- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
6 Y* C, R- o4 v2 s3 H, IReadiness
' y* j5 L: j& ]* v+ oSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out) u! K+ r/ U; o2 L, }
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority
( D1 j, C5 p' z0 F' M5 salong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
% V! W3 M. @. P$ ^) Nincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational, U1 C7 O- x: ?% j1 H8 N
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
5 x) P% n! I: K8 |- K; iverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the/ a! K( p- }) g2 a1 t z5 W7 m. u
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under- N9 t F; L7 t3 ]) D' j* _
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions- H' F5 [, t4 N/ d
necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies$ d J! [" a5 J, x7 y. a
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,( j; ]+ D- b# x4 S! ]0 ?+ L+ T
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results
9 n, N# Y; O5 m5 F A" o8 b! N6 ^status reporting.
6 r; `9 L4 _# ^" c7 ZSystem8 v5 X+ V% h5 J% [
Readiness/ m6 u; B5 k1 U' @, R1 v+ }
Objective/ w6 f5 z7 M) C: n# J$ q
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
" b. l, I4 i/ w- Ispecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
( w- A: b2 ?1 p! u% J# GSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and: ^- T( \6 k% Y. L' d) `# w
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support
7 L" p% W2 O" I7 k+ esystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
/ g& y7 W8 {0 Q" D8 z8 @0 Fsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission: H8 I* l3 ^" k0 [
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
5 @1 k4 ^7 G8 |- l& i, S2 eSystem
3 h9 m+ ?# q* F# p" F* eRequirements' q) L+ I- h/ M8 V( ~# D* l. c
Analysis (SRA)
' g) |* `2 _% i& T. FAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System+ y% e- a1 I" r0 q; y _! |
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine e% A5 a0 h5 }0 O0 d" ]. F
specific system functional and performance requirements.
2 Q( g. w0 C* `5 g, O. d+ K4 vSystem
9 e+ f( `6 A: P& U) c3 nRequirements; n, V2 ~9 o. i% Q
Review (SRR)
; B S* a0 O3 L/ T2 r2 G" @" bConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
, Y3 F* G* F; O$ U- VDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the8 [6 Y# `1 ~0 K3 w
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.) [& ^) L' x( K' A
System Security; ?5 M) @2 g( W6 v0 ]
Engineering9 ]3 i. u" V1 i* g- s
(SSE)' t0 o9 w& l& A: G
An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
1 n" }, f: i8 r b/ _% ~1 C% bprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks
5 f0 C- |9 o5 R7 B5 l) V8 C# \associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related! A: @6 f3 @; U9 Q! Q; b
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and: W8 K0 Y& h+ z0 T
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to- s. H3 L+ O( y
security threats.
& X. i# F9 `: k# n9 B4 LSystem Security/ ? L& e) h# ?
Engineering
) c) ?6 ], Z8 J/ }Management
7 a3 k, R6 x& m/ x; m5 X, tProgram
! [- a' S' n8 l; [9 i(SSEMP)
! Z2 `* X( u, c) q) l+ s9 F) _/ [The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical @1 S- {% J4 J
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE
; \, J! D, B& ^% Uprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the0 ~% S! r8 ^. Z; T. p
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
, r6 B; f4 I) `1 P! Eresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides1 E+ z8 b6 ]) Z* S
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes$ K1 m9 h$ m: S% J5 }% Z* l
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
% Y! x( d2 `3 ]3 _+ s( }5 H$ QSystem Security9 d: ~& |0 P. o# Q3 d2 k
Management7 i1 e* O( g6 a$ h& U
Plan (SSMP)2 E: J; }' {- {5 Q& I% ^( r
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to5 H! R+ Q2 q: b! h6 s
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
2 z; b3 l/ G7 R k# L7 S smethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
3 R/ W+ {! n: x4 E7 D7 zother program engineering, design and management activities, and related
4 E1 N# |1 N5 @. E Jsystems.
( }9 c+ T+ ^# `; m6 x) a4 eSystems
+ m% ^ Q! B: k( @: P, e0 iEngineering% E& z; Z+ |/ Q) K: j
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle1 p& e7 S7 u7 T( P6 B
balanced set of system product and process solutions.5 L2 z J7 }- c# V
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S# j7 N/ U" C6 C3 W% _0 R, D: \. I
2875 y5 q( r J2 H: \4 p# q
Systems, e4 _8 e! G* _9 O, R u# k7 N
Engineering7 q% m8 [& ~ P/ P
Management
7 y9 |; T8 K9 z9 a( kPlan (SEMP)
8 b) z( | }- q6 U" NThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)
. J3 G! Y( T' }3 J1 ?Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
! O! x) V9 A4 q7 r. d3 ^* wdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
: \5 I4 P3 f* v4 P( `/ V7 ]Key engineering milestones and schedules.. A7 c/ v* [# G7 ?& Y
Systems Test. w7 Q8 @2 p. H) M1 D& C
Integration and. Z0 i: F3 S2 g I, y. ?
Coordination( b5 M; p, I! S5 h" k! t
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.
# @5 c' c5 d0 |+ CSystem Threat
/ G; W% k& y' e6 V5 Z, ^Assessment7 _' g+ v+ D+ m: E. A5 Y
Report (STAR)
: O* `2 v' G% \) zRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
" [' B' f" ]# W% MService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
/ ~: B9 R2 g* c' uand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
) [) N5 r) Z W9 v# s! t4 x& _the threat changes significantly.
: a# d; C, N& p3 gSystem-Valued- m% I* C2 h! g% A: f& o
Asset3 c5 o) P2 L' P3 O
A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
! C1 `0 n0 ^# t* i1 Lthe proper operation and well being of the SDS.
. s7 L, @' Z) s7 x7 k# c4 C5 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T, I+ v8 c! ]7 T: X
288/ T! H. _) O5 [; I" w4 T7 @( } E7 o
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
. k0 d7 S0 k( ]2 R0 OT&E Test and Evaluation.
* t% s# d8 x' t5 o; k, o; HT&T Transportation and Transportability.6 P" \/ R2 X0 q
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
q" Y) Q- y! k: }: y5 |. RT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.) g7 X8 i! g* Q! e
T/R Transmit/Receive.
m! |. R7 l+ b5 {T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
# K8 U6 o4 s8 a0 Z2 rT$ M9 [* w" o) i# c/ e
2
; U* J) r: V( i4 ?+ J8 tTechnology Transfer./ V7 s. M8 {" C4 \) F# p( }
T
- o4 ]" J' ^9 d: i; l& [2. x3 U- \+ j8 O& K
E Technical Training Equipment.
; V! Q2 f1 F9 s4 O5 \TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.2 T8 C8 W& T; f( Q, H0 L, Y
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.' z! G3 T+ F3 {% O" E0 b8 B% F
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
( \9 \2 M' ^- D& d' Q$ J, J+ HTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.* V4 i+ i* g; _6 \: ^8 U; I" u
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
# Z4 f/ I. _. ?4 \( }- E2 rTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.: a7 F$ A+ v! \9 v% \/ ~
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).1 T! }! Z4 a1 r! m* J m
TACAIR Tactical Air.
0 l# W# G7 a1 \! hTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
2 a, o# `: X+ q7 @# B2 eTACC Tactical Air Command Center.5 }' E K# d; n5 D9 X# O& ^
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).0 L5 @& U: A! |/ N! O1 _, B
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).4 D; [+ `/ y4 c; V0 T* L6 G9 M
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.) E, K2 {% Z( @0 N1 B1 X
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.% T" w F. _4 m, h
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
) L1 }' H: {: D `5 [TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|