航空缩略语词典

帅哥

STINFO Center Science and Technical Information data centers archiving and providing user , h6 X9 J1 U/ D( K4 _7 _access and support to a variety of missile defense test and evaluation data. ) \/ _ o5 o' C, A* I( aSTM Significant Technical Milestone. STO (1) Special Technical Operations (JFACC term). " m% @; u) R1 B" h9 g(2) Science and Technology Objective. STOAL Short Takeoff/Arrested Landing. STOM System Test Object Model. 7 C: T2 J, ^( l+ {5 {. m0 Y% BStorage, Handling, and Transportation 0 f5 z! S) w9 i4 jEnvironments These environment categories cover the applicable free field or ambient - x9 F2 X* V/ A9 genvironments, which the system assets must be capable of withstanding during storage, handling and transportation. They include the full array of applicable 1 C, `2 @% @: r( x' Y& [atmospheric and ground environments to which BMD assets will be exposed during these non-operational aspects of system deployment such as pressure, 7 b$ m2 J& `0 B e7 Hshock and vibration environments, among others. ; _! i9 r6 W( W: v. b5 w0 J' u/ T. _- bStorm Name of a theater ballistic missile test target system, part of the Baseline Target Set. 7 v" N0 N. v& z, O' v3 b5 oStorm Shadow Conventionally Armed Stand Off Missile weapon based on Matra of France’s % ~* Z' g0 r) W1 \+ y* w% r& H; QApache missile. 4 @7 z2 ^9 c6 t3 zSTOW Synthetic Theater of War (US Army term). STP (1) System Test Plan (2) Sensor Task Plan. ; c+ a9 _& a/ ?! @- t1 jSTRAP HATMD System Training Plan. STRATCOM Strategic Command. Strategic Defense 3 Z" S, L& z5 hAll active and passive measures to detect, identify, assess, degrade and defeat 9 G3 g7 T! g# r `2 f) }% r! Xballistic missile, air, and space threats to North America, including measures to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of such attacks. : Q6 G7 X% d2 { h. P) OStrategic / l8 \6 S& }; {6 r# lDefense Emergency Declarations that attack is imminent or taking place. , r" z( E" R& ~4 e) R- {2 hStrategic . z9 w+ s7 `6 `: B9 m4 B2 X. {Defense System ( ]# w8 y# ]# U. q. f3 [9 Y7 |(SDS) A generic descriptor, which refers to all architectural elements of the evolving : ]3 Y. o. d+ O& h1 `ballistic missile defense system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S : m' J) |* x2 ]: O: N) i280 ! q" X# C( g" V& AStrategic Level of War 3 u. C# @' B S" ]The level of war at which a nation or group of nations determines national or 4 i% P3 |/ J7 y& _# }4 ~ \1 }7 Galliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to * D- @) l$ C* ?/ naccomplish those objectives. Strategic 0 h. S4 R) Y7 n6 I7 F6 m7 r; KOffensive Forces (SOF) * t( B3 `% F/ i0 n) \6 ~Those forces under the command of the Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Command, the Commander in Chief, Pacific Command, and other forces assigned to execute the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). These forces include but are not limited to B-52s, B-1s, FB-111s, Minuteman IIs and IIIs, Peacekeepers, Poseidons, and Tridents. Strategic Reserve % y" y, X# A4 E2 M7 w- C0 VThat quantity of material that is placed in a particular geographic location due to " F! Q9 u/ P" T f, b8 pstrategic considerations or in anticipation of major interruptions in the supply distribution system. It is over and above the stockage objective. Strategic Warning ; N2 ]0 G) o) q: dA warning prior to the initiation of a threatening act. 9 T1 {' x& K; F. iStrategic ' P6 n; j5 Q4 dWarning Lead Time That time between the receipt of strategic warning and the beginning of - d5 v/ b% C3 X& k8 Ohostilities. This time may include two action periods: strategic warning predecision time and strategic warning post-decision time. 2 r) } a4 Y0 ?Strategic Warning Post- Decision Time 3 x' P6 \* j8 E; V' cThat time which begins after the decision, made at the highest levels of government(s) in response to strategic warning, is ordered executed and ends with the start of hostilities or termination of the threat. It is that part of strategic warning lead-time available for executing pre-hostility actions to strengthen the national strategic posture; however, some preparatory actions may be initiated in + Z C, K+ ] \; rthe pre-decision period. Strategic ; M! @ m; _$ T- sWarning Pre- / \3 e9 q6 j1 k P, `Decision Time That time which begins upon receipt of strategic warning and ends when a decision is ordered executed. It is that part of strategic warning lead time 3 y$ Q+ B) t2 |2 I( `# Q8 aavailable to the highest levels of government(s) to determine the strategic course : L6 J9 {; u" P m. t% D1 @of action to be executed. : j8 G! J8 ^* [2 ^. P |( W+ |STREAD Standard TRE Display. % s- T' m8 A0 YSTRICOM Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (USA term). Structured 6 X0 ~( ?( C; G3 ~Attack : L; [% q& t* ? n4 \# ^: `( F2 LAn attack in which the arrival of warheads on their diverse targets is precisely 4 f& i/ B% b& X& g! O) vtimed for maximum strategic impact. 5 K" ~% \! r* JStructured Design 7 f; ~8 p1 S \3 N$ ~0 CA disciplined approach to software design that adheres to a specified set of rules based on principles such as top-down design, stepwise refinement, and data $ _: B' G% ^% M# \# Q$ d& @+ Tflow analysis.

