K6 r" T [Tracking, and & V& l6 w! k! E# ]5 t6 w* GCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and ; C# `7 J% q# g" a! [status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a ' c h! R$ |- b( Csequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the ! E: }. n3 K( Q: s3 `automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. : f i. Q k$ `. ZTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. , m( Y* O! ]; U$ n" L- M ~TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of , N5 G( {" A/ d& M; Y% Bcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 2 b) q# e3 x7 R; J! k6 P"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 1 \8 m4 `" L1 U7 C8 q6 j4 V! dTER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. - K+ ?2 i+ M8 W( F; K8 QTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) % |9 h7 y+ m" z6 I+ o0 n- F AThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor / w) N5 ~) X9 I3 eA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the c6 P4 n, _% U2 J$ qterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 3 H1 a8 e1 r- T( OTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. " Q% m9 d0 u8 l0 i# q: `TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. . a h& S1 G$ J5 zTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. E. c; P( X3 l: J% }- ~: zMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 8 ]5 x% j( F- E7 I) i/ \5 U0 V% V$ UTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary + [! j/ j6 C \: X. M: yconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all + L" P* p* p9 K9 _+ N8 doperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, ) A) j; h) @$ c* m, Sanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and 4 f/ @' Q2 u7 d) m" O; IEvaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated / S& |' W0 L( K# {to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three % f; ]6 b6 h* a% Y! dtypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof $ ?+ V, {6 ~/ A5 ^- l9 Omanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 2 }' O/ f% L: q" U( ~# Osystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 0 @# F8 \$ H8 u7 R: w" s) M O. trequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that 8 P* n R. Z* H! H( uthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational o) o" c2 A E(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness S" Q2 [1 N! T' H* r; zand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of B8 @" S. G% z. [1 l6 X' c4 q! ?deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and # A/ `1 J# b* y5 Q4 l! KEvaluation " d8 W! u% V5 b Y) T/ x. r: B4 B. SMaster Plan 2 `/ _* P; C2 @9 T+ t; D s! I(TEMP) ; u+ P. q4 q0 B: y* b5 aAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate ! D( Q; F5 Q( M- b1 T$ qobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as % x8 w% G3 s5 l9 ^early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 9 r# Z# y# D0 r& |! Aprogresses. / b, c! }* Q+ {Test and ; h) d i; G, FEvaluation Working Group . L9 v" i/ M$ H+ b9 W(TEWG) % x# P9 \3 D6 i: N7 }+ K1 ~/ \The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of : K/ f' Y/ _4 l) I, i0 m2 `9 Z' Dtest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the % k% Z9 k+ B/ p. `) d- N5 U% `program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling # D4 r2 E; R+ G! m" ^problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 0 @2 x1 g# C" ewhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 9 g' S* U: ]3 ^. u8 [# {7 K0 e" Fand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 3 [+ J$ z0 j8 Y: f4 B1 ~! pTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. $ T* r4 y1 q0 c+ D" {9 j/ w! mTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. $ }' K0 F2 Z, F2 tThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 2 M% g# Y* [+ M/ ?test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 p! a/ c9 @ A ?297 2 p7 u3 }& K5 Q* gTest Target Vehicle (TTV) , f7 G# n0 ]/ l7 J( o: `+ `) pSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ! E) g/ y+ f2 O# b$ {- B( QTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. * C! _4 g6 M9 e x7 @! z0 aTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). & F+ {1 x! _7 v3 vTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 7 [, {4 r; ? `( e( B! i9 ~# \& {TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 6 I m: s0 Y: e. f- m8 g& NTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management ; {# S4 V3 |4 O& t& |( P9 j3 STFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. ' F3 I5 f' f+ W: |4 }! i% FTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). e( `5 M: x/ O( K7 D/ f/ t0 STFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). 1 C7 V6 D0 i2 L9 ]/ I/ _3 T7 s- `TGS Track Generation System (USN term). 5 w" c+ I/ e" {- O# tTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. $ A; |- }4 H8 _( KTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. / ^0 F% `1 s/ T9 W) ~9 u( lTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. & X3 R. Q! U5 I _5 ?, v$ }Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. ?3 h* X: w1 S& O" U: TTheater Ballistic " _! m% j" F4 D8 pMissile Defense 7 {+ D1 D1 a% O; O9 }(TBMD) System , J& \4 Y4 M' I& GThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ! c$ x( t6 Q; z) x+ I8 T9 bballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)