- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C
+ _# I6 F/ \6 U0 G6 T; } D" ]" Y61
( j" B n- \1 l5 e9 L) [Control and- m+ u, v% Q( Y7 F2 d
Reporting Center
: x2 A5 S7 J6 {/ B( xAn element of the US Air Force tactical air control system, subordinate to the
6 {; Q3 ^7 c% m" J/ W( c- ltactical air control center, from which radar control and warning operations are1 h$ o. z/ ~# T/ N) }* x; i, N: H
conducted within its area of responsibility.
1 ^, h1 {/ r7 LControl and
4 e/ Q! J" U; M9 q3 A6 u4 AReporting Post" f' f4 g9 i4 z- q8 ~
An element of the US Air Force tactical air control system, subordinate to the3 b5 h9 ~" [, S) Y5 I1 l
control and reporting center, that provides radar control and surveillance within; ]# B6 i# N! ]% o7 _
its area of responsibility.& R" r& K2 _% {
Control Area A controlled airspace extending upwards from a specified limit above the Earth.
" E+ b9 h/ j9 ]/ Y& `* yControlled
, Z! B5 r0 _3 W' tEnvironment0 u3 D# z- C2 s" n0 p. o \; u
Area where entry into the radiation hazard area is controlled.
# h; L* y! u9 j5 l& C' ]Control/ {& V7 V ~' t' W2 e3 I
Procedure5 y- D- i; w5 {) B2 O, ?0 F
The means used to control the orderly communication of information between( ?. N- ?. b2 h
stations on a data link. Also called line discipline. Q1 Y) ]6 y2 A! r5 w* J) j
Control Station The station on a network, which supervises the network control procedures such
9 @; M. c% G1 U( Y% ~- U) z7 m' c) g4 |as polling, selecting, and recovery. It also is responsible for establishing order
' Q: y$ \8 ~% Q- N) ~7 e7 Eon the line in the event of contention, or any other abnormal situation, arising
% @: x5 S/ x1 dbetween any stations on the network.8 ~# E0 l; }! K( V4 e v
Control Zone The space, expressed in feet or radius, that surrounds equipment that is used to5 I. F" T! t8 a K6 O
process sensitive defense information and that is under sufficient physical and
5 W1 C/ ^1 `0 l) E/ f' Rtechnical control to preclude an unauthorized entry or compromise.0 u. q3 x7 \9 n+ l2 J. h+ X5 c; Z
CONUS Continental United States.5 z$ s! P4 S. L8 h2 O" d7 L
Conventional Co-
! A5 K/ X4 W" o1 u4 m* b* A, fProduction8 o2 E5 c% n2 ?& O% O7 X$ x4 e
An effort between governments to produce the same end item, or components3 E! e1 s; H! U) b: |( H! g
of the same end item, in concert. ]6 \0 X% z# |+ a& K$ J- B
Conventional. Q, C S1 v9 `3 f! c# }) |# y- a5 j
Weapon( U: m/ b. i& e6 j, o1 a: o& Z
A weapon that is neither nuclear, biological, nor chemical." }) R/ w8 O8 t0 G Y2 X( w
Coop Cooperative
2 T" p2 H! y7 o; }Coordinated
4 K' B1 r1 g1 Z5 P @' K& D2 yEngagement( K! [+ p; W1 L' ^* d/ M
Planning/Actions
: C" @' s {; H! u7 VNecessary coordination among engagement components to ensure maximum
6 ]) |- X5 U" @effectiveness of the SDS and resources are not wasted on targets already
b2 V4 M# {5 Y- _% |# utargeted.
& X: Q; A1 [ |4 xCoordinating- g' I$ [7 W: F o" p) l5 D: g
Authority; M, M# I9 c9 t6 v7 }' \
A commander or individual assigned responsibility for coordinating specific/ \" H* T8 I3 s+ O
functions of activities involving forces of two or more Services or two or more6 ^& k% H1 E8 m* h& U# S" L
forces of the same Service. The commander or individual has the authority to
$ Y" d' k& ~8 u. D# Frequire consultation between the agencies involved, but does not have the
' H; n$ t+ B+ A. g$ Z8 X b/ Jauthority to compel agreement. In the event that essential agreement cannot be
( @! q7 s! p: @/ greached, the matter shall be referred to the appointing authority.( W+ u( j/ U- A# t# k! s
COP Committee of Principals% _$ ]+ K6 E4 z( T* l+ h9 F7 o) ?5 [
COR Contracting Officer’s Representative. Contracting Officer.
7 s8 P8 N( ^$ L0 jCORBA Common Object Request Broker Architecture.
: j* s) w- f7 ACORM Commission on Roles and Missions.
