- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
|
Acquisition
- ~. W) C, U) ~# M5 P0 OCategories
" S. G7 Q6 }( ^Categories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
1 S9 [6 ^& v3 V/ y, y, u4 i2 i0 Sand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories3 j0 n) }. z$ [3 i/ Y5 a2 K, y2 \
determine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.6 k0 s! g+ O3 P% m0 Z* U! }
Acquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They
$ `6 z+ B3 P% D0 c& A" \have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting
4 M g9 r. u: arequirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
. q- _) z9 @$ C* R2 lSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
0 i* W- V' C/ c' S6 W9 C(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --) }! S, b% O" o3 t: t, f6 F" w
acquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the
! i$ @8 e8 t; Z1 HComponent Acquisition Executive.
4 L, ?" X1 ?5 r1 h* BAcquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is
4 @/ i7 j" Z9 ?- ]3 ^3 Tdelegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have0 I( q, x3 k4 t* B# ~4 y* y
unique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
2 j6 a/ ^. _+ V& d* MAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition* I. c5 b% {$ b; h- `
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone% c8 F+ a" a$ i4 I- D
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
+ ^9 E! S4 M% z) |# t* X( Swithin their respective organizations.: U+ {& q. |. C6 Q7 _
Acquisition4 P5 Q1 u- _! g; A/ w) I. ?" }* q! X
Decision
* `4 P* p8 E, I: pMemorandum
8 L* q7 l: y/ X7 P4 f- W5 \, z(ADM)
' K- O+ A1 E* I/ s6 O Y0 jA memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents
- y' C+ ?- ~' s9 gdecisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
# v3 l2 e3 ?, F$ i8 {( fdecision review or in-process review.
$ J1 ] o# `. s' L( KAcquisition
0 \, m l2 S, K7 KField of View8 Q' ~/ V$ ^/ U( b! [: V
(FOV)
7 }% ^; g# ^: A! V. AThe instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
6 z& a% E0 _8 h6 O" c) |) tof searching its assigned volume.
, B6 w9 [( D" d2 [; O! x0 jAcquisition Life
' M+ x Z: `* b3 I. b3 @Cycle
3 Z% z( a' g- D& mFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
& E7 p( n$ D1 Y- V" ~$ ~- T9 r* la system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
7 p D b+ r5 ~/ jproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration; u# z# Z7 T# s+ {. ]& m
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and0 c Q9 U5 K' d0 {7 v7 W2 `7 ^" T$ e
Deployment, Operations and Support.6 N# p) e/ Z. d; h
Acquisition2 ]$ v( @; u3 \6 Y
Logistics2 _) A/ \6 Z/ p; H
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,0 v2 c0 }8 ?7 F6 _
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics( |+ e# l# K; u0 O
support throughout the acquisition process.
5 w0 K) r3 K9 n4 CAcquisition
. V; T( u: i, q& dManagement% n2 t$ Q% S% Z/ R+ ?( i, p
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of
+ v4 l) m7 ]1 Z% }“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense6 C) q* ]7 a. B& H* t4 v% F- B
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
7 Q9 Z6 Z4 i# Z( l' y* U" ~acquisition systems/programs.# c7 r& ]8 i- a; p8 y) q
Acquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute: |! \' K) d2 `/ R/ r
the approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding2 {9 [# D7 ~2 {, }
contractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
0 X, {# r j6 B0 B, G _9 O% zDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)
0 r) i: y/ D9 v1 a% wAcquisition
# o: _7 g: m8 w2 s# k/ q6 ^Planning1 D1 D. n9 _# V1 }, {1 `$ s
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition$ {5 I; P0 B: y6 y$ M$ q
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the" ~. v' g6 y- N) `- C6 m+ ~0 l
need in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout: q; O) e# c# U7 I0 O
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for
1 ]+ F6 }: L% `* ~8 ?' l. vmanaging the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.
) \* U& g0 d" |% T" Z* j5 h: sMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A" ]9 _. _- k; G* n
55 {" k$ }1 c* O/ R" C2 b: \
Acquisition# i, j0 ~1 f W1 I. l: ?9 q
Program8 Y) D# c7 J/ _5 H5 a
A directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel
2 O! w a1 f) K, y9 v3 Scapability in response to a validated need.
. J& U' a! H# ~" ]7 lAcquisition
# n+ j8 l3 I8 y& e$ q( H/ yProgram
# z4 Q1 c" H l7 G! d; a$ r/ nBaseline (APB)
! a& E# g. L1 y/ L3 B- PAcquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance3 S8 B1 M/ s, x0 \# D8 e
objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision( e. ]8 }# l7 Q. t' A
authority milestone reviews as follows:* b# l* v7 M4 ]6 T! }
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,' }4 w1 V/ A5 L! B
Demonstration and Validation.
: F4 e6 ]/ u2 ]) s•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in, S# V& Z3 i" U6 @1 _! y
Phase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
2 n, v! F& V# h7 l; s' F* E* @" f q•roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in: A- K- ^( N* Y4 A n
Phase III, Production and Deployment.
4 N: m! ~& J- A( _$ C" R4 ` Z# FEach baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
3 v$ J) n- O6 _4 z+ Mparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
1 d" @+ a" ?% {4 n1 }thresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
! k% D8 k7 E3 Wchanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of
4 l- v% H' O+ ]: `; zthe milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline
W, C. o2 X! _deviation.
$ p3 |* T/ g# v4 EAcquisition% @- f$ b& u# r, w+ N
Radar* M; ^$ J9 I/ M2 W- s9 q2 E6 O6 J
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the: V9 @4 t$ M( R
background and non-hostile objects.
* _3 j9 g% \0 x6 e4 d: CAcquisition
$ ^5 o; P- s( X4 ~# _. zRisk
$ ^* W( F5 N; Q4 ~. J, Y/ z1 x8 ?The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an1 b) k* V: T/ [& Z
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,& C7 Q. `) C/ t0 ^2 j
cost, or availability for deployment.: [6 [/ G" J0 S
Acquisition/' e# B' @( h* t
Reacquisition
- \- v3 b1 |) b4 w- G# iTime
; J2 F( @: x$ R FThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This
$ w" P7 l) B+ D! U' `, N- A3 Eincludes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|