航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). * g& i: K* ^. \4 ?4 a: K1 U/ k2 S F: O(2) Science and Technology Objective. 3 n( [4 s+ K4 P8 E% C5 r& p9 lSTOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 0 j- Y5 j, X0 Q' ]. ] rStorage, ; ]* U$ F7 [: o5 v, [Handling, and Transportation $ _$ O1 m: S' k, iEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed 0 W6 ]) P& A6 P1 A7 k; Xduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 9 y8 z \) W6 f0 a6 [7 wshock and vibration environments, among others. ! `7 R! y3 E; B* L" rStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target ) }7 O/ T _5 t- P" |2 `Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. ( s7 a6 ~$ ]: O4 x+ N4 kSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. 8 K n7 \9 k6 c7 N' T/ tStrategic 0 v# I7 x1 r: m; h5 \, M- [3 zDefense 7 m% x1 C! D1 D& g' O4 [) s% W1 D5 eAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. : X. O. i* U- R; aStrategic Defense ! E+ J3 Q- M" X9 dEmergency 0 c. A. p. u' T0 a! p4 k1 [) w ` y! RDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. Strategic Defense System / `5 e- D4 U5 B+ i& j% g6 @(SDS) $ t/ I+ f2 {* l4 P8 ?% B" E2 S7 ?' ?A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. ) F1 g3 |( T+ C7 ?MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 0 C$ |# `6 H4 y z! Y280 Strategic Level of - M& ^) [/ J( K1 r/ C, aWar . o/ N" G1 {- @2 |3 J2 lThe level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. " Y* `6 d9 m, x" J) U8 D$ ?& M0 C3 }1 ?Strategic Offensive Forces (SOF) ( E2 ~7 y) T+ y% `8 D8 s4 ZThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific 1 M/ m3 D" r6 W" Y( DCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to 9 a. n j8 x3 S" N! R7 [- sstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply 4 f; e2 f6 Z) t$ y$ e/ ]$ odistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 0 p) t; u5 v# d8 ~9 U& O* J3 qStrategic Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. & p K" d* X( m9 l& n z& WStrategic ! s/ R3 \( F/ R- B* v1 EWarning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 4 O0 c; Y2 R7 }/ W2 q" P7 P+ lhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 3 N$ B; M$ \- D0 pStrategic Warning Post- Decision Time That time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic 8 E7 q2 d3 n+ M6 h/ Pwarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- Decision Time ) l: w) \/ {( S+ L1 `That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a 6 l/ w3 b4 F9 A- ]0 O% k/ Ndecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. ) @1 C" k% ~4 w: p! W! Y3 O! gSTREAD Standard TRE Display. # Y {8 T! O! f0 d1 R3 l3 L5 SSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). 7 i+ K2 D! G, N8 f% i# pStructured Attack & s; q, Z, {) g# L6 A: R0 x& WAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely 3 i/ R7 h/ O! Gtimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules * U# {; V3 K0 o3 Q/ zbased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data 5 ?5 N- p" {) o! x6 ~/ L8 Pflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured ; o& r/ V9 t. E% B7 @6 p. G7 T H% K# qProgram A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one 0 x) m. F" W; ~0 [! A/ B- {# Oentry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: ' X/ h& }) d! ^3 L* O* @0 xsequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 4 h4 W1 l8 z: P" c5 Ginstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. ( v& M( f3 |: Q# q( F! s5 c# K. x ?STS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. ! K N- @* ]* _; {- wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). (2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 8 K9 z0 Y( l4 OSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security , e0 q) G2 H% D! _; DLevel A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it * Q/ L7 z) F9 E# j+ S$ ^" s hhas both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- 5 m- r, o- R/ g3 F: lLaunched : k ^( R2 H8 ~- ]2 T$ {; `* IBallistic Missile : I% \, I6 q% l; T8 S! S* f(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 # ] d) e9 H2 Imiles. $ ]4 y( C9 x" F/ k" @SUBROC Submarine Rocket. # ?* t, r6 X2 A* Z* w ~1 C$ F; [. kSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. Subtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. SUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of 3 S' D0 h2 ] wCommand The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, 2 V' k$ Z" c5 hbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two ; Y% M# z2 c5 ialternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). 