航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. 4 }& o6 o% x* aSTM Significant Technical Milestone. % \" r/ [' S6 \1 KSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). . B1 F0 U% W# ^, A- T# L(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 2 [) k$ b2 M" \$ K" yStorage, Handling, and Transportation & U/ S1 c, r, H$ n" n7 I& r4 hEnvironments `& y2 Z0 [& i- D+ V' O2 KThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 2 s6 e8 Z8 G, E, Zenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during , C2 I" j7 K4 ]4 P2 @! x9 fstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable 9 x2 H6 Z9 q9 U1 G \( d2 ?& f6 satmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 8 l/ N8 z& D9 wduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, ! Q+ d8 u8 B2 ^shock and vibration environments, among others. . w& s! H( F5 y9 c; B+ I7 [Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target r N; ]1 y) g( l4 ~- `Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. : r/ w6 _- i DSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic + p6 ~0 n& W7 `5 P! WDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat # M2 I7 m( W9 vballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to ( ~) T1 b2 R: _4 I1 v0 Znullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. + c, n/ p3 _0 d# ]Strategic ) H4 k5 I3 S( u4 z1 ]; u* PDefense + _4 O8 u8 y; i' k! @7 BEmergency # E0 o. G0 L5 `) ]1 |5 T3 X0 VDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic + m2 b# F% n% W/ x5 [* P- i; F6 WDefense System ! g" Y% Z8 a, U0 j& ]8 V: m(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving $ u c2 l* m r/ s% `' dballistic missile defense system. $ n1 s: Z; A) d( a4 rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of 3 r2 s2 P2 Z6 X1 \" bWar 7 T- }) K1 P; W1 F" tThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or 3 C% X* b, W- V e/ Ralliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to ; o) o' F, s- b H1 Vaccomplish those objectives. 9 t: \! s5 g+ N" k% I" KStrategic * H5 ?/ B c; z; p& W- POffensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, ! U' J3 J, C/ j+ i! L$ cthe Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific 0 t6 u6 `+ i+ s6 i4 ~Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 3 D! v2 E# }3 X1 {' ?strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic $ t: U ^, q9 E$ f1 c! q4 qWarning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. 1 D1 L; Y) _2 u: j" u. _- {: GStrategic 8 E( O$ J1 Q9 tWarning Lead ! f" D4 S5 P" G) f2 w( S' qTime 2 X4 K" w& I( v+ O: sThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ! R8 n7 ]5 y7 }hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 1 ], \5 @& w& ?, eStrategic Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 5 {7 Z3 ]0 s: H, h+ z2 P9 E0 ~warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the & \: K% Z: P% L8 z* K# cnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in ( f3 u" _ X6 Zthe pre-decision period. Strategic 5 L. L& o: r2 r$ v3 g& O) PWarning Pre- Decision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. % P# n, `% e+ U8 Z0 f1 w5 U( nSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 1 N6 f& Q2 [" V. [+ n1 w# o% LStructured + P- K- j5 |. r$ c( X& PAttack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. % l/ X/ }3 j m6 U0 R, mStructured 3 n2 [3 B5 N. N; A# d- o1 `Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules 3 F" A" ^5 q _) g; j$ j( |based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 1 U! ^. s7 E* T9 }# Z+ |flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured : O: y$ c( ~0 C9 Z0 XProgram ' A9 L3 n4 l0 m8 M tA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one . `0 t. n. S# \entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or & W$ C5 R6 M2 s8 o$ x5 Vsequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of $ H; Z0 r: @2 S Iinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. : j/ \" V) c1 x6 }/ W, l% XSTS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. ' f+ F$ _3 p9 {. }4 W' _* zMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 5 n) h) T9 g4 w(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. / Q6 h' l7 U$ O2 F# USTU Secure Telephone Unit. 5 z2 i, [% j6 \8 qSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. ( T1 V/ X7 W7 f$ X& U) o8 \STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which / A+ I( i+ R' _0 f9 Dis only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. " j; z X U1 m+ pSubmarine- Launched 4 ^3 k" A) t5 n4 }) IBallistic Missile / \& [3 L+ P9 T2 |/ @# m2 r& F(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 : L! b. t* R! jmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 0 \0 E. j( \% ~! \+ awithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense ' o! ]) K/ b2 r. N) v* A3 \First come first engaged as long as weapons last. " U4 C, w1 ^( }7 \) f. g2 xSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Command 3 P6 n" v+ |. S. _1 D: CThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, ' y3 ^! \3 J5 u! h$ [9 Vbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. + ?. i* f, F( I- F6 z% lSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. - b1 `5 \, y/ \6 kSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). d2 I6 J( S9 L! H5 ~/ @' \Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. $ _# L% ^) b4 @5 S4 B* ISuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, k7 J! u3 M" I& G) Q2 Ythrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. & k7 ~) N1 K/ R; ]& ^4 RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S / M4 J- U2 z+ ]. e282 Superradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not ) ?% {" ^" M! |0 ?3 s, ?required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional , s* ~8 }4 e; X# @/ I2 C* ]lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric / J( u. }3 i* gor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. # b( }1 ^1 S9 ~# k% A! GSupervisory 5 t; G' n: \6 o1 PPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and 7 h* {. ?# }) c8 _controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 2 d3 r: a3 }) w6 C8 u" B9 B/ NSupplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support 0 h' S. g$ @. H1 h3 NEquipment 1 b$ n" A- b% M* u2 S2 kAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), - B0 t/ z6 _' j! U, M+ W$ V. U! Dmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). * e) T2 h/ [, QSupport 5 _" W* y2 B/ E* b% mPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, G1 o! T9 o' h9 kadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for ' L. M; v. s+ Fexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, - i1 L4 e0 }: S. m. k4 O* \. E0 Tbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. - V) I. H; |6 Q; A1 ]& m1 }) ]8 P2 OSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. f+ ] S6 S' O1 k5 _) MSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. , C9 F1 `2 a4 n$ C+ qSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items 1 O' q! k4 }0 E% Adue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity & f9 X ^8 i1 b; \! L" bmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 3 G" X; X6 h; s6 u5 h, n7 WRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and ( ~+ p: b1 z/ K# V' [Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, - i2 D/ J1 G1 w$ i5 land characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 3 h; U, z+ v5 Y5 H# N4 Eand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. : V' i2 p$ ?1 [9 d( J: Q' H0 }Surveillance System Configuration 8 \7 D$ O2 n" Z. `* e, a+ sThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 9 ~+ a7 [% k {4 {in the surveillance system. , e8 m- D$ y/ @; t5 G; E) FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 ( v; n) B" Q( u4 TSurvivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes 3 I( U% \0 X& I/ R. Bthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and 8 r6 u% a. X& ^1 g9 B7 H3 zEnduring Command Center (SECC) % M3 ^, i: h/ } |/ Z# j# H- `" ZThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. & c7 A9 U' }2 L% W9 X' ^! l& Y5 sSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. . X/ B& @; G# VSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. , D# J- e6 N4 ISW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. : v8 b$ k8 b* i* O+ DSWC Strike Warfare Commander. ) z+ ?& E4 t( ?2 b1 hSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating % U: ^2 c; U0 ]) K* ^, v$ Tband of frequencies. + U4 m8 ?6 h( s+ w% Z' \0 gSWG Scenario Working Group. , f, C6 x+ R; C& i- c tSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 9 U+ s) K6 p _# ^# n# o, @8 |SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. + r H- n n) p9 L aSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to 3 l( I5 c ^# j* \0 ]one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. - M Q! I6 ?; lSynthetic # g- K# r/ r" L/ P. E) KAperture Radar 4 ^* o0 q* m0 O4 ~2 N) M(SAR) 4 |6 y/ E# a- ?- `" H4 A. x1 j- iA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance , _7 L; }( Z' R: C5 }( @7 _between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. 