航空论坛_航空翻译_民航英语翻译_飞行翻译

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: 帅哥
打印 上一主题 下一主题

航空缩略语词典 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

51#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:07:59 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 H 0 O7 x" `' {6 J* L% @# W' |0 q5 t130 ; L; W' e3 x7 u& }2 s0 ]8 `; J9 |# _Human-in-Control Human-in-Control provides for the positive control of automated system ! ]8 D4 `* u5 ~6 B) \2 q, @4 b( kprocesses. This is accomplished by requiring human action to provide essential' i" c! T! E% {/ k high-level commands such as initiate, terminate, and interrupt. With regards to 4 O+ ^5 e2 N% ?3 z; |. eBMD, 10 USC 2431, Section 224 states that: “No agency of the Federal / K3 i! L( Q3 H4 u* PGovernment may plan for, fund, or otherwise support the development of, ~" h4 E# n1 `. b: e command and control systems for strategic defense in the boost or post-boost # s1 {) n) J5 M3 M( N# fphase against ballistic missile threats that would permit such strategic defenses # ?8 g5 Q1 M. @8 o2 ^' q% Fto initiate the directing of damaging or lethal fire except by affirmative human0 t% v1 b" k, E4 {* @2 o2 | decision at an appropriate level of authority.” (USSPACECOM): c' {: h: y7 U6 R$ F2 r Human 2 N+ U7 `: P0 P: IIntelligence ( n) E) f0 p; `/ Q$ c$ w(HUMINT)4 ?# V* z8 m) b/ y A category of intelligence derived from information collected and provided by / x9 O8 K3 G# n4 v) {: ~; z6 A0 Phuman sources.' P* \! Y, M7 [( T. e Human Systems9 t' d) J: K- A2 N4 ]) P. L Integration$ P1 |" f0 j6 e2 l The human considerations (human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, & q! {0 V" {5 \/ N4 gtraining, and safety and health hazards) that are integrated into the design effort9 v6 ?! [; c2 n% b4 z/ Z, w" J/ E for the defense system to improve total system performance and reduce costs of# a9 a F5 U% E9 r; V( [ ownership by focusing attention on the capabilities and limitations of the soldier,+ g+ N7 w3 ?$ K A1 e5 `+ z, ] sailor, airman, or Marine. : m3 v" L8 u1 U8 r$ D" MHUMINT Human Intelligence. / P) O! k7 T+ ^+ Y7 PHVAA High Value Airborne Assets.! v& R5 F, F# o! F0 d4 G HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.2 r6 v! q5 W7 p: g" ^8 u) w HVG Hypervelocity Gun. ' J; }, g5 \' }" A9 wHVL Hypervelocity Launcher (Gun). 8 Y# E: ]2 m, @3 y" kHVM Hypervelocity Missile. ; M6 C/ }/ _- t6 P0 dHVP Hypervelocity Projectile. 3 v: v* {2 w: u% E: \; d5 [HVT Half-Value Thickness.: w8 M* p: ]8 Y% ~/ C( s1 V HW Hardware./ m; w+ A5 C) z, H HW/SW Hardware/Software.% Q' z/ C# i; y" m HWCI Hardware Configuration Item. 6 V# |/ t- f/ |# A' q3 I. ]' {HWIL See Hardware-in-the-Loop. - g1 i: X3 a2 P6 z1 i, u" q! z YHWILT Hardware-in-the-loop Test. 7 |% \3 M9 _, T2 |HYLYE Hypersonic Low Temperature.5 ]% v+ E2 b; X! |; \ Hypervelocity 6 Z3 Z( e% \& ^6 E* H2 _) M- n# QGun (HVG) , z; ^, K( t" I/ {) V/ H! C7 YA gun that can accelerate projectiles to 5 km per second or more; for example, 7 p1 }: w4 Q# k# {: e/ ]0 T/ Z; yan electromagnetic or rail gun. ; i, M- ?8 a, J- Y8 FHypervelocity8 E+ ~# R# O5 u% ` Missile (HVM) 0 P8 Q8 j7 l6 G5 R- R2 y( h" `A missile that can operate at a velocity greater than 4 km per second.3 ?" \7 U9 Q$ F; f9 W; t( m" } HYWAYS Hybrids with Advanced Yields for Surveillance.: s7 h9 {/ e0 W. |# T% ~ Hz Hertz (cycles per second). 5 i, Z. S1 j( C% P- \! M! K7 pMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I" z/ d, j- f; Z" B6 l1 P 131 ( l; |% [& M3 T5 C: ZI&CO Installation and Checkout. 0 R: m2 F& [! Y& t+ l( dI&I Installation and Integration. 5 Q3 _" j# ~. _1 G1 q9 sI&PA Integration and Performance Analysis.' T- Q; p( K: a& H6 g6 F I&T Integration and Test. 0 [0 R8 O7 ^1 Q& \I&W Indications and Warning. : E5 T% T6 d R! A* t: M8 EI-CASE Integrated Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.1 R- _& \$ @0 g$ T1 Q I-HAWK Improved HAWK. 9 b8 V1 ?2 W/ o/ d! c. e8 NI-MOSC Integrated Mission Operations Support Center (USAF term). 5 K4 S& L0 C. A1 ]/ JI/F Interface.5 I3 `* Z8 [6 o& M8 U! K I/O Input/Output.' ]% O7 b3 r5 T8 g I/R Interchangeability/Reparability., n0 F: o, |: Y. E I4 International Information Integrity Institute. " ]7 p* P0 I8 C0 F8 cIA Information Architecture.# |: q: T# M- {( k% i* k8 u IA&I Industrial Affairs and Installations./ W5 [5 J& J7 o6 L" l* G+ _6 i IA&T Installation (Integration), assembly, and test. ' A4 v1 @2 j2 zIAD Integrated Air Defense.9 P8 w' J0 O2 ^* |/ T/ V IADS Integrated Air Defense System.6 o r B* c$ y* M! T IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency.: }! J9 v5 L# T0 E. i IAG International Agreement Generator.: v R3 q' i$ n# A3 a K" W IAI Israel Aircraft Industries. # E& C) w1 I! P; y' QIAP (1) Integrated Action Plan. (2) Integrated Avionics Package. 8 p5 U1 ] j7 C$ C W- d3 RIAS Israeli Architecture Study.; T3 R+ V& W4 C4 V0 u IAT Integrated Assembly Test.' o% q- @2 D& l1 l) ]. c IATACS Improved Army Tactical Communications System. ! p- c, E( y5 T" R7 M% V( FIATCO Integration, Assembly, Test & Check Out. ( N* i A! t+ R3 E9 _' p6 H; {. q0 YIAW In Accordance With. 1 ~# x2 Z1 k5 R* ]" DIBA Industrial Base Assessment.& s$ f8 [9 y; l* F) ?: } i IBC Impurity Band Conduction. ( d5 T6 T; ~0 j$ h- iIBCSi:As Impurity Band Conduction Arsenic Doped Silicon.6 E* n5 p) H8 ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 4 B' Y& J7 G0 J+ l/ y/ N( M132: H3 h/ |# R7 w* X* U- h5 F% r6 C IBDL Intra-Battery Data Link.: G: d$ V U6 d t. {3 [" H IBID Integrated BMC3 Infrastructure Demonstration & B5 g& ?6 J) D4 O2 \1 c5 PIBIS Israeli Boost-Phase Intercept System. 8 k4 ~6 O! c1 rIBM International Business Machines Corporation.% H& V- g4 Y1 e0 p, x IBPA Industrial Base/Producibility Analysis.& p |: m$ c$ h$ n4 n IBR Integrated Baseline Review (DD 5000 term).+ K( \1 A2 }8 F9 \( ^+ z' p$ H4 v1 E/ j IBS Integrated Bridge System, a part of the Integrated Control System (ICS) for US4 ~! e0 v4 e- {. e$ t naval ships.+ H3 Z9 M" H2 G7 i7 \) ~# | IBSS Infrared Background Signature Survey.6 t( ~7 M0 ~5 X; V, d* E% } IC (1) Intelligence Community. (2) Integrated Circuit." y) Q3 Q, Z( z ICA (1) Independent Cost Analysis. (2) Independent Cost Assessment. H) V, }4 k& A7 [2 D Y. P ICADS Integrated Correlation and Display System. 8 F8 k* ~- @; D, ?0 l& ]* g9 aICAF Industrial College of the Armed Forces. * O4 ~8 i: k- x! V; l7 pICAO International Civil Aviation Organization.; N/ u) S( s+ B ICAS Integrated Condition Assessment System, a part of the Integrated Control " a+ r' h5 L USystem (ICS) for US naval ships. - v1 [; N; k1 Q8 SICASE Integrated Computer Assisted Software Engineering. 1 g% W7 e* d! U7 LICBM See Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.* [/ U% F# W% r ICC (1) Information and Coordination Central (PATRIOT). # R% c( B) J+ m- Z, U, M(2) Item Category Code (ILS term)." `! t0 T* q- U" z2 Y( e M ICCIP Inter-Center Council of Information Processing. * K& k, w5 Q( L/ |* b L( uICCITS Inter-Center Council on Information Technology Security. , {; Z) U* a9 j! |ICCN Inter-Center Council on Networking. ' ~$ o% A. h% s( AICD Interface Control Document/Drawing. W3 ~' l) t/ l( i" s9 JICE Independent Cost Estimate. / F3 q3 D% f; aICEDEFFOR Iceland Defense Force (NATO)./ w+ ^: g, A$ H8 M$ d. a ICM Improved Conventional Munitions. & [2 E( A: d, z/ Y3 wICN Installation Completion Notification.+ v! B5 a9 H/ n) e4 e, l7 _8 ? ICO Interface Control Officer (JFACC term). , h( e# M; r! N# }& VICOE Initiations, Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures./ ^+ U$ b1 Y7 s MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I3 g) n2 k1 P+ k1 v: n 133 , k' |, I2 W0 f* A) g( E" RICP (1) Interface Change Proposal. (2) Inventory Control Point (ILS term). - G5 ]" `$ U* Y9 `6 z6 R4 ^(3) Interface Change Proposal. (4) Interface Control Process./ B7 h7 x' k# X) v k ICR Integrated Contracting Report.2 C# ^, t! l2 ^+ K5 W1 o- [! | S ICS (1) Integrated Control System, a computerized monitoring, command, and6 E6 N# O9 d3 K: b* i. v control system for US naval ships. 1 I: z& @0 F9 ~0 d(2) Interface Control Specification. 0 }8 p0 `* @* a$ }ICU Interface Control Unit.5 O8 s6 \+ \+ |+ p4 F; [. g0 |$ W' G ICWG Interface Control Working Group.. B3 ^' W" h8 G" _( ] ID (1) Interactive Discrimination. (2) Identification. * Z' y) m, A( o+ u. MIDA Institute for Defense Analysis. 6 Q0 j) L' \* k) vIDASC Improved Direct Air Support Center (USMC term).* f' j- h7 b# \- l0 i IDB Integrated Data Base. . @" Q5 r5 u4 S8 fIDD Interface Design Document.4 o- P. c, a! O IDEA Integrated Dose Environmental Analysis.# ?3 L5 ^1 n( n# U IDECM Integrated Defensive Electronics Countermeasures (USN/USAF term). 9 m8 [4 ~2 z& H8 ]Identification5 A1 `$ c/ I/ ]* a2 l% ? Friend or Foe1 G- N( J; {8 z$ m (IFF) & J `0 L1 J [7 EA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by9 J! d) {. S. D7 t3 O9 ?5 k% U" I2 ] friendly forces automatically responds, for example by emitting pulses, thereby; ?. P) c3 o' |, f3 { distinguishing themselves from enemy forces.4 N5 k3 v" e6 b IDG Institute for the Dynamics of Geo-spheres. 8 x x* ~5 \8 S' \7 VIDHS Intelligence Data Handling System.2 \& m5 B1 F) C5 |7 j+ w/ N6 U( I IDIP Integrated Development and Initial Production.# T# o' A) u9 _- }- c- T IDR Initial Design Review.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

