航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user ( p$ D' z& T, x% D3 y' Z3 uaccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ( i( E9 Y/ B3 y/ e, j) R: tSTM Significant Technical Milestone. ) y0 A! B. X. t0 ?STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. 3 k) N' e' Y+ {7 GSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. * z$ x+ B3 F+ T0 y, J* s' I! _STOM System Test Object Model. 0 U1 x( v: ], e5 t* tStorage, Handling, and Transportation 9 Q( \+ c- v5 J- T/ S8 X5 y ?Environments * a2 [ Y! v9 `$ bThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient - h3 ?0 |( f( n* Y- R/ Kenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during 6 i6 d9 w W# o% w* W! |& v0 Wstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 8 m3 U8 @9 t* f+ rshock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target 5 S) }8 l) }& ^Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s # b: f" K5 J, K& H) R$ i& Q5 t4 F5 CApache missile. * h) G. g0 Q9 bSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. # m( G6 I9 {7 o. W/ h) ]* JSTRATCOM Strategic Command. + h6 P: I [! J" `4 R, ^Strategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. 0 b1 P5 `3 H8 G- @; S0 IStrategic - W! L/ ~! M, h* nDefense ; x4 n% k/ x0 B2 ?Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. , ^$ [, h. a4 wStrategic / |# B8 l2 ~3 i. m4 oDefense System (SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ) F& D T% c T P1 A6 {ballistic missile defense system. ]; q6 q5 z: B( S8 c+ gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 & } ~& J* l$ |4 e' G( {) EStrategic Level of War / v0 q! R+ q) f5 S: {/ {! qThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or 4 t5 W7 `4 ?! J; U! q- kalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to $ U. k U/ R/ {5 Z" Uaccomplish those objectives. / r% a/ V3 F7 w4 h4 C, P9 @: e& yStrategic Offensive Forces $ \: A# q* \6 Y) N/ F! B(SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 1 |% \8 a7 D9 a: A7 y! UOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, ' c+ U4 |( E# N L2 wFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. 2 X: [, g7 ^- y) K! F y& eStrategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to * Y2 [0 A$ N+ O9 istrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic 9 h* z. ?+ N+ G+ x9 ?% |Warning & P/ Q( b C" n1 yA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time 6 f' O. j3 c2 h( eThat time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of ! l3 b) `5 _0 Y( _hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 5 ]" l4 H4 x6 g5 g4 z8 jStrategic Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of $ g! ?/ C7 K3 G, X) k6 Hgovernment(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends 2 z T- r! b! f3 |- p" Dwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the ) M/ i6 u6 E4 S+ y& ?1 G% _national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in 6 p K T* H" [+ B; x4 u, Ethe pre-decision period. Strategic 2 h4 [3 g3 J' w6 B% S6 DWarning Pre- Decision Time 4 y- C1 L# W9 j1 I6 tThat time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time 5 X2 W# c; f# Z* a f2 I$ bavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course + q! x" N. z2 Cof action to be executed. ( c: Z' e' c9 R2 [' ?- S5 gSTREAD Standard TRE Display. * ^5 ^6 C1 n1 R r0 ~4 ASTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack / f6 m! t) r5 d$ u5 b( }# B* Y& iAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. $ F& E9 @) q$ v3 ^3 cStructured 8 f( V" |% b- ^- Q! tDesign A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data " e9 T) t9 o( t6 Z6 E+ e2 Zflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one 8 Q. E, m3 K7 G% @& Fentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 0 L9 F& L* i2 P% Q1 HSTS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. + T: y5 m# b! E# iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 * M# T) b' N" i6 F* `% FSTT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). $ r0 t- J( B7 A$ v6 g4 _(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. ) R" H' i% z/ S. GSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. & S3 G7 d, _# D9 KSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. # n. S `) y) c, y6 N1 \Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level * ]" s4 l2 S* z4 R3 kA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be 3 D% b" ]. U' e+ V1 fdominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. 