航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. STM Significant Technical Milestone. / L( P$ y5 U7 _- }" I- hSTO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). & w6 _1 b7 ]7 X( l& K(2) Science and Technology Objective. % ~. ~( w1 @! f+ |STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. * a+ \* k* j3 |, Y) @STOM System Test Object Model. Storage, , }( p7 m: Z+ E& R5 GHandling, and 9 u! e$ N& z3 u# s6 RTransportation ' P- C- e1 o- y/ R7 M( ?Environments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient 9 x3 w* J2 _9 l4 Oenvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable ! w1 \( H1 ?/ N$ }. ?# Patmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed & @' B( ~+ r. _( f* O& ]' r" jduring these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, shock and vibration environments, among others. 2 D* P, ]$ m+ }" W! |2 \, y* L$ xStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target " x3 _; ?, N$ I6 B5 QSet. o8 ]) _* b4 g8 d7 t% s/ N5 v0 iStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s Apache missile. STOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. ) e/ [* W' q% v9 d' {7 K* BSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense ) ?( w2 n2 ~/ n' x3 ?9 W) l+ e, I; zAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat , r/ Q a! K$ K" Q( sballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to 3 ^) a8 S+ `& `& w. fnullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. F- A* V8 a- K, ?4 c5 W& ]Strategic Defense ( O! N! t, A4 S3 D1 Z% pEmergency * b' W5 I6 O! |" ^4 xDeclarations that attack is imminent or taking place. . h. C6 L" |, v( _Strategic Defense System : k2 q: p- I; x3 T. p(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving - N* H. h/ H1 c; K, Pballistic missile defense system. 4 w( w) ?1 e7 k/ K; TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 280 Strategic Level of $ J u& @4 O' d& mWar The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or " s4 d* a3 X0 Z* I4 M' X8 halliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives. Strategic ; S4 c/ Z n1 [' pOffensive Forces (SOF) 9 b$ u, p( A) }. Q. T9 P( kThose forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated 6 s* y* t$ B. D9 f) }/ LOperations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, 2 J2 L5 |. I ^! N; W! j( OFB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. & F" f; H/ D, a5 L1 ]7 b* d8 {5 ]% jStrategic Reserve ' G! F# c' L) H( |: R0 G% z2 kThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to ( D! e; N* X3 k+ ostrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. 9 o2 F0 a) H; L% @. H+ e( Q* QStrategic ) i) G8 P, e5 q% z! |Warning A warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. Strategic Warning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of hostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. Strategic * ?& G8 B, T! n4 fWarning Post- Decision Time 2 t5 P4 i, r5 X/ kThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends ' F, s" I) C4 }6 ~: e/ p0 jwith the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic " \; g7 [! Y& Z) Twarning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in e% X' o: c) l8 g9 Z: [5 [0 zthe pre-decision period. Strategic Warning Pre- ; z2 V5 y9 K: nDecision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a ) v6 \8 b9 N% l6 {- J/ F$ N' J# Ydecision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time available to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course of action to be executed. . C) B6 \) H9 X" NSTREAD Standard TRE Display. ! ?+ y$ C* l2 ?4 t, |! g2 X3 Z# JSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured Attack ' ]$ A) r+ G" j5 a4 eAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely timed for maximum strategic impact. Structured ' X0 o% ~6 l+ Z- b4 j& B3 H# L l6 \Design A disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data ( u: D3 G3 G1 O; b: ?8 x: j0 |. wflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program A program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or % l* s0 [8 e& o' Asequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of instructions. " U& \5 X' b, C# @8 tSTRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. 3 ?7 j5 F1 E, t! P* bSTS See Space Transportation System. $ B+ F* {* t& ^. y. n% N, pSTSC Software Technology Support Center. 0 G2 D* T" G! B! w+ KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). ' [7 p6 r% F- K( u(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. ; c* t; b3 E3 A* w" RSTW Strike Warfare. 0 e7 n+ a8 F7 L" WSTWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. , f- c/ L+ a! x& FSubassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which - w$ [) o+ n3 o' A5 {is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. ) E6 a6 \+ v. ?" A) _' X3 `Subject Security % M% {1 y' o" `- l0 `. \$ L3 xLevel # I& q& |, G2 Q: b. F% nA subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it 8 z3 F( K/ w- L; S' M: T/ ?* _has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be + _6 ^/ z$ ?: x& F1 B9 ~dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. Submarine- 2 F$ F! O/ _# N* t. m+ [. C+ \Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 : }$ J/ m" u0 S9 h+ }miles. ! |: d5 V6 Q( q3 iSUBROC Submarine Rocket. Subsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. 