52#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:15 |只看该作者
IDS (1) Interface Design Standards. (2) Intrusion Detection System. - U9 G! t* o% O. A4 }) oIE (1) Independent Evaluation. (2) Integration Exercise.: ]% I' Q L m/ c IED Intrinsic Event Discrimination. ( a! p; L( e$ l3 T" q8 nIEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. $ ~# F; Z( ~. {1 @5 LIEI Integrated Engineering Infrastructure. 2 y" o) @3 v# y* D! IIEMP Induced Electromagnetic Pulse. 4 a3 R# d+ S2 J5 EIEP Integrated Evaluation Plan. 1 Z& V$ W! [" D; S; K4 _1 Z9 ]IER Independent Evaluation Report., \2 K9 T4 t' r9 x/ i IESG Internet Engineering Steering Group.3 s" c7 Q( @% V9 Y5 t5 F% C/ J, \ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 3 t# p6 V8 {* B6 Q; L1349 T' B% C; X- f2 V- O; a: ^* G/ i- \9 [ IETF Internet Engineering Task Force. , {6 L/ D) L0 ]3 f! A" W2 c( f7 H/ jIEV Integrated Experimental Version. 4 H+ W2 y9 `% ^* T+ a$ YIEW Intelligence and Electronic Warfare.# g3 M$ _7 [8 r+ d( f) f IFA Integrated Financial Analysis.$ U" s6 @3 w9 }+ L0 G; P IFF Identification, Friend or Foe. % V v R( L5 Q8 w% v4 `; k' nIFHV In-Flight Homing View.+ Z# R* y" [: @ IFICS In-Flight Interceptor Communications System. IFICS provides the - x2 a _3 G! J& i* Kcommunications link between the ground and the space based NMD assets.9 S) K8 P& L. Q0 L5 H/ [& i0 z$ K The generic term IFICS replaces the obsolete design specific communications / B: A- Q* I! w4 P' Y7 Asystem term GEP.) ]" H& y5 D' S. l IFOG Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyroscope.% R- y; m7 h, j( t& z IFOV Instantaneous Field of View." t( w2 C7 S8 S- m( b, q' |7 V IFSR In-Flight Status Report$ g0 E! q8 o: f1 ]3 G7 A IFT Integrated Flight Test.+ t4 T( z7 l) D5 V' p+ v7 L; { IFTU In-Flight Target Update./ ]6 U% g5 L: W+ u4 Y0 r, @6 a* z IG Inspector General.+ F( y& }2 q4 j' H# o, p7 i IGEMP Internally Generated Electromagnetic Pulse. & Q H( I! {! S! w% N$ z+ L( T' CIGES Initial Graphics Exchange Standard. 8 g" m7 p/ z/ n; qIGS Inertial Guidance System. 0 z$ q# w# r) s; S5 QIGSM Interim Ground Station Module (JSTARS). 9 m6 }' Q8 Y uIGT Integrated Ground Test. 3 ~9 w, T2 \9 u1 xIGU Inertial Guidance Unit.5 A4 _ D* e' f- b# ^& x7 B( u" \ II Impulse Intensity. . U# f. o) ~- N, D/ T' eIIP Interoperability Improvement Program., ?: [- J- J0 E% u% o IIPT Integration Integrated Product (Process) Team. + v: z* a$ B% @: z7 [IIR (1) Intelligence Information Report. (2) Imaging Infrared.% _* |0 r7 H8 o4 m IIS International Institute for Strategic Studies (UK).4 x9 ]' x$ K1 J1 j IIT Interceptor Integration Test. 3 X* W6 l" @$ pIITF Information Infrastructure Task Force. : v2 y. z7 K5 F* F2 ZIJSOW Improved Joint Stand Off Weapon.( C9 Q$ V# }2 B/ B- a MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I4 l4 d! D" k9 \+ b& R; t6 { 135 1 N8 E) Z1 B' zILA Inter-Laboratory Authorization (Contracting term).- ?# w+ S5 R2 K# P' G, l ILC Initial Launch Capability.% ~. e+ J* q0 Z9 n" n- N7 g7 f! ^ Ilities The operational and support requirements a program must address (e.g., ) y9 K; V. _; Z q6 Favailability, vulnerability, producibility, reliability, maintainability, logistics - w6 W1 W% W8 a% { ~# lsupportability, etc.). % r" u$ Z$ o* x- Y! P+ \Illumination Non-interfering impingement of electromagnetic energy on Red, Blue, or Gray; q8 |( C% }7 N' v. l satellites and Red ballistic missiles in test.% {2 J& I; C# d ILS Integrated Logistics Support.5 m: `& B0 W6 j7 R. y$ K ILSM ILS Manager. + K* s1 I* q8 S& z8 SILSMT ILS Management Team+ k( g! I/ r- S6 s+ e( _2 y) a( L ILSO ILS Office.- r; a( Y$ S' y% h. [. {8 \/ v% K6 z ILSP Integrated Logistics Support Plan.' k0 R( p/ G/ o9 T+ ^+ X. P ILSWG ILS Working Group.9 Y$ M: w2 T0 S IM Information Management. 8 Y6 t8 K/ p# q* V; MImagery Collectively, the representations or objects reproduced electronically or by optical- o! T' \# y n: G4 X3 [8 P means on film, electronic display devices, or other media. 1 y6 e/ q' W+ y2 q) P& BImagery / {9 y# {1 a$ ]* x# |: fIntelligence3 t: Y- c6 @' t- y# ~ (IMINT)( {5 U* j4 M5 {9 \ Intelligence derived from the exploitation of collection by visual photography, 5 Z- y4 f2 @0 k6 ~* @! Ainfrared sensors, lasers, electro-optics, and radar sensors (such as synthetic; l, M" A s& C! r; q3 l8 w7 ~ aperture radar) wherein images of objects are reproduced optically or% W* {- } Y: \( r: K, J electronically on film, electronic display devices, or other media. ' |( q* c0 _- n1 T' S6 H1 RImagery' p, R. f k/ k Correlation; ?8 l) H* o" [7 U2 `! l The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from( W% V! K0 i8 m1 w different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics 9 F6 d$ O) I9 w& d! hsignified.) u) C( D, v. H* }* B, ] c Imaging The process of obtaining a high quality image of an object. 7 O$ }' I+ i3 e8 zIMC (1) Interagency Management Council (GSA term).4 o; H# x' @: f3 O& \6 w& i (2) Internal Management Control. : N, F/ T2 d- Z) y" q& a, n+ VIMDB Imagery Management.. p$ ?1 s8 ^' L IMDO Israeli Missile Defense Organization. MDA counterpart in the Israeli Ministry of $ Z5 C9 j* T, ~: Q+ Z7 Q* |Defense.9 J( h$ w! m( _3 B IMINT Imagery Intelligence. 2 w U G, Y0 e1 y6 T+ BIMIP Industrial Modernization Incentives Program.! X' h1 F; i8 V1 r: h Immediate Kill " p" D; J& O' CMode' ~- a8 B I% I0 x: Z1 {& P* N A kill mode in which the target is immediately catastrophically destroyed by, h) G+ u M6 B4 }0 N impact with the KV or KED.7 s+ k4 A! b3 r" }5 g4 A Impact Point! S1 w" @6 _5 A/ t Prediction (IPP) , _8 g2 ^& P V# uPrediction of the point on the earth’s surface where a specific RV will impact, * \! e- Z* S* Q' `usually specified in terms of the circular error probable. The estimate includes, R$ C2 x x8 ] the perturbing effects of the atmosphere and resultant uncertainties. B& K* X [+ n& u) O& f# u% hMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I # ~ `9 E& r" D) h136; J) l, c0 O: a2 A: n( V6 k Implicit3 m! ^$ }' n1 Q: x5 X$ h Coordination# A: s( y/ M5 T6 u5 M+ C Many independent battle managers (computers) use the same algorithms to1 z- Z) H! P1 ?6 b% | derive a common calculated result. Decisions resulting from these calculations * [9 [. D' A1 u k1 P# ewill be identical even though the calculated results may not be identical. : X) V \2 E' u b9 [* E' mDecisions or results are not communicated between Battle Managers. 6 J) I; G- i- X8 {/ sImpulse A mechanical jolt delivered to an object. Physically, impulse is a force applied for 6 f2 ? ?' G! E& M6 ha period of time, and the System Internationale Unit of impulse is the Newtonsecond (abbreviated N-s). (See Impulse Intensity.)$ E0 q7 ~ B' e( r/ }& a Impulse- q; {: d* _' U$ ^; m% s) h- n, J; j Intensity (II)8 T* g/ h! l8 S Mechanical impulse per unit area. The System Internationale unit of impulse 4 K$ e6 Y7 p0 [0 z0 a% uintensity is the Pascal-second (abbreviated Pa-s). A conventionally used unit of+ N' T* n# y! J, Q6 J* h: `8 @5 T impulse intensity is the “tap”, which is one dyne-second per square centimeter;& Z8 J( W1 d( M. M# j hence, 1 tap = 0.1 Pa-s. ' t1 k5 @- v$ D* ~Impulse Kill The destruction of a target, using directed energy, by ablative shock. The $ l4 Y& J u: ?. Yintensity of directed energy may be so great that the surface of the target) I) \' J- |. d! q violently and rapidly boils off delivering a mechanical shock wave to the rest of2 G5 ^# ?) R( @' O X the target and causing structural failure.; L7 _% G9 b7 r/ b& j5 ^ IMPWG Information Policy Working Group./ y8 T; U, i- H5 Z" ?& \ IMS Integrated Master Schedule.( ` j* e; |* b9 ^8 B c, Y IMU Inertial Measurement Unit. 8 j2 P5 m9 K. Q/ \3 LIN (1) Air Force component intelligence officer (staff). (2) Instructor. (3) Impulse7 [- L% |, i7 @- ?1 f$ E Noise. # c2 l* s1 y$ }( g9 n) ]In Inch." E/ J+ j1 K6 H5 O* ]* f P IN LINAC Induction Linear Accelerator." t4 d' d; I& t) g In-Flight Target4 g3 z7 Q6 R# l# d. K q: Y- x+ s Update (FTU). d" s4 a+ X5 a' `0 s A report to in-flight interceptor weapons. The IFTU provides updated, predictahead target position, time, and velocity for use within the interceptor’s control 6 N+ I+ j4 M& p- `suite to make midcourse corrections to intercept the target. j/ z- R9 D2 G; h) z% @6 E Inclination The inclination of an orbit is the (dihedral) angle between the plane containing* l8 j( c8 L- l0 ~' f the orbit and the plane containing the earth’s equator. An equatorial orbit has5 ^% W* x- u y2 S& W+ S an inclination of 0° for a satellite traveling eastward or 180° for a satellite6 w) C& Y- t5 M; C. U traveling westward. An orbit having an inclination between 0° and 90° and in% h" ~! o4 }6 ^8 z6 Z which a satellite is traveling generally eastward is called a prograde orbit. An" y6 E2 q7 U! D, k- Z' a( L9 Y orbit having an inclination of 90° passes above the north and south poles and is/ l9 `& b0 h. O6 `1 F6 w" h called a polar orbit. An orbit having an inclination of more than 90° is called a7 O1 d/ ?% X6 s* w8 B; W* K1 H retrograde orbit./ m3 v- l4 M% X) b2 T' P Incremental 7 ]: q; C% ]7 T" i$ q, ^8 u* g4 mFunding5 I# d; O* L% B. l" F The provision (or recording) of budgetary resources for a program or project6 Q6 b/ t" K" A. ^- I based on obligations estimated to be incurred within a fiscal year when such4 k0 `" h( E6 c( L+ Y budgetary resources will cover only a portion of the obligations to be incurred in; Q2 P( D4 M0 r" R( L. B completing the program or project as programmed. This differs from full funding,9 m) d# B1 J9 l! N. J# \ where budgetary resources are provided or recorded for the total estimated 6 G) {5 q! |1 t4 m3 `obligations for a program or a project in the initial year of funding.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