帅哥

Structured Program , \4 L- Y [" o0 TA program constructed of a basic set of control structures, each one having one entry point and one exit. The set of control structures typically includes: sequence of two or more instructions, conditional selection of one of two or more 1 h# Z0 b# V$ Y Pinstructions, conditional selection of one of two or more instructions or 0 ?3 h; z+ t" L+ H5 ]sequences of instructions, and repetition of an instruction or a sequence of ! C& r9 d0 ?; o" jinstructions. STRV Space Technology Research Vehicle. & D- s1 `9 o: r* I' SSTS See Space Transportation System. STSC Software Technology Support Center. * `* P3 e0 g& I. g+ jMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 281 STT (1) Small Tactical Terminal (USAF term). 9 \! y7 e5 e# e2 _(2) Stockpile-to-Target (US Army term). / P& d/ ~& Z& e/ _* l6 m( `STTR Small Business Technology Transfer. STU Secure Telephone Unit. * g& m$ [7 h% o0 uSTW Strike Warfare. STWC Strike Warfare Commander. STWG Simulation Tools Working Group. - o% Y z3 p6 v b# `Subassembly Two or more parts joined together to form a unit, capable of disassembly, which is only a part of a complete machine, structure, or other article. Subcontractor A contractor who enters into a contract with a prime contractor. Subject Security Level A subject's security level is equal to the security level of the objects to which it has both read and write access. A subject's security level must always be dominated by the clearance of the user and with the associated subject. ! U- g7 I* ]9 U$ J7 BSubmarine- Launched , x8 u, y4 q! L' M5 g4 ]" m: Z* ?Ballistic Missile 2 T/ i8 X0 q1 T1 C5 j(SLBM) A ballistic missile launched from a submarine, with a range of 3,000 to 6,000 miles. : w* e7 ~4 k6 M6 H9 nSUBROC Submarine Rocket. / P k7 t" x4 D, D7 GSubsystem A functional grouping of components that combine to perform a major function within an element, such as attitude control and propulsion. " Z- z& C" X- W _0 k+ nSubtractive Defense 9 k: Q# U! p" Q0 ?* [4 e8 F, y0 rFirst come first engaged as long as weapons last. 8 f: {3 j }: o, ]2 C7 K( ySUCCESS Synthesized UHF Computer Controlled Equipment Subsystem. 9 Q% V1 K' }4 d9 [$ ]. n, LSuccession of Command 2 L7 {" \ z9 g1 TThe planned or actual sequence in which subordinate commanders, in turn, become de facto commanders of a senior organization. Devolution of command # X6 t3 S* [# a8 [is a synonymous term. : O. Z0 E7 I& V: q& |" k' @3 l" K' jSUM Software Users Manual (Computer term). Sunk Costs The costs of resources already committed or spent. In comparing two 8 }2 O2 x! n$ D( aalternatives, such costs are "non-additive," and they are not germane to / x, a- z9 Z( W+ J: Xdecisions about future use of resources. % ^ t: N x- m1 g2 oSup Pro Supporting Programs (MDA term). Super Survivable Solar Power Subsystem Demonstrator. Super Radiance The process used by a super radiant laser to generate or amplify a laser beam in 8 ?2 u1 \% a/ {3 n4 ^a single pass through a lasant material, or, in the case of a free electron laser, : N7 Z$ `( _+ | r5 d gthrough an electric or magnetic field in the presence of an electron beam. Super * ?$ R( l, |' v% Dradiance is actually a form of stimulated emission. Also known as superfluorescence, or amplified spontaneous emission. $ j$ W$ t8 N4 O. o- _ X: aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S % P9 _' `( |- Z- [$ m282 Superradiant , b& q5 Z3 l3 K/ ^9 y1 d+ _9 [; L1 BLaser (SRL) 1 F( O o N8 O: y4 |A laser in which the beam passes through the lasant only once; mirrors are not 4 Z* g- @* p7 Grequired for the operation of such a laser, as they are with more conventional lasers which are sometimes called "cavity lasers" to distinguish them from 0 Y7 o- L1 W* [3 G6 fsuperradiant lasers. Free electron lasers may also be superradiant; the laser beam of a superradiant free electron laser would pass once through the electric 0 x. Z7 T' N+ a( o1 Uor magnetic field (instead of a lasant) in the presence of an electron beam. Supervisory 2 p( _+ O. U1 CPrograms Computer programs that have the primary function of scheduling, allocating, and controlling system resources rather than processing data to produce results. Supplemental 7 \5 @1 Q9 i+ Q, P/ \/ G7 yAppropriation An appropriation enacted as an addition to a regular annular appropriation act. Support Equipment All system equipment required to support the ground and flight phases of the ( I' r/ A* V8 I% s: y1 l' Jmission. Support equipment includes aerospace ground equipment (AGE), ! M7 N' P$ a1 K/ y. s2 `maintenance ground equipment (MGE), transportation and handling (T&H) 0 D) C# T, Q3 W* qequipment, and equipment used to support system deployment (i.e., assembly tools and fixtures, test and checkout equipment, personnel support and protection equipment). 1 D3 u2 q2 t( l$ C8 y) _# y% dSupport Personnel Individuals, in addition to operators, trainers, and maintainers, who are directly 3 I0 p: y6 L( L& f2 m6 Qassociated with an operational system(s), and who are critical to its continuous 1 E: h( b S' ~2 Poperation. Examples include program management offices, security, supply, administrative support, and the like. Support Software Software that aids in the development or maintenance of other software, for 3 ^$ m- R1 Y" t \9 c) uexample compilers, loaders, and other utilities. 3 {3 N' R+ ]3 v4 @7 K6 R$ [( }. ZSuppression Temporary or transient degradation of the performance of a weapons system, . L5 b4 }0 [5 @3 I+ b/ ? kbelow the level needed to fulfill its mission objectives, by an opposing force. ( u5 D; e5 O4 q2 _1 }" J9 eSUPSHIP Superintendent of Shipbuilding. " ]1 a9 w8 v+ n7 ?- nSURCOM Surveillance Constellation. & m1 k7 n0 s x6 D5 w d$ Z& dSurge Production An increased rate of production necessary to meet demands for defense items due to a need for accelerated production to meet a threat or for a wartime or ; @- N- G5 a( F/ W Xmobilization situation. This increased rate can be obtained by having excess $ l5 b, L3 E) M( o, I3 m# tproduction capacity available or by utilizing multiple shifts of normal capacity measures. Surveillance An observation procedure that includes tactical observations, strategic warning, and meteorological assessments, by optical, infrared, radar, and radiometric sensors on space-borne and terrestrial platforms.

