航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O( Y1 j3 u& v. f" U8 ~& `3 Z 211 % O& V. ^/ C% b( d- S% N' _ W: `Operational ; e5 w& \" ~! N, zAssessment! N/ n$ j8 J1 `9 y; p' ~ An evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an# ~8 K& A& f9 @ |! h1 W% a" l" q independent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other 9 X, N" `0 e, ]' {than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on& t# W8 O( k0 G, W significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk,7 c) }2 M; z r adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate8 r! h( R1 \1 f, ?( L operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using 1 c& @) u/ }3 f8 Itechnology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development$ B' a6 } y ^' g% Y models, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test # `3 A9 W3 x$ r$ Aand evaluation necessary to support full production decisions.0 P' X3 q* R: G; p, `+ F6 W! X Operational 9 S3 Y: @, ]" EAvailability1 i9 t: [& R% p% f The degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect; t4 ^' b8 h8 p" `5 U) J2 d equipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is 1 m; }; [4 r# O+ k/ buptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link 0 P) ?. ?; s; F! j0 Ibetween readiness objectives and supportability. 8 s' R- Y. G' }% y5 R& ?Operational" ^& H5 t! L/ ~' S) ~ Concept) _! o& C: n% C0 w An end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, 2 p% t% {" Y$ p% G) ^1 u" Morganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task. ) P2 ?3 `: T0 |. N5 xOperational" M; E. `4 s% r; t! b2 _ Control (OPCON) " f6 {- A. {' r/ wTransferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any ' m X- G$ X( r+ Dechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is$ b% s: \" I, M' q# p inherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to 1 Y7 u& Z2 L) ~0 vperform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving9 B a' {% }; ]5 d organizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating T/ S/ q0 Q- N: R% z; Q objectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions( P! Z. T* H0 c assigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the' q# C, `: e" F" Y commanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised9 M5 W$ {" Q' x+ D through the Service component commanders. Operational control normally + z4 [7 t& k# k% X7 C3 bprovides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those9 U- I% o2 w+ S/ `, w$ q forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to! C4 g: w1 R" r accomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself, - N/ r( J Y( \( w4 t% r7 o" Rinclude authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline,% L3 |3 u0 b7 q$ z$ d# f2 Y) s internal organization, or unit training. 7 l5 h F7 l0 o0 K* r; w+ aOperational * k, |+ h7 }4 W- v) V) T% AEffectiveness$ k% { j) t3 m2 q9 G The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by 4 }2 K' A! J T8 ^- F- ]representative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural,6 H# T% N5 V, r6 z7 Q1 l: @% Z electronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering! b: V. f9 D" G7 w; Q organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including! h* x3 d8 z: {4 V countermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and0 U: a1 C8 i3 x# U' K: q" m" I chemical contamination (NBCC) threats). R4 [9 w* U) S LOperational : _, [" R! I) F; `& gEvaluation * a7 A8 z5 n! X! E/ o. FThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable k- [$ X8 y' S) z. W under Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is 6 U7 w! b+ r% L& J8 G4 J0 n. {warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; @2 m* z4 T8 Q n5 Cand b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems,; B( B. P# A [; n0 ~) V! e3 X consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate6 Y4 {* R6 r, a. h/ U, j the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy - y( j4 v- ]% r A r- dcapabilities in the field. ) i( C% q/ ?0 o1 I) lOperational$ Q# x0 \8 l$ _( R' a& k( K Level of War. o& b i V8 K The level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned, , B8 P9 S- S. M w) A7 u8 V$ ^conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or6 d L, N2 o3 w3 O8 L areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by - j$ F H1 S' I7 }establishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic 1 d" _' f8 p; d5 u: @+ W- N: N/ Wobjectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating. t% M9 l7 f, B- m: C, ~/ ? actions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These ) H% v- X/ a$ eactivities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure 9 f6 c& r* M- R. @# [the logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by + e }) {- \0 w0 Q6 A' mwhich tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives.) W9 Y$ N* ?" ^; Q8 q, j6 O9 }4 i MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 9 V4 G: H) I1 }; _+ v0 u212 6 m* [; f8 L2 ?9 cOperational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the" }' s. d7 V6 y& L: j operational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training ' E/ B7 ^: p7 h" o1 sconfiguration.( ]& e; b, Z' v Operational . a1 z6 Z& t$ ^Readiness v/ a* ^! v2 O4 N The capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform9 H! j. W, Z& ] the missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in 2 Z0 `6 V* o2 qa general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.- K& _1 j% K5 R Operational; [5 t: J7 r# L4 Q6 s: \7 V Reliability7 r0 m7 V! R- z) d4 @1 b" X0 y The reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment. 2 N+ Q% j6 V0 {" `Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment. # A0 q3 h6 }2 z' o! y8 rOperational / i; I, t/ u; {2 z" }* \Requirement9 H7 l! C1 T3 t9 ^; y% J Navy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected3 F& G* x1 Z! {' w# J$ Y* P8 H by OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less ) e/ C c0 T& Y) ?: n/ Jthan major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |只看该作者
Operational ) ~6 |- Y$ q( P: j# zRequirements1 O; W' G; v* q- }" O Document (ORD) 7 c. k3 |$ |6 X6 Z! ~Documents the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for2 M; M- C. H7 c+ S K6 } operational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and7 x& v2 J+ d& s( A DoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components. ( N O e |" Y* c8 z \Operational 2 F( O- u3 y3 mSuitability$ v7 h3 ?* ~9 H6 @7 I The degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with 9 j! @9 `* g; k0 u& vconsideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability,; L0 ?9 u9 D, E) \$ b) t( b reliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower , O+ O1 U) R; Qsupportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts, . l" i3 W, a' O" ?' ^documentation, and training requirements. 5 | Z$ b1 |' Z0 V5 iOperational Test0 w. k5 `& n+ ?- `( G9 x, g and Evaluation % o; P/ T; q: z8 X& F(OT&E) 4 H% H, W3 z5 ?2 y) Q% _* ^* ~That T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational2 L* \% O, `& W0 c; v7 _. k( M9 e effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any# a% B6 v% e$ S3 |1 k2 ~. R modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the( n) Y7 p! b; D, ?7 P types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when 9 P& X" e( Y6 Y; t. w- xdeployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as 2 u- }" v# x0 Z+ E3 e( s/ upossible.' J0 K, N' o: B# {) L. x Operationally " \& [( W9 d- Q' M/ {2 J" G" x& E% oReady/ F. w% n) v: {8 X: l0 P 1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or " q! ^. q; T. d- k. T$ `% R, odesigned (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both / p9 a! `+ q* G8 wequipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to; s) }2 V y7 T perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel). 2 O8 a" ]/ x, R) ^; mOperations and) W1 ~4 E0 ]- a* e Support (O&S)7 \0 D0 g2 T9 F- M7 l- i( g. ~ Costs - }5 A( X) } B5 o7 o& U c; m6 O& aThose resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a# E2 `" S3 x, e8 W( A5 I' k) T7 r9 b9 ?& E major component during its useful life in the operational inventory.3 L" b2 W: L: k$ D Operations* w4 P9 G4 k. @9 B& n* i: Y Profile2 S* p) Z: z( @9 ?