航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H1 r$ S1 T2 y& @ 130 6 W! |- L9 D4 G: e$ xHuman-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system$ @/ [0 k$ J4 m- k1 ^% w. l5 G processes. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential 0 ], Y; ?, n* ~- G+ Rhigh-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to5 H, o7 v5 p$ P# h BMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal 0 j+ Y1 l; ~" I! H/ K7 hGovernment may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of $ K9 }) e. k* E( U4 }: X4 G4 K2 ycommand and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost& }4 h" c8 p+ V8 E) ]/ c8 | phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses , M3 ?7 G" `# i% m& K! u: N+ {to initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human " @6 s. K1 H, I, s+ n; e3 [( edecision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM) 4 Q" Z; K' N9 h6 _Human0 f7 m7 M, P1 R q% e Intelligence 4 z: E* r$ H4 P7 N% x3 |(HUMINT) 6 A7 c# p( u* ~& m- E- j, f% IA category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by 5 O+ j8 [8 g& c2 G; f; |$ b, Phuman sources.8 h, I( q/ b3 A- I+ E" w5 g Human Systems # s) v- T8 g- B( HIntegration / z9 o& X* i: S$ t0 L2 KThe human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, ! e; R" f3 d3 n. Z: u" I" r+ x. f+ Gtraining, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort ; y) |. |5 n" E8 ~6 _* t5 n* J. {for the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of: X7 M( |6 Y1 ]* U/ Y4 {0 } ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier,' m1 M/ u" z' u$ Q' W, O' E sailor, airman, or Marine. 9 W0 n: `2 @; _( qHUMINT Human Intelligence. ; z% Y, r, a, E2 pHVAA High Value Airborne Assets. : j9 ?( J5 _ u- d9 p t- UHVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.# k5 v0 g( B6 ]% ? HVG Hypervelocity Gun.7 Q; S L/ K' o- c; N5 v5 K; n2 |5 c& C HVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun).! k c; P0 y1 y0 }) O, ~$ I+ h* o1 {* O HVM Hypervelocity Missile.2 B* ^# C9 M$ S; `8 K* ]! F HVP Hypervelocity Projectile.8 Q/ T! T2 F+ P% {& V: x* ]8 {1 t HVT Half-Value Thickness. ; H0 M- b8 }8 c4 o1 K3 k. WHW Hardware.- _- ?6 U( Q" Z3 r y$ T) u HW/SW Hardware/Software. - A: M$ i" J2 b, J& M2 |, iHWCI Hardware Configuration Item.7 U; [' z2 p7 c7 @. w3 }& g+ T HWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. ) p# n& d8 u0 }. o3 Y& e( {HWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test.3 A/ o8 T8 m& h$ m" X5 t8 Z( b HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature.( T% ~5 W, r7 V3 s* ~ Hypervelocity, b& B" I0 ^6 x" ]9 \+ D! J Gun (HVG) - u, O" o% O, _$ fA gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example, 9 x( Q0 {# M+ ?) Can electromagnetic or rail gun. 8 ^8 ~' ?, y* X0 z3 l' d+ rHypervelocity % o% O. o8 z) |Missile (HVM) " x2 w8 q6 J# ?) pA missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second. ' Z5 w+ B9 c5 r4 h2 d3 y. @9 |HYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance.& P+ s. Z. [# O. q* s& i& q$ I+ s Hz Hertz (cycles per second). J% f- l+ T* ^9 O MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 4 `0 b: _! c0 w! C# ^131# V6 \/ q4 u u I&CO Installation and Checkout. ' ^0 l! e) w6 l+ |/ m LI&I Installation and Integration. , W" f* \# U, h8 _4 o+ gI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis.2 L7 [9 _5 w u5 p1 q I&T Integration and Test. ! k# x2 _7 i+ f7 ~1 F* wI&W Indications and Warning.2 {, g6 R8 _ Q% X I-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.( K" u: A; a5 d* H I-HAWK Improved HAWK. 8 a! r) ?+ D* g& A4 NI-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term). 9 S9 g/ @3 |3 a, ?, J) w! CI/F Interface. 5 Z* V2 _4 `5 o* d0 ~I/O Input/Output.7 u- n9 B- A. f( ]' E% O I/R Interchangeability/Reparability. - o1 H. C- e! s: BI4 International Information Integrity Institute. 2 S: i1 {! Y# l5 N) U- H: w" eIA Information Architecture. + T2 H) Y1 m( J3 b8 ^- I/ dIA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations.8 v' `% g* f- N+ L IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test.: x! ?& |0 W+ @" u) n2 X. z, Q. n! B IAD Integrated Air Defense. 0 @( ~2 y( j G% u# W1 s- ]IADS Integrated Air Defense System.9 C) g, e# `) x+ K) `" S IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.* \0 ~* v$ _/ j) q8 Q# q# ` IAG International Agreement Generator. 1 j6 O2 Y( A' s) l" y% h; x" a1 g/ ^IAI Israel Aircraft Industries.+ Q3 q: [+ i. c& u" e IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package. % N5 d. i2 @& m2 ~7 t, G3 s5 v hIAS Israeli Architecture Study.6 L) |1 `/ m0 }$ [ IAT Integrated Assembly Test. ! i7 K: M0 i: i# x% ]1 SIATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System.7 p2 H6 j h- W8 y4 M2 o IATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out.7 R6 E5 `( S% v IAW In Accordance With.8 e9 n9 U. X* g* f7 c7 v IBA Industrial Base Assessment.- ~/ d& p4 r& Y/ Z: i% v& o" M9 z! ~/ K8 o IBC Impurity Band Conduction. " x. M# u3 @8 ?# c* A2 BIBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon. ! c1 e6 c6 f1 Y1 z! ~5 M+ g& A; UMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I, f! Z9 g1 m+ N* D6 K% @( N 132 * Q2 [! Z. G. s7 p# W1 LIBDL Intra-Battery Data Link. 9 @" }- p: X; ^2 _% }( WIBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration! K9 X4 w% W. i* | IBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System.: j% g1 p M) {: l0 D- @5 l IBM International Business Machines Corporation. b3 z* P" r0 O# JIBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis. 8 b% `2 B7 d# `0 P, YIBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term). " z% T) C7 e y9 m* s4 IIBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US9 a& H1 U" B3 H% s6 d naval ships. Q; _: i$ m8 @# Y1 f# r2 f# v1 \) l IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey.& ]9 E5 f& g ?- D IC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit.$ Y. N2 g3 u7 D4 @; x ICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment. 2 k% r$ x3 \: q$ Q# W6 MICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System.9 U- ~. G5 C2 V0 w* C& ^1 j3 k ICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. ! _6 H& _8 z, s# k2 d6 TICAO International Civil Aviation Organization.' T n) Y/ X7 F( P8 \# Q& @ ICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control G$ C2 i5 O& A7 ? System (ICS) for US naval ships.: A8 F5 S1 M6 n* o ICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering. 4 w4 P6 M* E2 |1 Y y5 LICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. , l( s6 d7 `! e8 FICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).7 ~* {) A5 ^2 p! ]( y# t% G# Y (2) Item Category Code (ILS term).; m [/ B2 `1 g1 {' B ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing.4 o3 _: O5 a' J1 Y ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security. : h1 K: E) A. r/ z& `( x5 Y& g0 iICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking. & ^5 B3 Y- \7 ]ICD Interface Control Document/Drawing.5 @- K* L- p Z b) S, S3 L ICE Independent Cost Estimate.4 W% B7 X, F6 S9 t3 e, E; M9 } ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO).$ c: W' @$ C$ U' X; M5 W z* T ICM Improved Conventional Munitions. 1 v4 W% H- t: p4 vICN Installation Completion Notification. ?/ ^2 [8 h& }; m6 t ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term). 1 k! }6 z V9 N5 ?ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures. ( K- X. P( L/ r2 M8 B: OMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I5 d4 v/ h+ q1 P2 V& [8 u 133 : g, A P8 q/ q& ^8 iICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term). 5 `+ ^& l/ |! H- t N$ H, l# {6 e(3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process. & e/ g# w8 T) h+ |$ l+ G. _- LICR Integrated Contracting Report. ! A3 C C; L% M+ E2 q% p" f, d( MICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and2 W3 n* z& N. g+ T control system for US naval ships. : f! p- S% ?% e; M2 ?; |(2) Interface Control Specification., y. a/ c6 O2 _7 H3 V6 @. B ICU Interface Control Unit. 6 [6 K u1 x% c3 m* Q( v" P3 @# AICWG Interface Control Working Group. ; H. h% N( Y2 l* z& x3 c/ _* |ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification." y, f' C/ X6 U6 e0 X6 i, [8 z IDA Institute for Defense Analysis. ' g; `& i$ O# a3 ]9 h- |IDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term).% N+ X g% X! r& u: C$ [% I IDB Integrated Data Base." c' G/ L2 \) U% L0 _, e$ {8 ] IDD Interface Design Document. / ]( f' k2 ^1 {1 FIDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis. u& k" H$ _8 i9 R7 E! m! M9 l2 vIDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term). - M9 [( o; R( n2 T3 @( \' j0 y ]Identification % z9 w. r% F1 H2 B( N! x. tFriend or Foe# i: y' d) {+ ^5 a& ^$ T (IFF)6 q$ V! P! i9 ^0 v) P' b( N A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by# O' Q7 \% L. y+ d: p friendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby, n/ u3 e2 ^, w# K distinguishing themselves from enemy forces.: H. q# ~, p: j8 {- h& t! T% G. e IDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. 2 m+ u5 X0 V8 ~1 q! Q9 L) t3 ZIDHS Intelligence Data Handling System.0 t& `2 z% S" a% ~6 R0 r+ `. T/ ~7 j IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.# L, M8 R0 @; d4 O9 l IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System.# F0 O2 W9 \% y6 x8 }6 s IE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.) \: N7 z: V8 b! W! g IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination. ' [8 `" }" X! h+ R3 ?; e' V' N" u5 m* HIEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.' s3 m- z' \ ]: }/ d# P IEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure. 7 h& U9 e1 }- `& s& x1 FIEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. " y% _0 n/ ~, `9 T0 R4 ]IEP Integrated Evaluation Plan. / a' G* n. o' G% t" c" f) j: O$ rIER Independent Evaluation Report. 4 |5 T% ?! M) B% ~4 k+ ^8 T mIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group. % T# m: f! G1 [6 OMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I4 E! w U3 R8 H 134* H5 @& c; t! |: X! ]6 V4 }5 D IETF Internet Engineering Task Force./ w) a/ [ }# w7 {; ]+ o IEV Integrated Experimental Version.4 a6 m: \1 X' Z, H/ P4 T8 r IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare. " O" V! m% g: w1 |IFA Integrated Financial Analysis.3 r+ j# M/ O! c; g3 p% |( `7 ~5 z/ J ` IFF Identification, Friend or Foe.' {% r" H% ~7 T; o8 y T, U" } IFHV In-Flight Homing View. ! A( @& M* U0 P" y: j% o; h& ZIFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the & B# R/ \" c, ^6 Pcommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets.! u7 n8 E3 [' y: M The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications9 K' @0 s! @$ C* V: n. } system term GEP.$ `4 N3 L' |# Z7 @& a IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope. 3 e8 p. p" v. KIFOV Instantaneous Field of View.7 K* ], ^" y4 a. ^ IFSR In-Flight Status Report" j9 {9 F9 @! O+ E4 _4 S% W IFT Integrated Flight Test.; y* a/ T q4 b8 ~# M IFTU In-Flight Target Update.6 `. w$ u; p9 e7 K0 u. [$ C IG Inspector General.: k( V j2 ` P; J, n. s! z' N IGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse.