航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H: S( C4 r! ~ g+ C& E 130 ' K% z$ B h! e* A* a; fHuman-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system - N" N0 ?; d: L, Jprocesses. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential9 w$ s# @( z6 y5 a9 B7 Z$ L/ M/ P high-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to , z' U* M5 R+ z6 r. y* y7 JBMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal9 r0 h' l8 C5 _4 y; a; n! P: V k Government may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of : }4 ~4 b% t* vcommand and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost ; Z2 t- R. d" l* R( ^phase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses ; f! B& E3 I0 l: v: i0 ]4 Pto initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human: K, R1 |4 x+ }5 D decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM)* B' k4 e. t4 Q( a Human " `2 L/ l; v: ]/ X; Z0 X: X( aIntelligence $ ~1 P4 W9 I" h! ~$ C- R(HUMINT) 1 Y! y: Z, D* R( m! DA category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by9 A, d u6 L; W# j human sources. 0 f$ x! D; g9 X- i g5 qHuman Systems 5 Z! r- G% G% h9 H! `Integration . u& r0 i- |9 z" K/ _; n) uThe human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel,4 P9 |+ \% t, Q, { training, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort v1 h* l. N8 M8 n( ]for the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of1 V' Y* t; M- ^$ b, M ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier, # O$ l& p- x& s8 z7 R; m+ t1 u$ }* {sailor, airman, or Marine.# d' i. d! X; o+ e, W, Q2 F HUMINT Human Intelligence. 7 `7 ~$ ~' o' ]* s! a: I J6 ?HVAA High Value Airborne Assets.& Y; p: f. g' @ HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. * ~) S' v K" L- YHVG Hypervelocity Gun. ! g- n- h2 E: m5 G3 x0 nHVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). 3 Q6 H; y5 X) \1 ^HVM Hypervelocity Missile. 3 ?, w2 }7 r4 z, {( F" M6 JHVP Hypervelocity Projectile.5 `5 R q. M6 e; u HVT Half-Value Thickness.6 G/ k) J0 l; E4 y( ` HW Hardware.- l) l9 Y2 E* g' N' d HW/SW Hardware/Software. 9 h8 J7 M/ j0 }: u/ }; P# w0 @HWCI Hardware Configuration Item. 8 u! Y* S: `, z1 B" e! HHWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. * O$ f q7 l9 ]HWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test.5 ~+ ?1 E. F& p1 C! F! _* E- D HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature. J1 A/ }! ]+ s Hypervelocity 5 P- Q0 J' G) i4 dGun (HVG)$ x% d7 ?; W/ W0 C! d A gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example, W: P/ j$ h/ `) E8 [7 K$ i an electromagnetic or rail gun. ! G; J# H( g; }" G. v1 SHypervelocity 4 u. ~- P n. N( g% eMissile (HVM) , ` h$ t5 j) H' GA missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second. 5 M2 b) W7 ]) @1 [+ l# I7 w: LHYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance. 2 `$ v& ~0 e, RHz Hertz (cycles per second).& |9 O# ?( R( B+ x4 Q MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I! |5 \; b4 ^ \ 131 J6 o2 G& m2 G% \; j$ x I&CO Installation and Checkout.6 F3 f( d. Q, t* [2 |8 x I&I Installation and Integration. / P _! a7 F, Z6 _% [ MI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis. * f9 E, w2 G* B. e/ O9 cI&T Integration and Test.9 F k, k3 [! K# R$ I' T+ ` I&W Indications and Warning.) w+ i6 F! ~4 t, N2 ~3 m- d' B" n I-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering. 2 _9 a3 u2 {- n- j" z; C M: UI-HAWK Improved HAWK.7 S3 T/ {5 K6 M: \( S5 h I-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term).3 t6 O3 k& p' \1 M+ |% d1 g0 x I/F Interface. 8 w0 t, n" h$ [5 l( U7 g2 W; oI/O Input/Output. M" g* K9 U& [9 k h j I/R Interchangeability/Reparability. - d1 W+ n2 z& N1 S* CI4 International Information Integrity Institute.8 E X: @: t6 C9 t+ c) R# m1 C IA Information Architecture. ' J- r0 r5 V2 Q( Y* J0 D! sIA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations.6 B' ?' w/ v" [) m# ^4 T1 L% X3 Y IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test.4 y- {- x5 Q3 S, z% B, a! L5 i. c IAD Integrated Air Defense. 0 [8 b0 c6 C. x+ Q- f; H: w: tIADS Integrated Air Defense System., a- A2 T8 ^4 j: b3 Q IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.$ B# k4 [9 h0 n' R% p IAG International Agreement Generator.: N3 B1 G( d( }( t1 U2 I IAI Israel Aircraft Industries.7 I+ m5 v9 X. d IAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package.- y$ V. \% c1 k% `$ q/ {: e) A. ] IAS Israeli Architecture Study. + L1 u/ D R4 p! ?2 h v: eIAT Integrated Assembly Test.* o0 _7 U% _0 }, g6 O+ B IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. * B: ~9 _) }# s" [) o) O1 sIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out.7 Y% a+ N5 s- m l IAW In Accordance With. }+ m" ^# L+ P$ `: s! f IBA Industrial Base Assessment. 6 B; E. H5 T5 g$ ^# c" ]IBC Impurity Band Conduction.$ y/ d* h3 h& p/ X# `. x2 y) N IBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.7 G2 G/ N3 x2 c/ P, d6 X9 o0 [1 a MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I1 k i+ O4 g# g 1324 B. t3 s3 J7 ?/ G1 l4 H) l IBDL Intra-Battery Data Link. a- ?, O4 D a' Y) }9 O4 ~8 WIBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration ' `$ d! i0 X' d( UIBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System.9 w. {% s/ W/ P, H3 ^. S7 A+ t0 j IBM International Business Machines Corporation.1 y: Y8 x* q" { IBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis. / F } L5 I4 [8 T ^( CIBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term). 8 E0 F! g2 j! x0 G7 T% Y" MIBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US 0 e& p9 A) Q# N4 g* X4 W: E' ]naval ships. ) i6 A3 c+ W- f. a% w& ?IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey. 7 e: F+ K$ s/ q4 C- i' Q) ZIC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit.% n) t. f" |) O: F! s ICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment., E9 @/ ^! f: p: ~8 k! s ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System. ' f# s* a6 Q3 v" B+ _ICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. a/ P- a7 S1 b! ~$ m! Z$ { ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization. ! U: `: u/ |6 ^: g6 oICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control 8 B& n( v$ n3 p' y$ zSystem (ICS) for US naval ships.# ?- z5 e( ?8 @ ICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering. 6 d. ^* T9 ]/ v5 B. d; U& FICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.- m" w. z5 Z* [& ? ICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT).* S% H% Q- l! W' D: s) O (2) Item Category Code (ILS term).+ P, Z" F( k- _3 [ ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing.: p9 V% {( S- Y: P. u2 ^ ICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security. % ?* z( x" C7 m7 vICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking.4 S9 X8 Q! V. m* w# b$ b: K ICD Interface Control Document/Drawing. & n+ L( G( \. bICE Independent Cost Estimate.4 A6 e. c, K. ]6 A ICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO).6 x* p) \5 N% Z% ]+ E! h, G7 x$ @' k ICM Improved Conventional Munitions.. @. w/ C7 x0 z0 c7 h+ _ ICN Installation Completion Notification.( L5 r9 v1 v' R& j" t" F' W' n% ` ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term).# G7 k7 ]4 K( j: E: M* O7 \ ICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures., u- \& C: {. i3 V7 t+ p! B MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I + s4 \9 ?: y# n133 / M) v2 x! W5 Z# N% ]# h) sICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term).& Z3 g) m5 I ] (3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process. 9 N3 n0 t2 V/ o; cICR Integrated Contracting Report. 6 @$ h2 Z; K- w+ f7 E1 y# sICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and 4 Z7 S1 h( s. L5 H f! P8 rcontrol system for US naval ships.& w2 K1 e" d; ]" f (2) Interface Control Specification. " N, s+ }& a2 p+ L0 O, S9 tICU Interface Control Unit. : c. ^% ^- R8 R) }ICWG Interface Control Working Group.2 V# W1 v4 d/ C$ `" x/ G. { ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification.) u5 P2 j7 u( \6 o4 ?" e+ o IDA Institute for Defense Analysis. 4 s* P" J1 Q( r: `, U* WIDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term)., b1 ?! y8 U& r- n* M; ~6 I* P IDB Integrated Data Base. 3 O' ?/ Y4 W3 EIDD Interface Design Document. & Z( D4 _2 V8 |/ qIDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis. % T: u0 `! z' j) I. Z0 TIDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term).: S- x0 S+ r* I% {( ~/ Q Identification # z" \6 Y) J: `0 x4 qFriend or Foe5 j. i) W& {4 a! x1 ?: [ (IFF); |2 E' I+ A( l( k A system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by: D: T' W" f- ^5 g/ T# |2 g5 X9 d5 v friendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby x( z) v8 I- o+ a9 j( Qdistinguishing themselves from enemy forces. 4 J2 G6 l% A m& |' s5 UIDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres.% g" R" v' {& n IDHS Intelligence Data Handling System.% ]; U, C7 }) ~* N: x IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.2 o5 d2 X1 c8 L/ @! } }3 d' M5 K IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System. 2 {+ z" e* |$ ]& m* P+ SIE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.0 g& D* V; F7 W/ K- p9 _ IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination.- B0 s9 K" l0 i0 A4 { IEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. * ]: |3 ~+ |2 p' ^1 oIEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure.6 t* q7 ?! e' K! C3 X IEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. / w0 z# v- ?$ @( ]; r. L& c$ V) SIEP Integrated Evaluation Plan. 2 F) E' S1 |& i# vIER Independent Evaluation Report. & g4 m/ A, ]4 eIESG Internet Engineering Steering Group.8 Y& N+ u5 h4 C; W8 m MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 {* }4 l6 H Z: Z8 [( \ 134 * B& A h: N/ s; FIETF Internet Engineering Task Force. : K$ n Q# S$ I- R& N- X0 fIEV Integrated Experimental Version.7 o' R$ D7 p: l# u; J* Q1 x IEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare." |8 Q$ s- e" z" i2 i0 v R* V8 G IFA Integrated Financial Analysis.4 b) M9 g/ N' W m3 ? IFF Identification, Friend or Foe. 7 A3 t7 v2 s; j6 |5 w: j) a) K OIFHV In-Flight Homing View. * H) \- P8 @- w, R& xIFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the ) t& T$ i& X4 Ycommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets.# O3 I* G: ?) `3 X The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications / ?7 M/ N2 D! @0 U& _ xsystem term GEP. : g% s8 J/ W0 M$ [IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope.+ m, t- `4 e% Z: I+ |8 k IFOV Instantaneous Field of View.* R6 Q" P: c- I$ ~* F IFSR In-Flight Status Report% i4 H, C' ~% s5 q" ? IFT Integrated Flight Test. # I/ {9 u3 D# J) TIFTU In-Flight Target Update.# s2 @8 v& j0 p4 B- z IG Inspector General.% q2 S; |. V$ f' t4 G+ | IGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse.& d+ z6 v' s3 t0 x IGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard.$ w" {4 J$ i! L( @ IGS Inertial Guidance System.# A) A( @( e* T6 _& @& p- Z4 c1 Y8 S IGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS).0 O, h2 f8 I) ~' x3 d+ w IGT Integrated Ground Test. 0 g: @' |- H1 d RIGU Inertial Guidance Unit. 0 P1 |- ?4 x5 }II Impulse Intensity.8 l l1 c+ S e6 @- r IIP Interoperability Improvement Program. + ?" o; Z4 |5 I: s' |+ f( ?; DIIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. 5 c7 o5 C( O$ \IIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.3 i- G- |9 H8 n+ p4 E$ X IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK). . y: @, B5 V7 M9 z; _1 _- UIIT Interceptor Integration Test. . @5 G$ f0 ?, T+ t/ VIITF Information Infrastructure Task Force.2 g+ f( k, N" T7 Z) n3 d IJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon. $ n! y) ?# l$ l! rMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 3 G$ h D8 o! S, J! ~# r8 V135* W5 N6 { L8 `5 g- d0 k, R ILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term). ; v$ o9 \- V' R+ [5 YILC Initial Launch Capability. % D7 `. W; q% s/ [# Z) G. f8 eIlities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g.,* U6 Z+ y6 S% Z9 m" x' r availability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics- U8 g' p" Z! }" O supportability, etc.). , _( H" V& u" e7 l+ k$ DIllumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray% Y) o- N# X. M4 B9 b% p& {, @7 K0 ? I satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test. . \$ n- x2 R+ o' |" ~ILS Integrated Logistics Support. " X9 y5 ]. n2 k; C" ]2 D# xILSM ILS Manager.' X Z. x; E/ i' v; p; U7 l ILSMT ILS Management Team4 y7 v L q* O' a% S, b ILSO ILS Office.* f4 ]1 W8 l0 f& F+ _ ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan. 8 E" W- T/ B. ?3 \* z. _( `ILSWG ILS Working Group.. ~9 `, O/ v+ d; x, Z IM Information Management. 0 O1 ^2 s# `( b: {3 ]& m; YImagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical; `/ D5 y* A L9 v means on film, electronic display devices, or other media.2 Y+ T, m( d; q& D Imagery 8 Q% k1 h0 ]4 H! o pIntelligence ; q" U! _! s6 _( L8 ]; d(IMINT) : I+ h3 Q, j/ l: H; m# t- F, _Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography, ( r t# c Q9 f9 einfrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic $ u3 m3 j' a9 o8 `aperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or 2 u) I7 m0 O" F* C& w+ G- D5 Xelectronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media. 7 L: R+ V. ?9 q. [* ^$ i& \' }Imagery6 R6 d. w7 S" v; b4 [( R l4 Z6 s Correlation # G1 R, W/ Z+ q' h* x: Z+ FThe mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from 5 E4 w) r/ V$ T0 X' Zdifferent types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics / m, Q& T0 W7 `7 r4 W6 @$ B6 msignified. & i2 {) h5 D! _* z1 CImaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object. ( r* q4 ~% U8 J7 kIMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term).8 x( Y" r! u3 \( k- V7 c$ b/ ` (2) Internal Management Control. $ S% J2 r9 K2 e: p+ U8 s+ pIMDB Imagery Management. ; |5 [/ P! K, mIMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of, W7 l0 z6 Z4 N& a) G5 |% i Defense.8 Y' l$ Y+ c. V. C2 B% W4 z IMINT Imagery Intelligence. / R& s7 n. M9 i% o5 ]# ?IMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program.2 R7 }; c7 {) K6 s/ X7 | Immediate Kill : h; A8 N5 D8 }Mode 6 C5 V( l" r6 Y, eA kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by ! `( l# s! N+ ~" wimpact with the KV or KED.( ^4 i; [8 V+ [ Impact Point ]6 \* W4 r9 Y8 k Prediction (IPP)6 {3 S& }) B9 ?! x3 h9 @% D/ l( i1 I Prediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, # _% t1 X0 U3 P/ susually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes8 ]) o8 D* C! W1 J' H2 x the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties. 3 K7 s" s* p5 Q- S; aMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I1 p8 z/ i L y1 g/ h& q6 X 136 3 q) {- w3 |$ j. M; O% NImplicit - W3 Q+ o2 `: Q/ b/ E: o0 K! jCoordination& W) C* M0 S3 c Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to . d9 s$ ^! s6 Xderive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations9 w4 c9 l/ k4 }3 D1 ]6 ] will be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical.! E5 Y5 C6 r1 F9 ? Decisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers. % J; |1 i9 s( c8 u" X/ mImpulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for( ^# ?. x8 h# \ i3 c9 q' s5 I* C a period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.) 6 M3 X: o6 n5 KImpulse" n, o4 U0 o# F6 s Intensity (II) 5 T8 {1 x, j; g4 V0 \* ~" _Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse& n4 [& d2 Z8 P# ] intensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of 6 [& G; d. b9 U; I) x- }; V3 v4 rimpulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter;- L. E8 t7 z, C* Z7 G2 @ hence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s.9 v3 B3 I$ \6 P" U' Y Impulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The 6 m- f2 |! w4 {& \: _( J eintensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target + G% T4 X. P& X$ C* q4 o; d; Lviolently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of/ K0 I# j" S- I the target and causing structural failure. ) i% D5 n" S: ~IMPWG Information Policy Working Group.9 N$ ^% y' |$ g1 A. K6 H F9 N IMS Integrated Master Schedule.! ~0 p4 M0 S1 ?! W5 O IMU Inertial Measurement Unit. $ Y7 u2 _+ p/ y; w7 K% FIN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse& n3 c& m9 d: c Noise.; K9 g: D5 {+ S) r W1 j In Inch. $ ~) z- h" D# l0 nIN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator. & [" @9 W& {' K% @2 M3 Q5 z" p- wIn-Flight Target" O9 R$ v* Q$ d. N$ \2 r Update (FTU)$ X7 ^# \+ D( | _& y+ B A report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control7 h. {3 D5 W* z7 r suite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. 5 r0 I, ^& |( m: c k7 q2 d7 uInclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing 8 l1 X) @7 j" O/ w7 Q/ Hthe orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has2 u" f2 c- _( e8 P" U/ T' ] E1 p C an inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite / a8 ]9 F4 f; ?. xtraveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in5 D, K! q$ W* q7 ]6 z which a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An * h0 F( _, O8 D ~6 x0 \orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is/ \' X3 ]% _) V* o2 P0 N called a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a % r0 m. i, j2 K" u- q; Pretrograde orbit. & D0 Z- |, a! `0 r. H( v9 [Incremental3 }/ T. E$ O$ u k- ~* j2 g Funding ; y+ |4 i0 x8 U6 [The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project $ \. V+ C& h! Tbased on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such . a( k7 W6 q4 V. ~9 Cbudgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in ) N- t/ o, d/ E5 L+ ]' y& _' Scompleting the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding, % G5 f0 u6 d. `7 |8 x% X0 X$ Ewhere budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated : v+ ?, W6 t8 q+ D6 wobligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification4 ]& W G7 o j" e$ P0 \2 N Friend or Foe8 s( A3 w2 u- C8 b# g# p2 P (IFF) ( ~! ]6 L7 D$ R& hA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by7 w( F, Y$ i' {; m' q! j friendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby * `' j/ |8 a& S/ _' Pdistinguishing themselves from enemy forces.1 @& N2 Z' M! s( J MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I9 ]% [0 P0 w, F: X N 137 0 q3 S! s/ z$ Z" a. P, x: Y, u' AImagery ) f4 m" S t6 E1 v- ZCorrelation! @5 `, |# [, b3 f, _ The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from. V4 U5 h2 k9 q9 J& a+ j different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics7 v" ?4 r7 t/ H2 p signified. : H+ K5 l# S0 P, P: F7 h( f, r6 zIndependent; O3 _% H2 p2 V {' A1 O% Q Cost Analysis 4 K' q- D U' Z' kAn analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body: s- e1 P/ i/ R' g disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United- `$ _. G: T7 T4 j, I States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational $ m& K4 N0 R Z5 ~3 ~4 @Manpower Requirements.”)3 Y# Y; [/ ]( Z* f2 b, o- }; _9 V& D Independent Cost0 ], ^. h3 R( |; J( C Estimate (ICE) 7 X C- I5 y) E7 X a! g7 ~" pA cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority u0 o0 G. K3 G# Qresponsible for acquiring or using the goods or services. 6 R0 _; K/ b" b: j1 @* M8 p3 B7 s4 SIndependent5 O; R: R) m, P0 N2 R/ I Evaluation; x/ m6 } q) L5 v Report (IER)4 h$ o* K+ j* f Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, * P4 e7 _( W4 s# _4 @1 N/ Kreports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s - m$ F6 y) `3 P- }5 Q( ]assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on3 S' X- a# v0 Z7 T: j5 o) N0 m4 P the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is 7 t6 k! N; n0 ^' |, B' sprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER + o/ q9 h1 h0 M' v$ ~, D8 ~4 Emay also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army)" Y! d% O- ]% T3 w! i Independent ( ^0 x# @* ~5 I; `Research and . R; G# D4 ^# L$ ^Development+ D) Y% h( M( N+ p( g6 r6 v (IR&D)5 d" l/ @4 V! N- B9 q, M7 W Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a9 K8 O! z: E' p) n3 H contract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and \" C) @& r( T/ ]applied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation/ C' j" C1 y! V) } studies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See * Q) s. _5 F1 O4 z0 d5 u/ D' X9 m* JFAR 31.001.) F3 f$ Q, G! g' xIndependent 2 I* T+ r P" r# X. pVerification and; y x6 m/ c8 O' W Validation (IV&V)* O" K) i" T; J Z: D' ^7 `& b- b Verification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that# v: g; C& g4 ]' H is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being 7 I* t Z/ w+ }; Devaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software: X/ P, p, ?) ]3 m3 j7 R0 R development activities.# \/ U, f$ ^7 _5 u9 p; C Indium 9 y/ d2 R3 P/ J' z a0 W2 s1 VAntimonide1 ^+ r. f- V# L; Y Infrared sensing material.$ V3 z0 f& v5 D+ u5 @; Y# X! M Individual - @) ]* y3 n4 n5 y+ v# ~- h0 PAcceptance Test( C/ c3 r1 z3 k) S c! s1 k A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics 7 x! X6 Z( Y9 S/ [# l; u# [; Pprior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using5 L$ ~* M0 b" S9 v X the end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency.' b7 i; c4 L a" s Induced 7 _4 k" r+ n6 E$ AEnvironments6 G+ }/ K4 B$ o' M! @ Induced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the" {3 P; ^; K( H& R: \ natural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets* }/ @, ]5 \4 ~ (Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or + D, D: J) W& L9 bthe influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally-3 @4 y; H! n( G' J/ p Induced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E! t5 j' Q6 B" d. z% N electronic equipment).. G8 Y4 ~# T- T5 V" x# _ Induced ; }/ H) N' j, J' k. e, G# \6 sRadioactivity2 W8 B2 i. x" A2 ]6 W+ O6 ^8 r Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions, K f8 U) m2 J _3 k1 W8 `1 k+ F particularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of$ |$ v% {# N$ C% ^; j unstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce . I9 m/ s2 h, N, Z$ D! @$ a _radioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by ; {4 e* y& ^/ p& R7 ]interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and; `8 V; p- c7 K2 f% u silicon in soil and sea water).; l/ C/ l- H9 G$ G7 H6 f3 U z4 q. S9 y MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I . i1 R' Z1 o* |& F138 + b. _ D% z/ a4 k6 ? d9 VIndustrial w% f% l! D7 j% w+ }Resource ' L1 d8 N5 u) q# x) |Analysis (IRA)- K0 `3 j1 M+ o2 T- ^$ k A quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory9 @. e# f' u! h( H- ?