航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user & H. t1 M! v: Y4 J Caccess and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. # x( ^ W$ r% S7 v: lSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). (2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 0 z4 |, x6 y, Z) f6 hStorage, $ V. @2 B8 u4 l3 ]& H% SHandling, and Transportation 1 ^6 l3 C. a" L X1 ^- J8 U. Z1 O G# VEnvironments 3 E( |9 ?; Y2 w/ N( rThese environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during : m# J$ A. C' s+ {2 K3 o* _storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. Storm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target ; q4 N7 @6 r, e' `9 W7 R2 ASet. 0 I8 D' w5 K5 a. R+ }; CStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s ! X1 \4 R& J1 ^6 S) ^7 lApache missile. 3 d7 o/ y! s% lSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). * H0 }; V# F+ U6 G0 h- r7 u2 OSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense All active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 3 ~& G) C2 b" O" ]4 Pnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. Strategic Defense 0 p7 _; \7 F. P. p# }! ?Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. 9 @; f; |+ P* ]Strategic 8 `% R6 d$ r: m" i" |Defense System - s G0 O9 G$ O(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. ) d. |% a8 _! A8 |; dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ) f/ y/ Y) E" \* T280 Strategic Level of $ i, r! v9 X9 n n1 c4 z: oWar The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or ( G; T+ V9 A* j0 U- b3 }. Aalliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 6 T( H* [9 V4 B l* Waccomplish those objectives. 1 |: B! ~ V) P1 m$ `; Y5 y! f3 RStrategic ) @" |9 b3 H M" ?4 r& YOffensive Forces (SOF) Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 1 c& i9 h3 j' v# C2 l' V6 w7 {9 UOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, 2 a p" {: K( M' l2 Y+ ~FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. ! X. y2 z2 A6 u$ Y$ RStrategic . e- {( u) F; s& ^Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic % W$ C- c$ D7 nWarning 4 a1 `) }- K2 Z' X# T8 ]A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of y/ i# A( @6 u; q, l' khostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. & r0 G5 k! {' i3 Y2 }$ GStrategic / t" G( Z5 |6 `1 H' WWarning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends ( C+ ?0 d' h8 rwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic J. i* h m2 q' K4 Ewarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in ' Z; d1 F; u1 [the pre-decision period. " j* e" c: @- f) a- pStrategic 5 ?& j% X8 {8 V2 KWarning Pre- % i9 q. _/ `, x; ?4 ? R/ B" w% EDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time 8 B$ Z9 x2 P# o: |8 H4 n Eavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course * {) z& E- c5 i- }: rof action to be executed. ) T2 y3 Q1 {5 d/ V3 BSTREAD Standard TRE Display. 9 p( ^2 G2 G8 Q" o1 {4 @' DSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack 0 `' P' i' ]" Y* ^5 F4 y* J8 kAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely , X0 i; L: b, d# J( l3 C$ xtimed for maximum strategic impact. 4 J! |! ^; a: O2 c$ HStructured Design 1 [9 w& Y' l. M( @( ]2 X% HA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules 4 \4 s7 @& }/ E" t+ g, Hbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program ' D- j I) T3 F6 Z5 ~7 e0 I% cA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one - @+ C; O; u4 p% `& s8 x7 [' G6 aentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. ! `9 w' u2 [& z" u, Z; X' c# LSTS See Space Transportation System. ) w, o+ C2 G. J3 xSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ( o, s2 e' Y% C! W& S, N c281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). " p$ G4 [/ Q& Z# X$ z4 g$ ESTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. ) \- K0 e' o; q( k' ^STW Strike Warfare. 7 s% A8 h5 F8 q" dSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level : D# c3 S) U6 H! E b/ _A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be $ h( p# J4 @4 y' N3 J5 i- q/ Ndominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. $ p/ ? W! n0 _8 R9 qSubmarine- Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 1 @9 v! F$ ~ n u# gmiles. 5 p5 F# u, W8 @3 B3 |: K! hSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 4 Q+ p7 u4 a) X# mwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive 9 p( k" q2 r5 g( A3 c `2 j$ Z$ yDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 3 l/ _$ _) s/ L! K1 ASUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. . k$ ~+ J. m. P- K. n: ISuccession of Command ; B: `1 ^& d% m& B G9 qThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, 7 [* a1 ?7 K* u8 ~; t2 \3 P. pbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command " i" Z9 @9 l3 q9 wis a synonymous term. - b4 I$ A, ~3 w5 \1 K! ?SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two - R, \9 o9 j' ?( x2 H j; L; x4 dalternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. 