# U' U8 L' ^: q2 y/ r0 j* Q IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard.# ]( e- O' a+ E& L3 v. w% Y IGS Inertial Guidance System.; g2 ]7 x! W9 w! K IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS).1 c' U3 G4 o: N6 X9 h& [ IGT Integrated Ground Test. , |+ U! O, x4 mIGU Inertial Guidance Unit. , g) B8 H% a2 [9 F- y7 X1 W2 {7 UII Impulse Intensity.8 W7 ?1 d0 I* f( _5 w IIP Interoperability Improvement Program.3 b+ y2 y9 U5 ^# X IIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. 5 S: ] h3 I6 B4 {IIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.% `7 O$ `# r' Y6 U4 P1 D IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).2 {# R& y' V2 V" V# ?* U IIT Interceptor Integration Test.& K! H0 e! Q$ w- g- x IITF Information Infrastructure Task Force.! I0 h; d* a+ Y- a. N9 h: Q: B IJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon. $ B- T# l5 C* O' XMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I6 J: R- g! o" t$ P9 n3 `% C 135; B2 w. n$ [# ~+ N ILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term). ) S8 a# @6 x3 f gILC Initial Launch Capability.. v, r- V7 [; N Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g., 1 U) U# D: V( [3 R. {# V* c/ Javailability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics ! Q& y+ f5 l) n3 `& X' _supportability, etc.).5 h( {1 E* ?8 Y) ]! p6 C% B Illumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray8 {) U6 y3 f) @+ } satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. * | e( c3 q4 {9 M! H4 s2 v$ G0 IILS Integrated Logistics Support.! o5 w9 c; a) P( [$ D; d ILSM ILS Manager. 3 Z- J' i$ M4 F6 N$ Y: Z' H" cILSMT ILS Management Team 0 W, K' \2 W4 b4 RILSO ILS Office.4 B2 ?! [' v3 l& b q/ p. V ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan. 6 v- U. L, t' N) e- j A" UILSWG ILS Working Group.0 g- P/ I* D/ g7 T* G7 V IM Information Management.) m4 l! S1 A; v4 P Imagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical 0 m: V" h) q' wmeans on film, electronic display devices, or other media. - u( }2 g/ [7 }% v9 lImagery + ^0 Q$ {( X$ I. KIntelligence1 m7 w1 r6 K$ w6 o) m7 l, s k; K$ M (IMINT) $ s E& L b# b9 Y' hIntelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography,% q. c1 `. w- I( W' { infrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic 6 {; K. ]) o1 L# h3 f; M# ~0 kaperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or5 }8 W; @+ {* D% Q; I; Z electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media.# t Z5 P9 r! l2 B2 j5 S Imagery 4 b, ?8 T" w) \! }& y" v; UCorrelation # w8 r) y- W1 h& h5 }1 NThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from 9 h! x9 d' b4 Q$ V( C4 W" Ndifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics 5 T3 P% }% J ]9 W3 Ysignified. 0 w7 v5 M# d. N( xImaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object.8 H5 e9 `$ E! V, W0 U, z IMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term). 5 B, W4 p' G7 u8 n! ?' n5 A4 ], C( G(2) Internal Management Control.5 y9 j* E1 ^3 z& G* Z6 P C IMDB Imagery Management. 8 V9 G0 ^+ e/ |IMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of 5 X+ e1 ]% @3 R( k7 [1 \- MDefense. # p# s c7 h# j4 {! RIMINT Imagery Intelligence. ) c* a) `* k6 k. R& f% `) H% ]0 bIMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program.! G0 w3 }* A {% \" p8 r. i Immediate Kill3 Y# C3 W+ H) \8 i- B Mode# {: ]$ s4 Q% j* V, s+ ^2 t A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by: Z* C) Y& H* R# A impact with the KV or KED.6 `0 v7 I F3 J0 N; T Impact Point, ~, a; N& [* Z! G Prediction (IPP)2 q" D2 `, y/ [& f, Q* Z Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, / l( _2 L( F4 X$ p& E% Yusually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes 4 n; J/ A0 C- H- Z0 W6 N" kthe perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties.; t6 Y6 M) v2 l1 Q MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 2 Z5 B4 w4 R: T& C4 b136" E5 l4 K4 [, y Implicit ! y: Z- F, E# i% gCoordination2 e5 z/ t2 Q& @: K! c: o1 Q: |8 X Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to, y' W, h% C8 @& D& s! p! q( K derive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations1 o$ _5 M, j& p J( Q will be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical. 1 F8 s- {4 g X* }1 p1 p5 BDecisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers.: G4 K4 s0 m0 M4 |0 M Impulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for4 ?( S7 ?5 e! Q4 \% ^( ` a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.)7 [: a. {- c- @( w: U. _; e Impulse ' `) y# B( J- O' `( F* gIntensity (II)& S& O7 {* P$ w' H% V Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse% ^1 r, s+ n# @7 s intensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of/ k1 B8 R$ W# B9 W8 N9 r impulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter; % X; V y. D) l7 A6 Hhence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s. 6 m% |) o; @' y! {) o, O& dImpulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The, U5 a( d S a: A6 A C intensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target2 ~8 r F9 w" \% |) E5 z! ~ violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of 8 r2 c5 |) n% U" d# cthe target and causing structural failure. ) E& K/ M1 B/ r8 V* @( uIMPWG Information Policy Working Group.5 Z7 A1 F( ]0 N4 W2 r IMS Integrated Master Schedule.3 x: y6 l$ V0 q4 g f1 [ IMU Inertial Measurement Unit.) Y$ m W- p& {3 X: ~- Y+ Q0 o IN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse , s: t5 n/ }, a( C/ c, PNoise.! c6 a9 s" s* E4 O In Inch.# s. y3 o2 ?, g& Z IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator.: ~* k! K* I2 j/ v C In-Flight Target , ]" ^- [* |6 Y" b$ HUpdate (FTU)* z6 f* p+ ~4 b" M* F A report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control : f9 Q* W4 I" ~$ vsuite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. 9 U; b. j; X, jInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing9 K6 L& Q6 c- d: @9 f the orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has ) O/ _; t" u7 t4 A$ y# j: x$ Y v0 Qan inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite q8 W6 Q8 N: a8 B traveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in 8 T4 d2 x5 k* p& Qwhich a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An N, ]* T9 T1 C" Y2 { orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is 5 e5 B5 {0 D" Gcalled a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a 1 U( c& m$ B; z1 Jretrograde orbit. 9 W0 V( l+ ~& H: c7 [2 cIncremental 8 N1 `( o1 h: HFunding ! q- c6 m+ C2 v$ z: @3 ^2 P! WThe provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project! ]# k1 Y- T8 v- L: r" Y based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such 8 |& _: i2 E3 j* b# v% Vbudgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in ( j# N% Y4 W' c( f; G# Tcompleting the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding,( s- q+ F, }( t- v: w$ w2 U2 Q' U6 s where budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated 2 R2 R+ Z4 O) D8 z F: C+ |- Lobligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification & `0 ^ Y5 }$ b) z4 H. t+ f7 d8 p# KFriend or Foe' m0 W" o" G; I7 o9 H (IFF)* X" R9 y8 Y3 b7 _& W9 ` A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by7 n" e9 K, A. [* b1 N friendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby + ~, I: X1 X7 U. ~distinguishing themselves from enemy forces. " [( P: J! P+ @& T' s! ?9 s" xMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I) I% j! ]5 j2 P$ G# A+ |+ D8 S# Z& l 1377 F, I/ s# e5 f) Y9 _( n) ?4 `" R1 C4 B Imagery4 p* G* L( i+ G1 K; q% ]( W Correlation % y+ @( F" L3 M0 L* A- j2 }The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from 9 |! U1 M9 b& N+ u0 Ddifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics ! x* p$ d; {3 z7 z8 _7 msignified. 7 f" U9 L5 Q1 C9 M) BIndependent: `. q# S, A3 H# v Cost Analysis * z5 ?3 }7 |7 k; TAn analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body & h6 E8 d3 O* hdisassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United |& H* ~) y# v N* {* Q* ~ z- A States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational / o7 F" y$ Q/ P; _- H; ZManpower Requirements.”)# i: d1 {: c3 \' j/ m. ?9 }8 o9 ` Independent Cost' t! _. G) w& |5 G! i& q! {% F Estimate (ICE) ( ^ \. O! y' p8 B2 cA cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority 2 O9 s) h& L; O" s4 d* zresponsible for acquiring or using the goods or services. f3 {6 u4 q+ _8 ~: ? Independent* X) C: w. ?7 L Evaluation . Q j0 k1 Z4 a5 LReport (IER)8 [% P( v- ]+ w) r8 m0 n% G* W0 i Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, 2 {$ W4 s1 H) O! Yreports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s, V8 b% z- w) M assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on ! S( u4 E$ g- s+ z1 g, \! G7 hthe future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is 2 `" K p5 h! l6 t$ N$ D/ yprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER 3 h4 X; K( `" O0 }! J! g; r2 Emay also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army) + _2 J. {* z6 C' w+ w- bIndependent $ [( j4 P; T! j* t, GResearch and$ W4 t0 ?2 u) | Development9 }8 v- w" \; a: e( _& B, C& r (IR&D)& Y3 F9 p+ V- m Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a# C# i* r4 I! d/ ]% T; E contract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and7 T0 \" m0 N: z G6 |* ` applied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation , p6 m# s" T8 ~! ] @& Vstudies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See+ U2 w7 r: U) Z* E FAR 31.001.)5 O* y$ v, s( `( y Independent . @9 l1 p8 k4 @; ]- H8 n) t, T* uVerification and ' N! ^# e' g8 W. S- @1 x) ?/ x- hValidation (IV&V)5 T( F* H5 @: n$ B& J' |' n+ t Verification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that m5 P6 V9 l& s! s is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being $ H' ]/ {6 ]- G3 b, l3 }7 \evaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software 5 Q0 ]1 q/ z" Y3 `( f1 ddevelopment activities.( k8 Z x A; R Indium1 W+ M( _& v9 `/ b _2 S$ V Antimonide) _+ o3 O% J2 F4 ^ Infrared sensing material.( k) x1 g9 H1 m. E' i+ s Individual1 l( P6 m1 V- _" F Acceptance Test, C' L+ T, g" |) C6 `8 p A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics$ I: ~: l" H2 W- g; | Q& h4 d prior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using/ T$ ~4 b+ t3 d) m the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency.& N9 Z& k0 {3 y0 u6 r# b Induced: Z9 A8 i4 J9 K5 W1 \9 x Q# H Environments ; H$ u& t, x4 ^# p+ q! ZInduced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the - Z, a& A' v( t- c3 K+ O( W6 Fnatural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets& C% ^3 Z6 |, f: m# j& x4 y (Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or% y6 A, q' n# A: x3 A g$ ^2 D the influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally- & k* M9 D7 V: _" q: P$ B; I; W |Induced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E ; _, v7 ]$ V! uelectronic equipment).