航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user . T' Z$ ], d$ r8 J7 M! ]3 O: u* qaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. 5 e6 N: H; K- p& A& k' T/ L5 ESTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. 5 L' g. m4 ?, V# m# O9 zSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, 2 u" L4 K3 t CHandling, and Transportation 4 @8 x) f6 g* T( i2 w; X0 r9 n0 g. yEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient - @$ G- W2 L+ F8 lenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed - w/ B! J& W3 Q3 R# `during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target % y: ~6 q* W/ D3 \0 P% |Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s ) `" c V, h; q, GApache missile. ! e* w' L, _$ \: {! [+ VSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). ! s& i8 F: d$ X5 mSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic $ H5 M% k1 K" ^+ V$ ? @# }) ADefense 5 i! M% F; h% M- y" ~All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense Emergency 8 f& o( y' k7 X* p* Q+ E/ tDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. / f; \, l- b! qStrategic 2 w0 n; h) C& }: @+ ^# PDefense System (SDS) 1 \' E8 }1 W6 ZA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ) w+ U* H2 N- Fballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S " ?; {7 ]7 c3 `' ]3 s' b& L280 ) |- o5 A H2 q& n' d5 ~Strategic Level of War # u7 z# C4 u; r" V& m+ LThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or $ J, S, A5 s G, Q$ C" Zalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. 5 g0 c$ P4 {% NStrategic Offensive Forces 6 S# X) I/ c+ Y/ Z5 {; o7 b(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, 7 d/ ?4 j! n* g1 w L. ?the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific ( }! ?, @* p7 v2 ^- UCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, * n. m/ M. ]& R4 |, q, _- x8 UFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 3 v/ L/ M& X& D! V9 F4 _Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply ( K/ o9 W$ K! }: C7 Q- H% J/ ldistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic 3 I7 q6 K( U4 c7 y% _Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. ; a# R/ k; M$ J" o; m$ EStrategic Warning Lead Time & f' d w+ X a; F6 HThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of + x+ |; g7 r3 ]hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. . j5 Y+ k2 I: @ G) j0 WStrategic Warning Post- * Q/ G3 l. c) d! W1 e- {Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 1 Y: l8 w8 q' F- W+ I2 E3 ?' F7 fnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. 4 e3 L1 E) q6 p: x c" m5 HStrategic ; [* K1 s9 r. zWarning Pre- Decision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a 7 n4 _0 p% R& p0 Zdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course ; l O% q& r2 d+ c2 ~. n5 n; fof action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. 9 b( q0 Y/ j! F3 A& W2 H+ l% ISTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). ( T4 {4 T. y7 q6 J g3 u+ cStructured . u! a: J' V) ?4 \* \; h* bAttack 9 s+ g8 y0 ^- [& F$ T7 WAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured , n8 n$ ?" f" ]4 {4 i6 ]Design * V8 I6 _ L9 Q$ `) W5 B; TA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 0 X* e. C' z* I. ~% L: Q: bProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or ' v4 e+ k% W2 S& I& Gsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. # M' D$ i7 u0 J# `( S* rSTSC Software Technology Support Center. 7 U- f S4 S2 u; k/ F* ]MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 9 R5 J8 q; c* w4 i& h7 p(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). $ [- Q* u- F% `* O# tSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. $ M! X5 f2 M; y' T: MSTW Strike Warfare. : _: x# M' O" l$ K# ~3 Y, |STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. 6 M9 \' b# M6 _1 J8 FSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. 0 G* d, {2 R0 u2 v; q* X& j" rSubject Security ( }" ?8 z. b+ Q5 ELevel $ ^! f( d7 a3 u7 tA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. 0 \! a4 I, \6 M1 j4 DSubmarine- g3 ]5 S4 A, n8 m g! e- B! rLaunched . H2 s' ]3 X5 ABallistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ( T. w; ]% n/ Q; @ \miles. q( ?( V) E* n- ~, k9 [+ ySUBROC Submarine Rocket. - `" R4 {% Z r3 qSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 4 S% Q1 [( x% ?# F' qwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive ) ?6 U# R4 L+ d# B; ?Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. . X" e3 T5 M. h4 `5 Q# dSuccession of $ j7 w. J7 N3 ~' C% ]5 {# HCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command 0 O4 X. b+ C8 nis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two $ l/ R9 l, H2 Z, C9 A B6 `alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). + E0 r. x- m# b5 k: U6 P* P cSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 6 e0 ~0 ^% u) t9 |, N+ d. USuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in - R$ r% N$ I1 X2 Z" U* A% S' Wa single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 * C* f( v% s JSuperradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not + j$ v+ J8 W9 {6 w1 f) \% nrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional $ ^( z5 _, f1 i9 J: T1 elasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from & R5 G! ?9 q |3 Q" |8 csuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 6 [$ X3 |% [4 t% W& abeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory ! h5 P: u+ Q7 G* }" d- U a, Q3 oPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental Appropriation & w% B: z( k7 P( a9 x3 h- |; u/ HAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support # _; W3 X5 Z) `3 W+ K: eEquipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 1 r) W8 x* J, Q6 ~ Vtools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). 4 o! N r( ], u8 E; d- ^Support ' d, I$ w+ k* s& I2 VPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly * L F/ q3 e5 l0 sassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for & X6 W+ ~6 f& N9 h( eexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. ! O: ]. L# |$ X% _) `% t% w+ zSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, ) l4 |+ |& {. f9 @6 f2 y5 Jbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. . f I4 W: c$ Z6 F0 y* q6 F5 \( G9 TSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items * A! d% O) S# K4 G9 @$ Q+ ~+ m. f9 mdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 4 N) S* V/ x( @. N( xmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess " z" i% ^! o1 X8 G/ \8 Bproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity : |0 g K: w" R$ cmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 2 d" g' L9 i' R5 `. ^and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance - I. }$ v5 k( [/ u7 P, nRequirements ' S& Y" o' C; m: D! L) e& bRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for / z4 S3 ^; i2 t" a* X5 i6 y c- Kcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response 5 X% i& w3 L1 ~- l# h5 \options and current surveillance system availability. 6 r+ z" E0 \% nSurveillance, Satellite and Missile ! K$ n8 h& [& I @9 a2 W2 |( |The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 6 E0 ^! z, S* U; h1 ?! Iand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. % }! K4 T+ G+ ~/ B7 S% dSurveillance * y: d' K) C7 w6 P! fSystem Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 6 c$ M4 y9 P( ^% Uin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability + j, D; K+ M9 B, cOperating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. & p: O2 I- p+ gSurvivable and Enduring - }/ o* c- N; I4 a5 O4 d/ ^Command Center # @/ L* g9 I$ L) x5 D(SECC) 4 i% k7 T5 C) \; m9 {6 J( k' \The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. ! a: ]/ R, p% b/ qSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. * J) g: x% r/ e7 f) J; L/ ~& ^SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. 7 S, b: }1 j& u8 KSWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating * j9 M% ]# ]$ w$ S; mband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. 7 n( }) @7 H; Q; m0 CSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. ; P) \+ v) g" h$ ?6 Z( w5 K1 JSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. % b; J R, V5 |3 [. J9 qSWSC Space and Warning System Center. # v) G% A* \" Q! S% P0 N; i! USYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. / f5 l! t5 [) k6 iSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where ! c1 r, k% z* Y& d. [each module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar 7 Q. d( N6 g( [9 D(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for . O3 e. W) p( L5 R+ Y7 w0 `transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. " H+ o2 L' y3 G5 n USys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. 2 v0 Q* V! |, N0 i0 F& S6 `Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. & [ M& q! @9 v( O- x0 ~1 eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 3 m8 ]. b+ |; i* [* iSYSCOM Systems Command. % _; ^0 R# g) v {4 ESystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, ' z4 y8 F& y! L. Y: |data, and services needed to perform a designated function with 8 U, ^4 n2 U+ I1 `+ Y8 ]specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. $ `# ~# Y0 R ^% u(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. + F. U/ D) b* Q# y3 D( WSystem 2 B. c" g- i; I6 \) A; S8 |! GActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. ; W8 t6 R5 a4 C `0 b6 HSystem Architecture * r8 t3 ]( |2 u7 QSystem Capability 3 U# y4 F) J M# e; D" i9 ~Specification . H& ^/ u, s' H% d: w9 C. c(SCS) . v# g* E1 U" g" n! ^The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system ; G" l6 b6 E0 r* E, Tarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the / j" n- o5 ~* K# Telements of missile defense systems. ; x( m5 K8 d0 B- |The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among * S! J/ K# b, m3 Zthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) 9 v2 u) e& f! f0 |7 R9 z* Q7 qA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide + S3 q/ |) L qsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. 