航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user # R& H' ~& Q* m0 b' G/ G+ `access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ' W. r, I6 ^5 }& KSTM Significant Technical Milestone. , I% s8 O1 i6 i$ }& \/ ?6 z" TSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). 2 l2 b- T8 E8 j, ]* R(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. d8 y! D% m! a! K2 U' HStorage, # p. m0 F. m: B$ K# M8 M- }8 rHandling, and Transportation Environments & B! X8 P7 u' S# {# ~' |6 g- t7 l* `These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient ' t1 {5 v+ K* a" ~+ [/ nenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed * C* V+ p4 W! r' v) M7 pduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 4 d2 _+ Y2 s3 PSet. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s . j z, P* ?) ^2 iApache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). ! ^% ?7 u# a6 R! U4 l, {: YSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. # P& K/ {9 P7 |# D" P5 w7 NSTRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic 1 |* D, p! O1 S. R NDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 7 ^) }2 P) F) Q7 \ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. ' `9 c! t* I* i, Y5 o' |( }1 g) EStrategic 7 \7 P* d9 N1 ?8 u9 c$ L* MDefense Emergency 9 ?% U- o/ p0 sDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System / g {! V& c( e. m9 |(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. - k# L W v. |: b- W% w1 R# yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S # B B% A" L, W. N" A7 A280 7 A% F# m2 F. d, [7 x& z- [Strategic Level of War The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or % @5 o5 Y$ ^. k* o, f# u/ a8 ~alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 2 q$ [% W" b6 [ Haccomplish those objectives. # [6 x5 M6 q: o6 iStrategic Offensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, ( ` |' n: W" v6 h: u, E% \the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated * R# r: e4 @& s6 K5 G( uOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 4 l. A' g a+ V& h9 H$ v/ ^! H: LStrategic 7 n* u' H# ?4 X. pReserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to : `+ @2 d. P! R2 Z- b1 V3 |strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 5 @+ U3 X/ o; nStrategic - H) Y7 c# H a3 `" C$ d- [Warning # @# ^4 Z6 g& n. ]5 Q. hA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time d% X1 a. Y6 V# LThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of : A, u7 K0 r/ ]+ o# @% khostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. & l, A. E6 O6 [ V3 PStrategic - T' y+ _1 D% ?Warning Post- % u2 l0 n |: C9 v7 JDecision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of 9 K: C$ C. K( K- x* p2 kgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends $ v2 b' N2 b" H y5 G# mwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 7 a! v, ]) j( J% f+ r/ jwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. 6 W: ~2 d* @; q3 w0 I1 a$ _Strategic Warning Pre- Decision Time . s1 J$ ~9 y) yThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a , c$ q5 @4 c' H+ J9 s- H2 Mdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time + A% U5 o* }! y5 p2 y+ }available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. & g n; C8 f4 Q7 n! mSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack 5 w3 Z1 H* A( fAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely & y8 e; A! g* l7 n* Y0 p% D# Ztimed for maximum strategic impact. & c( m. v/ g. Y* d# {# yStructured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules 5 S* }! `2 ^0 y8 Nbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 7 I1 R% ^2 n* L) O1 o- t. Fflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 2 B- _# G: }, e; b. VProgram % x3 w* p0 D' Q" TA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 7 d$ n! _$ N; D2 G% I( E* t$ r6 y8 hsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more $ L( _' m3 p" Q& K9 I6 \instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of 1 q. K7 J# Z' n% y9 tinstructions. 3 ?) w3 n2 N$ S" k9 T* v) V) SSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 8 o3 h4 s9 _- S% M4 Q5 N: hSTS See Space Transportation System. + m4 G1 n" R7 w$ u+ rSTSC Software Technology Support Center. / w9 t& \$ x( S' l/ ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S Z: X: O; A, ?0 _% V( B- q281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 8 w) n2 _3 {* K5 O" x1 ?; \STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ( ^7 a9 j- X& R4 x5 S2 USubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 0 x/ x2 |) H0 r$ R6 E. M: vhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. * ?# X& D, a6 B" `Submarine- ! @) W3 N, U6 cLaunched & L# i6 x& h$ H* C- eBallistic Missile , E& R; Z( ]" I1 q2 `. \1 ?