9 J+ R+ @. h0 |7 G8 l5 V* g- I5 xSubmarine- & U+ M! L2 Q1 M4 d( F) [1 }Launched ( [1 i q+ x' S+ X9 x( }! ZBallistic Missile ; ~* S& V" U: S6 p' b(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ( J, X+ A. f, E# L) v3 @7 A+ Dmiles. SUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive * Q# X! B4 B# ~. aDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. / |$ K: U- R* u' d' v. [2 \+ ISUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. % c+ \8 k4 p+ x( D3 e2 j9 H; ASuccession of 8 b) N/ O" j/ k1 [Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. ' B7 |# ^5 \! p" ^1 ySUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). - |8 v( l$ R0 W- G/ a* o$ [Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to ) n+ L3 A' `% S6 C3 Ddecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. ( Q( p6 y* D9 e- c1 nSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 5 `1 |3 {/ J, u- Dradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 3 r3 ^2 g' L* y8 n8 t* DMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 7 h( W5 a. H# a: D6 X) f7 I7 CSuperradiant . t* E3 v' B# ]. i% yLaser (SRL) - B+ ~$ R0 j. U. L4 U5 FA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 4 \+ I0 U1 S. ]required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional + L$ B D% o e( Y- d5 I& [3 Glasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 2 v- `% O6 a, c8 [) O" |1 eor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory 8 M# E7 ?7 A' yPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental / N# G& }3 I* c& u) u5 \0 @" yAppropriation 0 S3 l* | O" Q' mAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. 2 V' ]- D, V9 nSupport 0 m1 |0 M6 _4 L" ^+ MEquipment ' N. F: a8 _& [/ c, MAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 9 r5 i4 [8 c% h* o$ J8 Jequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and 7 a* o' k6 F- I/ z2 lprotection equipment). Support Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous ( |! Q" n& e3 D1 M( goperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items / f/ A) c$ m* \# _due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. 2 H6 Z' ?7 K% z* xSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 7 E8 T% {3 H- f" P4 Pand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric # Z) \* s9 \! M- I' Dsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response $ [0 a3 K* d3 @5 t: |0 Ioptions and current surveillance system availability. . E7 l8 V4 `6 b: I2 ]: ZSurveillance, / f9 `) g+ e" R+ v2 @: u hSatellite and 5 l" N0 J% C: W# wMissile 4 z& Q# n" \1 V, y) pThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, : C# e5 N. G6 M Sand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance ; o+ y" h9 y% V6 R8 X) y# ISystem ; n. C% k: b1 {Configuration 5 b9 C H4 n. S* U% sThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 3 ]3 F4 Y5 B1 d4 w6 t% g# m# l! Tin the surveillance system. . `8 Y3 o7 d8 e+ C0 kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ( M/ R& F2 D; w# e# G3 {9 N" m; Z283 0 e# y. e8 R7 q eSurvivability Operating Modes 8 B; E0 d) _" p1 P* YThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes # v1 z J. a( V# t8 u2 cthat all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. # s& a' p- d* Z! ~& eSurvivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. ! w/ L8 G7 B1 B6 T" ^Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. 4 f" e% j: i/ ~' [! W6 oSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. . o: G* t" A6 w+ e& M) o3 e% e1 c9 WSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. 1 \. \2 S$ j h: W, {SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 8 u! u- [) Y iSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. 2 V$ H8 H0 s2 B1 u) i5 W/ KSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. % P9 e8 m( h# H' Z# c! l( pSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to " Y: t1 i c) |+ mone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. : X8 R9 a5 Y a1 ^/ SSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. $ \( y8 [% E' v% O; CSynthetic : D9 j K# k: eAperture Radar ; v6 N6 j6 e X+ W(SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 8 D+ I8 f/ H3 U7 ~7 Ntheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for # l: S+ w! K2 d: O3 H/ l. \4 V$ ktransmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's 9 n* D. ]$ |. ?) y4 rsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. . x8 M" C0 h1 rSys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. . y4 E- H. N {6 wSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. % x9 v8 t% A$ h- \3 gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 / C8 \" M' }+ tSYSCOM Systems Command. % K2 n u7 |" H& Z& q3 R, b; cSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with " U+ ~0 J9 I9 |3 \* ~* Uspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, 7 l, W( _ F+ A' \9 gand delivery to users. 