8 h% w* Q6 Y. n5 a9 H; wSystem Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 0 Y' ~% {/ m, N: r& O$ V1 x5 k+ D0 yconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition ' i7 @' u8 d. ]( Xstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other & l7 Q3 i5 C; a) W2 h! vconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) & v; R9 Z9 z" c) W% FThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. - W' ^$ S% |4 i& t5 H2 GSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and ) m1 {: Q3 K% Z; qcomputer systems. 3 b0 v" C. w8 a( p. u XSystem-Critical Function $ J. y' Y7 J' l& U1 pA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's ' X2 E9 P3 p W. z: \9 _mission. System Definition 6 K, `2 e( j/ C9 ~0 i- WReview (SDR) ' F1 a# _4 Q, y- y a4 jThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the - I& A0 d" T6 Z7 v9 \system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, & N' ~, K$ C" h6 x& Hdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. ; B- R8 z. S O. I pSystem Deployment ) y, P1 @" [' w+ Q0 \Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. $ K. d* N f, hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % E6 M% X& W6 ~* o* P" N2 ]285 , @: {$ r2 E- J7 T0 X/ CSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy * G1 P# Z- S' }; B" v& rspecified system requirements. G: R/ W h; l9 F2 h(2) The result of the system design process. * C# X% H k' v4 H: X" mSystem Design + H: _( }0 V4 E! u( vConcept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and : H0 P9 ]( i5 M ?9 k1 u: ]9 X Fcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. ( G" W; k/ c+ x: b1 G! s0 ` RSystem Design + [4 |3 J. o5 `" e6 A' |Review (SDR) 4 x: D- e0 i1 D1 u# L' IEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with " E' P4 _: `% y$ z5 v" c! e* v3 {1 Kthe allocated technical requirements. # k8 f8 @. b$ QSystem ; z) @, \1 l8 |( ^2 zEffectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution / f$ v' Q. I' c9 wPlan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 6 a% u& J3 u2 `3 O8 WDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 1 @4 ]5 ?4 S9 }" Fsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome ! y) q4 \6 w- R: z) K+ d/ ^8 {8 Xthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System ! \, }- T* e9 qGenerated 7 d, x t7 C( U* oElectromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the / Q; B5 t: u! H- ?4 }8 z8 Uprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the " d( z& P$ i0 w$ pobject in order to produce charge equalization. ' I$ \, V8 U9 A j3 X" i0 n/ pSystem Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, # o. x$ X% r% g# n- ~sensors, and weapon hardware. 2 |1 {" e3 M1 m5 eSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks 1 b* i3 c6 T# \+ s0 v8 qand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or & z V, R ]& Q7 q2 {equipment systems. 4 E( c6 L& y$ Y r) m* t# J+ \System " o# ~+ f1 K- c5 A5 {4 L, c5 FOperational / w9 F+ Y2 [7 p$ k; F- Z( gConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration 1 o) t4 G' n5 K2 }! fFunctions (SOIF) " ~2 s+ T# z. z# w. b- @4 B2 p) UThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and ) ]# ?4 |+ V6 D: ]9 Q6 xbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ! U D) w% ~2 s. N+ l) Cand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 8 M, k/ z, |0 U mSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 5 i2 y. C" Z. M8 I' f, X; V6 sposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. ( J( o- ~# V9 @# z9 b+ Y% C; t8 mMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program # S3 `2 x; _# c a4 F \Office (SPO) " w6 o! h# y* W* i$ B6 A {8 s: QThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, . i+ f, e( j5 o6 i6 ^government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority * X8 w/ W5 U- [along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational % T% }/ \* G1 ^- sstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 3 G N' b+ R# _continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions ) @; C% o3 \: m5 [9 F+ P/ Hnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 1 v! r% a1 H h& i1 Vhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 8 ~5 A X& p) W7 x3 pstatus reporting. System Readiness 7 _4 e1 Y9 ?. g( XObjective 0 ^* l3 @) s5 |% v9 M5 x0 zA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a % Y! X1 {' Y- g- ospecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. ' s2 d5 X5 I: `# S9 ~# k' E0 YSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. 