* D, o An identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time& W& t+ c! W" n) G8 c) F those actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational F% g" b$ b( Tprocedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are ) L9 k) W$ e4 kdiscernible. , T1 i4 E* n6 p. f# ZOperations z3 _7 x# K1 A" s" \& I* v, @ Security (OPSEC)' G' M2 n7 ~8 p5 n9 K Survey # K G, x8 X; D3 q7 w5 }* S: |The method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is: P* [& q/ z! s) _ composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or2 S5 c+ o, ]2 Y; i) d/ t inefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational 6 j' F" ^& u& Y$ O5 a' weffectiveness. % t# D/ N( C$ u' AOPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy).* ~" G! L, P9 R+ e6 `3 { OPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment." n& b. t9 G8 F5 q3 V9 H. j OPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor.+ N# M2 K) R4 h1 w5 c% c- h' r. M, f MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O1 W( \4 R" }; m* B- d 213 2 N( d4 j3 W1 X& j$ { m- pOPLAN Operation Plan.. g0 @3 H, r/ e. x" q OPM Office of Personnel Management.7 Q& q. J( }8 T, U! i# ~ OPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. ; x( `2 y4 V8 W, ?) V/ j! O+ L% pOPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction. 6 Z4 }) g# E6 `; L. v c0 fOPNS Operations. 3 d# [: N! B8 \0 ?% O" COPO Optical Parametric Oscillation.$ N3 ^0 Y8 Y6 G. ]8 R, ? OPORD Operation Order. c0 C, H" R' M OPP Other Physical Principles. 3 M- H+ p9 H: S; QOPR Office of Primary Responsibility. $ U8 Y+ x! K9 N; DOps Operations (employment).! S$ q4 S- {2 S* q8 o OPS Operations./ z( K5 r, u8 G. |% r, E5 p OPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies.9 S4 a# e) u2 A+ d9 N# h6 N. f OPSEC Operations Security. 0 x' O3 P2 y! c6 j- T$ C$ M1 hOPSMOD Operations Module.0 O6 K& I7 C" z/ c9 ^4 a OPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army)& U8 U9 w) o' [9 A OPTEMPO Operating Tempo. 5 d1 {+ G# u) }8 Q! g; e8 POPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy) , N) a6 y( H& r+ sOptic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.7 x/ G: ]- T. r# ]5 u# x1 A Optical Airborne( v1 a3 Z. @: S9 x, D1 k' v! [ Measurement; ~0 D6 s* k1 d% D) O Program (OAMP)& Z( G$ J( b! V8 M+ e) q6 q A program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct 0 r5 O C# E2 Q( P8 Q1 c: ^7 E7 ^ |surveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems. ' m& J- m, j3 M+ a" ] P5 W(Also known as Cobra Eye.) ) u+ N; s% Q! k( {: n6 WOptical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the $ }( ~. \* }6 H/ H/ N4 G$ q* l7 ^) K; m* Jmaterial to which they are applied. 0 ~ }; ^8 T; W9 B! xOptical5 @! I# E* e3 X! v2 k Processing( P# }8 o, q) \ A type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed6 P% a. n- w% h9 a; I7 D through optical systems, is used in problem solving. 2 y% X; {: c- ~% `! K' sOR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational 8 D7 I4 _( ]+ i. z) lReadiness. (4) Operational Reliability. * D# o8 o" B6 i9 h9 {OR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis.+ L, L7 D4 g) a: N ORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser.1 I7 c. k: \1 U0 I: K- I ORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature. + V1 B# i! G: z- F& ?8 y# ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O5 n! C9 p9 V$ g0 C 214, j5 F# i* g4 r* r' }) N4 v Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.) 4 I6 {% I/ m; {* Aused to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital" K6 p `0 V1 ~( {$ h elements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a # @0 D4 H* U) h7 h8 V, j3 LKeplerian orbit at a particular time. - Z& ?* Q) { {& o( rOrbital U+ h' L. u4 k5 BManeuvering3 u' O @! S9 H( |8 l4 S Vehicle (OMV) * n% L. d8 Q1 E b! `' d# A5 vNASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing.. h" u. f) \5 a! U/ Z4 G G$ o Operates from shuttle and Space Station.8 S, l2 b1 \ g% ]* k: } Orbital Suborbital$ x+ x4 a; }# u: ~) { Program (OSP) ' i }- K8 s4 ]6 V+ ]A strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the9 O9 h% R# D( w9 P6 ^ Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |只看该作者
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites.* i7 ^3 r1 x5 k% r0 w ORC Operational Readiness Condition. : d- B' ?5 }) l& f; EORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment. 7 c9 t! [ G( `1 n! _" |ORD See Operational Requirements Document. " l; ^" a" |0 X# cORDALT Ordnance Alteration. " A7 {5 i9 E3 F% g* Q! kOrder of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the) l0 i6 b; A$ h% |4 R personnel, units, and equipment of any military force. ' ]' z* t$ P! Q' l. V n4 q) F1 y' H: vOrder Wire 0 C; o$ G% y; D/ I! P9 OMessage/ c* u$ I% \; H" K A communications support function for internal control of communications / B; O, k M+ w9 Ielements.* Q0 y0 H( \- I7 `9 x$ [ Organic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic 4 J, E- z8 L& x. _: mparts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force, . w. s2 Y" Y" e1 ] tand Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the# y4 C' \1 Z9 X3 K9 t2 T) H operating forces for the Navy. - D- z6 b- D- aOrnate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.6 _) D+ W# J: g ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. * o. }6 c# l7 r: d- q, nORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications. - j \ y0 [# Z& X" Y% zORU Orbital Replacement Unit.% g! U( S/ Z6 H ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. $ f# ~% u4 Z9 nOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System.* u" G F* X& U- P& S1 z OSA Optical Society of America.7 l8 E3 k9 s3 m/ \/ d3 y/ K4 M OSC Optical Signature Code. 9 C3 P% h+ n' D! H# B- }OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe. 0 @3 E4 b6 h: mOSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. 0 p& t# U V% ?. L1 y1 h# cOSE Operational Support Equipment. {2 Y8 K! I, ~2 y1 mOSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool. & O' p: u0 N3 c8 F! w' b2 L/ hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 6 R$ R: c# x- ?7 B' g3 M6 n$ m215 , Y" \) J4 {+ e x9 EOSF Open Systems Foundation.9 B$ s4 J8 D! z OSH Occupational Safety and Health. & p6 @" ?8 @( r+ G* P8 OOSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. % m. n0 v" v! w" I: H: BOSI Operator System Interface. 5 X! p) ^' D4 n% k# t" i/ IOSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC. 7 \$ \& K; |. a5 P6 g2 T5 i, pOSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term).5 F: X- t! h/ x$ b& l3 I2 \# @5 e OSIP Operational System Integration Plan., ?3 }5 o& P" z1 ~6 J8 [* N OSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group.1 |2 E; P9 B* l: c3 Y OSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force.# m% Y! A1 p- p) S OSM Object Sighting Message. , I- _ h! K% K1 d! k) }OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program). : H' Q! i" F0 E0 y1 G+ d8 oOSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy.3 P" O( D: G) F2 ^& c OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research.. q ?7 [( m7 w8 |# X9 ~ OT Operational Test. 8 n+ ~6 k. B, y) wOTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC. # s6 a& _. d4 y+ i' c(2) Operational Test Agency.$ P- R' Q$ o0 w8 {7 v0 I (3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA.5 D; _1 D: C% n0 Z5 v* I OTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term).2 C& a! y# f5 |: g- ]% }, U/ W OT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation.1 F0 \# }+ i D3 C' y OTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. $ d- u5 [' j; I) X5 [OTF Object Track Profile. 3 U. }: B! W+ ^1 t& WOTH Over the Horizon. 9 D9 s" B; ~) g( _$ j' oOTH-B Over-The-Horizon. 9 @/ S. o. G& P5 ~( {. VOTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting. 7 e7 m% L; V6 v4 T. I `8 ~6 vOTO Operational Test Organization. ( @7 u/ l( _1 G4 h+ ~. P, B# aOTP Outline Test Plan. + O5 `. l) A' z S6 wOTS Off-the-Shelf.9 G9 m2 l" o. X: W; `/ O- n } OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis.0 N+ ^8 Y& F: F$ m7 D- w5 G OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle.0 V4 S4 H: N% {+ d& F- u9 ?