53#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:32 |只看该作者
Identification3 R8 o" J8 c2 R" K8 [ Friend or Foe + L* m# H' U$ ^/ s! @; D(IFF) 8 h) _) A! d, u7 a9 t, q KA system using electromagnetic transmissions to which equipment carried by ( K$ P1 t3 o4 ffriendly forces automatically responds, fro example by emitting pulses, thereby9 y& u6 |8 y8 p) S distinguishing themselves from enemy forces.0 G0 N1 m, X, s8 B) P MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 9 C, u7 X1 @+ M137& C) P# ]5 q$ ?( t Imagery8 B& A U$ v9 K: N6 t# R Correlation* h! F3 M; @* s( d2 s/ A, ] The mutual relationship between the different signatures on imagery from, z% p0 Y$ l3 Q( O5 f; q* a! I different types of sensors in terms of position and the physical characteristics- Z6 h+ H' w I) g: p# @4 Z) t signified.7 l2 ~ ^& J: A5 ^ Independent , e [2 W2 @7 k3 ECost Analysis \& U7 q/ j1 ?An analysis of program cost estimates conducted by an impartial body( h! S& p+ p K! ? disassociated from the management of the program. (See Title 10, United0 V3 |+ |( ~; d0 V States Code, Section 2434, “Independent Cost Estimates; Operational a: n, n2 m7 j* j9 G$ c# o Manpower Requirements.”)* T; E) q% l; }5 j8 H ]; a% n* } Independent Cost % a; n- L% w0 Y# lEstimate (ICE)0 |# n+ t, l6 |% G7 s% t' f5 O4 j0 { A cost estimate prepared by an impartial body outside the chain of authority: Q7 }# J/ ~) }) @! b responsible for acquiring or using the goods or services.4 T0 p8 m& L2 U- Q1 Z; m" [! H- R! p Independent 0 L5 r& q: G; O E8 R5 W/ q1 DEvaluation8 D. m, b5 ^" A& _- B Report (IER)7 K9 c# c" y D" K9 U Documents the independent evaluation of the system and is based on test data, ) }1 R/ Y! ?$ `! k8 k( H wreports, studies, and simulations. The IER contains the independent evaluator’s& \! f" d- y* o0 p& n assessment of key issues, supporting analyses, major findings, and a position on; w( m( K$ ?, J# |5 L8 J the future capability of the system to fulfill approved requirements. The IER is 3 i) U/ u7 i) dprovided to the DAB to support the MS III decision production decision. An IER2 s8 v( L2 v5 ^) W" B; f may also be used to support LRIP decisions. (U.S. Army) 3 O* n& q [7 \0 NIndependent' ?4 J1 S* F5 Y* }9 O5 u# t Research and* B- g( }; m* H( f# f. @8 T8 ^0 _ Development" e1 z: D* P0 I0 N3 d (IR&D); U/ R$ h1 N% q. l( J. h, \* M* O Effort by industry that is not sponsored by, or required in performance of, a ) e4 u# X( U: E* f2 fcontract and which consists of projects falling within the areas of basic and- \; G1 R" ^( A) U2 O9 F1 ? applied research, development, and systems and other concept formulation3 E( z4 f, [' F/ B# @ studies. Also, discretionary funds which industry can allocate to projects. (See5 T# V" z0 {1 b9 ?/ k FAR 31.001.)2 L6 D6 A" n \6 f* k z; w Independent ; z/ F+ s9 }7 S. a7 r% b' w5 F/ iVerification and 6 w: T3 d1 G4 i! t' ]Validation (IV&V) ; W# J2 z5 q4 w9 u. s3 O WVerification and validation performed by a contractor or Government agency that5 D' e* L' d# @! c is not responsible for developing the product or performing the activity being7 M V" x% }% ^ evaluated. IV&V is an activity that is conducted separately from the software 8 A8 u$ J6 f$ F5 Vdevelopment activities.& g( }( k3 N, ^% ^ Indium 9 W8 S; F$ \* C; W. kAntimonide 9 @+ e I1 N+ G& W6 eInfrared sensing material. ' I, p& e$ g( k" w/ iIndividual # d: c" d; Q5 s7 v: PAcceptance Test9 g1 D& r& r3 W9 X A test of predetermined critical items to verify their operational characteristics# e& ?7 U8 e& z) |. i5 y8 Z- G8 t prior to assembly into subsystems. Waivers to this requirement, such as using 7 D* |3 T* M' W& t- y6 m8 othe end item acceptance tests, are not recommended as production expediency./ U2 t% G3 N7 [ Induced7 b7 D) I% v3 d$ G Environments $ ]9 @. \- }! z/ h: I4 h/ u0 u! ZInduced environments are defined at the system level as the disturbances in the+ v3 h4 ]& u0 x$ D0 w natural environments caused by BMD system influences on other BMD assets) i3 X5 o; P2 X (Self-Induced, e.g., GBR radar energy impacting and effecting a GBI in flight) or 3 A Y; N0 F% [* vthe influence of other systems external to BMD on BMD assets (Externally-* u/ x; r. V) ]7 p$ ^7 f, v Induced, e.g., high power electric line electromagnetic field effects on C2E # w" N2 }: D% N. M. M, o1 Helectronic equipment). : ]0 Q& i9 |0 B, aInduced ( P. x! N' t0 |( ]: }4 b5 oRadioactivity% N$ }+ M" a# d8 D5 r& F Radioactivity produced in certain materials as a result of nuclear reactions, ( m; v3 B3 X1 O1 R& x: Dparticularly the capture of neutrons, which are accompanied by the formation of) k- e6 v) T4 @, c unstable (radioactive) nuclei. In a nuclear explosion, neutrons can induce % y' e) k2 x# ?' Mradioactivity in the weapon materials, as well as in the surroundings (e.g., by5 A# z9 L8 R4 I interaction with nitrogen in the air and with sodium, manganese, aluminum, and " D7 a; u% e' |) U" D# ?5 ksilicon in soil and sea water).* E) U% A: g' u- |( F9 g# b MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I ) H) {: y0 B: B7 J) ?: E1 L138 6 |/ g X, b3 a% M2 fIndustrial1 R, H( C/ S" u. g, z$ u. Z Resource- g: J* T" i! e% B4 N& Q" h Analysis (IRA) 4 L+ n3 m: ]1 }! mA quick-turnaround or a detailed analysis of industrial and/or specific factory 8 F# f/ k' C f0 N, zcapabilities to determine the availability of production resources required to $ J% t1 u% b# h& msupport SDS. These resources include capital (including machine tools and8 @) j9 y7 d2 X special tooling/test equipment), materiel, and manpower needed to meet the* s- U4 p# q5 {: E# O; W range of SDS requirements. IRA includes the results of feasibility studies,/ u/ j: F+ R. N' T# [- e producibility analyses, and technology assessments. Shortfalls discovered in% N3 d; a5 Y5 [6 X& `) p IRAs are assessed for risk levels, based on the reasons for the risks, and 4 L6 O" d) X( K5 C0 M3 Tbecome issues listed in the MDA Producibility Programming and Issues, T+ G2 M( `* e! L/ s, C, p Resolution Strategies (PPIRS) document. $ h7 a4 [9 ^/ F3 \3 r& I0 c- sInertial q+ F$ a M5 gGuidance, A; h' G) p. X: H- S A guidance system designed to project a missile over a predetermined path,; d6 A5 f% O( a3 p3 f' [ wherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly : @ A4 l1 X. G' N# T/ h/ Kwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The system measures ' L) P2 @: E; U0 ]/ u9 c' w% wand converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain6 `& ? d" B8 l$ \* s# ]) M ` direction. 9 S# V+ Q" I7 E0 mInertial 2 F9 m( e$ E Z' ?2 OMeasurement8 M* M* s6 O! I( N1 d& [+ F Unit (IMU) ! E& y% ~' \8 w ~A guidance mechanism designed to project a missile over a predetermined path, 3 k$ U3 O: f0 a+ dwherein the path of the missile is adjusted after launching by devices wholly 5 Y7 u( K& j7 z' \0 Zwithin the missile and independent of outside information. The unit measures: H, w4 P2 H0 P+ p8 h. a# k" R and converts accelerations experienced to distance traveled in a certain 6 {6 ]" U6 u E4 vdirection. , g) s6 X/ n6 V& ^INETS Integrated Effects Tests for Survivability.: U. @8 S0 `$ r/ S& Q INEWS Integrated Electronic Warfare System (Navy term). 4 Q- y4 {% X4 `, _% f+ N; ]! CINF Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (Treaty term). Also the name of U.S./USSR 7 l& G' A2 E" @8 g2 e8 @# aTreaty. 2 c5 R6 K! p' [4 x% n8 Q/ xIn-Flight Target7 x( L; E# z# w7 A" M Update# `, z) D! D/ v& Q; u! T! H A data report, which contains updated, predict- ahead target position, time, and2 u3 N2 F4 L7 L; }" A velocity for interceptor weapons to use in making midcourse correction. 2 N2 w- \0 z/ O7 s(USSPACECOM) L) B" ], ?* Q1 i: a Information 5 G" o* ^- k l- n( x- e7 hArchitecture (IA)' A1 ]; _% K$ | A description of the information that is needed to support command and control 9 p( j5 K; c7 Y% M- Edecision making and battle management, where it comes from, the processing; g. H5 w, Y/ z3 j/ X8 _5 Y; U- t, O that must be performed to provide it, and the resulting behavior. The description' m# K+ P3 y c; W5 ~% k provides the invariant framework for interoperability, operational and design+ ~ M0 ~' `! K( T$ [ flexibility, coping with the unexpected, extensibility, and reusability. 5 Y7 g l' a4 p. j; A7 y% Z# W. BInformation5 _" R5 O" G! H% u, W# S Resources % |3 l0 ]5 R( J' S0 s* d: t/ ^Management & d" Q A& x4 n" P2 W2 y$ PThe planning, budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling, $ {* Z5 Q! O( V, E: z6 b+ `and management activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use, ! ]: H( ?8 J- Q* v" n, Sand dissemination of information by agencies and includes the management of 3 m; i T+ o& d* x" ~' Winformation and related resources, such as FIP resources.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

54#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:08:50 |只看该作者
Information, u! b. h7 y7 Y) J: a Security : G2 r6 U$ y- M(INFOSEC) * l8 r/ M* D# }Those measures and administrative procedures for identifying, controlling, and+ }; C2 l, l) G( G, } protecting against unauthorized disclosure of classified information or G8 n9 a1 \, @2 z* e5 Eunclassified controlled information, which includes export-controlled technical 8 @+ g$ Y$ L8 t) f* a8 U) C p! idata and sensitive information. Such measures and procedures are concerned 0 e' l1 E: L- ^. B, o8 p( G( {with security education and training, assignment of proper classifications, ( d% u8 G; ^9 u7 k6 q4 edowngrading and declassification, safeguarding, and monitoring. / _. Y; P* c2 b+ P! mInfrared (IR) Electromagnetic radiations of wavelength between the longest visible red (7,000 R" c5 o/ L3 W2 Y7 SAngstroms or 7 x 10E4 millimeter) and about 1 millimeter. (See Electromagnetic k/ |" w- N2 \2 q& E8 iRadiation.) 7 m5 C+ ^) L, y/ q1 MInfrared (IR) ' { ?1 ?3 t, H$ rElectro-Optics5 G4 ~3 R# A+ w# o* d/ y8 H Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength ' M+ Z3 B3 g" H9 B+ a4 x1 zspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.) @! D2 W- U, N# s MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 1 y+ F% i& e4 d9 R5 \8 d- X$ }9 @139 , M# h3 w: L# \5 ~Infrared Imagery That imagery produced as a result of sensing electromagnetic radiations emitted ' R, ?! H1 H5 O4 d/ }or reflected from a given target surface in the infrared position of the 1 _$ {9 i3 C. eelectromagnetic spectrum.' m, J1 F3 r- Z& k9 S8 v/ \* L+ }4 a Infrared Sensor A sensor designed to detect the electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength : n" c! r9 x* b! A8 {/ V; Qregion of 1 to 40 microns. ( F4 a) P6 N1 L1 g+ qInitial ' ]3 B' F% S% x, m% G& ROperational 4 g F0 |! d! ]- GCapability (IOC) $ X. |' A9 D }- S: FThe first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of2 { n3 V% Z9 {8 S. i& D- R equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics, and which is manned * F4 E9 z9 W% |7 K9 x( cor operated by a trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. 2 D# T- w$ P& V- uInitial * Q1 O5 i2 `& z bOperational Test3 A4 T7 N- y3 m3 X. o& k; v and Evaluation" R Y" P& r" m# A3 L5 g5 E. z (IOT&E) 2 N5 j6 H+ N# D; ]/ L/ TAll operational test and evaluation conducted on production or production' n+ g# {$ K0 l9 m i, H representative articles, to support the decision to proceed beyond low-rate initial / r6 R7 Z, X" g5 X9 g eproduction. It is conducted to provide a valid estimate of expected system# V. B# s+ K6 R w" ~" c, [ operational effectiveness and operational suitability.7 A* p9 w4 v3 y# R1 u/ k% R! M INMARAT International Maritime Satellite (a UHF communications satellite). $ @8 e) X. n$ X; q# NINS (1) Internal Navigation System. (2) Insert code.3 `/ ~4 R) n. q" V InSb Indium Antimonide. 1 L9 D3 y% \3 X, sINSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.5 M) s: E0 w$ w INSICOM Integrated Survivability Experiments. # m L* C* C2 L: e& LInteg Integrated.6 ?3 b) t- m" Z. F8 K& Y/ H Integrated/ e2 @% m0 o$ s/ ? Contracting 7 W: T# `% ]' d8 _Report (ICR)" p% | L. l- b' e: \+ H A quarterly report of BMD contracts, which define the roles, relationships, and ( z1 y7 n5 E* v# r6 Tinterfaces among contracts, contractors, and programs, and provides a t( |& Q9 z7 p, J; w( } mechanism for strengthening MDA contracting oversight (formerly known as 7 [8 v+ S0 {' Y5 v- YIntegrated Contracting Plan or ICP). ' i! |7 S. D, iIntegrated Fire 6 g4 H$ \; v" n0 j$ V) `( WControl System 5 J3 }& R) ^8 x' ]" R1 I$ b8 iA system, which performs the functions of target acquisition, tracking, data 7 B# k- N% B R) ` _! }computation, and engagement control, primarily using electronic means assisted 5 n; K0 @) R0 w9 t2 `' nby electromechanical devices. ' g6 v1 F+ h( k; q& j6 g9 n0 lIntegrated+ x; A; t% r/ ]+ M3 i5 g Logistics Support0 a# G% ?2 e# v0 U% [8 u( f (ILS) 5 s1 Y! a7 y) W5 A) j3 @(1) A disciplined, unified, and iterative approach to the management and8 ]3 b0 l, g% V) T" X technical activities necessary to integrate support considerations into9 Z d6 G' P, @; | system and equipment design; develop support requirements that are % O0 I) I5 {0 h# A! l9 k9 K0 Erelated consistently to readiness objectives, to design, and to each% ?2 H ]; I0 s3 S: n other; acquire the required support; and provide the required support) j5 Q" ]/ [& ?2 c, \ during the operational phase at minimum cost.7 o( j" ]. B- ~0 Z& }0 ?8 V (2) A composite of all the support considerations necessary to assure the : Q; m( F; O9 m$ b; \/ R8 i/ X3 yeffective and economical support of a system for its life cycle. It is an1 N' n( N, P) J) [ integral part of all other aspects of system acquisition and operation." t6 v) c' z3 A4 x& r Integrated 9 o/ c: y- d) M' \5 L7 sLogistics Support ; R5 }% @8 y5 t& G/ E4 s- L% G4 S7 B, P(ILS) Elements ; r4 l" I. y+ n xMaintenance Planning. The process conducted to evolve and establish3 [" g% a' [* X+ g8 n5 F: i( d maintenance concepts and requirements for the lifetime of a materiel system.) S+ a3 x/ C) M7 y7 F Manpower and Personnel. The identification and acquisition of military and2 I" E5 A2 m8 T; v" I; I: Z civilian personnel with the skills and grades required operating and supporting a 3 }! F7 ?) H0 v1 t! I }" G! ?& x5 Jmateriel system over its lifetime at peacetime and wartime rates.$ M( \, g% W( N2 F% \. q d% I Supply Support. All management actions, procedures, and techniques used to ! [# b' v* M+ p, f2 Tdetermine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, and 3 h- L$ Q; y" v9 ^8 Z9 ndispose of secondary items. This includes provisioning for initial support as well3 E$ z* C4 Q' v as replenishment supplies support. ; J8 P6 O' L( s, M* bMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I. ]2 m4 H# Q6 ?7 j( M) P. L* n 140 4 d6 O2 E2 a# p$ n. [9 lSupport Equipment. All equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support the 3 V! J+ i! f; moperation and maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse end items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, meteorology0 w6 O! H% r* K5 y; i and calibration equipment, test equipment, and automatic test equipment. It " z: f3 ^$ f' d$ z1 i2 U0 v4 Wincludes the acquisition of logistics support for the support and test equipment 8 p1 A) D/ L: N+ ?- `itself.- @& X7 ]' S8 F2 p3 ]6 R# b, P Technical Data. Recorded information regardless of form or character (such as8 R o+ O I! b- A$ ? A manuals and drawings) of a scientific or technical nature. Computer programs ) O' k. l/ y/ L' _8 c) E/ d K, X, }6 _# Iand related software are not technical data; documentation of computer2 J; W* I W; Q% v4 w/ N* m' n# d3 ^7 C* g4 x programs and related software are. Also excluded are financial data or other. u0 ?' m! |/ F0 C( X) ^; o1 T information related to contract administration.( A& o6 \: y! ]. _" k Training and Training Support. The processes, procedures, techniques, training" B+ A2 b6 |1 Q devices, and equipment used to train civilian and active duty and reserve military 6 b4 l3 p7 I' G5 X/ upersonnel to operate and support a materiel system. This includes individual 3 }- u& S8 Q" @7 Z( D) Pand crew training; new equipment training; initial, formal, and on-the-job training; ! F! o: P# v8 `( U0 k* qand logistic support planning for training equipment and training device + L9 Z R+ g7 c) v- Racquisitions and installations. 9 b1 x, e; x* }5 Y. a& j1 jComputer Resources Support. The facilities, hardware, software,2 `6 y- ], {4 L" Y documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support6 E, D$ O6 O+ ?3 P embedded computer systems. . q8 h/ M, W0 m; M7 @5 HFacilities. The permanent, or semi-permanent, or temporary real property assets , m% r8 u# n- Z2 v7 l% `required to support the materiel system, including conducting studies to define7 ?% a. j0 P3 U types of facilities or facility improvements, locations, space needs, utilities,+ v5 h( G. O* B! U environmental requirements, real estate requirements, and equipment. * t5 H( |/ G9 [( E0 B) g; YPackaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation. The resources, processes, ( Q! `" p& ]: r2 J- f7 uprocedures, design considerations, and methods to ensure that all system,- n& N$ b1 T3 Y, C* ~0 t) _ equipment, and support items are preserved, packaged, handled, and / k( _. Q4 S; P: R2 v' }transported properly, including environmental considerations, equipment 3 P& n4 i- R, }9 V' Z2 H) ^0 M# [preservation requirements for short- and long-term storage, and transportability.1 F+ M/ k. b- B$ ?( F* m# F0 E Design Interface. The relationship of logistics-related design parameters, such as 4 L5 r# b) y# Vreliability and maintainability, to readiness and support resource requirements. 1 X. r- e+ A* j% a# c: i$ ^! oThese logistics-related design parameters are expressed in operational terms& T: k/ r% F+ t$ r" R rather than inherent values and specifically related to system readiness ! L( T+ y. m. T+ J) jobjectives and support costs of the materiel system.3 s+ t7 }; p9 C- C7 v. j Integrated " s" N1 M h: P$ oLogistics1 J& P, ^6 u; q7 k5 P Support Plan + s- z4 ^. Z; T1 c7 z' N9 \! I6 B(ILSP) , t7 }) z. y* I- rThe formal planning document for logistics support. It is kept current through the$ F' y9 S" O( q) N/ @ program life and sets forth the plan for operational support, provides a detailed 5 g$ \8 W t ~ILS program to fit with the overall program, provides decision-making bodies with ; H; e/ d# B( w3 i l6 e4 anecessary ILS information to make sound decisions in system development and 8 B( d: s7 o$ }6 ]" M, [) w* z! oproduction, and provides the basis for ILS procurement packages/specifications ' n5 S" ?# o1 j1 a# x" g# B2 Y) {RFPs, SOWs, source selection evaluation, terms and conditions, and CDRLs.5 X! ~3 R7 n Y/ T/ G, i5 I Integrated . ?! M) y: Y( k: ~Priority List0 c3 a8 m# n& h3 y" }1 N A list of a combatant commander’s highest priority requirements, prioritized- \2 T8 w% e0 s, i across Service and functional lines. The list defines shortfalls in key programs 8 |9 Y# p6 R t1 Y/ J+ w3 T6 mthat, in the judgment of the combatant commander, adversely affect the 7 {' f$ E1 l. N7 ~) ?: Ncapability of the forces to accomplish their assigned mission. The integrated 3 F% R/ ~0 a" b- o: M' U/ mpriority list provides the combatant commander’s recommendations for3 Z1 o1 L2 `3 m8 O8 K programming funds in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System - t8 G, F) B. j1 p! v* r" B$ iprocess. Also called IPL.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