1 r- }* @1 \+ q% u# O0 PSystem Requirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System + M' a3 X4 _, J3 n: p. o2 _' N' [Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System ; g$ d" x& s( ]2 v: fRequirements Review (SRR) ( ]& T5 E3 m' c8 \0 I0 J+ I# K3 o+ NConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 4 E# \) O G w5 e1 e; Rdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. ' [" ?$ P l+ d' u5 p, VSystem Security # L- [5 N' b" U& v9 S, W& FEngineering 6 L1 b7 n% \$ R9 \: D+ t4 @(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering 6 M' o" w# a# S5 \: }! y% e; yprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. 8 \) D \6 v! t# O, CSystem Security ( W3 X% ]$ r* q" B1 lEngineering ; N' P8 n2 s) ~/ A" B& W) D8 o |Management Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the " Y* k' q& [- N* A' G Hresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides $ }" y# P+ q# z6 H, Smanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes ; o A1 R! z) @6 Wits own impact on overall program cost and schedule. ! F' `+ o. c# n( z1 U2 W3 ESystem Security Management Plan (SSMP) ) x' O0 b _/ V+ Z- {A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to ! o- G9 ^. M9 \3 X/ Imeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 5 ]" L$ m; h9 B; `# @methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related 5 A4 {2 g: Y/ `5 `8 W& ysystems. Systems 7 i1 ~. D' _& s( }* y. m1 ~( kEngineering . G% W4 I1 E9 y1 t$ wAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. ) c5 V+ s8 @# h" v3 iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 1 g O1 I2 M% bSystems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. ; q5 C- f0 ]+ ~5 A/ w# S% b8 D/ USystems Test Integration and 7 _) D- U2 g1 k* z8 I; DCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. p3 C9 P( A0 V% F1 i7 tSystem Threat - }! u& R! X3 zAssessment 6 y: Z3 u2 s( }8 V2 l5 ^# Y6 d# PReport (STAR) * M% c: G) b( W% ?& aRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a , P3 y/ b2 N6 ?3 c: M" XService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset 6 G) t/ i0 D' t# WA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to + G1 d: t, f+ ]$ k5 t6 Cthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. & k2 c) y) e! ]2 r& \4 gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T / \4 f$ N1 }1 W. C3 q2 i# y288 ( j+ D7 n0 Y3 e. A' y zT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. ; Y1 b' s+ r7 o& qT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. 4 I! b6 o' a- j4 Q7 S0 _ w/ ET-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. + ]% X% l/ ]! oT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 6 K O' m! C' n# D! qTechnology Transfer. + f, _. ?4 c1 @' oT 1 x0 W6 x/ v$ m! E2 E Technical Training Equipment. - ^. e4 y5 ~4 ~. f+ E. @& xTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. ! J6 ?$ T7 E7 g0 {: E9 ^& d* MTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. , q: I: D$ y5 lTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. . g6 o x& o$ V; b9 P2 {. E; L; zTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 5 z! T) u: V4 C w6 `1 x1 fTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 1 z8 G. n& j0 o# n7 jTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ) z! ?$ x2 k5 o8 p* }TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. - g! p( D( ?+ R& r- x! p/ PTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). + W& {6 _0 f' ~TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). % w( ]5 T: F3 j. j2 G* hTACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. $ q' n( u! M* S/ C3 KTACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air + L6 e$ i8 x7 XDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air 1 u4 g# Z! J L+ h3 N, _. T- Lpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air 6 z$ c! A1 l/ |5 S2 Y' LOperation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with : @5 i! A* F: S7 \+ @9 Pground or naval forces. ) b. e% B3 e W) D! KTactical Air Operations / M6 T7 z. K: W, l' CCenter 2 U4 v0 o" R* r# N' H+ V" jA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support / s5 s9 ]4 g$ W8 lAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility % @! _' n$ d8 N/ b" _(TAOR) 4 q$ w- T$ `1 [6 [$ jA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the # i% H2 E( j6 ucommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 2 k; \" G6 Y( {( }) S# Lemployed within a continental theater of operations. & b# w7 \3 l3 JTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. 