5 M# ^) p8 J2 B- `: _! nSys C/O System Check Out. 5 A9 z2 A9 N( }# W% |Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! N" r6 _" M; q! c284 SYSCOM Systems Command. System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. & e7 @. [) K; e4 h8 H4 ](2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a ( R# L4 q( y: q( m; W- Wfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. ! g4 O" h4 q* Y& u6 I) C; |6 }System : i- m6 N7 s! C, jActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions ! W7 o* O7 w+ h+ f3 r6 s5 Z$ Ximplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System ! n% N# `7 q( P; P9 f, \6 ZControl. System 5 C- k+ |, N+ aArchitecture / t/ w( N) ]0 F- I3 MSystem , ]+ D! o: x- ICapability Specification * f( ~8 l1 \' @+ c" w(SCS) 9 V( d0 K& B8 Y- ]The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the % {: a" Q. R) K; n$ ?/ jelements of missile defense systems. ( ]. i1 e1 N4 p3 o1 SThe government document that translates capabilities into functional 7 Y8 g) I% [, d7 P5 xspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. # |! T& |6 p2 |' Z+ {System Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ! t0 E* E' R0 pequipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) % G6 o1 ~- M" T6 [- v; [OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ) Z) A/ P1 L8 O- t" p( f; _concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition , m8 Q$ f* t' ]) D0 M) [strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System 1 A% r/ C" ]$ r" BConfiguration ; m+ O' y5 |. h" u! ?$ [. q" ]Control Board . w, Y( }1 A* @. [4 b(SCCB) ! ]% T2 l" W# N# l% lThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 1 a( a% T- Q" H5 m' t& V7 KSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function ( [. D. U H* sA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's ' g2 e; f. q$ K. s# n2 T3 rmission. System Definition 9 [3 N2 j$ ]+ [9 j( f% M% nReview (SDR) & t3 M0 f" y2 F( v$ Y$ MThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and - R# ^1 G" u! m# Wfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 6 i% R9 ~3 K0 S& Udetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S * M W( A( D% O V# o# S285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy specified system requirements. ! g4 U. s' ?) h7 L(2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 7 s; n2 d! S* G3 Z8 s9 `operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) ) t+ _( Z5 {* rEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. 8 y1 Y$ O! M, N' f! kSystem Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 2 {4 P6 ^4 `6 f9 H- _- u; y1 F. gcapability. 7 i* p! k3 f3 V, F( ^- p8 L$ a& sSystem Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS 6 ~3 e/ s/ _0 [/ W }4 z5 ~8 Ycapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 8 U7 `3 V6 s% p4 w) t! R0 sDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide : W% H% K9 R4 S! m1 R% ~( _- Ysignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 0 E" ]0 V/ M% z1 }6 R, Rachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. 1 Q7 h: S6 A3 m' L2 H& }System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share 5 ?- E( q! o9 P0 _, X4 M7 n8 pa set of common characteristics. 4 m2 Z4 }* i3 u; B, K" s# JSystem , |5 I" }# _ h' |! C9 RGenerated 3 W5 a0 i2 k& L) m, a: iElectromagnetic 5 K/ U. ]5 V% ^0 H3 SPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the % x# E3 ~9 j9 A6 B5 wsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the $ e" f( X0 s7 c+ Robject in order to produce charge equalization. , G2 D% J& L; {& h3 }$ i# NSystem Integration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. + _- M8 o4 u" W8 w$ }System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual ; M. G0 z3 Y7 H/ Rmanagers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks / d% D5 G, O% s4 E3 g# T Mand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. System Operational 1 }( ]/ g% a# R( J7 ?0 L% r+ KConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. - X! O. j; z& B `/ A6 ~7 ?System Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) 6 f& B- e/ q/ |& X6 V+ JThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ! I4 A8 I, g4 j, R6 C; U. n. ]and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 5 P0 F1 V4 J7 c; x( l) kthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic / d& [- ]8 x6 J* S3 k2 DBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 5 u- X" ^; Z2 u4 ^ Sposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S , Q! G3 S. r4 t n4 ~! p286 System Program 2 J7 i6 ?5 U/ k6 t) W! @Office (SPO) ; w/ X5 T* U' ~4 T7 OThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 1 _ c8 d3 n, R0 n8 G* Bincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational . [% H* @, \( L2 estate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the ' |0 X; [ ~% Y& i+ nverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under ! J1 ?