- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
9 L" g4 Z/ ]' g2 t/ AReadiness* q3 z3 n. C5 X) b* O+ \. I
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out& Z! A* V% @" \5 }( v/ g+ ?
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority9 P" o# }8 Q6 D# i
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
+ g+ ?+ V" K+ vincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational8 T8 i& E- M7 O& t2 }" g
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
& B& |/ Z- K0 x7 B1 w( p. T1 X& M1 Jverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the
$ r8 B" C! ]: h2 [0 z9 Econtinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under
7 \; l% R1 I5 G n& N, u urealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
- E: }, D- ?& S# x( Xnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies) p' ^+ }5 S+ d- N
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,, K* |" E; q4 D2 ^" p
historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results( p5 ~ n0 q& } ^, a( N
status reporting.
) p5 @- C Z3 a8 U; N. z+ NSystem
8 Q1 A- p" a3 HReadiness0 O; Q! K, e/ V7 Y W
Objective$ n" g; K3 }, y
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a7 O8 _$ I3 a6 [" C! {* b# A9 B
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.3 R q4 o3 H% h# k# s
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
. J/ [. Y3 r; n: X5 ]maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support6 V8 e2 C+ \. A/ `0 S _9 Z' C
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
3 y+ }7 a7 z3 |/ isystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
+ ? ]; F( b* e* `. d& dcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
5 G" e8 b' P, W6 B* cSystem! Y6 X8 C! V+ P. J a6 u4 a
Requirements
& I: N* ] `# G3 J8 o( cAnalysis (SRA)
6 L1 R" v5 t Y$ ?0 e- E% NAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System3 t3 T3 Q3 F) b8 A: o
Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine" V2 P0 h# f- q# c& | q' J0 d
specific system functional and performance requirements.5 B, ]) x' H" y! H% X' a* ^4 p# L
System
& A! }, K$ x, n: |" G0 \+ l" `/ qRequirements
b+ u! T$ Z( s! P) c1 A# BReview (SRR)
6 G5 g, ] @% o3 [5 h3 W6 C9 uConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements." \1 @0 \ r0 G6 S9 v, L
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the( L; m* v1 O1 w1 \4 A
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.
# d M4 |- I) N( r2 B# h& qSystem Security' r' g9 Z. y8 m0 ~6 l& k2 _
Engineering
2 }( D3 y7 Q. D; M1 j+ w(SSE)
/ ~3 t. {* O- zAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
1 ~5 p% I+ T4 s4 B" j C4 f$ o0 Vprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks% {+ ]4 J) q8 m8 J7 q" r# ?
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related! Z% c0 T o5 i7 }
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and% l! v. H {2 q$ ]$ J; ^
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
4 O9 r0 u5 ?$ G# Rsecurity threats.
: x* `6 I- w+ W5 T1 BSystem Security
2 M3 o' O f% n+ |8 O1 zEngineering
% G- M* m- G: S9 o E9 A/ OManagement( r5 T! i9 A. p! r+ i
Program# V% z! r' X) t* U% }" m$ b
(SSEMP)
/ J& N" r' d/ a: tThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical
9 u, `" x: X3 M: T1 a+ z/ X) e, fachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE( I+ B2 m9 Z! g( N
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the
0 U- ]; n- a, G- u$ H9 q; Wdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the
# a& r( C* V. Q( sresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides0 t* [/ L. |2 X: z4 U7 R
management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes P! X; B% M* l& Z& U
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. l9 W1 d, W0 j$ c1 N
System Security
- t! l1 n2 z4 OManagement
0 d+ S5 Y3 i7 }7 l v. j0 t( m- lPlan (SSMP)) @- o% a! |9 _, ?3 K
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to; ]* p `6 ]- @+ S' D) w, Y
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,
$ S' A2 B3 z; ?$ Emethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with6 c6 R- q" _; M+ g
other program engineering, design and management activities, and related/ U/ \) j/ @6 i3 M
systems.