(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ! d5 k: Q& L$ p* l: }- H X7 [8 A- pmiles. % n6 l' I6 F @" C) @SUBROC Submarine Rocket. * Z/ z9 ]% M# h/ W3 C3 B) m2 ^Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. ; ]0 a1 N( Z3 \ ]( J! ZSubtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. - Z$ L% ^5 T. z# Y) @SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 7 c0 y6 z7 O/ C/ QSuccession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. & ]9 d4 H2 n5 i# q; x* lSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. # W& P( k o& ^, t! cSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, , W9 A' Y% B; Xthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 9 S+ p2 E, e7 q0 h$ Lradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as - e1 ~7 A. R4 g0 ssuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 Superradiant / w# b6 k- y( X( T/ d+ [" t# tLaser (SRL) ' J8 |3 y% D4 c6 J% O9 qA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from " U3 s8 d0 H8 {' O1 g7 w- Nsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 7 n& q2 w2 T3 j7 H) hbeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory Programs Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. . a. _1 j% E3 Z# K4 m9 r9 BSupplemental Appropriation * {! Z, a9 T4 c8 T$ M' BAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment - F x: T- }4 }% ~( c3 w) `5 zAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ) z2 E- D1 T8 |% t# j& [! ?maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) & m. R! W- b0 D* C- z7 M }* Jequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly ?' W; @5 M/ f% f+ |8 h* W+ }tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 0 w( S* B) \% Rprotection equipment). 5 r3 i6 d7 D% s2 h* L4 N+ U. ASupport ) F8 l* x3 M, w$ A, ]5 t0 ]! o( bPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly # Y4 R4 y ^9 ~, o% |, x; Uassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for * J, u) Z" S4 hexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. * v/ M8 w& D* x2 p" ^# S' Y/ NSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, * {9 t0 A4 z# \# d; g- R( q7 g- kbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 5 V: ? n9 N: T$ tSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. 5 L9 w1 D3 u4 q) ?SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. ; P: m& W& h3 p( `$ e" YSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 9 I) ]/ _" _! a( _$ n; }" bmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity : f$ M+ J7 v3 G9 q. M, S( |measures. - c, Y9 L$ q* dSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response - g+ F- A1 z3 p& ^7 \options and current surveillance system availability. 2 ]5 e ] @+ z5 h/ g: f1 ]7 ASurveillance, Satellite and * K( b$ }; ^( pMissile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, ! ^0 f5 y' ^: A$ e7 gand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 6 i- R7 d8 ?+ m1 p/ u6 H; L6 wSurveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated & F% G4 i1 v5 z0 u- ^$ s- Z2 x& Uin the surveillance system. + \. Y8 D, _$ v: N; [0 ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability Operating Modes & Q% s- X2 u; u! a8 F rThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) 1 Q) y% c( ?/ [' U6 o% YThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. 9 G8 Y# {: B9 F$ u2 `; ?8 sSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. , l- Z! O) W3 ~4 _ m8 Q3 R) RSWC Strike Warfare Commander. 9 t! g a( E/ g* ?2 RSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating 5 X: k0 Q& {$ [9 V T4 M+ y! H+ sband of frequencies. ( ^4 c$ ^( a {# N2 Y$ eSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 3 ?4 h: }6 v. O5 m/ w _$ OSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. ' D3 d" B; q: d3 L& i% l' [1 f/ `SWSC Space and Warning System Center. ( @& f" M0 k2 P# `; j& {3 }SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar z) \9 a# o" M(SAR) 5 \0 u3 i6 ?9 T0 o, W2 JA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 9 V, D* C/ }' |. L' qtheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for . B3 @ t& g U# V6 htransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. - N! q, b) q0 ~ uSys C/O System Check Out. , z/ _3 K' w2 g: hSys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 l% ~2 P1 O6 E* |! q* ~284 + z& X5 }& U: |: N' _SYSCOM Systems Command. ; K; s5 A9 s& ~+ P! E' BSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, m% G- C7 X4 L1 R, |; G! xdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. : x( K3 } [9 r* c(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a # C) m+ D5 S" s/ y0 n- Bfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. # g$ W% R" L8 c, A. ?9 i3 wSystem " |( e( i% \5 z: q2 \/ K7 {) Z+ cActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. 