8 s I1 c6 T7 i- q! W0 w- T(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a + [7 @8 O0 T- s/ O8 X) v; Pfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. $ C% t! x1 V/ c' v4 |4 ZSystem ' H/ Q- e4 Q6 v% T3 S4 G( X! dActivation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 6 E& H2 G- L$ Q# [1 l/ z4 Yimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System Control. System Architecture System Capability : x# w4 K. @/ n, k& ASpecification 1 i! s W% q' }& m(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system . f9 Q+ z- t, ]% \architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the " T" g ~9 B8 ?! x# j4 q+ F- @elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among - b; `* [ `8 e. Y% x4 bthe elements of the BMDS. 4 p" Z5 c0 U6 m" xSystem Center (SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide # l: x( ~( e. y8 I$ gsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) 4 S# l, E* [6 M0 f, M' POBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition 3 ^( y) B9 [% J+ Rstrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration 8 ~! k r% [( ?# C* [Control Board . I- j2 r0 H2 A4 P! G3 p5 y(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 5 ` ^0 D0 h; N5 J/ f: {computer systems. - v; j0 `3 [) K/ r) O" {8 \System-Critical ' O6 z2 U) ^' _- _5 J5 KFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's 3 P! A' ^# |5 l# O; T3 {. b4 Ymission. * g0 v; F* m8 R* A& vSystem Definition Review (SDR) 4 @5 [. r8 z7 j6 R2 ?6 N* dThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 1 ^5 \1 b5 x+ N7 G$ Jsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and 8 Y) I5 \, u# d- i5 _funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 4 B8 M1 o# X, n& l# Kdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, % a0 t+ ?, O4 q6 E& K# zfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. : u6 S9 G1 o, pSystem Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) a) S: t) b4 |& `( J285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 2 s2 s9 L6 ~/ h) ecomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy % q6 }0 Q; }1 {- S5 y: C2 Ispecified system requirements. ( n w& H( b. ]$ I2 h1 Q(2) The result of the system design process. . v t1 H0 g* C# sSystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and * C6 e* I! r7 Y% pcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be $ F( d1 w' o2 b! ^" Poperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with * t5 f% n f S3 j" L, Uthe allocated technical requirements. - n1 G* c; _/ h4 f! S( xSystem Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 8 L6 p' e% J: S( Z* f6 x* Vof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and ; h1 ?4 {! R% [/ |' Q' m+ f) X# ]% y7 E6 Ncapability. $ r$ e( I1 q$ y5 q" p2 ?System Evolution Plan (SEP) 2 P& g$ Z! k3 H& O2 hThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS 7 N& B- M3 h( d( R- I) {. [capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior ( G6 b- ~3 f [5 I* G. P+ G& f z8 eExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 2 x& L0 W# y3 S! b' N& T7 BDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 3 b9 D9 p" S4 I# \$ o! p7 h J E) Eachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share ! K' W8 I$ ~2 \a set of common characteristics. System 1 z+ R6 q& U8 ZGenerated * |% D5 Y) {+ pElectromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) % c/ i% f, z$ ]$ u3 J/ rTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the ' B" E) M. T1 hsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local ( e8 `& }! k) \fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System ) l: K4 o. k$ L4 {( }0 BIntegration Test ; j; e8 Q; D+ Z2 w/ x; U' gA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 6 d: X+ e$ a$ P8 ysensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or + F2 i" v0 o$ x% l% u; ~" Uequipment systems. ) @: N0 q& ]9 GSystem Operational Concept 7 Q/ E% d5 _9 `1 s3 J6 [A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 3 w7 d" C9 h ?deployment, and support of a system. 0 x3 s4 |: f' S+ x' L5 e1 ]System Operation and . V' b. `% Z7 U' d& ?Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and _' H7 \5 t! X: M/ bbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to + g6 m# D6 R- z4 j2 a/ K6 othe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of 8 b3 k# U& v: V' ^4 S7 S9 Y/ yposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S # f+ ?0 ~% ~ u6 B) O286 1 E: D2 ], t; h2 T; U' R2 }System Program 3 T# o9 x- s( i( w$ P7 ^Office (SPO) & A2 h9 l9 u/ G+ S1 MThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, 5 x5 E; ?( p; D3 @5 P. Y3 Z1 y7 ogovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System " C! Q% {3 ^, ^) y) y6 kReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority " }& t4 W; B aalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 1 X+ P/ |9 n. A x: a8 K8 G% E& pstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the ; ]6 u2 g: A7 J4 C' qverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies r& W& J# t0 H/ |+ v* uand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results # l+ I6 [" Q/ z7 N6 `; ]3 e! W) j @7 H! |: Xstatus reporting. ' J0 `$ ]6 y5 D; ]System Readiness 7 ]1 v6 t/ I' s$ r9 fObjective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 1 N% X3 j! t8 `+ P n+ ?System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and ' o! a4 c% E6 H8 }+ w$ j! Smaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 7 R S% j/ x$ {capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. $ J/ d" A- k2 q1 D4 d" OSystem 6 G/ y) c7 _5 l/ c! A, jRequirements N! B+ H, L. s) QAnalysis (SRA) $ z/ K5 ^, R7 O7 }. U: mAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System & E* k$ s# C3 H8 TConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements : ]) U T3 d2 f* A) z( rReview (SRR) . Y; h0 y, e: z$ Z# F4 S& uConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the 8 S/ d0 `$ ^$ S8 E: Ndegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security # _2 G B' N* ~( x( _0 }* {Engineering % L. i% f# O" `' x(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering / o$ j8 X& G# _% K' s9 [principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks ) l7 C7 Q) L: Oassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 8 @3 F0 V5 Y$ E6 C2 l& j9 t4 uanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to 1 R% F$ `0 Y* ]: m$ w2 zsecurity threats. System Security Engineering Management ; o) e: U. z' L0 I' N x% E7 O+ T5 CProgram (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the ; l2 L: e$ u6 g2 vresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes & F. c6 x- g! U1 ~; Q; S$ _its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security 1 h3 [, B, I0 xManagement Plan (SSMP) 8 P; z$ _; D# dA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 8 m8 x P, ], D7 V4 ^; @1 u' fother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. * A+ j$ `. @8 u! V# u) g' Z# QSystems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 / B( S- k, E) Z& U0 s- `Systems 7 }& d/ a- f: y; n5 YEngineering / h* I9 ~3 ?! K3 f Z( h! v- NManagement & ]4 B9 ^: T7 ~) N) O5 b1 X+ sPlan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) ' w! i4 _: a5 j% f' |Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures 5 }* U' Q' i. `. H3 u' w, [development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) $ N; G) z0 T/ VKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and 0 {: ]: x9 b W' ^- c1 ^& vCoordination 0 T t3 m# p+ S, y4 FThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat 7 r: n! s0 x9 k& Q, V7 M3 n- T7 jAssessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 0 u' `5 b2 C d$ _Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency / W" ] f( [; P2 I' X5 @' q2 J+ M/ kand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. 0 \8 Q- R: w4 B- e3 p8 tT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. % `4 ]/ P8 E0 P% a; H2 gT-MACH Trusted MACH. 6 t. E" r* @9 lT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T " ^4 _& O5 N+ K h& V% ~2 Technology Transfer. $ q% z- C5 y2 Q3 |' OT % \0 S. G- V9 k/ t, `2 3 d8 R+ ]4 U+ @; r* [! u# ^E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. - [# l" B9 N. Q k- i1 p$ x- w# WTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. / L6 q1 Y5 W9 T3 k) ^TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. * k& M+ \3 V c* J- cTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. / }' O1 @' A" U1 Y# mTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. / ?# z, `/ V- ]- P2 tTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. . L! B/ [% O E7 ^3 BTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 2 v6 ^! E1 Z$ x9 T$ s. C) QTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. 