3 z. k1 T8 D+ nSubtractive 2 J) W$ F H2 x! p v$ dDefense First come first engaged as long as weapons last. 8 y) J; f' j3 J9 w( H$ _& a5 YSUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. Succession of Command The planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command is a synonymous term. SUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). / n* k) K% X' B1 z1 X9 ?9 YSunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two alternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to % A; {! H/ b; R" |* ?; r6 gdecisions about future use of resources. Sup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). ( U! l# [9 N% W! k, r; j4 YSuper Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. . g4 b0 m5 P! a6 m- |9 K) M) {Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 0 U/ u/ B" U8 H7 Y+ c) S1 p$ Ua single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, through an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super radiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as V0 d, C& Y8 zsuperfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. 1 f" R. H5 S1 E( H: p, EMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S + \9 }& M: ] r2 N3 f282 0 U% G) r/ B/ j |) d3 k/ sSuperradiant Laser (SRL) . u* [2 I% [- p* c, b. ^/ h1 |* \9 KA laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not ! H& z+ K" ~1 Y7 Nrequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from superradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser ; ?6 U' K9 u' H6 z \beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric or magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. ) Z8 O3 H4 v E( ^Supervisory Programs . c4 X- B2 i4 N. H' {, \Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. + a) R0 N4 a( C q/ N' MSupplemental Appropriation $ T) U' h3 F; T5 |1 bAn appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. & O, V. K7 V( z2 kSupport Equipment ; j' J) v# |6 Y- z( o9 ?$ Q$ u4 GAll system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the mission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ( f* b2 y5 S1 P- a3 t% B% H1 }, vmaintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) - P& w& a! @/ [' }* E( Nequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). 0 w4 S: X! j1 U9 fSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly ) o( n: ^) H4 t# Massociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous operation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. 7 I$ }$ ^7 @7 f' v tSupport Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for example compilers, loaders, and other utilities. Suppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, . a0 V. ]3 O2 R$ ]* xbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. SUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. ' j5 m) ?! o6 e# a$ M$ ySURCOM Surveillance Constellation. Surge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items + m2 p5 U _, a3 R' mdue to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or mobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess production capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity ) O2 @5 g, y; hmeasures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance ' I# @9 i; v' fRequirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response options and current surveillance system availability. Surveillance, Satellite and 6 R, v4 X$ P9 [3 i, w: YMissile # q1 { [/ E7 rThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, ; C+ A8 w( C) a, C! k6 P2 [" Tand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. 7 u4 ]2 G* }% ^0 R/ @0 PSurveillance System Configuration + z. o$ ^* E+ z3 yThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. $ |' t$ C3 e1 A4 W$ q' Y* e& Y) tMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 : v4 h0 `1 y# \4 a6 b9 m# D! VSurvivability Operating Modes - P6 Y- j; F7 Y. LThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. Survivable and , K1 M# q4 p" v2 c5 ]/ mEnduring Command Center (SECC) The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. Sustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. ; g; T/ E+ c8 x0 e' U& m7 N- xSV Space Vehicle. SVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. y/ o+ J" e+ E( p+ XSW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. ) Z5 X3 z; B9 {+ _2 `! ]Sweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating . O( H* f. k3 |) Yband of frequencies. 1 q5 T; w$ |, A5 ]SWG Scenario Working Group. $ F Y s! `5 X3 ~4 U9 h7 KSWIL Software-in-the-Loop. 9 k# C' {/ U5 pSWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. SWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. / l( b7 Q# ]# ^( \% e( J4 N& `$ oSynchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to 0 l' a+ [2 _7 j% c% F2 F4 kone correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where each module description has associated implementations. ) O5 W9 i2 r8 Q7 Q a1 |) RSynthetic : X# K. [4 K" Q9 f* Q# BAperture Radar ; F* ^4 M _2 h5 P/ |9 N(SAR) 4 l* d( s; y' n! F* j9 gA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is ; e; M! K8 h: j4 P1 p+ Q+ n0 J% Jtheoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance 3 d. a K& |7 v! Rbetween the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. ! i3 @( S& h' u9 s/ a' z5 Z3 ?6 _8 ASys C/O System Check Out. / ` H1 k$ C3 Q5 ^/ t0 H( z6 cSys Cmn System Common. 