0 Y! t# [6 D( ^/ tSystem / V8 m3 j3 a3 u. \) MArchitecture ' k" p% i- g6 G: g# n' ~/ O( _System Capability , _5 `8 O' y2 |: Q* r; b( D! ^Specification (SCS) . }" H6 X& u% C9 d/ MThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system c. f4 c' F4 x5 O& L# A8 \9 }$ Karchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. + K( P" B- ~0 ^4 q' jThe government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center 5 a1 s& ]; c: }2 i) T(SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide ; k0 p e6 M, {) G- X( ksensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept 2 f* Y" E* P2 j+ {# f- f3 UPaper (SCP) 5 i+ [( t# q) I* K! S7 q( O- P5 d, iOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other ( E2 H2 A; g+ U3 M- L# g5 y6 Mconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board $ W5 m9 U# h4 X/ x9 V' B" N(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function : I) \6 i; O1 l! M+ aA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. % y% s% b2 @% D1 X" h3 _. H& YSystem Definition Review (SDR) $ b) r7 A0 m. d" ~The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the ' \/ w9 A7 u/ a2 @. t' {/ U: tsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential 0 n/ `8 f" f. Y! K. a: |impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 5 @/ P, |; t: Q6 Xdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment 1 T3 F: j- v. A% `Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. ! U: C% M2 C& E9 PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 " B* D" F+ ?: r) L6 N! ^System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design 1 E. h0 E( `, B7 H- U' I+ b5 @ AConcept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ; E% m5 |! e& l: pSystem Design + }: h V/ ^- TReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with # ?% W+ E1 I- B, Z7 ]/ v/ ~/ d# Pthe allocated technical requirements. , i+ |9 s' l# A) a( ]System : {: u2 S6 k* j! ~/ y9 u$ Q# S, nEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 9 B$ _3 {! `1 h# M3 Tof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. . x9 J5 w" p. M0 A* l5 g2 R5 E/ i. ZSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) , \+ Z q* Z8 y: C# t0 Q; L# U; dThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS ' g- x) D2 w- l: {; ^1 n% ^# acapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior * }0 d. \7 C6 KExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 0 K' R6 L# Q, `" l: _1 S* V: n* D# bDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 6 q7 v8 ^0 R/ Usignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to - {8 H3 G9 O: X$ Y' Gachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. 4 d7 K) S8 E5 |System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share / u0 P/ L9 @0 F1 W% D( e2 pa set of common characteristics. System Generated 1 w2 U' P9 j& M; a5 w6 P) @3 u9 V3 jElectromagnetic $ `! a! o3 j4 O% m, C0 {+ K; jPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. & M0 B2 p6 l; z6 w) i4 \/ GSystem Integration Test 9 g! n. y8 J# F3 f* C$ |0 eA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual 6 q$ b+ ~" @: n/ R9 _1 y# f9 E" Emanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 5 n- y$ {% K8 e( O& N1 J) Z# W. Wand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. 6 X' \. q4 N; k: g6 v9 JSystem 1 M3 O, O& Z+ s' K7 T, g; KOperational 0 d; E& G. ^/ R" p7 ?Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, ( h# K0 P, T$ b) c$ O0 l2 U' Vdeployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration % J0 r% R A9 g# }2 p+ pFunctions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and ; G* k1 [" E& y1 B# ?battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to - t8 |, q% Y6 tthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of . e8 t5 u9 a8 J& J/ m/ t9 Gposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 : B8 _! d) j) n! N6 `* YSystem Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, , s" b q, y i; N: Bgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out $ m0 o$ q/ z; R- |6 Bthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority }1 s9 I% ~' g z5 _8 U3 I* Kalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It * {3 g0 _! U7 v5 Bincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 7 Q3 n& R2 ]* J8 Y3 _3 Nstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the ( h7 n# T: k. _! ^+ Yverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under & K7 j- c8 d/ |realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies , N1 w& D+ T% M' q9 jand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 9 ] L+ L7 m/ Y" b3 Sstatus reporting. . M x+ \ G% ~5 q+ I& ISystem 1 D! n2 l$ |8 o4 S! |Readiness 7 J+ [, l) R+ B- q% o1 iObjective 8 x' E8 o9 h/ iA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support , s M: W4 N# b' z& hsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of , N4 P* \( S. Rsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 2 Y2 s. w0 j8 Vcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System 8 b) a9 }5 A, U0 l p2 y3 _ r" [Requirements Analysis (SRA) 4 n8 Y4 H# N1 J8 Z5 p7 m; t( MAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. , t2 `+ c3 E% I, s( J6 J' VSystem " B1 ~8 o3 K% BRequirements Review (SRR) " I8 h1 K% B, x' w3 M0 e5 x/ vConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. ( y1 b; q( w7 wDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security / ?