# N capabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to * T' z/ {& k! H$ r, a! Jsupport SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and # u1 @ A, M- d6 k( Q$ I8 uspecial tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the . [. G8 i( m! w, ^1 S! [' n, `range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies, + f4 E( j7 h' j$ zproducibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in . U; |& c q% V, zIRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and 9 N& r% r" f9 `7 @9 T- nbecome issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues : m# w3 c* D; H6 gResolution Strategies (PPIRS) document.* }$ l! g+ D H* i$ G: [/ c Inertial. L* k+ `! o2 c( X7 n! V! E+ P Guidance u9 R" _% Z0 x A guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, 3 U9 d8 B/ m5 f/ y% wwherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly " R" r$ g( e) G9 p* Y" y nwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures, K* g$ [8 t) S( Y* c and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain0 K4 @/ I1 U z- r) {# M direction. ' F. |) t) C; Y; {0 |7 d6 ]# C- \Inertial : |% L6 ~4 R' RMeasurement* w6 d) U9 L" c T$ e o Unit (IMU) / m6 Y3 r' v K) B; X( x/ s0 w" VA guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, ( R ~ n+ i8 [0 Q& t4 `% @( bwherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly3 i( a ^) m8 e% G within the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures% v4 C l/ d, a1 Z and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain 8 C+ L( I7 W( L' f9 kdirection.+ u3 K) l0 h) I6 M INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability. 9 u/ ?/ d/ v- f2 FINEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). ?+ a2 J& K8 b' o6 \4 B INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR2 u! w/ p6 S$ G9 A0 g/ k Treaty. - h' d9 w6 k4 n6 J' vIn-Flight Target % n9 ~2 s* j4 I" BUpdate + t+ m! d. E# Y9 f# KA data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and+ ?( s7 l# s2 @. m/ t& ` velocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction.3 J+ U4 Y4 @& {* F (USSPACECOM)4 E$ W* b# G% |& i0 x% D+ I/ s/ l Information 0 k t0 ?$ e& H& X( k6 ZArchitecture (IA) 0 g8 D: B1 r) Q+ L' WA description of the information that is needed to support command and control . @8 D, ~7 W8 ]' L J; W, D6 S5 Ldecision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing3 h0 L7 V. T1 r6 F- q) a% p that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description * T6 p& `$ k, Q( A, h( sprovides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design! _; d* {+ k" d* j& P+ n flexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability. ' X5 U3 p! I8 z# C9 U- y! ~Information1 H+ P) _+ |* [' { ?" [$ y J) N Resources9 c+ @5 C/ \) ]7 e1 p1 d Management . \+ t" m9 \: G: }The planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling, ; x- j% \# m% E) `and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use,8 f" N- L2 {; I% O3 ], J6 I/ D and dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of # K- Y$ ~) A% d9 `6 yinformation and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information& w( r" C% E6 M8 N( J7 ]$ L: h: A3 ? Security; L. h: r% [3 f7 _& { (INFOSEC) 6 S. j; V5 q; A6 ^) _Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and3 ~) c/ `- h1 A# k1 H2 K" @, r2 o: c protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or 7 H* J2 y6 q0 W% q( E8 junclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical+ g6 K% D" t; l4 f data and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned 3 W! T* H- ?/ i# h9 o( ~with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications,( ]4 R7 K& U5 ^8 B downgrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring. - V+ s8 f3 B$ y7 T8 m ^. P- oInfrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,000 ' d3 K' H- n6 sAngstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic 0 R7 V: U1 ~9 z, lRadiation.)2 ?/ @) x' F* b2 ~' ?6 a+ s Infrared (IR); c% F# |: @' L {; N Electro-Optics 6 }. c" n4 D% L* C( ?1 W7 PTechnologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength # h8 u' @" j* C; z, P& T1 hspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.: J6 ~& Z, b; t MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 v6 |9 C/ H1 s 1394 d9 s. g' Z& J' X Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted " T0 ^; [$ Y5 t+ h9 Wor reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the 3 r! n- ^4 g2 o0 K- N( R( i6 }electromagnetic spectrum. 5 g0 D! E. M$ \4 Y# G. G* N* i; F* }Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength) |0 q3 ]8 z ?: D% W8 I, G9 O+ { region of 1 to 40 microns. n! Y8 a8 \! r9 u7 Y Initial6 D2 g+ U( n2 s Operational 0 q% o5 D2 x! _/ d. E9 t9 dCapability (IOC); a/ l3 M- j- r7 \! K5 ]% L The first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of# k# M3 n+ D; L! c, h equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned1 ^+ D; K$ t9 V; a% p or operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force.% M4 E2 U1 `3 a. C9 G6 c1 e J2 A Initial # C* h) s6 b1 \7 R" ]Operational Test * [) a* M4 o# L0 k; land Evaluation* s5 B+ {$ m+ U7 y (IOT&E) ; Y4 [1 y; x: ~ {9 SAll operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production ) v ?1 G$ a0 ?' g) ~representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial; q: I3 p' w3 C8 A1 k T production. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system4 O2 T; S: S8 }4 r! e operational effectiveness and operational suitability.7 w( q8 m6 h. O/ m INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite).$ }) y4 a, u. K% M' N6 Q" M5 t INS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code. ( q) l! F$ p) r. T; yInSb Indium Antimonide. 2 i. c# @6 W, x/ D( {# ZINSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. " u4 z+ Y5 ^9 s" A* x' }. PINSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments.2 n( j/ M6 a" J Integ Integrated.+ P0 G7 m5 f+ E Integrated 8 n) Z" n* f6 eContracting ' w' V) R+ C2 U- m; YReport (ICR)1 X8 {5 o; b, N* @0 e A quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and ( _$ h& k) k8 q/ Qinterfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a , ?; r i8 d; d B: H, R2 W! Pmechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as9 w8 |- x r: r Integrated Contracting Plan or ICP).! N" {5 U1 P' }6 z Integrated Fire6 ?9 S q3 Z: P- q' u5 U4 J1 z6 d- M Control System# N! X- \, y1 W, [' W A system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data 9 ]9 N2 Y& s, U( Z) {/ zcomputation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted - U1 A7 J# N2 Hby electromechanical devices.) o6 |, x* s. \: \) O+ x8 f Integrated5 ~8 e9 w' ]1 E" P Logistics Support $ H7 J9 t# w- H$ |(ILS) ; f* g, i( s* ?(1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and & x; z* A% e1 U6 @technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into : v0 v, M0 v% B9 s2 U9 b! Jsystem and equipment design; develop support requirements that are( a4 O- U1 [6 D2 }. _+ o related consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each 3 N0 D4 L5 B N3 u: e2 f+ Cother; acquire the required support; and provide the required support3 h. X6 I) z$ [4 q during the operational phase at minimum cost. . Z" ^5 w! F- ~8 F( Y; L(2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the. G. _, c; I( F& h6 Z. f! b effective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an# |% |2 n! X5 `. e* P) J4 r- U+ Q6 G integral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation.% D1 P8 K1 e* m6 \ Integrated 8 l( I3 \+ ]0 l- ELogistics Support ! H4 B; R/ D1 b(ILS) Elements& Z' Y- e- q) V3 F Maintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish" P1 t+ ` W) ?& f8 ]2 y. v# L maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system.. X/ ]0 P2 U5 Q Manpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and4 U; i, t' c( g0 L" ~ X civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a & G, I0 l: M' l, B% Emateriel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.; ]$ K- a! Y+ s1 ^% P( ] Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to * I: ?+ u# g# J1 [ |; g* \determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and- o* }' f6 B2 s8 ~9 R( D3 P4 o; o dispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well2 c1 `3 W' h' g9 c/ P as replenishment supplies support.$ U, X, q9 m# x( L MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 8 Y6 d4 o3 U+ I2 E& e140 & s0 B! h# A2 w! Z! b1 X3 J0 GSupport Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the $ h6 o3 `" l; t8 w D, J2 Doperation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology8 ^7 ?4 |; @0 [1 r and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It 6 q3 ^; L1 e- e2 t* Yincludes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment ; L' Q5 L* c$ ~6 f3 r( X: e0 r7 eitself. $ F- b+ X% ]6 |0 GTechnical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as" \; }) z- b/ \+ j manuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs . @1 v; X, d! m! _! `) A5 Y. \and related software are not technical data; documentation of computer ( r5 N7 `* F6 wprograms and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other7 I9 v) z4 s: o5 z% [0 V information related to contract administration.+ f: C- ]( R' y H9 l* s0 X Training and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training ) a R: z! v' q7 x l' K5 |4 C( qdevices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military8 U$ A/ N: H. P/ q& d personnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual . ]0 N$ A, G4 l+ Sand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; . Z2 V n$ a' _) T" c% D' Land logistic support planning for training equipment and training device7 n& }8 w5 U1 z( Z acquisitions and installations.$ t+ S- p* [& B ^2 ]9 D% r Computer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software, 7 V! ^3 A9 I z0 R y( j+ q3 J7 Fdocumentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support * }/ Z' k( e: |0 N' Z+ Y1 X0 u9 `embedded computer systems. 