+ J) n1 D* J+ i; q5 R Induced 9 n e7 o* p" J P7 SRadioactivity % a0 [5 l3 E6 S! k% g8 l9 tRadioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions,) G7 D4 u+ P* @8 n; p& a particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of : {% b1 z9 C! J) S' cunstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce7 D; ~( ]9 s& ^ radioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by3 O- F; g3 u" x* d" l( O interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and1 m# f9 w0 V5 v( Y( a2 U8 Z silicon in soil and sea water). ( c" e- M- j# _: R1 }. ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I - M6 `* ]5 O1 ~7 s7 c0 r5 Z138 1 I% m$ N+ K0 G7 gIndustrial: A$ z( B" b( d" R Resource. P' A* w% E- V6 D: x( Z: u Analysis (IRA)/ E0 Y6 o* P Q A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory 7 W0 ?4 q' a5 c7 p: Dcapabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to # a# M, w" f2 d" X* O% ^support SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and ( v4 [( F2 f# J: ~& k/ x2 Y" {special tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the8 H" Q& [/ {! U: h, T6 [ range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies, ; ?- F( T' [, Kproducibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in8 T- B; |0 X0 Y3 U/ A+ U- d4 _ IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and ! K3 h2 ~# N- U) tbecome issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues7 z$ A7 }9 Q, d Resolution Strategies (PPIRS) document./ K+ B" U" g/ L9 s g. Z Inertial" d$ T9 e1 {" l3 _ Guidance 3 K' L7 ^* J/ g2 I) N1 i- e. i; q" iA guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, - Q4 C j* m0 ~9 twherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly: U" b6 `* G9 ]8 k2 C9 U4 f within the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures 3 [- _: K. A% k9 ?8 P7 b; }and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain# z% p3 E1 a# u5 l0 ~& U direction.6 n: C0 s5 m- ]) F9 V a Inertial ! q1 o2 O0 o! C/ x' F1 y9 \: {' fMeasurement8 A9 F4 S) q$ x Unit (IMU) : A$ [) ]# X$ F7 l+ C- AA guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,8 N5 \# L0 r- @2 Q. [ wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly" c1 O/ E7 Y U; p) V5 s within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures; H( G; j5 s9 N" b2 I+ y and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain$ R& P5 \' V5 S! G. v$ e" X* x. _ direction. & N9 B t- X& A, @INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability.2 c' O* F: z) h7 k5 \ INEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). 2 ?4 o; ~6 P x- S4 }INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR7 j( |, @, x- ]( a/ `* @6 M Treaty., T. ]# M. B) b8 w% H In-Flight Target 8 ? _1 d- H3 E: z7 n" [1 G) lUpdate * `' Y) D4 o$ l! qA data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and . K# z$ u0 { K0 Wvelocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. 2 W. g* X5 t: M1 o(USSPACECOM)9 k% T9 J$ V% M Information" B' z2 O1 L; }: H" q2 \" a Architecture (IA) " r# r& u y& k8 r/ O- |7 A8 TA description of the information that is needed to support command and control 1 V% Z& ?- p3 Gdecision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing, Z% H5 ^. t) V+ B% U- D' U7 Z, ] that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description ( v2 T+ B/ n) {0 \4 Rprovides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design 6 h" F8 x+ e5 V4 ^6 j) Yflexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability.% L, h: Y8 n9 a Information * ] K1 Z7 C! y( X: P4 u( BResources ! ]1 }9 m4 N5 J* {4 WManagement ( X9 d# R5 J: }& LThe planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling,& v/ G( x& U! t; k+ K7 W and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, 3 l6 e( K! G, r+ T) ^and dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of9 O0 x% s0 g/ j/ u4 Z) { information and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information0 y+ w& a4 R" `3 P Security - { j7 `& v6 C& D0 {: n(INFOSEC) % c9 q- }; I, j4 Q0 }Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and6 j2 L* n$ J4 L7 I O/ ? protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or/ j! V1 N1 G# X* K* f unclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical/ G( m s/ J0 D3 i* [ M data and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned- d4 v/ _' _! [, m0 {% I with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, 3 R' T1 G; J+ U ^* C9 ?downgrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring., u) h: P7 o1 u) j+ i6 E Infrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,0008 k7 N7 R$ ]* e5 y0 P" v7 s Angstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic 8 ` c' N5 B) \7 M! f6 dRadiation.) 7 e' R% r& v1 ~Infrared (IR)$ b. T/ i# e2 b. Y3 ?- T Electro-Optics1 z4 \& C! N1 i* m+ T$ s Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength / ?" T- K0 l) u% A% H4 Q9 S* Bspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. 6 H4 [( p. c: P9 g$ c0 cMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I" Q L* H4 N9 L# c# Z6 U 139# M1 V6 @$ j1 J. w, p0 v; l Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted 7 n8 T, N- a: }0 }. z! h/ S7 Z0 Nor reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the 2 @& p; R. P7 I4 E5 Oelectromagnetic spectrum./ _- ]+ J5 q# X9 c( l Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength* ^, \- j, [1 v region of 1 to 40 microns. & l1 U7 J# Q! X y. \3 a/ pInitial : ^0 o1 U6 D) P( ]5 YOperational/ b# R/ ~2 R$ c+ ?+ _- v! m$ y& E5 Z1 ? Capability (IOC)/ L9 w {" H9 S" \8 I8 M( r' q The first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of. l. z! W( y9 F2 a equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned4 W9 I% o' F& W2 u or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. . ]& |- _4 `7 j) J9 g* pInitial 6 r8 e. L# ~/ v4 cOperational Test5 \0 ]6 \. Q, p: v8 ~ and Evaluation ! B2 v& K8 `( Y# R* h(IOT&E) $ P( o# {# @6 n+ ^$ j2 \" q1 LAll operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production' t( W: R2 A6 v! V4 f8 l representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial * Z' O s) m; J5 M6 U+ d; w/ Gproduction. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system; ] Y8 I( c8 z$ d, h operational effectiveness and operational suitability.. t8 q+ `9 f9 g. b2 d INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite).( E3 ~* |3 g6 h+ D; {/ l- I INS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code. " w: A, c6 P5 a! B5 E i, ]: F" a$ {InSb Indium Antimonide.2 |9 r H0 ^, _ V; C INSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.6 N% B9 U2 o# W) K( [ INSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments. ' b5 q/ o" _, QInteg Integrated." x: @( R6 F; Q) ^7 z Integrated& d' Y; Z& {: e, b Contracting# k1 D* l1 U9 D/ ?, Y3 {4 _ Report (ICR)& O# o! ]! a( h; h$ C$ o A quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and J6 X- g; g) k interfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a! W7 ^1 t9 T0 h( s, D mechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as # j: _! h, _& V+ ?/ ]Integrated Contracting Plan or ICP).* t& D3 u" L( f5 A/ R2 r* t Integrated Fire3 d) I/ x7 u5 u i F Control System ( c: C# ~7 `& L( VA system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data* I0 v$ W$ _1 P6 n B( ^! t; F computation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted / \* I' u& B0 Xby electromechanical devices.6 i) @6 I4 K3 `+ J/ s/ w% ^ Integrated" i. G, P7 q8 \; x$ P' D& t Logistics Support+ a. R6 [0 \$ Z (ILS) " t/ }; R6 d! G$ ~& \(1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and2 |( b0 d* r2 ~8 r& \) H5 S technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into % W M% Q' R: w$ o: A+ k; Jsystem and equipment design; develop support requirements that are ; @' R$ d. s! }% F$ B; Prelated consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each! W( S" `' i `3 R7 p- v9 o! L6 M$ Z other; acquire the required support; and provide the required support |; s' r6 S) |( f2 t during the operational phase at minimum cost. 8 r5 Q0 O, R- C- @( L. ]3 Q(2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the/ \1 u4 D6 X2 E effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an 0 p$ B' k0 f) q8 b" ?8 sintegral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation. 8 E. h, ]% I' B. v! f' NIntegrated & y6 X0 g. n/ o5 ~. u9 I: A1 lLogistics Support 9 R4 ^0 l7 }8 l) y/ E7 t(ILS) Elements$ m3 N5 t0 }1 T6 K. J Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish , a2 Z0 P% S/ M+ j1 n& o6 `6 Gmaintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system. 0 z7 ?. {- m7 x: dManpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and , V3 |1 H" E- w+ s, [2 ^3 Fcivilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a: o+ Z# ]0 d' L* } materiel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.: M( j9 E+ D% p Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to; [% B' X% c* r1 A& o/ v6 O determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and$ Q$ e( G) U$ m% ~7 O dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well3 F; W2 o) H- l. y) j. N2 a8 F as replenishment supplies support.7 V6 N. b- ~9 [- B: X5 j) q8 @: k MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I1 |! r( a5 p6 U) Z 140 % E+ w( t) g8 o5 z2 fSupport Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the 2 n8 J4 U$ \% x. Z W3 `operation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology0 E( N9 G- o. C" j% ] and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It / K- n9 K5 Z7 ]includes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment; V- V0 ^! m, ^ a4 N1 n itself. 8 z. \9 j# L( {0 n5 S4 |5 y. ^Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as : R" L3 Q2 k7 k4 Ymanuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs % H9 U$ Q7 U* S [( G; yand related software are not technical data; documentation of computer7 U% i8 y5 P/ {8 k programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other 6 d1 t" N! i! U! J) P7 I2 Iinformation related to contract administration. 1 M) }; }8 x" a" p2 jTraining and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training ) `# ]* M% P% k5 x8 o6 tdevices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military5 G6 W+ m. b% E* e# K% t personnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual% ]6 {" v/ y9 i and crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; ' r) W1 F0 T+ Oand logistic support planning for training equipment and training device) k( k/ V4 ~: [$ O- F/ N7 T acquisitions and installations. 