航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

81#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:14 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O: s- V! M* G, O" n$ ] 211+ f6 r- d* ?" }: v Operational . q% P; S$ X+ D$ W4 O! sAssessment - J+ Y. B4 ? \. F& LAn evaluation of operational effectiveness and operational suitability made by an + R. V0 e! ^' lindependent operational test activity, with user support as required, on other4 W% s, _* i0 z4 p than production systems. The focus of an operational assessment is on 9 x# L b- {) l' Osignificant trends noted in development efforts, programmatic voids, areas of risk," k2 ?! N8 {5 `. j0 `3 E9 V adequacy of requirements, and the ability of the program to support adequate/ j8 v7 c. o4 B% c operational testing. Operational assessments may be made at any time using! O3 w: [$ q, u3 D technology demonstrators, prototypes, mockups, engineering development 5 C, _" {, E5 H! J4 M. \ _. E1 Dmodels, or simulations but will not substitute for the independent operational test ) p5 W2 D; q! y8 W5 N. n! U% M3 yand evaluation necessary to support full production decisions. ' i' n3 i+ p0 ?6 R! AOperational; Y% }8 a- F# [0 g) b" J( E! C Availability ! `) H: F2 c5 b' T/ c" dThe degree, expressed in terms of 1.0 as the highest, to which one can expect _5 @0 u1 _, h( Uequipment or weapon systems to work properly when required. The equation is # D$ u; p2 k9 J E/ G4 Buptime over uptime plus downtime, expressed as Ao. It is the quantitative link 4 `0 M i2 p) o, u* h3 Pbetween readiness objectives and supportability.+ b$ B8 p7 ]* A/ s4 Q" v# G1 ~ Operational - O1 [. Y9 Q) A4 w( J3 JConcept $ u8 X* F; w1 iAn end-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, ! ^& U/ H5 D+ iorganizations, and tactics combined to accomplish a military task. 2 H& D6 O) w1 S; Y3 ]1 n2 W# M8 [, |Operational 5 }$ j r: \% F" |2 d* e6 nControl (OPCON) - n/ m% A3 w$ U( lTransferable command authority that may be exercised by commanders at any 6 z, F/ }; R/ S; {2 aechelon at or below the level of combatant command. Operational control is + }" a8 \8 G' Linherent in Combatant Command (command authority) and is the authority to" x! `) I, R- ^1 L& U perform those functions of command over subordinate forces involving" q. F& @( X6 [/ }/ `2 ` organizing and employing commands and forces, assigning tasks, designating % m1 x) r( O! r t; M0 K* Kobjectives, and giving authoritative direction necessary to accomplish missions 7 q+ {1 X# x) J. O& lassigned to the command. Operational control should be exercised through the % [2 m+ ]2 e6 \1 A- _: ?' a( m* M9 tcommanders of subordinate organizations; normally this authority is exercised 5 C5 v$ r- J/ s2 E+ u* C& pthrough the Service component commanders. Operational control normally 9 E2 |* M$ x. ]provides full authority to organize commands and forces and to employ those' e. Q% L4 w: f$ r! f forces, as the commander in operational control considers necessary to ' a- g6 G4 G3 u! L0 _+ Oaccomplish assigned missions. Operational control does not, in and of itself,) C! n1 l0 S. o4 K9 T$ Q2 K include authoritative direction for logistics or matters of administration, discipline, % E1 E: O8 ~- Winternal organization, or unit training. / A {* P2 s: G' w ]3 Q, v3 @- zOperational- d' S5 @( d. Q4 C# }0 b4 o Effectiveness- l3 G& s- H1 Z+ W8 U2 c The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by' Y) H. {& ` u* M8 D8 x0 \1 | representative personnel in the environment planned or expected (e.g., natural,2 j, g9 ~7 g2 s electronic, threat, etc.) for operational employment of the system considering' ^0 D, q( E4 ~# s organization, doctrine, tactics, survivability, vulnerability, and threat (including; \8 c& T1 f* l0 I7 p countermeasures, initial nuclear weapons effects, nuclear, biological, and - _ t/ r z; T. C- I- Bchemical contamination (NBCC) threats).& `7 v( I+ E ~6 O5 e Operational7 I" f- r g0 W' S+ e Evaluation % Q: Y- A, s/ d+ t/ a$ LThe test and analysis of a specific end item or system, insofar as practicable . D: Z+ I3 w2 i$ R1 L! _2 Kunder Service operating conditions, in order to determine if quantity production is+ a0 |, S; Y5 p7 [4 M warranted considering: a) the increase in military effectiveness to be gained; " t0 V1 y [0 y6 s( Jand b) its effectiveness as compared with currently available items or systems,6 F( W$ y/ G/ W! S( _ consideration being given to: (1) personnel capabilities to maintain and operate , a' Y, ?1 k% ithe equipment; (2) size, weight, and location considerations; and (3) enemy 2 x$ M' n. y/ Fcapabilities in the field.8 Y: z, i: \' c) ]' b4 ` Operational6 _$ T2 P2 t! k- w/ w0 ~ Level of War , F4 D" a1 _$ L- _% i/ k. _$ eThe level of war at which campaigns and major operations are planned,. b6 C I0 c( ~1 R) x conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or. ?* f: Q' k: m) Q areas of operations. Activities at this level link tactics and strategy by , W( A/ g8 z# q7 ]: L- D: v! uestablishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic8 j8 A" Q8 r5 Z; N W% s( w5 z1 | U objectives, sequencing events to achieve the operational objectives, initiating2 \! I$ t; M; b5 x actions, and applying resources to bring about and sustain these events. These; c& T8 F* m" c" H+ T activities imply a broader dimension of time or space than do tactics; they ensure ) M. ~5 Q& E) O! Ithe logistic and administrative support of tactical forces, and provide a means by # n0 Z. ?% m E9 \which tactical successes are exploited to achieve strategic objectives. ^7 F( t" o2 d% S3 v5 h) jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O8 F! D% Y$ u2 m& U( R 212 / P- A1 E2 j& V2 A9 r5 M; cOperational Mode The configuration of the defense system element or segment. Refers to the 0 C5 s2 u; F2 ]3 J/ E2 L% Xoperational environment of system, i.e., test configuration or training6 } x) B! \; @+ J2 S5 q configuration.9 A: X7 b1 P* r- c- ~# F Operational7 h* ]# s$ c& A, P( U Readiness ! b6 H! k, E: q/ wThe capability of a unit/formation, ship, weapon system or equipment to perform 5 {8 {& J3 Q" {5 y2 m+ xthe missions or functions for which it is organized or designed. May be used in# X% R$ r* L( G" I8 \! R a general sense or to express a level or degree of readiness.$ K, L3 a9 V( _" H Operational " o9 y6 Y! R2 U5 ?, T" B LReliability " T3 D+ I; h6 [1 {4 v0 c& u0 {: Y$ pThe reliability of a system or software subsystem in its actual use environment.- n/ H* e2 q/ T3 N6 M) [/ D9 Y' e Operational reliability may differ considerably from reliability in the nonoperational or test environment. & b R; t) A* X2 Z; `& O/ h" LOperational 7 Y' p6 C# `( s2 F* H$ [Requirement ) ]; d8 C* `$ N: J& o" {Navy document, which describes major characteristics of the alternative selected ' `5 [$ n; b1 @( N2 Vby OPNAV. It is submitted as originating document for all Navy new starts (less - N8 P5 u' U+ ~2 p; V% a+ w/ N# ethan major programs)--ACATs II, III, IV.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

82#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:45 |只看该作者
Operational - a" w# U$ c' qRequirements . B& K$ {9 w0 [ y0 uDocument (ORD) ( A" V. B3 D3 P/ x7 ?Documents the user’s objectives and minimum acceptable requirements for # h. `$ v) ]. Z' f' y- D5 uoperational performance of a proposed concept or system. DoDI 5000.1 and : D0 x0 S8 ]2 t8 sDoD 5000.2-M have standardized format across all DoD components.4 B* P- A# V( E+ k+ z Operational9 M* O0 _, ?1 W9 j Suitability/ U+ J! E" w) J- O0 \+ F2 A The degree to which a system can be placed satisfactorily in field use with! g* A& \; \+ `3 Q# m consideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, 9 K: n6 y, I) qreliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower - N5 \7 t. o9 p7 y+ C3 B7 Rsupportability, logistics supportability, natural environmental effects and impacts, . ]6 d/ ?7 ?! }3 Tdocumentation, and training requirements.8 h$ |6 @3 M/ | Operational Test' X+ x1 a; Z! }0 X0 b and Evaluation7 J' ^7 c _5 `5 u4 w( n0 J8 M1 O (OT&E) - K2 O7 M* \' d/ u) z# yThat T&E conducted to estimate a system's military utility, operational5 h, w5 `* b6 o, F, ~" u effectiveness, and operational suitability, as well as the need for any. g0 U/ F# ?2 \8 Q modifications. It is accomplished by operational and support personnel of the7 A5 a p0 f1 R' p8 c types and qualifications expected to use and maintain the system when $ P+ H+ ^* [7 D( `1 [5 j5 Ldeployed, and is conducted in as realistic an operational environment as" G) e- C) G8 `6 X1 o possible. 3 w$ O% X1 y, E: z8 QOperationally ( A4 n$ i3 Q' [# X. x6 JReady 5 H5 t7 C" ?" G1. Capable of performing the missions or functions for which organized or) q. d* S" _( c& |/ ?2 \1 f+ ~ designed (as applied to a unit, ship or weapon system). Incorporates both9 c% m2 _- f" X4 y equipment readiness and personnel readiness. 2. Available and qualified to ! d/ w/ Z$ o1 jperform assigned missions or functions (as applied to personnel). f5 S- L1 o' r" L/ ?; X Operations and$ q- {7 S, y7 g6 P Support (O&S) 7 ]1 m2 s' K, w- ` ?2 d" M7 N- a* fCosts % K7 o! F) W" M9 KThose resources required to operate and support a system, subsystem, or a 8 k X' X; t- ?! u, Umajor component during its useful life in the operational inventory. h- H' P1 Q$ a$ _1 u: U Operations: b. F- v r* K) E7 M9 ~/ W L Profile ; V% `# K% G6 C/ W2 XAn identification of all participants in an operation, their actions, and the time 1 h o) o, V0 P1 z' o' Uthose actions occur in the operation. Includes assessment of operational / ~7 _+ P l% _: }procedures to ascertain whether stereotyped or predictable patterns are " d: \# ^6 Z5 Cdiscernible. " [& q0 u# s0 b/ X' [7 r( m* h) wOperations 3 K" r |1 B, P( _# V* N7 gSecurity (OPSEC) / M. y. Q2 j# O5 i6 [4 |Survey$ k6 I9 p4 \& t7 C( l: ^ The method of evaluating the protection afforded a given operation. It is ; D% o8 e' R8 u5 S0 j( H% @composed of multiple functional outlines that identify possible weaknesses or 8 \$ L9 y8 K' }: O5 r: finefficiencies of an operation that could, if exploited, degrade operational2 v+ b- ~; |( Y& o& K effectiveness., [5 ]* n" ^. ?7 g OPEVAL Operational Evaluation (Navy).7 K: `8 R% M9 @ OPINE Operation in Nuclear Environment.& D- K. o; F' R% R5 l; |0 a OPINTEL Operational Intelligence Processor.$ G: y* a( }1 } ] MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O " l2 I$ h, z) q. X& o% v- _213 : e7 r* |+ A0 [0 y; i+ i" G: v8 f" COPLAN Operation Plan. ! B7 H: ^4 T* o( W: e* FOPM Office of Personnel Management.6 q- E& x, ]: G) W OPNAV Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. 