航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user 9 E$ ?* f a% ^access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. " I+ s5 Y, }3 jSTM Significant Technical Milestone. $ r% y+ t. B' |; lSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). 0 }/ [4 t% ~* t. `9 A8 `# \, n(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 0 l# s" z( B+ f; g5 g7 uStorage, Handling, and Transportation Environments + w2 G0 h+ c! \# e* d5 \These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient environments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during . ^0 M0 c/ y' C. Rstorage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, + k% `$ M3 e2 M o! L) t5 i, y; \shock and vibration environments, among others. 0 R9 O( `* Y x5 R" I) h! k0 KStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. Storm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s $ X" b0 v% l8 E/ R6 \: B: A: pApache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). 6 w; K1 S% ^; }8 J* N8 p- PSTP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. STRAP HATMD System Training Plan. - l& O3 p1 D+ ~; FSTRATCOM Strategic Command. 1 j( u' Z6 ^1 F% m WStrategic Defense + v& i" s3 m0 o/ M1 `7 d1 W; MAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat ballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. 6 v; Z2 z# {4 NStrategic ; F9 G! Q& s' _7 `Defense ; r3 d3 E9 ?9 X# E8 H( {+ aEmergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. 0 \ h, c- |7 W5 T+ D5 e7 ^Strategic Defense System (SDS) " M8 r, }, D9 i. f1 v' BA generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S ! _& y4 e2 q5 J$ r280 Strategic Level of 2 w& Y5 H% d& k: n* \% ]- zWar ( X8 F2 q8 |9 f. T& ~+ T7 ] \The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to 3 V+ Q( N Z: [! P1 o* eaccomplish those objectives. 6 _( W( R1 J- d$ ~% A% j _Strategic 2 `" t7 P k7 V4 @0 ROffensive Forces (SOF) + h X3 D. k9 V8 D, sThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific + o: S6 j9 R; a% Z6 w" i) jCommand, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 3 O0 ` {8 e. c& c# e1 FOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, - X% b. N Q% h' ~FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve That quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to strategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply + j) Q* {, U" H" O4 zdistribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. % n9 Z% w4 [/ n% rStrategic 6 H C6 R4 B9 L) i0 E6 ~+ iWarning ! m$ j& n+ P" F' ~% iA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. 8 g" o5 Q2 i+ m; d1 u% aStrategic - }* ?3 x4 V$ F4 e/ F( WWarning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of 2 T3 e8 [$ G: \4 rhostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. & R; J: @, F& nStrategic Warning Post- 9 m" O; r+ H$ R+ pDecision Time 0 q0 z2 F, p/ ]4 W* ~* g, R. b9 AThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the 8 \0 C# m' @! t6 Mnational strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in the pre-decision period. 4 G& a$ n0 S6 `# N2 |2 G! u' qStrategic $ P& D, k+ ?* s8 `Warning Pre- * @- V' I- ^) ]4 F: Y2 q# q4 u% m8 k8 WDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a k8 V$ y: c+ t9 H! A! c" v! j+ ndecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. STREAD Standard TRE Display. STRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured / D' _( y7 X9 U/ w5 ZAttack An attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely 7 j5 L1 q' ?$ q" ~# C* H$ u$ Rtimed for maximum strategic impact. Structured & |8 C( q+ d* ]2 GDesign % z9 ?4 |! q. ~$ [9 `A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules - Y7 t! H' E7 |2 V3 e6 A% Ybased on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data flow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program : G. w7 U+ y) v; D K6 `2 K& iA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: ) y. W, {& F6 E. Z6 J5 I8 ]2 h9 `sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 0 V# Q. O O0 }+ R& d ginstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. # ?: I9 |" \) {) J9 eSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. STS See Space Transportation System. # Q6 c! a' h6 mSTSC Software Technology Support Center. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S . _. i+ B! s, D# n; d281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ( a7 X: j+ v, N4 ?# j( l% N, T# E! ~4 W(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). 9 Y" H1 p2 r8 N. U; W; N2 GSTTR Small Business Technology Transfer. 