55#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:01 |只看该作者
Integrated ( P, w4 i8 \4 c C1 _Program" Y; \" P0 e) V) w" \! L2 f Assessment/ S( d0 U! [/ r0 O* T (IPA)( h$ D G) @' e: W- Z8 O0 ]9 W- h& @. Q A document prepared by the supporting staff or review forum of the milestone * I8 z# t4 [6 qdecision authority to support Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It provides an0 X7 m- A P4 G# c9 M9 P independent assessment of a program’s status and readiness to proceed into% x4 r+ ]# u1 Y1 f5 g& ?# T. F- I% [ the next phase of the acquisition cycle.2 |! I# F3 S- v7 ]8 o MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I/ @ `$ r- D2 Y0 u 141! C2 W R! I. J% | Integrated, j! W! P5 Z& i0 y1 P Program4 z! u+ u D T3 w2 \6 y Summary (IPS)2 `9 {7 D- Z* P+ }. p9 V A DoD Component document prepared and submitted to the milestone decision$ M" T& {( M) ]; _ authority in support of Milestone I, II, III, and IV reviews. It succinctly highlights F* K0 f; c% I& V$ [8 F" i0 S the status of a program and its readiness to proceed into the next phase of the 9 }6 H% @/ O- P& s u( kacquisition cycle.8 r: J- A7 `6 _# I Integrated' b1 e" C, g7 K Tactical Warning 8 W* Y2 z; Z3 J+ n4 xand Attack . P$ M$ h5 s9 R# \+ `4 yAssessment 3 @9 d& ^1 W5 ?; A(ITW/AA)" h; {3 F% q3 \$ G ITW/AA is the integration of ballistic missile warning, space warning, and( u/ T0 Q! v3 ~5 e- D- ^+ j) U" Z atmospheric warning with intelligence information for synthesis of all attack 8 ]2 q* Y) p8 B, \7 @) z; twarning information, strategic and tactical.; V1 \3 N" l5 p% J% [ Integrated " @ ^) J- o- C$ G v; R: ]$ mWarfare p& x3 l- u" M: h The conduct of a military operation in any combat environment wherein opposing$ }' K# C3 i& t6 I; c" |& k forces employ non-conventional weapons in combination with conventional/ w- G# j: R6 y/ Q. c weapons.6 b* B o( F, c* C3 k# f; D; j Integration (1) The combination of separate systems, capabilities, functions, etc. in such% U0 d, Q# U+ h1 E4 A# c a way those individual elements can operate singly or in concert without0 W+ Y6 p5 y9 H/ k+ t0 K adversely affecting other elements. (USSPACECOM) % g: Q5 k& k0 x- {(2) Act of putting together as the final end item various components of a) | K6 A# F3 U$ P# ~$ ~ system.$ e+ I" R& {: }7 p INTEL Intelligence. " m2 T2 R7 l; u& Z$ g- e1 \6 p! o. {Intelligence (1) The product, resulting from the collection, evaluation, analysis,# M' z6 o8 A; f integration and interpretation of all available information concerning ! j& D+ T: x0 J9 q; v! n$ Y' |+ ~foreign countries or areas. - ^: C( a1 L) L; ^8 F(2) Information and knowledge about an adversary obtained through: Z3 v( d; |% D2 @3 h observation, investigation, analysis, or understanding.5 y6 m7 l+ C8 ^ Intelligence 0 E. T0 T* O& c5 F; j) U+ i5 UIndicators ; I$ P+ `) p. A) B& ~Classified or unclassified actions or information obtainable by an adversary that,3 Q* u4 }, N& A! y! ~7 ] when properly interpreted, can provide information about friendly capabilities and4 a% y4 O2 O4 w9 L! [. c intentions. 2 x U, S6 W& b6 \3 KIntelligence8 l! d/ B$ {) _' ~ Operations ; T% j/ e L$ b' f3 b7 ~Center (IOC)9 f S7 e; D# B& K0 t' _6 X An organization term for all intelligence activities in Cheyenne Mountain AFB. * w) F8 ^$ H* DThe IOC includes the Consolidated Intelligence Watch (CIW), Operational) f* Y' S: C7 M+ p( O/ U- q Intelligence Elements, and the Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center (JSIC) 1 u$ ]+ K g! u6 H V1 O/ LCheyenne Mountain Node (JCN)." B" G0 J* T9 ]3 V9 y Intelligence " n7 V$ _3 Z# }Preparation of" `5 X0 @. @; a+ H2 P1 T4 Z the Battlespace * h, ]9 L, Q/ b$ vAn analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the $ D0 ]# L, `& j7 T% `. zenemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence- t) J, o& P9 m+ _9 d6 Z preparation of the battle space builds an extensive database for each potential . c7 z3 _& U J4 I5 u1 karea in which a unit may be required to operate. The database is then analyzed & l" P$ `* W* t6 J- Q+ p5 L: ein detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment, and terrain on E5 y# w# T& h* ^operations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the battle * e' L) z0 U' Zspace is a continuing process. Also called IPB. $ B0 i8 j& a9 HIntelligence 5 ~; f+ i' C: g- NReport (INTREP) & A) O1 _3 S3 L) ZA specific report of information usually on a single item made at any level of( ?; q c; x8 t7 m$ k$ f9 m command in tactical operations and disseminated as rapidly as possible in% d& _/ b: q8 M' n4 q' F& F2 x keeping with the timeliness of the information. " U! r3 r% Q9 N. e; ]Intelligence# U7 b# a4 t! U0 f Threat6 n5 [2 S' @. q! F; x An identification of known and potential adversary capabilities to collect and7 f7 g/ z2 ]1 R$ |: B exploit information from a given or similar operation. 7 C/ Y, M$ \& W# O! A5 b) bMDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I4 M" K1 L% p0 p4 t 142; m: m5 Q9 O! X) a% l Intensity The amount of energy of any radiation incident upon (or flowing through) unit ( ~4 A6 K4 f! A5 S; Rarea, perpendicular to the radiation beam, in unit time. The intensity of thermal6 E, Q# C. j, i8 Q7 D radiation is generally expressed in calories per square centimeter per second - n' [ X X. d, H( `9 Xfalling on a given surface at any specific instant. As applied to nuclear radiation,$ I, | O6 `& k3 w. F$ c1 n the term intensity is sometimes used, rather loosely, to express the exposure (or0 G3 {. Q$ {7 C8 A( S( q2 `6 y K dose) rate at a given location.$ i3 K6 M% b$ B/ }6 e/ T5 E Interactive( ?" `' ^3 W7 H5 T* O' ~/ ^ Responses, r2 A6 \, c2 i Interactive response data on tracked objects to assist in their classification. * ~2 i( u8 j, J7 m7 y. H- u' |Interceptor 3 e6 t2 P9 X" U& VCluster # j! y! l9 f( ]) rA group of objects, which are within divert capability of a deployed interceptor. & C+ E x5 F) ? p/ L' d2 u; ~Interceptor Track A function or ability of a sensor to accurately detail an interceptor’s position and# H0 h u& e; |5 L3 \+ ]0 A velocity in three dimensions. ' u2 H7 U. d/ }Interceptor Track6 _4 A4 R7 M0 y9 @& N; I3 c Range (Max)+ ]" J: U6 g( v1 h4 t The maximum range at which a sensor can perform the interceptor track function% V+ `( S8 c' W3 a7 c on a single interceptor in a normal (non-man-made) environment.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

