航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user v9 E( R. T/ g3 J# T5 H8 Faccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ) w% I- d0 F# d! V8 R! `STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). % l+ ?6 H _3 W/ K3 N; E% @(2) Science and Technology Objective. % G6 q) [7 x2 O, m hSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. : x8 D9 }( ?' _9 MSTOM System Test Object Model. 9 {( _8 y* r: i! ~5 r' A. cStorage, 5 X5 P% @( `. e, GHandling, and Transportation / _ C) T( ~" |) SEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient + W( W3 v' Q6 j( ienvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during / F/ m: C b, zstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 7 n. p( g/ r. V0 tshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. 4 D" B0 I N) s4 mStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s : G! j: {2 C# H3 BApache missile. & A0 s- l0 j* FSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). - s( C+ c) R4 |/ D( USTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. 0 T N0 {% F0 m: A" u& s7 BSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. , _) j: N- P% o/ r: sStrategic , z! J6 [+ W" R8 ^; i' m5 e0 cDefense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System (SDS) 2 n% ?$ T" p* M# `8 uA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ' V4 M# r: b* c# S4 ~ballistic missile defense system. " |& K( _/ e- A. ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 - o8 @: h$ {4 h; T9 ~5 D/ Z, dStrategic Level of 0 K; Q1 o) z9 S" m+ }2 m, Z( T4 qWar 0 G5 K% g9 C2 B0 c G3 q- n$ V9 FThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to + }4 u/ ?* }- G1 Caccomplish those objectives. Strategic . i+ l v( c1 O y$ s/ X! P$ MOffensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated ; ?0 _ L0 Q! POperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, " V0 x! P* U- \; bFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 7 `$ b3 c3 Q4 U$ _) O zStrategic + r/ f3 s$ U, y/ D" ?& K. r2 hReserve 5 q" u# N" m/ Z* q: e0 Q, A- ~That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 9 I( s8 w5 N( v+ Q" b# estrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic v6 x: [1 h Q" ]7 pWarning Lead Time " @+ b: s# r9 t! n& qThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of . ?. _. Q6 C- W$ [" f4 fhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic - n* f4 R5 w0 [/ A5 ^! n. ^; KWarning Post- Decision Time 7 x5 x& v; b6 d7 s# SThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of " c' ?7 t1 Z: }; Y% z% j6 Kgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- Decision Time / L o! L1 S. C4 [That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a 8 k! W8 y h' k% V" ~0 xdecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time ! m) n l) E. W. m7 M5 `- Javailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. 1 K# v6 A/ t- F& |6 a! m0 |. aSTREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack * o5 k! k5 G9 J3 q, k0 EAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured 5 e7 Q5 a' q3 l$ g8 M4 z/ JProgram ) u+ R9 |: @, A- i( X" KA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: 0 G% D: y) P K) C! V! rsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 3 }1 z+ @& l' k3 W8 V8 P- @sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of : P- n/ W: P& i. n' P1 hinstructions. / P: d, s1 F; w" E6 wSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. # |, i- ? V1 \% qSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 7 a2 e: v I* E. D281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 7 w& N6 p% e7 S4 {: ^' i: J ISTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. 4 y) M5 w" M% @6 K- A# aSubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security + x! o$ s; V ~. M! A$ Y O) pLevel : F4 G3 T% O+ }! i! oA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 6 X/ b$ H! T' G) l4 g+ jhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 3 Z4 ~# F+ Q- V6 ^' i/ U/ Kdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- 4 L5 z8 [0 n6 W5 V& i1 } XLaunched ' p o, ]) R0 U3 mBallistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. . ^' j1 w2 y5 |1 v1 O7 S7 w# N/ PSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. : G& Y2 D! a4 I! R: l; z/ g# `Subtractive 2 X @( p7 m& q" I; X Z/ w5 \Defense " h& Q$ x) ]9 }( W. \First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 0 R" |/ `2 h- n# ^9 PSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 0 F+ i& _8 _2 T5 wSuccession of * b" v5 N" r# x- d' kCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, 4 x5 L& P3 V, e/ e7 F) Ybecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). " K; M" E0 H" i* |, o. LSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two & C, y+ Z3 M# l6 ~5 f: G+ ?, Valternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. % M1 S' h7 K2 [0 d2 D9 z# MSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 9 ^% @7 R( t6 v! H: z8 fSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as 2 v, o1 s( D j" _+ w1 Fsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. ' S) S% ~. R, iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) x& j/ L; b# s: C5 o7 ~" I282 . E3 d3 m) G$ v2 |* W0 qSuperradiant . R: F1 a8 M; s9 c- NLaser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional : x( n/ C: [# J6 y xlasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser 6 E' i% K7 p4 a# c: ibeam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric ! w2 L! A: l+ H# p7 {4 m; y: cor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 7 g4 D) ?