7 ^8 Y; n. I* ^& U; SOPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction. - _* m% U" e- x7 ?9 tOPNS Operations.% z+ Y& M9 z3 L1 w6 W' W' a OPO Optical Parametric Oscillation. , v' Q K4 _ X: ` _! WOPORD Operation Order.) y$ B/ w3 v. m8 s1 v! U OPP Other Physical Principles.3 j& A' E" i# U. G9 l OPR Office of Primary Responsibility.. @; d/ C0 _/ b, x9 g Ops Operations (employment). + T+ K8 C6 ] c& p6 P `- v" U7 ^8 UOPS Operations. * s3 @ b, i/ oOPSDEPS Service Operations Deputies. 5 _" z% @( ~& eOPSEC Operations Security. 5 @' {& N4 f' z" [: N: c0 p2 ]& }* KOPSMOD Operations Module." j" W4 m, H+ c7 C. O OPTEC Operational Test and Evaluation Command, Alexandria, VA. (U.S. Army) 6 U5 T, V' x7 {; N: C. JOPTEMPO Operating Tempo. , o3 ^- P% x$ ?% zOPTEVFOR Operational Test and Evaluation Force. (U.S. Navy)0 K- W# w* w) E: { Optic Cobra CENTCOM Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise.& T3 u% a# h @( b" [% z m Optical Airborne 8 q9 q; Z. N/ @) p, R1 FMeasurement9 |' \ R( X" x" ?' @. D7 o Program (OAMP) - r+ K" I9 k$ ]6 G9 `( AA program involving an aircraft-mounted research platform to conduct. H1 f2 P& N* K1 b surveillance experiments that can be used to design future defensive systems." ~# l1 V9 D% I. L0 J1 F, U: A6 r (Also known as Cobra Eye.) 3 |8 V2 L2 V$ HOptical Coating Layers of materials that alter/protect the physical/electronic properties of the3 x* J2 q: i& F$ G, l3 k$ D material to which they are applied. 6 q; E2 a2 `1 I5 ~8 ?( r. QOptical" I0 K" ` w# j. o Processing $ v: f; C0 y- `! A& QA type of analog processing, in which the behavior of light beams, passed# _1 b& `# i! k( G9 m through optical systems, is used in problem solving.6 r2 l; l1 a# t, a! r: p' l OR (1) Operations Research. (2) Operational Requirement (Navy). (3) Operational. P) g2 E6 m9 N4 _# c Readiness. (4) Operational Reliability. 1 O t a# r z0 i9 O/ D' }" u8 QOR/SA (ORSA) Operations Research/Systems Analysis." m* S f$ t* N' e* _' \ ORACL Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser.& I; ?3 a; ^/ m3 q; l0 I ORACL HYLTE Overtone Research Advanced Chemical Laser Hypersonic Low Temperature. # @0 S# U( l9 n$ ]$ FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O! v8 m, i7 o j 214! X* v+ B9 v* V2 F7 p& Z' @ Orbital Elements Any set of several parameters (e.g., semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc.); P' S- K$ L$ W. ? used to specify the position and motion of a satellite. Six independent orbital6 O+ |& W. p+ J) R6 B8 Z elements are required to unambiguously specify the position of a satellite in a , V: v+ p) T- VKeplerian orbit at a particular time.% W/ P+ C" d& E: G8 z V Orbital( I) u9 S, ?, v) o Maneuvering # o0 m$ L+ J2 z# ] o( TVehicle (OMV) X, s/ k0 q1 kNASA program to provide capability to perform satellite on-orbit servicing. ! \+ s) ~- R' |; @6 L5 N5 XOperates from shuttle and Space Station./ D" e2 G5 T% ~& B# P5 Z Orbital Suborbital . ]3 A- i- o9 q5 w: \Program (OSP) : n4 H; L4 p- ^. c! \$ \9 R# sA strategic target booster system used by the GMD Program that uses the 8 }6 X/ e& E; ]* x1 G- C1 [0 M& }Minuteman II booster stack.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

83#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:15:55 |只看该作者
Orbiting Debris Term referring to all earth-orbiting objects except active satellites.( r4 @1 R; y9 L; o( e9 i1 k$ I ORC Operational Readiness Condition.) s# s. c8 Q, R) e) @ ORCA Operational Requirements Continuity Assessment.( q4 q9 s- B( D" _; V; g ORD See Operational Requirements Document. # u d x! W ?ORDALT Ordnance Alteration. r% ]$ K- G6 A x; Z9 e: }8 mOrder of Battle The identification, strength, command structure, and disposition of the / {. h) c3 G+ Z. v5 y0 gpersonnel, units, and equipment of any military force. ! n0 R( Z' @- |% j0 ^4 ~8 {Order Wire 9 O! b6 D5 C2 V8 L$ N3 ^3 {5 {6 VMessage0 I+ e9 D& \% v0 A/ R' O4 V' S/ B C A communications support function for internal control of communications& r& t- _# i" y5 j7 e$ F/ O elements. 9 o+ m# l# C5 x$ w% h% H* M3 xOrganic Assigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization. Organic( i! E6 p# X1 A% e+ Q+ g parts of a unit are those listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force,) E) e9 O, l2 [' B3 h$ y# ? and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the administrative organizations of the Y1 c" w- Y9 x operating forces for the Navy. , B; f% O J- M. z3 ~" Y2 _Ornate Impact USFK Joint TMD Warfighter Exercise. B- l7 U) H" s/ M ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN.# s2 z. I9 n; \- S! Y' v ORTA Office of Research and Technology Applications.; f2 [) J+ T Z ORU Orbital Replacement Unit. $ N- }' B5 _3 u) [; |ORWG Operational Requirements Working Group. * N" ?1 W, a& P3 GOS (1) Operational Suitability. (2) Operating System.& ^' I* [- @8 v( `$ N! a8 J OSA Optical Society of America.- ^( y& n0 u6 B OSC Optical Signature Code. ; ]. A) b0 O" d8 zOSCE Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe.2 E$ v% q( E% [- ]2 W6 P# D OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense. - D; a9 `, @+ d+ @ K4 g: POSE Operational Support Equipment.9 j C5 }, ~" I: d OSEIT Operations and Support Engineering Integration Tool. - p1 p4 p! u: n Q# D; Z1 T& GMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O7 c o9 ~1 W( a 215 1 J( S; r# Z# [# }+ qOSF Open Systems Foundation.- k' ?. V# T6 p+ V3 G- B/ p" { OSH Occupational Safety and Health. # J* a5 v3 B; p1 p5 d4 J2 pOSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act. 0 E+ q9 H/ N1 n' d; D; ]- YOSI Operator System Interface." p# ]8 m& X! Q OSIA On Site Inspection Agency, Washington, DC.& M" v2 u" ~5 l; X# G1 x3 C OSIM Object Simulation (NMD BMC3 term).; R& h( Z' O- t k OSIP Operational System Integration Plan. ! `" ^1 u- E6 I* i# \* VOSIWG Operating Systems Interface Working Group.8 o7 e6 L/ G1 u7 l! o+ I OSJTF Open Systems Joint Task Force. 5 C& ^& x& }$ I/ Z: l6 qOSM Object Sighting Message.6 d* z, R4 W; }6 E6 Z OSS Operations Support System (Navy C3 program). 7 l, v9 x2 G% _- [+ lOSTP Office of Science and Technology Policy.8 Y% p. [. _# u: v( C OSWR Office of Science and Weapons Research.5 L/ {, ?2 E' k3 G2 { OT Operational Test. u$ Z% `1 H3 G0 H& Z- YOTA (1) Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.7 j" b: r* Z- w5 R9 Q# h (2) Operational Test Agency. % y5 ]9 V! }' J" @3 u" I(3) Office of Technology Applications, MDA. , s$ R# s7 F8 }8 ZOTCIXS Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange Subsystem (Navy term).: z* Q# N. T7 F7 U+ D4 D- ~ OT&E See Operational Test and Evaluation. 4 x5 l$ r3 e ^( Y* U5 A7 c% sOTDR Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer. 8 b& c( {1 J2 S3 `5 n vOTF Object Track Profile.9 v& k R: C8 H$ l* a6 m, Z OTH Over the Horizon. + q0 ?% @4 {: D+ ]* H" ]/ E- l: T! ROTH-B Over-The-Horizon.% m$ s- l) [0 ^( @7 S9 u! V: G OTH-T Over-The-Horizon Targeting.) T0 M6 @ \2 U) }3 F, O OTO Operational Test Organization.5 J$ A& B8 f# a% C9 ^4 { OTP Outline Test Plan. 5 C. q8 H( F8 o+ q0 AOTS Off-the-Shelf. p* ]4 i3 I2 u( xOTSA Off-the-Shelf Analysis.( V ~# X0 ^. A% R! J) m/ e OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle.. U; o: R$ A3 L: J: k OUSD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. : O/ I0 H# l9 e; D- A B+ }; oMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 O 4 N5 d0 I1 C' N# ?" i/ }2163 a- `, F& ~7 J) ~ OUSD (A) OBSOLETE. See OUSD (A&T).5 o3 ^( @! h4 A$ ~ OUSD (A&T) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). 4 q$ o5 b5 w. b" D: |Outer Space0 C4 [/ D) V# a. G Treaty of 1967- N! E1 l2 K( q' O3 f) |: `3 H, h A multilateral treaty signed and ratified by both the United States and the1 C8 M |+ ^; m (former) Soviet Union. Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty forbids basing 6 K& c4 r8 _- H7 dnuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space.1 W, g/ o w; F. L6 ` D) a' K( v Outlays Actual expenditures. Checks issued, interest accrued on the public debt, or! L7 h6 m& P! C l( i& [8 s other payments, net of refunds and reimbursements. Total budget outlays" q }" X1 Q# U& j/ D" p; F. f' U consist of the sum of the outlays from appropriations and funds in the budget, - U0 ?2 Y! _3 F5 M0 ^minus receipts.8 ]& l4 p1 g( q: }# _+ M Out of Band0 A$ ]1 A( c; B1 D Laser Flux ) v1 ^$ i- w/ E8 P/ p(Sensor) Laser energy directed at a sensor that is intended to damage or disrupt, j6 @9 M: P. n; l; z& x the sensor and is outside the sensor’s bandwidth.2 _3 j1 ?7 v* i) V! N3 F% l Out-Years Normally, six years beyond the year being worked in the upcoming POM/budget." I+ w/ P; O* C" ?2 X Overlay BMD / G) W! s5 B4 i- nSystem 7 g( }3 j5 a+ P. C) T `An advanced exoatmospheric defense system oriented toward defense of* [0 k* V8 U% b) z ICBMs, consisting of missile-borne, passive infrared sensors and non-nuclear 3 X' C [5 L/ P8 h. r# Y( l I* s4 B6 t Hhoming interceptors.9 h7 o/ ?, A* [2 N0 A8 m( Z" g OWG Operating Working Group. . ~' i: w1 V5 W! @6 ?. oMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P( Z: l; c I/ z+ h 217; A$ {2 X, b2 e- r P&D Planning and Design (MILCON term). " D3 b' k9 @8 S( X9 Z- X/ eP&M (1) Producibility and Manufacturing. (2) Procure and Manufacture.8 b) E: P$ n6 J Q0 t P.B. President’s Budget. 8 S5 b" _& a7 e; X) e% HP2 Pollution Prevention.) R9 G4 b" m. j" p' y/ o( V. [ p2 NRTA&A Pre-Planned Near-Real-Time Assessment and Adaptation. Q6 q8 U& w! c" l- ~* E9 p P3 Pollution Prevention Program.7 Z% v' X9 D9 W" Q K2 i P3 I Preplanned Product Improvement. + z3 d2 c) {5 I# ^* B+ aPA (1) Product Assurance. (2) Public Affairs. 6 t; Y+ f6 H5 f, VPA&E Program Analysis and Evaluation.7 I \+ B7 X, ?8 n PA&ID Program Analysis and Integration Directorate. " n6 g/ w$ g) t3 APAC (1) PATRIOT Advanced Capability. (2) Program Assessment Center. (MDA) - l, ^4 s1 }" i- iPAC-2 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-2 1 [' f4 b' K6 B# XPAC-2/-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability, Level 2/Level 3. Formerly called ERINT. + ]- h5 p9 \+ ~; z, [! c6 @ oPAC-3 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 : _1 J0 t) S, C8 A# wPAC-3 SIM PAC-3 Simulation (PATRIOT), Huntsville, AL.0 S7 x- K4 j+ Z7 T2 P' ?; u' g PAC-4 PATRIOT Advanced Capability-4.( Y9 t0 H& L6 Y; p" r! U PACA Professional Aerospace Contractors Association. * u* p1 s" Q8 n VPACAF [United States} Air Forces Pacific. . |" ~& G% B3 v4 n q6 BPACBAR Pacific [Radar] Barrier.9 C' h5 ~4 \' g* y& k PACFLT Pacific Fleet (US).

