- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition/ v8 x8 D+ { A' W6 l
Categories, G9 ]) T1 O6 p, Q4 z& @
Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
: d. {+ w* p; iand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories3 ?1 @0 m" {0 c
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
! D# i! X6 U! Z1 P) M6 U0 @Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
# U9 R* |, b; Q' @3 h- r8 {have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
w0 C) o& g) h# j! C7 X/ grequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
+ }1 e) n: i# x2 O/ \& X# q5 ASecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;( ~8 u* q6 D. w
(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
# n& f; P$ _1 e: y9 f0 I. y0 ?' oacquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the0 d5 Q& l6 \) z }$ d
Component Acquisition Executive.
- U9 Y1 h% z( Z# c$ M/ dAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
w) |' Q3 L: J6 edelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
% E3 f j; S1 d0 K' m, Z4 ounique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area( D% y+ X$ h: Y* l
Acquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition
( G2 m5 z+ @* {3 Ncategories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone" ]2 Z5 V, J" x' K
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
2 o) u0 X2 q4 N; V2 }: mwithin their respective organizations.
$ \+ j d5 G) X5 XAcquisition
+ n; ]# K. V8 rDecision; r1 O! O2 \9 ?* f# ?
Memorandum6 ?3 z* `( u7 q3 I
(ADM)
+ G; L% P8 p" q9 |- x" Y& @A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
! g3 l. m: N- b0 x9 H" Ddecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone- h) S# y# i' u, U: X; J h
decision review or in-process review.9 M5 ?% |1 C$ f
Acquisition
# [% d$ A; ?5 s# CField of View
7 Y4 g3 `( Q' [! s8 O(FOV)9 i" U, {7 H" P T' N. Z
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
4 ^- Z% C+ q$ ]& K) Hof searching its assigned volume.) y/ i x! Y7 J3 d
Acquisition Life
* J- T1 J$ S4 [- i( H6 LCycle; v( f$ }! V6 R- }6 i
Five phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
7 J1 K/ O4 Z6 o+ O* ba system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
1 z" \; z1 Y, b" Y0 Kproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration% J" j+ y0 p- U l
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and/ r6 c! S% {+ I1 O) s6 o
Deployment, Operations and Support.4 j9 D& ^" J& Y
Acquisition( \( R( C' U$ J6 j( N
Logistics
' x" J: i( l0 n* v/ JProcess of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,
8 i* D* `1 k1 y$ D; j/ Yanalyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics" H& O+ u1 h4 t+ z3 e
support throughout the acquisition process.
. I7 ~, j9 c1 ]Acquisition
9 W1 l* g& X7 r! o y3 NManagement# q5 S2 y- `, F& E3 \1 [7 ~
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
3 ?0 G) i9 x3 t' a“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense
; Y% I# @/ j4 U7 U6 c+ Gacquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
+ s0 E/ t5 w+ m$ l$ Cacquisition systems/programs.
) ?9 p) Y e% ]5 h2 d$ @ k! GAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
* `8 b5 k+ d* a: [: lthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding. i7 c" F% T4 g5 \- a; r
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and) Y4 u) f' X8 x- N8 C n
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
$ X I4 s, C/ C* h m. tAcquisition
& o0 A' e* G( f+ V( ZPlanning3 k" `0 b( b7 M* K
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition
) \* d- \4 x% ]; u xare coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the4 B) M; w9 z3 r6 [6 x
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout
4 B1 f2 ]) @6 M/ a: h3 ~. nthe life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
; s C! A$ ~: [* amanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.7 h# ^1 H$ k& r5 m
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A2 h2 ?8 ~* ]0 P" B- p& I
5; I7 m; _& F! j2 {% @% E8 i
Acquisition# F& O# R g9 z8 v
Program: X. V$ a" j, I2 Y
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
% A9 j7 L/ U/ Tcapability in response to a validated need.
% F1 B1 R) R9 e/ L- P0 F3 l! JAcquisition
; G+ T3 v) ~; h( q' `4 C: WProgram/ v' o# X1 \7 \% O
Baseline (APB)" O7 Q$ M* h2 |7 k* h. }5 s
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance& v/ T+ T6 G8 {2 J
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision8 z# T1 N8 i- Y" A% t% O! g w
authority milestone reviews as follows: `! Q |% Y% a" t1 U; |
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,
! z- ~1 V& z% D3 ?/ [! y/ q! IDemonstration and Validation.. @5 E* z' K! F+ W7 Y8 B$ B
•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
. Y. j4 @! W, _Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.; e) ~" E) K2 W& V: w O
• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in
) P+ G) Z9 e/ N! I& q( vPhase III, Production and Deployment.
- M' F7 j8 L1 n* g' VEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
! }6 |* X' o. Bparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
$ {- c+ q1 {9 [ s7 pthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be# W; L8 Z8 B8 ?: l9 Z6 o1 I6 w* r
changed at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
; B8 l9 N' M" q0 |the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline. ?. N# l! X! p3 U, Y5 k
deviation.1 a$ F+ r- N6 {) B' M0 K7 O( k
Acquisition
/ k2 H: \- P1 `- r2 }5 BRadar4 S7 o& u4 E+ \$ D h6 p9 F5 @
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the! p* l) \, k$ i. |9 W0 c3 P
background and non-hostile objects.
$ j5 i/ S2 x' P, nAcquisition
+ @5 f3 a U! ?) CRisk
! n" t# J* K9 {' |' yThe chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an
' Y% X4 X A/ ^9 ?+ funintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,
$ k4 V1 F. ~+ K0 ~, O; z/ F3 jcost, or availability for deployment.
6 k( N7 S5 L% e+ s. O) uAcquisition/
2 N! M; e9 B- P) Y# j. ] d# d$ }Reacquisition% `. R: f0 q0 V ~5 }
Time
2 y/ H% [% @" U1 oThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This) X$ T- B* f! U' B
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|