* w+ z0 U( Y+ bSupervisory 8 \: S. h2 y* O" ~8 z8 ?Programs 6 X4 z; F1 r U) |3 ]* X* \" G: [) eComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and ' ~) ? x! m2 E+ f# N! Ocontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 0 Y: h( h( ^ V* [Supplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. ( U( Z+ c/ Y" g* @- ASupport Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), 0 \* F V, ]4 M; f. Z3 g. A- `+ e1 Dmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) & i6 L2 M* @" m* N, ?equipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and $ l& A& N' B! Zprotection equipment). ) h5 R1 a, `. i% S( r" |Support 1 \ h* r$ Z2 TPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly 3 R w" t( I% N2 X0 W# @( `associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, ' Z2 S) n( _! b' U) tadministrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 4 S7 p8 i" @7 o8 `0 [. Kexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. + t, v! `, a: xSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. ! }3 M8 V: k1 C# s- o6 F- BSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or 4 P/ B- d4 M9 p) t/ m) G/ N% \5 \mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess / T7 L# e3 `% Yproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity 8 z" Q5 A( b' j- z, U, Imeasures. 4 E4 E! V3 G jSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, . i9 }/ s! {$ s' u0 q4 i/ c/ gand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric * H; |$ W7 L( Y* V/ Q; W4 ]& msensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for / F% f- \2 ?: M3 l) U% Ycoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response ' K7 `+ r- \8 @5 `, yoptions and current surveillance system availability. ( K/ m' _6 s) V$ b( pSurveillance, * y" ]5 k0 M. f8 jSatellite and 0 k- E) a8 I E% [" l0 J/ BMissile ! |5 a1 U. ~0 S4 z# pThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, 5 t- M0 \+ f- A6 `; {and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites 8 {; u/ w0 I" C3 Zand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 1 P% n @7 I ]Surveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated - D; u0 S' s, `3 p6 Xin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes ! \2 l; R( l; ?, y+ ]& x3 [that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 0 o$ K, A/ J" A" i0 ^9 `. H% \Survivable and - t# P- |5 K2 d2 ~Enduring + J5 {' @' X/ jCommand Center 5 u, @- W% O X7 _, _: v+ C8 N2 N(SECC) 8 w0 u, R/ Q5 v8 A* |$ v# yThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. # Z7 m5 u9 G5 a dSUS Site Utilization Study. : o. H0 @/ W0 v: @) C, U$ e+ rSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ; L' L4 F2 @( D8 ]* @' z+ f7 q3 ^' dSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating $ _% O. s. N* X0 Rband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. 8 O& Y4 l9 J$ m2 @$ q+ L& \SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. ) M5 y5 S% M& s: ]$ R {% _SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. ) K; L* _& m& Z. E9 }SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. 4 @3 c" o. p2 O4 C4 rSWSC Space and Warning System Center. % T- i6 N3 q K7 A& MSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to ! B9 P& h `% _7 q% [+ ]7 m; done correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. ; I+ w5 o: v) DSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where - a2 ] R# W5 X% G1 t0 Heach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic / t" u: q5 e" h Z1 z7 U4 b& MAperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 7 D( ?* @$ t& n2 X S$ e3 N0 ^along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is # x' v2 ? w5 g) T$ Mtheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance / |: `. I$ u. Ubetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's # l: g1 v" V" G/ f6 ^signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. . k; F4 S7 r, j, q# _# ySys Cmn System Common. 1 f9 Q$ m- e) s2 m: |8 j+ jSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 8 h! z; e, K9 {- E5 G! e+ AMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % Z* W3 {# H' t" N284 SYSCOM Systems Command. + z/ l$ C; o% H. R7 @3 |. k2 ASystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, ( J% B! s! v- a- `2 h) L# @) \data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, * W7 J# h7 p. e+ P. W4 J' ]and delivery to users. ' F, T. b) ~; t+ r(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. 