5 g, {, W) c) I- {( `Facilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets , x8 L' v2 U8 S( _- p! Urequired to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define # D2 j. ~9 ]" P* L& _types of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities, ' K0 ^& N6 i( N4 U, n- Tenvironmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment. $ k8 P/ ^/ U4 _8 b$ {: nPackaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes, , N2 ]; x( O$ e/ N7 Qprocedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,) \9 |8 T! R- }" f$ n1 a, q& N# k equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and ) w1 e5 k& B! w! h9 ^transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment% a6 r0 N6 S! B, f* A4 a9 Q7 J preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability. 3 C& F1 a, [# q& f: W# j" SDesign Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as3 m$ L8 Z# ?) E+ s1 @! W- w reliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements. ; E+ D5 A! B; r+ K$ sThese logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms ; _8 y. ]2 f- N! A0 C% vrather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness $ [* @5 u0 ^8 f; @+ G! robjectives and support costs of the materiel system.) v, s( d' w! @' Q1 ^* M, w1 w Integrated 0 X$ y5 B: n$ T iLogistics" W; M' O4 u: U- V Support Plan # L- N0 J; _8 @) B K(ILSP)1 ?% S) V# s# d8 o- [; i( T The formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the& X* H6 F5 u. _6 O1 \# F; v S program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed$ U' ?7 V, \( e# o9 v$ M ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with ' z6 U8 r! @7 p; mnecessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and ; b4 k- Z6 W, l7 K, @- ^production, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications : L& U* a2 R: W3 `# w# YRFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs.6 ^+ P: s- t: p; m5 i Integrated6 g- C6 ?) Z. r% W% P/ k8 N Priority List6 v7 ~8 G- O: V3 p* e4 L A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized) b! O+ D6 H; { across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs( ~, v+ R5 ~! B2 g that, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the 8 A/ Y2 Z& U# U. b$ q+ Scapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated; ?1 D# \- ?/ E3 g& j: T, ?8 F$ E9 O priority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for - `; v, g; W$ E, J% sprogramming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System# C ~* Q8 K. i% K process. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated F2 ]5 `- L2 D* lProgram % a! a! h. o# j5 H1 R: |9 J0 zAssessment 3 y/ I# [( W) g) r3 V(IPA) 1 U. E+ m5 P0 O1 N( {A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone6 C% s1 n9 E9 V9 k O: K+ s( i$ B decision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an + y, w0 L9 o0 Y. W* jindependent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into* n* W6 C5 A7 N7 n. A/ j the next phase of the acquisition cycle. / R- y* j- g- Z6 d3 f6 u4 lMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I& x8 Y4 ~- I% G, L: N7 O) M 141 $ q0 P2 W6 I8 o! iIntegrated + c) Y+ H6 d; |& ?6 S# _5 W% g$ H8 vProgram6 P8 B2 g! g3 m" z, T( ^6 ~$ Q Summary (IPS) " M: ~6 z0 B% b3 B' o7 b7 nA DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision - Z2 V9 j0 ^: M& mauthority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights9 E' P% b4 \+ Z y6 f the status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the7 h' I! m2 Y! g2 n9 W acquisition cycle.9 e+ A& N5 h3 }: A0 V6 v Integrated * t" l1 Y) I0 `Tactical Warning ; R% i9 G" y7 [' T; h. m: d5 a( xand Attack + @' N( t- `0 ~, ^; v" J! EAssessment6 G* w9 I$ F) h" u6 e (ITW/AA) # O( S& h7 k- o: G7 N3 P; \2 A' _ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and & J8 l _7 o, k' n, j* a: a( Datmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack $ J+ ~) e& {, \' U- s5 Ewarning information, strategic and tactical. 4 z* X8 B: [4 k1 {9 O/ b) ] iIntegrated- u& e3 M5 A0 n' U! m7 j Warfare 0 ]8 M" E6 z5 m7 Q. yThe conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing- G2 V5 B5 j: Y, Q) O forces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional; H! H5 v/ ^) ]6 l% h weapons.' m3 e" r9 u8 q- B* Y1 Z6 g( h1 W Integration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such X% q/ Z# O5 A4 b/ wa way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without " o# u! h8 C0 Jadversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM)% t$ p/ O: t* d9 V. Z (2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a " F6 X8 n9 P6 {# Y' o2 h' q9 G7 isystem. 0 O+ C5 B) a% ]2 ~8 Y8 n. ^INTEL Intelligence.4 Q% }( o) ]; n4 v+ p" M. t; A Intelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis,. Z# y- T2 ?" V integration and interpretation of all available information concerning % q6 T! _; [0 F ]) Zforeign countries or areas. / Q8 @) B+ ?) F! a2 ]( l(2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through , f. m3 S; f# L# x/ D" G! Hobservation, investigation, analysis, or understanding.; P7 O! s# o3 L% P Intelligence # z" |$ Q0 W2 F& y( r5 MIndicators / Q: \& F; h$ U% w- r/ X" `' i" fClassified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that, 4 E5 L+ l; O0 f/ b. owhen properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and7 x! s2 \: O/ B# B intentions.6 C1 _$ `& ]6 V. J Intelligence* u: ]# S' b- L: Q Operations: ^+ D* a6 Y3 t" O Center (IOC) & o# U. E2 |; l1 U7 UAn organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB.; g. E z* k! T' j- B3 M* W The IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational E9 d9 g! x$ _$ JIntelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) ' y/ J$ K; F) h1 Q+ t) HCheyenne Mountain Node (JCN).! v' h6 {+ v) q" r: b8 B t6 B Intelligence; \" i" g4 z8 u) a' | Preparation of # p4 T3 k0 }" x& o7 xthe Battlespace % a! e6 ]# F: b8 E0 JAn analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the ( o5 L7 s- r1 A; j3 b* y8 Eenemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence - @8 M0 d2 h: E. j% ]4 |) ]* Opreparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential 6 u- T2 _" ]6 A% ^1 O" y! d! Tarea in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed8 i1 `: _, z: K in detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on 3 C5 a( { a- o2 _* m' T- ~; woperations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle, D9 R9 v8 @! R" F: X4 _ space is a continuing process. Also called IPB.9 c( n$ j9 R- P Intelligence0 v9 [' w: I, X$ B: B8 ` Report (INTREP) ( g/ R7 ~! c" w/ Y9 WA specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of 9 w/ A- s4 k8 |6 Scommand in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in 7 u/ m6 |7 J2 [6 H- q8 jkeeping with the timeliness of the information. 5 i1 T% [, ]" A5 T& iIntelligence$ u$ e9 f1 B! \8 {. z+ @" C Threat , z. q& g$ ]. ZAn identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and ( e1 |' F% M) ?( D' dexploit information from a given or similar operation. 1 e6 B1 C; k% R+ n- N! bMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I' a, J' k$ ~% g$ e( U5 ~# K5 F 1420 C3 f+ P- _* B( h+ t8 e$ r Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit 4 A' e# G" O9 q8 ]: S3 @! Xarea, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal8 J0 ^/ I( l2 P' i" l: e0 L" q radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second4 G' X6 T8 t0 g" K2 P* } falling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation, 5 J/ v. L! \0 {. y( dthe term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or# ]: W3 V- R- E% b- j$ v2 J2 d dose) rate at a given location.$ f1 A. R" i* t7 f" q Interactive 8 `4 E* Y5 ~1 h# zResponses$ f: R2 i3 u) M2 w+ V8 | Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification. ! i. ]( Z0 T( [- }Interceptor+ G9 |! f# U2 O7 c3 S6 R( C9 L- U Cluster* y2 h% _2 n! F+ U. M A group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor.+ ~. h7 D: D; v Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and5 B4 z* {: s# }: e6 p' _7 i velocity in three dimensions.- P5 b7 A9 m$ V- q6 x. Y) T! U Interceptor Track . ^" [ D1 M3 R4 dRange (Max)4 [# [3 `) `$ s; q% k7 W The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function 6 `2 i& e/ Z( e. B- Yon a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit4 F. w$ E% P# c: Q y $ h4 R8 a! i0 n- Z6 ]) fA condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and# z x% L4 M, _3 D1 H. I# U3 M2 ~. O2 S) e L physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and 3 V; t( X6 Y" e+ \+ K! `+ T; |% jare capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items* x/ \7 f* `# c4 J. j themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for " i5 D- a& e! k3 E6 p8 H1 @fit and performance.' O4 U9 M/ A4 e2 a! `" V Interconnection The linking together of interoperable systems. # A0 k! P- Z. u0 ~/ o; }Intercontinental" w/ X6 p# c$ B3 N P) T& z Ballistic Missile) e. V# _, F! {" ] (ICBM) & `) M/ A2 J& m! N) b3 ? j& k( o% Q0 PA ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The# z; x4 n3 r3 n. d! { term ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from$ N0 k, i) g2 I: J submarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.)) J! x$ O6 c2 R3 C ^ Interface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection3 M0 P4 j& Y8 S1 ] H, h characteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged / ~% y. W; v+ D6 O! ysignals. ) H1 F" u; P# Y! A* P(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two + [. z8 { a+ u V5 ]: Ysystems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register. : a7 A- C+ r+ H* N U0 i(3) A shared logical boundary between two software components.4 `) e% V" a+ T& x9 f (4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between 8 F# W. f2 F' ^; ?# }! Osystems, or between persons and systems. , l+ b7 ]8 Z5 F+ _" B/ @0 B) l% _Interface Control8 T9 e6 n: c, |5 [ Document (ICD)& o7 Q' C" L5 {/ a% a (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must: W0 d: f, q0 X; {6 ^/ l; g exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer ( Y: j0 n4 @4 qsoftware products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an" B! r! D! O1 ~2 n Interface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD). $ s% Z4 x' E( Z9 ~, I# F(MDA Lexicon) @, E0 m$ o8 A& r1 W6 W3 C (2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control # m; r! Y( g$ v7 w$ m+ D, Zagreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements. 8 X5 J5 Y& a8 o5 V% GThe ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification.' w' A+ y5 @/ A' c; O Interface , G' ^9 C& S" MRequirements 8 n( y L1 l* ~Document (IRD)* M! @& m) o3 N* [# D A document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system0 o' k0 ~' Z& a" i7 L component. 