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

84#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:15 |只看该作者
Packaging, + n6 f' [6 z" T& [! [% W, hHandling,: o, L d9 `$ c1 m3 ]: U6 c! l7 Q Storage, and 4 x7 B" ^+ X/ }- D! h; a! ~Transportation R" ^# l+ h$ T7 K5 r (PHS&T) 8 _- v+ @' {1 J) v8 Y% _ IThe resources, processes, procedures, design considerations, and methods to/ j, [4 {1 V# p: D ensure that all system, equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, 5 H' S( S1 S6 R8 \4 J8 |handled, and transported properly, including environmental considerations,* q! O5 o9 j: C6 ?, y; X" V equipment preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and . x. B k n4 E2 [8 \& Stransportability. & |* U2 @1 I$ g4 {: EPacket Switching0 W" i8 t+ X" \! y+ `4 F k0 Q# C; U (PSW)) l; D& j6 Z+ d d; J( b A data transmission process, utilizing addressed packets, whereby a channel is ( c, D, Q7 `$ }' q: R5 [occupied only for the duration of transmission of the packet. In certain data; F, `& V7 Z$ V f+ e communication networks the data may be formatted into a packet or divided and ( b' F+ q8 w. t- r* I8 Z. a; M: ithen formatted into a number of packets (either by the data terminal equipment/ q/ t1 g/ z( g, ~ or by equipment within the network) for transmission and multiplexing purposes.% T# H* s* D# D0 p" f/ ^ PACOM U.S. Pacific Command. # Z* O3 T/ i R5 f9 [( z7 {PACOSS Passive and Active Controls of Space Structures./ O# t: O+ ^ B e# U% H7 M PADIL Patriot Data & Information Link.3 o/ E3 R! V2 W- o6 i2 S0 O MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P. x1 m/ U5 F$ [ 218 " Y* g2 u c+ T' F. f- n: D+ CPAFB Patterson Air Force Base. k2 W! V" ~6 H" y/ o$ D PAL Permissive Action Link. & z |5 a" T2 R1 `' f2 y# `" ]PALS Protection Against Limited Strikes (SDIO term). ; o9 g" F; h; E1 _1 K6 N8 VPAM Pulse Amplitude Modulation. 5 z" G7 D; i7 n. f: pPAN Polyacrylonatrile [carbon fiber]. E, c a' }8 M3 v+ K& b# F7 P% ^ Pancake Altitude Altitude at which the trailing edge of a chaff puff/cloud effectively catches up to8 }4 L: Y( V! F* U, y/ Q the leading edge because of atmospheric slowdown.6 z( P- h f2 w7 ?; j8 P PAP Predicted Aim Point.* u* S" K0 Q8 {' I, \ PAR (1) Phased-Array Radar.! E& u5 j/ ^3 ~+ i: I5 w& x (2) Perimeter Acquisition Radar. (See Phased Array.)+ B+ Q- G9 b3 n (3) Preprocessing Analysis Report.0 H; v- Y6 ]: r$ ] (4) Program Assessment Report. V: f2 Z% P( q(5) Pulse Acquisition Radar.! E3 E! A Q/ {$ M0 A) X6 v4 q Parallel 6 x {# M3 `9 s& b0 rProcessing # M5 f- H/ g, sIn parallel processing multiple processors (CPUs) divide up a large task into0 I: J$ b. w3 i) a Y" z smaller ones and each CPU acts on the subdivided task simultaneously so that 1 l9 b9 Z6 K6 Y9 t+ i* Hmuch higher effective processing speeds can be attained.9 _; M1 X! w: r: t Parametric Cost $ L3 e$ U9 l* R" J3 BEstimate ( P) E: a0 k4 E/ q9 a5 |A cost estimating methodology using statistical relationships between historical% `' u" O& e6 I% Z+ b, t costs and other program variables such as system physical or performance% Z; t/ ?. p+ F characteristics, contractor output measures, manpower loading, etc. Also % n f# [ j$ g% c: u% H' wreferred to as a top-down approach.' O8 q U! K1 |& E& Q; c+ c PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Radar and Attack Characterization System.: L6 Q$ P# W3 A! G. J1 R PARPRO Peacetime Application of Reconnaissance Programs. ' x2 ]$ t- I F" v1 c3 Q3 L J3 MPartial Mission 4 L& H+ q. t; c+ ~Capable) Y# k) f( K2 |5 e9 @! q6 t/ B1 ? Material condition of an aircraft or training device indicating that it can perform at $ B a! P" |$ T% D, x6 K) Fleast one, but not all, of its missions. Also called PMC. See also Full Mission . D; q" |; D* D! C3 D+ D% w* L+ WCapable. ' S4 ]3 W$ ]# }: v' b2 K$ y( r4 \& {Participating , J# i& z0 m9 @Service + i' e4 T1 g& i( y3 z; X5 {A military Service that supports the lead Service in the development of a joint- {3 J( x& G7 L r/ c acquisition program by its contribution of personnel and/or funds.9 m; E# z2 M7 B3 G- z$ E: f Particle Beam! C8 S$ ~8 z& X! ` (PB) 4 H3 h! R/ g. D8 s1 ZHigh-energy beam made up of atomic/sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, or/ C' L, g3 J% `$ a) C& J6 r neutrons) accelerated to near the speed of light. 4 {: r( |& U `" }3 p g B9 {( LParticle Beam ' m- R% u; @2 r+ }% GWeapon (PBW) 3 S1 J7 N; r7 YA weapon that relies on the technology of particle accelerators (atom-smashers) - E: C/ n1 G& \/ q: g) }' E3 Hto emit beams of charged or neutral particles, which travel near the speed of + G( O6 O0 |# x9 i4 Blight. Such a beam could theoretically destroy a target by several means, e.g.,0 C' h0 v5 \2 l# Q" S5 ?+ M T electronics upset, electronics damage, softening/melting of materials, sensor ; O- [7 Q4 X9 c4 wdamage, and initiation of high explosives. " ]/ u/ `- t1 Z+ \. DPASS POET Advanced Submunition Study.# }9 j; }; p4 D% x7 `/ S {2 f Passive In surveillance, an adjective applied to actions or equipment, which emit no) B5 B# `6 \: v, c: `$ l energy capable of being detected. ! Y/ L) [- w) @1 D' [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 3 t- k; ?- \ I3 w, B; t219. e8 J% s" }- {. t. T# T: A Passive Air 7 ~% j8 ]9 q5 R* k0 | O' J. EDefense* x* i. ^5 V5 o0 a% m All measures, other than active air defense, taken to minimize the effectiveness - R( d1 M k% p# Y. u& k2 R. _of hostile air action. These measures include deception, dispersion, and the use , f2 p5 l- V/ K; iof protective construction. : k; b! z- N' l( g7 B G9 CPassive7 G! ]# w+ ]) @ Communications / ]9 d& |# k+ _% E4 aSecurity Threats# r0 L2 C) ]& H: H4 D/ c' L: f Threats to electronic systems posed by a capability to obtain intelligence through3 L' S) b" f7 v2 G9 o# f intercepting and evaluating intentional and inadvertent electromagnetic o# D) k7 z: aemanations from electronic components of the system; e.g. communications, p8 A1 r7 A y% }. Y& R, [ interception and direction finding.- W- x8 _+ ^7 I$ w Passive Defense (1) Measures taken to reduce the probability of and to minimize the effects 8 t# X# w! r; i+ [1 s# u( {2 Y$ Lof damage caused by hostile action without the intention of taking the 1 X' V- g5 F* l9 ?) }initiative. }$ O! {% q- u9 D) ? (2) Passive defense minimizes the probability and effects of theater missile0 c8 l2 h+ k0 I6 n& M attack by reducing an enemy’s ability to target friendly assets, reducing1 Y8 K! g5 z2 I+ O the vulnerability of critical forces and infrastructure, and improving the - K, d' ]" _6 M8 R* Qpotential to survive and resume operations after an attack. Passive% Z9 s+ {* J: f1 ~# g( y0 L: G6 o measures might include counter-surveillance, deception, camouflage and 8 o; p( `5 c: m0 ]7 _3 a, g" ?% b5 @concealment, hardening, electronic warfare, mobility, dispersal, and 7 R! L" U3 i# U( X* o& qredundancy. Passive defense is considered one of the four pillars of + @) u5 ~. s0 XTMD capability. (JCS J-38 CONOPS)8 j" d6 H6 }1 M8 f- i# } Passive Sensor A sensor that detects naturally occurring emissions from a target for tracking. }3 J, v4 j) }+ | [- F h7 v$ [ and/or identification purposes.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

85#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:26 |只看该作者