56#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:15 |只看该作者
Interchangeabilit2 O8 ^8 b' X/ A- M# z* K y ) n6 W$ ^/ r5 B- q; o S* SA condition which exists when two or more items possess such functional and ! L) U6 S0 G0 F8 k W6 m$ ]physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance and durability, and5 F7 Y& [8 R# [. }; u& u" [# b are capable of being exchanged one for the other without alteration of the items + h0 w6 K5 b" n5 @! L( Qthemselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment, and without selection for2 G, [: o2 R! [4 y fit and performance. 9 v& C2 v. l) K' MInterconnection The linking together of interoperable systems.# J9 S0 ~( v2 t) T Intercontinental4 ^" t3 D3 R. N4 N h% M5 O4 a( \ Ballistic Missile 3 w1 ]6 c# T5 D _+ A(ICBM) . n/ O. o e7 E% NA ballistic missile with a range from about 3,000 to 8,000 nautical miles. The h, V+ h" z( P7 h- d; Jterm ICBM is used only for land-based systems to differentiate them from* ~, H+ L+ q7 K0 T7 i submarine-launched ballistic missiles. (See SLBM.): t, | K V) m: n1 C* w Interface (1) A shared boundary defined by common physical interconnection 3 S/ q! q p8 ^# \0 _8 [characteristics, signal characteristics, and meanings of interchanged / o' a# T3 s ^7 x- S( w, w& Rsignals. , I0 s) Q- D. i8 W(2) A device or equipment making possible interoperation between two0 a0 ?2 [; D0 \1 z# b; H systems, e.g., a hardware component or a common storage register. 3 ?5 M" T+ _) u. q9 B' f3 P(3) A shared logical boundary between two software components. ' S+ H0 I; S* s$ g(4) A common boundary or connection between persons, or between% D5 B$ h+ K) ?- }! K4 \9 ?9 w* K. M systems, or between persons and systems. 9 C# v% {( b$ j0 L* lInterface Control& X# F; S9 l2 ?& w Document (ICD)4 k) G D8 K- @) G9 ? (1) A document that describes the requirements of the characteristics that must$ i% t& E, V7 r- h exist at a common boundary between two or more equipment or computer5 K8 ?. z; ^" j! K1 J# b8 C software products. An ICD for a BMDS element or component consists of an 8 Y7 g$ q9 X6 J: M% JInterface Control Specification (ICS) and an Interface Design Document (IDD).( p; e% n9 d. p$ [ (MDA Lexicon)& C5 d8 R: {$ x' z( P- `! n (2) The technical documentation, generated by each party to an interface control8 a) W/ L+ q" t# d2 r agreement, that presents that party’s interface and interfacing requirements.% w8 x9 ~" }! _! d1 S The ICD may be in the form of a drawing or a specification. 9 ^$ g9 v6 n8 SInterface9 C6 p6 u& F! M) u7 S# q( u8 S: ~2 S$ f Requirements 8 P& v: S2 b* V r2 [2 RDocument (IRD) $ e- d# U, G2 o) r( YA document that sets forth the interface requirements for a system or system 9 M+ P2 }, G$ g5 acomponent.$ Z. q4 S+ H0 P: O MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I5 T: y9 y2 |1 z K0 Z) I# T 143 + n. ]$ ?% }/ I& v# ]1 J0 z( ?Interference The phenomenon of two or more waves of the same frequency combining to! E- `* q9 B, B8 P, z( ? form a wave in which the disturbance at any point is the algebraic or vector sum6 S$ T$ Q( u8 A2 N7 t of the disturbances due to the interfering waves at that point.5 W& D) J6 J7 ]: L Intermediate* ? J8 K7 C% j9 F: V Range Ballistic: B4 C7 E7 @. [+ B Missile (IRBM) + s/ h7 R$ W+ p; S8 j& U6 y0 AA ballistic missile having a range capability of 1,500 to 3,000 nautical miles. ) v& u+ m" x9 r# Y; V/ I# i. LInternational$ ~% @; H" w4 M! V7 p ?9 r Q/ } Agreement$ C2 [1 u) b4 Y* j& c Generator (IAG) 8 A0 v; L7 T m h7 m) i8 JSoftware system, managed by OSD, which must be used to author DoD' F6 i! P* |1 l( T international Agreements. - d% q! F! w" c& }* h8 }International5 A( `! h! z$ P4 ^! f% K+ k7 S Cooperative # l$ T; M, P# T) i6 O0 @, uLogistics " C- m) X" v# S6 W4 e+ x: \! Y/ @. @2 NCooperation and mutual support in the field of logistics through the coordination z8 ]- Z5 e& _( I" x. ~; uof policies, plans, procedures, development activities, and the common supply : a+ m2 f- g2 {and exchange of goods and services arranged on the basis of bilateral and1 r; y/ `$ o0 j0 u4 R multilateral agreements with appropriate cost reimbursement provisions. % i/ p/ u Y4 N/ ZInternational + y- |! P/ M: l' \8 z* SLogistics& |8 E; k" ^ Y( d( R% g The negotiating, planning, and implementation of supporting logistics : M0 Z. t+ z/ d: k/ N# Z8 o; parrangements between nations, their forces, and agencies. It includes furnishing4 @( ~4 s7 I7 G logistic support to, or receiving logistic support from, one or more friendly foreign % Z4 ~" O2 [2 K# pgovernments, international organizations, or military forces, with or without - x: G2 g* \5 X6 }; [; `reimbursement. It also includes planning and actions related to the intermeshing 0 E2 W: X% \: T- T4 rof a significant element, activity, or component of the military logistics systems or$ o, h1 x/ q" e2 b# d# K procedures of the United States with those of one or more foreign governments,0 e$ N5 ]3 Q4 d# Y5 s" `6 H. R international organizations, or military forces on a temporary or permanent basis. 0 X* f) Z F! I+ yIt includes planning and actions related to the utilization of United States- Z8 m* ?1 X$ Y0 G9 t+ S logistics policies, systems, and/or procedures to meet requirements of one or 0 T) l- h* }9 I! Q7 z/ A$ I" Imore foreign governments, international organizations, or forces. b2 M6 T4 j m' ]% EInternational7 M: L1 b) U3 b8 \, `0 Y$ B Logistic Support: a5 C7 C- [ i( _! s The provision of military logistic support by one participating nation to one or1 p6 f2 i4 X/ N7 |- h more participating nations, either with or without reimbursement.8 c! N5 R3 o% _- t) {! b) e) I Interoperability The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to or accept services . c# V Z- C9 ]+ \* ffrom other systems, units, or forces and to use the services so exchanged to9 ~3 Y) d6 H9 O5 {4 @& Z operate effectively together./ m7 w) V0 |# ]+ u7 n INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization.6 I5 E( u. d) b' _; D4 z INTLCT Integrated Electronics.1 q A% _" V8 Y3 h" L Intruder % O) M) n) I) o! z' fOperation 6 e( H, z9 ~9 gAn offensive operation by day or night over enemy territory with the primary 6 r: d0 I" O0 e+ \; B2 e+ xobject of destroying enemy aircraft in the vicinity of their bases.4 F+ b1 e" M) e& r INU Inertial Navigation Unit.( }8 }+ p" C, t1 v Inventory Control * Q; h+ I3 u+ ~! }Point - ]8 X0 ^0 o8 t1 ~* g/ X. GAn organizational unit or activity within a DoD supply system that is assigned the: u& c0 P. [. y! u! T E5 p primary responsibility for the materiel management of a group or items either for a 3 _8 e0 p$ ?3 ^particular Service or for the DoD as a whole. Materiel inventory management( z5 W( h- ]8 M$ Z& j% p includes cataloging direction, requirements computation, procurement direction, / I7 p9 Z* a$ Kdistribution management, disposal direction, and, generally, rebuild direction. ( q+ R- m5 R3 G, M, X2 ]Inverse Square* I# g% `' x8 ~" R2 U Law 6 P, E% g& s7 m: ?3 o$ WThe law that states when thermal or nuclear radiation is uniformly emitted from a 3 ^- ]( S0 x) Y7 P. V9 W' X* Mpoint source, the amount received per unit area at any given distance from the , J. D: l8 ` Z. _2 X, ksource, assuming no absorption, is inversely proportional to the square of that 6 Q0 W- _7 h5 K: jdistance. k9 E6 T: l+ B- l8 J MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 7 f6 O, Y1 D' S, B# d144 2 V6 {; D7 n) f2 d, ]6 a+ y% cInverse Synthetic5 T( [5 l# h: |7 X1 ^$ a9 z A% o Aperture Radar3 Y" c& I' `0 D (ISAR) + f" b6 [( u1 J6 w$ ~$ GA type of radar similar to synthetic aperture radar, which uses information from / G% I) P* t& P% ~5 Dthe motion of targets to provide high resolution. # }- \" Y' t( [) Q2 J uIO (1) Information Operations. (2) Integrated Optic.+ ?! t, C4 x1 N$ d IOC (1) Initial Operational Capability. + c) q/ D) m& y w(2) Intelligence Operations Center. 1 b9 }0 I# m$ O7 Q0 }5 t/ N, u(3) Integrated Optics Chip. + u3 z* k n9 O( |% _IOM Inert Operational Missile. 5 R3 t1 n) v6 f9 p; ` hIONDS Integrated Operational Nuclear Detonation Detection System (US).+ z, k! U4 j, `5 J) q Ionization The process of producing ions by the removal of electrons from, or the addition* _: N8 s1 a) M of electrons to atoms or molecules. * Y0 L9 Q; u# v9 k/ e* V: a. nIonizing 8 H! b' |9 _7 X D" QRadiation 4 ^- k+ W* S4 l( X3 i1 H3 \Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, extreme ultraviolet (EUV)) or ! ?9 |3 S0 r% F* Rparticulate radiation (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, etc.) capable of6 ^- R* Q6 T0 ^% J4 ^5 Z producing ions, e.g., electrically charged particles, directly or indirectly, in its 0 ?2 I/ h8 ~0 rpassage through matter. (Nuclear Radiation.) 0 b4 n) ?; j' W: L, O" v0 L: nIonosphere The region of the atmosphere, extending from roughly 70 to 500 kilometers & {1 g W: `+ h1 J r8 X( s r% Valtitude, in which ions and free electrons exist in sufficient quantities to reflect 4 {; J, E; G$ R# welectromagnetic waves. ! E4 f+ ^" d6 }' j, bIOSS Interagency OPSEC Support Staff.% f1 m, I2 c2 z3 H1 [ IOT&E Initial Operational Test and Evaluation.9 h+ p, h+ A8 K" O1 r. T+ ~! R) i IOU Input/Output Unit. 1 J4 b& L8 F8 G4 ZIP (1) Instructor Pilot. (2) Initial Point. (3) Initial Position. (4) Internet Protocol.3 C# q8 ` S6 R, ~8 K (5) Interconnect Protocol.7 ]& i/ m" K8 z( e6 t IPA Integrated Program Assessment. & u; Z1 F& s) {IPB Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield or Battlespace.5 Z' ]. W3 F5 I( y" R% k IPC Information Policy Committee., a$ K- R# i, u% r: H2 u# T7 N IPD Integrated Product (Process) Development. % C2 P( n2 B9 s8 G e8 HIPE Industrial Plant Equipment.: R/ V0 |& {5 I p t9 J IPL Integrated Priority List.4 j1 G# F. J ~( T0 Y2 A IPM Integration Program Manager. 6 S0 R( h) y6 v! `" d( _. |IPMI Integration Program Management Initiative. - _, G2 ?" V K) O+ u) DIPP (1) Impact Point Prediction. (2) Industrial Preparedness Program. ' \! p" W) J: N. Q7 {& PIPPD Integrated Process and Product Development.% m1 k1 A3 ^/ k; D) o: k% u IPR See In-Progress Review. (Also called Interim Program Review).* l( x1 w) g0 ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I 2 j( f- S8 y! ^2 `: |, d145 0 ?* T' c$ @/ `. `: C9 r H8 FIPRR Initial Production Readiness Review. . C" M- K; {6 `. VIPRWG Intellectual Property Rights Working Group. % @/ |) ]. A9 J# mIPS Integrated Program Summary. " C( H: c% h, b' gIPSRU Inertial Pseudo-Star Reference Unit.2 I5 T+ b4 F3 U$ K IPT (1) Integrated Product Team. (2) Integrated Process Team. (3) Integrated : `% J& T J8 F% uPlanning Team. : c% _( b& J1 o/ c6 oIQT Initial Qualification Training (ILS term).4 ], H1 L! x6 U' T IR (1) Infrared. (2) Information Requirement. (3) Incident Report. (4)% M+ L' I8 X( M6 W Information Rate. (5) Initial Review (NMD BMC2 term). (6) Isotope* K4 ~9 t4 Z8 z# J# y& @ Radar.8 D% k" @6 E, R; S: [ IR Electro-Optics Technologies/techniques employed by optical sensors in the wavelength * Q$ H5 L- ^8 @2 d( M3 b$ m4 yspectrum slightly longer than visible but shorter than radio.8 b4 W, p" C- l0 m4 H' t1 h, \# p IR&D Independent Research and Development. (Also called IRAD). / I/ Q* W9 N. U- EIR/Vies Infrared Visual. 7 g( E/ U8 v, ^' A/ ?$ [. ? VIRA Industrial Resource Analysis.4 H% J' m% E: l$ ^6 X IRAD Independent Research and Development. . j! l$ @2 o BIRAS Infrared Astronomical Satellite. & e$ A% p. L; a9 ~$ s1 R7 y+ d, [IRBM Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. 5 G% L0 d) t( fIRBS (1) Infrared Background Sensor. (2) Intermediate-Range Booster System.8 b% Q S. z* x! n IRCM Infrared Countermeasures. ( U f, D$ x1 f2 a: B# y/ b- XIRD Interface Requirements Document. / N% [. z1 x) m0 N8 Q7 {IRFP International Request for Proposals (Contracting term).. X% y A8 B% o. K4 p IRFPA Infrared Focal Plane Array.4 D( q- d' A# R) \1 { IRG Independent Review Group.. \! U. H) ~9 j IRIA Infrared Information Analysis Center. : T* V/ B4 e; g; J* m' VIRIG Inter-Range Instrumentation Group. 5 G( Z4 ]( K/ o" g" a+ vIRINT Infrared Intelligence.2 n' d0 e9 g/ Z9 g3 [. X IRIS Infrared Instrumentation System.% ]5 k3 ^) S6 L IRLA Item Repair Level Analysis ILS term).( q3 r2 h* Z! E! ?' x IRM Information Resources Management.5 N) y$ b F1 |' u6 ~; ]$ ^ IRMAC Information Resource Management Advisory Committee.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