4 k7 }$ v3 x' |! S+ _% b# pSTU Secure Telephone Unit. STW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. . {( _( p1 Z! D5 p" O* S) l. sSTWG Simulation Tools Working Group. + f( s5 a6 a0 j1 C, [Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which 2 ], w8 ]) \4 X4 \" @is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. ( Z. g" m6 S1 s: ISubcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. . |3 {. z. T4 bSubject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. + u; F" l; K9 j3 ESubmarine- , a$ g1 n6 t( @6 d V- m$ B' {Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) # B3 ]' u3 f) R" k: o, r. [" k: U3 O0 @A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 ; R( \# k. f9 y i" m& K3 a* Gmiles. 0 }+ [- Q# ?! [4 ~$ O* F# I) a/ XSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function 1 @8 t4 D) U; r( cwithin an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. , D; u5 E. P" ^8 a$ _Subtractive Defense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. , ~. J3 O: e# h' W2 FSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 9 O$ ~7 R( E) d! cSuccession of Command * e7 E% J, M4 K: ]; ]/ eThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, " A1 d, e8 o( M' J$ fbecome de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command ' Y+ u1 G5 t1 D5 s7 Yis a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to decisions about future use of resources. 8 S& R. \/ U( H- Z0 RSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). ( c; r0 V7 x/ R n/ D# k8 KSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. 0 G/ k" U9 k5 v; E) VSuper Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in : A8 b- B# z- r; _9 fa single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, / S+ K; `3 l; w- }; h- K% O' Lthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super * {. T/ \+ [) b! aradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 9 X3 i5 v3 \ n4 C282 * ]* U2 T K5 N* [5 ?; Z( sSuperradiant Laser (SRL) ( w* r! d5 {2 z1 zA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not # s0 I) m4 I3 `. z- I" p$ S- Orequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 8 J9 A6 W8 U( j# D& m. Asuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. 1 ]% t$ v4 N4 M0 qSupervisory 4 J& c2 C/ _$ V- Z2 ]1 l7 H) ~3 ~7 ]Programs / c* L4 t+ p. }2 Z. [* S0 w+ xComputer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. 5 U: }/ w. U9 ]+ A9 X4 DSupplemental Appropriation 4 c9 ~9 L, Z$ s N5 Z7 iAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support ( i, F1 X5 P* b6 oEquipment ; X* }1 L7 \( u: {All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) ) b; P$ I+ X. f. D2 m9 S: b8 d1 c/ zequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly & @2 z+ g( z" K1 j) Q! h' \tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and ) ]2 y# K; ]* Bprotection equipment). Support ! a- _3 [ g; T- Q8 XPersonnel - w, V. x( R" o4 H0 S* m% m" sIndividuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly associated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, 5 o. c" R f1 I1 |4 r' s" A6 @5 _administrative support, and the like. # }4 t: T1 `; v F9 `' uSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for ) {5 x! y6 H; Y+ u* u7 iexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. # k% N3 X2 H4 v: zSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, 8 R! c' E8 a8 s+ C1 h1 f8 fbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. # b- W, s0 _% jSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. SURCOM Surveillance Constellation. 1 W' {* B+ {/ X. q8 r! m& gSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items & X- i: H) W3 o, z% S5 j2 wdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess & {2 F z- w. sproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity \, I0 c) k* V( Wmeasures. 4 H) W7 P3 n; V0 p! lSurveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, 4 n$ E: v0 w. W* d8 mand meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance & }9 R3 ]; m9 J: i% R3 h6 Y1 ERequirements % z- r3 R S) ?; C" pRequirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for + U. O7 r6 O) E1 t% ?coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and Missile % ?+ F$ ]$ R8 S- ?9 C( U* ^The systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, 9 u0 ~' z+ C# ^) x' Fand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. Surveillance System Configuration The sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated 5 Z8 [% b; R% ?* v# Y7 g6 Kin the surveillance system. ; L. A0 _5 V" M( @# wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 6 x: ^& D' B: H) b8 j' `; JSurvivability ! g( b G& E# v* iOperating Modes 6 J+ Z' n ^2 g ^The operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. ) K4 z2 d! O$ ASurvivable and Enduring 9 i( k" T# C6 f: I% k5 D/ BCommand Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. / J3 g% A! i4 A; B$ H7 N/ S' I MSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. SW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. ! q, E# \5 i3 ESWC Strike Warfare Commander. 