2 j2 t# X+ [* O9 j$ YMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ! z$ p7 A) a- l143 ! Q: O) q0 S+ r/ C" o5 eInterference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to# l8 v4 d1 h& w: L |6 i form a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum: z9 @, v$ h- b# g3 j$ L of the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point. & A' H: h* A, a, PIntermediate ) S# o; \4 D5 h LRange Ballistic- u/ I% l/ \- |" [ Missile (IRBM) * l: e3 G* W. K7 fA ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles. / ^1 y0 e% Z6 BInternational3 ]6 O2 \7 w; C$ x: \0 z Agreement3 x5 e+ m0 u8 p, n4 @& i Generator (IAG)4 q6 @$ i6 n* I Software system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD1 L3 D3 x5 n/ [& d3 v international Agreements./ j$ r+ F: x( C" B( n International 4 N* s; i, e+ V1 cCooperative5 m( o! S9 I( k Logistics6 V- I- q( w0 t7 A Cooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination. D# m2 I% n& U# R; W, A# H of policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply " P, ~3 e- y1 ^and exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and 7 }( d" I7 c- A9 ^0 m( hmultilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions. ^8 c3 G7 z3 C) f4 b- _International7 A; k; n! n. I9 B Logistics) v. \4 M1 m% ]& j/ f( q The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics; d; u5 H/ ^4 l$ C arrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing5 g/ T" A( k* _3 I, b0 g logistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign / U- X$ h6 L, c9 |; C) q3 jgovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without& D3 L# c2 S: q2 ^ M0 f* Q reimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing 9 S# h0 |" F7 f) H$ l; |( b3 tof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or) z; h0 `# O" p* n: s procedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,( A7 T/ h4 c1 J3 l& v. `6 x international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. . d. I( N# w. @& F. D. a8 EIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States- T1 w& t' \/ l5 B f: x% N logistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or * O: I% G# c6 J+ ?7 qmore foreign governments, international organizations, or forces.& X9 F E& r" ]4 K International : ]+ x; }7 s4 M8 l6 hLogistic Support% b$ `: M5 L3 K The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or$ c9 R Y# N( J+ c& y0 B more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.5 E1 B, k! R& J& L+ L% }) o Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services8 C1 {- Z: R0 D7 _, y% o+ L1 } from other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to : m; C% l: o7 Yoperate effectively together.( b. S F% k" q4 F INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization. 5 b4 d: T& J) ^7 P i9 h, [INTLCT Integrated Electronics.6 O, @* _& k8 x' W/ s. T Intruder " b+ B# P' G; l8 DOperation' b+ |, [: K7 c8 @# g. I/ S An offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary1 J) y* L: L7 c3 E4 L/ P# a object of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases. / \) K; ?$ X1 d, R/ ?INU Inertial Navigation Unit. 9 }" T0 Y1 p0 i, @Inventory Control , P E3 D: I/ iPoint A3 G9 a U- v An organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the8 \/ e6 C8 a+ {, E a6 W primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a9 T2 B3 G9 i/ ~* y0 n particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management ; ~6 S9 I4 b) R$ C9 v8 j8 Y' [includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction,# ?5 T/ q8 W% e( j2 ?: G# i2 [ distribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction.3 y; T& d1 h" O3 E! g2 \$ L4 K Inverse Square 1 G+ r4 c# O& S4 C8 X" r- oLaw 3 Q l/ ~& @6 `/ RThe law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a , L0 X6 `4 v' \0 Z; S, Y% h! j2 ipoint source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the# K) V! I, _, ?! Z1 I source, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that # C5 J; D0 g; Wdistance.9 b8 [" {; A2 d/ P2 G! J MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 f' r2 e7 L" _* N$ |9 e# I 1449 G0 }8 P; ~ r5 B- t9 ^% R0 b& P Inverse Synthetic # f- l) s+ d6 j& n; QAperture Radar) e/ f# E8 q5 E, V (ISAR) 2 `! J+ m; ]0 d/ \+ m+ W) A+ AA type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from- t) I2 r, t: m8 U8 h" N5 p the motion of targets to provide high resolution.) w4 ^- P! e, P: }/ k8 j0 O4 } IO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic. 5 N9 w$ o- @% t: N9 H; VIOC (1) Initial Operational Capability.+ |$ o# O: c4 z% z @3 U (2) Intelligence Operations Center.( s* `& v( r/ U, q (3) Integrated Optics Chip.1 k: D3 M0 h% g/ _! m( a& D* P% Z$ `4 w IOM Inert Operational Missile. 3 w+ f, Z$ n7 p: u8 JIONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US).' P0 z4 _" @" {- L Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition + k1 G& ]3 Q- q; `of electrons to atoms or molecules.9 P. m+ m" [# q2 D Ionizing9 Y: F2 O( _8 B9 W# d" {' I) R Radiation% j7 h% q& e4 ?9 n, J Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or 7 x$ W8 K/ y9 ?) E! kparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of8 Q+ v2 G) e- x3 @- x# X producing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its 9 E/ ~3 _+ F0 J3 j( M- I( [; Dpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.)+ l4 t" N* |6 {0 b Ionosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers3 R$ v* s7 E6 S3 R) j4 r) B$ f" U altitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect ( l. T! q. r$ V0 h$ m! `3 Gelectromagnetic waves.1 h. n4 }2 q/ a1 X# \ IOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff. # `) [- H, ]+ k+ h. UIOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation.% r* m; `, t6 M IOU Input/Output Unit.2 R! z' ^" Y3 F \: X- q IP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol. 2 I& C: _* z; f# [8 J(5) Interconnect Protocol. 8 ~. W! ~7 z. ^, N3 \IPA Integrated Program Assessment. - h$ ^7 W& B9 Q- c3 h( |- rIPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace.- n9 G' J* i8 Z8 t t ]2 Y4 |8 q IPC Information Policy Committee. ( r C) B4 ~& Z. J6 ?. s: F U5 SIPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. 4 v. w) E ~: g5 vIPE Industrial Plant Equipment.8 U w0 F- [: p IPL Integrated Priority List. : P4 {* B( ]# `1 S! r9 v) mIPM Integration Program Manager. & d, r) e% l* @( Q* @& zIPMI Integration Program Management Initiative.# O" `" m7 f& R. m B, M- p IPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program.3 R2 \8 ^: i+ t, w. T' X: g' O) W IPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.: m' L; |% C. ~3 T# K0 G% H IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review).+ |( f0 x2 Q* I) {; b% S' ~2 u) | MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I/ v! O* P) Q1 k 1456 _* o: R) K+ \ IPRR Initial Production Readiness Review. : h+ I* V! ]( q1 y0 x# l* LIPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group.5 k1 x2 e. a* G9 d& J8 { IPS Integrated Program Summary. - \' F2 \! e7 F8 h% x% ?2 DIPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit.) x! r6 l' Z1 [9 X# r9 n7 ] IPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated- u; t$ F! }* [( p, J' i- T Planning Team. ; E. j9 ?2 h: o, A M) M; HIQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term).. [2 F y( ^- _0 j IR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4)5 w( I/ D0 `( |5 }5 j+ D( k Information Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope8 _" W! C8 k8 H6 c- Z2 F Radar. & e( R2 [0 L) q- f7 |5 N; I# p6 b M$ KIR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength! f) Q) Y4 t* y8 v x5 G5 K spectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio. 0 {* [. n+ d$ L, b6 @8 u1 gIR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD).! ?. Y- L' O, g+ n& q2 a% m IR/Vies Infrared Visual.1 \: j1 k, ]- y; o IRA Industrial Resource Analysis. & E W4 h+ `+ S' U9 O; m) f: v* I* lIRAD Independent Research and Development. 9 H' V& d/ B' w1 ]* _& nIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite.: U. n6 q& R# f( A( ? IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. v) M6 `* c1 z- g7 t( ?3 P$ b0 C. GIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System. 3 s' _1 b p7 ]* Q: E7 T. b; FIRCM Infrared Countermeasures.. t3 @4 |( y* N7 `- @2 T' M IRD Interface Requirements Document.6 C- u' L$ T" |9 u0 |! s( v IRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term).& Y4 j1 {5 [0 F7 h IRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array.8 A3 p/ n+ F0 Q9 ~ IRG Independent Review Group.. c, x7 ]# \+ N# { u IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center." c- h/ A B6 e F% b' J IRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group.) w- {! M: _' {1 ]% \ IRINT Infrared Intelligence.5 O! W9 k' n6 Q IRIS Infrared Instrumentation System. " } e- K4 `1 V- a' }3 {4 e- B: jIRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term). & d4 s7 d. j2 tIRM Information Resources Management.$ [, y6 p2 v* ~ IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I% H& S3 ~6 O" m% x" R 146/ q y: t- s- [: K IRMC Information Resource Management College.7 a$ X6 G/ Z" K0 y( {, ~1 f IRR Internal Requirements Review. 5 ~' [$ g3 ~ O5 KIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System. ( O2 L& |, |8 u1 S* iIRRS Information Resources Requirements Study.8 Z) `4 z, {1 ~; v1 j P* [ IRS Interface Requirements Review.2 X( j; f$ j0 g( v3 Q IRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE). 4 E6 G" Z ]& tIRST Infrared Search and Track. : m/ N6 S0 y# a2 k7 [0 [6 ]IRTF Internet Research Task Force. 5 ?( ]/ U0 p2 TIS Information System.# k1 _3 A' I/ p9 U6 h& x8 g IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.$ E- H1 Q2 Q; C* s% s (2) Innovative Science and Technology.* V- \, k" L9 s9 ? (3) Integrated Science & Technology.3 L% N. ^" i6 R" Z6 m1 w ISA Inter-service Agreement.0 t" J' h+ v& F" d IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.7 c3 w/ U ]+ _( Q5 ? f8 e (2) Innovative Science and Technology.: s2 r8 `6 A( K- k ISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar.: U% j& L' u4 } ISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan).6 j& N5 G$ i4 C; t ISC (1) Information Systems Command. 8 _2 {& a9 Z$ P+ o4 q(2) Irvine Sensors Corporation. 4 i' ]* h# J, t. u1 AISDN Integrated Services Digital Network. @4 L' {& V1 {% \0 C3 TISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment. l( _+ B, r7 v+ N! }* b+ uISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration.! @/ i& W ]8 j B3 J% H ISG Industry Support Group.2 |6 s: _4 |; w3 |# a, D* e$ ] ISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model. L( O) u7 B. y' x8 K/ EISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group.) {& N) H/ K5 ^) w @6 m& X2 V ISMO Information Security Management Office. 1 d# M3 K4 d$ T* m2 v+ D% I, cISO International Standards Organization./ I0 x, }4 v! P, K$ r2 h% L ISOO Information Security Oversight Office., }7 j9 `+ f* W. h8 G9 t Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with ) ? l- c1 F7 n6 Y" ] _$ j! Aequal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional).2 \. P3 r/ O7 r& o; \* n0 m8 Z MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I6 J$ }) t4 m" I' [( f$ d 147 ; l& Y H: Z, @Isotropic! J r9 L7 Q3 X( K Nuclear Weapon) S; k; B5 Y8 Q% R) c/ ^& A A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with# l1 s9 ?