- 注册时间
- 2008-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 积分
- 0
- 帖子
- 24482
- 精华
- 4
- UID
- 9
  
|
Acquisition
$ J* K) D, r4 P/ p/ e( d) I5 s2 KCategories
5 C# F" w" @4 {! B# DCategories established to facilitate decentralized decision making and execution
" j; V; E2 u" U# nand compliance with statutorily imposed requirements. The categories
5 \% p. o8 J! n% j# s" cdetermine the level of review, decision authority, and applicable procedures.
L! l! Q# N4 D! t8 SAcquisition Category I. These are “major defense acquisition programs.” They) n& ~8 y x% F* { V( g) P# {
have unique statutorily imposed acquisition strategy, execution, and reporting' c5 U8 b3 q7 e( P7 o
requirements. Milestone decision authority for these programs is: (a) the Under
2 C4 y* c, {5 b. ^) }* @6 e* lSecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology -- acquisition category ID;
( G' I/ }) x' d4 s$ h7 b(b) if delegated by the Under Secretary, the Cognizant DoD Component Head --
& M9 z3 [3 a$ U9 R& Z& ^ facquisition category IC; (c) if delegated by the Component Head, the* N/ ~2 Q/ E j# ?" g8 y% I
Component Acquisition Executive.! {5 _2 ~; R2 J. S) @; i8 H
Acquisition Category II. Milestone decision authority for these programs is# n/ n8 G) S! W2 l/ d$ T u
delegated no lower than the DoD Component Acquisition Executive. They have
/ u6 l/ Z: p% E8 x: z1 Tunique statutorily imposed requirements in the test and evaluation area
! J1 s" J! R& s- E1 w0 c. E2 uAcquisition Category III and IV. The additional distinction of acquisition- u' A9 E& \) r7 L/ q2 b
categories III and IV allow DoD Component Heads to delegate milestone: a5 V& l# J% \: F. M
decision authority for these programs to the lowest level deemed appropriate
7 h9 P6 e0 \/ U4 ]within their respective organizations.* n4 [3 q: w6 F4 W0 c
Acquisition
$ j1 J; t% o4 i; |Decision
! o4 J# n8 \$ O2 y0 W7 _Memorandum4 D, x5 r' K4 ^4 Q6 Q
(ADM)* r- q( U( D3 d5 L; n, |
A memorandum signed by the milestone decision authority that documents3 }6 s9 ^( Z& S6 O% S
decisions made and the exit criteria established as the result of a milestone
% v2 g2 T. b2 p1 E% X8 ldecision review or in-process review.
$ u0 o9 D+ E0 z8 ?Acquisition
+ I4 n+ L5 @) Q( `& o. @. ]Field of View
& h3 d; K8 `5 D( w+ H1 G(FOV)& E1 y! v/ F: B
The instantaneous volume viewed by the interceptor’s sensor during the process
$ W8 l3 s+ [) u# s- Q* V7 m/ k, U4 bof searching its assigned volume.; Q: m, \- r, D$ N: W# b7 W3 ^
Acquisition Life7 }. u; @' z Q* f6 R5 W# |
Cycle
/ d8 Z+ ~) d* k# x+ L0 [4 XFive phases, each preceded by a milestone or other decision point, during which
( @! C3 I9 g- Ra system goes through research, development, test and evaluation, and
) X/ l2 {# B5 w2 } [8 lproduction. The phases are Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration3 y" t" H! ]5 }; j7 l, G
and Validation, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and
8 `/ E, Y& C' x/ qDeployment, Operations and Support.9 m9 ~. w9 m. Z# f
Acquisition
, ?+ B$ S( X! a B& y' O8 dLogistics7 _5 P/ _+ o) H% l1 I
Process of systematically identifying and assessing logistics alternatives,2 u# d+ @8 Z0 F" A# a W( J
analyzing and resolving logistics deficiencies, and managing integrated logistics7 _- S. d" W+ q2 d5 f, S
support throughout the acquisition process.