2 _1 ~( j' Z+ _. t; W/ |; LSystem 5 Y n1 s5 e8 pActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. System * o6 w3 E# r6 q9 R9 C) C' b+ mArchitecture System 9 h9 E0 j- C9 xCapability / e3 t2 y1 L+ A$ A) QSpecification (SCS) / e* H& w. R( E6 ]The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational $ P1 F3 R: i4 G' N1 Lenvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the ], X2 {1 V* a3 l) lelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional 5 f2 o. G/ Y4 C5 Kspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. 5 x" e# H3 F/ ySystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide # m, O, n. y! vsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ; m8 [- v& c: E+ W. T; q% Yequipment in CMAFB. 0 @. _, V! |" i' hSystem Concept ! _" g1 _* v4 C! a. yPaper (SCP) : I* |7 p( J: T$ w& H8 sOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the 9 {* _; k& x+ C4 g: Z2 q/ \& tconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board (SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. ' P. w% C$ m+ E& oSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and + J, w1 P# p! T8 Vcomputer systems. / `2 s- a% _% M0 l) t# gSystem-Critical 4 n7 m: A. W3 cFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. / g7 O5 f& d, mSystem Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 7 Y2 N/ z0 z& E" e, O1 R; o' Psystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential + ]2 |# n1 `% T/ {9 S& Bimpacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, # l1 W8 j# o4 h3 g$ wdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System $ G. N7 l' i. S! MDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. - \" f# H& g$ MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 * W. S4 h' `1 lSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 9 F& ?! W f4 p7 jcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 8 J: p1 W3 T+ k5 k6 fspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. System Design 5 ?/ I' d2 y% s6 c/ t+ `Concept " P; {. b% }6 }3 _An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 9 B& b. Q/ a) y# P# n' \operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. - D5 U$ t( }3 e, {3 n- n* e6 YSystem Design - L! V2 U* A( U. ~7 xReview (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with ( h, w2 z6 ]2 |the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness : ~5 w, w' r9 a" m( L# z: j8 oThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set . H0 D8 H$ P% u1 fof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and {1 ^6 n( ?9 _* f# a( }6 dcapability. + e/ n8 p( h+ q7 ^; ySystem Evolution - c5 P# n# j0 p& b, E/ qPlan (SEP) ' X5 S2 T7 X* i" u/ y5 FThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS , j7 A2 t$ R$ C: Q7 b% YDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide # k x: h. [+ `/ C6 W Fsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome E7 f1 F0 q3 l. L! G% k bthose challenges. , @4 Q, x% P' Y1 U7 l, o0 H7 JSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System ( L( X' U8 ]6 n5 U( o3 KGenerated * v- C' U0 h3 @Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) " d6 C1 T- ?* t1 e; LTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the " J$ T8 D0 |8 nsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local ; S; \9 T- H! R+ d7 m c# l5 Rfields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the - r& R' k) |/ ^8 Q% Y k( Aobject in order to produce charge equalization. System 4 Z( t/ i. \% t9 u8 d. A0 I4 }Integration Test , g3 _- o; ~ H7 uA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, s6 G8 q! x' q4 V3 q" \sensors, and weapon hardware. $ b, ~( m$ ]4 d$ RSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks u6 F( B$ u# {. P9 Fand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or - Z, u4 ]* i% _. z+ t. Y4 C! pequipment systems. 1 l7 S, f/ v3 \' {# h! WSystem ' G K# ]1 i, q6 H* s; gOperational 7 P ?0 @% q0 d ?7 ~* uConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. System Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) 9 r! q9 v: @7 g3 y& q% |$ B' A* u- s. vThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ! z* D5 P3 Y, ~+ s) B, i+ nand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to % x8 v1 Q& t) Tthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic , B0 d. E& d7 C$ A: RBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. " j% J6 R, j; y# a& {5 cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 4 I' M) Q1 k% y286 System Program Office (SPO) 7 r& s8 b" E3 r. u: XThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition ; Z v* R# L9 c5 eprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System ! s: \) _" t9 G0 JReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out ! f8 x. k6 P- \9 i# Q. x: e" i1 Kthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the . L# c" X# u' q2 v `- xverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the : ^- m- b2 d* B6 S, _continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under * }# o3 ]8 C$ xrealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies - @4 q" v. B, W0 Iand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, " c) o1 e) _ ehistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results & C9 D5 F1 B9 |status reporting. System 5 R% ~ ?