- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
: g; [: k! C9 v9 W. |Readiness& Z7 v9 V2 `/ u$ R: J
System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out7 l2 P7 |7 L, P4 T7 z0 w( C
the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority7 c: L( B, e: q. b9 w
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It- w) `. e& P' I# c; c% u( b
includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational( d! ]8 O l/ h e5 h/ U# D0 g/ x
state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the
* |4 ?6 n4 L' |5 v( R9 ~5 Bverification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the% c6 I4 q* ^! V5 J
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under$ i& c0 a6 w$ ^
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
( r5 i/ Z$ L+ |- J# A" snecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies
+ A, k/ N8 x" l/ s- W' T% U& ]and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
" L6 d" B% u8 g, e/ j) r9 Q; f% N* Zhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results% D( ?# ] e5 Q+ f: ~# S% h3 X
status reporting.4 B: K9 o2 K3 A3 E( F1 N6 W/ k& P- B
System, q0 y: o4 w- f e* V% w
Readiness0 o5 }/ C% i3 e4 f
Objective, u, @+ j/ d# T. ^ R+ r
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a( v. C0 R" Q: x
specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.
) E$ X4 S: |- H- ~1 j& uSystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and$ p" o* {& x1 b' M/ ?- R
maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support7 ]" T7 t* b) B0 K7 f8 s
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of
0 F! t+ M! |. I: z9 @8 P( ksystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission4 n5 O( ~7 H( d R6 {0 E
capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.: H: `$ o4 u; q8 b# x2 h& |, r
System3 q# ^/ E4 M, I% N3 m
Requirements
% A0 f( O3 Z k" ^* e6 jAnalysis (SRA)
/ \5 Z8 R& t- o$ x \0 VAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
" V% p7 Z$ x) c7 @/ L+ b9 \Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine1 d% q# X0 O! Q% S) o( f
specific system functional and performance requirements.
; h+ f" u( @) z7 mSystem8 {0 N4 h2 }0 j* Z0 k: X+ B: j
Requirements
! m x5 z, s* x4 j" @; Y/ NReview (SRR)
5 L- v+ J) [* Q' F7 F! RConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.* n3 ^3 ?) N- s. s, C: S3 A1 b
Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the( x* u6 k6 u' ?3 L
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.4 o% j$ j9 N( e6 ]6 D
System Security# Y G5 p* T% T8 O `
Engineering, |. h7 Y7 j' m: E( V7 E
(SSE)
/ n* m) ~( T6 c. eAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering
6 s. P7 I- c, h8 n, {principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks6 a, B( U b: U( i7 Y
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related* `. H6 x; w* Z$ r; _0 c) w2 J
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and
% q1 h; ?; q/ u5 S$ panalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to* E9 I ~1 Q: V4 O {
security threats.
$ z0 e' \/ O" q) P. CSystem Security! f9 f4 {, Y9 `7 ?
Engineering
: |9 d6 N" ^6 G. r/ PManagement
8 S3 M( G& P& {" g! e. s; ~ B# uProgram4 p2 A: [! r' _0 C7 n
(SSEMP)$ V1 D( B- R, W: m: X2 r6 A& {
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical0 e! g1 o' G) `$ R9 v: r0 i
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE; v! [: d) V- Q: [+ e, C- v. G
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the% |8 j# _ O+ j
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the' m$ m; E5 @3 {9 @, t
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
: o! n& o+ y% T8 ~management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes: }4 n0 Y* ]- |% Z) T- ^) i; q) G
its own impact on overall program cost and schedule.
" D; R3 _$ U. jSystem Security
* i& A* g1 y4 F" \9 TManagement' z% }, s" y/ T A! M
Plan (SSMP)7 Y/ ]% _9 z J3 o. Y+ i1 b
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to
* P/ I7 L3 Q$ ^2 L3 c, xmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities," o8 A1 B: D: N4 N( n% j0 `1 P# |
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
& b3 i! P Y5 C4 E' u0 kother program engineering, design and management activities, and related8 ?; y' S, D7 h( }+ O6 k* e( m+ c) Q! y
systems.