4 I. @, ?" g3 A2 C' A1 eSys T&E System Test and Evaluation. 8 a# g6 X' [) U* OMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S * {5 G+ B5 w0 s$ x284 SYSCOM Systems Command. 9 Y# H3 H2 e; J* m8 \System (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, 1 \4 R( \# c, p0 l$ @0 ^+ Jdata, and services needed to perform a designated function with specified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. (2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a functional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a ' g3 \) k/ P ^requirement. 8 ?7 G* I, J5 y. ]$ T$ G8 nSystem . k& c2 @6 ~4 }! Q! A6 E& B, F# W" MActivation ; g" D$ k" Y: O$ s3 ]That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions implemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System % }) J3 w' l% r7 i! g7 ZControl. System " }, N: S% ? D MArchitecture System Capability Specification % A" j% h6 B7 Y$ E$ S1 Y3 |# \5 K1 W(SCS) * u; {' P' a) p+ w! Z- e: K/ wThe structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system architecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational # ?9 L- t/ F6 W4 Q# H Y5 |environment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the elements of missile defense systems. 5 L$ V' C$ J, }7 QThe government document that translates capabilities into functional ! B9 J2 J8 y; M1 C1 P4 |& yspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among the elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) 8 A( f5 R6 M% f% L. K$ V, y6 z( dA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide . r6 |* t6 r( M6 v& a5 P4 I wsensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of equipment in CMAFB. System Concept : n' _1 G1 ~1 h9 c |: w& \Paper (SCP) OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition strategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the demonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other 8 f! y6 s5 h0 a1 r# Qconcepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration + F$ f; `8 Z4 |* |) S7 m& O9 sControl Board # L! q. H, B9 n' k) u: L3 d(SCCB) The senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 3 h! \+ l( o# T+ v1 v- MSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and 4 V( i" d3 L0 |- Xcomputer systems. System-Critical - A# M: b# d8 f+ K- ?Function A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's mission. ' ~2 R4 D6 X, a" p+ Q( zSystem Definition Review (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the ! g0 [9 |! M; F& csystem plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, : L. K1 Q( Y% `final trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System & a" d: a% h* n$ l) h7 vDeployment - S) K% i& ^: JDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. ) J) n( c7 ~! U; T! t5 WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 System Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 0 j9 G3 A, ?: x5 M& M& Rcomponents, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy ; T# c7 N+ i3 S- [specified system requirements. (2) The result of the system design process. " A* q9 N; i! a, `System Design Concept ; n+ n. g+ p6 |5 Y n$ k. n4 xAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and * k/ Y! v1 P1 b3 p- }" _" Qcharacteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be ( y( z* `) {, L% j' e% j: F) O3 Doperated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design $ ^/ C0 c I; U0 _9 N1 C4 u# l" S M+ iReview (SDR) + Y8 U2 I( y# u3 z0 F" G6 QEvaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with + Q6 o$ ?$ }5 {$ b9 h5 v+ I3 ?the allocated technical requirements. * j1 j* z% m _% h3 Y4 YSystem Effectiveness The measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set - l. d1 G, D. `$ y [5 zof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and / C/ ] u5 u( \capability. System Evolution ! D' x, ]0 ^. b# s# n0 N3 vPlan (SEP) 9 C( P( i9 H8 D4 c6 n- D( FThe documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS : m" S" h: B4 k( d, P5 ?, gcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior 2 b9 Q q( ~- W6 L4 O8 X* ~Executive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS 3 a3 G, K' E0 f3 zDevelopment Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and assessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide 5 Y2 S( e9 e* s$ w+ G gsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome $ j+ o* A9 ~: x" h$ dthose challenges. ' X& `/ y4 b' w# MSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System 2 K; |& L4 S) T& W: T0 L w( pGenerated 3 i- Q+ w- H% ^7 L* V) AElectromagnetic $ [2 A/ r4 }& V( F2 [2 Q) g' [; ?Pulse (SGEMP) Transient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 9 Q9 u) I0 q; w$ \& h x) `7 Bsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. System ( _# W( c4 l' M6 i' jIntegration Test A live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, 0 k3 d% d' v$ \2 fsensors, and weapon hardware. 5 Y" D2 w* Y. Y7 l8 z; o: s' USystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks % |/ W w9 Q6 V' i/ Uand associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. 