5 D5 n- v, z" a2 ^$ d6 ?Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating band of frequencies. SWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. 2 u, @& F: \7 t. |& G6 w8 J; K5 }SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. ' n8 V) @4 f4 `: }" USWSC Space and Warning System Center. * g1 h# q3 Y6 A/ q: D1 K0 bSYDP Six-Year Defense Program. 2 i8 t7 B* G- b5 CSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. / P1 t# i# S& _9 FSynthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. ! f, D& B: P2 NSynthetic " u4 {& {- o3 [8 t. rAperture Radar 2 {+ P- D& T9 D0 c- m(SAR) * D6 d6 S- ~2 S. o" b, L! `A radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is - q1 G$ [: u# l8 L( ]3 ytheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 7 l# T9 f& K4 L+ D8 ]" ebetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. + K! G+ w! D6 o2 c% A O: J. LSYS System. 8 Z7 E4 u0 m+ b5 @& @- q8 xSys C/O System Check Out. 8 E6 z+ W# v) J; _# X6 }" E8 KSys Cmn System Common. ) i: I' Y" q- u: y3 }Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. ) v; `7 x8 h( O2 z$ A9 D" UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S & P: @5 |' c- F" ^284 - U5 r& m% X7 Y7 y% }: m# YSYSCOM Systems Command. ( U& L2 F$ F6 R0 F! pSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 0 A F" r/ Y0 Z, U) z# S {, Udata, and services needed to perform a designated function with 9 u. X8 J& u: r3 {9 Aspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a * u+ U3 b/ d' l# sfunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. , G5 ~& A9 l/ _3 g' A7 DSystem Activation $ D6 R: C9 A) {2 j) m. {That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions % H9 ]5 E8 Y( Vimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System + m% `0 b4 j% yControl. System Architecture & P' y5 q2 O1 \" E XSystem / J0 R6 U2 v- G3 l8 s r; PCapability 5 a" {1 A7 Q- J% c- KSpecification (SCS) 4 u: g2 H7 G* f3 b! EThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system & F, R$ E' \% R4 B. p2 j& Y. ]architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational % {) k% F4 t, F$ O" genvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the ' u' y, Z- B$ C5 Ielements of missile defense systems. f( X5 _3 }& I% OThe government document that translates capabilities into functional specifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center 5 x7 D8 u) }% W" `3 ]' _: J(SC) " V- L# i' E+ N. v; C" n* U/ y; LA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of 0 F4 n) c/ N/ Eequipment in CMAFB. System Concept Paper (SCP) : h# B% M3 U, tOBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the ) `3 {, M! Z6 Q @+ [- z+ Cconcept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition 8 J% i7 v0 M9 @! p4 Ystrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the # u/ o. A& z+ ^+ Z) r0 b Ydemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board 1 g. s9 W, T% J5 J2 X(SCCB) & C8 E0 e4 k2 ^The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. ; D$ X' o4 v! x F. \4 hSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and $ ? O* }* ]% n% @2 I& x# |1 Pcomputer systems. 3 x0 @0 Z/ M3 g6 K7 k. oSystem-Critical " u6 h! b3 P. b2 M$ d" P8 HFunction ! o* F' i+ G! f2 T! IA function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. System Definition Review (SDR) , i- ?6 e$ D% k2 m+ oThe formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and $ {: L' l0 W, tfunding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, 3 D$ m7 Z3 o( l* C5 Q0 c8 Sdetailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, @% l' `4 F* f9 tfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System 7 y' ~$ \) O" L8 S" t7 B- D: zDeployment Delivery of the completed production system to the using activity. 5 h$ p. f+ g3 c6 E2 n) eMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + `6 m' s: p! F285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy / l- T4 W; m$ t3 U1 N& R* n* gspecified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. 