- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
|
System
; J" e( W& z6 ?9 k* yReadiness
3 F# Y1 w! V2 y" Z8 s: `5 e% k# vSystem Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out
% g% F0 ~7 }% t0 n6 Wthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority$ ~& _: m' T1 @5 S1 n
along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It
+ j7 |$ n c* o, U, F# wincludes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational
2 T- z2 j3 o; E2 Z$ i k: D# fstate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the' \% [5 _1 y& y( z U9 J- N( q
verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the; A/ J9 y& S! }- d9 L, u1 s, q
continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under) L; q. u: n. c! c+ j6 m0 w( N
realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions
" w& \2 y8 r0 X7 \( Nnecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies8 [# ^2 t% {5 e5 D) I; c$ v
and for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control,
( _ Z3 A& z" a" S9 t0 g- Fhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results1 l3 p# O8 R$ x9 f( u
status reporting.- b7 X) b( o0 X Q: F y2 v
System: m5 w$ H1 |3 ~, s& g; s0 v
Readiness
( A0 p& T/ \/ z5 C4 }( UObjective6 T& \5 e# J, x
A criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a
. i# Y6 z6 a3 ~) n/ p2 Hspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates.# I$ M5 B/ W: J) i0 k5 s; b
System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and
. r* S0 @7 R, u& Q) a1 Hmaintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support) X7 Z. q9 W: X# g7 {$ \/ X/ d
system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of8 X/ _" E) m/ p% k
system readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission
5 m+ O4 ?1 K( R C: I9 Jcapable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate.
: B& H! d* ]' `1 K2 NSystem. k7 B* h/ ~5 Z1 e3 w% A
Requirements9 [; t! P; C/ L% Y- W3 \1 r
Analysis (SRA)5 H1 { V! W6 w
An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System
( O2 \; \/ Z1 pConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine
* @2 W4 U" a& S3 c2 |: dspecific system functional and performance requirements.& t' J+ B$ G" N0 P7 t% [. S
System
2 D" D8 O- o0 C; W* x8 XRequirements
* `( x; i7 f9 f2 lReview (SRR)
: | G; u. [; Z2 g+ o, HConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements.
8 e* f4 c0 y/ YDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the" J6 N& D- Q+ v# ^. t
degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration.3 L9 w* W' h8 l1 E! m. ^8 S
System Security$ l* U( W3 p/ X- F8 V
Engineering0 Q, I w' x Z# p2 o. I
(SSE)
& m0 m. F+ [$ w" `" t+ gAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering+ O3 p; Y3 [# d$ \
principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks7 s/ o" v( E2 K* f: r9 _
associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related' P# @ Z3 f, @$ J- h- R: e
scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and8 r, T5 }3 H- w, F& e( {* M! v
analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to
9 s% y) ^5 v8 I6 d Isecurity threats.3 o. p1 N* [8 |* k
System Security7 H7 y8 _5 D. y- P
Engineering4 I3 h/ [% W1 Z
Management
; `1 O, W& d+ sProgram
9 M8 N" T1 z! T+ \* B1 l x; Z e3 M: O(SSEMP)2 ~, S* r* Z# p1 }: f% u
The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical, T6 P3 H) B5 N, Q( v5 r& q1 [( b7 M1 [
achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE% ?- o8 x6 F; m0 k
program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the8 M. t9 U. W0 S/ j
defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the0 ~! b! O" H( I, l8 H8 l8 P% Y# L
resource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides
5 Z0 |# c V5 m5 w( o$ b, c9 ^6 W, Cmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes
: m$ K1 H# [# w% @: q+ q/ iits own impact on overall program cost and schedule.! [$ f2 `! z# P0 }: n9 p5 l; d1 g
System Security2 z/ A$ ]! \4 x( B4 z
Management
% A8 Z) R/ n* t( ?' [ cPlan (SSMP)2 i( K+ `4 M6 y, ~0 z5 c. p) P: F
A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to$ O5 x# P, B7 D. ]% n
meet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities,! l- H0 T/ Q" t; v" L+ L
methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with
( G. f/ [' c, r# r8 C; Rother program engineering, design and management activities, and related