0 R2 }8 r3 U0 D. n5 t5 O+ B8 XSystem ; T$ E8 b$ U6 ^+ A% hOperational 3 w, Q/ f, t: m1 k9 hConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, deployment, and support of a system. 2 l$ l% R! K6 ~ R; O4 ]: ]2 eSystem ' _3 F5 o" A5 i- m) UOperation and $ d8 ^) `1 `' Y7 n- x' p5 U) kIntegration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and battle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to 4 W( i/ b" `' l" gthe system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic BMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of posturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 8 j+ _) U9 w, W286 System Program Office (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, government agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition process. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System ! S0 p9 D% h$ t9 }Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out # N9 A4 p! a+ P' ?: l/ wthe assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority 7 E" D, v* u" S9 Z5 ], E7 y' oalong with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational state, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the - @$ k# S Z: e1 K: v7 Hcontinued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions necessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies ( N" B! {* C* F2 X$ G# [8 v% Y8 E9 hand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, 5 x* d( a8 Q8 ~$ V: }' @& H; vhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results ' S& \' N! l' i% z# e. dstatus reporting. System ' A7 R7 M+ L1 q5 cReadiness ! y M7 I+ n# I- w2 E% VObjective 9 z7 U, T* O) L' d3 ] N# }* rA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a 5 H% G" |# ^; Mspecified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. 1 [# u1 u# N# P3 U# T1 E; H6 ySystem readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and v. N! t; ]' Y0 u' x3 C3 R, Y0 P! w( ]maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ; o- |: I, z. G0 w; {1 r9 _system, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of 2 H2 W8 _9 _) |* K* Y6 l" Osystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. System Requirements ( Z T8 L; ^0 r2 j8 sAnalysis (SRA) " K+ E: O+ Q' |An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System % D5 g9 @- C: g6 z! DConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. System 8 k) u- N0 E9 p% ^: mRequirements 8 l& V9 U* n6 r) aReview (SRR) + m) M' z# l; YConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. ( o0 ?" K4 {# L9 YDetermines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. / r. i' f9 J9 YSystem Security 8 J2 Z* m, f# O- H3 {; bEngineering (SSE) 8 M' u& G: l" Q0 v* Y, W& nAn element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering principle to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related scientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security Engineering 0 z! ]; U) S8 m$ }) WManagement Program (SSEMP) - o# I5 `' G1 v8 NThe contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE program: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the 0 c: k! D6 J+ `! U" n# \; p4 r4 W# [defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the $ J& K: T. j* {' E/ Nresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides management information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes $ x9 W" u( B4 ?1 S7 i! f7 [its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. $ s1 x8 o% E" r7 ^0 VSystem Security : l2 h; Z L6 @Management Plan (SSMP) A formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 9 J, l0 t8 v, }$ Tmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, T; H" k; v+ k* b5 tmethods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with other program engineering, design and management activities, and related " _. v* ^! q& L. ~ Z5 a: Jsystems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. ( g/ ^2 \- V/ N$ Q( L4 @MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S P/ D9 ]) Y. D. N) h) o, y% z0 ?287 - `8 C* \4 K* s; QSystems ' |$ A4 ^9 Q( ^) JEngineering Management Plan (SEMP) This plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) : I. M# i0 {1 M% I; V) _$ m8 iIntegration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures development and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) ( o) x! T8 G9 o5 i* F& p7 a2 H, [& CKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and Coordination The combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 4 r% `6 u9 b* v, E% i2 p6 X8 HSystem Threat Assessment Report (STAR) ! y" q' P U. A% z3 rRequired by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a J+ o5 N( `; Z3 u6 K) J7 s! gService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when the threat changes significantly. 3 v: |6 [ y2 V/ j( w6 N, i+ NSystem-Valued Asset 2 g0 T/ p- [: _7 wA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. + |8 I, D- n4 E* |8 [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. T&E Test and Evaluation. 2 S: c+ m7 X4 b/ t! s) ?0 x8 y8 qT&T Transportation and Transportability. 6 q# R" f% B: zT-MACH Trusted MACH. T-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. " D) H$ F# v1 B. y% DT/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). T 2 Technology Transfer. 