2 N5 Z0 M$ B8 v6 K6 A0 B) @MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C
# P+ a2 B6 ]! w2 n( ^62$ n( |! V) c- S7 J5 |
Corner Reflector (1) A device, normally consisting of three metallic surfaces or screens
! E2 d0 z; E. I3 x8 l2 L4 p$ Uperpendicular to one another, designed to act as a radar target or9 s* d: k. F* ?5 C2 u+ ?' k& N
marker.8 p7 C1 m S9 b- i" m( c
(2) In radar interpretation, an object that, by means of multiple reflections% c1 G1 J3 h$ B3 |( Q) \/ D; C
from smooth surfaces, produces a radar return of greater magnitude than# i0 y' ~7 q L. y/ K0 E; M6 A0 `) S
might be expected from the physical size of the object.
8 o$ K# U$ B' R0 oCorps SAM OBSOLETE. See Medium Extended Air Defense System.
5 z' N r8 ~; w, a& p, v$ a* R# RCorrelation (1) The process of relating observations or tracks from one set of data to
& z x1 ?; A+ r; H9 E% x- Fobservations or tracks from another set of data, i.e., collecting data from2 V* b: |$ {- c5 e% n
different frames or sensors that presumably relate to the same target. (2)
+ {: _# i. m0 o: B8 p& i3 }* \In air defense, the determination that an aircraft appearing on a; F4 \- x: q1 k
radarscope, on a plotting board, or visual is the same as that on which, S7 M e1 Z: W# ^" q! c9 m
information is being received form another source. (3) In intelligence
w$ x, A! G5 f& F2 Iusage, the process which associates and combines data on a single
/ _) Z% _8 b3 H9 D+ {$ y5 Wentity or subject from independent observations, in order to improve the
+ {3 L, c$ \# V# q# `3 hreliability or credibility or the information./ Q* c9 b' g/ V' n
COSEMS Evolving architecture operations support tool.* n3 |/ h* p, I* J" J( T8 p. A
COSM Computer System Operator’s Manual
2 X5 p: v1 `" l+ X& k/ CCOSMIC NATO security category.
' x& q/ k, U" T. k* p# p* HCost Analysis
' k3 {/ }' a1 m: e! l HImprovement) h. Y; U& w5 v6 ], L
Group (CAIG)
0 p, e9 {0 ~" ?) L: o1 r8 e) k; iAn organization within the office of OSD Director, PA&E which advises the DAB/ m% J" }; N4 }& y
on all matters concerning the estimation, review, and presentation of cost4 A& W; a% l' P" {3 s Y
analysis of future weapon systems. The CAIG also develops common cost
6 L" s0 H( C5 G) t+ ^0 eestimating procedures for DoD.
( F+ G6 s& ~+ r6 W6 MCost Analysis+ ~' K0 Y: e5 U# S+ z* ^
Requirements
' T4 Q# j! k, h0 d, b- H8 b% C, DDocument
, c8 X) t/ x1 B& b(CARD)+ m2 ], ?# o; ^+ K+ ~3 W* U2 U
The document describing the technical baseline, which is a subset of current
# y+ j8 v' F* ~2 B9 Xsystem technical data and is used to generate the baseline cost estimate for an
& b+ E% m+ Z3 w# @( [SDS element. It includes, but is not limited to, the element description,
B% ~4 l1 _) {interfaces, operational concept quantity requirements, manpower requirements,
# j" i4 w' c" i) a8 e4 `& ~activity rates, schedules, research and development-phasing plan, and facilities
5 R8 I Y4 {: T+ j4 Drequirements.8 e' [# l1 c/ a& A, _$ `; |
Cost and
- W8 Q6 \( ~& D, [/ U6 Q7 Q% UOperational
( g+ v! K" F o$ H: I- X! r1 }: [/ aEffectiveness
# a" M, X& {; w2 EAnalysis (COEA)2 b# D0 s* A9 ~; f4 M
An analysis of the estimated costs and operational effectiveness of alternative6 `4 y* L% T9 L( h
materiel systems to meet a mission need, and the associated program for
4 t' S; S' i4 W- F/ F% f4 kacquiring each alternative.
$ Q( [/ Z0 h3 J1 yCost Risk Cost estimating risk and schedule/technical risk. Cost estimating risk is the risk
& w, ?& C( l( E: D e. kdue to cost estimating errors and the statistical uncertainty in the estimate.' \. A7 V, H8 Y- b8 G: l
Schedule/technical risk is risk due to inability to conquer the problems posed by6 a! U2 t; m: p% z+ n3 T; }4 V: n
the intended design7 q4 ?9 m9 p1 v L& B2 ~, B
COTR Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative. See Contracting Officer.