9 l1 j: \& w. p( o6 ASuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, ( [1 @1 W% w u- Gthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super 9 _! U0 M" C5 Qradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as % O A3 b# B2 z2 u2 W! m psuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 282 * {9 a' e" p& K9 H6 mSuperradiant Laser (SRL) A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not : z; a- J' t' u: z4 g, h+ frequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional ) r3 z4 X$ g- ^2 ^lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric $ I* r7 ~: Q& g M ]2 Nor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory ' s4 |3 D8 }$ W% w* y# a- BPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and ) |) ?, L" t* ~3 {" P: \: q3 jcontrolling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. % y7 G3 v4 Q) \5 W! Q5 WSupplemental Appropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the 8 d* j% F$ M3 t3 ^" \, w% |# imission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ) F- l" ^ @$ H# f5 K% D2 R' Zmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) & \0 R: ^& U- Z4 P( pequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). ; A8 A# S8 t; j& S/ R* \7 z' j( @$ ZSupport 2 _7 N5 Q( R8 M YPersonnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, % j& ~( }1 P- ^& E, B& ~administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for * {% |$ q' [2 Lexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, below the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess + U9 s9 ^; A( X3 H. [3 U; Y9 X8 }production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, " l/ r- G: A" ]# k) }and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric * R+ G" b! G* e! A$ K% O; Nsensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response " J: P: d; N) X- `% E/ u" F3 q) ?options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, 1 J3 w/ G, S4 GSatellite and Missile The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, and characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites ' X: d. h5 s9 `9 Sand in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System , [% e, C: p- P1 TConfiguration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 3 P& H% B2 t/ `0 T" B9 S! Gin the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S * l; L( g6 \0 l1 \283 Survivability Operating Modes " M5 N3 a: \% L9 o; a' x& |The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 8 t: b1 R5 Q+ j: kSurvivable and / d% e- e$ n, Y$ f! QEnduring 1 Z4 B4 `3 W; D; `Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. \5 Q# f/ [& r" O# G) ASUS Site Utilization Study. 6 ]2 b! l+ _; t! O9 J- t- NSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ! f0 b' M8 L6 B9 `SV Space Vehicle. 0 M2 s3 e! a; T6 S$ C4 D9 V* d) YSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. * \+ m& C1 `- L5 W# W! D( I# MSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. ! k$ S& R2 ?# H3 {7 zSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating , _ K2 O0 r- ~/ {4 nband of frequencies. / w0 s3 i; w5 O jSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 5 w4 L. F! Q# A, zSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. / P& y# E8 j6 @* i* c2 }+ QSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to ( K- _) n8 p# S, }one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. $ r7 o% M q7 B, lSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where ( L6 K5 o3 ^+ e7 \) l6 _& Z! Ieach module description has associated implementations. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points 3 u) ~; s e) b* T) _: P) walong a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is 7 O1 J4 a' a! j4 l5 N2 }( x# @theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance / c p- \0 G: S4 x' T- obetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's 8 X: ]& N( l! R( c, r% z' O( Bsignal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal 3 j9 v. Q( ^% m3 bemitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. 6 q/ q s: y& T: [Sys C/O System Check Out. . y! d2 m# g2 i# U' W$ V4 ISys Cmn System Common. ; t( y6 s, [( f- A/ hSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. # Z: [% j+ w7 `, x" x0 `3 jSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 5 Q* V9 R- h: G \. h* _5 U% jdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with % @) T- [% {9 k, `$ o3 ^. Dspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a 8 l6 r% _5 I- y* G8 v3 s) Ffunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. System Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System % d: `3 e, g, J, AControl. 