- O9 I OUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense., S1 {( g1 c& e' u6 {& B; Y) f MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O ! D/ p1 p' _. N8 X5 |2166 [# m& N+ b0 P OUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T). , `$ C+ d8 f1 p+ o/ N: G( wOUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology).! k$ O, G0 L8 A7 b( r Outer Space$ P. l$ [$ T6 S4 ?: N* Y Treaty of 1967- B4 ~2 r6 p; `( t! Q2 ]$ X* M0 Z A multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the9 |% j1 Q5 N2 Q& } (former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing / D7 b9 \3 y" [( M+ d# pnuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space.9 u! J) H9 P( ]) N Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or - y q$ {* C: F {$ L/ |- zother payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays # ^/ f9 G6 v) J4 ~" Jconsist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget,+ {- n6 r$ @( m* X minus receipts.8 @7 L; f/ }7 e$ [ Out of Band 7 a9 ~- G* l4 e# } o8 [# tLaser Flux6 G7 E+ l, P2 K+ W* T# H (Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt ) h: S, h( Y- F1 Z; @the sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth. 1 W" [2 s. i% Y7 Q1 ^Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget. 8 m$ {: g2 q4 f5 K3 UOverlay BMD ) Q- o; B% u3 c+ l4 wSystem & }% l# U: i1 {3 M3 k1 {( V6 u" {An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of8 Z* P6 ]- a$ n ICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear 0 r+ r! C* T- \! ]) u- ohoming interceptors., Y' j. d; D" ]( U OWG Operating Working Group.! X5 Y* e( z: s+ g6 t MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 1 S' r* F! ^3 G, N# u5 _217 , q; ]' O+ e; B8 x! J4 r8 g5 cP&D Planning and Design (MILCON term).4 k9 n0 H" a4 O o% N9 M" ?+ `3 E P&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture. F* z h; [3 TP.B. President’s Budget.: W( {2 a f! {* @" s/ m P2 Pollution Prevention. 6 T1 f0 z7 z. K& ?p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. 1 j6 g& w2 X; e2 C6 uP3 Pollution Prevention Program./ W9 P" R E! t) d2 P4 ^4 e- Y P3 I Preplanned Product Improvement. 8 \& H) f& |; N: [: I O: J/ [PA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs.. Y2 c5 [2 G3 s5 e \+ ] PA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation. 5 C& q3 G* y2 Y& C& R8 W* l0 PPA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate.3 q2 b# p& l$ P- H$ z PAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA)& N) i% H( H0 `- \ PAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-29 ^- K x K& H PAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT. 1 H% u: s2 U* m) MPAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 . j' T4 M$ U9 KPAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL.. Y& _/ q9 H# n& L PAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4.; R" r) P% h% o' M0 h+ E; Z6 ? PACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. 2 W+ r0 o# U9 P, J* J/ R+ u6 J0 OPACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific.2 H0 W! q+ N9 ~7 Y" c0 ~' G" X PACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier.( c6 b8 V s/ ?) j, J+ k d$ Q8 z) c- G) p PACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |只看该作者
Packaging, $ [9 K+ S% B0 a5 g3 ^, Q. { qHandling,- d9 y+ E2 K7 g Storage, and( N% \5 ^$ a+ J7 ^2 u Transportation 8 d+ T0 F2 h! B(PHS&T)$ \7 E9 |$ e. V3 B& f The resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to; P% t" `- F- u7 h5 y ensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged,% s. U3 O! V$ ~$ n6 u) ] handled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations," Z3 y$ p& m% n# @ Q equipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and % d2 `1 Z. Z4 |5 [: ?transportability. / s/ I7 i% C! Q; @9 @9 F1 MPacket Switching $ g# ^2 ?9 [# }7 b& E(PSW) 4 e" |- b6 l \6 `+ W' D& UA data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is * `) J5 K+ X+ m8 Moccupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data0 X) o2 E! Q; j7 w4 l9 q5 U. b t: x communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and% G/ T* l2 h6 C. X0 W/ m, \ then formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment ( ?( u5 F( n7 v) n- uor by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes.0 w# W$ ~; C4 g. p/ {, X PACOM U.S. Pacific Command.- O! B! G" A0 i( {( i PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures. ! Q' Y8 F, f( W, b$ `6 u% z4 w5 FPADIL Patriot Data & Information Link. & G w) _5 Z! }8 r( @- wMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P2 L3 W8 B4 T& W6 R3 U% @9 n0 j) J 218& `" B9 ]. A! H! J PAFB Patterson Air Force Base.) O& B* S G6 A% _" A PAL Permissive Action Link.# y! b9 G9 Q7 F+ ]2 Q0 P( S a. A PALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). . k% `6 X8 F/ o6 L2 SPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation./ _5 V. b0 }# Q& Z6 m PAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber]. ( c6 {1 `1 C/ w' p( ]* LPancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to4 [) `; [' w) J& L) _5 v the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown./ D# G/ e2 b& }9 w. U% M PAP Predicted Aim Point. $ H6 Z" W# u% Q- Y% Z- f. o& z- n2 ^PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar., y, p4 l; W9 ~/ O$ ~* Z/ O (2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.) ! o0 E7 D' Z4 d(3) Preprocessing Analysis Report.) R( ?: W$ `# F. K7 B; e (4) Program Assessment Report. $ z0 P( Y" R: }. o& y5 h(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar.+ X/ r1 ]/ y; {$ `0 \6 z; F Parallel I4 v' a" A* N% V Processing4 W5 a: A7 W! A In parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into! _; \- E, t/ Z smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that % D7 j. V" X# y: H$ g4 imuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained.4 B+ g: \! _ ~# [ Parametric Cost2 R7 @( `. v. U8 L1 _. X7 |4 F Estimate j7 ]' H9 G% ^. S) fA cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical 4 [- d H4 I5 p9 t6 j7 acosts and other program variables such as system physical or performance 8 h q& {! d1 U& a- K! ^characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also 5 I% ]5 R- [3 j" j2 S+ f1 Preferred to as a top-down approach. , G$ {+ ~& ?& nPARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System. 1 a/ C3 ?: z0 b9 ]" P0 nPARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs.% k3 }0 c1 \8 y) E, u/ ^ Partial Mission$ h1 h9 C* ~' l" H! ^1 m8 H Capable4 i. D: {' P& m9 C; ~8 s' [ Material condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at/ |8 |& Z! h7 n least one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission ) @# L; b. |' ^% jCapable. & a3 P# T9 g# k1 H9 V& L6 Z, QParticipating* f5 G% t% g. p" b Service " O& P3 Q$ Q1 s5 a; I7 q6 K8 hA military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint( j, r( @, E6 }/ O1 h! p acquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds. 5 L6 _& Z" C) n( |$ a0 P1 a7 rParticle Beam* t+ {+ Q7 ?. V% u (PB) : _8 Q" ?$ L, Q3 VHigh-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or- M+ {" G" d+ I4 z& Q neutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light.7 E7 ^6 A$ I5 m5 k Particle Beam + d2 A; R+ @. c8 S; |# `Weapon (PBW) , W+ T3 A S# a" F* m4 qA weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers) $ a6 p0 \- L, ^0 C# B: ~+ w3 Wto emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of 5 _( h7 W: T# I" q Clight. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g., : x3 l$ C) h2 ~electronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor, C3 B! C) A b2 u3 g+ l7 b) ~ damage, and initiation of high explosives.+ K+ Y$ e( g. X" Z5 L PASS POET Advanced Submunition Study. + {+ c, X9 t- ?6 k( H8 |Passive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no, O, D, J( n$ g/ n- L3 } energy capable of being detected.4 W ^4 @" l J0 @# T& y& ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 3 U# X0 [+ I8 ^219# y* c. f% i0 b0 B- Z Passive Air2 o9 p2 b4 G+ o$ |3 G' F Defense ; t. k$ m+ x0 w' m6 X7 a. S4 SAll measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness 2 G7 h7 P3 K$ F$ o' |$ \; Bof hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use1 r+ _; Y, `8 b5 r of protective construction.( k6 X- T2 \' y* U L+ E/ R Passive5 E: I- {" ^* u( B9 g Communications$ _: u1 y0 k; H2 Y/ U Security Threats0 s" h% u0 ?4 m) n% _ Threats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through3 c/ D( `1 O% W3 m! ^) Q intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic1 G" u" j9 E1 b$ N! Z6 h6 { f emanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications ! I8 q) t: R0 h. _interception and direction finding.5 o* w3 K4 x5 D# s Passive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects& i3 E4 C! Q2 \! l( j( O1 q# k of damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the ' r" Q9 o1 u0 M6 c ]# e* J$ finitiative. ! q- I* A3 e7 n ?8 }+ G(2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile1 n9 p6 ?; q& @% t attack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing . C4 P; H0 i: Q3 B. P5 Ithe vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the " g. m/ j2 r/ G1 [$ ypotential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive# ^; s& y+ a3 S1 m measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and+ D y `% G& ^; z3 p1 l2 B; ^ concealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and+ \# c7 ~" u: t A2 ^ redundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of. V& d, F$ e4 s TMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS) B3 X; s4 L' |2 G8 e9 `- @Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking 6 a8 r' _7 y- ~5 N# dand/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |只看该作者