7 c6 s! ?+ Y- a8 p# n5 b2 P( bT 2 4 A. H% x1 E% g$ A- R7 Z/ ~$ hE Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 0 {$ @! @6 ~- ]TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. TAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. , ]3 ^/ s9 P' A, ]/ B& z3 q2 K7 }6 UTAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. ' S2 K _8 e+ B9 b( qTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). / O B3 a# H: O6 OTACAIR Tactical Air. ( d, ]& d/ C) d: a% ?3 |& J/ s9 ATACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. TACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 0 S7 N2 o6 H% \6 V1 DTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). 0 Q r; P9 k+ L; ?TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. TACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. TACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 7 P. ?$ x- \/ JTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. + y2 ]/ I. i9 R4 }: \TACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 289 & \" j( r. C1 v, x4 ?TACSAT Tactical Satellite. TACSIM Tactical Simulation + O2 b F' f$ F- b. T S, ]" O* dTactical Air Doctrine ' w+ ?% c9 z0 v- s- L/ ^Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air 7 z7 O8 a2 y; {6 Vpower in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. & d$ ^; D# {: O1 C+ c1 L- ~" D+ MTactical Air Operation . _9 K' W/ J: V5 V5 i/ w, w9 BAn air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with " @$ I5 {( K8 f/ v7 F% u! ~ground or naval forces. Tactical Air 8 H; t! g; q+ y' wOperations 1 \9 ^; ^$ T( wCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air defense operations in an assigned sector. Tactical Air 5 C0 D3 {6 n3 E7 ^Support " R: [3 x4 z: B% @: Y/ R7 uAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly ! z- Z' x3 b) y- kassist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of : Q# ]! ^7 P$ R& M, tResponsibility 0 e5 R. z; o, R5 S8 b/ `2 c5 c(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and # o' d9 y9 y4 w; }, Bcoordination of support. 2 t' F- f- S; ~: |) YTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) 0 r' J r$ R) d" x7 U3 F) G( eA land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. & ]2 m) [. v4 M/ x0 H5 n" k$ S! {5 jTactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future ) O6 y3 V; G7 odevelopment of tactical doctrine. 3 i+ F1 W' o8 o [( E" s x6 ITactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or 4 s) ]+ g; _2 { E0 Rmaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link 1 l8 _2 A6 i& ?; v: jA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. 1 S8 g- u8 e) c6 kThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. & q' w3 Z0 X; q% f! lTactical Level of ! u* `! I+ B- o" eWar The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to # `# s- K1 c* U& o. J' X1 caccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical 4 m6 w- f- Z* p- [Operations Area (TOA) - N) ^- B$ v" Y+ f7 O) ~; NThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations 6 d: B; ^3 L2 m* L) uarea where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission accomplishment. & l8 B y$ P y3 l5 z- U8 XTactical , x( E" _6 f1 n( m4 xOperations 1 A9 q2 c0 _4 W9 v! wCenter (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff ; [8 H; c4 y9 V/ Tconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. Tactical Warning (TW) 2 l; C; A" m' e4 `& u(1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an 3 \ R& ?# ? D1 s+ _* zevaluation of information from all available sources. (2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command * o! t$ V' Y2 tcenters that a specific threat event is occurring. The component 5 y5 [* C: O3 v# n' R4 qelements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type $ a# W& ?- s F+ }; ]' uand size, country under attack, and event time. % O6 K6 U, ^/ E6 kTactical 9 v$ a, y2 s0 F. L" EWarning/Attack 8 r& k$ t/ ]' r; e; j1 vAssessment 0 @! B- Q% e4 x6 n7 A' g; b, ~(TW/AA) A composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack q o: e- g. f+ F! TAssessment. 8 C* a# B. b0 b- iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T . Y2 o) n2 c6 Q+ x290 / |# _: z, q% d Y' w. dTAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. : _( o# V/ ?! `3 J! N2 a, k! @(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 7 m- y6 m. t; R0 t' B% E1 oTAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. ' Y/ {; s+ i3 ?4 ?7 ?7 k: iTADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. ! {, k! d2 U3 l/ I# H1 I, G# uTADC Tactical Air Direction Center. TADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. - x( O# ^ Q6 jTADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. TADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” # r* x0 G% M( j dTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. 3 J' ^1 B. t2 @& z) i; y) B" eTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. " z/ A7 X# C6 h$ q5 iTADL Tactical Data Link. ; ?5 m* m/ J" D1 NTADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. r5 Q% s- {7 XTAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. ' b8 \9 Y: @0 l8 M0 S6 uTAI International Atomic Time. 5 A; R2 m+ ]5 R1 f5 oTAIS Technology Applications Information System. * S, p% X. B, y4 R* jTALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. ( O5 A0 J0 j s; ~* ?