9 F1 c0 p9 U/ H1 ? f/ |; M) HSystem 1 E) h; |, n% U# YArchitecture System Capability Specification + ^) N: ]6 S* u( k(SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system & k/ X2 s* a; Uarchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the ) |/ ?) ~2 X2 E R, _( Jelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among ! m) a2 J; [% E- O) x( L }5 lthe elements of the BMDS. System Center ! T( X* m) j; n6 {& I(SC) A center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. ! |5 D J; n4 E- f. BSystem Concept Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ( S5 a- a7 b d5 |( g& Zconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the " K6 d0 h& s5 w2 Gdemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board / t( b8 m/ g4 P1 I# H(SCCB) + u9 C0 u3 S1 A% n l% RThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. System Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. System-Critical ) |7 X6 P6 E3 H+ O. @6 e/ W) MFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's & g1 ~# V) N- f& O# pmission. System Definition Review (SDR) / T$ R3 R% C( }- D( Q6 IThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, * O) }# R2 s9 Q3 r& @2 Q" \+ Z1 ~9 pdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, * m( T. M$ w, X! f! K8 ffinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System Deployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 % l1 K5 F" u* y7 JSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy ) V. a2 X1 w9 o6 D! P. h/ \5 Qspecified system requirements. : s$ J0 I, K& I4 X(2) The result of the system design process. System Design Concept ?- V# J, i' A# W6 \1 W% aAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 3 H1 R6 E- b: y* qcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. % ^2 i" q+ [- l1 \( s) o& ?5 i7 V0 ZSystem Design Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with ' M, e6 ]- m' G+ R( g0 dthe allocated technical requirements. 8 G( F' |# t; s; |% [8 P" {System Effectiveness - I: e* T( E& p# O: ]0 \The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and 8 {! c3 ~. O" x' tcapability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 1 I9 z8 J5 O# }1 `' AExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS {7 A3 X: E' @$ W' X, T7 c( NDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide significant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to ) U1 J6 Z$ l! z& I, y, y; p1 sachieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. " z5 f7 c i- i9 h) _% DSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. 7 v# j* J, V8 y" n3 dSystem Generated ; [! S- c, ^" \Electromagnetic + I$ N7 b, }! ?2 n$ v: ?) hPulse (SGEMP) 6 A$ e% m$ J; jTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the , U$ o1 h* z! }7 k z2 F! gsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the , P8 G' P; L! r4 ]: d# ^5 ?primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the ! f( G2 m; v! {# u* Iobject in order to produce charge equalization. 0 E* g/ L2 n9 T$ ]; W( xSystem 5 o7 d) e& d2 A& k! yIntegration Test + z5 J! a% l" N/ BA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 5 T& R' ^# b- F( k* M: Q: Psensors, and weapon hardware. 5 v8 K9 i7 [; b8 BSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks / X' n3 ]2 K8 [9 o5 j) O+ u" \/ Gand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or 4 \) }# @8 I: g8 l! K6 Bequipment systems. System ; G8 a* W7 u/ a+ `& q0 FOperational ' w: R/ x" V2 x, R% W' WConcept . Z; _! n2 J& x. k6 A- O3 `- P% ]A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, : @7 w1 Y- A% V" Z( M4 w, qdeployment, and support of a system. % }. }" Q5 p* A# }2 M& ^: p) ~System * \! t& x1 t6 `9 S% c1 o- ?Operation and ) ?1 t5 K* q# p5 g# }Integration Functions (SOIF) $ h- A# t/ [- g. I5 y vThe automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command ' U8 r% X3 n& g! M' Cand Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of ]7 }5 r0 N3 _posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 6 C5 q9 J+ I+ g: ]; D& ASystem Program . b$ g7 W% f# g& m GOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, 5 ^& U$ ~ q/ B. H5 mgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational . ?2 F% L7 h' B; ~6 Hstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the 3 d4 V1 b1 x! l, }* Overification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the 7 _5 z( G' H9 @+ M$ h" @$ W% Icontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System Readiness Objective 5 ?1 _/ X9 V# B, j% qA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a : H/ T! O9 ?2 A' n4 gspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 2 i& f2 l3 `8 i/ ?. u9 ~( t! Acapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System ( N C8 @; _+ aRequirements 3 f) R! G5 O7 L2 }1 o& r) rAnalysis (SRA) 0 z$ X8 ^8 K$ g3 ZAn analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System Concept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine ) c+ r; W, s+ y" tspecific system functional and performance requirements. System Requirements Review (SRR) Conducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. System Security Engineering (SSE) 0 G+ T) ]" ]8 o' u& J* U. F8 CAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering : L. ~0 o2 `) R3 V" G6 gprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks : ^, d' O5 b# F3 R: {5 v! Cassociated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and 3 S7 d2 ^+ n) q; U' V' K5 I3 T# `analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security Engineering ' U5 P- k; _7 [$ V6 a1 EManagement Program " o6 W$ |6 f! o m5 T9 G(SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical ( W! ~" U" {( E) s+ C# Xachievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the ( i; I3 m2 K1 z5 Cdefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 2 T* B9 U# d* W& f. ~( h2 ?resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security Management Plan (SSMP) M. x* ^) q1 `' PA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to # s/ l7 K- b3 ?& B( w9 qmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, 6 @+ E0 [; i' X. W( B7 {methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. 1 |, {/ m; D* L F+ @1 ZSystems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. " O2 P+ `! S( _/ Y9 b$ Z [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S . E. R. N( k, e7 e4 N/ O" d8 d% {287 - b' j) G% n6 M2 O) c& j) A% _ oSystems Engineering d S; Y; l" z5 F# m, p! I5 }2 V. rManagement ; l% d4 C# l @( P7 sPlan (SEMP) 5 f9 }3 F: Y I! L/ VThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) 0 ]7 V+ d6 v: K. D* l a+ c3 \Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) ' {: W3 _* E; M! {3 J5 UKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test - l) `! a7 {: O( |7 JIntegration and Coordination , Z7 m7 V% y r/ n% cThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment 5 _2 b3 f& K7 ^9 wReport (STAR) Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a 2 P7 d; } P+ _, S5 }8 d9 L6 YService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency ; A& U/ D0 M$ I5 A/ L$ {; }and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset " c7 a. t+ ^6 j! T( }( OA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to 9 D" c, ]0 c% e3 n7 l8 n) Y4 h$ Pthe proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & G5 ^# f( k+ d4 `4 w) E4 U% m288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. , x7 W$ t3 _" `7 R% r7 NT&E Test and Evaluation. _# l$ N+ L: `; Z0 Z* ZT&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. 8 P: A% q) s1 f! B3 v" u c1 NT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 9 W: n+ o8 L: z! Z( [T/R Transmit/Receive. T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. T 2 7 Q+ N; P& R, T8 yE Technical Training Equipment. 5 G' z# Y" H& R% R& H9 fTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. ! P1 u- l8 d9 e' u3 {+ R6 gTAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. / K5 a+ s' O- G& {7 Q1 }TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. 2 e- N* C1 I: K5 Q5 c0 G' TTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. 2 r+ d" o9 n C3 S) n, QTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). 9 |. @% X6 k8 ~5 u* R+ N4 ETACAIR Tactical Air. 8 H' O( L, D$ C, ]7 w3 ~# U/ G0 [TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. 6 U. h: q0 _; W2 T7 e/ ~. eTACC Tactical Air Command Center. - z- @' _0 e% d) K5 C# Y mTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 1 u# s; H5 T, L; q3 e# nTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). $ V7 ]* j4 X" u" E- q6 NTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. ; h |6 I+ v/ F* N" BTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. ; A; J% J9 K& t' H. z) B- HTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). - V$ @$ t2 w/ g1 g& hTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 3 F9 S5 ~6 H L5 B' }' m; jTACON Tactical Control. ) ?2 D. b' u4 E( M& ETACS Theater Air Control System. $ `% }4 {2 J; {( G Q$ q5 XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 6 W9 W3 M" F' ~; lTACSAT Tactical Satellite. 6 X, C. q7 _* B, Z- kTACSIM Tactical Simulation 7 W5 a. U$ S: kTactical Air " l# S7 F7 m6 ?5 X5 vDoctrine , I' b! |2 H$ N- }' N0 sFundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air ) S: B5 b5 c9 E4 [. s& R+ e7 Kpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. $ b1 Y6 G5 J; L5 C; rTactical Air Operation 4 I- @- W8 I+ t& H! g1 yAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with . c Z6 p1 U- V# K( [ground or naval forces. * x. P" v# ^5 UTactical Air ! P% ^% l) [2 Z. s5 l2 k) k* POperations Center A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air : f- [4 `. l1 j& odefense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of ! X, b4 O* S! Y; |, gResponsibility # k& H1 K" X7 I, s8 G" W(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. ' y1 Z1 p8 N4 U. fTactical Ballistic l7 D& @! p! Z1 ]1 x6 DMissile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be / H @2 G9 i: t0 C, Y& c" R R" semployed within a continental theater of operations. $ o, H$ \( I" c4 @' z8 {Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future * I/ V# w. |( L# r; N* zdevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 3 @+ a' h: @/ o& hmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data D6 w) l ?! M/ J' RInformation link A netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of % V0 q1 b) j/ z: }/ ?3 ^War 4 A3 e4 P) E& T& ~$ N% I) lThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. 