PAT Process Action Team.( H( V0 u8 d2 U2 q4 q# [ PAT&E Production Acceptance Test and Evaluation. - T K$ h6 P8 e# l& Z! v, @PATHS Precursor Above-the-Horizon Sensor.+ \# T- H" Y& V PATRIOT See Phased Array Tracking Radar Intercept On Target (missile). 2 x- N% v! X# g3 Z3 V! ~/ s: VPAVE PAWS Position And Velocity Extraction Phased Array Warning System. # B# d w3 b0 YPhased array SLBM warning system. Four sites:9 q+ P8 g ~' E. }9 p% H+ B) d a. East Otis ANG Base, MA0 ^; ?/ ]# t, H% e9 n; h4 \1 V b. West Beale AFB, CA0 S+ c9 S6 ] ?3 d2 l/ E2 i c. Southeast Robins AFB, GA! |' A7 K+ _; |' n8 w d. Southwest Goodfellow AFB, TX- A& R; `' u8 L. A PAWS Phased-Array Warning System (USAF term).1 N9 f! K+ R3 W6 u$ U Payload (Missile) (1) The warhead, its container, and activating devices in a military missile. # X; }) x r* V& o+ j(2) The satellite or research vehicle of a space probe or research missile. : l) ?! n# G) A: H" R: |(3) Any part of a ballistic missile above the booster stack. Includes reentry # {9 o* G1 w, U+ E0 X/ n6 K- @vehicle, guidance-control system, countermeasures and countercountermeasures, decoys and chaff. (MDA Lexicon) ( W K b+ G5 D N/ g" A0 Q$ yPayload Build-up 4 O. _- j( l- `0 S3 ]" S' G/ ^& S(Missile and # y" H9 q8 R1 USpace) 7 U# q8 l$ \/ _3 B1 ` d$ AThe process by which the scientific instrumentation (sensors, detectors, etc.) and 5 T' U, b4 g- k3 F( E: j7 Lnecessary mechanical and electronic subassemblies are assembled into a & ]9 {+ B6 t% L1 Wcomplete operational package capable of achieving the scientific objectives of3 r+ g8 P' \6 v" h" N7 r the mission. : o1 ~& z6 U. _Payload. s2 j0 z0 @* N; v R Integration # O% n5 h6 q }(Missile and6 A b1 R! K8 N5 }6 p9 k7 I( F$ w5 B Space). J9 e* } {% X1 n$ e The compatible installation of a complete payload package into the spacecraft 5 [4 y/ u# S" T8 V1 O6 [and space vehicle. " t3 q6 Q% P+ FMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P4 D! \; y2 I4 F" q: H 220 7 x3 P) }1 v6 FPB (1) Particle Beam. (2) Post-Boost. (3) President’s Budget. 6 m3 |) a/ i7 C! _7 l(4) Program Baseline. 8 m; u( @( A: P3 N% QPB/MT/D ATD Post-Boost/Midcourse Tracking/Discrimination ATD., n( Z1 o5 c; M& V9 F' Y3 h PBCRAW Post-Boost Control Reaction Altitude Wafer. - k! w+ @" H1 n0 D1 VPBCS Post-Boost Control System. , S- r/ z" l* J0 mPBD Program Budget Decision.! q3 `3 v2 @, [, H3 s PBI Post-Boost Intercept.9 {4 s5 A- K5 W1 U$ { PBP Post-Boost Phase. q7 @+ }0 x. Z0 q6 y5 xPBS President’s Budget Submission.2 w; ~" ^+ [! z PBV Post-Boost Vehicle. % u+ c* N; u& t# IPBW Particle Beam Weapon. 9 Y$ a' K1 [2 U& o+ iPC (1) Printed Circuit. (2) Personal Computer. (3) Principals Committee.+ p1 Z) O/ m9 d PC-PC Personal Computer to Personal Computer (JFACC term). ) o5 Y8 @7 k, n/ M2 Z! y4 A( d' oPCA Physical Configuration Audit.7 j( ^6 N7 {1 m PCAST President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology.. a8 k* k+ f: G0 ?/ P7 K PCB Printed Circuit Board.5 b9 Y, b/ N% _% A9 Z PCC Pilot Command Center (C2E term).- P/ I; c9 S' b3 v) r8 s PCD Program Connectivity Diagram (MDA/POC term). 7 Y1 T7 q i! D6 {, t3 Z N zPCE PLRS Communications Enhancement. 3 y8 J& v& h; F6 T( N, w( kPCERT Pursue Computer Emergency Response Team. $ ~3 S; b4 _7 H) cPCF Packet Control Facility (TelComm term). , n. `; G8 L) ~3 W6 v: APCI Peripheral Component Interface.3 r! b' R6 Q! N PCL (1) Pulsed Chemical Laser. (2) Printer Control Language. ( u8 A) s) T2 K% E4 FPCM (1) Pulse Code Modulation. : M4 p& p' X. K9 s7 ~PCMCIA Personal Computer Miniature Connector Interface Adapter.- w" I( D1 N" l* Y PCO Procurement Contracting Officer (FAR term). 0 ]! Y, @% z- {/ zPCR (1) Program Change Request. (2) Program Center Representative.' G2 W- ~2 C" W ^5 [- Y9 L PCS (1) Permanent Change of Station (ILS term). (2) Planning and Control System.; f; _/ X9 r# @4 L: @ PCWBS Preliminary Control Work Breakdown Structure.( K+ P1 F) T, e5 _6 Z4 Q( j MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P & S8 Y1 h" e: T" l$ n/ g2 i) R3 y3 ~221 3 L- ~5 P% Z; ~; H3 Y bPD (1) Presidential Directive.7 E6 ?* ]+ ]% M4 L (2) Procedures Description. ) T7 ^3 l$ i6 F w/ k4 R4 q- Q(3) Probability of Damage. " ^+ y4 j1 y( ^5 u3 P1 u(4) Probability of Detection.0 V0 j8 l, j+ r7 M (5) Preconditions for Defense. 3 ?4 V' j) T# n5 ^2 C(6) Program Director (AF). 8 w D- d& v* K7 G( z* ~/ x(7) Production/Deployment.: W! G* K: m {/ J& w( |, p (8) Phenomenology Document. + O% W: r: b! Z' O/ }2 K9 ]8 a+ @(9) Passive Defense.& L, J6 f7 f. d1 Y: `5 G) Z PD&V Projection Definition and Validation (MEADS Program term). / I5 p; y$ z6 r; @" |: \PD-V Program Definition-Validation [Phase] (Acquisition Phase term).& u% Q) W5 P6 X* O PD/RR Program Design and Risk Reduction (Acquisition Phase term).2 F$ Z& E5 z- O7 h: @ PDB Post Deployment Build (PATRIOT). ( b I) B# l& P/ J$ kPDC Plume Data Center, AEDC, TN.+ n2 N9 J/ X% K( F( M PDD (1) Point Defense Demonstration (USN term). (2) Presidential Decision Directive. ; ~0 t: z N% APDM Program Decision Memorandum (DD 5000 term). - r7 ^) N$ K) t7 [" oPDM (I or II) See Program Decision Memorandum (First or Second). 5 |% V, p0 }6 @. J$ SPDP Pulse Doppler Processor.8 S4 v' p9 b5 Z PDR Preliminary Design Review.$ h; p9 {. w1 Q6 o PDRR (1) Program Description, Requirements Review [phase] (DD 5000.1/2). 2 n4 G# T' _! g" y5 d$ v(2) Program Definition (Development) and Risk Reduction. E! i, ~* Y2 y& ^& r! SPDSL Process Data Sensitivity Label. 1 ?% `. D( B( e1 v1 v& H4 {" kPDSS Post-Development Software Support (ILS term).6 J& r% \. D+ Q4 q PDUSD Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense. . w* z) o" f2 ~( i2 gPDUSD (A&T) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology).5 O6 ~ b0 m/ y4 R- N* r; v PDV Program Definition and Validation. H" }+ o: E$ ^% X' dPE Program Element.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

86#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:38 |只看该作者
Peacekeeper US MX Missile.+ X' {5 j# s3 m" j' I, D Peak Gamma 4 Z- |% b" {% jDose Rate& G* u' y0 f. }( K' y) y# h The maximum rate (per second) of gamma radiation that the system could3 @; L. v$ B; P! p survive and continue functioning.4 C* y3 Z7 K& ~2 m- G7 l PEC (1) Program Element Code. (2) Pre-authorized Engagement Criteria. / R$ B& ^7 Q! v$ F& d/ D/ v$ R. _9 `& sPEELS Parametric Endo-Exo Lethality Simulation.) K7 @7 ]$ H( r- c. o q PEIP Programmable Embedded INFOSEC Product (ex-MSD).- g, h0 Y/ P$ J, ~" d, g# G PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. # _9 w/ U1 \6 h6 PMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 2 f" K& K, E5 t) F222/ e+ e. c) B$ P! ?8 O6 } PEM Program Element Monitor (AF). 4 W, L4 \& J1 Q* u ?1 K$ LPENAID Penetration Aid. ) z. @2 Z$ E4 {7 rPenaid5 |' O$ U% q, D( Q2 a (Penetration Aid), z2 e+ t0 J1 O (Formerly an acronym for Penetration Aid.) Techniques or devices employed by! q3 N# I1 M" r# y/ S" Y( h offensive aerospace weapon systems to increase the probability of penetrating 3 J( E% \5 }& }$ r% m# ~enemy defenses., g) P" ^1 J( \, F* g Penetration / H/ Y" s5 H- r" yTesting 8 y. n. F) B( ^& _& f7 [8 uThe portion of security testing in which the penetrators attempt to circumvent the6 _3 S# z& a0 J! k0 H9 b security features of the system. The penetrators may be assumed to use all . I3 Y- r3 o; }% w" {/ v+ Rsystem design and implementation documentation, which may include listings of2 T( ` o, W3 d% ~( {. d3 t. O( | system source code, manuals, and circuit diagrams. The penetrators work under / G% r, t0 A. U# Cno constraints other than those that would be applied to ordinary users. ! g; _; Q* i" mPEO Program Executive Officer., ?( d$ O% ^" L+ q PEO-AMD Program Executive Officer, Air and Missile Defense. (U.S. Army)* {) U9 x A* P+ D9 i" B4 U PEO (SC/AP) Program Executive Officer, Surface Combatants/AEGIS Program. " ^" Y0 W8 ?% k& `PEO (TAD) Program Executive Officer, Theater Air Defense. (U.S. Navy) . g. X+ `' ~9 q8 H5 a' n$ f5 bPEO (TAD)-B Program Executive Officer, U.S. Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Program ; ^3 l i) l$ m; eOffice.$ M0 u1 x, i7 t* V PEP Producibility Engineering and Planning. ' P i# l& n% IPEPP Producibility Engineering and Production Planning. . g! Q; Y& K" R; ~( Y/ aPeregrine An Air Force boost-phase interceptor concept under development at USAF/SMC.! J2 n8 c; p) [2 [/ x" U Performance Those operational and support characteristics of the system that allow it to 1 c! a4 _' G. I: n( G. y) Heffectively and efficiently perform its assigned mission over time. The support 7 l' l5 Z# y g/ A; {; Pcharacteristics of the system include both supportability aspects of the design / m3 w" Y* G, k7 g1 L0 t. j6 _and the support elements necessary for system operation.3 V& c: }: d& n% E1 P Performance 4 I1 l% r6 \- W; Q/ _Requirement 3 m- w0 w8 r7 E5 y" W7 _9 HA requirement that specifies a performance characteristic that a system or system1 ]# g" z4 @5 M or system component must possess; for example, speed, accuracy, frequency.. i4 A! [2 G1 r Performance & h w* [6 l) {" G! d- H# eSpecification2 R. P; |4 D- f (1) A specification that sets forth the performance requirements for a system$ l( c1 W; ]3 W or system component. 0 D- n- W9 B) B/ |0 T; v! ?(2) Synonymous with requirements specification. " s! ^( Z6 L2 {1 @+ zPerimeter' e5 @& q8 t0 R/ K( v Acquisition 0 h1 C; ^2 m8 U3 _" c5 MRadar and Attack % a0 @" ?9 Y' Q7 lCharacterization : ?9 u1 P% J7 c. y/ R9 s( \) ~System (PARCS) ! k8 V. V3 R& E% L- NAN/FPQ-16 phased array radar at Cavalier AFS, ND, used for early warning and ' a: i* d7 Q: z! Z5 C& Mattack assessment. 3 R$ m2 M0 X1 O# rPeriod (nodal) Time for a satellite to travel once around its orbit. ! D% \. K4 E! Z7 m* yPermeability Having the ability to diffuse through or penetrate something. 