9 x( h2 d" o4 a8 ]( [System Design * C* u. l( k6 Y2 G* }- ZConcept * u8 @/ t" n: u# c7 u" Q6 mAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and 0 h3 T) X0 U7 s7 [0 n& gcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be 0 ~9 w2 X( ~0 e5 p5 Zoperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. + Q% F( G6 _( A! l: K: s& _System Design Review (SDR) $ O% {2 j6 d+ B, u5 IEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. System Effectiveness 9 F0 B9 f- c- z z# X( ]8 ?The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set . G* u+ f# V% r3 C- C( l$ P6 kof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and capability. System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS capabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 1 Q4 v9 W. e% {5 c& j* y- N SDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and ; _% E% p. U) e2 |$ ?! }7 Iassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide z4 D9 U7 L' J# v! N0 D2 m1 Fsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. ' P$ E) N# ?3 w, e5 r) Z+ pSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System Generated j! D+ J' P1 S' c% M0 YElectromagnetic & m7 M# q2 L l: O0 K3 w2 WPulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 6 q3 W; r9 L! ?+ ^surface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the " d4 D0 P9 G8 q# s# v; _9 Q! oprimary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the 9 |- c- T! t8 _# z* j" Cobject in order to produce charge equalization. 9 j& V- o4 V' i* {. w% o3 s8 xSystem 7 D( @; m7 k7 n5 V9 zIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 1 \" u2 A1 m, T9 A1 psensors, and weapon hardware. System Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or # @0 }, f9 p& U: ^4 Yequipment systems. : {9 t! y1 { J* I" Y2 [System Operational Concept 6 r: ^' r0 l' X5 o# H/ V& TA formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 8 c" H4 Q9 z" L( FSystem Operation and Integration 1 b6 J. n* l( Z9 g" YFunctions (SOIF) , b! D' p! F- K1 b$ {The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and % G, c, g. s1 _$ H0 nbattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). 6 V2 K; F1 l; O# e: ^! o- v j) y, D KSystem Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic + R: q: F4 J0 d3 B/ {) HBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. 4 t2 _, I r7 L, ^3 }' d8 q! }MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 286 System Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System 6 i2 y; S+ m+ L) v/ TReadiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority " k/ p5 K* \* Y4 T+ S, V% d# b. g7 qalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the ) @6 @8 ], w$ r- W4 g1 k2 ccontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions j/ m/ a9 `$ H* B+ l1 c* Onecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, ! ~0 ^ s" x* o2 i' J: }historical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results 5 `6 }. t, b* z! F9 E2 Ostatus reporting. System + Z V* q" p# F3 ]) mReadiness Objective , {7 l0 y/ x# b. {A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a K) _$ ^% M& o0 M2 s6 v3 Nspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ! v: r) t; o0 m* Vsystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System " j6 F- n# ?9 U0 r, D! I, }Requirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System ' X$ p. ^# o6 N) H3 D+ pConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System 5 K7 A4 d M7 y- ^$ P) X9 }Requirements Review (SRR) $ e! l1 C. X8 p8 AConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. $ @/ m- H4 `$ G7 G* ~% Q$ `- ?* ?, nSystem Security Engineering % S6 S$ ?7 u6 }4 k" d/ A% t0 p(SSE) + w. S, R U BAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related # {8 X7 L1 u! i. n; m9 ]1 p9 F \scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to / I( K; C/ S% E8 z; `! |security threats. System Security $ `* a% G' f5 [$ |% c" d7 fEngineering ( s' h* ~, T7 r; _3 j* V0 S% U' RManagement Program (SSEMP) 2 k7 K* f$ t. J( E( SThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE 3 A3 G7 k4 ]4 h; b1 Yprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the + r+ u; }% y+ I' P. N( |6 ndefense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. System Security & ?, L1 q' I( U s* X/ NManagement Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. 7 U0 q% ~) J' w9 `Systems & c( K& t- }9 j7 k0 UEngineering 1 S0 D' m% Y; Z1 U% C0 _An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle , X. P- ]- t& f6 x$ Vbalanced set of system product and process solutions. 8 G5 m, N7 G" p# B$ ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 287 Systems ! ]5 \* M# m B7 ~/ WEngineering 2 x% V1 |9 D& x- jManagement : @/ Y# x. @* F6 z# k) E0 W3 s( ]# HPlan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) Key engineering milestones and schedules. 4 B8 `' ~% r/ [9 ~$ b1 V3 jSystems Test * e. ^( l2 Y9 [5 _+ c, FIntegration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. System Threat Assessment 3 z2 x7 m7 v! oReport (STAR) ) L5 D* O6 N. R+ pRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a Service's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when ; i5 F+ {% B% D9 Uthe threat changes significantly. 