3 `5 H/ D, \) e; q8 |; |TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). 0 f* P8 L0 K8 s& T: a0 O7 T: d3 rTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 ) n2 x; r7 @; iTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation $ ~5 `% y! Z- M3 i: h: t8 DTactical Air ; Q! o8 ]& H z- rDoctrine 6 O+ G! z( L; |5 o/ W+ r+ l& OFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. Tactical Air - c- Q+ e' T( N% ]+ n, O7 O k9 HOperation 7 J( w0 r) S9 UAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with ground or naval forces. 3 Q- \/ }! k' J: X. Y9 ?Tactical Air Operations . Z5 B# m' g( ]3 U; ^! zCenter ' y* c4 D7 H& T7 W- kA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control : ] Z b. W9 ?- M% xSystem designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air , V _/ v. r# QSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly - {0 ?, I5 z( I& ]! K/ y9 |/ @assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of 4 {" l/ w, F2 ~9 g0 r8 E" yResponsibility , h& d# q- D3 }(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the ' h$ o, \6 }$ kcommander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and % |$ [( z2 f" Gcoordination of support. 5 T% L7 H/ `# K- V0 E; M9 aTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) 1 u, n( i: X- X8 {A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. . \+ t* T9 F% r9 w& z* MTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future w! B; h. q6 Y% F; |development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or - _ g0 L& W9 a7 g& s2 omaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. ! Q5 E# _3 E1 }* qTactical Data ) E: V' F0 l2 r* U" bInformation link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates / J5 _9 M, N, ?each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. ' |8 i, ]* A) f" I0 [- z. ?$ |This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of - @7 H, T: _# P, U, v, O9 A( pWar : U' v" y# O" Z) e* o+ xThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to , C! Q0 `) n4 D% }" P. r$ f* _% Uaccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. ; e3 w+ D# k3 p; D9 @0 ?7 [Tactical " Q' m- o5 [" `" W9 b3 M/ YOperations Area (TOA) ( P' Q! l9 ? c" B( p0 I4 G1 _That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission % n5 f' K5 i# kaccomplishment. Tactical 1 x P+ }/ u5 z$ K# Y7 T- N9 rOperations : r( G2 r! i6 _; n! P3 o! H; eCenter (TOC) 3 B. H3 J; T# I' w" h5 cA physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning 9 q p. z4 K# I3 k(TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an ( E- r8 }, b, u- `+ z5 Zevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command 8 c# R1 ~' \" V" c" W4 P7 j, @centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component % P K5 \- P! w* welements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type 3 q8 u" _) W5 Y6 `; |and size, country under attack, and event time. . E# ]- v& p3 E4 N6 P& tTactical Warning/Attack Assessment (TW/AA) , _! ~1 o' b% B/ W- v* b" Y1 T& HA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack 9 i0 D1 d$ M) uAssessment. 4 |! }* Y" ~: @9 ]+ y5 fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 , N9 N& I9 N6 Z( X; U$ lTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. Y4 f4 |+ g9 l! |8 w) K(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. / |# S: d% }: |3 ITAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ' U' c8 J7 s$ O2 I/ bTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. , s8 {0 W; f8 H5 C1 H' c" O/ pTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. ( |* q7 L, D3 V _: s) vTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. }0 I( z* x! W! wTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ! X$ H& e. _' s/ P5 ]; ITADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. $ S! t. Y% H# h. A- J% s) t# b. ]9 [ f" GTADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. h1 x% Y6 I* \6 h5 ` z$ |/ v3 B1 c) }TAI International Atomic Time. 7 l0 g/ o, D% _5 l3 [TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ( s1 \9 d" u+ l* R0 Q6 ITALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector & P) `; ]! k# m/ land impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive , ?3 K1 q' q* i. D& K+ q9 rdefense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 0 H( m% W* u- O) Z& wTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 1 t; e, |& ^# a9 \1 v# ETank Debris Hardware associated with tank. 6 P& c& U( k$ p0 m& }7 eTank 9 t: k. I. c, l- G0 L7 ^3 dFragmentation 7 i; ?