( @+ kTALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. TALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector and impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. $ [, h) O7 I9 Z+ \- B* }TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. Tank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). 8 \8 O6 B- Y1 TTank Debris Hardware associated with tank. * f+ q0 g- v8 D, v) Q, u# FTank 9 A7 F: s- B) q, B" l, j- UFragmentation 9 r9 i5 ]* R! G1 C6 ~+ m7 z7 \ OThe breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a result of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. / k2 X a" w& s' I/ x8 s7 u8 }MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 1 t. h$ C5 `7 @; M% }: S# L/ F7 T' i291 7 n# P# S+ x2 v. {TAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. TAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. / U4 P1 O" j! u2 x5 B/ b- O l$ h(2) Threat Activity Report. . S& w8 }4 Q: A6 P( _- v(3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. K6 { H& [* q( }6 h n+ n; {TARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. $ M7 y" N9 L1 n3 f eTarget Acquisition 1 [# y: v' E( Z0 j8 jThe detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. Target " S7 o' Q! H( _) A( k* @7 ]Classification & l5 e. ]1 i E. Kand Type & v1 x! p8 {/ R6 o( @4 CIdentification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, ( f1 Q5 x& v( y5 B9 c1 \4 Y6 u; odiscrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination The ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one . Z$ X# J& b1 a. F' b2 m$ atarget when multiple targets are present. Target Object Map (TOM) , c$ [+ ]" \0 g! cA data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in target designation. (USSPACECOM) & J3 C/ h: u( p3 Z1 ZTarget Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 1 A6 z( X n1 `. kTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and 3 s1 `4 o2 K. iidentification equipment. (2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the 2 }4 d* e w" b: J# n' V" j2 M7 dpassage of a ship or sweep. , O4 z: [0 F9 I: k$ G1 ZTarget System Requirements # \; v3 B" R$ rDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD Program Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. 9 e \0 S. {' `4 mProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. + c2 {% a8 ]) C+ l2 K# l/ l9 HTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance to the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 7 w- P2 C! _2 Rengagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. ( a9 S0 I9 u; W4 \TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. TAT Technical Area Task. / b. A, c' y& A$ E1 s8 nTAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. ; k' E: w* P9 ~6 R7 A( r% C2 P& I4 B. qTAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 5 m/ I! N" m' z% ]4 h! X2 bMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T / y Y# t9 G7 i$ w5 E) T' j292 & ~9 P! C) u8 Z. M, s- NTAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. 7 Z& J# `! m0 ~* A _TB Test Bed. / D1 `4 S% i6 n$ F; [TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. 0 ^+ u& L6 L. F3 q: q+ ]0 BTBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. & ~- U+ I8 l/ CTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. ; S- ~3 t9 L5 V g! J9 O8 | ^TBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. U/ c. b! E0 B# W8 r, e; }TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. TBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. 3 o. @$ ?& ^8 eTBN To be Negotiated. ) p) R; |0 ^5 z: fTBR To Be Resolved. TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. (3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. TCF Tactical Combat Force. ' K3 X# g% D/ e: N0 a6 S$ z/ oTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. TCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 5 c7 A3 z8 e5 I/ dTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. 8 n& v4 m& d. P) ?- l% U1 {TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD Countermeasures Mitigation). 3 O2 c- U( ?1 D% g: ]* C, ^3 ^TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. 1 A3 x/ j0 u1 x! \. `TDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. TDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. . M7 o" m6 _1 z0 v4 b/ k8 G& Q8 FTDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : y! S$ ^' \- ? a: A, M293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. ) H' ?, ~& Y) xTDC (1) Tactical Display Console. / M0 U2 F; k/ l- g5 O% D! k& K(2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). 0 @) @' c) G, K& OTDCC Test Data Collection Center. ' \! z. i, f! O' F8 o2 z9 STDD Target Detection Device. TDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. ; Z( h8 t, b E" T; zTDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. TDM Time Division Multiplexed. TDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). , }9 _+ s! E. x& I7 r4 ]TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. 9 r/ w+ P+ ?* CTDOA Time Difference of Arrival. TDP (1) Technical Data Package. 7 x( J3 B, Z0 ~) J N# A: v+ W(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. 3 L* ]+ T8 x1 F& aTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. 