6 |" q; E* H$ U& {0 ]2 [( H# ySystem-Valued Asset ( j) L1 r3 G7 k# _* N* e: u: l/ cA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. U+ Q0 S9 ?' R6 y/ E' A, {T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 6 V2 J1 B. z- s& m4 ]$ L3 }6 kT/R Transmit/Receive. 8 r* @* C6 ]# YT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 2 v/ R% T( Z' G% tT 2 Technology Transfer. 6 C( }+ @$ h0 p" g* {T # g8 Y: |2 S& B+ N9 b. F- P y+ {2 " r: T1 a% O0 O0 ~- sE Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. 3 b- ?7 l: F) V( O- HTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. {4 `5 O' s% L U0 r1 l1 OTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. ! `, I5 e( }7 U' R# O! h# vTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. # O5 d$ S) M' cTAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. ' a( I* x9 C, C- H% @' oTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. % Y% J. Y, ]0 S( K; G4 B eTACC Tactical Air Command Center. 1 \& b, Z- c# {8 W! [) hTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 4 b; o7 a3 `6 DTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). . a, }/ x0 F' \. A. mTACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. + ^7 V9 Q+ G" A& q, ?TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. * v S( q# J0 [$ ~TACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). " J6 {3 w$ y& a, t% KTACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). 3 A! O n6 O# o1 L. lTACON Tactical Control. 7 k9 d* @0 f3 _TACS Theater Air Control System. `9 F# |$ E/ U9 | `7 ]# yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 2 |* b! H Z7 d6 f( I( W6 n289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. - h" B4 Q$ Y3 r9 `4 mTACSIM Tactical Simulation & {0 ^* {7 R/ n& jTactical Air Doctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. % I5 p% N' N8 C# v: wTactical Air Operation " Y: q, N, `) U/ |An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with * l, f- y3 I/ w+ j; [; J* N9 ~ground or naval forces. 3 X: D4 A- l5 D$ C$ m; G3 w6 STactical Air Operations 2 X1 D2 U+ A8 h6 z' UCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air ! z: ]: H% n7 {0 r- h; R4 K$ Vdefense operations in an assigned sector. % J) x- l) i: n; vTactical Air Support Air operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly + z! o3 `0 B9 S' uassist land or maritime operations. - a( U# M/ {+ k- G) x# vTactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) + f% F: ?4 c# c0 O# I& u. DA defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and coordination of support. Tactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) " e9 }/ T- S$ n7 t; {) b' @# lA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future development of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or t: l1 i5 U& ]% Q, C- emaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. ) _! j1 ?; j9 f- rTactical Data k! \% F6 A( ~/ I$ d6 zInformation link : D6 v8 Q3 a/ K3 Z8 p4 i5 yA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. This means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of War 1 p6 n1 p8 a. N* ]9 bThe level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 2 J1 l8 w% Z, v5 \accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. - r0 ~7 Z, h# p U) fTactical ! F0 u4 @; p$ n# b8 A5 E: ?Operations Area - z( A9 ^$ e; U5 D(TOA) That area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations ' u3 Z- {& ~; Aarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. Tactical Operations Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff concerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) 0 H5 B7 r Y( z+ H9 Z6 z; j. I( z(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an " ~& d3 t3 c8 r2 revaluation of information from all available sources. 7 q3 f$ Y# L5 o& C(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command % w7 { S% g# l$ B- Y: \, L# ecenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component ) ^! g+ d8 V/ u& Velements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type ! h3 e1 G* S! W1 y$ G/ }; c. c. {0 E! Oand size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical ) @8 c4 h# p6 Z8 H* ~% a9 V e0 P2 T0 KWarning/Attack Assessment ) C2 Y3 F3 q" j6 D4 @7 X) N8 R(TW/AA) % A5 Z8 X6 V- M; `4 c/ nA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack : e4 n: C( S: O9 P: M! r" XAssessment. * C. Z& U6 v) ^' U9 TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T * b9 S" @3 r) M290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. : w5 E2 `- ^, n' A' x( d/ C(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. 