1 r$ ^' h8 }. Y" H1 c* U/ BComputer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software, + i" J" Q) A! Q( `documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support % Y; B0 n @0 L ]- b) fembedded computer systems.9 ^7 H6 `9 w: |1 L% l! r$ h+ W% [ Facilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets : W+ U5 y: @6 mrequired to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define 2 l7 h) t* f: a4 @( U ftypes of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities, ( T" ]0 E7 h! f0 b4 Y: R0 kenvironmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment." u; G; K0 O! M* f% A8 D7 r' Z Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes,& ~. o8 `- Y9 T1 h d' N( x' E procedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,, g0 b& ^9 P5 M8 J+ E equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and ; ~5 [1 G$ t: p2 ^) L6 k3 wtransported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment ) G2 o( g* p- N" h/ e; [preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability. 1 ~$ _* T E3 y pDesign Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as ( y2 {" h; K- vreliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements. ( A4 }. H( V* q) ?5 d- _& }8 d* kThese logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms ! `& O+ \ w; u) J7 h6 Z% d4 h/ ?rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness: J2 x% V3 b, E' C0 c# H1 Z objectives and support costs of the materiel system.$ n- {# s$ w+ u/ v" P) w; J Integrated ; R! R7 M. i% jLogistics- U8 g$ x- Y* h; v) W Support Plan ) r r$ W5 s# J, p+ G7 r(ILSP) 5 F+ b8 O. K9 T3 W9 C' XThe formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the! r9 _- Z' [: J) f program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed4 I) Y2 w) R0 _4 I. f1 r4 t$ s6 z ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with4 ]. J b: C; z0 ]8 b necessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and ; u e9 C C! M" aproduction, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications% k! ~6 o( f1 E9 m4 J RFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs. 7 T* i1 j r: f% f' N2 y1 zIntegrated 3 O! Z" P% f. |1 |3 @7 ^3 Z6 H& ^Priority List0 _! t8 Y) X- E6 N& Q A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized* L# ~3 J* Q8 m2 I across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs + S( a% s1 i3 J- O. Fthat, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the 5 {4 d( W; `% R& ^6 H* d B, ycapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated" E, J" z O1 U* @0 h) f/ P* g priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for5 x. ]0 {6 C! c programming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System) I9 ~1 S% b% ^- S: T. L process. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated 2 S0 l9 n' G- f( {) [9 d' zProgram: ^5 a. {7 G i( H0 g Assessment; i' b5 G, S, I1 O, w (IPA) 0 Q9 d/ a0 e- pA document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone 1 }. q4 T9 M& _* M- zdecision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an * ^% N" t6 o0 B( Y! d( ]) findependent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into - g/ `' q- G$ j. @8 s+ g9 fthe next phase of the acquisition cycle.5 n1 X5 l) S' w3 g MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 5 S( o ~% a: p1 h$ i4 T141- l. j3 C% A2 ^, K) y Integrated 3 W& B6 W2 L; I! L$ W1 kProgram2 H# W( g/ F* r# s Summary (IPS), u g* H& d) a7 Z A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision ' \* n" g( u4 Qauthority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights & a6 z1 M8 E3 Uthe status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the : {" w$ e0 | J1 {# x& H8 cacquisition cycle. + O7 I! q/ M% g EIntegrated0 C: ^! \( E2 D/ X; s( W* g% d! P, R Tactical Warning # z( I9 J( o* ~) pand Attack2 D3 k+ c% X6 {! g3 S* A Assessment 9 u8 J3 q6 P" p/ M" r% w0 }" A(ITW/AA) * o! e% c5 I/ @" S+ K8 }: A& EITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and$ h- w$ Z& T6 O" @0 b Q! r5 g atmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack; p5 y6 n: B0 \( ~+ K warning information, strategic and tactical. - e; y& o; g& `( @Integrated9 G: d! d/ y- K Warfare3 a, ]; E" K2 U/ _0 I The conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing # k3 B+ _" w: d* H- y" I+ Y& P5 hforces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional- w9 d( R8 [! b8 e weapons. : h! j' H- b' v# F/ N* E) JIntegration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such " |/ y7 ?5 h) M7 Q$ U) p* [- |3 ya way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without + B5 Q' A& @( ]4 }1 m2 \/ {adversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) . l7 p& O& e" c4 \+ z(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a 3 M/ V8 T4 S+ @# X }system.0 H+ W+ A$ E. ~' q% s: B INTEL Intelligence.3 `4 T7 Q$ u8 J Intelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis, : D* S) }8 M( e7 t2 R! Q; Fintegration and interpretation of all available information concerning - f$ C- c/ P- H' w2 i Cforeign countries or areas.* f% `# S* v6 R# e) z (2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through ' H% j( T8 \9 I. Gobservation, investigation, analysis, or understanding. . @" f9 u, w$ V* P( d8 wIntelligence % A8 ?, D4 H" g' O" z% I. @Indicators , \: O4 e1 e$ J2 aClassified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that, / T4 w1 x! F" R" ?! Bwhen properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and + ^2 Z1 j2 E l* g+ T0 V) b7 T' o Uintentions.. k: f5 J8 k" V5 A+ g [% S Intelligence $ {0 J: u6 y* J8 Z5 Z6 nOperations" Y3 D& ]% D) Y Center (IOC)& k K/ x9 b5 a( c$ Y3 E* O An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB.$ o0 r7 O B* F5 x+ A, `2 z The IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational $ G, d) T: y7 ]' S8 QIntelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) ! Y9 N* K. ?" ]Cheyenne Mountain Node (JCN). 5 t ~9 U& p; P' L% F( eIntelligence 9 N4 R% ~- J" UPreparation of- c; l: _# h/ |. N& W7 E0 {$ m9 K6 ^ the Battlespace . z5 j1 ^9 R9 b9 N3 M1 a6 `An analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the/ f& M7 d" P+ k4 a) _3 B C4 @ enemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence ; F: T* q+ N4 @0 m: ?! h3 |preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential$ o% O1 j7 U4 w8 D) V# H. V area in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed 2 T7 D: {: o- uin detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on4 X4 j& x. z) _7 d( l- k operations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle6 {3 T/ J* w. Q1 F K space is a continuing process. Also called IPB.9 @$ c/ E- u7 P0 F1 j% d* Q; V Intelligence& m( ]- V! f& o8 B Report (INTREP)- K! K) T, f" \) ~. O7 ~" ] A specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of 6 y- ?7 n& e, V8 w( @0 vcommand in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in/ g2 q4 B% s/ T u D, y( d keeping with the timeliness of the information. . Z' I' V; E9 ^. D* F$ }0 C# jIntelligence ( P' P: t" O% A0 tThreat& S+ n1 Y9 L2 s+ S) Z/ |9 H0 \ An identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and 4 S/ Z9 V& P" ?exploit information from a given or similar operation., v6 H$ [6 O" Q- u: T MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 8 r# j6 j, _& s Z' |1424 N1 E" p7 \+ A! G Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit / ]- @* ^2 I; p+ ?; R2 Sarea, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal, A( z6 [0 u0 T$ G$ I( ` radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second7 g0 N0 g8 q/ ^- b2 ]: A falling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation,3 t: W% f8 g" C, w: }( O1 I the term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or 5 V! H% T/ D* s% l& o& adose) rate at a given location. $ a7 v' b( ?* z8 h6 G8 R8 N- NInteractive2 Q7 _& z' S1 z4 P/ r7 a Responses x7 ?$ r- b: `: C5 r3 PInteractive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification.) x! b K7 d; N) X% y7 G Interceptor 5 U3 q9 q% k5 \. V- gCluster * \# N6 j" y3 b! g7 [ [9 iA group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor.$ h6 M' Z! l) |7 C+ }; L( c Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and ( ^: {1 z! P, ]9 z7 Rvelocity in three dimensions. : j- `$ u' X) s$ r5 @3 r4 }/ Y- _Interceptor Track + b& k( z) \. W' O5 ?* z! t$ ?' mRange (Max), S+ m- G/ o" j9 c, a. r The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function! s4 [" [& p1 S5 o. J8 S on a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit$ ^4 ]8 m+ p% s8 e y) a/ q; j* O1 z7 W. ] A condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and4 k/ ?" r/ x" ^+ E, x/ D9 P% x physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and 3 d2 v y$ E; F. jare capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items % [0 R- }- S9 ]$ H6 N2 Athemselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for5 V1 ]: ?* a, n2 m+ v- s7 x fit and performance.* c, a' W w8 n- B \: \ Interconnection The linking together of interoperable systems. 1 Z) j$ n# p% [$ s! e- `6 |Intercontinental ) P, i) b" W, Y. c- X+ fBallistic Missile ; j" ^5 N4 o* g! s* ?6 Y5 f(ICBM), h7 s6 Q$ G5 o. Y0 @ A ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The8 C Q! E0 F' b/ k term ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from* f( o. ]0 G" w7 m; P: a. x/ ] submarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.) - U4 u2 O3 l# {; o* T& b; BInterface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection , z0 D; }3 u" c! ^" kcharacteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged 8 M( G! @3 g* Z7 c, S: P7 R8 wsignals. 4 u' ^. O1 C8 G; V2 v8 b% X(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two( U" Y* s* K+ _ r+ t, v5 ?4 ~, V- } systems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register. & w: d7 [2 Y. I5 N+ m1 j(3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. ) b) T2 T7 p7 V0 h2 M; q(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between # y5 p5 ?; z' e3 D5 x: tsystems, or between persons and systems. # B" X& v% r/ m8 I8 K7 o9 T) ZInterface Control 5 B& D0 q; T8 ADocument (ICD)3 l% }5 w) |% m: N. F( J D (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must 5 F8 K N; n4 Vexist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer. G Z0 N$ m+ N0 M d% W software products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an 6 _) Q: P6 _- L6 {9 rInterface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD). . ?0 u8 J: L- Q* z(MDA Lexicon) # ^; V7 Y# o3 ]. B% }7 F! p(2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control& R# x" c& l% g7 s* g/ ` agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements. ; |2 t& t3 M6 Q8 H t/ J2 dThe ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification. + s" u0 a9 {& h! lInterface- E* u0 Q. K# W4 z' X0 n Requirements $ N; Z3 B, D& w9 u* J. wDocument (IRD)8 I1 F# l8 T$ J* U+ E A document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system ( Q7 [4 g% I" i5 X) E$ |component.' K8 u* j, p- W m MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I8 Q8 Q4 h% Q* W# A- } 143 ) V6 L Q5 l+ S1 Z" R z) r _Interference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to 9 Z& d1 j4 F0 c/ {6 e x0 a3 [0 pform a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum9 m3 V, c# V. l$ M4 `% f8 k, g7 R of the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point.9 V4 Q1 w' g) ?, K Intermediate # [9 y9 @2 }" z+ ORange Ballistic ; H" }7 _. A7 w3 [" f6 x- qMissile (IRBM) 6 |5 W1 `+ O# j! {1 e1 n8 T; M, IA ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles., o$ A7 \' m' T" | International ; S! U+ o+ v# t! Y5 @Agreement / y3 E4 Q4 m' |0 o7 mGenerator (IAG)' N" d2 ]9 G7 A7 M" s' y Software system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD ' C$ f" F, p9 g0 Z J2 minternational Agreements. 