航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 1 B/ ]5 u/ o! L; D. Y( a0 [8 {211 ; O' H' p" @3 Z! O3 R+ s5 GOperational% ~# ^! y) q# d. I Assessment H' Y$ \* ?* E- \/ q% eAn evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an+ M0 Z" Y& {: S' A+ Q) h independent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other $ H, ~% M- c' tthan production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on+ A, ~3 o( W$ I- d" a! t$ i$ Q significant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk, , n3 c% j4 J; Q! Cadequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate, }5 h6 K9 {8 Y0 R6 P Z, b operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using$ C2 e% G7 L3 E! j* H technology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development: Z) c2 F& H" W models, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test$ |1 }6 w* f% U7 \1 f8 G& g+ |. h and evaluation necessary to support full production decisions.- S$ o) j e; O4 R4 Q% X Operational ( g1 A& D; @5 V7 z' j) mAvailability4 [0 K& K7 ^( A3 x' M( v9 O The degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect : J9 Z. r2 Z/ g8 Vequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is 9 x5 A) K* E/ t. G. l2 r# T' y3 tuptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link' u9 m. L1 K! C% ]# O* M' L; R between readiness objectives and supportability. + }( x3 y: }3 H# W$ L5 b$ u: aOperational ) Y! G. o0 S0 n3 B3 a _+ R' wConcept" U! n" Y& f& S+ H4 X An end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, & h J- A" `+ t) W! @" c% Z8 ~4 xorganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task. : F0 Z* R8 m- p/ SOperational* _ Y1 V$ b4 F, c% K Control (OPCON)9 W; C. L, t$ Q- A1 k; W Transferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any $ S$ ]. o" a. e! I$ U0 C! a; kechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is " J0 r! F5 |, g( Vinherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to + X3 \) [! N1 \4 q* Nperform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving 5 r$ E F U) L3 e8 D: Q9 y- Dorganizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating C; m) I0 L, K8 A. g- E objectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions Y( N; p0 L5 X6 b3 W& ]& h9 Z& b+ P6 cassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the " z! v: u a; I4 S6 q3 bcommanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised5 l4 h) j: Y" B# S; _/ T through the Service component commanders. Operational control normally5 I4 c5 M; N+ J0 C) g' B provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those ' w4 \* K+ p! f2 _3 Y& Oforces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to1 D7 s0 X O) {0 M: ] accomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself, + Q) ]1 S6 T5 C9 X% g) einclude authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline, : T; Q1 s% |/ x1 Zinternal organization, or unit training.& N: _. J: B: p7 B v; R* b Operational / c* q: i: z5 I; n- oEffectiveness . g t3 l3 \7 F: GThe overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by % ]) U2 s7 ^0 m5 g9 V. Grepresentative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural, " K' H- N. J! s7 ~, ?2 P$ Kelectronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering$ U/ Y$ e6 H& r b; D organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including " j$ a; z& m1 i) J7 Y1 ucountermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and& ~0 @3 T" k5 V! w: F; F chemical contamination (NBCC) threats). q# L9 r" [! _% d$ tOperational8 Q) z! k4 z! k! \# f Evaluation/ b% d. `/ r+ H N# ? The test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable 3 K; e2 k7 y( G, c# t5 l6 ^under Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is , c. [/ Q; F. C" U9 ^warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; 2 R, r4 K/ H! ^7 ^and b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems, 7 o4 m2 |& x6 I1 N8 L- F5 D; }consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate1 [2 T- F2 a7 g- ?5 O n1 p the equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy6 q. H: C. h' {9 k capabilities in the field. - \4 `2 e+ w# E& K6 ROperational% X% w% ]8 m* ?/ C2 s7 M Level of War # w# o' h. L* E) x3 DThe level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned,9 ^: u/ M2 Q, H; U3 O conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or1 ?: b; P1 y7 `. m* X& K areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by _. K: h5 ~; a; t5 w- H establishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic+ ^9 Y) Z8 F0 A# u objectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating, j: T/ D& O: \3 N7 A2 L9 ? actions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These" \* Z5 z8 G4 G6 `, ] activities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure : `& R5 Q) N4 L2 \( x$ Rthe logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by ( A P h( F5 |# xwhich tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives." W+ y5 S4 ?7 c) L: D6 n MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O / n5 {: Y' [2 o9 k0 i0 x2127 {6 E. S: T. B2 O Operational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the$ c& f2 y3 K) j6 L& q operational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training* E; ^5 t1 [3 _4 h configuration.: x. X$ J$ G& N$ L! s) @ Operational" e0 C T/ g- |* ^ Readiness 0 r# A: X9 D* h' i2 | L3 HThe capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform4 r. ~ B" F x- m3 } the missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in ! Z& H. \- U. R6 h" n* da general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.: ]1 a5 F8 G9 A. ?0 P' h Operational ; Q8 X" v7 `2 p" @7 T9 DReliability) w. ~' I' j4 e4 P& `* x The reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment.' O# `# f/ N6 I; @ Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment.' c0 L% C( @' E" p Operational 5 T6 C! j! X" j9 B( NRequirement 8 o2 X! S5 O& sNavy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected 4 ~( t' O5 x* }" H0 qby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less ( K1 F; ?* G$ W0 E) Y) }/ Uthan major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |只看该作者
Operational; I ~6 v2 ^0 d5 Z" O' l) Z Requirements$ u/ E* Q d' U% _' z! j! T$ J. w Document (ORD)+ s: H. S) b9 \9 C* ?; a, c Documents the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for" u, g ], B3 k7 M1 I operational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and3 {/ X* G, s. a6 v DoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components.4 C3 Z6 U2 n- }; I6 v4 O5 i Operational / [& u1 p; x7 D: q$ X8 NSuitability M+ t; L$ s3 Y1 O The degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with 7 Z4 s6 u6 \; O. Kconsideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability,, G1 W8 C) e# k9 X6 D7 T3 E reliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower 1 _! e9 o# d) B1 F4 g8 E1 osupportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts,: m+ f) m4 y3 o+ b) |4 g documentation, and training requirements. 3 \+ `0 P1 z! A3 S/ J @9 t* ^Operational Test5 o" \, U# ~2 W- f& c2 \ and Evaluation5 L4 E s: ?1 n( T: c- P) D (OT&E) 8 y, p- q1 V/ W* D; mThat T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational ; d \# x, ^4 K$ j* beffectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any5 e+ B7 K% Z. X) J modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the8 b2 u1 @3 _8 B8 e" k8 Q0 X) I types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when( F7 `6 S: N) l: i% A+ \# @& K% e deployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as 6 J( G& l( \# R" W. Fpossible.0 u2 Q# ~/ [& f% a Operationally - L+ {5 Y4 k2 \9 }; Y) g$ h" pReady- p# B% N, T% C* @" ]- N# ~/ P5 T 1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or% ]% ?& o1 I2 L8 r& ]2 e" k designed (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both ( f6 G5 H* }3 X( [" h1 V$ a6 }& h+ Aequipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to$ e7 u2 Q D5 c) ^ K" r: z: q5 e' B perform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel).' B; p4 L# s' W& t3 c Operations and / }3 t \4 R1 g, V$ h% jSupport (O&S)4 F \, S8 Q2 C9 m0 L+ B9 w) m Costs0 {! K( [2 X3 g6 Z1 \ Those resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a: Z/ ~ j' D/ ~+ ^ major component during its useful life in the operational inventory. 1 B, w" {/ d! A! K; c9 D! N- kOperations1 f4 n, ?