3 D4 f/ i' E/ l& b2 d! V0 V4 KTactical Operations Area 0 n6 `8 Z. S: l5 U8 k(TOA) ' O. o* v4 U% ]+ V* @$ p$ A$ W; Z$ IThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical Operations Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. . h0 G+ E O+ XTactical Warning (TW) / C# V0 k- G4 k% X) A& X(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an evaluation of information from all available sources. ) _8 T5 W8 V$ P! ^(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command - K+ t1 f" W# i% b% [9 R# n- pcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type : x* `' O0 X7 q6 }2 c7 ]and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical Warning/Attack ?9 `" h6 [3 @# I) r& a- yAssessment ! T3 r: K2 `( c- u6 D(TW/AA) + g8 A8 l+ U; B' |- }1 G( O; _A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack ! E$ N8 b) Q4 B% E* g$ qAssessment. & k1 I: [8 m2 s* J' OMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 m2 i5 C$ |7 V* A8 Y1 Y! Q290 P1 w* P# F, K3 T/ ]1 mTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. B# F9 x+ [7 t0 |( P+ u5 R6 Y(2) Theater Air Defense. - _% K: F5 `" B! g1 a) u% i(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. $ D+ r" m! y, \5 d* r( U0 lTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. 7 R" E, r8 _+ {7 B& i' }3 Q jTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. ( t3 g& ], N! f: e" }8 NTADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. + {0 H* E" p, m& kTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” 5 I4 H' n, b# x: [TADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. $ t0 c5 u* y& \0 |TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. - q4 C# j% \5 h" ATADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. $ Y: n9 f- r" A# h B1 u* aTADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. 8 Y; K$ u8 p/ _% r" o; {, ITAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. ( j: ?) w, d1 O% HTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ) D( U; k; U4 Y" h3 T3 o+ Q; tTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. / \/ {; o0 A2 k5 q; KTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). ; x! y+ [2 ~3 f, ~Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank 3 e% E/ e3 [' l5 P& XFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a . ?; v7 K- q& Rresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. # O3 k7 w; `$ A: |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " p4 Z* Z0 o) T: C4 r" c2 ]7 W291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. : {4 p# }0 @: `3 i6 r( E6 @TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. , I$ s! G' k3 _, `8 @TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. . g- c: r: C2 Y0 v4 i' I+ tTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. 1 q- ^: @) @) ~9 V* X* _7 U' FTarget 0 [: M* V) @/ ^1 ?- ^Acquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. ( I \. Y+ ^3 t6 XTarget 8 e$ G" a$ |2 u' ?+ B' f" d9 C- C8 gClassification * o5 M- d+ s0 Z3 @5 J4 xand Type ( @2 G' P, [ n1 z& O6 q2 MIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. 5 K: E1 H- B* k/ F& G( wTarget 9 V/ c- `. S$ I' \7 EDiscrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object Map (TOM) 8 A) ^1 _/ J( Q g4 u8 kA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 0 U& w! ?* A y0 ATarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 4 q% n6 V9 ` C; O* uidentification equipment. # ?: y& ^4 Z& f) u/ O7 q(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements # ^' s& h' d$ zDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 7 f; \" ]9 U" l# L' p# q8 ?& WProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target : o. p( p( o5 M, J8 d8 R+ nrequirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. % E3 N' |/ w+ x* w6 `' l" n6 iTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance ; `) u, V2 e; w" V( _* Oto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 8 Q& k/ R" f: J6 L n2 l* G' Trequired performance. " t7 I: M9 e* D; \# ^TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. * z" \' p- x( x# N$ L* h. k! S0 RTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. . C3 ]4 T' m/ G6 u3 mTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 8 ] [* V! N Z- j, sMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. # o3 i# B6 p) ~TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. ; H; ]. J$ V5 Y4 \) YTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. , S5 b+ K. K8 h/ g- kTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. ( Y- f) r( i+ P% X, h5 jTBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. : U& X# I9 H5 Y' v8 i- oTBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. 