4 f4 w" M- S# c3 q6 }; a. l; bTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. ) W+ b) a1 ^; y9 Q' ZTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” ! D1 y+ M. c" t' w9 C- CTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. TADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. ) o9 {+ @+ o, p4 N9 B4 w& RTAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. TAI International Atomic Time. TAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ! [$ C* s% W# R8 ^6 ?$ KTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. . ?* v' P5 @ y9 y+ S9 [Tank Fragmentation 7 A; v# N6 ^ o( s' DThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 291 TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. 0 R) g* v) X$ e& _TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. & h; \- X" N& Z0 Z3 p/ v/ {; \TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. (2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. & |2 u. f9 l9 ]' L, KTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. Target Acquisition + p4 \8 F1 d9 q2 ^( [The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage 7 Q. u+ a5 e; T5 E% a g' E4 Pregion of a sensing system. Target : u, B! U: y, @6 nClassification 7 k: c, ]7 h5 D9 o& mand Type 3 v7 A5 \+ X1 h0 H3 \8 r/ }3 SIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, 7 a# {$ C1 ^# Q! Y4 g, q6 Q; ydiscrimination, and intelligence data. 0 G3 m* e0 V7 d% }& cTarget : Q b# _. p( RDiscrimination + D5 \; P/ X5 |) h3 N4 `0 b8 E8 N) |The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one - X: i8 M5 X+ l1 i& D: f/ [/ v! L& jtarget when multiple targets are present. 3 `$ Q, f3 t T$ d# R) F; eTarget Object * H2 V7 B' G1 E+ ?& jMap (TOM) / H* m$ Y- C0 V3 lA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and / \% i1 u; B& k( Jother objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in - n h: d3 q: d7 F; C/ utarget designation. (USSPACECOM) 9 |' s: }3 j6 [! @Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. Target Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and ! {! B$ O3 X" ~; b; {4 ?" widentification equipment. ) ]8 _+ Z; w0 [0 K4 P4 }(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System . R8 P9 e% m# J3 ?: S( CRequirements Document (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target 6 \, c+ ^+ `* A$ @6 Y# R5 D% ?requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. Producing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Tasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and 1 W1 d0 G* o, T9 lrequired performance. ) |* G- t/ _7 R3 r5 e% pTASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. 3 g$ [# W2 q6 jTASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T + } p/ N* p, ~292 ' [9 p( U0 {3 F: T' w1 @# hTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. TB Test Bed. 9 O; d: o. o! E' T+ TTBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. % g, C) t5 K( F; Y. X& cTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. TBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). % a3 K5 U' ?+ Y# z8 z) K9 h(2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . ( a1 _& n8 A7 R% y. q: { `, ]TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. % Z7 G9 ~- d8 o# z9 A1 V" t( i$ \TCF Tactical Combat Force. ; r( g8 w+ n3 O, zTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 4 P$ t; x! D# [; P- I( i! YTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 6 I' m) [$ L: W+ Y% n1 eTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 3 m3 @8 [9 B; o6 Y0 |* VCountermeasures Mitigation). / d5 l: q+ X- h7 E0 s2 Q2 u. ATD (1) Test Director. 8 O9 V% Y" v" c( k7 z7 ?3 T(2) Technical Data. ]1 s8 A; Q7 _ @; Z! i; K7 w(3) Technical Director. - k4 E; X: s) Y6 [1 p(4) Training Device # @. w/ u- l! ZTDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 293 . A. w( g$ `5 uTDBM Track Data Base Manager. ( J/ ^- X" K1 B9 M2 E' @$ YTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). - u* |3 J! E# u d7 b: R" o2 R0 D9 kTDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. 8 c i! B$ N8 UTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. 9 | g% N2 x2 {, ~* u. F7 tTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. ( z, Q8 B+ z3 ?4 p; }3 U6 B0 BTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). # N, a) @. h U: m2 n& K" vTDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. (2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. TDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. " s* v1 K& k8 h ~TDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. , k* ~7 V+ I2 {& hTDU Target Data Update. 