0 E! G/ X/ H2 H- IInternational 6 q3 Q+ Q6 W( U- y# \- lCooperative ' t- l6 W7 j. f# {Logistics5 B3 s9 _# _ w$ |% n1 L' z9 V Cooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination- l# u% h/ r/ t* U7 E. f; P5 t of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply 9 ^. F; N& J) J1 F* oand exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and ( j& e/ T; j: L* ^+ p5 vmultilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions. " s2 B Z! h! }7 o( O* c* Z7 zInternational- F/ S" `: F8 R1 D# C/ x7 E Logistics; h4 u3 r- u; n: g" [7 N. _ The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics : q3 A: G6 \0 i9 ^. G, Y! \arrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing r+ j$ G8 T/ _' V; i) |9 T0 ^1 klogistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign $ X8 p$ ^ m) Lgovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without 4 K0 u9 T! ~/ lreimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing! Z" `1 [7 n! Q7 [. C9 I# F of a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or % S2 ^5 ^! z, e0 p2 F% P5 \procedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments, 1 y. o6 G) j( `. uinternational organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. & \6 f) e1 X& Q& \* n8 ~1 C* pIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States * I, W1 V* q+ y7 \& P) Hlogistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or2 D* h# h+ Z# c) b8 C- W4 G more foreign governments, international organizations, or forces.( Y) p- t; i! `0 Z, Z, U- O1 k International ; h& u, @$ `7 t* j6 y p$ `( T9 FLogistic Support6 [# [) _/ n' A+ \ The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or ; G( x7 J9 J# W& Fmore participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.9 e. V \# @4 g Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services: z& O- h# ?' G- d+ V from other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to( r7 g8 N( z+ M$ o$ w# x3 |6 o operate effectively together.! v+ Z8 \$ D$ J! T# a$ l* B$ X) v INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization., I0 v" _- u. G) {4 m INTLCT Integrated Electronics. . M4 c2 b& { X0 V V, nIntruder& O, X0 Z6 A* u b! w1 { Operation / N9 k6 @2 I+ I0 J& OAn offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary$ u( N1 q3 S) t5 C$ i) ` object of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases. 2 R4 ^8 B/ z5 h5 K, U4 h0 B# cINU Inertial Navigation Unit. m& }! U% K5 Y% S+ r Inventory Control& |+ p9 z" [: o p/ z+ D, G Point# P( h" o7 `7 k# m$ O; Z# f7 p An organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the, R, C6 u: D9 Z/ ? primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a + e; \/ ~% ~/ a* ~particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management# I# K8 R6 u, y' r }% e/ s includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, " ?1 T; F) M1 M$ e) Ddistribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction.: \: e- B/ h+ M6 C Inverse Square) c( c& T% c( M- u/ _5 v3 B Law* s; U# V! [6 I {* B The law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a$ Y3 G" a" C. ~/ T$ L! N( G* W point source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the ; _1 p0 b/ L4 ?+ I( w, usource, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that , o; Q, ^2 M, r% idistance.2 ?& w2 t6 h1 ?- o6 u0 e; M MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I O# J5 O, h' { g2 ~+ H 144 7 \5 w @' m% N& \/ ZInverse Synthetic, r C' D9 |9 r2 V9 p Aperture Radar 7 d# g% L O4 k* {" S(ISAR)5 c8 F- U3 q, n4 i8 w: @# n/ d W4 G1 d6 S A type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from 8 S2 N2 Q3 D) }5 K c& g+ t+ vthe motion of targets to provide high resolution. * A. q4 }. T7 G, s) ~: k7 Z7 x, s. [IO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic. ) m/ e% E' ?1 a% H. L" B: b! uIOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. 3 ~; L) }/ \* O(2) Intelligence Operations Center.0 O) I2 Z) e! J, a8 K (3) Integrated Optics Chip. + U2 ?6 Z+ B7 P3 TIOM Inert Operational Missile.( S4 ^3 L2 r$ H3 W7 u% x5 n; X9 M IONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US). + J+ |# `/ r5 A6 B4 ]Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition* g- U8 h- g' Y5 g of electrons to atoms or molecules. 6 E& R* E* i2 f2 bIonizing % X7 ]$ H2 q. d* }1 IRadiation( P4 f& @. f, Y5 y0 ~/ D9 E/ i Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or : t" ]5 n' J4 Sparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of3 `5 q' R2 q% H- `+ S, \9 \ producing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its + T3 c8 p, Q+ N/ Rpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.) 9 Q4 q2 U- S+ ?8 I4 x9 s2 tIonosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers8 Z. d- L' b# k# g, s altitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect 9 L( P0 t$ L( _. o4 `) welectromagnetic waves.: g" c8 R" H. q; Q- } IOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff. 4 |9 ^2 i" O! yIOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation.( X4 _: u- @# r& {" A IOU Input/Output Unit.3 U4 Q) g: v% C IP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol.+ P& k$ W* `% o9 N9 U( z" Q (5) Interconnect Protocol. 3 D5 a s4 r7 S+ ~" gIPA Integrated Program Assessment. 3 i6 `4 z: h8 nIPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace./ X* _0 Q- K7 A7 p IPC Information Policy Committee.- P) s. T, j3 P( B IPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. n6 y+ D& C3 `8 m' o& ?/ v; IIPE Industrial Plant Equipment. 7 k3 ~- O" O4 n3 m7 @) gIPL Integrated Priority List. + H6 @9 m& f3 V9 |. _IPM Integration Program Manager.7 u1 S& j+ M. Z. F IPMI Integration Program Management Initiative.( Z0 O2 ?8 M9 G& y2 B IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program. $ n2 g" l2 ~$ R) ?8 F* uIPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.9 O! `" Y6 V8 [8 n3 { IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review).. u5 |9 G# [6 g7 m. L7 g0 O# w* H MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ; ~. d2 x: v! P8 z145 * \3 x0 E1 L+ w* o7 a: zIPRR Initial Production Readiness Review.1 u4 t1 {. L' I S7 m7 z IPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. , ]9 a/ t$ }: V1 x8 `; H1 tIPS Integrated Program Summary.0 b1 r* O; e) w5 e4 O. j IPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit. ( f% @5 g% m3 _6 F" X, |$ UIPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated . E1 Y0 Z$ Y3 U: cPlanning Team. 8 c4 u8 L% n1 ]/ z1 Q0 p1 [IQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term). - r8 I# f8 V! f! m U% C XIR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4) 4 p7 F. V% g# l/ P2 PInformation Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope. N' o/ ?3 l+ F Radar.1 C! l3 D$ x" ], D0 J" c1 S IR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength; v' B5 W) G! K; W' t spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.+ N g6 X9 m+ W7 f4 q! p IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).1 e2 s1 q5 R. v IR/Vies Infrared Visual. 7 O; y2 ~: Q/ Z( l, G2 wIRA Industrial Resource Analysis. $ Y$ g4 M4 ^* P9 rIRAD Independent Research and Development.2 S$ p- D" G: q IRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite. 5 A% b1 B( x' h, @IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. ! i* U6 y: z- G3 aIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. ; W; {& _3 G6 u6 {2 k, R, M1 ]IRCM Infrared Countermeasures.1 Y" _5 \5 e( y5 v" q" V5 ` IRD Interface Requirements Document. 3 ^- d) C+ e) V; u9 zIRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term). 8 f5 p4 M5 f. M6 |4 A1 _IRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array." {# @4 o" g. E$ c7 ] IRG Independent Review Group. X: U0 f; T; S/ X IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center.8 f# a+ V m+ O$ j3 Y, ` IRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group.; ?. Y6 y9 Y! b# } _1 G" n IRINT Infrared Intelligence. 6 N1 @3 E4 C# Y0 I, C7 a4 k+ z! s kIRIS Infrared Instrumentation System., Q4 u& }4 k8 J; l5 r IRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). % r# N) D d% e% O2 `) gIRM Information Resources Management.2 m6 ]; T# ^- X" A( N( w- E IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 8 D0 ~! \, V- ]& c8 d3 x3 d$ e) E146 : F; l4 V1 q$ G; Y, qIRMC Information Resource Management College.* U9 w: z, e& m! H; x& ?$ g, h. M IRR Internal Requirements Review. + a5 E0 ]7 y. X4 _3 T3 zIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System.! W+ U* L% |: _1 X7 G- s IRRS Information Resources Requirements Study.; }- _" l9 l8 ~2 g- K IRS Interface Requirements Review.9 M% F' E$ {. j IRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). % W- E& s2 o4 c( \; A/ h4 i @IRST Infrared Search and Track. * c0 Z i N8 j7 D8 \IRTF Internet Research Task Force.$ z/ M2 Q$ u" i9 L5 c( @: M IS Information System.- T, u, O8 o% w$ O3 ~- X3 Z IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.. r% ^3 \' T* g+ F9 N (2) Innovative Science and Technology.: }% A3 @: ^0 h+ T9 B; `" O (3) Integrated Science & Technology.: p9 R, d9 S' N0 M/ F( u7 U7 C ISA Inter-service Agreement.& R# g/ P) c# f! \3 q# f( S IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.; W, s3 K/ J0 D0 H+ P. a* w (2) Innovative Science and Technology. ( N; E3 `* C) P3 XISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar. * W, J( H0 ?4 c, g, qISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). - U7 |+ n: t" hISC (1) Information Systems Command.& w1 I$ O7 D$ C* I (2) Irvine Sensors Corporation.7 L% w& u# R( q/ s4 H ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network. " H8 g+ I. n7 v: _ISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment. ; _: M2 z G) ]4 F- W4 IISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration. * ?6 M# b; q; a$ j, PISG Industry Support Group. ( H3 E9 {( Z; C0 zISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model. 