* G4 U7 `, b, K% L2 L( @; aReadiness 6 c4 T. n' }# A- u4 C$ y1 I+ {Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. : n# z2 r3 f7 ]& pSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 7 _% t* e# _ m% l' V% Bsystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 3 ]7 F, a1 r7 k" m4 o9 ]- ]. }5 Qcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements % i: ~, m/ ] } ~7 p& r4 cAnalysis (SRA) 6 N& i0 M h% s' ZAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System $ m( B0 Q$ D& Y1 |5 P( D& hConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine ) C" l; u; |; h$ T( tspecific system functional and performance requirements. ' f0 `, s' q$ MSystem 3 F- `( U) k2 c$ R" ~) oRequirements Review (SRR) ) C6 r8 F- T+ @( E+ Z' A7 ~Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. 2 o: d4 y* ~ H" v4 }Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the + s+ k" D; a& O* I8 L( x8 ?3 J idegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security 7 \& m. K, U0 D7 a0 HEngineering 8 ?* p0 K0 `% D9 c4 b" {(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks / e: t S; e3 M) ]associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related J; K$ Y/ e2 q6 r$ ]4 {3 hscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to , e5 w* y$ a0 P2 z9 |7 Ssecurity threats. System Security 4 }' V) _! Q i1 v: E" s% `+ MEngineering 9 @' l: g: K3 X4 w, o v3 Q' [( Y! rManagement Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE % Q/ ?' F, P; d, j1 C" Y% zprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 8 q" J! @ e2 @defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 5 n! _8 }( x# i# V( [resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security Management Plan (SSMP) 6 W: ^3 m2 g4 I$ B! zA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to " ]+ }- f9 U9 W" Z& X. V* U4 D( lmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 3 K7 s$ K) Y3 E9 N+ V1 [other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. % {4 z5 z6 O8 S% k" ~! sSystems Engineering & f3 Y- A! ]- XAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems Engineering Management # [& S ~% |( v- @Plan (SEMP) 9 s) w: Q) Z: p2 \1 i' z. P6 XThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures / {7 l. q- q" @# p! U8 Vdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and 3 b+ {, v! S/ I) H) E1 k/ X5 uCoordination 9 b! R8 }$ ?* G, E8 GThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment - l- ^6 T$ F: c+ d' l; J' qReport (STAR) ( t. |3 h6 O( e5 F- c3 {/ YRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when % t% K; M4 c, h+ kthe threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset 1 G$ r( E* @4 iA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 9 t3 |0 q% |3 v! |. Rthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 . N* ~" f: L; K. J4 S) N9 z9 a+ _$ nT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. # w: t7 L, k7 H1 FT&E Test and Evaluation. 1 k4 w0 [- s+ Z* I, o4 I: HT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 O0 R* g% ~% s, R+ {2 0 O. r- l6 v+ ITechnology Transfer. T 2 + C( m2 F e6 v. k+ Z: _E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. : r& J ^& }+ _; S9 `( m: bTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). * a6 H7 t M0 s! Q8 `7 H; oTACAIR Tactical Air. % `2 Q2 c. Q" s# _8 }1 d! ?TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. - J$ |* W' [/ F& }. vTACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ! S8 e7 O( \5 n" z) m' Z) i; ETACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 1 W" | g" g$ H U4 r' RTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). ) L) h7 J" j& w3 a7 Y9 N. KTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. 4 G8 A1 w8 |% X7 z% p8 h: k$ D0 P HMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation 3 p) x# Y' e# k" |2 B8 ^7 k: i* uTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. Tactical Air . m P* v, \- WOperations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. ! T1 f3 c- A) n+ H6 V C9 L4 T) aTactical Air Support 0 A" o: f3 N* M/ N+ M; DAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. 1 f3 B$ \/ U; H3 Q! ]8 [% Z* k7 n% RTactical Area of # O- d* b. i% j' G( LResponsibility (TAOR) ( t+ o3 `. y/ t6 U l' k$ YA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. 4 M' W0 x @# _% @3 M+ r7 ?Tactical Ballistic 3 T( l8 R! u! E5 x7 v# ?Missile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be 1 e" w) g0 [# L) bemployed within a continental theater of operations. 