3 }% E" l- D+ m4 tTactical Data Information link # R9 l& _7 M3 S( DA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates ! ~" y( J s8 P4 M2 _+ U4 I& jeach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. ; M0 H: _1 b" o- B: D; |6 L) rThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. $ O5 n K I$ |/ n: L9 E; }+ K3 ^Tactical Operations Area (TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission ; `( T* s: J+ ~/ ~ Y4 p7 @accomplishment. Tactical + W/ \$ n* Z# o4 aOperations Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning m: Z- I. i$ [% U(TW) / @. P3 |5 H/ ]5 x. C/ {, C+ y$ T(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command , i' \5 @. C: u# i; X/ M4 M4 H1 t4 ecenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component 6 ]; t' p0 T: S; ]4 r9 D3 S' a! R8 l9 {elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type . {' T) Y3 E Wand size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical 5 f$ _6 U" Z) I' IWarning/Attack Assessment $ x; c* J6 k {1 b(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack - ?$ G$ Y& R6 S: W1 G | \' O+ uAssessment. 6 w" z; @, y- r, [$ c& XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 3 R( f# u) A: X. K; e3 W6 q6 YTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. * d3 s$ x; L5 y1 I; ^5 j* RTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. 9 J8 Y2 ~: ^/ mTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. $ f* _+ p% ~. ]TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. 1 D. p ]" m* BTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. ; V, P: U/ V7 c: zTAF Tactical Air Force. 6 S/ ~$ R9 V1 p; ]6 VTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ' a, F8 K# x$ v. WTAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. % ?8 [, q2 v; b0 zTALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector . Q" e8 ?5 B {$ k" Kand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. ^% V1 V; \, H6 E1 g) @TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. # q7 y' @7 i0 A1 J4 e& FTank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a $ y3 V* v& s4 b8 Z* Presult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. ) T! N( Z, ?; C* i: CTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. 3 Q$ s; k4 G- E" {! X1 S/ ^- b(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. e% d! T) d2 d, H+ z4 c+ ~: R1 zTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target 5 \% l$ h5 |" ?' Y3 s; pAcquisition . C5 E; V R) BThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 2 ^% D3 {0 ]0 s$ I. J3 L' g% Gregion of a sensing system. Target Z' T8 X1 D0 c& u$ Q' l6 }Classification and Type # C0 \% Z; h0 v) S' P& ~# d2 ?Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination : ~/ l [( {. {. iThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. " M8 b, n2 w, s4 N# o' K! FTarget Object & ~4 S2 p3 q& j3 iMap (TOM) 0 ~) C. p* E; a2 dA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 8 h/ R9 v- C. U* P0 \) [identification equipment. 2 V( y1 ]# F4 F' h(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. + {# ]" f/ ]) XTarget System 9 a8 _+ w, Y. \% N& hRequirements Document (TSRD) % Q9 t* y' A3 O2 Y* @1 D4 M. w6 hBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD " A3 B! f: f3 O0 Z, S* F, ZProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 5 Z ?# r$ P- a9 @' BProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 8 ]7 B3 E- T2 tTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance * p9 f# P3 C$ w" F1 Uto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 5 }/ J' \1 O& O0 D! B& }required performance. ' G0 l8 _6 k+ U8 v0 GTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. : k; k0 s7 C+ P2 _5 N. A% NTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. $ E5 ^ n0 }, q, _TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 7 I# w1 W5 z6 j& i9 k; A) BTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. 8 |; S; q. }, U1 T5 \TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. ! J x) e: r- f5 HTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. * M9 f5 s8 P9 |TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 1 f* {* b! o% k' ]5 \TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. + I5 N# J0 T" @& y% V8 J9 O K8 {- hTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . 3 A3 `& d6 l# ~* [( ~# o4 ~5 cTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. $ R, {+ T$ D2 V0 Z6 cTCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. * H# F" r' ?0 n/ k% [0 t2 rTCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. & F9 O7 T @0 b/ @8 p M3 ~4 G(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 7 h! h/ U) _+ X6 M(4) Training Device / Z) D0 ^& W3 ]% mTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 5 H+ |4 A) L" ?