- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
0 `" Y- x* ^/ z% l, ]5 q0 Z8 y) e% CReadiness3 \, W1 N1 ]9 d- N6 R" C4 e
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out* [- z. o# u/ Y& H9 p
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
) E+ r( k3 w+ ^, `8 }! qalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It' Z* O; M- t/ s, t5 `+ {
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
/ l2 X4 p. e7 E" t( x4 n$ Q5 Astate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the. F S/ e B4 Z' m6 U
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
# `, e9 u3 O5 V& i. x0 E9 w8 _continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under. x0 `3 m) q0 d3 A* [3 E9 i5 S
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions' H/ p$ P. ]# O; m9 {6 _
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies
" @2 X; B7 G/ H% ^and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
* w4 ?% R% e. L | U" ahistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results& K4 {( ` ~/ ]/ C
status reporting., V! E0 u: ]2 y( h" m9 t! u. a
System, c7 x8 r4 |0 j4 j# n
Readiness$ M3 c8 w7 m" J& p+ u
Objective, |. {$ P+ y9 d" v/ T8 F
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a' u( M* Y) a% Y# y/ ~" C! Y
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.2 U. f1 S* r% m' p7 Y# ^
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and6 M6 f- N$ H5 p2 @
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support& H1 l9 W& p& {. \+ e
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
, Y/ G) u1 M3 H/ Osystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission G3 q/ d3 v4 i* e% f
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.$ ]8 |3 y2 a2 @* @) [/ A) W
System7 m- X! A/ U) O& a @) ^/ x# m
Requirements. e6 g [) C! v, Z# i& I
Analysis (SRA)
3 R# C# g/ q7 ^3 x+ gAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System/ a2 v8 o0 X! t5 `/ _% |' L
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
9 A: [2 h% b H3 I& t! uspecific system functional and performance requirements.4 l0 r+ a' d! Y- a! e5 u
System# d& d4 M- v& W! O
Requirements
- r2 W9 ?; m1 F/ fReview (SRR)
; h3 Y% e: O9 F5 HConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
; A, m6 D' i. y- G$ Y, { UDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the
& e1 H3 R: H- L8 t; ldegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
+ ]8 C+ j& ?: PSystem Security
6 G" N3 ?5 p$ X) iEngineering. U2 y* K, d4 p$ `0 w
(SSE); y6 d. X4 g! D! W( h3 F( V
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
, a# J6 S: P9 c; C$ j4 [ p' Uprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
& ^6 x' N3 G* C1 O9 @2 z, v( t8 Eassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related
. W% l8 P! k8 F$ r1 sscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
- L X0 E1 {$ f& |( p/ \analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to% i- \ O t" N
security threats.
/ n6 }2 N: w1 |$ R1 e1 R3 a! |System Security
; l* N$ O, Z7 v" C) d! c& PEngineering! B# Q- W9 c# I0 O) D
Management
9 G9 u% W( Q* u! s2 A2 X9 ^Program6 f$ V* {4 f7 z" `; Z) J5 }+ p) h B6 N
(SSEMP)
- c; x% E, [. l7 A! f) l7 cThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical" l: z7 P. e" _ J* y. b
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE/ T5 ]" R8 a: Y
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
6 _8 o7 Z0 J5 Q' z# e) S& \" [% S; |defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the- M/ @9 I/ Y8 p; F! B& R$ h* v
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
2 J& i1 \; P) d6 ymanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes4 H. H: t. W# l0 F' M
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
Q, U* f* i! o0 @System Security& N( l9 M" B" J" n- c: K
Management9 [1 v9 v: O& Y `3 @% b, Q8 O% f
Plan (SSMP)" F2 u4 w6 D, ?3 n6 Q! {, s
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to. {- c# {3 n* q' U
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
- G7 Z# b+ } Tmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with+ q% x* t) E! P4 x' R+ t; u
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related7 l" n* V4 c' l( g- i
systems.
1 u7 C0 G& O9 G- S9 }Systems
- A. F |$ ?( M eEngineering
0 ~, p9 N" ^3 t6 fAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
1 p9 o/ A3 _4 vbalanced set of system product and process solutions.. m2 d2 I4 I) y q
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
( Y+ [5 K3 B5 c8 G3 X1 o287; ~8 f, M% V: g2 L# }0 v
Systems
S8 ~% M! u* }( m1 R/ REngineering! o5 W( p5 t3 {- n! n
Management5 b0 P G% y. }4 b* V1 w
Plan (SEMP)
/ t4 @; c3 ? L) WThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
K9 x& ` k" {4 u1 [Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
! f' G5 ^8 ?8 D& `" y3 ?development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4). C) t8 y# R" y
Key engineering milestones and schedules.9 N$ |+ X F3 E% D! R
Systems Test0 X3 z4 ?1 | J. }5 P8 r% H* v& h! J
Integration and
3 Y5 p7 C9 U, p; R" I( A LCoordination% h- `& F+ E, z+ v3 u- @ i6 }
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.; \/ C" X3 X! Q, Z C& s
System Threat
1 K0 q, t3 y( b1 }& c, g# VAssessment! l5 N5 g7 }$ b$ ^5 q- ]
Report (STAR)# X; h$ O" @) W
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
p, m. g5 R/ d- \: C) e# G6 GService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
' }: e: d+ ~+ @and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when! g& G) }" q2 z0 i6 |
the threat changes significantly.
1 a/ E' L% X+ N# @- V+ ISystem-Valued
! I* f7 {9 O% V5 Y6 Y+ JAsset; t. v6 ]3 x$ `, C" E* @ \# ]
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to' F+ X/ [: W9 o7 S5 d) `" x
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.
6 e0 g6 s/ I7 J" u: ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
& ~) Q& D! C( s4 w* s) `& }288
( l o, \, C3 z% dT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control., y& o( G9 B+ j. U! }
T&E Test and Evaluation.% F% K5 y" j/ ?* A# f) x4 q( ?
T&T Transportation and Transportability.
# T, H- l" v) N6 U4 u8 x* ZT-MACH Trusted MACH.
* r: K. ^. B9 @/ F- ]T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
0 K+ V' I* c5 J6 XT/R Transmit/Receive.
) h- L- _! G; q3 |) W ^, BT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).4 m0 g/ S0 T. {5 U
T
- N- v M- i: c2 z4 P& }. i0 @, g2& D, J% | ?8 Y( n, V6 N
Technology Transfer./ W) V2 l& m1 W' i
T
. |! g6 r; A4 n% ]4 }2
* {5 k! z, n( bE Technical Training Equipment.
6 R' i2 s9 p) a( t! j# HTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.7 n& }! S+ h d( U# T( E+ X
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.* F+ g& L9 `& _% u
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
F- T! ?8 V$ o% s) X1 A+ @' ?TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.* C: u6 k' |0 O- R
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
+ |* C$ X$ c4 g. bTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
. D) I" E2 q4 N) }, g8 w' kTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).! L% ?" c; L( b1 D6 m
TACAIR Tactical Air.
$ O( j. K+ ^+ F/ Z: o9 `7 R3 x4 OTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].* j K# g' B3 ~/ z( \+ S, m! k: ^
TACC Tactical Air Command Center.0 P2 ?3 ~4 S/ s% x5 R I- _; I
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).' u) Z8 G8 x8 n1 D! H2 v2 D
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
% c% o x( [4 M4 |TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.
9 N9 b! Z2 L8 a5 w5 GTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
' K2 o+ L8 `- c, aTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.: Z3 l) g3 C4 K* ?
TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|