- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition* A1 t' _/ ~! h9 I* ~( s
Categories% F3 q4 _$ k' Z9 c- Q, `9 H+ x. M
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution1 m+ x; p! h( G/ Y% s4 l! n; ~/ [
and compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories# }5 V6 W! ?& T1 t: u$ X
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
' v- i8 e- X6 J1 A+ a9 S/ LAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They. U. z9 Y' i' p8 _
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
* e! ?) o* c& g! x1 ?requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under% n$ T6 S4 i$ }' _ n# [# s
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;0 e# Y9 _4 _& H+ @7 c' _% K
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
. S: k5 k3 `* }% @- Yacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the: ^; K: G+ h0 x
Component Acquisition Executive.! \3 Y3 d7 W2 n! n+ m7 F4 U) ?
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is9 ~5 o3 X v9 Y- D* |; {. K
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have% h( L: I* o5 v o" e+ x. U0 b
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area9 v& @/ ^" J* X+ G
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition3 _' G1 P/ o0 }+ v, y
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone4 {0 W% J" r" ^! w. U# y: L8 Q
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
# ~' L5 T6 h7 w4 v# q1 Twithin their respective organizations.
+ C6 @6 S. e" Z+ p/ IAcquisition
7 M" X6 w3 [0 N! A3 y% nDecision
- \+ d* B' z; z5 I( xMemorandum
0 q8 N- q4 a2 U2 ]9 k(ADM)! m! C, Y( { v k( d7 B& n
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
/ H- F! P1 \+ m) y7 r/ }decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
( R: ]- `# l( g( H1 Wdecision review or in-process review.# y& j! g6 w7 S3 W$ X
Acquisition A- Q# b9 G4 \
Field of View- p) p6 Z/ F6 ~- W) ?
(FOV)
R# w0 ~( h. Z' xThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process( U" y9 y' l, ~8 Y* t6 N6 a% Q
of searching its assigned volume.( a* L( t0 ^ }% w0 d0 h
Acquisition Life7 _( L$ n, @: u Z3 S5 M( `
Cycle' ^' f; x+ N) v. y" A* \) l
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which8 ^0 H- I5 U; g) ~/ h
a system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and4 _1 B: O. l, I% c( K7 _: h9 v$ [
production. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration K. L" n$ L0 ~+ f# O* J" [5 ^
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
8 ]4 v3 m- }! |, `: QDeployment, Operations and Support.$ x" ^4 ]8 f7 v6 R) e; Y
Acquisition
8 b7 ]. L2 N6 J" YLogistics! G+ |* i' g" J+ ]; E
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
* ^: J1 N R7 o; r9 e9 h! Ianalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics
3 J6 p0 X: O, {3 T8 g4 isupport throughout the acquisition process.5 z5 @" [( y% P/ w9 G
Acquisition1 E, m& g$ A2 b8 T J1 z
Management
) g, x. k+ r5 |" |2 R6 D+ GManagement of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
9 ?* }: ^! W$ {4 P/ W“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense9 k: B% b2 F: _( Z+ _
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
. u, U: o( |% n0 \. L% iacquisition systems/programs.# [) H3 D1 U) A2 X7 b
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
+ ~2 q# E; }8 B; b7 Lthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding) G& ~( i( A/ N' U9 H" p
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
/ Q% X9 l o4 ]# }" G( UDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)- d5 y7 H$ Z* t$ o5 g) j
Acquisition
% [' i: ]* I: e/ A7 `5 JPlanning6 G0 o) w" P/ s( b% B4 L
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
8 A& h9 R* F, M4 i& D0 dare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the0 S( ?9 [/ k9 Z6 ?
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
) n: o1 a( l; b& `& |$ G& mthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for# w+ d& R8 r" L- ^7 w8 N
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.; N1 v X6 J+ ]6 `; C8 p
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A
( a6 E. y! l p0 H3 k0 n1 G# \* b5
# z/ D' ~7 d& @9 f9 U5 j2 vAcquisition
+ {$ w; o4 M8 y, k V) mProgram
+ f1 S9 j P1 T! RA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
8 R _: s! Y6 ]capability in response to a validated need.( N7 b/ p; l& {0 ]+ \, A8 \) C2 O7 Q
Acquisition& ~+ p# c5 p! d9 r% C+ j
Program, b& S; w W5 u6 D6 s
Baseline (APB)3 O9 Y0 X7 B* W! T5 N7 N
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance1 m( w& n+ ?+ r: t
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
x. g6 P2 G9 q. h; dauthority milestone reviews as follows:6 n0 [7 ?; S% i( V6 t
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,( a( q. N X% O0 ?; M1 M3 `
Demonstration and Validation.- |9 S" [! D: P5 h( ~
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in$ k3 Z' B6 W$ H3 f: I! e
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.* }! y8 ^/ F1 E( M2 y, Q
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in3 I1 j/ B' l1 T1 x4 C, V& z% l3 w& I
Phase III, Production and Deployment.' D* s) q& e j8 g" N5 e+ T
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance/ M5 C! ~5 e+ J" E0 z8 `$ C" J( l
parameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called/ m+ }" h. r% ]- S
thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be. n8 i3 N* w" d" }, W
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of* a! d2 J" v8 ]- T. n5 L
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
W7 ?/ _; _! B mdeviation.
5 }! f7 X( @9 n$ RAcquisition+ f, E1 c0 G9 R( E& q/ r
Radar
% G. e# G8 Q1 `. m4 Y4 kRadar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the
* f r( D, B5 w* ^5 V, rbackground and non-hostile objects.
8 [ e; z6 e3 t, K7 d: i2 t- b/ z' WAcquisition
. L& V) C6 t9 j: iRisk: p0 L3 R9 w: x2 J) {. O0 n# m3 e
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an6 G$ X# x+ T6 e0 ~! i$ U
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,; z4 m$ O( p3 ^& |+ I# O- ^
cost, or availability for deployment.+ i7 `3 B7 {+ _( H& J9 L
Acquisition/
- {2 o1 @. q' h" W8 m8 k x, pReacquisition' M: d9 d0 P! S. P
Time8 |4 M3 X# U! l7 J! e
The time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This/ ~$ U6 x9 P, m& q) @* {& y; V) z
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|