# |7 E! l approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to $ ^; ~1 ^ x5 ], a9 Z |distinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons. + O, w* V" m1 L' uISP Integrated Support Plan. ; k# D7 m$ }3 L. P6 t8 L% w& b& _8 cISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. # s8 S; f' m+ aISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System./ j( b. }( U$ u) F' j/ E& K r ISSA Information System Security Association. 0 G' n, x( `% O! T8 ~ISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency. 1 B; Q! x8 r I+ p; V- H; N2 |ISSC Information Systems Security Committee.: V- q7 ^7 F* m: T7 v' z& y ISSM Information System Security Manager.0 P: U( `5 t/ R ISSO Information System Security Officer. 0 r. x2 U0 r3 S9 t5 f6 kISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.7 y# R" e+ F8 a" @ N Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and 7 ^4 D; f* L+ w7 f7 M- r. b1 ~' }extends into July.# J: f0 _2 y* L6 @ Issue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.- w- q( f: ?9 H; a# u& D IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test.6 s& C l7 m2 v, v { ISTC Integrated System Test Capability.8 Y1 a+ p9 P5 B0 M4 Y( V" m" v ISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility. 0 ?5 E1 k! i" p, @0 h5 s: ?ISTF Installed System Test Facility. " G% {: H) g3 K0 y7 H- SISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle. ( U9 ?/ W4 c# `- G, R; EISWG Integration Support Working Group.: [0 x. _0 Q$ Z% m4 u+ B" n IT Information Technology.; s+ X+ B$ N' _2 f9 H5 j ITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center.% [' f6 z& c& V8 @9 {7 L; g: ~ ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations. * E2 Y! C& k! W% g- x' z; ~ITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed. 8 }- L# i/ v+ b8 S0 cITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations. ! c6 F4 ~6 T% q* I, ]: pITD Integration Technology Demonstration.) p; v# Z$ `8 c! r: }; b6 x' ^ ITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan.2 L, v6 o* d$ |& k (2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan.1 d& ?$ u1 z# B ? Item Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such# X8 g& a+ E8 l! S5 b0 ~' I organization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items9 A& p$ P% D, O, G of materiel.) I3 Y1 X ]0 g' n MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I. N8 {0 k( i6 C! D* z% o 148 2 m4 m3 Y" V/ p. @ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System.: ^) j; Q0 ]8 b8 U( M6 g& P H ITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch ( r, f# [- u7 Q" M3 E, k/ h2 _% K+ aITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council.( _3 [0 V5 Z+ D- F9 w8 c7 t& A/ O ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team. * |: j, h' k: \ITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). 0 j" U0 W4 b* o' b& lITP Integrated Test Plan. 7 y8 F3 b' v- \# AITPB Information Technology Policy Board.8 Q2 [1 Y+ ]' o1 k ITR Information Technology Resources.- [) W* |( F# ]# Q8 M! E# ? ITS Information Technology Service. ) c( Q! C6 J- U2 U% EITSD Information Technology Services Directorate./ T, w- b0 B5 r1 s9 t! g/ L6 A ITT ITT Corporation.9 G& @* G0 I* c; y7 F ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle& V2 W c3 k0 V: X1 y$ I( O ITW Integrated Tactical Warning.: ]' n' {' @5 R! w1 {1 G ITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment.3 k" [0 O2 q% Z4 t) p& ^1 l IUI Integrated User Interface.0 H0 E" L6 x5 [8 ~* p IV Interceptor Vehicle. * _, H/ E3 Z' {& o4 S1 N' T$ t5 TIV&V Independent Verification and Validation. ( v/ N1 h Y9 d# MIVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System. ( g8 `$ w6 n+ m3 m0 c" t, rIVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).) Q7 G2 [1 H8 C3 v9 m IW Information Warfare. + ^; E# [ K" O: Z- hIWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration. ! o& |* X: _+ n- {4 F' V, VIWEB Information Warfare Executive Board. 8 `1 R6 k7 c9 R! j4 n" g% {- H8 ` jIWG Interagency Working Group. % }( _. {5 K) @* U& G* z, n/ EIWS Indications and Warning System.% Z( G9 s' H" x IWSM Integrated weapons system management.2 t [0 B- B- G0 R IXS Information Exchange System. 4 \+ H/ f9 U, z4 k# c& o) ]6 K WMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J+ L1 P& w& X6 L" O3 r; O. ]. ^ 149 2 E7 y- y" @. J0 v7 _- L! {J&A Justification and Approval.3 A. ?2 _& j! e z6 j J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses.4 j$ B4 d" S- Z' r JAAT Joint Air Attack Team.- n, j% s" D, [0 X: y$ r. r JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. . p b- f# Y, Y7 OJAE Joint Acquisition Executive. # V2 ]- U6 x6 E4 K; ~ h, MJAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term). 4 |+ W+ ^* j4 Q- {% ]% _0 q1 ?JAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).' s- o: c6 b8 ?) X7 g, [7 a2 o4 L Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the # I; f/ Y. g6 e4 u& k6 S# zsame frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals 2 G/ h8 `5 N3 `# q' s7 [( w) F$ Preflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming 1 q2 @5 x1 J: A2 Y8 H, P+ d/ rgenerally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude, ) i6 C9 w9 g# L$ m1 q+ Mand with increasing radar power. $ E" v- K' O4 e- OJAO Joint Area of Operations.+ r3 l) {( H& [2 {: O JAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term).1 @2 O |: ]( c* S( n0 J2 w JASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term). . ]2 m% B+ ]& n& O. Q! g. @JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program). 3 t2 d5 M! D f+ }0 f$ zJBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term). : L; v7 D' l$ _# j# u4 [5 D- X- aJCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US).2 ^+ \- Y9 t" e2 x+ h JCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions. ) B6 k8 h4 U- f, Y1 Z' n! sJCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US. / K3 \ J+ X. H$ s. h( O* \7 ]$ NJCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum.# Q2 F& ~, F) f2 w# @5 A JCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network. - ~ @) A. w! I3 N( bJDA Japan Defense Agency." a, U O5 C2 P* D; X JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon).6 O2 c$ B6 \: k" U. W" x( Q" P* ?1 \ JDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community.) a6 t3 v4 Q7 { JDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System. / [: d5 v, V2 z% O5 Z8 s" \JDN Joint Data Net.2 ]/ ^; S3 B5 D' ~+ p& J JEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA).3 @4 Z2 H+ B( y- a# r JEC Joint Economic Committee (US). 8 n k5 p H& P& D$ j6 J8 l6 U# JJEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office. 0 `9 Y9 ], x$ z* z: TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 8 U, N% B k5 h% e' ~+ l' w$ t150: k9 G$ m; m0 ~) {* o' e JEM Joint Exercise Manual. 4 @& W" D! s8 [JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis. - h& ~, j$ ]1 P! dJEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center." T d% m( e5 k7 R" c, r JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. " }9 ~9 k' N5 ^7 fJFCC Joint Forces Command Center.7 L) ^8 W" H) f JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor. 2 `3 l9 u* z" L v0 N4 NJFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term).( [2 x { z7 h4 l JFLC Joint Force Land Component.+ C8 b4 F) S' e9 | JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component." @% H4 e4 B+ I+ J+ A( u- M JFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA. 6 @2 f5 A5 }1 H5 W9 dJFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component.5 t7 c- i2 b* @( S, u JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention. 1 F; _+ a$ j+ T0 SJHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 5 A- h; d7 t3 }6 c% WJHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD.. W0 h) c7 M0 O( R/ J0 w( n JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.! ^9 z: I: N x7 j1 g3 K7 ^' Z# u JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term).% l4 {* _$ J0 @0 I% Y4 @. C& X JIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization.6 k8 X* k3 y4 H/ n. i* `& U$ G JINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems./ s" O% Q( K$ g: A- t5 H5 n3 y# }/ F JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures.: @7 b8 e: B S( i, _0 D JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms. 1 }) k3 U+ ~3 f1 GJIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). : c1 `3 T5 f- {5 fJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center.# P* v; M' E1 ~' ~6 n0 k8 v4 ? JLC Joint Logistics Commanders.% {! O2 g4 E) }, W JLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore.3 m/ p6 M) H% d9 a( V- n: W1 ~ JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation. 7 Z n+ p/ L+ J& U) R( t* yJMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. ) P0 r1 M8 n; M# f/ d+ ?6 wJMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. 9 i" P: H1 s1 d( Q- j. r' t4 ?JMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System." ]* j5 T# O: n1 m5 `7 m MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J . N+ P, ?0 ?( P$ J- L/ y1510 T1 e6 X5 M3 i5 U JMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information x2 F! b- H8 P7 J3 [: G: T, k+ ?8 f* D Technology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded& A& f% x7 e l4 Q3 {; Q by MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major6 a* y+ i& O# p& k6 V/ ~ component of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN), & X8 G9 w# r- E1 U) I; W" T: J0 ^operated by the JNTF.6 ^$ R$ p: C; T JMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual. L6 \/ t: O8 {( W; N: ^/ nJMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement. ( K- ^2 i4 X6 x/ pJMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement.! ] {- q" J5 t( i JMO Joint Maritime Operations.1 _2 w! W) B: L3 M JMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. 9 E8 J5 R ^# j/ t1 g: xJMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group. 5 v" k- [' `& o. H! A$ M(2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group.2 X4 M" D3 I+ o7 U& B6 W% y JNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service.# G9 z, ?4 L" v3 e; C2 q+ w# r$ _ JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System.! Y' n; z5 N2 z v0 {' I JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. 8 g3 L" j! s ^8 H7 n$ C' N, UJNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. 5 T+ N; C# p) x/ t' P/ ]JNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor. * g2 {3 O8 L. {" N7 v1 EJNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access. - }: D1 o. a. r+ m% D& O$ z; mJOB Joint Operations Board. ; O/ {% t! m/ i! D, L/ G8 _JOC Joint Oversight Council.& X" m+ j# S& F4 [; }2 Z JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System. X( @! i) U& R1 a5 e F Joint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one! a5 m0 E+ J6 d! t Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the1 z' i2 [# N. W; f. U; l participating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy).% ~7 }& N2 j8 W/ c v Joint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more ' G# A8 @' W2 @; x0 RServices in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be 6 t& ^, ?4 h% j# k( X+ k2 C& `) ^promulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the 2 Y" q3 g* G. |" ]3 z2 xcombatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint * h( y; q) ^( c/ hChiefs of Staff.! q8 u! E2 T( B) w% H9 ` Joint Doctrine. W9 S% E( B$ P Working Party( X2 l' P! s) u" ~ e, e( Z A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands( v6 o9 d7 O# c6 Z. J with the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, ) C7 t0 b* v/ w. h) Itechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination,, Y6 E! d H; W project scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation.+ Y, n0 v6 p+ j3 f$ Q: U# [ T The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, 5 k/ m1 c6 n* k( a& p) s) [2 pOperations Plans and Interoperability. 7 ] A" D3 @/ I% F o8 L CJoint Electronic 8 `4 Z- D) c& h* N# I. x H4 `Warfare Center: J& i2 Y& }* u& D. k (JEWC) 2 U8 o: Z' T3 d. R0 R. [Electronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for ( z9 |6 {3 P" l/ kinvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground 3 P+ H( e3 B5 t2 V, }( y/ @9 lsystems. $ C# ?# ?# u( T7 OMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 5 m" Z0 y, X! w1528 l/ T- Y$ C: i3 J4 m0 f, W Joint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or( Y3 L: i+ U6 V: H6 m& L, J: p0 ? attached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or ( E. [4 f1 M+ I- N7 w, `more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to; K$ p! n/ Y/ X# J/ w0 W* R exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander. : D: E7 b+ |% f0 f1 ZJoint Force Air : v# {0 y, n$ d% g- aComponent 4 l. x4 t9 m: ?Commander + b! i# d$ W1 C$ p% C4 p(JFACC) 7 o( s# m/ s: ~- |The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or) h8 a; P( S) t9 M2 I& y joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making( b3 o% Y3 q( ? recommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and - U% t! W3 T. s3 S3 ]9 kcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may / {: A3 d$ p& k- A' W* V* z( Kbe assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority3 a# p" t* F( f, s9 p% r necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing, j" S% b- N- ]( q5 X# x commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the + i, t& m. U Xpreponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities. * x9 A: w) l9 \Joint Force1 n7 M: ?0 ~, p3 P, `4 I Commander0 F* |' I$ @0 |) b$ V4 L7 Q- Y& | (JFC) " k; j/ @) v- VA general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant & ~) E6 h, G- K! l/ K. Rcommand (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also: B0 h# v" G0 R4 L. i" o h0 U called JFC.& E5 P9 y, O$ W5 s Joint Force Land( T1 h' M5 Z5 w Component/ X; `4 w1 P1 u% k# d: j- Z Commander4 q. ~# r* x$ |2 V2 p (JFLCC) 0 b% w) {& s: D9 c; N8 `& _The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or! B4 k2 L) J& |1 C/ u9 {8 H* c( R joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making - u: |3 Y! `4 u+ grecommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and: ^& F% Q3 b4 R8 V. N coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may! X5 ^2 |- N/ {# x; A( v+ p5 A be assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority 9 G) D Y o5 b. w3 {* N. }6 pnecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing. V7 l# t7 e4 v commander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the; B( T# ~3 m3 r4 |& ?4 S$ o/ c preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control% _& \. R, a5 e5 d: X, w6 J capabilities. & k, l* P6 E# C# Z" v/ DJoint Force 5 q# y, A1 A- b# G3 KSpecial / X. b. \* o1 L* yOperations2 z" f& q% W8 A, U T M. M Component ; J$ o2 g+ J/ Q& xCommander+ v' e; e6 [9 X* d (JFSOCC) [# i- d; f& t8 qThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or " }/ |! b0 _3 G" l* i0 ujoint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making * l3 Y: o. q9 Hrecommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and0 G9 z: p/ V/ |5 s9 ^ assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such* L6 e9 g _: g& ?0 } operational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority8 r6 o2 Y% P2 w2 }: q! }6 w. V necessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing* J8 d3 d# {- Z$ a commander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the 3 T P4 m- L0 o9 r% Zpreponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and R9 i& V% T: L, b$ r* G. u1 K control capabilities. ! C) o) Q# y$ A% k0 h6 u- qJoint National 1 O ?+ y% Z. d' YTest Facility 3 ]9 t- {, ^; u9 _- I' Y) `(JNTF) V- S N4 F9 l' l3 G9 r A large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado1 r8 N7 |5 {9 ?, X% l which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the) ^% b/ o* S) q `0 r% s1 F NTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF) 2 s& f3 z) L4 \* w% zJoint Operational- K! I: L$ e2 p/ l @ Planning and 8 W: ]7 f' \/ w% u8 p& o' x4 fExecution. q! `9 U+ M4 k+ f5 g& K System (JOPES) ) @& g. c# `# O3 j# yA continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration & ^$ y$ N1 c1 [$ x) A; tand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation4 M. s1 [$ h* J# o8 R Planning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for- R! ^/ _% W, d- C conventional command and control by national and theater level commanders . `3 b( l, T/ N |1 aand their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct4 d2 j3 A+ s" X* \" B, O: X( e' {+ s of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning & G7 K- }$ b+ E. F" o- E# q5 [policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and& _& X9 b8 b; ?: G: P automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and 2 _9 `3 L* Y# ^7 h) ?execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities 5 n J2 L, }$ z4 h X: B/ }: \associated with joint operations.3 G: t- L X& u S MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J ; w3 W! m0 y6 D! \5 r* z153. I( Y$ q) m# @7 K8 y Joint Operating/ k0 U. K' r7 B; D+ { Procedures & l" S# x1 C# a(JOPs) + w& F8 k: j7 `These documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions ' @! @2 E1 p$ _1 W# }* J5 O2 Qnecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs$ i9 q5 Y& `$ L may include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, - S, n" X6 S6 f. [0 o8 R- M& QVulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting,% q/ l# ]2 _+ P# Z Financial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement ( K' X. ^/ E0 S; |1 hand Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program- W/ i; d" h, U6 i Manger and the participating Services.. M9 B& J$ k, A | Joint Operations # B) Z. D8 U. z9 F. f0 eArea( W, r# I0 G" m N V9 k N1 _ That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military ) ~2 G6 ~9 v' H% m1 X# y. D! ^. V5 l+ Qoperations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to8 z) a9 H& r/ X9 L3 }/ B7 W such military operations. Also called JOA. ' J( b2 Q3 g" ~1 R5 cJoint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program - C i! g* |3 _6 N- v4 Fthat involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component 8 r# b& Q" ^7 Mduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle.3 V+ f/ Z) h7 N/ H% G( D' c. U, _: b Joint ( w0 I. B/ L, }# xRequirements$ p+ i$ E! s9 w8 E4 a Oversight 6 R: J1 j; ?7 _- j BCouncil (JROC)+ ~! f6 N) @$ ^" f x9 k/ v A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts $ D: g; p/ X4 A2 h# yrequirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops 1 h8 ~1 _8 Y( V3 h6 ^+ D, Orecommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates 8 e1 o- U! A6 F$ K9 r- u3 T6 Kperformance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition 9 K$ V6 l/ E# E2 P+ ZBoard. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air " R ~' c# ?3 s. TForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps.% i. g5 f4 Y: L( [* p7 o Joint SPACECOM $ A0 e. |+ a# r) ^, }; KIntelligence X' ^9 p( j- P1 u Center (JSIC)- w; r% r3 k* ^+ R8 A A USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational 7 l2 }* {! J/ Wintelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for# w, k+ k, A% i, J. o0 T- g' K1 Q the DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production % ?3 o6 b- q. N9 z- r; `includes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and / A# \- u0 `, ]$ a7 pSatellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB.4 E+ F0 F/ P, Y" F$ ~7 H, { [ Joint Strategic7 ^7 J3 E' y: h+ p Defense Planning + }/ K4 U n7 \Staff (JOSDEPS)# i! v! L1 s0 r/ r A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for9 S: B- E* ^+ D# n8 C integrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive! n; R2 u( T! S: R. Z and strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint3 Y2 ?* f7 G2 O$ R2 X Strategic Defense Planning Staff. , ?* K3 v: Z% ]: \+ g" f, Z* k/ fJoint Strategic7 Z) |9 U5 a* j( g# \7 I' p8 U8 _4 H1 T Target Planning / G z/ j$ O. MStaff (JSTPS) 4 I Z# g: W" L1 J6 P" x& H8 w7 tA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing,, u& y5 a. S6 F, b0 Y coordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP)., ]4 ]: ]# y- O0 f# p+ M, m3 { Also responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The, D! M8 R0 ^" y! m2 U$ A* i Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target! ]4 x! z y" t9 E: F' D h Planning Staff.5 M2 D* E, M8 G: Z Joint. N1 S/ n% D" \4 ~; q4 [( U Suppression of+ o0 [; Q3 _1 L* f0 C. ` Enemy Air * A% ?6 X! q' U' }: p4 ?% ~Defense" e$ a8 L; N! T+ ] A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities' V1 |& E$ U4 ?2 M. X8 a provided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called ; W. }; G2 b4 {J-SNEAD. @* j. K- Y( |+ b6 {/ T Joint Tactical5 L2 S. j& Y' i4 G' i5 z Information ( ~3 s2 G" U4 {; ~' o2 k) q8 {Distribution : N# Q& _0 H8 w \$ ~System (JTIDS)# W3 Z, R, s* c, Y% f7 h9 Q A joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the 7 \) D2 Z6 X7 b0 d! ^interchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels, ; Z* q ], V8 @ p& k6 ]3 F9 Gand mobile or fixed-base land stations. 3 {' Y3 N7 Q1 U: b& F: bJoint Tactics," c' }2 H( N% ]; Q6 q; | Techniques, and6 K4 l9 ? p* q6 D2 _9 n/ H1 A5 m Procedures% J4 J2 S7 e; W9 E8 T6 h* {8 t (JTTP) ; T- B3 G! v4 `) f( zThe actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how ) k# e" m4 H; U kforces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,' h$ T4 t9 e& v; `0 J. C/ |( B% F- | promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and6 s3 w* v$ E3 E Joint Staff. Also called JTTP.