5 |$ }/ f! c1 I7 i7 sTDT Target Development Test. TDTC Test, Development and Training Center. TDU Target Data Update. 0 j* l; m6 q! PTDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. 3 M& Q% J F @TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. % e* @) r6 L) q v$ I/ F1 y# f(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. / ~ Z& E/ E5 z& ~Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician TECH Technical & r$ b/ z7 Y( r1 e' T9 O' gTECHON Technical Control. $ S( d6 {0 Z. `; b gTECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 9 ~' F7 _6 C9 K0 P$ j' G294 # E0 F; t$ B, I K# kTechnical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not % D2 D' n4 p; F Z3 @% @5 |8 ctechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract 1 h( l# L D4 G* X# Jadministration. ; A2 o3 J- x: \* KTechnical Data ) r# h" Y/ @9 aPackage (TDP) $ X) ^, G1 F) L9 P9 i7 m8 AA technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition , |# Y0 Q0 o+ w8 ~ ^strategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item performance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, 0 `) h$ G- T( L) Q- \, ]% {! Uassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality ( s. n. `6 I6 d& s' p' L* p% P7 xassurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical 0 b4 v5 z$ l' p h. }Evaluation , [/ x: R, _, ~: |The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to - M- P/ Z7 X s/ y# z5 cdetermine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in ' c# R8 r7 r% Y! Tthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives The “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. Technical Objectives & Goals (TOG) High-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS # ]- s5 J1 i% O9 \" Hdevelopment; communicates objectives and goals. + Y/ R! B$ m3 V7 u5 {2 YTechnical Parameters (TPs) & J1 `! Z! l _3 `: [$ rA selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical 2 f+ R4 W1 _8 Z# z6 J: I/ _4 _Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk 8 P; E- ?% H0 g) m3 t! a1 Y3 X/ Xanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by management. x2 H7 ~( p! HTechnical Performance Measurement & P: b& D3 O5 _ F# D7 y* _(TPM) : h: P, C9 s3 S& HDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status 3 |& n: N9 h2 H" V9 ?beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design * R p; y: H: ?! Massessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance parameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the values to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures - V7 C8 w) D$ \differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product 0 i t, w3 O' p0 v. C! d' Gelement by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these 0 K* a/ Z7 S0 S* d: M/ p2 _% I" Edifferences on system effectiveness. ; D. k& u! |/ W1 wTechnical 1 C5 k' F: J5 C! HSpecification ' `" N: q' F0 gA detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form 4 `. n: m* i& ^$ c3 X/ {& L% \the basis for actual design development and production. Technical & Z! {2 _0 r! ZSurveillance 2 ^! d1 r: Z% U6 F8 _) c4 I# B6 O9 QIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or 9 f, C3 |8 n, q% {/ g% T/ bemanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise " x7 P; s4 K3 F. Z8 f& ntargeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. A# o/ Z/ j. LTechnology 2 y" q. g) v+ a/ ?; yExecuting Agent . U4 ~3 m) ^" NThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management 0 }# s7 Z# {+ h+ V Cresponsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing 9 f G3 I$ B# O" C/ KAgent. Technology " y, Y; T3 x8 f9 X; z1 UProgram Description $ w4 }$ I; o5 O3 X E, X" u* SThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. 6 w( u2 I* h) W- L4 r6 RTECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. * b4 r# [2 E$ yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 0 g% e4 W$ M6 k; k/ \5 t/ n; ^295 & _0 N4 _& B: c8 P- h) V+ E5 DTEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. & @% f1 s1 F6 E, n4 w! l0 XTelemetry, Tracking, and , r: v* ]3 j5 M" x& D! YCommand (TT&C) " s( ^5 O" ^% y( d1 u- g" j) UFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and status, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a + S& o H$ c; q. l# g' X7 ? Ssequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. Teleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. TELINT Telemetry Intelligence. / `( U: Q& W, F( Y3 {% W5 H% o# YTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See Compromising Emanations.) . d' ?/ ]2 w: N5 D2 @6 D* q; vTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. ' X c9 @- C/ OTER Test and Evaluation Report $ l( }* l+ c5 _3 lTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. " U2 q" {: @" dTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. 4 e/ w" H. U( ^* |, @Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between atmospheric reentry and impact. . T, p3 D1 ^9 [2 aTerminal ' T9 c3 s$ V' C# d# | d: B! YGuidance % z: p# B+ s/ ~3 ]$ h0 VThe guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. + l8 ^& z. G6 |# k) bTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase + L7 c c. k8 e! d7 [and trajectory termination. Terminal Phase Interceptor 5 Q4 A; j" w0 _0 y' w1 A, t! f. OA ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the # v" g; B3 s/ |terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy / I5 }) m/ o1 E+ j, @PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) ( h/ Z$ k3 q3 O D, ~. \- g: t7 N# mTerminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. TES Tactical Event System. + V/ n; z( ?