PAT Process Action Team.2 j7 t" A: U- Z+ y8 K9 _- ^ PAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation.6 a, K4 e. g# A" P: _ PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor. 8 e* W7 [* {8 r5 w* M. V( i' ~5 tPATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile).7 c& `4 l/ U6 G' Q PAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System.8 E* r4 E j$ K! E6 K! ` Phased array SLBM warning system. Four sites:4 b. U/ O( a4 y# {7 e a. East Otis ANG Base, MA : w& _% G2 k0 Z4 c# v; c. L: ~, j3 Cb. West Beale AFB, CA 4 a& p! v) E2 xc. Southeast Robins AFB, GA 3 u1 h ^0 X2 T& d9 f9 T& vd. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX3 q+ b! @: ]) ^. l, ? PAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term). & P- O% s7 R5 p! o1 xPayload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile.9 T; a3 u F, }# n, \5 H! ] (2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile. . Z6 o# M. y8 D$ F* ?7 ^1 R(3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry 0 Q0 h ?# G2 [& F; @/ I% \vehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon)" g% F5 I% ]# U* t8 r- \ Payload Build-up& B* E8 [9 X# b9 L0 \: S- a9 X1 { (Missile and: U; a! P1 y0 V0 y Space) 4 i0 g, J/ s Z! x9 L! uThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and $ ?: S; U+ z/ y$ {, unecessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a & T0 B0 e7 j7 _; Y4 mcomplete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of . X1 {7 e& H. Pthe mission.3 u9 e) f6 [# i9 C0 {1 s Payload* T/ [6 W0 P7 b5 h7 e8 d: M8 o Integration ( v0 x. s7 K% r) e' i(Missile and 4 d+ }4 h/ u3 v' z$ Y5 J% V# e: j& c lSpace), u v, S; w) E: y The compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft , s& u% @; u/ z. ?and space vehicle. ; ]6 r$ ]/ `3 I* D6 t& U: X3 |MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P* s) w- K! z, p+ u 220* n- P& [/ r: f! S& [/ y# b9 ?5 ^ PB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget. + R' y& g) A9 z( X* P. D# B& @2 S* Q(4) Program Baseline.) ]. E, T4 y. @6 ~6 d PB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD. / [- Z4 M8 p% n. ^PBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer. 8 z8 L, V7 N1 O+ Z; `0 RPBCS Post-Boost Control System." R% ?3 q8 ~% [ PBD Program Budget Decision. 4 u( Q; r' L6 f7 P7 k; x, @PBI Post-Boost Intercept.* l% t) t8 J6 P* r- T* o PBP Post-Boost Phase. 6 K% W0 x. P5 G$ V1 d' p5 PPBS President’s Budget Submission. ( Z9 t+ Q; S8 d) k! zPBV Post-Boost Vehicle.# p6 t4 ?# y8 A! a PBW Particle Beam Weapon.8 e: q/ |; A7 [ PC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee.5 _; x3 ]; a9 v PC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term).2 p# r4 Q; x- a" u! S PCA Physical Configuration Audit.; {3 I2 `1 M; b5 A4 D; e PCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. " [* B2 H. _( f+ f( e8 m1 O0 aPCB Printed Circuit Board. ; [+ O4 A$ G1 r2 y& tPCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term). * _% V/ u; }+ JPCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term). ( h; O0 W& W: _4 mPCE PLRS Communications Enhancement.& R; }5 ?% Q- V F& s PCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team." z0 J7 Y3 } S0 U8 W PCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term).; |& x/ c; z) J1 _ PCI Peripheral Component Interface.. @. L% @3 a3 E( R PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language. ) ?8 G0 a, X3 z; `PCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation.$ Z' ~4 w) A9 N/ f& u* J7 f PCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. 7 s# w: L8 T( X2 R, QPCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). 1 U$ G2 ]0 w5 w- K) U n8 j' ] Z( ePCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative.: \ e6 |' N2 t+ {; y PCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System.1 d; Z3 b8 m/ C# h) K PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure. ! X- A6 {: Y4 w! `6 c) I( yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P% E0 t. V8 d1 ~' U% g 221% x1 c6 r4 V5 [5 \) j PD (1) Presidential Directive. ' T' B6 ^" N! L' Z(2) Procedures Description.3 w) T# X- {- y8 @ (3) Probability of Damage., v" C. s$ H" C. ?0 ^+ M4 ]) {& A r (4) Probability of Detection. ' f6 { A- ?3 M& @" q9 L(5) Preconditions for Defense. . L( s' {0 B- `* @: c" |, x( ?+ i {(6) Program Director (AF).. c h: H: q0 z (7) Production/Deployment. 2 ~1 z) ~* [) F1 c/ S6 {(8) Phenomenology Document.6 O9 e) I8 e6 a1 Z (9) Passive Defense. / `# z# j7 E6 v/ A% [PD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term)., q: r" N: g( T, s8 G! U( Z' T4 ?0 p6 v- O PD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term). 0 t! p X6 s( T2 M6 w1 FPD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term). * ]1 n4 k# a4 F! x$ p2 d% _PDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT). % H0 i l/ U3 W$ h# GPDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN. * L+ H- d$ F4 ~; UPDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive./ x- h6 F- I6 e. U; N7 U) P+ w$ P PDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term). 4 X8 K3 n- I# B V# c- OPDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). # K5 Z: d0 P3 d$ _1 C6 oPDP Pulse Doppler Processor. & f1 H0 e/ u# V* A1 K# q3 k, mPDR Preliminary Design Review. 2 Q! {& V9 D8 b; s/ ^$ ]1 }, G8 qPDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2).) p' e8 U3 Z. x3 n (2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction. T7 n2 F2 D& h. i2 @ PDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. O8 k, U% w p, p1 V1 tPDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term).3 M4 e. F0 i" e& y# p2 y PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense.! ~; Z% b. P+ A, b$ G PDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology).1 k0 {, [9 C+ S& c- l- B6 U) z5 G PDV Program Definition and Validation. , V4 [% d! c0 v6 H3 gPE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |只看该作者
Peacekeeper US MX Missile.+ r6 R" o. c) G2 a+ b- q Peak Gamma 6 D X! S- Q9 ~) tDose Rate2 x1 x8 Q' D# n0 o The maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could / [- i0 H+ a& Y# p( ?survive and continue functioning.* ^0 U9 Q$ H3 M) S1 Z5 A PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria. 2 g# M( @/ S$ i m }5 KPEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation.3 U6 b8 e& {! x! z( j PEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD). 8 R/ e, ~2 i, r6 s+ r9 s0 x3 n6 j% oPEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.. k7 `3 t' L3 T- r MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P' d) W4 O8 ]! C 222 $ z, |" X7 d/ G& W" F3 K( P( o9 C5 zPEM Program Element Monitor (AF). ( a8 e! {' e5 N3 RPENAID Penetration Aid. . c- G$ g% ~0 |( g4 ]1 ?Penaid) Y+ a- G" `' g0 E (Penetration Aid)& c9 ]" N6 v U% r" k% m% e7 i (Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by8 d: O7 K$ H; B1 K \4 @" T: h offensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating# M/ m4 ?