7 f4 Q% O4 K! a. b6 X1 kTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. & X- b* |4 [6 g. I4 p! }+ I' ^TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. (4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. 9 }2 h0 [) g- R# v( p& z5 b. FTEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. 5 {; L$ ^7 O3 k4 n' K" a9 K$ JTech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician # w( T$ f* C+ f/ C. TTECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. 6 C9 V: m( ~& Q- u! ?$ N4 n: NTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). - }6 B( I" M2 F8 xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 294 ( H" K( O. o! y* L# F1 I4 y* j0 w; G7 wTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not 5 q J8 l! V' N1 ~7 c7 ~technical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. ) G0 Y3 E0 l2 C8 i5 xAlso excluded are financial data or other information related to contract administration. Technical Data / `- |/ q* `/ t9 O6 C' z, JPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition 4 y6 K7 _4 Y) G# vstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item : k" t& i' B" N3 n* @performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 6 a7 H, d: o& t3 f: _) gassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical $ h" y* S0 j: pEvaluation ! {4 Z c/ @9 P2 Z+ u _The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in the military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) ( t2 j: |+ G5 |1 h8 LTechnical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available , G! P0 B3 L8 n+ e% Nfor stating binding technical requirements. # C; G. j. \1 Q7 p! {- vTechnical 4 M- e, d6 g+ i' A9 u8 QObjectives & Goals (TOG) 8 V' z! l2 u) A! c7 oHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. " h. v) N- t1 jTechnical Parameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical & v0 x# _) a Q8 v3 z+ N# m8 dPerformance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk + p H! Z2 K6 e0 r$ Uanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 9 @. D% f* w% u! @' Zmanagement. Technical Performance Measurement ' Y. ~) |8 u- s+ T/ A8 b' K(TPM) Describes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status ; i! \" y% P6 P+ X+ @2 J1 Ebeyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 3 J0 c/ t; s# T; z" uparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the 2 Q7 o/ N g$ ^, R0 Yvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures 7 b% v' P: ]5 B$ F. X5 Idifferences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 3 [$ R& i7 C$ o! R a, h$ Z! uelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these % f* Z# l! s9 X) F1 p+ Ldifferences on system effectiveness. . F$ G; j: ]( r5 i2 I4 X) k6 sTechnical " }8 y2 G3 [/ z {; ?Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. + ]8 X$ a1 F. U# T1 T. XTechnical Surveillance Intelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or % U/ M6 L5 G; E: s9 |. |emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise ( U5 T- U: ]$ I. l' X t$ Dtargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. Technology Executing Agent The Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 0 E( [1 @, `8 H' {1 kresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing ( r# Q/ m' ^6 N. A0 B: `9 jAgent. Technology 5 _. p4 h0 X& l; s3 X9 g* mProgram Description The generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. 4 Y/ ?: G8 Q! B9 U; n' BMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 295 " l) s3 H/ k; [$ [1 t: {8 tTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. : R; E" H: c0 o3 UTEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, Tracking, and Command (TT&C) 8 N4 g( v3 t+ S5 dFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and Y. ~1 e r2 ~7 q1 u) u. a; W9 O4 @status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit * [1 Z$ s( R; x6 V* u2 Kmission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. & u3 e) M$ n7 h* sTELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. TEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. ! [+ D* Z1 A6 z& W# BTEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term ( Y8 o# _! \9 J2 I) m"compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See % ?! o3 R& V7 {; O% `4 ECompromising Emanations.) : r" B% N- v2 O WTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. 8 ~, h4 c/ f* Y; ~) O; oTER Test and Evaluation Report 4 {9 A% ?2 S: I% i' c% l0 `! W- bTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. TERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. * _) u/ M! d$ ?, \Terminal Defense ( [' Z6 y; |5 r! V- v& M( oSegment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. ) R# p8 z, S/ ~, `Terminal Guidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the 3 g6 c: I- C3 Mvicinity of the target. Terminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy / [) q( w+ H! F# s" wPBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. 