0 {, d: Q7 b) ?2 C% z; vPershing II OBSOLETE. US intermediate-range missile deployed in Europe.: v5 F; Q% A I% a. t6 O% O PERT Program Evaluation and Review Technique.( q7 i; z3 C/ @) R MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P7 V n. b- _9 J) {, I 2238 O! s' y! t& g# \) r9 U; u PERT Chart A graphic portrayal of milestones, activities, and their dependency upon other * {( N3 a+ ]! Q9 k+ ], Gactivities for completion, and depiction of the critical path.! X7 ?$ ]" Y M$ \" u/ s7 m PESHE Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation.4 u* e5 {% p, G6 f PET (1) Pilot-Line Experiment Technology. (2) Production Environmental Test.* q q* \9 e7 ]/ X" ^0 M PFC Prototype Flight Cryocooler.# J0 j3 h g( r5 F$ e) B+ z/ k% f7 @5 s PFD Preconditions for Defense. 8 S7 j" e+ x+ B" s3 F( P0 _PFIAB President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. ) u! ? J& c! a+ DPFS Pre-Feasibility Study (UKMOD).( O& L9 i4 m. m; W% v: R0 C PGG Patrol Gunboat, Guided missile (Naval term).$ g% D. P9 Q* q4 r PGGH Patrol Gunboat Guided Missile Hydro-foil (Naval term).! P- m" I8 [3 Q! j, f PGM Precision Guided Munition.* H, c- [" F4 i; `1 p2 D PGU Power Generation Unit. 2 U- {/ X/ Z5 q. I5 v4 lPH&S Packaging, Handling and Storage (see PHST) (ILS term).# K( m9 X8 p" r6 G# B- |+ H Phased Array The arranging of radiating or receiving elements that, although physically 7 X: Y* K! y7 S( ?/ lstationary, is electronically steer-able and can switch rapidly from one target to& D$ t$ k/ s- |" E# Z& A another (e.g., phased array radar). 0 s0 K) v' m3 w2 m' }$ ?6 \; jPhased Array 5 |6 r$ j* X) }0 b, X: VTracking Radar ! Y5 g+ v+ A( w; T9 n+ ^% K. I9 e2 jIntercept On % m' A5 j+ W* X6 WTarget (missile); I8 Y: k m" h9 u. ` (PATRIOT) F+ o( P4 h: PA point or limited area defense system originally built to intercept aircraft. PAC-3' K+ h' D p. V$ n, ?$ b improvements, which will give it greater capability against theater ballistic missiles, U/ ^. j% Y2 Y+ V6 {( k include upgrades to the radar and selection of an improved missile, either: S+ M, `) t4 F: k0 J5 e PATRIOT Multimode Missile or ERINT. ) Z9 b1 z2 w; DPhased; B6 y9 a' c: t) l% X Deployment1 k7 |1 A1 Q# ~+ t0 _ The sequential steps of element deployments leading to a designated system e" D. t" }# H/ J9 C0 z$ d capability that is realizable with fiscal and technological constraints. ) m$ k! ]1 U( ]. D% L9 A' |+ L+ nPhase One2 V+ C: E ^; o7 k8 E2 s Engineering9 L+ m1 h9 g9 O# B: ?+ S, T' s Team (POET)' E' ]* q3 [8 a5 ]2 }4 j* o& E OBSOLETE. An FFRDC providing technical support to the Phase I Program Q8 |1 s* D4 _7 R0 \ Office. Now referred to as POET.) M b5 a- L$ `- j9 `& w$ s Phenomenology The topological classification of a class of phenomena. Phenomenology efforts & \) T8 ? f9 t: r8 c- z* P# Xcollect and analyze optical and radar signature data, and model phenomena; R+ _8 ? M. i, O4 S! L& N I required by systems developers to design and evaluate SDS elements. + Q' [/ ?7 Q# a9 wPHI Photonic Hit Indicator. ( K: Y; E" I3 {0 W$ }" D. {PHIGS Programmer’s Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System. - ^- o( c4 Q' W0 v; k, n5 l7 f7 ~% aPHOTINT Photographic Intelligence. 4 O6 K$ w. J) j+ H) w7 J2 h! ~Photochemical A chemical reaction resulting from exposure to radiant energy or light. # ?# d0 H. A I4 ~+ a& }8 j0 NMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P $ u8 L% q- e$ d+ A. _2 ~" G0 r224 / u ?$ ?$ A6 C8 kPhotoelectric: ]( n" V* X* w& S( f+ } Effect# p+ n0 W; f4 O- q* S" B: L The process whereby a gamma ray (or x-ray photon) with energy somewhat 2 d- k5 W+ O% ^+ L# |, O5 Ggreater than that of the binding energy of an electron in an atom, transfers all its ! A% k. y0 }* h! Benergy to the electron which is consequently removed from the atom. Since it * B& ]/ v, E& Uhas lost all its energy, the photon ceases to exist. (See Photon.) 1 S1 h" e* o# bPhoton A unit or "particle" of electromagnetic radiation, carrying a quantum of energy, . R3 j. p4 k- s% swhich is characteristic of the particular radiation.- Z# K6 x3 N* B7 m) U; J" Y( q4 M& i PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. ! D r( J; i' m% `. ?3 JPhysical Agents Descriptive term that includes non-ionizing EMR, static electric and magnetic : O% r* K8 v) i$ |4 R$ ^6 ]0 M. }fields, ionization radiation, energy beams, noise, explosions, de-orbiting debris,4 ~+ L* f3 C+ g( a and extreme cold.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

87#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:48 |只看该作者
Physical - x% X5 j( \( t5 _& ?6 K! iConfiguration ; [: v( P0 ~( b3 oAudit (PCA) # p- f2 b) c6 _0 @+ hPhysical examination to verify that the configuration item(s) “as built” conforms to : b7 Q5 k( F I( P$ Fthe technical documentation that defines the item. Approval by the government 6 q1 ^# F. q! U% Q$ \program office of the CI product specification and satisfactory completion of this, w" {& k& ^9 u: r9 U audit established the product baseline. May be conducted on first full production , P. ^$ R0 S4 Y9 Vor first LRIP team.* z: h# V5 i0 f9 ? PI Program Integrator.' U# g2 C9 E" M5 v8 @, a" K) F PIA Personnel Identification/Authorization System (USA term).: k& t9 J% \% z( x, j2 g3 F& x" Y! b4 S PIC (1) PLRS Interface Controller (US Army term).) T% z% f2 ^1 W! q: J (2) Policy Integration Committee./ y% x2 x; s% Z7 l+ I+ |* l (3) Program Information Center (Computer programmer term). 1 a6 c: Z) r( c9 M% d4 |Picture Element 7 y$ `" ?0 K1 ]& _" V p(PIXEL) e; u1 r+ x! a" m( K8 }4 s0 EThe smallest element of a display space that can be independently assigned 7 X* _6 g7 o p2 o3 O/ acolor and intensity; the finest detail that can be effectively reproduced on a ! r I& |5 P y# I8 n2 E. }recording medium. 4 e+ r4 q Y4 a: B! {+ BPIDS Prime Item Development Specification.) x+ p4 e: G% ?) z! ~( m8 A Pilot Production Production line normally established during EMD to test new manufacturing+ p; E( R$ f! ~ methods and procedures. Normally funded by RDT&E until the line is proven. # B) n$ Y8 g) ONot the same as long range initial production.7 }# p v7 W9 R4 f8 x5 Q: Q PIM Position of Intended Movement (USN term)., G- L( { s7 n$ W! m" F8 t$ ^ PIMS Programmable Implantable Medication System.& I$ ^) k) M8 z" v5 l$ y/ v9 a9 f5 r PIP (1) Predicted Impact Point. (2) Predicted Intercept Point. . ?$ f) r9 t) |(3) Product Improvement Proposal/Program. ; D1 R: p& C% w" q; M6 ]$ hPIPT Program Integrated Product (Process) Team. 9 I3 U% n% N9 Y( E+ y' }! ?PIR Program Information Report.4 @- U2 p. b: K: \$ h& k3 L PIXEL Picture Element./ D& u# _3 o4 M8 {- Z Pk Probability of Kill. $ P+ x& `& J8 ?6 T+ \0 mPKCS Public Key Cryptography Standard.$ }% Z# ?! i$ j+ z. w PKH Probability of Kill, given a hit. ' M+ z# A' |- Z' t8 Y9 v/ i6 l6 LMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P 6 C6 m) M, k' G6 X225 5 d, N1 T9 G9 E( i9 L& {- V; c+ jPKO Peacekeeping Operations.) K g# i5 D4 e$ s/ R7 N0 k! ~ Pkss Probability of kill -- single shot. # D/ B% F' Q- h6 ?+ C+ ePL (1) Probability of Leakage. (2) Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM. (3) Public ; p& M& @, b1 f" aLaw.' [6 e8 w( X+ m; r9 ?: G( T PLA (1) People’s Liberation Army (China’s army). (2) Patent License Agreement.$ j( F( o1 M$ h9 a! U7 @ PLAN People’s Liberation Army/Navy (China’s military).- k2 ]/ s8 p- E; r5 Y Planning,2 k2 f+ [) K. A# ~& V: K( V. i; t Programming, ! J, ?8 q# ?" o8 c2 P2 C0 g" {/ X+ u& BBudgeting ; r0 Z- J2 x M1 I8 U% |System (PPBS) 8 B9 m. U* g) _# BThe primary resource allocation process of DoD. One of three major decisionmaking support systems for defense acquisition. It is a formal, systematic* W6 @$ d2 t$ y* v$ k" a structure for making decisions on policy, strategy, and the development of forces . G$ K* P c- ?1 c0 F* t& q: [$ }and capabilities to accomplish anticipated missions. PPBS is a cyclic process" U/ I5 Y. m% ^( f0 k& Y1 k; t containing three distinct, but interrelated phases: planning, which produces the) ^& T% q+ f8 }# b: | Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) for the Military Departments and7 ~/ N1 @. p T- z: ^, K- d6 ]- S Defense Agencies; and budgeting, which produces the DoD portion of the ; x! G$ X) \" z, v2 a+ c/ U; ?