7 T- L! l" `2 w' P* Q TTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future " n9 \. |. t$ W5 J+ c; Ddevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. % w& z7 s0 o" G6 S. o/ ?& s5 }Tactical Data , M2 p h4 h# I; IInformation link # k3 ?- q) J$ @A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. $ H# m& \& L& |6 Z' q$ FThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to ; H# p) ?* H* ?- Paccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical Operations Area I1 {4 n' n) z1 \# k: ~' Q' h(TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. * N. j1 }9 \' @9 R7 VTactical Operations Center (TOC) 2 c0 C& I8 ^. f9 t" [; {& a2 VA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning 0 \' \3 B6 K( Q* m(TW) 2 D3 w% p! D: `* f2 \8 W1 ^(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component - ]" H1 @8 V& E0 |! F! X7 {elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type + O! p( o! q4 h" d8 eand size, country under attack, and event time. $ O( ^# q! w7 a% d/ d3 TTactical Warning/Attack " g% Z! s N- d' K5 QAssessment (TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. % _3 h0 O7 Y+ _- n: S+ yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 4 u6 X* h. b3 x; Q; T% ~ a, G# i290 " `: n3 H3 T4 a" a2 u2 Z* ]TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. (3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. / n2 E# |5 S8 e' s! q- Q3 A U- ~TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. % O, C. W& q! L) [% ATADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. : d8 m8 C7 C6 _" |) T/ P2 ~- mTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. 0 j3 o$ s# Z. ?3 ~TAIS Technology Applications Information System. # h. C- o- G/ ]: B; UTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector # B7 Z& T+ Q9 S# i( F' Qand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive * ~+ [7 z C& v* M5 ^* Rdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. 0 z- g5 W- N8 q" b$ LTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). ! g" ~/ x: {' q9 V5 dTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 6 R- Z( G8 d9 s2 NTank Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. 0 Q. v( q% F6 e: C. O% e4 ?( \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. , S& P) Y% B" e, P4 l8 eTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. # u1 X! d4 D C: R3 |! `TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. / G N3 c" R' A |1 Q: ]* PTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. ; j5 H, R4 P0 d& ^0 A G( [" E7 E8 UTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. / B* {6 v& ^7 c7 \5 gTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition : v# f& h: z" {The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage - x2 S! }5 H) [ k9 j' @region of a sensing system. Target Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination 4 y* U8 Q3 d7 ~( ?The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one $ K T+ l+ J4 y! ]target when multiple targets are present. Target Object Map (TOM) % I- v m0 w( q2 uA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and 8 o- M0 a @0 J! i! Mother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in 1 p E- O& f% Rtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. $ ] F7 d7 y7 p' W8 ]" g+ v, vTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. / p: j* N9 Z" i) |3 l% [Target System Requirements # ?- ~, T& V' bDocument (TSRD) % n2 {0 s; |! j$ f/ E0 gBMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 9 N- Z! Y5 b7 c$ b/ sProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. ; ~8 d# t4 d9 I# xTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 8 Q t% V) U7 J( C7 e8 O" }engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 7 S! Y* O1 N4 e4 [. H) P1 E& ]! y$ ?required performance. 2 _6 g; M# y* I% N+ Z. I1 ]4 ZTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. & E% D; T' H) i1 Y& ]( BTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 6 {& T0 M" F, p! QTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. ' p. o1 ~5 v' W9 G. IMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 & {9 F) S( a' ~+ B) VTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. & a# ^5 g, h6 H2 _* P8 DTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. & i* k% }2 A0 K% A) C* K3 S+ ATBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. . c& ?% X! H! G- h9 O2 MTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 8 e* |/ t+ A7 _9 G4 eTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. ! a% T- F: t" I& P9 ?# \+ W0 o' zTBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. , h. H5 V9 p. w7 j/ F+ W- c4 ATBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). * b8 W. U; k5 L3 k(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled $ v4 @5 ?4 B& t5 G9 N1 }. ) N! ^! j1 \" N$ H4 }2 cTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. n' k: ?9 t4 J5 K9 ~4 [TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. ' J6 E1 K1 c7 CTCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. 