( K* L L2 x" Krealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 1 C5 H% f; }* f/ }. E2 J& t2 Sand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a + [- A5 i$ m* v" X# bspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. . f; |' a/ f; W: D) B& |System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 9 o$ [- }4 N4 `/ } q# Msystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements Analysis (SRA) - q; y' N7 y9 } Z6 _An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 3 S7 L' e3 j1 \# o) nConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. 9 ?1 R) P# T9 q, L' n, WSystem 5 g2 g o" w1 jRequirements 4 L% _, @( S5 eReview (SRR) " M) v8 |; Z9 l# y. N+ a0 AConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 9 x5 O. b% h/ C7 I1 s' J7 fdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. # X$ [0 C- y4 DSystem Security 8 o* s# k5 v& D! v" D" G1 T6 {Engineering (SSE) 1 L! z" w) l T! [$ a9 c) GAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering # ^& }' A6 ]7 `, C) `0 Zprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks 8 A9 H4 h% u% V4 Passociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and $ F ?# D+ c: O- q2 b" eanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. ]4 G% N% s0 V: P8 K" i! LSystem Security 2 b, j- X/ F: e9 A! IEngineering ' m3 o& D0 p* b l& D6 K4 Q2 UManagement Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the . ]- O* ^* J+ E: X2 ^' Wdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 4 c" s$ `2 c$ `6 ^$ V8 xresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides 8 p+ f; F$ n$ g% ^management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 7 P& g' B8 `/ t# u/ YSystem Security 5 `2 i8 u$ _- |+ W! ^" t4 D8 ?+ wManagement # o9 ]2 R) X9 ]. [Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 9 w& E; W! o8 H1 c& zmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with ) }& l' R, I! w. x" k- ^other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. & @% t& o) }! N4 v* X, g# x6 uSystems $ A: N; a n5 ]& i0 T( QEngineering : A7 F6 B0 w& ^3 M4 Z) dAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle 5 E% k. h+ b D$ h8 \/ Zbalanced set of system product and process solutions. & R0 M9 l* M' ?$ n6 g ]/ Q0 z: rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems & C5 Q9 ?$ O) K4 D1 Z$ i& t* t* nEngineering 0 A6 C/ K& q4 tManagement Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 6 g/ B6 @/ ?6 \ e4 Z4 f) KIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures 8 L. Q. H' X, r# Qdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) 9 q5 W3 }" t6 `9 W' x1 g7 xKey engineering milestones and schedules. 9 _+ z9 Z% e: F, z" }; A$ \, ?; \Systems Test 0 i4 k0 w$ A' S( @/ W, vIntegration and ' _1 q( }8 H/ D* F; @! B$ MCoordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. ) J9 I9 U# } l fSystem Threat Assessment Report (STAR) ; s' K8 [, o% u; U$ NRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a - w/ y( M8 B8 }% o! e) zService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency ' Q7 O- s: m7 V, j7 fand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. ( u5 U+ T o2 sSystem-Valued ' w( E+ n& a7 BAsset % x6 [* }9 l9 I- lA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to ( s! R8 u6 O: N0 Ythe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ! F; F% J1 v8 Q+ B+ b$ k4 _288 + ]0 [: V; o4 K' ^! a2 V, _) u8 z% qT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. ) O0 C1 r) r- c& B2 Z+ s5 p0 VT&T Transportation and Transportability. . j, k! y3 v$ o, ST-MACH Trusted MACH. . S! n* H# m. uT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. 5 C( p. N j! v' ^ @9 l( LT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T , x& w! O- P# K! u: c2 j2 Technology Transfer. T 2 8 F4 i( M( E5 }7 A9 x1 nE Technical Training Equipment. & l b1 @! _' L6 C. H9 g* \* ?TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. , N# W3 J9 K1 ~, Q% YTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. {- \ _. j; T1 q8 tTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. : s" T# K8 T+ x$ ?TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. ( z% x/ E% R( QTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. 