57#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:34 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I, K: c0 G7 {7 F( ]! \ 146. _* B8 i' H3 I( v2 S9 _8 a3 ^ IRMC Information Resource Management College.( m! p& m8 z$ }, I" G IRR Internal Requirements Review. 3 g) b1 ~& [) W% D3 ~# h' QIRRAS Integrated Reliability and Risk Analysis System. ! W+ E3 `+ X2 XIRRS Information Resources Requirements Study. 5 B7 W7 E/ Y! g4 UIRS Interface Requirements Review.2 Q3 \5 B* c$ C! P6 O, f IRSS Infrared Sensor System (EAGLE).1 U* T$ Y& b8 p+ w IRST Infrared Search and Track.' e6 |* e, r* I r; ]: N IRTF Internet Research Task Force.1 r4 X" E0 t _ S- F. w9 e IS Information System.1 _" M9 G& N+ @% T IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test. / X/ e4 Q3 X* U0 H(2) Innovative Science and Technology." U; `! V* J# z; C; H9 M) R" K) m! j (3) Integrated Science & Technology." I: a6 c! {1 e& i ISA Inter-service Agreement.8 F/ Y7 L; f# ]! o$ S7 U2 r. v5 T IS&T (1) Invite, Show and Test.9 w: d+ U+ s7 M! D, x, o" x& x (2) Innovative Science and Technology.* B* q4 V; X: ?. @7 x/ x3 [% w ISAR Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar. ! T/ G3 ^8 G% ~0 V( \, r+ yISAS Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (Japan). 6 ^" g, ^; \- ^+ c( p5 |ISC (1) Information Systems Command.. c: ?5 ^: A* M; n! d. F (2) Irvine Sensors Corporation. 4 ~! t- ~$ @4 V XISDN Integrated Services Digital Network.( S- h' T7 c5 Q+ N2 S ISE (1) Integrated SATKA Experiments. (2) Integrated Space Experiment. ' y3 g5 ~5 y: \ISE&I Israeli System Engineering and Integration. & {* `1 M" _6 {ISG Industry Support Group.& a6 {! z2 \8 G+ i ISM (1) Industrial Security Manual. (2) Integrated Structure Model. ) p' ]' q: @ s1 h: O ]ISMG International Simulation & Modeling Group.8 R6 a' r2 G i+ C; U4 s8 X! | ISMO Information Security Management Office.1 e6 E+ _; s' D) s: Y7 S" j ISO International Standards Organization.0 c9 o' r. T8 q. L7 l1 G r ISOO Information Security Oversight Office. 3 i5 C, J. [) L; [Isotropic Independent of direction; referring to the radiation of energy, it means “with ( ]: l3 F% S: G6 I ?7 ?$ dequal intensity in all directions” (e.g., omni directional). T$ ]' I& R# @* P9 ^) D MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I! \2 F3 a1 v4 T$ a# h7 s0 n3 @ 147+ V6 c1 N0 j, {" i+ }0 [5 V Isotropic1 X% f+ I3 ?% _2 F$ u! z Nuclear Weapon ) o6 y2 \3 `0 P$ o6 i. S5 S* {A nuclear explosive, which radiates x-rays and other forms of radiation with 4 j1 \- ~2 h5 P& j$ M* k2 ~approximately equal intensity in all directions. The term “isotropic” is used to 2 X4 K$ D8 p/ U8 W- Y) a |: w4 j& Udistinguish them from nuclear directed energy weapons. ) B& g: W/ A E5 N' `/ dISP Integrated Support Plan. : v! [" I+ J/ w. t+ }: S1 D" W3 s) a0 `$ HISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance. + i) T8 [# A6 t$ @8 [. M- Z* g, O8 yISS (1) Information System Security. (2) Infrared Surveillance System. - S% M# D8 z$ k m* f8 A# MISSA Information System Security Association.( s9 z& o( j+ P- j. r ISSAA Information Systems and Software Acquisition Agency. 1 N2 ` R: @' s$ l) T& f$ N4 D$ y7 `ISSC Information Systems Security Committee.$ E4 b- X6 M: D& Y: w' ^ x ISSM Information System Security Manager.) z. c7 J( d/ ~5 Y1 `5 j* v ISSO Information System Security Officer.. |! B2 l' Z3 v# ^. ] ISSTA International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.# w8 s' ~! p; T0 } Issue Cycle A process followed during OSD review of the POM. It begins in early June and / g% [" H, D' t8 Wextends into July.2 G. I( l6 Z: ]) q5 z Issue Papers OSD documents defining issues raised during review of the POM.; U& E( U. A8 h IST (1) Innovative Science and Technology. (2) Integrated System Test. 2 ?" x6 L2 s+ B1 s3 _2 ]' L) mISTC Integrated System Test Capability. A6 T$ j. s: y: E) J$ w3 E( FISTEF Innovative Science and Technology Experiment Facility.$ W' l* p0 k8 v% J ISTF Installed System Test Facility. . c J# ^, S4 F N# OISV Interceptor Sensor Vehicle. - J& V( ?1 z* u7 [6 X& e1 d# \/ }ISWG Integration Support Working Group.- j. g3 q d# d0 T- C7 S: V IT Information Technology. / I: C' L* s+ M' v& h% rITAC Intelligence Threat Analysis Center. ' |2 D# f6 \# J, A( d! JITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations.1 U- b0 G" z- G6 N4 L6 s& E6 F ITB (1) Integrated Test Bed. (2) Israeli Test Bed.' \4 p/ }; ~5 J ITCE International Traffic in Arms Regulations.3 C, [* m0 {# _+ D/ m8 f$ W ITD Integration Technology Demonstration. 1 `2 F5 G | P% d6 @/ SITDAP (1) Integrated Test Data Analysis Plan. 4 y% B# X- s* P7 b(2) Integrated Test Design and Assessment Plan. 4 c2 L$ ^* F- ^; ], C/ p' HItem Manager An individual within the organization of an inventory control point or other such 9 |6 Z2 B5 h' U0 x( o) v, gorganization assigned management responsibilities for one or more specific items : _( {( t( N2 Sof materiel.: @ q% b; E1 l MDA GLOSSARY, VER.4 .0 I6 I9 L2 i' q; }+ p 148( P2 l2 j' v' T5 `7 O, E ITERS Improved Tactical Events Reporting System. 9 e* ^8 a- ~0 b$ Y1 k. a, v. G# ?) UITL Integrate, Transfer, Launch # _( b: ^, L. \2 b2 ]( ], YITMSC Information Technology Management Systems Council.. G% p8 @9 L3 e, H! ^ ITMT Integrated Technical Management Team." G, i3 {- Q6 I+ D7 Z ITO Instructions-to-Offerers (FAR term). $ b0 ]5 d& D. c3 b& _ITP Integrated Test Plan. " B& U7 r$ m) rITPB Information Technology Policy Board., V1 r' l' ]# C! `( b- O. c( r! T9 _ ITR Information Technology Resources.- {4 o# y; r( m8 P0 [ ITS Information Technology Service.8 L9 m+ Z- o. s" l) V: Y) ^& {0 v ITSD Information Technology Services Directorate.! j0 m/ A; i) w! a( S) ^ ITT ITT Corporation.+ J' ~6 K5 F# ] E ITV (1) Integrated Technology Validation. (2) Instrumented Test Vehicle4 B6 p8 a7 r5 f/ ?/ U ITW Integrated Tactical Warning. $ K2 A$ e1 ^& n; K. S% NITW/AA Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment.+ f0 r0 f$ y y9 a7 j. { IUI Integrated User Interface. ! ^' b. ]0 r0 t9 ?IV Interceptor Vehicle.$ B4 Q. Z' F% k$ t3 p IV&V Independent Verification and Validation.' L# R. _) j. m2 n+ l9 W3 C IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway System.4 F% b$ z+ k( _. [1 | IVIS Inter-Vehicular Information System (USA term).' b9 y! g6 I1 \- F IW Information Warfare. / s# f2 _ [, T" L& P8 n+ RIWCD Integrated Wavefront Control Demonstration.; Q. j0 g4 C- S5 m- A2 ] IWEB Information Warfare Executive Board.# B1 o: W5 n7 H IWG Interagency Working Group.6 R. A: }4 V' A5 t$ r IWS Indications and Warning System.3 @" F8 g1 P2 V* h6 b! F4 e- s IWSM Integrated weapons system management. ( F' V, j, Z* `! hIXS Information Exchange System." g* H' J! i' y! y# T ]( ~ MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J ~) ~% N: b' L4 g5 }7 G 149 & w8 r! e1 k6 U# N; z: g( w$ rJ&A Justification and Approval. $ z0 M( k! e; D* n6 {J-SEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. ! n! l+ O a0 Z8 i6 g% I. pJAAT Joint Air Attack Team.& E9 c* a' y+ L- G JADO Joint Air Defense Operations. % ~& [5 e; F7 i1 _' G/ jJAE Joint Acquisition Executive., V& m$ R2 u! T* w$ R JAIC Joint Air Intelligence Center (JFACC term). # v1 N7 W% C! j& h! R7 AJAMES Joint Automated Message Editing System (USN term).6 q+ A& u0 \+ S' B Jammers Radio transmitters accompanying attacking RVs and tuned to broadcast at the! ^3 F+ c0 F+ B# B0 S* h same frequency as defensive radar. The broadcasts add “noise” to the signals% F% g' J4 n. a reflected from the RVs and received by the radar. Susceptibility to jamming0 A. k5 F; `# u+ l generally decreases with increasing radar frequency, with decreasing altitude,& N7 X# G: G9 M and with increasing radar power.3 x7 C0 C& q% U$ x. l8 ` JAO Joint Area of Operations. & m8 A$ u& N' U, l( G1 eJAOC Joint Air Operations Center (JFACC term).& P0 m( i1 z+ u' {/ Q: k4 D V JASSAM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (USAF term).+ w) \& e, U5 c8 Y6 ~/ X, F JAST Joint Advanced Strike Aircraft (USAF/USN program).- z! l1 ^1 h: y4 h JBS Joint Broadcast Service (ASD(C3I) term). [( X5 p2 H7 o/ t1 u5 r% ? RJCAE Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (US). + ?' X% I: t8 i0 }JCEOI Joint Communications-Electronic Operation Instructions.1 m4 f5 v M- F5 m; ]! c JCM Joint Conflict Model.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

58#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:47 |只看该作者
JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff (US. . z$ A" j* Q! g4 d* x" S8 |JCSM Joint Chiefs of Staff Memorandum. ( l3 x1 n" `; N6 ?" pJCTN Joint Composite Tracking Network. ) n: I1 }0 P0 K1 Y/ @0 ~JDA Japan Defense Agency.$ ]9 r# L) @' u2 B# x% T7 N* t" J' C JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munitions (USAF B1-B weapon)." a3 s) O g8 r! z1 u! p" q V JDC (1) Joint Doctrine Center. (2) Joint Deployment Community. 1 @1 ?9 `( f5 | [' S0 JJDISS Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System. z% s1 ~% A0 _' ^JDN Joint Data Net.; O# f! k+ Y* X; H, j JEA Joint Effectiveness Analysis (formerly COEA). 1 N# V9 [% y- e& S- O; g; dJEC Joint Economic Committee (US). # n* W7 }/ l# c( C. n" g" v/ fJEIO Joint Engineering and Integration Office.- R( k5 d0 ]& ?6 x( x MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J$ g; d5 z0 c: A6 ]- _: U 150 7 g: \# Y* k. l8 i+ J eJEM Joint Exercise Manual.3 I% j" U* i0 N% ], }7 ~ JETTA Joint Environment for Testing, Training, and Analysis. , q, ^# A/ c7 {0 ?1 v- m# ZJEWC Joint Electronic Warfare Center.! N9 f" V8 F4 }7 s' `& X+ y JEZ Joint Engagement Zone. . V2 I: u2 r+ l& H1 WJFCC Joint Forces Command Center.; N# G9 N8 N( r6 f5 d* | JFET Junction Field Effect Transistor.: h- ]- ^$ o9 g) `: V2 l* ?5 q JFFC Joint Forces [Weapons] Fire Coordinator (JFACC term). 2 C9 @2 h0 x5 ^( I& d: }JFLC Joint Force Land Component.. |. M! [- f( u JFMC Joint Forces Maritime Component. 6 e& r0 ]$ m3 _/ uJFSC Joint Forces Staff College, Norfolk, VA.: t% |/ ^. ^& I9 ?! J+ H0 k JFSOC Joint Forces Special Operations Component. , ]$ P" i) t( u1 u; [JG-APP Joint Group on Acquisition Pollution Prevention. ! I- Y9 r- _& L# @- ~! V h& IJHU Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 3 N7 h1 K- f' ^" _7 xJHU/APL Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. 3 u) N {, O' [4 T0 B5 I5 _JIC (1) Joint Intelligence Center. (2) Jet Interaction Controls.7 H! Y" ?& U! E7 q. G8 v: J JICPAC Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific (JFACC term).8 r+ g9 w3 p0 k7 R: R! B JIEO Joint Interoperability and Engineering Organization.5 p1 d r& r" v" ~9 F7 K JINTACCS Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems.# j3 V7 e# M/ |2 V# l: c/ i3 |5 C JIOP Joint Interface Operational Procedures.' p& n3 j, {: N1 A N5 I& y6 @ JIOP-MTF Joint Interface Operational Procedures – Message Text Forms. ; |! O7 W9 w+ J8 JJIOPTL Joint Integrated Prioritized Target List (JFACC term). 5 r" |0 z: }3 ^ jJITC Joint Interoperability Test Center.* @) O1 S C. N' a2 q, k8 F$ D; S' } JLC Joint Logistics Commanders. ( h6 w9 A2 H5 `" V& NJLOTS Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore.( f5 t; E; G E9 K: O1 S8 U JM&S Joint Modeling and Simulation.* [* T' I1 B* e% |1 i" J# w JMC (1) Joint Movement Center. (2) Joint Military Command. 9 f b& O L& K* [JMCCOC Joint MILSTAR Communications Control and Operations Concept. " p5 v# I/ ]/ c9 l; n6 J& G9 ~$ KJMCIS Joint Maritime Command Information System. 4 z' m9 b+ I8 V) J$ {) O1 nMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J2 ?+ N" `1 m+ l5 @7 A* d* v. m* h7 @ 151 $ L8 l, }+ v |, _# ?JMDN Joint Missile Defense Network. Encompasses all mission-oriented Information 5 O* x4 K$ M) U$ B% M4 k4 GTechnology Resources (ITR) networks, facilities and systems operated or funded % F+ R9 e$ u8 s4 Y. S% v; cby MDA in support of missile defense programs and operations. A major8 p! d. n" F' v9 w7 w component of the JMDN is the Ballistic Missile Defense Network (BMDN),2 y* j; L( i! b0 ]! s operated by the JNTF. 1 W; M7 v9 n# Y2 T' |JMEM Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual.9 w% W+ ^( s% s3 N8 R JMENS Joint Mission Element Needs Statement.& Z- @% z$ [' n9 ~) U# o+ X4 Z# i) w JMNS Joint Mission Needs Statement.0 J6 d+ X1 K' i0 N+ ?3 O JMO Joint Maritime Operations.+ Y2 O- v( H# y0 i- N JMSNS Justification for Major Systems New Start. 5 f* v0 e6 W* w! I7 ?5 f: jJMSWG (1) Joint Multi-TADIL Standards Working Group." U1 u2 V$ ^- X% F4 H& P ]6 m4 O (2) Joint Interoperability Message Standards Working Group. & y" J% w3 {8 x% lJNAAS JNIF Advisory and Assistance Service. . Q- `+ R1 a7 \ h% O% |JNESSY JNIC Joint National Integration Center Electronic Security System./ I, ]1 Y7 t4 x& ]: N( l: x JNTF OBSOLETE. See JNIC. ' |$ ?/ t( a7 c! ~2 o/ j2 `JNICOMC Joint National Integration Center Operations and Maintenance Contractor. ; U1 I/ W" F$ q0 x7 dJNICRDC Joint National Integration Center Research and Development Contractor.( F, Q0 R) H2 ^6 @/ m' G0 E/ S. Q+ K# X JNICUSLA Joint National Integration Center Unclassified Standalone and Laptop Access. ( i2 e3 _2 a! u9 D2 \# mJOB Joint Operations Board. 4 L8 |7 G n1 J; Z- ~0 }& eJOC Joint Oversight Council.$ }( F7 V7 {9 J0 C% b0 [ JOCAS Job Order Cost Accounting System.4 d2 `+ x% e4 E+ N7 x% s. }5 G6 w Joint Activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one $ c! o5 C& V3 O) N2 ]Service of the same nation participate. When all services are not involved, the . d! w8 y+ u3 E5 Sparticipating Services shall be identified, e.g., Joint Army-Navy). % {" b% p6 B/ j( R0 i& d7 a/ E5 fJoint Doctrine Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more 4 a( {$ v9 _) j. U9 o; i/ [Services in coordinated action toward a common objective. It will be - }5 }6 m) J2 j2 v8 h4 Gpromulgated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the + f. H2 C5 o; Z' x4 Lcombatant commands, Services, and Joint Staff. See also Chairman, Joint/ a" V. T5 Z% { Chiefs of Staff.% a; e6 Z" p" P! }6 I* Q" ~7 U' j Joint Doctrine " n8 B6 _; v; v1 _( B: h6 MWorking Party* d. D( G6 y; Q! `: ^3 s* Z A forum to include representatives of the Services and combatant commands 5 e1 P* e- U! A, c# E. owith the purpose of systematic address of joint doctrine and joint tactics, % w. q# @% v+ K9 [1 otechniques, and procedures (JTTP) issues such as project proposal examination,( a) B0 v# c' r project scope development, project validation, and lead agent recommendation.: x! p' A+ c1 P4 i0 t The Joint Doctrine Working Party meets under the sponsorship of the Director, 3 }! l% r6 ]$ t* r+ W8 X# nOperations Plans and Interoperability. ; d0 Y# x% x1 M. p9 Y5 W2 b. `. JJoint Electronic" b: U- |* h" e: m2 y Warfare Center+ t: D5 J( N. R- _% I8 Y' x4 J2 ~ (JEWC) 9 G( h* c1 L: F6 [4 HElectronic Security Command (ESC) team at Kelly AFB, TX, responsible for 8 [! i* H. {# Linvestigating and locating the cause of MIJI either against satellites or ground8 y7 P4 g# `4 e; w& c9 \; | systems.3 [* r" X8 Q \+ L% K MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J % e6 M3 A) h- m' C0 q% h152 % J: u3 p H$ n0 R/ nJoint Force A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or ; e9 ~9 u% k, f0 Jattached, of the Army, the Navy or Marine Corps, and the Air Force, or two or! p. x$ d2 [+ m, ?% A more of these Services, operating under a single commander authorized to 2 c. F1 O" l6 L6 Y) D- }: _exercise operational control. See also Joint Force Commander.1 F- A q% k0 P% H% Z9 Q8 _ Joint Force Air 5 V7 l/ F, Z- Y8 @( H4 [Component: \" O+ {8 A4 ]( U3 A: O. q Commander 9 S) F4 m( Y4 `! {" s6 N; N3 {(JFACC) . G& V E5 B% m3 jThe commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or5 S8 }7 D( }* T" |, u, M joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making- `' K: E* ], [, P- t) `1 I& o7 \, U recommendations on the proper employment of air forces, planning and ! V& [7 V. A5 L8 S% {7 H/ R0 U, dcoordinating air operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may / s: D7 o% ~- a, ebe assigned. The joint force air component commander is given the authority 3 f- I3 F5 q: O6 Q4 @0 b8 ~7 rnecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing( g& I. \+ A- @* K3 b commander. The JFACC will normally be the commander with the) J5 h% { N! I2 n preponderance of air forces and the requisite command and control capabilities.: l; l- l1 P( |. q B/ H3 U Joint Force7 [( R6 A3 M4 `* ^: Q Commander , L0 k) B6 }; X' G+ ?" I6 S9 R, a(JFC) ; n% b- C7 P! h3 s$ B$ M! z" tA general term applied to a commander authorized to exercise combatant [1 x2 F3 `+ P) {# d$ w& Zcommand (command authority) or operational control over a joint force. Also 6 U/ K2 R9 c; L9 t3 J' G2 |called JFC.8 R. R9 T7 o+ G Joint Force Land 2 a. s, T9 O' o3 r J( D6 WComponent' P6 j6 W7 r1 ?4 F# v: } Commander / Y: Z7 z( S/ k4 o! @: v0 L, @(JFLCC) 5 K% w! @* H# z; j4 X8 B2 r0 {The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or9 T5 B2 a8 w% L% G* H joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making + a5 ^2 O6 y9 P; o+ S1 ]/ A" vrecommendations on the proper employment of land forces, planning and5 J" O6 W; J% k) [ coordinating land operations, or accomplishing such operational missions as may 8 k7 I6 X* f: D/ s- Y; \be assigned. The joint force land component commander is given the authority " S7 ?- K& Z, y Knecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing + T( y# ?& N7 Z; e8 M, |, Pcommander. The JFLCC will normally be the commander with the. l3 T* I% P. \0 l5 t. w2 q; w- f preponderance of land forces and the requisite command and control + b3 P: \& e6 O2 t' ecapabilities.4 v) e. |; B& h4 {/ V* u6 w% P) r$ J [ Joint Force1 I/ t5 ~2 x) E R1 N Special . M" r# k0 k5 |) H8 c4 lOperations 3 t8 h% o0 N5 R: t l! c( m) kComponent) C' Q- i9 F1 P: M; w9 T' p( I Commander * |7 {: k$ y7 f! S6 \1 o: {(JFSOCC)" y3 F. g: z( x- Z | The commander within a unified command, subordinate unified command, or 4 n/ `+ [; [( v l7 ~joint task force responsible to the establishing commander for making/ L9 {& ?- M! Y6 p1 m recommendations on the proper employment of special operations forces and- K- m& e. ] `5 p assets, planning and coordinating maritime operations, or accomplishing such b" u3 x! ?9 I% k% S$ E1 E0 \0 {, ` operational missions as may be assigned. The JFSOCC is given the authority & |! s% H0 ~1 I, g5 r+ |% N Wnecessary to accomplish missions and tasks assigned by the establishing $ Z: F$ e2 l/ q* {commander. The JFSOCC will normally be the commander with the ! r( }1 ^- ~% @' `, L, m/ Gpreponderance of special operations forces and the requisite command and & U" n( K% J, T/ d7 o" Y- K+ r, b3 ncontrol capabilities. - Q- v, x9 ?$ a& F/ EJoint National : j/ \% c6 A0 ^; k( yTest Facility A! f" Z4 O q7 H2 P* L (JNTF) # o& v4 P3 E& |A large, modeling, simulation and test facility located on Falcon AFB in Colorado9 F9 ^8 n# W( o& M which serves as the central control, coordinating, and computing center for the / [+ @- H/ i, RNTB and as the primary integration and test facility of the BMD SE&I contractor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