6 z- T: S6 k2 _ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group. # i O1 i1 m8 S2 ~9 E# M/ UISMO Information Security Management Office.0 `. n' |- a3 |; ^3 W$ G6 n ISO International Standards Organization.! N- p" G# m% {, D5 K ISOO Information Security Oversight Office.8 m0 L& F# {- s& G, F4 E Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with9 a& K- S$ `! ? equal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional).. j7 t5 X0 R) w! M MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I. K. d: Y/ \% N; N8 ]- \ 147& Z5 d, y# y( \/ P4 h8 D( J Isotropic- V M' ~& H) Y, B1 }: p" | Nuclear Weapon3 F4 Q6 M0 s P& O9 K3 i A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with 1 J8 A }" x9 d5 [+ Y' S, |approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to2 f) i- v* X" w0 k6 m/ N r. Q distinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons." n! i: K5 v' B' B+ A ISP Integrated Support Plan. 2 n" [4 H) D' @% N7 [7 bISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. ) ^4 `+ X+ ]0 bISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System. 3 L) @3 |% ?/ m) x9 r4 k4 EISSA Information System Security Association./ J |; u7 u9 d% h ISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency. / T9 N w$ g2 D4 `ISSC Information Systems Security Committee. 0 {1 U' g: ~; f- U' l/ l$ uISSM Information System Security Manager.* q+ ]' M( z) u7 z( V1 | ISSO Information System Security Officer., g% ]* p3 V: ` ISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.; H p: [( A0 N) R Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and# f3 C Y+ R, b, k" H3 W extends into July. 3 e& {- {* I3 }& E" o2 uIssue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.& b( O( l+ J2 ?. g- s6 ^1 K5 j+ a IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test. * I- R1 |2 } z1 P/ BISTC Integrated System Test Capability.* T8 u9 Q8 |3 ^% H- k ISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. % D' S- B# p9 F4 m- l" iISTF Installed System Test Facility.: @" I! J0 p* m) z* h9 `( h" c ISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle.# c5 X" v0 L6 T/ y: N7 L; S ISWG Integration Support Working Group.4 ~& o+ Q3 z1 E! ]; o IT Information Technology.. v1 i9 A! `: j( M% \ ITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center. 1 B" q( `' _& f3 e) v5 x- q3 oITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations.+ c% m0 U' {* h" B; C6 G7 a( ` ITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed. , V/ k. k6 z* mITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations. 6 v3 O/ i O b- QITD Integration Technology Demonstration. ; [1 T! g; Z- l0 V# IITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan.; `, N/ T& K( C3 { (2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan.( U W( j5 C% D" l Item Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such" U0 L: o4 O" T: S" j' S organization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items $ J& \0 D8 w3 g! `of materiel. & q7 s' C( Y* |# n7 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I * d, _0 i+ X! j7 J4 J/ o148 ' `7 U( \" E7 nITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. ) H; j/ } c* z& p3 Y- ^% KITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch9 I) d0 Z2 c: G: @; N ITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council. , j# q' D, J' j: i7 f2 |2 d) [% OITMT Integrated Technical Management Team. + M* E4 ^0 g: u3 tITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term).4 l- Z' G) p9 v$ M ITP Integrated Test Plan.7 F* ^$ l- M$ N8 _3 l6 [ ITPB Information Technology Policy Board. 7 n: A# {' w& p }ITR Information Technology Resources. + V* g p% A( _& a& c: U3 eITS Information Technology Service. ) i+ u$ V9 _- u6 u. [) cITSD Information Technology Services Directorate.; G* ?' v4 X% X2 `/ y# R ITT ITT Corporation.+ x0 P, m/ j& p# c$ L4 |/ } ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle; Y: k& Z7 J7 P& t; o, @: ` ITW Integrated Tactical Warning. % M8 j! H( s0 H0 Y+ qITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment./ W4 s6 W) d: F) I3 \) l IUI Integrated User Interface.; l- U; J* P6 s, j IV Interceptor Vehicle. 1 z9 ]! X4 H3 S2 s- R" MIV&V Independent Verification and Validation.9 d D. v) X8 R7 }, b+ @ IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System.7 W$ A+ Y0 d! Z4 t2 ~ IVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term)., l9 I' W- _2 ?6 x. ^+ |% ^! } IW Information Warfare., i% w: M0 m# q9 v- N' k IWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration.7 d+ e, `9 Z3 {4 E IWEB Information Warfare Executive Board. " ?1 m7 E7 y" }/ s+ oIWG Interagency Working Group. $ q: `9 k4 {% [# c( O% bIWS Indications and Warning System. ! U9 S2 r0 x9 y7 a6 |& l3 s9 M$ nIWSM Integrated weapons system management.6 j7 M- q4 p; u6 e# M+ q7 n IXS Information Exchange System.# r c7 `+ Z4 ]5 g$ A' e MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J& N, L$ Z0 C* k5 G 149 * s' a( E3 D M9 N8 \J&A Justification and Approval.7 }) [. S; ?5 r! p$ m J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses.- [3 B4 e- G! f JAAT Joint Air Attack Team. $ q& R& C. r3 X+ fJADO Joint Air Defense Operations.' V2 f) `. K3 R4 ^% Q JAE Joint Acquisition Executive. w! N3 Y, J; k- q( f JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term).; L( H0 k7 L3 Y# X. Q. b- [7 { JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).4 E* ^$ Y2 v' }( d Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the 2 X3 S( J9 U8 N3 j% m& n Wsame frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals3 e K3 A/ `$ P& D0 {2 z/ G5 T reflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming & v, v5 f0 i1 d$ p) ^5 ^generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, % |) \' t) b7 G- w5 Q: P9 l' u4 hand with increasing radar power. . `- D% d( g/ N2 uJAO Joint Area of Operations.8 O4 e5 z& N2 Y3 T- t JAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term). 8 T, N3 l4 ]" b$ \2 LJASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term).+ @; P# k' C( G- U5 a5 A JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program). 7 b) M! Y0 M5 q$ g- GJBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term).) V, W/ q* L, Q( T V$ |. x+ B JCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US). . L9 C P: D- i' ^% Z U: EJCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions.# ~# y& e& R$ B6 L9 x2 v JCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US.# J: H! } [) N- ?+ N3 K4 C JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. 9 l/ i9 G; |$ i: B- D$ E+ TJCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network./ m) Z& k% D& y! ]( ~ JDA Japan Defense Agency. # E7 h3 m5 n( Q8 G5 r# \$ cJDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon). ' G+ Q8 L* X* ^+ V. AJDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community.) i! `- }! h& C7 ?/ h' i5 U JDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System.. M/ k# x+ f( F# ?" X5 C JDN Joint Data Net. 2 z. o4 W: W ^& pJEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA). 4 F [1 _) u/ q m$ yJEC Joint Economic Committee (US). ) }0 x0 {+ A: X7 ^; _$ g% ZJEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office.$ n6 y8 M& w# ^7 n MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 2 ^3 V7 @0 K( [' O1 y150 / V1 S- }5 E: Y$ S5 vJEM Joint Exercise Manual.: O5 S* p8 m) S- Q4 M JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis.4 L) u; F0 G- ^( n( p' v- ? JEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center. ) m) y+ d$ J; o _JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. 3 v @$ x" z" Z* U0 I: HJFCC Joint Forces Command Center. : Z5 j8 v- U6 @+ ~' K" N) j; jJFET Junction Field Effect Transistor." _/ B: U% {/ }) K- m JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term). ' ?4 W6 |' I3 d. P5 L, eJFLC Joint Force Land Component. : Y, d( e. K) X8 ?8 E' s# \1 r3 iJFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component. : n; h$ B7 H: e; LJFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA. & }2 k+ C5 ~6 E% Q2 t- d1 g9 v' `% rJFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. / ^. ^1 z- U+ ^; O$ _JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention.4 ?4 u7 n0 f n: I- v+ b2 j JHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD3 v. b; P( Q% B5 J JHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. 3 \4 w; i& k' S' k: v( t" [. dJIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.. G7 J/ d& g& B3 X JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term).6 t' S7 @! C. A0 Y5 @: e2 I JIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization. 4 E5 ]( Y3 Q, p! ]JINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems. 2 e. w0 ? V! S: D: {9 Y- xJIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures.9 s6 g3 C4 E# R1 ]+ Z2 a; `$ x JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms.% W: Q6 _1 b, w7 I7 B1 M: B! O JIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). / p! [% P8 V$ P8 |8 y' mJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center. " r( G. Z# _/ c v3 T, OJLC Joint Logistics Commanders.0 i8 c& M" o% x# \ JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore.4 M7 z" i K9 _8 n" K; b JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation.* v, @' ~' H" E V+ k( Q& l JMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. $ m1 i: h' ~; qJMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept.& x) G1 G) ^7 V$ t9 h JMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. ! J" }5 I" s! p$ A" iMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J* e r& r$ B U- s 151 0 q; i/ m' ~$ D/ ^* y4 eJMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information5 {/ z7 k8 @4 B. R" W3 _' f Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded - s* M# [/ _0 l/ J6 Yby MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major : }' b0 X* G. ]( w" _; scomponent of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN), & V( N) N6 a5 W8 H! k, t! Coperated by the JNTF. 6 r9 I! B0 f% N: ~9 V3 P' J, PJMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual.% y; W, f2 t$ `( | k! `" P/ s JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement.7 Z& p! \# M6 B JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement.2 g: I2 S( F3 Z) r* ~ JMO Joint Maritime Operations. N3 t1 ]7 H/ K/ L, t" i, H) RJMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start.6 `$ Q) C3 S# H, t1 A5 Z JMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. 0 e; x" J5 f& z: K A6 d(2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group.4 @* I4 ` `& Y0 B" u) g JNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service. 7 I+ c) z$ c! q: v5 ~* H QJNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System. 0 H" M7 B0 M. {0 z8 @4 w# M& rJNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC.7 k9 C2 F1 N$ U0 ~# I7 ? g' o JNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor.5 Z* A$ x- P5 [* t JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor.( B4 Y, x0 H/ r7 O7 W' `. j/ G* q& W- d JNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access. ( ~0 h8 G- F# M1 j$ s) ~ bJOB Joint Operations Board. ! j+ g" W7 Q; g% JJOC Joint Oversight Council. 