帅哥

Surveillance 8 s0 k' g0 s) A! @Requirements Requirements are requests for surveillance, including relative priorities for / F2 E3 g' H/ ]) _coverage and sensitivity levels, based on operational orders, selected response " n2 L' y! x) U( J6 D( f4 Soptions and current surveillance system availability. & @) @1 _7 G( X6 Q0 QSurveillance, Satellite and 7 d% X W5 Y! k% R5 bMissile & Z2 I& @0 u6 ~9 n8 BThe systematic observation of aerospace for the purpose of detecting, tracking, / z5 z% u! G. `: ?* Mand characterizing objects, events, and phenomena associated with satellites and in-flight missiles, friendly and enemy. - R$ @4 k% }. |Surveillance System ' W5 w$ d- @, K* vConfiguration ! o ^) z2 y; CThe sensor types and locations and the modes of operation currently activated in the surveillance system. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 283 Survivability ( G; P8 x! @5 z% ?2 I3 h7 ~. XOperating Modes & m3 O. B9 Y$ ~/ B. T9 HThe operating modes not including but in addition to the self-defense modes that all the elements can use to protect themselves against direct enemy attack. 6 l: ^& Q) o& \. ]/ K; ]Survivable and Enduring Command Center * U7 u1 s3 X) K' ~(SECC) 2 u9 F+ P7 n' J4 s' w4 |The USSTRATCOM mobile C2 facility. SUS Site Utilization Study. ( [% \* c( h6 ?, K9 PSustainer Propulsion stage of a missile usually operating after the booster cutoff. SV Space Vehicle. ( A5 w2 M* p( y$ j, G* ZSVS (1) OBSOLETE. SSTS Validation Satellite. (2) Scientific Visualization Suite. , Y2 E3 L: L4 S: ASW (1) Software or (S/W). (2) Space Wing. SWC Strike Warfare Commander. - T/ E. X& H# L) jSweep Jamming A narrow band of jamming that is back and forth over a relatively wide operating 5 c$ o0 X* ~0 [) y ^1 }$ p1 G" ~! o0 Hband of frequencies. ; W6 A( o8 f- x% m6 B0 C8 cSWG Scenario Working Group. SWIL Software-in-the-Loop. SWIR Short Wavelength Infrared. $ C$ f1 O1 ~% h2 m8 R' P" ~. ZSWSA Spatial Weapons System Analysis. SWSC Space and Warning System Center. SYDP Six-Year Defense Program. Synchronization For data streams, the process whereby a received set of data is placed in one to one correspondence with the data assumed to have been transmitted. Synthesis The automatic generation of a run able system from a specialized design where * N. O( G" q& N& Z' ^" ueach module description has associated implementations. / v1 v; I! D1 h& R; [) [% V; sSynthetic 7 t" X) M, }# n" s' B2 Y, L, kAperture Radar ! q! y8 P( y: e. G5 G(SAR) & e4 ^! j6 Z0 c! n8 SA radar technique that processes echoes of signals emitted at different points along a satellite's orbit. The highest resolution achievable by such a system is theoretically equivalent to that of a single large antenna as wide as the distance between the most widely spaced points along the orbit that are used for transmitting positions. In practice, resolution will be limited by the radar receiver's ( D4 S9 \8 c$ K3 ?signal processing capability or by the limited coherence of the radio signal emitted by the radar transmitter. SYS System. Sys C/O System Check Out. Sys Cmn System Common. Sys T&E System Test and Evaluation. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 284 SYSCOM Systems Command. ; v# x' u3 N& `+ G, `/ ]5 p$ P0 FSystem (1) The organization of hardware, software, materials, facilities, personnel, data, and services needed to perform a designated function with , _6 I3 Y' Z: I) [- r! Z4 C3 yspecified results, such as the gathering of specified data, its processing, and delivery to users. 8 R6 e& ~) s5 e& V8 M(2) A combination of two or more interrelated equipment (sets) arranged in a n! z. F! S" q8 @4 S Ofunctional package to perform an operational function or to satisfy a requirement. ! _8 Q. T7 A/ d# D# w) o4 y0 jSystem Activation That set of coordination, assessment, decision, direction and control functions 4 d" G- L0 `7 F9 K& U3 d% Q: e5 jimplemented to enable defense weapons, and to initiate the automated, realtime aspects of Battle Management, Engagement Control, and Weapon System + X s6 u! e: mControl. 1 D: m& R7 l2 g+ Q& \System Architecture System Capability Specification (SCS) The structure and relationship among the components of a system. The system + ~ Q' }$ @4 A. y( Z% Varchitecture may also include the system’s interface with its operational 6 e2 q5 t* @* c2 a. N. J3 Henvironment. A framework or structure that portrays relationships among all the 3 q0 o) t5 p( Uelements of missile defense systems. The government document that translates capabilities into functional & i: B' F2 ^2 d+ j. ^5 l4 Xspecifications for the overall BMDS and allocates functional specifications among ( M2 Q# ?$ ?; m2 V5 b) C* tthe elements of the BMDS. System Center (SC) ' k/ }$ R8 {! e7 c% LA center in CMAFB responsible for the scheduling of maintenance for worldwide sensors and supporting equipment as well as maintenance responsibility of ! }8 k5 H0 Y. G4 I/ ]equipment in CMAFB. System Concept 5 O' c0 A$ Y3 V: Y5 j! H0 U! O' cPaper (SCP) ' H$ h! b' r* A: r9 ^. a0 |OBSOLETE. For a major program, was used to summarize the results of the concept exploration phase up to Milestone I and to describe the acquisition * i, f3 B& {! O8 Q0 K1 estrategy, including the identification of the concepts to be carried into the ; ]& _9 l- f1 A# {! idemonstration and validation phase and the reasons for elimination of other & g9 h8 Y3 f6 f6 C( b; @concepts. Now an Integrated Program Summary (IPS).

帅哥

System Configuration Control Board ) Q3 Z( U ^" k$ `4 |6 [(SCCB) % E: x4 `& B7 C, r+ F8 h4 J3 `. NThe senior SDS configuration control board. The SCCB will manage the systemlevel configuration of the SDS and the interfaces between elements of the SDS. 0 b* V. N; c6 t1 X, N0 F1 K2 dSystem Control Function or task of monitoring the maintenance status of assigned sensors and computer systems. 5 R5 _3 u2 t) }" j( @9 HSystem-Critical ! S& R3 g4 _+ }( WFunction A function that is necessary for the successful accomplishment of the system's & ?* F2 X3 v* ?: p$ dmission. System Definition 7 |& N& U/ C& BReview (SDR) The formal review, in briefing format, for periodically deciding on updates to the system plans for development based on estimates of the program schedules and funding. The SDR summarizes candidate development plans and their potential impacts on system design, cost, and schedule. The SDR provides a systemsengineering basis for the MDA program planning activities. Following the SDR, detailed element planning will result will result in a Configuration Control Board, ; R1 e2 C; e1 j* Jfinal trades, and program documentation in the PPBS. System 8 L, c3 R! S" O1 N7 o; CDeployment q! R' r( z" Z: QDelivery of the completed production system to the using activity. " ]5 [% y3 D& TMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S 285 0 Q: Y, {$ w3 x0 H7 I( FSystem Design (1) The process of defining the hardware and software architectures, 2 C1 k- D/ k& q/ `components, modules, interfaces, and data for a system to satisfy $ S% i) j& r) _. K; M% `; Mspecified system requirements. ' |1 H i( @& x [. Z; s# k(2) The result of the system design process. System Design 0 [: I: ~* E; a+ c3 w1 K5 u$ IConcept ' }* G& D( C# Y3 i& U% tAn idea expressed in terms of general performance, capabilities, and characteristics of hardware and software oriented either to operate or to be operated as an integral whole in meeting a mission need. System Design Review (SDR) Evaluates the optimization, correlation, completeness, and risks associated with the allocated technical requirements. ( y, J/ x ?& A2 f2 ^System Effectiveness ! |0 c a& j! p, E4 A( TThe measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set 7 V& T$ P7 `3 ]7 U# F9 p4 Aof specific mission requirements. It is a function of availability, dependability, and , [, m; i( ?' z) `8 q3 Icapability. * B6 A9 x/ M" j% ~System Evolution Plan (SEP) The documented plan that establishes the strategy to evolve the BMDS / w6 y- \, }) d/ e4 Rcapabilities over time. It reflects the BMD Acquisition Executive (AE) and Senior ' Z$ p1 G, F1 ]* e* J+ P1 h1 J0 IExecutive Council’s (SEC) development decisions; documents the current BMDS Development Baseline; and summarizes the capability, integration and + l4 [4 P, v0 g5 d0 cassessment of the BMDS evolution. It identifies opportunities (items that provide , D( I" ^! z# x2 I hsignificant improvements in BMD capability), identifies challenges (impediments to achieving opportunity), and points to promising alternatives that can overcome those challenges. + f/ {2 K% @# G* I z( U- LSystem Families A collection or grouping of interrelated software systems in the domain that share a set of common characteristics. System 8 v1 ]8 E+ c* ^0 G; ^4 FGenerated - X& K, d; a) d# @: R4 \Electromagnetic 0 L" z4 h, G7 M$ t N- s, R! H5 a: {0 {9 pPulse (SGEMP) 8 l3 \3 K9 s+ H) F9 |0 VTransient electromagnetic radiation caused by the photoelectron emission of the 6 B: H: e4 I/ L* ^$ v8 s3 T" xsurface of an object subjected to a pulse of photon energy. Although local fields close to the object surface may reach quite high values (kilovolts), the primary disturbance mechanism is the flow of replacement current through the object in order to produce charge equalization. # X" z: ~, o! {/ [System ! \+ S0 s% ]4 j' G+ n- PIntegration Test 1 T+ V. m1 h+ H) tA live flight system-level test utilizing actual system command and control, sensors, and weapon hardware. . Y+ E' g! ?$ [1 m" jSystem Manager A general term of reference to those organizations directed by individual managers, exercising authority over the planning, direction, and control, of tasks . n8 a8 v, ~& M2 _and associated functions essential for support of designated weapons or equipment systems. ; C$ `9 ^+ k9 @+ N8 D" j5 U# SSystem Operational 5 ~* a: ]& m( h n8 sConcept A formal document that describes the intended purpose, employment, 5 t8 T k" j/ s. i# d; bdeployment, and support of a system. % _$ t ^5 c/ r3 |System 0 |1 R) |; c( w( A! J5 {Operation and Integration Functions (SOIF) The automated activities of tracking, communications, asset management, and 7 N2 K/ b( Z: e. _& E$ ibattle plan execution, which are executed under the guidance of the Command and Control Element. The allocation of these functions (and sub-functions) to the system elements will be specified in the architecture(s). System Posture A USSPACECOM system of graduated readiness steps to bring the strategic - B) N# [4 P3 i7 [8 a% ]& mBMD system to fully generated alert, similar to the USSTRATCOM concept of ! [/ y( g4 q% h7 U) Uposturing aircraft and missile forces to reduce reaction time. $ q0 u0 i3 x3 `& aMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S & V! a( D1 u5 L8 h6 r* o286 System Program # T7 \1 @- Q9 v; i+ y2 r9 ZOffice (SPO) The office of the program manager and the point of contact with industry, , x: G+ e1 Q+ c# cgovernment agencies, and other activities participating in the system acquisition 6 }+ X( K% @, o3 H( Oprocess. (U.S. Army uses term “Project Office.”)