$ y! U% l/ n5 M- D2 P# b3 U8 O3 i3 q' Q MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J : |" b4 B& J% [$ E154 6 N- p6 H! J+ `. ~( y) s7 S: bJoint Test and T# i* {' B+ h I Evaluation6 H8 b' B$ T1 {, |7 A; y+ z q6 }$ B T&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be3 x* E% g2 A1 k( q. ? acquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have$ \# @8 i: J3 E- r$ Q' A) e interfaces with equipment of another component. $ w5 C# E8 ? m4 iJoint Test and 6 C q. x' I$ x$ j$ E, f# _/ D' XEvaluation ( M3 q) |2 A1 k( H; g1 _, MProgram5 [" D) |4 E0 X3 m( p/ q An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on$ c. p1 A2 t* A: _ system performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements,2 q9 u: V1 I7 Z7 D, ?/ v7 h systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for. y4 J: f" ?. h% a. a" _ force structure planning, doctrine, or procedures.( j/ T8 I1 o& ~ JON Job Order Number. " `2 x4 W" _2 U! o+ O) XJOP Joint Operating Procedures. ( Q: h6 s3 J2 m- T0 ^JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System.4 h& u! ~2 b9 I+ S0 f/ u& w4 A) g JOPS Joint Operations Planning System.5 B. Z8 z) X6 Z7 ^2 y JOR Joint Operational Requirements.6 M! Q0 F/ W/ Q JORD Joint Operational Requirements Document.5 G7 z& |' L$ q* f JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. 8 ^$ `" s6 p! X2 Z* }( H! jJOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term).7 {6 h8 g' a; P$ `) q4 ?" N. q JOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term).7 O# y' }: I$ w5 h3 N" R2 { JP Joint Publication., d% l9 p, b9 y/ K& Q JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.5 h) {7 d1 f1 J3 x JPM Joint Program Manager. ! B9 h5 j+ f, B, @, B0 _JPN Joint Planning Net.' E& n) t& ^: A" L) ` JPO Joint Program Office.8 R/ u$ D" c6 ]; @- z JPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. . O( |3 c5 g, E* b. [JPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact* ~; d. u+ e q$ L2 J" U JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle. ! f( Y4 e; r4 k' s+ [JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net.0 Z0 b s7 c+ p( [4 E8 E$ T JPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration.- h* y7 v+ o0 A: n$ J0 _# N0 E) d JPT Joint Planning Tool." [2 t: W! K* K/ ? P JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term). - W/ [& V+ W1 L2 tJRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term)." }% [* Y; Q* U1 m JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).2 R% o ] ~/ Q4 j% H JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J % e1 A6 M% \7 J _155( {' w7 T { g JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council.5 ]* H7 n. D5 }3 m% A JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group.0 s. |3 b! ]) q& t0 T+ a JRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications. 1 e6 Z5 Y4 A' }% C& m2 ~- zJRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. ( x( h7 I8 B0 | x+ a! lJS Joint Staff. 1 Y7 N& `, T% e8 ~* r- X5 W T0 mJS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. d( o4 O. X, `- rJSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term).; ~) i) f" X2 P, X2 C JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. ) }$ O, X9 O% C l* r' R% WJSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term)." q& n' H% I5 K& ~ JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term).* C4 \) a4 b9 h L (2) Joint Service Evaluation Team.: S8 P' d4 o! {6 U JSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). . C% R* r( S; ~ ]JSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center. f& J/ Z( S+ w JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term).& w0 F1 _* U6 r( y# H JSMB Joint Space Management Board.9 b( R! O* }" R a) S JSOC Joint Special Operations Command. 3 z& \+ q5 k! T: pJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. ; [. \* W- R- H" r) X; }! QJSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document.; ~ f$ q9 Y) s( l JSPS Joint Strategic Planning System.1 _) B/ s' c& }2 k JSS Joint Surveillance System. $ q* G! \2 [/ v9 O) ~1 ]JSST Joint Space Support Team. 6 \" ` j* z& kJSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System.1 x1 a8 C. I; v( H( A' X JSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff.9 A- o. V- Y L/ U: x, |& C: g JT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting9 f! @1 x" Z' r, a+ V JT&E Joint Test and Evaluation.% S& O" A4 Z0 e JTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term).+ v! Q9 u& Z# T4 E- V7 h" E JTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station.* @% _+ X: ~2 f1 B% J6 _1 B JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. 6 x$ e* F, [* i1 P. @# IJTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center. * G8 }4 m7 Y, P: Q. s8 QMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J \4 O0 R1 E" X! D2 ?( z 156 ! h" a& `: Y2 m1 \* uJTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). 8 \( h1 n" \, u; CJTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. ' f# ]$ [2 H/ E* Y EJTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term). % U8 y3 z6 @' J) R; F5 t5 LJTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).$ s! B: u& i( I; q JTF Joint Task Force. - E* N( ?( z/ J/ b8 p4 W: b O# W! ?JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise. 9 p: N; y; K9 x8 IJTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System.: @: |: h9 a; K: e$ ?7 E JTL Joint Target List.' E9 \9 f% W& ^9 t( V% X JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense.4 T4 x+ Y9 F3 J& k& A( C8 d. Y JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan. % ^$ \1 L! J" [, q+ L% b* s2 |$ HJTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys]./ l, x: h5 G( a( ]' J7 L JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. # ~3 P. J8 O" I5 s; u0 t" LJTR Joint Travel Regulations.: w/ C. k6 B2 |5 U) n0 d JTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board. * _2 l( D5 L/ {+ o+ S: f$ m: WJTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term). % Z3 e' ?3 v5 IJTT Joint Tactical Terminal. 1 V8 F0 R& `$ K! W2 TJTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures.( E. h4 D, r: K# b JVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft. 4 e- o" O3 j& n3 a5 n' oJWAN Joint Wide Area Net.0 ]1 h2 E8 ]$ d0 ^ JWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model).# g G6 K. w/ ~# ?9 k; V JWC Joint Warfare Center. : R. M+ I, h+ x6 D, rJWG Joint Working Group.* q9 K) _. C, R, D! Z6 N9 |8 c JWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network.1 c& i: s( L7 |- f5 w JWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration ' Z) k" b- P8 S1 \0 \6 qJWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan.0 t( q& U* S2 ~6 E0 {9 M8 j1 @3 t0 M q MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K : R: G1 R' Q: ^4 ^# z157( g z6 p$ e- O9 u K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo. - B( s; A$ |: o* B$ p2 h' E8 l GK Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another.- J. W) V. t0 Z9 R Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of . ]& _5 k* [: V: ?+ w4 Otwo observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both 8 b/ }7 _& x' q o+ ]0 r, E0 S+ kobjects. 3 ^( o7 k6 u* x* ~: R0 v5 G; rKA Kill Assessment./ F8 Y$ r$ T" A, G! q# [" i+ D KAPP Key Asset Protection Program.6 m, x( l0 [: }5 l2 w3 D- L+ R KB Kilobyte." P3 V0 Y; V; E) i I0 Y6 @ Kbps Kilobyte per second. ! s* \6 I1 U$ ^( f, [1 [5 bKBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). 1 ~) S$ k T, H) `8 pKBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion. 9 M, [+ i0 T/ e* b: b; \# u6 ?- kKDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL. # q7 G$ z, q3 B- V& Y0 R+ tKDS Kwajalein Discrimination System.+ z( f8 _5 t4 d4 x" f KE See Kinetic Energy.% t5 G! y7 U6 n4 v KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon.$ t' n& m/ X( e- V2 r2 u; W KED Kill Enhancement Device.( m# {- k7 w, S# @+ _% W, F+ G. _0 e Keep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the; s' k: z) Z3 X" H/ b1 } asset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to . D7 |* V/ X+ h5 w7 Gdefend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones 7 A# ~$ {% C# d$ Q8 j# V) Yunder the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined.1 z3 S( m& R0 e" ~1 m( C! S# b8 j, v" L; T KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept. . Z9 o' t+ L3 ~+ p2 c3 ?% C" ~KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool.3 w; C# T X# [: h KEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. % X; Q5 F+ h% N2 Z% CKEW Kinetic Energy Weapon. 4 g+ C, @ _2 mKEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion).4 \- ?5 y% I& Q( v& Z KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion).' P$ P7 p3 k" B" R! F& w KEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground. ) p# o, f3 R1 M6 AKEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. ]4 T, f; N' |3 ], M: PKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a 8 Y8 q# p I' m; A6 a0 H: |- a( ksequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption. * i& Z3 h# p* v0 Q7 r9 { vKg Kilogram. : T7 d m6 K& f$ \KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL.2 y' J; f' O% k# q0 f; N* ] MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K0 O5 Y- S" J) P# B& { 158 6 c' F! b* ]) h3 W+ } q1 S' vKHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. . |: c; M$ ?; V8 |2 c, l% T! G! ?KIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution. 3 j' Q4 H- z5 ^9 m" DKill Assessment " o" \- [; v8 a. D(KA)! G2 L0 ~! e' ^# K) v0 M An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV1 G) M5 t& O5 l intercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and' D( |0 q$ E2 G& R re-engagements. (USSPACECOM)# b+ F. J1 c5 a' B Kill Enhancement( H# H1 i6 E. n4 m3 P, N Device / i7 y# z# Q. }6 oA device that improves an interceptor’s lethality. 4 j& w1 ]. \1 C, R8 mKinematic , s! w: F( m8 M, p# Q0 nBattlespace . g2 E& h# ] LThe planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor/ }4 p6 b1 H% t+ O! u8 @+ a: V timeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and9 D7 k( T, A! ?- ?1 P& @0 b& ~ \ operational constraints. 3 ?7 ^& b4 W- p: I. BKinetic Energy" f9 a4 _4 [/ O$ \# K9 D (KE) . Y/ q; d2 P/ }5 ?The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion. ) V9 p6 D' L; w" F. K( f1 }2 D& \Kinetic Energy+ A0 J3 F+ l+ P, p* Y Weapon (KEW) * P6 w- J, ~3 {. p2 g4 mA weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object." U v" [, Z3 | l+ s, z! \ Examples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. / ?+ L6 m; U1 r8 NKinetic Kill8 I$ W4 L V. B: R Vehicle (KKV) 4 A: o- O! W8 A+ q% V0 ?A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy4 c3 g- C3 x( p( \, P0 X+ n& D$ u a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board . @3 [8 [# @+ b* s! M. Nrockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell % y- Z e& f( T. W. i- tlaunched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2025-4-26 15:10 , Processed in 0.062400 second(s), 9 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部