( j$ i5 R( lTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 ) ^ ~8 h3 R; l* F: j9 e! Q" ]TDBM Track Data Base Manager. , ]) C( ^, L: |TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. + t3 D. Y+ U2 G, \: [4 ATDI Target Data Inventory. * J! w, ]4 L! H4 ?' b8 T. I* pTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. 2 `3 e9 X' t& v1 \# Y" rTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 5 \7 J) R4 d) y5 o6 k& TTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. * Q% k% X1 R+ C! p" ]TDP (1) Technical Data Package. * |7 h) E2 l9 u( w4 G8 i(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. , k M8 p; _) v/ [" ~TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. 8 q! w; v2 g7 x6 F7 o2 _TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. - f+ a" m6 h2 x! N8 {, n( e7 OTDU Target Data Update. 1 \& O5 R; v9 a6 f; s) fTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. ! I8 \& g3 R- ]" Z \1 [TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. 6 p( \: B/ k# `0 s4 w. _TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. 9 u, l) k0 \! R# HTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). % t8 }! p9 g6 h, ]2 v, vMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 ( o: }4 t% l# x6 {) N1 kTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as C* t, Q" t% t( N ^, jmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract ) z- `% |- y" H6 cadministration. ! T+ A1 J" D- A8 Y& `Technical Data 1 h: E8 a3 J. fPackage (TDP) : F/ E0 n- ^, ?; ]5 tA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 7 E& [# O/ i1 V/ \strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item * R! J1 Z, {" |( u; xperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation 9 r0 x& l1 S) [4 p% e2 g3 Z; ~8 mThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 2 A- H) t$ j% f( K5 Uthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) & m" v6 x: r! \+ Q; YTechnical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available ) s2 B. c1 D7 m& n# L$ [for stating binding technical requirements. % w! Z x4 ^+ G# H& rTechnical 9 J C0 L: G, ]Objectives & $ Z( q0 L0 p: G! i$ P' i9 SGoals (TOG) 0 J8 o5 ^, N& Y4 C+ A5 A% d4 R+ KHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS 1 Q0 k1 z' R5 O# zdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. ' V- w! n7 D1 N8 [# C7 kTechnical : V ?0 L( a; e5 ZParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical 7 X! c# J) ^" [( \, d. q% nPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. Technical " W, a1 y# U' _( L" e0 mPerformance 3 v5 c- d# \0 Q1 U4 zMeasurement (TPM) 7 Y" J2 a8 j. x$ ?! ~Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status : g# \- l. D! _* L% _% ybeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance - s w2 e# A* H( n/ zparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these . G3 w8 W$ B2 d4 kdifferences on system effectiveness. + ~, p- {* c% Z2 J3 y JTechnical Specification ! l- r: }; e7 E. w+ X& YA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. 8 `; o$ ]2 E w; ?8 z: @( tTechnical 8 L k: R& {, ~Surveillance 9 s1 v: O8 { N9 aIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or ; W1 Y8 t, d' k! Semanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. . s6 |, G8 ]2 pTechnology v* G) ~" o( d DExecuting Agent : x( Y% ~! E5 n g9 s1 N0 X: lThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. % R8 w& U0 E9 J7 p! B' F5 s8 NTechnology Program % g" c/ \' @% H. p5 ]+ d; XDescription The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 w9 M; p8 O9 Q6 k# m4 ?/ ]4 C3 ~& I295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 2 ^, B5 L. V) hTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. o" g/ q, }/ u( ?( x, \Telemetry, # z7 N4 d. }0 @Tracking, and Command (TT&C) ' M6 L7 M& \% c# g/ ~Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. ' v: j+ b. Q$ {7 i) ^8 |2 yTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the 1 ]2 I% d+ \9 W: l0 z+ Xautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 3 t0 |) y! r! w" C4 M0 [4 Z& Z+ bTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. 6 r. H+ m! n! o" r9 vTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. # K1 V& Y# Y4 ?- p0 v+ I. ETEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. 0 N/ @1 S/ O2 y5 uTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of 4 I3 l; g2 P/ p" y% ~" `* pcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See 1 Z# U7 J1 d- I4 ^: N* u' v8 `! pCompromising Emanations.) * n( X- D- Z) A* z/ L2 xTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report 3 Q3 \; k/ e# jTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. ) _6 C9 W# a' oTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense 2 x! P( F. K" g! CSegment (TDS) 9 P* \0 Z Z- p' q( z9 n! sThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. O+ g( q' ~7 h! JTerminal 6 y- I" z% }6 s; q1 `/ f; YGuidance 2 z, a5 v5 U3 O0 j1 p0 ~1 A" PThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the ! {- ^% L- R0 E z/ M& t9 Z, X- \vicinity of the target. ! U9 e5 r, m1 G, vTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase n# T# v+ ?' Kand trajectory termination. 