3 S2 O( o# E. \ J' eSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). . s! H+ s/ l0 E: L0 tSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 4 F9 w1 E% ~- q8 _a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, - b% j& G4 W+ U6 ?* tthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super % H" I9 I% {2 A' Y( G+ Mradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as Y; n4 y3 u/ d1 L0 ]% b" rsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. ' }2 c E* S" L( i5 G2 W, WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 b& Y" d5 z/ x5 P. E282 / C4 t* K, \' D4 `) G: \Superradiant Laser (SRL) : @/ B1 A' E. F3 VA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not required for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from $ r- U# f& f- Wsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 8 U6 g1 r6 o* Q! t! c! [0 for magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. , Q, D0 b( R# o2 e) RSupervisory H" R3 N8 Z! \5 s% pPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and - @$ ?6 p3 n+ x/ T1 M0 q" x8 n! h3 ?controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 3 w8 w$ Q- R5 P: K+ b8 xSupplemental 6 {* h" |$ C: d5 SAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment - P1 n! h9 O1 I3 ^( c$ pAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 9 ^: T( g- P; Y, pmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) * }: K' ]+ n: o4 p1 Xequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly 9 a+ _( v, R/ x5 B" Gtools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). Support # X1 I8 S0 b- V$ Y/ C6 J3 Y& Q/ ]" k8 VPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous , p$ r, }. c. D( O0 p8 Joperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 1 ]9 h. x! k" g2 q/ ]administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 0 z" q# N8 l* r/ sexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. $ l) ]& d$ R8 ~( Y& cSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. 6 a# B+ H( v3 e3 F! SSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. $ P' e" U/ \% L; OSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. # u& w4 q3 G5 Q. i$ SSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess 5 h( z) E/ X/ t% T, ]" z2 Q7 N6 n( {8 ?production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, G8 L' O9 @+ g+ {& H& s/ y! Q' Iand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric ! L8 C# L6 q' w# R6 U! |' q% osensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 6 L. ]6 @( M* f/ ? E" Z( }Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for 7 _- Y1 z# T2 _) n# f& h" Rcoverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. 6 l! M- m& S- F6 ]) l: b7 W( |Surveillance, 5 ~& K8 P5 O$ b# {, VSatellite and 6 J. J. A0 S8 ?+ gMissile & w" t0 L x! p( B$ ?' _( eThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, # X$ K/ ^4 X9 N/ o* Sand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites " a; B4 X4 O! F& V kand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration D; i! f( x+ m8 o2 w4 {The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated / U( k- t# N% W" x% a# d6 \in the surveillance system. 0 `) J- v* L$ B$ dMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! [# i# T' a& t- X X283 Survivability Operating Modes The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and Enduring Command Center (SECC) 5 `$ \4 ~) Y& N% G( C YThe USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. % H& A6 U( f$ _/ d) {' U& M! GSUS Site Utilization Study. 1 h) j q. [: n/ ]3 t% ]Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. 9 t4 Y+ j+ B3 l- WSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. ' @9 Q2 N/ ]: ^, K5 ]2 ~% bSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. " \; P* G0 n7 A* aSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating $ M4 `' \ |$ y1 o7 Dband of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 6 ?$ ~" [/ l' F+ G; ^# V4 F2 pSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. ) b/ A8 E6 X7 t' l: HSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 4 P6 h- B. V. x+ F3 r9 g/ L/ kSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. - W, X5 \3 f, v8 I* ?Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where 4 Z: J% ^% ~2 I# Eeach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic 3 s M( m8 H+ P5 J- ^& [3 _7 Y- TAperture Radar . I1 A5 [1 ? ], V(SAR) Q% L! h, `. n' g6 RA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ' M& t. m3 d' J3 U2 B9 Itheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 3 t; O+ Y9 F1 }) R4 demitted by the radar transmitter. & M$ G1 D% z1 T9 y: C' l/ S; kSYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. 8 t0 w; p6 {/ {" e) sSys Cmn System Common. 7 `* H: [4 F7 u$ E! ] U6 N6 RSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S $ B Z" f0 W! U8 Q! o284 8 D/ |) e* e# U4 E, W* E* o4 bSYSCOM Systems Command. 4 W+ ~- @5 {! u* }8 D4 uSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, , \* E3 ^6 c/ [: |& \( jand delivery to users. 