, C$ ?! O, s6 sSystems) k3 F1 m5 b+ ~- ^ k
Engineering
! x" H7 j7 ^1 p. rAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
& @: P+ T% E, N- v [9 _/ g. t+ ^balanced set of system product and process solutions.
+ [3 A3 B% T, |% GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S
: }& v. j+ {. |' {287
1 `4 W' V( M$ I* d1 v0 K* c; H9 WSystems
, O" O& L$ e1 Z' b" a2 c2 qEngineering% u5 i! q6 n& R3 A8 H
Management$ G) d& `1 g) \) ~% t! ?
Plan (SEMP)
a, ~( h, `' n4 }This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)) J* o2 W7 u( Z; d3 D. M2 R
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures& k8 {! O8 \) o
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
4 S, W x. N# t$ {Key engineering milestones and schedules.
# m( M6 ^3 m# w: }, j0 R! \' NSystems Test; k% d2 }+ K0 d
Integration and
, c' ~3 C$ C9 i& z8 I7 P" W: X5 VCoordination' L( j, X5 B- H& C. P
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.! j% X7 a) C. h9 D4 N
System Threat) P$ V5 b& v0 ?( L5 S- A1 O, r g
Assessment) D8 c( z, t* }8 b l8 n
Report (STAR)1 u; o% }+ @! a
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
8 n1 J' _2 R) {; \4 mService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency3 C' {% k ]7 k+ ] [) `5 j$ k6 Y: L
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when$ u, \* U! c# {4 x- z3 \$ I
the threat changes significantly.0 m; `( _; Q5 t D0 n7 K' S5 D, Q
System-Valued
6 g* E/ [# g8 X# xAsset
, P; u# O+ h* F" l5 lA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to" w- h1 v# p! P2 l- I z' e
the proper operation and well being of the SDS.
" T' f7 j; c* gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
. Y' R5 L1 n7 t! p! j288
9 b% N+ Q& F( v) r. \9 X6 WT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.: z5 L, q& `, E; [4 {. X
T&E Test and Evaluation.3 n; } L! v# d# ]+ s; q0 B8 X
T&T Transportation and Transportability.9 w( X' G8 j F2 Z; Q
T-MACH Trusted MACH.4 Q- @5 ~1 ?+ A! W: _
T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
8 p- Z: v) J. n' C9 [T/R Transmit/Receive.
; D" r* Y* Z3 {; j2 V2 L q) FT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
- f$ l+ j+ `9 L- `* c5 i; XT! ^1 [+ Z, [3 j; h9 |
2, e: G# E* y/ y- v# D
Technology Transfer.% u% ?3 B+ ~& @/ G/ x
T, ?, h% U* `) ~1 n$ o# x# f
29 a- H3 z, i8 `2 Y, x, w, {
E Technical Training Equipment.' \; e' Q. ~0 K$ H
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
5 [/ i( K2 W0 D7 D. {TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.8 {$ _# g) b# n7 J8 F" l% A
TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
( V4 c* i% |7 H3 JTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.6 e3 ^! p! t* N
TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.- H% V+ A- ]) k3 }) ^! m
TAC Tactical Advanced Computer.5 z w7 t& x' R$ [8 R
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).; {9 Y3 @" r! s6 S' c9 E7 D
TACAIR Tactical Air.
" C$ A6 e0 b8 h" p( ~TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
0 z7 Q) p: v, H8 J3 STACC Tactical Air Command Center.- w0 Z5 M, y! |! C" R4 q1 A& u
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).% S! Z! D: d$ D& x r/ C, J/ U
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
* f! w2 f% J, b" [ ]. \( b( pTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.9 _9 O% F0 r& k- @( u( |/ O
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
$ o; Z2 {8 D7 f. @TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
( s. Z7 Z5 F W9 K0 _; `0 \TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|