% k) l" D3 W8 n& U Profile 1 O9 l o, `0 x; o3 U) t* BAn identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time ! c1 o/ }3 K7 Cthose actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational 4 n6 L- C$ A Y, Jprocedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are1 \" N) f" G7 w; ?9 z discernible. : h' O/ k# s* m2 s! SOperations# y8 p2 Z. D9 ] Security (OPSEC) , i6 ^2 F6 J7 g6 J* SSurvey' b9 O! C, M9 c+ Y. t The method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is! `; d& j1 `/ ?( l! P b @7 | composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or$ ?8 t, @: Z/ w/ ?" q3 E! Y inefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational : d% @& L" n" v# M0 ^effectiveness./ a3 {) A. b+ W2 b OPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy). B5 M' b0 h; r3 k OPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment. % z( i+ y* V/ v0 h9 QOPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor.- K, [7 H$ P4 O/ D! j+ A+ ^ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O- U: O* x1 u1 E& \* Z2 }4 Y 2133 [5 t4 R* @3 ^' \& T OPLAN Operation Plan. 6 \- f% O( o$ k: MOPM Office of Personnel Management. % _# v" b/ l# l+ o- `OPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. 1 n/ y) N8 }/ U% [; YOPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction. # Q) w; _6 _$ X- J& T3 R/ c' COPNS Operations.2 `5 e7 u# r' w6 { OPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. 7 D o/ d6 j8 f0 P1 y* @+ l7 LOPORD Operation Order. 0 X* V3 p: J) g6 p! jOPP Other Physical Principles. \5 N: z; i/ H+ y, K0 [: e OPR Office of Primary Responsibility. W; ]( \7 R5 p0 i$ m Ops Operations (employment). $ l0 i3 h$ k4 i" x4 KOPS Operations. 1 W; s: c' ~- m& `& d T, QOPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies.4 E9 m2 t& O/ e( [; g- B OPSEC Operations Security. . a7 m5 k; h4 VOPSMOD Operations Module. + X# h' H6 P' v5 M* V' y) m* lOPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army)" w+ U7 Y/ x3 G OPTEMPO Operating Tempo.0 u: L5 w- ]$ \$ ]0 V9 m OPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy)$ I( d. v3 ]8 n8 x- c7 h7 ] Optic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.3 r- |/ S7 y2 k1 q+ L Optical Airborne; }! E1 A0 K' | Measurement ! h& W8 D* J( AProgram (OAMP) 6 P1 h8 X1 E) JA program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct " L- a3 ~8 S' J* k3 r) w( qsurveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems. 8 Q, M' o" C; |(Also known as Cobra Eye.)" p% k. |5 W4 I& `2 e" k0 C Optical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the0 u& |5 d, t4 s# j: g material to which they are applied. ( B% U. A. n9 l0 J) M+ b" P4 OOptical ! J9 ?- C0 s( ~8 v* sProcessing( z* Z+ \# `; k A type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed 6 f- C/ s& i% Q1 S* T; g: y0 k' Ethrough optical systems, is used in problem solving. 4 n- |4 _& ^ P( l8 XOR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational ! D* w ]3 u+ d4 n+ [Readiness. (4) Operational Reliability. - Q `8 \+ w% [- c, f7 H4 X- \OR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis. O8 v: Z& M; ?% D; p% F ORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser.5 Y/ N( b6 q! C2 D P ORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature.1 c3 Z% w2 I+ l7 p. X* C; P. s/ j MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 7 ^! X& t% ?: O) A& [% M/ f( o2143 W( m& L6 X: ^% a; p6 {; j Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.) 0 d {8 M4 _! B) v# Kused to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital9 A' u/ {- ~% m$ ^" O5 _ elements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a # K& M# g8 J; i! V0 z9 |& jKeplerian orbit at a particular time. / y( z3 L8 X3 p1 e- o/ ^Orbital , A- @" r2 b( \" ^ l1 i( JManeuvering $ Z7 L* @8 C eVehicle (OMV) + U+ w) Z8 @1 O. ~0 T# h! qNASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing.7 a8 S' ]: Y8 X( y Operates from shuttle and Space Station. 6 x9 x m; B) t) VOrbital Suborbital 4 ]6 j8 ^* _) F. BProgram (OSP) i, `; E3 k7 B* ^6 ]2 X; w6 \ W* L. V A strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the& N" C, P/ Z+ f% \$ H4 j/ s Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |只看该作者
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites. m; m* Q/ P B/ P& m; t ORC Operational Readiness Condition. 5 V" D, ]4 f6 \6 E3 V3 ]7 v& YORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment. 5 ?* X' V& V6 ~ORD See Operational Requirements Document. " z V) L" b; Z* f6 }( wORDALT Ordnance Alteration. 5 `* j) c7 f5 |; K4 w+ [Order of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the 7 R1 A3 Q+ X. B$ wpersonnel, units, and equipment of any military force. ; L" v; c- F1 o' b8 _$ lOrder Wire- A0 \+ L: o- P7 q# H) q# J/ a' [ Message 0 S: e G3 Q' {9 ^! ~2 |A communications support function for internal control of communications ; O9 u- V4 C4 Z" Aelements.: |" h- R$ I) U3 V8 A4 x Organic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic7 Y: m! B% m8 T0 x) C parts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force,( e, _$ h9 O1 ?* ~2 M1 y: ?. ] and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the - Q0 s7 J, j7 a- t# F6 [operating forces for the Navy.2 ]+ a0 x* X- ~* ]+ T. Y+ v Ornate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.' O4 Y- C3 X; S, X ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. + l# k! S: D" ]' D* d, ~ORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications.+ n9 A6 w5 W# l/ m' s, y) ?1 U ORU Orbital Replacement Unit. . f( f6 F* r3 l+ r h p4 wORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. ) n9 V3 d! A! ^1 [, m; {' OOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System. 7 }8 j e0 O. i% N# z! `OSA Optical Society of America.- r3 q2 G% A% p$ z OSC Optical Signature Code./ b+ P0 G- h4 Y' o3 ? OSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe. c7 x0 j& o$ d! oOSD Office of the Secretary of Defense.6 y4 |: j8 j& s" t OSE Operational Support Equipment. ; I; S* x* J- cOSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool. * Q! e- l) J# l! yMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O' \& b$ N6 X+ f* o0 o t) o 215 ( S% |: e/ N) b2 t! I$ n0 XOSF Open Systems Foundation.! v2 o. C+ P( j# ^! Z- @0 B OSH Occupational Safety and Health.# f. l3 Q; R3 H. ~& g2 ~ OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act.& v& I7 l7 q# I/ j) G2 E& P$ H OSI Operator System Interface.; U2 e6 d: q0 ^# h& K1 x OSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC./ A$ A v( b+ J$ a1 y3 k1 r3 c7 p OSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term).+ e7 }. `4 B0 e+ @0 t' E OSIP Operational System Integration Plan.7 A! n* v) v' O2 D1 |3 { OSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group. 2 Q( n& E' k8 }# H+ gOSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. # J; }5 [5 v XOSM Object Sighting Message.' }6 ]2 J9 r5 N c+ G OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program). / O& Y; a7 @, W: V3 ]# DOSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy.9 t. X |) X3 B# d8 A \ OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research. ' P1 C* L9 u1 s& C' i* K i, POT Operational Test. ) d1 ^$ t Q& c k. D' r( rOTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.+ z' P* {/ w% T% ]! Z (2) Operational Test Agency.' i3 |6 ]* T& ]0 x (3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA. / n' W; `# Q0 ?( a |OTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term). & D) ~- d5 Y( XOT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation. 1 ~. [" T' @9 z( N! M1 B% ROTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. # `& Y& [( ~" c; n, h+ yOTF Object Track Profile. 7 e) b9 _4 a6 l. e: M# gOTH Over the Horizon.+ K' _$ G5 D8 @! v& f OTH-B Over-The-Horizon. ! Y- s1 M2 u- p" z5 c7 r! M ^4 GOTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting.4 `5 a0 W V- \" I* w! t* J OTO Operational Test Organization.; o: r( m9 A# w, r( N OTP Outline Test Plan. ; e2 T Z; n3 n% KOTS Off-the-Shelf.# Z4 m8 u; g" D OTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis. & a- f1 p/ E: A# T4 U8 Z6 I0 LOTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle.' L2 \/ Q" {( s3 Q OUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. . A( q8 n# |6 b- HMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O % G- P0 I- L }! m, Q' O216/ d5 Y% x6 U" Z* [ [& N OUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T).3 l! y7 U9 |( ~0 z- Z \ OUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). / a0 M* R2 o8 w" ^2 \# e `' pOuter Space, }3 k) p& ?7 s+ l# \ Treaty of 1967 ! _0 R7 i6 Z' M, f3 OA multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the; C: e+ f5 ]0 a (former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing : T ?