$ H; ] f. t0 l8 A0 \2 eEngineering 8 Y: I9 C. K& I1 o. w(SSE) ) j, C( b9 p/ H. e$ O; e9 i) S; KAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 5 u: }4 W. f; ^% E2 V! Xanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security 1 l) \- _; K$ ?Engineering Management Program (SSEMP) / m8 f! @" ~4 C1 FThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE " `' X; I7 h1 ^. O4 \program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the " L: y0 p: s8 @3 \6 Pdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides ; |% v H+ z: ]/ x2 Wmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes * L! [- h9 n9 j+ y- |its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security ! f& T2 M; j- g' ^6 I; n) `/ S( YManagement 9 y5 x; b* U: S( q/ m3 w0 xPlan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 9 s( Y% K. j- Xsystems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. 9 {4 Y: j* \5 w' H+ X2 {MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ' k* k$ a5 g& U2 n) [287 3 W, b5 U* r- @. s$ K. Q, mSystems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) ; X, A% A9 V! g, I0 A# L$ }This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures ! K: Q- }% Y5 j4 xdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) % z: _2 f! `" V: z2 Q A6 KKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test x$ J8 g$ J! P) i$ @) ?. v& m I1 XIntegration and 5 R: [5 R+ L i9 P# C0 g6 ^. hCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat 0 V# ~' {" }+ q; y# ? AAssessment . M0 j2 _& D% d0 R) E! F w% qReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. 7 k. Q4 j6 O. P5 g. mSystem-Valued ( J( ?, h b9 V a& \" H9 KAsset % T; x$ G, s' z2 p2 x" ?7 HA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to . h/ k4 g5 m0 D4 H8 S* f5 i5 k+ athe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. ! W7 |3 @$ V9 m& gT&T Transportation and Transportability. ; |3 v: P! h( D3 A, DT-MACH Trusted MACH. 1 n" u% P9 ~2 yT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. . D, @* r7 x' H! nT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). G6 k8 O0 p5 `5 E, Q4 gT 2 3 k6 G* h8 x% a* i$ ETechnology Transfer. T ! c+ k: [/ G- t( j3 s! u2 4 e2 ~. y8 r. C: {# ~& DE Technical Training Equipment. . e4 n( i/ m' n( n( P7 STA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. & { @; Q# |# L0 gTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. % }- k8 ^& }' g7 y2 jTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. % A7 e4 X8 h0 L) f; o" l7 f' {TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. ( E* {2 v+ i9 V3 b/ c8 dTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 4 R# }: _/ k( ^6 ?TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. 5 Q" I$ Q5 A- H E$ `2 N! F9 |# w, [TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. . j5 r$ U D7 e( [8 `8 M, ?TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T % l+ {) l) U6 A289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation 9 j/ }4 L( D) v* G( E$ c+ ITactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation ; N3 y; h! R" q. W- g; LAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 5 r. o5 F* M/ j3 h8 uground or naval forces. 1 o# ~0 K& j5 r# y9 p# k8 ^2 NTactical Air Operations : J- H. r4 \1 @. y" b1 j3 m. K: DCenter 6 J) i/ k6 w' m2 E$ f: W+ uA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly % F5 X% [6 K: _" L! ^# |assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of ) r/ r N: \, F/ T7 LResponsibility - E/ n5 i4 k0 h6 Q(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and ) y5 u# N) Z+ U- t8 bcoordination of support. % D j, ~( o, W6 i8 H* MTactical Ballistic # {$ U9 ~" g( C* I/ u- KMissile (TBM) ' t) ]$ V# V! l7 n2 Y4 DA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be " _& M4 t5 `0 q7 a! D3 remployed within a continental theater of operations. " a5 [' O$ C1 GTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future . i5 u( w% V) ldevelopment of tactical doctrine. 5 d) m/ W4 D$ T( K$ gTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 7 n( n0 t" f' P/ ?Tactical Data Information link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates " u$ X2 k) |" [8 s4 c* deach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. 