4 o* m5 h& H! }, v7 |TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). 0 o9 @8 W/ l. e% i: a(2) To Be Supplied. ' D: U, e) [( B( e5 F% H5 b(3) To Be Scheduled 0 L+ w# u, R* [3 @. TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. 6 E1 O1 d, Z1 P- B6 rTCF Tactical Combat Force. ; d4 \) L6 ^% iTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 4 a, F) R- ]* Q cTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). 9 e. m4 B" J' K) p* i; iTD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. ' k0 t3 N: h9 f3 ]5 W(3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " o; r. M" D, [+ ]293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. - a1 V, C3 D! v) Y" e' y8 lTDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. g; x& `; O7 l" gTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). + k7 f& {" B) y7 Z3 mTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. ' J, w. L- r B+ B(2) Test Design Package. 5 X/ k0 O( K! o+ Z+ d(3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. 0 O) X3 s2 \4 N" U/ rTDR Terminal Defense Radar. 6 H6 H1 b) P' NTDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. ' }' Z! T- G! m0 p2 |! qTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. 1 [5 a1 e7 e. |$ e% q" k2 ~1 LTDU Target Data Update. , ^% q$ L7 s- h R# |TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. 2 ]0 ]. G$ p! C3 f(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 2 m6 n9 E+ L% Q$ j) H+ OTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. ) N4 N" F9 N4 G( O+ j( lTEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. + J% U# I- R9 z4 R% D& O3 v! gTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical ) u, R+ ]% |! [- U6 z/ O4 sTECHON Technical Control. : Y5 Q Y1 A8 mTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ) P. s9 i2 T O3 s# O" a, G294 & [2 i0 p0 o& p% q& CTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as + g$ z) \- U8 `8 }manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. . L. |+ D8 o3 Q9 L. m9 O1 p1 LAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data Package (TDP) 4 ^0 j8 Z. y9 |2 @A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, - K& i0 N7 V, S& b) M xassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical Evaluation % ^$ s: A3 t$ n/ }' m* @. HThe study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) 1 {7 o0 s* `' `+ YTechnical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available . ~! c0 X: i+ t+ j) R) R- F. Qfor stating binding technical requirements. : k7 I3 s9 P$ zTechnical Objectives & . s8 v' }1 g, w4 h% a' d3 CGoals (TOG) ! e' x# }8 u3 F& V8 ^2 mHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. ) R3 e( N0 t9 ITechnical Parameters (TPs) , P1 N% N4 E$ nA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk analyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. Technical % x: n/ e$ C, x E9 [Performance . p9 f0 Y7 s/ t& C nMeasurement (TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product + U7 G: Z7 A7 E7 P# P( {$ ~& r+ velement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these 0 r9 Y0 T& J) b& \2 b% q0 A% Xdifferences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form + ?: m# t( l% @the basis for actual design development and production. % X6 Y: Y) `$ iTechnical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 7 l! c: S' J4 `- Q& p3 Aemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. Technology . G! t3 Q0 I; |$ N! qProgram 2 \ N0 J. h+ H) H, UDescription 7 a* c7 K7 Q# ~# Q7 A; n- OThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. ( `( W; B) ]7 H9 YTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. ! e! n% d+ ]; t& ^TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and , g4 Y6 M- Q# d! cCommand (TT&C) - h* M4 l$ D5 W+ Z! n2 s7 VFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit ' I0 d* l+ [1 P6 O" Mmission commands to the satellite. 7 G3 j5 M$ {5 p% o cTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the * z0 g! K4 h* W x9 l/ wautomatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. , M. y! t: d+ H, Q1 C( z# mTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. ' g+ ^% j) M* y9 `7 NTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. $ @. I7 F3 m4 h# r5 QTEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) TENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. * n; @) R& Z4 m" H, ?