) a9 j8 d. z, NCOTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf.
8 ~1 D( _9 ^. B _8 ~1 u- S) `Counterair A US Air Force term for air operations conducted to attain and maintain a desired' n$ |; s7 r: J6 {) G+ M9 Y
degree of air superiority by the destruction or neutralization or enemy forces.
) z! C1 o$ K8 j) l# \9 eBoth air offensive and air defensive actions are involved. The former range
$ k+ _, r6 Y' \/ Tthroughout enemy territory and are generally conducted at the initiative of
0 f/ \4 p) @. ?- K7 Q4 ufriendly forces. The latter are conducted near or over friendly territory and are9 Z0 W6 L( `" Z6 M2 k* y: r7 R
generally reactive to the initiative of the enemy air forces.' Q; U7 [# h. J* s y4 F
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C9 { X+ F+ [1 n) r3 i4 Q: A
63: v( k) y- e3 V' [, ]. b
Countercountermeasures
" `* K; c7 ~- A. g9 H8 v) ~(CCM)
& m+ g+ l; |- M/ V6 lMeasures taken by the defense to defeat offensive countermeasures.
k; t0 A6 x! V! Y. @+ ?Counterforce The employment of strategic air and missile forces in an effort to destroy, or" C/ X' f/ y: W$ O# M& A/ m
render impotent, selected military capabilities of an enemy force under any of the
& @! P3 ]- ?# vcircumstances by which hostilities may be initiated.
$ ~' f% V, m- [$ r( `Countermeasure A design or procedural measure taken against covert or overt attacks.
# D* q, `% f: j4 V/ f) ~) O) } j) tCountermeasure
, Q6 a2 [- J0 \9 M, P i( j0 `& Hs (CM)
# A7 T& @+ d" QThat form of military science that by the employment of devices and/or
% t4 ?1 \4 I- P, Q# ^# ctechniques has as its objective the impairment of the operational effectiveness of* b' N- J# g4 W8 U8 |5 j
enemy activity.2 r6 t0 A) k. q. u/ A
Countermeasure
0 u/ o, v- j0 @s Rejection$ d" X7 N( p3 `! O: [, _
(Surveillance)1 b# C) V, ?! h! o; C' V
Improvement or rejection of an object signal in the presence of' f" J0 Y& U+ ?; V
countermeasures., F) w% C" |- I/ c2 d. j
Course of Action. Y9 b8 U* C1 W& {/ J2 r% s. {
(COA). k0 ]& l( H, X" U ~' @+ X
(1) Any sequence of acts that an individual or unit may follow. (2) A possible
3 g4 O! m, E/ N9 ?8 ^& ]0 Dplan open to an individual or command that would accomplish or is
; W& i9 N# P$ D% k1 q6 |5 Srelated to the accomplishment of his mission. (3) The scheme adopted! t, H0 T& a, }" J3 U
to accomplish a job or mission. (4) A line of conduct in an engagement., ~9 G- B. L$ [5 _* L- y
(5) A plan to accomplish a mission. It describes the execution concept, M0 Y: N2 S" t* c1 T r2 z& O. |
for BMD of North America. It will specify the engagement priorities,
% [# H9 {+ ~2 j; A6 O9 }4 Kresource allocation and desired results by Area of Operation (AO).
, g) P& }. o# O; Y0 M; y(USSPACECOM) (6) The scheme adopted to accomplish a task or' M% l- d" k( G* Q& d2 ~2 }6 m, G
mission. It is a product of the Joint Operation Planning and Execution
9 Z! ]: w0 P) ^; O. P9 hSystem concept development phase. The supported commander will
. p+ _# X- O) Y* v9 p r; Ainclude a recommended course of action in the commander’s estimate.
9 N; H) O. S0 Z& |" t9 y# rThe recommended course of action will include the concept of
6 t* V: |+ b/ F5 w6 @operations, evaluation of supportability estimates of supporting
. G/ O+ J( x7 b, A+ _organizations, and an integrated time-phased data base of combat,
3 k+ @: i7 K$ acombat support, and combat service support forces and sustainment.$ L& U$ I( Q5 q2 \( a# Z: F
Refinement of this database will be contingent on the time available for
( F; S; r: S9 Rcourse of action development. When approved, the course of action
/ ~8 ?. v* v/ Hbecomes the basis for the development of an operation plan or5 s- f d* K( a% ^5 I8 S) V
operation order.) `6 ]/ @6 t) I: Y y- y
Coverage (1) The ground area represented on imagery, photomaps, mosaics, maps,; X) m" \3 B* M# V: {
and other geographical presentation systems. (2) Cover or protection, as$ K' r+ }. I9 X9 O* L/ n
the coverage of troops by supporting fire. (3) The extent to which
6 e& r1 p. u8 N/ p$ h3 S3 Pintelligence information is available in respect to any specified area of
4 w+ t9 O6 k$ \6 N( ointerest. (4) The summation of the geographical areas and volumes of4 R$ j8 q! w- z
aerospace under surveillance.* l: U q$ r: {/ M
Covert Timing
2 j! X$ @7 D* Y. e. d; i# f4 ?Channel5 l/ W! _/ a2 d' o' T9 V1 U
A covert channel in which one process signals information to another by
8 p d; I g& ^% z1 w/ a+ |modulating its own use of system resources in such a way that this manipulation