& i1 M" W C" l( \; t/ gSystems
2 e6 ]1 S7 D6 t+ @Engineering! U# N: E1 c* W, _$ G) r9 O9 d( Y
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle8 ~# O8 @% o9 \6 \$ y- U& p
balanced set of system product and process solutions.7 t, D' j, A2 S& a
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S) _8 n" v$ b, Q1 K) e8 D
287
# a; N( p7 {- mSystems9 J' s; U8 E) i3 d& G
Engineering* J y" O. O" e* J2 N; M( ]; d
Management
- {8 g& m+ r/ G6 T: n# x: {: \! [Plan (SEMP)
. P4 c6 X# G, A# P7 G- fThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2)0 s: i6 J; Y8 G+ ^7 j. a7 {" }$ p+ ~
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures
1 Z4 a, t- u6 d% u0 K. udevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)4 ]2 T: K" E' ]
Key engineering milestones and schedules.
1 b4 M9 Q1 o5 a. L2 kSystems Test
! J$ P5 l; F. Q: Q4 L' k. m5 V6 OIntegration and
1 E6 E7 }2 v9 O. O: ]Coordination5 e, d0 x( c; M7 F: ^# h- W; t& U8 c
The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution.
3 S V9 I2 u5 P# x1 KSystem Threat5 w/ A; D* ?4 Z1 j" n8 g6 s4 r1 m
Assessment
7 v, c/ w- X' g: N: nReport (STAR)5 ?7 h8 ?" s- b! @1 w
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a/ L1 Y3 [, } k# T6 \" Y
Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency' f' O" ^9 W% J% Q8 R2 k9 X5 T1 w0 F
and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when
+ e8 p$ N& b& Y: Xthe threat changes significantly.
3 n3 Q4 T3 @, M- m2 USystem-Valued- i$ v+ E5 A, E ?
Asset
$ m5 j) k9 |4 n1 I# EA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
0 H2 g& I/ \, G+ |0 z) Q2 j* y4 tthe proper operation and well being of the SDS.
' J2 @! G1 p N" Z7 o! J) |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T
1 C% B8 F2 x3 b6 j7 `; T2886 j- i5 ^( N( k+ z3 V, j) ~
T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
/ b! b( X- z6 {# |& D( Q# |T&E Test and Evaluation.
9 A. j1 m d* h& g: E- [5 @4 hT&T Transportation and Transportability.' k, v# M. x1 T6 b" D/ y
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
3 v! P$ {/ E% E8 n0 KT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
, T1 |$ F }0 d* W& m5 k) P1 RT/R Transmit/Receive.7 v! [9 b- O2 `1 {% |
T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
$ `8 i8 `8 o, Z/ i! QT
1 K6 |8 } o3 x! B# }0 v+ a2* }0 l- \! {/ p
Technology Transfer.+ l9 I# G( T0 u# ^8 I
T4 Y6 j) ]+ h$ \7 M! [' C
29 M5 D8 o$ }6 V4 M( q9 l# O
E Technical Training Equipment.' m5 o; z+ Y7 G3 F( ?4 q
TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.4 J1 M, R( p9 Y
TAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
1 P) y/ ^1 g: _1 \TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.# A2 X5 Z0 h- s. Y. g
TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
! U0 D. H& v! P- V4 W7 ]5 ~" O1 tTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
6 D$ ?9 o/ D0 e) R$ i# {) w9 ATAC Tactical Advanced Computer.
( E" Y. p+ M# Q6 |TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).# J, A: z* j8 Z! p- }( _2 m: K
TACAIR Tactical Air.# H) G, w4 s- r4 A. ^2 O1 J k
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
& K. Z0 x, ]4 a* L5 d3 w& sTACC Tactical Air Command Center.: g; |( Y" e3 n1 x" p
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).4 s8 N2 q! J, R2 O; L+ c3 _
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).
. R! a& o& H2 p! JTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.+ R3 P$ e- J& m" n2 n
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.5 g A0 v6 R6 p4 ~
TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
2 p# b0 a/ g1 E- ATACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|