- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O: s- V! M* G, O" n$ ]
211+ f6 r- d* ?" }: v
Operational
. q% P; S$ X+ D$ W4 O! sAssessment
- J+ Y. B4 ? \. F& LAn evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an
+ R. V0 e! ^' lindependent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other4 W% s, _* i0 z4 p
than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on
9 x# L b- {) l' Osignificant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk," k2 ?! N8 {5 `. j0 `3 E9 V
adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate/ j8 v7 c. o4 B% c
operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using! O3 w: [$ q, u3 D
technology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development
5 C, _" {, E5 H! J4 M. \ _. E1 Dmodels, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test
) p5 W2 D; q! y8 W5 N. n! U% M3 yand evaluation necessary to support full production decisions.
' i' n3 i+ p0 ?6 R! AOperational; Y% }8 a- F# [0 g) b" J( E! C
Availability
! `) H: F2 c5 b' T/ c" dThe degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect
_5 @0 u1 _, h( Uequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is
# D$ u; p2 k9 J E/ G4 Buptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link
4 `0 M i2 p) o, u* h3 Pbetween readiness objectives and supportability.+ b$ B8 p7 ]* A/ s4 Q" v# G1 ~
Operational
- O1 [. Y9 Q) A4 w( J3 JConcept
$ u8 X* F; w1 iAn end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems,
! ^& U/ H5 D+ iorganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task.
2 H& D6 O) w1 S; Y3 ]1 n2 W# M8 [, |Operational
5 }$ j r: \% F" |2 d* e6 nControl (OPCON)
- n/ m% A3 w$ U( lTransferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any
6 z, F/ }; R/ S; {2 aechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is
+ }" a8 \8 G' Linherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to" x! `) I, R- ^1 L& U
perform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving" q. F& @( X6 [/ }/ `2 `
organizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating
% m1 x) r( O! r t; M0 K* Kobjectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions
7 q+ {1 X# x) J. O& lassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the
% [2 m+ ]2 e6 \1 A- _: ?' a( m* M9 tcommanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised
5 C5 v$ r- J/ s2 E+ u* C& pthrough the Service component commanders. Operational control normally
9 E2 |* M$ x. ]provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those' e. Q% L4 w: f$ r! f
forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to
' a- g6 G4 G3 u! L0 _+ Oaccomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself,) C! n1 l0 S. o4 K9 T$ Q2 K
include authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline,
% E1 E: O8 ~- Winternal organization, or unit training.
/ A {* P2 s: G' w ]3 Q, v3 @- zOperational- d' S5 @( d. Q4 C# }0 b4 o
Effectiveness- l3 G& s- H1 Z+ W8 U2 c
The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by' Y) H. {& ` u* M8 D8 x0 \1 |
representative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural,2 j, g9 ~7 g2 s
electronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering' ^0 D, q( E4 ~# s
organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including; \8 c& T1 f* l0 I7 p
countermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and
- _ t/ r z; T. C- I- Bchemical contamination (NBCC) threats).& `7 v( I+ E ~6 O5 e
Operational7 I" f- r g0 W' S+ e
Evaluation
% Q: Y- A, s/ d+ t/ a$ LThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable
. D: Z+ I3 w2 i$ R1 L! _2 Kunder Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is+ a0 |, S; Y5 p7 [4 M
warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained;
" t0 V1 y [0 y6 s( Jand b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems,6 F( W$ y/ G/ W! S( _
consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate
, a' Y, ?1 k% ithe equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy
2 x$ M' n. y/ Fcapabilities in the field.8 Y: z, i: \' c) ]' b4 `
Operational6 _$ T2 P2 t! k- w/ w0 ~
Level of War
, F4 D" a1 _$ L- _% i/ k. _$ eThe level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned,. b6 C I0 c( ~1 R) x
conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or. ?* f: Q' k: m) Q
areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by
, W( A/ g8 z# q7 ]: L- D: v! uestablishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic8 j8 A" Q8 r5 Z; N W% s( w5 z1 | U
objectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating2 \! I$ t; M; b5 x
actions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These; c& T8 F* m" c" H+ T
activities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure
) M. ~5 Q& E) O! Ithe logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by
# n0 Z. ?% m E9 \which tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives.
^7 F( t" o2 d% S3 v5 h) jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O8 F! D% Y$ u2 m& U( R
212
/ P- A1 E2 j& V2 A9 r5 M; cOperational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the
0 C5 s2 u; F2 ]3 J/ E2 L% Xoperational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training6 } x) B! \; @+ J2 S5 q
configuration.9 A: X7 b1 P* r- c- ~# F
Operational7 h* ]# s$ c& A, P( U
Readiness
! b6 H! k, E: q/ wThe capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform
5 {8 {& J3 Q" {5 y2 m+ xthe missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in# X% R$ r* L( G" I8 \! R
a general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.$ K, L3 a9 V( _" H
Operational
" o9 y6 Y! R2 U5 ?, T" B LReliability
" T3 D+ I; h6 [1 {4 v0 c& u0 {: Y$ pThe reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment.- n/ H* e2 q/ T3 N6 M) [/ D9 Y' e
Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment.
& b R; t) A* X2 Z; `& O/ h" LOperational
7 Y' p6 C# `( s2 F* H$ [Requirement
) ]; d8 C* `$ N: J& o" {Navy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected
' `5 [$ n; b1 @( N2 Vby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less
- N8 P5 u' U+ ~2 p; V% a+ w/ N# ethan major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV. |
|