- X$ a, T2 A( i7 inuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space. ( E+ z9 o& q- ^; i4 iOutlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or, `) ^: K5 t- M/ i+ i other payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays 8 m7 X. \/ _- z9 k2 L4 P0 _ uconsist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget, + M8 [: I" X. _# {* jminus receipts. 2 k/ ?; F, R4 b' U* V3 ]Out of Band4 L& d. \1 O- `# X+ \) M- M Laser Flux 2 s* w: w ?! l(Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt ' Y8 ~- l: Z% T2 e7 ^+ _; Y# Gthe sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth.9 Z' I2 I' X& u- h u/ h5 ] Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget.2 f; O/ t1 _% R4 G: H0 `$ u/ \0 Y' R9 { Overlay BMD% R$ t5 _( m9 i: N System % d+ m9 P5 J3 N$ G* w' }An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of0 S" u/ Q* u1 J/ a( u# k ICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear, Z1 v* C0 ~( V! I( M9 H2 O' y homing interceptors. # l* N( t& D3 d) X! V/ u `% COWG Operating Working Group.2 k D3 |, d- Y; n: S. s4 B MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P8 i V7 k3 a; Q0 q, H F3 A1 D 217 - d, t% T$ s! u1 ^' BP&D Planning and Design (MILCON term).; ?- C4 r$ }. R: d' D( [) u+ ~ P&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture.- Q+ L+ T/ x$ N v6 ?( z c P.B. President’s Budget.- ^) o' o7 f# f7 J6 h9 V P2 Pollution Prevention. ) P, S- `/ O5 l$ q x t0 n+ D" Up2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. + Q7 e1 U- ?* K+ b, x. p0 JP3 Pollution Prevention Program.# O% ]" F- W: |0 ^) m4 F P3 I Preplanned Product Improvement.! q3 a/ T) F: |! W5 O' X$ w0 R PA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs.; H0 d' _+ ^# Y PA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation. 9 `" z3 D" {3 TPA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate. : ~* ^6 J/ f! M) qPAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA); G& }2 z* R. o& z, K7 H PAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-2% q/ W$ J+ L+ e PAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT.5 N0 t2 u( D R( Y PAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 6 z5 \* k$ o9 g+ V+ m( @( yPAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL. * m& g2 I2 N; E! _* W; S: cPAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4. 1 A }( y, O6 b! D; d2 H* s% pPACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. % Z& x- {% y% s$ ~) _7 o! ~4 tPACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific. * @+ ~8 Q& z0 `+ q j8 ^PACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier. 1 C& u4 ?5 \+ t, YPACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |只看该作者
Packaging,6 ]9 q* [. L: [! D! ]$ _6 b Handling, & b* z2 w8 W* K% N4 e2 gStorage, and 6 m/ H. X1 e0 ]: [5 {9 b6 l. @ jTransportation& F, y+ f5 O8 H% D: U8 N+ o (PHS&T)4 b5 w4 F1 a6 w! y6 ?% F The resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to- F+ t) Q8 J* S5 O& n ensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, 0 Y/ M$ j$ p6 ?" B4 L0 s/ G6 ihandled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations,& m: ~3 i' U* f5 L equipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and / V+ l; P* n7 [: W# B) ?4 d) gtransportability.& e0 y( B: Z' O+ h8 x$ A Packet Switching* ^; g# w# V4 j2 X (PSW)7 J$ `' _; _5 e5 g& j3 h5 Z A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is . B1 a/ n( K7 doccupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data8 y" E) l0 R% o9 h7 T; [ communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and$ x% X4 D2 q: ^# Q5 O then formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment; `5 n* A ?0 K! G or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes.3 ^$ @" g4 ^- L5 @6 | PACOM U.S. Pacific Command. + B3 _! S V2 J' ^PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures.2 @6 }# l; @! p K PADIL Patriot Data & Information Link.5 k) Z1 T' _' E: e/ s( p+ l MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P . F2 i6 ]% g! N8 b" M; F% |- I+ A218! x& |+ x4 f, D. v% N/ V+ I: D PAFB Patterson Air Force Base.5 h$ ?" o( E9 ~# Y PAL Permissive Action Link. 2 S# F# ]- t- Z* W5 l1 WPALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). 0 g7 A! o- m+ D* f; B4 rPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation. $ ^% i% W3 j$ j' EPAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber].$ l) t4 A* x6 B" x6 V Pancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to. Z. \1 Y) x' o" o2 w the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown.2 ]5 \+ v& U- ^" B o. F2 R PAP Predicted Aim Point.+ l' l5 H& G! i( g; r$ a: S9 F PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar. / f: x! i* v+ t9 a. U, V(2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.)* o$ N4 v% E# a7 | (3) Preprocessing Analysis Report. 5 J% }0 X3 T. a, T) L' l(4) Program Assessment Report.& y1 s+ Y& G* g7 }, t5 y (5) Pulse Acquisition Radar. ! v! ` J- t1 bParallel. |2 Z% ^' u: n- `( i: E Processing" L: `$ w/ D$ a( ] In parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into 7 h. _+ ?& N' @& ~smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that / z O/ C9 C8 N+ {6 A2 m" V' }/ i0 r0 emuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained.5 l, v1 D% C$ m3 \ Parametric Cost/ T; h; T! R% B* [3 A+ Z; ?- p% y Estimate $ d6 N8 l5 |2 T7 ]% _A cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical, O y1 ?) X9 w# O- H3 i costs and other program variables such as system physical or performance5 C" a( p, }/ U5 r. g; c* \( [ characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also $ C' X) P: P) greferred to as a top-down approach. ; ^$ {% l# p$ [! Y* u( DPARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System. . m z4 Q) O* _0 p; _& D/ PPARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs. ( t/ V ]: t( E9 pPartial Mission/ Y2 Q. L7 }) _7 ]% L/ d Capable 6 g# @# M8 z- j% R1 sMaterial condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at3 q% u& j% o. S$ G least one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission $ Q7 b7 g8 b" v: o7 Z" s% FCapable. 1 w- [! Z4 _1 j9 Z* I3 d. CParticipating2 |+ d1 N! M+ X. {4 c# E% z' x5 K Service/ ]) v- e5 l7 Z A military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint: g7 z7 D1 C% ~& W2 o acquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds. ! p- c2 \. x. v2 k0 Y: V: aParticle Beam ' m( t' d2 B1 r0 h+ n(PB) " n1 F; p! R7 xHigh-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or8 Z5 Z. e$ }% x1 m9 s, \ neutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light.: x& j/ P' ~2 p. k) f4 y- u Particle Beam 8 f% {$ `9 D1 [/ M% @+ kWeapon (PBW) % I3 h) D3 b4 h/ h) BA weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers) A7 e+ E6 `. W6 u; Q$ B# wto emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of7 q3 @6 A7 v# c, G$ ^ light. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g., 4 o. x J: b9 J7 L% C/ O7 celectronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor 6 T" i8 t' N0 ~- @damage, and initiation of high explosives. : f4 U: \4 M4 v6 Y. mPASS POET Advanced Submunition Study. 6 a3 z: u2 k3 y& X i- wPassive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no / E$ ^6 E7 j0 henergy capable of being detected. 6 ~" m8 \3 L9 u \- u. Y) |; ZMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P & v% p5 `! `( G" @4 d; |219! R/ i$ F; C# _6 _% E# s4 [ Passive Air ' q8 r1 ^& c; u0 B/ Z# b) _& L$ eDefense1 [+ x' D6 {+ ~ X2 N6 e+ i% O* d All measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness" v$ x& ?- R) R7 ?4 m of hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use e: O* P4 G7 m& u* U/ P of protective construction. 3 {2 R7 h5 M1 Z! O# p, }Passive& Z) G. ]& X3 I Communications6 R$ r& D* j1 k, t2 G Security Threats / K' \$ J( l3 gThreats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through , T; E6 m h! }+ a3 D" e Xintercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic- f6 q" h* Q. B. f emanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications + ]& E- n9 X+ m& w+ cinterception and direction finding. / C8 ~ {: @# n$ `1 z6 Z( cPassive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects * r( K! p- V2 y7 E! O# A$ F1 Eof damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the6 K2 v2 a: Q8 M8 t. A initiative. W- P; o3 D8 e, \' N3 g3 j(2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile 0 ?) _' z! i A4 Z+ A$ c, l. Mattack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing . Y S) a' g! q g+ G) }the vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the 9 Y! p" v4 t/ S1 W, Z+ Apotential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive + q0 n& `# Y B- m+ m! rmeasures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and . Z6 c$ w% ^+ N. Y. v G7 T; _concealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and/ }/ v ^2 m& T X( E redundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of ( K6 Z! B" S' P) M1 d! N; mTMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS)5 r' e! e$ B: o' Y% i! W Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking8 z. c. [: H9 r/ e% {3 I and/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |只看该作者