8 x; y Z* P% X1 P# `. X6 jJOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. - Z. L/ F9 L. O: j; p+ gJoint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one# D1 S. B- g* u' t7 f% q Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the) s0 V% q! [* R& B) ^ participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy).2 i8 B, a4 P$ Y. ~5 s8 h- \$ b Joint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more ( |) Q; E! W; Q; H$ F. cServices in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be( J; f3 G! O' x8 }+ y+ r promulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the; S( [" m- a7 w; L a4 p combatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint 4 I5 g: w% E9 |& p0 k( ~8 \+ HChiefs of Staff. 8 J0 v/ A8 E: U9 g$ aJoint Doctrine 5 ]. w2 X; y: d: H. ]; HWorking Party " A' Y/ K7 w. jA forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands9 P( z& x0 F6 Y2 ~6 Q/ @1 X" V with the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics,3 F1 [4 q4 d: W$ {- S) G techniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination,7 H$ I1 _4 J: @, P project scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation.9 V* V" s1 d: ] |/ l$ V% L1 d The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, $ I4 O9 _" ^% POperations Plans and Interoperability. 1 y1 {- w, J$ X h( c7 v( h6 WJoint Electronic" n9 ^; O8 |6 P0 c% P1 P Warfare Center- p7 ], X4 D# K$ ~! ~% R (JEWC)5 q1 }# w4 [5 E) M Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for ! |- e6 o% X# \& w8 h: V# Zinvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground' Z; `& Y3 p, q; n systems. 6 G3 B H0 j9 e3 l$ YMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J $ i8 s8 `1 G( K' \- e8 b: o" S: ~152 7 v, v- x3 l; \8 PJoint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or % }9 K( u5 c" g* E% l5 z9 Oattached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or ; O' n, O% P& f" [more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to : e9 |5 o, o( b }exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander. ) [1 b# C5 g. Z8 s( O# _+ KJoint Force Air. x y1 L1 H: O: b1 ~% G Component4 Y) [) v( L: o J Commander3 g' \% `/ x8 o5 z/ w# T (JFACC) 1 N v6 o4 Y3 z$ M; v! HThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or ; `2 D& c! P$ C4 M0 \7 L* z5 ] S! ]* y4 Djoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making $ X9 p- ]% A( R; U; ]+ D) Crecommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and' y7 j, a' ^: z& B6 e coordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may( e! R0 V% Y; m be assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority% b( G- I! V: D1 n" E necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing * }: L9 q! _- M5 f% j! g# ncommander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the9 D3 O. h+ e, Z; e2 l preponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities.$ m7 O/ _* l4 ]2 w Joint Force / X) j5 T! I' V# m1 l) nCommander 9 p- `0 l. s- C& V* d(JFC)0 i! W) v& \. E6 ^ b! t* ?4 ] A general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant5 u( ?' @) p' @) ~+ j command (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also* ^( f; Y; v5 L/ g. L- ^1 T called JFC.) q# j; U2 x* ]9 f; L* W Joint Force Land " ~0 }5 W$ T% V( h. z2 U9 N. r- F% JComponent& T, w7 V& @' a9 Y% V" x6 C Commander5 X R. \8 ]0 ], j+ k (JFLCC) + a! Z# W6 s( c* K [1 M" |The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or0 N! A* y. F: Q% s joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making2 [6 j, e( `$ z M/ c recommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and/ l8 b; _* R1 @" s9 h) ] coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may + W, u: p+ |- R1 Y8 W. ~$ B; dbe assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority h2 u* J1 S7 v% K6 r$ x necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing: {$ ~8 F3 E) K( u+ ^8 a commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the: d. q( X! S+ c8 Z3 s9 ?5 @( o preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control : f9 M; m; c8 p* v0 @' ]1 Wcapabilities. ( i! Q; O) ?; _+ I4 l5 AJoint Force0 {7 C- B- b; e/ ^: `* G Special : E# I. X- F. D; k3 A, ^Operations $ C3 S/ @1 b u4 u) x; RComponent% |. \' L3 Z2 {1 d8 S' f Commander, I- q( d+ e( P4 b (JFSOCC) ' p. g7 D( K" Y; NThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or . b: J# x( o/ I1 e [joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making 1 A! i5 P. ^9 n) J; orecommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and " J8 c# z7 u" u7 h6 c) aassets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such 2 S9 k) `" i* \: Poperational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority' J3 @' a' @% E. c% l necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing9 ]8 B+ }6 Q. j) j& U1 f commander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the ' u9 y% x8 y; Tpreponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and ( p' |/ B" A) P% g% [control capabilities.7 s" l4 [8 b: F" e- m% v Joint National. \( b# G5 m" ^- R Test Facility : K: W) K9 x( `+ |6 N(JNTF) 4 `4 x0 f+ N( cA large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado, q9 U6 F, J+ V8 ~' m2 T which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the }" L% }7 w! \/ L9 H! ^NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF)) h- t' V9 W* Q2 v7 f; C3 r: C& r Joint Operational 3 t3 U2 u2 T3 H9 C" D2 h; J4 WPlanning and8 P0 g4 o- |: A Execution! j1 _9 m& g# ~$ c. C System (JOPES)& V1 }/ y7 x1 G- ?3 t" l% { A continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration 2 Z L9 m, S+ d, f( [( u5 E( b" y8 sand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation . c `' g2 W/ Q9 @1 {Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for 8 X9 n+ ?7 D. B; z5 J1 u+ nconventional command and control by national and theater level commanders 9 S- C, I* X* h5 L$ N9 Pand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct* j5 u: k6 I* D" ^/ z of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning ' X: D* l, m {2 p8 q% F+ n9 |policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and! O1 o# G; a. a6 l& g automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and 4 N; A( u- U" W) O9 v. U9 Zexecute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities $ x; H+ M4 t3 p6 vassociated with joint operations. 1 Y: E% x2 h G" f* `4 T4 H ^MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J: N& ~# ~# Z+ F 153 & |, O7 X* g& f1 [6 G3 `$ \& BJoint Operating ) B( M2 b9 n* l* W `+ Q- h) h6 wProcedures ) W1 d% }' v, m% B. T(JOPs) 2 U* m. ~. O: JThese documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions$ Z* m2 K3 o* U) D necessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs 7 \8 _ d( P3 p- W5 ?; gmay include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability,( `' E) P3 L- a! G& u" n) q Vulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting, 7 {9 L; d1 u( d. OFinancial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement+ W% h; B9 Z2 S$ d M; D and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program2 p- J: d% M5 R- a" z+ t' z* a Manger and the participating Services. - Y. ]" h. X: w6 U h: KJoint Operations , d$ Y, r% t4 V9 i4 c3 b2 G, A5 ?Area; k* N& R+ A: e9 r; i That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military ! E0 I/ F& F3 w0 M; Boperations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to , ?/ O6 N! \. Isuch military operations. Also called JOA. ( [4 z* L3 C+ ?( F. y+ OJoint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program ! e; Z2 c" l* [1 M' ethat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component 6 s/ C2 u( P+ [* lduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle.1 G$ [% y0 w6 u- t( v/ `! F! E Joint ; Z s2 f r+ g$ L5 MRequirements 7 j6 b( i H6 B: A) [3 M& POversight 5 J$ s0 G: y0 U, RCouncil (JROC) 5 G9 k, k3 m S0 LA council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts + L1 }9 `- i8 ^6 q0 Z0 B8 ]6 ~requirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops8 ]& O7 `. _1 [ recommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates : m% O8 Q) T, o' [1 m' nperformance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition 9 v7 W) E& ?$ { q6 e; ?Board. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air ! v% Y5 O! J& T! r2 TForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. . R- r: R. \0 x) `" XJoint SPACECOM: F7 O: u" j5 P Intelligence2 j5 l, \& W$ O: E7 n! e' n Center (JSIC) / e1 Z: E0 D+ n$ y' GA USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational % G* F% P+ V2 G& H7 p$ ]intelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for/ h$ r. M/ E, F+ M" x6 y$ \ the DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production/ c2 V4 ]- H4 b$ _ includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and , L$ `5 l0 g+ _# B' rSatellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB.; e9 n$ a. k( w1 Z Joint Strategic9 y% I; b, A# P) g8 k Defense Planning- z0 `9 [, d7 @ Staff (JOSDEPS) - f( k& R+ J$ R N$ _3 ^A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for0 P! Z3 p |, a* M5 i! b integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive " D3 ^; o: H3 Y% x* zand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint 6 c0 W; Q* d; V& b7 EStrategic Defense Planning Staff./ |% w4 B- y# T+ Q Joint Strategic 6 `4 G+ Q) s6 H! t, e( STarget Planning % }' @0 g# A& b7 q6 VStaff (JSTPS) # C4 R: |% x1 I* \A JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing, 5 N# s \! w" M* rcoordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). M/ g; A0 _* N9 h# v+ c Also responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The & P6 I: ]. ?+ A+ F2 OCommander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target$ V7 z: Z# Q: ~7 r6 w" M$ ^ Planning Staff. , j* d' j9 H1 N' o' K2 MJoint ; y& B0 w% y) w% g6 QSuppression of , F% S# j# k/ S' c( s* PEnemy Air! p( P& |+ E3 Y9 I+ p Defense , J2 F" ~/ H- z( ?! KA broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities5 F+ `% E; O6 U# l& @: J/ r provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called / v, Y, G" y& w$ a; VJ-SNEAD.1 U( a3 L* e: ~7 V; d7 n Joint Tactical( s+ M* E% g# K& _6 x" r( |6 C Information7 w' z/ {8 V0 f6 n8 T. y Distribution ) l6 \, ]$ E% [, d" N, n9 o" W% iSystem (JTIDS) % Z( p! o8 X" X/ x6 B$ SA joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the- p: D5 i2 k7 W8 I8 [; T interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, : H( A3 C' B( L* kand mobile or fixed-base land stations. B8 d9 |& [" b; _7 { Joint Tactics,( H; N) o& ]; N7 P( m Techniques, and3 g: P" q' G& i Procedures ) N+ i) H0 h9 l; ~(JTTP) ) b5 Y9 W6 U4 RThe actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how ! B$ p& O; r- X+ U3 @forces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,- {" G3 p8 s! T3 F/ z promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and8 u- s7 P: z. i0 Y e2 A) ~ Joint Staff. Also called JTTP. , H- F' A2 H: X$ D9 X4 ]5 F) m; \MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J$ k9 {/ O8 F0 r& o) m: D 154 5 o8 `, y( c! p( H$ ~Joint Test and - z* y* c5 M+ I: [Evaluation3 k0 L& X O1 T: }0 f T&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be 0 j6 ?" [& J6 \2 R- H, n* {acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have7 X. Y, x! t0 X; ^+ U! ] interfaces with equipment of another component. : m. l4 `) p& M+ [3 iJoint Test and& O; }' O$ M3 s: s Evaluation1 W; N9 `" P! @; x Program! d! P7 l4 ?; u* d0 l An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on j: Q L, G V7 j( H3 Psystem performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements," `5 l; f4 V5 a0 ?0 g6 _' \ systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for) q- x- [, F' x( R$ ^" V force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. $ }1 J$ v7 O IJON Job Order Number. / m% ]3 l& P1 H& eJOP Joint Operating Procedures.4 d. h0 H, E$ w S4 h JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System. 