2 @2 F8 V' a% d) d N& V9 r: v' YThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of ; k8 l: j! Z% B% [, T8 y% H$ j, bWar The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to - `! p, d# s0 t* D* Caccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical 4 [$ W) e4 N0 c; o6 N! wOperations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations ' X& r9 K$ \4 g* J2 L6 Uarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical p3 g7 z# q* b# }, E% sOperations Center (TOC) ; `7 [/ n; b9 [/ Y( IA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff ) V, C" [0 U, s' o [concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. ; n6 v9 O6 p- K5 I0 n- U8 fTactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack " Q: {2 {2 [- PAssessment 5 y9 j. m3 X& s0 O8 g; V(TW/AA) 9 }$ y0 X3 w- i3 ?5 `( sA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack / _ _ o/ W9 z- ~+ X: ~3 {0 [Assessment. * C* `2 Z2 K+ Z% dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 8 H* |# d3 e& r* R3 @TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. ) D+ c$ {6 [( ]1 }3 e(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. " T1 D. r5 }% e/ k4 E: NTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. 5 h: z% }" U. x% p1 p4 B, N8 _TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. 4 c5 ]0 |+ ?3 W' A+ uTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. u9 S A7 G1 U3 V! g3 l( h- OTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. : ?- k9 ^; o7 T7 Q6 ?: j6 T6 x- uTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 9 d, N) Y" P6 M9 U6 d" WTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. & _& B a1 i+ [( u! ATADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 6 z( m' o% g- R5 ETAF Tactical Air Force. 5 k/ {% c: T% G; o+ n8 n* l4 e9 aTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. 4 w: u1 Q) U" v# a2 b4 o! ATALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. ; z) p$ ] b3 O4 }6 W+ \, tTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. ; c! O0 [/ y. F+ e, `# J! L& V: q6 A4 uTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank , v' B- R8 R1 P( TFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. 9 U4 G4 j6 U% P$ u( O/ MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 o- M' S8 n; c; ~% B/ [# |# Y291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 2 W; l# |2 G: i. P- j- C* {. Q2 p' jTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. ' @( @2 f8 A- p% A; \(3) Target Acquisition Radar. 1 G4 v6 D8 V9 P8 n2 T5 ?1 dTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target ' w/ Y3 q" [* h4 G& SAcquisition 0 b$ \7 A# P0 u MThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage $ Z- g5 ?" Y* A% cregion of a sensing system. ) t3 r, d# m# |, n1 K; _! MTarget " X: w- a5 v( R1 X$ GClassification ) `: h& | s/ E# Mand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. ) X; A N; H# q6 [; ^0 lTarget / D- c. y4 g. L8 ~; `Discrimination ( y) M& M9 ^; ], Y" \# }The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one d. z% ^/ q1 d6 atarget when multiple targets are present. ; A6 u1 x2 n! v+ q6 L; BTarget Object Map (TOM) & w7 r, V- |/ E! I2 {A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 8 w$ i' H6 W' _& w* A1 R W6 wtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) " z% A+ ]/ c- G9 T1 zTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. * N5 a$ a" x3 U. a(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 5 r; X F# |6 }: _( B( V4 Z1 |passage of a ship or sweep. 0 f3 s3 X: F6 q8 p/ Z, `# \3 N0 yTarget System 9 u9 s* s1 d# j# L3 wRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target , ^9 l* Z. C6 T6 w3 Yrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. : L; I- ~; l* v6 XProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. 2 |1 S& h+ {5 t1 iTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 6 F" [7 C/ U' L; kengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 7 l w2 u8 J+ v D: r% ]. n1 U, F: Krequired performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ' x% w0 n6 l* H* r4 b7 @% `TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. + j9 b# L- d* y% vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. 0 g6 Y# v# A- Q3 KTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. $ ~% @/ c: S/ v1 [/ b* u* {, pTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. 1 w, \3 z) i7 K. E+ A, ]1 sTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. + D) y/ [% J& G3 c6 YTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 6 X) V: p) j$ [1 W3 G6 y. `9 ]4 ~TBN To be Negotiated. * G' P1 E- l3 I1 B$ ETBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 4 K# w9 T. }6 R2 o(2) To Be Supplied. ' Y/ E3 K! f0 Q) O* e(3) To Be Scheduled # g6 M; }/ ~* S- M. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. ; ]* l- S3 C* I. qTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 6 ? m/ X5 u. A' nTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD " ^! h, y# P, t3 P R) ]0 y/ p9 ~$ \Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. % [( C8 d# U @) p(2) Technical Data. 0 f" T& G a2 a0 \1 i(3) Technical Director. " a$ B+ K' P/ k. j) L6 ~(4) Training Device 4 f" H) R4 H7 q' K+ K( hTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. 6 n+ a1 g3 @2 r* j! E/ S8 FTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. % y, q! U5 j# Q: H& Z4 O! V8 {TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 2 O n2 f/ |; Y+ R& K# qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 2 [& ?9 S ~, b W293 ( O3 H# Z- p, XTDBM Track Data Base Manager. : V7 R& Z3 _# \7 M6 WTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. " ~* T6 T; I. |- o8 V1 {+ w. |" {! ^TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. 6 c8 s. ^3 O; a1 b( }1 JTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 9 i# _4 S) P% i( Y. i& WTDM Time Division Multiplexed. , o# ^ k7 \) QTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. # K/ i* { [( ^3 j: H1 v(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 1 }: P/ @8 \+ jTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ) p* Z1 @2 l" J7 x+ Y8 s. X, sTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. * [! t# d) m* _, I1 o& E, tTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. ' {' `7 {% n: _7 \TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. - G |- \ |1 v, tTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. # Y: m$ X8 G; Y# H) HTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). ! z" P3 c* Y: k4 I4 ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as 7 O* |; O: {4 D; S: z9 Ymanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not " \8 Y. i: j3 Z$ t3 ?technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item ' i) k, o7 W: U7 [9 yperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, . J1 T) F; @7 y- p# Z9 Bassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality " P5 U0 s5 z/ @1 u$ m2 Cassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation " Y$ n- V) u4 Z3 rThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to $ {) r U$ [( `determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available ( Z2 }& b: z& F& vfor stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & Goals (TOG) 5 [9 z: q" g5 F; f, E. i! P+ qHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS & X+ Q* m9 U" wdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. : ]" P; M. N# q' aTechnical ( K; K5 U5 c' G4 XParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by $ M# J" T) H; U- \" m* @; O( s# wmanagement. Technical Performance Measurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 0 _+ O. A: c9 zbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures ; v9 U. x* S$ y( u" V( xdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product ; ]- m W$ @( b4 [1 @9 B" K. Velement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. ( G, e4 d {* o A2 H$ gTechnical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form * f. I5 l6 x8 o7 ~3 V' B* O7 e- X% Gthe basis for actual design development and production. Technical 4 K2 ?% b7 }& Y# \: k* t, p9 MSurveillance + j5 y) U2 a: f7 }. U- N: V9 ^/ gIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 6 _8 n1 N/ |& j: M" s5 ?5 ytargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent 1 C# k* c& t: m5 H. Q5 s/ eThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management & k1 o" z+ f, B1 o6 E! xresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. 4 A" d% `$ D: s g* C0 FTechnology Program Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical % y5 n K/ h4 h+ _supporting technology. 1 Q8 _2 x( d; i7 i x7 V' ^# k* LTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ; _3 c( h% A, R$ J* wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * S$ Y: P7 ]4 t295 5 B% Z' _4 B# P) fTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. / ]8 W" C" g. l7 c$ K* v! \TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, `% }/ z( d {% \$ }Tracking, and 7 C& I1 K: c; M9 E" `Command (TT&C) $ _: D) l" G: b# F0 wFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and ( r2 `& d" Q0 Z5 y H# F+ Fstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a 2 ^7 w1 N$ a) a) a6 q" C/ asequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. 8 `+ \$ q# ^" L: oTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. & \# m& c- D% r2 e' Y. b9 QTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. - j% z! _4 ?