PAT Process Action Team. L( \& C: G+ i7 u$ P PAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation.8 ~* Y( r) ]& j8 } PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor.4 x; K2 Y4 R- k# m3 @- Z PATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile).& y0 e `" @8 q) t( z PAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System. / y" b3 f1 Z# o& a, V4 LPhased array SLBM warning system. Four sites:' Z. N/ ?$ y; l# s f a. East Otis ANG Base, MA / Q+ n$ ]# ^* G/ w6 e+ F4 Pb. West Beale AFB, CA : v3 ]: T( k1 {* @$ D5 ~( b5 ?c. Southeast Robins AFB, GA + a# H3 e$ g+ q. |d. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX $ b) P% n9 n# ~* l! M7 o `" X! L z7 ~PAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term). 6 w7 s5 ]7 p! Z% y( `8 W! H/ S7 hPayload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile.' L+ y0 W1 t3 ?6 V; B (2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile.8 f1 |3 g9 Y2 H% m+ T! I6 s' H* M# ^ (3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry % N4 e$ R. y3 h3 P# Z+ J; X. Ivehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon) $ d, B9 ~& e( hPayload Build-up9 |0 q4 ]- r/ q3 R& L (Missile and 1 C' _6 v: }+ g; mSpace) $ l/ ]% B: ^$ d# q: B0 \( _% [) cThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and, ~' j( q3 |7 W) m, d# r, h2 Z" e1 J necessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a & U# b8 ~% M% \0 z6 V q% Ocomplete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of 9 F& ]; m7 C) }- Q3 y: o& Nthe mission.! j! D4 Q7 V3 y5 ?+ G* x Payload / B: P. g- W, y2 dIntegration( }% `( T( q9 h' H (Missile and ; @3 C. r. k. X' J" C' Q( ?$ N4 WSpace)& C9 n) ^3 e! E: M1 W$ K The compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft ) U: Q g2 j& c* v8 band space vehicle. , d% Y; u* o* B* kMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ( w+ \7 V2 k7 M7 ?2 J$ C2202 n. K$ x0 X% m* T* i! ]# e, D PB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget.9 K+ u a& E! \5 P& ^" C4 Z (4) Program Baseline. # C5 i8 Z. x0 n2 A0 fPB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD. / u% |/ X/ {% Y8 J2 @PBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer. : {. ^1 i: e: h) qPBCS Post-Boost Control System. 5 a, i* P3 G& ?& ]8 sPBD Program Budget Decision.8 r) o% J6 o' ]0 g ?1 d! m9 n; g PBI Post-Boost Intercept.) ?# S) ?. b& Y' v( X' _8 m PBP Post-Boost Phase. 9 t# k& d: u0 O- vPBS President’s Budget Submission.4 ~) e) D: j- e& W8 q ] PBV Post-Boost Vehicle. 4 q% f, V7 ]7 L7 qPBW Particle Beam Weapon. , O1 b) y8 y: G0 lPC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee. 1 A g" B- v6 C' X3 k4 Q3 C3 BPC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term). 0 T! ~, i- S; zPCA Physical Configuration Audit. 2 K* }" {5 w3 S h/ c2 UPCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. 1 i+ R7 @6 _; ~$ q3 T IPCB Printed Circuit Board. 9 a2 Y; h0 ^6 }8 N1 [9 d) O( R) EPCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term).) s L5 N- Q& @4 S8 ?5 ?7 X PCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term).- a7 ~2 B& n& z. S PCE PLRS Communications Enhancement.: m; M/ p9 e; F( |6 {- G PCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team.. o8 _5 m) Y0 ]& I1 s! Y) L PCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term). ( m' g. p% \, P9 D( Q! hPCI Peripheral Component Interface.$ p: g4 M5 y4 U PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language., E# @1 b6 [5 d L c- {( L. { PCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation. ; B2 M) K& s% s8 uPCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter. - m: b8 q0 z) `PCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). 2 B4 b! _; D4 U* `- u4 [! M% dPCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative. 6 m2 |% h4 E% V1 X' \; kPCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System. 6 A; m$ M1 B6 Y8 L% ~PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure. ' p. ^7 E: }9 f" uMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P . \$ P( q5 W, @' z( f& Y221 8 W/ V. `; b x4 f$ A' D. e9 A: X. e$ t8 V4 JPD (1) Presidential Directive. - m# G/ _$ c# B7 V3 `+ g$ V(2) Procedures Description.6 G# v! d V2 U* V/ J; S% Y (3) Probability of Damage.% f: E) H% ?9 [4 f3 j% f0 d (4) Probability of Detection.3 P" Y: C; h7 m0 F (5) Preconditions for Defense.& |- c1 C; I( `5 d9 h (6) Program Director (AF). 2 Z# ~5 P$ ?0 }8 [: d(7) Production/Deployment.+ m7 e$ |: O* P (8) Phenomenology Document.9 Q, w# B/ X$ E8 X% u (9) Passive Defense.' R( M" _' F! q6 ^7 _ PD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term). 6 H5 m$ E. R9 U* }: p4 y4 CPD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term). # _8 h8 m7 N* [3 p, i& NPD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term).7 B# ` y$ _" d5 L6 q PDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT).* S( ^+ }) _$ n- M5 ]; z0 h0 e PDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN. 3 Q' Y$ `( n5 ]: ?9 V: tPDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive. 0 e8 z. S/ R9 `% ]% N. t( V6 B' nPDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term).4 X( e4 }6 a& [6 J2 l: B0 x" F PDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). ( r( Z/ {1 x2 c+ [- FPDP Pulse Doppler Processor.: g) n g( C" z! g% l: f t( @1 X" Y PDR Preliminary Design Review. 8 A! G1 ]% i& ]- }PDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2). * h& ^% O @9 c(2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction.% l0 Q' i' a/ e% S3 X PDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. ) O& R( f k3 s" [5 ]PDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term)., E) `! b ?" b& j PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense. & a- X% q2 M. b1 [4 _+ N' a: A/ T5 UPDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology)., W9 ~* G1 M3 T0 t& W$ o" G PDV Program Definition and Validation. " ?& u- t3 C. F( XPE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |只看该作者
Peacekeeper US MX Missile. & L; {% H! k b+ `, ]Peak Gamma4 J. O$ B2 ?! N4 M8 _. O4 i Dose Rate + w) ~/ \1 t1 ~3 e: Q) N8 YThe maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could ! t* T: |! D% {7 W- ssurvive and continue functioning. 6 d9 z- Q( j3 n8 iPEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria.6 O8 E8 H" S# _& {3 P PEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation. & z0 Y: ]& A' K7 @; L8 ZPEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD). 6 B- x, g! H* W8 y- c1 c; t9 MPEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. 1 T ^$ ?6 e5 B) e# o, t6 H: cMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ! K+ v. j0 y$ L! r+ l2220 B1 b; O& b& m; D0 L6 l( {5 o PEM Program Element Monitor (AF). 