4 y* D+ T, D7 `# U4 AJOPS Joint Operations Planning System. # j' m8 b- m# y" Y8 AJOR Joint Operational Requirements.' Q+ c$ _9 v+ c* ^0 D JORD Joint Operational Requirements Document.# ~; n( Y; M& L; k JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. 9 I# |8 p5 o$ X- t' qJOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term). 2 i* \$ R' P* S/ s! R' z" ]JOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).7 ]( T- }+ u% e/ V JP Joint Publication. 4 t+ k c6 {0 `JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.. f2 ~ i6 A: }, N3 l( H l' k$ H JPM Joint Program Manager.$ p7 I) \' L# v. [7 K JPN Joint Planning Net. ' T/ U+ U( [/ m! _& NJPO Joint Program Office.$ m# y7 T- v1 g, M8 z: F* h' B JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra.) ]' g2 A8 ~- s3 w JPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact& C2 G; ~; X" D& u9 W2 e JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle.+ Q- y2 r5 o4 O! R5 l( e1 Q u3 D% H1 h JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. $ w$ R+ C Q- D, j* u( vJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration. * f" C8 \- B5 J4 r4 D( ^* ]JPT Joint Planning Tool. : i+ k' U1 I0 b5 a8 x7 yJRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). - i8 D8 T; q5 g: W9 z9 QJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term). * f1 X2 ~1 ~5 j; o: S' m/ hJRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).7 t8 m6 P- u! c+ F JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J * ^, C$ ?8 t( U5 Z1 q* y P155 - x( H' F3 I y. zJROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council. ; K' ^7 S* I B, z1 }JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group.5 z6 G8 V$ K/ |% r; R: J JRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications.: U" j0 T5 M; _6 b f" G5 f JRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. " i, u8 G j9 {! q4 `2 _$ C5 a9 FJS Joint Staff.% Y* u+ s% k/ j: B1 S JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. * w! V: G5 ~; U( u) ]JSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term).! I. e/ I' w3 z3 K0 A- U JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. q$ F; ]3 ^. o' ~ v2 x" pJSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term). , F! D9 a; Q- d0 W) f- {JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term). J; ]" C4 O) @. l2 b4 Y (2) Joint Service Evaluation Team. 0 w1 x7 }5 v, ^0 n' O" |JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). 0 F* U2 A5 x. z8 p V b; yJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center. 8 O" s9 I' b/ T3 y% SJSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term).0 ~$ U' h- M5 S* N, G JSMB Joint Space Management Board. . T2 q9 @0 K. }JSOC Joint Special Operations Command. " \( m, B; s. yJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. 2 w$ ^1 c: G3 YJSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document., O9 g8 z) n8 R* n% Z+ b, f1 \$ r JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System.- x# H/ w: d4 Z _! N$ }6 s6 ] JSS Joint Surveillance System. ) s- [- C" F$ C+ WJSST Joint Space Support Team. ; p1 d& R' C; M0 p. p) Z: _6 S; qJSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System.! D/ `7 r; b7 L( [2 l- t$ Z1 Z JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff.3 w4 f9 u3 n# F JT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting . Z0 ^& \5 _& i7 I4 q. BJT&E Joint Test and Evaluation.+ |# p8 _1 D& q- G6 f) }: p JTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term).. t" c! l9 r7 } JTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station. $ e2 d ~4 B$ P& uJTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. # P0 k8 g7 T. F9 u% y8 dJTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. 2 f9 y1 a% L& B, ?7 |% y2 xMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J _* T+ p. n( O/ O4 }+ Y1568 R. d9 R+ Z9 [0 n JTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). ' C' A/ N5 h9 |9 p% yJTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. 1 \" F) A1 X: w( U0 ~; n: BJTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). ! ^6 F$ c. m5 q& Q4 E9 t8 M# ?3 dJTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).& x7 v+ H3 `$ R+ X$ g JTF Joint Task Force. * p( D. {3 |1 XJTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise.8 c& O/ `6 b9 ^3 ?5 d5 m# Z JTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System. 6 d; w l$ Z+ h- H7 x4 fJTL Joint Target List. ( ?! T3 C2 K- K# U8 b5 kJTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense./ O' N$ Q+ A% e$ F) ?: W( Q* \ y JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. / L0 G& B6 X! H# [JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]., J8 I0 f" P! f. U! t2 V5 U0 ` JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. 1 U* i( Z" T3 W% Q9 m1 C! G; aJTR Joint Travel Regulations. $ {/ P( _+ Z& r8 t9 Y7 YJTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board. + u& t" k/ p8 X7 m3 @JTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). # R' [" f1 \+ o; K8 I8 bJTT Joint Tactical Terminal.$ f5 N2 \9 {; q0 V JTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures.' m* [2 j# k. G# c$ H0 t' S JVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft.4 Q" b. u* z, z/ ~# \ JWAN Joint Wide Area Net.( \+ w" |* A2 {1 _ JWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). - ?. B T5 k8 m9 l% I) O" t% @JWC Joint Warfare Center. 4 s- p" I6 b9 T3 D. Z8 M; z8 DJWG Joint Working Group. 6 y6 ~) C% S4 V, ~' G8 dJWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network. 5 T$ o- r! n' b( t9 F& KJWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration* @# i& V' A4 t0 | JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.0 U# s0 g: s4 ^- P6 g9 k MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K ' _: u2 M; l, [1 C157 1 Q* e+ V9 f, X" B- sK (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo./ e `+ T- U2 Q K Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another.; a( A. f2 z2 ^; y9 ^& e: ^$ ~7 p Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of * x4 S- B, a. D# i$ ^. ~two observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both / N' R2 q# I' o3 K$ w2 X g2 aobjects.4 D* Q6 G3 V% j5 e6 y KA Kill Assessment.$ V: q6 n8 K# s. t! G KAPP Key Asset Protection Program. # D5 `1 }6 |& uKB Kilobyte.. m( o& b8 }. ^- w Kbps Kilobyte per second. " N" ? M* ` a7 d7 NKBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD).9 u/ r t5 w( D( b KBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion.; U9 p3 s+ [) j4 L KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. 4 b1 v" ?0 n3 t6 h+ [/ CKDS Kwajalein Discrimination System. ! T7 A9 t1 H( c: `0 k6 [ d SKE See Kinetic Energy. 9 x# U5 p& o# b7 X+ b9 RKE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon.9 [. H$ y7 U4 b0 E KED Kill Enhancement Device.7 `6 b% Y+ a8 {6 r# |! O5 a Keep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the- |/ P2 o+ a( X9 Y, ~( L$ Q7 l y. Q asset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to $ a& D8 X- J6 y' Pdefend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones, c' j9 w4 H" |& q4 a under the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined.1 q' I; P: F" x3 v3 ? KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept. ; V. I: R4 D+ ]6 k0 lKENN Statistical pattern recognition tool.4 ?+ p& Z! u! s1 A/ y KEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle.1 w" [0 ?! {5 L/ X# P% i% {" { KEW Kinetic Energy Weapon.) s% H6 F! }+ L9 F5 I! E- O+ e KEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion). # f6 l/ V \& d1 p* nKEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). - H# o3 T2 K$ E$ ^% j0 e+ b. QKEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. 3 x3 s2 q) M7 |* }8 i( s* UKEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital./ l1 V3 S0 e3 r' X Key A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a6 `" p ?: Q% X$ {( Z' F2 V. x sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption. . t/ d* T2 U' kKg Kilogram.& A$ h) ]/ W7 x5 F9 d KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL.- s! l2 S" u+ z( W5 O( b7 Y: J# ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K $ V7 o* X( I, s4 F& K& E158( r+ T V8 j) C KHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test.' S$ e. d- N8 w2 ]+ n2 s! m% m7 A KIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution.7 i: B9 c4 G! C6 b Kill Assessment6 o8 E4 ?7 ~5 I (KA) 2 h9 \1 |$ Q) B. _An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV 8 a( z- w9 U8 q3 Dintercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and* A. f2 s2 D: r3 w9 i7 q re-engagements. (USSPACECOM)& Q# C% d& J) u Kill Enhancement % b6 K- v& M* ] `5 FDevice$ N* }# n S# i' I. _ A device that improves an interceptor’s lethality." F; X* j# p, Y( a) W' U! [% H! [ Kinematic9 i" \% s! K; t9 z- c4 L1 T Battlespace * e# b1 x8 v( ~The planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor6 s) [/ d1 q: u4 v timeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and * v2 a; S, V1 |4 }5 joperational constraints.2 ?- u/ |0 f; @, G4 V Kinetic Energy ! c* u I5 j3 V; y(KE)0 O! I5 c2 R+ _- c6 y The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion. ! u- A6 u4 J K; fKinetic Energy # Z% ^% D& M' D9 }* Y+ R. C7 bWeapon (KEW)) m; x6 w, _9 N2 P" K( R A weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object.9 g( }/ S" |/ U Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. + _( W1 d2 R* }- ?# SKinetic Kill1 D, c' g& r0 w8 h/ H! b/ q# G8 F Vehicle (KKV) Q! i# j+ n9 ~) @- [# MA weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy/ E" G9 ]) |9 v7 \2 R a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board5 m2 M1 v% C" r: R6 W a rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell2 h2 U( a& v D, D7 _ launched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-10-11 22:19 , Processed in 0.049003 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部