5 D2 E$ _ G( f8 u/ W$ @& v3 h$ ?TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD ; O) g# L2 D+ l. iCountermeasures Mitigation). % |! \4 s+ p; x; U6 yTD (1) Test Director. . N. ~% _, I9 u(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. 6 u9 K8 D4 ^, [; N(4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. ( O. w h+ Z- s& \$ H! hTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. 4 F7 P5 K( j. j" b2 p cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' x+ l# H; S, U5 S9 l& H293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). C1 ]4 y" }! s! mTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. - \; n2 I2 P4 O- P8 C3 DTDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. . t3 U: e: K3 { ~* K8 UTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). 5 \9 O7 R9 z) ^TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 2 l" d, u0 m. `4 sTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. x) C/ O' J \5 Z9 N! f; j; f6 QTDP (1) Technical Data Package. 4 p, E& f* o& m9 E: ]. H(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. ) Z) \. E2 S' E5 f4 ?2 v6 s2 XTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. 1 [4 Z& l7 T9 V" c8 d2 R6 Y& P( lTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. & U. {: W1 k$ d Z. cTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. * ?6 F& x: d/ `+ F7 O0 ?3 C. FTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. ; @- k, p: U( q! L4 QTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician 5 O* k+ E1 P0 F3 h& X; p0 T% G! DTECH Technical . R! p% f: N: V" GTECHON Technical Control. c; J- l8 [+ ?5 {& I. n' P5 ^2 q+ V3 xTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 7 |6 ]0 I7 t3 `3 P: o) ~" s$ r294 , [, L% F5 J6 }% lTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ' L2 O1 B6 f ]% X& zAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. ; a! \' ]1 ]: S4 x' u# TTechnical Data 1 ^- a2 o9 k4 x. pPackage (TDP) 7 o6 K# H e* G; ZA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition . ^' c! |% O/ ostrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines F$ b( a( W4 U: h9 jthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, , w, b& p' c, n6 p- y, g4 j$ h1 l1 passociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to 9 }: A: c$ `9 x' v5 P. i. _determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical + M$ Y' I, h' z! f3 K" A, `! RObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical 6 D$ W! P5 o; k" `$ @. p2 k9 b+ T- O1 XObjectives & & @% Y! ^9 u8 B% K( u. FGoals (TOG) 0 D9 c+ G, E; t4 IHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. Technical 9 V0 x. J$ k1 tParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk $ Q! C2 ?1 p8 \: S1 x" S0 zanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by # i# q% k. c, u- Ymanagement. Technical Performance . L" g3 Y3 N1 ?$ n7 s* @$ P% x& ]Measurement (TPM) 2 V" r- X$ S+ q- \Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the / E. K- `3 F8 ?2 M$ E' ^& F3 Fvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification ; q) t7 ?; ]9 m# C/ R9 gA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form ; n. b% a# P0 z' M6 ~0 {the basis for actual design development and production. 5 E) d2 [4 h+ s5 a8 Q' HTechnical ( E# F4 n# ^2 fSurveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise . w+ r; p+ r( c& U8 Stargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent 3 e# P. q+ J8 KThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing $ y0 E# ^. | J6 l7 E1 m% }1 fAgent. C7 U3 K: n u6 O% p: r" RTechnology Program Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ' O3 u2 v" H5 F: F* `% p3 @supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. 5 F5 t! e; K6 W7 iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 7 _4 j+ c! z2 _( g; B2 nTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 1 s, n9 C0 \: R& T: I: kTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, 5 k0 n+ F* T! ZTracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the - _! D0 m3 O" T z. Pautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. % l! T& A" X: O5 W* tTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. 4 P9 Y6 G5 e/ C% A: i0 W; C$ ?! B: FTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. . ^- A F0 X' T: p* K: {TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) ) \' `8 \& C9 r- sTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. ! D+ Z4 m- C7 B) z! G+ |1 TTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 0 O/ F( V5 q. `9 P6 b4 i' Q. ^0 E$ UTER Test and Evaluation Report , C& i; P& Z0 L7 [TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. 