* }TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report TERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. % ~4 u' s* y Z! c' r2 H" u( _$ s f, VTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. 5 E2 H# F7 ]# i2 kTerminal Defense ; h, d% A2 R7 P/ SSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between / r" i B% w9 a* datmospheric reentry and impact. $ Z6 C2 h0 Y, o" |& Y cTerminal * n7 @- a/ I0 S* ?% nGuidance & G2 f* H1 Y& }0 }9 gThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase & y, f' K5 F( v, N, O! Tand trajectory termination. & f& g, [' d" c& |9 H2 ~8 YTerminal Phase / [' ^* q/ H1 W, }$ H' U4 W4 AInterceptor 8 |, K! C8 a& n# _9 PA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) 4 ^7 M/ S$ ~: |Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. 4 m* |! `7 [( A% MTERS Tactical Event Reporting System. 4 L5 C( Q! ?$ v2 t: Q- ^3 JTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T , [3 r5 i5 I' K& Q" ~" U: u296 ; q' ]* J( o) ^; [ uTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary # J) C7 w; a5 E0 jconsoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 6 C0 ^0 A& s- p' Janalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) Process by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 2 y6 k/ t" P7 N3 Q ^2 Wto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production * f9 t9 h3 {. _/ tAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted * S3 ?- K' B& B" D6 [, _! xto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof * n8 d4 T7 @ b6 ymanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical 2 x2 j* W' t8 Vperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel , [3 w3 [# _7 q; g# J3 qrequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts % K% O' m8 D2 H# m2 a5 |1 qor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational ! [3 q% {% K" b) s$ Z0 ^( W7 d(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before . z7 V) A( `- s! Pthe production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of 8 J3 V+ s) U6 Foperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic ^ G' s( d9 x) N5 ^ t9 Penvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate - B W$ U0 X: U' ^4 [! Eobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ) o9 M H/ M, C4 ?! G3 t2 searly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. 3 m2 E$ H* H& d& w$ qTest and Evaluation 7 S4 A' X3 A7 U. B+ VWorking Group (TEWG) / U; ^& I- l1 {9 F: Z; GThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the 5 e: f$ A r* S- C; v! sAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of : [7 N Q1 R; s! l3 W+ @+ Stest data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the / P' |4 Z! U9 a) Kprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling ! Z t* d$ g9 c% B! ^problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. * C p. Y3 \6 `5 z fTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. . u9 K' z$ t7 F5 ]- g# wTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. : P) R8 z2 |3 s) U( Z( z. F8 [Test Integration Working Group (TIWG) % i D- x9 q6 i' w- F- kA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in 3 [4 I+ D) Q# _" u k( K* jorder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. & F& V# n4 D3 z& ^Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, ) g! P% T* f; k3 X' }test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation : O9 |: v& U* e5 Xcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 " p$ i( Y$ u! t# F3 _9 UTest Target : h% l: m: I+ y: g6 p+ P- AVehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. - ^& q0 M4 y' A8 w8 eTest Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. , }9 Y7 o- P& [' j1 ITEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 7 L2 n$ y' k; ?2 x$ e2 \TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). 9 g: R* `* H5 x7 ATEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. 2 S( J' Q% j1 S. U' B5 l5 qTF Task Force. 6 S8 B' Z( E* G% n0 KTFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. ( O4 E, w! p; @; bTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management ) g6 {% l! h6 j- p4 PTFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. TFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 6 z( \; J/ i7 c6 O: u6 j4 B$ XTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). 0 v% w7 X& c; V9 zTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 2 F% s! N( d D% k3 j" l: vTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). 0 c- h. Q& M& O: n6 BTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. * Y0 j7 N/ T; G4 q! _Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. , }5 @5 u( ^. x( o+ ETheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic 8 V+ f; q! ?+ |% `Missile Defense 4 T4 v, q/ d1 L) g K7 }(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 8 k* p* [& G7 J- l, ?ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)