# O; `' c( c enemy defenses.2 S4 h( ~8 p5 p0 A# M Penetration/ e+ Q. c3 N( l+ W. {8 C6 q Testing: l% L; ]* W5 B9 b The portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the $ T- M2 K; i+ {. j- U. w$ r- psecurity features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all8 g, ^- p) y& F- T system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of 6 B# C0 J$ b4 Usystem source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under 1 y! s. ?7 ]5 Y# _) r& A4 ono constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. ' _) t& M. a9 X9 D8 zPEO Program Executive Officer.4 v8 w% T; J, @2 T6 v. a" M9 L PEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army) $ f% k( p9 y$ q4 O1 G4 uPEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program. ' O7 T( P: h5 b9 m ZPEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy)6 Y( l, F+ g; ` L9 e3 e PEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program# j2 S% J! b z$ E) k8 \( l Office. 7 T" I/ {8 A, P5 K. v/ |PEP Producibility Engineering and Planning. " g% H* u: l5 m6 `. G) m( iPEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning. 7 _1 _, u# ` ]8 u7 W# ]: w! w8 CPeregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. ) F! W1 M" [' M0 k+ N; g3 kPerformance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to d/ B" g* d7 _7 j- x effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support1 c- h& y! `2 c characteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design # t5 j! K( \, E* d& fand the support elements necessary for system operation. ) Y! @6 l; h! u8 o. VPerformance 9 \) M7 a- a3 Y rRequirement" J( [0 V$ s1 u; e' c, ~ A requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system2 C- `2 e$ e$ }: u9 S/ J* Y( S or system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency., Q. ?! a8 Y# o( z& ?; z, V: K Performance . f& c7 s" a0 \- m! s; Q2 e( {6 sSpecification 8 y! @$ w* k9 s$ U(1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system 0 H& A3 W0 z: vor system component. 1 ~0 E; M. s2 E2 P(2) Synonymous with requirements specification.- Q( A+ {, ]) h: p+ m5 D1 H; L Perimeter ( n. i; B! F& `, z5 A. A5 ]) GAcquisition2 G; K, d% T# W# n Radar and Attack % y8 ]' S( ?9 P- [( L l. }Characterization 7 p4 U# g2 I7 E6 \ h& H. z! q/ |System (PARCS)$ b# G3 L5 o5 X5 ` AN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and# n' J: k+ Z9 F( n- l* w attack assessment.. s; g$ P+ L* V6 R3 J {& ` Period (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit. 2 t$ J9 Z. J, n2 a0 u/ T. l7 UPermeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something.; ^$ h% R; r9 v9 h2 N Pershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe. / c, U5 t/ ]4 F# Q" IPERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique. + O* z# e+ ]7 l0 s1 ^% z( FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P % o8 M% ?+ _, d0 D. F) f223$ f) E6 E- N$ k3 S8 H# D PERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other# L5 H. D7 h0 [7 v/ f$ L6 o activities for completion, and depiction of the critical path. 9 d) [ a) {' H, N+ z) lPESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation. & k, G, ?1 y2 S7 ] RPET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test. - w8 ~4 p: P3 B$ [6 }9 QPFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler. ' D- {6 l& n5 @PFD Preconditions for Defense. 9 ?+ u8 v, J% { [PFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. % B: h# @5 n* o/ TPFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD)." n: i' I2 s8 f6 a1 w+ k8 I PGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term). 3 e( Y8 q2 \" ZPGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term). 0 H. f4 A$ q0 D5 }; F2 t iPGM Precision Guided Munition.$ y' d! V4 Z& C( c9 | PGU Power Generation Unit. ' Z" K1 }& {: Y, r& lPH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).6 r8 {7 c+ l. L* a5 I" j; V6 J' a/ } Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically6 F6 D' k3 c! r4 U' i( ?% ` stationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to ) A$ E5 H0 G. f. w7 f# [+ canother (e.g., phased array radar). ( l$ ?; E% P1 KPhased Array" d6 G- o# O; r) g! {/ E5 ? Tracking Radar! ^, I% D! G2 {& b Intercept On - }: \9 M# a1 Z1 Q* y/ O4 dTarget (missile) 7 @; q5 a6 P" F. z! @1 K! ](PATRIOT)5 {1 Q# }1 _! [& s/ G8 l6 Z A point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 - s5 ]6 t4 m7 U$ v+ k: Z: }improvements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles, 8 W+ {; K/ u$ Q; kinclude upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either# ?1 |; g L e7 _ PATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT.% z; L3 }6 t+ g0 H+ i Phased, A# g/ a' ?) c& E: J. t Deployment 3 o& G4 r& T2 Z5 x: @, Z# ^5 \The sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system ) z& E9 }" J! Y) p0 L6 U! ~capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints. 5 V2 ~6 R9 N0 q) p l. tPhase One. B% i: G) y% V( W Engineering" i8 p6 f6 ~! Y- z' | Team (POET) 0 Y' Y$ ?5 b* k) n0 O- uOBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program7 S( v @/ q5 v; {& r Office. Now referred to as POET. 7 [# T t% b9 ^$ TPhenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts% ?$ s/ |: i8 f collect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena& F5 I( [" M( m4 T6 y required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. ) M" p; \1 a5 f9 h; }PHI Photonic Hit Indicator. + ` |4 Z _6 |3 I% e* [PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. * N* b( I5 _8 S pPHOTINT Photographic Intelligence. : p" L, N4 q {$ s9 A0 e' ePhotochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light. 5 f; d a( W1 pMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P$ r, o Y' o q& L- v3 J6 I 2244 }+ n2 l1 B- _+ f" u+ e Photoelectric5 @; h1 O, K! _# E Effect! D0 s( P% E) `5 D J The process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat4 q& q4 n$ F, T2 L+ n greater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its% N( _. L0 M6 l energy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it$ ~" V# a9 f# g has lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.): R% u5 H" }2 U# z Photon A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, . X8 j2 Y! N$ e. A* |/ y( t- Awhich is characteristic of the particular radiation. ! e+ Z" `: z1 w! }4 f* Q- DPHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation.: S6 y1 l- r( [6 w' @. ] Physical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic & t! d5 K9 I' o6 b% efields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris, , S' z5 K ?: @and extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |只看该作者
Physical8 J+ h' _7 [& N Configuration0 @6 r' [8 b) l6 U% q+ B/ G& G Audit (PCA)7 U! O' H! Z+ X+ c- P2 ~ Physical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to & X* v+ I( ^& a$ _. tthe technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government2 |; S. r5 |& | g program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this ' N) d8 j7 ~; T3 laudit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production ' G" s" H6 D0 }8 U6 `or first LRIP team.6 f" ~7 n& ^" @; y; ~ PI Program Integrator. ( [/ A+ E1 ^4 {0 e# A% uPIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term). : e7 ~1 k) K1 O |# mPIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term). $ ~9 D5 i; |. a- d) O; S% V(2) Policy Integration Committee.6 K$ v. N$ s- R (3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term).* C4 i2 A% r* O/ i( d+ a9 m Picture Element6 U# r1 b( |6 L8 D( N0 |+ {& Z (PIXEL) # h* [& K8 y6 @) ^/ n4 }% X5 eThe smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned 6 v9 c( k$ b! Bcolor and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a( r8 x$ ]% x( S recording medium.7 {1 J. M- A5 x6 y PIDS Prime Item Development Specification.5 y0 Y4 K7 b& D6 v% e8 K Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing- P( N# M. ?# |8 i4 @, K4 V methods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. 0 h( w0 e% I/ b+ E6 u* y% SNot the same as long range initial production. - Z' s" R% N* Q; L9 N7 v: CPIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term).$ u6 D1 t6 B( U. { PIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System.; w: j$ e7 X, T+ g7 i' j+ l) R9 u PIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point.0 m- {. c3 y U2 D (3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program. ) j- s" s" z9 z8 v- lPIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team.; E2 E7 r5 x- a. X% w PIR Program Information Report.8 Z" l. w2 q4 h l6 }; N PIXEL Picture Element.) n7 r. d R: e, A# R; h+ V8 H Pk Probability of Kill.