* |1 EPresident’ s Budget. DoD PPBS is a biennial process starting in January of each/ Z( w- W' z0 T& `& X odd numbered year with national security guidance to initiate the planning + D5 i D! [5 M7 j8 Hphase, and ending in January of the next odd numbered year with the6 g3 ~; r7 y* j3 a n9 ` President’s budget submission to Congress. (Defense Systems Management% o w& V# ]& l" e College) 1 X; k" o5 z \" V( h3 I9 P3 cPLCCE Program Manager’s Life Cycle Cost Estimate.9 k! X5 G$ ^) E PLISN Provisioning List Item Sequence Number (ILS term). - X: \4 K# W% [# \ Q, x. l: EPLRS Position Location Reporting System. % R4 [# Y9 M7 `& }( M; t( J, rPlume Data- u0 u9 F6 Z, q9 @ Center. u$ C3 t3 O, ~: v AEDC, Arnold AFB, TN." w# V i% Y7 J, w PLV Payload Launch Vehicle. 9 w! a# V9 M; LPM See Program Manager.- `* O, s( x* p9 N7 | PMA (1) See Program Management Agreement.6 r5 V7 L- Q' o' f. }( b (2) Post-Mission Analysis. , K+ d- Q+ e" T2 d/ t- t# y) Z(3) Pressurized Mating Adapter (NASA term related to the space station).9 W, ~# A) z E2 T# u( j8 m PMASIT PMA Software Input Tool MDA/DPI S/W tool).# g+ u% `3 B p, F4 w* {4 N$ `, ~6 ?3 R PMC PCI Mezzanine Card (computer H/W term).. C# C& ]* L! p% ^; I9 o. @6 O3 { PMD (1) Program Management Document. (2) Program Management Directive (AF).) I T) @4 J0 C' k PMEL Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory. 6 u3 [% I- F3 l4 d+ TPMI Preventive Maintenance Inspection. ) z# ^4 v1 ]. v$ D+ d* {) ?# WPMIT PATRIOT Missile Integration Team (PAC-3 Program term).: Y9 I+ x0 e8 ]% o+ V2 m1 ?3 l PMJEG Performance Measurement Joint Evaluation Group.! s, Q( P) w+ U8 [- K PMO Program Management Office. + H. h7 X7 r3 _9 JMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P9 t: V: K* n& {( h 2266 n) m0 L+ B. o- ]$ E PMP (1) Parts, Materiel and Processes (US Army term) (See also MPP). * a% T* D8 a) u(2) Program Master Plan. 2 g9 |4 `' `) B% Y! Y(3) Prime Mission Product. - H' H; y5 K8 t5 d(4) Program Management Plan. * N' W- Q0 k1 z; ~" \8 }' OPMR (1) Program Management Review.& }0 u! }, n( S (2) Pacific Missile Range.; O. { {+ _7 X; B, B2 t% i2 h. a! _ (3) Program Manager’s Review (PAC-3 term).. `7 H1 M6 t: ]8 c PMRF/KTF Pacific Missile Range Facility/Kauai Test Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, HI.- r! m& W5 ^: o4 O; D PMS (1) Planned Maintenance System (ILS term). & X) {/ G* L( X& f. L(2) Performance Measurement System.% [7 d8 j/ N( n PMTC Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Mugu, CA. 0 V( j" M( }" K y8 WPMWG Producibility and Manufacturing Working Group.- v( l' h$ F, z- Q# d PN Probability of Negotiation. . s8 G/ P1 z- n8 Y9 cPNE Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. " H, {! X; N# NPNET Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Treaty. + M R% r& ~4 e% \0 ePO (1) [Acquisition] Program Office.- Q! x1 V& P7 `- V4 y (2) Purchase Order. 9 x! V- S; O4 u+ {% f2 Z9 A4 D7 VPOA&M Plan of Actions and Milestones.* E+ c: H: w& F" ~1 G POC (1) Point of Contact. (2) Proof of Concept. ! ?6 M4 b. T2 C. n+ M/ D& pPOC/ET Proof of Concept/Experimental Test (e.g., modular USSTRATCOM ground mobile8 \$ p8 v# C* C9 p: z( ?$ ^ command post). 2 n! }2 t( k9 BPOCT Passive Optical Component Technology." v" I/ P8 m+ X, z- K# y. P# U POD (1) Plan of the Day. (2) Probability of Detection. (3) Port of Debarkation. n9 o% p5 x0 v2 o6 d PODIUM Project Origination Design, Implementation and Maintenance.# L. l1 S! P' z2 x+ m POE (1) Program Office Estimate. (2) Projected Operating Environment. % a4 t; b! [; y P( aPOET A consortium of scientist and engineers from FFRDCs providing technical support# b L2 ] B! F" R7 W( X to the MDA. (Formerly referred to as the Phase One Engineering Team.) ( p5 `) u2 s3 R% _5 x& x" y. lPoint Defense The defense or protection of special vital elements and installations; e.g.,- g; S" m3 Y$ |5 k command and control facilities, air bases, etc. - h) n4 S4 @! R z3 _, kPoint Defense % O0 ~% a& [# B8 ~8 iSystem " r8 D, Z. j8 V) p. D# aA terminal defense system using radars and large numbers of guided projectiles " E' e0 U4 q, m8 q; L' lto defend ICBMs. This concept was considered in the early 1980s. 9 a2 j1 c4 l, k% S$ R9 \Pointing The aiming of sensors or defense weapons at a target with sufficient accuracy ) y* C; r, ~. z) veither to track the target or to aim with sufficient accuracy to destroy it. Pointing1 ]8 h, @) }. O& [7 k& w8 B1 C and tracking are frequently integrated operations.4 G8 ]( T) a& W7 g8 I* Y POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubrication. 7 y/ G% r! {1 ^7 r" F3 K* r' M& _MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P# s8 Y* ^+ v: N5 Y0 T! X/ d 227; \# y8 a6 p \6 Z. G9 P6 ^$ g POLAD Political Advisor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

88#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:16:59 |只看该作者
POM Program Objectives Memorandum.0 _- w8 x8 C+ f2 S8 b9 n POMCUS Pre-positioning Of Materiel Configured to Unit Sets. 9 G( W$ ^+ v) |1 [) x ~POP Proof of Principle. . r9 w) V& j( U, T7 `* PPort Covers Mechanism for thrust termination of solid-propellant systems. 8 I: i# M$ d7 I0 y8 ^, zPortability (Software) The extent to which a software component originally developed on ' M C, O2 U0 S9 fone computer or operating system can be used on another computer or' p7 D3 q7 h1 Q+ R operating system.3 @# w/ ?$ Z: J6 w3 p POS (1) Primary Operating Stocks. (2) Probability Of Success. (3) Position. W- x8 Z) a" e1 uPoseidon Class of US nuclear ballistic submarines (USN term). / }2 w' F a3 j0 {POSIX Portable Operating System Interface. - K2 d; ^) Y# JPOST Portable Optical Sensor Tester. ( h( {* L% H9 f# C) V+ NPost-Attack The period following the attack, prior to the next wave. 0 h: ], A* q M/ S' V5 PPost-Attack& c+ Q, ^1 ?: I+ T2 M9 ?7 ` Period 5 W4 M1 ~! H- i' a+ \2 q$ S6 rIn nuclear warfare, that period which extends from the termination of the final. j, N0 N1 x2 A& { attack until political authorities agree to terminate hostilities. 8 ~" ~: J w3 A- N7 hPost-Boost( \6 [4 U7 W" a3 n% |* v! n Phase (PBP)( i8 `9 a/ ` s% h That portion of the trajectory of a ballistic missile between the end of powered 4 m; E) e# S% K9 @+ n: _flight and release of the last RV. Applies only to multiple-warhead ballistic9 A+ o3 F A F: ?% u. K. ?" @/ O ~ missiles. (USSPACECOM)/ g2 |3 T0 u7 q) W Post-Boost& h( E9 I, d2 J Vehicle (PBV): \8 J" p. C6 \& J x% `; k The portion of a rocket payload that carries multiple warheads and which has the7 P! [4 n7 l8 Z( y$ A% f9 ? maneuvering capability to independently target each warhead on a final6 | c" q. M* b5 v) @: K trajectory toward a target. Also referred to as a "bus."" [ ^9 E0 G3 h. U POSTPROD Post-Production.) s/ ^ Z/ }6 i7 P& f POTS OBSOLETE. Phase One Threat Specification.$ J4 A# s0 I; h PP (1) Parallel Processing. 1 s. _: F5 z# g+ t) Q, b(2) Principal Polarization. k' c& U' [# K9 @0 J(3) Post Processing. / o% |2 L6 d, M; F! L(4) Program Plan.+ a3 ^* ]; F/ K- a. D PPBES (1) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System.4 c: U. g2 V7 ~- g/ B+ I (2) Program Planning and Budgeting System.2 D' P. R0 @3 b/ ~0 S# b PPBS Planning, Programming, Budgeting System. 7 m) C# D( A0 V) `$ b% \- t" pPPG (1) Parallel Programming Group. (2) Program Planning Guidance. 7 p+ N% n& G4 ]3 vPPI POM Preparation Instructions.0 g% `, |; \& i; g% V) H2 ? PPIP Program Protection and Implementation Plan. 5 d/ i) F$ T& {; UPPIRS Producibility Programming and Issues Resolution Strategies., ]8 j" Q1 m6 r5 s, ^# `& T: I MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ' _5 u, X/ X2 ]228% ^" h1 v; C8 k( ]2 S2 g/ K PPL Provisioning Parts List (ILS term).: a3 p: a1 j, k5 B: g PPLI Provisioning Parts List Index (ILS term).2 E; {: x- F' C8 x, e- c* H PPP Program Protection Plan.& J( i5 _1 k3 M PPQT Pre-Production Qualification Test. s* @" }0 }4 T4 w, m$ \PPS Precision Positioning System./ ^) Z- d0 a% r' b: c& B PPU Prime Power Unit (THAAD). 8 t- h% m, }( e. f5 _) ?5 P8 fPR Procurement Request./ B0 z) i I- a' d PRB (1) Planning and Resources Board. (2) Program Review Board. J! ~( j: g" n& e/ }/ ^: N- J9 i PRC Program Review Committee.6 D. ]) |, {8 }8 a# r" i' i, S8 k PRD Presidential Review Decision." F O' z) k& n3 E7 @7 x PRDA Program Research and Development Announcement.$ c2 d# V( `' Q G4 q, ]4 f PRDR Pre-production Reliability Design Review.: K. R: C( `% u5 {4 e Pre-Allocated% } T9 ~0 f" }/ _. \" d: h9 [: c* G Defense$ R" {" ?