5 Y) ]8 N0 z+ v( v ]9 F, iTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ) X$ J: T4 n% }* I( \6 r1 rTerminal Defense ; x9 u# n3 B/ HSegment (TDS) 1 }0 n7 @( i6 u# _5 w! I: p+ fThe portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance 8 U# ^% L0 q$ KThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 9 ~! ` t( x }9 f. t4 r: Z% `vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor : s: K) a4 v2 P) [8 I' L! f- p- t' nA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 1 n+ a) u% s6 t% VTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. $ S* B- m) S4 @: R1 h# y& v* kTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 3 \& k' h9 [6 MTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , ^5 u$ D6 E8 @* s296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 9 b F$ N; d, P: F4 ehardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all 1 i) }2 K& ~' I7 E5 |operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 7 W, N8 T- p# o" aanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. $ t i! {/ S: XTest and 0 ]: N- U8 F( w: L2 MEvaluation (T&E) # T% V8 M ^0 _/ }, kProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 6 q8 G5 P% B& ?3 @' eto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three 6 |1 B3 C- |+ [( l" p$ k/ O/ l6 Atypes of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production 1 ~6 w' l- F* @* s9 uAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted * @' Z. a( c9 Ito assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical ! |* _: `7 ` Uperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel B8 {9 m$ _* L s2 arequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts 4 @" F, @/ \$ ~$ X% |8 z: y2 C4 sor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before ' k3 R3 y( B- B kthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of - m# R; A/ A) soperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic - \- e, _* l/ Y% n1 n3 q( s5 P8 Cenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. ; d% c/ _7 V' u0 v+ w9 {7 Q. U0 M6 @FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 1 u; K3 o$ \! a$ f( J% y8 dand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of # E5 G* I0 C* {9 w; [deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan 3 M9 {% N+ o3 O; Q, c, S(TEMP) ' y, E+ ]4 K' O. VAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation 4 ?- ]. ^/ k2 Yto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as $ O- I/ F* X0 g) x6 v' kearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. : ?* c1 z, W7 t* r: h( ^) J$ k! hTest and Evaluation Working Group ; A2 B5 N! S/ t. J& |, L(TEWG) `: T5 I0 I* K+ S. }* OThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the # T( S5 D7 i7 b( x/ |! O1 QAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of 6 F! m- y% @& P1 o; b/ Stest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test - x: u D r" {" H {* P l9 |& bintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and * m) ?$ `5 v7 Y1 k( k5 krelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 0 s* n* a2 T, Mwhen there are T&E implications. ' o; X/ d- ?" v) D1 OTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software ) q# | X" E# r. c. Q! {" m2 uand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. ( [6 q0 Q& \! qTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. ' ~3 M% I8 H) `$ b, j( X5 LTest Integration Working Group * G1 z+ d& f* i; M(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in # J/ W E4 i" i; i# D$ N1 D; Horder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. # r/ }7 _/ g4 a: p, AThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 5 T6 P% ~6 a6 Z! stest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. V" ]! ~+ S9 W8 d' j8 R+ FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 R; n. C6 ~8 h; R, W297 / D1 H& j7 m3 p! Q2 x7 }Test Target Vehicle (TTV) 9 |1 F' q- b! W% M% j) r' ESingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. & r! T; r3 L6 G% |) R; ^Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 4 v1 B! c+ o. c j1 l) jTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 6 v0 C* M3 x9 O1 v/ E( _0 eTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. ) n- `- |4 k* e; w+ I2 VTF Task Force. 0 m! N; o% k8 X- k0 b% h6 jTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 3 F) X2 F' c/ @; R' h& xTFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. % L7 G# l. k( m/ iTFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 2 S5 C0 M5 P b4 V8 \; |9 }/ zTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). 4 x' R4 o- `- X& E0 R4 iTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). / o. F( j: o0 R5 VTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. * _% A9 \) e* _5 X) F' ZTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 2 {, c/ ?. u: f9 E; R6 UTheater Ballistic * _8 i! M( Y Y } ~. W. r+ K( u7 wMissile Defense (TBMD) System 6 z0 \% W) {! }8 K$ K8 c5 Y- PThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against " P( b& Z/ j- Q9 G5 Nballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. # |: i! Z( I" E' Y(USSPACECOM)