: N( G$ B) Y' ~6 hAcquisition
* ^) B; Y9 l0 x5 N" e) iManagement# L# Z0 u4 I& X- m
Management of all or any of the activities within the broad spectrum of6 Z7 _! \# K! \- X C, T1 ]
“acquisition.” Also includes management of the training of the defense/ w! o' s7 m3 a
acquisition workforce, and management activities in support of PPBS for defense
5 O0 ]1 B4 g) W% f( D8 vacquisition systems/programs.
+ _# H( \, M! a/ UAcquisition Plan A formal written document reflecting the specific actions necessary to execute
$ e- R7 T8 ]3 H9 X+ `4 bthe approach established in the approved acquisition strategy and guiding
8 C. L$ v+ h8 V# ncontractual implementation. (Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 7.1 and
: o& e ?& ^7 ^Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Subpart 207.1.)2 X" g6 z2 W' e) r6 \8 {, Z
Acquisition
3 x# h" U& Y4 \0 R2 G4 S: D4 S) cPlanning8 k D) d( h, P1 E
The process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition8 O) z( n2 j: @$ k0 I* f. F4 P( _
are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the
( b8 }4 ?& w, @5 s& dneed in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. It is performed throughout& K2 c8 i* D8 i* G' k$ p8 B7 w/ A
the life cycle and includes developing an overall acquisition strategy for/ @5 G+ C( H: d9 Q
managing the acquisition and a written acquisition plan.4 U. S! i& P7 {1 R, f( G3 g: v+ [3 F
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 A9 I- P* A% z$ j$ Q" o0 t9 d
58 r% M0 a4 |- j4 k+ n
Acquisition* @$ e7 @" m d5 ]* U
Program
4 [' B' [" E+ Y1 X0 NA directed, funded effort that is designed to provide a new or improved materiel1 g/ L/ u' @( }' u
capability in response to a validated need.
' C' d' o* O5 c8 y, M: e+ T, d! C# }, uAcquisition
: g/ w- g! @, G8 u: h. pProgram
* V) k3 T/ Q0 q9 C7 EBaseline (APB)" z0 p6 B5 [/ M- `
Acquisition program baselines embody the cost, schedule, and performance
% I' k0 s8 `: n" W8 `objectives for the program. The APB is approved by the milestone decision
9 h8 j- O+ y' d# Y1 @' \% Jauthority milestone reviews as follows:) Y' F6 E2 K+ _3 p( {" q
•Concept Baseline, approved at Milestone I, applied to the effort in Phase I,/ U9 n! c0 G y [! L" w
Demonstration and Validation.
( s& _2 m! `+ I: L; q•Development Baseline, approved at Milestone II, is applied to the effort in
; R% q1 J0 c2 lPhase II, Engineering and Manufacturing Development.
7 v3 k" S4 {7 o7 P! I• roduction Baseline, approved at Milestone III, is applied to the effort in: t& N% b3 [1 F1 a" s2 b
Phase III, Production and Deployment.% c( b, \) S) ]8 O8 t
Each baseline must contain objectives for key cost, schedule, and performance
# D7 D7 Y$ q" p, @& G3 D' w2 tparameters. Objectives are accompanied by minimum requirements called
$ O S/ G; P; R6 P& ]- hthresholds. Once signed by the milestone decision authority, APBs may only be
9 \, C3 k4 E0 A6 Ochanged at subsequent milestone or program reviews, or with the approval of5 ^; E* \+ [% n! M; a" W
the milestone decision authority as a response to an unrecoverable baseline6 i/ t0 `7 ^7 T& t4 c5 M, X
deviation.
% L2 s6 H3 `4 @/ ~. w) B4 QAcquisition
V& D- C( v$ }9 u# n g. j$ L- XRadar! g$ Q# s! t. H p7 g# C2 V
Radar that searches a spatial volume and identifies potential targets from the) @4 S; V* }% G1 E
background and non-hostile objects.& U5 Z1 P# W: i* m7 s" @
Acquisition* U2 d5 S" F3 p- g; y+ T
Risk' |3 g6 |1 U+ X( |
The chance that some element of an acquisition program produces an( `, t( B5 q3 `% t# e
unintended result with an adverse effect on system effectiveness, suitability,6 p7 E8 D* U/ X6 g. J5 M
cost, or availability for deployment.$ F. U: F4 U2 J5 O1 B+ P
Acquisition/
4 Q# Y3 x* G, }6 e' Q2 PReacquisition" \, z) C2 s6 B( v* e( f
Time
7 H. ~) d! y' k9 R+ {+ X- aThe time required to establish or reestablish lock on the received signal. This0 r6 \3 l3 s6 ? L) V1 c$ A
includes carrier, symbol, frame, code, and crypto synchronization. |
|