6 N+ e. }" z- s1 {+ b1 T% ]7 Z! _(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a ' {& r5 U- @0 m% U1 S! u) Mfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. ! u/ }2 F2 K1 `, B( o( Y: OSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 5 e2 y Q6 @. Iimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System ' f* {. {. U, X8 z0 vControl. System Architecture 7 z8 {" t Q9 t; a( w+ DSystem Capability % n7 c6 o( x' Q7 XSpecification - U+ I# G: M5 ~! V# ~(SCS) 5 D* o* ^9 L2 @. Q. XThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system , i5 Z& {! ]! }% g& farchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional : S% a3 z5 R$ X+ A! L8 C) C& Lspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among & p( P4 u0 J) mthe elements of the BMDS. System Center " b4 O1 y% k0 A$ N4 j! B3 d# ?+ l(SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide 3 {3 D* x0 d+ r- ~& t# \9 @* R: Osensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. 1 g2 |) A, \" |- Z+ SSystem Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition y2 G$ i/ g6 `/ M b' V2 `strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the 2 g" b+ b2 W1 ]; I& gdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration 0 Z8 h Z! b& kControl Board , A4 }9 Y4 k# X; o) k% y) m8 Z(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 9 ?- E8 l9 V! O8 \0 q7 F4 dSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical Function - v: h1 v& i" v4 p# J9 y. qA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. $ C/ i# s8 n! PSystem Definition : f' O( q+ i- f" v8 ~Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the 0 ^8 W; i7 v8 g+ b' bsystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and ! K, B% d o& h4 a2 \1 x3 b* |funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, , Q# B6 P' q4 f6 S6 l/ Gdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment 2 |; F c4 K' Y9 k$ K4 LDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. ; v* `3 O3 O+ L5 t: A% rMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S T& F0 d6 q, i' W2 w9 P285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, . S6 T3 Y. I% s; s- Y: U: dcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy 3 l2 U2 _6 I" [specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. ; \( d3 h+ e" Y7 E7 G" ]) CSystem Design Concept An idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. # x$ w+ K6 U) oSystem Design , n% U: l O# Q" G3 C2 s" k( T3 {Review (SDR) ) \$ C3 {) H8 ]$ @0 |. Z* P1 H" J' `Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with , K0 o5 C# \9 L7 \8 rthe allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness ' W9 S1 Z6 b/ |5 q$ tThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set ; W& t) Y; b- W( |6 ~0 n* {of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution ' ]: g2 L X" F/ [1 \/ }) TPlan (SEP) e6 Q) M- p" N$ w/ K( L& R; ~The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS . c$ J1 \: \- @6 n' H( Ecapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and 7 A0 P2 R! i" Z* x: X6 aassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to 5 g4 k. l/ t h& R( p; |' cachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome & R6 O# w; T3 M5 m% F9 w1 A1 wthose challenges. System Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System ! k/ y/ h: [& C. UGenerated " L" S, Z, X l, h( @Electromagnetic Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the ! g/ ~% F8 E$ v# R$ y. m+ wsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the $ y7 Y% Q4 Z! \* [9 e1 J0 sprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System 3 a- w( `3 S- [3 K: n4 EIntegration Test + Z6 W1 z) j8 C6 ~2 W4 Q2 VA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, . K. B6 ]% g: t6 G! Z7 u0 q/ usensors, and weapon hardware. % Q& p, R/ q/ X5 Y% e- ?5 ~+ \System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or : E9 a" G3 }. ^& Sequipment systems. System Operational Concept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. ) N) a' C- T. K; j: v# ?System Operation and $ [ l* Q3 ~+ _2 d, _" _3 J; OIntegration Functions (SOIF) 7 o9 K; z6 h M9 t+ W3 o4 E1 fThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 9 G0 w) z- g6 L) R9 ubattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). % ]$ \/ X: z, U/ I$ f2 lSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of " R, t3 S0 \9 ~; }, ]6 g% I) wposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 6 D& c ^$ Z3 y, @3 X$ x9 P3 ]286 ; K5 N0 n1 @5 h. ?' N0 t( `' ~2 mSystem Program Office (SPO) 1 V$ h/ @5 n+ T- a" HThe office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 0 b+ w1 b$ n# P% R6 Wprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out # R. H' L; N1 R; fthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority # l& w6 ]) v5 B2 K% s5 yalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It 3 S4 t4 B: }2 r5 d; D; \2 Eincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational ; m5 j9 w. g; L$ o$ X% m$ rstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under - m9 t) K* h7 x& crealistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 9 \0 W x4 u' |+ Nstatus reporting. System Readiness Objective A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and $ o% a4 ]0 v8 @8 {, O% \maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of . N5 o- W8 G {system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System 4 o/ W7 [! v! A' O! ]- ^Requirements Analysis (SRA) D( A. M& G- {An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System 9 N$ v" r; y. V& t8 T5 [Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine # U2 p) \4 J9 G3 V4 ~specific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) - {& ?4 T$ k, K( GConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. ! E2 q4 {* ?8 ADetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the . t' m; b0 ^( }$ `$ l0 Hdegree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security * G" }8 P4 r# |# a2 ` Q; CEngineering ! i& ~, z7 _: a" \7 h9 }% F: I$ K(SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks 6 z" w) _" K3 z; ? uassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related 5 [" E9 [3 Z4 W! lscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and : q. S. n: Z; x2 o" Y# [' g0 [$ kanalysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security 5 x0 [2 `: g! t( @Engineering + X5 @! k$ q. m! i+ U1 n- h9 V1 OManagement Program & T; `) Z: x$ B5 f- ](SSEMP) # N: x" E8 h* d" GThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical ! j5 E0 M, E0 e& @achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides p# G( j; Q! d9 b! a5 umanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. * m) Q# f! ]+ K4 S2 n; t1 m% u6 LSystem Security ; V* m% a2 u/ V. h7 d# c6 g. }2 T3 [Management # M' M5 A2 }; SPlan (SSMP) 9 x4 l: R3 \5 IA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to . u, B& h; g$ ?2 u1 kmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 8 y# v4 ^; Y3 {4 T: Z3 T- mmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with P* }- [5 F$ m5 J0 d4 Z9 Gother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. ) _5 @, n% ~( { k% Q3 cSystems Engineering ( U5 r) q a, n+ `2 IAn interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems 6 L2 S: ]( F+ p; M' B' JEngineering % y7 O0 E. B& a6 o% K ~' @Management Plan (SEMP) - Q7 F1 _. C! C. X* w* `9 ~+ a" pThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) . N/ ]4 L' C( d0 M0 q9 `, x" t- YIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) 8 u* \# E3 F) X) |; w, FKey engineering milestones and schedules. * b6 I- |# w D d# a, VSystems Test Integration and Coordination # d- C7 H9 ] Z5 wThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 5 O3 T: T% M7 X6 J: W- oSystem Threat Assessment Report (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 2 Z7 s. S1 C" z j4 cthe threat changes significantly. 6 X6 {7 c# W; s# v5 L0 DSystem-Valued $ h0 T9 W( P$ |/ h" [/ eAsset A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 9 F+ i. k7 b' C. k1 \3 tthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. $ H% t( `5 z. }( K- d. C0 H0 WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 3 B$ y2 Z6 s: P& t) M( w; U* v- i' g288 ; l* h+ g* w- CT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. 4 O: F2 g, I$ u @T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 7 e; z2 t' |( ~* vT/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. $ F. g: k% ]& y( K( fT 2 6 W( D7 Y* k; ?3 s4 tE Technical Training Equipment. 7 M" f# S1 J* A$ YTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. ) t' W [& L1 T( pTAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 3 M8 l; v3 j- W: i( Z4 R- |' H9 qTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. , u) w$ f+ @! L0 R: }; N! J! }( m3 `TAC Tactical Advanced Computer. ) ?# c, P, ]/ C, e; a7 |2 {" YTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. - w7 g1 T1 d9 F* F9 pTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. ! w9 B* L! U2 V( p3 ^; ]; j6 b K PTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 8 a& w- E/ K9 O; F! F/ \TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. # N& o. A# W8 X0 o) uTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. & K% }- o) E* A1 v; }TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). & O' I( ~- p6 xTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 6 g' U& Y% Q0 f: ~# A/ f) S; XTACON Tactical Control. TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 + N: Q) S! j R1 c- wTACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation Tactical Air + B" B# t p$ S6 \& x1 T! i; FDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. # |5 ?7 v2 w) G8 L* }- f! |6 qTactical Air Operation : u$ R7 w4 d% E. V0 a# E" TAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with * d9 t; H" Y7 t- j; j, |0 J% Yground or naval forces. " Q/ e# R2 m/ }4 t7 @4 S! JTactical Air Operations . t7 @2 I' j7 {Center ) y7 x% r# a6 ?$ C* n9 LA subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 2 @ V' [7 F& |6 S$ rdefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air / b' }) c3 s7 Z) p& d8 }9 I5 pSupport Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. 