, Q- b, k) Y# b& P" Gsystems.7 r! @9 @9 v& H2 `1 _, m
Systems. Z. Z, ]9 \! ~! U. h. O' w
Engineering# N' Q B4 H+ W$ @( w
An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle
# k% Z9 v9 D$ x( l. vbalanced set of system product and process solutions.
9 N$ X+ s' u0 ^& q' L# x: XMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S$ Z8 L4 ?# Z1 \1 a; C
287' k/ y- w' i9 z
Systems/ L. S, B& V) v, {% s# E
Engineering
7 h% { v9 Y" u* M- mManagement
" V9 f: l9 g1 q( _; bPlan (SEMP)
5 z7 Z6 ]) g# f9 h" zThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) g D/ K* |3 j( H; K
Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures- Q: J( d4 w/ p
development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4)
" S v, Y7 h8 hKey engineering milestones and schedules.# ^0 s t, L* p. b' Q# o9 B3 ]* I8 g
Systems Test) N1 ?; j( y: Y
Integration and$ c) n; ]" o9 s* n: d" `
Coordination
8 \$ V+ E' B- {/ T1 S# G5 bThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution./ n" m" d, S( r, X( E) M
System Threat
6 g% C% G1 X. d! x: r yAssessment& i0 x9 D+ ?; A2 s9 S
Report (STAR). i& S0 C% D4 Q) e
Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a
6 {* x' q" f- |* h7 bService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency
: Z6 K, B k& q4 Uand potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when7 L# W3 x( v% m/ A& @ `% Y
the threat changes significantly.6 C4 x# Y% y7 j i9 w' n: L
System-Valued
; {: q9 r1 U2 d( w- D8 k6 P! qAsset
# A. m2 R' J* D6 }A system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to
" a8 b6 _4 e: Rthe proper operation and well being of the SDS.+ \& _0 O0 O8 ]# V" H: _2 k) i
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T* z5 F( R- z& ]" s: G! g( k4 T
288
9 B$ y1 ~' S5 r4 R+ D- {; V8 V! IT&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control.
: L$ x3 I' ^! x' G( e$ }* \2 o+ ?T&E Test and Evaluation.
8 _/ f8 r- o! `5 ~T&T Transportation and Transportability.$ ]" N& j" R; N6 `
T-MACH Trusted MACH.
8 ^1 C# A+ |) `: h( xT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.* i, ?0 G# Y. M7 Z- k
T/R Transmit/Receive.
; _) R% c* d( ~; }9 xT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar).
3 B% v0 ]' a, l& a- l& H2 @7 rT
/ U2 D. P9 e* M' |2+ Q2 ^8 E8 z3 _) U) d( I4 W4 r, i$ M
Technology Transfer.
0 U+ B7 Y) U- f6 PT
( V/ `0 J0 ], R7 n' [. U2
4 f8 v: x" @ ~2 P2 S! x$ U8 gE Technical Training Equipment.
8 V8 Q$ o8 b% G, @3 ^; KTA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles.
: f9 c5 _7 d/ h6 QTAA Technical Assistance Agreement.
2 A0 y$ }2 Y$ U! n" A! ~TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander.
7 ~# z& c8 C0 ]8 NTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander.
! p& i% y$ N; m7 ^1 g/ @TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix.
0 O, J) g: X2 S4 c* _# jTAC Tactical Advanced Computer.. E; ]8 \$ `; q- b- b
TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term).
9 P& X8 ^# |* r* S- V: m& cTACAIR Tactical Air. f, H4 W7 W5 q) r6 Z. c, o# K
TACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post].
7 a' s! q: J7 J# r2 ^TACC Tactical Air Command Center.0 M4 R% S) j" B# @
TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term).- f: N0 h2 c. Y3 e( m! F1 A
TACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term).! \. R( m% P, ~& d/ O. e" s- u
TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System.9 q4 j7 H! Z& F- z7 J" _# T# Y& f
TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility.
# f: W; Z5 g/ I" _) {8 xTACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting.
, Y1 @5 r, `$ [2 t+ Q% iTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire. |
|