0 Z8 T. W* V- jTACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). * I8 R/ T8 @5 y- dTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). / X- c, r/ f1 \9 |TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 1 A3 S6 F: s% \6 H4 VTACON Tactical Control. / u! M! c! _4 N) _TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 " z9 E( R$ d- z' O; h7 ]& ATACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation i) n9 r7 k- NTactical Air ( b# h7 H- z4 [) j- uDoctrine - R2 {. y$ P9 r" ?0 W* v& \$ n: x* VFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air " {6 q- }$ v$ f8 ^$ E3 npower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation / E$ a; |6 j; lAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with 1 Z( u( p7 ~. q( I) Q' Hground or naval forces. / e$ }: [& }. R2 U s. g) k( i) s% v/ N- yTactical Air Operations Center X" |; V& l8 tA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control & z& T0 d9 ^* F' }System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air . T2 t. V1 j/ m5 Bdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support 3 R$ {+ I/ s( q' ?9 u* v+ w* FAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly / H3 R8 r" ]& C4 l# r. ?2 g0 Aassist land or maritime operations. - g9 V3 P: G2 S0 NTactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) 6 s# ]0 X% a7 c/ c; gA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be , r% C$ f p1 F" g6 b; Remployed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. : h* h( [$ Z" W$ S' M; zTactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link ( t+ M1 ^5 y5 MA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates r1 q- k$ d# W. b5 \3 R% beach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. : S. G( K& @1 C! M' o$ w- ^This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 5 z0 U' S( g4 ]% TWar & g6 K9 E2 r: Z2 j2 WThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 7 p% [ c+ b n1 Jaccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. ( s7 a- W8 W% Z' GTactical Operations Area 9 q: L, g* }/ C% A+ Y(TOA) ( z1 C; X. F( gThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. # J& v/ F$ L6 o, jTactical Operations & x! V. E9 ?3 U: c- h, a6 A2 t( A! D% HCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning * ?/ b0 C8 A J( Y, O4 {+ O(TW) ' F' d* p$ M @3 W8 B( r(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. # w9 p! D8 c6 R, m0 |(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component " o! o7 N* Z5 relements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical . v* R+ B% |8 k6 _9 D- m& z! `, \5 pWarning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack ! h0 K& @( Z2 O: L$ K2 U5 lAssessment. * r D" }9 \5 wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. 6 B8 ~/ T a6 k- D(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 6 M6 o4 L4 F* V' vTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. ) t# m6 Q2 C3 BTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. # y/ W, j& d0 g! r& MTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. 0 b( y) [/ i; lTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. . a. \) f3 c5 c+ s: OTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ! j6 p6 }5 F4 v, ?4 RTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. - z. D# T0 v% cTADL Tactical Data Link. . R# W4 C7 H; VTADS Tactical Air Defense System. " t Q4 y. U% XTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector - Q# ^; b( J; |4 P" q' B7 qand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive , G; `$ U, L4 S# i( H9 x1 \defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. 2 T" z) W$ V6 T- E0 h" i* ^: X2 O, BTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. % K" Q2 }6 a, k+ h9 f, p6 P. Y& |Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 4 Q6 o9 _/ E" x( eTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. 3 L. K0 L: Q2 [2 v# O, z: lTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. : i. F. ?: S2 d. C(3) Target Acquisition Radar. : p1 G V$ J0 U' bTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. ; b% {1 t( h; @) ?3 gTarget Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target Classification , n( G2 H8 s1 a4 t% e, q# aand Type 3 A1 \. l) H; k+ |& WIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. & `6 e9 c. V# i5 I, h1 L% B* P1 tTarget 2 I& D* C$ Q* b; V! Y3 |5 y. |1 V& yDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one % i6 \: m. B, jtarget when multiple targets are present. 2 `6 U ]4 d+ r6 OTarget Object 4 t) s5 Z% A- U" D1 nMap (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and * N6 R- z/ q2 r' f& vother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ( e7 M$ p4 I! K# Vtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 1 y1 H1 c) ~& O, s2 VTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. 3 T( H. D/ s# c5 s" s(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 9 @6 L& Y( n4 |+ H2 v4 T$ {passage of a ship or sweep. Target System ( z$ I; i/ }2 L/ kRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD / b7 g: H* x0 ^6 pProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target ) i+ T) \6 c: V9 t. Krequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. ; m7 l) Y$ y5 C& m4 h+ ?Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance % j! u3 ~5 F. ^; w# fto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 4 M$ g7 [& c, V& p3 s1 ^2 W9 [2 dengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ! N. B( q$ a' `; vTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 4 o0 G7 g6 }' \: wTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 n+ C% O, ^1 @' v( p& T3 a) J3 RTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. / P' j. S# e$ D* V5 S7 K4 oTB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ; t" W# S" e7 P9 K ^2 MTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. ) L( |! @+ F1 hTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. - ~" N+ B$ q g W, d3 G" L* HTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). - s; b. k9 K0 v/ o2 Z# |: Z/ o(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled , f" Q5 w2 j4 Z2 a: R, q. 7 u( ] q8 I# z# bTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. : S" g: W; E# p, B7 ITCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. ! B6 s: g1 d+ H4 W1 VTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD \* q8 O( G1 j- W' q2 F: n) jCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 8 M" `( X' U5 Z(4) Training Device : _5 i- y/ B: @& y+ _% ?6 ~' B# _TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. , s7 d4 T3 E/ g# qTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ h, R1 ]. R' z1 I9 ^/ s1 b293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. # C/ Q9 ^8 j! {6 Z5 M' sTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. . W. [9 c* `1 ]' V' ^(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. + A: m' S/ K" } @ }TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. + E: L* R8 L* d) f/ v1 J( _TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 9 d7 V) r5 Z/ P(2) Test Design Package. : W2 b/ R2 c1 K8 Z/ X& \(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. ; e4 k7 F4 Z- J3 ?+ T2 HTDR Terminal Defense Radar. ) t$ ?* r! U8 S: ]1 I9 ITDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ! e' y! y7 W- N) c, ~3 X8 HTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. # ^3 g3 J& F! O5 `) w1 h9 u2 _! ](4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 6 x# b- a: l) N7 y4 \5 VTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. # E$ Y* x. u: ? M! z* iTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. % y0 L* a+ c% t0 N8 jTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician 4 g2 q$ h6 R, l0 V4 WTECH Technical 9 o" s1 T8 d! I) a1 a+ LTECHON Technical Control. 5 b6 f" P( k1 MTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 0 y& t- f7 D+ c6 \+ ?Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as - _2 B* l5 b/ M: q+ ^1 Bmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. , A" p8 T: o) @Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract & W! A( m6 j8 s$ Vadministration. ; d/ m8 h, k+ E; ETechnical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item 3 V& L2 ]2 l" R2 J2 [performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, % J7 ^0 X2 L" d2 n3 H' ?associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical % F1 N0 F0 x/ d% q" _: @- \; Z1 QEvaluation 8 k1 x+ _0 p+ ^& D# l6 jThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to / n& B6 d) {1 C, w V: X. O2 X( mdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical * V u9 o6 T! X( TObjectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical n# G1 R7 m. f, F( @3 @Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk % e' l& Z L* i1 y. ]1 c/ o- `- uanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. Technical Performance Measurement (TPM) - N+ G4 f. R/ N7 \- q; H6 ~* }Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design 3 }' u8 U$ h" r Z/ ]assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. 5 L& }' K2 E5 i9 z9 ~Technical Specification . e& ^( Z/ a. [A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form * n6 ^. C! T8 Q/ M: Y6 r5 u7 Tthe basis for actual design development and production. Technical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 7 k, F2 a/ _3 etargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. % t0 n; K- H! l' m: O! lTechnology % w2 F8 l( [! a9 hExecuting Agent 7 C* F" y' Z) s* a8 W/ Z! eThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing ( _) ^" y4 Q) hAgent. Technology / ], ]9 S% i6 B8 K8 WProgram Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. # X+ I C; o/ f6 a ]- W) A! ?0 Y( |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. & z0 B# U9 [5 ?; e' v1 \TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, % ^4 i6 l8 B: H0 ~, oTracking, and Command (TT&C) & W3 h' k$ u1 g3 c8 DFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a ! ?! a' n6 W, [- [5 H, U8 ]sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 6 \# f% H: O2 n/ u/ Hmission commands to the satellite. 