帅哥

System Readiness System Readiness includes the development of OPLANs necessary to carry out the assigned mission, using strategy and guidance provided by higher authority 2 K8 \& x8 E2 ~, S+ U/ M8 N5 F$ {along with knowledge of current system performance and planned capabilities. It includes peacetime tests and exercises to maintain the system in an operational 1 z+ y& `* B' v4 ostate, and the demonstration and evaluation of alternate tactics and the verification of system performance, to the extent practicable. It provides for the continued training and exercise of personnel in operating the system under realistic conditions, and provides for control of other system test functions ! E( E% W5 o- Znecessary to keep the system operating. It provides for detection of anomalies 2 D c* g. D# i+ t' A9 f3 T) cand for corrective action. It also provides for maintenance schedule control, $ i# e5 E6 ]) @) D* s3 dhistorical maintenance data retention, maintenance training, and test results status reporting. System : q/ ?8 I/ ?5 ~; z6 w0 _; ~! XReadiness Objective 2 y$ x k3 S/ M. ~1 _* vA criterion for assessing the ability of a system to undertake and sustain a specified set of missions at planned peacetime and wartime utilization rates. System readiness measures take explicit account of the effects of reliability and maintainability system design, the characteristics and performance of the support ( x6 e: y2 `$ D* Esystem, and the quantity and location of support resources. Examples of $ [9 t$ }: F7 L, r) \# p3 f4 ^, Osystem readiness measures are combat sortie rate over time, peacetime mission 9 R1 [. G- o) U) x7 J. d3 e# R9 r( @capable rate, operational availability, and asset ready rate. ) @3 w- Y. P0 m) I' }3 XSystem - U3 ~/ m# {( y1 `' ?3 kRequirements Analysis (SRA) An analysis of the operational system requirements, as defined in the System % f5 b8 b6 @& @5 JConcept Paper and other approved requirements documents, used to determine specific system functional and performance requirements. 0 E( e4 Y' d9 t- [System ; W0 v/ p+ C" X; E# y5 y3 H O0 \; xRequirements Review (SRR) ! J3 y* u% j( F- n* d! h RConducted to ascertain progress in defining system technical requirements. Determines the direction and progress of the systems engineering effort and the degree of convergence upon a balanced and complete configuration. : x* W2 C7 v2 ~) o: HSystem Security $ F4 a8 e) Y" @: ? N4 q& H3 OEngineering (SSE) An element of system engineering that applies scientific and engineering - t' ]+ o3 S5 o _/ X kprinciple to identify security vulnerabilities and minimize or contain risks associated with these vulnerabilities. It uses mathematical, physical, and related ( h. T, \7 I xscientific disciplines, and the principles and methods of engineering design and analysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the vulnerability of the system to security threats. System Security ! G7 j4 c& D. C4 } D8 E6 SEngineering 0 n, C$ a, K; x# d% w' `8 ~Management Program (SSEMP) The contractor shall establish a SSE program to support economical achievement of overall program objectives. To be considered efficient, the SSE 1 C5 M) }$ s) l& `) g) yprogram: (1) enhances the operational readiness and mission success of the defense resource; (2) identifies and reduces potential vulnerabilities to the 5 M( }- k' Z: P: J! K4 eresource from sabotage, theft, damage, destruction, etc.; (3) provides % Y6 O- v) X: ~0 z0 C# cmanagement information essential to system security planning and (4) minimizes its own impact on overall program cost and schedule. 9 d% B, y* O. l# R2 q& O. t+ ySystem Security 3 m! I+ o8 J8 f7 }* g5 H5 s9 t5 XManagement Plan (SSMP) 4 g2 w9 V' C$ Y, f5 `4 N( R6 gA formal document that fully describes the planned security tasks required to 6 ~- R% o& N' A) Pmeet system security requirements, including organizational responsibilities, methods of accomplishment, milestones, depth of effort, and integration with 4 J& b U5 p; y0 `- aother program engineering, design and management activities, and related systems. Systems Engineering An interdisciplinary approach to evolve and verify an integrated and life cycle balanced set of system product and process solutions. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 S * q7 p. m! O- e( Y0 v287 Systems % d8 F* p' E/ W" cEngineering Management Plan (SEMP) 6 U# O B7 S* b/ r: L# c' F& ~- xThis plan documents: (1) Management of the systems engineering process, (2) Integration of the required technical specialties; (3) Performance measures 0 {; z n/ q9 u' ~7 cdevelopment and reporting, including intermediate performance criteria, and (4) ( M& ]. U' }+ D$ zKey engineering milestones and schedules. Systems Test Integration and Coordination ; I7 l$ n7 @5 m; v- n6 x, aThe combination of SDS elements tests to reflect SDS performance contribution. 7 Y+ ~$ h7 ]* B- ASystem Threat Assessment : @7 j0 |/ i- \$ NReport (STAR) + z* |( d# Y4 x8 s8 \5 b+ |Required by DoD 5000.2 and validated by DIA. Establishes the threat (to a ( e& \" E# q! b) RService's Mission Area) and is part of basis for considering mission deficiency and potential program new start. Updated to support a DAB Milestone or when 4 Q2 \1 C4 ?+ z% _5 qthe threat changes significantly. System-Valued Asset ' _) [! I+ k6 u5 \: E( ?& N2 PA system element/component, function, or information element, which is critical to the proper operation and well being of the SDS. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T ' F7 ~' J- L' ]$ [; }288 T&C (1) Tracking and Control. (2) Test and Control. $ a8 i \4 ~8 sT&E Test and Evaluation. T&T Transportation and Transportability. T-MACH Trusted MACH. * j/ d, _9 n& e5 Y) y+ v/ A/ uT-UAV Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. T/R Transmit/Receive. - }) A/ a4 V& h+ C9 D/ {T/REA Transmit/Receive Element Assembly (of a radar). 1 t+ a) G0 _% |. ~T 3 a0 u- l0 b8 h: Q2 V/ h0 Z T2 Technology Transfer. T 4 g0 e7 D, {, p3 E2 E Technical Training Equipment. TA (1) Threat Assessment. (2) Target Acquisition. (3) Test Articles. TAA Technical Assistance Agreement. 6 Y& B5 G* S( \TAACOM Tactical Air Area Commander. $ P, x$ t& y( U0 w7 p' C8 U6 OTAADCOM Theater Army Air Defense Commander. TAAF Test, Analyze and Fix. , V6 R9 S6 s# g* R) s2 K4 tTAC Tactical Advanced Computer. $ S6 K' O3 F; [TAC-3 Tactical Advanced Computer – Three (USN term). TACAIR Tactical Air. ; B% L3 c7 z r1 NTACAMO Take Charge And Move Out [Airborne SSBN Command Post]. TACC Tactical Air Command Center. ) Q6 z$ |7 z% i' m* j) iTACC USMC Tactical Air Command Center (USMC term). 7 ~8 l$ z# e: D% M I/ A0 |7 eTACC USN Tactical Air Command Center (USN term). TACCS Theater Air Command and Control System. ; V1 j6 Y* o% b: X. T+ P( l: }0 yTACCSF Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility. 8 G" ~/ |6 y5 V9 J1 ^" P% ETACDAR Tactical Detection and Reporting. 8 E, V9 Z4 H0 } z% }* U* A8 jTACFIRE Tactical [weapons] Fire.