( x% p$ O' m. { PKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard. # M2 D, T0 m+ GPKH Probability of Kill, given a hit. 0 A" n/ Q. X7 \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 3 x' ]# Q% k* c" l4 \( i. Z6 |225 ! Z% h, t( N! e0 K, MPKO Peacekeeping Operations. ; m' I% ]3 x2 I' }' k* j gPkss Probability of kill -- single shot. & o9 S* \& G/ \- m3 T( N5 O# bPL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public! }' I7 y# a$ Z; c! Z) p4 P Law. 3 q) ^$ t& k9 T, G/ g7 FPLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement. # C3 k" u& M+ S* J, bPLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military)./ E- m2 S& _' U Planning,) l, ~0 O( e. E8 ]0 O- D3 v Programming,; |2 o5 b& e6 s Budgeting, t/ [* b- r! J" }9 p System (PPBS)) y0 h# L5 l" D* H' [& t The primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic. ?5 i. h8 Y# ]! G4 S structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces , |+ n% a7 Q' b& ]& B2 tand capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process ; a j6 Q6 Y7 V+ ] G8 {containing three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the: Z7 `5 K7 p0 }( W- l7 w* V1 h Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and - J' e& E/ ?: A" _Defense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the& t1 ?' q2 q; g/ _+ M; ]2 `# j' N9 j President’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each 1 n! N$ b$ P. N* ]+ M ]odd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning 9 x+ T8 w+ T- K( S t' Fphase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the 0 P& K- N% g1 Z' P. M/ k. DPresident’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management9 S# i w" V6 \: N# R College)6 W' g9 t4 v- V, I4 y" @: F: ~9 ?- \ PLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate.. z' ~5 @: `$ ^* @5 L/ X PLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term).* C; L9 D8 h5 c PLRS Position Location Reporting System.: } {$ A3 j& e0 w Q. \ Plume Data / [( S( V3 R7 j2 x' ?1 q( v8 R5 fCenter: A: F( V' c: U& z# U% {( Z AEDC, Arnold AFB, TN. ) G- k! W% f$ QPLV Payload Launch Vehicle. @5 _' ?7 g5 Q: PPM See Program Manager. 7 F# R$ b" E, [3 F( }3 Q3 ?PMA (1) See Program Management Agreement. 6 `* x0 z% t) q(2) Post-Mission Analysis. D4 B2 K0 S# U$ y6 Z (3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station)., }4 n# K! x% N% a5 G PMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool). ) a# b8 a: \4 e) d, GPMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term). 2 F+ \6 b0 X. H+ ~ c- qPMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF). ; i6 H/ }" p5 ^; s. V' HPMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory.2 p3 G# r2 b+ E# H9 a$ D PMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection. . S: r# ?! U2 w QPMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term). * E# Z4 }1 M7 a9 [9 O7 CPMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group.8 n' v8 w8 q& d: M PMO Program Management Office. ! ^6 ^* y# E# f- I) \& hMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P $ v3 c! {$ c" {6 |( c* ?" B o" Q5 i226 $ s8 [5 m6 r8 h3 G7 ~PMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP). 3 |5 J! `' a; ~7 x(2) Program Master Plan. 7 \7 [- O( K- Y& i" Q4 J(3) Prime Mission Product.& K3 G0 M I9 k3 a, U (4) Program Management Plan.2 w# I; f0 |* N# X5 d4 s% V6 R PMR (1) Program Management Review.; S% U: D# ^! R0 F+ [5 A4 k (2) Pacific Missile Range.- P- g$ ]( `* f$ i( f (3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term). ' h; z8 G& N- [PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI. 2 o7 D( v* X5 t! q7 n# }7 s+ dPMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term). ! K0 [% j, ^* N+ g5 H/ S(2) Performance Measurement System.$ l& ?+ N. t( j& t% t PMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA.2 l+ w* G- i g9 t9 V* |) [& E* K PMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group.. }! \- ~2 A& U0 y+ q PN Probability of Negotiation. ]) C3 u" X5 s4 i* X/ W PNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion.( T2 a# O% ?$ ^6 c2 Q PNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty.% g, e. R6 `8 ?- D# P PO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office. 7 k8 B3 R3 U$ x a3 q# i/ H(2) Purchase Order.% E) t0 f, U: c# F2 ^ @0 } POA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones. / T+ }' {& j- l& t" aPOC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept. 5 O+ Q/ }( n7 K, T# y GPOC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile ) c. D3 U1 \7 t" f, `8 @/ @9 Mcommand post). n3 J1 _/ f* f' Q( rPOCT Passive Optical Component Technology. $ b" E8 y; ^3 m. [1 hPOD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation.3 E! ^- b5 w4 h- q! e PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance.' E$ ?, O* k( t0 @9 A0 S POE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment. . y/ e% s; w2 A. [+ C9 wPOET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support " c6 A+ X# B. h/ a6 O6 b4 ^( Ito the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.)7 A& q: S+ Z" o+ `! O Point Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g., ) U4 m; ~* P; f' L: k' V# {command and control facilities, air bases, etc.. V/ a3 L8 W' K' R6 i/ M Point Defense 9 l' ^" G# |; j' E- eSystem3 \5 o& D7 D* o* D1 _3 t& y$ g A terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles 0 }7 s; V7 k8 i: @0 I- [5 ~to defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s.# L3 S! _3 ]1 \9 ~5 Q Pointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy 0 z& ^: s9 x% [" B5 j( ~either to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing! O2 R- R3 w8 U$ j and tracking are frequently integrated operations. 6 X2 ]: f$ \ _. O0 qPOL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication.' t$ W: k, W/ h/ s, X MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 6 `4 r6 ?& o5 e3 ?) j227* v% L* X8 E0 I6 h POLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |只看该作者
POM Program Objectives Memorandum. 1 r, s; f" X8 e& \ r3 N6 SPOMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets./ V4 V; _& W8 \7 e' S }) W POP Proof of Principle. + u) Z9 x: c' i- K8 CPort Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems." E# e* k* g: n Z! D: G, ~6 \ Portability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on% O( q- O" j7 V$ Z" M; ? one computer or operating system can be used on another computer or% e; A2 a2 H% [- v& C* v# B, o operating system.7 S2 T( P6 n! j( \ POS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position. ; B- u7 K7 z2 _$ `Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). & v$ ? F$ b9 @+ @% `; S9 nPOSIX Portable Operating System Interface. / w+ P G4 u8 c4 b7 o- `! QPOST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. 7 d( [" s% @0 c7 P/ BPost-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. + K( a7 Q3 a( m! VPost-Attack7 V4 b6 C- z/ P! q d& n. i0 ` Period ) a9 C n( u# f5 _; \3 ^In nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final 2 D# G* D% M# R$ p$ y! Jattack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities.! F& u* m. ]: D5 E Post-Boost 5 j1 z3 C: Q2 R/ nPhase (PBP) 0 @' I$ u( i) EThat portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered * V. x8 M& B- p+ Y# Gflight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic 7 I+ S: S5 `. G4 S/ E5 Fmissiles. (USSPACECOM) 6 J3 ^" L/ ^$ N) S1 tPost-Boost4 v) V1 t$ Z* {1 g, N Vehicle (PBV) 1 H9 {+ @$ J, R" w7 aThe portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the' a O8 ?$ V7 A9 E; e maneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final N* Q, V5 {; `/ {/ O trajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus." s& [& [4 V0 A6 | ^. S1 ?POSTPROD Post-Production. . v: v0 k. n# ]# R, I0 E$ ~POTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification.4 W2 O) K% F( R; ?1 }. P6 D+ y9 N PP (1) Parallel Processing. 2 K4 V* L9 l1 [& R0 {(2) Principal Polarization. 