7 q( h" b2 _; u! h# VTactical Area of Responsibility 5 Y; e* Z% u3 X( \, ]" r' w/ }(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) - ^& G& w3 i) q6 }A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be ( s1 p. ?! g9 S- |! Z% |employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or $ d+ B, } e- S/ d8 u/ m( Hmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. ( X9 E- v! w" STactical Data " v# T, x" H4 ^Information link ( U9 ?3 ~& ^7 F* X! e' AA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates 9 P2 F9 [5 M7 A' j0 N# Weach unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. 4 `% Z+ M m2 T1 a) L6 o" bThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to ' T' j; l5 x" f; \, Daccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical . S; p# C3 n" {Operations Area (TOA) . f5 a- p0 r2 N5 I6 y/ kThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission ! c6 y/ X' n8 B w0 o1 zaccomplishment. Tactical % M) S' ] U0 d+ X5 s3 J; lOperations " e6 F( i7 C5 U" h mCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning ' j5 r2 T2 V" u+ D+ ^0 c(TW) . x8 B$ C5 ^5 c2 Y(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command * O) c+ b, H: D' e& g* fcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component % Z( a* X. T8 ^. x' b5 S( Relements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment ) T. h A9 e0 d% q: g# w$ |" J' F(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T % u ~. D2 ^3 {' b290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. $ }# J7 l: p- t(2) Theater Air Defense. 1 g; J A" `6 |. d(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. d: q( o6 _. cTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. . u0 O9 w; {9 I/ u8 E$ j4 B- wTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” ' p* _! N& J) X7 ~6 b8 s( e* o* CTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” 8 u% n$ w& M. v. n' s+ r! sTADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. 7 T: R$ h9 [) ETADL Tactical Data Link. 6 G/ ?6 t z* F3 n9 `TADS Tactical Air Defense System. . e0 e: z8 R% R/ A: YTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 8 l- R7 v- Q. ~5 b; y) _$ ITAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. ! z5 ?' U' L( w0 Z; |2 oTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ; N5 o& m3 P& K9 VTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector : w/ V4 u" B2 e! b; Gand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. / Q$ l ^2 ^" Z: rTAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 5 S1 q- C& T1 K* [0 `Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 3 e# E4 A* u: U0 x# {Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank . z' E$ ]1 u% ~Fragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. 0 ~4 d/ B9 Z! ]8 S7 kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ( R6 ?2 ?: F1 r' g. W291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. " s4 t+ B9 h: A) j3 ]& }2 lTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. 2 O6 y! F; ^: C: q! rTARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 8 U" M9 N$ g: }9 s, _0 oTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 7 R) Z5 j% a$ [Target Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 5 s& b# G/ o+ @1 y& y& z( Gregion of a sensing system. ! S: g, P5 ~/ f* G# T' ?Target Classification and Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. ; q5 c. D; R& J0 d- qTarget Discrimination ' P/ S* Q, U V; a( M" NThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one . F. l% {3 M, a! s" g- P- A/ ltarget when multiple targets are present. Target Object 7 g- X) K! @) x* b; ?# qMap (TOM) ; g2 t' W9 v' X( c3 {A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) 4 l4 z. ^' i0 S& d I" @; A9 \Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. ( ?" W8 r. P" NTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and identification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the ) v9 i' Y3 d( ]& _+ lpassage of a ship or sweep. . Z# c8 Y: J1 V0 O: _Target System 8 K1 ]; S4 _, ~, W5 F( oRequirements : {6 C0 }: S8 l/ }6 ADocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD ! F1 D. M/ t3 a4 Q% `4 \# Q3 jProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. 3 D: s! |! s) W# \% PTASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 6 x9 B% b7 ?( `; M* o" X! o0 V; Grequired performance. 9 v+ P9 I9 h4 KTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. & M$ p9 y' A& s5 cTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. , N; S9 c o2 \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. & d+ G3 k9 {$ R/ D2 PTB Test Bed. * V6 F X( h" h9 I( m3 k# xTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. & K, r2 l$ o J1 ]TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. TBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. 7 B7 J' r( O) rTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 5 I0 T4 f: ?5 Y( ?TBN To be Negotiated. 7 F! q: t5 j" }2 S ITBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. + J) P2 P, {7 s% }# q(3) To Be Scheduled . C3 `: ]9 d( R0 k. G8 TTCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. & t' Y9 B7 M. ?% w) K% pTCC Tactical Command Center. W1 R( u6 @9 [* o7 u( u! ZTCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. ?