1 j6 A, K+ Z: ~( ` ]PENAID Penetration Aid.) Y" b$ O9 I) @- Y Penaid + R. b/ k q& h$ g3 q: \7 V(Penetration Aid) . p8 w6 B) G& v(Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by 0 @- G0 L# g* v! h& ?, Y1 q! ?2 }offensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating6 d5 w' v" [. v/ b/ K8 \ enemy defenses. ; x0 M4 b: |# b. ^3 `! |Penetration0 M8 ]/ o T, T4 I8 c Testing ( P# \6 U5 q6 ?. U! Y* E/ `The portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the/ S0 i$ R6 h! E0 a+ B* J security features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all& ]: d1 A* @ S1 A: B% s F3 ~8 d system design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of & t/ G9 O$ f" T2 H4 Z" `2 G6 qsystem source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under - K' {, R0 s) \1 C% Lno constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. & \4 Z2 X1 G, W8 B% r9 CPEO Program Executive Officer.3 m5 s5 `/ X- R5 V, m PEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army) ! h% F0 P* `" R- t' A, NPEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program. % J$ U# l9 n7 m- ^# v. dPEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy) * Y# {5 N& t/ @4 j: M4 rPEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program+ y3 h! G% z0 J9 I. _" T% B9 b. _. F Office. " ?! w7 i: ?0 J zPEP Producibility Engineering and Planning.5 x9 ^# }7 e* G PEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning. 8 R# Z* i: A2 {/ u6 J. _4 nPeregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC. * c3 H) i' J9 W, QPerformance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to0 b6 |: W& j* S6 ~1 O) [& y effectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support # i+ u. _, o5 ~characteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design# q3 S& v* E0 r# R& G9 b/ _ and the support elements necessary for system operation./ u; P! Y# s, E! E Performance ; W6 i( l$ [+ C4 F$ C- d4 c8 NRequirement , C$ c" ]9 z, oA requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system" W3 S* `4 q: d or system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency.) Z8 b/ d7 @% d& K2 \% Y Performance+ K7 `& B- K5 ~) y q Specification - k- C* V6 j" e# N- r1 d+ r(1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system 3 B" f! Q0 @0 t% @* k9 B" nor system component. # H6 M8 m" z3 S0 F" [ f(2) Synonymous with requirements specification.2 S3 R. [8 q1 T0 D/ @2 t+ a Perimeter- b) X W& n7 M/ H Acquisition 5 ?' e# N1 S# `2 X) D- o9 HRadar and Attack' q3 M2 F0 o# p9 G: E5 B Z5 t Characterization$ b( s4 @/ n8 p# D# L# w: o System (PARCS)7 `( Q8 S$ x+ F j) E4 c+ E AN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and1 M2 e7 J& D* J attack assessment. 5 r& J" k+ h' j \6 p; y/ ?Period (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit.; S6 o* g$ Q' ?8 N Permeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something. 7 [1 p1 \# g0 ?8 R$ ePershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe.& k: v- `) A9 E f" o/ i( O PERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique. ' T: e0 o" w0 Y4 R# nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P% R* U9 n7 E9 w 223 ) F* [6 R3 @6 u, Y# J- DPERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other * o9 E& Q, G% R& Y4 C0 G0 f2 }# iactivities for completion, and depiction of the critical path. # b3 d0 X& U, E9 HPESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation.7 t- p4 _# v5 }" n* j( H% d5 ^ PET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test. % ~! ~5 g/ j# z S& E i+ v, w! zPFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler.7 K) @' U; {7 I6 x( v PFD Preconditions for Defense. , \9 t5 i$ g& t1 L' EPFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. C% }' x- W; n4 ?; G% M. [8 wPFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD). * o7 A3 Y8 h: e2 CPGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term). 0 L4 s4 |% R' O6 b* C& DPGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term).3 Y& q% _9 h* Y% p+ f PGM Precision Guided Munition.' ^2 h+ ~1 S' f6 L8 @" f PGU Power Generation Unit.- p; |# Z+ h4 u/ y+ |* F$ Y6 a& d PH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).* t: E5 a0 d% D% |' k0 k+ q Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically4 Z9 F( C( }, m$ C stationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to 9 T1 X# Z8 X2 g( x4 X% l' R/ Ranother (e.g., phased array radar). & ~! R8 K8 {& M* _! CPhased Array; u4 G( o0 Q/ A5 ] }! U7 f2 ` Tracking Radar1 H( f3 A _5 Z Intercept On & l- y$ Y0 B, F% ]) P$ w ~) D kTarget (missile)6 [1 W) x. ~( e, Y (PATRIOT)$ s# Y8 c8 x! T# g' j" Y9 C A point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3 ( A; g- F& B8 [& P7 E( W" |improvements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles,5 b8 |) ]: B- b5 s8 U1 N# `- S5 Z+ f include upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either0 f. |3 u8 l+ p* e PATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT. ) I* O( A& `3 \% c* Z; v' Y# M/ FPhased ' {( a7 l/ O/ u' g/ Q: aDeployment ~ [6 u3 o- |5 ~7 X- W% B0 b The sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system 6 Y5 d! v' E/ [/ s3 z9 _capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints.! [ `0 e' G7 B3 Y2 ~! S: O Phase One! |( A( P6 X/ j O1 t/ w Engineering 7 d! M4 I& T' nTeam (POET) 3 r# v% F$ m$ r8 DOBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program* b$ ?; @/ a( R. D Office. Now referred to as POET. ' P( A F7 W$ n3 p: uPhenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts % Z* e# `- ]% ]collect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena7 e% A# I7 \# C required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. $ e7 ?8 c w$ ?, _PHI Photonic Hit Indicator./ A( u! m/ M$ S$ h2 |+ E3 A1 A PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. 4 V9 L2 L n$ m$ jPHOTINT Photographic Intelligence.* @* y; ] E0 y- N; H Photochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light.. p! e {! Q/ N8 _1 Q MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P . |/ c! y- }, n1 }) B7 ]224 ' r* U3 Q* F4 {; |- Y7 x( z; R% DPhotoelectric9 N6 o$ t! U$ d' [- f- \ Effect 8 ~/ T5 r7 L6 ]/ @3 p9 BThe process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat 0 _; i: I4 I( Y3 L+ ogreater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its& e+ h1 w _. t energy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it- i, {5 v0 {7 {2 W1 r; { r. r has lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.) ' y- X# C* K0 g% NPhoton A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, . `4 h* ]- \% p, Y; a# Kwhich is characteristic of the particular radiation. ! w* ?$ {0 V5 H; X# N3 ]PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. 3 O0 T. B1 C, K( E3 ]7 r5 vPhysical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic ; s* `3 b3 I" {( h! lfields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris, . i( H: L* n% ^" E2 m2 band extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |只看该作者
Physical5 Q% U- w0 Z: w5 j3 e9 O# q Configuration# @7 U3 F! r: q7 A Audit (PCA) % [4 ^1 r7 Q8 C' NPhysical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to 5 X. |. s0 a9 J# O) R0 f" Athe technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government: C* E9 E5 J8 o. r% O! [3 {" J' d program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this & W: j0 T$ w5 _; vaudit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production0 \$ Z' g( j. b ~/ R1 ~# U or first LRIP team.7 w; g5 Z% `- A; w/ |: [ PI Program Integrator. ! w( I* h) M8 T# F4 wPIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term).0 [+ X! L: s5 E0 L PIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term).- d4 U5 r+ E2 x) J' }7 f (2) Policy Integration Committee. - p s) u& G# o; c. M(3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term). 9 k( d# o( s+ r7 mPicture Element * f7 A# l# N; X U# o(PIXEL)6 y2 z" S+ j! S; y The smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned ! c) |5 r |: {* ^ P7 y! acolor and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a " j Q) \0 v0 Y& |# Orecording medium. ) Y; Y b3 L, W# zPIDS Prime Item Development Specification.: d0 n" J. p3 D Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing" {) _3 g' O$ g/ s$ \" w3 x methods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. ' l9 }9 V. T8 O! d- ONot the same as long range initial production. " y, T, o) b% S | C; B3 ]PIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term). 5 M. l& g4 L0 {9 o* ^PIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System. |4 k- P" y+ a1 x4 R- J& sPIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point. 1 W, B! @; }" {& x! ~(3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program. 7 ^" B0 v! N$ n7 EPIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team. - K7 C. j7 z: G, o& ePIR Program Information Report. # I8 d0 Y( Y. I7 f: i; GPIXEL Picture Element. 8 \2 z* H1 w1 T! r1 E% H5 P& fPk Probability of Kill.& G1 _2 j$ ]" Y _8 r- ?