59#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:09:59 |只看该作者
(Former NTF). x7 Y U8 R# g Joint Operational. K- |' m. n0 {1 |0 ^ Planning and 2 P2 S0 o! K4 x$ |- e1 `0 kExecution 0 O M: w4 g- K/ tSystem (JOPES) . \" \6 x! A/ T1 ?0 s3 WA continuously evolving system that is being developed through the integration ' {2 I' {. y$ H/ h) I: U( E' p/ Z' zand enhancement of earlier planning and execution systems: Joint Operation % a: x. y) h, c- pPlanning System and Joint Deployment System. It provides the foundation for ( n# ]4 e1 B2 u( J4 p: iconventional command and control by national and theater level commanders2 ~2 ~9 ?* E$ Y! `' ? and their staffs. It is designed to satisfy their informational needs in the conduct& @8 B- r7 W9 r& v of joint planning and operations. JOPES includes joint operation planning8 f8 r3 q: E6 Z/ W E policies, procedures, and reporting structures supported by communications and! I+ z. b1 g9 }8 a* O. X6 R automated data processing systems. JOPES is used to monitor, plan, and+ g+ n" v, i) A# H# `: K. ` execute mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities0 d7 `3 ?: x1 ~$ V4 O- a associated with joint operations.# P0 Y h: f) I. |* Q( D+ s* g MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 2 T- G5 d. a% p! |7 H153 / @3 ]9 K) t( T# W0 F: lJoint Operating 4 ~ H2 g* M7 p7 v3 qProcedures 5 u3 L$ l0 t/ ~0 S9 J) E- n; C" q0 V- ?(JOPs)2 _8 g: ~6 p2 N7 T8 M0 I These documents identify and describe detailed procedures and interactions : O: P m% B j: `; Jnecessary to carry out significant aspects of a joint program. Subjects for JOPs: e9 e x9 D% m; e/ m8 `! c* \ may include Systems Engineering, Personnel Staffing, Reliability, Survivability, 9 {5 _6 p9 T1 O/ JVulnerability, Maintainability, Production, Management Controls and Reporting,5 ?' a2 n, r$ o$ q# M u2 ?) { Financial Control, Test and Evaluation, Training, Logistics Support, Procurement1 P% D# Z/ o8 Y' C& b% R4 ` and Deployment. The JOPs are developed and negotiated by the Program! [' R- k' `' T2 P0 x7 N9 I Manger and the participating Services.; S% ]- T1 g/ y# n Joint Operations ! O6 _/ Y- _7 l% U# @# MArea* d0 j5 C. g& D1 I% g That area of conflict in which a joint force commander conducts military; z# `& z; m7 B( C1 ?. ?6 \7 T- ? operations pursuant to an assigned mission and the administration incident to : D5 h8 ~% @1 |# Jsuch military operations. Also called JOA. 3 y" g/ `1 E% LJoint Program Any defense acquisition system, subsystem, component, or technology program+ W" F+ {: J( s7 r9 c" Q that involves formal management or funding by more than one DoD Component ; E! a+ a% k7 o3 I4 A: qduring any phase of a system’s life-cycle. S, d/ z& ^* b Joint5 J$ n v& f8 d/ \; H* \: d( I Requirements 8 r0 u9 j2 o3 w- C( h4 V3 j" }! z9 nOversight8 r# W) J1 }2 e, F$ \+ X; k4 L Council (JROC) , K. D) h+ w5 W. u5 v2 @A council, chaired by the Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, that conducts # M2 C# K) Q" ?$ h. C7 ~; Krequirements analyses, determines the validity of mission needs and develops ! R/ I: [# [" E, urecommended joint priorities for those needs it approves, and validates1 G7 N' [8 J, L/ I performance objectives and thresholds in support of the Defense Acquisition . h$ k1 E E4 dBoard. Council members include the Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air ! T4 G( _1 ]5 tForce, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps.) U3 ^0 z7 h% I. n# x( h9 p Joint SPACECOM9 ?" N$ [# C1 e" g1 |1 Z! Q2 S1 D; K Intelligence m! J% \5 K2 |8 U! `/ J' u$ A- z5 nCenter (JSIC) ) j7 U$ i5 @2 [/ }; b. s! VA USSPACECOM Intelligence Center responsible for producing operational ! s2 `8 n& T2 |1 ]6 E Hintelligence for USSPACECOM missions and for space intelligence production for 8 E+ u% M6 F! \- B' F$ X" Hthe DoD and intelligence community. Delegated Space Intelligence production ( V! _2 g/ T$ K; I. P+ uincludes: Space Order of Battle (OB), Space Object Identification (SOI), and ) [2 K* n6 F3 wSatellite Reconnaissance Advance Notices (SATRAN). Located at CMAFB. R* x: k6 P# y! y3 A8 ]4 @Joint Strategic# k2 k3 t( ?# K& o, @ Defense Planning: u( @; b( ^0 k# ^7 y9 F4 H, W Staff (JOSDEPS)# D$ J8 q* z' o A special staff located at USSPACECOM Headquarters responsible for ' d5 m% V4 z; ? o& \* z e: Eintegrated strategic defense planning and for integration of strategic defensive 8 `5 e4 K6 P4 d+ aand strategic offensive operations. The USCINCSPACE serves as Director, Joint0 Y+ x6 i9 W, B' R" M0 g Strategic Defense Planning Staff.$ [6 j% z3 d. } b' C( {( q) [ Joint Strategic 8 J& j% x7 z0 i% }4 r: B c# y" Z; GTarget Planning0 u. Q/ o- A) T# r( V+ T6 e Staff (JSTPS) % H( ~" L: G- P& p# E; CA JCS organization located at Offutt AFB responsible for planning, developing, ' t" l" j- |. T a6 J4 Q9 T( A, p+ gcoordinating, and producing the Single Integrated Operations Plans (SIOP). ~- x& X: v( D' {# }; cAlso responsible for producing the National Strategic Target List (NSTL). The ; u+ [2 }( _# M1 [) W. ?/ U$ ?Commander in Chief, USSTRATCOM is also the Director, Joint Strategic Target * \: [3 d/ L$ h4 IPlanning Staff.4 R/ h5 d1 F3 `) ~( ? Joint 7 x' b1 @$ `$ @6 ESuppression of 1 k( V7 u1 B3 g- h5 JEnemy Air / o4 U# Y- |6 v: qDefense + G, A2 E, @) \0 ], ?A broad term that includes all suppression of enemy air defenses activities $ k+ X3 k" I6 D3 K6 P( c" Sprovided by one component of the joint force in support of another. Also called 8 k$ P* t0 Y6 UJ-SNEAD.# j% _7 }' e% y& j$ S1 }7 `8 ` Joint Tactical Z* h3 j. H( F1 K' I Information 3 C% Z& _/ F9 Z* O) d2 eDistribution! J9 J2 K/ ^' j5 Z7 h. _; L& a System (JTIDS) 3 @! c. C3 m, E) I5 tA joint service, jam-resistant, secure communications system that permits the - Q& o! ^/ C/ B e! k. f" tinterchange of essential tactical information between aircraft, surface vessels,% c7 ?: J% k3 B( h2 U% ] and mobile or fixed-base land stations. k8 e6 D# E# ] Joint Tactics, 8 a& L w$ x' k) u% gTechniques, and & g% v) `& x/ A) D) ^7 T# J) A" @. bProcedures ; {/ v1 |3 D5 {8 F2 t3 m. i(JTTP) . W+ v( j. R1 c E3 SThe actions and methods, which implement joint doctrine and describe how 0 D* S$ i' F, @/ O9 c% `$ Kforces will be employed in joint operations. The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,3 s: ^# G( C/ v promulgates them in coordination with the combatant commands, Services and : h5 z5 o; x9 H, r* `% EJoint Staff. Also called JTTP. G8 Y; _* o: P4 L6 P) X0 l3 ~MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J ; T/ j, @& G9 F. L154 ! x7 u1 P) |# [5 e, g: TJoint Test and. |; D a0 z, P% m# } Evaluation , W4 y' |, B9 L( `) JT&E conducted jointly by two or more DoD components for systems to be , `' R1 M" i: o: {: vacquired by more than one component or for a component's systems which have 6 s, i* N N0 L: V9 G2 tinterfaces with equipment of another component. - L$ P c) B$ H" ~2 A" QJoint Test and9 r& H& `& I! r6 V$ z Evaluation 3 s$ S( M; A2 }+ qProgram 3 q7 F( \4 J7 t4 ], @An OSD program for Joint T&E, structured to evaluate or provide information on . \5 _4 I0 }+ R+ X* Ssystem performance, technical concepts, system requirements or improvements,7 M; z3 _8 z& z' N) w systems interoperability, improving or developing testing methodologies, or for ' X1 ^$ P' n Z- bforce structure planning, doctrine, or procedures. 5 J1 m2 e* Y) T. k( l6 ?& g* Q. M- k0 YJON Job Order Number./ }- P/ u7 @( }& p* Z5 Y JOP Joint Operating Procedures.$ T0 }5 T x3 U2 \ JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution System. # a" \- J: B1 \' L" W! oJOPS Joint Operations Planning System. K/ m# r/ A, ^% J. C0 b; X6 {2 Y JOR Joint Operational Requirements.* l* e8 w. \+ f( K% ^( h3 l) K JORD Joint Operational Requirements Document. 7 `; E* J9 k' L* W3 A \JOSDEPS Joint Strategic Defense Planning Staff. ?) v3 Z- t/ q: N' R0 [5 mJOSS JTF Operational Support System (JIEO term).7 J( e1 b: _# Y* q4 n \: l JOTS Joint Operational Tactical System (USN term). ' f. E/ p9 O, L \- FJP Joint Publication. ! t7 s* @( y) V# I& R# BJPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. 7 K0 x/ ]& ]6 P6 eJPM Joint Program Manager.* S8 F& R3 A( B6 { JPN Joint Planning Net." g9 a5 x# z7 M* a& z- L/ H JPO Joint Program Office. ! a. d" z3 s# }; i/ |8 Y$ oJPOC Joint Program Optic Cobra. # [0 [2 z/ T& G1 nJPOI Joint Project -- Ornate Impact" e% X$ G# N$ b. l8 \ JPON Joint Project -- Optic Needle.! k6 t) C: F) v7 N JPRN Joint Precision Reporting Net. , f$ [( }; p R: WJPSD Joint Precision Strike Demonstration. 4 L3 Z: n0 N1 |" n8 QJPT Joint Planning Tool.% F2 a3 [/ ?. I. i1 ]2 { JRB Joint Review Board (JROC term).( Z* m8 @7 D4 S F; X JRC Joint Reconnaissance Coordinator (JFACC term).* a5 T! r. \$ _( y3 @ JRCC Joint Rescue Coordination Center (JFTF term).0 Q$ w8 ]7 U' o0 v& U JRMB Joint Resources Management Board.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