( K1 c$ l6 W+ v A preplanned decision to designate a specific number of defensive assets to be2 \! N+ R2 L8 T1 x$ z* q$ T used against a specific target or set of targets or to defend a specified asset or3 |% O6 ]0 P' {' `+ [: [ set of assets. The defense will select the best tactic to use based on the7 M+ _5 L" ?. q. G9 U number of interceptors available, their probability to kill, the number of targets & p" ?3 p7 N1 v/ f6 Punder attack to be defended, and the scope of the attack., l( `( K* y* [: s6 b Pre-Attack A period of time immediately prior to an attack, usually hours to minutes to tip-off. & ?8 p. `# q( b# E4 t0 Q ^8 m) ^Pre-Authorized- k/ p2 a3 {1 s/ p0 u8 N" n Engagement V8 D! N9 i- [5 ^( j4 w Criteria (PEC) ; \7 S) h. X: u& z XPre-specified quantitative operational parameter thresholds which when : z9 u2 l- I3 a+ S, z0 p6 G( xsurpassed cause automated engagements to be enabled. / h- E# V% G* iPre-Commit* V T; W. T/ Y1 z1 D! l2 P" C Strategy : L% Y& _6 P9 Z# B! O- D4 {A tactic in which defense weapons are fired without being individually committed( m6 ?+ Q4 F1 h to specific targets. Target commitment would occur relatively late in the: N& z8 V z! \1 P( y defensive weapon’s trajectory.! I* A5 z; O' W1 ^9 _8 i' ~* O Pre Launch4 [5 {# T: a+ U8 q0 M Survivability ! x: ?/ w' {/ B0 v# u5 I7 KThe probability that a delivery and/or launch vehicle will survive an enemy attack, Z1 b- e5 q5 h) V! M/ L under an established condition of warning.2 A. n; X, S5 h% a Precedence 1. A designator, which indicates the order in which a number of messages shall & j5 A; E2 i2 k# \/ d% n- a- Fbe served. Four precedence levels are provided for SDS, with one being the 7 B5 ?) T7 a4 L% hhighest and four the lowest. Messages with precedence level one are served 5 a% S; `. G: Q! h Q$ efirst and those with level four last. These correspond to the four precedence " l% D( K+ o+ D! [% Xlevels, Flash, Immediate, Priority, and Routine respectively. 2. (Reconnaissance)( f# P7 K. F9 R4 h0 b6 G1 B' [ A letter designation, assigned by a unit requesting several reconnaissance ) Z7 M' A8 m/ d- g9 vmissions, to indicate the relative order of importance, within an established' L/ Q' C: U9 m priority, of the mission requested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

89#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:11 |只看该作者
Precision6 f3 a0 _7 `; { Decoys $ j: K3 v! m& m$ J l# G" g1 TDecoys that precisely match RV characteristics either exoatmospherically or6 ]) R8 R4 ?8 a+ {/ {$ F; X endoatmospherically, or both, and seek to deceive the defense into intercepting/ W6 D N8 n5 H" r8 C: j them., e1 ^7 F& a' D/ @+ a. P MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P3 e4 B$ m$ G6 a) l" g3 M 229! u8 u: y) p# i# e Preconditions for9 m2 a" t8 R$ O& N Defense (PD) * t5 C. ^) y# Q6 wPDs are NCA pre-approved criteria, authorities, and procedures that delineate $ M4 @3 m) v. S4 D2 Fcircumstances under which USCINCSPACE BMD forces will initiate or continue# F1 F, J7 B7 } combat engagements and operations against hostile ballistic missile attacks - a* s8 p4 ~ u% S9 R7 v' ~directed at the United States, its Allies, or U.S. interests during peace, crisis, and4 @- `# g, k r8 t war./ @% D9 g) r6 M1 Z. I8 a Predicted+ S! K K# y9 c- T Intercept Point& ]9 B7 n' x. H' T4 P2 ^. N; Z (PIP)- e% A/ F9 \) Q- ]' j# t The calculated position in space where the target and interceptor coincide. 6 C# |# Q. s6 A zPreferential * `' i$ R& p+ d2 }* IDefense $ h8 H) m8 q, D- XPreferential defense is the a-priori assignment of defensive assets to protect$ D+ u( {9 f' r( F given facilities or capabilities.$ g" [6 T( p8 Q* J& q- a6 \ C% j Preferential/ [5 i7 g8 ?: R5 Y3 @% D Defense Strategy5 |- V! `, u% P3 j, i- a3 e& j A tactic used as part of the SDS strategy to optimize the use of weapons and. ]: y* e0 J& S, ~3 Q sensors by selecting high value targets for engagement by the defense while , Q! R1 e8 J. t6 {temporarily allowing less important targets to pass. This strategy forces the" R; V! y5 f3 D offense to attack with several times as many RVs as the defense has1 |# C& ]2 f! {# b9 l u interceptors. Since preferential defense demands precise impact point prediction,7 B0 F' O1 ?3 V* V" z* M the strategy is placed at a disadvantage if targets are closely spaced, if RVs can5 Q$ A6 u" {- y; p5 @8 k3 _ maneuver or if the defense intercepts ICBMs in the boost phase. " s: a4 {. S6 I/ f- s5 t5 \4 j6 fPreferential 8 Z' }! _" s b5 w7 N$ D/ e3 \Offense 0 o( c( p# L1 h* e7 vThe concentration of offensive assets on a subset of targets.3 g/ Y3 K5 B f; v, S% r Preliminary . a6 t0 I: u8 P( x# dDesign Review; Y8 W- t7 P- n2 g (PDR) . ?( i2 u0 ^) W. aA review conducted on each configuration item to evaluate the progress,& D) t5 d- E5 t/ {" p: Q% Q technical adequacy, and risk resolution of the selected design approach; to" O' ?# _" N7 V determine its compatibility with performance and engineering requirements of the- f$ N1 o! j, b5 B9 w7 F' N4 W* ? development specification; and to establish the existence and compatibility of% }+ U( i- M) W/ R8 w2 D the physical and functional interfaces among the item and other items of$ z# v4 m: `+ T' G" a; b. k equipment, facilities, computer programs, and personnel. Conducted during . J% C5 N, @) l6 y8 ?' _Phase I, Demonstration and Validation (for prototypes), and Phase II,5 \1 p# _# b) f1 U Engineering and Manufacturing Development. , h$ ~( j( s1 j) g$ j% r! ^Preplanned ! F. D. d9 p3 R2 h9 r1 PProduct4 a6 N8 E6 G5 l: ~* W Improvement8 y( B4 M% S' O& d+ f/ A. D! w; c (P3 I)/ b( z k1 r6 h- @/ {2 r: h* L Planned future evolutionary improvement of developmental systems for which* l3 G7 E+ a; r' i6 V8 q design considerations are effected during development to enhance future O/ S" ~: M4 S+ I' x% [application of projected technology. Includes improvements planned for ongoing; D3 G/ G" K2 F systems that go beyond the performance envelope to achieve a needed' W+ S" m9 r, N2 c9 F8 q z operational capability.2 R' c4 Z$ T3 v2 M Preplanned% U J6 A$ }! q( J9 d( Q. S9 |0 o Response 1 B, U! z4 x; COptions (PRO)) |8 s" `% B% ~0 e3 v$ r* D5 r Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) reactions, which have been preplanned, 2 T( c* }2 n' Ianalyzed, and pre-approved, for specific ballistic missile threats. The PRO,: Y. @5 }) Z* | equivalent to an operations plan, consist of a number of Defense Employment" ^! P, w5 _& y$ Y6 i2 K Options (DEO) which provide force employment objectives to Component forces% h3 s$ K- n5 z& }& ~ based upon the world situation, national objectives/guidance, BMD asset status, ( c0 x' F$ D' J* o9 d7 vand the intent of the threat. PRO is automatically processed with real-time 2 U, [9 K. C: b; b$ }, ]human oversight and control when USCINCSPACE directs execution." V9 a: B: w3 ~2 ]0 x Preproduction0 c( L/ L; Y- Z2 u; S% D; C Prototype & b- d3 u9 b7 p! {An article in final form employing standard parts, representative of articles to be # }7 ?. b, b# V% L7 t$ A- rproduced subsequently in a production line.1 m2 a" H9 |# y! ^ Preproduction& t* W m: E/ F0 V8 c/ k5 b Test# U0 b I+ k: ?7 ]: _7 G This is a test of design-qualified hardware that is produced using production1 u0 n6 R* X# v2 D# |. D4 Q1 \# O tooling and processes, which will be used to produce the operational hardware. / T* S7 D* H }$ k) m) ^No production hardware should be accepted prior to satisfactory completion of $ p, d- [* `: l# o2 ^this test. Test objectives include: gaining confidence that production hardware% H; t' x- X: t5 @1 [/ @ is going to work; that it will be reliable; that it can be maintained and supported 0 `6 F1 ?/ {" P9 i/ N! C, A" q/ _by the user; and that it is not over designed.9 _0 @! a, \, X3 {7 D% \) D MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P/ g" X U+ G% G 230 }5 D0 ^/ N1 c+ G& KPreset Guidance A technique of missile control wherein a predetermined flight plan is set into the + @* u) H& f! |$ K2 e6 \( z8 q$ vcontrol mechanism and cannot be adjusted after launching. 0 R) C0 O/ d# WPresident's 5 g+ k( K- y& f+ Q4 X5 o5 K& J+ ABudget (PB)* D% K8 E* _5 M5 E3 U. B The Federal Government's budget for a particular fiscal year transmitted in , |" o# l/ }5 r3 \January (first Monday after January 3rd) to the Congress by the President in * i/ h, `( _& a4 k, c1 }$ I" laccordance with the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended.( j. r2 H) F6 u* m9 F# a Includes all agencies and activities of the executive, legislative and judicial: z" b) O/ i1 C4 w3 B+ m* r branches (For FY 88/89, two-year budget for DoD submitted in January 1987.)) n1 {- g' Q* t) H' ~7 y3 d; t PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency.8 X2 S8 E0 s5 k! C+ U PRG Program Review Group.- `& z3 i0 \$ r* p, t Prime Contractor A contractor having responsibility for design control and delivery of a system or : c, F3 L6 E2 v% H3 pequipment such as aircraft, engines, ships, tanks, vehicles, guns and missiles,% s3 X' l7 _/ F& U ground communications and electronic systems, ground support equipment, and4 f' q" @/ A3 p/ ^4 f7 J0 ? test equipment. 5 J1 m* B) _/ L8 C. W8 X; [Prioritize Targets To identify and rank targets in priority fashion, based upon criteria such as type,' k! Q& u% t: x# F3 T# g predicted impact point, and predicted time of impact. J7 T P+ N. |2 _) BPRN Pseudo Random Noise. 2 I& |2 P0 H+ ]( C# o% VPRO (1) Preplanned Response Options. (2) Plant Representative Office.1 K& @' g8 c+ b' S Probability of " A; P z) |! n8 C1 P; }Damage! G5 e& [' C$ L; F1 h8 F The probability that damage will occur to a target expressed as a percentage or ! J! ^9 K. k4 M: ?* @5 [0 C% o" Q/ ~as a decimal.5 R3 n- G! l# Y0 _ Probability of ' U6 [& Q$ ~5 j1 N, d6 e5 mDetection' j1 \- e& V1 Q7 A' X (1) The probability that the search object will be detected under given' Z6 {+ t5 p3 V conditions if it is in the area searched.0 X8 H& F: H- X; N (2) The probability an object will be detected given all known error and noise) O0 i8 S% j2 k/ o8 D. a6 @ sources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