& F( q9 ~- wTCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. TCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. TCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 7 ?1 ~8 B9 I9 F$ b' p- J: \Countermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. 7 ]5 C# c( a4 C(2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. 5 {6 |+ a& |* xTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 8 U: e% w- A* q+ e1 J% x* Z4 C7 @293 # @2 \6 i Y& h+ z: d" RTDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. - B! i( G5 z7 h# m& P- ] k(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. 1 O( Y, G- [# KTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. : @6 J% ]# `0 T' ~+ vTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. 1 S- k( w5 U) j6 H% u) N# J/ s& n6 BTDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 8 h$ A; z. z* ]7 S" ITDOA Time Difference of Arrival. ' n0 I0 @( |* k% FTDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. : V) r3 ?( ]/ E# ~6 H(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 7 U% N# ]1 v( Y8 fTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ' S( \- o* D, N9 STDU Target Data Update. , n0 w! ]% P8 f1 g, QTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 8 `4 `/ @+ Q9 o) cTE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 6 O! k! J1 X ?/ ~& X7 c3 c(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. ) u- T& Q- a/ W/ h8 h2 J- ATEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. - h/ w6 D) Q0 v' RTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. + Z* \1 {% J+ uTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as 9 K* m% ~) L, vmanuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not * f9 {2 O; A% Z: ^technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) & t3 r. q {. }A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines 5 B& S# u6 B$ Mthe required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item ! Z+ z8 l8 t- Q1 q5 vperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 9 {% ~3 _" k, `+ T; Z/ l! L* U3 U' Xassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality 2 Z5 U3 r* S$ s3 w* U9 r9 G# Fassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical 3 j4 d" I* }9 @Evaluation The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 5 @- S$ @* D* n1 P4 t: _; ^the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 9 j0 w+ w% z; {8 @8 @2 gTechnical Objectives + B- H3 [. a3 ^2 k# Y/ u, VThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. # u! D4 Z1 Y6 o gTechnical Objectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS ( P: u& V. C% cdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. 4 L# q9 ]; ?3 J: E% k1 ^+ pTechnical - U; R6 Q6 r- @/ FParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk + d1 D+ r t5 R0 G! Z# Xanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by . F6 |$ X- I" d; t; c4 G0 `management. * ]" ]5 a4 }+ z% f' TTechnical 3 X8 o1 V( O" s: jPerformance Measurement + ]2 ~2 J- q4 E3 v' g( j( n7 s(TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 2 u( ]0 U) Y! o4 xbeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design ( ?/ R% m5 X' hassessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance ' E! r* I8 m# A2 _parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the 5 z" I, ~2 K' H/ R) J0 lvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures 0 b/ p1 j" [ ]# @3 a4 Wdifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product + J+ d$ t; C- m" L, |element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these ) i: F3 _* O4 X1 o/ |differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 4 N( p7 B! {$ Z; \# f7 Qthe basis for actual design development and production. 5 m0 K o5 G+ H9 P( @* iTechnical " x$ i1 q; O- ^3 C- dSurveillance , ~% H& d4 l" E5 s: x: H2 q, hIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 2 O+ @2 n9 B7 L/ `) Vemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise 4 i9 K. y' A' S* `% m/ W# ?targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology + K0 {: `# e4 Q7 ]Executing Agent 2 m7 R5 u4 @5 O% b! dThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management . Z# p4 |; ~- f! aresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 5 b* E! v3 o# VAgent. Technology Program + U3 i7 ]; p3 SDescription 5 x* w- k5 K& w @: c1 G. @$ g: uThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. ; l* p6 |$ s4 ^. o- t' CTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. 4 {3 t0 l- k/ c1 }9 A, C0 \7 OTED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 5 l6 M. ~1 G2 W# yTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. # M5 E5 }5 y; w0 }Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) Functions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit 4 f( o2 Y6 x+ g! Z: U9 G" T7 jmission commands to the satellite. & W! G) t$ v j5 }. qTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. 