$ S4 y) g* LThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. 0 U4 L7 o9 s% A ~4 y9 FTAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. + a# Q% @8 _ g& E$ i8 HTAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. 3 R/ T/ J# r" Q2 ~5 T. e0 `(3) Target Acquisition Radar. # V' N0 s& K7 V0 ]- A. i, E! q VTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. % E7 w4 b/ E# Z( P; h# xTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. ' D! [( t! c# CTarget " p7 g S' d) B+ X5 K5 k# V RAcquisition S: H3 o! m9 b6 @# IThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage : L+ w) T- [) o# Tregion of a sensing system. ( {) ?1 ]" J- S$ r2 [) d; ITarget & b3 p1 s" c5 {8 H4 m$ j8 xClassification and Type % E" V% B! H7 Y/ K: _% K+ RIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one 7 W% n- o5 _# V3 w. l' L, Otarget when multiple targets are present. 0 ]6 P) k0 z3 ~0 R+ M: H6 CTarget Object Map (TOM) " o+ Z2 [6 t' y% v* `A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and . L: D/ K$ k' ]8 Z8 q, _. Q2 Aother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in : D% M, n* B' ]target designation. (USSPACECOM) 8 K; o" \ v2 F; bTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. ) L1 n U5 y6 J! ETarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. # q" \' ]" `9 Z3 M: @" _(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 6 d" t% L. G+ U3 _' Lpassage of a ship or sweep. + b% k. \, L* P; D9 W) f( @Target System Requirements 2 W, \" [3 c: U ~5 JDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD + Z! q: D* s0 ]( k6 [9 I5 WProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target ' M: c" N8 N3 _+ {. H4 W5 F- ?. `requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. D) f% w; a7 D1 XProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. 6 t$ j4 d) s: ?Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance - k6 R2 @: F; x& k6 ito the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and . y+ E7 v1 _; f8 zrequired performance. & e+ ]' Q; K l; w; A7 iTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. + d6 O8 m$ E8 x1 s7 ]# NTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. ; K+ p J1 I* |) Q; c) d, ATAT Technical Area Task. 3 W* |+ `8 }& Z& nTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. 4 }9 x9 }; s+ ^2 d! K% xTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. / W/ Q) d* u& s6 E$ C& b8 bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 9 p" R) U1 U5 y; rTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. : p' @9 N7 P% D: V C; w5 d3 ^TB Test Bed. ; ~" R j; \8 I& Z$ JTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. 9 Z) ]9 q" q3 ~' W- V O$ d7 TTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. 6 a* {; o: E5 }2 v3 l; jTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. 5 f% @ x+ r- N/ V) C8 J/ dTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. s" |3 A( m1 I- ~( kTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 9 h" I b8 g% zTBR To Be Resolved. - l% W2 X* o }: f2 U) WTBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled ' i: G4 l' S1 v( H: ~. * M U1 H) h( P7 P# A/ Q) x* ATCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. ) w, w" o5 U* a: [TCE Three Color Experiment. , J/ P3 r) P( ?8 xTCF Tactical Combat Force. / ^ Z5 n7 L7 `" V8 V6 v7 X6 jTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. $ H$ r+ o5 B) \TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. % V: M3 r' r$ ~0 j% z) tTCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 0 J L8 }6 m: L4 T0 ~" V# iCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 3 t6 V0 T5 R% {# x BTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. 4 y. C* G: t" f E/ b! F+ WTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. : \0 {5 R* h5 U- q) z6 FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 P7 L5 N1 x7 ?293 2 ^ ?, |, B2 r4 JTDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). - ?: H r0 M0 OTDCC Test Data Collection Center. & c m! R/ u2 W( i7 g7 s( PTDD Target Detection Device. ! l/ N# m4 N' _& ~: rTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. ; ~6 L. G. \8 E( n" r- o4 z4 dTDI Target Data Inventory. 0 R# A3 A9 F0 lTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 5 |+ ?