90#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:17:22 |只看该作者
Probability of8 S# n* ^# T& H7 ]5 n Discrimination - l: N& n4 R0 \1 p& {" }This is the probability that an object, which is threatening will be correctly, U( ^; `: G9 L identified. The ability to discriminate between a potential target and a decoy is , d: C" q/ ]5 \% Gquantified by a “K” factor, in which the higher the numeric the greater the2 o4 N9 N, F1 N) J2 f' M1 Q8 Z; b probability of discrimination (thus, a “0” K factor implies that the target is3 W7 Z: S8 a. ?2 }, K indistinguishable from the decoy). 2 z- E4 Z7 w2 A' S( M/ {Probability of * ~- H0 Z+ h/ y, {; a- B3 K* rFalse Alarm3 l0 ? t, m/ Q" I3 u( V& W) { (1) For a single sensor this is the probability that an object will be detected$ H7 o5 [( v1 J* R4 }# t when no object is present.8 g( A( z1 Z( j5 s& _% o9 J (2) For discrimination, this is the probability that an object, which is not a X& h+ Z7 G- I2 {' H* e+ j/ X threatening object will be identified as one. : T- n+ a+ q2 a' E% SProbability of Kill The lethality of a weapon system. Generally refers to armaments (i.e. missiles,5 V7 B( L- |5 `" T% g4 H4 B# b ordnance, etc.) Usually the statistical probabilities that the weapon will detonate ; T4 n% T1 h+ ^% ]3 ]. H5 J7 d, Iclose enough to the target with enough power to disable the target. (Defense $ ^: b: s& ^9 X5 U1 l& \' `$ ^3 CSystems Management College)1 l8 G1 E: d7 H0 }0 ?1 d7 J3 n Probe The air vehicle of the GSTS.5 S0 v. K8 `3 t PROC Procurement.0 O4 Y% ~8 B$ i3 F8 O; @ Process Data% W d( B% k" \9 l8 R Sensitivity Label+ x9 ?) z1 h9 b% }, x4 e (PDSL). b! z; X2 v" b# F3 } The sensitivity label for data contained in a process. / N# Z5 x S5 V. e# |3 ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P" `9 h/ k3 e( W W 231( G+ C2 w2 V0 \ @) ? PROCMT Procurement. 7 J. U+ m$ b9 o3 K' cProcuring ( D3 y2 z7 o4 `1 ?% U4 `Contracting4 h% n, h0 n9 n3 N$ u. y5 H Officer (PCO) ( n+ y' ~2 w3 ^: m& T& o* L- lThe individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services on + g7 Q' {: c0 |behalf of the government by sealed bids of negotiations that is responsible for . B: u" o& S' \& u' boverall procurement of the contract. . S H7 I& F' p0 e$ JProd Production. " S' H u1 C2 p! l9 E" ZProducibility The relative ease of manufacturing an item or system. This relative ease is8 j# _* K, ~" }2 B governed by the characteristics and features of a design that enable economical; L& e4 z: L1 S& L2 F' D- j/ a fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing using available manufacturing# Y) V: R) c5 x7 W# T% T techniques. + u0 J' H4 }! O% O# FProducibility, 5 o" u& d2 p9 Y" {Engineering, and! W; D$ `: G& U1 u0 g6 ?6 C4 R Planning (PEP)" P6 G6 @$ F2 L/ q" ]# f Applies to production engineering tasks to ensure a smooth engineering( }; K7 H" K/ `+ ?* z transition from development into production. PEP, a systems and planning3 R8 @6 G/ W6 z engineering approach, assures that an item can be produced in the required 5 w! X" x; n; O# Q4 Yquantities and in the specified time frame, efficiently and economically, and will . ^" H+ A/ L7 L- G: x4 h, Fmeet necessary performance objectives within its design and specification' H9 S1 V6 U4 {- D% H constraints. As an essential part of all engineering design, it is intended to ) R( \$ W4 `' Z- M/ y; v7 qidentify potential manufacturing problems and suggest design and production ! l+ S) C& [! R3 f; t3 f- Achanges or schedule trade-offs, which would facilitate the production process. 7 A5 ?, u1 }, ]4 b# _1 |; lProducibility, ; O2 g! L, T& b3 [3 j h- PProgramming,0 u) W! e& V" [- T; u and Issues9 j2 [$ i* Y. S4 F Resolution - {0 }& i; J8 B. T Q4 s$ hStrategies $ U( x+ S( h+ ~6 G, F(PPIRS) % b' C: p2 e) u9 `& X0 T& HA semi-annual document put out by the MDA P&M community listing all medium 2 h. \/ i+ X4 L2 ^; v D) G' @and higher P&M risk issues as prioritized and coordinated by the MDA P&M 0 U& T5 K5 |2 E' n5 [Working Group.& v2 A& S5 p$ n0 K+ N3 y1 L Producibility % i B c3 R. K5 H4 iReview 4 e6 S+ G4 k. B& ]: l* C; D' G" CA feasibility review of the design of a specific hardware item or system to ; a+ V3 p/ l& S4 m2 P8 H1 sdetermine the relative ease of producing it using available production technology - {* b5 K( u2 A! G: dconsidering the elements of fabrication, assembly, inspection, and test. This is a9 Q( _6 M/ J; [* c% l0 X8 e8 g generic term for the concurrent engineering portions of MIL-STD 1521 system5 {5 V3 h* h/ D design reviews.0 E g/ o7 D+ Y0 {$ R Product Baseline (1) Established by the detailed design documentation for each configuration1 b' N/ c: S7 h( h8 U( i item. Normally includes Process baseline (type D spec), Material baseline 6 r# X5 c3 `1 f7 `(type E spec), type C spec, and drawings. - M% Z& B5 ?0 F0 q; @/ f(2) In configuration management, the initial approved technical W6 a( ]9 u+ L% G8 `documentation (including, for software, the source code listing) defining a/ ^6 r, b7 D2 d0 G2 q# L0 V configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and ( y. _+ M/ l3 h9 jlogistic support of its life cycle. ( g* j& f, d8 D& f, QProduct & n: s( s9 s5 V7 y3 U3 p& }Configuration 6 b/ b% g0 S/ Q9 B* r2 ?Identification: x# F1 @- z9 y/ L+ \$ z The current approved technical documentation which defines the configuration) ^8 m8 U- \4 l5 h+ t/ C: J of a configuration item during the production, operation, maintenance, and8 r# ~3 }: {. J( O( E logistics support phases of its life cycle and which prescribes that necessary for:- ]/ `& ?8 }3 E7 g1 I fit and function characteristics of a CI (Configuration Item); the selected / \1 u7 j0 F: d: ?functional characteristics for production acceptance; and the production - H$ ]8 G2 q2 K t! D$ D0 N' Sacceptance test.! [" f; e- S: x- e i/ @ Product9 r. ^. E& O! `5 g2 l- ^* B. u Improvement 3 s# b- G; P! @9 j; oEffort to incorporate a configuration change involving engineering and testing on7 F" R' E+ x' O3 k- G2 \ end items and depot repairable components, or changes on other than- J0 q1 ?$ _8 o7 D |, m; X developmental items to increase system or combat effectiveness or extend$ e) M3 i) P1 t% m% j" F- ^ useful military life. Usually results from user feedback.- f7 @$ c5 L: Z0 Z3 k( p3 k MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 P ( T5 ]* V& }: x" H* Z- H5 D232 ' k. h) z. F) W" x( oProduct Manager The individual, designated by a materiel developer, who is delegated authority . Z( k3 N5 K& T' L' A% Zand assigned responsibility for centralized management of a0 g: B( r' |/ B3 I development/acquisition program that does not qualify for % G- a: S" q/ S8 H. `' Qsystem/program/project management.' G2 I1 p, g2 [# {. J* v& a Product Security / q2 H# C j$ \! c$ ~. |& O' \(PRODSEC) 6 t/ U# C$ F" z3 B' u" y' g/ C1 lThat physical security provided for selected DoD products (major, high cost,& J, p& H1 M# X/ L politically sensitive systems with significant military value) at Department of ! r& s' d H% E6 E/ d! j p6 |Defense contractor facilities to mitigate the risk of the government as a selfinsurer. Defining and instituting product security during production are essential ! w3 M2 s1 P4 @) s M& n0 Tto the delivery of uncompromised systems.

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-8-2 16:17 , Processed in 0.042002 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部