+ i+ ~' w PKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard.* ]9 Q$ J( u8 b2 Q7 V PKH Probability of Kill, given a hit./ ]) X0 u- O4 t; ~7 y) R4 e0 O MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ) I% l; s: i( N225 5 |7 h3 x$ A4 ^8 L8 H8 b" m* S8 nPKO Peacekeeping Operations.3 Q8 U. ~( m: N: J) u7 u, J0 p# c- N Pkss Probability of kill -- single shot.6 a7 i3 u. G! ? PL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public% f1 k/ C6 z& U% s! I3 [: W Law. , T w$ q0 {4 o- F4 C. TPLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement. 7 O! s2 d8 @( T# k; X- z& `; @: t8 QPLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military)./ Z, J+ r$ U5 R, Q) f Planning, - W# |9 ]2 A; \" q2 e, HProgramming,' `$ o6 R5 O: T5 @% D3 f Budgeting ) k T, F) K! O, o. K5 U, U4 `1 W. _System (PPBS), U) H4 V8 J- y" d: ^( B The primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic0 [6 @+ b( w' ^ structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces* l' V# G3 h/ L6 C: a1 O1 O8 e and capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process 6 i9 N. A4 J: a# Y8 ~; W1 G# r! {6 }containing three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the7 s! k9 c; s# U1 d Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and 2 o! R; Q3 Q) z5 uDefense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the : `2 {% e& n% H HPresident’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each 5 R8 ?4 z/ h" hodd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning' M) u& l% ^" M) c8 E% w phase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the/ ^ z4 o! e4 C, @# ` President’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management6 ?) d% ]% L2 i; i: `4 m College)& [5 G" v/ R* z* t3 y$ a; R PLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate. 8 Q& P" @5 s& x6 [$ M5 S* t% n2 pPLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term).8 H, |4 b x, E, q1 v4 \/ N, O3 x0 S; ? PLRS Position Location Reporting System.2 ^ M" y; K+ d Plume Data' E7 v) x$ v: j Center " @6 N T7 |, a+ f' y/ `( H) b( z" }AEDC, Arnold AFB, TN. & j; N/ w, E, Z9 o3 DPLV Payload Launch Vehicle.8 S+ m: o) t l2 V$ }: t PM See Program Manager.6 x; j% q8 M* z& \+ S% Q0 @' Q& O PMA (1) See Program Management Agreement.) S- O _. d3 `& p3 o" f: b (2) Post-Mission Analysis. ( T! d/ A3 N3 X' S. g0 E; Y(3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station)., n" `1 h8 [& }$ P# R. | PMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool).& j$ n; G6 t' H2 p$ E PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term). $ K! K; N. ?! g6 F0 m* `PMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF).) D6 r6 j& L- J4 Q PMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory.+ N4 X3 h$ G5 n PMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection.) \9 k; a9 f( F0 l PMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term).+ K4 u, V+ F( h7 c PMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group.) |" S. s" P) e! s Z$ s! H PMO Program Management Office.* f, T' C" L. a4 S5 m MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P( v% R- T X% r4 m! Z* g 226 8 V) B5 j0 \/ RPMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP).9 j# D) m8 O: a# B7 y1 }! R (2) Program Master Plan. , a! ]) T2 g) L; s6 d( H W(3) Prime Mission Product. % h8 n; e. W$ M: x(4) Program Management Plan. # W7 ?% B, a2 b- FPMR (1) Program Management Review. # \8 N$ ^) w; t) S(2) Pacific Missile Range. 5 r8 @1 K# F8 T: ]4 O" G; W0 g: t7 h(3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term). + B P I# j2 X; G) f, cPMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI. & R( _* J+ i0 s; C; Q/ e" EPMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term).. a6 z$ u* S! D6 b# @) A (2) Performance Measurement System. 3 r _4 w F6 G3 j7 QPMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA.& ]9 m* {. k% C) C PMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group. _, I/ m/ X; C+ q4 i% o qPN Probability of Negotiation. 0 P+ j+ B- v( W: v6 gPNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion.3 C) u; C1 ]8 Z: f PNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty. 2 h% n6 O9 h4 T) O) t6 e( ?PO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office.' h4 k. B+ N' R1 V (2) Purchase Order. : F, D& A9 K; o8 yPOA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones. " D% p2 i1 L( ^' IPOC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept. 9 y' f4 a, G1 `7 q2 y) M# L+ uPOC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile : X! r9 u" G: L; Q6 fcommand post). % ~' H }% c6 w- T% V/ K7 wPOCT Passive Optical Component Technology. 6 T; x+ k2 o$ S9 jPOD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation.8 k8 q2 a+ C3 F+ Q8 V PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance. " \3 W8 j$ @! _& lPOE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment.% C/ c( W9 g. `9 L/ ] POET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support 9 k0 W. `) f: s0 V1 v. a/ v/ gto the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.)& }2 d3 `* T8 k2 q: I Point Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g., - ^" D3 ~1 W U8 A% U2 xcommand and control facilities, air bases, etc.1 @+ A# J$ W- p6 N% M& ^0 K Point Defense ; j/ x) h' a5 C% }8 M# bSystem6 ~$ s2 |) D1 g F ` A terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles' n) j6 ~& m- d. \! s" C to defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s. . b" f5 n5 O8 {+ v, C' y' tPointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy " X4 Y& C r1 G" Xeither to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing ) t, \6 L7 e i* a' ~and tracking are frequently integrated operations. & V1 v" t" E( V* `POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication.3 W- F2 o, i1 s0 x2 _1 I5 l( i MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P! o( c# d; L+ X6 Y# n! y# O 227 " }4 }! ?9 J s& C3 qPOLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |只看该作者
POM Program Objectives Memorandum. 3 @3 f+ N1 c! G" tPOMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets.# }" p5 l1 J+ @ POP Proof of Principle. - c* L, }: Y# z6 L! X ~Port Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems.4 D5 J; @, ]5 S2 r. D2 `+ C% Y5 x Portability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on 0 T) Q G5 X9 n& d7 U! bone computer or operating system can be used on another computer or! W, F4 W7 s; S* g7 i operating system. ; o6 a2 T" R# m9 t. K0 OPOS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position.4 g2 I' L, t# N7 b Poseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). 3 x9 @6 z; Z5 }# g: UPOSIX Portable Operating System Interface. : a, X' Q* G+ _' P- JPOST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. 4 O7 x( W+ E0 N% ~; z" YPost-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. ( ?# U: J0 ~4 A# M+ f* |/ H7 ?Post-Attack 4 [: r5 z1 I: V. _Period ' ^3 o8 b' l( ~& T7 aIn nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final" Z* C3 A( w2 ^0 p: V attack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities./ _6 W2 l+ [9 O7 ~' _9 d; H6 s6 o Post-Boost # `$ p% s& i+ |7 I9 {: vPhase (PBP)9 r4 X9 K. p) n2 y1 f6 g3 @ That portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered% |: c" \0 q% a) V$ ]9 y( _, h flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic2 n- B% o- _( X! r, T+ A# p1 j missiles. (USSPACECOM) 5 R" _, Y4 J$ c# {0 X1 mPost-Boost 9 P+ X. H4 d9 @3 q7 d# f$ BVehicle (PBV) " o1 I9 d5 A4 Y) x9 y% k9 }# ?: k Z; ^The portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the # I* c* c7 R8 U. N! L/ K% tmaneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final; s8 E2 a0 H' y& [ trajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus."( t* X" L- Q% T8 I& I' q POSTPROD Post-Production.7 b! p, C3 j7 O% C% t POTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification. Z4 l& ^9 b6 K3 n N$ A6 u/ {PP (1) Parallel Processing. / D9 j1 W# s- R7 }2 e(2) Principal Polarization. O S- o& D6 n(3) Post Processing.+ C/ O$ j: S* i/ K4 g8 X/ o0 Q (4) Program Plan.0 m$ i! s, y1 P: a$ K PPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System. ( D* K5 B+ O7 X(2) Program Planning and Budgeting System. , [ |# I4 ~+ M# x, }. e6 q- u1 t, i% JPPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System./ |" s' M2 A$ S2 K PPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance. : W9 Q+ |1 l3 i! SPPI POM Preparation Instructions. 