帅哥

TACINTEL Tactical Intelligence Information [Exchange Subsystem] (USN term). TACOM Tank and Automotive Command (US Army term). TACON Tactical Control. + @" L& _$ E0 QTACS Theater Air Control System. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T & d& J9 j' Z5 e7 t289 TACSAT Tactical Satellite. & e, ]7 u$ D; p7 R3 { GTACSIM Tactical Simulation 4 `5 f; m* t R1 Y/ F8 sTactical Air , z9 |+ |4 j% rDoctrine Fundamental principles designed to provide guidance for the employment of air power in tactical air operations to attain established objectives. " V4 ^ |& d8 S# GTactical Air Operation An air operation involving the employment of air power in coordination with + o9 x5 H: V, B6 O4 Jground or naval forces. Tactical Air ; l% a& d8 \0 c" o+ R3 g+ U; _Operations # e/ j# _4 ^! N2 rCenter A subordinate operational component of the Marine Air Command and Control " K5 L- a8 T) g& X; _System designed for direction and control of all en route air traffic and air 9 O( d- J" N. a. {) w# Sdefense operations in an assigned sector. 7 F4 k M! _2 U# Q4 rTactical Air ) n) E8 s# c! S, N, ~Support 9 H. B& j6 T( I) R WAir operations carried out in coordination with surface forces and which directly assist land or maritime operations. Tactical Area of Responsibility y; t# i2 @/ a1 G(TAOR) A defined area of land for which responsibility is specifically assigned to the commander of the area as a measure for control of assigned forces and 1 H% h: v$ Q/ q" Q$ E) i* Vcoordination of support. 3 @7 P+ ^* j+ e5 c0 j( sTactical Ballistic Missile (TBM) A land-based missile generally having a range of <3000 miles that can be employed within a continental theater of operations. Tactical Concept A statement, in broad outline, which provides a common basis for future 0 i0 L+ L: J2 M$ ]. i/ ^7 Odevelopment of tactical doctrine. Tactical Control The detailed and, usually, local direction and control of movements or / P; H5 F, Q: W0 x: j4 Q: omaneuvers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks assigned. Tactical Data Information link U/ `* k x# v$ w3 cA netted link in which one unit acts as a net control station and interrogates each unit by roll call. Once interrogated, that unit transmits its data to the net. 1 Q" b1 t' @7 \ z) M7 C# TThis means that each unit receives all the information transmitted. Tactical Level of 1 k+ G: i- p, a" y4 ?3 \War The level of war at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to 1 K; L0 s0 r+ q! Z4 \# m" ?! maccomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units or task forces. Tactical # D/ a! |' P8 vOperations Area (TOA) . Z% A( R- H' o9 V: ^! k5 fThat area between the fire support coordination line and the rear operations area where maximum flexibility in the use of airspace is needed to assure mission - f5 D9 l- ?& [% ? N$ h9 Aaccomplishment. Tactical Operations Center (TOC) A physical grouping of those elements of an Army general and special staff ; G8 U7 ?$ D1 M: h4 Aconcerned with the current tactical operations and the tactical support thereof. - F4 ` k1 e, c% TTactical Warning (TW) (1) A warning after initiation of a threatening or hostile act based on an ' y& \+ w2 a) V, Z1 a: Levaluation of information from all available sources. : q2 P, I1 q% w0 u, ?% }(2) In satellite and missile surveillance, a notification to operational command centers that a specific threat event is occurring. The component elements that describe threat events are: country of origin, event type and size, country under attack, and event time. Tactical " t Y# g6 Y+ O' R6 z+ vWarning/Attack 7 R c, A3 }1 u' F" @3 i. {* KAssessment (TW/AA) n' L( f2 `% @ d0 OA composite term. See separate definitions for Tactical Warning and for Attack Assessment. 1 A0 a* `9 @8 ^- U9 [MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 290 TAD (1) Tactical Air Defense. (2) Theater Air Defense. 1 w. p3 x7 D% v$ e& S6 I* `(3) Technical Acceptance Demonstration. 5 S- o9 T& r0 [- h }" a5 ?TAD C2 Theater Air Defense Command and Control. TADAP Theater Air Defense Asset Planner. TADC Tactical Air Direction Center. ) d0 X9 o: Z/ I* R4 dTADCOM Theater Air Defense Command. P" U% c: n& X; Z- G6 z0 c7 n- ?TADIL Tactical Digital Information Link. TADIL A Tactical Digital Information Link “A”. # x+ S& u+ D$ b; j' wTADIL B Tactical Digital Information Link “B” $ o. t( O) I( I8 G( y6 cTADIL J Tactical Digital Information Link “J” TADIX Tactical Data Information Exchange. ) J4 K# K' O% F- r$ G6 k$ s2 N7 Q' wTADIXS Tactical Data Information Exchange System. TADL Tactical Data Link. TADS Tactical Air Defense System. TADSIM Theater Air Defense Simulation. TAF Tactical Air Force. TAFIM Tactical Architecture Framework for Information Management. & r3 {( J, Y. G- @4 [: g! z4 }3 @TAI International Atomic Time. 4 G/ _; s/ y/ t8 q+ I0 O$ LTAIS Technology Applications Information System. TALDT Total Administrative and Logistics Downtime. TALON NIGHT TALON programs, which support SOF. # B& R4 H. l+ G2 ETALON SHIELD An effort using stereo DSP processing to provide ballistic missile burnout vector 9 U0 r- L0 d+ k$ A; pand impact prediction for interceptor cueing, counterforce tasking, and passive defense.