3 C& E2 a2 i7 i/ @$ kTES Tactical Event System. 6 Z* H) f1 N c5 G: [TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. & L8 b2 M' B4 P( l+ p1 x& @0 oTESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary 4 e6 g* d8 e, Q4 |consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all operations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) s4 C% }& g: SProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 2 {2 K* X# o3 @2 b+ N' Xto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted / k4 y8 p, @7 m/ o7 u( F* f% fto assist the engineering design and development process, to proof manufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a c; U& [4 Z# l0 a7 n/ k+ o) tsystem's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, , P1 |0 K8 ]$ L0 D( T6 N2 c) Nand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel $ ?5 i: U! D" `% f* w0 F3 A! Q/ N1 Urequirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that & ]( z0 M/ P: }1 Fthose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts + o0 C; t& V8 ~4 F: H% Y; Jor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational 5 H* W" C+ M2 p: P* M. e' b; m(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of U% C* R' Y5 V% I( \- Toperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test - v* m- r% R9 p; `6 w6 S5 a* lconducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 7 B4 c1 W9 W' menvironment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and ( [& \5 \: q# OEvaluation Master Plan (TEMP) An overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 4 b1 K: Z% s3 d+ hobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation to be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as % L1 g$ T: J! bearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development progresses. Test and Evaluation 5 \$ t: n( Z0 t7 |Working Group (TEWG) # F, Y8 ?7 ?* T( n) C$ |3 Y2 fThe TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the 8 }. z) F" |/ Y7 F2 V S" ZAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the * n% F* B$ ]( @program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and 8 _6 P. k! Z* b8 F( crelated contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software ! [9 l, n1 A3 y( S7 f: {) {and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. 7 z" Z* `$ R6 f1 T. ?Test Integration / C. p* [( ~( j) X. u( ]' K0 r+ ^Working Group 9 I% S( m U) _# _0 y- L(TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between 0 G+ Z* m: c [' P) V% Y7 }3 S4 Wdevelopmental and operational testing. Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. 4 \' q( y- N# e# A. oThe plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T F6 f/ Z) C. k: |8 x1 `/ `297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) 5 r X0 }* q% Z/ l+ Z; _Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. % A' r9 \6 ^3 Z- _! sTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. - A) [) c# S- s4 u7 HTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. 4 K3 ?3 D2 W5 tTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. 0 }$ s4 f7 [1 D3 S! U* v% c- TTEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). ; N" h, a l# J; Q! r" qTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. / c( x" h: A3 I6 NTF Task Force. 4 g" P/ _+ H) c$ z' STFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. ) j% L+ b8 v+ gTFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management ( l l: J5 a% s, TTFOV Theoretical Field of View. : t8 ]; x: q8 x4 b8 ~TFR Terrain Following Radar. 6 a0 x. J2 l$ g4 p7 C0 aTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 1 }+ A/ }6 [$ h3 \/ ?TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). - `* ~2 a4 n' W" Y0 [4 xTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. 6 K# D) ]# ]3 R# y4 LTGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). + V( u4 c2 h8 s, X: ~TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 3 g, N' b/ v9 V( E/ T u3 JTHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. % ~+ p. M! B! E5 K8 H9 _" FTheater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. 0 K! q5 x9 d# B6 OTheater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. 1 W t) H. Q, o3 k. iTheater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) System ' ]0 F1 D$ X6 w8 }The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against 0 {5 p/ e) Y4 q+ d' W8 g& u3 _ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)