8 h5 A% K1 k5 _. W. f(3) Post Processing. % x! q; b4 ^( P" f7 q& s( r/ v(4) Program Plan. ' t9 K p& u$ r2 `. }1 _PPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System. R0 D. I* L: U( W6 `7 W (2) Program Planning and Budgeting System. & _0 N5 [: {. @1 P8 O- OPPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System.8 G( T' }$ k8 a" w+ v( Q2 x! t) Y PPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance. ) z1 B5 v2 ?) n( sPPI POM Preparation Instructions. x4 U6 @0 N2 _. K/ r- F$ m PPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan.1 a! e% m$ I3 ], q( c% j, q PPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies. 0 C9 e; Q( s" E) RMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P * c8 {+ |$ ?5 M228 ! o$ ~! t4 Q* U+ m( SPPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term).2 H, Q9 h0 ?! f2 j/ |% v. d PPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term). : b! k6 {, k/ ~. OPPP Program Protection Plan.* N9 Q9 u) q) N% c3 U PPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test. ) R! i1 _ A% Q9 r3 w0 W0 @PPS Precision Positioning System.' Z% q' S7 _8 B$ ]" y2 A* N PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD).- C8 t/ C0 F" q' Q7 w PR Procurement Request.% h. h9 l& S4 r$ T$ A, \/ s PRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board.5 J8 { e8 v0 k6 z5 ]# n+ ] PRC Program Review Committee.! G# N* |$ R! Y1 H3 y" } PRD Presidential Review Decision. 6 D4 V) l: `, z" K. e5 dPRDA Program Research and Development Announcement. . a5 v" Y! p |PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review. * s$ F U7 s: M* Z( t- S) b2 V0 GPre-Allocated9 n$ R5 o7 G9 z Defense9 e j4 B) x( F1 u' W- M6 S2 B& ^ A preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be9 w2 X+ q& j+ @9 w0 Y. y) b, W# } used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or + M# I# l: s C1 h8 t2 c0 T9 Yset of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the * r# H. ~7 r& Q' G/ B' f3 Unumber of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets : D- F$ ~* y- i0 D& Runder attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack.) b% {0 _6 b( B$ \! t$ {- E; g( { Pre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off. W+ v7 {( }* w1 j3 ^Pre-Authorized/ F2 L! d5 ^( k3 \ Engagement. ]2 t# _6 E( y# [; P, a Criteria (PEC)6 D+ M8 U# l( T, F& {! G Pre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when 7 y" ?$ c$ m3 ^8 i* w4 A$ [5 Bsurpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled. / j: q) h) j& F rPre-Commit C3 E- i8 m7 _3 Z Strategy : ?! C/ X* z. W0 \A tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed 2 C, N `* k* y. oto specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the $ |; f- {# g4 a0 edefensive weapon’s trajectory.3 b3 `/ Z' r% j9 S1 }3 N Pre Launch 8 d- t8 b4 z* o- [9 nSurvivability / K1 M J& h3 _6 Z0 CThe probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack Z6 v0 H$ U$ G9 V5 h6 Xunder an established condition of warning. : L* a. d/ T7 Q7 H- VPrecedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall " j% j9 `: r6 M, Q- t) bbe served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the1 C" D& |. K# q! g! {) w1 Y highest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served2 `8 V3 G! A* ]1 b; S, D first and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence( D7 M- ]& R- K, i0 H( A levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance)$ a5 _( }' j" z+ i A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance m: u& s1 \/ ` C4 G/ N% bmissions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established' L; U9 _2 `5 v/ w! k+ z priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |只看该作者
Precision 7 G" ]; z* g# _' E+ X9 TDecoys 3 F& V- @% R0 zDecoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or / C3 [) u \ H% J5 Hendoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting6 b! r- S$ h3 G+ C' b( c# F) s them.. |6 k+ C. m. ^! a# K MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P6 _7 z+ M0 V! {' x. a+ C/ U 229: c' a9 F; b0 x" Y/ Q Preconditions for& e+ I$ t0 w, b Defense (PD)6 j+ ]. ~8 K' j2 D& t; j PDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate4 K+ e' S0 K: t% Q/ O2 f) {" z circumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue% w/ x! _# ?- \4 F) I7 F combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks% c/ S; d- H0 D5 | directed at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and ' m& c- G- S# V/ \war." o6 _; O' v' c! L. q4 G Predicted # W9 n7 \0 s2 \7 sIntercept Point4 t [% S. W$ m (PIP) : h: @# I+ f; ^0 QThe calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide. & b' M: @2 a% g; c/ hPreferential - m; G+ Y) s O: h. ADefense 5 T; E3 j. v1 J( r8 z% m5 S3 bPreferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect $ J: m3 A" a, w& K, Jgiven facilities or capabilities.4 y% l$ ~6 x) \2 E4 ^% B Preferential w _1 `6 s+ G8 R! IDefense Strategy 1 j% _5 `( z5 U+ y+ C# g! _9 HA tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and \- K5 b- T0 L( O' u4 T, r sensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while# N, G; \ B* @ temporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the % [9 o. [. Q: V* Z- _, woffense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has * r$ s3 m8 f# `- Z0 j) n9 }interceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction,7 h5 D0 t5 h6 X2 k0 k0 P2 c the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can4 N" u8 l4 v8 ~$ Q0 H- _ maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. , v+ y: s) E7 Z% ?6 }, U+ w8 APreferential3 r9 q4 g- O$ W+ V5 ? Offense) @! p5 J/ V3 g% p/ B; i; x The concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets.4 \2 F4 {1 s# B6 p/ r' T" j Preliminary - _8 f! p4 N2 W* V% U HDesign Review6 L5 T( _& m+ b6 g4 u) m" B( D (PDR)3 O3 Y' |& w) r9 R1 [: e7 Q! F A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress,% v( n' c/ }2 S1 p5 Y) L4 o9 C# k3 e technical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to ' r3 v. I; A* X, m: S* `determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the" O" C" c2 C+ X- N' j, B% l development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of4 [- I- w( x- R2 X" r the physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of# Z4 L; S- z6 |" c6 m+ {# @ equipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during ) e8 O% E! _- U, L+ V) s) Y' e3 W0 rPhase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II, Y8 |% k! e# B1 W' I4 J Engineering and Manufacturing Development. $ y6 n g: {4 h- h) G- qPreplanned 2 g9 D4 z; q/ N% m; m. eProduct: n1 ]9 B; d5 c8 g4 C+ p+ c Improvement# G0 x. F8 b0 e3 h# i# F8 H ^ (P3 I)0 v- K% r2 x; x3 r" X/ R" V Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which+ I v- }) x7 G4 N design considerations are effected during development to enhance future% B9 z) J9 h1 h% N' _" k; Q application of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing " p' e! T* u/ ^9 M# T# i. m' ?systems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed+ k1 ` Y; X0 h r% b. o P2 \( S4 u operational capability.; @7 t0 i; u7 } a8 K Preplanned " _5 e) `8 q2 m/ E' `" yResponse 9 X' F f7 H6 w& O( U$ u- iOptions (PRO)! p- v1 i4 q" D h: |( F0 f Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned,; a, G* x6 D' Q% f! m: x, R# Y analyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO, : \0 `, a! @; R. Requivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment 5 U5 P+ P3 q/ U- S9 j+ g* TOptions (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces 8 }9 D7 m% W5 i( b$ h/ Jbased upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status," r1 Q, \% Q& R* I. l and the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time, F( j) _" Y9 z8 Q- G$ [6 d+ H human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution. + @; X( S3 s- i, M% e9 ^Preproduction4 E2 H) X' Z: K Prototype# c' B* c/ }, P" E( p9 Q ^, B1 @$ ` An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be( _' X* P/ o8 N1 V produced subsequently in a production line. * r# D. W- k3 }, UPreproduction" x' x& Q V$ x7 ~6 w Test / w; b% W8 A) p$ W2 h& K1 ~9 f7 N/ OThis is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production/ c2 l2 a) }( i+ {6 f tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware.8 B8 I, W* h+ M) @- o2 a3 w6 b No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of 6 s! d" _+ {8 jthis test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware 8 E) m6 [( R% M8 ^is going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported# P9 Z( P; f) b* L3 w S) y by the user; and that it is not over designed.9 ]1 y/ U2 t) J1 d& k9 k MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P1 [% i t5 {: i1 C- n 230 + |) d* |) i! f" DPreset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the - n4 G$ a" T* Pcontrol mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching.& f" Y, I2 N6 X4 A5 T President's, P4 v) P3 @, T! e" f! } Budget (PB) + ]2 t h% r, a+ m3 a- z7 T( b6 uThe Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in* S( ?0 x/ F2 u4 p; n4 s/ M January (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in ' H6 `- O6 W. x0 [( i _accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended.4 `. c: g* n9 W& K Includes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial5 U& e$ Q: J; g' e2 H i branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.)0 B1 Q2 o+ c f, g! m- B PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency. : G- [0 K1 Y0 o& U& i2 |PRG Program Review Group.( P! B5 }4 s3 j0 X5 u Prime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or4 d0 n# `2 C' \ equipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles, $ r* {8 ?" W* j& ~. E. _% Uground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and + x1 P9 d$ v! `- ^: ztest equipment.; u# V7 A8 Y8 z! F3 E5 [& t! ]4 V- h3 ~ Prioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type,) H: C3 F* c: z6 b predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact. ' z6 U T* B6 S- f/ a) VPRN Pseudo Random Noise." n$ l& F. F# V1 o* c PRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office. * X" `: d5 B; BProbability of 7 J* T/ u& [. R1 B' YDamage3 | i# Z2 b0 V% x) ~9 }. _. f2 u The probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or # X! `2 b; a$ N2 N$ Has a decimal., m8 v# o+ D% r! q Probability of ' d2 ?9 S( S% \3 l' F" EDetection& `5 @) ^# U+ Y" p" j/ c. `- I (1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given - t1 E' G( E3 gconditions if it is in the area searched. & @' S ~3 _! c3 n(2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise% f8 L- w7 |/ ~! B1 q+ g sources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |只看该作者
Probability of' v0 o0 ]& L1 M9 N Discrimination4 e& c0 g; H5 A$ p This is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly! y+ v1 v8 p7 j6 X$ U8 p identified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is 2 d" {; j: c- Y. ]& B9 @quantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the- b' }! D' S- e- U: F' M" B probability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is + F- h3 x* K$ ?. @7 Tindistinguishable from the decoy). ( I/ B: P8 N* J4 ^) {8 |Probability of 3 S p \5 f4 BFalse Alarm% {" }; M' H0 |1 B. @ (1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected! z7 W$ k5 J2 |4 I: h when no object is present.9 D u1 P0 ~/ l+ B- G2 o" i (2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a J( I9 L+ t* r3 M; N+ Vthreatening object will be identified as one./ {( o% e" Q# N% f t" | Probability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles,8 [2 ], k5 ^: `# i% c+ P ordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate 2 W. m4 D0 L6 I- }( R6 u4 ?+ jclose enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense % R& I1 U o0 {, A% z; O" W5 tSystems Management College)" o) n* p3 |& r3 |4 {* Y0 \* Y' u Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS. 0 e, N) b. R. V7 K/ c2 W3 Y. tPROC Procurement.: F c5 G; F1 n2 n* o/ K Process Data ; p! K/ `# d1 r, mSensitivity Label! u# r, X6 W4 \ (PDSL) @$ H- a1 q P# p# r' l& t" M1 h0 R The sensitivity label for data contained in a process. 5 v/ ]& v2 g# z4 H* b# f% @ `MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P) d& d1 y* A! P+ d0 d 231 8 W7 {7 z; t Q7 C) B: h, RPROCMT Procurement. " P5 I4 t5 x9 d# `+ gProcuring6 o; u# i; ^2 d- K2 ` Contracting I7 t# F# J8 f$ A4 }: n' s, gOfficer (PCO) + i7 A" o2 V. V4 n6 rThe individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on 0 w H+ L2 F- K7 e/ {" Dbehalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for ! S, M4 k' d% d- x3 Q- c+ xoverall procurement of the contract.3 V# e+ H% x" ]8 ~4 l Prod Production. . X8 c j9 Q7 n+ ]; l' cProducibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is3 t/ A7 n# A+ ]+ o governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical # d7 w# g2 S: C, D- [6 O8 Wfabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing4 e+ _; y0 k4 X1 I. X! a( v techniques. 4 Q8 k% H$ Y: ^4 q, s* |' _0 n+ nProducibility, ; T) ~, x1 a- v/ d$ GEngineering, and ; v& y; F' m2 P, y& y, ]0 ZPlanning (PEP)/ L6 D- x9 _2 {% M Applies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering ! ~& L; Y' {! V! g" {transition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning 8 N; ^% C! {) V0 B1 p" Mengineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required. x+ O. E" @0 `& h I( Q; ^ quantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will6 ?# Q* R$ `: d$ z5 @ meet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification 6 L& m; I, G2 V% } S: H# xconstraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to 8 @2 _# P: J5 E( S. D5 ]3 ?" B8 Hidentify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production: z% q; N/ k% i4 c6 a changes or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process., L5 A9 V2 s4 L1 s% r; X Producibility, 7 G' Y; R0 P0 y( Q$ Z: j& n/ tProgramming,5 b6 u P. ] _- v2 Q and Issues$ I, R( R! n/ m; M2 T Resolution+ y. l! k) s; w( c Strategies9 U r y' M8 c0 W5 ?+ V) F (PPIRS)) U/ R1 S& i9 K0 I7 a A semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium' p% q6 b: [; t) R and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M0 ]5 h" v7 n0 A; D# k' | Working Group.3 A& I( M9 R$ w7 |. F K7 F Producibility ; G7 k8 ^+ ]$ t& R5 bReview/ U# P4 r3 b% e A feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to 7 i# f% L" m5 g# v" V; @1 I% J, f, ~determine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology + J/ F2 _9 {7 k/ \/ Zconsidering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a & j/ E- e4 b; W* M$ ygeneric term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system 3 d( K% {2 @( Qdesign reviews.1 i! ^0 ~0 |+ h4 e/ r1 w4 U! Q Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration - n2 \- R C" @7 n- t+ e0 Mitem. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline ( ]0 V7 @5 _6 E7 @6 ^$ @(type E spec), type C spec, and drawings./ R- f% M# ?0 a, Z$ k (2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical * _! x& X7 P) xdocumentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a3 u' K1 s7 ~; M+ w5 C$ M& O configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and9 P& T S* t) b& V logistic support of its life cycle.* L( Z) l+ r" F1 ]$ [ Product 0 N" k) {% j/ P6 c$ I8 I6 XConfiguration" v: c' [5 k5 }0 u O: S Identification 8 x' u P' d& EThe current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration) h- i6 G9 f7 _( s of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and # c# e$ Y3 l9 Ologistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for: # u0 q% f! y5 q* I/ {9 ~9 @! Sfit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected * k) d% r; q+ M' Sfunctional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production" \& h; T _5 w* K; p6 ? acceptance test. % I/ Y( N1 [4 |8 M3 JProduct u; o5 n) {8 w6 p3 RImprovement: L+ g. ]( Q- c3 N+ \ ~! M Effort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on/ E$ _$ A! d6 H0 X. U/ f end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than 0 ^' `4 h# d2 ^4 r! Fdevelopmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend 5 [6 g' H; |! E0 l4 D$ \5 B1 e/ Juseful military life. Usually results from user feedback.3 O6 _! N! |1 p+ b MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ! B+ t, h+ {! P& i( m232 . o6 B( i& s" a4 `" Z" Z4 X8 zProduct Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority 9 Z# [# B6 j" Z9 K! Fand assigned responsibility for centralized management of a ; J/ j- c6 E3 Ldevelopment/acquisition program that does not qualify for5 ]; E/ Y1 O- C- C; b/ S system/program/project management. ' f o; L! ~6 @( PProduct Security% ^2 p, ?' H; \ (PRODSEC)- F/ [2 S/ X% o6 c8 P0 T" J4 M; Q That physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost,% s: K* _5 l; m, v) X politically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of 3 K2 g/ Y/ G4 Q5 D( fDefense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential, I# J5 a' [4 L, @9 e+ @+ w to the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-9-1 17:41 , Processed in 0.044003 second(s), 10 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部