帅哥

TAM (1) Theater Attack Model. (2) Theater Analysis Model. TAMD Theater Air and Missile Defense. 4 f+ C4 ^: ?5 ~# iTank Final Propulsion Stage (used interchangeably with sustainer). Tank Debris Hardware associated with tank. Tank 8 G) \* G- s6 m( jFragmentation The breakup of a tank, either intentionally to serve as a penaid or naturally as a 1 M" z3 n E- hresult of aerodynamic loads and heating upon reentry. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T " `' F1 Q5 k$ e" B8 C$ ~5 K8 h291 ; Q' j4 G3 w; r3 r, u8 CTAOC Tactical Air Operations Center. $ A' L( l1 X/ a" P+ b0 tTAOM Tactical Air Operations Module. TAOS Technology for Autonomous Operation of Satellites. # O3 A& x- J, ` q9 D3 L( \TAR (1) The NMD Threat Assessment Report. , s# W+ [' Q& l(2) Threat Activity Report. (3) Target Acquisition Radar. TARA Technology Area Reviews and Assessments. 6 k4 T/ u; b/ X( \" }/ j9 O7 cTARGET Theater Analysis and Re-planning Graphical Execution Toolkit. . g5 @$ H; Y- i1 I; r3 Z& Z) E1 |Target ! z7 M: i! {; y& P3 H! a; k, ^) TAcquisition The detection and initiation of track on a target in the surveillance coverage region of a sensing system. # u; o: W2 ?7 VTarget - F: i) q/ b$ y+ Q" y/ lClassification 9 k; F2 u+ \" w! v2 Eand Type Identification of the estimated target category based on surveillance, discrimination, and intelligence data. Target Discrimination # J# e+ {( h/ A4 B# o5 zThe ability of a surveillance or guidance system to identify or engage any one target when multiple targets are present. Target Object 7 f. L# q2 g0 iMap (TOM) A data set, which contains three-dimensional position, estimates for target and other objects predicted to be in a weapon interceptor's field of view for use in ' o+ V! @! b* q, Jtarget designation. (USSPACECOM) Target Resolution The splitting of a single target into two or more targets. 2 x( l g- C5 [2 zTarget Signature (1) The characteristic pattern of a target displayed by detection and ) L) o4 g: \; I$ I* ?9 Iidentification equipment. ; B! H V4 K' T" y Y(2) In naval mine warfare, the variation in the influence field produced by the passage of a ship or sweep. Target System Requirements 4 [ B3 f: Y* v& z6 CDocument (TSRD) BMD Program level program management document. Developed by each BMD 5 M7 c* Y0 i0 g5 g6 Q1 E( v8 k" yProgram Office, it outlines to MDA/TC and MDA/TE what the PO’s target requirements are for each specific flight test based on the test objectives. ; o$ @5 G- t; e* i( u9 fProducing the TSRD is the first step in the target development process. TASA Task and Skills Analysis. Y* E. n! P' p8 |+ s3 i! XTasks The required actions to accomplish all or part of a COA. Tasks contain guidance . r F9 p8 [* f! D, yto the Battle Management/Command, Control and Communications (BM/C3 ) 3 b+ `0 Q* l! [4 e8 D6 `engagement planning function concerning resource allocation, constraints, and / b P* f& c3 W9 f% ?required performance. TASM Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile. TASO Terminal Area Security Officer. . l" I0 g! \- c4 k/ z! y: {- OTAT Technical Area Task. TAUL Teat and Upgrade Link. TAV Transatmospheric Vehicle. 2 O" W7 j+ ^9 |2 z5 Y1 z' KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T # C: i; T Z z6 _1 K+ w6 g. a292 TAWG Threat Accreditation Working Group. ! b! ^. D- s3 W' g' [TB Test Bed. - ^, H7 s/ S5 q, D& _TBA (1) Theater Battle Arena. (2) To be Announced. TBD (1) To Be Determined. (2) To Be Developed. : ?1 U w8 ~# h. b. V; ]$ P" vTBIG TMD BM/C3 Integration Group. . ~, G) r/ M& w BTBIP TOMAHAWK Baseline Improvement Program. TBM See Tactical Ballistic Missile/Theater Ballistic Missile. TBMD Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. $ X: O( ~) A. mTBMDSE Theater Ballistic Missile Defense System Exercise. TBN To be Negotiated. 5 @6 l# r0 J! LTBR To Be Resolved. 4 C( q* ]2 C/ L3 g9 ?TBS (1) Tactical Broadcast System (US Army term). (2) To Be Supplied. + e5 i/ I( z0 }7 O* x- W(3) To Be Scheduled . TCAMS Technical Control and Monitoring System. TCC Tactical Command Center. TCCF Tactical Communications Control Facility. TCE Three Color Experiment. 2 ~; j0 v7 {8 T" y* W* g% a, [8 C6 jTCF Tactical Combat Force. # i3 m ^: t( @/ Q; PTCMD Theater Cruise Missile Defense. 1 q. S% }& K$ J# r& x/ PTCMP Theater (Missile Defense) Countermeasures Mitigation Program. 2 D* C3 J2 M7 ~0 dTCMP I Theater Countermeasures Mitigation Program One. TCMP II Theater Missile Defense Critical Measurement Program Two (Replaces TMD 2 n' q5 @8 p, k4 J( V5 C+ G# qCountermeasures Mitigation). TD (1) Test Director. (2) Technical Data. (3) Technical Director. (4) Training Device TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance. 2 J4 }, I! Z. N. BTDADT Total Distribution Advanced Technology Demonstration. ! z/ S, m; S* H- S% M) B8 o9 XTDAS Theater Defense Architecture Study. 0 M' F7 i0 m7 I4 d* r. f( |TDASS Theater Defense Architecture Scoping Study. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T + p0 _/ E4 \) M293 TDBM Track Data Base Manager. TDC (1) Tactical Display Console. (2) Theater Deployable Communications (USAF MDAP). TDCC Test Data Collection Center. TDD Target Detection Device. ' _1 R$ O- ^" t" Z5 Q$ iTDDS TRAP Data Dissemination System. TDI Target Data Inventory. TDK Two-Dimensional Kinetics nozzle performance. % G1 c& M' y" X3 HTDM Time Division Multiplexed. ) Y1 }0 {. s! VTDMA Time Division Multiple Access (TelComm/Computer term). ' @1 w/ b* S1 M+ t* t! O5 y- B" ~TDNS Theater Defense Netting Study. TDOA Time Difference of Arrival. 8 Q* j+ M" L. I5 nTDP (1) Technical Data Package. 7 |! f' q" K; N; e0 ? I(2) Test Design Package. (3) Threat Design Program.