- D( F' DTDM Time Division Multiplexed. % Y1 N9 W9 d/ ?4 C: G" o3 WTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). % a& x+ h o2 ]* S `+ ZTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. i" B5 A; N V3 yTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. & y/ [$ v4 p/ s& X8 s/ G7 QTDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. $ z0 B. F# G: c' \" V. s( Z- F(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. % M( G6 k' |2 g" V9 ETDR Terminal Defense Radar. 0 `' N. m" l" M; m8 VTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. ' v: Y w0 e; _& H4 \7 A, t" eTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. # E* N1 n' N, D/ a; v4 wTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. 9 o# J/ M$ I7 |" d2 r/ Z4 PTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical ( O( F- F6 O- ?TECHON Technical Control. / K) L) A$ b# X3 V7 T- }TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ X3 B2 V4 B6 P" j294 % d1 S' g4 n+ G! sTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract ) [ R- `) E! j$ Qadministration. Technical Data Package (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines ! ^, f9 m+ M( v* ^+ D/ c5 Y( x: e6 mthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, associated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical . \3 t/ b' G9 V0 j3 ?Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical 0 m% s" Y* ~: ?* j1 L# a! @+ u7 NObjectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & . I" W4 h* t# ]% C3 V# dGoals (TOG) 1 x% D$ ~; z' J* ] `' j* {* c9 PHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS ; u# d; M: ?$ X# e' q0 Zdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. Technical 9 S7 D5 H8 [3 m4 b8 R7 ZParameters (TPs) & ]. ^7 U3 x# O7 q3 X: _ a- qA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 0 b& w8 S% S* c2 Amanagement. - @1 u, k2 k4 S8 Q) Y- q: ?Technical ) M- Y \0 a& [# }* G% gPerformance Measurement (TPM) & b+ Q# t' t. y; r# SDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 9 u# O* ?0 n+ G. a3 @beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ( X4 n3 ]( S6 Z: b, U# Iassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 2 ?/ Q' c) `8 D' ]0 H! rparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these 0 R" `: U" ?% C0 ^differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification 9 Y) N! g/ ]& ^0 z6 ?5 J" y& qA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form : {! \' e0 x% d G w9 G) bthe basis for actual design development and production. * u5 {" y. `- jTechnical & |+ X& g( e+ P K) j* p6 SSurveillance 5 t: l8 I( i9 E; p) G* h+ zIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or . J* ^% q4 n+ o# x4 m* j$ M+ u% zemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 3 D, ?' X" F* @$ ^+ M etargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. % I% c0 [; B+ N/ KTechnology ' _ P. `* S* X6 e" yExecuting Agent " w8 r" h& R# l, ^The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 8 T$ P- }6 V1 ]- V2 D1 L9 u1 tAgent. Technology Program Description / M& F# _8 N9 ^+ J9 }: {The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical ) D ]# @0 T! y& b& zsupporting technology. 7 a: W1 K! l: D- K; HTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. * y7 J0 d# g8 k+ [. MMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 5 o, X8 v. c0 M. {5 A6 J295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. 1 Q: M5 g1 |# z7 e/ @: G6 G9 WTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and " H; e9 C# ]$ SCommand (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and 2 U' j$ G& [6 i# k, B4 o; ustatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. # Q& J" M n* {Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the 1 [+ C6 _9 S2 c' V/ Y8 hautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 0 h" ~! W9 D% D4 WTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. " ^% H( f V# W: X& ]TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. , e3 C8 z" c# f$ I! t1 b+ oTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term , s9 |( m$ ]# K, F"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) & {( K5 X' K$ k6 gTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. $ s' O+ i; V4 L' U- s4 m( @' PTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. % x3 a' y. S1 ?TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. " b) D$ q/ x, z" H1 N' c! O% J! MTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. * l6 S, m3 U5 W" g& ?Terminal Defense ( j; t3 Q! i* r% g- w* TSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 9 e9 v7 w* M- D% \* e) rvicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. . D5 B+ q0 m5 R, \4 V7 |Terminal Phase + i6 w K, c# [8 N1 {7 k2 |Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the 3 {+ h( q0 Q2 w- P! u7 g4 Z. e eterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy / w2 i; O+ h# QPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 0 ~0 _7 _0 r7 L2 b7 [TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. ( H$ R8 y0 b9 c( o3 @TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. 