1 z+ @1 ^. y2 |4 h, JTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. ; ]* ~7 F' [2 p3 [TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term & h j9 @! C0 ~1 a( s; \ [/ v"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report / x5 M% D: U( e" K% \TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. 8 o+ q, w& C0 \$ ]3 `TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. Terminal Defense 7 _% t5 y4 Z$ n0 h4 hSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between . Y" J8 v# a* D, t2 vatmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance 1 M8 N* x9 X' _- X3 o5 z: dThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the / A4 C# v( w# ^vicinity of the target. 7 j+ W& U0 e) m3 L3 v: V$ j. i/ FTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. , k( n( [( ]3 \Terminal Phase $ B/ N- g& V( q8 |" i! }Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 9 \4 ~, F: h4 Uterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy 0 @7 H. Y$ ]. ~1 fPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. . J: J8 N- l* O; l2 ~/ FTESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. - b9 G& \) d$ sTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. ( [0 R q3 M" GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( P8 j$ x$ V2 O5 W296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system ; U6 M p" x" g: Zhardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 2 Y4 ^' Z) I2 l7 l6 _) _consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all / j. a4 _1 Y4 G: Boperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. " y3 W6 |+ Z, R0 h+ tTest and ) g. ^! P7 }) i* H `" SEvaluation (T&E) 7 t5 j Z* M$ [7 M- iProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three 3 B& @2 ?9 \ j3 J; U1 B! ttypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof . R! d# C z+ w0 J' o0 nmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical X% \8 k( ^) p# ?& ]. R+ Hperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a 5 k9 E* B2 k0 `3 \system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational / r3 n" n- N1 T4 Q(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test + I) ^, g* i) N% X6 vconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and 2 Y3 ^. Z3 f# G- |& eEvaluation Master Plan & ]! M. P6 B$ {2 p(TEMP) 4 c' Y7 S1 G8 i- y; e VAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate g0 l) d5 h; P: i7 z! A$ ^objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as 9 R" k' s' r& ~2 q8 Xearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development , m' R1 {' T8 ]progresses. 6 Z1 N" j( q2 D; a) U) y4 q4 ~Test and % F9 k# {( \7 M) r" i& M3 T: pEvaluation ( N# v5 B! @3 w3 }+ x& DWorking Group ! e3 t; e! f% B" q1 ^2 v(TEWG) 4 k J% |. q& D) \3 f r5 e' [The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the # Z1 U* |4 W$ H9 a7 p) RAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test - F6 w1 K: q) f( J2 A1 zintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 3 g) K+ d6 M3 w4 a/ m6 rprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals , D( s6 X; N* g# Twhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 0 ^, A1 L3 x( D) X1 H" ]and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 5 q' x, i7 a* l+ P% x ~# c0 GTest Integration # ~ w' }4 R9 u7 d3 x+ f% s' {Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in t. Q- r7 J; z* korder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 1 S: p+ }4 A- f3 A, Z* cdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target ! b% {$ K' i! Q/ f [Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for ' y) R& s- J! V5 x ESMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. ) Z8 A% ?5 k" ]TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. # L ]& {0 a; S6 dTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. ; J8 v2 |+ b8 C' o- S* z oTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. - {4 h& d/ g0 }TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. * z8 r, g7 y: V8 S5 {9 Y0 S& @TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 1 B9 z, |% B3 q! X" [9 |TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 4 B1 V) t6 Q& }" U$ FTFOV Theoretical Field of View. / |1 c0 o+ S D6 j. ^1 r/ u( }! gTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 5 ]7 _' V( N/ l3 }TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). * A/ Z0 ~( x/ N. kTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. % S' F' {. J6 e4 F% c4 M9 V WTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. & `2 I8 t4 J2 k# [Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a 6 _4 ~2 i6 d/ \) P. y. Y, Ucommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. D$ l) e) q/ DTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 6 W' D9 ?/ V0 P7 Z, t d(USSPACECOM)