帅哥

TDORC Technology Demonstration, Quick Reaction Capability. TDR Terminal Defense Radar. TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. $ ^4 H* z; O/ [. k/ H2 w0 GTDSSPA Technology development for Solid State Phased Arrays. ; q: A+ }5 R1 i2 {* ^. rTDT Target Development Test. # i0 q" p. U5 j, UTDTC Test, Development and Training Center. ( K( g3 L" g8 Q9 J0 J+ pTDU Target Data Update. TDUGS (1) Target Data Uplink Ground Station. (2) Target Data Update Ground Station. TE (1) Thermo-electric. (2) Test Engineer. (3) Training Element. " i6 _: a1 O& J; k% y6 }(4) (BMC3) Test Exerciser. TEA Transportation Engineering Agency. % s* w# H$ `) }TEAS Test and Experiment Activity Summary. Tech (1) Technical. (2) Technology. (3) Technician $ X, ~9 R! O9 z2 L1 oTECH Technical TECHON Technical Control. TECHEVAL Technical Evaluation (USN term). 8 E+ p$ C- F" B$ C6 NMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T $ U& D" o$ E: X294 Technical Data Scientific or technical information recorded in any form or medium (such as manuals and drawings). Computer programs and related software are not 5 x% `5 ~ J7 P4 l. ?- o) ntechnical data; documentation of computer programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other information related to contract ! c1 I4 i7 ~; c T& H+ W6 }# sadministration. 0 n3 l! q) q1 _Technical Data 3 Z' z `. T& `( UPackage (TDP) A technical description of an item adequate for supporting an acquisition $ s4 I* V8 J6 A2 R4 u) A) fstrategy, production, engineering, and logistics support. The description defines the required design configuration and procedures to ensure adequacy of item ' J8 {3 Z, ~0 qperformance. It consists of all applicable technical data such as drawings, ) B, M, \+ w% u3 p! O+ ^7 T, bassociated lists, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance provisions, and packaging details.

帅哥

Technical , q7 [4 @( e" [6 E+ I% W, K mEvaluation $ o4 s8 w% @' X8 }The study, investigation, or test and evaluation by a developing agency to determine the technical suitability of materiel, equipment, or a system, for use in 7 X6 E5 Q% k$ n. Cthe military services. (See Development Test and Evaluation.) Technical Objectives # t Q9 I" }8 [1 mThe “target” values for the development effort when insufficient data is available for stating binding technical requirements. * [9 l1 E3 w: Y0 kTechnical 8 y; ], P0 I5 WObjectives & ! }+ Z- {- B& {- P4 ~% kGoals (TOG) * {$ L. R6 C% u+ sHigh-level acquisition document to guide decision making for BMDS development; communicates objectives and goals. * ?0 l, ~+ d% N: M( X: @9 I+ wTechnical 1 F5 X% }+ t5 F8 A7 S2 BParameters (TPs) A selected subset of the system’s technical metrics tracked in Technical Performance Measurement. Critical technical parameters are identified from risk % F- C/ a' W5 v5 ]% s. uanalyses and contract specification or incentivization, and are designed by 2 q0 K4 n; Z# O4 h% }4 P+ Rmanagement. Technical 4 a: ], h0 N J! F0 L! P8 ^Performance Measurement (TPM) ' U* s: m& f5 U7 R5 aDescribes all the activities undertaken by the government to obtain design status beyond that treating schedule and cost. TPM is defined as the product design assessment, which estimates, through tests the values of essential performance 9 ]8 ~5 f4 f% Cparameters of the current design of WBS product elements. It forecasts the & e# g2 i# F0 L, E, i2 N. N/ _! Rvalues to be achieved through the planned technical program effort, measures differences between achieved values and those allocated to the product element by the system engineering process, and determines the impact of these differences on system effectiveness. Technical Specification A detailed description of technical requirements stated in terms suitable to form the basis for actual design development and production. 3 h# p8 l( }2 O, T9 |0 @7 LTechnical Surveillance 3 _* D; D+ v$ y0 EIntelligence gathering methods in which clandestine listening, photographic or emanations gathering instruments are placed within SDS facilities, or otherwise targeted against SDS assets to gain access to denied information. + ]" S: k2 Z2 r" {Technology % G0 ~* U5 t7 g" Q1 t) XExecuting Agent 8 z4 T1 U6 t B rThe Service or agency (DoD or non-DoD) that has been delegated management responsibility for a particular critical supporting technology by MDA or Executing Agent. Technology Program Description 9 V+ Y1 P; d8 b' pThe generic description of the applicable supporting technology or critical supporting technology. - X. A0 X9 y* x& }TECOM Test and Evaluation Command. TED Technology Exploitation Demonstration. ; ]3 {2 H$ G; j9 Y4 KMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T : |, ^8 e- D+ M6 }/ R295 - t2 ^% C" `6 R; `- y: ~TEIPT Test and Evaluation Integrated Product Team. TEL Transporter-Erector-Launcher. Telemetry, 8 D- p1 P, H, X" G n) H1 QTracking, and 2 X" r% z' h6 x% Q% [/ G& Q0 tCommand (TT&C) $ |' Y6 N& s5 i6 Y9 OFunctions performed by the satellite control network to maintain health and 8 W1 x7 l3 v S: j3 Qstatus, measure specific mission parameters and processing over time a sequence of these measurement to refine parameter knowledge, and transmit mission commands to the satellite. $ R# S/ h4 N: j( GTeleprocessing The combining of telecommunications and computer operations interacting in the automatic processing, reception, and transmission of data and/or information. TELESAT Telecommunications Satellite. : G! E+ Q( u9 | GTELINT Telemetry Intelligence. # ^1 }. m W( \9 X+ dTEMO Training Exercises and Military Operations. TEMP See Test and Evaluation Master Plan. TEMPEST TEMPEST is an unclassified short name referring to investigation and studies of compromising emanations. It is often used synonymously for the term "compromising emanations,” e.g. TEMPEST tests, TEMPEST inspection. (See & e. P" u7 D7 V8 vCompromising Emanations.) 2 h; Y9 q" C) B+ I" }' r) LTENCAP Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities. 3 B2 f* X- O O; i2 D/ {TEP Test and Evaluation Plan. TER Test and Evaluation Report . Z/ t0 P0 G/ h. w3 f2 f: q4 QTERC Test and Evaluation Resource Committee. & @, @+ d' M7 K9 G4 }6 O; XTERCOM Terrain Contour Matching. * H( y7 q6 F# I# X; ?Terminal Defense Segment (TDS) The portion of the BMDS that defeats ballistic missiles in period of flight between ; _* m* y: x1 Ratmospheric reentry and impact. Terminal & w) C. c: \! W1 TGuidance The guidance applied to a guided missile between midcourse and arrival in the vicinity of the target. ! ]3 r+ x1 D8 YTerminal Phase That final portion of a ballistic missile's trajectory between the midcourse phase . }* J# N1 s* S+ ?$ Rand trajectory termination. Terminal Phase ) a$ C; q) C* }. `$ f* W9 aInterceptor A ground-based interceptor designed to intercept and destroy RVs in the terminal phase of flight. It may also be assigned to intercept and destroy enemy 8 ?7 o/ a' e& }PBVs and RVs in the midcourse phase. (USSPACECOM) Terminator Transition from sunlight to earth's shadow in space. TERS Tactical Event Reporting System. ; R6 N9 G" I3 ], t4 oTES Tactical Event System. TESP Test and Evaluation Security Plan. TESSE Test Environment Support System Enhancement. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T 296 ) {/ G5 \7 @ s( mTest and Control The ISTC Test and Control provides the human interface for testing system hardware and software. The Test and Control will consist of the necessary consoles, processors, and storage devices in order to be able to control all 1 v( B2 }4 ^; {0 w) Z* G2 Doperations of the ISTC such as configuring the system, running a scenario, 8 L [ l% a2 n" Yanalyzing data, generating reports, and testing system hardware and software. Test and Evaluation (T&E) ) J3 e: N' k3 L( P( b9 TProcess by which components or systems are tested and the results evaluated to assess progress of design, performance, supportability, etc. There are three types of T&E -- Development (DT&E), Operational (OT&E), and Production Acceptance (PAT&E)--occurring during the acquisition cycle. DT&E is conducted - T2 K4 p* a* I2 M: _to assist the engineering design and development process, to proof $ q* v; A; g/ g5 h) c, n8 emanufacturing processes and control and to verify attainment of technical performance specifications and objectives. OT&E is conducted to estimate a system's operational effectiveness and suitability, identify needed modifications, and provide information on tactics, doctrine, organization, and personnel requirements. PAT&E is conducted on production items to demonstrate that those items meet the requirements and specifications of the procuring contracts or agreements. OT&E is further subdivided into two phases--Initial Operational + U/ ~1 [. y+ i6 s(IOT&E) and Follow-on Operational (FOT&E). IOT&E must be conducted before the production decision (Milestone III) to provide a credible estimate of 2 |' V+ x% H7 z% R, E; \- joperational effectiveness and suitability. Therefore, IOT&E is a field test . e# o1 m/ t( |$ r1 u* |6 {conducted on a production representative system in an operationally realistic environment, by typical user personnel and includes use of realistic threats. FOT&E is conducted on the production system to verify operational effectiveness and suitability, to fill data voids from the IOT&E, or to verify correction of deficiencies in materiel, training, or concepts.