3 m; i6 t2 I. PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system 0 }- v7 Q& i2 f- }. Ihardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary Z; G7 F3 v/ }6 Q+ F$ M. A# C, k* v( [2 Dconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all b* q9 p7 v9 k* c8 Voperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and ; F" I& x1 S4 m& R1 h& R- ]" R' PEvaluation (T&E) * N7 s+ ?- P/ Y; O |Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 6 D. V. U+ t/ f( g& a9 \/ Rto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof " P6 i& Q' \) L8 J- hmanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical * S4 h5 }* S9 n* f" A" zperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, + k: v, `6 R8 r# t6 D j0 Xand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that $ t3 g1 y) Z. x& xthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts $ z& E* L+ R. \or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational . R! n& }& x% t# T5 t7 b+ Q(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before 2 [" c5 g0 h/ M5 uthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of 0 w: t. F& R5 z' _9 k' ^0 ioperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 3 ]; M" N: e% P: nconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic $ H2 W4 ]) I; H; A, D9 fenvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. 0 @9 `8 Y7 Q# c2 z5 _; y4 }FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 8 `& n0 |3 e% h9 {and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of , Z' E+ C( { q9 y% o0 Udeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ) B; P( ?& b/ M$ b# Z) A4 WEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. ) I, Y) ]9 ?/ r- w4 {3 i5 ETest and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) ! X& g7 C- H2 iThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, 0 B) W3 |. U/ ^& d, o6 ~planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of ' O# \1 T# X: r5 itest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 4 r U3 C* Z' z1 m4 e( jintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the 9 m1 m' v, h1 S3 S Sprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling + k% y3 U, T) u% u/ s7 Oproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and * n: e Q7 M4 ]/ A: E E$ ^! ]related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. 0 z5 ?" x, h% ~Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software ( X% d# g* K4 W' X& yand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. % k$ P5 V' j0 n. A: h) ^Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 7 K/ p0 f, o1 C- |* U. O% Rcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 6 u8 T q% ` q297 2 H! \# o. H. h& ?8 U/ _8 |' `Test Target Vehicle (TTV) - `) t3 Z" x* @: `Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 4 Y% b& p2 c) j5 ?) `# g$ BTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. ) D6 p) r+ l' @" R3 ~TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. $ v L1 l. w1 i- `1 {2 bTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 0 A% \+ Q. _, Y( n' @TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. ; e4 x# k% t8 F: ?! _" z7 ITF Task Force. TFC Tactical Fusion Center. 9 f( J4 M4 i7 C3 E3 HTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). 6 w6 F6 D& @0 |: m4 DTFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 6 \0 m5 Q! k* R) B a$ |TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). - S( B. ]* D7 e' b# QTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. # {) c! B( N1 u, ?TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). ! j- M6 J8 |, I% KTGS Track Generation System (USN term). 2 ]! A6 E1 m; Q! s/ uTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 5 f, P( u& Q9 T% m! qTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. - J7 ~5 v! x2 r' h4 A* c1 fTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic & u% F) x6 L. ~2 l1 H- IMissile Defense " i7 p$ ?5 J, b$ R/ {% t(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against + E! {7 K2 _+ G( Q" ~% I4 Xballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)