9 }) |; i( u6 z g* k3 LPPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan.% K+ n8 ~5 J* \( X. V# o PPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies. `0 o/ z) ^+ k4 I MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P6 r& r+ J g& Q 228 + {: g& |! ~4 x- x3 WPPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term). 6 G4 q2 v! a, A3 {4 A+ fPPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term). % [$ a' G2 }6 m2 APPP Program Protection Plan.; R8 f( x* A d8 T$ }$ t) Y) L6 D, U PPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test. . i2 T9 ?& m3 R9 f/ UPPS Precision Positioning System. 2 f0 t8 I; p2 p3 K: T3 o% ~ {PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD).; {5 V W) S/ C# U$ @5 v PR Procurement Request. ( l" _; m9 s J7 ^PRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board. 9 G/ v* v- n9 T+ p: SPRC Program Review Committee.% g& L/ Z; Q& P) z PRD Presidential Review Decision. * P; E/ B# F* I3 T. {PRDA Program Research and Development Announcement.0 T+ _+ c" X, h5 ]; `; |4 U0 i PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review.( ~5 T3 S/ `5 U; W, I+ O- f Pre-Allocated ) V: B- T: k8 X @* f9 ZDefense $ ?+ [0 J, u& H5 [A preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be 7 I" l& _ H8 [# @used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or ! i8 ~# d) s' t' \. c0 Oset of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the @$ y: H) O7 S, W' I: n; u3 Znumber of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets, |4 ^4 ^' Q- ]8 p under attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack. 9 n9 k$ H" N0 b# `3 R0 VPre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off. j4 e( T$ |$ }Pre-Authorized 4 e! q$ ^3 T) U, W& o. [7 y) ]3 eEngagement ! k. e/ V# [/ R2 }0 J3 oCriteria (PEC) + F7 O: {( ]: D+ Y: kPre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when3 y+ @& E8 `& b- E) F$ Q surpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled.$ j" U: m1 G$ M' g# i- d Pre-Commit 8 L: N+ u8 i; ]3 KStrategy B, _- \: z: Y# {; RA tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed4 ^/ \: b4 c& s- o0 o* A& n7 A to specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the- P/ I* I, |( B defensive weapon’s trajectory. 5 G" w, G7 a: S. SPre Launch/ I8 l) {4 P5 P2 X, L4 | Survivability0 i: L3 q. d3 c' i V" P The probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack5 z$ u m z9 h4 d% p6 t9 ?5 o+ ~& r+ [ under an established condition of warning.2 ^; d, {& V( a( y# G Precedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall0 x6 k+ ~! \) y be served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the * K# E% ?# A1 ^: Ohighest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served . [- `( r) i% h; l" \# u$ ufirst and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence Z/ Q2 H! L0 o$ x( f8 B levels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance) ; m6 c8 q2 Q, ~A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance& P) z& g6 H. e6 Z; r; ? missions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established7 _1 ?! m, J( n: l* @ priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |只看该作者
Precision0 d# I8 G3 H6 k( n: { Decoys8 l+ l6 R6 p8 N0 j" Y- j Decoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or 6 [4 ^; _( b1 q6 X6 f0 \endoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting - k1 u7 w& x8 X- J# {them. 5 m( {6 M" P4 z$ fMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 3 \6 U% H+ g; v2 Z229 1 d6 B7 I0 b" i9 G) a: uPreconditions for2 l% D* f. F4 M0 }* { Defense (PD) / u# r5 G& G9 Y2 i/ s( j$ |* J. yPDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate 3 b! S- w& K7 U, I- ?2 jcircumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue y. U& O+ ^+ {1 ]5 R, zcombat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks * r5 Q- n% V# I8 Z7 _; c( Idirected at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and# v) m0 k* T# {1 h war.( H4 S/ O* I5 q v/ c; g Predicted4 b2 w6 o x, d. u Intercept Point ( w4 |( Y3 o: ]5 T(PIP) ! m8 T# h) `% {5 g5 v5 iThe calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide.0 G1 j6 Q2 g4 Q; a" p2 r; a Preferential! U# t+ a) n& t+ L! W! ~) Z; x3 Z Defense ! L1 R6 W2 R; y5 F6 ?1 rPreferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect, ? x) a* h& w: i( M* T given facilities or capabilities. 5 L% A0 ]3 l: vPreferential8 K3 ]) f; J! q! r) y: N Defense Strategy2 j. A/ b! v3 O% h6 S: H7 A+ G A tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and- x6 u; |0 T) ?5 C6 @# @+ G% h5 d+ e sensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while8 z1 m3 X9 C8 Q temporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the " z. j7 y$ {! ~7 ]* joffense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has $ z0 F7 U" a& T9 r, L" G& g6 ~3 Binterceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction, : ?7 |7 _4 c$ B5 b/ k* zthe strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can# D0 [6 J) V& ~! O& V X maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. 5 D: h6 a- `0 x# j$ ~+ a4 ~" WPreferential* L: U; |4 h Y1 i5 v: ] Offense$ B3 U" E+ g9 W* } The concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets.) @) V( I* g6 B& H3 y Preliminary ( U- @" \8 M. I; Y q d; v; jDesign Review/ F5 d, o1 c# D |( O (PDR)4 U" Q* ^5 a9 ~4 \: p2 Y A review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress,7 A% @# T; h$ n( } technical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to 1 g" u5 Y7 l' y/ ?# {. X/ {determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the+ z4 A/ g6 W$ { development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of" L. `- c2 G q8 E the physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of) m; G* }: x* r' q$ A: h* H equipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during / L6 E3 |% ~: X6 O1 g( |2 ^Phase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II,) E$ V, |) F0 A8 } Engineering and Manufacturing Development. " x1 @* y7 ~4 l$ B. H1 o3 pPreplanned 2 k: P" m7 s hProduct0 E% b' t2 K+ a4 M' X' T Improvement 7 I6 G. E2 }5 s" f(P3 I) . M' ^: L* i% y9 x; O( e P, JPlanned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which 1 i: I' s6 z2 n5 p4 B- [# Sdesign considerations are effected during development to enhance future ' J& Q/ {9 y* c7 J9 y% T; bapplication of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing; {% S# z. X e systems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed# \, G) | _' C& J- q' I operational capability. 5 N2 h/ N1 q9 [! ?) DPreplanned1 Y% v) q, C* T! B& d q Response; j9 q, t! {! [& L, J& C+ a Options (PRO)) M% v; e8 Q* ^% x) r Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned,$ o2 S5 j) U* N1 X: R9 X analyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO, $ t1 U0 d1 Z; W4 V1 g6 z/ |equivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment T8 v; _( c8 bOptions (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces8 Q1 L2 r& E I/ R: M: v b based upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status, 2 a; t9 s* X! `" Oand the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time% N, q& _( B7 ~( O2 U5 v human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution. 3 f. m8 g; @, f) c8 W& y7 UPreproduction ; k0 t! a. ~. ?6 q3 D# `) g& `Prototype 9 A$ o5 ~% [$ n2 }An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be9 X1 z' Y1 l$ z, g8 P9 i produced subsequently in a production line. ! q f* w, s) QPreproduction) a* I8 ?2 ?( S& r8 u Test , T* |3 u: `. L3 D& a2 b% dThis is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production 8 E: E; n. }: Otooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware. / W, B; L; d) K" k' t& q4 ^. @. nNo production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of - K, e3 F4 T% j. K! G$ g2 o8 bthis test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware & X1 m ?7 I7 `& [6 T, u/ C+ Kis going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported9 h3 f! [# t- @8 L: a by the user; and that it is not over designed.) ]4 E( F/ M- v7 w) { MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 0 a! Q! G: w% X$ @230 ; y. g# F* c8 I. E1 IPreset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the( p6 s# [: n6 C L# f, u/ J control mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching.0 ^9 J7 e3 P6 J' E- m, L President's . L3 x5 E8 c/ ?0 s( q8 e8 cBudget (PB)$ [. y, t r5 R& N$ b9 d The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in$ W" n/ t: H2 z5 W- } January (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in! A# j8 I5 A, j! z" h accordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended. + K1 d5 G8 S: S5 T: B! H `Includes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial) O9 A7 b6 W* K* ^7 l- B, ~ branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.); E0 C8 T$ ^2 @- N( w( Q PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency. + G! y$ c7 @2 {! q+ F: JPRG Program Review Group.