帅哥

Test and 6 S _8 l! d/ J: OEvaluation ( |, R6 R6 \1 B# J7 aMaster Plan + s8 m+ i2 |, o$ z X(TEMP) : E% `% a. Z; N1 ^; p" OAn overall test and evaluation plan, designed to identify and integrate objectives, responsibilities, resources, and schedules for all test and evaluation $ j. x; ^% L4 }3 U: P8 dto be accomplished prior to the subsequent key decision points. Prepared as early as possible in the acquisition process, it is updated as development * D6 a( X' S$ `: h! x) [progresses. Test and Evaluation Working Group ; l/ y3 q- R; l+ m9 }* @$ J(TEWG) The TEWG is the forum in which T&E coordination for test requirements, planning, execution, and reporting, is accomplished among members of the Acquisition Team. The primary purpose of the TEWG is to optimize the use of test data, instrumentation, facilities, and models/simulations to achieve test integration and reduce program costs. The TEWG is established by the program sponsor to integrate test requirements, resolve cost/scheduling problems, facilitate TEMP development, assist in preparation of RFPs and related contractual documents, and assist in evaluating contractor proposals when there are T&E implications. Testbed A system representation consisting partially of actual hardware and/or software - V- a! q' M7 {8 F0 Iand partially of computer models or prototype hardware and/or software. 5 I9 F3 R, N5 DTest Criteria Standards by which test results and outcome are judged. $ k8 W( p/ r" [" a1 BTest Integration Working Group (TIWG) A working group designed to facilitate the integration of test requirements in order to minimize development time and cost and preclude duplication between O- F6 b* d& Vdevelopmental and operational testing. 4 ]! v+ e6 c7 {Test Plan A document prescribing the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the testing to be performed, 3 ^4 k1 y, s3 ?! G+ G ztest schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation ( y" X. r' D) {( L! lcriteria, and any risk requiring contingency planning. MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 T D- J& D, X* G297 3 ~: X6 T+ _9 wTest Target Vehicle (TTV) & ^3 o5 y {7 Q9 x1 Z' h7 Q/ wSingle stage, ground launched, solid propellant theater target developed for SMD Program. Also called “Aries”. 3 r) T3 w$ M4 k% z: B: s/ |Test Validity The degree to which a test accomplishes its specified goal. 5 h! g& ]: m, h7 V+ m% RTEV Test, Evaluation and Verification. TEVS (1) Test Environment System. (2) Test Environment Support Systems. 3 j8 |: b- S& h, g: WTEWG See Test and Evaluation Working Group. TEx Test Exerciser (NMD BMC3 Term). + I y$ ^. q( h1 b( T% uTEXCOM Test and Experimentation Command. TF Task Force. ! N# U# A1 v2 \$ |2 {4 e. m% K" WTFC Tactical Fusion Center. / z3 j, l7 o% x |- h. ]* Q# rTFCC Tactical Flag Command Center (USN term). 8 ~( N) [/ L" g$ J0 ?TFD Technical Feasibility Decision. TFE Thermionic Fuel Element(s). TFIM Technical (Architecture) Framework for Information Management TFOV Theoretical Field of View. TFR Terrain Following Radar. 3 c; ] ^# V4 g: ^! @6 z6 K3 DTFRAMES Tools to Facilitate the Rapid Assembly of Missile Engagement Simulations. TFT Time Off Target (JFACC term). % E8 `" P* ]* U" KTFW Tactical Fighter Wing (USAF term). TG (1) Threat Generator. (2) Trajectory Generator. TGINFOREP Target Information Report (JFACC term). ; n( U- n4 B MTGS Track Generation System (USN term). 3 |" \7 i4 d, S: M7 A: Q( ?0 mTGW Terminally-Guided Warhead. 7 u1 `2 D# q/ k4 M1 O3 G% ETHAAD See Theater High Altitude Area Defense System. Theater The geographical area outside the continental United States for which a commander of a unified or specified command has been assigned. Theater Attack Attack on a geographical area outside the continental United States. * Z0 j4 } N2 h- T* }( I9 ]Theater Ballistic " [* W. K' I4 k4 d: sMissile Defense (TBMD) System & v" q+ u2 t$ DThe aggregate TMD C3I and TBMD forces that, in total, provide defense against ballistic missile attacks within an overseas theater of operations. $ R; g' s8 I4 E8 ^3 J o(USSPACECOM)