* q; M; W' \TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 Test and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all & z: U. M3 U6 m, y0 ]; H* I7 doperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, analyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and 5 W0 B/ ~/ T6 t9 z2 r& ^Evaluation (T&E) ' i# Y1 G U5 a! ~, \7 C/ ZProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated 0 v; W, F) K" } c! Eto assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production # F8 \+ C0 W2 s' [- HAcceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof 2 s& X. e& \7 ]4 q& Umanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical . f' V# W& s/ N5 Z+ Fperformance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, 5 j4 U7 Q \" P+ C8 Yand provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel , p& H1 Q9 R8 u7 `; _requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that , C/ L5 g7 G2 ]* _: F3 G8 L, i8 Ithose items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts ! z& N: |. K6 f0 u1 x& O Yor agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational (IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of ; h. a# d* A/ n4 U) b1 i8 Eoperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic 1 q: [: @9 r% L- R" F; `environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. ( y; w& h. e$ c: r# D; o% MFOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness 3 x& F3 L$ ]* p$ Z9 L& l" j& [and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of 0 k$ x1 ~. d. ideficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and Evaluation 8 L# j! j, |) N) bMaster Plan $ T" d4 t5 i8 S" F( S# e(TEMP) 9 Y, p% n+ Y, ^7 t5 k( M3 q1 E- p5 DAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate 7 |1 f: g: }3 Y. k6 y% Cobjectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation $ k3 U$ s& ^& K3 I- kto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as ; k f3 O6 d0 B% Kearly as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development 8 s+ i' D* a! d: v: V2 Eprogresses. 4 j3 W) n; {( N8 RTest and Evaluation ( _0 I3 M- [2 H% YWorking Group (TEWG) ; e9 e' M1 b4 ~' ~The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, + f% g$ H% G& w5 ]planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the . G2 H0 ?3 t% Q4 Q/ `( _/ `3 N% R; JAcquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of ) `8 z1 F/ \" h5 Q. N6 {test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test 1 c+ j- t3 w6 a3 z6 ]" w- K! _# ^3 W( }integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the : s& Z7 P' o2 M6 R) F( i$ f2 ~5 Bprogram sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. . M1 C! u$ v; k5 l _ HTestbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software and partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. + a; }, E& S" w0 \% I2 X, _Test Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. $ \5 R1 H. v' X% x) {7 tTest Integration Working Group 1 i& D1 k& B* \. w5 U(TIWG) ; g+ E5 ^, y% `' X2 GA working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in 1 @6 c5 ?: f5 h e d5 corder to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between developmental and operational testing. " K- F$ H/ r1 O- C* e5 _# DTest Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. % j( V7 K# @0 H8 L/ m+ ?The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation 0 C1 z4 y# e$ W0 u. O8 H1 H1 \criteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 297 Test Target Vehicle (TTV) Single stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for 2 p d/ I2 l0 n" u0 D" X! wSMD Program. Also called “Aries”. Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 8 d( r" W) F e5 C; oTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. 9 o3 w7 D9 ~+ ?; v9 R4 OTEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. TEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). TEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. ' H) P- p1 A1 i' X0 q, R9 o) NTF Task Force. 4 E. M! Q- f" p/ @2 @TFC Tactical Fusion Center. TFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). 0 V3 u' o9 L, ^TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. 6 ?! R; O5 U8 |; C/ `TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management 3 @/ s6 F) ]4 `6 `' Y3 }1 m( ~0 dTFOV Theoretical Field of View. ( P& ~ g2 ^2 M9 D( G& n8 O1 tTFR Terrain Following Radar. ( l4 M, G. c7 C$ C: TTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. 9 I7 {0 Q1 y' g( q. zTFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). TFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). / f% n9 G( V) f% T3 uTG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). TGS Track Generation System (USN term). TGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. THAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense 5 @. N, G1 Z/ C(TBMD) System The aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. (USSPACECOM)