6 I* B' P* C2 qTerminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 1 m O+ m" E+ c+ ]Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 6 v2 v; [) @* u* ?- R6 Y+ RTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. + w, Y' S7 k; v( D8 HTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. ; P1 R5 }% Y, q1 eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 3 n- Z2 A6 L) Q, P" _Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 0 z% w8 P! s" g8 khardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and - U; s) Q5 A4 H% EEvaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 6 C+ ^; \: B8 w1 j0 r, Qto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production 3 ~9 @) f/ _. U/ ~: k' M* X/ ?+ O; VAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical $ h8 A+ Z6 a, z2 s8 X* n; zperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 5 S- E' i: J) [system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel : _3 C% `/ L$ _9 K$ H8 b8 Vrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before - X: c$ V6 N' g: p5 B) E# }! I) ]the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. : Q0 X _& a1 H7 p# F0 MFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 0 E' q9 B1 F" w7 Z8 jand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan ( Z1 ~2 T! s3 p& s(TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate ! ?2 S" E; u6 _! Cobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation ( t# y, b2 {/ R3 i6 c l( Ato be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as " L& b2 \) P1 Q gearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 3 G. ~0 S; \" ]' Z5 m2 \$ R0 b; g+ oprogresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) ( o3 ]$ K" j7 i5 XThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the # v* v8 R) M6 @6 H5 s! t, AAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test ( e4 o6 W0 j+ [+ D- N1 C* T4 { ~integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the / b" U- c* J# I& _program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 4 B M$ t6 h; {% M" prelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals & T5 B# A z" Zwhen there are T&E implications. ( d* |1 t. i0 U3 c ? c6 cTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration Working Group , Q0 O9 ?( B% l(TIWG) ; G8 U- j8 V# C2 l* Y2 OA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in ( ^( E* u8 ]7 p2 R+ q4 Z) X( [order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 3 J" c+ n$ R4 D3 N, s- }developmental and operational testing. : X# N' z& D) B8 q6 ZTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. 4 z1 ^8 B7 r! a- X) ?) E7 ~The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, ; n, H4 ]' P" m* w; Htest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation ! |8 C. s' i% v" b$ }9 ?2 O: c# Ccriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. ; r" l$ K# G q" qMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 $ T! K) q. ~8 XTest Target - T/ q* {" T. [ sVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 8 |" K- ~. o7 ]' W5 ?# e' tSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 4 T: M$ E' R6 a2 k6 |1 X! i* zTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. / T2 W7 ?6 h% s3 `0 ~TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. * q5 v8 Y! R, N- YTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 2 {8 L& d6 I$ V$ a- mTF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). & R% N0 x: {: ^( q6 t1 yTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 1 x) u: r8 f. Q5 u$ Y) FTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). + x2 U, F: S/ G, [1 `2 mTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management * G5 s: G( t. T0 a# O; S6 fTFOV Theoretical Field of View. / b$ Z4 }% c# A+ |TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. ' L$ F4 e! _- sTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). q7 m2 l$ N# a5 S0 ~) STG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 1 `& ?& }7 }' GTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 5 y- t: b: n9 e3 y2 S' P/ Rcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. " ]% [7 M3 ~# J/ h. o5 u6 T( b) OTheater Ballistic 1 i) h; ]. L$ U* H& XMissile Defense ' a) L7 k# Z( Y$ |(TBMD) System + x, s- |; U/ |- XThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. : K2 \' ?: B2 B* ?3 E(USSPACECOM)