1 j+ v) C/ x9 x4 R2 ^TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. , K9 T& g* f; B b1 L6 p0 \: _TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. - @, ]# S) N9 XTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of , E6 F, ?: y; L7 Xcompromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) 9 h; d$ ~. E4 C' x: b9 A! ?TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. " T9 J- W! }+ a8 V$ P4 o2 iTEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. . D* C9 B {% c* iTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. ) q- m, V& v: g- d% jTerminal Defense 9 W3 X* z& J; B" o ASegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between 9 N% h9 |2 x; ]3 Y5 F# Xatmospheric reentry and impact. 0 d7 m2 Q* n: }; C" V$ C% s& FTerminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. 6 ?, ^, S5 f1 p: F2 G. h. XTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. - m- O# A" g: h% M; rTerminal Phase : h! [0 s% L! M& [Interceptor 2 v4 ^: [5 k* C8 v* z7 ?. p) W6 wA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the + E9 Y- \1 s* }0 K! A7 Kterminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 5 |+ M# ?: t! B% U/ \0 ]! GTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. $ V: X% c+ Z- j' fTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. ) W% q3 a2 x" u6 h6 t# wTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. 0 O9 q* E: v' Y; a$ h2 W* mTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. 7 _" { j" Y* _, K4 ~' JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary ; X* G- o% p. S M& Oconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all ( s& w- J. L" t4 H+ e _operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. $ ]' e, G0 u$ Y+ w0 J6 g* pTest and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 5 Z7 Y- m1 u( ^3 ?to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three & Q& A2 X5 `8 v+ z9 @3 |types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production , p+ L7 ], _- R; i9 i \# xAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted - k3 Z" e- ^/ ?) x6 Gto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a _+ ^3 l1 a6 @system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel 9 S) F: J K" \/ ]requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that 1 I7 E! m" R( _. G! l5 Athose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts ' C+ ]- m: _# `& K' b' L& ^. ~or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of operational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test 4 f9 j5 q3 y0 Y `2 bconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. . R8 a: a. t0 h% y$ O. t% aFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness % i, a; b9 m% z9 Mand suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of 4 L2 F! q( V$ mdeficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan 0 {* T+ \/ i: E" u. P(TEMP) ' F5 d3 a* k/ gAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate ' o: E, V3 ^+ t4 ~$ k, i7 Jobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the * H$ A4 K- e% TAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test J- }% f( X% I: D8 D0 h; Bintegration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the , ?' `* g a2 _& k: iprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling ( o9 ]" M6 p( k3 F& X, ]+ fproblems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 1 b4 g* v4 @# A8 Q7 l5 }) @) mrelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals 3 s0 N' c7 j* } r7 q8 d) e. cwhen there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software 2 s7 b/ h" G/ ?5 H3 r: {, H% Gand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. - W1 U+ F/ ?2 }, W' {# H& DTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. Test Integration Working Group 9 t5 n3 |# E/ ^: ]+ U7 Z: P(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 7 E- V% z1 d8 F v! e$ B Vdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target 5 l5 J( G3 v4 QVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. TEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. ) ~' `4 V* p3 m% z, BTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 3 v# W3 R8 ?5 U2 _6 MTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. * }* f0 `, ~: f) D2 \TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). % _, ~: Z+ q5 A& Z9 p, W, {TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). 5 z/ T# V$ `; F/ }& F! Y" A- f+ |TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. 6 b& W: Y5 o' l( B1 [$ S( o, z6 ]TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 2 V6 c- a+ {' Y2 V* d" T1 w) \TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). ( b4 w! }* X6 W" RTGS Track Generation System (USN term). . C' I) c- [! P( aTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. + ?. _: F1 O* mTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a / e+ O+ p+ t* [6 i# I4 N9 Vcommander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 7 k) E! H ~0 g4 B& x6 S6 N6 R* xTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. " V8 M( Q( N) v$ QTheater Ballistic 1 w% g# F+ c$ F7 s5 z( lMissile Defense * W% n! i' Q. [. S. P+ J; V6 U(TBMD) System * `8 B% d: \; m# fThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. 5 k' k( m9 X0 s6 W y9 O) }/ \7 I(USSPACECOM)