60#
发表于 2008-12-25 20:10:12 |只看该作者
MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J $ ?# N: z1 V& d( U) I155/ s( E( i' F6 k7 J JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council. 3 j. [9 g: ^6 _9 s5 n- ~" ]JROC SSG JROC Strategic Systems Group.. I! F& C% ?1 [# F JRSC Jam Resistant Secure Communications. 8 b6 U6 J- n* k6 r4 IJRTC Joint Readiness Training Center. 3 |, F$ U h" `JS Joint Staff.( b) k& F4 V3 F9 ?4 d JS&MDWC Joint Space and Missile Defense Warfare Center. 6 k& e& n0 B5 \$ }3 A% wJSC (1) Joint Security Commission. (2) Joint Steering Committee (French/US term). % d2 I$ B6 r. c8 ?- ~$ f0 qJSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan. c! y, G% U' |% h- ~! R& t JSEAD Joint Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (Joint Forces term).4 Y0 [* s. m, q7 M JSET (1) Joint System Engineering Team (MDA/USN term).$ t+ `! y A/ ^/ B9 y (2) Joint Service Evaluation Team. + X- o- p2 O4 tJSF Joint Strike Fighter (USAF, USN, USMC, UK RAF project). # H6 e9 d. G. `( hJSIC Joint SPACECOM Intelligence Center.4 L; h4 G, x- t \ JSIPS Joint Service Imagery Processing System (TelComms/Computer term). " E5 S" u# H! J: U( X: J' d& AJSMB Joint Space Management Board. - s8 q& P7 I9 r$ N2 v3 rJSOC Joint Special Operations Command. 3 \ C1 Z3 D5 N8 H5 R- V* qJSOR Joint Services Operating Requirement. ! S1 v' n9 q8 @: A+ c) [! \JSPD Joint Strategic Planning Document. l+ B4 e- l! P4 \0 QJSPS Joint Strategic Planning System.3 k3 y' e1 H' y( H" J; F& v. s$ J JSS Joint Surveillance System.2 [( H9 z, m7 B" e* b0 { JSST Joint Space Support Team. + `! Y, [- r4 [' y1 J7 ]1 i$ D5 eJSTARS Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System. - W7 ~( p9 S5 T6 D LJSTPS Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff. ( g' D- ^, x5 H% SJT (1) Joint Test (2) Joint Targeting 0 q5 G) b! E+ p# R) uJT&E Joint Test and Evaluation. : q3 b/ t' ^8 H" _6 f3 u! lJTA Joint Technical Architecture (JCS term). 8 e2 ]' W% I; m3 ]+ q* x% EJTAGS Joint Tactical Ground Station.1 W# T+ C/ n+ p1 v' b, n JTAMDO Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organization. v& j, j$ B+ a# a6 p7 W) l JTASC Joint Training Analysis and Simulations Center.0 h4 p8 _$ `+ @" R0 `4 {, C MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 J 7 J4 n5 {5 Y! j6 d/ i. h( u156; O. }/ I7 k% M$ R4 L JTB JFACC (Afloat) Targeting Board (JFACC term). 3 A5 m+ p* Y2 g- Z2 E5 QJTBP Joint Theater Battle Picture. & o! ^9 d s& [$ l' G/ T0 P5 I4 @JTCB Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JFACC term).: s: J9 O1 _) l3 c3 s JTE Joint Targeting Element (JFACC term).. S; y& m& k( X H JTF Joint Task Force.. i n/ T9 `7 |; r& B6 w JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise.: @- C7 w7 G; e; P JTIDS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System. 2 P2 \. T( v, b( H& N/ n) EJTL Joint Target List./ t* N! V( P6 ?, `* E JTMD Joint Theater Missile Defense." P! O! M( W3 m2 h7 z JTMDP Joint Theater Missile Defense Plan.- b1 `: f ~ F4 y JTPO Joint Terminal Project Office [of MILSTAR Comms Sys].+ }2 o. N& R2 ]+ Y JTOC Joint Targets Oversight Council. & T1 H9 o$ }( `JTR Joint Travel Regulations. 9 G" [. {/ l. D) DJTRP Joint Telecommunication Resources Board. # M; [( ^. c2 e d7 g8 SJTSG Joint Targeting Steering Group (JFACC term).8 S+ U- B& t7 e: j JTT Joint Tactical Terminal. + y0 r- p1 M5 f+ r+ c) qJTTP Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. 2 ?8 T+ m! @; J5 M4 AJVX Joint Services Advanced Vertical Lift Aircraft.% e0 {1 Y# u5 H JWAN Joint Wide Area Net. + v0 E; K( T$ U3 D! T% S7 W. X! U7 PJWARS Joint Warfighting System 9 computer model). y8 ?# a. f V: [ JWC Joint Warfare Center.( k5 o7 q& R) `' g' l" |1 P9 u JWG Joint Working Group.# w. Y j; o8 }, T JWICS Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications Network. 2 z7 I7 }; [1 y; ]8 L4 JJWID Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration% N q ?7 ~; ] ^* P# Q) y( a JWSTP Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan. $ r! d" H0 O' B8 @# l1 z4 UMDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K! o2 S; l0 f A/ s* l3 G: S 157' t/ v# r1 L. F }% i9 F- H/ ^1 i t K (1) Kelvin. (2) Kilo. h$ s& n0 Q5 H+ Z8 Z K Factor The relative measure of a sensor’s ability to distinguish one object from another.: i% |6 S$ w( u5 T& B8 A6 ^- L Theoretically (but not in practice) it is the distance between the mean locations of ( S2 T) `! k% {: I ^+ F( wtwo observed objects given normal distributions and standard deviations for both% `" C0 N" u: i e- b objects. 8 }$ g! ^" @. b _2 V& yKA Kill Assessment. $ Y! ^ ?, N* J z, J7 _" KKAPP Key Asset Protection Program.- N n& N L/ o9 | KB Kilobyte. 3 j/ F. M1 G. ]. A& ?& z6 y; m, H+ }Kbps Kilobyte per second.5 U9 h/ [4 G: Y& y KBS Knowledge Based System (UKMOD). * n& i7 y" c- U" a5 ~KBSF Knowledge Based Sensor Fusion.5 Y$ G; V) n* n; k$ Q X3 c, F KDEC Kinetic Energy Weapon Digital Emulation Center, Huntsville, AL." g4 s) m0 P$ I P KDS Kwajalein Discrimination System.1 m \9 S( E6 n6 A) E KE See Kinetic Energy.! a3 L6 [0 r; [2 G% [. V) J KE ASAT Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite Weapon. ' Q9 U0 B7 j- cKED Kill Enhancement Device.- | c1 D( U# i! D( E8 y5 @3 o% ` Keep-Out Zone A volume around a space asset, which is off limits to parties not owners of the 8 A0 _2 }, M& u w; U6 Rasset. Keep-out zones could be negotiated or unilaterally declared. The right to( I( T4 A- H) O0 U! Y# I+ v defend such a zone by force and the legality of unilaterally declared zones; X1 r e; l# c# K under the Outer Space Treaty remain to be determined.' i5 {% `2 Y4 H6 W4 ^/ @ KEI Kinetic Energy Intercept.* ^! P* ~6 v# b/ D' U/ h0 k, N KENN Statistical pattern recognition tool.+ C" t: F& a* h5 W# |! L KEV Kinetic Energy Vehicle. # x# d9 \, N1 a! X) eKEW Kinetic Energy Weapon. 2 i9 V# D0 y+ ^# z+ IKEWC Kinetic Energy Weapon, Chemical (propulsion)." g4 R1 e9 ^- Z3 f KEWE Kinetic Energy Weapon, Electromagnetic (propulsion). u w% D8 S/ Z6 a" SKEWG Kinetic Energy Weapon, Ground.$ n/ R) x. H2 s& s% w( ^ KEWO Kinetic Energy Weapon, Orbital. ; H$ s" U$ x& a: R4 ^3 d: X$ qKey A type of dataset used for encryption or decryption. In cryptography, a' g5 T- v) z7 S) h; D sequence of symbols that controls the operations of encryption and decryption.2 t5 c3 T- S' i0 c& N8 _ Kg Kilogram.* y. o& |8 D. [9 e KHILS Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator, Eglin AFB, FL.. G+ W( M+ ]1 C5 k3 R MDA GLOSSARY, VER. 4.0 K & @) G o9 R1 v) _3 o: ?. ?158. C! W0 c' u" k* n- V7 a1 `0 F$ R KHIT Kinetic Kill Vehicle Hardware Integrated Test. : Z1 y% P, l l# }& H2 M! A1 t- |KIDD Kinetic Impact Debris Distribution.7 k) Y/ B% G* M) b Kill Assessment2 L; O# V" ]! m% O0 t3 ^2 R (KA)9 F5 ~; q/ A1 C* j0 n% Q7 M5 X ]8 v3 \5 B An evaluation of information to determine the result of a ballistic missile/RV" c C9 b3 O; v5 M4 ^ intercept for the purpose of providing information for defense effectiveness and ! b' l7 h" i3 N( m$ L. M3 Dre-engagements. (USSPACECOM) ( {9 z) b7 M: oKill Enhancement- h b3 x2 ]5 w Device1 V: P( j# w, z' C' t6 f2 c% U4 M A device that improves an interceptor’s lethality.% Y# U8 Q: B! L3 M2 m, `! I8 Z Kinematic; C9 |0 s. H u& k" b Battlespace ' p4 L& L* T RThe planned engagement region in space of an interceptor given the sensor 2 } Q. \. _: {' A2 f& Xtimeline, kinematic capabilities of the interceptor, engagement timeline, and ! _5 _; g. _9 t5 ]operational constraints.2 N8 m( ?0 y4 e+ b) p' r Kinetic Energy / V4 a6 H- O$ c0 e* l(KE)& Y& ^; y- f$ r' f2 { The energy from the momentum of an object, i.e., an object in motion.0 ~/ W4 v v$ C6 c% y Kinetic Energy 9 k( n" ~2 a$ [, q4 hWeapon (KEW)9 ]" y6 P0 ]1 I A weapon that uses kinetic energy, or energy of motion to kill an object. 7 F' e$ o; A6 kExamples of weapons, which use kinetic energy, are a rock, a bullet, a nonexplosively armed rocket, and an electromagnetic rail gun. 4 C- P% K8 h1 g u) U# x. X7 hKinetic Kill 4 ]1 @2 p& g, m2 GVehicle (KKV): F+ z2 N! o$ J4 T A weapon using a non-explosive projectile moving at very high speed to destroy6 A6 H u8 N# U5 r2 Y' g3 a a target on impact. The projectile may include homing sensors and on-board0 f0 K$ K- M2 A5 B rockets to improve its accuracy, or it may follow a preset trajectory (as with a shell$ E6 ~7 t. I* y' D3 s launched from a gun).

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册


Archiver|航空论坛 ( 渝ICP备10008336号 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-25 02:26 , Processed in 0.048003 second(s), 10 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 MinHang.CC.

回顶部