9 X- J# H, g! c% Kaffects the real response time observed by the second process.
& S& k" Q6 P. s- E! |# DCP Command Post.+ }2 i# ~- u* a* P6 g" s- X
CPA (1) Chairman’s Program Assessment. (2) Closest Point of Approach.& M; X+ M; n8 p c& r" ?4 a
CPAF Cost Plus Award Fee.
* r, G! c7 D) K5 h) G+ U9 L+ mCPAM Chief of Naval Operations Program Assessment Memorandum (Navy)7 ~# |' H5 ?' X% C
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 C
1 W: B* n3 r% S/ t, b5 [- x3 k2 d64
* D/ ~2 T x3 @3 X7 Y1 I# [: JCPAR Cost Performance Assessment Report.' k5 y" S* S' F& B
CPAT Critical Process Assessment Tool7 |) M! P ]1 w) \7 Q5 m) |
CPB Charged Particle Beam.
1 s1 t ]0 ^" {CPEV Communications/Processor [Network] Experimental Version.
( C$ ]3 d, N5 r0 L1 @/ A2 F# BCPFF Cost Plus Fixed Fee." E0 z6 g$ a) J6 Z/ E* \ t
CPIF Cost Plus Incentive Fee.
8 U" f# x% F# r$ W, Z! dCPIPT Cost-Performance Integrated Product (Process) Team.
" q M* K- c2 [; B4 N' \' f/ ^" _CPM (1) Critical Path Method. (2) Contractor Performance Measurement.
# c" E3 p8 t& ~! ~" I6 cCPP Critical Performance Parameter.+ R; W, c0 `) o6 }! ~$ \
CPR Cost Performance Report.
4 h5 X. O; F0 H- u+ u/ h* RCPR/NC Cost Performance Report/No Criteria (Contract management term).- i1 h2 \ f$ D4 }( e. F5 v% n' Q! M
CPS (1) Consolidated Program Summary.8 X0 A. T5 T5 H: a/ x6 ]$ Y
(2) Competitive Prototyping Strategy.
2 D2 v2 X. M. x6 I2 t8 t2 o(3) Current Program Status.6 h/ P/ i% d, Y/ m
CPU Central Processing Unit (TelComm/Computer term).0 U, z; n' i1 c. ~6 \( ?7 J5 n
CPX See Command Post Exercise.
, w; d, U( m3 l& }- ]# j% |CQAE Chief/Contract Quality Assurance Evaluator.
$ j" P$ Z S, r% U- ~2 O; uCR (1) Computer Resources. (2) Continuing Resolution (US Congress term).% k$ S0 i. j( _( Z0 v6 u8 f7 r
CR-UAV Close Range Unmanned Aerial Vehicle." K/ C) W; \4 i+ C G
CRA (1) Coordinating Review Authority. (2) Command Relationships Agreement
( X9 D: d+ \9 ]: i8 \; n/ B, Y( zCRADA Cooperative Research and Development Agreement.3 G1 l1 A0 _0 J+ d8 U" Q
CRAM (1) Control Random Access Memory.$ f" E0 I7 H4 p9 u
(2) Cross-tie Random Access Memory (Computer term).
/ X$ _8 ^- R- O# s3 {, n6 x3 aCRB Configuration Review Board.& n X5 L: e4 R$ H8 E' [
CRC Control and Reporting Center.. K! X/ x O1 T+ o4 p: C
CRD (1) Capstone Requirements Document.' P2 s' { ~8 u# h% T, z
(2) Component Requirements Document.% |1 [' s% v8 N" ?0 i) C" T
CRDA Cooperative Research and Development Agreement.
* \% r* ]8 g( m9 T' _CRG Communications Relay Groups (PATRIOT).
/ i% F2 @/ p$ p3 W, P' iCRI Classification, Recognition and Identification.8 \0 Y0 u' H) }
CRISD Computer Resources Integrated Support Document |
|