- C! L4 P# O0 tTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of 8 ]3 Y5 |+ }. E* w Ccompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term 6 r* c4 p* M! g2 U3 G' d, d3 B) Y- d"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 4 h( {0 M- o* N# o! \7 aTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. 9 {- f" A9 T5 _TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. , O+ W8 ?2 V$ J8 r8 F7 W8 ATERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. : Q Z3 ?) l6 B. V3 RTerminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 5 N" R/ Y. I1 J, `atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the l9 B5 h$ M: E- J" |1 |; Fvicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. . `* S, v* Q3 m! K! UTerminal Phase - x/ z/ P" w3 K+ I$ f; g2 dInterceptor 4 U7 {0 F0 r, NA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) & K4 ~) q2 a& g& b, STerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. : o' J( f$ k9 P) K5 c W9 B% [TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. & r( f9 B4 i! T, nTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. " u8 B) `: O) Q$ Y9 \4 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 0 m4 S( n# w( a8 c) G: [consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. 7 Q% \; i2 z6 q/ A) I9 k9 e: h! HTest and 2 `# B, g# R0 B) X5 c5 z: eEvaluation (T&E) - p* ^7 A+ U0 T2 g9 `1 jProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated - q3 e) c2 ?& ]% I$ r9 K& }* Gto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production ( K, P5 t, H, \# `& K6 ~: J" ?Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof & r$ k1 ?. D% \2 }6 _8 [1 q7 Pmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical + [, B9 N# [* g/ U* u" Bperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a ) b/ _. h" S ksystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, q# @+ R7 o, [1 Rand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 9 s# P9 M" j/ X9 E( ?requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that a6 f6 T1 W* C& | C. cthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 3 B: H1 b9 e! C5 A: k+ Lor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 1 ~* Y0 [% I7 e/ P3 Y& \* Q. |(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. ! u: v) H1 T& _7 }FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and # O! R5 Q/ @5 U2 W# VEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) 5 l) u$ E$ D$ i6 u! @" j6 q# c! VAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate " N) m: \& ~ Y& s, Bobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation , p" S* U8 \' v4 ^# k' v6 A# Kto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as 8 E# s5 _+ a, I% _1 h/ Dearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test " ?& a' G% [# c6 ^: R3 Xintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 8 h; r5 k9 {: Q) m4 Mprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling ) F& j1 f/ O6 l6 x* sproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and - m8 F/ @. H! x2 ~related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals ; U/ J7 w: J; E: e! G( Kwhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 4 v! B3 l' K- k$ Tand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ) h' f. {0 }, u% ^/ q: UTest Integration 1 Q3 u& i @' o! N' c4 S+ dWorking Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in 0 A! c6 J O. Z! q4 I1 O/ porder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. 4 W, U7 T8 E5 D$ j+ I( B8 BTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation $ P' J1 Y f) ^! D' E& gcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 ' A7 R, F) z, c; k2 e* P- ?Test Target Vehicle (TTV) + K$ @/ ~; k, c, tSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. # Y# y4 @8 D& \; ]" j. K& ^Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 6 G3 a% P3 A! y8 Y- K2 S9 VTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. K* R! }" a1 y; O+ y* aTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 9 j4 ?! r# I5 T! T4 o: ~TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management * h5 g; u+ f$ _9 v1 QTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. . Q; o$ [$ D' h0 UTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 9 ]* ?8 s& B6 ~4 X- x x* wTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). ) z. a9 m9 e) g. y) Q4 z* oTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. ' k) G6 x/ k" F: pTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. 3 M; n0 f0 h" `6 lTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a + J* S# z- Q" R7 J) Z* t+ z2 E9 Gcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. / b- `: e, {8 F Y) R2 M' ?Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense 7 c2 d& C D- ?. ]* z+ m; o(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. ! i/ s5 W0 w0 ~(USSPACECOM)