+ j% G( q! Q ]* ?! k( l: U7 r4 ~* @ Prime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or ' ]9 r1 y7 M& [. z* H Eequipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles,, F8 k+ E. q( z1 Q2 | ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and + L- f8 |6 _+ A0 Q% \ \test equipment. - @5 W( ~5 ^' N k8 e/ o) m) KPrioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type,# J4 f" B% x' P$ X0 S* {; [ predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact.- {4 x5 }( [( Z. v5 e; q PRN Pseudo Random Noise. 8 B% i. ~' u# S: I7 x& f5 X3 aPRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office. % b& {; {: b( H4 I* {9 l3 LProbability of- U2 `7 y$ { w) A Damage / m9 q) a( i6 Z8 D! O0 rThe probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or " B9 s/ [0 }* [" B" d+ Oas a decimal. # F4 {! H+ y$ V3 hProbability of 3 c7 a- i3 W# f4 ~0 _7 a. w7 pDetection 1 g# f4 o* K9 ]7 \0 Z# F(1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given% Q6 @* m0 F' L J: [ conditions if it is in the area searched. ; K% g) C7 L* \0 ]- r2 ~(2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise % [& ~4 Q% y& S5 p% I1 l7 [sources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |只看该作者
Probability of ' z5 B H' C7 u3 N GDiscrimination 7 W% J7 E2 V' i) G/ A8 _This is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly2 s5 F# o* b% q* D, Z1 M identified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is 3 Q9 y% Z/ n; R* E0 Iquantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the # [& M& ]: U' e o3 D% Iprobability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is: j q& o/ j H# ]& { indistinguishable from the decoy).1 k' w9 {: z% n: V9 z Probability of# [- H0 @) F8 {. ^2 p7 R! z0 D0 p! ~ False Alarm . o/ f- N) j1 F# D(1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected 6 ?; O5 }7 m; e* e' r9 k( S3 |when no object is present. " n X4 p) R& M3 O- q9 `7 u! k. `(2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a 6 P/ }* B+ y- D( `5 ^! z# v& fthreatening object will be identified as one.8 h# ] b# g' ^1 T8 T# d Probability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles, 5 B# L; \. B2 k& x3 }) Hordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate " F8 V+ }/ O6 `. D; b" Vclose enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense' r# ^* K, c" J( Z7 [+ {$ ? Systems Management College) $ K$ v9 ?. F3 s2 qProbe The air vehicle of the GSTS.& @) i2 v, g7 p i) M' D PROC Procurement.4 I4 ?& `; e j: b1 b% m Process Data 6 P% ^6 i- ?" n8 u' A9 v9 qSensitivity Label 5 g' o) F( |" b9 d3 X2 `) U0 q( d(PDSL)/ A: F# P+ `9 {$ _! Z6 V" M3 Z& g The sensitivity label for data contained in a process. 4 P5 V0 a- l2 R8 |5 h) v, gMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P- c1 c6 }7 j' w2 { v 2315 X" ~ g' N) O! E. [2 q2 p" f' ? PROCMT Procurement.$ d+ Z6 m8 Q: b( k3 }0 F# x! ~1 T/ Z Procuring 0 q# G! V* V/ k) R0 G- D( m8 V5 ?. _Contracting. ~% F9 x* W5 K( v' S8 ~' R3 ` Officer (PCO)/ H& U2 z. Y% ` The individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on 9 |7 n/ j: K: U0 Z. Bbehalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for" c& A0 h; V$ q" p, o# R9 ?$ c overall procurement of the contract.. i# C' }; \% t: U& [4 [- S) q7 V% H Prod Production. ; J8 q" J2 _, IProducibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is5 i5 i- ] ?6 |) J* X governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical0 k5 \2 n0 x' i6 A) `# x fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing Y4 g: q% i$ mtechniques. . d. W0 q. G6 `8 u7 F! a; u* mProducibility,* a' h( j; l5 T% F! n Engineering, and" M! R- Q9 ^; [$ A& n- v7 B5 N3 a+ }& L Planning (PEP) 1 `8 K$ V4 _( @2 ^2 eApplies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering 0 L$ s1 A/ C3 C4 z @/ R2 \transition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning " {0 x' C0 n7 h( n* Jengineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required 8 T: v- H. Z5 m$ L( Z0 g0 _quantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will# `! w4 Y3 v/ o7 j6 _ meet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification4 b7 \, s+ M5 ]) Y L5 G8 A) ~ constraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to6 A0 X" X4 E8 W& V5 w6 L identify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production 7 _, C# P1 a4 [5 R( B) gchanges or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process.& m8 T2 _* C0 T2 x- U Producibility,2 a. Z7 L. Z1 e, h* [ Programming, k1 _+ S8 S- r9 I9 \and Issues' b) d9 h% f4 @, Z1 i1 `2 D Resolution % ~/ w+ R* l$ NStrategies; _3 w/ Y$ @# D- I6 a u8 ^ (PPIRS) * C, C |$ t/ i7 ^A semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium ( A1 {/ X: f1 z. e7 }: b. }and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M0 ^6 [& e3 @+ K% G5 @) ^- e: R* e Working Group. 2 \" e( T4 \6 R; h. dProducibility ( G+ y) X% D5 `! R* u) m+ {* XReview , _) L" g* k5 A6 KA feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to 9 l3 e1 u) w/ f) K# q: y" Cdetermine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology + e3 C0 @7 W7 T6 T5 a/ z! d" Bconsidering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a $ T6 E7 Y; N1 Y, n9 B. m6 T/ \generic term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system7 v. w, F. \" c* i$ h, y: A design reviews.! |% S) e" K+ L! u3 ] Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration- T, B; b( {/ \% {2 q7 v' M item. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline- d* T& U0 l9 p8 [& R (type E spec), type C spec, and drawings.$ l2 e7 f" C# T, E8 v+ D% ?) @ (2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical+ x5 i$ ?2 t% r1 L documentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a * }4 u& C. }+ W4 J# Vconfiguration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and 1 W2 k7 y1 D, W; j8 e# P6 [logistic support of its life cycle.5 D* z5 s! d; B9 [: U: j Product - ]1 _' S9 ^# K9 Q* AConfiguration $ Y. q, a/ r/ E* |- oIdentification 4 s( \% a* Q) n2 z. _$ ]- k7 a0 r- lThe current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration + I) v" G: l7 n: S+ w$ Q- |of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and ) I/ E$ s! f5 o4 clogistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for: 4 F& b; V3 r* l/ [3 c. Y# V. pfit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected( }9 c0 ~7 g6 H functional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production$ o6 o) C" {5 Z( W. b acceptance test., m$ ?4 j6 t, f- V+ ~ Product ' z( i# I8 `' t& XImprovement ) U9 p0 j0 V0 a q7 g' UEffort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on6 p, j3 v+ L m. i R M$ ~ end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than6 B3 u. |9 o5 z7 a6 q2 V developmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend ' ~7 [* a: t8 d; R, Cuseful military life. Usually results from user feedback.* }4 P* n; j* Y/ Z. G4 _* p MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P - n$ T. N7 T5 [232 5 X8 X- V# b3 N. w6 iProduct Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority7 q- P' e/ K; R Q, b' U- @ and assigned responsibility for centralized management of a + Q0 }1 e5 N2 q* Adevelopment/acquisition program that does not qualify for1 k; m) B5 L. u) X2 C1 ~+ L9 @) h1 h system/program/project management., m% R2 }* Z s H7 k Product Security : q/ b o5 V M& v8 c(PRODSEC)* n( {; `- P( C& u2 `( j5 D C That physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost, 3 p# }1 W& I6 P0 N, P3 ppolitically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of1 J7 U- W! t- s2 e* M7 t* V) u Defense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential0 R u1 `" l& D& `7 w, }& F to the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-1-22 12:02 , Processed in 0.044003 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部